So if we actually go to the text here, Ms Durkin points out that the text in the current piece of legislation is bigger and broader. Let me just go through this—I'm reading from section 39(2)(b) here, in the original legislation: there has to be an assessment "of the amenity's application of the funding against the matters specified in the amenity's annual plan for the year under section 23(4); and (b) contains financial statements for the year consisting of—", and this is where the difference kicks in, "(i) a statement of financial position prepared in accordance with the New Zealand International Financial Reporting Standards; and (ii) an overall operating statement; and (iii) a statement of cash flows; and (iv) any other statements necessary to fairly reflect the amenity's financial position, the resources available to it, and the financial results of its operations; and (v) any other information reasonably necessary to enable the Funding Board to make an informed assessment of the amenity's operations for the financial year as set out in its annual plan."