In conclusion, this legislation is something that will get us to what I believe, and ACT believes, is the right place—that, fundamentally, if you have a choice between being born into a place where water is fluoridated or a place where water is not fluoridated, you're much better off to be born somewhere where fluoridation is a reality. On the other hand, the way of getting it here, making the decision making remote from the practical operation of the water reticulation, of taking away democracy because people made the wrong decision, and of putting in place a fix which I don't know is the most important thing the Government can be doing right now—when, anecdotally, at least, one of the biggest problems that we have is people who simply are not giving their children the kind of care and dental hygiene and diet that all children really should have a right to access. And that may be the major challenge, and if we don't tackle that, and we're still going to have kids admitted for surgery to have the rotten stumps of what were their teeth removed under general anaesthetic—something that happens too often in this country—then it's not clear that we are really serious about solving the problems of dental health. Nevertheless, the initiative of sending this bill back to committee where it can have some more democratic consideration is the right thing to do. Fluoridation, in my view, is the right way for things to be, and, therefore, it's worth supporting.