So good on the member for bringing it across. You know, he's come here, he's been a long-time police officer like myself. You come here and you want to, sort of, make a bit of difference, but actually, this simply isn't going to make a difference. The member will remember when he first went on his detective course as a constable on trial. He'll remember sitting down, looking at the legislation—look, he's smiling over there because he knows this. He looked at the legislation. He was tested on this, and he couldn't work out what was a wounding. He couldn't work what was an injury. This is just another layer that's going to confuse those that come after him. It's not necessary. It won't make anyone any safer. It may make him feel a little better, and that may not be such a bad thing, but I cannot recommend this. With my experience of the law, this will just simply add and create a confusion and a gap for the defence lawyers. I do not commend this bill to the House.