The perpetrator was, of course, known to authorities and was under 24/7 supervision. We, I think, can just imagine when we hear the number of people involved in those supervisions how incredibly expensive they are for hard-working taxpayers. He was the subject of a number of court cases, and courts had held that the law fell short—there was an ellipsis in the law, if you like—in terms of what was required to protect New Zealanders, particularly in relation to that issue of planning and preparation short of an actual seeing-through, if you like, of a terrorist act, and that brings me to this law. National has unequivocally supported it at first reading and at select committee. 