Other submitters pointed out that if you're going to have a confidential reserve price and you're going to have an auction process where people bid, then those bidders who bid above the confidential reserve price—as you would expect—should be able to take the units away that they had bid for above the reserve price. They pointed out that there's actually a design flaw with the legislation. It may be designed that way on purpose, but they considered it a design flaw, none the less. That flaw is that if the number of auctions that are put up—and, in this case, it's going to be 4.75 million units every three months. If the prices bid for those units are above that price but one bidder bids for a fraction of those units remaining below the reserve price, then no one will get to take any units home. 