In terms of a cultural redress, the bill includes provision for a number of cultural redress instruments, which are listed in detail in the bill. The bill then comes to the substantive matters, which is the vesting of properties, because, despite the fact that the Crown has acknowledged a large number of properties and the extent of land that was alienated from Ngāti Maru unfairly, it's not possible for the Crown to restore all of that land, because since that event, much of that land is, in fact, owned by others. Other people now have private property rights in that land. So the Crown has to find some other way of giving redress, in terms of a financial redress of $30 million, and to make available other properties that the Crown has access to. That is land about which the Crown, essentially, says, "While we might have wanted to use it for other purposes, it is far better that we give Ngāti Maru this land in recognition of the loss of their lands and alienation of their lands as a result of the Crown's action.", and that is fit. 