It now remains to be shown in more detail that the immanence of this knowledge means that it can serve as an appropriate point of departure for the critique of knowledge; furthermore, that because of such immanence, this form of knowledge is free of that enigmatic character which is the source of all skeptical predicaments; and, finally, that immanence is the necessary mark of all knowledge that comprises the critique of knowledge, and that any borrowing from the sphere of the transcendent, any attempt to ground epistemology on psychology, or any positive science, is nonsense not only at the start but at any point along the way.