But the point I hope that the select committee will tease out is the sudden nature by which this legislation would transition. The reason I say that is if you set a date by which Royal assent means this suddenly changes and it goes from 10 years to 20 years, then you'll have the very unfair situation where if, say, Royal assent was 1 April on a particular year, somebody who had been here and completed their 10 years on, say, 29 March would suddenly be eligible, and somebody else who completed their 10 years on, say, 4 April would be ineligible and would have to do a further 10 years of work. I think the select committee needs to look very carefully at a transition measure whereby some justice and fairness is delivered if this legislation successfully passed. But I commend the member Mark Patterson for giving this bill to the House—a chance to examine the issue.