So I just want to—I don't think I'll take the full 10 minutes. I do, though, want to recap on some of the arguments that have been made. The first argument, I think, that we hear so loud and clear from the public health lobby, from Andrew Little, and from the Labour Party, is that this is all evidence-based. Well, the only study—I keep asking Chlöe Swarbrick. I kept asking Andrew Little. I kept asking other members on the other side of the House for their studies, the evidence base that they relied on. The only Kiwi study they could rely on—by the way, they never referred to anything else from around the world that I could see, not a specific study. The only study they could rely on was a Victoria one. By the way, it was self-selecting. It was a sample. It wasn't within cooee of being what I would consider a proper evidence-based, scientifically selected study of what is happening in New Zealand. It was self-selected. It was a sample.