The Minister touched upon the 1,000 hectares threshold, and also there was probably the last amendment that the select committee suggested—and which I'll raise today—which is to access the special forestry test or the general "benefit to New Zealand" test for conversion, the relevant land must be used and will continue to be used exclusively, or near exclusively, for forestry activities. There was a lot of debate around the words "exclusively" and "not exclusively", and officials assured us that there was quite a bit of precedent throughout the current Overseas Investment Act regime for them to lean on to be able to apply that test. One submitter, though, indicated that plantings might be staggered, meaning parts of the land may, at times, sit outside of the cycle of "establishing, maintaining, or harvesting a crop of trees" in the definition of "forestry activities". To ensure these scenarios are captured, the bill and the select committee recommended that we widen the definition of "forestry activities" to include maintaining the land between harvesting and establishing a new crop of trees. 