Now, the first thing we need to understand is that when he talks about, "Oh, we need to compare what behaviour happens now that we've put up the top rate with what happened before", of course, the reality is there is nothing to compare it with, because this information has never been asked for before. So there's a significant rationale flaw in the Minister's argument. The second thing we have to appreciate is that he is changing the law to get information about trusts, but it is highly unlikely to be helpful, actually, from a tax point of view. Instead, if we look particularly at new section 59BA in clause 35—and members opposite should look it up, because this is actually a very detailed section—the new law of section 59BA, which sets out numerous requirements that everyone involved in a trust is now going to have to file annually, the commissioner doesn't just get these by discretion; the commissioner is "obliged" to get this brand new set of information. So this isn't a set of discretionary powers to allow the commissioner to have a look if there could be an issue; this is a new obligation to collect a huge host of new information about trusts. And the Minister I don't think has been entirely upfront in explaining why that is and for what purpose that is, and I am concerned and I am not the only one. There are many in the tax and broader commercial community who have cottoned on to what is happening here and who will be sending that Minister emails and messages tomorrow.