But what there isn't a comparative analysis about is whether or not there are other seafood-gathering species like pāua, and that, in fact, is the conflict. It's a business conflict, but it's a conflict between the sharks and what happens with the sharks—and if you have a look at that court determination, essentially it said that the department didn't have power, because under the Wildlife Act of 1953, as Minister Sage has articulated, there's proof that sharks suffer physical and mental agitation and there is a risk to the sharks. So I think this bill is before its time, Sarah, and I think there will be an opportunity for a resolution to be sought, but it's not through this bill.