I just want to start by saying we understand this bill is under urgency, and that's understandable. It's a little bit curious, though—I just want to point out that it wasn't introduced under Budget urgency. Instead, under Budget urgency we got the log traders and forestry advisers bill. But here is a bill which actually, in its title and in its purpose, goes to the very heart of the problem that we're dealing with, that the Budget spent billions and billions of dollars on helping to improve our economy as we recover from COVID, yet it wasn't introduced under Budget urgency; we get it under normal urgency. It's just a strange anomaly that I wanted to point out because it is very confusing to us why this wasn't introduced under Budget urgency. This bill has the aim of supporting employment and boosting local economies by the acceleration of nationwide projects and activities, and what better bill to have introduced under Budget urgency?