So how do we bring these two together? If we think about the role of the lawyer and the role of the child, these being the two key players who are affected by the legislation, I think the answer must be that while changes should be made to the system—because, as I say, we don't pretend that it is perfect now; certainly, it is not—the answer, surely, must lie in having better dispute resolution, and to the extent that lawyers do need to be involved, that they have better training to deliver the kinds of outcomes that the Government envisages by this bill. Because merely to state that the appointment of the lawyer for the child should take into account such considerations as the cultural background, personality training, and experience of the lawyer to represent the child—that's all very well, and I don't think anyone here would disagree with that. But to simply prescribe that without a corresponding shift or lift in the ability of the legal profession to actually deliver that, it is something in the realm of, well, I mean, good intentions, let's just say that.