But one of the things that I know that Mr Bayly did very well in explaining is that when we heard the submissions in select committee, I was, effectively, shocked to find out that within some of these covenants and the lease agreements that these supermarkets, in fact, go into with their landlords, there is a major restriction in what other shops can actually take lease. For example, the definition of "supermarket" seems to be extremely wide. When normal people think of a supermarket, you actually think about things like grocery shopping, whether it's actually breads and meats and fish, fresh vegetables, and fruit. You often get things like Panadol, and there's a bit of, you know, a section of pharmaceutical things that you can actually get for emergencies, for example. But you wouldn't, effectively, think that it will prevent an actual pharmacy from setting up next to a supermarket, but the exclusive covenant could potentially restrict these shops from actually setting up.