Under the previous regime that Louisa Wall's bill is designed to address, it is that sense of sex as degradation to women that is present in the legislation. So, if you look, the ways in which this sort of act of digital communication, sexual acts—if you look at how it is characterised—you have the Crimes Act section 216G; that's about up-skirting, effectively. It is the crime where someone has non-consensually taken intimate video recordings of someone. And that's fine; it's a good law, but what I'm saying is it buys into that thing: sex is shaming, but if you didn't consent to it, then you deserve some protection. There is no requirement of harm in section 216G of the Crimes Act.