But more importantly, the concern for the Greens lies on the second outlined objective, which is a distributional objective. Of course, I alluded to inequality as rampant in wealth in this country just earlier, but here it's defined as, "The Government is seeking to raise this additional revenue in a way which has as little as possible impact on low- and middle-income earners and thus increases the progressivity of the tax system." Absolutely, you can see iron-clad in here that there is an intention, and, in fact, it will be achieved with regards to the progressivity of the income tax system, but not of the tax system as a whole. That's because we aren't, of course, increasing—by virtue of this legislation as drafted, there's no proposed changes to anybody who is earning less than $180,000 per annum, on their income, on paper. But it doesn't deal with, or grapple with, the fact that by virtue of potentially continuing to inflate this problem of rampant wealth inequality in this country, the costs, particularly the cost of housing, very well may go up in this country, which disproportionately impacts those low and middle income earners.