We were ready to go at the election with firearms prohibition orders which would keep guns out of criminal gang members' hands, institute a new set of offences with real tough penalties. I tell you, it was drawn from the ballot when Chris Bishop was our police spokesperson; that lot over there voted it down. Twice we sought leave to bring it up and prioritise it in this House, and they denied it. Now it has been drawn again in my name, and on the next members' day they should get a chance to have a go again. Unlike their bill, it actually does something about criminal gang use of firearms. Well, here's a spoiler alert, New Zealand—here's a spoiler alert—I've got five quid that there's no way they'll vote for it. Why—why? Because in their world, they prioritise more cost and regulation on people who follow the law. They've been gazing at their navels on firearms prohibition orders for more than two years. More than two years, they've done nothing, and I tell you what: they quite likely will do nothing. Know why? Because I think they think the rights of gang members are more important than keeping the public safe. It is a travesty, but something we can all be used to.