So let's be very clear about what's happened. The Minister has used privilege to re-litigate what happened. And we've got a lot of stuff about, "I believe the police"—and, you know—"I believe the police and I believe the internal investigation and I believe the parliamentary process that we went through." And he says don't believe me. Well, all I'm doing is litigating the settlement that he agreed to. There was a settlement, and he told me in select committee that he knew within 24 hours that what he said was wrong. He said that he was going to be here all night and get to the questions that I asked. Well, we look forward to that because they were not addressed. The question of why, when he knew within 24 hours, he did not admit he was wrong and say so, was not addressed. The question of why legal letters went back and forward between the plaintiff and the defendant in which Mr Mallard said he would plead truth and prove that what he said was right about rape, that was not addressed. The question of why he said he would do it vigorously, and put the man's reputation on the line, that was not addressed either. Those are critical issues because they go to judgment. Leave aside all of the defamatory stuff that the Minister just said in relation to me in particular, most of which was wrong—leave aside all of that—this is a very simple issue. He knew he was wrong but he fought for 18 months, at vast taxpayer expense, to fight it.