{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72","id":222573367,"number":72,"title":"Incorrect use of the `module` field for ES2015 module-support","user":{"login":"eltonjuan","id":8944422,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/8944422?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan","html_url":"https://github.com/eltonjuan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eltonjuan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2017-04-18T23:23:27Z","updated_at":"2017-04-19T02:58:44Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Added with this commit aee8cbc9ec1a0bf8d64121750fc2f0cc0e4b97a2 , it seems that re-bulma is incorrectly using the `module` field in `package.json`. Using webpack2, re-bulma is failing to build because the `module` field is pointing to `src/index.js` which is a file that requires transpilation. \r\n\r\nCorrect me if I'm wrong, but all of my research on the topic leads me to believe that the `module` field should still be built & transpiled, leaving only the ES2015 module syntax in tact (i.e. `import` and `export` are okay, but as a consumer we still need you to transpile / build your code). If you look at [`redux`](https://www.github.com/gaearon/redux), they have a build step that transpiles their code using `babel`, but leaves the es6 module syntax in place. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/comments/295050751","html_url":"https://github.com/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72#issuecomment-295050751","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bokuweb/re-bulma/issues/72","id":295050751,"user":{"login":"capaj","id":1305378,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1305378?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj","html_url":"https://github.com/capaj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/capaj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-04-19T02:58:44Z","updated_at":"2017-04-19T02:58:44Z","body":"@eltonjuan fixing PR here: #74"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"capaj"}}