Hon GERRY BROWNLEE (National): I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Mr Speaker, it's interesting that you suggest that the member might progress things by way of a notice of motion. In the end, a notice of motion succeeds either because it comes up on the Order Paper or the House grants leave for it. Now, the point is that if the member were to put that notice of motion onto the Order Paper, it would be the same intent, the same wording, and the same desire to have a debate that would be expressed in the leave being requested of the House today. It seems to me that it is fundamentally a decision to stop the House investigating something that might be important to it—the House's decision in the end—when, in fact, there is no reason for that to occur. The advice that's been given is effectively counter to the decision not to accept the leave.