{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28","id":260761694,"number":28,"title":"Command line arguments","user":{"login":"datafanatic","id":8211771,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/8211771?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic","html_url":"https://github.com/datafanatic","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/datafanatic/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-09-26T20:37:22Z","updated_at":"2017-10-02T18:14:26Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"As per #25, it was suggested that perhaps there would be a better way to organize and handle the command line arguments used in torrench. This issue will be used to track the discussion.\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/kryptxy/torrench/issues/25#issuecomment-331900687 suggested the use of `docopt` and `click`. Personally, I have found `click` easier to use and simpler to read. \r\n\r\nAre there any better alternatives? Also, perhaps we could also consider a re-factorization of the code, instead of changing the module used to parse the CLI arguments."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench/issues/comments/333618751","html_url":"https://github.com/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28#issuecomment-333618751","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kryptxy/torrench/issues/28","id":333618751,"user":{"login":"nicolasmsg","id":25707645,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/25707645?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg","html_url":"https://github.com/nicolasmsg","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nicolasmsg/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-10-02T18:14:26Z","updated_at":"2017-10-02T18:14:26Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Hello, i just rewrite the application using click. I tried to do it with the less changes possible,\r\ntell me what you think. With some re factorization it could be really great i think. \r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/nicolasmsg/torrench/tree/migrationToClickCLI/torrench\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"nicolasmsg"}}