To the question that the member posed: obviously, the gap was identified in the case that was before the High Court judge last year, and I think that sent a pretty clear signal to Parliament that the offence the judge had before him—or the attempt to bring about a conviction for the case before him—did not exist in legislation. So, in plain English, there was no offence around planning or preparation. I would echo the comments of the member: nothing can ever guarantee something not happening, when we legislate. But we must, as a Parliament—and we do take very seriously our responsibility as Government to make sure that we can do everything we can to prevent attacks of this nature occurring. Again, "of this nature" is an important phrase, because, over the last 10, 20 years, we have seen the nature of these kinds of terrorist attacks, which are ideologically motivated, change in their nature, and we have seen, both here and overseas, horrific incidents where everyday items end up being used in terrorist-motivated attacks.