The member, I think, misunderstands the status and role of the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission. If he looked at the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission Act 2020, he would see that the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission is an independent statutory entity. It is independent because it provides a monitoring and oversight function, and it must stand apart in order to play its critique role and its advocacy role; so it advocates. In putting together any planning or strategy, naturally, I would expect Health New Zealand, the Māori Health Authority, where the ministry in its revamped form might take responsibility for development of plans and strategies—they're going to engage with relevant communities, with those with lived experience. And to the extent that the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission is an advocate, it has a statutory right to be that advocate and to be consulted, that is already provided for and isn't needed in the member's Supplementary Order Papers.