So as we move forward, as we have done in this legislation, this has very much been part of a consultation discussion—robust, some of it—to get to a place where I think we've got the balance about right. That is, some would wish us to continue with tenure review—yes, I understand that—but some actually just want certainty and to get on and to farm the land as their ancestors and others have done. That's what we're offering here through this legislation. Yes, there will be people who disagree with parts of it. But on all the contentious issues, I have had active, robust discussion with the High Country Accord, with many of the members in the lessees, and I've tried to make the adjustments to get the balance right between the landowner, the people of New Zealand, and the lessees who have a perpetual right of renewal and the right to pasturage—but not to soils, and not to some things that have been claimed in the committee. But, actually, as technology and as new opportunities, as innovations roll forward, we want to leave the door open for engagement and partnership arrangements that allow that innovation to be carried out on high-country leases. Indeed, that's what we will do.