My question to the Minister is: why was that not part of Budget appropriations last year or this year so that they could be examined for the quality of their spend, and why was it believed that they would be COVID-related, when indeed the Family Court recommendations are seven years old? It strikes me as extremely odd and, frankly, lacks transparency. It may well be good-quality spending, but for it to be appropriated in a supplementary sense, without the scrutiny that we should be putting it through now, including through select committee, I think is an example of where the COVID response and recovery fund has been used for things that it shouldn't have been used.