On that particular point—the pre-trial cross-examination—the question is not whether this should ever be able to take place. Indeed, our law already allows, in exceptional circumstances, this to take place. But it should not be a matter of course, and the reason for that is that the Evidence Act, which the previous contributor to the debate, Angie Warren-Clark, has referred to, allows the recall of a person who has already given evidence in circumstances where that might be necessary. So it is that a person who has given her or his evidence at an early stage prior to the trial can be cross-examined on it, can be recalled under the legal regime that will apply if this bill is passed in its current form, such that she or he will be recalled to give that evidence again and therefore be re-re-traumatised, as I have said.