Then, I guess, a sort of related question—I'll give you two for one, because we wouldn't want to be here all night. There are other ways to, I guess, reduce the Gini coefficient, if that's one's goal, and the other way from taking money off people that have it is to give to people that don't, or at least take money off people that have more and give to those who have less. I wonder if the objective is to transfer half a billion dollars—although, as we've heard, it could be a lot less than that; we're not sure. Did the Minister, in his discussions with his Cabinet colleagues, ask if maybe somewhere in the hundred billion - odd that the Government spends, rather than going down this route, it might be easier to find economies and efficiencies elsewhere, if the objective was to transfer cash and reduce the Gini coefficient? Could they have reduced Gini by more than 0.2 percent by finding greater efficiencies in other Government spending? Now, it may be that the question was asked and the answer was "No, there's no inefficient spending in this Government", but it would be helpful to know if the Minister asked that question first. 