Now, remember, fundamentally the Government decided to legislate minimum pay rates in exchange for extinguishing the right to go to court because they didn't like the findings of the court. What occurred, according to surveys of people actually affected was that about half of them said that their job had stayed the same, half of them said they had extra responsibilities added to their job, and a quarter said that they had their workload increased. Others, meanwhile, said that they had had their hours reduced against their will. Actually, it's all pretty understandable. Parliament stepped in and legislated what the wages should be and legislated them up, and, as a result, what happened is that they found that the managers, not having enough money to match it, found people they didn't think were very useful and forcibly reduced their hours, and the people they did think were doing a good job were given more to do and added responsibilities to them. 