I really think it probably just makes immediate sense to a lot of people that there's a really big difference between seizing somebody's massive TV that they may have spent too much money on and seizing a mobility aid that is essential to that person's participation in society and health. This piece of legislation makes sure that we recognise that difference, and there is no chance for somebody's ability to, basically, have their human rights met to be compromised by the seizure of goods through our debtor process—also acknowledging, as I think the member concerned raised, that at the moment, bailiffs can't seize a tradie's tools, because that would undermine their ability to earn a living and pay back the debt. So if we can make that recognition, then this is very, very obvious and clear to me that we probably should have done this a long time ago. But it is really fantastic. 