The other thing I've noticed, though, on the point of different rights is my understanding—and, look, we can all be wrong in some things in our life. My understanding is that an eligible voter has a legal obligation to enrol. We're not required to vote, but there is a legal obligation on those eligible to vote to enrol. This bill does not apply that obligation. This bill gives the prisoner the right to decide whether or not he or she wants to go on the roll, because the prison officer has to ask them if they want the prison officer to forward their details on to the Electoral Commission. The only deduction that can be made for that, because there is no other provision, even inferring something different in this bill, is that if the prisoner decides they don't want the prison officer to pass their information on, then they won't be on the roll. How, in fact, will that then sit with other electoral legislation? Because the overarching legislation is if you're eligible—and this creates eligibility—then you must enrol. But this bill says you have eligibility, but you don't have to enrol if you don't really want to.