During the select committee hearings, what we heard plenty on—on top of most submitters actually supporting the changes proposed by this bill—was a really strong call for some changes to the criteria around the breakdown in the family. So while submitters were not necessarily always able to give a cohesive or clear alternative proposal to the current barriers that exist, I think most people acknowledged that there needed to be changes in terms of the family breakdown criteria. One of the reasons why we decided to put an amendment to that, and to help make this bill go further and pass through into enabling our children to thrive, was that the current barriers on top of the 12-month period that this bill is addressing is the fact that requiring a breakdown in the family ultimately creates the conditions where people are told—especially those in whāngai arrangements or in other arrangements—that in order for your wider village to step in and to look after a child, there is a breakdown, and that the biological parents or the parents looking after the child were somehow unwilling or uncaring. It creates that negative stigma, when actually for many cultures—including my own culture back in Mexico—it is quite common for your wider village to step in to raise a child. It's not about a lack of love or a lack of support; it's actually an acknowledgment that you often need a wider community to step in.