This is designed specifically so that environmental offsetting done on the pastoral lease property can actually be taken into account when the commissioner considers decisions relating to the mitigation of any adverse effects from a proposed discretionary activity. Now, it seems to me to be utterly logical that if in cornerstone legislation such as the zero carbon legislation and other climate pieces of legislation and, indeed, other environmental pieces of legislation, offsetting is permitted—indeed, encouraged—then why would it be excluded from this piece of legislation other than simply to further reinforce the narrative that this is a Government that actually does not want these farmers to succeed in any possible way, because the practical effect of this position is to ensure that farmers do not undertake any discretionary activity which will produce a net benefit to the inherent values of the pastoral lease. 