I have to take a moment to disagree with the previous speaker who said that because we already have free-trade agreements with a range of different countries within RCEP, it doesn't matter. Well, I'd completely disagree. I believe that the consequence of not being part of this agreement would actually end up with us being excluded from regional agreements, going forward, because of value chains. So if you take, for example, the rules of origin that are within RCEP's agreement, we may find ourselves being discouraged from having input in non-RCEP countries because we aren't part of the same collective agreement, and that would lead to a loss of economic opportunity. Also, not being part of RCEP means that if RCEP decides in the future to create new rules then we wouldn't be able to be part of the negotiating for those rules and would be unable to influence them, and that can only be a bad thing if we go back to ACT's original position on the importance of our foreign policy to uphold our values internationally. We need to be a player—we need to be at the table—in order to have influence in these international agreements.