Now, kudos to officials for making a change to the bill that I thought was confusing, at new section 34A(1)(a) in clause 4, where it had initially had said that this section applies and the Minister can authorise an off-label administration if the Minister gives consent. Now, one would have thought that that means that the Minister is giving consent to an application, but, as we've heard, Pfizer don't have to make an application. So the bill has been changed—and I think that's an improvement—to say that "(1) This section applies if—(a) the Minister has given consent". It's a past tense situation. So that's only partially easing my concerns. 