So it gives me great pleasure to be standing here, and I'll just reflect on one of the other submissions. It's from Birthright—this probably sums it up, and again, it's why there's so much support: "Children have needs irrespective of their care agreements and in times of high stress it is especially important that those needs are met. It is also important that there is equity between caregivers who all take on a significant responsibility when they care for a child. Whether a child is cared for for a month or a year in some ways is irrelevant, the child's needs must be met. The review clearly shows there are numerous incidents where a child might need to be cared for for less than one year in difficult circumstances whilst more permanent arrangements are made. Illness, death and imprisonment may mean that carers also need to make rapid arrangements." And that, again, is a submission from Birthright.