Applying the story to what happened to the Justice Committee last year, should that good professor have not been critical of China but full of praise for China, would that have affected the way we voted procedurally? The answer is no, because the submissions had been closed some six months ago, and the rules should not be bent or overtaken by other political factors. To be fair to that National member, if he moved a motion to reopen the submissions to invite the professor in and I voted against it, then feel free to hold me to account. He didn't do that. Instead, he leaked a story to the media, and the rest is history. 