The New Zealand Medical Association recommended that the statutory test for the period post - 20 weeks needed to be narrower. They recommended a point of distinction in the legislation, a statutory test at, say, 21 weeks and 38 weeks. There is no distinction or upper limit in this bill. Some in the House will say that I am scaremongering. I urge those members who take this view to look closely at the meaning of section 11 and tell me how a different conclusion could possibly be drawn. How can one doctor deny a woman an abortion under these criteria?