# High Temperature Symmetry Breaking, SUSY Flat Directions, and the Monopole Problem

## Abstract

Supersymmetric flat directions allow a generic counterexample to the phenomenon of symmetry restoration at high temperatures. We show that (exponentially) large VEVs can be developed along these directions through temperature-induced ‘dimensional transmutation’. A minimum with broken gauge charges (e.g. electric charge) can exist at arbitrarily high temperatures. In such a scenario magnetic monopoles are never formed, independent of whether inflation occurs before or after the GUT phase transition, or whether it occurs at all.

It is well know that many supersymmetric theories and in particular the MSSM, contain non-compact vacuum flat directions. These are certain trajectories in field space along which the potential vanishes, no matter how large the expectation values of the associated scalar fields are. With unbroken supersymmetry these are flat to all orders in perturbation theory. $`D`$-flat directions can be parameterized with various holomorphic gauge invariants constructed out of chiral superfields. Depending on the structure of the superpotential, some of these invariants (or some combinations of them) can also drop-out of the $`F`$-flatness conditions. The space of all their possible values then will define a continuous vacuum manifold, sometimes referred to as a moduli space. Each of the independent holomorphic invariants accounts for a complex dimensionality one in the moduli space. For example, consider a flat direction parametrized by an invariant constructed out of $`n`$ chiral superfields $`\varphi _1\varphi _1\mathrm{}\varphi _n`$. Far away from the origin, we can define a canonically normalized (at the tree level) flat direction field $`\varphi =c(\varphi _1\varphi _1\mathrm{}\varphi _n)^{1/n}`$ (where $`c`$ is a normalization constant). At any point along the flat direction the masses of physical particles coupled to $`\varphi `$ are $`\varphi `$. Expanding about any of these vacua $`\varphi \varphi +\varphi `$ we can ask what is the effective low energy theory for the field $`\varphi `$. By definition, $`\varphi `$ is massless and has no self-potential. The crucial point is that all the particles coupled to it (via renormalizable couplings) get masses $`\varphi `$ and can be integrated out. $`\varphi `$ then can couple to the rest of the particles only through $`\varphi ^1`$-suppressed operators. Thus, at energies $`<<\varphi `$ the flat direction field is effectively decoupled from the rest of the world! This simple fact will play a crucial role in what follows.

What is the thermal history of the flat directions? Since finite temperature effectively breaks supersymmetry, the flat directions are lifted at high $`T`$. Usually it is assumed that at high temperatures, the flat direction fields get confined to the origin where all the symmetries are restored. This goes in accordance with a general belief that spontaneously broken gauge (or global) symmetries must be restored at high $`T`$. In non-supersymmetric field theories counter-examples to this phenomenon are well known, and it has also been shown that symmetry non-restoration takes place in various physically motivated minimal extensions of the standard model. The effect was also shown to persist by renormalization group-improved methods  and by lattice calculations .

On the other hand, it is usually assumed that symmetry non-restoration is impossible in supersymmetric theories. This may have to do with various no go theorems  according to which in supersymmetric theories an interacting scalar field always gets a $`positive`$ mass-square $`T^2`$ and thus its expectation value will vanish. While this statement is correct for small field values, it does not preclude the existence of other minima either for $`\varphi >>T`$, or if the field in question has only non-renormalizable couplings.<sup>*</sup><sup>*</sup>* In the present paper we will not be interested in scenarios which rely on a non-zero external charge density As it is argued below it turns out that such minima indeed exist in many cases of physical and cosmological interest. Flat directions, in some sense, make the effect of symmetry non-restoration more generic then in non-supersymmetric theories, where such flat vacua are absent. In particular we show that high temperature corrections can provide a runaway potential for the flat direction and induce an exponentially large expectation value. Crudely the condition is that the gauge couplings of the light fields that are in thermal equilibrium should dominate over their Yukawa couplings to the heavy states that are getting masses from the flat direction field. In realistic theories many flat directions have this property and therefore the early history of the Universe may be very much different from what one would otherwise naively guess. Our effect is reminescent of Witten’s upside-down hierarcy, in zero-temperature supersymmetric theories where a tiny supersymmetry breaking can induce an exponentially large VEV along the (would be) flat direction provided certain conditions are met.

The standard conclusion about the inevitability of symmetry restoration is based on the following assumptions:

1) large field values $`\varphi >>T`$ are removed by some (zero temperature) potential, which grows unbounded for these large $`\varphi `$.

2) The scalar field in question $`\varphi `$ is in thermal equilibrium.

Obviously one or both of these conditions are violated if $`\varphi `$ is a flat direction field. As mentioned above, if one moves far enough ( so that $`\varphi >>T`$) along the flat direction, all the particles directly interacting with the field $`\varphi `$ (call them $`Q`$-particles) become superheavy and $`\varphi `$ decouples from the rest of the light particle bath in thermal equilibrium (call them $`q`$-particles). What is the impact of the thermal bath on $`\varphi `$ in such a situation? Although light $`q`$-particles, by definition, are decoupled from $`\varphi `$ at the tree level, they can couple to heavy $`Q`$-states. After integrating out these $`Q`$-particles, the parameters of the effective low energy theory, e.g. such as masses and couplings of $`q`$-quanta, will depend on the masses of the heavy states and thus on $`\varphi `$. In the other words the expectation value of the flat direction field appears as the course graining scale for the low energy theory. This induces a dependence of the free energy on $`\varphi `$. Depending on the precise nature of the interaction, the resulting effective potential may force $`\varphi >>T`$. This is the central observation of the present paper.

We will now illustrate this general phenomenon in detail using several toy models.

Let $`\varphi `$ be a flat direction field charged under some gauge symmetry, with corresponding vector superfields $`Q_a`$. At the moment, we will assume that $`\varphi `$ has no couplings in the superpotential. Let $`q_\alpha `$ be some light particles charged under the same gauge symmetry. For large values of $`\varphi `$ the gauge symmetry is broken and $`Q_a`$ get masses $`\varphi `$. The effective low energy theory then consists of the massless $`\varphi `$-quanta plus some light $`q`$-particles. Now, integrating out the $`Q_a`$-states we get effective $`\varphi `$-suppressed non-renormalizable couplings between $`\varphi `$ and the $`q`$-states. These interactions appear in the Kähler metric and at one loop they have a form

$$K(\varphi )_q^qqq^{}=qq^{}\left(1+\frac{g^2C}{16\pi ^2}\mathrm{log}\frac{\varphi \varphi ^{}}{M_P^2}\right)$$
(1)   
(the $`\varphi `$-independent part is assumed to be rescaled). Here $`C`$ is a (positive) Casimir operator and $`M_P`$ is the ultraviolate cut-off. The subscript denotes a derivative with respect to the superfields. This result can be simply understood as the $`\varphi `$-dependent wave function renormalization of the light fields. The low energy theories at the different vacua of the flat direction are identical, modulo masses of the integrated out heavy states. Thus these theories can be thought as one and the same theory at different energy scales $`\varphi `$. Changing $`\varphi `$ is then equivalent to changing the wave function renormalization. Now let us consider this theory at a temperature $`T`$. We will always be interested in the region $`\varphi >>T`$. For these values the contribution to the free energy from the heavy gauge fields is exponentially suppressed $`T^4\mathrm{e}^{\frac{\varphi }{T}}`$ and can be neglected. The purely bosonic part of the action can then be written as

$$K(\varphi )_q^q_\mu q^\mu q^{}K(\varphi )_q^{q1}|W_q|^2$$
(2)   
Qualitatively the generated runaway potential for the flat direction field can be understood as a result of the operators $`^\mu q^{}_\mu q`$ and $`|W_q|^2`$ having nonzero thermal averages at temperature $`T`$. The induced potential for $`\varphi `$ favors larger $`K(\varphi )_q^q`$ and thus larger $`\varphi `$. In fact $`\varphi `$ will grow at least until the log becomes of the order of one, at which point the given approximation breaks down and higher loop corrections must be included. Thus $`\varphi `$ will be exponentially large in this picture.

To see more explicitly that the potential pushes $`\varphi `$ to grow, we can expand the Kähler term in terms of small perturbation of the absolute value around any point $`|\varphi ||\varphi |+\rho `$ and keep terms in the effective potential linear in $`\rho `$ (note that $`\rho `$ may have either sign). The constant part of the metric can be trivially absorbed in the wave function renormalization. The resulting non-derivative couplings of $`\rho `$ have the form:

$$(\mathrm{negative}\mathrm{constant})\frac{\rho }{|\varphi |}|W_q|^2+\mathrm{higher}\mathrm{terms}$$
(3)   
At high temperature this interaction generates a tadpole for $`\rho `$. To see this fix $`\rho `$ as an external leg and let $`q`$-propagate in the loop. Since by assumption $`q`$ is zero, only loops with no external $`q`$-legs contribute. The result can be extracted from the computation done in . Take for example $`W=\lambda q^3/3`$, then the $`q`$-independent contribution is given by two-loop ”butterfly” diagrams 

$$(\mathrm{negative}\mathrm{constant})\frac{\rho }{|\varphi |}\frac{\lambda ^2T^4}{48}$$
(4)   
Thus $`\rho `$ wants to grow positive at any point of the trajectory: there is a runaway potential for $`\varphi `$.

Alternatively, the shape of the potential can be found via a straightforward calculation  Borut Bajc and Goran Senjanovic suggested this approach using a simple example with non-renormalizable Kähler metric. We thank them for this suggestion.. Here we will generalise this approach and argue that our result can be simply interpreted as a $`\varphi `$-dependent renormalization of coupling constants of the fields in thermal equilibrium. Treat $`\varphi `$ as a constant background field and go to the canonical basis for the other fields by rescaling the Kähler metric: $`q\sqrt{K(\varphi )_q^q}q`$. In terms of these fields the interaction part in the potential now becomes:

$$\lambda (\varphi )^2|q|^4$$
(5)   
where

$$\lambda (\varphi )^2=\frac{\lambda ^2}{K(\varphi )_q^{q3}}$$
(6)   
can be treated as a renormalized $`\varphi `$-dependent coupling constant. Computing the leading diagrams without extra $`q`$-legs, we get the following effective potential for $`\varphi `$

$$\lambda (\varphi )^2\frac{T^4}{48}$$
(7)   
This dependence creates an effective potential for the background field $`\varphi `$ even if its quanta are not in a thermal equilibrium. The minimization of the free energy pushes $`K(\varphi )_q^q`$ to be as large as possible. In our case $`K(\varphi )_q^q`$ is obtained by the one-loop integration of the heavy vector superfields of mass $`\varphi `$ and it grows only if $`\varphi `$ grows. Thus the potential forces $`\varphi `$ to grow.

Up to now we were ignoring possible Yukawa couplings of $`\varphi `$ and were assuming that the only heavy particles contributing to the wave function renormalization of the light $`q`$-quanta were gauge superfields. Let us consider what would be the effect of heavy chiral superfields in the analogous situation. For this we have to assume that $`\varphi `$ couples to some particles in the superpotential, which also couple to $`q`$ and thus renormalize its Kähler metric. Let $`Q`$ be such a state and take the superpotential to have the following form:

$$W=h\varphi Q^2+yQ^2q+\lambda \frac{q^3}{3}$$
(8)   
(where $`h`$ and $`y`$ are coupling constants). Now when we go along the flat direction $`\varphi \mathrm{}`$, both the gauge fields and also the $`Q`$\- particles gain masses $`\varphi `$ and should be integrated out. However, in the one-loop corrected Kähler for the low energy fields the latter particles’ contribution appears with an opposite sign:

$$K_q^q=1+\frac{g^2Cy^2C^{}}{16\pi ^2}\mathrm{log}\frac{\varphi \varphi ^{}}{M_P^2}$$
(9)   
($`C^{}`$ is a positive number, and $`g`$ and $`C`$ are defined as before). This means that the slope of the high-$`T`$ effective potential depends on the relative strength of the gauge and Yukawa couplings. $`\varphi `$ will grow if the gauge coupling is strong enough. However, along the flat direction $`g`$ and $`y`$ must be understood as the running coupling constants at scale $`\varphi `$. As a result the coefficient of the logarithm may change sign at some point $`\varphi >>T`$ where its overall magnitude is still small enough so that perturbation theory can be trusted. One may conclude then that that a stable minimum develops. The resulting value of $`\varphi `$ is in general exponentially large with respect to $`T`$. Thus exponentially large VEVs can be induced at high $`T`$ by dimensional transmutation!

In general there can be other temperature-independent (but model-dependent) stabilising factors, like soft terms and or the $`M_P`$-suppressed interactions either in the Kähler metric or in the superpotential. These require separate study in each case. Some of these issues will arise shortly when we discuss cosmological implications.

The high $`T`$ symmetry breaking by the flat direction field can have two immediate implications. First this can provide a desired initial condition for the Affleck-Dine baryogenesis scenario. More importantly perhaps it can cure the monopole problem. In the present context this mechanism should be viewed as a variant of the canonical solution via symmetry non-restoration, although the expectation values in the present case are much larger then in the canonical non-restoration scenario. ( For alternative ideas for non-inflationary solutions of the monopole problem see).

The simplest specific example occurs when $`\varphi `$ is an electrically charged flat direction, but not the GUT adjoint (which is assumed not to have a flat potential). In this scenario (as in the standard one) the VEV of the GUT Higgs vanishes above the temperature $`10^{16}`$GeV. However, some of the gauge charges remain broken by the $`\varphi `$ VEV. For instance, in the minimal SUSY $`SU(5)`$ $`\varphi `$ can be a flat direction parameterized by the invariant

$$\varphi ^3=\overline{5}^\alpha 10^\beta \overline{5}^\gamma $$
(10)   
where the $`10\mathrm{and}\overline{5}`$ are matter superfields and $`\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma `$ are generation indexes. These break the $`SU(5)`$ gauge group down to $`SU(3)_c`$.

The resulting cosmological scenario is as follows: as discussed above, at high temperature there is a huge potential barrier $`T^4`$ separating the broken and unbroken phases. If the Universe ‘starts out’ in the phase with broken electric charge, it can easily persist there all the way until the GUT phase transition that occurs around $`TM_{GUT}`$. At this moment the adjoint Higgs gets a VEV, but monopoles are never formed, since the Universe is superconducting and magnetic fields are completely screened. Then the temperature gradually drops and the barrier between the superconducting and the normal phases disappears and the flat direction can relax to the origin therefore restoring electromagnetism. The important point is that the flat directions must be able to relax to the origin. This is an obvious requirement and has to do nothing with the monopole problem. In general, this will be the case since the flat directions are lifted by the supersymmetry breaking soft term $`m^2\varphi \varphi ^{}`$ at zero temperature (usually of order TeV). Obviously for the charged and colored superfields these soft terms must be positive so that the flat directions are stabilized at the origin at zero temperature. However, at high temperature the effect of the soft terms is negligible and the potential is dominated by the thermal corrections that induce a large VEV for the field in question. At what temperatures the non-thermal soft terms become important is, in general, model dependent, but even in the most unoptimistic cases this will not happen before the GUT phase transition. Thus the desired suppression of monopole-formation will persist. In general, depending on the explicit scenario for supersymmetry breaking the soft masses may have a nontrivial temperature and $`\varphi `$\- dependence.

For example, assume that, as in conventional scenarios, the supersymmetry breaking takes place dynamically, due to instanton effects of some strongly coupled gauge group. Gaugino condensation in the hidden sector is an example. Then the soft terms may vanish at temperatures above the supersymmetry-breaking scale in the hidden sector ($`T_h10^{11}`$GeV or so for the gravity mediated scenarios) provided the two sectors have roughly the same temperatures. This is reasonable to expect if they were in equilibrium at some $`T>>T_h`$. In such a case the gaugino condensate can vanish above the deconfinement temperature in the hidden sector and the potential will be governed by the thermal supersymmetry breaking effects as discussed above. If the hidden sector was never in equilibrium, or if the supersymmetry-breaking in this sector is not dynamical but hard, then the soft terms may remain intact at arbitrarily high temperatures. Even in this most unnatural case the zero temperature potential can take over only below $`T\sqrt{M_Pm}`$. The charge breaking minimum gets destabilized below this temperature and $`\varphi `$ starts coherent oscillations about the true minimum, just as in the Affleck-Dine scenario. Since this temperature is well below the GUT phase transition temperature, monopoles are not produced.

The scenario we have outlined can work in the minimal supersymmetric $`SU(5)`$ model without postulating any extra physics. Whether or not it is responsible for resolving the monopole problem, the generic phenomenon of symmetry non-restoration at high temperature in supersymmetric models may be of some importance.

Acknowledgements: We thank B. Bajc and G. Senjanovic for very useful discussions. We also thank A. Linde for valuable discussions on the different version of this phenonmenon and G. Gabadadze and V. Rubakov for comments. LMK’s research is supported in part by the DOE. LMK would like to thank the theory group at CERN for their hospitality during the early phases of this work.