He was referring, when he considered this, to the release of individuals into the public space, and the ability of the victim to be heard. He noted that the victim's views are not determinative and that there doesn't appear to be a legal requirement to provide a substantial amount of personal information to the victim. He notes that the bill's victims' rights provisions are consistent with the requirement that persons deprived of their liberty under mental health legislation be treated with humanity and respect for their inherent dignity. And I do think that that's important to note.