So we know that 'Una Tanginoa, who was a member of the public, was put in a situation where they were left without their mobility device. In this instance, it was a van that had been specifically modified for his disability. He'd been a victim of a rugby injury and is a quadriplegic and he needed this van in order to go to the doctor, to get out of the house, to do his daily duties. So once he got behind on paying his rent the vehicle was repossessed. When he managed to get a lawyer and go back to court and have the vehicle returned to him, what the judge in the case did say was that it wasn't an illegal ruling. So that really drew attention to this particular anomaly in the law and it's been largely the reason why this member's bill has been drafted. 