My main concern, and what we weren't able to do in a select committee process, which we were in May 2017, is to examine the manner in which the funding of this settlement is going to take place. We know from the bill—it's pretty easy maths to determine—that this is a 4.6 percent increase over 18 months for the workers themselves. And what followed last time was a very, very complicated formula being established to work out, on an averaging basis, how each aged-care provider was going to be remunerated—and was going to be compensated, effectively—for the Crown legislating for increases in pay. That took quite a bit of work even before the bill got to the House, and then, through a shortened select committee process, it considered issues around holiday pay, relativities, and a few other things. And I'm sure officials—who actually look a bit familiar; it's starting to come back to me—may have been involved in it. What I'd like to know is how that's been dealt with in this bill, because I think it's really important that we examine this through the lens of the employer as well as the employee, to make sure that these people who are already under significant financial pressure are actually no better or no worse off as a consequence of the law that we're about to pass. That was what we attempted to do in 2017. I think largely we achieved it. There were some problems at the margins.