The information here for the commissioner, I believe, is either the same or similar to what was put in place for the wage subsidy scheme, which is just to prevent any potential abuses or misuses or the commissioner feeling that they are obliged to publish some details that might compromise safety or national security or matters like that. So that's the sort of desirable point, and the line about disclosure being reasonably necessary for the purposes of the administration of the scheme merely aligns it with the fact that we've taken a policy decision that we will do that. So I'm happy to put on the record of the House for the member today that the same level of transparency that we saw for the wage subsidy scheme is enabled through this clause.