Hon Dr NICK SMITH: So does Mr Seymour and the ACT Party apply the same philosophy that testing drugs at a concert or festival, but equally so it could occur in the community, and that, actually, if you believe in the philosophy behind this bill—and that is that you are going to make drug use safer in New Zealand for illegal substances like P or like ecstasy, which is probably the most common drug that is intended behind this bill, but it may well be cocaine or some other service—that it is not limited to simply a music festival or event? Actually, the part provides the authorisation by Parliament for that testing to occur anywhere, and that may well be the Government's intent, that may well be what ACT is intending to support. But my question is: why should it? Do we really think we are going to make the use of drugs like P, like cocaine, like meth safer if we test it not just at music festivals and events but otherwise? And can they, please, if it intended to limit it to music festivals—why would your philosophy be different? 