He raises in his report the question of the word "communicating" being a very broad one. So just to be clear, the definition of "prohibited behaviour" includes communicating with, among other things, a person "in a manner that an ordinary reasonable person would know would cause emotional distress to a protected person". There is no exemption in this provision for the father of the child—there's no exemption. I would like to believe that that's an oversight in the drafting, and I would urge, respectfully, the member who is the sponsor of the bill to understand that she is, whether she knows it or not, moving in a direction to criminalise a conversation that would be had, for example, in a car outside an abortion clinic by the father of the child. 