I'd also like to have a talk about my SOP 195, around clause 34. There has been a little bit of talk about entry without notice when it comes to Oranga Tamariki facilities. I understand the Minister's argument—we don't want to upset children, people coming in and out without notice—but this is actually something that young people and advocates and the Children's Commissioner talked about. It is about allowing a child who may be trying to reach out because they're in danger or something's not quite right, or they feel that their safety is at risk, being able to reach out to their advocate and have their advocate come in their time of need. And if you have to give notice and the organisation has the ability to say "No, you can't enter.", these children feel like their lifeline has disappeared. And that's just the perception. It's a bit like when I worked in retail—you know, the CEO is going to come the next day. They give you notice, you clean up the shop, you make sure everything's fine and dandy before the boss comes in. The boss comes in, doesn't see any problems, and the problems still exist, but they've just been hidden because that notice has been given. I really feel like that lifeline is something that these young people have called for within the select committee process and after.