{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103","id":201423323,"number":103,"title":"Api wishlist for a better GUI","user":{"login":"vikramrajkumar","id":793567,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/793567?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar","html_url":"https://github.com/vikramrajkumar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":520507044,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/labels/api","name":"api","color":"ededed","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-01-17T22:23:36Z","updated_at":"2017-01-17T22:23:37Z","closed_at":null,"body":"_From @svk31 on October 20, 2015 6:45_\n\nI would like the following api calls to be added in order to improve the frontend (in order of importance):\n- [x] **get_market_order_history(asset_id_type a, asset_id_type b, fc::time_point_sec start, fc::time_point_sec end)**\n\nIt would return a list of orders for the given market. I first asked for this in June, it's essential to having a functional Exchange. See #47 \n- [ ] **get_market_summary(asset_id_type a, asset_id_type b)**\n\nIt would return a short summary of that market: bid/ask depth, latest price, 24h change if possible\n- [ ] **get_account_order_history(asset_id_type a, asset_id_type b, uint32_t start, uint32_t limit)**\n\nIt would return the successful orders made by that account in the given market, a negative start argument should count backwards from most recent transaction (-1 for starting at most recent I guess)\n- [ ] **lookup_assets_simple(const string& lower_bound_symbol, uint32_t limit)**\n\nIt would simply return a list of assets with only three fields: symbol, id and precision. This is useful because in a lot of cases that's all the information we need, but instead we now ask for the full asset object including nested objects. This would reduce load on the backend as well as frontend.\n- [ ] **lookup_account(account_id_type account_id)const;**\n\nSimilar to the assets lookup, it would simply return the account name and id. This prevent us from looking up X full account objects just in order to display some names.\n\nI would also like to remind you of #375, which is essential in order to display a user's created assets\n\n\n_Copied from original issue: cryptonomex/graphene#382_"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/comments/273319892","html_url":"https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103#issuecomment-273319892","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/103","id":273319892,"user":{"login":"vikramrajkumar","id":793567,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/793567?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar","html_url":"https://github.com/vikramrajkumar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vikramrajkumar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-01-17T22:23:37Z","updated_at":"2017-01-17T22:23:37Z","body":"_From @xeroc on October 27, 2015 10:18_\n\nWhile we are at it. For traders we need to **ALSO** offer those Calls for the\nCLI-wallet:\n- Market (quote/base) Data\n  - Market Ticker\n  - Market Volume\n- Market Orderbook\n- Open Orders of account\n- Cancel an order\n\nI would agree with this having very high priority b/c we need traders to\ninterfacer for liquidity!\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"vikramrajkumar"}}