Hon CARMEL SEPULONI: A number of the submissions traversed the same themes when they came in, and many of them touched on some of the issues that I covered in my answer to the primary question. Much of that, I believe, the select committee has done a good job at resolving. It was very clear that people still wanted a Chief Children's Commissioner, but we still believe that a board is required to strengthen the advocacy of the Office of the Children's Commissioner. It was very clear that there were areas in the bill where it wasn't articulated strongly enough with regards to the independence of the Monitor, and that certainly has been enhanced. We heard loud and clear—I believe the select committee did—that people still felt that there needed to be a direct ability for the Children's Commissioner to contact the Prime Minister directly. So that is another area that the select committee covered off. In the revised version of the bill, that has been included. There are a number of other areas where there is change. They came directly from the submissions that were put forward, and I am confident with where the select committee has landed.