Logophonocentrism is not a philosophical or historical error which the history of philosophy, of the West, that is, of the world, would have rushed into pathologically, but is rather a necessary, and necessarily finite, movement and structure: the history of the possibility of symbolism in general (before the distinction between man and animal, and even before the distinction between the living and the nonliving); the history of differance, history as differance which finds in philosophy as episteme, in the European form of the metaphysical or onto theological project, the privileged manifestation, with worldwidedominance, of dissimulation, of general censorship of the text in general.