{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry/issues/67","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry/issues/67/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry/issues/67/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry/issues/67/events","html_url":"https://github.com/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry/issues/67","id":214810157,"number":67,"title":"still need VLen?","user":{"login":"twhiteaker","id":699496,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/699496?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker","html_url":"https://github.com/twhiteaker","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/twhiteaker/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-03-16T19:14:52Z","updated_at":"2017-03-16T19:14:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"My impression is that CF isn't aggressively pushing for enhanced features.  Dropping VLen simplifies our message (and implementation).  If we don't drop it, let's use the Multiple MultiPolygons with Interior Rings example to flesh out how we want use use VLen."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"twhiteaker"}}