But I want to give you an example of how the Government, in bringing this bill to the House, is actually acting quite duplicitously. It's not sharing the full facts. In fact, some of what is written in the regulatory impact statement almost sounds like utu, particularly when you look at the way they've responded with this legislation to a court decision around whether a permit holder was likely to comply and give proper effect to their work programme. That was when the Government was successfully sued by a petroleum company and was then forced to admit, in fact, they hadn't followed their own processes. Then, just a few days ago, the Government's own radio station, Radio New Zealand, reported the Government was prepared to shell out millions—tens of millions—of dollars to Rio Tinto to help offset their costs of clean-up.