Stuart Smith makes the point that, in reply to the Minister—who said, well, oh, you know, that might apply to the current Government, the current Parliament, because the Labour Party currently has an absolute majority that we all know won't last for ever. If there is one thing that is certain it is that all Governments, sooner or later, are temporary, and it's just a question of how long that temporary nature is. So the make-up of this Parliament will, in future times, change. I'm convinced it'll be in 2023. There'll be a complete reversal, and the new Prime Minister, the new National-led Prime Minister, will, of course, be a regular guest on the Mike Hosking show. But this piece of drafting that Stuart Smith's put together actually accounts for a situation where the make-up of this Parliament will be different, and it doesn't name parties; it just says "the leader of each party that is not in Government or in coalition with the Government". So that leaves a high degree of flexibility about who would be—it'll be, clearly, in an MMP environment. It will be the leaders of the parties that do not make up and are not part of the current Government in power. I think that's a very astute, very wise option, because what it does is it gives a sense of inclusion of the whole Parliament to this process. 