The question that I have—and I didn't adequately get an answer from the Minister—was that two years is not a long time, and given that the Minister indicated that the panel and the chair of the panel would need a fair amount of time to get processes set up, well, how long will that take? Will that be six months? That then leaves 18 months' time for this panel to consider what could be—and the Minister acknowledged that he did not know how many consents, which does not give a long period of time by which the Act expires. Of course, there is a provision in the soon-to-be Act which allows for the consenting panels to continue their work until the consents that are in hand are dealt with. But I just wonder—and this side of the House wonders—whether the two years was just the right amount of time, because bills of this sort, or this bill in particular, was modelled on the Canterbury earthquakes legislation and the legislation which came as a result of the Kaikōura earthquakes.