On the question that Mr Woodhouse raised, I was briefed in either late March or early April, in a very limited way, by the chief executive that a female staff member had approached him, that there had been an accusation of serious sexual misconduct, that it was a matter that had been previously investigated, and that he was encouraging the woman to formalise a complaint, and he was putting support around the woman and was encouraging her to go to the police. That was the extent of it then. I think it came up on one further occasion in a 30-second conversation where he indicated that she was waiting for the results of the Francis Review before making a decision as to her progress, and then, on the day following the release of the review, he indicated to me that he had suspended the person and, as the member is aware, that he then instigated the new investigation, which went on, I think, until November, and at the conclusion of that investigation—so, you know, it wasn't on the spot that he was sacked; it was an investigation—