{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29/events","html_url":"https://github.com/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29","id":200354004,"number":29,"title":"Graph output unreadable","user":{"login":"DannyBen","id":2405099,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2405099?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen","html_url":"https://github.com/DannyBen","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DannyBen/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-01-12T12:24:48Z","updated_at":"2017-01-12T16:20:44Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Not sure if this nice gem is still maintained or not, I hope it is.\r\n\r\nI am facing difficulties visualizing the tree.\r\nUsing the `dec_tree.graph` method, I am getting an unreadable graph for any tree that is larger than the small examples.\r\n\r\nHere is a small part of the image I get:\r\n![screenshot](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2405099/21889418/813ac9d8-d8d1-11e6-8b0a-4dc497a021b8.png)\r\n\r\n1. I saw a probably similar issue at #28 .\r\n2. I have looked at [this section of the code][1], to see if there are options I can pass (there aren't).\r\n3. I thought about generating my own graph, but I see that [`build_tree`][2] is private, and I am not yet sure how to get the nodes and their connections on my own.\r\n4. I saw in issue #11 that someone (you?) said \"very few people use the actual graphing output\" - so I wonder, how do most people generate a visual representation of their tree, if not with this function?\r\n\r\nAm I missing something?\r\n\r\nThanks.\r\n\r\n[1]: https://github.com/igrigorik/decisiontree/blob/master/lib/decisiontree/id3_tree.rb#L130\r\n[2]: https://github.com/igrigorik/decisiontree/blob/master/lib/decisiontree/id3_tree.rb#L176"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/comments/272208057","html_url":"https://github.com/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29#issuecomment-272208057","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/igrigorik/decisiontree/issues/29","id":272208057,"user":{"login":"igrigorik","id":10652,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/10652?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik","html_url":"https://github.com/igrigorik","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/igrigorik/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-01-12T16:20:44Z","updated_at":"2017-01-12T16:20:44Z","body":"I don't think you're missing anything... :)\r\n\r\nGraphing bits are not a well exercised path and could definitely be improved: we can extend the api with options, expose more options, etc. Would you be up for driving this?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"igrigorik"}}