{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109/events","html_url":"https://github.com/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109","id":240147863,"number":109,"title":"EJB-Specific extensions how should/can I/we proceed","user":{"login":"aschoerk","id":311695,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/311695?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk","html_url":"https://github.com/aschoerk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/aschoerk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2017-07-03T11:42:00Z","updated_at":"2017-07-05T17:19:30Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hello,\r\nat out company we implement unit-tests with cdi-unit for about 3 years. The idea is to do complete blackbox module- or artifact-tests. Meanwhile a specific maven-module has been created which contains extensions we had to implement for each of the projects. \r\nThese extension I put into a github-module [ejb-cdi-unit](https://github.com/1and1/ejb-cdi-unit). \r\nNow I am looking for a reasonable way either to integrate these changes with cdi-unit, or to make cdi-unit better adaptable so that some code-copying I did, is not necessary anymore. \r\nI started this issue to come to ideas, how to go forward. \r\nA speciality at out site is, that we yet need to support weld 1.1.14 since most of our deployable yet run on jboss7.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/comments/313169047","html_url":"https://github.com/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109#issuecomment-313169047","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/issues/109","id":313169047,"user":{"login":"sventorben","id":12183470,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/12183470?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben","html_url":"https://github.com/sventorben","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sventorben/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-07-05T17:19:30Z","updated_at":"2017-07-05T17:19:30Z","body":"@seanf\r\nI removed support for Weld 1.x in 43ce81f65d5ac5490a3e0aef122541d3bf23e466 mainly because the tests failed (see https://travis-ci.org/BrynCooke/cdi-unit/builds/210230383) and I thought getting rid of some \"legacy\" would be nice.\r\nIf we get the tests fixed, support for Weld 1.x should not be much of an issue, I guess.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"sventorben"}}