{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65/events","html_url":"https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65","id":241702467,"number":65,"title":"Testnet stuck on block 27070","user":{"login":"nomnombtc","id":1503969,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/1503969?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc","html_url":"https://github.com/nomnombtc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nomnombtc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":72,"created_at":"2017-07-10T12:55:34Z","updated_at":"2017-07-11T00:00:01Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hello,\r\n\r\nit seems someone mined a bunch of blocks yesterday, which maybe(?) triggered\r\nthe BIP102 rule that it rejects blocks that are too small. But whoever did it did not\r\nfollow up with an actual bigger block, so two of my nodes rejected it with \"bad-blk-length-toosmall\"\r\nbanned a ton of nodes and are stuck now on block 27070.\r\n\r\nI also have a BitcoinUnlimited node up on testnet5 which has no such reject builtin\r\nand this one is now on block 32767... \r\n\r\n```\r\n2017-07-09 21:26:53 UpdateTip: new best=0000000035a7b078c8b54e33b496dcbd66f8d52049da3684d80291d1cc13f29a height=27070 version=0x20000000 log2_w\r\nork=56.568487 tx=1081252 date='2017-07-09 21:26:51' progress=1.000000 cache=0.3MiB(1034tx)\r\n2017-07-09 21:26:53 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length-toosmall, size limits failed (code 16)\r\n2017-07-09 21:26:53 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED\r\n2017-07-09 21:26:53 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 0000000016b2af58fc30fef380a4cec7262858e68aaa0bad37a9c419257d0636 is marked invalid\r\n2017-07-09 21:26:53 ERROR: invalid header received\r\n2017-07-09 21:26:53 ProcessMessages(headers, 82 bytes) FAILED peer=10\r\n```"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin/issues/comments/314283208","html_url":"https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65#issuecomment-314283208","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/btc1/bitcoin/issues/65","id":314283208,"user":{"login":"floreslorca","id":22631338,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/22631338?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca","html_url":"https://github.com/floreslorca","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/floreslorca/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-07-11T00:00:01Z","updated_at":"2017-07-11T00:00:01Z","body":"@JaredR26 what is the justification for the >1MB again? seems risky since its not even widely tested. I get your assumptions, but as @snavsenv pointed out; Are you expecting gambler operators to keep the chain going after the HF? Theres already a lot of misinformation out there, and relying on what people might or might not do for the health of the chain seems careless."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"floreslorca"}}