{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779","id":225775173,"number":1779,"title":"License of fdm_materials","user":{"login":"onitake","id":371687,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/371687?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake","html_url":"https://github.com/onitake","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2017-05-02T18:06:52Z","updated_at":"2017-05-03T18:17:02Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The fdm_materials repo does not contain any licensing information.\r\n\r\nSince the material definitions are an integral part of Cura, one would assume they are released under the same license (AGPL-3+).\r\nCan you clarify if this is the case, and maybe add a LICENSE file so there is no ambiguity?\r\n\r\nThank you!"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/comments/298992744","html_url":"https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779#issuecomment-298992744","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779","id":298992744,"user":{"login":"onitake","id":371687,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/371687?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake","html_url":"https://github.com/onitake","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/onitake/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-05-03T18:17:02Z","updated_at":"2017-05-03T18:17:02Z","body":"The issue arises here, because the configuration files are distributed as part of a larger application.\r\n\r\nIn any case, I think it wouldn't hurt to add proper copyright and a license. But it would avoid all ambiguity."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"onitake"}}