In response to the comments from Nicola Willis, I do think it's very important to understand what the Auditor-General said, and I too am quoting from the Auditor-General, in his letter to Nicola Willis. I quote: "To summarise, the concern that you raised (that the Government unlawfully used the KiwiBuild Housing appropriation to authorise the land purchase) did not eventuate." So that actually was what the Auditor-General said—that that concern did not eventuate. The concern that the Auditor-General had, and that the member has moved on to, is the question of whether or not, in the decision and in the creation of the appropriation that took place on the time line that the member has outlined, two important clauses from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development were put in place that would acknowledge that imprest supply would be the source of that funding. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Development failed to put those two clauses in the paper, and so for the period of time from 17 February, when that was signed off, until 17 March, when the normal regular March baseline update was done, there was an unappropriated expenditure. 