It was interesting, I just thought I would talk to a retired practitioner—and someone said practitioner. I'm just going to quote—just indulge me—what he wrote: "I think this is a good bill. When banks send in an investigating accountant, that is the prelude to whether, in fact, they might put a company into receivership. To advise on the viability of the business, the first thing the accountant does is work out how they can get more work. One of those ways is to recommend receivership. The current Act currently provides that they are not conflicted"—and this is a thing I never heard from any of the members on the other side—"from doing this."