What we found was that when officials were questioned and the Minister was questioned at select committee, we found, actually, that a list was not going to be made available. But somehow readers and subscribers to a very credible and worthy publication called Carbon News—but it is a niche publication and very much focused on the intricacies and the weeds of the day-to-day operation of our emissions trading scheme system, of climate change matters and what have you. As I say, it's a credible and worthy publication but a niche publication none the less. The readers of that publication were the ones who were given notice. So if you weren't a reader of Carbon News, you didn't have notice that this legislation was coming to the House. For people who may have wanted to have a say and have a participatory role in this select committee process, they were excluded until the time that the legislation came to the House, under urgency. I simply don't think that that, in terms of process, is good or right or correct. As I say, this is a black mark against a Minister who normally is much better than that in terms of process and respect for the process of this House and also for the process of select committees. 