I also think, in terms of the proposed new section 42C, there's some thinking to be done about how far down the road you go. Obviously, there are things like managed funds where you may have interests but they're not active interests—they're not actively managed or purchased or sold by you, but, nevertheless, you do have an interest in companies or properties. But perhaps you don't need to go into that level of detail. Certainly, the members' pecuniary interest register makes some distinctions there. Obviously, the travel there: "family member" might need some definition, because, obviously, if a husband or mum or dad or wife purchases travel, that's one thing. We need to make sure that captures all domestic relationships, whether that be what we might've once called a de facto partner—just make sure we don't spread the net too narrowly there.