We have outlined on a number of occasions our concern about a couple of elements—a concern widely shared across particularly the defence counsel but across the legal profession. We are disappointed that the Government didn't agree with our Supplementary Order Papers during the committee stage on two matters, which I'll traverse briefly. One is around evidence relating to the sexual experience with the defendant. This bill brings in the higher threshold which, in effect, means that if a complainant has had a prior sexual relationship with the defendant that can be referred to as a mere fact but nothing much beyond that can be referred to. The legal concern that is raised by particularly the defendant community is that details about the complainant's previous experience with the defendant will be directly relevant to the issue of reasonable belief in consent potentially, in some circumstances. So there is a real concern about the consequences of that.