It seems to me that the situation we're facing is, as one submitter put, that "the perfect is the enemy of the good". By that, they meant that the opposition to the bill seems to look at the broad situation in New Zealand and conclude that te reo Māori is the absolute priority and, until everybody in this country is bilingual in that, we shouldn't be looking further afield, effectively. I'd be interested to hear what the Minister has to say on this topic. I think that is a mistake. Fundamentally, our party comes from one of choice. Nothing in this bill takes away the existing obligation on schools to ensure that all schools have teaching in te reo Māori and tikanga Māori available and makes best endeavours to achieve that. So every child, in theory, should have access to an element of that. It is a separate question to decide: "Well, do you want to study, in depth, that particular language through your primary and intermediate school years?" The reality of the situation is that some will and some won't. There will be children from many cultural backgrounds, in particular, who would be more engaged and more interested in picking up their language as a second language, and they are not going to have the choice if that carries on, and I think that would be a pity.