{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/messageformat/messageformat.js/issues/172","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/messageformat/messageformat.js","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/messageformat/messageformat.js/issues/172/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/messageformat/messageformat.js/issues/172/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/messageformat/messageformat.js/issues/172/events","html_url":"https://github.com/messageformat/messageformat.js/issues/172","id":226887946,"number":172,"title":"alias to \"zero, two, few[, many]\"","user":{"login":"Spown","id":3817672,"avatar_url":"https://avatars6.githubusercontent.com/u/3817672?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown","html_url":"https://github.com/Spown","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spown/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2017-05-07T19:44:45Z","updated_at":"2017-07-17T10:50:25Z","closed_at":"2017-07-17T10:50:25Z","body":"these keys \r\n-  zero\r\n- two\r\n- few\r\n- many\r\n\r\nwere valid in ver ``^0`` but not anymore as it seems. Why not alias them to ``=0``, ``=2``, ``=3`` instead of throwing an exception? I guess you could ditch ``many``. But I mean its not like it leads to ambiguity if it's already leads to only option of an exception. Also you still have \r\n```\r\n'{CAT, selectordinal, one{#st} two{#nd} few{#rd} other{#th} }'\r\n```\r\nin your Readme\r\n\r\nPersonally I don't really care - I've never used this module. I'm just trying to up the deps of my ``i18n-node`` module fork (I haven't really found any use for it's ``_mf`` method that employs this module). It's just that by upping ``messageformat.js`` to ``^1`` tests start to fail. I can fix it but I don't see why this change was even necessary.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"eemeli"}}