{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design/issues/960","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design/issues/960/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design/issues/960/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design/issues/960/events","html_url":"https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/960","id":201554510,"number":960,"title":"why not java or .net?","user":{"login":"kovalenko0","id":9482594,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9482594?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0","html_url":"https://github.com/kovalenko0","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/kovalenko0/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2017-01-18T11:57:38Z","updated_at":"2017-01-18T23:03:26Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Why not just run JVM or .net bytecode in browser?\r\n\r\nIn that case we could benefit from infrastructure of these platforms and already implemented interpreters "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design/issues/comments/273630213","html_url":"https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/960#issuecomment-273630213","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/WebAssembly/design/issues/960","id":273630213,"user":{"login":"wllang","id":16811840,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16811840?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang","html_url":"https://github.com/wllang","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wllang/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-01-18T23:03:26Z","updated_at":"2017-01-18T23:03:26Z","body":"@kovalenko0 Oh, and getting all the web browser vendors to agree to bundle a JVM and .net might have also been too much of a barrier (I expected for reasons such as the attack surface and bloat but perhaps for much more petty reasons too), so asm.js worked with what was common ground. Wasm might allow people to use JVM or .Net on the web even without agreement between the web browser vendors, and for people to make their own judgements on the security and bloat."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"wllang"}}