Without these changes, people who are attending court, many of whom are legally compelled to, could be exposed to a heightened risk of COVID-19. Without changes, some people may be unwilling or unable to attend court because of safety concerns. Surveys indicate there is a public concern about serving as a juror in the current environment, and representatives of the legal profession have indicated significant concerns amongst lawyers about the safety of some court processes, which also threatens to undermine the safe functioning and efficient functioning of the courts. Some people may also seek to challenge the outcomes of their cases because of the impact of safety measures without these changes. If these risks eventuate, then further delays in access to justice could occur disrupting court business and increasing the already lengthening number of cases awaiting jury trial. I would like to reinforce that the bill will not change a person's entitlement to access courts where they're legally compelled to do so even if they don't meet the general entry requirements. 