Australian Immigration denies issuing banned drug
{{missing image|Image:BaxterGate.jpg|thumb|right|Protesters at the gates of Baxter recently, another of Australia's immigration detention centers.}}
{{byline|date=April 12, 2005|location=Melbourne, AUSTRALIA}}The Australian Department of Immigration ([[w:Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs|DIMIA]]) today denied issuing a banned drug to immigration detainees, either in Australia or on [[w:Nauru detention centre|Nauru]]. But the Asylum Seeker Resource Center (ASRC) said in a press release yesterday that a woman detained here was administered the drug, until advocates called the Minister's office recently to have it stopped.

"It took a phone call to the Minister's office to stop the administration of [Vioxx]," says Pamela Curr of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC) "Inadequate care for asylum seekers is so normalised in the detention centres that the doctors contracted by the detention system continued to administer a banned drug."

Dr Graham, a US whistleblower influential in getting the drug banned, has described that the painkiller and anti-arthritic [[w:Rofecoxib|Vioxx]], banned on September 30, caused up to 160,000 heart attacks and strokes, and 27,785 deaths from heart ailments from 1999 to 2003. [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6520630/]

DIMIA this afternoon repeated its claims published in this morning's ''Age'', that the drug has not been prescribed in its detention system since sometime before the ban was even made, and "no detainees at Nauru were taking the medication".

According to DIMIA, the drug was withdrawn from use at Nauru last September, and doctors at other detention centers around Australia were directed on October 1 to stop prescribing Vioxx. All stockpiles of the Vioxx had been destroyed when it was withdrawn.

The ASRC says the International Organisation of Migration ([[w:International Organization for Migration|IOM]]), who "run the camps under orders and with funding from DIMIA", made the same claim in January 2005. Refugee advocates had emailed the IOM, believing at the time that Vioxx was still being prescribed.

== Sources ==

*{{source|url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/Immigration/Detainees-given-banned-drug-say-refugee-groups/2005/04/11/1113071911114.html
|title=Detainees given banned drug, say refugee groups
|pub=The Age
|author=Andra Jackson
|date=April 12, 2005 }}

* {{source|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6520630/
|title=FDA failed public on Vioxx, scientist says
|pub=MSNBC
|author=MSNBC, Associated Press, Reuters
|date=November 19, 2004 }}

* {{source|url=http://www.dimia.gov.au/media_releases/media05/d05011.htm
|title=Media Release DPS 011/2005: Setting Record Straight About Vioxx
|pub=Commonwealth of Australia
|author=Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (DIMIA)
|date=April 12, 2005 }}

* {{wikinews|title=Talk:Australian Immigration denies issuing banned drug#Press release from ASRC 
|date=April 11, 2005}}

== See also ==

*{{source|url=http://lists.topica.com/lists/safecom/read/message.html?mid=810909017
|title=TWO NEWS ALERTS: Vioxx .... and Nauru
|pub=Topica: SafeCom News (mailing list archive)
|author=Jack H Smit
|date=April 9, 2005 }}

*{{source|url=http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice/news.htm?story_id=9236&topic=Vioxx
|title=Banned Report On Vioxx Published (copy)
|pub=Financial Times
|author=Thomas H. Maugh II
|date=January 25, 2005 }}

*{{source|url=http://news.ft.com/cms/s/29e97e52-6eb9-11d9-94a8-00000e2511c8.html
|title=Banned Report On Vioxx Published (original - paysite)
|pub=Financial Times
|author=Thomas H. Maugh II
|date=January 25, 2005 }}

*{{source|url=http://www.onlinelawyersource.com/news/vioxx-graham.html
|title=Forbes names David Graham "Face of the Year"
|pub=Forbes
|author=Forbes
|date=December 13th, 2004 }}

*{{source|url=http://www.mercola.com/2004/dec/18/vioxx.htm
|title=Whistle Blower is My New Hero
|pub=Mercola.com
|author=Dr. Joseph Mercola
|date=viewed April 12, 2005 }}

   
{{publish}}

{{archive}}

[[Category:Australia]]
[[Category:Immigration]]
[[Category:Health]]
[[Category:Oceania]]
[[Category:Australian immigration policies]]
The Australian Department of Immigration (DIMIA) today denied issuing a banned drug to immigration detainees, either in Australia or on Nauru. But the Asylum Seeker Resource Center (ASRC) said in a press release yesterday that a woman detained here was administered the drug, until advocates called the Minister's office recently to have it stopped.

"It took a phone call to the Minister's office to stop the administration of Vioxx," says Pamela Curr of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC) "Inadequate care for asylum seekers is so normalised in the detention centres that the doctors contracted by the detention system continued to administer a banned drug."

Dr Graham, a US whistleblower influential in getting the drug banned, has described that the painkiller and anti-arthritic Vioxx, banned on September 30, caused up to 160,000 heart attacks and strokes, and 27,785 deaths from heart ailments from 1999 to 2003. 

DIMIA this afternoon repeated its claims published in this morning's Age, that the drug has not been prescribed in its detention system since sometime before the ban was even made, and "no detainees at Nauru were taking the medication".

According to DIMIA, the drug was withdrawn from use at Nauru last September, and doctors at other detention centers around Australia were directed on October 1 to stop prescribing Vioxx. All stockpiles of the Vioxx had been destroyed when it was withdrawn.

The ASRC says the International Organisation of Migration (IOM), who "run the camps under orders and with funding from DIMIA", made the same claim in January 2005. Refugee advocates had emailed the IOM, believing at the time that Vioxx was still being prescribed.

* 

* 

* 

*

*

*

*
Australia Immigration Health Oceania Australian immigration policies