{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/linkcheck/linkchecker/issues/26","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/linkcheck/linkchecker","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/linkcheck/linkchecker/issues/26/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/linkcheck/linkchecker/issues/26/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/linkcheck/linkchecker/issues/26/events","html_url":"https://github.com/linkcheck/linkchecker/issues/26","id":205416355,"number":26,"title":"Consider using BeautifulSoup instead of built-in HTML parser?","user":{"login":"astrofrog","id":314716,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/314716?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog","html_url":"https://github.com/astrofrog","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/astrofrog/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-02-05T10:34:37Z","updated_at":"2017-02-05T10:34:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I wonder whether it would be worth considering using an existing HTML parser such as BeautifulSoup to avoid having to include C code in the linkchecker package? This might lower the maintenance burden in the long term (since keeping C extensions working across platforms is not trivial)."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"astrofrog"}}