For viewers, I'd like to reference them to my colleague Chlöe Swarbrick's first reading speech, which I think contains most of the context of why this bill is in place. As many have noted in the second reading, there is a geopolitical context as to why the Government decided to, effectively, subsidise fossil fuels and subsequently bring in this bill to ensure there's no perverse outcomes for vehicles that use diesel. For us, in the Greens, we've been really clear from the outset that, while we really welcome the Government's intent to reduce the cost of living pressures by, for example, discounting public transport, we feel that a much more effective way of doing this across the board would have been with cash transfers, as opposed to trying to do what this bill is trying to achieve, which effectively is a really knee-jerk way of addressing the cost of living pressures.