Thus the sense of his presentations is factually (i.e., as his own sense) unambiguous; but unfortunately this unambiguousness stems from the fact that he does not actually carry through the original radicalism of his ideas, that he does not actually subject to the epoche art (or bracket all his prior opinions, the world in all respects, that he, obsessed by his goal, does not draw out precisely what is most significant in what he gained through the ego of the epoche, so as to unfold, purely in connection with this ego, a philosophical av ia$eiv.