We considered deleting clause 6, too, so that the maximum membership of Environment Canterbury, including the appointed members, would remain at 14. So the effect of that would have been that the same number of members still sat around the ECan table, but two of them would be appointed by Ngāi Tahu. But we chose to retain clause 6 on advice of the officials, but proposed some drafting amendments because we thought that that gave effect to the policy intent that Environment Canterbury and Ngāi Tahu and a number of submitters were trying to achieve, which was to add to the skills around the table and to maintain what has been there since National implemented the policy in 2016. 