So my question for the Minister is: is it his view that the courts, in judging whether the Minister has appropriately exercised his power, should therefore treat clause 10 as a checklist of the skills that an appointee to the board should be able to demonstrate? If that is not the case, then it is very broad as to what the Minister's opinion may or may not be, so I would ask the Minister to clarify that. I think it's an important matter of interpretation and it is exactly why we have the committee stage—so that if this were ever to be an issue in the future, learned people of the court and lawyers could refer back to the Hansard and get a very clear sense of what the Minister's expectation was in the drafting of these words. 