It is understandable, then, why the analyses of the Physiocrats and those of the utilitarians are often so close, and sometimes complementary; why Cantillon could be claimed by the former for his theory of the three fundamental revenues and the importance he gives to land as well as by the latter for his analysis of circulation and the role he gives to money; why Turgot was able to be faithful to Physiocrat doctrine in ﬂexions