{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71/events","html_url":"https://github.com/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71","id":227748440,"number":71,"title":"Use of pd.date_range breaks compatibility with non-standard calendars","user":{"login":"jhamman","id":2443309,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2443309?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman","html_url":"https://github.com/jhamman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jhamman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-05-10T17:05:19Z","updated_at":"2017-05-10T17:30:38Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I'm starting to use MetSim to disaggregate some met data that uses the `noleap` calendar. Currently, we are using `pd.date_range` in a bunch of places in `metsim.py` and we should probably move toward a more naive calendar approach.\r\n\r\nI think I see a fairly clear way to do this but wanted to check with @bartnijssen and @arbennett before I jump in."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/comments/300555365","html_url":"https://github.com/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71#issuecomment-300555365","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UW-Hydro/MetSim/issues/71","id":300555365,"user":{"login":"bartnijssen","id":1106706,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1106706?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen","html_url":"https://github.com/bartnijssen","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartnijssen/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-05-10T17:30:38Z","updated_at":"2017-05-10T17:30:38Z","body":"Maybe explain first how you would do this. I don't really want to give up on using pandas time series capabilities unless there is a significant upside. Can `noleap` be treated as a special case? So just give some info on you implementation plan."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bartnijssen"}}