Your regulatory impact statement also says that even with cameras—and this is actually, I think, a critical issue—and observers, it is very difficult to determine the size of the fish, the species of the fish, and the likelihood of survival of the fish, and is very challenging and difficult for both observers and cameras. So cameras are not a panacea. They clearly help, but the idea that these rules are going to be comfortably overseen by a plethora of cameras needs some testing. Indeed, in the conversations that I've had in recent weeks with fishing operators themselves, they have talked—with conversations that they've had with MPI, they have talked of up to 30 cameras per vessel. I mean, the cost is prohibitive. You really get a sense there that whoever that was in MPI who was making that assessment of how to manage the issue had lost all sense of reality.