But here's the other point: if somebody, under this bill, if it is passed, nominates to be a candidate, there's a few hurdles they have to get through. They've got to get nominations, they have to pay a deposit—all difficult when you're behind bars. But here's the other thing: they then, in the most unlikely event that that would happen, and, secondly, that they'd get elected, have to be able to take up their seat in Parliament, and if, by a certain time they don't, they vacate that seat. Those are the practical implications. Now, most of us—possibly all but one of us in this Chamber—live in the real world. We understand how the world works. We take a practical approach to the world. We look at rules; we see how they apply in the real world. Not Dr Nick Smith. He lives in a fantasy world—in a fantasy land—which informs his arguments, which makes it entertaining, but doesn't help us to understand the law in front of the committee that we're trying to debate at the moment.