For that reason we can say with equal truth that these expressions express the inner too much, as that they do so too little; too much, because the inner itself breaks out in them and there remains no antithesis between them and it; they give not merely an expression of the inner, but directly the inner itself; too little, because in speech and action the inner turns itself into something else, thus putting itself at the mercy of the element of change, which twists the spoken word nd the accomplished act into meaning something else than they are in and for themselves, as actions of this par.