Having said that, you know, the rights issues in respect of this legislation have to be seen against the background that there is no human right to carry a gun. This is not a right such as that entrenched in the American Constitution; this is a privilege which is conferred by the Arms Act, and therefore the granting of a license or the ability to obtain a licence, that this legislation if passed would take away—which a firearms provision order is—that is, essentially, a discretion, a benefit, extended by Government to citizens. It's not the case to say that not having the right to bear a firearm is some fundamental breach of rights. However, the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure is, and that's something which isn't sufficiently worked through in the legislation before us. The balance must be carefully struck. The threshold, the evidential burden that needs to be shown before a police officer or other authorised person can enter into a residential premises must be high, and there must be a safety threshold.