My colleague, again, has reflected on the fact that we don't believe that making this change from two years to five years will be a sufficient measure of prevention or a motivation for people to not engage in this because people often don't walk into a situation intending to do this to an animal. We'd also question whether that act of increasing it by three years does anything to deter whatsoever. My colleague also spoke about the fact that there's no change to the penalty for injuring a police dog so there would be no change of deterrence on that front. So, again, while I would recognise that there is really good intent here, we are unable to support this bill through to select committee because of its practical inefficiencies.