I was curious to know, first of all, looking at the commentary that has been provided by the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee, the Minister's view of a number of the recommendations that have been made, one of them being the new maximum penalty to be created under new section 83, set out in clause 28. I wonder if the Minister can explain his response to the recommendation that the select committee made around the timing of which that penalty would come into play. For those who haven't followed the bill closely before or perhaps are even very new to it, a position which I have some sympathy with, being pretty new to it myself, they may not be aware that section 83 contains a penalty for anti-competitive acquisitions and mergers. So, obviously, the name of the game is to allow competition. We have a fundamental view—I think, when I say we, it's probably shared across the House, and I know that the relatively orthodox position of the Labour Party in this would presumably support the idea—that more competition is good. Indeed, I should acknowledge there's been a review into supermarkets' pricing and competition and so on.