So what the difference is, I think, and as the Minister tried to look at the difference between, you know, this side of the House—and that side of the House, actually—when we think about taxation, we think about how do we use taxation in order to deal with factors that are true market failure. And what we're trying to deal with here through this is an ideological tax that makes the members on that side of the House, and a small number of supporters in this country, think, "Oh, that feels good, that's going to deal with the problem." Well, it's not, and it's not going to deal with the problem. That's the shame about this aspect of Part 2 of the bill.