{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/issues/3672","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/issues/3672/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/issues/3672/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/issues/3672/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pull/3672","id":238238018,"number":3672,"title":"[BACKLOG-17100] Logging work item lifecycle changes in a single location","user":{"login":"pentaho-amessier","id":25508632,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/25508632?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier","html_url":"https://github.com/pentaho-amessier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2017-06-23T19:52:29Z","updated_at":"2017-06-26T14:42:24Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pulls/3672","html_url":"https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pull/3672","diff_url":"https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pull/3672.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pull/3672.patch"},"body":"This PR is not ready to commit yet and is still work in progress. Creating the PR to get the review process going,\r\n\r\n@pentaho/rebelalliance \r\n@pentaho/rogueone "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/issues/comments/311079965","html_url":"https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pull/3672#issuecomment-311079965","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pentaho/pentaho-platform/issues/3672","id":311079965,"user":{"login":"pentaho-amessier","id":25508632,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/25508632?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier","html_url":"https://github.com/pentaho-amessier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pentaho-amessier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-06-26T14:42:24Z","updated_at":"2017-06-26T14:42:24Z","body":"@diogofscmariano We discussed whether to publish status messages for WI in non-WN mode while you were out. We did not reach any specific consensus. We know that having status for non-WN is not required, but the feeling was that it doesn't hurt and that it might actually help, even in the non-WN scenario, when multiple WIs are being executed at the same time. We felt that it was ok to have this work in all cases because it's not anything that would be considered an EE feature, it's really not a big deal to the customer, more of a tool for QE and dev that will help with debugging in both WN and non_WN cases. Also, it was easier to insert the publish calls where it made sense in the code without having to think about whether WN mode is enabled. Disabling this for non-WN mode is actually more work, and we though it wasn't worth the effort (however small), in addition to all the other reasons why it migth actually be helpful to have this feature turned on for both cases.\r\n\r\nRegarding GenericServler and GenericServletTest - this is the class that I mentioned in stand-up  today, changes that we did not make that appear in this Ps."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"pentaho-amessier"}}