I was OK with supporting the safe zone provisions as they were, but I had levels of discomfort. So I'm really pleased that we got to consider this in its specificity and go through the detail of it, and I think we've got a much better result now than what we had in the original legislation, because it is the balancing of rights, but also it recognises the fact that the provisions in our law at the moment that protect against harassment are fundamentally useless, because they rely on the person going for an abortion to be providing evidence in the court, to be able to take that case. That's not really something anybody wants to do. You imagine: you're going through this medical procedure, you are harassed, and then you have to deal with the police on top of that, and then at some date well out into the future, you have to then stand up in court and relive all of that in front of a public audience, and spill your guts. There's a reason those pieces of law are not being used, because nobody is going to do that. So we have fixed that problem in this piece of legislation, and I think that will make it effective as well, and I think that's really important. 