{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/edzer/sfr/issues/368","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/edzer/sfr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/edzer/sfr/issues/368/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/edzer/sfr/issues/368/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/edzer/sfr/issues/368/events","html_url":"https://github.com/edzer/sfr/issues/368","id":232251022,"number":368,"title":"GSoC 2018","user":{"login":"etiennebr","id":393576,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/393576?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr","html_url":"https://github.com/etiennebr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etiennebr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":29,"created_at":"2017-05-30T13:22:14Z","updated_at":"2017-06-23T14:36:17Z","closed_at":"2017-06-23T14:36:17Z","body":"I feel like `sf` could be a good candidate for [GSoC 2018](https://github.com/rstats-gsoc/gsoc2018). @edzer, do you have any experience with GSoC?\r\n\r\n@tdhock kindly provided a link to a previous call for [spatial tasks](https://github.com/rstats-gsoc/gsoc2016/wiki/spatula:-a-sane,-user-centric-(in-the-mental-model-sense)-spatial-operations-package-for-R) (similar to what `sf` achieves). I believe it didn't caught any candidate as the description is more like a wish list than specific tasks. But now that the core of `sf` is built and as we want to move away from `sp`, this could make for a  well scoped task to translate functions from `sp` to `sf` and eliminate dependencies. Also as Toby mentioned, it is possible to find different levels of student autonomy by designing tests appropriately. What do you think?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"edzer"}}