{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/10915","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/10915/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/10915/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/10915/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/10915","id":279021123,"number":10915,"title":"New release of ACGtk","user":{"login":"Nyavlys","id":5575032,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/5575032?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys","html_url":"https://github.com/Nyavlys","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Nyavlys/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2017-12-04T14:47:09Z","updated_at":"2017-12-10T14:11:33Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/pulls/10915","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/10915","diff_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/10915.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/10915.patch"},"body":"This pull request include:\r\n+ a modification on acgtk-1.3.1 opam file to ensure it is compiled with yojson-version < 1.4.0 and easy-format <1.3.0, otherwise compilation fails (because linked files changed)\r\n+ a new release compatible with yojson-version >= 1.4.0 and easy-format >=1.3.0. The build now relies on jbuilder\r\n+ a patch for bolt in order to allow for compiling with ocaml-version >= 4.06.0 (the tarball uses String instead of Bytes)"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/comments/350551020","html_url":"https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/10915#issuecomment-350551020","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ocaml/opam-repository/issues/10915","id":350551020,"user":{"login":"gasche","id":426238,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/426238?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche","html_url":"https://github.com/gasche","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gasche/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-12-10T14:11:33Z","updated_at":"2017-12-10T14:11:33Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"@rgrinberg I don't see the problem with fixing bolt to support newer OCaml releases, but I agree that the maintainers should be notified, and that it is better if the patch is integrated upstream in the first place.\r\n\r\n@xclerc, as the maintainer of bolt, what do you think would be the best way forward here? Is the darcs repo at <http://bolt.x9c.fr/_darcs> still active, and in what format would you expect a patch? (Would you need someone else, for example @Nyavlys, to take care of releasing a 1.4.1 on opam?)\r\n\r\n@Nyavlys: is it ok if we wait to see what's the status of the bolt change before going further with the PR? In general it's not such a good idea to patch already-released software on opam (it can change `.cmx` hashes, etc.), so it is worth waiting to know if a new release can be made soon.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"gasche"}}