The majority of the remaining recommendations that the committee suggested clarified existing provisions, increased transparency, or were technical in nature. But there are a couple that I'd just like to highlight here today. The first one is around the "safe harbour" provisions. When the bill was first introduced, it included a provision intended to ensure that online content hosts were held liable under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classifications Act 1993 where they had knowledge that objectionable content was being hosted on their platforms and refused to take this down. In order to achieve this, the bill recommended removing those "safe harbour" provisions that were under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 for online content hosts. Those provisions do provide protection to online content hosts from liability when illegal content is posted on their platform without their knowledge, providing they take certain steps set out in the Act.