Now, the Government has said we've got to keep it around in case we need to bring it back, but, by keeping it in place without any of its features, it's been distorted beyond recognition, and meanwhile, we have the question of—regardless of whether we call it the traffic light system—what possible benefit are we getting from knee-capping hospitality events with a 200-person limit inside, when the reality of Omicron is there are so many different transmission sites that one super-spreader event will make far less, or any, difference, in comparison with elimination, when one super-spreader event really could decide whether an outbreak got under control or not? So if the Minister could explain: why do we still have the traffic light system? How can we claim that we're keeping it around for the future when it's been completely denuded? Wouldn't it be simpler just to say there's a maximum crowd size of 200 and you have to wear masks inside, which is, effectively, all it adds up to now? And, if there is a rationale for a crowd size of 200, what is it and can the Minister explain why it's worth the enormous cost and impacts it's having, not only in not being able to have events but the uncertainty of whether events can be had, by restricting indoor meetings to 200 or more? 