So this goes more to a question of, I think, perception, but I do think that market participants and, indeed, the broader general public need to understand what the process was in coming to deciding that it should be the Minister of Climate Change. Was, for instance, there any suggestion that it might be some independent body of experts or maybe another, potentially more appropriate, Cabinet colleague that could do that, that was—in terms of the public perception—one or two steps removed from the climate change broader debate, if I can put it that way? As I say, I think this goes to a question of perception rather more than reality, but I do think it's an issue that is clearly of concern to some people, and I'd appreciate the Minister's answer, particularly to the question of whether there was consideration given to any other mechanism or person or office being the appropriate form for setting the confidential reserve price.