{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155/events","html_url":"https://github.com/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155","id":245574422,"number":155,"title":"inconsistency between concept paper and method paper","user":{"login":"rueuntal","id":1157182,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1157182?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal","html_url":"https://github.com/rueuntal","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rueuntal/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":16,"created_at":"2017-07-26T00:44:28Z","updated_at":"2017-07-27T01:41:06Z","closed_at":null,"body":"@dmcglinn @FelixMay - I'm going over Jon's concept paper, and there's an inconsistency in the description of the methodology of the alpha-gamma scale analysis, so I want to double-check that the three of us are on the same page before bringing it up to Jon and making edits. (I'm using GitHub instead of email in the hope of making our discussion easier and more tractable; this issue doesn't have much to do with the code.)\r\n\r\nIf you read the last paragraph on page 20 to the end of page 21, and look at figure 4 on page 22, it is described that a number of metrics on the alpha and the gamma scales (e.g. rarefied S, asymptotic S, PIE) are computed based on the spatially-constrained rarefaction curve, which I don't think is being used. My understanding is that these calculations are all done using the individual rarefaction curves. Is that right? "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/comments/318232685","html_url":"https://github.com/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155#issuecomment-318232685","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/MoBiodiv/mobr/issues/155","id":318232685,"user":{"login":"dmcglinn","id":1190381,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1190381?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn","html_url":"https://github.com/dmcglinn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dmcglinn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2017-07-27T01:41:06Z","updated_at":"2017-07-27T01:41:06Z","body":"If you're ok with this last bit then I'll send this hierarchy out to the broader group and if everyone is ok with it then I'll make changes to our methods paper which I think we be minimal. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dmcglinn"}}