Now, there's one other thing in this bill that I think is quite challenging for us as well, and it's very different again to what happens in Parliament. The member has modelled the bill on the parliamentary pecuniary interests register to some extent, and another challenge I can see facing the select committee will be in 42C(1)(c), which reads: "if the member of a local authority is employed, the name of each employer of the member and a description of the main business activities of each of those employers [must be declared]". Now, if you think about the piece of legislation that the Government is proposing to put into Parliament—and they've said they'll put it into Parliament some time later this year—around a piece of labour law, I guess, it would be, it's highly likely that contractors will become employers. And do you think that a courier driver, for example, who has maybe 150 employees is going to want to stick his client list out there in the public forum, on a council pecuniary register? Not likely. So I think it's going to put a whole lot of people off standing for council for that reason as well, and I think it could apply to accountants, lawyers, or anyone like that, because it's not defined in the bill. And I think there's some work to be done on clause 42C(1) as well.