{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll-seo-tag/issues/150","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll-seo-tag","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll-seo-tag/issues/150/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll-seo-tag/issues/150/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jekyll/jekyll-seo-tag/issues/150/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-seo-tag/issues/150","id":200845093,"number":150,"title":"New form site verifications not output","user":{"login":"jhabdas","id":440298,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/440298?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas","html_url":"https://github.com/jhabdas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhabdas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2017-01-15T03:12:46Z","updated_at":"2017-01-15T03:59:30Z","closed_at":"2017-01-15T03:59:30Z","body":"#148 introduced additional verifications for Yandex, Bing and Alexa. The template updates were desk checked here with success: https://github.com/jhabdas/habd.as/commit/922b3da1fc8bcba27756854ad1bf557249cd5a64. But with the bump to Gem version `2.1.0` the new format does not output the verifications.\r\n\r\nThe previous backwards compat method of verification with Google still works as expected. I'm a baffled as to why the new format will not output. Thoughts @benbalter @pathawks? Sorry for the flub."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"pathawks"}}