{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bethgelab/foolbox/issues/60","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bethgelab/foolbox","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bethgelab/foolbox/issues/60/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bethgelab/foolbox/issues/60/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bethgelab/foolbox/issues/60/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bethgelab/foolbox/issues/60","id":249982697,"number":60,"title":"LBFGS and SaliencyMapAttack are lower-bounded by GradientAttack","user":{"login":"wielandbrendel","id":6177693,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/6177693?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel","html_url":"https://github.com/wielandbrendel","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wielandbrendel/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2017-08-14T09:49:20Z","updated_at":"2017-08-28T13:41:17Z","closed_at":"2017-08-28T13:41:17Z","body":"Right now LBFGS and SaliencyMapAttack use the GradientAttack to initialise the best target class in a misclassification setting. Due to the internal optimisation of the adversarial object it can happen that the best adversarial is actually found by the GradientAttack and not by LBFGS or SaliencyMap. We should reset the adversarial object to avoid this confound. I am currently testing a PR."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"wielandbrendel"}}