What is the real benefit in this? It doesn't actually measure the footprint; it is actually assessing future risks. That is the point of it. It is going to be quite onerous, quite frankly. If you could imagine, let's take sea level, for example. If a hotel chain decides to build a hotel on a beach, or a bank decides to fund a hotel that is going to be built somewhere near a beach, they are going to actually pay quite a lot of attention to sea-level projections. This bill is not going to make any difference at all to their concerns about whether they are going to build that hotel there or not. They will look at the known studies that are out there, what is happening in terms of sea level, what are the projections, how do those projections that are being made by those entities actually perform when you go back a few years—what were their projections, and now, at this point in time, have they come to pass or not? The projections on sea-level change, Mr Speaker—which I know you'll be very interested in—have been much overblown.