Secondly, the risk to productive land can be managed under the general "benefit to New Zealand" test because the investor must demonstrate benefits that are in proportion to the sensitivity of the land. So proportionality in this sense means that overseas investment in our most sensitive land must demonstrate a higher degree of benefit for the land than land that is not so sensitive. Now, that sensitivity goes partly to economic productivity. We don't want lots of our high-class lands planted out in forests, I don't think, as a country, and there are a lot of communities concerned that you can go too far in that regard. So that now is relevant for the Overseas Investment Office as to whether this is inappropriate land to be planted out in production forestry. 