I just end by saying I guess there's been a philosophical argument that some people like to make about why fluoridation is somehow in opposition to individual freedom. I've had many people make this argument over the years. And as someone who spends a bit of time thinking about individual freedom and the politics of classical liberalism, I think it's worth addressing. A water reticulation system is practically, and by definition, a collective good. The value in it is that it connects at least two, if not many more, points together. The value in it is the same water flows throughout the whole system. Now, if you're going to have one type of water in an entire system, then by logic it has to be a collective decision. There has to be some sort of collective decision about what the nature of that water flowing within the pipes is. And so there's no way that each person can have their own choice about the type of water. People are going to have to accept probably the majority decision, or that of the owner of the reticulation system.