{"push_id":2085891040,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/bcache-for-next","head":"9279128d668c5425a6890cca0a039747994cc809","before":"b38f5a86354684e67bec3fb213bea9c70c6041db","commits":[{"sha":"9279128d668c5425a6890cca0a039747994cc809","author":{"name":"tang.junhui","email":"bb3256b0d8a23fa6ca188a765da40bcbb7f451c9@zte.com.cn"},"message":"bcache: fix wrong cache_misses statistics\n\nCurrently, Cache missed IOs are identified by s->cache_miss, but actually,\nthere are many situations that missed IOs are not assigned a value for\ns->cache_miss in cached_dev_cache_miss(), for example, a bypassed IO\n(s->iop.bypass = 1), or the cache_bio allocate failed. In these situations,\nit will go to out_put or out_submit, and s->cache_miss is null, which leads\nbch_mark_cache_accounting() to treat this IO as a hit IO.\n\n[ML: applied by 3-way merge]\n\nSigned-off-by: tang.junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>\nReviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>\nReviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mlyle/linux/commits/9279128d668c5425a6890cca0a039747994cc809"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"mlyle"}}