There is evidence, we've heard already, that shows the culture in the public sector, that shows a culture of a little bit of fear, where people are fearful to speak out. Forty percent of all respondents currently in work felt their jobs would be safe if they reported the wrongdoing. But that's 40 percent. That could be significantly higher, and that was the Chief Ombudsman's commissioned report. Fraudsters can even squeeze out multiple whistleblowers. The research showed that whistleblowers felt they might not be protected, or they didn't think that their identity would be anonymous. So what this bill does, most importantly, is strengthen protections by looking mainly at the role of the receiver of the information, and it puts an onus on the receiver of the information in public institutions to at least acknowledge receipt of the information. They must also consider the disclosure. What will they do with it? They need to take it seriously. They need to deal with the matter, and they need to—very importantly—inform the discloser about what the receiver is doing, and provide reasons for the decision. 