Clause 9 of this bill is moving current section 41A in the Arms Act and renumbering to section 59AAA and placing it "after the Part 9 heading. It's a tidy-up clause there. I have produced a Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) where I have suggested that perhaps subclause (3) could be removed, and that is regarding the marking of certain types of firearms where the Crown absolves itself from having to pay any compensation for the devaluing of those items by this directive. I wonder whether or not the Minister would be prepared to support ACT's SOP, which would make the Government—or the Crown—have to pay compensation for the devaluing of goods having to be marked?