But coming back to this bill, this is a bill that is very murky, very unclear, and I'm not sure—because I listened to the last 54 seconds of the sponsor's speech, and I listened to the full nine minutes of her speech some weeks ago, and not once, not once—and I see the Attorney-General sitting in this House—not once did she mention the Attorney-General's report on this bill, which says, amongst other things, that "I have concluded [this] Bill is inconsistent with the right [of] freedom from discrimination affirmed in s 19 of the Bill of Rights Act." Not once did the member refer to that—not once. So there was a fundamental flaw in this piece of legislation. Not only is there a fundamental flaw in it, it's a bill that has no real need. 