The member raised questions about what the owner of the substance who surrenders it for testing will be told. Well, again, the scheme of the bill makes it clear: they will be given information and harm reduction advice. So they will be told regardless: "You might want to use this; it might be your choice; do you know what this might do?" Once it's been tested, they will then be given advice on the composition and likely identity of it, and, again, it's an opportunity for the drug checker to give advice on ingestion of that particular substance. And then there's a range of other things that the tester can do, which also includes that the substance provided for testing, if the person who's provided it doesn't want it any more, is for the drug-testing service to dispose of. So the dangers that I think the member is raising, quite legitimately, are, I think, satisfactorily covered off in the full scheme of the bill, as laid out, particularly, in clause 10 of it.