There are some policy objections that people have. Some people in the past—and this debate's gone on for 15 years—have said it gives the courts too much power. Well, it certainly does allow the courts to pass judgment on the laws that Parliament makes, and that is new to New Zealand. But New Zealand is an outlier. We have no written constitution. We have no subnational Government, states, or provinces. We have no Upper House. We actually need to move closer to where most countries are that have some sort of constitutional principles that the courts can judge lawmaking against. It gives New Zealanders greater security, greater stability, so they can plan their lives, invest, and make for a more prosperous country. Some people will say that it doesn't allow the Government of the day to legislate and serve the public interest they are elected to. Actually, it does. There's an exemption that anything can be justified if it passes the test of being justified in a free and democratic society. All this bill requires is proper analysis of the laws Government's making, proper transparency, proper reasoning to be set out, and people to be consulted. That's all we're asking for with this Regulatory Standards Bill. Just think for a moment what a Government or a member of this House is really saying if they are opposed to that.