{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pachyderm/pachyderm/issues/2000","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pachyderm/pachyderm","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pachyderm/pachyderm/issues/2000/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pachyderm/pachyderm/issues/2000/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pachyderm/pachyderm/issues/2000/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pachyderm/pachyderm/issues/2000","id":239583459,"number":2000,"title":"The `strategy` field in parallelism spec doesn't accept a string","user":{"login":"derekchiang","id":1535686,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1535686?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang","html_url":"https://github.com/derekchiang","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/derekchiang/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":576601902,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pachyderm/pachyderm/labels/high%20priority","name":"high priority","color":"b60205","default":false}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-06-29T19:15:40Z","updated_at":"2017-07-06T00:39:42Z","closed_at":"2017-07-06T00:39:42Z","body":"First reported by a user.  Right now the `strategy` field in parallelism spec doesn't accept a string such as `CONSTANT` or `COEFFICIENT`.  @msteffen proposed that we remove the field entirely since we can infer the strategy from the other field."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"msteffen"}}