Now, this bill would give Ngāi Tahu two unelected members on Environment Canterbury, and therefore would give those two members decision-making over many people whose livelihoods and businesses depend on access to fresh water and to building things on their land. Labour MPs, and the member who sponsored the bill, Rino Tirikatene, claim this bill addresses Crown obligations to Ngāi Tahu under the Treaty of Waitangi. Well, I say that's nonsense, because the place for that is in the Waitangi Tribunal where any breaches of the Treaty are determined. Once a Treaty decision is published by the tribunal, if that then requires legislation that legislation is brought to the House. This legislation does not come from a Waitangi Tribunal decision, therefore your argument is nonsense. 