I guess my question is: of that $2.1 million, I think, that was referred to by the Minister as to the cost, what percentage of that cost is actually going to be undertaken in terms of this assessment process, with people with clipboards making determinations of whether someone is purchasing too much, too little, or enough? What is "reasonable", because I think we would all want to say—yes—we don't want people necessarily going in abusing a reduction but also we also want to ensure that we're not overburdening people with regulation and people with clipboards.