I would just remind the member of why we have border controls in place at the moment, and it is still to contain the outbreaks of COVID—the potential outbreaks of COVID-19—within the community, because, if we follow the member's train of thought, which is that we allow this Act to disappear, we say we don't need it any more, then we would have no controls at the border around COVID-19 at all, no ability to stop someone who wasn't vaccinated coming in at the border, which is still the National Party's policy. And yet they're proposing to do away with the legislation that would allow them to enact their own policy. They're proposing to now do away with it. So we would be saying the border is open—anyone can come in, vaccinated/unvaccinated, tested/not tested. There'd be no legislative framework whatsoever to allow any of that to happen, which means hundreds of cases of COVID could arrive at the border every day and there would be nothing we could do about it, because the law that allows for a vaccination requirement, the law that allows for a pre-departure test requirement, would be gone. And those requirements would no longer be in place, because, by the member's own statements, he believes that the law that allows those requirements to be put in place should no longer be there, that the Parliament should not extend it for the next year and a half. In other words, it should remove those requirements. Because, once this law is no longer in place, none of the requirements that have been put in place under it, including the border restrictions that the member's party's policy requires, would no longer be possible. And that's what he's just argued in the Chamber.