And here's the real kicker and the problem with "Jacindanomics": you see, most first-home buyers will, by definition, if they haven't bought a home yet, then they're first-home buyers, and if they're first-home buyers, they don't own a home, and if they don't own a home, they're either homeless or they're renting. And I hope they're not homeless. So if they're renting, what does it mean to have a policy that taxes landlords and puts rents up? It's going to take money away from landlords, who are going to pass it on to tenants who are first-home buyers. So when this Government tries to tilt the market towards first-home buyers, it taxes first-home buyers and makes them worse off. And the problem is: this Government doesn't know how to solve any problem other than putting up tax and taking more money away. 