# La Palma night-sky brightness

## 1 Introduction

The zenith brightness of the moonless night sky at a clear dark observing site, measured at high ecliptic and galactic latitudes, and during solar minimum, is typically B = 22.9 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup>, V = 21.9 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup>, about 10 million times dimmer than the daylight sky (but easily visible to the dark-adapted eye). This glow<sup>1</sup><sup>1</sup>11 $`S_{10}`$ one 10-th mag star per square degree, 220 $`S_{10}`$ $`V`$ = 21.9 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup> comes from airglow (145 $`S_{10}`$), zodiacal light (60 $`S_{10}`$), the integrated light of faint stars ($`<`$ 5 $`S_{10}`$), starlight scattered by interstellar dust (10 $`S_{10}`$), and extragalactic light ($``$ 1 $`S_{10}`$). Auroral light is significant at geomagnetic latitude $`>`$ 40<sup>o</sup>.

The airglow is emitted by atoms and molecules in the upper atmosphere which are excited by solar UV radiation during the day. Its intensity correlates with solar activity, being $``$ 0.5 mag brighter at solar maximum, and can also vary randomly, by up to a few 10s of %, with position on the sky and with time during the night. The strength of at least the NaD line varies with season; $``$ 30 Rayleighs in local summer vs $``$ 180 Rayleighs in winter.

Zodiacal light is sunlight scattered by interplanetary dust. At high ecliptic latitude, it contributes $``$ 60 $`S_{10}`$. Its brightness rises slowly with decreasing ecliptic latitude, to about 140 $`S_{10}`$ on the ecliptic plane, for ecliptic longitde $`>`$ 90<sup>o</sup> from the sun. The spectrum of zodiacial light is very similar to that of the sun over the UV - IR range, and it’s fractional contribution to the brightness of the night sky peaks at a wavelength of 4500 Å ($``$ 0.5 of total for $`\beta =30^o`$).

Starlight contributes substantially to the integrated brightness of the sky, $`25+250e^{(|b|/20^o)}`$ $`S_{10}`$ units (approximate fit to the data of Roach & Gordon 1973, $`b`$ = galactic latitude). If all the starlight were scattered uniformly over the sky, it would produce a background of $``$ 100 $`S_{10}`$ units. However, most of this light is from stars with 6 $`<V<`$ 16 and published measurements of sky brightness usually now refer to the sky between stars with $`V<`$ 20. Starlight scattered by interstellar dust produces a diffuse glow concentrated along the galactic plane, analagous to the zodiacal light along the ecliptic. Faint galaxies contribute $`<`$ 5 S<sub>10</sub> (observational upper limit) to the brightness of the night sky; a lower limit can be estimated from the faint galaxy counts, $`>`$ 1 $`S_{10}`$.

Light pollution at observatory sites arises principally from tropospheric scattering of light emitted by sodium- and mercury-vapour and incandescent street lamps.<sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup>2Lighting wastefully emitted above the horizontal costs the US taxpayer $``$ $`\$`$10<sup>9</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>, more than the cost of funding US astronomy (Hunter & Crawford 1991). Garstang (1989) estimates the increase in brightness at zenith distance 45<sup>o</sup>, in the direction of a conurbation of population P at distance D km to be $`PD^{2.5}`$/70 mag. The IAU recommendations for a dark site are continuum $`\mathrm{\Delta }mag<`$ 0.1 for 3000 $`<\lambda <`$ 10000 Å, and intensity of NaD light pollution $`<`$ that from airglow, at $`ZD`$ = 45<sup>o</sup> towards any city (Smith 1979).

At high airmass, light from outside the atmosphere may be dimmed by scattering and absorption, but the airglow will probably be brighter, since a line of sight intercepts a larger number of atoms in the airglow layer. For airglow arising in a thin layer at height $`h`$, the intensity should vary with zenith distance $`ZD`$ as $`(1(a/(a+h)^2sin^2ZD))^{0.5}`$ where $`a`$ is the radius of the earth (the van Rhijn formula).

## 2 Measurements from La Palma

The observatory on La Palma lies close to the island’s peak, on the rim of a large volcanic caldera, at longitude 18<sup>o</sup> W, latitude 29<sup>o</sup> N, altitude 2300 m, geomagnetic latitude $``$ 20<sup>o</sup> N. Approximately 70% of the nights are clear (95% in the summer) and 60% are photometric. The median site seeing is $``$ 0.7 arcsec. Atmospheric extinction is typically 0.15 mag in $`V`$, but can be substantially higher during the summer, when dust from the Sahara desert (400 km away) blows over the Canary Islands. The island has a population of $``$ 80000 people, but light-pollution is strictly controlled, by a 1992 decree, the ‘Ley del Cielo’.

Dark-of-moon sky brightness was measured from 427 CCD images taken with the Isaac Newton and Jacobus Kapteyn Telescopes on 63 photometric nights. The measurements were made in areas free of nebulosity, stars, cosmic-ray events or CCD defects. The median values of sky brightness during solar minimum 1994-6 are $`B`$ = 22.7 $`\pm `$ 0.03, $`V`$ = 21.9 $`\pm `$ 0.03, $`R`$ = 21.0 $`\pm `$ 0.03 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup>, with a scatter of about 0.15 mag in each band. We have fewer measurements in $`U`$ and $`I`$ bands; the median sky brightnesses are $`U`$ 22.0, $`I`$ 20.0 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup>, consistent with the few values measured elsewhere. The $`I`$ brightness is dominated by OH emission bands (Fig. 1) and varies by up to a factor $``$ 2 during the night. The brightnesses in $`V`$ and $`R`$ are similar to those measured at other sites. The measured brightness in $`B`$ is 0.2 mag higher than the sunspot-minimum value reported for other sites at previous minima, but the La Palma median is dominated by data from 1995, and Krisciunas (1997) found that the $`B`$ sky brightness at Mauna Kea was still declining then. The 0.15-mag scatter in the measured values is a combination of measurement errors and true variations in sky brightness.

The measured sky brightness varies with solar cycle, being 0.4 $`\pm `$ 0.1 mag brighter in 1990 than in 1995 (Fig. 2). It also varies with ecliptic latitude, being 0.4 mag brighter on the ecliptic than at the poles, consistent with the known variation in the brightness of the zodiacal light. The sky brightens steadily with rising airmass of observation, being 0.25 +- 0.07 mag brighter at airmass $``$ 1.5 than it is at the zenith, consistent with the eqution at the end of Section 1, if airglow contributes 70% of the total. The sky is brighter under exceptionally dusty conditions, with extincton $`A_V>`$ 0.25 mag.

80000 people live on La Palma, mostly in or near nine small towns lying between 10 and 15 km from the observatory. The predicted brightening of the zenith sky from the main populated areas, including the neighbouring islands of La Gomera, El Hierro and Tenerife, is given in the last column of the table overleaf, using the model of Garstang (1989). The predictions are approximate, but serve to indicate the relative sizes of the light-pollution contributions expected from different sources.

Most of the expected contamination is from La Palma’s 14000 streetlamps, which emit $``$ 120 Mlumens, corresponding to $``$ 180 kW of visible photons. Approximately half of the light generated emerges from the lamp housings, and $``$ 10% of the emerging light is reflected from the ground, so $``$ 9 kW escapes to the sky. The $`V`$-band zenith sky brightness on La Palma is similar to that at other dark sites, which suggests that light pollution must contribute $`<`$ 0.1 mag to the total. A stronger limit on the contribution of light pollution to the brightness of the sky has been obtained from the equivalent widths of the NaD and Hg lines in the spectrum of the zenith night sky. These yield directly the contribution to sky brightness from emission lines, while that from broad and continuum features can be inferred from the strengths of the emission lines, the known shapes of the lamp spectra, and the relative numbers of lamps of different kinds. ¿From these, we estimate that light pollution contributes $`<`$ 0.03 mag to the zenith continuum sky brightness in all bands; and that the total contamination is $`<`$ 0.03 mag in $`U`$ (Hg lines), $``$ 0.02 mag in $`B`$ (Hg lines), $``$ 0.10 mag in $`V`$ (mainly low-pressure and high-pressure NaD), $``$ 0.10 mag in $`R`$ (NaD, as for V band). This degree of light pollution is comparable to that at Kitt Peak, $``$ 0.02 mag in $`B`$, 0.05 mag in $`V`$ in 1988 (Massey et al 1990) from Tucson (275000 inhabitants, 65 km distant). It is likely to decrease in the future.

## 3 Conclusions

$``$ The brightness of the moonless night sky above La Palma, at high ecliptic and galactic latitudes and low airmass, at solar minimum, is given in various units in columns 5 - 9 of the table overleaf.

Column 4 gives the equivalent intensity in Jy for apparent mag = 0. The units of column 8 ($`\gamma `$) are photons s<sup>-1</sup>m<sup>-2</sup>Å<sup>-1</sup>arcsec<sup>-2</sup>. The brightness of the La Palma sky is similar to that at other dark sites.   
$``$ The sky is $``$ 0.4 mag brighter on the ecliptic plane than at the ecliptic pole, $``$ 0.4 mag brighter at solar maximum than at solar minimum, and $``$ 0.25 mag brighter at zenith distance 45<sup>o</sup> than at the zenith.   
$``$ Light pollution contributes $`<`$ 0.03 mag to the zenith continuum sky brightness in all bands, well below the 0.1-mag limit recommended by IAU for a dark site. The total contamination is $`<`$ 0.03 mag in $`U`$, $``$ 0.02 mag in $`B`$, $``$ 0.10 mag in $`V`$, $``$ 0.10 mag in $`R`$.

For sky-limited exposures, an uncertainty of 0.4 mag in the surface brightness of the night sky translates into an uncertainty of a factor of 2 in the exposure time required to reach a given signal-to-noise, with potential wastage of half that time. The measurements reported here of the absolute level of sky brightness, and of the ways in which it varies, allow more efficient use to be made of telescope time.

We are grateful to Ed Zuiderwijk (RGO) for helping us extract data from the archive, the Carlsberg Meridian Group (RGO) for extinction data, and Javier Diaz (IAC) for information about street-lighting on La Palma. SLE carried out part of this work while a summer student at the Isaac Newton Group in 1996.

References   
Benn, C. R., & Ellison S. L., 1998, La Palma Technical Note 115   
Garstang R.H., 1989, PASP, 101, 306   
Hunter T.B. & Crawford D.L., 1991 in ‘Light Pollution, Radio Interference and Space Debris’, ed. D.L. Crawford (PASP conference vol. 17), p.89   
Krisciunas K., 1997, PASP, 109, 1181   
Massey P., Gronwall C., Pilachowski C., 1990, PASP, 102, 1046   
Roach F.E. & Gordon J.L., 1973, ‘The Light of the Night Sky’ (Dordrecht: Reidel)   
Smith F.G., 1979, Trans IAU 17A, 220