{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/issues/747","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libbitcoin/libbitcoin","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/issues/747/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/issues/747/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/issues/747/events","html_url":"https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/issues/747","id":220810360,"number":747,"title":"Internal double spend check should replace duplicate tx check.","user":{"login":"evoskuil","id":1369335,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/1369335?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil","html_url":"https://github.com/evoskuil","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/evoskuil/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":39728835,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb","default":true}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2017-04-11T00:57:52Z","updated_at":"2017-04-11T01:04:18Z","closed_at":"2017-04-11T01:04:17Z","body":"Any duplicate would be caught by the internal double spend check, so in the case of block.check the former can be skipped."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"evoskuil"}}