{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crowdresearch/daemo/issues/1013","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crowdresearch/daemo","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crowdresearch/daemo/issues/1013/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crowdresearch/daemo/issues/1013/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/crowdresearch/daemo/issues/1013/events","html_url":"https://github.com/crowdresearch/daemo/issues/1013","id":274686723,"number":1013,"title":"Workers can't do anything if a task is returned, has an iframe, and does not show the previous submission data","user":{"login":"markwhiting","id":673171,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/673171?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting","html_url":"https://github.com/markwhiting","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/markwhiting/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-11-16T22:28:52Z","updated_at":"2017-11-16T22:28:52Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Perhaps we could do something like the following: If a task has an iframe and is returned, display a question to the worker asking if they see the previously filled data. If not, the task might kick back to the requester, or might go into a paused state because presumably it would have the same problem for other workers. ( @mbernst you might have more thoughts about that) Presumably if we did kick back to the requester we'd do it in a way that meant the return count was still 0, i.e. it could not then be rejected by the requester.\r\n\r\nThe text for a prompt like this might be:\r\n\r\n> If you don't see what you previously entered in this frame, [report it](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ). We will contact the requester and ask them to fix it."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"markwhiting"}}