{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/go-winio/issues/49","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/go-winio","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/go-winio/issues/49/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/go-winio/issues/49/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Microsoft/go-winio/issues/49/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Microsoft/go-winio/issues/49","id":226369731,"number":49,"title":"Re-evaluate \"cgo\" dependency?","user":{"login":"danjacques","id":9965104,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/9965104?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques","html_url":"https://github.com/danjacques","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danjacques/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-05-04T18:31:18Z","updated_at":"2017-05-04T18:31:18Z","closed_at":null,"body":"As of [23ad5a714ce953959ea79723df23a913ff886ddd](https://github.com/Microsoft/go-winio/commit/23ad5a714ce953959ea79723df23a913ff886ddd), the `go-winio` package depends on `cgo`. Some projects, mine included, try to avoid `cgo` dependencies because of the can of worms it opens, including adding complexity to cross-compiling and, in my case, the addition of the `gcc` toolchain to builder systems.\r\n\r\nIf `cgo` is required, so be it, but I figured I'd at least raise the issue for discussion. Is there any way to achieve a similar end without it? Thanks!"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"danjacques"}}