Having gone through the process of the first reading, second reading, and committee stage, I am still left with some questions, particularly because I think my colleague Simeon Brown had a very good point in his amendment. But I am left with the question: is the degree of criminality of the offending of appellant D, if the wording in our original bill had been clear enough so that he would have been placed on the sex offender registry in the original piece of legislation, so there would have been no reason for that person to end up in the Supreme Court—does that process diminish the degree of offence that requires the offence and the offender to be put on the sex offender registry? 