I really just want to make two points. And the first one really is that, of course, National, as we have in many debates on Māori-Crown issues, relationships, and so on—we have from the very beginning, as it were, supported the historical Treaty settlement process. And of course, whether it's been the partnership really of Jim Bolger and Doug Graham or John Key, Bill English, and Chris Finlayson, we have strongly believed in this process. And the reason for that is—in this country there may be a small group of outliers who disagree, but I think there is in place, in this Parliament, a strong and a clear consensus that real wrongs were done in the 1850s, 1860s, 1870s in this land. They created very clear, real grievances, and it is right, it is just, it's the only thing we can do to apologise as this deed of settlement does and, to some extent—and I say "to some extent"—right the wrongs of the past. And I say "to some extent" because, of course, what is true here is that the quantums, the recompense in kind, in no way come close to the real damage that was done in the past. And that's true across the Treaty settlements; they are but a fraction of the real economic, social, and cultural harm that has been done. And there's a bunch of reasons for that that, you know, I don't need to go into. We may question—and indeed I will tomorrow at the Māori Affairs Committee with Minister Kelvin Davis—the extent to which contemporary claims, contemporary issues, ongoing things that happen by the Government, may be right and proper, but we certainly believe in this process as right. But I digress.