Secondly, we need to think very carefully about the implications of this legislation, because what it means is that the society has decided that on an ad hoc basis, when there's people we don't like—and I, for one, don't like anti-abortion protesters very much—that we are going to introduce a makeshift law that suppresses freedom of speech on an ad hoc basis. People might think very carefully about the words of a member who changed her mind and just told me in the last few minutes that she's supporting this. She said, "Had a change of mind. You're right. Freedoms of movement and the right to protest is a value that's critical in a democratic country." In New Zealand, we might want to think carefully about groups of students, about farmers, about oil and gas industry people who might say, actually, "We want the kinds of protection from protest activity that those people got in the Abortion Legislation Bill." That's the precedent that's being set here, and I think we should be really careful about setting such a precedent when the Law Commission says there is not a problem. Thank you, Mr Chair.