{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/962","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/csswg-drafts","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/962/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/962/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/962/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/962","id":202112937,"number":962,"title":"[css-text-decor] A new property for text decorations to skip ink","user":{"login":"kojiishi","id":1274377,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1274377?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi","html_url":"https://github.com/kojiishi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kojiishi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-01-20T11:03:01Z","updated_at":"2017-01-20T11:03:01Z","closed_at":null,"body":"From the [IRC log](https://log.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-01-11/#e757645) of the WG discussion on issue #707, #727, and #843, we agreed to add a property to control skipping ink in L3, and defer other controls to L4.\r\n\r\nThis is to discuss how the property should look like.\r\n\r\n@FremyCompany said\r\n>  ink skipping: yes or no should be in level 3\r\n\r\nand given #707 and #727, @fantasai suggested\r\n\r\n> auto | yes | no\r\n\r\nsomewhere.\r\n\r\nAs far as I understand, the discussion points are:\r\n* Property name. Is `text-decoration-skip-ink` appropriate?\r\n  - It may or may not be part of the shorthand in L4, see #843 for more details.\r\n  - It may not include `line-through`, does not at least for `auto`, see #711 for more details.\r\n* Values:\r\n  - I think it's reasonable to have `auto` as an initial value, and we're almost in consensus on this point in #727?\r\n  - Opt-out is quite clear, easy to define, easy to understand. Just wondering on the naming, is `no` good?\r\n  - `yes` isn't as clear to me; how should we define it? We're seeing a few cases `auto` should not skip ink; `line-through`, per-script, or when position is inappropriate in some scripts. Should it turn on for all cases? Maybe we want different control for `line-through` and per-script to avoid unintentional breakages?\r\n\r\n/cc @fantasai @frivoal @litherum @FremyCompany @dbaron @astearns @tantek @eaenet @drott\r\nI can't find github account for Jenn and skk (anyone know?), all others in the IRC log are on the line above.\r\n\r\nOpinions/discussions appreciated."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"kojiishi"}}