And I introduced three Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) in the House to clarify that. The Minister has given assurances that each of those areas won't be covered by the legislation: i.e., that any free opinion or just a statement of opinions is not captured by the bill. The concern was, of course, with a broader definition of conversion practice to be a "practice, sustained effort, or treatment" that that would be directed towards an individual because of their gender identity with the intention of changing or suppressing an individual's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. That's quite broad, and so people will naturally ask the question, "Well, what does that mean? What is captured by a 'sustained effort' to suppress somebody's gender identity?" If you're confronted with a young teenager, a 13- or 14-year-old, asserting that they are a different gender and wanting to make very, very significant decisions. So we've heard from the Minister, "No, no. Nothing in this bill will in any way inhibit frank discussions by medical practitioners prior to any significant decisions.", which is wholly appropriate and should be quite clear. That basic question that should always be asked before any significant medical interventions is "Do you really want to do this?" And you need to be able to have that in a frank and open way, without feeling inhibited.