The RMA in its principles was not poor legislation, but it was poorly implemented. There wasn't sufficient national direction around things like making land available for supply. New plans were held up for many years in the Environment Court, because the Environment Court wasn't funded to hear appeals, and there were many other causes of delay. There were no standard plans done, there were no common definitions, and, as a consequence, implementation of the RMA was very poor. Now, we're in the middle of the legislative reform process, but we've got to get on and implement the new system, because if it's not implemented any better than the RMA, then it would fail just as the RMA has failed. 