But one of the real problems is that there seems to be a lack of clarity around when people can bring their own strong personal views to a decision-making process—that is to say, a political point of view—and when that crosses over to being a personal interest where their own financial or other position will be affected by that decision. Certainly, there are places where a strong view is not appropriate in local bodies, and, certainly, hearing panels is one of them, where it's a quasi-judicial decision-making process, but when it's just round the council table, political views are grist to the mill. I'm a bit perplexed to hear that people think that being transparent and honest about the influences on your decision making might be a disincentive to standing for council. I must say, if people want to conceal what financial interests they have which might affect their decisions, then I'd be pretty happy for them not to be standing for local body politics.