However, the logic simply doesn't add up. It makes a huge leap from correlation to cause, and that is similar to what we saw earlier in the Crimes (Robbery) Amendment Bill. The bill simply doesn't solve the problem that it seeks to address, and that is workplace safety. The bill seeks to heavily restrict access to synthetic urine to make workplaces safer. To go through the logic, if we look at the intention, the policy statement is that "Drug testing in the workplace is used to keep people safe and prevent accidents and deaths." That policy statement says that employers are concerned. That's a little bit of a red flag for me, because if this was a real issue I believe employees would be concerned as well. They are the ones who stand to lose if their fellow employees are impaired.