The new fiscal strategy, however, only goes so far. So it loosens those tight fiscal rules for physical infrastructure, and this is something that I am particularly interested in and passionate about. We've still got the operating spending tightly controlled by the accounting rules around running operating balance before gains and losses surpluses. If you think about it from an economist's perspective, it doesn't make sense. Somehow, we can borrow to invest in concrete, whether that's a road or a building, and that counts as a productive asset against the Government's books, but if we are investing in people—and we know that there's a lot of economic literature and research that if we invest in education, if we pay people to do things that help out other people, it can actually have much-greater economic returns than a strip of concrete or a building, in and of itself. Yet that public spending for services—whether that's childcare, healthcare, early childhood education teachers, midwives, nurses—it's seen as an ongoing expense for Government, and so it's kind of sort of against it. It's not seen as a productive asset.