{"push_id":1482108866,"size":15,"distinct_size":11,"ref":"refs/heads/dev","head":"c5304574f3e81892edb915fb914e26521dc52afb","before":"4805a8092eef6e086e4ebd4164cfe976f4bc23f4","commits":[{"sha":"8aebbe30e21e8f31cad4b3c6472de67e8603351f","author":{"name":"Chris Adderley","email":"7c31ac4d04225ae0fa3badc4311ef117b34ea825@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #33 from ChrisAdderley/dev\n\nPush 0.8.1 update","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/8aebbe30e21e8f31cad4b3c6472de67e8603351f"},{"sha":"c6874d76e26bd5f67a4b5abcb3452febf5b47be5","author":{"name":"lOmicronl","email":"91c6756e3f5bc304e7b88f2f6ef0d56e0cc446e4@gmx.de"},"message":"Update NFElectricalUSI.cfg","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/c6874d76e26bd5f67a4b5abcb3452febf5b47be5"},{"sha":"0d85fea0a276eda078dd17a8bc7c716c26d5c241","author":{"name":"Chris Adderley","email":"7c31ac4d04225ae0fa3badc4311ef117b34ea825@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #40 from lOmicronl/patch-1\n\nUpdate NFElectricalUSI.cfg","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/0d85fea0a276eda078dd17a8bc7c716c26d5c241"},{"sha":"3c8ce4520636e38798b51e83bf81e7ca72d7a536","author":{"name":"Chris Adderley","email":"7c31ac4d04225ae0fa3badc4311ef117b34ea825@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #41 from ChrisAdderley/dev\n\nDeploy new version","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/3c8ce4520636e38798b51e83bf81e7ca72d7a536"},{"sha":"4bb5522eae396224d1fdaf681613d7205a5b7e55","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Update legacy MKS_PDU2 patch for Duna_PDU instead\n\nThe MKS PDU part no longer exists; it's been replaced by the similar Duna PDU.\nThis change updates NFElectricalUSI.cfg to patch the latter instead of the\nformer.\n\nCompared to the legacy version, the Duna PDU has 25 times the EC-generation (and\nfuel-consumption) rate, but only 20% as much fuel/waste storage capacity.  The\npatched values have been scaled accordingly.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/4bb5522eae396224d1fdaf681613d7205a5b7e55"},{"sha":"ebfc0e2855c2caf8bc7a50ee673dfd6e82ca888f","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Fix Duna PDU fuel/waste capacity\n\nThe reactor in the legacy MKS PDU was the same as the 0.625m reactor part, but\nwith 25 times the fuel/waste storage capacity.  The NFE patch, however, changed\nboth parts to have the same capacity, 3 times that of the 0.625m reactor.  This\nseems to have been a mistake; the MKS PDU's patched fuel/waste capacity\nshould've been 3 times its original capacity, again 25 times that of the 0.625m\nreactor.\n\nThe Duna PDU's original fuel/waste capacity is 20% of the legacy MKS PDU, or 5\ntimes that of the 0.625m reactor.  This change corrects its patched capacity to\nmatch that ratio.  (Importantly, this allows it to hold more than about two days\nof fuel.)","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/ebfc0e2855c2caf8bc7a50ee673dfd6e82ca888f"},{"sha":"96a9006c8c8918eb58e55da61a89da4dd50a163e","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Fix inconsistent Duna PDU optimum temperature\n\nThe temperature targets defined in ModuleCoreHeat and FissionReactor ought to be\nthe same, so that the part avoids heating itself past the reactor's optimum\ntemperature.  I've changed the ModuleCoreHeat to match the FissionReactor,\nrather than the other way around, because this way it matches the 0.625m reactor\nthat the Duna PDU is based on.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/96a9006c8c8918eb58e55da61a89da4dd50a163e"},{"sha":"64e92ab08595e76b9aa24c7f6ce2aefa736ba8d0","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Remove obsolete suppressions for USI's old NFE integration patches\n\nUSI used to ship its own integration patches for NFE, so NFE's patches had to\nremove USI's NFE stuff before replacing it.  That's no longer necessary since\nUSI no longer ships those patches.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/64e92ab08595e76b9aa24c7f6ce2aefa736ba8d0"},{"sha":"29863364c26270ad902b9af46c8c94605a14f13d","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Remove \"perform maintenance\" command from USI reactors\n\nUSI nuclear reactors use the \"perform maintenance\" command to automatically\ntransfer fuel into the reactor and waste out, but that's superseded by NFE's\ntransfer mechanics (which require a skilled engineer, unlike USI).","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/29863364c26270ad902b9af46c8c94605a14f13d"},{"sha":"45c0a3386271e5fc4750054eea12e4ed24df78da","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Add NFE transfer mechanics to USI nuclear fuel/waste containers\n\nSince USI's mechanism for transferring nuclear fuel is disabled by NFE, its\nfuel containers need NFE's transfer mechanism in order to be useful as more than\nradioactive paperweights.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/45c0a3386271e5fc4750054eea12e4ed24df78da"},{"sha":"40319609d40c22bc45b4ff1de2527f38a9199867","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Disable Whirlijig's uranium extractor only when MKS is installed\n\nConversion from Ore to EnrichedUranium should be disabled when using MKS, which\nhas its own system for refining uranium.  But checking for an\nUmbraSpaceIndustries folder is too broad, because that folder is also present\nwhen using other USI mods, like USI-LS and Konstruction, that have nothing to do\nwith uranium.  Fortunately, MKS includes MM patches with :FOR[MKS] clauses,\nwhich satisfy a :NEEDS[MKS] here.  This keeps the Whirlijig's uranium extractor\nenabled when other USI mods are installed, and disables it only when using MKS\nspecifically.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/40319609d40c22bc45b4ff1de2527f38a9199867"},{"sha":"391d3c8d2cc81ad474a6056a27f3e52d7e16dbf2","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Add patch for Tundra_PDU\n\nStats are derived from the Duna_PDU patch using MKS's pre-existing\nratios between the two parts: 1.6 times the fuel consumption and EC\ngeneration rate, and twice the fuel/waste storage capacity, for roughly\n1.05 times the cost and 1.01 times the entryCost.  The\nFissionGenerator's HeatUsed is two-thirds of its PowerGeneration,\nfollowing the trend of larger reactors having smaller values for that\nratio, and matching that of the NFE reactor-25-2, which is at the same\ntech level (with CTT) and has similar size and dry mass.  The\nNominalTemperature and CoreTempGoal also match those of the\nreactor-25-2.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/391d3c8d2cc81ad474a6056a27f3e52d7e16dbf2"},{"sha":"f5cdb48679b731b7c6a3e5a3a05163f9ee887e56","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Fix Duna_PDU and Tundra_PDU costs\n\nThe cost/power ratio of the NFE reactors, and patched USI reactors,\nfollows an approximate linear relationship.  I forgot to update the\ncosts when adapting the MKS_PDU2 patch for the Duna_PDU, though, and\nthat carried over to the Tundra_PDU as well.\n\nNormally I'd follow the ratio between the unpatched costs of the two\nparts, but that's not a useful guideline in this case since the Duna PDU\ncosts less but produces much more power.  Instead, I've brought both the\nDuna and Tundra costs into line with the other reactors by interpolating\nthe (NFE-patched) costs of the USI_Nuke_125 and USI_Nuke_250 reactors.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/f5cdb48679b731b7c6a3e5a3a05163f9ee887e56"},{"sha":"2b6270f2b7ac7f0bf03d0cdfb406c6fb18943fac","author":{"name":"Michael Paul","email":"9c718659c7cd4c715abab71c311def3c89922b67@wyzardry.net"},"message":"Add USI resource sharing to fuel/waste containers\n\nThis adds two modules to the NFE nuclear fuel/waste containers that are\nalready present on their USI counterparts:\n\nUSI_ModuleResourceWarehouse enables logistics consumers to automatically\npull resources from the container on-demand.  Though it circumvents the\nRadioactiveStorageContainer module's requirement for a skilled engineer\nto perform a manual trasfer, it provides less player control (so there's\nstill a niche for manual transfers), and it's an important convenience\nfor MKS-style \"kolonies\" that consist of multiple disconnected vessels\nand an implied logistics network -- especially since the MKS reactor\nparts (\"Duna\" and \"Tundra\" PDUs) don't have much fuel capacity of their\nown.\n\nUSI_ModuleRecycleBin allows the container to receive resources that\nwould otherwise be lost when a nearby part is disassembled (\"recycled\")\nby an engineer.  Nothing seems to utilize this for nuclear resources\nquite yet -- MKS allows parts to be disassembled only into MaterialKits,\nnot EnrichedUranium or DepletedFuel -- but the USI nuclear fuel/waste\ncontainers have the module so there may be a purpose for it in the\nfuture, and the NFE containers should be prepared for that.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/2b6270f2b7ac7f0bf03d0cdfb406c6fb18943fac"},{"sha":"c5304574f3e81892edb915fb914e26521dc52afb","author":{"name":"Chris Adderley","email":"7c31ac4d04225ae0fa3badc4311ef117b34ea825@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #44 from Wyzard256/usi-patch-update\n\nUSI integration patch updates","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ChrisAdderley/NearFutureElectrical/commits/c5304574f3e81892edb915fb914e26521dc52afb"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ChrisAdderley"}}