Chlöe Swarbrick wanted to talk about the title of the bill—said that No 2 was just a reproduction of her bill No 1. That's incorrect. Her bill also was titled the "Other Matters Bill"; this is titled the No 2 bill because the Government of the day had the No 1 bill and so this was in contrast to what was being offered, so she has that wrong. She's also rewriting history with her review of the discussions and negotiations we had. We can put those discussions on the table if you really want. We can talk about who came with a mandate to negotiate and who didn't, but I'd suggest we don't. 