Now, I just want to, especially, acknowledge all the pain and suffering of those families who have lost people due to any sort of car crash or vehicle crash and acknowledge that it is particularly painful in those cases, like in the case of Matthew Shepherd [Matthew Dow], when the driver was known to be under the influence of impairing substances and a repeat offender. But those tragedies alone are not a reason to rush to a particular legislative solution unless we have enough evidence that the legislative solution is actually going to be a solution and is actually going to reduce impaired driving. In the case of Matthew Shepherd [Matthew Dow]—and I did meet his family—this legislation would not have made any difference in that case, because that driver had already been reported to the police, was already driving erratically, and the police already had tools in place to do a compulsory impairment test. So it wasn't the lack of random roadside drug testing that that led to that; it was insufficient police on the roads and insufficient response to the complaints that were being made.