{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uliska/offlineimap/issues/4","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uliska/offlineimap","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uliska/offlineimap/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uliska/offlineimap/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/uliska/offlineimap/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/uliska/offlineimap/issues/4","id":259876211,"number":4,"title":"is the utf-7 file required?","user":{"login":"nicolas33","id":90065,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/90065?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33","html_url":"https://github.com/nicolas33","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolas33/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-09-22T16:55:27Z","updated_at":"2017-09-22T16:55:27Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"We already have utf7 abilities in offlineimap. Why not improve the current code?\r\n\r\n> This integration is far from ideal for several reasons:\r\n> - the two procedures should never be used independently\r\n  so it doesn't make sense to have two individual options\r\n\r\nSure.\r\n\r\n> - they interfere (overwrite) any configuration for nametrans\r\n\r\nYes.\r\n\r\n> - they interfere (partial redundancy) with decodefoldernames,\r\n  which should (IMO) be removed\r\n\r\nEither removed or superseded. I don't think introducing a new configuration option worth.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"nicolas33"}}