The purpose of my contribution today has been to highlight that when we say this bill is adding a bit more compliance, we're not just indulging in rhetoric; this is a very specific set of new powers, and I don't think the Minister has done a good enough job of justifying these powers. And what I would invite him to consider is: if this bill is really what he says it is, which is that it has a purpose of raising revenue and doing more for your distribution, then why not just say, "Well, yes, all of these other new powers aren't necessary today. They should go to a select committee so that we can get advice on what they'll actually mean in practice." Why don't you, Minister, remove clause 35 altogether as a good faith initiative to show that you will invite experts and those affected to consider the compliance implications of this bill. These sections cast a very wide net; they imply that the Minister wants to dig into a huge host of tax measures. They will be corrosive to trust in the commission and corrosive to trust in the Government's tax intentions, and we will continue to oppose this bill.