So we were impressed, I think, as an Opposition, that the council had done a lot of work, and they'd clearly, I think, learnt from the mistakes that may have been made some years prior. I think the indication was that the Hon Steve Maharey had introduced legislation, or sponsored similar legislation some 15 years ago, that didn't cross the threshold in terms of satisfaction, in terms of the select committee's mind back then, that due process had been followed. On this occasion, I think we're satisfied that it has been, and we are, as I say, supportive. I was particularly compelled by the submission of council. There were 29 submissions, some from local citizens and community groups who were concerned about what might happen to the land and what plans the council had. This piece of legislation actually doesn't focus on, and is not intended to provide, a solution as to what will happen with the land. This piece of legislation simply allows the council to move forward into a position where a decision about the end purpose or use of that land can be made by council in due course. So this is a piece of legislation that is, effectively, freeing up a legacy historic legislative rule that has prevented them from doing so.