The second element of the letter that Mr Seymour chose to highlight was the idea that there was some outrageous proposition that the Government, as the 52 percent shareholder, might ask Air New Zealand to maintain a comprehensive domestic route around New Zealand. Now, under Mr Seymour's vision of the way Air New Zealand would operate, with the Government completely disinterested, not part of it at all, we wouldn't be flying into Hokitika, we wouldn't be flying into Kerikeri, we wouldn't be flying all around New Zealand, and that's the question that Mr Seymour and Mr Bayly—who I know is worried about this as well—have to answer when Mark Mitchell says, "I want to get to Kerikeri.", and they say, "Sorry. No need for a comprehensive domestic route around New Zealand. No need for the airline to be able to get people from place to place." And I know there are members opposite who've lobbied very, very hard to make sure that Air New Zealand flies to their particular destination, their place in the world, and that wouldn't be in Mr Seymour's vision.