It's interesting: I've heard some people comment in this debate that the Resource Management Act (RMA) is the problem. Zoning roles, and some of the bad zoning rules, pre-date the RMA; they've got nothing to do with the RMA. I mean, yes, the RMA is the framework under which they are implemented, but they were implemented under the Town and Country Planning Act. A lot of the really bad zoning rules were adopted from the United States, like minimum parking requirements, which I was very happy to see removed by the National Policy Statement on Urban Development. Of course, removing those minimum parking requirements in and of itself has immediate benefits in terms of reducing the cost of housing, like, for example, in Minneapolis, when they cut their parking requirements, within a short period of time rents dropped from $1,200 a month to $1,000 a month, almost a 20 percent savings. Of course, that provides more choice for people not to have to own a car if they're living in a central city and they've got good public transport options, they've got a car share they can join. There's no need for us to build in the cost of car ownership to every single home.