When I look through some of the detail, I think a lot has been said, and I'm just going to reinforce some of the things that have been said. I want to reaffirm to those who may be listening here tonight—those first responders are probably out working or taking time off or resting from their shifts—but any assault or any misdemeanour on a first responder, regardless of role, is completely unacceptable. I think the select committee—I know and I had a lengthy chat with the chair, the member for Hutt South, Ginny Andersen, saying, "Why? What happened here?" Why did this not get through, despite having a lot of work done to it in terms of what she said to it going through the select committee process twice? So how does something go through a process twice and still not get to an outcome where both sides can agree? And that puzzled me. That puzzled me. I thought, "Hold on a minute. How did we get to that?" And I thought then, "OK, so we've got to that stage. It's still coming to the House and it will come here knowing that we will oppose it. And why was that?" And I thought. "Because the amendments that were put forward, they still didn't address the significant issues that this bill should have addressed—the fundamentals that we've heard previously." I thought, "Well, that could have been better with extra work, but hei aha—that's how it is. So I come back to that fundamental around saying: what, I guess, with a prevention-first approach is the need for this? I can't see it. Madam Speaker, kia ora.