I want to finish off with my final remarks that come as this—and this comes, again, from the words that have been spoken here by the advisers, by Māori that were given an exposure draft that came prior to the bill being introduced into the House. The bill states that the Minister must have regard to advice but there is no legal compulsion to seek or take that advice. There, again, seems to be no regard to culturally informed, evidence-based decision-making. It is of great concern that the interests of Māori are not referred to at all in this section, given that all manner of enforcement powers and associated sanctions have historically and contemporaneously been used disproportionately against Māori. This absence raises alarm—this absence raises alarm. And if we can't in this nation get right, after 160 years of Westminster governance, the roles and responsibility between a covenant relationship, what we are doing today in this House by passing this bill is a breach of every other relationship, of every civil liberty, of every other citizen in this nation. If you get this one right, you get the others right. We haven't today in this House, and I own this as a "we". But, for you in power and with influence, you have the ability to decide this.