The select committee, as I say, did an excellent piece of work. What they did was look at—and I'm looking forward to hearing from members of the select committee shortly in some detail around the work that they did, because I know they took it very seriously indeed. But among the issues they have now put forward amendments that have been unanimously agreed on are broadening the circumstances where regulators may agree that one of them acts as the sole regulator; simplifying the thresholds for when Ministers can grant approval or consent to decisions being made by a regulator; clarifying the relationship between the general purposes of the bill and principles of the bill and the purposes and principles that relate to crisis management powers; removing the requirement of ministerial consent before the regulators can issue a notice requiring a rule change; and removing the requirement for the ministerial consent to a new operator scheme. So those amendments, if I am interpreting them correctly from the select committee, are, essentially, to ensure that the scheme operates even more smoothly than it has in the past. Ministerial consent alongside regulator consent is not always required. The regulators act independently, they know what they're doing, and they need to be able to do that in a timely manner.