I'd also like to ask a couple of genuine questions, and we'll see if they can get answered. Because one of the things that I've actually noticed tonight and through the day, as I have been in throughout the entire debate today, is that there's been two quite distinct angles of debate on the same issue. First of all has been, and I think the Minister has said it, the bill itself is not about whether someone is pro-abortion or pro-life, or whether it's based on someone's feelings or points of view on whether abortion is correct or not; this is a piece of legislation that is taking something out of the Crimes Act. But then I hear some suggestions from some other members that this is a very contentious bill or topic, very personal, and very sensitive issue. They let me hear some stories, some personal stories, about their families, their children, and their relatives that give them the ability to form their view on their conscious view and conscience on this issue. So on the one hand we have just a bill that is about taking something out of the Crimes Act and then we've got something quite different, which is based on personal beliefs, personal moral stances, and personal experiences. The question is, that I have for this committee, if it isn't about being pro- or anti-abortion then why isn't this a party vote? Why is this a personal vote?