I was watching the news—not on Facebook or not on Twitter; actually, on the TV for a change—and there was an article by the whistleblower Frances Haugen, who was a product manager on the civic integrity team at Facebook. She was talking about—she was a whistleblower, and, you know, Facebook is a trillion-dollar company. I can't even imagine a trillion dollars, let alone a billion dollars. One of the things she said is that one of the consequences of how Facebook is picking up that content today is it is optimising for content that gets engagement or reaction, but its own research has shown that content that is hateful, that is divisive, that is polarising is easier to inspire people to anger than it is to other emotions. And, yes, Facebook has realised that if they change the algorithm to be safer, people will spend less time on the site, they'll click on less ads, and they'll make less money. She revealed that they, kind of, turn these settings off and on. When they saw that a particular president was getting incredibly problematic, they turned on a whole lot of settings; he disappeared. They turned them off again, and next thing you know, the events at the Capitol house happened as well.