Other submitters have been concerned that in fact there was only a limited amount of consultation, with 22 invited submitters, and that that did not actually invite consultation from that wider group of organisations. It was telling that the previous speaker from the Government side made the point that a law firm had been very, very supportive of the concept of a very large number of trusts being set up. I would be surprised, if I was offered this opportunity as an interested party, that law firms wouldn't be interested in setting up trusts at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars for each business. So, yeah, I would assume that that particular submission was made at least with a half-smirk behind the hand, but good on that member on the Government side for standing up for all of the lawyers who stand to gain from this particular requirement.