So I'm thinking that perhaps if a substance or a chemical has been assessed in Australia or the United Kingdom or in Europe or maybe Canada or maybe in the United States, well, we would want to have a look at those and say, "Well, why do we need to start with a blank piece of paper and assume that no knowledge has been collected on this substance by anybody else anywhere else in the world? And we will be a beacon of light as New Zealanders and we will find out what the pros and the cons of this substance are, and we will come up with it, and we'll just pretend that the rest of the world hasn't done any investigative work, and we'll pretend that the rest of the world hasn't done any analysis or scientific interpretation of this particular substance or organism, and we will try and invent our own." I think the risk of that for us as taxpayers and citizens is there's a relatively high risk that that will be, firstly, painfully slow; secondly, it will be incredibly expensive and time consuming from a resource point of view, and, for us as taxpayers, we'll all be paying for that.