It's the kind of law change that will mean that more [Audio issue] people are more likely to run. More communities will see their lived experiences represented without those types of barriers that are so ad hoc that we don't even notice them, which this is. So to require a residential address or a business address means that somebody in their place of work or home will have to be exposed, not only to abuse but to that kind of interaction that they can't control and we can. So that kind of benefit of incumbency, the benefit of being a member of an established parliamentary political party shouldn't mean that we or people, candidates like us, have an advantage in putting our names forward. That's not good for democracy; it never has been. And to say that the communities who don't have a secure or stable residential or business address will kind of automatically, in fact, not even just for safety reasons, but automatically be excluded, seems antithetical to democracy. 