It is an important little bit of legislation that we are bringing to this House this afternoon. It is particularly important, because while it may seem simply to repeat language, there's a serious purpose behind the language. My colleague Ginny Andersen has already quoted it, but the substance of it is a philosophic change from what's known as the medical model of disability, where it's something to be treated and got rid of, through to a model that sees disability on a social—it's called the social model. It sees it as something where you may have an impairment that is a medical condition—for example, if I take off my glasses, you're all a blur because I'm quite short-sighted. But the point at which an impairment like my poor sight becomes a disability is when society fails to accommodate and enable me to live a normal life by doing this and putting my glasses on. That's the difference. I'm not disabled. I live my life because I'm able to use my glasses. That's the social model of disability. That's the model we're seeking to bring in here. It is the model that says "You may be impaired, but we will facilitate you to live a life that is not disabled by the way in which we treat you in our society." We are an inclusive, we are a facilitative, society. 