There are three substantive points that I want to make. The first really significant question is: are the amendments substantially different or not? Now, if we reflect on the Speaker's ruling from 2010, I was actually the Minister in the chair, and what happened was that there were over a thousand amendments moved to slightly change the date, whether the date was going to be 1 November, then an amendment for 31 October, then 30 October, etc. The Speaker at the time ruled that those amendments were substantially the same. I think that was a correct and a balanced ruling. I've looked back on the rulings, if we go back to the bible of our Parliament Erskine May, and the reference that it makes about what determines what is a substantially different amendment. I think it provides some guidance as to whether the amendments are substantially different for the Parliament to be able to reasonably consider those.