One of those which needs addressing is exactly who they extend to. What is the reach of a member of a criminal organisation? Is the trigger, for example, as I understand is in here, some kind of serious criminal offending, or should it extend a little bit further, perhaps? Should it extend to associates, people who are members of what is, essentially, a criminal organisation but have managed to escape the long arm of the law to date? That's an inquiry that we need to have, and I suggest that it's something where we need to perhaps look a little more carefully, because if the policy underpinning this is firearm safety, as it should be—and everyone's policy is firearm safety—then we need to ask the question: where is the risk coming from? Is it coming from only those people who have done hard time—