title: 2013 Nyeri local elections

abstract: Local elections were held in Nyeri County to elect a Governor and County Assembly on 4 March 2013. Under the new constitution, which was passed in a 2010 referendum, the 2013 general elections were the first in which Governors and members of the County Assemblies for the newly created counties were elected. They will also be the first general elections run by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission(IEBC) which has released the official list of candidates.

text:
# 2013 Nyeri local elections

**Local elections** were held in Nyeri County to elect a Governor and County Assembly on 4 March 2013. Under the new constitution, which was passed in a 2010 referendum, the 2013 general elections were the first in which Governors and members of the County Assemblies for the newly created counties were elected. They will also be the first general elections run by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission(IEBC) which has released the official list of candidates.

## Gubernatorial election

| Candidate | Running Mate | Coalition | Party | Votes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gachagua, James Nderitu | Githaiga, Wamathai Samwel |  | Grand National Union | -- |
| Gakuru, Patrick Wahome | Munene, Maina Patrick | Jubilee | The National Alliance | -- |
| Mathenge, Thuo | Ndegwa, Geoffrey Gitonga |  | Saba Saba Asili | -- |
| Mwangi Njururi Mutahi | Macharia, David Wanjohi |  | NARC–Kenya | -- |
| Wang'ondu, John Githinji | Gichuki, Eliud Kanyi |  | Orange Democratic Movement | -- |
|


title: Arping

abstract: arping is a computer software tool for discovering and probing hosts on a computer network. Arping probes hosts on the examined network link by sending link layer frames using the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) request method addressed to a host identified by its MAC address of the network interface. The utility program may use ARP to resolve an IP address provided by the user. The function of arping is analogous to the utility ping that probes the network with the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) at the Internet Layer of the Internet Protocol Suite. Two popular arping implementations exist. One is part of Linux iputils suite, and cannot resolve MAC addresses to IP addresses. The other arping implementation, written by Thomas Habets, can ping hosts by MAC address as well as by IP address, and adds more features. Having both arping implementations on a system may introduce conflicts. Some Linux distros handle this by removing iputils arping along with dependent packages like NetworkManager if Habets's arping is installed. Others have iputils-arping split into a separate package to avoid this problem. In networks employing repeaters that implement proxy ARP, the ARP response may originate from such proxy hosts and not directly from the probed target.

text:
# Arping

**arping** is a computer software tool for discovering and probing hosts on a computer network. Arping probes hosts on the examined network link by sending link layer frames using the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) request method addressed to a host identified by its MAC address of the network interface. The utility program may use ARP to resolve an IP address provided by the user.

The function of arping is analogous to the utility *ping* that probes the network with the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) at the Internet Layer of the Internet Protocol Suite.

Two popular arping implementations exist. One is part of Linux iputils suite, and cannot resolve MAC addresses to IP addresses. The other arping implementation, written by Thomas Habets, can ping hosts by MAC address as well as by IP address, and adds more features. Having both arping implementations on a system may introduce conflicts. Some Linux distros handle this by removing iputils arping along with dependent packages like NetworkManager if Habets's arping is installed. Others (e.g. Debian-based distros like Ubuntu) have iputils-arping split into a separate package to avoid this problem.

In networks employing repeaters that implement proxy ARP, the ARP response may originate from such proxy hosts and not directly from the probed target.

## Example

Example session output of arping from iputils:

```
ARPING 192.168.39.120 from 192.168.39.1 eth0
Unicast reply from 192.168.39.120 [00:01:80:38:F7:4C]  0.810ms
Unicast reply from 192.168.39.120 [00:01:80:38:F7:4C]  0.607ms
Unicast reply from 192.168.39.120 [00:01:80:38:F7:4C]  0.602ms
Unicast reply from 192.168.39.120 [00:01:80:38:F7:4C]  0.606ms
Sent 4 probes (1 broadcast(s))
Received 4 response(s)

```

Example session output from Thomas Habets's arping:

```
ARPING 192.168.16.96
60 bytes from 00:04:5a:4b:b6:ec (192.168.16.96): index=0 time=292.000 usec
60 bytes from 00:04:5a:4b:b6:ec (192.168.16.96): index=1 time=310.000 usec
60 bytes from 00:04:5a:4b:b6:ec (192.168.16.96): index=2 time=256.000 usec
^C
--- 192.168.16.96 statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received,   0% unanswered (0 extra)

```


title: 1976 Westminster Titans football team

abstract: The 1976 Westminster Titans football team was an American football team that represented Westminster College of Pennsylvania as an independent during the 1976 NAIA Division II football season. In their fifth season under head coach Joe Fusco, the Titans compiled a 10–1 record. They advanced to the NAIA Division II playoffs, defeating Texas Lutheran (31–0) in the semifinal and Redlands (20–13) in the NAIA Division II National Championship Game.

text:
# 1976 Westminster Titans football team

1976 NAIA Division II independents football records
|  | Conf | | | | |  |  | Overall | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Team | W |  | L |  | T |  |  | W |  | L |  | T |
| No. 3 Texas Lutheran ^ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 |  | 0 |
| No. 1 Westminster (PA) ^ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 |  | 0 |
| No. 4 Cal Lutheran |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 |  | 0 |
| No. 11 Georgetown (KY) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 2 |  | 1 |
| Franklin (IN) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 3 |  | 0 |
| No. 18 Waynesburg |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 3 |  | 0 |
| No. T–19 Benedictine (KS) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 4 |  | 0 |
| Simon Fraser |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 5 |  | 0 |
| Azusa Pacific |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 5 |  | 0 |
| Iowa Wesleyan |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 7 |  | 0 |
| Oklahoma Panhandle State |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 8 |  | 0 |
| Geneva |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 8 |  | 0 |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| * ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Division II poll | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

The **1976 Westminster Titans football team** was an American football team that represented Westminster College of Pennsylvania as an independent during the 1976 NAIA Division II football season. In their fifth season under head coach Joe Fusco, the Titans compiled a 10–1 record. They advanced to the NAIA Division II playoffs, defeating Texas Lutheran (31–0) in the semifinal and Redlands (20–13) in the NAIA Division II National Championship Game.

## Schedule

| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Attendance | Source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| September 11 | at Susquehanna | Selinsgrove, PA | W 20–7 |  |  |
| September 18 | Juniata |  | L 7–14 |  |  |
| September 25 | at Indiana (PA) | Indiana, PA | W 6–2 |  |  |
| October 2 | vs. Waynesburg |  | W 33–7 |  |  |
| October 9 | Grove City | * Memorial Field * New Wilmington, PA | W 27–0 |  |  |
| October 16 | at Frostburg State | Frostburg, MD | W 55–7 |  |  |
| October 23 | at Bethany (WV) | Bethany, WV | W 10–3 |  |  |
| October 30 | Geneva | * Memorial Field * New Wilmington, PA | W 28–6 |  |  |
| November 6 | at Allegheny | Meadville, PA | W 10–7 |  |  |
| November 20 | at Texas Lutheran |  | W 31–0 | 4,500 |  |
| December 4 | at Redlands |  | W 20–13 | 5,278 |  |
| * Homecoming | | | | | | | |

## Season overview

### Homecoming vs. Grove City

On October 9, Westminster defeated Grove City, 27–0, in the Titans' homecoming game. It was Westminster's 25th consecutive homecoming victory. Quarterback Jan Budai ran 74 yards for a touchdown after the running back missed an assignment to take the handoff from Budai.

### Frostburg State

Westminster won its most one-sided game of the season on October 16, defeating Frostburg State by a 55–7 score at Frostburg, Maryland. Westminster's defense gave up only four first downs, forced six fumbles and two interceptions, and held Frostburg to 14 passing yards and minus 16 rushing yards. Frostburg's sole touchdown came on an 88-yard kickoff return. Westminter out-gained Frostburg by 535 yards of total offense to minus two.

### Allegheny

On November 6, Westminster concluded its regular season with a 10–7 victory over Allegheny at Robertson Field in Meadville, Pennsylvania. Sophomore Jeff Ribey returned a punt 88 yards for the game-winning touchdown in the fourth quarter. Rimbey was a backup safety and not the team's regular punt returner until an injury earlier in the season gave him the opportunity to play. The victory qualified the Titans for a berth in the NAIA Division II playoffs.

### Semifinals at Texas Lutheran

Westminster entered the playoffs with the top rushing defense in Division II, allowing only 57.7 points per game.

On November 20, Westminster upset the No. 1-ranked Texas Lutheran Bulldogs, winning by a 31–0 score on the road in Seguin, Texas. Texas Lutheran had won the Division II championship in both 1974 and 1975 and was the favorite to win again in 1976. Quarterback Jan Budai threw an 18-yard touchdown pass to Dave Hasson and ran one yard for another touchdown. Dave Armahizer also scored on an 85-yard interception return in the third quarter. On defense, the Titans held Texas Lutheran to 122 rushing yards and 139 passing yards.

### Championship game at Redlands

On December 4, Westminster, ranked No. 2, played in the Division II national championship game, defeating No. 3 Redlands, 20–13, on the road in Redlands, California. Westminster quarterback Jan Budai threw a 44-yard touchdown pass to Dave Hasson. Redlands kicked two field goals, and the Titans led, 7–6, at halftime. In the third quarter, Westminster capitalized on a Redlands fumble recovered at the six-yard line. Mike Szuba scored on a one-yard run. Redlands tied the game, 13–13, on a 29-yard touchdown pass from Steve Vento to Brian DeRoo. Redlands fumbled a punt, and Westminster recovered the ball at Redlands' 22-yard line. From there, the Titans advanced to the two-yard line, and Budai ran two yards for the game-winning touchdown with 6:56 remaining in the game.

## InfoBox

| 1976 Westminster Titans football | |
| --- | --- |
| NAIA Division II national champion | |
| NAIA Division II Championship Game, W 20–13 vs. Redlands | |
| Conference | Independent |
| Record | 10–1 |
| Head coach |  |
| Defensive coordinator | Gene Nicholson (5th season) |
| Home stadium | Memorial Field |
|


title: Fort Louis (La Rochelle)

abstract: Fort Louis was a Royal fort built just outside the walls of the Huguenot city in La Rochelle. The fort was a source of great tension between the Huguenots of La Rochelle and Louis XIII, and was perceived as a real threat to their survival. Marshal Lesdiguieres predicted "Either La Rochelle must take Fort Louis, or the Fort will destroy La Rochelle." The construction of the fort had been started by the Count of Soissons in 1620 during the first Huguenot rebellion. With the Treaty of Montpellier, Louis XIII had agreed to remove the fort in due time, but he and his Minister Richelieu later temporised and avoided the promised removals despite the requests by La Rochelle. Fort Louis played a key role in establishing the fortifications around La Rochelle during the 1627-1628 Siege of La Rochelle.

text:
# Fort Louis (La Rochelle)

**Fort Louis** was a Royal fort built just outside the walls of the Huguenot city in La Rochelle.

The fort was a source of great tension between the Huguenots of La Rochelle and Louis XIII, and was perceived as a real threat to their survival. Marshal Lesdiguieres predicted "Either La Rochelle must take Fort Louis, or the Fort will destroy La Rochelle."

The construction of the fort had been started by the Count of Soissons in 1620 during the first Huguenot rebellion. With the Treaty of Montpellier, Louis XIII had agreed to remove the fort in due time, but he and his Minister Richelieu later temporised and avoided the promised removals despite the requests by La Rochelle.

Fort Louis played a key role in establishing the fortifications around La Rochelle during the 1627-1628 Siege of La Rochelle.

46°09′21″N 1°10′20″W / 46.1558°N 1.1721°W / 46.1558; -1.1721


title: Atanasio Ballesteros

abstract: Atanasio Ballesteros was a Spanish lawyer and politician who served as both Deputy and Senator.

text:
# Atanasio Ballesteros

**Atanasio Ballesteros** (7 October 1962 – 10 May 2019) was a Spanish lawyer and politician who served as both Deputy and Senator.

## Biography

Shortly after graduating in Law, he opened his first law firm in Almansa and decided to run for Mayor of his town with some friends for the People's Party. He narrowly missed winning the mayoralty by a margin of three votes.

A member of the People's Party, he held various positions within the Party: President of the PP of Albacete (2000–2004); Councilor of the Bonete City Council for eight years (1995–2007); Member of Parliament in two terms, V legislature (1993–1996) and VI legislature (1996–2000). In the latter, he was replaced in December 1999 by Enrique García Martínez.


title: 1986–87 Cypriot Second Division

abstract: The 1986–87 Cypriot Second Division was the 32nd season of the Cypriot second-level football league. APEP FC won their 1st title.

text:
# 1986–87 Cypriot Second Division

The **1986–87 Cypriot Second Division** was the 32nd season of the Cypriot second-level football league. APEP FC won their 1st title.

## Format

Fifteen teams participated in the 1986–87 Cypriot Second Division. All teams played against each other twice, once at their home and once away. The team with the most points at the end of the season crowned champions. The first two teams were promoted to 1987–88 Cypriot First Division. The last two teams were relegated to the 1987–88 Cypriot Third Division.

## Changes from previous season

**Teams promoted to 1986–87 Cypriot First Division**

**Teams promoted from 1985–86 Cypriot Third Division**

## League standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | APEP FC (C, P) | 28 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 53 | 25 | +28 | 43 | Promoted to Cypriot First Division |
| 2 | Anagennisi Deryneia FC (P) | 28 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 56 | 21 | +35 | | 41 |
| 3 | Orfeas Nicosia | 28 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 52 | 25 | +27 | 40 |  |
| 4 | Doxa Katokopias FC | 28 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 37 | 23 | +14 | | 37 |
| 5 | Onisilos Sotira | 28 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 44 | 33 | +11 | | 33 |
| 6 | Evagoras Paphos | 18 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 46 | 31 | +15 | | 31 |
| 7 | Keravnos Strovolou FC | 28 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 27 | 26 | +1 | | 27 |
| 8 | Akritas Chlorakas | 28 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 36 | 47 | 11 | | 26 |
| 9 | ENTHOI Lakatamia FC | 28 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 31 | 35 | 4 | | 25 |
| 10 | PAEEK FC | 28 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 13 | | 24 |
| 11 | Othellos Athienou FC | 28 | 6 | 12 | 10 | 28 | 34 | 6 | | 24 |
| 12 | Adonis Idaliou | 28 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 31 | 46 | 15 | | 23 |
| 13 | Digenis Akritas Ipsona | 28 | 8 | 5 | 15 | 31 | 46 | 15 | | 21 |
| 14 | Orfeas Athienou (R) | 28 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 26 | 48 | 22 | 16 | Relegated to Cypriot Third Division |
| 15 | Apollon Lympion (R) | 28 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 66 | 45 | | 9 |

Source:
Rules for classification: 1) Points, 2) Goal differences, 3) Goal for. Points system: Won=2 points, Drawn=1 point, Lost=0 points.
(C) Champions; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated

## InfoBox

Cypriot Second Division
| Season | 1986–87 |
| --- | --- |
| Champions | APEP FC<br>(1st title) |
| Promoted |  |
| Relegated |  |
| 1985–86 1987–88 | |


title: Atlantic Greyhound Bus Terminal

abstract: The Atlantic Greyhound Bus Terminal, at 109 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. in Savannah, Georgia was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2016. It was designed by architect George D. Brown in Streamline Moderne style. It was opened in 1938 and operated until 1965. It made intercity bus travel possible for residents of Savannah. John Marisano bought the building and since 2018 it houses The Grey Bar & Restaurant.

text:
# Atlantic Greyhound Bus Terminal

The **Atlantic Greyhound Bus Terminal**, at 109 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. in Savannah, Georgia was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2016.

It was designed by architect George D. Brown in Streamline Moderne style. It was opened in 1938 and operated until 1965. It made intercity bus travel possible for residents of Savannah.

John Marisano bought the building and since 2018 it houses The Grey Bar & Restaurant.

## InfoBox

|  | |
| --- | --- |
| Atlantic Greyhound Bus Terminal | |
| U.S. National Register of Historic Places | |
|  | |
|  | |
|  | |
| Location | Savannah, Georgia |
| Coordinates | 32°04′47″N 81°05′51″W / 32.079828°N 81.097621°W / 32.079828; -81.097621 |
| Area | less than one acre |
| Built | 1938 |
| Architect | George D. Brown |
| Architectural style | Streamline Moderne |
| NRHP reference No. | 16000837 |
| Added to NRHP | December 13, 2016 |


title: 2007 French motorcycle Grand Prix

abstract: The 2007 French motorcycle Grand Prix was the fifth round of the 2007 MotoGP championship. It took place on the weekend of 18–20 May 2007 at the Le Mans Bugatti Circuit. The MotoGP race was subject to wet weather and the race saw the first time in the 800cc MotoGP formula era where riders changed bikes mid-race as a result of the conditions.

text:
# 2007 French motorcycle Grand Prix

The **2007 French motorcycle Grand Prix** was the fifth round of the 2007 MotoGP championship. It took place on the weekend of 18–20 May 2007 at the Le Mans Bugatti Circuit.

The MotoGP race was subject to wet weather and the race saw the first time in the 800cc MotoGP formula era where riders changed bikes mid-race as a result of the conditions.

## MotoGP classification

| Pos. | No. | Rider | Team | Manufacturer | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid | Points |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 71 | **Chris Vermeulen** | **Rizla Suzuki MotoGP** | **Suzuki** | 28 | 50:58.713 | 12 | **25** |
| 2 | 33 | **Marco Melandri** | **Honda Gresini** | **Honda** | 28 | +12.599 | 9 | **20** |
| 3 | 27 | **Casey Stoner** | **Ducati Marlboro Team** | **Ducati** | 28 | +27.347 | 2 | **16** |
| 4 | 26 | **Dani Pedrosa** | **Repsol Honda Team** | **Honda** | 28 | +37.328 | 10 | **13** |
| 5 | 66 | **Alex Hofmann** | **Pramac d'Antin** | **Ducati** | 28 | +49.166 | 17 | **11** |
| 6 | 46 | **Valentino Rossi** | **Fiat Yamaha Team** | **Yamaha** | 28 | +53.563 | 4 | **10** |
| 7 | 21 | **John Hopkins** | **Rizla Suzuki MotoGP** | **Suzuki** | 28 | +1:01.073 | 5 | **9** |
| 8 | 65 | **Loris Capirossi** | **Ducati Marlboro Team** | **Ducati** | 28 | +1:21.241 | 15 | **8** |
| 9 | 6 | **Makoto Tamada** | **Dunlop Yamaha Tech 3** | **Yamaha** | 27 | +1 lap | 16 | **7** |
| 10 | 50 | **Sylvain Guintoli** | **Dunlop Yamaha Tech 3** | **Yamaha** | 27 | +1 lap | 11 | **6** |
| 11 | 11 | **Fonsi Nieto** | **Kawasaki Racing Team** | **Kawasaki** | 27 | +1 lap | 19 | **5** |
| 12 | 5 | **Colin Edwards** | **Fiat Yamaha Team** | **Yamaha** | 25 | +3 laps | 1 | **4** |
| Ret | 4 | Alex Barros | Pramac d'Antin | Ducati | 27 | Accident | 13 |  |
| Ret | 10 | Kenny Roberts Jr. | Team Roberts | KR212V | 26 | Retirement | 18 |  |
| Ret | 1 | Nicky Hayden | Repsol Honda Team | Honda | 25 | Accident | 7 |  |
| Ret | 56 | Shinya Nakano | Konica Minolta Honda | Honda | 20 | Accident | 14 |  |
| Ret | 14 | Randy de Puniet | Kawasaki Racing Team | Kawasaki | 8 | Accident | 8 |  |
| Ret | 24 | Toni Elías | Honda Gresini | Honda | 7 | Accident | 6 |  |
| Ret | 7 | Carlos Checa | Honda LCR | Honda | 6 | Accident | 3 |  |
|  | | | | | | | | |

## 250 cc classification

| Pos. | No. | Rider | Manufacturer | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid | Points |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1 | **Jorge Lorenzo** | **Aprilia** | 26 | 43:12.237 | 1 | **25** |
| 2 | 34 | **Andrea Dovizioso** | **Honda** | 26 | +0.156 | 8 | **20** |
| 3 | 3 | **Alex de Angelis** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +2.733 | 6 | **16** |
| 4 | 80 | **Héctor Barberá** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +5.971 | 3 | **13** |
| 5 | 60 | **Julián Simón** | **Honda** | 26 | +6.111 | 2 | **11** |
| 6 | 58 | **Marco Simoncelli** | **Gilera** | 26 | +22.753 | 7 | **10** |
| 7 | 36 | **Mika Kallio** | **KTM** | 26 | +23.139 | 9 | **9** |
| 8 | 19 | **Álvaro Bautista** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +27.416 | 5 | **8** |
| 9 | 73 | **Shuhei Aoyama** | **Honda** | 26 | +28.915 | 12 | **7** |
| 10 | 14 | **Anthony West** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +33.950 | 11 | **6** |
| 11 | 8 | **Ratthapark Wilairot** | **Honda** | 26 | +57.900 | 20 | **5** |
| 12 | 32 | **Fabrizio Lai** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +58.011 | 13 | **4** |
| 13 | 25 | **Alex Baldolini** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +1:06.251 | 22 | **3** |
| 14 | 44 | **Taro Sekiguchi** | **Aprilia** | 26 | +1:06.720 | 18 | **2** |
| 15 | 50 | **Eugene Laverty** | **Honda** | 26 | +1:07.649 | 19 | **1** |
| 16 | 28 | Dirk Heidolf | Aprilia | 26 | +1:14.837 | 16 |  |
| 17 | 9 | Arturo Tizón | Aprilia | 26 | +1:31.455 | 23 |  |
| 18 | 41 | Aleix Espargaró | Aprilia | 26 | +1:39.701 | 14 |  |
| Ret | 10 | Imre Tóth | Aprilia | 15 | Retirement | 21 |  |
| Ret | 4 | Hiroshi Aoyama | KTM | 12 | Retirement | 10 |  |
| Ret | 16 | Jules Cluzel | Aprilia | 5 | Accident | 15 |  |
| Ret | 17 | Karel Abraham | Aprilia | 5 | Accident | 17 |  |
| Ret | 12 | Thomas Lüthi | Aprilia | 2 | Retirement | 4 |  |
| DNS | 15 | Roberto Locatelli | Gilera | 0 | Did not start | 24 |  |
| OFFICIAL 250cc REPORT | | | | | | | |

## 125 cc classification

| Pos. | No. | Rider | Manufacturer | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid | Points |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 33 | **Sergio Gadea** | **Aprilia** | 24 | 41:50.112 | 6 | **25** |
| 2 | 52 | **Lukáš Pešek** | **Derbi** | 24 | +0.478 | 5 | **20** |
| 3 | 38 | **Bradley Smith** | **Honda** | 24 | +2.963 | 2 | **16** |
| 4 | 14 | **Gábor Talmácsi** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +13.516 | 8 | **13** |
| 5 | 6 | **Joan Olivé** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +13.845 | 18 | **11** |
| 6 | 55 | **Héctor Faubel** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +15.098 | 4 | **10** |
| 7 | 11 | **Sandro Cortese** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +15.603 | 14 | **9** |
| 8 | 24 | **Simone Corsi** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +15.664 | 13 | **8** |
| 9 | 63 | **Mike Di Meglio** | **Honda** | 24 | +15.777 | 10 | **7** |
| 10 | 71 | **Tomoyoshi Koyama** | **KTM** | 24 | +19.108 | 3 | **6** |
| 11 | 44 | **Pol Espargaró** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +23.920 | 19 | **5** |
| 12 | 7 | **Alexis Masbou** | **Honda** | 24 | +24.210 | 11 | **4** |
| 13 | 34 | **Randy Krummenacher** | **KTM** | 24 | +29.517 | 15 | **3** |
| 14 | 60 | **Michael Ranseder** | **Derbi** | 24 | +29.701 | 9 | **2** |
| 15 | 22 | **Pablo Nieto** | **Aprilia** | 24 | +34.936 | 17 | **1** |
| 16 | 8 | Lorenzo Zanetti | Aprilia | 24 | +45.124 | 16 |  |
| 17 | 27 | Stefano Bianco | Aprilia | 24 | +45.308 | 20 |  |
| 18 | 53 | Simone Grotzkyj | Aprilia | 24 | +46.142 | 21 |  |
| 19 | 18 | Nicolás Terol | Derbi | 24 | +46.350 | 22 |  |
| 20 | 77 | Dominique Aegerter | Aprilia | 24 | +1:00.825 | 25 |  |
| 21 | 13 | Dino Lombardi | Honda | 24 | +1:00.948 | 23 |  |
| 22 | 20 | Roberto Tamburini | Aprilia | 24 | +1:09.701 | 26 |  |
| 23 | 95 | Robert Mureșan | Derbi | 24 | +1:10.101 | 24 |  |
| 24 | 56 | Hugo van den Berg | Aprilia | 24 | +1:10.295 | 28 |  |
| 25 | 37 | Joey Litjens | Honda | 24 | +1:10.471 | 29 |  |
| 26 | 15 | Federico Sandi | Aprilia | 24 | +1:16.496 | 30 |  |
| 27 | 99 | Danny Webb | Honda | 24 | +1:21.822 | 31 |  |
| 28 | 46 | Romain Maitre | Honda | 23 | +1 lap | 32 |  |
| 29 | 47 | Steven Le Coquen | Honda | 23 | +1 lap | 34 |  |
| Ret | 75 | Mattia Pasini | Aprilia | 19 | Retirement | 1 |  |
| Ret | 35 | Raffaele De Rosa | Aprilia | 15 | Retirement | 12 |  |
| Ret | 29 | Andrea Iannone | Aprilia | 14 | Accident | 7 |  |
| Ret | 48 | Julien Cartron | Honda | 11 | Retirement | 33 |  |
| Ret | 51 | Stevie Bonsey | KTM | 3 | Accident | 27 |  |
| DNS | 12 | Esteve Rabat | Honda |  | Did not start |  |  |
| DNS | 45 | Valentin Debise | Honda |  | Did not start |  |  |
| DNQ | 49 | Gwen Le Badezet | Honda |  | Did not qualify |  |  |
| OFFICIAL 125cc REPORT | | | | | | | |

## Championship standings after the race (MotoGP)

Below are the standings for the top five riders and constructors after round five has concluded.

* **Note**: Only the top five positions are included for both sets of standings.

1. "2007 French MotoGP". *Motorpsortmagazine.com*. 13 June 2017. Retrieved 18 May 2018.
2. "2007 French MotoGP - Motor Sport Magazine Database". 13 June 2017.
3. "OFFICIAL MOTOGP REPORT" (PDF).
4. "motogp.com · ALICE GRAND PRIX DE FRANCE · MotoGP Race Classification 2007". *www.motogp.com*.
5. "Standings" (PDF). *resources.motogp.com*. 2007. Retrieved 2023-04-17.

## InfoBox

2007 French Grand Prix
| Race details | |
| --- | --- |
| Race 5 of 18 races in the<br>2007 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season | |
|  | |
| Date | 20 May 2007 |
| Official name | Alice Grand Prix de France |
| Location | Bugatti Circuit |
| Course | * Permanent racing facility * 4.180 km (2.597 mi) |
| MotoGP | |
| Pole position  Rider  Colin Edwards  Time  1:33.616  Fastest lap  Rider  John Hopkins  Time  1:38.678  Podium  First  Chris Vermeulen  Second  Marco Melandri  Third  Casey Stoner | |
| 250cc | |
| Pole position  Rider  Jorge Lorenzo  Time  1:37.934  Fastest lap  Rider  Andrea Dovizioso  Time  1:38.566  Podium  First  Jorge Lorenzo  Second  Andrea Dovizioso  Third  Alex de Angelis | |
| 125cc | |
| Pole position  Rider  Mattia Pasini  Time  1:43.111  Fastest lap  Rider  Lukáš Pešek  Time  1:43.859  Podium  First  Sergio Gadea  Second  Lukáš Pešek  Third  Bradley Smith | |


abstract: Group C of the 2006 Fed Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group I was one of four pools in the Europe/Africa Zone Group I of the 2006 Fed Cup. Four teams competed in a round robin competition, with the top team and the bottom team proceeding to their respective sections of the play-offs: the top team played for advancement to the World Group II Play-offs, while the bottom team faced potential relegation to Group II.

text:
# 2006 Fed Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group I – Pool C

**Group C** of the **2006 Fed Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group I** was one of four pools in the Europe/Africa Zone Group I of the 2006 Fed Cup. Four teams competed in a round robin competition, with the top team and the bottom team proceeding to their respective sections of the play-offs: the top team played for advancement to the World Group II Play-offs, while the bottom team faced potential relegation to Group II.

|  |  | BUL | UKR | HUN | **GBR** | RR
W–L | Set
W–L | Game
W–L | Standings |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19 | Bulgaria |  | **21** | 12 | 12 | 1–2 | 10–10 | 83–84 | 2 |
| 24 | Ukraine | 12 |  | **21** | 03 | 1–2 | 7–13 | 73–102 | 4 |
| 38 | Hungary | **21** | 12 |  | 12 | 1–2 | 10–11 | 91–98 | 3 |
| 42 | **Great Britain** | **21** | **30** | **21** |  | **3–0** | **15–6** | **105–68** | **1** |

## Bulgaria vs. Hungary

|
Bulgaria
1 | TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
18 April 2006
Red clay (outdoors) | |
Hungary
2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 2 3   1
 Dimana Krastevitch
**Kira Nagy** **6**
3 62
**77** 3
**6**     2
 **Tsvetana Pironkova**
Melinda Czink **6**
3 **6**
4      3
 Maria Penkova / Tsvetana Pironkova
**Kira Nagy / Virág Németh** 3
**6**  1
**6** | | | |

## Ukraine vs. Great Britain

|
Ukraine
1 | TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
18 April 2006
Red clay (outdoors) | |
Great Britain
2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 2 3   1
 Valeria Bondarenko
**Elena Baltacha** 3
**6**  0
**6**       2
 **Olena Antypina**
Anne Keothavong 6
**7**  **6**
2 **6**
0    3
 Olena Antypina / Valeria Bondarenko
**Elena Baltacha / Claire Curran** 4
**6**  4
**6** | | | |

## Bulgaria vs. Great Britain

|
Bulgaria
1 | TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
19 April 2006
Red clay (outdoors) | |
Great Britain
2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 2 3   1
 Dimana Krastevitch
**Elena Baltacha** 3
**6**  1
**6**       2
 **Tsvetana Pironkova**
Anne Keothavong **6**
1 **6**
1      3
 Dimana Krastevitch / Tsvetana Pironkova
**Elena Baltacha / Claire Curran** 1
**6**  **6**
1 2
**6** | | | |

## Ukraine vs. Hungary

|
Ukraine
2 | TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
19 April 2006
Red clay (outdoors) | |
Hungary
1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 2 3   1
 Valeria Bondarenko
**Kira Nagy** 2
**6**  2
**6**       2
 **Olena Antypina**
Melinda Czink **6**
4 3
**6**  **6**
3    3
 **Olena Antypina / Valeria Bondarenko**
Kira Nagy / Virág Németh **6**
4 **6**
4 | | | |

## Bulgaria vs. Ukraine

|
Bulgaria
2 | TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
20 April 2006
Red clay (outdoors) | |
Ukraine
1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 2 3   1
 **Dimana Krastevitch**
Valeria Bondarenko **6**
3 **6**
3      2
 **Tsvetana Pironkova**
Olena Antypina **6**
0 **6**
4      3
 Dimana Krastevitch / Maria Penkova
**Olena Antypina / Valeria Bondarenko** 2
**6**  1
**6** | | | |

## Hungary vs. Great Britain

|
Hungary
1 | TC Lokomotiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
20 April 2006
Red clay (outdoors) | |
Great Britain
2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 2 3   1
 Kira Nagy
**Elena Baltacha** 1
**6**  2
**6**       2
 **Melinda Czink**
Anne Keothavong 1
**6**  **6**
3 **6**
2    3
 Kira Nagy / Virág Németh
**Elena Baltacha / Claire Curran** 1
**6**  65
**77** | | | |


title: Barcarolle (Saint-Saëns)

abstract: Camille Saint-Saëns's Barcarolle in F major, Op. 108 is a chamber composition for a quartet consisting of violin, cello, harmonium and piano. Composed in 1898, the work also exists in a version for violin, cello, viola and piano created by the composer in 1909.

text:
# Barcarolle (Saint-Saëns)

Camille Saint-Saëns's **Barcarolle** in F major, Op. 108 is a chamber composition for a quartet consisting of violin, cello, harmonium (or organ) and piano. Composed in 1898, the work also exists in a version for violin, cello, viola and piano created by the composer in 1909.

## Background

The Barcarolle was Saint-Saëns's second attempt at composing for this combination of instruments, with an 1897 attempt being abandoned after five and a half pages. In 1865 he had composed the Serenade Op. 15 for a similar combination with a viola rather than a cello as the fourth instrument. In the first performance, which took place at the musical society La Trompette on 18 May 1898, the piano was played by Louis Diémer, the violin by Guillaume Rémy, the cello by Jules Delsart, with the composer playing the harmonium.

The work is dedicated to Antonio Jeanbernat, who initiated two festivals of Saint-Saëns' works in Barcelona.

## Structure

The composition is structured as a single movement marked *Allegretto moderato*. Performance time is around 8 to 10 minutes.

Notes Sources * Anderson, Keith (2013). *Saint-Saëns, C.: Piano Quartet/Piano Quintet/Barcarolle* (CD). Naxos Records. 8.572904. Archived from the original on 2016-08-16. Retrieved 2014-09-22.
* Fenech, Gerald (2009). "Review of Saint-Saëns, Piano Quartets, MDG 9431519-6". Classical Net. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
* Smith, Rollin (1992). *Saint-Saëns and the Organ*. Pendragon Press. ISBN 978-0-945193-14-2.
* Ratner, Sabina Teller (2002). *Camille Saint-Saëns, 1835–1922: A Thematic Catalogue of his Complete Works, Volume 1: The Instrumental Works*. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-816320-6.


title: Environmental issues in Puget Sound

abstract:
Puget Sound is a deep inlet of the Pacific Ocean in Washington, extending south from the Strait of Juan de Fuca through Admiralty Inlet. It was explored and named by Captain George Vancouver for his aide, Peter Puget, in 1792. The ninth Puget Sound Update, from the Puget Sound Action Team reports that:
  - "the Puget Sound has biological resources which include all of the living organisms which inhabit the marine waters and shorelines. These biological resources are plankton, invertebrates, fish, birds, mammals, and aquatic vegetation, including species that are either residential or migratory." The abundance of creatures and foliage allowed for the native peoples of the area to thrive and prosper by harvesting it. Many of the problems of the Puget Sound originated from explorers and trappers hunting and killing the indigenous species off of which the natives thrived and prospered. In the past 30 years there has been a large recession in the populations of the species which inhabit the Puget Sound. The decrease has been seen in the populations of: forage fish, salmonids, bottom fish, marine birds, harbor porpoise and orcas. This decline is attributed to environmental issues in Puget Sound. Because of this population decline, there have been changes to the fishery practices, and an increase in petitioning to add species to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). There has also been an increase in recovery and management plans for many different area species. The cause of these environmental issues are, toxic contamination, eutrophication, and near shore habitat changes. The Puget Sound has been affected by urbanization and the toxic pollutants it produces. As a government document regarding this issue says, "A major contributor of these toxic pollutants entering the Sound is the stormwater that runs off our highways, roads, driveways, roofs, parking lots, disturbed soils, and other developed surfaces." They also talk about the loss of habitat. In the last 125 years, the Puget Sound has lost or damaged 70 percent of their habitats including the salt marshes, eelgrass beds and the estuaries.

text:
# Environmental issues in Puget Sound

Puget Sound is a deep inlet of the Pacific Ocean in Washington, extending south from the Strait of Juan de Fuca through Admiralty Inlet. It was explored and named by Captain George Vancouver for his aide, Peter Puget, in 1792.

The ninth Puget Sound Update, from the Puget Sound Action Team reports that:

"the Puget Sound has biological resources which include all of the living organisms which inhabit the marine waters and shorelines. These biological resources are plankton, invertebrates, fish, birds, mammals, and aquatic vegetation, including species that are either residential or migratory."

The abundance of creatures and foliage allowed for the native peoples of the area to thrive and prosper by harvesting it. Many of the problems of the Puget Sound originated from explorers and trappers hunting and killing the indigenous species off of which the natives thrived and prospered. In the past 30 years there has been a large recession in the populations of the species which inhabit the Puget Sound. The decrease has been seen in the populations of: forage fish, salmonids, bottom fish, marine birds, harbor porpoise and orcas. This decline is attributed to **environmental issues in Puget Sound**. Because of this population decline, there have been changes to the fishery practices, and an increase in petitioning to add species to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). There has also been an increase in recovery and management plans for many different area species.

The cause of these environmental issues are, toxic contamination, eutrophication (low oxygen due to excess nutrients), and near shore habitat changes. The Puget Sound has been affected by urbanization and the toxic pollutants it produces. As a government document regarding this issue says, "A major contributor of these toxic pollutants entering the Sound is the stormwater that runs off our highways, roads, driveways, roofs, parking lots, disturbed soils, and other developed surfaces." They also talk about the loss of habitat. In the last 125 years, the Puget Sound has lost or damaged 70 percent of their habitats including the salt marshes, eelgrass beds and the estuaries.

## Puget Sound industry

Puget Sound, Washington is a body of water lying east of Admiralty Inlet, through which ocean waters reach inland some 50 miles (80 km) from the Pacific Coast to complex and intricate system of channels, inlets, estuaries, embayments and islands. Industries in this area include aerospace, military, biotechnology, fishing, electronics, computers, forest products, marine industries, telecommunications, transportation and other commerce industries.

Due to improper storage methods for dangerous chemicals, such as arsenic, areas of soil and aquatic land in Puget Sound are being managed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

Standards for the storage and discharge of industry chemicals have improved, and Puget Sound remains vital to the industries that depend upon it, such as shipping ports. Ports in Washington are diverse. Governed as municipalities, the ports operate shipping terminals, marinas, docks, and associated infrastructure, such as roads, railroads and parks. The fastest-growing part of Washington ports is industrial development.

## Urbanization and population

The Puget Sound region has been rapidly growing. According to the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), a board that plans for growth in the four central counties of the area (Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish and King counties), the combined population of these counties was nearly 3.4 million residents in 2003.

Times have changed since the 1970s, when a billboard in Seattle read "the last person to leave Seattle please turn out the lights". Between 1970 and 2000, the Puget Sound region's population increased by 1.3 million people. The 12-county Puget Sound region, including Seattle and Tacoma, has quadrupled to four million people since the 1950s, and the state predicts one million more residents by 2025. The PSRC predicts that between 2000 and 2020 the region will increase by 1.7 million people. Another change the region faces involves the demographics of its population. The segment of its population ages 65 and older is projected to increase by 150 percent, making up 17 percent of the total population by 2040.

The expansion of Microsoft and Boeing has spurred an economic growth in the area. This has major environmental implications, including pollution runoff and the altering of important shorelines. "One-third of Puget Sound shoreline has already been altered".

Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), local governments plan, coordinate and manage for growth in Washington, while protecting natural resources and public interests. The GMA requires local governments to develop long-term comprehensive plans for land uses in their jurisdictions. Plans must be coordinated with surrounding counties and be approved by a regional board. Finally, as part of the GMA, local governments must address sensitive fish and wildlife areas through Critical Area Ordinances (CAOs).

## Hood Canal hypoxia

Hood Canal is a fjord off the Puget Sound. Hypoxia is a low-oxygen condition occurring in Hood Canal. One overriding factor of this is the underwater topography of the canal. While the shallowest part of the canal is its entrance, where the ledge, or sill, of the canal measures only 150 feet (46 m) deep, the deepest parts of the canal are more than 600 feet (180 m) deep. The Hood Canal Dissolved Oxygen Program (HCDOP) and the United States Geological Service (USGS) are studying Hood Canal circulation, trying to model the tidal circulations and salinity distribution patterns between the canal and Admiralty Inlet. Other factors that, when combined with the constrictive shape, could also influence hypoxia in Hood Canal are:

1. Pacific Ocean marine water may be entering with a lower oxygen content than historically received.
2. Marine water may be entering at a density lighter than needed to flush out Hood Canal quickly or effectively.
3. Riverine freshwater input has changed—increased or decreased—altering the stratification (water) of Hood Canal marine life.
4. Organic material input may have increased.
5. Light input may have increased (algae growth increases with light, as well as organic nutrient input).
6. Wind currents may have altered water column circulation (Atmospheric circulation).

The picture surrounding hypoxia in Hood Canal is complex; research models point to more than one contributing factor: Nutrient level. Nutrient level is a large issue due to the human impact. The supply of nutrients, primarily nitrates, to the euphotic zone is thought to impact levels of dissolved oxygen. Nutrients feed algae, which under the right conditions, "bloom" and then die and decompose; the entire process requires a large amount of oxygen. This decreases the oxygen in the water column, lowering the dissolved oxygen level.

There are both natural and man-made sources of nutrients. The primary natural source is in ocean water that flushes Hood Canal. Man-made sources include leaking septic systems, storm water runoff, agriculture and various other sources causing nutrient pollution. The presence of nutrients leads to algae growth, which consumes oxygen when the algae die and decompose, contributing to the low oxygen conditions in these waters.

Another factor mentioned by the HCDOP is the influence of the ocean water. The ocean water that enters Hood Canal is like most estuaries: fresh, warm water flows out at the surface and is replaced by cold, salty water at depth. The cold, salty ocean water that enters Hood Canal comes into Puget Sound from the open ocean and has not recently been in contact with the atmosphere. As a result, this water is initially somewhat depleted in oxygen.

Oxygen levels will fluctuate throughout the year; this is due to seasonal changes in nutrient availability, solar radiation, and water column stratification (layers of water of different density, temperature, and salinity). Low oxygen conditions are at their worst in the late summer, after several months of limited flushing and maximum plankton production near the surface. In some years, oxygen becomes sufficiently depleted that animals cannot survive. These kills may occur either locally or over a wide area.

## Combined Sewage Overflow

Combined sewage overflow (CSO) occurs often in the Puget Sound. CSO occur during rain storms when runoff combines with raw sewage, overflowing pipes and carrying pollutants, harmful pathogens, and excess nutrients directly into Puget Sound. This is a threat to the biodiversity of marine wildlife as it degrades/damages the marine habitat. Due to high amounts of excess nutrients and water disturbance, there are fewer number of benthic invertebrate species found near CSO outfalls. One of the nutrients found in excess amounts is Nitrogen, which can cause low oxygen level. Excess nitrogen can causes algae blooms which leads to low oxygen level which is dangerous for marine organism that need oxygen. Furthermore, at the outfall the output disturbs the soils, which makes the water more turbid. Turbid water can increase the number of pathogens in the water. Many fishes and shellfish can be affected by some pathogens that are naturally found in the Puget Sound. High turbidity can decrease light penetration which can decrease food sources for fishes. If the turbidity is high enough it can kill fishes and/or affect reproduction and growth. Other pollutants carried by the runoff can have direct harm on many marine organisms and pollute the soils. For example, heavy metal buildup can cause physiological and reproductive harm. For example, lead in river otters and spotted sandpiper affect their reproduction. Furthermore, build-up in pollutants has been found to affect fish growth. To reach standards stated in the Clean Water Act, Washington State must have a long-term CSO Control Plan so that 1 or fewer overflow events occur on average in a year.

### King County: CSO Long-term Control Plan and Integrated Plan Alternative

King County, Washington, US, has two plans to help improve CSO impacts on the environment: CSO Long-term Control Plan and the Integrated Plan Alternative. The Integrated Plan presents management of both runoff and sewage overflow, while the Long-term Control Plan focuses on decreasing sewage overflow. At various locations, King County monitors and assesses the water quality at CSO outfall locations. Between 1979 and 2012 King County working with the City of Seattle has been able to decrease CSO by about 1.5 billion gallons. The Integrated Plan Alternative is implemented by Seattle Public Utilities and expected to be completed by 2025. The purpose of the plan is to reduce pollutants entering the water. It has suggested three methods: (1) increasing the number of streets that are swept; (2) build a water quality facility in South Park to remove pollutants; and (3) maintaining existing rain gardens and/or natural drainage systems. The CSO Long-term Control Plan is to be completed by 2030. There are four main strategies in the plan to decrease CSO impact on the environment: (1) underground storage tanks/tunnel; (2) Wet Weather treatment stations; (3) Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI); and (4) repairing/replacing existing outfalls/pipes. Underground storage tanks/tunnels are being built in North Beach, Magnolia, West Seattle, and Rainer Valley. Wet Weather treatment stations are being built in Elliot West and Henderson/MLK. GSI are being built at Barton, Highland Park, and South Green Park. At Salmon Bay (Ballard) and Leschi (Lake Washington) old outfalls and pipes are being replaced or repaired. The underground storage tank in Magnolia will be able to hold 1.5 million gallon during CSO events, which will eventually flow to the CSO treatment center in Smith Cove. The architecture of the facility was structured to collect and filter runoff by creating a rain garden. It helps clean water and provides habitat for wildlife such as birds, bees, and butterflies.

### King County: Sediment Management Plan

King County has decreased the CSO discharge into the Puget Sound, however soils are still polluted due to past CSO discharges. The Sediment Management Plan was first created in the 1990s to deal with soil pollution at CSO outfalls. The cleanup methods include capping, dredging, and source control/natural recovery. CSO outfalls of concern include the sites at Duwamish/Diagonal, King Street, Hanford Street, Lander Street, Brandon Street, Denny Way, Norfolk Street, and Pier 53-55. At Denny Way CSO outfall, the polluted soil was removed through dredging and then improved the habitat by refilling the sea floor with clean soils to mimic surround area.

## Aquatic vegetation

According to the 2007 Puget Sound Update:

> Aquatic vegetation is a key component of the near shore environment that supports the ecosystem through primary production and by providing habitat to numerous species of fish, invertebrates, birds, and mammals.
>
> Puget Sound is home to a diverse assemblage of aquatic plants and algae, each with unique habitat requirements. Major threats to submerged aquatic vegetation include physical disturbance, loss of water clarity, and excessive nutrients.
>
> Known to be important ecosystem components that are sensitive to anthropogenic stressors, eelgrass and kelp species are commonly recognized indicators of aquatic vegetation health.

There are twenty six species of kelp which grow along Washington’s shorelines, which makes it one of the highest sites of kelp diversity in the world. Changes in the oceans kelp have direct effect on other species. This is particularly due to the unique three-dimensional habitats that the plants provide for invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals. Widespread loss of kelp throughout Puget Sound would have repercussions for the marine ecosystem as a whole.

Eelgrass (*Zostera marina*) is an underwater grass that thrives in marine and estuarine water bottoms and spreads through rhizomes, or roots. It has been estimated by the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that Puget Sound is occupied by approximately 26,000 acres (110 km2) of eelgrass. Research has shown that eelgrass beds in Puget Sound can be found in two different habitats: flats, which can be described as either large, shallow bays or small "pocket" beaches, and fringe beds along steep shorelines. Beds of eelgrass provide a vital link in the nearshore foodweb, creating underwater forests for biota such as salmon, herring, sand lance, and numerous invertebrates.

Eelgrass beds provide nutrients and shelter for various biota in Puget Sound. As eelgrass and other seagrasses decay, it combines with other dead matter. This rich detritus is a staple for invertebrates, which are fed upon by salmonids, birds and other predators. Eelgrass functions as a protective cover from the predators for juvenile salmon and as a nursery for herring that deposit eggs among bed. Herring, in turn, are an important food source for juvenile and adult salmon.

During low tide, eelgrass beds shelters other small animals from extreme temperatures, and in tideflats the beds act as a sponge for moisture.

Eelgrass monitoring is conducted throughout Puget Sound using random sampling under the Submerged Vegetation Monitoring Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Nearshore Program. Results for 2003–2004 were posted in 2005. Many eelgrass populations were holding steady, but sharp declines were noted in five shallow bays in the San Juan Islands and 14 smaller sites in the greater Puget Sound. Eelgrass throughout the entire Hood Canal showed a steady decline. In eleven embayments there was almost 83 acres (340,000 m2) of eelgrass lost between 1995 and 2004.

A number of reasons contribute to the decline in eelgrass population, including, but not limited to:

1. Lack of appropriate substrate to grow upon
2. Lack of or poor-quality light, impacting photosynthesis
3. Changes in climate impacting currents, water temperature and water quality
4. Nutrient input, spurring algae growth, reducing light and oxygen availability
5. Sediment input, reducing light availability and quality
6. Physical alteration of the shoreline, potentially increasing wave energy or altering substrate in the nearshore area, sometimes both

The Puget Sound Conservation and Recovery Plan (2005–2007) outlines a number of goals for improving management and health of the state's eelgrass beds. These include increasing protection over eelgrass beds on state-managed aquatic lands, and developing a statewide "seagrass management conservation plan" to be used by local, state and federal agencies.

## Impacted species

### Groundfish

60% of the **ground fish** populations are currently considered, by the areas scientific community, to be in acceptable or good conditions. **The populations which are in decline are**: middle-trophic level predators such as rockfish, spiny dogfish, Pacific cod, and hake.

### Copper and quillback rockfish

There was a spawning decline for copper and quillback rockfish of close to 75% between 1970 and 1999; more recent data shows a continued decline. Many rockfish species which are popular to harvest in the area are showing large population decreases, while less popular species are showing signs of increased population.

### Pacific herring

The Puget Sound has 19 Pacific herring stocks; the populations from all have decreased since 2002. The largest decreases are found in the north Puget Sound area; where stocks dropped form roughly 12,000 tons of spawning biomass to 4,000 tons in 2004. The Cherry Point stock had particularly large decreases.

### Harbor porpoise

The harbor porpoise was once very abundant in the Puget Sound. However, its population declined to the point that it was rarely seen in the 1970s and 1980s. Its population has increased somewhat and it can now be seen in localized areas.

### Orcas

Orcas in the south Puget Sound were added to the federal endangered species list in 2005. In 2007 their population numbered 86 (down from their peak population number of 98 in 1975).

### Sea lions

The populations of sea lions in Washington State have increased. Steller sea lions specifically are showing an increase in population; 10% every year.

### Harbor seal

The populations of harbor seals have been on the rise since the early 1970s. In 2007 there were approximately 14,000 harbor seals in the inland waters of Puget Sound alone.

### Pinto abalone

Populations of the pinto abalone have sharply decreased due to the inability of the species to naturally reproduce. Between 1992 and 2005, in 10 long term monitoring stations, their populations declined from 351 animals per site, to 103 per site.

### Olympia oyster

The population of Olympia oyster (*Ostrea Lurida*), been declining due to sewage contamination and the effects of sulfur liquor emissions (from pulp mills). Both of these things were shown to have serious effects on the reproductive part as well as the health part of *Ostrea lurida*. Some other problems include mining, logging, and boat traffic. Pollution like gasoline and motor oil from the boats is harmful to the species of oyster as well. The Journal of Shellfish Research states, "Although oysters may be able to tolerate brief exposure to motor oil and gasoline by closing their shell, up to 14% population mortality increases after 10 days \[of exposure\]". As the article states, another large problem for Olympia oysters is the human-caused sedimentation caused by topsoil runoff in areas of logging or mining. The sedimentation leads to murky waters and oysters that are buried under layers of runoff as well as non-secure places to inhabit.

### Marine birds

There are over 100 species of marine bird which rely on the Puget Sound as habitat. A survey completed by the Western Washington University (WWU) reports that the total number of marine birds in the Puget Sound is decreasing. The cause of this decrease in population is not clear, although researchers suspect likely causes such as pollution, non-native species, and collisions with man made structures, abandoned or lost fishing gear, some fishing practices, unavailable food sources, and loss of habitat.

### Scoters

There has been a decline of surf scoters, white-winged scoters, and black scoters. This decrease of scoters is the largest decrease in biomass of marine birds over the past 25 years in Puget Sound.

### Loons and grebes

The loons and grebes which over-winter in Puget Sound have shown a population decrease of 75% in the past 10 years. (It is not known if this decline is due to a population decrease or a change in their winter location).

### Salmon

Under provisions of the ESA, two salmon populations in the Pacific Northwest have been listed as endangered, but none within the Puget Sound. One of the factors that contribute to declining salmon runs in Puget Sound, and the Pacific Northwest in general, is the lack of logjams in rivers. Logjams are essential to the survival of healthy salmon populations. Logjam and river current interaction carve deep pools into riverbeds, providing salmon and their young, also known as fry, with hiding places from predators. Logjams also force some of the water from the main river to spill out over the adjacent Floodplain, forming Tributaries along the river, which supply ideal habitat for maturing salmon. The natural processes of spawning and reaching maturity become much more difficult for salmon without the services logjams provide.

Also, as the organisms that salmon feed on begin to dwindle due to factors including overfishing and invasive species, salmon are further threatened as their food sources become precarious, as is the case with herring populations around Puget Sound (Puget Sound Action Team). For more information see Salmon conservation.

The increased urbanization around streams connected to the Puget Sound has led to the annual increase in premature (adult salmon who have not yet spawned) spawner mortality rates. The exposure to metals and petroleum hydrocarbons which originate from motor powered vehicles in the urban area, have led to the recurring fish kills. Salmon that transition from saltwater to freshwater are vulnerable to the toxic substances found in the urban streams.

## Degradation of nearshore habitat

"Nearshore" is most commonly defined as the backshore, intertidal and shallow subtidal areas of shoreline. In Washington, for example, the Shoreline Management Act defines the upland edge of this area to be 200 feet (61 m) behind the shoreline. Many groups also consider the nearshore to go fairly deep beyond the intertidal zone.

More than 10,000 streams and rivers drain into Puget Sound. Approximately 1,800 miles (2,900 km) of shoreline surround the estuary, which is a mosaic of beaches, bluffs, deltas, mudflats and wetlands. A number of factors have been listed as potentially contributing to continued degradation of the nearshore environment. These include changing the nearshore by adding artificial structures, such as Tide gates and bulkheads increased pollution from various sources, such as failing septic systems; and various impacts from agricultural and industrial activities. One-third of more than 4,000 kilometres (2,500 mi) of Puget Sound shoreline has been modified by some form of human development, including Armoring, Dredging, filling and construction of overwater structures.

## Protected species

**Federally Endangered:**

**Federally Threatened:**

**State Endangered That are Not Federally Endangered:**

**State Threatened Species:**

**State Sensitive Species:**

**Species with Vulnerable Aggregations (these species are not officially protected but are monitored):**

**Unprotected species that are "critically imperiled":**

* Pallid bat: Large, pale bat with doglike face. Feeds at night on large insects. Emits a skunk-like odor when disturbed
* American peregrine falcon: Removed from federal endangered list in 1999, but still endangered in Northwest. Cliffs were preferred nesting sites, but today many nest on high-rises.
* Sea cucumber: Relative of starfish and sea lilies; popular in Asian cuisine. Fourteen species found in Northwest waters.
* Marsh shrew: Insect-eating aquatic shrew with fringe of hairs on toes to aid swimming. Can run on top of the water for several seconds.

## Invasive species

Aquatic nuisance species are non-native plants or animals that threaten the diversity or abundance of native species; the Ecological stability of infested waters; or the commercial, agricultural or recreational activities that depend on such waters. In recent years, the Puget Sound has seen an increase of invasive species, specifically from Japan, as early as 1971. Invasive species have come to the Puget Sound via several factors, including aquaculture, importation of live seafood, shipping (attached to ship hulls and through ballast water), research and academic institutions, deliberate introductions, pet stores and public aquaria, and natural dispersal. The Japanese wire weed *Sargassum muticum* and the marine grass *Spartina* are currently two of the most damaging species. In response to such trends, ocean species have migrated to places they shouldn't. The Puget Sound has the most introduced invasive species. Nationwide, about 400 of the 958 (42 percent) species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA are considered to be at risk, primarily due to competition with and predation by non-native species.

The WDFW is now attempting to combat its exotic species problem with the Washington State Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan. Under this plan, Washington State Patrol Commercial Vehicle Inspectors search incoming vessels for harmful invasive species, such as the zebra mussel, and decontaminate the vessels before they can spread the organism.

The city of Olympia, Washington has worked with the United States Environmental Protection Agency to use the shells of invasive water snail which has started to decrease the numbers of the endemic Olympia Oyster. The invasive arched slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata) shell is taken and, packed into the sidewalk. With doing so, the shells of the said invasive species of water snail will slow down the runoff and will reduce the flow of stormwater which will in turn reduce flooding and potential environmental damage. Walker says that "The scoop-shaped shell of the snail could help slow storm water. Currently the city uses rock and gravel beneath sidewalks to stabilize the concrete. City officials want to try using snail shells instead." The millions of snail shells could act as micro-reservoirs slowing the flow of stormwater and reducing the chances of city streams, brooks, and waterways. Emmett Dobey, the program manager at Olympia’s Department of Public Works says, "The process also seemed to reduce the amount of pollutants that typically come along for the ride".

## Oil spills

Since 1989, there have been 225 oil spills in Puget Sound. Nearly every day Puget Sound imports 550,000 barrels of unrefined oil, thus making Puget Sound one of the country's primary centers for refining petroleum. One such spill on October 14, 2004 in Dalco Passage leaked nearly 1,000 gallons over Vashon and Maury Islands.

## Solutions

The Washington state government has adapted the federal government's Marine Protected Area (MPA) system into designated Aquatic Reserves, defined as "aquatic lands of special educational or scientific interest or lands of special environmental importance that are threatened by degradation". Aquatic Reserves are meant to serve as aquatic versions of national parks or sanctuaries. Through the Aquatic Reserve Program, the DNR hopes to control these areas in an effort to restore, preserve or enhance habitats and species that directly tie into the aquatic ecosystem. The first Aquatic Reserve created under the program was at Maury Island in November 2004. Further candidate sites under review include Cherry Point, Fidalgo Bay and Cypress Island.

### Legislation

Puget Sound Partnership reports that the Washington State Legislature included several priority items in the 2010 Supplemental Budget which are intended to support restorative efforts of the environment.

This includes funding totaling $50 million for Washington State Department of Ecology stormwater project funding. "Stormwater is a primary source of toxic chemicals and other hazardous materials washing into Puget Sound and other water bodies" . There is also $42 million allocated to projects targeting toxic site cleanup in the Puget Sound.

The specifics of this legislature are as follows:

* $1.645 million for a wastewater treatment plant and reclamation project at Potlatch on Hood Canal. This money, through the Department of Ecology, will allow the project to be completed and will help restore the health of Hood Canal.
* $2.8 million for Carpenter Creek estuary restoration in Kitsap County through the Department of Fish and Wildlife to remove a culvert blocking fish passage and restore tidal function creating approximately 28 acres of estuary habitat.
* $1 million for the Puget Sound Near Shore Ecosystem Restoration Project (PSNERP) through the Department of Fish and Wildlife to complete scientific work and near shore restoration projects. Preliminary engineering and property assessments will be conducted for a portfolio of priority near shore restoration opportunities that would be eligible for federal funding through the US Army Corps of Engineers.
* $381,000 for the Nooksack Forks large woody debris placement for habitat enhancement through the Department of Fish and Wildlife. This project will construct six large woody structures along 1.5 miles of the Middle Fork Nooksack River and augment 20 stable large wood structures on five channel islands in the North Fork Nooksack River.
* $185,000 for the South Fork Nooksack River restoration through the Department of Fish and Wildlife. The project will remove a barrier to provide fish passage to 1.4 miles of river, placement of stable log jams, and 41 acres of riparian planting along 2,900 linear feet of stream and several adjoining wetlands.
* $3 million for Commencement Bay cleanup in Pierce County through the Department of Natural Resources. This project will remove 2,300 contaminated pilings to allow completion of in-water remediation of toxic contamination at the Asarco Superfund site.
* In addition, the Puget Sound Partnership played a key role in securing $15 million to help acquire the Maury Island gravel pit. This complicated transaction is still pending but the state resources will help lead to its successful culmination. The money comes from state accounts funded by polluters, not general tax revenue.

## Pollution advisories

Pollution advisories are posted for some of the beach areas on the Puget Sound. These advisories warn the public of health concerns due to contact with sand and water of the posted areas. Showering after contact with material from these areas is advised. It is also advised to avoid eating fish and shell fish from these areas.

## Further reading


title: Erik van Schaaik

abstract: Erik van Schaaik is a Dutch animator, screenwriter, film and television director, producer, production designer and composer.

text:
# Erik van Schaaik

**Erik van Schaaik** (Maartensdijk, 24 July 1968) is a Dutch animator, screenwriter, film and television director, producer, production designer and composer.

## Biography

Erik van Schaaik studied graphic design at the Academy of Art in Arnhem (ArtEZ). He created children's television programs for broadcasting companies VPRO and KRO and animated short films, including VENT which won the FIPRESCI award at the International Animated Film Festival in Annecy, and Under The Apple Tree which won a Golden Calf for Best Short Film at the Netherlands Film Festival. Erik worked with i.a. Il Luster Productions, The Drawing Room, Pedri Animation, Martin Fondse, Eric Vloeimans en Ernst Reijseger.

## Filmography

* 1987 Side Effects – live action – 22 minutes
* 1990 Tower Of Pizza's – tabletop animation – 5 x 4 minutes
* 1991 Little Jerome – cutout animation – 3 X 4 minutes
* 1992 The Night Watch – live action / documentary – 22,5 minutes
* 1993 The Little Man In The Radio – live action / puppet animation – 3 X 6 minutes
* 1993 Bush Beasts – puppetry – 3 X 5 minutes
* 1994 Ot and Bilotte – live action – 14 X 25 minutes
* 1995–1996 Sausage Dog Titus – tabletop animation – 7 X 6 and 7 X 7 minutes
* 1998-1999-2001 Spot Light – cutout animation sequences – 13 X 3 minutes, 26 X 1 minutes, 26 X 1 minutes
* 1998 P. Tato and Small Frie – stop motion animation – 10 X 2 minutes
* 1998–2000 National Science Quiz Junior – cutout animation sequences – 8 X 2 minutes
* 2000 KRO's Kids Theatre – 2D animation \- +/- 1,5 minutes
* 2000 Cinekid (leader) – 3D animation – 25 seconds
* 2001 Doctors Without Borders – 2D animation – 3,5 minutes
* 2002 That's Not All, Folks (pilot) – stop motion animation – 6 minutes
* 2003 Toddler Docs – documentary – 2 minutes per episode
* 2003–2004 Full Proof – documentary / live action / animation – 15 x 7 minutes
* 2003 Nemo – digital cutout animation – 30 seconds
* 2004 Vent – 2D animation – 4,5 minutes
* 2005 Child's Play – live action / 2D animation – 7 minutes
* 2006 Piece Of Cake – documentary – 24 X 6,5 minutes
* 2008 ST\*CK! - live action – 9,45 minutes
* 2008–2011 This or That – live action – 26 X 2,5 minutes
* 2008 The Phantom Of The Cinema – 2D animation / 3D animation – 10 minutes, 46 seconds
* 2010 Pecker – stop motion animation / 2D animation – 3 minutes
* 2010 Ultra Short – 2D animation – 10 seconds
* 2011–2013 Illumations – 2D animation – 20+ x 15 seconds
* 2012 Under The Apple Tree, the book – Illustrated poem. A bedtime a story.
* 2012–2015 Under The Apple Tree – stop motion animation, CGI animation – 20 minutes
* 2013 Rozet – CGI animation – 2 minutes
* 2012–2018 Hieronymus – Original treatment and screenplay for the feature-length animation film about Hieronymus Bosch
* 2006–2014 Outside! – live action / 2D animation – 19 x 5,5 minutes

## Honors

### Awards

### Nominations

* "IMDB-profile". *IMDb*.
* NRC Handelsblad (28 August 2008). "Phantom of the cinema entry for the Oscars 2008".
* Il Luster. "Vent featured on IlLuster Productions website".
* Netherlands Film Festival. "Pecker (Pik) selected at Nederlands Film Festival".
* Netherlands Film Fund. "Erik van Schaaik's movies supported by the Dutch film fund". Archived from the original on 2014-05-11.
* Annecy International Animated Film Festival. "2005 - Fipresci Award".
* Zippy Frames (26 February 2013). "Hieronymus Bosch, animated". Archived from the original on 2015-01-04. Retrieved 2014-05-11.
* "Filmer wil film maken via crowdfunding". *de Gelderlander*. 4 January 2013.


title: 1986–87 Czechoslovak Extraliga season

abstract: The 1986–87 Czechoslovak Extraliga season was the 44th season of the Czechoslovak Extraliga, the top level of ice hockey in Czechoslovakia. 12 teams participated in the league, and Tesla Pardubice won the championship.

text:
# 1986–87 Czechoslovak Extraliga season

The **1986–87 Czechoslovak Extraliga season** was the 44th season of the Czechoslovak Extraliga, the top level of ice hockey in Czechoslovakia. 12 teams participated in the league, and Tesla Pardubice won the championship.

## Regular season

| Pl. | Team | GP | W | T | L | GF–GA | Pts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Tesla Pardubice | 34 | 22 | 2 | 10 | 142:87 | 46 |
| 2. | Sparta ČKD Prag | 34 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 115:95 | 41 |
| 3. | Dukla Jihlava | 34 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 132:99 | 39 |
| 4. | VSŽ Košice | 34 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 117:107 | 37 |
| 5. | Zetor Brno | 34 | 15 | 6 | 13 | 94:107 | 36 |
| 6. | Motor České Budějovice | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 98:90 | 35 |
| 7. | Slovan CHZJD Bratislava | 34 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 126:140 | 35 |
| 8. | TJ Gottwaldov | 34 | 14 | 5 | 15 | 114:107 | 33 |
| 9. | CHZ Litvínov | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 129:135 | 29 |
| 10. | TJ Škoda Plzeň | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 109:129 | 28 |
| 11. | Dukla Trenčín | 34 | 8 | 10 | 16 | 91:124 | 26 |
| 12. | TJ Vítovice | 34 | 9 | 5 | 20 | 104:152 | 23 |

## Playoffs

Quarterfinal * Pardubice – Gottwaldov 2:0 (6:2,4:2)
* Sparta Prag – Bratislava 2:0 (7:1,3:2)
* Jihlava – České Budějovice 2:0 (9:3,1:0)
* Košice – Brno 2:1 (8:1,2:3 PP,4:0)

Semifinal * Pardubice – Košice 2:0 (7:1,6:4)
* Sparta Prag – Jihlava 0:2 (3:4,2:4)

Final * **Tesla Pardubice** – Jihlava 3:2 (6:1,1:6,1:0,2:3,3:2 OT)

Placing round – 5th–8th place * Brno – Gottwaldov 0:2 (3:7,3:4)
* České Budějovice – Bratislava 1:2 (4:5,5:4,2:3)

7th place * Brno – České Budějovice 2:1 (3:1,3:7,6:3)

5th place * Bratislava – Gottwaldov 2:1 (4:1,3:9,7:4)

3rd place * **Sparta Prag**\- Košice 2:0 (4:2,5:1)

## Relegation round

| Pl. | Team | GP | Bonus | GF–GA | Pts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9. | CHZ Litvínov | 12 | 3 | 57:56 | 16 |
| 10. | Dukla Trenčín | 12 | 1 | 42:37 | 14 |
| 11. | TJ Škoda Plzeň | 12 | 2 | 50:53 | 13 |
| 12. | TJ Vítovice | 12 | 0 | 49:52 | 11 |

## 1. Liga-Qualification


title: 1963–64 Macedonian Republic League

abstract: The 1963–64 Macedonian Republic League was the 21st since its establishment. Bregalnica Štip won their first championship title.

text:
# 1963–64 Macedonian Republic League

The **1963–64 Macedonian Republic League** was the 21st since its establishment. Bregalnica Štip won their first championship title.

## Participating teams

| Club | City |
| --- | --- |
| Belasica | Strumica |
| Bregalnica | Shtip |
| Jugohrom | Tetovo |
| Karaorman | Struga |
| Kozhuf | Gevgelija |
| KSK | Kumanovo |
| Metalec | Skopje |
| Napredok | Kichevo |
| Ohrid | Ohrid |
| Pelagonija | Bitola |
| Rabotnichki | Skopje |
| Teteks | Tetovo |
| Tikvesh | Kavadarci |
| Vardar | Negotino |

## Final table

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Bregalnica Štip | 26 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 38 | +24 | 36 |
| 2 | Belasica Strumica | 26 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 52 | 38 | +14 | 30 |
| 3 | Teteks Tetovo | 26 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 37 | 38 | 1 | 29 |
| 4 | Metalec Skopje | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 54 | 44 | +10 | 29 |
| 5 | Vardar Negotino | 26 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 43 | 47 | 4 | 29 |
| 6 | Karaorman Struga | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 60 | 46 | +14 | 28 |
| 7 | KSK Kumanovo | 26 | 12 | 3 | 11 | 57 | 51 | +6 | 27 |
| 8 | Tikveš Kavadarci | 26 | 11 | 5 | 10 | 56 | 55 | +1 | 27 |
| 9 | Pelagonija Bitola | 26 | 11 | 4 | 11 | 39 | 45 | 6 | 26 |
| 10 | Ohrid | 26 | 11 | 3 | 12 | 52 | 46 | +6 | 25 |
| 11 | Rabotnički Skopje | 26 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 46 | 38 | +8 | 24 |
| 12 | Jugohrom Jegunovce | 26 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 54 | 64 | 10 | 23 |
| 13 | Napredok Kičevo | 26 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 52 | 70 | 18 | 23 |
| 14 | Kozuf Gevgelija | 26 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 92 | 62 | 10 |

Source:
Notes:


title: Eucithara angela

abstract: Eucithara angela is a small sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusk in the family Mangeliidae.

text:
# Eucithara angela

***Eucithara angela*** is a small sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusk in the family Mangeliidae.

## Description

The length of the ovate-fusiform shell varies between 10 mm and 16 mm.

The color of the shell is yellowish white, chocolate-tinted towards the base. The narrow aperture is stained with violet in front.

## Distribution

This marine species occurs off Australia (Queensland) and off Vanuatu.

* Hedley, C. 1922. *A revision of the Australian Turridae.* Records of the Australian Museum 13(6): 213-359, pls 42-56
* Tucker, J.K. 2004 *Catalog of recent and fossil turrids (Mollusca: Gastropoda)*. Zootaxa 682:1-1295.
* "*Eucithara angela*". *Gastropods.com*. Retrieved 16 January 2019.

## InfoBox

| *Eucithara angela* | |
| --- | --- |
|  | |
| Shell of *Eucithara angela* | |
|
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Mollusca |
| Class: | Gastropoda |
| Subclass: | Caenogastropoda |
| Order: | Neogastropoda |
| Superfamily: | Conoidea |
| Family: | Mangeliidae |
| Genus: | *Eucithara* |
| Species: | ***E. angela*** |
| Binomial name | |
| ***Eucithara angela***<br>(Adams & Angas, 1864) | |
|
| Synonyms | |
| * *Cithara angela* Adams & Angas, 1864 (original combination) * *Cithara balansai* Crosse, 1873 * *Eucithara balansai* J.C.H. Crosse, 1873 * *Mangilia angela* (Adams & Angas, 1864) * *Mangilia (Cithara) balansai* Bonge and Dautzenberg, 1914 | |


title: Eupithecia holti

abstract: Eupithecia holti is a moth in the family Geometridae. It is found in Russia.

text:
# Eupithecia holti

***Eupithecia holti*** is a moth in the family Geometridae. It is found in Russia (the South Siberian Mountains).

## InfoBox

| *Eupithecia holti* | |
| --- | --- |
|
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Lepidoptera |
| Family: | Geometridae |
| Genus: | *Eupithecia* |
| Species: | ***E. holti*** |
| Binomial name | |
| ***Eupithecia holti***<br>Viidalepp, 1973 | |
|


title: Bartschia significans

abstract: Bartschia significans is a species of sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusc in the family Colubrariidae.

text:
# Bartschia significans

***Bartschia significans*** is a species of sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusc in the family Colubrariidae.

## Description

The shell size varies between 40 mm and 51 mm

## Distribution

This species is distributed in the Gulf of Mexico.

* Rosenberg, G., F. Moretzsohn, and E. F. García. 2009. *Gastropoda (Mollusca) of the Gulf of Mexico*, pp. 579–699 in Felder, D.L. and D.K. Camp (eds.), Gulf of Mexico–Origins, Waters, and Biota. Biodiversity. Texas A&M Press, College Station, Texas

* "*Bartschia significans*". *Gastropods.com*. Retrieved 6 December 2010.

## InfoBox

| *Bartschia significans* | |
| --- | --- |
|  | |
|
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Mollusca |
| Class: | Gastropoda |
| Subclass: | Caenogastropoda |
| Order: | Neogastropoda |
| Family: | Colubrariidae |
| Genus: | *Bartschia* |
| Species: | ***B. significans*** |
| Binomial name | |
| ***Bartschia significans***<br>Rehder, 1943 | |
|
| Synonyms | |
| *Metula significans* (Rehder, 1943) | |


title: Arizona Daily Sun

abstract: The Arizona Daily Sun is a three day newspaper in Flagstaff, Arizona, United States. It is published on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. It publishes an entertainment supplement on Thursdays called "Flagstaff Live!". It also publishes a monthly magazine, Northern Arizona's Mountain Living Magazine.

text:
# Arizona Daily Sun

The ***Arizona Daily Sun*** is a three day newspaper in Flagstaff, Arizona, United States. It is published on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. It publishes an entertainment supplement on Thursdays called "Flagstaff Live!". It also publishes a monthly magazine, Northern Arizona's Mountain Living Magazine.

## History

Artemis E. Fay published the first issue of the weekly Peach Springs, *Arizona Champion* on September 15, 1883. On February 2, 1884, he relocated the paper to Flagstaff. In May 1891, the paper was renamed to *The Coconino Sun*. On August 5, 1946, the paper was again renamed to the current *Arizona Daily Sun*.

The paper was owned by Scripps League Newspapers, which was acquired by Pulitzer in 1996; Lee Enterprises acquired Pulitzer in 2005. The paper was sold to Wick Communications in 2023.

Starting June 27, 2023, the print edition of the newspaper will be reduced to three days a week: Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Also, the newspaper will transition from being delivered by a traditional newspaper delivery carrier to mail delivery by the U.S. Postal Service.

## InfoBox

Arizona Daily Sun
| Type | Daily newspaper |
| --- | --- |
| Owner(s) | Wick Communications |
| Founder(s) | Artemis E. Fay |
| Founded | September 15, 1883 (1883-09-15), as *The Arizona Champion*; May 1891, as *The Coconino Sun* |
| Language | English |
| Relaunched | August 5, 1946, as the *Arizona Daily Sun* |
| Headquarters | Flagstaff, Arizona |
| Circulation | 7,712 Daily <br>7,354 Sunday (as of 2022) |
| ISSN | 1054-9536 |
| OCLC number | 10668635 |
| Website | azdailysun.com |


title: Environmental issues in Russia

abstract: Environmental issues in Russia include pollution and erosion, and have impacts on people, wildlife and ecosystems. Many of the issues have been attributed to policies that were made during the early Soviet Union, at a time when many officials felt that pollution control was an unnecessary hindrance to economic development and industrialization, and, even though numerous attempts were made by the Soviet government to alleviate the situation in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, the problems were not completely solved. By the 1990s, 40% of Russia's territory began demonstrating symptoms of significant ecological stress, largely due to a diverse number of environmental issues, including deforestation, energy irresponsibility, pollution, and nuclear waste. According to Russia's Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Russia is currently warming 2.5 times faster than the rest of the globe.

text:
# Environmental issues in Russia

**Environmental issues in Russia** include pollution and erosion, and have impacts on people, wildlife and ecosystems.

Many of the issues have been attributed to policies that were made during the early Soviet Union, at a time when many officials felt that pollution control was an unnecessary hindrance to economic development and industrialization, and, even though numerous attempts were made by the Soviet government to alleviate the situation in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, the problems were not completely solved. By the 1990s, 40% of Russia's territory began demonstrating symptoms of significant ecological stress, largely due to a diverse number of environmental issues, including deforestation, energy irresponsibility, pollution, and nuclear waste. According to Russia's Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Russia is currently warming 2.5 times faster than the rest of the globe.

## Wildlife

Russia has many protected areas, such as zapovedniks and natural parks, which are made to preserve the natural state of environments. There are currently 101 zapovedniks that cover a total of over 33.5 million hectares. However, some animals, such as the Amur tiger, polar bear, and Caucasian leopard, are facing extinction. The Russian government is attempting to revive those populations. A tiger summit was held in St. Petersburg in 2010 to discuss how to save the dwindling tiger population, which is threatened by deforestation and poaching in Russia.

## Deforestation and logging

Excessive logging is causing the widespread deforestation of certain areas of Russia. Despite efforts of Russian authorities to preserve forests using nature reserves and parks, funding for park rangers is lacking, limiting the protection of forests. Illegal logging is also widespread, especially in the north-west and in the Far East parts of Russia. It is estimated that Russia loses $1 billion every year due to illegal logging. According to the Center for Russian Environmental Policy, 16 million hectares of forest are lost each year to a variety of causes, including logging, pollution, and fires. Inefficient logging and clearcutting strategies result in 40% of harvested trees never being used, and the implementation of forest protection policies has been slow.

Russia had a 2018 Forest Landscape Integrity Index mean score of 9.02/10, ranking it 10th globally out of 172 countries.

## Energy

Up to its collapse in 1991, the Soviet Union generated 1.5 times as much pollution per unit of GNP as the United States.

Inefficient energy usage and the use of fossil fuels is another environmental issue that Russia faces. The Ministry of Energy stated that upgrading energy sector equipment could cut carbon emissions by 25%, and the Energy Research Institute predicts that such measures could save up to $1 billion of fuel every year. 68% of Russia's energy is produced by polluting fossil fuels, and it is a large producer of those fuels.

## Pollution

### Air pollution

Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, and Volgograd, as well as other major industrial and population centers, have the highest concentrations of air pollution. Overall, over 200 cities in Russia exceed pollution limits, and this is increasing as more vehicles appear on the roads. Before the 1990s, most air pollution came from industries. When industrial production declined, emissions of air pollutants from those sources also declined, although the amount of motor vehicles on the roads skyrocketed. Currently, vehicle emissions exceed industry emissions in most Russian cities. Air pollution is attributed to 17% of childhood and 10% of adult diseases, as well as 41% of respiratory and 16% of endocrine diseases.

### Water pollution

Water pollution is a serious problem in Russia, and 75% of surface water, and 50% of all water in Russia is now polluted. Towards the end of the Soviet era the government increasingly recognized the need to take care of the spawning sites and habitats of fish, in order to return fish catches to what they had been. This has caused health issues in many cities as well as in the countryside, as only 8% of wastewater is fully treated before being returned to waterways. Obsolete and inefficient water treatment facilities, as well as a lack of funding, have caused heavy pollution, and has also resulted in waterborne disease spread, such as an outbreak of cholera spread by the Moskva River in 1995. Industrial and chemical waste is often dumped into waterways, including hydrogen sulfide, which has been linked to the large-scale death of fish in the Black and Caspian seas. Lake Baikal was previously a target of environmental pollution from paper plants, but cleanup efforts since then have greatly reduced the ecological strain on the lake.

Unsafe dumping methods have been used sometimes to get rid of military nuclear waste, which was dumped into the Sea of Japan until 1993. The testing and production of nuclear weapons also affected the environment, such as at the Mayak atomic weapons production plant near Chelyabinsk.

### Radioactive Waste

Radioactive waste can be described as high-level waste or low-level waste. High-level waste is what can be seen as the waste from the use of nuclear fuel which is typically stored at the site of the nuclear power plant is it produced from. This can also include the waste produced by the mining of uranium and thorium both of which are key components for the usage of nuclear fuel. Low-level waste consists of things that have come in contact with radioactive waste such as packaging, clothing, and other similar materials found on site. The main difference between the two categories is the level of radioactivity one would be exposed to when coming into contact with these materials. According to the World Nuclear Association, low-level waste is no more than four giga-becquerels per tonne of alpha activity or twelve giga-becquerels per tonne of gamma-beta activity.

An example of the effects of radioactive waste can be seen in the construction of the SouthEast Chord highway. Since 2018, Moscow's Department for Transportation and Construction has attempted to create an eight-lane highway over what is now an inactive nuclear plant. The Moscow Polymetal Plant, owned by Rosatom State Energy Corporation, was shut down over 50 years ago and is said to still contain harmful nuclear waste resulting in it being labeled a radioactive site. Its main purpose was for the extraction and production of uranium and thorium resulting in high levels of radiation in the surrounding area (reported by the environmental justice organization Greenpeace). The Government of Moscow and Radon State Unitary Enterprise, both responsible for the management of radioactive waste, have claimed that appropriate measures of decontamination have taken place in order for construction of the highway to commence.

The main conflict associated with the SouthEast Chord project is nuclear waste storage and its harmful effects to human health and the surrounding environment making this site unsafe for the usage of a highway. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and their article on the effects of radiation on the human cause, radioactive waste can directly damage the structure of one's DNA as well as major organs. This alteration of DNA can leave victims at high risk of cancer or even death. Ultimately, this all depends on the radiation dosage and, in this case, how frequently a civilian were to drive on this portion of the SouthEast Chord. The main contaminants highlighted are the extraction of uranium and production of thorium for the purpose of nuclear reactors.

### Other forms of pollution

## Soil erosion

Snow run-off has caused substantial erosion in pastures and croplands in northern Russia, particularly near the Ural Mountains. In parts of southern Russia, overgrazing and deforestation has resulted in large plots of bare soil which are highly susceptible to wind erosion.

Center for Russian Nature Conservation. Retrieved 2011-02-22.


title: Axiocerses croesus

abstract: Axiocerses croesus, the dark-banded scarlet, is a butterfly of the family Lycaenidae. It is found in the Eastern Cape, west up to Port Elizabeth and into Kwazulu-Natal. The wingspan is 24–32 mm for males and 25–34 mm for females. Adults are on wing year-round in the northern part of the range. There are two generations per year in the south with adults on wing from September to October and from February to May. The larvae feed on Acacia species.

text:
# Axiocerses croesus

***Axiocerses croesus***, the **dark-banded scarlet**, is a butterfly of the family Lycaenidae. It is found in the Eastern Cape, west up to Port Elizabeth and into Kwazulu-Natal.

The wingspan is 24–32 mm for males and 25–34 mm for females. Adults are on wing year-round in the northern part of the range. There are two generations per year in the south with adults on wing from September to October and from February to May.

The larvae feed on *Acacia* species.

* Woodhall, Steve (2005). *Field Guide to Butterflies of South Africa*. Cape Town, South Africa: Struik. ISBN 978-1-86872-724-7.

## InfoBox

| Dark-banded scarlet | |
| --- | --- |
| Conservation status | |
|
Least Concern  (IUCN 3.1) | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Lepidoptera |
| Family: | Lycaenidae |
| Genus: | *Axiocerses* |
| Species: | ***A. croesus*** |
| Binomial name | |
| ***Axiocerses croesus***
(Trimen, 1862) | |
|
| Synonyms | |
| * *Zeritis croesus* Trimen, 1862 | |


abstract: The Women's 500m Time Trial is one of the 9 women's events at the 2009 UCI Track Cycling World Championships, held in Pruszków, Poland. 23 Cyclists from 20 countries participated in the contest. The Final was held on 25 March.

text:
# 2009 UCI Track Cycling World Championships – Women's 500 m time trial

The **Women's 500m Time Trial** is one of the 9 women's events at the 2009 UCI Track Cycling World Championships, held in Pruszków, Poland.

23 Cyclists from 20 countries participated in the contest. The Final was held on 25 March.

## World record

| World Record | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **WR** | 33.588 | Anna Meares (AUS) | Mallorca | 31 March 2007 |

## Final

| Rank | Name | 250m | Time | Speed<br>(km/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | 250-500 | |
|  | Simona Krupeckaitė (LTU) | 18.841 (1) | **33.296 WR** | 54.060 |
| | |  | 14.455 (1) | |
|  | Anna Meares (AUS) | 18.977 (2) | **33.796** | 53.260 |
| | |  | 14.819 (3) | |
|  | Victoria Pendleton (GBR) | 19.333 (7) | **34.102** | 52.782 |
| | |  | 14.769 (2) | |
| 4 | Sandie Clair (FRA) | 19.072 (4) | **34.114** | 52.764 |
| | |  | 15.042 (6) | |
| 5 | Willy Kanis (NED) | 19.327 (6) | **34.258** | 52.542 |
| | |  | 14.931 (5) | |
| 6 | Kaarle McCulloch (AUS) | 19.161 (5) | **34.276** | 52.514 |
| | |  | 15.115 (7) | |
| 7 | Lisandra Guerra (CUB) | 19.070 (3) | **34.358** | 52.389 |
| | |  | 15.288 (11) | |
| 8 | Olga Panarina (BLR) | 19.629 (10) | **34.557** | 52.087 |
| | |  | 14.928 (4) | |
| 9 | Miriam Welte (GER) | 20.159 (16) | **34.827** | 51.684 |
| | |  | 15.119 (8) | |
| 10 | Yvonne Hijgenaar (NED) |  | **35.054** | 51.349 |
| | |  |  | |
| 11 | Kristina Vogel (GER) |  | **35.278** | 51.023 |
| | |  |  | |
| 12 | Elisa Frisoni (ITA) | 20.114 (15) | **35.409** | 50.834 |
| | |  | 15.295 (12) | |
| 13 | Gong Jinjie (CHN) | 19.554 (9) | **35.442** | 50.787 |
| | |  | 15.888 (18) | |
| 14 | Anna Blyth (GBR) | 20.024 (12) | **35.443** | 50.785 |
| | |  | 15.419 (13) | |
| 15 | Olga Streltsova (RUS) | 20.081 (14) | **35.710** | 50.406 |
| | |  | 15.629 (16) | |
| 16 | Huong Ting Ying (TPE) | 20.488 (21) | **35.924** | 50.105 |
| | |  | 15.743 (18) | |
| 17 | Zheng Lulu (CHN) | 20.340 (20) | **35.965** | 50.048 |
| | |  | 15.480 (14) | |
| 18 | Diana García (COL) | 20.289 (19) | **36.034** | 49.952 |
| | |  | 15.745 (17) | |
| 19 | Lee Wai See (HKG) | 20.193 (17) | **36.103** | 50.857 |
| | |  | 15.910 (19) | |
| 20 | Helena Casas (ESP) | 20.257 (18) | **36.319** | 49.560 |
| | |  | 15.623 (15) | |
| 21 | Aleksandra Drejgier (POL) | 20.068 (13) | **36.475** | 49.348 |
| | |  | 16.010 (20) | |
| 22 | Maneephan Jutatip (THA) | 20.565 (22) | **36.673** | 49.082 |
| | |  | 16.240 (21) | |
| 23 | Cinthia Martínez (URU) | 21.887 (23) | **38.652** | 46.570 |
| | |  | 16.764 (23) | |
|

1. "UCI 2009 Track World Championships Women's 500m Time Trial Finals Official Results" (PDF). Tissot. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 April 2009. Retrieved 31 March 2009.


title: 1962 Naples Grand Prix

abstract: The 20th Naples Grand Prix was a motor race, run for cars complying with the Formula One rules, held on 20 May 1962 at Posillipo Circuit, Naples. The race was run over 60 laps of the circuit, and was won by Belgian driver Willy Mairesse in a Ferrari 156. This race was held on the same day as the 1962 Dutch Grand Prix, and consequently many of the top drivers at that time were not present in Naples. Only the 10 fastest cars in qualifying were allowed to start the race, leaving a number of the more unusual entrants on the sidelines. The two Ferraris were dominant throughout the weekend, with Lorenzo Bandini leading from the start of the race until lap 24, when he was passed by Mairesse, who led until the end. Carlo Abate finished fourth in his first Formula One race, narrowly beaten by Keith Greene.

text:
# 1962 Naples Grand Prix

The **20th Naples Grand Prix** was a motor race, run for cars complying with the Formula One rules, held on 20 May 1962 at Posillipo Circuit, Naples. The race was run over 60 laps of the circuit, and was won by Belgian driver Willy Mairesse in a Ferrari 156.

This race was held on the same day as the 1962 Dutch Grand Prix, and consequently many of the top drivers at that time were not present in Naples. Only the 10 fastest cars in qualifying were allowed to start the race, leaving a number of the more unusual entrants on the sidelines. The two Ferraris were dominant throughout the weekend, with Lorenzo Bandini leading from the start of the race until lap 24, when he was passed by Mairesse, who led until the end. Carlo Abate finished fourth in his first Formula One race, narrowly beaten by Keith Greene.

## Qualifying

| Pos | No. | Driver | Constructor | Lap | Gap |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 6 | Lorenzo Bandini | Ferrari | 1:18.7 |  |
| 2 | 10 | Willy Mairesse | Ferrari | 1:18.9 | +0.2 |
| 3 | 12 | Keith Greene | Gilby-Climax | 1:21.2 | +2.5 |
| 4 | 14 | Tim Parnell | Lotus-Climax | 1:21.2 | +2.5 |
| 5 | 4 | Ian Burgess | Cooper-Climax | 1:22.4 | +3.7 |
| 6 | 2 | Tony Shelly | Lotus-Climax | 1:22.9 | +4.2 |
| 7 | 32 | Carlo Abate | Porsche | 1:23.3 | +4.6 |
| 8 | 24 | Tony Settember | Emeryson-Climax | 1:23.4 | +4.7 |
| 9 | 46 | David Piper | Lotus-Climax | 1:24.4 | +5.7 |
| 10 | 26 | Gaetano Starrabba | Lotus-Maserati | 1:25.1 | +6.4 |
| 11 | 42 | Graham Eden | Emeryson-Climax | 1:26.8 | +8.1 |
| 12 | 18 | Roberto Lippi | De Tomaso-O.S.C.A. | 1:27.0 | +8.3 |
| 13 | 8 | Jay Chamberlain | Lotus-Climax | 1:27.1 | +8.4 |
| 14 | 40 | Heinz Schiller | Porsche | 1:27.2 | +8.5 |
| 15 | 34 | Maurice Caillet | Cegga-Maserati | 1:28.1 | +9.4 |
| 16 | 38 | Gastone Zanarotti | De Tomaso-O.S.C.A. | 1:29.6 | +10.9 |
| 17 | 48 | Günther Seiffert | Lotus-Climax | 1:33.0 | +14.3 |

## Results

| Pos | No. | Driver | Entrant | Constructor | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 10 | Willy Mairesse | SEFAC Ferrari | Ferrari | 60 | 1.19:36.1 | 2 |
| 2 | 6 | Lorenzo Bandini | SEFAC Ferrari | Ferrari | 60 | +3.3 s | 1 |
| 3 | 12 | Keith Greene | Gilby Engineering | Gilby-Climax | 59 | \+ 1 Lap | 3 |
| 4 | 32 | Carlo Abate | Scuderia SSS Republica di Venezia | Porsche | 59 | \+ 1 Lap | 7 |
| 5 | 4 | Ian Burgess | Anglo-American Equipe | Cooper-Climax | 58 | \+ 2 Laps | 5 |
| 6 | 2 | Tony Shelly | John Dalton | Lotus-Climax | 58 | \+ 2 Laps | 6 |
| 7 | 14 | Tim Parnell | Tim Parnell | Lotus-Climax | 55 | \+ 5 Laps | 4 |
| 8 | 46 | David Piper | David Piper | Lotus-Climax | 51 | \+ 9 Laps | 9 |
| 9 | 24 | Tony Settember | Emeryson Cars | Emeryson-Climax | 50 | \+ 10 Laps | 8 |
| Ret | 26 | Gaetano Starrabba | Gaetano Starrabba | Lotus-Maserati | 0 | Half-shaft | 10 |
| DNQ | 42 | Graham Eden | Graham Eden | Emeryson-Climax |  | - |
| DNQ | 18 | Roberto Lippi | Scuderia Settecolli | De Tomaso-O.S.C.A. |  | - |
| DNQ | 8 | Jay Chamberlain | Jay Chamberlain | Lotus-Climax |  | - |
| DNQ | 40 | Heinz Schiller | Scuderia Filipinetti | Porsche |  | - |
| DNQ | 34 | Maurice Caillet | Ets Cegga | Cegga-Maserati |  | - |
| DNQ | 38 | Gastone Zanarotti | Scuderia Tomaso | De Tomaso-O.S.C.A. |  | - |
| DNQ | 48 | Günther Seiffert | Autosport Team Wolfgang Seidel | Lotus-Climax |  | - |
| DNA | 16 | John Campbell-Jones | Emeryson Cars | Emeryson-Climax | Car at Zandvoort | - |
| DNA | 20 | Dino Govoni | Dino Govoni | Emeryson-Maserati | Withdrew | - |
| DNA | 22 | Umberto Filotico | Umberto Filotico | Cooper-Climax | Withdrew | - |
| DNA | 28 | "Wal Ever" | "Wal Ever" | Cooper | Withdrew | - |
| DNA | 36 | Jo Siffert | Scuderia Filipinetti | Lotus-Climax | Withdrew | - |

* "The Grand Prix Who's Who", Steve Small, 1995.
* "The Formula One Record Book", John Thompson, 1974, pp. 86–87.
* Race results at www.silhouet.com

## InfoBox

| 1962 Naples Grand Prix | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Non-championship race in the 1962 Formula One season | | | |
|  | | | |
| Race details | | | |
| Date | 20 May 1962 | | |
| Official name | XX Gran Premio di Napoli | | |
| Location | Posillipo Circuit, Posillipo, Naples | | |
| Course | Street circuit | | |
| Course length | 2.491 km (1.548 miles) | | |
| Distance | 60 laps, 149.444 km (92.86 miles) | | |
| Pole position | | | |
| Driver |  | Ferrari |
| Time | 1:18.7 | | |
| Fastest lap | | | |
| Drivers | Willy Mairesse | Ferrari |
| Fastest lap | Lorenzo Bandini | Ferrari |
| Time | 1:17.7 | | |
| Podium | | | |
| First |  | Ferrari |
| Second |  | Ferrari |
| Third |  | Gilby-Climax |


title: Elyse Fenton

abstract: Elyse Fenton is an American poet. Fenton is the author of the poetry collection Clamor which was selected for the 2009 Cleveland State University Poetry Center First Book Prize by D. A. Powell. Fenton’s Clamor also received the 2010 University of Wales Dylan Thomas Prize and the 2011 Bob Bush Memorial Award for First Book of Poetry from the Texas Institute of Letters. She was recipient of the 2008 Pablo Neruda Award from the Nimrod International Literary Journal. Fenton’s poetry and nonfiction have appeared in numerous publications including The Iowa Review, The Massachusetts Review, and The New York Times. She was featured in Poetry Society of America's New American Poets 2011 selected by Rachel Zucker. Fenton received her B.A. from Reed College and her M.F.A. from the University of Oregon.

text:
# Elyse Fenton

**Elyse Fenton** (born September 4, 1980 in Brookline, Massachusetts) is an American poet.

Fenton is the author of the poetry collection *Clamor* (Cleveland State University Poetry Center, 2010) which was selected for the 2009 Cleveland State University Poetry Center First Book Prize by D. A. Powell. Fenton’s *Clamor* also received the 2010 University of Wales Dylan Thomas Prize and the 2011 Bob Bush Memorial Award for First Book of Poetry from the Texas Institute of Letters. She was recipient of the 2008 Pablo Neruda Award from the Nimrod International Literary Journal. Fenton’s poetry and nonfiction have appeared in numerous publications including The Iowa Review, The Massachusetts Review, and The New York Times. She was featured in Poetry Society of America's *New American Poets 2011* selected by Rachel Zucker.

Fenton received her B.A. from Reed College and her M.F.A. from the University of Oregon.