But what has always struck me with these whistleblowers is they are people, if you could use the analogy, down in the trenches, which is well and good, but they are not the people who have the overall view of what is happening. And that's very, very easy, particularly in that space, to think that the information you have and the view you have of it—sorry, not you Mr Speaker, in the context of the people I'm referencing, that they feel it's the right and bounding thing to do to release that information to the public, when in fact it doesn't remain in the national interest. And then perhaps that's the interplay here—the individual working in the intelligence space probably does not have the overview of what is in the good of the Realm of the nation and hence why that carve-out has been used.