Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_individual-dd51f1d2-bf9d-4e42-9a72-5b30dd2bd338.jsonl

@@ -63,3 +63,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722358794.1134, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358793.8686, "finish": 1722358794.1134, "ip": "", "conv_id": "e4c6ce6f8a924a55914bd8af25aab3ff", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1722358877.9707, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358875.5131, "finish": 1722358877.9707, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b0d36170b64947a5b92f47145da1c137", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1722358877.9707, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358875.5131, "finish": 1722358877.9707, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f5ce1163f07c459f918462330844dde2", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Progress in artificial intelligence\n\nSub-human Optical character recognition for printed text (nearing par-human for Latin-script typewritten text)\nObject recognition\nVarious robotics tasks that may require advances in robot hardware as well as AI, including:\nStable bipedal locomotion: Bipedal robots can walk, but are less stable than human walkers (as of 2017)\nHumanoid soccer\nSpeech recognition: \"nearly equal to human performance\" (2017)\nExplainability. Current medical systems can diagnose certain medical conditions well, but cannot explain to users why they made the diagnosis.\nMany tests of fluid intelligence (2020)\nBongard visual cognition problems, such as the Bongard-LOGO benchmark (2020)\nVisual Commonsense Reasoning (VCR) benchmark (as of 2020)\nStock market prediction: Financial data collection and processing using Machine Learning algorithms\nAngry Birds video game, as of 2020\nVarious tasks that are difficult to solve without contextual knowledge, including:\nTranslation\nWord-sense disambiguation\nProposed tests of artificial intelligence\nIn his famous Turing test, Alan Turing picked language, the defining feature of human beings, for its basis. The Turing test is now considered too exploitable to be a meaningful benchmark.\nThe Feigenbaum test, proposed by the inventor of expert systems, tests a machine's knowledge and expertise about a specific subject. A paper by Jim Gray of Microsoft in 2003 suggested extending the Turing test to speech understanding, speaking and recognizing objects and behavior."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722359122.6293, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722359120.4378, "finish": 1722359122.6293, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7fe10dee09184f45b5cec05ca1a5557a", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "has a hurricane crosses the equator?", "output": [["has a hurricane crosses the equator?", "Physics Stackexchange\n\nQ: Hurricanes and Atmospheric Temperature EDIT -- It appears that everyone is confused by the question.  That's probably my fault.  Let me say it another way. \nDo hurricanes cool the atmosphere (by taking heat out of the ocean/air and using that energy to essentially power the winds)?  Does this counter the effect of global warming in any significant way?\nOriginal question wording:\nDoes the energy expended by a hurricane/typhoon have a cooling effect/counter the effects of average temperature increase caused by climate change?\nIf so, do any climate predication models account for this?  Or is the effect so negligible that there is no need?\n\nA: Energy can't be expanded. The only way the earth can get rid of energy is by radiating it into space.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722359122.6293, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722359120.4378, "finish": 1722359122.6293, "ip": "", "conv_id": "01fc306f3e784a6b81757157817505bc", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "has a hurricane crosses the equator?", "output": [["has a hurricane crosses the equator?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: Codeigniter Multiple Database connections I'm diving into multiple database usage. According to the codeigniter user guide. To connect to the additional databases use use the following\n$db2 = $this->load->database('second');\n\nthen to interact use,\n$db2->get('second_table');\n\nI'm receiving a Fatal error call to a member function \"where()\" on a non-object.\nfor the following line\n$db2->where('field1', $data['item']);\n\nand also for\n$db2->get('second_table');\n\nWhere am I going wrong with this? \nThanks for any help. \n\nA: In order to return the database object, you need to pass a TRUE as second paramenter:\n$db2 = $this->load->database('second', TRUE);\n\nSee the manual on database class for more info.\nMake also sure you've loaded the config for that database in application/config/database.php\n$db['default']['hostname'] = 'localhost';\n//.........\n\n$db['second']['hostname'] = 'localhost';\n//..........\n\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}