TIM VAN DE MOLEN (National—Waikato): Respectfully, there was a slight difference there, Minister, between Mr Penk's contribution and my own, his initially being around the definition of forestry activities and then the use of that land. Mine was more around whether there could be accommodation either in the same dwelling where one person in there is working on the forestry land; another person, tenant, or worker in the same accommodation is working on adjacent land or, indeed, there are adjacent sharing quarters, for example, that are on the forestry land but have no use for that, but are used on an adjacent land and are perhaps rented to that farmer, or, indeed, in the sense where we have forestry workers coming into the accommodation for a period of time to carry out pruning, for example, and then leaving again, and the accommodation—is it then able to potentially be used for other purposes outside of the time when it is being used for forestry purposes? 