So I've three questions for the Minister, and, dare I say it, they are the most important in this party that she should be asked and answered, if I do say so myself. Firstly, did she know—I'm not being a smart alec—did she know that the commencement of this bill will be retrospective in its practical effect? Secondly, was that—and again, I don't think I'm being a smart alec about this—was that the reason that she did it, to effectively knock out the referendum provisions, or is that simply in her view a highly regrettable side-effect, if you like, from this? And thirdly, did she get the advice—actually while I'm a-roll, I'd add to that—and will she release the advice? I'd like to see what that advice was in relation to the very clear implication of this commencement clause, that this is a retrospective bill that will become retrospective law and, as I say, is offensive to the rule of law in this land.