The Regulations Review Committee also looked at the safeguards on power to make regulations, such as the methodology, and they expressed concern that there was insufficient safeguard on that power to make regulations. Their recommendation to the Environment Committee was that we consider whether the Minister's decision should be subject to greater safeguards or independence, and the ACT Party view is that Stuart Smith's amendment to new regulation 15A, proposing a new subclause (3)(aa), that "the leader of each party that is not in Government or in coalition with the Government" should have full scrutiny over the methodology—we think that is an appropriate mechanism to address the risks that have been brought to the attention of the committee and that were not adequately addressed by the officials and in subsequent amendments. So, for that reason, the ACT Party supports that position, and we'd like to hear more of an explanation as to why this fundamentally sound amendment cannot be incorporated and accepted by the House as this Part 2 passes through committee stage towards final stages.