We are concerned about whether or not the Minister is, in effect, setting a tax. We are concerned about the fact that he is tinkering with an auction, when, I'm sure, as I said in my last speech at the second reading, he would have been told by his advisers, or possibly even Treasury, that it's not a good idea to tinker with the rules of an auction, because you actually increase the risk. Actually, I'd be quite keen to hear from the Minister as to whether or not he did receive that advice very early on last year, which is, in fact, why he thought for such a very long time that a reserve wasn't, in fact, needed. What advice was he given to not make any changes until now? You know, which officials and what did they tell him? And did they, in fact, tell him that, by tinkering with the auction, he was, in fact, going to be increasing the risk? As I said earlier, the more that we tinker around with these rules, the more we're going to find ourselves in difficulty, which is why I have tabled this amendment which requires an independent review of exactly what we're putting in place today, potentially, to make sure that we are not, in fact, increasing the risk and we've not made mistakes and that we get this looked at comprehensively to make sure that we are actually doing the right thing.