And what the bill now says is that if there is an abortion clinic, a premises they call it, then the Minister has the ability to define an area—doesn't have to be a 150-metre radius, but up to 150 metres around that premise—and say this is an abortion safe zone. And in that area, you must not "obstruct a person who's approaching, entering, or leaving". Well, that's reasonable. I don't think anyone in a free society should be physically obstructed. So we support that. It's a big tick. "Make a visual recording of another person in a safe area in a manner that's likely to cause emotional distress"—well, frankly, you know, I would defend a lot of freedoms, but the freedom to go and video people that are going to get an abortion—that's not of the freedoms we need to defend. I don't think it's a priority. In fact, I think it's pretty grotesque. So very happy with that. And it says, "do any of the following in a safe area in a manner that could easily be seen or heard by another person who may be accessing, providing, or assisting with abortion services: advise or persuade against it; inform them about matters relating to the abortion, other than if you are actually a clinical person or engaged in the procedure; or engage in protest about matters relating to the provision of abortion services."