We heard several submissions. One of the submissions that was compelling was from the New Zealand Automobile Association (AA). Their submission basically made the following points: the bill strikes the right balance to enable meaningful enforcement action against drivers who are drug-impaired while having safeguards in place to ensure individual rights and freedoms are protected. We felt very strongly too that those had to be in place, and there was a lot of debate around transitioning through the oral test through to the option of actually having a blood test. And we debated it quite a lot around the fact of should the person pay for that blood test if they elected to have it. We felt that if they had a blood test and it came back and it was negative, then there should be no cost associated; if it was positive, then actually they should pick up the cost of that.