My hope is that the Minister and Labour will consider that, that the logic is pretty sound. If you've got a bill which has a very broad definition and has to have a whole bunch of exclusions or things that are not included by the bill, and then some examples, then why not have a few examples just making it absolutely clear that expressing an opinion is not going to be falling into the definition of any sustained effort to supress something; and, secondly, that parents do have the ability to not agree to medical interventions for their children—and that is not included in this legislation—and that full and frank and robust discussions with medical practitioners, before any such major decisions are made, is also not a conversion practice. My hope is that that will be considered over the next few stages of the bill. Thank you.