Now, the legislation says you must comply. In the case that a business says "We explain that we're not affected by this." and they are, they have broken the law. It's not an exemption from meeting their obligation; it just says there's a shortened procedure in a case that you are not affected by climate change. I would say that it was in the original legislation the Minister brought to the House and spoke of, and then it was changed. I think it's a mistake that we've made that change. It doesn't lessen the impact of the bill—although the bill doesn't have a lot of impact anyway, but it doesn't lessen the impact. It doesn't alter the requirements of the entities that are covered by this legislation to report properly based on the standards that are being set, but if there is an entity that has no obligation, no consequence of climate change upon them as a result of the legislation, then, actually, we shouldn't be asking them to go to the extent of what would be a very costly and long procedure to come back and say, "Nothing to see here."