But the real point here is that this is a piece of legislation which says we want to attract high quality investment and not just the capital, because capital is only one part of the picture, but investors who bring particular expertise. We heard about the benefit to New Zealand test and essentially the abandonment of the counterfactual test, because the counterfactual—and it pops up in various areas of the law, including competition law, but it's always a bit fraught, because it's a "What might happen if we allow it and what might happen if we don't." And so your counterfactual is, by definition, hypothetical. So it is a bit of crystal ball gazing, whereas you've got a much more concrete test now—the before and after test—which asks the question, "What is the status quo?" and then asks the next question, "How will the status quo be improved if we allow this overseas investment?" You have to show, ultimately, a benefit to New Zealand to do that.