I looked at the general policy statement—the GPS—where the member argues that it is difficult to make out the offence of robbery in the case of a motor vehicle because the current definition requires an intent to permanently deprive the victim of their vehicle. And to rectify this, the member has proposed clarifying the current definition of robbery, proposing that aside from theft, the words "or unlawful taking" be added. But the problem is that the bill provides no definition of what unlawful taking is, thereby not offering any clarification at all. There's no reference to where the definition of "unlawful taking" can be found, and that is really just the start of—really sums up for me—why Labour is not supporting this bill. In my look through it, I don't think it stacks up and to be worthy. 