Well, perhaps the member could explain to us which expert she relied on to come to that opinion herself that this was a bill that needed to be presented to the House. Because perhaps, you know, I understand the member has real expertise. She, after all, holds a PhD—I believe it's in chemical engineering or something like that—so obviously, a very, very smart lady. I certainly wouldn't be able to claim expertise in that area at all. So perhaps it is something that the member herself doesn't explain the absolute technical detail between GAAP and IFRS and the recognition of income and all those sorts of things. But in that case, I would assume that she had consulted experts who'd be able to explain to her what the difference was and which motivates this on the bill.