I would have assumed—and this is based on my experience in presenting to mana whenua groups as an engineer at Auckland Council—that, actually, by engaging with people early and meaningfully and offering them an opportunity to comment on infrastructure or land development proposals or regulatory proposals, you actually clear out a whole lot of potential objections early in the process so that when you come back to the decision makers with your recommendations, they say, "That's good. We understand all of that. Where do we sign?" In fact, what the member has proposed is that even after the council officers and potentially all the applicants for resource consents and people that want to develop land have made their case and they've been and they've talked to all the stakeholders and they've done the consultation and they've got everybody to sign off on the consultation that's required under the resource management consenting process, and when it goes up to Environment Canterbury's decision-making committees of the elected members and the two non-elected members, basically what they'll say is "You, start again.", because there will be things that the non-elected members, the representatives from Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, haven't heard about before and they'll be asking a whole lot of questions. Basically, that's going to be like a massive handbrake on the decision making of Environment Canterbury. Who would have thought that the member representing Te Tai Tonga, supporting this bill, and having brought this local bill to the House would say that quiet part out loud? But there it is. 