Now, somewhat personally, I call this the "Michael clause". Michael's the name of my son who is disabled, and we weren't aware before Michael's birth that he was disabled. But had we been and had we existed under the proposed provisions, considerable pressure would have come to bear: a little bit of an unspoken pressure on us as parents, on probably the medical people who were advising us that this option would have been—certainly, it was never compulsory, certainly it would have always been a choice, but this is something where, actually, all of a sudden, a pressure would have come on not to bring a child into the world who was somewhat less than perfect.