{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/6453","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-platform-tests","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/6453/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/6453/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/6453/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/6453","id":240262554,"number":6453,"title":"removeTrack test should not rely on Transceivers","user":{"login":"jan-ivar","id":3136226,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/3136226?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar","html_url":"https://github.com/jan-ivar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jan-ivar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-07-03T20:50:36Z","updated_at":"2017-07-03T20:50:36Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@soareschen It's great to see modern tests for `addTrack`/`removeTrack`!\r\n\r\nEven better would be them following the [evolution](blog.mozilla.org/webrtc/the-evolution-of-webrtc/) that justifies their existence.\r\n\r\nSpecifically, I don't think we should require `addTransceiver` (a stage 3 api) to test `removeTrack` (a stage 2 api), when we can use `addTrack` (a stage 2 api) which returns a sender. IMHO we should use the same abstraction level.\r\n\r\nE.g. Firefox has supported `removeTrack` for [almost 3 years](https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/79525105ef9a), yet won't pass any of the `removeTrack` tests [as written](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/6251/files) because they require `addTransceiver`."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jan-ivar"}}