My own concern is really more to place on record, I think, what certainly I hope we would all agree, which is that the representation of the child is the key factor in all of that, and I make that comment in reference to the select committee discussion where the select committee members turned their mind, I think reasonably, to the question of whether there might be discrimination alleged against the lawyer who wasn't appointed to represent a child. I was pleased to see that the select committee ultimately decided first of all that that wouldn't be a breach of the lawyer's rights, but I would hope more fundamentally as well that the feelings or the professional opportunities of the lawyer involved are much less important than the child receiving the best possible representation that she or he might have, to whatever extent they might have an involvement in that and to whatever degree different qualifications or characteristics might be taken into account. So, really, placing that on record in my own case and inviting the Minister to state that as well, because I feel as though that represents an important philosophical point about the legislation, even if it may or may not make a practical distinction in terms of how it's interpreted going forward.