{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/usnistgov/800-63-3/issues/1220","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/usnistgov/800-63-3","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/usnistgov/800-63-3/issues/1220/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/usnistgov/800-63-3/issues/1220/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/usnistgov/800-63-3/issues/1220/events","html_url":"https://github.com/usnistgov/800-63-3/issues/1220","id":218553915,"number":1220,"title":"A progression of 1 then 2 then 3 factors for strength may be too simplistic. Certain combinations are weaker than others. ","user":{"login":"dig-comments","id":25691591,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/25691591?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments","html_url":"https://github.com/dig-comments","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dig-comments/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-03-31T16:31:40Z","updated_at":"2017-03-31T16:31:40Z","closed_at":null,"body":"**Organization Name (N/A, if individual)**: NZ Government\n\n**Organization Type**: 1\n \n**Document (63-3, 63A, 63B, or 63C)**: 800-63B\n\n**Reference (Include section and paragraph number)**: 2.Introduction, 6,7,8\n \n**Comment (Include rationale for comment)**:  A progression of 1 then 2 then 3 factors for strength may be too simplistic. Certain combinations are weaker than others. \n \n\n\n**Suggested Change**: A principle based approach based on the threats may need to be considered.\n \n---\n \nOrganization Type: 1 = Federal, 2 = Industry, 3 = Academia, 4 = Self, 5 = Other"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dig-comments"}}