NICOLE McKEE (ACT): My question is in relation to clause 12 which amends section 69 relating to forfeitures. New subsection 69(1A) will read that any person, with an FPO upon them, found breaching an order and in possession of a firearm will have, upon sentencing, an order that those items will be forfeited to the Crown. I had asked the question in select committee, "Well, what if those firearms were stolen?" What if it's Billy-Bob Joe with Uncle Bob in the vehicle, and Uncle Bob's going off hunting—what if there is legitimate reason for those firearms actually not to be confiscated and forfeited to the Crown, but returned to their owners? I understand that section 69(2) does give an exemption where the Crown doesn't have to forfeit if they feel it's unjust to do so. But I wonder, Minister, what provisions will be in place where it is found later that the firearm can be identified as belonging to a legitimate owner where it's been stolen, after the court has decided it's going to be forfeited? What response are we giving to those firearm owners who will be expecting that registration will mean the return of their firearms, not the confiscation and forfeiture of them?