Mr Simpson spoke about the fork in the road or this matter being stuck, and that's exactly what happened. Because of the wording of the actual bill, as it stands at the moment, where there was a disagreement in a particular region, even if it just involved one iwi and they had no other issue with everyone else, that whole region's assets were held up. It was unintended, but it's something that came to light, and I want to acknowledge Te Ohu Kaimoana, who have responsibilities under the statute in terms of working with iwi in the allocation of these settlements in fisheries and in aquaculture. I want to acknowledge Te Ohu for their work in raising this issue and working with the Minister and with officials to ensure that we can come to an approach—and also, obviously, with the iwi stakeholders to ensure that we had a workable way forward. And that's what this bill does: it provides a limited discretion for Te Ohu Kaimoana where there is a disagreement and there's no other way through, through dispute resolution mechanisms—it provides a way for Te Ohu Kaimoana to be able to release those assets where there is no issue so those other iwi are able to receive those assets and pursue their aspirations in aquaculture. 