Hon GERRY BROWNLEE (National): I think the final comment made by the member Duncan Webb that this bill does, in fact, strike the appropriate balance between, you could say, human rights but also the right—I'll take my mask off; sorry, I was getting a bit carried away there—to go about your business freely in our society, and the restraint that has to be on people preventing others from behaving in that very lawful fashion. Everyone got a little bit of a surprise, to say the least, with that supermarket attack at just how easily some of these things can be done. Here you had someone who was on the New Zealand watch list, who was being very closely surveilled by the New Zealand Police, and there was concern about some of what he had been, effectively, planning but no capacity to restrain him under the law. So this particular change, while some might say it can affect the general freedom of New Zealanders to do what they want, to express what they want, to say things without any particular meaning, I think does go right to the heart of the fact that if there is a plan to materially affect the lives of people through the sort of violence that we saw at that New Lynn supermarket, then there should be capacity to restrain people like that. And we can get all concerned about civil liberties, etc., but we live in a world where there are, these days, far too many people using those freedoms to push agendas that are totally anti-freedom.