Chapman Tripp are a well-regarded law firm, and their corporate and commercial partners put out a paper about this bill, and they made some quite poignant, I think, comments about the failures of this bill. In their paper on this bill, they said, "We expect these provisions will cause significant anxiety in boardrooms." They said the changes expose "sellers to a potential cost double whammy – first in the form of a lower purchase price to reflect the cost exposure created by the Bill, and later if the purchaser fails to carry out and fund the decommissioning activities." They go on to say that "At the very least, this will make transferring permits or licences more intensive and cumbersome – particularly for the seller who will have to undertake substantial financial due diligence in relation to a purchaser's ability to meet [future] decommissioning costs [into an unknown] future." They go on—and this is the last quote from this piece—"We expect sale and purchase agreements going forward will include indemnities from the purchaser, indemnifying the seller for any liability under the Bill. However, those indemnities cannot extend to directors of the seller – a point which is explicit in the Bill." Dr Duncan Webb comes to this Parliament with a reputation for being an academic lawyer—a lecturer, no less. He should understand the implications of this piece of legislation, and he should realise that this is a step too far.