So in terms of a mens rea test, I imagine we're talking about a pretty high bar here, and I'm expecting that the way this will be interpreted will be to look to see whether the intent is unfair—whether those grey terms have been explored or brought into question. Those who are going nowhere near this really will not be affected by it, of course. This is really only to address the obvious or just unfair terms where they are present in contracts. And we know that the majority of businesses want to trade in a way that is fair, because they rely on the relationships in their business trading. They want to have good outcomes for the people that supply them, as well as the people that consume their products. So what we're talking about here is protections against those who would deliberately go out of their way, ignoring the advice that's already available around grey areas, ignoring the law cases that have been interpreted, and would still go ahead and seek to have unfair advantage because of their size or scale in dealing with smaller players in the market.