In relation to the Remuneration Authority, Environment. Canterbury had quite a lot of dialogue with Dame Fran Wilde and the Remuneration Authority on this very issue, and it goes back way before this bill was introduced to this House. Again, it's an issue where Environment Canterbury and the Remuneration Authority disagree. Environment Canterbury, rightly, asserts that the workload with two additional Ngāi Tahu members, the workload of the council, does not decrease and therefore the remuneration should not decrease—and an example of that is the additional perspectives of mana whenua and of Ngāi Tahu around the council table. It requires more work from the whole council to be able to gain their understanding and engage with their communities around the concerns that Ngāi Tahu express at the council table. So it doesn't involve a reduction in workload; arguably, it involves more. But, on that basis, it was an aspect where there was just disagreement in terms of reducing the remuneration based on the formulas that the Remuneration Authority applies towards elected council members across the country. 