{"push_id":1615805437,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/restorefk","head":"cac4d9e00cebe65419c726064ee89186d920a86d","before":"9092b65b8e6c0c243871b9fd0fd5da4700f08873","commits":[{"sha":"490a451b05eaa4cd39477d675b115d90ad84bedf","author":{"name":"David Taylor","email":"deda864f31e9ba3b7efc08e0ba9f954a384bd048@gmail.com"},"message":"sqlccl: switch some tests to singleNode\n\nwhere we’re just looking at descriptor handling, multi-vs-single node\nis uninteresting and the extra nodes just make the test take longer to start.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dt/cockroach/commits/490a451b05eaa4cd39477d675b115d90ad84bedf"},{"sha":"cac4d9e00cebe65419c726064ee89186d920a86d","author":{"name":"David Taylor","email":"deda864f31e9ba3b7efc08e0ba9f954a384bd048@gmail.com"},"message":"sqlccl: preserve/discard FKs in RESTORE\n\nif, and only if, both tables are restored do we preserve the FK.\n\nIf only a referenced table is restored, we remove the backref -- since we are a *new* table during restore, we know no existing tables reference us unless they are also in the restore.\n\nIf a referencing table is being restored without the table it references, we potentially could update the FK to point to an existing table with the same db and name if one exists, but mark it as unvalidated, though it is unclear that RESTORE should have side-effects on tables not restored, at least by default. Either way, this is left for a later followup.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/dt/cockroach/commits/cac4d9e00cebe65419c726064ee89186d920a86d"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dt"}}