I have been myself on a number of boards, voluntary organisations, where lawyers have stepped in. One—there's a guy called Martin Williams who is a very good friend of mine but is also a very good lawyer. He takes his roles and responsibilities on community governance organisations incredibly seriously. But he does so, I suspect now, not knowing the law before this, Dr Webb, taking into account that if he was to offer advice that was counter to information that had been received by other parties, he may, in fact, be breaking the law. The thing about this that I would be keen for Mr Bishop to talk about or, hopefully, it'll come out in select committee, is that if, in fact, a lawyer provides information outside of their employment and that information is proven to be negligent or in some way can be challenged in court, whether a lawyer will be required to undertake their own or take out their own liability insurance. So that's just a question around how a lawyer's advice, when it is given pro bono but legally, stands up in a court of law in terms of their ability to be sued for that advice given.