ERICA STANFORD (National—East Coast Bays): Thank you, Madam Chair. I think that the Minister mostly misunderstood my point, but kind of got there at the end, and still didn't make any sense. The point is that this is around those providers who have already started construction and are trying to get their application in before the deadline so that they don't have to apply and get caught in this dual licensing scheme that the Minister has set up. He himself pushed the date out from 1 August until 1 February for that very reason: to allow them to get their application in before the dual licensing system sets in. What I'm trying to explain to the Minister is that he did not give them a fair amount of time, because, included in that time that he's given them—acknowledging that he wanted them to get their application in before the 1st, because they're already under construction—they've lost six to eight weeks. The period that he's given them—the period of grace that he's given them—isn't the period that he thinks it is, because it loses six to eight weeks. My question to him is: why wasn't that taken into account? Has he listened to the early childhood education providers who are under construction at the moment, who are crying out, saying they're not going to meet the deadline, and are concerned that they won't be able to meet the dual licensing criteria?