Then my second point is around the practical effect. Parliament's procedures need to be practical, they need to be able to work so that the Opposition is able to fairly express its opposition to views, but equally so you, as Speaker, have to ensure that the Government is able to reasonably do its business. Now, if you take the Speaker's ruling from Lockwood Smith back in 2010—of which you made a very considered and, in my view, sensible contribution at that time as a member, not Speaker at that time—it is that if every individual amendment was allowed, you would have the Parliament voting for about 13 hours in that situation, and that is not reasonable. I would put to you that for Parliament to have approximately 20 minutes to consider nine amendments about each of our individual polytechnics is not at all unreasonable in the context of the balance of power that you, as Speaker, have to dutifully and carefully try and manage.