I said earlier, why is it discriminatory? The bill starts from 1 March. Now, I'm always the first to say we have to live in a real world and you have to draw a line somewhere, but 1 March is relatively arbitrary. If you lose your job from 1 March onwards, strangely enough, as per this bill, you get the money; so that's fantastic. But if you were, unfortunately, made redundant—I think this was a leap year—you luck out. There are no provisions. There is not even a transitioning scheme, which is maybe something we can consider in the committee stage if this does indeed pass first reading. That does seem unfair.