There is no evidence that the use of synthetic urine to pass drug tests is a widespread problem in New Zealand, so the bill appears to be, again, a solution looking for a problem. I think there's three main points that illustrate this. Firstly, Newshub reported that in one particular workplace last year, despite hundreds of workers being tested, only one person was found to have produced or used fake urine to provide a sample—one. Secondly, it looks as if there haven't been any employment cases in New Zealand relating to this particular issue. Thirdly, I think that it's also important to note that where a worker who has legitimately been tested has been found to use a synthetic urine product, they can already be justifiably dismissed in the workplace.