I guess the other thing that cropped up in there was relatively straightforward, but the idea that investments go up and down. There are some situations where that's not problematic, and we know that, by dint of company law, there are some thresholds that are important. The 25 percent threshold is important, the 50 percent threshold—where effective control exists, the 75 percent threshold, and of course total control at the other end. Within those boundaries, creeping or shifting, creeping sounds nefarious, it's not nefarious, but shifting shareholdings or ownership interests on something like—we mentioned, the Fletcher group of companies, which is an overseas company, although has strong New Zealand roots, it's not invidious at all. So we don't need—simply, if there's an additional 5 percent being purchased, for example, it doesn't cross a threshold. We don't need a special Overseas Investment Act inquiry into that. So I thought that was sensible and a good tidy up. 