I reflect also on the composition of the committee, because I think it actually is an opportunity to learn something about the role of select committees in our democracy, and this is why I think it should continue. It's interesting that usually any select committee that has really important legislation you can guarantee has a majority of members of Parliament who are also members of the governing party—take firearms legislation, sent to the Finance and Expenditure Committee. One of the results of that is that the outcome is very easy to predict. All one needs to know is what the Government's policy preferences are. The fact that this committee had a majority of Opposition members gave it a completely different tone and purpose from most important select committee deliberations. When I look at our country and its anaemic constitutional arrangements—no written constitution, no Upper House, no subnational Governments, no states or provinces—I think, actually, we can learn a lot from the benefit of having a select committee that has the power to actually change legislation and drive the outcome from a perspective other than the Government majority. I'd put it to you, Mr Speaker, and I suspect you'd be sympathetic with this view, that perhaps future Parliaments should actually learn from this experience and consider making select committee membership proportional to the non-executive members.