abstract: The 2012 United States state legislative elections were held on November 6, 2012, for 86 state legislative chambers in 44 states. Across the fifty states, approximately 65 percent of all upper house seats and 85 percent of all lower house seats were up for election. Nine legislative chambers in the five permanently-inhabited U.S. territories and the federal district of Washington, D.C. also held elections. The elections took place concurrently with several other federal, state, and local elections, including the presidential election, U.S. Senate elections, U.S. House elections, and gubernatorial elections. 13 chambers shifted party control, as Republicans had gained many chambers in the 2010 mid-term elections, and this was seen as a modest rebalancing. Democrats won the Colorado House of Representatives, Maine Senate, Maine House of Representatives, Minnesota Senate, Minnesota House of Representatives, New Hampshire House of Representatives, and Oregon House of Representatives that was previously tied. Meanwhile, Republicans won the Wisconsin Senate which was briefly under Democratic control after multiple recall elections earlier in the year, and both chambers of the Arkansas legislature for the first time since 1874. The Alaska Senate went from a Democratic-led coalition to Republican control. The Washington Senate went from Democratic control to a Republican-led coalition, and the New York State Senate went from Republican control to a Republican-led coalition.

text:
# 2012 United States state legislative elections

The **2012 United States state legislative elections** were held on November 6, 2012, for 86 state legislative chambers in 44 states. Across the fifty states, approximately 65 percent of all upper house seats and 85 percent of all lower house seats were up for election. Nine legislative chambers in the five permanently-inhabited U.S. territories and the federal district of Washington, D.C. also held elections. The elections took place concurrently with several other federal, state, and local elections, including the presidential election, U.S. Senate elections, U.S. House elections, and gubernatorial elections.

13 chambers shifted party control, as Republicans had gained many chambers in the 2010 mid-term elections, and this was seen as a modest rebalancing.

Democrats won the Colorado House of Representatives, Maine Senate, Maine House of Representatives, Minnesota Senate, Minnesota House of Representatives, New Hampshire House of Representatives, and Oregon House of Representatives that was previously tied. Meanwhile, Republicans won the Wisconsin Senate which was briefly under Democratic control after multiple recall elections earlier in the year, and both chambers of the Arkansas legislature for the first time since 1874. The Alaska Senate went from a Democratic-led coalition to Republican control. The Washington Senate went from Democratic control to a Republican-led coalition, and the New York State Senate went from Republican control to a Republican-led coalition.

## Summary table

Regularly-scheduled elections were held in 86 of the 99 state legislative chambers in the United States. Nationwide, regularly-scheduled elections were held for 6,015 of the 7,383 legislative seats. Many legislative chambers held elections for all seats, but some legislative chambers that use staggered elections held elections for only a portion of the total seats in the chamber. The chambers not up for election either hold regularly-scheduled elections in odd-numbered years, or have four-year terms and hold all regularly-scheduled elections in presidential midterm election years.

Note that this table only covers regularly-scheduled elections; additional special elections took place concurrently with these regularly-scheduled elections.

| State | Upper House | | | | Lower House | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Seats up | Total | % up | Term | Seats up | Total | % up | Term |
| Alaska | 19 | 20 | 95 | 4 | 40 | 40 | 100 | 2 |
| Arizona | 30 | 30 | 100 | 2 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 35 | 35 | 100 | 2/4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| California | 20 | 40 | 50 | 4 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 2 |
| Colorado | 18 | 35 | 51 | 4 | 65 | 65 | 100 | 2 |
| Connecticut | 36 | 36 | 100 | 2 | 151 | 151 | 100 | 2 |
| Delaware | 21 | 21 | 100 | 2/4 | 41 | 41 | 100 | 2 |
| Florida | 40 | 40 | 100 | 2/4 | 120 | 120 | 100 | 2 |
| Georgia | 56 | 56 | 100 | 2 | 180 | 180 | 100 | 2 |
| Hawaii | 25 | 25 | 100 | 2/4 | 51 | 51 | 100 | 2 |
| Idaho | 35 | 35 | 100 | 2 | 70 | 70 | 100 | 2 |
| Illinois | 59 | 59 | 100 | 2/4 | 118 | 118 | 100 | 2 |
| Indiana | 25 | 50 | 50 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| Iowa | 25 | 50 | 50 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| Kansas | 40 | 40 | 100 | 4 | 125 | 125 | 100 | 2 |
| Kentucky | 19 | 38 | 50 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| Louisiana | 0 | 39 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 105 | 0 | 4 |
| Maine | 35 | 35 | 100 | 2 | 151 | 151 | 100 | 2 |
| Maryland | 0 | 47 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 141 | 0 | 4 |
| Massachusetts | 40 | 40 | 100 | 2 | 160 | 160 | 100 | 2 |
| Michigan | 0 | 38 | 0 | 4 | 110 | 110 | 100 | 2 |
| Minnesota | 67 | 67 | 100 | 2/4 | 134 | 134 | 100 | 2 |
| Mississippi | 0 | 52 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 122 | 0 | 4 |
| Missouri | 17 | 34 | 50 | 4 | 163 | 163 | 100 | 2 |
| Montana | 25 | 50 | 50 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| Nebraska | 25 | 49 | 51 | 4 | N/A (unicameral) | | | |
| Nevada | 10 | 21 | 48 | 4 | 42 | 42 | 100 | 2 |
| New Hampshire | 24 | 24 | 100 | 2 | 400 | 400 | 100 | 2 |
| New Jersey | 0 | 40 | 0 | 2/4 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 2 |
| New Mexico | 42 | 42 | 100 | 4 | 70 | 70 | 100 | 2 |
| New York | 63 | 63 | 100 | 2 | 150 | 150 | 100 | 2 |
| North Carolina | 50 | 50 | 100 | 2 | 120 | 120 | 100 | 2 |
| North Dakota | 23 | 47 | 49 | 4 | 47 | 94 | 50 | 4 |
| Ohio | 16 | 33 | 48 | 4 | 99 | 99 | 100 | 2 |
| Oklahoma | 24 | 48 | 50 | 4 | 101 | 101 | 100 | 2 |
| Oregon | 15 | 30 | 50 | 4 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 2 |
| Pennsylvania | 25 | 50 | 50 | 4 | 203 | 203 | 100 | 2 |
| Rhode Island | 38 | 38 | 100 | 2 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 2 |
| South Carolina | 46 | 46 | 100 | 4 | 124 | 124 | 100 | 2 |
| South Dakota | 35 | 35 | 100 | 2 | 70 | 70 | 100 | 2 |
| Tennessee | 16 | 33 | 48 | 4 | 99 | 99 | 100 | 2 |
| Texas | 16 | 31 | 52 | 2/4 | 150 | 150 | 100 | 2 |
| Utah | 15 | 29 | 52 | 4 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 2 |
| Vermont | 30 | 30 | 100 | 2 | 150 | 150 | 100 | 2 |
| Virginia | 0 | 40 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 2 |
| Washington | 25 | 49 | 51 | 4 | 98 | 98 | 100 | 2 |
| West Virginia | 17 | 34 | 50 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2 |
| Wisconsin | 16 | 33 | 48 | 4 | 99 | 99 | 100 | 2 |
| Wyoming | 15 | 30 | 50 | 4 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 2 |
| Total | 1281 | 1972 | 65 | N/A | 4595 | 5411 | 85 | N/A |

## Electoral predictions

Analysts considered both the Democratic and Republican parties to be at approximately equal risk of losing state legislative chambers to the other, owing to the expectation that this would be the first election that was not a wave election since 2004. Although Republicans were expected to win states like Arkansas, which had been trending towards them in recent years, Democrats had the potential to roll back some of the gains Republicans had made in 2010 in more competitive states such as Colorado. Despite the potential for Democratic gains, they were still expected to remain far behind the Republicans in overall chamber control due to the major losses the party suffered in 2010 and 2011.

Ratings are designated as follows:

* "Tossup": Competitive, no advantage
* "Lean": Competitive, slight advantage
* "Likely": Not competitive, but opposition could make significant gains
* "Safe": Not competitive at all

| State | Chamber | Last election | Governing Oct. 24, 2012 | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Alaska | Senate | Coal. 15–5 | Lean R (flip) | R 13–7 |
| | House of Representatives | R 24–16 | Safe R | R 26–14 |
| Arizona | Senate | R 21–9 | Likely R | R 17–13 |
| | House of Representatives | R 40–20 | Likely R | R 36–24 |
| Arkansas | Senate | D 20–15 | Lean R (flip) | R 21–14 |
| | House of Representatives | D 54–46 | Lean R (flip) | R 51–48–1 |
| California | State Senate | D 25–15 | Safe D | D 29–11 |
| | State Assembly | D 52–28 | Safe D | D 56–24 |
| Colorado | Senate | D 20–15 | Lean D | D 20–15 |
| | House of Representatives | R 33–32 | Lean D (flip) | D 37–28 |
| Connecticut | State Senate | D 23–13 | Safe D | D 22–14 |
| | House of Representatives | D 99–52 | Safe D | D 98–53 |
| Delaware | Senate | D 14–7 | Safe D | D 13–8 |
| | House of Representatives | D 26–15 | Safe D | D 27–14 |
| Florida | Senate | R 28–12 | Likely R | R 26–14 |
| | House of Representatives | R 81–39 | Likely R | R 76–44 |
| Georgia | State Senate | R 35–21 | Safe R | R 38–18 |
| | House of Representatives | R 108–71–1 | Safe R | R 119–60–1 |
| Hawaii | Senate | D 24–1 | Safe D | D 24–1 |
| | House of Representatives | D 43–8 | Safe D | D 44–7 |
| Idaho | Senate | R 28–7 | Safe R | R 29–6 |
| | House of Representatives | R 57–13 | Safe R | R 57–13 |
| Illinois | Senate | D 34–25 | Safe D | D 40–19 |
| | House of Representatives | D 64–54 | Safe D | D 71–47 |
| Indiana | Senate | R 36–14 | Safe R | R 37–13 |
| | House of Representatives | R 60–40 | Safe R | R 69–31 |
| Iowa | Senate | D 26–24 | Tossup | D 26–24 |
| | House of Representatives | R 60–40 | Likely R | R 53–47 |
| Kansas | Senate | R 31–9 | Safe R | R 32–8 |
| | House of Representatives | R 92–33 | Safe R | R 92–33 |
| Kentucky | Senate | R 22–15–1 | Safe R | R 23–14–1 |
| | House of Representatives | D 58–42 | Lean D | D 55–45 |
| Maine | Senate | R 20–14–1 | Lean R | D 19–15–1 |
| | House of Representatives | R 78–72–1 | Lean D (flip) | D 89–58–4 |
| Massachusetts | Senate | D 36–4 | Safe D | D 36–4 |
| | House of Representatives | D 130–30 | Safe D | D 131–29 |
| Michigan | House of Representatives | R 63–47 | Lean R | R 59–51 |
| Minnesota | Senate | R 37–30 | Tossup | D 39–28 |
| | House of Representatives | R 72–62 | Tossup | D 73–61 |
| Missouri | Senate | R 26–8 | Safe R | R 24–10 |
| | House of Representatives | R 105–58 | Safe R | R 110–53 |
| Montana | Senate | R 28–22 | Safe R | R 27–23 |
| | House of Representatives | R 68–32 | Safe R | R 61–39 |
| Nevada | Senate | D 11–10 | Tossup | D 11–10 |
| | Assembly | D 26–16 | Lean D | D 27–15 |
| New Hampshire | Senate | R 19–5 | Lean R | R 13–11 |
| | House of Representatives | R 298–102 | Lean R | D 221–179 |
| New Mexico | Senate | D 27–15 | Likely D | D 25–17 |
| | House of Representatives | D 36–34 | Lean D | D 38–32 |
| New York | State Senate | R 32–30 | Tossup | Coal. 36–27 |
| | State Assembly | D 99–50–1 | Safe D | D 105–44–1 |
| North Carolina | Senate | R 31–19 | Likely R | R 32–18 |
| | House of Representatives | R 67–52–1 | Likely R | R 77–43 |
| North Dakota | Senate | R 35–12 | Safe R | R 33–14 |
| | House of Representatives | R 69–25 | Safe R | R 71–23 |
| Ohio | Senate | R 23–10 | Safe R | R 23–10 |
| | House of Representatives | R 59–40 | Lean R | R 60–39 |
| Oklahoma | Senate | R 32–16 | Safe R | R 36–12 |
| | House of Representatives | R 70–31 | Safe R | R 72–29 |
| Oregon | State Senate | D 16–14 | Lean D | D 16–14 |
| | House of Representatives | 30–30 | Lean D | D 34–26 |
| Pennsylvania | State Senate | R 30–20 | Likely R | R 27–23 |
| | House of Representatives | R 112–91 | Likely R | R 111–92 |
| Rhode Island | Senate | D 29–8–1 | Safe D | D 32–5–1 |
| | House of Representatives | D 65–10 | Safe D | D 69–6 |
| South Carolina | Senate | R 27–19 | Safe R | R 28–18 |
| | House of Representatives | R 76–48 | Safe R | R 78–46 |
| South Dakota | Senate | R 30–5 | Safe R | R 28–7 |
| | House of Representatives | R 50–19–1 | Safe R | R 53–17 |
| Tennessee | Senate | R 20–13 | Safe R | R 26–7 |
| | House of Representatives | R 64–34–1 | Safe R | R 71–27–1 |
| Texas | Senate | R 19–12 | Safe R | R 19–12 |
| | House of Representatives | R 99–51 | Safe R | R 95–55 |
| Utah | State Senate | R 22–7 | Safe R | R 24–5 |
| | House of Representatives | R 58–17 | Safe R | R 61–14 |
| Vermont | Senate | D 21–8–1 | Safe D | D 21–7–2 |
| | House of Representatives | D 94–48–5–3 | Safe D | D 96–45–5–4 |
| Washington | State Senate | D 27–22 | Tossup | Coal. 26–23 |
| | House of Representatives | D 56–42 | Likely D | D 55–43 |
| West Virginia | Senate | D 28–6 | Likely D | D 25–9 |
| | House of Delegates | D 65–35 | Likely D | D 54–46 |
| Wisconsin | Senate | D 17–16 | Lean R (flip) | R 18–15 |
| | State Assembly | R 60–38–1 | Likely R | R 60–39 |
| Wyoming | Senate | R 26–4 | Safe R | R 26–4 |
| | House of Representatives | R 50–10 | Safe R | R 52–8 |

## Maps

## State summaries

### Alaska

Most of the seats of the Alaska Senate and all of the seats of the Alaska House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans won control of the Senate from a Democratic-led coalition, while maintaining control of the Alaska House of Representatives.

|
|  |
Alaska Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 5 | 13 | 3 |
| | 5 | | |
|  | Democratic | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| | | 5 | |
| **Total** | | **20** | **20** |  |

|
|  |
Alaska House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 24 | 26 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| | 12 | 10 | |
| **Total** | | **40** | **40** |  |

### Arizona

All of the seats of the Arizona Senate and the Arizona House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans maintained a government trifecta with control of the governorship and both state legislative chambers.

|
|  |
Arizona Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 21 | 17 | 4 |
|  | Democratic | 9 | 13 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **30** | **30** |  |

|
|  |
Arizona House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 40 | 36 | 4 |
|  | Democratic | 20 | 24 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **60** | **60** |  |

### Arkansas

All of the seats of the Arkansas Senate and all of the seats of the Arkansas House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans won control of both chambers for the first time since Reconstruction, thereby ending a government trifecta. The Green Party won one seat in the House because a judge had ordered all votes for the candidate's opponent not be counted, due to a felony conviction for election fraud.

|
|  |
Arkansas Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 15 | 21 | 6 |
|  | Democratic | 20 | 14 | 6 |
| **Total** | | **35** | **35** |  |

|
|  |
Arkansas House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 46 | 51 | 5 |
|  | Democratic | 54 | 48 | 6 |
|  | Green | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **100** | **100** |  |

### California

Half of the seats of the California State Senate and all of the seats of the California State Assembly were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
California State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 25 | 29 | 4 |
|  | Republican | 15 | 11 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **40** | **40** |  |

|
|  |
California State Assembly
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 52 | 55 | 3 |
|  | Republican | 28 | 25 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **80** | **80** |  |

### Colorado

Half of the seats of the Colorado Senate and all of the seats of the Colorado House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of the state Senate and won control of the state House, establishing a trifecta.

|
|  |
Colorado Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 20 | 20 |  |
|  | Republican | 15 | 15 |  |
| **Total** | | **35** | **35** |  |

|
|  |
Colorado House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 32 | 37 | 5 |
|  | Republican | 33 | 28 | 5 |
| **Total** | | **65** | **65** |  |

### Connecticut

All of the seats of the Connecticut State Senate and the Connecticut House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of both houses.

|
|  |
Connecticut State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 22 | 22 |  |
|  | Republican | 14 | 14 |  |
| **Total** | | **36** | **36** |  |

|
|  |
Connecticut House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 99 | 98 | 1 |
|  | Republican | 52 | 53 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **151** | **151** |  |

### Delaware

All of the seats of the Delaware Senate and all of the seats of the Delaware House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Delaware Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 14 | 13 | 1 |
|  | Republican | 7 | 8 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **21** | **21** |  |

|
|  |
Delaware House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 26 | 27 | 1 |
|  | Republican | 15 | 14 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **41** | **41** |  |

### Florida

All of the seats of the Florida Senate and all of the seats of the Florida House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Florida Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 28 | 26 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 12 | 14 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **40** | **40** |  |

|
|  |
Florida House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 81 | 76 | 5 |
|  | Democratic | 39 | 44 | 5 |
| **Total** | | **120** | **120** |  |

### Georgia

All of the seats of the Georgia State Senate and the Georgia House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Georgia State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 36 | 38 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 20 | 18 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **56** | **56** |  |

|
|  |
Georgia House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 116 | 119 | 3 |
|  | Democratic | 63 | 60 | 3 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **180** | **180** |  |

### Hawaii

All of the seats of the Hawaii Senate and all of the seats of the Hawaii House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Hawaii Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 24 | 24 |  |
|  | Republican | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **25** | **25** |  |

|
|  |
Hawaii House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 43 | 44 | 1 |
|  | Republican | 8 | 7 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **51** | **51** |  |

### Idaho

All of the seats of the Idaho Senate and the Idaho House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Idaho Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 28 | 29 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 7 | 6 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **35** | **35** |  |

|
|  |
Idaho House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 57 | 57 |  |
|  | Democratic | 13 | 13 |  |
| **Total** | | **70** | **70** |  |

### Illinois

All of the seats of the Illinois Senate and all of the seats of the Illinois House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of both chambers to maintain a trifecta.

|
|  |
Illinois Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 35 | 40 | 5 |
|  | Republican | 24 | 19 | 5 |
| **Total** | | **59** | **59** |  |

|
|  |
Illinois House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 64 | 71 | 7 |
|  | Republican | 54 | 47 | 7 |
| **Total** | | **118** | **118** |  |

### Indiana

Half of the seats of the Indiana Senate and all of the seats of the Indiana House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Indiana Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 37 | 37 |  |
|  | Democratic | 13 | 13 |  |
| **Total** | | **50** | **50** |  |

|
|  |
Indiana House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 60 | 69 | 9 |
|  | Democratic | 40 | 31 | 9 |
| **Total** | | **100** | **100** |  |

### Iowa

Half of the seats of the Iowa Senate and all of the seats of the Iowa House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of the state House, and Democrats held control of the state Senate.

|
|  |
Iowa Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 26 | 26 |  |
|  | Republican | 24 | 24 |  |
| **Total** | | **50** | **50** |  |

|
|  |
Iowa House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 60 | 53 | 7 |
|  | Democratic | 40 | 47 | 7 |
| **Total** | | **100** | **100** |  |

### Kansas

All of the seats of the Kansas Senate and the Kansas House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers and maintained a trifecta.

|
|  |
Kansas Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 32 | 32 |  |
|  | Democratic | 8 | 8 |  |
| **Total** | | **40** | **40** |  |

|
|  |
Kansas House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 92 | 92 |  |
|  | Democratic | 33 | 33 |  |
| **Total** | | **125** | **125** |  |

### Kentucky

Half of the seats of the Kentucky Senate and all of the seats of the Kentucky House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of the state Senate, and Democrats held control of the state House.

|
|  |
Kentucky Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 22 | 23 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 15 | 14 | 1 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **38** | **38** |  |

|
|  |
Kentucky House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 59 | 55 | 4 |
|  | Republican | 41 | 45 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **100** | **100** |  |

### Maine

All of the seats of the Maine Senate and the Maine House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats won control of both houses, ending a Republican trifecta.

|
|  |
Maine Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 11 | 19 | 5 |
|  | Republican | 20 | 15 | 5 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **35** | **35** |  |

|
|  |
Maine House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 72 | 89 | 17 |
|  | Republican | 78 | 58 | 20 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **151** | **151** |  |

### Massachusetts

All of the seats of the Massachusetts Senate and the Massachusetts House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats retained control of both chambers to maintain a trifecta.

|
|  |
Massachusetts Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 36 | 36 |  |
|  | Republican | 4 | 4 |  |
| **Total** | | **40** | **40** |  |

|
|  |
Massachusetts House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 127 | 131 | 4 |
|  | Republican | 33 | 29 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **160** | **160** |  |

### Michigan

All of the seats of the Michigan House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. The Michigan Senate did not hold regularly scheduled elections in 2012. Republicans maintained control of the chamber.

|
|  |
Michigan House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 63 | 59 | 4 |
|  | Democratic | 47 | 51 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **110** | **110** |  |

### Minnesota

All of the seats of the Minnesota Senate and the Minnesota House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats won control of both chambers, thereby establishing a trifecta.

|
|  |
Minnesota Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 30 | 39 | 9 |
|  | Democratic (DFL) | 37 | 28 | 9 |
| **Total** | | **67** | **67** |  |

|
|  |
Minnesota House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic (DFL) | 62 | 73 | 11 |
|  | Republican | 72 | 61 | 11 |
| **Total** | | **134** | **134** |  |

### Missouri

Half of the seats of the Missouri Senate and all of the seats of the Missouri House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers.

|
|  |
Missouri Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 26 | 24 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 8 | 10 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **34** | **34** |  |

|
|  |
Missouri House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 106 | 110 | 4 |
|  | Democratic | 56 | 53 | 3 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **163** | **163** |  |

### Montana

Half of the seats of the Montana Senate and all of the seats of the Montana House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans held control of both chambers.

|
|  |
Montana Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 27 | 27 |  |
|  | Democratic | 23 | 23 |  |
| **Total** | | **50** | **50** |  |

|
|  |
Montana House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 68 | 61 | 7 |
|  | Democratic | 32 | 39 | 7 |
| **Total** | | **100** | **100** |  |

### Nebraska

Nebraska is the only U.S. state with a unicameral legislature; half of the seats of the Nebraska Legislature were up for election in 2012. Nebraska is also unique in that its legislature is officially non-partisan and holds non-partisan elections, although the Democratic and Republican parties each endorse legislative candidates.

### Nevada

Half of the seats of the Nevada Senate and all of the seats of the Nevada Assembly were up for election in 2012. Democrats maintained control of both chambers.

|
|  |
Nevada Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 11 | 11 |  |
|  | Republican | 10 | 10 |  |
| **Total** | | **21** | **21** |  |

|
|  |
Nevada Assembly
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 26 | 27 | 1 |
|  | Republican | 16 | 15 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **42** | **42** |  |

### New Hampshire

All of the seats of the New Hampshire Senate and the New Hampshire House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans maintained control of the state Senate, and Democrats won control of the state House.

|
|  |
New Hampshire Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 19 | 13 | 6 |
|  | Democratic | 5 | 11 | 6 |
| **Total** | | **24** | **24** |  |

|
|  |
New Hampshire House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 103 | 221 | 118 |
|  | Republican | 288 | 179 | 109 |
| **Total** | | **400** | **400** |  |

### New Mexico

All of the seats of the New Mexico Senate and the New Mexico House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of both chambers.

|
|  |
New Mexico Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 28 | 25 | 3 |
|  | Republican | 14 | 17 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **42** | **42** |  |

|
|  |
New Mexico House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 36 | 38 | 2 |
|  | Republican | 33 | 32 | 1 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **70** | **70** |  |

### New York

All of the seats of the New York State Senate and the New York State Assembly were up for election in 2012. Democrats held control of the state House, and Republicans lost control of the state Senate and thus entered into a coalition government with the Independent Democratic Conference.

|
|  |
New York State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 33 | 30 | 3 |
|  | Democratic | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| | 25 | 27 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **62** | **63** |  |

|
|  |
New York State Assembly
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 100 | 105 | 5 |
|  | Republican | 49 | 44 | 5 |
|  | Independence | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **150** | **150** |
|

### North Carolina

All of the seats of the North Carolina Senate and the North Carolina House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers.

|
|  |
North Carolina Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 31 | 32 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 19 | 18 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **50** | **50** |  |

|
|  |
North Carolina House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 68 | 77 | 9 |
|  | Democratic | 52 | 43 | 9 |
| **Total** | | **120** | **120** |  |

### North Dakota

Half of the seats of the North Dakota Senate and the North Dakota House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
North Dakota Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 35 | 33 | 2 |
|  | Democratic-NPL | 12 | 14 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **47** | **47** |  |

|
|  |
North Dakota House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 69 | 71 | 2 |
|  | Democratic-NPL | 25 | 23 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **94** | **94** |  |

### Ohio

Half of the seats of the Ohio Senate and all of the seats of the Ohio House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Ohio Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 23 | 23 |  |
|  | Democratic | 10 | 10 |  |
| **Total** | | **33** | **33** |  |

|
|  |
Ohio House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 59 | 60 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 40 | 39 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **99** | **99** |  |

### Oklahoma

Half of the seats of the Oklahoma Senate and all of the seats of the Oklahoma House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Oklahoma Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 32 | 36 | 4 |
|  | Democratic | 16 | 12 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **48** | **48** |  |

|
|  |
Oklahoma House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 70 | 72 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 31 | 29 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **101** | **101** |  |

### Oregon

Half of the seats of the Oregon State Senate and all of the seats of the Oregon House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats retained control of the state Senate, and ended the tie in the state House, thus establishing a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Oregon State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 16 | 16 |  |
|  | Republican | 14 | 14 |  |
| **Total** | | **30** | **30** |  |

|
|  |
Oregon House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 30 | 34 | 4 |
|  | Republican | 30 | 26 | 4 |
| **Total** | | **60** | **60** |  |

### Pennsylvania

Half of the seats of the Pennsylvania State Senate and all of the seats of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers and their government trifecta.

|
|  |
Pennsylvania State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 30 | 27 | 3 |
|  | Democratic | 20 | 23 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **50** | **50** |  |

|
|  |
Pennsylvania House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 111 | 111 |  |
|  | Democratic | 92 | 92 |  |
| **Total** | | **203** | **203** |  |

### Rhode Island

All of the seats of the Rhode Island Senate and the Rhode Island House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats retained control of both chambers.

|
|  |
Rhode Island Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 29 | 32 | 3 |
|  | Republican | 8 | 5 | 3 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **38** | **38** |  |

|
|  |
Rhode Island House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 65 | 69 | 4 |
|  | Republican | 9 | 6 | 3 |
|  | Libertarian | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **75** | **75** |  |

### South Carolina

All of the seats of the South Carolina Senate and the South Carolina House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
South Carolina Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 27 | 28 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 19 | 18 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **46** | **46** |  |

|
|  |
South Carolina House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 76 | 78 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 48 | 46 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **124** | **124** |  |

### South Dakota

All of the seats of the South Dakota Senate and the South Dakota House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
South Dakota Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 30 | 28 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 5 | 7 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **35** | **35** |  |

|
|  |
South Dakota House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 50 | 53 | 3 |
|  | Democratic | 19 | 17 | 2 |
|  | Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **70** | **70** |  |

### Tennessee

Half of the seats of the Tennessee Senate and all of the seats of the Tennessee House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Tennessee Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 20 | 26 | 6 |
|  | Democratic | 13 | 7 | 6 |
| **Total** | | **33** | **33** |  |

|
|  |
Tennessee House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 64 | 71 | 7 |
|  | Democratic | 34 | 27 | 7 |
|  | Independent Republican | 1 | 1 |  |
| **Total** | | **99** | **99** |  |

### Texas

All of the seats in the Texas Legislature were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta, but they lost their supermajority in the House.

|
|  |
Texas Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 19 | 19 |  |
|  | Democratic | 12 | 12 |  |
| **Total** | | **31** | **31** |  |

|
|  |
Texas House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 102 | 95 | 7 |
|  | Democratic | 48 | 55 | 7 |
| **Total** | | **150** | **150** |  |

### Utah

Half of the seats of the Utah State Senate and all of the seats of the Utah House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Utah State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 22 | 24 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **29** | **29** |  |

|
|  |
Utah House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 58 | 61 | 3 |
|  | Democratic | 17 | 14 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **75** | **75** |  |

### Vermont

All of the seats of the Vermont Senate and the Vermont House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats retained control of both chambers.

|
|  |
Vermont Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 21 | 21 |  |
|  | Republican | 8 | 7 | 1 |
|  | Progressive | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **30** | **30** |  |

|
|  |
Vermont House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 94 | 96 | 2 |
|  | Republican | 48 | 45 | 3 |
|  | Progressive | 5 | 5 |  |
|  | Independent | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **150** | **150** |  |

### Washington

Half of the seats of the Washington State Senate and all of the seats of the Washington House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Democrats retained control of the state House, while Republicans won control of the state Senate with the help of two Democrats who formed a coalition with them.

|
|  |
Washington State Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 22 | 23 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 27 | 2 | 1 |
| | | 24 | |
| **Total** | | **49** | **49** |  |

|
|  |
Washington House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 56 | 55 | 1 |
|  | Republican | 42 | 43 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **98** | **98** |  |

### West Virginia

Half of the seats of the West Virginia Senate and all of the seats of the West Virginia House of Delegates were up for election in 2012. Democrats retained control of both chambers.

|
|  |
West Virginia Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 28 | 25 | 3 |
|  | Republican | 6 | 9 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **34** | **34** |  |

|
|  |
West Virginia House of Delegates
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 65 | 54 | 11 |
|  | Republican | 35 | 46 | 11 |
| **Total** | | **100** | **100** |  |

### Wisconsin

Half of the seats of the Wisconsin Senate and all of the seats of the Wisconsin State Assembly were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of the state Assembly, and won control of the state Senate after having lost control through a series of recall elections earlier in the year, thereby recreating a Republican trifecta.

|
|  |
Wisconsin Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 16 | 18 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 17 | 15 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **33** | **33** |  |

|
|  |
Wisconsin State Assembly
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 59 | 60 | 1 |
|  | Democratic | 39 | 39 |  |
|  | Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **99** | **99** |  |

### Wyoming

Half of the seats of the Wyoming Senate and all of the seats of the Wyoming House of Representatives were up for election in 2012. Republicans retained control of both chambers, maintaining a government trifecta.

|
|  |
Wyoming Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 26 | 26 |  |
|  | Democratic | 4 | 4 |  |
| **Total** | | **30** | **30** |  |

|
|  |
Wyoming House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 50 | 52 | 2 |
|  | Democratic | 10 | 8 | 2 |
| **Total** | | **60** | **60** |  |

## Territorial and federal district summaries

### American Samoa

All of the seats of the American Samoa Senate and the American Samoa House of Representatives were up for election. Members of the senate serve four-year terms, while members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms. Gubernatorial and legislative elections are conducted on a nonpartisan basis in American Samoa.

### Guam

All of the seats of the unicameral Legislature of Guam were up for election. All members of the legislature serve a two-year term. Democrats retained control of the legislature.

|
|  |
Guam Legislature
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 9 | 9 |  |
|  | Republican | 6 | 6 |  |
| **Total** | | **15** | **15** |  |

### Northern Mariana Islands

A portion of the seats of the Northern Mariana Islands Senate, and all of the seats of the Northern Mariana Islands House of Representatives, were up for election. Members of the senate serve either four-year terms, while members of the house serve two-year terms. Republicans maintained control of the upper house, and Independents won control of the lower house.

|
|  |
Northern Mariana Islands Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 5 | 5 |  |
|  | Independent | 4 | 4 |  |
|  | Democratic | 0 | 0 |  |
| **Total** | | **9** | **9** |  |

|
|  |
Northern Mariana Islands House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Republican | 9 | 4 | 5 |
|  | Democratic | 0 | 0 |  |
|  | Independent | 4 | 12 | 8 |
|  | Covenant | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| **Total** | | **20** | **20** |  |

### Puerto Rico

All of the seats of the Senate of Puerto Rico and the House of Representatives of Puerto Rico are up for election. Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives both serve four-year terms. The New Progressive Party lost control of both chambers, to the Popular Democratic Party.

|
|  |
Puerto Rico Senate
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Popular Democratic | 9 | 18 | 9 |
|  | New Progressive | 22 | 8 | 14 |
|  | Puerto Rican Independence | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| **Total** | | **31** | **27** |  |

|
|  |
Puerto Rico House of Representatives
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Popular Democratic | 17 | 28 | 11 |
|  | New Progressive | 37 | 23 | 14 |
| **Total** | | **54** | **51** |  |

### U.S. Virgin Islands

All of the seats of the unicameral Legislature of the Virgin Islands were up for election. All members of the legislature serve a two-year term. Democrats retained control of the legislature.

|
|  |
Virgin Islands Legislature
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 10 | 10 |  |
|  | Independent | 5 | 5 |  |
| **Total** | | **15** | **15** |  |

### Washington, D.C.

The Council of the District of Columbia serves as the legislative branch of the federal district of Washington, D.C. Half of the council seats are up for election. Council members serve four-year terms. Democrats retained supermajority control of the council.

|
|  |
District of Columbia Council
| Party | | Before | After | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Democratic | 11 | 11 |  |
|  | Independent | 2 | 2 |  |
| **Total** | | **13** | **13** |  |

1. John Celock (November 7, 2012). "State Legislative Elections: Democrats Gain Control Of Eight Chambers". *Huffington Post*. Retrieved November 7, 2012.
2. "2020 Legislative Races by State and Legislative Chamber". *National Conference of State Legislatures*.
3. Daigneau, Elizabeth; Jacobson, Louis (2012-10-23). "The Latest Chamber-by-Chamber Analysis of the 2012 State Legislative Elections". *Governing*. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
4. Zinser, Lynne (7 November 2012). "A Former Globetrotter Wins Election by Globetrotter-Like Margin". *New York Times*. Retrieved 9 November 2012.

## InfoBox

2012 United States state legislative elections
| --- | |
| --- | --- |
|  | |
| ---  86 legislative chambers<br>44 states | |
| Majority party Minority party Third party   Party Republican Democratic Coalition  Chambers before **61** 36 1  Chambers after **58** 39 2  Overall change  3  3  1 | |
| ---  **Map of upper house elections:**<br>Democrats gained control      Democrats retained control<br>Republicans gained control      Republicans retained control<br>Coalition gained control<br>Non-partisan legislature<br>No regularly-scheduled elections | |
| ---  **Map of lower house elections:**<br>Democrats gained control      Democrats retained control<br>Republicans gained control      Republicans retained control <br>Non-partisan legislature<br>No regularly-scheduled elections | |


title: Federation of Korean Trade Unions

abstract: The Federation of Korean Trade Unions (FKTU) is a national trade union center in South Korea formed in 1960. It represents the company union tendency of the South Korean labour movement, as opposed to the more militant Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU). After the May 16 coup in 1961, the Park Chung Hee regime dissolved the General Federation of Korean Trade Unions and its affiliates. The FKTU was placed under the guidance of the military authorities. The FKTU was the sole legal trade union center in South Korea until the KCTU was recognized in November 1999. The Korean Government previously considered the KCTU as a terrorist organisation. The FKTU is affiliated with the International Trade Union Confederation.

text:
# Federation of Korean Trade Unions

| Federation of Korean Trade Unions | |
| --- | --- |
| Hangul | 한국노동조합총연맹 |
| Hanja | 韓國勞動組合總聯盟 |
| Revised Romanization | *Hanguk Nodong Johap Chongyeonmaeng* |
| McCune–Reischauer | *Han'guk Nodong Chohap Ch'ongynmaeng* |

The **Federation of Korean Trade Unions** (FKTU) is a national trade union center in South Korea formed in 1960. It represents the company union tendency of the South Korean labour movement, as opposed to the more militant Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU).

After the May 16 coup in 1961, the Park Chung Hee regime dissolved the General Federation of Korean Trade Unions and its affiliates. The FKTU was placed under the guidance of the military authorities.

The FKTU was the sole legal trade union center in South Korea until the KCTU was recognized in November 1999. The Korean Government previously considered the KCTU as a terrorist organisation.

The FKTU is affiliated with the International Trade Union Confederation.

**History:**

* ICTUR; et al., eds. (2005). *Trade Unions of the World* (6th ed.). London, UK: John Harper Publishing. ISBN 0-9543811-5-7.

## InfoBox

FKTU
| Federation of Korean Trade Unions | |
| --- | --- |
| 한국노동조합총연맹 | |
|
| Founded | 1960 |
| Headquarters | Seoul, South Korea |
| Location |  |
| Members | 1,153,863 (2020) |
| Affiliations | ITUC |
| Website | fktu.or.kr<br>inochong.org |


title: Filipy, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship

abstract: Filipy is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Radoszyce, within Końskie County, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, in south-central Poland. It lies approximately 9 kilometres (6 mi) south-east of Radoszyce, 22 km (14 mi) south of Końskie, and 25 km (16 mi) north-west of the regional capital Kielce.

text:
# Filipy, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship

**Filipy** (Polish pronunciation: \[fiˈlipɨ\]) is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Radoszyce, within Końskie County, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, in south-central Poland. It lies approximately 9 kilometres (6 mi) south-east of Radoszyce, 22 km (14 mi) south of Końskie, and 25 km (16 mi) north-west of the regional capital Kielce.

## InfoBox

| Filipy | |
| --- | --- |
| Village | |
| Filipy | |
| Coordinates: 51°0′54″N 20°20′29″E / 51.01500°N 20.34139°E / 51.01500; 20.34139 | |
| Country | Poland |
| Voivodeship | Świętokrzyskie |
| County | Końskie |
| Gmina | Radoszyce |
| Population | 160 |


title: 2010–11 Cypriot Fourth Division

abstract: The 2010–11 Cypriot Fourth Division was the 26th season of the Cypriot fourth-level football league. Ormideia FC won their 1st title.

text:
# 2010–11 Cypriot Fourth Division

The **2010–11 Cypriot Fourth Division** was the 26th season of the Cypriot fourth-level football league. Ormideia FC won their 1st title.

## Format

Fourteen teams participated in the 2010–11 Cypriot Fourth Division. All teams played against each other twice, once at their home and once away. The team with the most points at the end of the season were crowned champions. The first three teams were promoted to the 2011–12 Cypriot Third Division and the last three teams were relegated to regional leagues.

### Point system

Teams received three points for a win, one point for a draw and zero points for a loss.

## Changes from previous season

**Teams promoted to 2010–11 Cypriot Third Division**

**Teams relegated from 2009–10 Cypriot Third Division**

**Teams promoted from regional leagues**

**Teams relegated to regional leagues**

## Stadia and locations

Ormideia FCEthnikos Latsion FCKarmiotissaAnagennisi T.
K & EASPISEnosis KokPOXKissos FCTHOIAchyronasFinikasPOL/AEMDynamoclass=notpageimage|2010–11 Cypriot Fourth Division

| Club | Venue |
| --- | --- |
| Anagennisi Trachoniou | Trachoni Municipal Stadium |
| ASPIS Pylas | Pyla Municipal Stadium |
| Achyronas Liopetriou | Liopetri Municipal Stadium |
| Dynamo Pervolion | Pervolia Municipal Stadium |
| Ethnikos Latsion FC | Pervolia Municipal Stadium |
| Enosis Kokkinotrimithia | Kokkinotrimithia Municipal Stadium |
| THOI Lakatamia | EN THOI Stadium |
| Karmiotissa Pano Polemidion | Pano Polemidia Municipal Stadium |
| Kissos Kissonergas | Kissonerga Municipal Stadium |
| Konstantios & Evripidis Trachoniou | Trachoni Municipal Stadium |
| P.O. Xylotymvou | Xylotympou Municipal Stadium |
| Ormideia FC | Ormideia Municipal Stadium |
| POL/AE Maroni | Maroni Municipal Stadium |
| Finikas Ayias Marinas | Evripides Municipal Stadium |
|

## League standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Ormideia FC (C, P) | 26 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 52 | 24 | +28 | 58 | Promoted to Cypriot Third Division |
| 2 | POL/AE Maroni (P) | 26 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 52 | 27 | +25 | | 56 |
| 3 | Achyronas Liopetriou (P) | 26 | 12 | 9 | 5 | 35 | 21 | +14 | | 45 |
| 4 | Karmiotissa Pano Polemidion | 26 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 49 | 36 | +13 | 44 |  |
| 5 | THOI Lakatamia | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 41 | 39 | +2 | | 40 |
| 6 | P.O. Xylotymvou | 26 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 42 | 37 | +5 | | 38 |
| 7 | Kissos Kissonergas | 26 | 11 | 3 | 12 | 40 | 44 | 4 | | 36 |
| 8 | Ethnikos Latsion FC | 26 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 24 | 37 | 13 | | 32 |
| 9 | Dynamo Pervolion | 26 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 44 | 41 | +3 | | 32 |
| 10 | Konstantios & Evripidis Trachoniou | 26 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 35 | 35 | 0 | | 32 |
| 11 | Finikas Ayias Marinas Chrysochous | 26 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 37 | 42 | 5 | | 31 |
| 12 | Anagennisi Trachoniou (R) | 26 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 31 | 45 | 14 | 26 | Relegated to regional leagues |
| 13 | ASPIS Pylas (R) | 26 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 25 | 41 | 16 | | 26 |
| 14 | Enosis Kokkinotrimithia (R) | 26 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 21 | 59 | 38 | | 9 |

Source: League standings at CFA
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) head-to-head points; 3) head-to-head goal difference; 4) head-to-head away goals scored; 5) goal difference; 6) number of goals scored.
(C) Champions; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated
Notes:

## Results

| Home \ Away | ANG | ASP | ACR | DNM | THL | ETL | ENK | KRM | KSS | KET | POX | ORM | POL | FNK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Anagennisi T. |  | 3–0 | 0–0 | 2–2 | 0–2 | 2–0 | 2–2 | 4–4 | 2–1 | 0–1 | 1–2 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 1–0 |
| ASPIS | 2–1 |  | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0–2 | 1–2 | 1–0 | 0–1 | 1–0 | 3–2 | 3–2 | 1–3 | 3–3 | 3–2 |
| Achyronas | 2–0 | 1–0 |  | 2–1 | 3–1 | 2–0 | 1–2 | 2–2 | 0–0 | 1–0 | 2–1 | 1–1 | 4–1 | 0–0 |
| Dynamo | 5–0 | 1–0 | 2–0 |  | 2–3 | 1–1 | 3–2 | 3–2 | 3–0 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–2 |
| THOI | 3–0 | 2–0 | 3–1 | 2–2 |  | 1–0 | 3–1 | 1–2 | 2–2 | 1–4 | 1–0 | 0–2 | 3–1 | 1–1 |
| Ethnikos | 3–0 | 0–1 | 0–3 | 2–1 | 1–0 |  | 3–2 | 0–2 | 0–1 | 2–1 | 2–2 | 1–2 | 1–1 | 1–0 |
| Enosis | 0–1 | 0–0 | 0–3 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 0–1 |  | 2–1 | 2–4 | 1–1 | 1–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 0–2 |
| Karmiotissa | 1–0 | 3–1 | 0–0 | 1–1 | 3–2 | 5–0 | 3–1 |  | 2–1 | 2–1 | 2–1 | 0–1 | 2–3 | 3–0 |
| Kissos | 2–1 | 2–1 | 1–0 | 2–0 | 2–2 | 5–1 | 4–0 | 3–1 |  | 0–1 | 1–0 | 1–3 | 1–5 | 3–2 |
| K & E | 0–0 | 0–0 | 1–3 | 2–1 | 2–1 | 0–0 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 4–1 |  | 4–2 | 0–1 | 2–3 | 1–2 |
| P.O. Xylotymvou | 2–2 | 4–1 | 1–1 | 2–1 | 0–1 | 1–1 | 2–1 | 3–1 | 2–0 | 1–0 |  | 1–1 | 0–0 | 4–1 |
| Ormideia FC | 2–2 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 4–2 | 5–1 | 1–0 | 6–1 | 2–1 | 1–0 | 1–1 | 2–2 |  | 2–1 | 3–1 |
| POL/AEM | 3–1 | 2–1 | 2–0 | 3–1 | 1–0 | 2–1 | 2–0 | 0–0 | 3–0 | 2–0 | 5–1 | 1–0 |  | 1–2 |
| Finikas | 2–2 | 2–2 | 1–1 | 2–2 | 3–1 | 0–1 | 2–0 | 3–2 | 5–3 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 1–2 | 0–1 |  |

Source: Results at CFA
Legend: Blue = home team win; Yellow = draw; Red = away team win.
Notes: 1. The match between Ethnikos Latsion and Anagennisi Trachoniou was interrupted at 2–0; It was awarded 3–0 to Ethnikos.
2. The match between Ethnikos Latsion and Achyronas Liopetriou was interrupted at 1–3; It was awarded 0–3 to Achyronas.
1. "Ανέβηκε και ο POL/AE Maroni" (in Greek). Cyprus Football Association. 2011-03-05. Archived from the original on 2014-08-04. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
2. Στους 31 βαθμούς ο Εθνικός Λατσιών (in Greek). Cyprus Football Association. 2011-03-17. Archived from the original on 2014-08-04. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
3. Στην τέταρτη θέση ο Αχυρώνας (in Greek). Cyprus Football Association. 2010-11-16. Archived from the original on 2014-08-04. Retrieved 2014-08-04.

## Sources

## InfoBox

Cypriot Fourth Division
| Season | 2010–11 |
| --- | --- |
| Champions | Ormideia
(1st title) |
| Promoted | Ormideia
POL/AEM
Achyronas |
| Relegated | Anagennisi
ASPIS
Enosis K. |
| Matches played | 182 |
| Goals scored | 528 (2.9 per match) |
| Top goalscorer | Giorgos Nicolaou (23 goals) |
| 2009–10 2011–12 | |


title: 2014 Superclásico de las Américas

abstract: The 2014 Superclásico de las Américas – Copa Doctor Nicolás Leoz was the 3rd edition of the Superclásico de las Américas, an annual friendly football match between the national teams of Argentina and Brazil. The match was played at Beijing National Stadium in Beijing, China. This was the first time the competition had taken place on foreign soil. It was also the time players outside the two countries' domestic competitions were allowed to participate as opposed to the original formant of only South America-based players being eligible to compete. Brazil won 2–0 with both goals scored by Diego Tardelli, while Argentina's Lionel Messi had a penalty saved by goalkeeper Jefferson.

text:
# 2014 Superclásico de las Américas

The **2014 Superclásico de las Américas – Copa Doctor Nicolás Leoz** was the 3rd edition of the Superclásico de las Américas, an annual friendly football match between the national teams of Argentina and Brazil. The match was played at Beijing National Stadium in Beijing, China. This was the first time the competition had taken place on foreign soil. It was also the time players outside the two countries' domestic competitions were allowed to participate as opposed to the original formant of only South America-based players being eligible to compete.

Brazil won 2–0 with both goals scored by Diego Tardelli, while Argentina's Lionel Messi had a penalty saved by goalkeeper Jefferson.

## Venue

## Details

| Brazil | 2–0 | Argentina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Diego Tardelli  28', 64' | Report |  |

National Stadium, BeijingAttendance: 52,313Referee: Fan Qi (China)

## InfoBox

2014 Superclásico de las Américas
|  | |
| --- | --- |
| Event | Superclásico de las Américas |
|  | |
| Date | 11 October 2014 |
| Venue | Beijing National Stadium, Beijing |
| Referee | Fan Qi (China) |
| Attendance | 52,313 |
|


title: 2005 Detroit Tigers season

abstract: The 2005 Detroit Tigers season was the team's 105th season and its sixth at Comerica Park. It involved the Detroit Tigers finishing fourth in the American League Central with a 71–91 record, 28 games in back of the World Series Champion Chicago White Sox.

text:
# 2005 Detroit Tigers season

The **2005 Detroit Tigers season** was the team's 105th season and its sixth at Comerica Park. It involved the Detroit Tigers finishing fourth in the American League Central with a 71–91 record, 28 games in back of the World Series Champion Chicago White Sox.

## Offseason

* October 15, 2004: DeWayne Wise was selected off waivers by the Detroit Tigers from the Atlanta Braves.
* February 7, 2005: Magglio Ordóñez was signed as a free agent with the Detroit Tigers.
* February 7, 2005: DeWayne Wise was released by the Detroit Tigers.
* February 28, 2005: DeWayne Wise was signed as a free agent with the Detroit Tigers.

## Regular season

### Season standings

AL Central
| Team |  |  | Pct. | GB | Home | Road |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Chicago White Sox | 99 | 63 | .611 |  | 4734 | 5229 |
| Cleveland Indians | 93 | 69 | .574 | 6 | 4338 | 5031 |
| Minnesota Twins | 83 | 79 | .512 | 16 | 4536 | 3843 |
| Detroit Tigers | 71 | 91 | .438 | 28 | 3942 | 3249 |
| Kansas City Royals | 56 | 106 | .346 | 43 | 3447 | 2259 |

### Record vs. opponents

|
Sources: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Team | BAL | BOS | CWS | CLE | DET | KC | LAA | MIN | NYY | OAK | SEA | TB | TEX | TOR | NL |
| Baltimore |  | 8–10 | 2–6 | 1–6 | 3–5 | 4–2 | 2–4 | 3–3 | 7–11 | 4–6 | 7–3 | 12–6 | 4–6 | 9–10 | 8–10 |
| Boston | 10–8 |  | 4–3 | 4–2 | 6–4 | 4–2 | 6–4 | 4–2 | 9–10 | 6–4 | 3–3 | 13–6 | 7–2 | 7–11 | 12–6 |
| Chicago | 6–2 | 3–4 |  | 14–5 | 14–5 | 13–5 | 4–6 | 11–7 | 3–3 | 2–7 | 6–3 | 4–2 | 3–6 | 4–2 | 12–6 |
| Cleveland | 6–1 | 2–4 | 5–14 |  | 12–6 | 13–6 | 3–5 | 10–9 | 3–4 | 6–3 | 7–3 | 4–6 | 3–3 | 4–2 | 15–3 |
| Detroit | 5–3 | 4–6 | 5–14 | 6–12 |  | 10–9 | 4–6 | 8–11 | 1–5 | 1–5 | 5–4 | 5–2 | 4–2 | 4–3 | 9–9 |
| Kansas City | 2–4 | 2–4 | 5–13 | 6–13 | 9–10 |  | 2–7 | 6–13 | 3–3 | 2–4 | 2–7 | 3–5 | 2–8 | 3–6 | 9–9 |
| Los Angeles | 4–2 | 4–6 | 6–4 | 5–3 | 6–4 | 7–2 |  | 6–4 | 6–4 | 10–9 | 9–9 | 4–5 | 15–4 | 1–5 | 12–6 |
| Minnesota | 3–3 | 2–4 | 7–11 | 9–10 | 11–8 | 13–6 | 4–6 |  | 3–3 | 4–6 | 6–4 | 6–0 | 3–6 | 4–2 | 8–10 |
| New York | 11–7 | 10–9 | 3–3 | 4–3 | 5–1 | 3–3 | 4–6 | 3–3 |  | 7–2 | 7–3 | 8–11 | 7–3 | 12–6 | 11–7 |
| Oakland | 6–4 | 4–6 | 7–2 | 3–6 | 5–1 | 4–2 | 9–10 | 6–4 | 2–7 |  | 12–6 | 4–5 | 11–8 | 5–5 | 10–8 |
| Seattle | 3–7 | 3–3 | 3–6 | 3–7 | 4–5 | 7–2 | 9–9 | 4–6 | 3–7 | 6–12 |  | 4–2 | 6–13 | 4–6 | 10–8 |
| Tampa Bay | 6–12 | 6–13 | 2–4 | 6–4 | 2–5 | 5–3 | 5–4 | 0–6 | 11–8 | 5–4 | 2–4 |  | 6–2 | 8–11 | 3–15 |
| Texas | 6–4 | 2–7 | 6–3 | 3–3 | 2–4 | 8–2 | 4–15 | 6–3 | 3–7 | 8–11 | 13–6 | 2–6 |  | 7–3 | 9–9 |
| Toronto | 10–9 | 11–7 | 2–4 | 2–4 | 3–4 | 6–3 | 5–1 | 2–4 | 6–12 | 5–5 | 6–4 | 11–8 | 3–7 |  | 8–10 |

### Transactions

* June 8, 2005: Ugueth Urbina was traded by the Detroit Tigers with Ramón Martínez to the Philadelphia Phillies for Plácido Polanco.

### Roster

| 2005 Detroit Tigers | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Roster** | | | | | | | | | |
| **Pitchers** |  | **Catchers** **Infielders** |  | **Outfielders** |  | **Manager** **Coaches** |
|

## Player stats

### Batting

#### Starters by position

*Note: Pos = Position; G = Games played; AB = At bats; H = Hits; Avg. = Batting average; HR = Home runs; RBI = Runs batted in*

| Pos | Player | G | AB | H | Avg. | HR | RBI |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C | Iván Rodríguez | 129 | 504 | 139 | .276 | 14 | 50 |
| 1B | Chris Shelton | 107 | 388 | 116 | .299 | 18 | 59 |
| 2B | Plácido Polanco | 86 | 343 | 116 | .338 | 6 | 36 |
| 3B | Brandon Inge | 160 | 616 | 161 | .261 | 16 | 72 |
| SS | Carlos Guillén | 87 | 334 | 107 | .320 | 5 | 23 |
| LF | Craig Monroe | 157 | 567 | 157 | .277 | 20 | 89 |
| CF | Nook Logan | 129 | 322 | 83 | .258 | 1 | 17 |
| RF | Magglio Ordóñez | 82 | 305 | 92 | .302 | 8 | 46 |
| DH | Dmitri Young | 126 | 469 | 127 | .271 | 21 | 72 |

#### Other batters

*Note: G = Games played; AB = At bats; H = Hits; Avg. = Batting average; HR = Home runs; RBI = Runs batted in*

| Player | G | AB | H | Avg. | HR | RBI |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Omar Infante | 121 | 406 | 90 | .222 | 9 | 43 |
| Rondell White | 97 | 374 | 117 | .313 | 12 | 53 |
| Carlos Peña | 79 | 260 | 61 | .235 | 18 | 44 |
| Curtis Granderson | 47 | 162 | 44 | .272 | 8 | 20 |
| Vance Wilson | 61 | 152 | 30 | .197 | 3 | 19 |
| Marcus Thames | 38 | 107 | 21 | .196 | 7 | 16 |
| John McDonald | 31 | 73 | 19 | .260 | 0 | 4 |
| Jason Smith | 27 | 58 | 11 | .190 | 0 | 2 |
| Ramón Martínez | 19 | 56 | 15 | .268 | 0 | 5 |
| Tony Giarratano | 15 | 42 | 6 | .143 | 1 | 4 |
| Bobby Higginson | 10 | 26 | 2 | .077 | 0 | 1 |
| Alexis Gómez | 9 | 16 | 3 | .188 | 0 | 1 |
| Kevin Hooper | 6 | 5 | 1 | .200 | 0 | 0 |

### Pitching

#### Starting and other pitchers

*Note: G = Games pitched; IP = Innings pitched; W = Wins; L = Losses; ERA = Earned run average; SO = Strikeouts*

| Player | G | IP | W | L | ERA | SO |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Jason Johnson | 33 | 210.0 | 8 | 13 | 4.54 | 93 |
| Mike Maroth | 34 | 209.0 | 14 | 14 | 4.74 | 115 |
| Nate Robertson | 32 | 196.2 | 7 | 16 | 4.48 | 122 |
| Jeremy Bonderman | 29 | 189.0 | 14 | 13 | 4.57 | 145 |
| Sean Douglass | 18 | 87.1 | 5 | 5 | 5.56 | 55 |
| Wilfredo Ledezma | 10 | 49.2 | 2 | 4 | 7.07 | 30 |
| Román Colón | 12 | 25.0 | 1 | 1 | 6.12 | 17 |
| Jason Grilli | 3 | 16.0 | 1 | 1 | 3.38 | 5 |
| Justin Verlander | 2 | 11.1 | 0 | 2 | 7.15 | 7 |

#### Relief pitchers

*Note: G = Games pitched; W = Wins; L = Losses; SV = Saves; ERA = Earned run average; SO = Strikeouts*

| Player | G | W | L | SV | ERA | SO |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fernando Rodney | 39 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 2.86 | 42 |
| Chris Spurling | 56 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3.44 | 26 |
| Franklyn Germán | 58 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3.66 | 38 |
| Jamie Walker | 66 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3.70 | 30 |
| Kyle Farnsworth | 46 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2.32 | 55 |
| Matt Ginter | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.17 | 15 |
| Craig Dingman | 34 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3.66 | 24 |
| Ugueth Urbina | 25 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 2.63 | 31 |
| Troy Percival | 26 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 5.76 | 20 |
| Doug Creek | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.85 | 18 |
| Vic Darensbourg | 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.82 | 9 |
| Mark Woodyard | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.50 | 3 |
| Andrew Good | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.40 | 7 |
| Jason Karnuth | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.40 | 0 |

## Farm system

| Level | Team | League | Manager |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AAA | Toledo Mud Hens | International League | Larry Parrish |
| AA | Erie SeaWolves | Eastern League | Duffy Dyer |
|  | Lakeland Tigers | Florida State League | Mike Rojas |
|  | West Michigan Whitecaps | Midwest League | Matt Walbeck |
| A-Short Season | Oneonta Tigers | New York–Penn League | Tom Brookens |
| Rookie | GCL Tigers | Gulf Coast League | Kevin Bradshaw |

LEAGUE CHAMPIONS: Toledo

## InfoBox

| 2005 Detroit Tigers | |
| --- | --- |
| League | American League |
| Division | Central |
| Ballpark | Comerica Park |
| City | Detroit, Michigan |
| Record | 71–91 (.438) |
| Divisional place | 4th |
| Owners | Mike Ilitch |
| General managers | Dave Dombrowski |
| Managers | Alan Trammell |
| Television | FSN Detroit
(Mario Impemba, Rod Allen) |
| Radio | WXYT (AM)
(Jim Price, Dan Dickerson) |
|  | |


title: Auguszta Mátyás

abstract: Auguszta Mátyás is a retired Hungarian handball player and Olympic medalist.

text:
# Auguszta Mátyás

**Auguszta Mátyás** (born January 17, 1968, in Nagykanizsa) is a retired Hungarian handball player and Olympic medalist.

## Clubs

## Awards

* Nemzeti Bajnokság I Top Scorer: 1991, 1992, 2002, 2004, 2005

## InfoBox

Auguszta Mátyás
| Medal record | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Representing  Hungary | | |
| Women's Handball | | |
| Olympic Games | | |
|  | 1996 Atlanta | Team |


title: Bellsund

abstract: Bellsund is a 20-kilometer (12 mi) long sound on the west coast of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard archipelago of Norway. It is separated from Van Mijenfjorden by the islands of Akseløya and Mariaholmen. Bellsund is located south of Nordenskiöld Land and north of Wedel Jarlsberg Land.

text:
# Bellsund

**Bellsund** is a 20-kilometer (12 mi) long sound on the west coast of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard archipelago of Norway. It is separated from Van Mijenfjorden by the islands of Akseløya and Mariaholmen. Bellsund is located south of Nordenskiöld Land and north of Wedel Jarlsberg Land.

## History

Bellsund was first seen by William Barents in 1596. He simply referred to it as *Inwyck* (inlet). In 1610 Jonas Poole explored Bellsund, giving the fjord the name it retains to this day. He named it after a nearby bell-shaped mountain. In 1612 the Dutchman Willem Cornelisz. van Muyden was the first to attempt to catch whales here, but he wasn't very successful as he didn't have any Basque whalemen among his crew. In 1613, Basque, Dutch, and French whaling vessels resorted to Bellsund, but were either ordered away by armed English vessels or forced to pay a fine of some sort.

In 1614 the Dutch agreed to give Bellsund to the English, but only for one season. In 1615 the Dutch built the first semi-permanent whaling station in Spitsbergen at the mouth of Schoonhoven (Recherche Fjord), on the south side of Bellsund. It was appropriated by the English the following year. In 1626 this station was damaged by York and Hull whalers, who then sailed to their whaling station in Midterhukhamna, just across the entrance of Van Keulenfjorden. Here they were found by the heavily armed flagship of the London whaling fleet, the *Hercules*, under admiral William Goodlad. A two-hour battle ensued, resulting in defeat for the Hull and York fleet and their expulsion from Spitsbergen. Hull continued to send whaling vessels to occupy this station for the next 25 years, while the English as a whole probably resorted to Bellsund at least until the late 1650s.

77°40′N 14°15′E / 77.667°N 14.250°E / 77.667; 14.250


title: Bates family

abstract: The Bates family is an American political and banking family from Maine and Massachusetts whose members include a prominent member of the prestigious Hell Fire Club, the 26th U.S. Attorney General serving under Abraham Lincoln, the second Governor of Missouri, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for Arkansas, and a prominent textile tycoon who founded the Bates Manufacturing Company and Bates College in Lewiston, Maine. The family includes various merchants, politicians, inventors, clergymen, artists, and socialites. The family is related to the prominent political Gilbert family and indirectly to the Alden family, the first family on the Mayflower.

text:
# Bates family

The **Bates family** is an American political and banking family from Maine and Massachusetts whose members include a prominent member of the prestigious Hell Fire Club, the 26th U.S. Attorney General serving under Abraham Lincoln, the second Governor of Missouri, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for Arkansas, and a prominent textile tycoon who founded the Bates Manufacturing Company and Bates College in Lewiston, Maine. The family includes various merchants, politicians, inventors, clergymen, artists, and socialites.

The family is related to the prominent political Gilbert family and indirectly to the Alden family, the first family on the Mayflower.

## History

### Early prominence

The Bates family most likely originated from Lydd in Kent, England. They have lived there since at least the 13th century. The prominence of the Bates family began with its patriarch, Benjamin Bates I (1651–1710), who worked his way into the legal world as a young boy, in Edinburgh, Scotland, and soon gained a reputation for winning arguments and debates among the most senior councilmen in his town. His rapid ascension through the ranks of the law landed him high paying commissions and high-profile cases, eventually leading him into banking. Little is written about the first Benjamin Bates, and he is most noted for being survived by Benjamin Bates II, is often noted as the "revival patriarch" as his life and pursuits landed him in the elite Hellfire Club hosted by Francis Dashwood. Using the considerable sum bestowed upon to him by his father he lived a life of pure excess and began collecting art to soothe his restlessness. Benjamin Bates III, went on to become a prominent merchant of food and working tools. The family can trace their ancestors to John Alden who was crew member on the historic 1620 voyage of the Pilgrim ship *Mayflower,* through the union of Elkanah Bates (1779 - 1841) and Hannah Copeland. The family assumed their family crest upon their marriage. Alden's daughter Ruth married John Bass, and were survived by Benjamin, Williams and eventually Hannah Copeland, who began the lineage with the Bates family. The Bates family starts in England but moved to and from Massachusetts periodically, with certain members being born abroad and others being born in New England. Deeply religious the family founded numerous (some now defunct) religious institutions and centers. Alfred Bates fought in the American Revolution as a captain, and later became a brigadier general for the Massachusetts State Militia.

Edward Bates born in Goochland County, Virginia, on the Bates' Belmont plantation, he was privately tutored at home as a boy. When older, he attended Charlotte Hall Military Academy in Maryland. Bates's first foray into politics came in 1820, with election as a member of the state's constitutional convention. He wrote the preamble to the state constitution—an honor that later influenced his fight against the radical Missouri Constitution of 1865. He next was appointed as the new state's Attorney General. He became a prominent member of the Whig Party during the 1840s, where his political philosophy closely resembled that of Henry Clay. While a slaveholder, during this time, Bates became interested in the case of the slave Polly Berry, who in 1843 gained her freedom decades after having been held illegally in the free state of Illinois for several months. In 1850, President Millard Fillmore asked Bates to serve as U.S. Secretary of War, but he declined. At the Whig National Convention in 1852, Bates was considered for nomination as vice-president on the party ticket, and he led on the first ballot before losing on the second ballot to William Alexander Graham. His brothers Frederick and James Woodson also served in politics as Governor of Missouri, and Senator respectively.

### Familial expansion

Many descendants of the first Bates members lived modestly off of their inheritances until Elkanah Bates began heavily investing all over the state of Massachusetts serving some clients in Maine, and starting his own cotton factory. His wealth was increased considerably, from cotton brought up from the slave plantations of Alabama, and Mississippi. Elkanah Bates was survived by Benjamin Edward Bates IV, who went on to be one of the most prominent businessmen in the United States and the wealthiest man in Maine for nearly half a century. Benjamin Bates IV was born in Mansfield, Massachusetts on July 12, 1808, to Hannah Copeland and Elkanah Bates as their third child out of eight. The family has historical ties to the Congregational Church, and both of his parents belonged to the local church in Mansfield. He was privately schooled the Wrentham Academy, at 15 and moved to Boston in 1829, at age 21. He soon followed the footsteps of his father and began his early business career. He co-founded the firm of Davis, & Bates in Boston, and his wealth exponentially increased so much so that his overall business engagements quelled the Manhattan panic of 1837's effects in Maine. His principle accomplishment during his early business career was the establishment of Bates Manufacturing Company. The company went on to be the largest manufacturing company in the state of Maine and provided two-thirds of all textile output for the state. It employed approximately five thousand people from Canadian and Irish descent.

He moved to Lewiston, Maine, which was considered a pivotal moment in his life as "the third reincarnation of the Bates man". He went on to found the Lewiston Water Company, and the Bates Mill which was the largest Mill in the city. Bates' practices with the mill dominated the mill industry and was one of the first great U.S. business trusts. He initially gained wealth and influence from manufacturing textiles and estate development with correspondence to the mills. His mills extended from the Androscoggin River to northern Lewiston. Under Bates’ supervision, during the Civil War, the mill produced textiles to the Union Army. His mills generated employment for thousands of Canadians, and immigrants from Europe. The mill was Maine's largest employer for three decade. Bates bought an unprecedented amount of cotton prior to the outbreak of the Civil War. During the War, Bates was able to produce uniforms for the Union Army as well as other textiles. His efforts concluded numerous periodic shortages of textiles through the war to be quelled, he was dubbed, the "supplier of movement." His capitalization of this, saw to great levels of profit for his firms and companies, and caused dozens of mills to be closed due to overwhelming competition. His business pursuits stemmed into the railroad industry, and he went on to control 15% of all railroads in Maine. Bates was drawn to the newly conceptualized Maine State Seminary in central Lewiston, and asked its founder and one of his good friends Oren Burbank Cheney to be involved, which would become his crowning achievement.

#### Bates College

After being approached by Oren Burbank Cheney, he began offering up the services of his mills, canals, and other holdings in the construction of such an institution. In 1852, he personally pledged another $6,000 to the school. In 1853, Oren Burbank Cheney appointed him as a Trustee of the college and in 1854 subsequently became chairman of the Board of Trustees of the college due to his considerable donations. He went on to donate $25,000 for the foundation of agriculture department and moved a subscription of $75,000 for campus expansion. On February 21, 1873, he donated $100,000 on the condition that the amount was met by third-party donors, within five years. Although he placed conditions on his donations, he realized his donations regardless of the conditions being met.

By his death in 1878, Bates' donations to the college totalled over $100,000, and overall contributions valued at $250,000. Cheney renamed the college after Bates without his knowledge.

Bates wrote to Cheney and noted the naming of the college after him on May 18, 1863, saying:

> In regard to the name of your college, I can only say that my choice would have been to name it after someone more worthy of its inception and history... I am sorry the Board of Trustees have renamed the college after me as I cannot raise so much money as people may think I am asking money for myself.

By his death in 1878, Bates had amassed a total net worth of approximately $79.4 million (worth $1.7 billion in 2016), and as the richest member of the family. The family possessed assets that included his holdings in Maine, New York, and Massachusetts that encompassed the non-operational value of B. T. Loring & Co., Bates, Turner & Co., his holding company the Bates Manufacturing Company, his stake in the Lewiston Water Company, Bates Mill, and miscellaneous banking endeavors in New York. In his Will he pledged $50,000 to his wife Sarah Gilbert along with his 2.8 million dollar estate, $10,000 to his brother William, $10,000 to his brother Elkanah Bates II, $10,000 equally divided among the children of his sister, Charlotte, $10,000 to Edward Atkinson, and $10,000 to George Fabian. He left each of his children, Benjamin Edward V, Lilian, Sarah, and Author $250,000 in the form of a trust.

However, Bates had $200,000 in outstanding debt and a pledged $100,000 to Bates College after his death. His family was required expend the $100,000 pledged but due to conditions placed on the inheritances, restricted distribution, and familial debt, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts eventually ruled that Bates' heirs did not have to pay Bates College the pledged $100,000. After a period of recession the college began to financially recuperate to a larger endowment, independently. Over the next couple of years Bates College's endowment grew slowly and steadily.

Although much has been speculated on the calculated sum of the family's wealth, many agree it has fallen below Bates' $79.4 million in 1878.

## Members

**Benjamin Bates I** (c.1651 – aft. 1716) m. Esther Bates (c. 1651 – aft. March 24, 1716)

* **Benjamin Bates II** (c.1716–1790) m. Mary Dolbier (1726–1796)
    + Thomas Bates (1741–1805) m. Caroline Woodson (1751–1771)
        - **Frederick Bates** (1777–1825) m. Nacy Opie Ball (1802–1877)
        - Emily Caroline Bates (1820–1891)
        - Lucius Lee Bates (1821–1898)
        - Woodville Bates (1823–1840)
        - Frederick Jr. Bates (1826–1862)
        - **James Woodson Bates** (1788–1846) m. Elizabeth Moore (1810 – .d)
        - **Edward Bates** (1793–1869) m. Julia Coalter (1807–1880) (The couple had 17 children)
    + **Benjamin Bates III** (1749–1818) m. Abigail Billings (1656–1716)
        - Billing Bates (1770–1850; unmarried)
        - Betsey Cobb (1771–1843) m. Jonathan Cobb (1764–1853)
        - Sally Day (1773–1851) m. Samuel Day (1759–1812)
        - Eunice Knap (1775 – .d) m. John Knap Jr. (1745 – .d)
        - Polly Pratt (1782 – .d) m. Solomon Pratt (1763 – .d)
        - Alfred Bates (1784–1786)
        - Charlotte Skinner (1787 – .d) m. Solomon Skinner (1790 – .d)
        - Harriet Clap (1789 – .d) m. Warren Clap (1759 – .d)
        - Elkanah Bates (1779–1841) m. Hannah Copeland (1780–1834)
            * Gerry Eldridge Bates (1800–1878) m. Georgia Smith
                + Dr. Frederick H. Bates (1857–1920) m. Nellie Porter Emery (1864–1939)
                    - Alben Frederick Bates (1886–1980) m. Clara Lucia Glos (1886–1965)
                        * Alben Frederick Bates Jr. (1917–2003)
                        * Henry Glos Bates (1923–2018)
                            + Christine Bates Crum (1947–) m. Lawrence Crum
                                - Anne Crum Ross m. Alexander Ross
                                - Henry Crum
                            + Rebecca Bates Dickinson (1950-) m. William Dickinson
                                - Robert Dickinson
                                - Bradley Dickinson
                                - Benjamin Dickinson
                            + Patricia Bates Pace (1952-) m. Gregory Pace
                                - Gregory Pace Jr.
                                - John Henry Pace
                            + Margaret Bates (1955–)
                        * Carol Glos Bates (1913–1996)
                    - Margaret Eunice Bates (1888–1976)
                + Charles H. Bates
            * Loretta Bates (1804 – .d; unmarried)
            * Stella Bates (1806 – .d; unmarried)
            * **Benjamin Bates IV** (1808–1878) m. Sarah Chapman Gilbert (2nd wife and daughter of Joseph Gilbert) (1832–1882)
                + Josephine Bates II (with 1st wife Josephine Louisa Shepard (1815–1842)) (1839–1886)
                + Benjamin Edward Bates V (1863–1906)
                + Sarah Hersher Bates (1867–1937)
                + Lillian Gilbert Bates (1872–1951)
                + Arthur Hobart Herscher Bates (1870–1953)
            * William Billings Bates (1811–1880) m. Mary Willard (1815–1877)
                + Alfred Willard Bates (1836–1892)
                + Harriet Richmond Bates (1843–1847)
                + William Ellery Bates (1855–1857)
            * Charlotte Bates (1813 – .d; unmarried)
            * Elkanah Gerry Bates (1816 – 1881; unmarried)
            * Alfred Bates (1819 – .d; unmarried)
            * Elizabeth Bates (1823 – .d; unmarried)

**Note:** Many of the family members are buried at the Bates Family Memorial at 930 Fir Avenue. With Benjamin Edward Bates IV's first wife, Josephine Louisa Shepard, there is speculation on the possibility of a child between the two, named Josephine Bates. Benjamin Edward Bates IV's second wife, Sarah Chapman Gilbert, was over 20 years younger than he was.

### Further reading

* Boston Herald, *The People You Know - Benjamin Edward Bates.* Boston Herald Publishing, 2010
* Harry Chase, *Bates College was named for Mansfield Man.* Edmund Muskie Archives, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine: Bates College.
* Johnnett, R. F. (1878). *Bates Student: A Monthly Magazine*. Edmund Muskie Archives, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine: Bates College.
* Gilbert T. Joseph, *Reminiscences of Early Days*. Edmund Muskie Archives, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine: Bates College.
* Thomas Mercer (1990) Bates: A Familial Journey. Boston Her. Press.

### Citations

*

## InfoBox

| Bates | |
| --- | --- |
| The grave of Benjamin Bates IV located in the Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Massachusetts. | |
| Current region | New England |
| Place of origin | Lydd, Kent, England |
| Connected families | Alden Family
Gilbert Family |
| Estate(s) | The Campus of Bates College
Frye Street Historic District |


title: 2015 Nashville mayoral election

abstract: The 2015 Nashville mayoral election took place on August 6, 2015, to elect the next mayor of Nashville, Tennessee. Incumbent Democratic Mayor Karl Dean was term limited and could not run for re-election to a third term in office. Since there was no candidate that received a majority of votes in the initial round of the election, a runoff election was held. In the runoff election, Democratic candidate Megan Barry was elected with 54.8% of the vote, defeating Republican Candidate David Fox. All Nashville municipal elections are required to be non-partisan, but each candidate was affiliated with a political party.

text:
# 2015 Nashville mayoral election

The **2015 Nashville mayoral election** took place on August 6, 2015, to elect the next mayor of Nashville, Tennessee. Incumbent Democratic Mayor Karl Dean was term limited and could not run for re-election to a third term in office. Since there was no candidate that received a majority of votes in the initial round of the election, a runoff election was held. In the runoff election, Democratic candidate Megan Barry was elected with 54.8% of the vote, defeating Republican Candidate David Fox.

All Nashville municipal elections are required to be non-partisan, but each candidate was affiliated with a political party.

## Candidates

### Advanced to the runoff

### Eliminated in the first round

* Bill Freeman, real estate executive, former treasurer of the Tennessee Democratic Party and former director of Development for the Nashville Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency
* Bobby Bones, National Radio Personality
* Charles Robert Bone, attorney and businessman
* Howard Gentry, Davidson County Criminal Court Clerk, former Vice Mayor and candidate for Mayor in 2007
* Jeremy Kane, charter school founder
* Linda Eskind Rebrovick, businesswoman

### Potential

* Stuart Brunson, former Deputy Governor of Tennessee
* Butch Eley, businessman
* Frank Garrison, businessman
* Jason Holleman, Metropolitan Councilmember
* Ronnie Steine, Metropolitan Councilmember and former Vice Mayor
* Carter Todd, Metropolitan Councilmember
* Mike Turner, state representative

### Declined

## Results

### First round

Election Results
August 6, 2015
| Candidate | | Votes | % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Megan Barry | | 24,553 | 23.53% |
| David A. Fox | | 23,754 | 22.77% |
| Bill Freeman | | 22,308 | 21.38% |
| Howard Gentry Jr. | | 12,110 | 11.61% |
| Charles Robert Bone | | 10,962 | 10.51% |
| Linda Eskind Rebrovick | | 5,827 | 5.59% |
| Jeremy Kane | | 4,767 | 4.57% |
| Write-in | | 62 | 0.06% |
| Total votes | | **104,343** | **100.00%** |

### Runoff

No candidates received the required majority for the election. Therefore, a runoff election took place on September 10, 2015, between the two candidates receiving the most votes, Megan Barry and David Fox.

Democrat Megan Barry defeated Republican David Fox by a 9.8% margin.

2015 Nashville mayoral election results (runoff)
| Candidate | | Votes | % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Megan Barry | | 60,519 | 54.79 |
| David A. Fox | | 49,694 | 44.99 |
| *Write-in* | | 241 | 0.22 |
| Total votes | | **110,454** | **100.00** |

## InfoBox

2015 Nashville mayoral election
| --- | |
| --- | --- |
|  | |
| Turnout | 28.39%  (first round) 8.68 pp
29.63%  (runoff) 1.24 pp |
| Candidate **Megan Barry** David Fox Bill Freeman  Party Democratic Republican Democratic  First round **24,553
23.53%** **23,754
22.77%** 22,308
21.38%  Runoff **60,519
54.79%** 49,694
44.99% *Eliminated*   ---  Candidate Howard Gentry Jr. Charles Robert Bone Linda Eskind Rebrovick  Party Democratic Democratic Republican  First round 12,110
11.61% 10,962
10.51% 5,827
5.59%  Runoff *Eliminated* *Eliminated* *Eliminated* | |
| ---  **First-round results by precinct**
**Barry:**      \<10%      10–20%      20–30%      30–40%      40–50%      50–60%
**Fox:**      \<10%      10–20%      20–30%      30–40%      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%
**Freeman:**      \<10%      10–20%      20–30%      30–40%
**Gentry:**      \<10%      10–20%      20–30%      40–50%      70–80%
**Bone:**      \<10%
No data
**Runoff results by precinct**
**Barry:**      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      \>90%
**Fox:**      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%
No data | |
| ---  **Mayor before election**
Karl Dean
Democratic **Elected mayor**
Megan Barry
Democratic | |


title: 2011 Campeonato Roraimense

abstract: The 2011 Campeonato Roraimense was the 17th season of Roraima's top professional football league. The competition began 2 April and ended 21 May. Baré was the defending champion, but did not participate due to financial issues.

text:
# 2011 Campeonato Roraimense

The **2011 Campeonato Roraimense** was the 17th season of Roraima's top professional football league. The competition began 2 April and ended 21 May. Baré was the defending champion, but did not participate due to financial issues.

## Format

Six clubs were divided into two groups that played in two tournaments. In both tournaments the teams played a single round robin. The group winners qualified for the final. The winner of both tournaments played for the state championship. If the same team had won both tournaments, they would have been automatically declared the champion.

### Qualifications

The champion qualified for 2012 Copa do Brasil and 2011 Campeonato Brasileiro Série D

## Participating teams

| Club | Home city |
| --- | --- |
| Atlético Roraima | Boa Vista |
| GAS | Boa Vista |
| Náutico (RR) | Boa Vista |
| Real (RR) | São Luiz do Anauá |
| Rio Negro (RR) | Boa Vista |
| São Raimundo (RR) | Boa Vista |

All games expect Rio Negro vs Náutico were played in Ribeirão, Boa Vista

## First tournament

### Group stage

#### Group A standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Real-RR | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 4 |
| 2 | Atlético Roraima | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 4 |
| 3 | Rio Negro-RR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 |

Source:

Real qualified due to having less red cards than Atlético Roraima (0-2).

#### Group B standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Náutico-RR | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 4 |
| 2 | São Raimundo-RR | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 3 | GAS | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 |

Source:

### Final stage

| Real | 1-0 | Náutico |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ivan Mota 10' |  |  |

Ribeirão, Boa VistaReferee: José Ordílio (RR)

## Second tournament

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Real-RR | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 10 |
| 2 | São Raimundo (RR) | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 10 |
| 3 | Atlético Roraima | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 7 |
| 4 | Náutico-RR | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 5 |
| 5 | Rio Negro-RR | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 4 |
| 6 | GAS | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 4 |

Source:

Real won both stages.

## Overall standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Real-RR (C) | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 17 | 2012 Copa do Brasil |
| 2 | São Raimundo (RR) | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 12 |  |
| 3 | Atlético Roraima | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 11 | +3 | | 11 |
| 4 | Náutico-RR | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 13 | +2 | | 9 |
| 5 | GAS | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 15 | 8 | | 5 |
| 6 | Rio Negro-RR | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 5 | | 4 |

Source:
(C) Champions

2011 Roraima on www.rsssfbrasil.com

## InfoBox

Campeonato Roraimense
| Season | 2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Champions | Real-RR |
| Relegated | (no relegation) |
| Copa do Brasil | Real-RR |
| Série D | all teams withdrew |
| 2010 2012 | |