So the bill amends the Crown Minerals Act of 1991. The aim of these changes is to mitigate the risk to the taxpayer of having to stump up with the funding for the decommissioning, and this bill does this in three separate ways. Firstly, it clarifies who is responsible for the decommissioning, what they are responsible for, and that there will be consequences for failing to fulfil these responsibilities. It seeks to encourage all permit holders to carefully consider who they transfer to, by introducing perpetual liability. Second, it also enables a proactive approach to monitoring permit and licence holders' financial positions and provides the regulator with enhanced oversight of planning under way for decommissioning. Third, while most operators want to do the right thing and plan for decommissioning, financial situations can and do change. That is why the bill that we have in front of us introduces the additional requirement that permit and licence holders must establish a financial security which can be used to fund and carry out decommissioning in the event that things do go wrong. The bill also requires a permit and licence holder to make a payment or provide a financial security that could be put towards the cost of any post-decommissioning work that is required. 