The key areas that have been reformed and made better are around design standards. It was the view of members across the House that those New Zealanders who came to the committee and said, "There must be good design standards when you're having more intensified housing in your urban areas"—it was our view that those submitters were right. So we have made changes: to allow for landscaped areas, to allow for greater outdoor living spaces and outlook spaces, and to reduce the height of housing in relation to boundaries. We also listened intently to local authorities who said that they needed to maintain some discretion so that they could exclude areas from intense housing development that were not properly suited to it—areas, for example, that were subject to natural hazards, areas that had particular historic heritage, areas which would not be able to support the level of housing that this bill implies. So we tidied up the qualifying matters section of this bill to ensure that local authorities were able to carry over assessments formed during previous planning processes.