So I would say to the Minister that, actually, we will be supporting this in first reading so that we can hear from those that are likely to be most affected, large companies and small, and then we'll make a decision as to whether we can support it further, because if the intention is just to be like other countries around the world because they're doing it, well, actually, that is not a necessity for New Zealand business. If it is that there is an actual problem there that needs to be fixed and that can be demonstrated and this will go some way to fix it, then, actually, the House would consider it. But if it is merely that the Commerce Commission find it hard to find prosecutions when it comes to market power of a dominant player in the market, because we are small, then we shouldn't just be changing the rules to make it easier for them; they should do their job better, because they have so very many tools at their disposal. The outcome will be one that isn't good for consumers—even though the Minister has said that when it comes to competition, the benefits accrue to consumers. Actually, more regulation and greater rules and more court cases and more investigations, when there is not necessarily a need for that, will just put cost upon those businesses. Guess what! Businesses pass those on to consumers. This bill should only go forward if it is good for consumers, and the Minister in his introduction has not made that case yet. Thank you.