Hon Michael Woodhouse: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Two things—firstly, when you ruled silence in the answering of the question, it was interpreted by many, including me, on this side of the House, that that related to the answer to the primary question, which was extended. Secondly, if it is for the entire question, the quid pro quo, surely, is that the Minister, in responding, cannot be as provocative as he has been in every supplementary answer he has given, and expect that—