As I've mentioned, the bill tonight looks quite different now to when it was introduced, and as a committee, we felt the industry-wide obligations were unduly onerous, so we worked hard to make sure the industry compliance was reasonable while still keeping with the intent of the proposed obligations and duties. As a one-time lawyer myself, I could appreciate the real value of having a professor in law chair our committee in the form of Dr Duncan Webb, as we painstakingly made our way through the hundreds of clauses, as we've already heard. We discussed things like whether a broom cupboard might be misconstrued as a room for the sake of a long-term maintenance plan, we debated parties' rights and responsibilities if disclosure is incomplete, inaccurate, or not provided in a timely fashion—including a right for buyers to delay or cancel settlement. We were concerned that some of the original submissions didn't appropriately reflect how properties are usually bought and sold, and actually most of the submitters shared similar concerns.