The National Party will be raising a couple of questions, and one of the important questions we do want to raise is regarding new section 11 in clause 5 in the piece of legislation, which does mean that this bill does not apply to the appellant in the Supreme Court decision, in line with the general principle of section 33(1)(c) of the Legislation Act 2019. We will be asking some questions during the committee stage regarding this issue because we do also note that the Supreme Court was split on the issue of whether this individual should have been removed from the registry, as well. In fact, two justices said that he should be taken off the registry, regardless of the point of law that was being raised, and two justices said he should remain on the registry, with one justice not giving a judgment on that particular issue, due to the fact that that justice believed that because the law didn't apply retrospectively in this case, it was not relevant. So we will be asking some questions around whether new section 11 should be, in fact, actually removed, with this legislation allowing for this case to be dealt with on its own merits separately, rather than Parliament also passing judgment on this particular issue. 