The only thing people who have been following this debate will be confused about is exactly what the National Party's position is on it, because, on the one hand, they think that vaccination certificates should have been done by now and then, on the other hand, they're opposed to the legislation that allows for them. On the other hand, the member opposite—Simon Watts, was it?—said that we lacked a sense of urgency and then devoted most of his speech to opposing urgency to bring this legislation before the House. The members opposite have argued that employers need greater certainty around the introduction of vaccination mandates, and that's presumably the reason why they're voting against giving those businesses that very certainty that they claim they need! This particular bill does many of the things that the Opposition have been arguing for. They're voting against—again; not for the first time in the last few weeks—their own policies in the House. So I think members of the public following along might be a little confused about what the Opposition's position on that is.