I want to come back to the purpose and I want to ask the member: could he please explain some of the things that he said in response to Eugenie Sage's statements, such as "The purpose of this bill fulfils the Crown obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi towards Ngāi Tahu."? And, if so, I'd like him to tell us which ones, which obligations. Eugenie Sage also mentioned that they fulfilled the obligations of a Treaty settlement, in which case I would like, if the member agrees with these two statements by Eugenie Sage, the member to point out which clauses of the deed of the Treaty settlement, the deed, where it says that Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu should have members appointed to Environment Canterbury with voting rights. Because if he can't point to the Treaty of Waitangi obligation which says Ngāi Tahu should have voting rights on the regional council, or to the Treaty settlement, the particular clause that says that, then we'll have to assume that that is not a valid reason.