I'll just put that out there, and I think you've encouraged us, Mr Chair, to ask a series of questions within our contributions so that the Minister can have a chance to reflect on those and sort of take them one by one, maybe, or refer to officials for advice and so forth. But the other questions I had mostly were clustered around the heading of "Code of Ethics". So again within Part 2, clause 20, we read that "The Monitor must have a code of ethics relating to engagement", but there doesn't seem to be anything in here about what the consequence is if the code of ethics is to be breached. It's enough, according to this clause, clause 20, simply that there is a code of ethics. It doesn't actually say that the monitor is bound by them. The monitor must publish the code of ethics, having developed it. It must consult certain persons. The code of ethics must include certain things, and the purpose of the code of ethics is set out, but it doesn't actually say that the monitor's going to be bound. And that seems to me actually a bit of a shortfall in the legislation, unless, again, the Minister can assure the House—excuse me, the committee of the whole House—and indeed the country that this has been taken care of. 