If what the member is referring to and what I've seen some parties in this House talk about is an inducement to councils, a flat fee of, say, $50,000 to put in place to say to councils, "For every house that you consent, we'll give you $50,000."—we examined this a few years ago to think about whether or not this was the way to do it, but we found that there are a number of failings with this approach. First up, the funding comes too late. For enabling infrastructure, you need the investment up front. You don't pay it on a piecemeal, individualised basis like an incentive programme like that would suggest. It also fails to recognise the variability of infrastructure costs by saying there'd be a flat fee that would be applied.