It should have been his intention and the intention of the officials to provide that information. And it wasn't just the National Party that was saying that; the New Zealand Law Society said that, the Auckland District Law Society said that, the Road Transport Forum New Zealand said that. Most of the organisations said there is no given reason for this bill that we can understand to have two years rather than one year. I'd just like to point out that the Minister said that most of the submitters wanted a one-year clause. In fact, every single organisation that submitted on this bill—every single one—said they wanted one year and vehemently opposed two years. One went even as far as saying six months, but every single organisation who submitted on this bill said one year.