But what this commercial lease law says is it doesn't matter. If you made a contract 10 years ago to lease a premise, a commercial premise, well, actually, we're going to change what that contract means. It doesn't matter that when you signed the contract, the law said you will be paid according to the contract or you will pay according to the contract. Actually, we're going to say, "Here's the new law, and it doesn't matter what you agreed back then, you have to follow the law today." That's what they call retrospective legislation. The problem with retrospective legislation is that people who want to be good citizens, who want to follow the law, who want to plan their futures can't do those things if they might find the goalposts get moved after they did the thing. That's the problem—that's the problem—and this Parliament, as far as I'm aware, certainly not in the time I've been here, has never changed the legislation in a way that is retrospective in any significant way. We've never changed the law on people after the fact, not like this. If we live in a country where you make a contract, you sign an agreement between two adults voluntarily, and the Government comes along maybe 10 years later and says, "Actually, it doesn't matter what the law was when you signed it, here's the new law. You no longer have to pay the rent, or you can no longer expect the rent, we've actually just changed at all.", that is a very dangerous precedent for any country. Labour Governments, National Governments, all sorts of Governments we've had in this country over a long period of time have never gone where this Government is going. 