The second point that has been raised is the question—and I think it's a very valid one—around the assessment of the revenue drop. So we've gone for a seven-day assessment. When this policy was originally promulgated in December last year, we had 14 days. Again, we were grappling there with the balance between those businesses like hospitality, like retail, where cash flow is the big issue. And if we had gone for a 14-day time period, that would have meant another seven days in which that money was not getting to the business that it needed. We were balancing that against those who would have impacts that might arrive later, and that's a very difficult and fine balance, and we fell—after discussions with the business community—on the side of seven days, because we think that is really the purpose of this: supporting people because of the alert level rise.