It was fantastic to see how much support there was for this legislation. As I think it's been mentioned, like 81 percent of the submissions were in support. The reasons that they gave—there were six kind of core reasons that reflected the Green Party reasons for supporting this. I'd like to go through some of those. So (1) that the policy is forcing parents back into looking for work, usually, often, in this case, when their kid's only like a year old, is harmful to children's development, and it fails to prioritise the first 1,000 years—first 1,000 days. Ha, ha! That would be interesting, wouldn't it? Which we all know, and I think I remember hearing from the National Party heading into the last election, the importance of the first 1,000 days a few times. Yet they can't seem to bring that thinking to this piece of legislation. But surprise, it's not unfamiliar for the inconsistency on that side. That first 1,000 days is absolutely vital for the emotional and physical wellbeing of children and their attachment to parents and caregivers, and we should not be forcing that detachment at that time, because that has lifelong consequences for those children.