To spend money like a drunken sailors on shore leave would imply a lot less than $100 billion. That would be one hell of a run ashore, as they say. The price of a rum and Coke in Sydney in the early 2000s was pretty steep, but it wasn't that steep, and the cocktails in Singapore were eye-watering in cost as well as just eye-watering, but $100 billion, such as we're seeing now being appropriated—the top-up that this bill represents—is pretty considerable indeed. But the problem, of course, isn't about the fact of spending; it's the quality of the spending. It's not the spending like drunken sailors that is the issue in relation to investments being made. Indeed, if the dollars that were being spent by the Government on behalf of all taxpayers, current and future, were being spent in the wisest possible way, then we would have no objection. But it's the bad decision-making that's inherent in here. It's the detail that's in this bill, but it's also the things that are not represented here in terms of a plan to get ourselves out of the hole that the country now finds itself in that the Opposition is honour-bound to bring to the attention of the country in this debate. 