But in so far as he is essentially a particular individual, it is an accident that his death was directly connected with his 'work' for the universal and was the result of it; partly because, if his death was such a result, it is the natural negativity and movement of the individual as a mere existent, in which consciousness does not return into itself and become self consciousness; or partly because, since the movement of what merely exists consists in its being superseded and becoming a being for self, death is the side of diremption in which the attained being.for is something other than the mere existent which began the movement.