Then they said, "Well, it's not a substitute. We need to check that it's as good as nasal PCR testing." Well, even if we believe the Government for a moment that a one or two percentage point difference in accuracy measured—and even if we believe that testing more often, because it's easier to do saliva testing, wouldn't make the difference—even if we believed all that, it doesn't have to be a substitute. Yet we heard from the Prime Minister today—she seemed to be saying we can't have saliva testing because it's not a reliable replacement. And then yesterday, in question time, yet another one: the Prime Minister said, "Well, we need to verify it for New Zealand, because it doesn't work in countries that don't have high rates of COVID-19." Well, apparently, the Prime Minister is unaware that Australia, Singapore, Taiwan—countries that also have very low rates of COVID-19—are also using it. 