ANDREW BAYLY (National—Port Waikato): Look, I won't perpetuate this argument, because we've got another four Supplementary Order Papers to work our way through, but it's interesting that the Minister didn't answer the question. I think, if you go back to the original proposition, Minister Robertson, you said that you wanted to create a lasting piece of legislation that would extend over 30 years. I think the very extent of what we've just talked about—COVID actually may occur again in the next foreseeable future, or a different version of it. We've had the Asian crisis, we've had so many crises over the last 30 years that this is actually something to be expected and should be anticipated in the bill, and if you hadn't had that agreement, why wouldn't we put that into a bill, knowing what you've just been through? That's the key, crucial point.