The fact is that, while some judges, thankfully, as my colleague on the other side of the House has pointed out, do recognise the immense harm that is done by these behaviours, some don't. And there are instances of judges not taking seriously and not considering the harm done to be of a high enough standard. And for that reason, it is an absolute delight to look at section 22A, inserted into the Act by clause 4 of this bill which would simplify matters to remove the requirement of any intent to cause harm—remember those stupid teenage boys not thinking seriously. It would remove the requirement to prove any harm. It makes it clear consent has to be free and informed, and the defendant doesn't have to have known there was no consent.