{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6","id":233258847,"number":6,"title":"Reconsider the use cases of do_ methods","user":{"login":"DeltaF1","id":6278108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/6278108?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1","html_url":"https://github.com/DeltaF1","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":618537171,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/labels/architecture","name":"architecture","color":"006b75","default":false},{"id":492962426,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/labels/todo","name":"todo","color":"0052cc","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2017-06-02T18:09:54Z","updated_at":"2017-06-02T19:34:03Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently there is no consistent definition of what a do_ method is supposed to be. My original vision was for any method that began with the do_ prefix to be editable by builders so they could embed lua code into their constructions. However, there is inconsistency between different classes about what kind of actions should be performed by do_ methods, and this inconsistency is partially driven by the verb do. Should this prefix be renamed?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/comments/305889298","html_url":"https://github.com/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6#issuecomment-305889298","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DeltaF1/Lua-MUD/issues/6","id":305889298,"user":{"login":"DeltaF1","id":6278108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/6278108?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1","html_url":"https://github.com/DeltaF1","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DeltaF1/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-06-02T19:34:03Z","updated_at":"2017-06-02T19:34:03Z","body":"Consider renaming do_ to on_, so these methods are clearly indicated as being event callbacks."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"DeltaF1"}}