So, turning to the key issues raised, some submitters were concerned that the bill could discourage investment, negatively impacting forestry investment and our climate change goals. However, the bill isn't about stopping investment in forestry; rather, it's making sure that the investments demonstrate benefits to New Zealand. Productive investment is and remains welcome. To achieve this, the bill requires investors to pass the "benefit to New Zealand" test. This allows consideration of a wide range of factors, including the economy, the environment, historic heritage, and public access to the land. In respect of the environment, I should say that it is deliberately limited, because it's not the Resource Management Act and it should not be primarily an environmental test under the Overseas Investment Act. That is for environmental legislation that applies to overseas investors and New Zealand and visitors alike. 