{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/16010","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/16010/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/16010/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dotnet/corefx/issues/16010/events","html_url":"https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/16010","id":206619434,"number":16010,"title":"GetAwaiter for tuple of tasks","user":{"login":"jcouv","id":12466233,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/12466233?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv","html_url":"https://github.com/jcouv","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jcouv/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-02-09T20:22:37Z","updated_at":"2017-02-09T20:22:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@jnm2 has [implemented `GetAwaiter` extension methods](https://gist.github.com/jnm2/3660db29457d391a34151f764bfe6ef7) which enable convenient awaiting on tuples of tasks (up to some arity).\r\n\r\nFor instance, `var (x, y) = await (thingX.OperationAsync(), thingY.OperationAsync());`\r\n\r\n@terrajobst @weshaggard @jkotas How do you recommend proceeding with such API proposals?\r\nDo you need an API review before going into implementation?\r\nIf a PR is ok, I'm assuming that the Task-related extensions would go into https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/tree/master/src/Common/src/System/Threading/Tasks Is that appropriate?\r\n\r\nAlso, more generally, do you prefer to review such proposal piecemeal (one at a time) or all together (to get a well-thought API surface?). I remember some proposals for `Zip` and `Join` in LINQ APIs.\r\n\r\nRelates to https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/16159"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jcouv"}}