I'm not going to go into a lot of detail, but I think there's general agreement across the House that the Resource Management Act (RMA) has passed its use-by date and hasn't really achieved the purpose, which was to protect the environment and enable development. In truth, processes take too long, they cost too much, and it hasn't been successful at protecting the environment against cumulative effects. The RMA's theory was that we would avoid, remedy, or mitigate adverse effects—in the end it's generally been "mitigate" rather than "avoid". As a consequence, environmental services have been sliced off like a salami having a slice taken off time and again. That's the reason why we've had degrading water quality, and it's also failed in its role, really, in respect of greenhouse gas emissions. In addition to that, it obviously hasn't enabled enough housing supply to keep up with the demand for housing, and that's not the only reason why we have a housing crisis in New Zealand, but it has contributed to it. 