To the extent there is, I say—and before they get the dog-whistling comments, I'm not dog-whistling. That's not my game here. There is the appearance of different treatment for Māori land owners than for the rest of the landowners where the situation otherwise might be basically identical, right. It might be the same situation where they've got land locked up in multiple owners, etc., etc. The various issues that we have in Māori land might happen in relation to other Pākehā farmers and the like. So why is it that we would just do it for one side and not the other? 