Possible black hole created in US
{{date|March 21, 2005}}
[[Image:BlackHole.jpg|thumb|right|180px|A concept drawing of a natural [[w:Black hole|Black hole]] by [[w:NASA|NASA]]]]
US [[w:Particle physics|particle]] [[w:Physicist|physicists]] at [[w:Brookhaven National Laboratory|Brookhaven National Laboratory]] in [[w:Upton, New York|Upton, New York]] have created a fireball in a [[w:Particle accelerator|particle accelerator]] that bears a striking similarity to a [[w:Black hole|black hole]].  It was generated at the [[w:Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider|Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)]] by smashing beams of gold nuclei together at almost the speed of light. 

The collision produces a ball of plasma which is about 300 million times hotter that the surface of the [[w:Sun|Sun]]. The fireball can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the collision, but in this case 10 times as many jets were being absorbed as had been predicted by calculations. 

Physicist Horatiu Nastase of [[w:Brown University|Brown University]] in [[w:Providence, Rhode Island|Providence, Rhode Island]] says that the calculations show that the fireball has properties similar to that of a black hole. Nastase says this could help explain why so few jets are seen coming out of the fireball. He thinks the particles are being absorbed into the core and reappearing as [[w:Hawking radiation|thermal (Hawking) radiation]], just like theory predicts happens in a black hole.  

Other physicists have pointed out possible holes in Nastase’s calculations. Carlos Nunez of [[w:Massachusetts Institute of Technology|MIT]] in [[w:Cambridge, Massachusetts|Cambridge, Massachusetts]] said, “I wouldn’t say his model is wrong, but it’s clearly under construction.”

Even if Nastase turns out to be right, the black holes created pose no danger. At this scale gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole and they quickly evaporate away - this one lasted a mere 10<sup>-23</sup> seconds, that is 10 million, billion, billionths of a second.

==References==

*{{source|url=http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18524915.400 
|title=Black hole-like phenomenon created by collider
|pub=New Scientist 
|author=Eugenie Samuel Reich 
|date=19 March 2005 }}

*{{source|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4357613.stm 
|title=Lab fireball 'may be black hole' 
|pub=BBC News 
|author=BBC News 
|date=17 March, 2005 }}

==See also==

*{{source|url=http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0501068 
|title=The RHIC fireball as a dual black hole
|pub=arxiv.org
|author=Horatiu Nastase 
|date=16 Feb 2005 }}

* ''New Scientist'', 16 October 2004, p 35

* [http://www.bnl.gov/RHIC  Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider homepage]

{{archive}}
[[Category:Science and technology]]
[[Category:Published]]
[[Category:Black holes]]
[[Category:New York]]
[[Category:United States]]
[[Category:North America]]
[[Category:Physics]]
[[Category:Particle physics]]
[[Category:Brown University]]

[[pt:Provável buraco negro criado nos EUA]]
Black hole by NASA
US particle physicists at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York have created a fireball in a particle accelerator that bears a striking similarity to a black hole.  It was generated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) by smashing beams of gold nuclei together at almost the speed of light. 

The collision produces a ball of plasma which is about 300 million times hotter that the surface of the Sun. The fireball can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the collision, but in this case 10 times as many jets were being absorbed as had been predicted by calculations. 

Physicist Horatiu Nastase of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island says that the calculations show that the fireball has properties similar to that of a black hole. Nastase says this could help explain why so few jets are seen coming out of the fireball. He thinks the particles are being absorbed into the core and reappearing as thermal (Hawking) radiation, just like theory predicts happens in a black hole.  

Other physicists have pointed out possible holes in Nastase’s calculations. Carlos Nunez of MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts said, “I wouldn’t say his model is wrong, but it’s clearly under construction.”

Even if Nastase turns out to be right, the black holes created pose no danger. At this scale gravity is not the dominant force in a black hole and they quickly evaporate away - this one lasted a mere 10-23 seconds, that is 10 million, billion, billionths of a second.

*

* New Scientist, 16 October 2004, p 35

*   Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider homepage


Provável buraco negro criado nos EUA
Science and technology Published Black holes New York United States North America Physics Particle physics Brown University