Now, the interesting case in which this could occur, of course, is the artist, who uses the $5 note in all its glory to create a mural or to do some such. The charity auction where someone signs a bank note and uses it for it. The interesting question I have for the Minister is why he thinks that should remain an offence. Because I think we can all understand that offence in the context of subclause (3), which says that if you are defacing or disfiguring the bank note and then intentionally using it to put in circulation or using it to demand payment or using it as a deposit, then that's not quite right, and I think that's fine. But did the Minister give any thought to the idea that defacing a bank note—if actually it's only for your own personal use or it's actually just for the purposes of raising money for a charity—and not intending for the bank note to be used legal tender in future should continue to be the case—should New Zealanders be very aware that if they write on a bank note tomorrow they are liable to a fine of $2,000?