Turning to my final point, which is the conclusion we reached: "After considering the responses, we found no reason why the orders and regulations should not be confirmed." A neat little double-negative there that I suppose counts for an enthusiastic endorsement in the language of the Regulations Review Committee. We weren't unhappy, and so it was that we said that the House of Parliament—as a whole, if they were to be advised by us and take their lead from our examination of these regulations—should allow them to remain in force, effectively, or be retrospectively validated for the period that they were in force up to 30 June 2020, which was several years ago, at least according to the way that I feel, and probably a lot of New Zealanders feel! But, in any case, that time has been and gone. Not really a matter of retrospectivity, in a sense that these matters were covered by regulation. They now are also covered by legislation—primary legislation. And so it is that we commend this bill to the House.