But it is also rational. And I would point to the fact that there was quite a strong statement—and I wish I'd got it down to be able to repeat it back—about the position of wanting to remove the 20 weeks not being consistent with any human rights perspective, where, actually, that is not the case. In the Law Commission's report, I point the previous contributor to page 79, where they note—and in chapter 3 additionally—that "international human rights law supports the removal of third party authorisation requirements and other statutory restrictions on abortion."