Further to the point that the member has raised, in order to reflect the best interests of the child, of the lawyers acting on behalf of the child, I do think it is important that we do have an obligation in the process for the lawyer to understand all the vagaries that the child may have. And if that means understanding the cultural context of which they are coming from, I think it is also important. I do think, again, with the aim of the bill trying to make sure that the efficiency and effectiveness of the Family Court process is enhanced, that if we are able to do that, we're able to do that in the context of what is best for the child and what both parties mean. We may be able to either skip the court process—which I think everyone agrees would be the preference—in order to get a quick resolution and understand what is best and have two parties that agree, as opposed to dragging a court process through 270 days, which is happening more often now, and, I think, putting families and children in more vulnerable positions for longer than when these changes were made in 2014.