The last speaker in this debate had a lot of energy. It's almost as if she was involved in the Huntly Power Station she'd been gobbling the coal, because that's the only way we're getting energy at the moment—electricity—when it comes to what the Government says they want to do. Look, everybody in New Zealand wants a cleaner, greener future. They don't want their costs to go through the roof unreasonably or unnecessarily because the Government decided a few years ago to ban oil and gas exploration and in so doing means that there is a shortage of gas and it cannot be used as a transition. Because here is the reality: if there was more gas available, then in Huntly they could be using that gas at the moment to be generating electricity, rather than coal from Indonesia. So when members opposite say they want a clean, green energy future, and when they say opposite that, actually, they are changing the way we produce energy in New Zealand and that they want to tax people that have utes but they want to give subsidies to use electric cars, what it actually means is more coal will have to be built to charge the batteries on those cars, which is worse in the short and medium term than it would be if there had been more gas exploration. This is something the Government don't want to talk about. It's something that they like to deny. But the statistics are there—2 million tonnes of coal this year imported from Indonesia. And you know what? The last piece of legislation we adopted, and this piece of legislation here that we're about to adopt, does nothing for climate change, and as far as Indonesia is concerned—where the blimmin coal is coming from to go to Huntly—it might make them feel good here in New Zealand on that side of the House but it isn't actually helping at all. 