We would say, on this side of the House, consistent with our position on matters COVID, and restrictions more generally, that we don't want to see restrictions placed for longer than is necessary from a public health point of view, although the point's been made by the Minister about the fact that we will need some period of time for the arrangements to be followed through—and I'm paraphrasing, but, certainly, that point was made in the legislation itself and I think there's a two-year period for that. I do have some sympathy for that argument, notwithstanding, as I say, that general principle that the arrangements shouldn't be required longer than is actually necessary.