Generally speaking, when a piece of legislation, whether it's a Government bill, a member's bill, a private bill, or whatever, heads off to a select committee—when it's drafted, in fact—it'll have a commencement date. You want to know that your legislation's actually going to take effect at a point. I do remember one debate in this House, going back to the last Parliament, where there was actually a piece of legislation that I don't think had a clear commencement date, and, as a result, it never took effect and we actually had to remove it off the statute book. Obviously, no one wants their piece of legislation to fall into that trap, so it will be good to know from the member if there was a particular reason at the outset why there wasn't a commencement date put in the legislation that was originally passed and sent off to select committee. I really would appreciate hearing from the member around that. It might be that there was a very good reason, and I think the committee of the whole House would want to satisfy itself—and this isn't to cast aspersions on the select committee and its competence at all—that the member who proposed the legislation in the first instance is happy with what the select committee has done in terms of the change that it's made there.