CHRIS BISHOP (National): Thank you very much, Madam Chair, and I thank the Minister genuinely for that engagement. Just in relation to one of the points he made in relation to my colleague Louise Upston's argument, the Minister just said that the Government's been very clear that there's a range of life-preserving entities and settings where people will not be required to be vaccinated—and I'm assuming he's relying on clause 6(3), which says, "After section 11(1)(g), insert (h) requiring persons to permit individuals to enter a place or receive a service whether or not those individuals are vaccinated, have a vaccination certificate", which is fine; that's great. That gives the Government very broad power. My question is: would it not be better for Parliament to specify the range of circumstances that those orders should be made to? That would be Parliament spelling out for the Government the powers with which the Government should act, and also giving some direction to the Government around which scenarios the House thinks that people should, essentially, be able to access.