Thus Foucault was entirely right in saying that, in a certain sense, the psychoanalyst completed and perfected what the psychiatry of nineteenth century asylums, with Pinel and Tuke, had set out to do: to fuse madness with a parental complex, to link it to the half real, half imaginary dialectic of I the Family to constitute for the madman a microcosm symbolizing the massive structures of bourgeois society and its values, relations of Family Child, Transgression Punishment, Madness Disorder; to arrange things so that disalienation goes the same route as alienation, with Oedipus at both ends; to establish the moral authority of the doctor as Father and Judge, Family and Law; and finally to culminate in the following paradox: While the victim of mental illness is entirely alienated in the real person of his doctor, the doctor dissipates the reality of the mental illness in the critical concept of madness.