So what else did VOYCE say in their submission? The second part was that they felt, as most other submitters have said, that separating advocacy from monitoring and complaints risks children falling between the cracks. Now, I don't really think there's anyone in this House who wants to see any one baby, any one child fall between the cracks. This was a real opportunity to get it right once and for ever. But, instead, what are we here—whether it's academics, public policy experts—talking about the fact that, for example, the independent monitor isn't really independent, and the risk of it creating a cycle where there can be increased levels of abuse and the potential for that abuse to be swept under the carpet. Isn't that what the whole royal commission into abuse in State care is all about? We heard submitter after submitter say, "Why isn't the Government waiting? Why is it that Labour thinks they know better and that they are pre-determining any findings from the commission that sits today?"