The committee also recommended two amendments to the bill: one to help clarify the definition of the area the exceeded land powers will apply to, and the other to insert transitional provisions for any section 71 proposal or plan process under way at the date the process provisions for those are repealed. With regard to the first recommendation—this was suggested to better define the definition of the geographical area of application for the extended land powers—the extended land powers will be available for the Crown's land title reconfiguration work in the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor. It does this by clarifying the land the provisions will apply to by reference to land in the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor in Crown ownership at 1 July 2021 and also provides a map to aid in interpretation. This suggested change does not change the area the extended land powers apply to, but, rather, ensures that it is clear what area is included. The extended land powers ensure the Crown has the time to complete its work to put Christchurch in the best position to continue its regeneration in this area. The other change is to include transitional provisions for any section 71 proposal or plan process under way at the time the relevant provisions in the Act are repealed. While transitional provisions were not originally seen as necessary, during the course of the committee's consideration, it became clear that clarity on the application of the current provisions to any application under way at the repeal of the relevant provisions would be pragmatic. The provisions included will ensure clarity for any proponent pursuing a proposal or application at the date the relevant provisions were repealed. This will provide certainty around the step in the process that needs to have been reached for a proposal or application to be continued under the current provisions in the Act. So these are very technical descriptions, but I want to finish up by thanking the committee for these recommendations, which have helped clarify these two matters.