So the question does arise around this: are we in fact enacting legislation that will enable a rogue State, effectively, to get away with whatever they want to? It's almost like a catch-22 situation. So on one hand we want to have legislation that allows us to intercept and to make arrests and to make confiscations of vessels etc., where they have been engaged in either illegal fishing, illegal transport of persons, slavery, effectively, and yet we could be in a situation where our own law says that because the offending country doesn't agree with or actually give an acquiescence to that particular action, we're hamstrung. So it's a very reasonable question that's being asked, and, of course, we know that we live in a volatile world at the moment. We're seeing it all the time. We know also that you've got various arrangements being made by other large countries about their reengagement in the Pacific, particularly our part of the world, for many of these reasons. So we just need to be clear about what the legislation actually says.