It was an eye-opener, I found, for me as well on the number of different things that could be seized and the concerns that people with disabilities and impairments actually have. Our select committee discussions brought about the issues that I was not previously aware of—for example, that change in definition for "disability". It was noted that impairments were not defined in the current definition of "disability", and this bill will make changes to make sure that impairments are defined so that people who are impaired rather than disabled will also not have some their items or property potentially seized. There is a difference between the two, but there is no difference when it comes to being able to access the ability to join in society and partake. 