{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA/issues/598","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA/issues/598/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA/issues/598/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA/issues/598/events","html_url":"https://github.com/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA/issues/598","id":254536097,"number":598,"title":"Option to continue auditing, gathering more evidence","user":{"login":"nealmcb","id":119472,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/119472?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb","html_url":"https://github.com/nealmcb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nealmcb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":634636986,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FreeAndFair/ColoradoRLA/labels/feature","name":"feature","color":"84b6eb","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-09-01T04:58:03Z","updated_at":"2017-09-01T04:58:03Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"Public interest may develop in a contest which is not selected for an RLA and thus driving the audit. E.g. some discrepancies may be noted, or there may be other reasons that develop after official RLA contest selections are made.\r\n\r\nIf a county wants to continue gathering evidence in order to meet a risk limit for such an opportunistically audited contest, it should be able to specify and obtain an additional set of ballots to audit from the sample, e.g. based on their own risk level calculations.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"nealmcb"}}