We know that the Labour Party has been all aflutter in their caucus this week talking about three waters, saying to each other—yeah, they know. You can see the response. They know. They've been saying, "Do we really want to do this? Is it really worth it, botching this thing, so that we lose our seats?"—all of those provincial seats. Paul Eagle is about to announce his mayoral run. He's less worried about it. But someone like Shanan Halbert from Northcote, he'll be thinking, "Is it really worth it? Is it really what I want to do, to put co-governance through everything?" Is it a worthwhile goal to try and be the first country in history to achieve equal rights for every citizen and then, as if engaged in some historic shuttle run, to run back in the opposite direction and create different categories of human, where you get seats at the table on these water entities based on your ancestry rather than being elected by your constituents? That's the problem that this Labour Party has. It's not a policy that was ever worth doing. 