But the one thing they had gone to court for—the one thing they were fighting for—was pay equity. That was, effectively, kicked down the road for five years. It's all very well for the member and other members opposite to say, "Well, you had five years to sort out a framework." There was no framework. Pay equity could not be advanced. This is a group of workers—61,500 of them—who are dispersed right across the country amongst 1,000 employers. Some are represented by unions; many are not. There was no framework that could be easily stood up—certainly under our current collective bargaining framework—that would have allowed them to negotiate on behalf of both represented workers and unrepresented workers. I know that's a challenge to the purity of the principles of the ACT Party, but the reality is this is a workforce that is low paid and difficult to organise but who want to be paid fairly, and they should be paid fairly, and there should be some minimum standards. There is no framework in place for that, and there could not be discussions about pay equity or rates approximating pay equity, because that was specifically barred until 30 June. 