Ifwe give the name of Notion to the movement of knowing, and the name of object to knowing as a passive unity, or as the, then we see that not only for us, but for knowing itself, the objectcorrespoQrls to the Notion Or alternatively, if we call Notion what the object is in itself, but call the object what z't is qua object or for an other, then it is clear that being in itselfand being:for an otker are one and the same.