Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: The Minister's acknowledging that I've got that right. Well, it strikes me that that's a circular argument, because the very criteria that are grounds for the declining of a consent application are also set by this legislation and by the Government. So, therefore, in order to broaden the number of projects that could come into the schedule, the Government was free to broaden the criteria for declining. Now, I completely understand why one would need to be cautious about that, but if I could also ask this question: it strikes me that these listed projects are likely to tick the boxes when it comes to clauses 32(1)(a) and (b). I doubt that the Government would've put any of the projects in if they were subject to Treaty claims, or inconsistent with settlements, rather, or if they were in conflict with a national policy statement. Would that also be true?