I also think that we need to point out—and why we're dealing in Part 2 of how we deal with discrimination—is a story that was sent to me by a guy called Jeremy. His daughter, who they managed to hold alive for seven days, had chromosomal problems. His key point was that all the way up to 20 weeks, in particular, there was pressure from the doctors to abort. They had done the tests—and yes, you know, those of us who, I suppose, want to practise between naivety and ignorance, will say, "Oh, well, we'll just make our choices.", but here are the doctors putting pressure on Jeremy and his wife to abort the baby. His fundamental argument is that, actually, they decided—they made the choice—to allow that child to be born. It was only for seven days—only for seven days. They say they were absolutely wonderful days, and I can appreciate that. But their fundamental point is that if we don't pass the likes of Melissa Lee's Supplementary Order Paper (SOP), that pressure will continue. So putting it really simply to the Chamber that post - 20 weeks, the doctors who do the testing will continue—and it could be the nurses and other health practitioners—to put pressure down on those parents. It's that naivety, again, of this choice argument—this ethical argument in a cuckoo nest, which pushes out every other ethical considerations—that human beings always act calmly and rationally with full information. We don't, OK? We're terribly flawed individuals who make very, very stupid decisions all the time.