{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/issues/602","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/issues/602/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/issues/602/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/issues/602/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/602","id":221792952,"number":602,"title":"Extended mnemonic codes","user":{"login":"Arachnid","id":17865,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/17865?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid","html_url":"https://github.com/Arachnid","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Arachnid/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":290507092,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/labels/ERC","name":"ERC","color":"d4c5f9","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":28,"created_at":"2017-04-14T11:31:34Z","updated_at":"2017-05-13T21:26:57Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/pulls/602","html_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/602","diff_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/602.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/602.patch"},"body":"This EIP specifies a method for generating mnemonic codes based on [BIP39](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki), while providing additional metadata for applications. This metadata makes new mnemonic-based applications possible, while also helping to standardise derivation paths in Ethereum-based applications."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/issues/comments/301275846","html_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/602#issuecomment-301275846","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ethereum/EIPs/issues/602","id":301275846,"user":{"login":"jprichardson","id":150063,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/150063?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson","html_url":"https://github.com/jprichardson","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jprichardson/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-05-13T21:26:57Z","updated_at":"2017-05-13T21:26:57Z","body":"> Flagging whether there's a password or not doesn't remove plausible deniability; you can simply provide a duress password instead of the real one.\r\n\r\nOf course. But let's assume the 12-words are discovered or required to be given for whatever reason. A wallet with 12-words and no password but the presence of activity may be satisfactory to the attacker. It's the difference of the wallet owner taking action (providing duress password) and not doing anything. I wonder if providing a false duress password could be seen as \"obstruction of justice\" whereas doing nothing (not providing a password) may be seen as exercising right of free speech. I'm not a lawyer though... just providing some raw thoughts here. These scenarios require thinking about different adversaries of course.\r\n\r\nI'll have to dig into the details above, as there's a lot, but at this moment, I don't see the benefit of encoding the presence of a password. I'm assuming the benefits are stated above and I may read to find out."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jprichardson"}}