Now, my colleague Scott Simpson has suggested on his amendment, and I agree with this, that compensation may be payable, and clause 6 should say, "Nothing in this Act precludes a court ordering that the Crown is liable to pay compensation in connection with a judicial review in respect of a proposal or related review, or for any loss or damage, or any adverse effect … or under any lease or other right of interest arising from the enactment or operation of the amendment Act." Now, if you're in a long-term—and this has been a very long-term legal relationship with the Crown, and the Crown comes along and then changes the rules on the farmer and the farmer goes for a judicial review and the Crown is found to be incorrect, would it just not make good moral judgment for compensation to be able to be payable? So I'd like the Minister to make a comment on that, please.