The debate has progressed through the House and the committee of the whole House, producing unusual alliances. There have been intersections of issues that have thrown together unlikely political bedfellows, in a sense—a classic example would be that of the free speech or free expression in relation to the so-called safe zones, in which some of us have found ourselves voting together with others whom we're not normally meeting in these lobbies, the Ayes and the Noes, on conscience issues. But, nevertheless, that particular matter I thought was one of a matter of principle, and I applaud those who saw it along similar lines, notwithstanding that they're on the other side of the debate.