{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642/events","html_url":"https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642","id":158676363,"number":642,"title":"Nunit v3.2.1 generates new format of TestResult.xml file than Nunit v2","user":{"login":"bmelnychenko","id":5400737,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5400737?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko","html_url":"https://github.com/bmelnychenko","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bmelnychenko/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":391892962,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/labels/NUnit","name":"NUnit","color":"5319e7","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-06-06T13:22:34Z","updated_at":"2017-02-07T15:49:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"When I used Nunit v2.0, TestResult.xml file was in another format. So Specflow.exe nunitexecutionreport generated normal report\n\n**BUT** Nunit v3.0 generates a new format of TestResult and specflow wasn't modified to use this format\n\nCan you modify your generator please?\n\nP.S. Nunit v3.0 can generate TestResult.xml in old format, but It doesn't satisfy my requirments\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/comments/278040889","html_url":"https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642#issuecomment-278040889","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/642","id":278040889,"user":{"login":"Autom8edChaos","id":2625005,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2625005?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos","html_url":"https://github.com/Autom8edChaos","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Autom8edChaos/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-02-07T15:49:38Z","updated_at":"2017-02-07T15:49:38Z","body":"For the meantime, I've put an [instruction on the Wiki](https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/wiki/Reporting) on how to create reports from Nunit3 through the Nunit2 format specifier. It took me a while to figure this out and wanted to save others the hassle. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Autom8edChaos"}}