We requested advice on the original verdict—the verdict the select committee chose and the verdict used in New South Wales. The bill as introduced said, and I quote, "the acts or omissions are proven but the defendant is not criminally responsible on account of insanity". The select committee amended the verdict to "proven but insane". So we sought officials' advice on both the use of either of those options and the New South Wales verdict of "act proven but not criminally responsible". Officials provided advice on three other alternatives. We have landed on a compromise, and that is in the bill that we are debating in the committee of the whole House today, and that says "act proven but not criminally responsible on account of insanity", which meets the needs of all parties: victims, those who are facing charges, the judiciary, and Parliament.