The Green Party here is actually saying—and I must commend them; principled, principled—let's give all prisoners the right to vote. That's the essence of the Supplementary Order Paper and the argument getting put forward. I just want to acknowledge that that is a principled position to come from. It's a principle that I don't agree with, but at least it's a principled position. Unlike the Minister's position, which is to stand up in the House and say, "Well, at this stage, we'll allow prisoners who have been sentenced to three years or less, but who knows what might happen in the future." We might get a Human Rights Tribunal decision or something might get challenged in the courts. He's passing other legislation around inconsistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and all the rest. So we might just see what happens. Will we be having this conversation again, that we might extend it to six years or nine years or 10 years? So where does the line get drawn?