Because the two requirements for a Minister to approve it are that the land is to be, basically, exclusively used for forestry—well those overseas investors are already doing that. The second test is that it has to be for plantation forestry. Well, the 20,000 hectares that my colleagues have talked about satisfy both of those tests. They're for forestry, they're plantation forestry—generally not carbon farming that those overseas investors are coming in to buy. So I want to know why the Labour Party isn't consistent. This should be under the farmland test, if the Labour Party truly believed in what it stood for.