I've got to say that in his speech moving this motion, he made some extraordinary comments to Mr Bishop in respect of what other parties would do, because, this afternoon, a colleague of his described the National Party's COVID plan as "risky, rushed, and reckless.", and then asked what we were going to get for Christmas, on the first day we'll get COVID. Well, actually, we don't have to wait for Christmas to get COVID, because it is here and spreading in South Auckland, and I think we are going to be hearing an awful lot more about that, and that actually is very relevant to both this bill and to the time we are going to take to consider it and make amendments to it. I should add that the other irony of that is that Mr Hipkins points out that the very things that the National Party wants to see happen are going to be made possible by the orders that are made in this bill. So, on the one hand, they say it is rushed, risky, and reckless, but they are doing it as well. He then challenged Mr Bishop to say why he wouldn't support this bill and its rushed passage. Well, the answer is very simple: a National Government would not have mucked around for months to get the necessary orders in place to enable the reopening plan to be made effective, and, actually, we wouldn't be getting loved ones for Christmas; we would have probably got them for Labour weekend or maybe Matariki if it had been held this year, or even Easter, but it sure as heck wouldn't have been at the end of the first quarter of 2022.