{"action":"reopened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jniediek/combinato/issues/25","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jniediek/combinato","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jniediek/combinato/issues/25/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jniediek/combinato/issues/25/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jniediek/combinato/issues/25/events","html_url":"https://github.com/jniediek/combinato/issues/25","id":214857633,"number":25,"title":"Amplitude of waveforms ","user":{"login":"seqasim","id":15975112,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/15975112?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim","html_url":"https://github.com/seqasim","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/seqasim/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2017-03-16T22:32:41Z","updated_at":"2017-04-27T10:17:19Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi @jniediek, \r\n\r\nI am using Combinato with Blackrock data (.ns6 files). I extract each channel and save it into a mat file with amplitude in uV (so each \"spike\" is usually ~ 100 uV). \r\n\r\nHowever, the waveforms plotted in the gui and that are output in the sort_cat.h5 file are scaled up by some magnitude, ending up as roughly ~ 3500-8000 *mystery* units. Compare this to the simulation_5.mat file that is downloadable in the tutorial, in which the raw trace is of magnitude < 10 and the waveforms end up ~100-200 uV. \r\n\r\nIs the data being scaled up by roughly ~ 80x at some point in the extraction process? I have looked around but have not been able to find this. This does not seem to be a problem with the neuralynx data. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jniediek"}}