The Government's response to that, we think, was the right decision. With a real absence of information, and acknowledging that Governments and officials are always dealing with imperfect information when it comes to these situations, the decision to adopt a cautionary approach—or I think some people have called it a precautionary approach—is the right thing to do, because unlike the case of the Northland example, where the person who had left managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) had not spread COVID, in this situation the person at the centre of it, or the person we think is at the centre of it—the laundry worker at LSG Sky Chefs, if, indeed, she is case zero—had infected the husband and her daughter. So in those situations, we have a spreader and some travel that the person had undertaken, and, of course, as it transpires, a more transmissible variant of COVID. So we think it was the right thing to do. 