My second question that I would like us to consider is the role of parliamentarians in this. It would be a mistake for any members in this House, and the Green member who made these comments, to hide behind what the Supreme Court said in its judgment, as if parliamentarians should play the role of Supreme Court judges. What the Supreme Court was observing in their judgment was that they did not have the power to presume retrospectivity, even though the Act in its purpose said that it was intended to be retrospective. They could not imply retrospectivity where they didn't see it clearly.