Now, we made it very clear all the way through, and I mentioned it in my first reading speech—I said, at that point, when I hadn't had a chance to fully take in this bill, that I did consider that there might be a problem around the Minister, effectively, setting the base price at the auction, and whether or not that was the right thing to do. We again argued those points throughout our committee stage and second reading speeches, where we did say that this is not a pure emissions trading scheme (ETS); this is something that is moving far more towards a carbon tax. Although it's not there, the waters are definitely muddied. What we've ended up with is very much a hybrid situation where we're not quite at pure ETS; we're not quite at carbon tax, but we're certainly moving in that direction. What we're talking about is hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of revenue, which is, effectively, being paid for by the people of New Zealand in many ways, but especially at the fuel pump and through electricity prices. 