{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openscope/openscope/issues/51","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openscope/openscope","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openscope/openscope/issues/51/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openscope/openscope/issues/51/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openscope/openscope/issues/51/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openscope/openscope/issues/51","id":200922950,"number":51,"title":"Erroneous warning of excessive localizer intercept angle","user":{"login":"erikquinn","id":5103735,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5103735?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn","html_url":"https://github.com/erikquinn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erikquinn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":509033803,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openscope/openscope/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"FF4D4D","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-01-16T03:19:22Z","updated_at":"2017-01-16T03:19:22Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Reports have been made that the warning for excessive localizer intercept angle is still being given inappropriately under certain conditions. More specifically, the cited example was at EDDH, via route `DH655..DH656..HOS`, and cleared for ILS runway 23 approach. Also mentioned was SAEZ.\r\n\r\nSomething is in fact broken here, because the course from `DH655` to `DH656` is directly in line with the localizer, and should not generate such a warning; yet, it does.\r\n\r\nOriginally reported in zlsa/atc#759."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"erikquinn"}}