Of course, what we've seen—and all the documents we have here today show us—is that, unfortunately, in the process of drafting that legislation, it was quite watered down and it wasn't airtight enough. So there was not, in fact, sufficiently strong indication that the retention money should be held in deemed trust, that it should be held in a separate bank account. The whole point of this regime was to ensure that the money that rightfully belongs to subcontractors for work that they have completed would not be taken by the main contractor and used in other projects, which would then mean that it was not recoverable by the subcontractors should the main contractor go into liquidation or collapse. Of course, that's continued to happen.