When the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 was passed, earlier iterations of it proposed that we would confer on the courts the jurisdiction to strike down primary legislation. The Parliament of the time, in 1990, thought that that was wrong and that the conduct of the executive and other lower-level decision-makers within the government apparatus should be able to have their decisions quashed by the courts in respect of decisions that infringed the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act but that primary legislation passed by this House should not be able to struck down by the courts. I think that Parliament was right back then to narrow the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act in that way, and that remains good in principle today.