Each of these two ways of judging finds a liken.ess and a disparity; in thefirst case llSciOl;tSness judges theandtatepow:er to be essentially different from it, and the enjoyment of wealth to accord with its own nature; while in the second case itjudg.t:s the state power to (; ,Qcord with its nature and the enjoyment of wealth to beessentiaJly different from it.