I want to return to the contribution of the speaker before last around SOP 79. Firstly, as I previously noted, there are local issues that are relevant to fluoridation decisions, and the director-general is required to take this into account: local health factors, the oral health of the population, the feasibility and readiness to start fluoridation, and its cost. But the Supplementary Order Paper goes further than that and asks us—well, actually, it was Mr Doocey's speech in relation to the Supplementary Order Paper that was prepared by Dr Reti. Mr Doocey said that it's not just about local government, but about involving community, but it doesn't appear to me that that's what Supplementary Order Paper 79 does. It asks for "the views of local health authorities legislated to represent … health interests where the local authority supply is situated." So it's a slightly wordy presentation, but I don't think the intent of it is about community involvement. No, it's about representatives I'm not even sure exist, and, in fact, the comment that Mr Bishop was making actually applies to Mr Reti's SOP, not to the Government's bill or SOP.