I also want to get on to—and it's another element that we talked about as part of the Estimates process. It was in regards to the expenditure, particularly around consultants, on advertising. And, again, the basis for this reform that was hammered home to Kiwi households across this country was a wide-ranging advertising campaign that was absolutely, as articulated, borderline in terms of what it was portraying in terms of the problem that exists in the country. Last week, as a process of select committee hearings in regards to the three waters reform, we heard time and time again: "Is your water broken in your district?"—"No." "Do you have an issue with your toilets or your taps, all that?"—"No." The issues that were raised in regards to challenges that communities and households across this country have are that, yes, at times there have been issues, but the overarching premise that our system is fundamentally broken and that we've got green slime coming out of our taps is absolutely materially flawed, and that analysis and that advertising is not accurate. So what I want to know from the Minister is, given the enormous problems that have recently been uncovered by the Auditor-General, does she feel that this money in regards to consultant spend and advertising spend on three waters reform was money well spent?