But it's also true that it was my amendment that took safe areas out of that bill, because there's a tension: you can be in favour of a person's right to choose, but also be concerned about free speech. The bill, as originally introduced in this case and as a subpart of that Abortion Legislation Bill, would have said that it is prohibited to communicate with a person on any terms within a safe area. And I think it's true—I find myself agreeing with some of the earlier speakers, and even Simon O'Connor, which is rare; the Venn diagram of beliefs that intersect for us is a very tiny sliver, it has to be said. But, nevertheless, he's right that we have a real problem in the Western World, that people find it harder to disagree without being disagreeable, to have honest conversations and work through our problems in a way that's respectful. And we also have a terrible habit of commodifying people into identities, rather than focusing on our universal humanity in an objective reality that we can observe and work through together as equals because we're human. That's a big problem, and it's a problem throughout the West. And if we look at the situation in Europe, I think it becomes more and more important that we understand, articulate, and stand up for those basic, classical liberal values.