My other question mark is in relation to proposed clause 12 of Schedule 1, in clause 5(7). I think I'm right in my understanding, but I would be grateful for any guidance the Minister can provide in this regard. I think what we have here is an overriding of any inconsistent other law, so any law arising from that particular case is going to be overridden by clauses 1 and 5 to 8 of Schedule 1, notwithstanding that clause 11 as it currently stands says that those don't apply to that particular appellant. So we've got almost a situation of competition between two different clauses there, but I think I'm right in saying that the intent of the Minister, and, no doubt, the Parliament as a whole, will be to say that that case has no precedent value but, in respect of that particular person, it should apply.