Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): For the several months that this saga has been going on, my colleagues and I—in particular, Mr Bishop and I—have been very, very careful not to engage in questioning comments or observations that would have the effect of re-victimising any victim in any of the cases that the Minister has outlined. While that is a fine line to walk, I think we have done that, because no one in this House thought that the Francis Review was not a good idea, however ironic it was that the biggest bully in this place was actually instigating it—that's right, that being the Speaker—with a long track record, by his own admission, frankly, and one who, as he said in interviews, came into this place when there were still people who had fought in World War II and it was a different time and he acted in a different way, and he saw the error of those ways. I don't want to do that now, but there are enough lawyers in this place and enough employers who know the importance of process, the right to be heard, and the right for the facts to be put on the table. That is what we have seen has been the failure here, and, frankly, with questions that still haven't been answered, and a Speaker that said one thing in one forum and said another thing in another. The Minister shakes his head, but he still hasn't explained to me when he was briefed by Mr Gonzalez-Montero about the case—the very case that I believe he knew was at the heart of the Francis Review. He knew because the chief executive told him. 