I want to draw the committee's attention to a submission made by Retail New Zealand. At select committee, their chief executive, Greg Harford, made, I think, a very good point that the vast majority of part-timers in their sector choose to work part-time for a whole lot of reasons. They don't want to be full time as it suits them to be part-timers. They think that up to 20 percent of people working in the retail sector are actually employed on a part-time basis. What this bill will do is actually encourage retail employers—instead of employing part-timers, they will be encouraged, by dint of this legislation, to employ full-timers. The simple reason for that is that if a business employs three part-timers, they face a potential sick leave liability per annum of 30 days, but if they employ and were to convert those three part-time jobs to a full-time job, then their sick leave liability risk is just 10 days. So that's the simple maths of the situation, and notwithstanding the views of those that have come to this Parliament from the trades hall, that's the practical situation that exists in business. Businesses will adapt, adopt, and modify their business in the face of Government-imposed costs and legislation, and they will adapt, adopt, and reconfigure their businesses to be profitable and to be competitive. If this is just another cost on a business, albeit with good intention, then businesses will adjust the way they employ and the way they hire and the way they take on people and their businesses. 