The other question that the member raises is in relation to the public information campaign. I do note that assumptions have been made that the public knew about the state of their water system or perhaps had access to more information than in fact they did. A lot of people, to a large degree, don't really know the health of their water system until they don't have access to water or the water is brown or it tastes funny or there's a leak outside of their house or when they turn the tap on, nothing's happening and it's not happening for a long time. That's the extent of the public knowledge around their water and the health of their water infrastructure network. So we're kind of faced with trying to ensure that we've got good communications going to people who, at a very surface level, that's the extent of knowledge they have of their system. To elected representatives who we would believe would have greater knowledge, but, actually, around a lot of council tables, they contract out the decision making in this critical area to consultants. So even many of our elected representatives didn't have the granular level of knowledge that we're debating in this House today. [Bell rings] Madam Chair?