Let me start by giving credit to the Attorney-General. I have said in recent times, including on the public record, that I believe that some of the section 7 reports produced under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act have landed in a different place than I would have myself. As it happens, I think that this particular report that has been produced, where he's identified an apparent inconsistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, is probably correct, actually. So credit where it's due, in relation to the advice that there may be a double jeopardy and retrospectivity element that would offend those provisions. 