What has changed here is that the Health Committee proposed one particular way of addressing that, and we have tried to keep the intent of the select committee, while trying to make it a workable solution. So the concern was—and an independent group was brought in to review the proposed changes to the scope of the kaitiaki group's work—it would have probably generated several hundred referrals to the kaitiaki group a year. That would include things such as ordinary data updates of the register and just some of the information that was needed on a day-to-day basis for the quality assurance of the system, because, clearly, it is important that we have good data, good reports, and good statistics—and to do all of that, the employees of the programme need to be able to look up in the register and work with the data.