The regulation powers within the bill that the Office of the Clerk, I understand, recommended the removal of: from a constitutional point of view, the desire for executive exigency I don't think is strong enough to outweigh the desirability of lawmaking that is more robust simply than providing for regulations in such key areas as this. The Parliament has proven, for better or worse, that it is capable of passing laws in very short order in relation to this space, and so it could surely do the same again in future, whereby the subject of the regulations, as envisaged by the bill at the moment, could, in fact, be the matter of Parliament made law, now and in the future.