Then, just finally, the timeliness issue was something that was really important to the committee, because there was a real sense that we needed to get on and provide protections in a very timely manner. The question was that there was a range of options considered, but if we could put in place a blanket protection 150 metres from all abortion services—could you do that quickly—and I think that brought up a whole range of questions about, "OK, if you're sitting in a safe area that is 150 metres from the service or from the building; is it the building itself or is it the land on which the service is located?", because you've got a lot of services that may be delivered in a big hospital complex where the land area is rather large. Where do you put that boundary? Then there are other issues around private property, and could you include private property in a safe area? I think where we landed was going back to the original provisions where we've got a customised regulation-making power so that each facility has its own regulations developed around that so that we've got the ability to work out for each area how to potentially exclude private property, but also make sure we've got the maximum protection.