Now, I note that it has been modelled on the Australian bill. I also note that the law in Australia was passed in a package of law and order measures, and it is actually difficult to ascertain how effective that law is, so we can't go on the member's recommendations that this bill should be brought in on the basis of its success in Australia. Now, if there were facts presented that could convince this side of the House to support it—perhaps the member could have presented to the House examples that this, in Australia, was successful, that this was indeed a deterrent—then perhaps we would have supported it. But those crucial elements are missing, and we can't simply support a bill just because we don't support the crime which it targets—of course we do not.