The National Party, for good reason, did not support this bill. It is not necessary. When it came to the committee of the whole House, there was just total dismissal of some amendments that were proposed, and it's interesting, because this bill is flawed in many ways. It highlights the fact that there should be evidence-based research as to how best to deliver the representation of the children's interests and the children's views. This bill is also deficient when it highlights that there's amendments just to the Care of Children Act and just to the Family Violence Act. Interesting, because, as a Family Court counsel appointed specialist for children, our practice note actually talks about representation under the Care of Children Act, the Family Proceedings Act, the Oranga Tamaraki Act, the Family Violence Act, the Property (Relationships) Act, the Child Support Act, the Marriage Act, the Civil Union Act. However, there's only two amendments that have been expressed within this view overlooking the application of counsel for children, representing them in all those other specialist areas of law that impact on the child.