We have a situation that those on student allowances are able to receive this as well and on top of. So again, it just strikes me as out of whack. Also, it's not wanting to be punishing, but strictly a person is eligible even if they've had a redundancy payment up to $29,999.99. Again, a line has been drawn that, if you have a redundancy payment of $30,000 or more, you're not eligible. I again understand a line has to be drawn somewhere, but I suppose I'm challenging already in this first reading: why is there not more of a graduated approach here? The fact that your partner, significant other, spouse, husband, wife, that person you've known for a couple of years, however one wants to term them, can earn up to $2,000 a week; that seems rather high. That turns out to be about $100,000 a year. And that's not to be sniffed at. Again, I just sort of feel that's just not quite right, and it's all just pointing to me, personally, that this has not been well thought through.