Secondly, the new offence has no regard to the level of injury caused, which could lead to even more bizarre outcomes. For example, if someone had injured a police officer with an intent, they could face a maximum minimum penalty of 10 years. If they caused grievous bodily harm to a police officer with intent, which is worse, they'll be charged with the extent of wounding with intent, which carries seven years. So what has been done—the members opposite who are complaining about what they've agreed to have agreed that mandatory minimum sentences don't work, yet they've come up with no viable alternative—no viable alternative. And so, in order to address the problems that were initially raised, this is not able to be completed.