This is how what is would most of all be and what is not would not be: on the one hand, by what is, if it is completely to be, partaking of being in regard to being a being and of not being in regard to being a not being; and, on the other hand, by what is not, if in its turn what is not is completely not to be, partaking of not being in regard to not being a not being and of being in regard to being a not being.' '