I would draw the Minister's attention instead to my SOP 449, my SOP which is far simpler and more worthy for these hard-working New Zealanders. It simply has it that a person who is the owner of rural zoned land—because they don't have to be farmers; we have things such as lifestyle blocks in this country, some of them very large, some of them not put to productive farming or agricultural use. But the pests don't care. They don't just walk in to farming and agricultural land. So in my SOP 449, proposed new section 4A(1)(fa) inserted by my proposed clause 8(2A) states, "a person who is the owner of rural zoned land, or their employee, and who requires a prohibited item for the purpose of controlling wild animals or animal pests on that land:"—nice and simple, no requirement to have to prove some material business impact, some loss of, I guess, potential revenue and/or profit to satisfy the police, because until, and if, this independent authority came into effect, it would be the police. And we know, because we've all heard the stories about pest control exemption applications since that first bill last year, they have been scarcer than hen's teeth to acquire. Tough, tough conditions. Why? Because the police don't want people to have them.