{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3/events","html_url":"https://github.com/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3","id":164970408,"number":3,"title":"Bump to linux-4.x.y","user":{"login":"ndoo","id":262784,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/262784?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo","html_url":"https://github.com/ndoo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ndoo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":105,"created_at":"2016-07-12T00:42:25Z","updated_at":"2017-08-05T07:48:32Z","closed_at":null,"body":"linux-3.4.y is quite an old release, and the amount of changed lines from upstream kernel is not too much.\n\nAre there plans to work on a newer kernel version? Also it would be great if support for this SoC is upstreamed. \n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/comments/320424934","html_url":"https://github.com/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3#issuecomment-320424934","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/friendlyarm/linux-3.4.y/issues/3","id":320424934,"user":{"login":"rafaello7","id":2477169,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2477169?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7","html_url":"https://github.com/rafaello7","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafaello7/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-08-05T07:48:32Z","updated_at":"2017-08-05T07:48:32Z","body":"@awl1 I see, the second drive should be added in [dts file for NanoPi](https://github.com/rafaello7/u-boot-nanopi-m3/blob/master/arch/arm/dts/s5p6818-nanopim3.dts). I compile it and give you for testing.\r\n\r\nIs the u-boot loaded by bl1 from emmc or from SD? I think one setting in bl1 should be changed to boot from emmc."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rafaello7"}}