I heard the Minister say that the rationale for not going for general cover was because it might lead to different outcomes. We also heard that between different areas, different language is used to describe injuries, so we may well end up with that difference in cover anyway, even with that specified list. There's a real potential it'll create more bureaucracy and potential for disentitlement as practitioners use that different language to refer to different injuries. It's also, for us, a really fundamental point of the separation of the physical from the mental from the whānau actually negates a Te Ao Māori worldview. So we're embedding a Pākehā world view on to a system that is supposed to be providing support for all people in this country. We think we could've done a bit better than that, and a generalised approach that included whānau would've been a way to do that.