{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/407","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/407/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/407/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/407/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/407","id":263666347,"number":407,"title":"nhml benchmarking doesn't make sense","user":{"login":"UnderwearWarrior","id":12115209,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/12115209?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior","html_url":"https://github.com/UnderwearWarrior","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/UnderwearWarrior/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-10-07T19:33:00Z","updated_at":"2017-10-07T19:33:00Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I'm not a programmer. So, I'm sorry I can't give more detailed info about this issue but I've been trying to benchmark 1 rig for days. There are some algos that will just stall and the benchmark will not advance. \r\n\r\nHow is there not already some built-in timer that restarts the process automatically when it's obviously gone too long!? I realize it's difficult to set a maximum limit on how long a given algo benchmark should take with different hardware but it's _definitely_ somewhere between 0 < x < 10 minutes on standard.\r\n\r\nAlso, when benchmarks fail, why is it not automatically retrying them until it succeeds? What user is going to just say, \"Oh the benchmark failed, I guess I'll just make less money and not use that algo.\" The benchmarking aspect of this software doesn't seem very well thought out. Why do I have to interact with it so much just to benchmark my cards? It's really silly."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"UnderwearWarrior"}}