{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325/events","html_url":"https://github.com/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325","id":207493350,"number":1325,"title":"Add explicit fields to competitions for competitors limits","user":{"login":"Luis-J-Ianez","id":2398227,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2398227?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez","html_url":"https://github.com/Luis-J-Ianez","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Luis-J-Ianez/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":215643731,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/labels/registration","name":"registration","color":"5319e7","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2017-02-14T11:46:29Z","updated_at":"2017-02-15T13:26:24Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The WCA Board has found that the competitors limits are the most relevant details about a competition that we still don't have in specific fields in our structure.  We would love to have:\r\n- competitors limit (integer - public - optional)\r\n- reasons for the limit (text - private - mandatory if limited)\r\n\r\nAdditionally you should consider to have a boolean / flag asking if the competition is limited and showing / hiding the two fields above, but this is up to the creativity of the programmer."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/comments/280009927","html_url":"https://github.com/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325#issuecomment-280009927","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/thewca/worldcubeassociation.org/issues/1325","id":280009927,"user":{"login":"pedrosino","id":1881933,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1881933?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino","html_url":"https://github.com/pedrosino","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pedrosino/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-02-15T13:26:23Z","updated_at":"2017-02-15T13:26:23Z","body":"I'm not sure what @larspetrus meant by enforcing, but if he means \"enforcing that the organizer/delegate must set some kind of limit\", the answer is no. I like Sébastien's proposal of a boolean indicating limit or not, and the other 2 fields only visible and mandatory if the boolean is true.\r\n\r\nAbout applying the limit to registrations, I'm also not sure it is a good idea. We could try to move to a system where registrations over the limit are moved to an actual \"waiting list\" and the registrant is informed properly, and where the organizer/delegate would only be allowed to accept new registrations over the limit if one registration is somehow deleted.\r\nThat could work, but would require more effort to implement, so I think we should stick to the original, simple idea for now.\r\n\r\nAbout #328, I think our registration flow has changed quite a bit since then, so some of the ideas there no longer apply and/or need re-thinking."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"pedrosino"}}