I also want to speak and just reflect on the Attorney-General's report against the current Act, or the changes made by the Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Act in 2018, for their consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. The Attorney-General, in his report, notes that he was satisfied that the limitations of rights were demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. He considered both section 14, the right to freedom of expression, and section 17, the right to freedom of association. While against both, in that report, he noted prima facie rights issues, and he then went on to consider whether there were justified limitations under section 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. As he considered his assessment, he considered whether the limitations were rationally connected to an important objective, and he considered whether they caused a minimal infringement on the right that was proportionate to that stated objective.