{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4","id":221968940,"number":4,"title":"One host but multiple ports","user":{"login":"hkroger","id":43050,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/43050?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger","html_url":"https://github.com/hkroger","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hkroger/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-04-15T19:51:13Z","updated_at":"2017-04-18T08:56:16Z","closed_at":null,"body":"How should one handle the situation where all nodes where the code is being deployed are behind same host but in different ports (behind NAT basically)?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/comments/294736079","html_url":"https://github.com/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4#issuecomment-294736079","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/qvantel/sbt-mobilizer/issues/4","id":294736079,"user":{"login":"liff","id":124475,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/124475?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff","html_url":"https://github.com/liff","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/liff/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-04-18T08:56:16Z","updated_at":"2017-04-18T08:56:16Z","body":"How about deprecating the `DeploymentEnvironment.port` and teaching `host:port` syntax for `DeploymentEnvironment.hosts` (with default to `.port`)?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"liff"}}