I want to talk a little bit about what we might well do with a piece of legislation, instead of doing what we're doing here. If you think about local government, local government relies entirely on those people standing for positions on council to promote the election. No one else promotes the election—the Electoral Commission doesn't, or virtually doesn't; local government don't promote it, because they've got to spend ratepayers money to promote it; so no one promotes it, and we wonder why people don't stand for local government. There's absolutely no promotion of the fact that there's an election happening or the activities of the council at all. So I think that we're very seriously threatening democracy by consistently and continually interfering in the processes of local government, and not really, in many cases, structured interference in those processes, but processes that are extremely frustrating for the people involved, for our local communities, and for people standing for positions in local government. So I think, if we continue to interfere in local government without putting a structure in place that lets them get on with life, manage the affairs of our local communities in a manner that at least enables the local community, to some extent, manage what happens in their areas, then we're going to have serious problems attracting anyone to stand for local government. Why would you, at the end of the day, when you're constantly, effectively—I was going to say "abused", but you're not necessarily abused, but you're, certainly, constantly under scrutiny, you're doing a job where you're poorly paid? I don't think, if we continue to interfere in the processes of local government, we're going to get anyone standing.