# Properties of Two New M31 dSph Companions from Keck Imaging

## 1 Introduction

Recently two groups have reported the independent discovery of new Local Group dwarf galaxies, potential companions of M31. Armandroff et al. (1998a) used a digital filtering technique to survey digitized POSS-II plates covering a 1550 deg<sup>2</sup> area surrounding M31 and found several candidate dwarf galaxies. They demonstrated that their first candidate, And V, is a dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxy sufficiently close to M31 to be its satellite. An additional candidate, named And VI following van den Bergh’s (1974) convention, was resolved into stars and found not to contain Hii regions (Armandroff et al. 1998b,c). The second group, Karachentsev & Karachentseva (1998a,b) visually inspected film copies of POSS-II plates and detected four potential new dwarf companions of M31. The two brightest, granulated detections were deemed to be the most promising candidates. These were initially named Pegasus Dw and Cassiopeia Dw after their parent constellations (Karachentsev & Karachentseva 1998a,b), and later renamed Peg dSph and Cas dSph by Tikhonov & Karachentsev 1999). Note, Peg dSph is equivalent to And VI and was discovered independently by the two groups. The galaxy Cas dSph is located in an area for which no POSS-II plate scan was available to Armandroff et al. (1998a). We will adopt the designations Peg dSph and Cas dSph throughout this Letter.

These three newly discovered candidate M31 dSphs, And V, Peg dSph, and Cas Dw, double the census of known M31 dSphs. It is important to test whether the M31 dSphs follow the same relations between absolute magnitude, surface brightness, metallicity, $`M/L`$ ratio, and galactocentric distance as the Milky Way dSph satellites? Do environment and distance from M31 affect their formation histories as one might expect from van den Bergh’s (1994) ram pressure/tidal stripping scenario?

This Letter presents results from Keck imaging of Peg dSph and Cas dSph that address some of these questions; a preliminary version of the results were presented by Grebel (1999). Our Keck results are also compared to the results from three other recent/ongoing studies of a similar nature targeting these galaxies (Tikhonov & Karachentsev 1999; Hopp et al. 1999; Armandroff et al. 1998c, 1999).

## 2 Observations and Data Reduction

In preparation for a stellar spectroscopy program of M31’s dSph companions, Peg dSph and Cas dSph were imaged with the Keck II 10-m telescope in August–September 1998, using the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (Oke et al. 1995) with a $`2048^2`$ CCD and a scale of $`0\stackrel{}{\mathrm{.}}215`$ pixel<sup>-1</sup>. Short exposures were obtained in the $`V`$ and $`I`$ bands: $`1\times 300`$s and $`3\times 200`$s, respectively, per galaxy. Observing conditions were photometric and the seeing ranged from 0$`\stackrel{}{\mathrm{.}}`$7–1$`\stackrel{}{\mathrm{.}}`$0 (FWHM). The overlapping field of view of the final, combined images is $`4\stackrel{}{\mathrm{.}}6\times 7\stackrel{}{\mathrm{.}}1`$. Resolved objects (galaxies) and regions around bright, saturated stars are excluded from further analysis (cf. Reitzel et al. 1998). Stellar photometry is carried out with the DAOPHOT/ALLFRAME programs (Stetson 1994). The photometric transformation uses airmass coefficients from Krisciunas et al. (1987) and observations of faint secondary standards (Stetson, priv. comm.) in Landolt (1992) fields.

## 3 Morphological Appearance

Peg dSph and Cas dSph have the appearance of typical low-surface brightness spheroidal galaxies without recognizable concentrations of bright stars, H ii regions, or obvious globular clusters (Figure 1). Peg dSph is not detected in H$`\alpha `$, indicating the absence of currently star-forming regions (Armandroff 1998a). An ellipticity of 0.3 is estimated for both galaxies, along with position angles of $`160^{}\pm 20^{}`$ and $`55^{}\pm 20^{}`$ for Peg dSph and Cas dSph, respectively. Hopp et al.’s (1999) measurement of the Peg dSph structural parameters is in agreement with this estimate. The ellipticities of Peg dSph and Cas dSph are similar to those of Galactic dSph satellites at larger distances from the Milky Way (e.g., Caldwell et al. 1992), suggesting little or no distortion through tidal effects. A detailed analysis of the galaxies’ structural parameters will be presented in a later paper (Guhathakurta & Grebel 1999).

## 4 Stellar Luminosity Functions and Distances

The cumulative stellar $`I`$-band luminosity function (LF) for both galaxies is shown in Figure 2. The LF of Cas dSph rises at $`I20.7\pm 0.1`$, and this is interpreted as the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB). The LF upturn is more gradual for Peg dSph with $`I_{\mathrm{TRGB}}20.7\pm 0.1`$. The Galactic line-of-sight reddening is estimated from DIRBE/IRAS maps (Schlegel et al. 1998) to be $`E_{BV}=0.04\pm 0.01`$ and $`0.17\pm 0.03`$, or $`A_I=0.09\pm 0.01`$ and $`0.35\pm 0.06`$, for Peg dSph and Cas dSph, respectively. An absolute magnitude of $`M_I=4`$ for the TRGB (Lee at al. 1993) implies true distance moduli of $`(mM)_0=24.6\pm 0.2`$ and $`24.4\pm 0.2`$ for Peg dSph and Cas dSph, respectively, where the errors include uncertainties in the exact location of the TRGB (Poisson error, possible presence of intermediate-age stars brighter than the TRGB), reddening, and photometric calibration.

Tikhonov & Karachentsev (1999) find apparent distance moduli for Peg dSph and Cas dSph that translate into true distance moduli of $`(mM)_0=24.52`$ and 24.36, respectively, when the above foreground extinction correction is applied. Corrected in the same manner, Hopp et al.’s (1999) finding corresponds to $`(mM)_0=24.43\pm 0.2`$ for Peg dSph. These results are in excellent agreement with the results of this study, when the uncertainties in the measurements are taken into account.

## 5 Color-Magnitude Diagrams and Metallicity Estimates

The color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) of Peg dSph and Cas dSph show prominent red giant branches (RGBs) and no evidence for young blue stars (Figure 3). Note, the surrounding $`R>3^{}`$ “field” CMDs in Figure 3, each drawn from a region whose area is about 45% that of the $`R<3^{}`$ galaxy area. The field CMDs are slightly contaminated by stars in the outskirts of the dSph galaxies ($`<10\%`$ of the number of stars in the corresponding $`R<3^{}`$ galaxy CMD), but this is unimportant for the purposes of this study since no significant radial gradient appears to be present in the galaxies’ properties. The Cas dSph RGB is more densely populated than that of Peg dSph, a reflection of Cas dSph’s higher stellar surface density. A small metal-rich ($`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]<1`$) population appears to be indicated by stars with $`VI2`$ near the TRGB in Cas dSph (Figure 3). The density and color distribution of stars above the Cas dSph TRGB are similar to that in the corresponding “field” CMD, but the presence of a small intermediate-age asymptotic giant branch (AGB) population cannot be ruled out. The Peg dSph CMD displays an excess of stars above the TRGB relative to the field CMD; this is also seen as a tail in the LF brighter than the TRGB. These super-TRGB stars may indicate the presence of a significant intermediate-age AGB population in Peg dSph; they are not likely to be blend artifacts (cf. Grillmair et al. 1996; Martínez-Delgado & Aparicio 1997).

The mean metallicity is computed from the median reddening-corrected color, $`(VI)_0`$, at $`M_I=3.5`$ (Armandroff et al. 1993; Caldwell et al. 1998), computed over the range $`1<(VI)_0<2`$. Outside this color range the surface density of objects is identical for the inner $`R<3^{}`$ and surrounding $`R>3^{}`$ regions, indicating that the majority of these objects are foreground or background sources. For Peg dSph, $`(VI)_{0,3.5}=1.46\pm 0.02`$ for $`21.1I21.3`$, which yields $`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]=1.35\pm 0.07`$. For Cas dSph, $`(VI)_{0,3.5}=1.43\pm 0.01`$ for $`21.1I21.3`$, which yields $`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]=1.42\pm 0.04`$. These errors are the formal errors of the mean; the overall uncertainty in the mean metallicities is conservatively estimated to be $`\pm 0.3`$ dex due to systematic errors in photometry/calibration. These metallicity estimates are in good agreement with those derived from the standard globular cluster RGB fiducials (Da Costa & Armandroff 1990) shown in Figure 3.

The observed width of the RGB in the Peg dSph and Cas dSph CMDs, $`\delta (VI)0.4`$, corresponds to a metallicity spread of roughly 1 dex. The formal uncertainty in the color measurement (see Fig. 3) is significantly smaller than the observed spread in bright RGB color. The effect of systematic errors (e.g., crowding, flat fielding), however, may be as large as $`\sigma (VI)0.1`$, judging from a comparative analysis of a subset of the data obtained in poorer seeing and at a different CCD orientation with respect to the primary data set. The fact that the RGB widths are similar for Peg dSph and Cas dSph despite the substantial difference in their stellar surface density argues against the widths being caused by crowding-related photometric error. Finally, the apparent flaring of the Cas dSph RGB near its bright tip is strongly suggestive of a spread in \[Fe/H\].

Measurements of the mean metallicity in three radial bins ($`R<1^{}`$, $`1^{}<R<2^{}`$, and $`2^{}<R<3^{}`$), based on a wider $`I`$-magnitude range ($`\mathrm{\Delta }I=0.5`$ mag), places a robust upper limit on any radial metallicity gradient in the galaxies. The variation in median $`(VI)_0`$ color over the inner $`3^{}`$ region is found to be $`<0.03`$ mag corresponding to a variation in mean metallicity of $`<0.05`$ dex, comparable to the formal error in $`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]`$ quoted above. Thus Peg dSph and Cas dSph show no evidence for a radial metallicity gradient, in contrast with what is seen in some dSphs with substantial intermediate-age populations (see Grebel 1997 for a summary).

## 6 Central Surface Brightness

The central surface brightness in the $`V`$ band, measured in a $`40^{\prime \prime }`$-diameter aperture after subtraction of bright foreground stars and corrected for line-of-sight extinction (same procedure as in Armandroff et al. 1998a), is $`\mu _{V,0}24.5`$ and 23.6 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup> for Peg dSph and Cas dSph, respectively; these brightnesses are higher than the observed $`\mu _{V,0}`$ values for the other M31 dSphs (Caldwell et al. 1992; Armandroff et al. 1998a): 24.9 (And I), 24.8 (And II), 25.3 (And III), and 25.2 mag arcsec<sup>-2</sup> (And V). Peg dSph and Cas dSph, along with the newly discovered And V dSph (Armandroff et al. 1998a), follow the general $`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]`$-vs-$`\mu _{V,0}`$ relationship defined by Local Group dwarf ellipticals (dEs), dwarf irregulars, and dSphs (Figure 4, upper panel). Absolute $`B`$-band magnitudes, $`M_B`$, are computed from the total apparent magnitudes, $`B_T`$, estimated by Karachentsev & Karachentseva (1998a). Peg dSph lies on the mean $`M_B`$-vs-$`\mu _{V,0}`$ relation defined by other Local Group dwarf galaxies (Figure 4, lower panel), while Cas dSph is somewhat less luminous than other dwarfs of comparable $`\mu _{V,0}`$.

## 7 Discussion

A summary of the properties of the two new dSphs Peg dSph and Cas dSph derived from Keck imaging is given in Table 1. Their mean metallicities resemble that of the M31 globular cluster system ($`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]=1.2`$—Huchra et al. 1991) and of the intermediate-age/old field populations in M31’s dE companions, but are higher than the $`[\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}]`$ of the other four M31 dSphs (cf. Grebel 1997; Armandroff et al. 1998a). Peg dSph and Cas dSph also have the highest central surface brightnesses of the known M31 dSphs. Their detection may have been hampered by the presence of nearby, bright foreground stars.

Heliocentric distances of $`830\pm 80`$ kpc for Peg dSph and $`760\pm 70`$ kpc for Cas dSph translate into distances of $`280\pm 85`$ kpc and $`215\pm 75`$ kpc from M31, respectively, adopting the Cepheid-based distance of $`770\pm 30`$ kpc to M31 (cf. Freedman & Madore 1990; Holland 1998). Thus Peg dSph and Cas dSph are the most distant of the currently known M31 dSph satellites. The Leo I and Leo II dSphs have comparable distances from the Milky Way, lending credence to Karachentsev & Karachentseva’s (1998a) suggestion that Peg dSph and Cas dSph belong to an extended subsystem of M31 companions together with And V and LGS 3.

The fraction of stars belonging to an intermediate-age population shows a bimodal distribution among the Milky Way dSphs, with small intermediate-age fractions at small Galactocentric distances and dominant fractions at large distances (van den Bergh 1994). By contrast, all the M31 dSph companions appear to have small intermediate-age populations (with the possible exception of And II—Da Costa 1998), even though they are located at comparable distances from their more massive parent galaxy. The possibility of highly eccentric orbits in the M31/M33 system cannot be ruled out. Our planned spectroscopic observations will help constrain the orbits of the M31 dSphs through radial velocity measurements and should lead to more accurate metallicity and abundance spread determinations.

We thank Igor Karachentsev, Valentina Karachentseva, Taft Armandroff, and George Jacoby for helpful discussions, and an anonymous referee for useful comments. Mike Bolte kindly provided IRAF and DAOPHOT scripts for reduction of the Keck data. We are indebted to Peter Stetson for making available his secondary standards, without which a reliable calibration would not have been possible. EKG gratefully acknowledges support by Dennis Zaritsky through NASA LTSA grant NAG-5-3501 and by NASA through grant HF-01108.01-98A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555.