I think, at the same time, as Opposition members have pointed out, we need to balance that out with the right to a fair trial, and we most definitely heard that evidence. We heard that from the legal fraternity during select committee, and many of those submissions came forward and made it incredibly clear that they were concerned about how that would play out. While the New Zealand Law Society supported the efforts to ease the burden of giving evidence on sensitive complainants, it did note that the legal profession is divided with respect to whether proposed reforms strike the right balance. Generally, professional legal organisations and individual lawyers expressed concern that the bill erodes fundamental principles of law and the defendant's right to a fair trial process, and a lot of that went in around that ability to question somebody in a live situation and not have the pre-recording, which—as members have pointed out—can sometimes happen sometime prior to when the trial is.