What this doesn't do is put a limit on it or provide any clarity. What it does is a never-ending course. And you can imagine over time, what might start out with relatively brief statements actually turns into being a meal, and under Government-proposed legislation that is often the case. So there doesn't seem to be any limit to it, and one of the reasons I'm highlighting this and seeking the Minister's response to it is that the wider and the deeper this goes and who is exercising the discretion of how far you go when you write that report will also give rise to the issue of indemnities, particularly where investors are involved, and who is going to pay for that, given that we don't have clarity around who the insurance practitioners are, as the Minister responded to in Part 1. And so it just looks like we're creating what seems good on a piece of paper. Wonderful for the Hon James Shaw to announce overseas what he's done, but without any clarity around actually what it is seeking to achieve and how far it goes. 