So while these other laws that guide enforcement officers in terms of search and seizure allow for a fast-moving situation where a warrantless search is required, this bill only allows for warrantless discretionary searches. To put that into context, it also allows for, for example, internal bodily searches for the collection of biometric data. So whether that's DNA or saliva testing, it allows for the use of force, but it doesn't allow for the challenge that comes with judicial monitoring. So when there is time and we can see a vessel approaching, when we've had information from Interpol and we're about to disembark and leave our shores and go over to a vessel—and there is ample time because these aren't necessarily fast-moving vessels—we can actually require our enforcement officers to show reasonable cause for belief that a crime is happening, as we require New Zealand police to do, before they go ahead, use force, and collect internal bodily materials, for example. If they are at high sea and things materialise quickly, of course there could then be a discretionary warrant and a search power. The New Zealand Law Society, who brought with them not one, but two maritime law experts who had actually acted as maritime officers as well—both said that this is something that they would recommend for New Zealand to uphold the rule of law whilst we extend our powers to enforce the rules and to monitor criminal activity at the high sea.