I've got to say, too, that post the earthquakes in Christchurch, Ngāi Tahu were a very, very influential part of the recovery, and included in all of that. But once again, because that work was being done largely by a Government department, it needed to have the sort of input that was required from the widest part of the community. How the widest part of the community is represented on a body like ECan is through the triannual elections. I don't see what the problem is for Ngāi Tahu to put up their own candidates, openly saying that they're standing on that ticket. What would be wrong with that? Why is that so hard? Because I can tell you that the public view of Ngāi Tahu in Canterbury is very, very positive—very positive. They are an organisation that contribute significantly to the wellbeing of the entire Te Wai Pounamu, and particularly in the Ōtautahi community. I'm using those words almost with a degree of reluctance because I do remember being criticised very heavily by a recently appointed Knight of the Realm for using inappropriate vowels in a couple of sentences that I uttered at that time. You know, I suppose through that I do understand to some extent the term "grievance".