And finally, the committee also raised concerns that a designated grocery retailer may be able to make unreasonable claims for compensation or damages from their landlord because of the bill making exclusivity covenants in their lease unenforceable. Section 89 of the Commerce Act has the potential to facilitate a process of renegotiating the lease, if this is appropriate, to reflect actual losses incurred by the supermarket from a greater exposure to competition in the area. The committee's concern, as I understand it, was about landlords having little protection against the potential for supermarkets to abuse this process. There are general provisions in contract law, the Commerce Act, and the Fair Trading Act, which prohibit the kinds of behaviours the committee was concerned about—for example, undue influence, coercion, or unconscionable conduct. I consider that these provisions should provide protection to mall and shopping centre owners. I also consider that the Government SOP will help mitigate some of the concerns by giving the commission the ability to actively monitor—which was a point that I had conversations with both Jamie Strange and Andrew Bayly on—these arrangements to assist compliance with both Acts. And with those introductory comments, I turn it over to the committee for wider discussion.