Can I just, before I embark on a direct response to his question that he poses—and, really, in response to, actually, an earlier comment by Alfred Ngaro, which is when Alfred Ngaro quoted from the Law Commission's report. The Law Commission was very clear about specifying, as an alternative, that the Parliament could consider setting up a separate, stand-alone kind of regulatory or disciplinary body or, as they said in paragraph 6.78 on page 118 of their report, "An alternative to creating a new regulatory offence would be to rely on the existing health practitioner disciplinary regime to address any failures by health practitioners to comply with the statutory requirements … The same consequences would then apply to health practitioners who fail to comply with abortion law as for other kinds of professional misconduct … The current grounds for disciplining health practitioners already appear broad enough to capture situations where a practitioner fails to apply the statutory test for abortion. A practitioner may be disciplined for an act or omission that amounts to negligence or is likely to bring discredit to the profession." So the regime, at the moment, doesn't just deal with strict legal issues; it deals with the professional and, you might say, ethical issues as well.