I just wanted to pick up on a couple of points that have been raised by members. I think at one level this is a significant departure if we buy the idea of an independent foreign policy. I sort of don't, actually. I think New Zealand—we'll often give lectures at the university on this. I think it's a hard argument to make any more. New Zealand is very much drawn along by the geostrategic winds, be it our traditional allies or the likes of our trading partners. So we will try to act independently, but we are under heavy, heavy influence. And so we can make an independent judgment on those, but I don't think we just stand alone. To further echo this, what we're doing tonight is not new. This is not New Zealand going out on a limb. This has not even been unilateral or bilateral. New Zealand is simply following suit of so many other countries, liberal democracies in particular. So many other countries already have Magnitsky-type laws in play, which they've been able to swiftly deploy, and it will be interesting to see, once this one's passed, just how New Zealand's sanctions align with other countries, such as our friends in the UK or Canada, for example; Australia, for sure. So that's important.