We have a system where people have actually broken down as a consequence of this kind of cavalier policy, which in disguise it calls itself "fairness" and it calls itself "redistribution to working people." Good, hardworking people apparently are going to buy a house with their $8. They are not. They are going to buy a house because this Government is going to support them into houses, because we are going to build houses, because we are going to actually produce emergency housing, and, actually, we're not leaving them in cars, and this is a very, very important difference. So, yes, I think it is an ideological difference. I think it is a clear difference between this side of the House and the National Party and ACT. And I think what Mr Seymour has said when he said, "Let's actually give this bill a go and add to it."—a flat tax that actually means that the poorer people pay an obscene amount more than the rich people—it actually bares, it shows, what is actually going on in that party, and I hope New Zealanders take account of tonight's comments because that kind of flat tax is actually about putting a lot more money into the hands of the wealthiest people in our economy. And guess what, Mr Woodhouse? They will not spend it in the economy; they will go to Fiji, if they can. They will go and spend it on expensive cars, they will not actually spend it in our economy in the way that our poorer people will.