I think there's a bit of a head in the sand approach being taken by the analysis of this bill. If it was so wrong, but, as many of the speakers over there have said, good in other parts, why not adopt it as a Government bill? Doesn't have to be in my name—could be in the name of the Government, could be rewritten by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT). They could've moved a little bit in their views since 2012—although, sometimes, I wonder if that's the case. Or it could've been perhaps sent to a select committee and then referred back to the House. There's a range of things that could've happened. So many members over there called for debate, but then tonight this'll be shut, and I'll bet, Madam Chair—