# KUNS-1612hep-th/9910196 Brane Configuration from Monopole Solution in Non-Commutative Super Yang-Mills Theory

## 1 Introduction

The fertile developments in string theory in this half a decade have enabled us to understand various perturbative and non-perturbative phenomena in field theories by geometrical intuitive pictures. This progress in string theory is now beyond the province of reproduction of the result of the field theories, that is, now the string theory has predictive power in various field theories.

One of the most intriguing examples is the 1/4 BPS dyon solution in 4-dimensional $`𝒩=4`$ super Yang-Mills theory (SYM). The study of the $`1/4`$ BPS states in SYM was triggered by the discovery of the stable string network in type IIB string theory . When this string network has its ends on D3-branes, these states preserve 1/4 supersymmetries of the original D3-brane worldvolume theory . After the study from the string theory side, there appeared some works  in which explicit field theoretical solutions for the corresponding solitons were constructed. The properties of the solution favor the string theory interpretation with respect to their $`(p,q)`$-charges, masses and supersymmetries.

Recent topics of the string-theoretical realization of field theories are concerning the space non-commutativity . The non-commutative super Yang-Mills theory (NCSYM) is realized as a decoupling limit of the worldvolume theory on D3-branes in the non-trivial NS-NS 2-form background. Taking advantage of this equivalence, some basic properties of localized objects in this exotic field theory were analyzed . The brane configurations corresponding to the monopoles, dyons and 1/4 BPS dyons were constructed, and they were shown to have the same masses and supersymmetry properties as the ordinary SYM counterparts. One fascinating prediction from this brane technique is that the monopole in the NCSYM has non-locality $`\delta `$ due to the tilt of the D-string suspended between two D3-branes (see fig. 1). Believing that the brane configuration of this figure precisely captures the field theoretical properties, the configuration of the monopole in the NCSYM should reproduce the tilted line, as the eigenvalues of the Higgs field. The ends of the D-string appear to be magnetic charges, hence the field theoretical solution should contain dipole structure.

In this paper, we explicitly solve the BPS equation for the monopole of the NCSYM to the first non-trivial order in $`\theta _{ij}`$ which specifies the non-commutativity. This 1/2 BPS solution has the same mass as the ordinary SYM monopole, in agreement with the prediction by string theory. Solving the non-commutative eigenvalue equation in Sec. 3, we show in Sec. 4 that the solution actually reproduces the tilt of the suspended D-string. Examining the magnetic field, the dipole structure is also found. In the final section, we summarize the paper and give some discussions.

## 2 Non-commutative BPS equation and its solution

The Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield (BPS) monopole solution  of the ordinary SYM is saturating a particular energy bound which is usually called the BPS bound. Since this bound is topologically sensible, the state saturating the bound is stable. Now in the case of the NCSYM, unfortunately the topological argument seems not to be valid due to the high complexity of the $``$-product. Even with this complexity, we can argue a similar mass bound as in the following .

The energy of the system without the electric field is given by

$`E=Tr{\displaystyle d^3x\left[\frac{1}{2}F_{ij}F_{ij}+D_i\mathrm{\Phi }D_i\mathrm{\Phi }\right]},`$ (2.1)   
where we have defined the field strength and the covariant derivative as

$`F_{ij}`$ $`_iA_j_jA_iiA_iA_j+iA_jA_i,`$ (2.2)   
$`D_i\mathrm{\Phi }`$ $`_i\mathrm{\Phi }iA_i\mathrm{\Phi }+i\mathrm{\Phi }A_i.`$ (2.3)   
We have put the Yang-Mills coupling constant $`g_{\mathrm{YM}}`$ equal to unity. The $``$-product is defined with the non-commutativity parameter $`\theta _{ij}`$ by

$`(fg)(x)`$ $`f(x)\mathrm{exp}\left({\displaystyle \frac{i}{2}}\theta _{ij}\stackrel{}{_i}\stackrel{}{_j}\right)g(x)=f(x)g(x)+{\displaystyle \frac{i}{2}}\{f,g\}(x)+O(\theta ^2),`$ (2.4)   
where $`\{f,g\}`$ is the Poisson bracket,

$`\{f,g\}(x)\theta _{ij}_if(x)_jg(x).`$ (2.5)   
We shall take as the gauge group the simplest one $`U(2)`$. Note that the group $`SU(2)`$ is not allowed here since the algebra of any special unitary group is not closed when the multiplication is defined by the $``$-product. The energy (2.1) is bounded below by a surface integral as follows:<sup>*</sup><sup>*</sup>* In deriving the inequality (2.6), we assumed that $`F_{ij}\pm ϵ_{ijk}D_k\mathrm{\Phi }`$ decay sufficiently fast at the infinity so that we can apply the formula $`d^3x(fg)(x)=d^3xf(x)g(x)`$ for these quantities. 

$`E`$ $`={\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}Tr{\displaystyle d^3x\left[ϵ_{ijk}\left(F_{ij}D_k\mathrm{\Phi }+D_k\mathrm{\Phi }F_{ij}\right)+(F_{ij}\pm ϵ_{ijk}D_k\mathrm{\Phi })(F_{ij}\pm ϵ_{ijl}D_l\mathrm{\Phi })\right]}`$ (2.6)   
$`Tr{\displaystyle d^3x_k\left[ϵ_{ijk}\left(F_{ij}\mathrm{\Phi }\right)\right]}.`$   
If the solution of the non-commutative BPS (NCBPS) equation,

$`D_i\mathrm{\Phi }+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}ϵ_{ijk}F_{jk}=0,`$ (2.7)   
has the same asymptotic behavior as the ordinary BPS solution, then the energy remains the same. This fact will be confirmed to the first non-trivial order in $`\theta `$ by explicitly solving the NCBPS equation (2.7).

We shall solve the NCBPS equation (2.7) to $`O(\theta )`$ in the small $`\theta `$ expansion. Let us express the gauge field as

$`A_i\left(A_i^a+a_i^a\right){\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}\sigma _a+\left(A_i^0+a_i^0\right){\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}\text{ }\text{ ̵},`$ (2.8)   
where the upper (lower) case component fields are of $`O(\theta ^0)`$ ($`O(\theta ^1)`$). The scalar $`\mathrm{\Phi }`$ is expressed in a similar manner. First, the $`O(\theta ^0)`$ part of the NCBPS equation (2.7) is nothing but the ordinary BPS equation, and we adopt the well-known BPS monopole solution as the $`O(\theta ^0)`$ part of the solution:

$`\mathrm{\Phi }^a={\displaystyle \frac{x^a}{r}}F(r),A_i^a=ϵ_{aij}{\displaystyle \frac{x_j}{r}}W(r),\mathrm{\Phi }^0=A_i^0=0,`$ (2.9)   
where the the functions appearing in the solution are

$`F(r)C\mathrm{coth}(Cr){\displaystyle \frac{1}{r}},W(r){\displaystyle \frac{1}{r}}{\displaystyle \frac{C}{\mathrm{sinh}(Cr)}}.`$ (2.10)   
The dimensionful parameter $`C`$ determines the mass scale of the monopole. For later convenience, we present the asymptotic behavior of these functions:

$`F(r)=C{\displaystyle \frac{1}{r}}+O(e^{Cr}),W(r)={\displaystyle \frac{1}{r}}+O(e^{Cr}).`$ (2.11)   
Next let us proceed to the $`O(\theta )`$ part of the NCBPS equation (2.7). Plugging (2.8) into the NCBPS equation (2.7) and taking the $`O(\theta )`$ part, the $`U(1)`$ component reads

$`_i\phi ^0+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}\{A_i^a,\mathrm{\Phi }^a\}+ϵ_{ijk}\left(_ja_k^0+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}}\{A_j^a,A_k^a\}\right)=0,`$ (2.12)   
and does not contain the $`SU(2)`$ fields $`(a_i^a,\phi ^a)`$. On the other hand, the $`SU(2)`$ component of the $`O(\theta )`$ part of the NCBPS equation decouples from the $`U(1)`$ fields, and is in fact the linearized equation for the fluctuation $`(a_i^a,\phi ^a)`$ obtained from the ordinary BPS equation. Since any solution for $`(a_i^a,\phi ^a)`$ corresponds to a $`\theta `$-dependent gauge transformation on the BPS solution (2.9), we take $`a_i^a=\phi ^a=0`$ hereafter.

Now our task is to solve the equation (2.12). The ansatz for the BPS monopole solution (2.9) was the covariance under the rotation of the diagonal $`SO(3)`$ subgroup of $`SO(3)_{\mathrm{gauge}}\times SO(3)_{\mathrm{space}}`$. In order to solve eq. (2.12), we put the following ansatz for the $`U(1)`$ fields $`(a_i^0,\phi ^0)`$ respecting the covariance under the generalized rotation, in which we rotate also the parameter $`\theta _{ij}`$: The generalized rotational covariance for $`a_i^0`$ allows two other terms with different structures, $`ϵ_{ijk}\theta _{jk}`$ and $`x_iϵ_{jkl}\theta _{jk}x_l`$. However, eq. (2.12) implies the vanishing of these two terms. 

$`a_i^0=\theta _{ij}x_jA(r),\phi ^0=\theta _{ij}ϵ_{ijk}x_kB(r),`$ (2.13)   
where $`A(r)`$ and $`B(r)`$ are functions of $`r`$ to be determined. Putting these ansatz (2.13) and the explicit forms of the BPS solution (2.9) into the differential equation (2.12), we obtain the following two equations as the coefficients of different tensor structures:

$`A+B+rB^{}+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4r^2}}W(W+2F)=0,`$ (2.14)   
$`A^{}+2B^{}{\displaystyle \frac{d}{dr}}\left[{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4r^2}}W(W+2F)\right]=0.`$ (2.15)   
The solution to eqs. (2.14) and (2.15) is given by

$`A(r)={\displaystyle \frac{1}{4r^2}}W(W+2F)2{\displaystyle \frac{c_1}{r^3}}+c_2,B(r)={\displaystyle \frac{c_1}{r^3}}+c_2,`$ (2.16)   
with two arbitrary constant parameters, $`c_1`$ and $`c_2`$. The parts in (2.16) containing these constant parameters are actually solution to the homogeneous part of eq. (2.12):

$`_i\phi ^0+ϵ_{ijk}_ja_k^0=0.`$ (2.17)   
Since the $`c_2`$ part of the scalar $`\phi ^0`$ diverges at the infinity, we put $`c_2=0`$. As for the $`c_1`$ part, a careful substitution into the left hand side of eq. (2.17) gives in fact a term proportional to $`_i_i(1/r)=4\pi \delta ^3(𝒓)`$. Hence the $`c_1`$ part is not a solution at the origin, and we shall also put $`c_1=0`$. Finally the desired solution of the equation (2.12) is

$`a_i^0=\theta _{ij}x_j{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4r^2}}W(W+2F),\phi ^0=0.`$ (2.18)   
Note in particular that the scalar field receives no correction to this order. Since the whole solution has the same leading asymptotic behavior as the BPS solution (2.9), we find that the non-commutativity does not change the mass of the monopole.

## 3 Non-commutative eigenvalue equation

The configuration of the D-string suspended between two parallel D3-branes is described by the deformation of the surface of the D3-branes in the spirit of the BIon (Born-Infeld soliton) physics . The extent of this deformation of the D3-brane surface is given by the eigenvalues of the scalar field on the D3-branes. We saw in the previous section that there is no additional contribution of $`O(\theta )`$ in the scalar field configuration. However, since we are now dealing with the theory with the $``$-product, the eigenvalue problem should be different from that in the usual commutative case. In this section, we see that the $`O(\theta )`$ terms are actually generated in the eigenvalues of the scalar field.

We propose that the eigenvalue equation for a hermitian matrix valued function $`M`$ to be considered in the non-commutative case is

$`M𝒗=\lambda 𝒗,`$ (3.1)   
where $`𝒗`$ and $`\lambda `$ are the eigenvector and the eigenvalue, respectively. Though there are other candidates for the non-commutative eigenvalue equation, the present one (3.1) has advantages over the others in various respects as we shall see in this and the final sections.

For solving (3.1) to $`O(\theta )`$, let us make the expansion

$`M=M_0+M_1,𝒗=𝒗_0+𝒗_1,\lambda =\lambda _0+\lambda _1,`$ (3.2)   
where the subscript number specifies the order of $`\theta `$. Then, the $`O(\theta ^0)`$ part of (3.1) is $`M_0𝒗_0=\lambda _0𝒗_0`$, and the $`O(\theta )`$ part reads

$`M_0𝒗_1+M_1𝒗_0+{\displaystyle \frac{i}{2}}\{M_0,𝒗_0\}=\lambda _0𝒗_1+\lambda _1𝒗_0+{\displaystyle \frac{i}{2}}\{\lambda _0,𝒗_0\}.`$ (3.3)   
Multiplying $`𝒗_0^{}`$ from the left, we obtain the formula which gives the $`O(\theta )`$ part of the eigenvalue:

$`\lambda _1={\displaystyle \frac{1}{𝒗_0^{}𝒗_0}}\left({\displaystyle \frac{i}{2}}𝒗_0^{}\{M_0\lambda _0\text{ }\text{ ̵},𝒗_0\}+𝒗_0^{}M_1𝒗_0\right).`$ (3.4)   
In view of the application to the present NCBPS solution, let us consider the particular case with

$`M_0=m_0(𝒓)\widehat{x}_a\sigma _a(\widehat{x}_ix_i/r),M_1=0,`$ (3.5)   
and hence $`\lambda _0=\pm m_0(𝒓)`$ and $`\widehat{x}_a\sigma _a𝒗_0=\pm 𝒗_0`$. Then, eq. (3.4) is calculated to give

$`\lambda _1={\displaystyle \frac{i}{2𝒗_0^{}𝒗_0}}{\displaystyle \frac{m_0(𝒓)}{r}}\theta _{ij}\left(𝒗_0^{}\sigma _i_j𝒗_0\widehat{x}_i𝒗_0^{}_j𝒗_0\right)={\displaystyle \frac{m_0(𝒓)}{2r^2}}\theta _i\widehat{x}_i,`$ (3.6)   
with $`\theta _i(1/2)ϵ_{ijk}\theta _{jk}`$. Note that $`\lambda _1`$ (3.6) is independent of the sign of $`\lambda _0`$. We obtained the last expression of (3.6) using the explicit form $`𝒗_0=(x_1ix_2,\pm rx_3)^\mathrm{T}`$. However, the general formula for $`\lambda _1`$, eq. (3.4), is in fact invariant under the local phase and scale transformation of $`𝒗_0`$ due to the identity $`𝒗_0^{}\{M_0\lambda _0\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ ̵},f\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ ̵}\}𝒗_0=0`$ valid for any $`f(𝒓)`$. This corresponds to the fact that the eigenvalue $`\lambda `$ of (3.1) is invariant under the right multiplication $`𝒗𝒗h`$ for an arbitrary $`h(𝒓)`$. We shall discuss the gauge transformation property of the eigenvalues in the final section.

Let us evaluate various eigenvalues of the system using the formula (3.6). First, the scalar eigenvalues are obtained by substituting $`m_0(𝒓)=F(r)/2`$ as

$`\lambda _\mathrm{\Phi }=\pm {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}F(r){\displaystyle \frac{\theta _i\widehat{x}_i}{4r^2}}F(r)+O(\theta ^2).`$ (3.7)   
Next, we shall consider the eigenvalues of the magnetic field $`B_i(1/2)ϵ_{ijk}F_{jk}`$ near the infinity $`r\mathrm{}`$. The magnetic field itself is given from the solution (2.18) as Since the definition of the magnetic field contains the $``$-product in itself, we should calculate also the Poisson bracket term. However, this term contributes only to the $`O(1/r^4)`$ part in (3.8).

$`B_i={\displaystyle \frac{\widehat{x}_i}{2r^2}}\widehat{x}_a\sigma _a+{\displaystyle \frac{C}{2r^3}}\left(\delta _{ij}3\widehat{x}_i\widehat{x}_j\right)\theta _j\text{ }\text{ ̵}+O\left({\displaystyle \frac{1}{r^4}}\right).`$ (3.8)   
We would like to evaluate the $`O(\theta )`$ contribution to the eigenvalues by putting $`m_0(𝒓)=\widehat{x}_i/2r^2`$ and $`M_1(𝒓,\theta )=C\left(\delta _{ij}3\widehat{x}_i\widehat{x}_j\right)\theta _j\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ ̵}/2r^3`$. Since $`m_0(𝒓)`$ in this case is $`O(1/r^2)`$, using the formula (3.6), the order of the correction to the eigenvalues from this part is found as $`O(1/r^4)`$. Thus near the infinity, the $`O(1/r^3)`$ part of the eigenvalues of the magnetic field is saturated by $`m_1`$.

## 4 Interpretation of the eigenvalues

In this section, we shall see how the eigenvalues (3.7) and (3.8) reproduce the brane configuration depicted in fig. 1. In the brane picture, the end of the D-string is seen as a magnetic charge in a single D3-brane worldvolume theory. The prediction from the brane configuration is that the magnetic charge on each end of the D-string is actually moved in different directions between the upper and lower D3-branes, as shown in fig. 1. This shift is specified by the spatial vector $`\delta _i`$.

Now, the eigenvalues of the magnetic field (3.8) indicate that the $`U(1)`$ part of the magnetic field exhibits a dipole structure. This structure is exactly the one expected from the brane picture above. Noting that the zero-th order solution (2.9) represents $`1/2`$ charge on the upper D3-brane and $`1/2`$ charge on the lower, it is easy to derive the non-locality $`\delta _i`$ as

$`\delta _i=C\theta _i.`$ (4.1)   
This result verifies the prediction of ref.  with the identification $`C=U`$.

Although the magnetic charges are expected to indicate only the locations of the ends of the D-string, the eigenvalues of the scalar field must reproduce not only the locations of the ends but also the slope of the D-string. In fact, the asymptotic behavior of the eigenvalues (3.7) is given using (2.11) as

$`\lambda _\mathrm{\Phi }=\pm {\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}}{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2r}}+\left({\displaystyle \frac{C}{4r^2}}+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4r^3}}\right)\theta _i\widehat{x}_i+O(e^{Cr})`$   
$`=\pm {\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}}{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}\left|x_i\left({\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}}{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2r}}\right)\theta _i\right|^1+O(e^{Cr}).`$ (4.2)   
Eq. (4.2) implies first that in the upper and the lower D3-brane the end of the D-string sits at $`x_i=C\theta _i/2`$ and $`x_i=C\theta _i/2`$, respectively. Hence the non-locality is precisely given by $`\delta _i=C\theta _i`$, in agreement with the result (4.1) from the magnetic field. Secondly, in order to read off the slope of the D-string from (4.2), we rewrite it as

$`\lambda _\mathrm{\Phi }=\pm {\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}}{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}\left|x_i\lambda _\mathrm{\Phi }\theta _i\right|^1+O(e^{Cr}).`$ (4.3)   
This equation means that, for a given value of $`\lambda _\mathrm{\Phi }`$, the corresponding worldvolume coordinate is located on a sphere with its center at $`x_i=\lambda _\mathrm{\Phi }\theta _i`$. Interpreting the trajectory of the center as the D-string, our analysis reproduces precisely the tilt of the suspended D-string.

In fig. 2 we present the curves of the eigenvalues of the scalar field. The thin straight lines represent the brane configuration of fig. 1. The dashed curves denote the eigenvalues of the scalar field with $`\theta =0`$. Comparing these with the bold curves representing the eigenvalues (3.7) with $`\theta 0`$, we can read off the simple brane configuration of ref. . (The reason why the bold curves are cutoff for small $`|x_1|`$ in fig. 2 is that the $`O(\theta )`$ term of the scalar eigenvalues (3.7) are actually divergent at the origin $`r=0`$. We shall discuss this problem in the next section.)

## 5 Summary and discussion

In this paper, we solved the BPS equation of the NCSYM to the first non-trivial order in $`\theta `$. Evaluating the eigenvalues of the solution, we explicitly showed that the solution exhibits the brane configuration of the tilted D-string, given in ref. . Magnetic field has the dipole structure, and the scalar field is also shifted to reproduce the tilted trajectory of the D-string.

Some comments are in order. Our first comment is on the gauge transformation property of the eigenvalue $`\lambda `$ in our non-commutative eigenvalue equation (3.1). Of course, the eigenvalue $`\lambda `$ in eq. (3.1) is never strictly invariant under the local gauge transformation of $`M`$,

$$MU^1MU,$$
(5.1)   
where $`U^1`$ is the inverse of $`U`$ with respect to the $``$-product, $`UU^1=U^1U=\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ ̵}`$. However, we can show that the eigenvalue has a fairly nice property under (5.1). Consider an infinitesimal gauge transformation $`\delta _ϵ`$ on $`M`$ with $`U=\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ ̵}+iϵ`$ ($`ϵ^{}=ϵ`$),

$$\delta _ϵM=i(MϵϵM).$$
(5.2)   
Letting $`\delta _ϵ`$ act on (3.1) and $``$-multiplying the resultant equation by $`𝒗^{}`$ from the left, we obtain

$`𝒗^{}\delta _ϵ\lambda 𝒗=i𝒗^{}(\lambda ϵϵ\lambda )𝒗.`$ (5.3)   
Taking the $`O(\theta )`$ part of (5.3) and using $`\delta _ϵ\lambda _0=0`$, $`\delta _ϵ\lambda _1`$ is given as

$$\delta _ϵ\lambda _1=𝒗_0^{}\{ϵ,\lambda _0\}𝒗_0,$$
(5.4)   
for a normalized $`𝒗_0`$. Eq. (5.4) implies that, at least to $`O(\theta )`$, the gauge transformation corresponds to a coordinate transformation on the eigenvalue $`\lambda (𝒓)`$. In the $`U(2)`$ case with $`ϵ(𝒓)=ϵ_a(𝒓)\sigma _a+ϵ_0(𝒓)\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\text{ ̵}`$, the form of the coordinate transformation is $`\delta _ϵx_i=\theta _{ij}\left(_jϵ_0+𝒗_0^{}\sigma _a𝒗_0_jϵ_a\right)`$.

Therefore, we have shown that the eigenvalue of (3.1) for $`M`$ and the one for $`U^1MU`$ are related by a coordinate transformation on the D3-branes and hence are physically equivalent, at least to the first non-trivial order in $`\theta `$. Recalling also that the eigenvalue of (3.1) is independent of the choice of the eigenvector and that the scalar eigenvalue (3.7) has an invariance under the simultaneous rotation of $`x_i`$ and $`\theta _{ij}`$, the eigenvalue equation (3.1) we have adopted is a satisfactory one. These good properties, in particular, the gauge transformation property of $`\lambda `$, are expected to persist to higher orders in $`\theta `$.

Our second comment is on another type of non-commutative eigenvalue equation,

$`M𝒗=𝒗\lambda ,`$ (5.5)   
where, compared with (3.1), $`𝒗`$ and $`\lambda `$ are interchanged on the right hand side. Eq. (5.5) has a property that the eigenvalue $`\lambda `$ is invariant under the gauge transformation (5.1) of $`M`$. However, for a given $`M`$ the eigenvalues are not unique and do depend on the choice of the eigenvectors $`𝒗`$. What is worse, in the analysis similar to those in Sec. 3 by adopting (5.5), we can show that it is impossible to obtain the the scalar eigenvalues possessing an invariance under the simultaneous rotation of $`x_i`$ and $`\theta _{ij}`$. These are the reasons why we did not adopt (5.5).

Our final comment is concerning the singular nature of the scalar eigenvalues (3.7) at the origin $`r=0`$. Since we have adopted the eigenvalue equation (3.1), the matrix whose diagonal entries are these eigenvalues is no longer a solution of the BPS equation. Hence although the eigenvalues (4.2) diverge at the origin, the energy of the configuration is still finite. We would need a technique beyond the expansion in powers of $`\theta `$ to dissolve the singularity at the origin.

Our analysis in this paper can straightforwardly be applied to the case of dyons. We obtain a result consistent with the non-locality predicted by . It would be an interesting subject to study the non-commutative 1/4 BPS dyons using our formulation.

## Note added

While writing this paper, we became aware of the paper  which has an overlap concerning the solution of Sec. 2.

## Acknowledgments

We would like to thank A. Hashimoto, T. Hirayama, S. Imai, H. Kawai, I. Kishimoto, T. Kugo, Y. Okawa and S. Terashima for valuable discussions and comments. This work is supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (#3160, #09640346, #4633). The work of K. H. and S. M. is supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science under the Predoctoral Research Program.