Actually, the Commerce Commission has a number of tools already that I'm not sure they use to their full extent or as adequately as they do. So when the Minister talked a little bit around, you know, how hard it is, in the briefing notes in his speech, for the Commerce Commission to get the outcome they want in the court sometimes, taking away an intention test and changing that to make it easier for the Commerce Commission to get prosecutions in itself is not always the right thing, actually, to do. So what we need to do is decide whether there is a real problem here or if it's just something that the ministry and the Commerce Commission and the Minister have seen overseas that they think would be a better idea. Is there a problem we're trying to fix here, and is it demonstrable? Actually, where are the real examples of where the Commerce Commission hasn't been able to meet an intention test but the practice has been anti-competitive, or where they didn't use other tools—they didn't have them—to make a change, in the case of the market power provisions that they have, or where the company concerned didn't make a change?