To me and for many members who have spoken before me, this all points to fairness. Therefore the policy mischief that the Finance and Expenditure Committee sought to respond to, for me, was covered in three key questions: one, whether having been resident and present in New Zealand for 10 years is too short a period for entitlement to New Zealand superannuation; the second question is whether an increase in residency requirements would contribute to the sustainability of New Zealand's superannuation; and, three, whether an increase in residence requirements would contribute to the fairness of New Zealand's super for people who have contributed to New Zealand for longer. I'll come back to these three policy questions.