But it seems remarkable that if these individuals—who I know and who I think the member might be describing, of such mana, standing, and competency. Wouldn't it be far better for their personal credibility, for the credibility and integrity of Environment Canterbury, and, of course, local government as a whole, which has suffered terrible damage to its credibility over the past 18 months or so—particularly as some councils have taken the three waters bribe and others have said, "We're not going to let out assets go". Wouldn't it be better for Ngāi Tahu and Environment Canterbury to say, "Look, how about we propose a Māori constituency and we hold an election where we put up some candidates we think are fine people, and actually give that constituency an opportunity to give them a mandate."?