Through the committee of the whole House stage, there were a couple of Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) that ACT supported. We supported SOP 82 under Louisa Wall, and we thought that this was important, and we're glad that it went through. That actually changed the interpretation of a victim so that an individual receiving a harmful digital communication of another, not just the victim themselves, can be included. This was important when we heard of the story of a son receiving intimate visual communications of his mother from another man. This change allows for that son to be included as an individual that is also now a victim.