I did just want to try to understand the way in which the amounts have been calculated. I did acknowledge in a previous contribution that they are relatively small. Again, I emphasise not to trivialise the fact that for some families in the situation it may be difficult to pay any amount. And, in fact, given that we're in the realm of penalties, that's almost certainly the case. But I wonder if there was a particular rationale for the calculation of $5 or, if greater, 2 percent of the outstanding amount at that time. I just pause to note the irony that we are passing in urgency a remedial measure whereby, of course, we are in danger of compounding the error by making further errors as a Parliament, and perhaps I should say, more accurately, as the Government, for it is they who introduced it in urgency as part of their Budget package. I do also want to acknowledge that point about the valiant efforts of the Hon Peter Dunne to bring down the system from the inside, libertarian hero that he was!