So what does the bill do? Revenge porn is currently covered by the broad offence of posting harmful digital communications, which is created by section 22 of the Act, but under the current law, there is a requirement for the perpetrator to have intended to cause harm. The victim has to prove that they have suffered harm of serious emotional distress, and as we have heard in the debate tonight, there have been varying judgments from judges in terms of that in meeting that threshold. However, what this bill will do is accept that the posting of intimate images without somebody's express permission—informed consent—is in itself a harmful act, whether that was intended by the perpetrator or not. So that changes it significantly, and I believe it will catch a lot more people. I heard one of the things in here, where to one person it could just be a joke, but to the other person—the victim—it's caused serious harm. 