We, of course, supported the first bill and, as a firearm owner myself, I too was concerned about the proliferation of semi-automatic weapons or rifles that were available for sale. And much of that was dealt with in the first bill, now Act. However, what we experienced after the passing of that first Act was a debacle, in the sense that the delay in determining the remuneration that would be paid for returned rifles led to a significant loss of goodwill by the firearms community, and that ultimately led to a rather small amount of rifles being handed back in. The estimate was approximately 56,000, even though, whilst the police weren't able to quantify it, there is an estimated 250,000 of such dangerous types of rifles in the community, out with the gun fraternity at the moment. That is a shame—that is a real shame. I know we can pass laws that we're going to fine people and jail them, and all that sort of stuff, but unfortunately a lot of goodwill was lost, and has resulted in many very old, historic weapons being handed in that do meet the strict requirements of an automatic weapon but, in reality, offered absolutely no ability to be used in such a manner, because of their age or the way that they would operate, and I think that is a real shame. That is a case of poor implementation of this bill.