There was a debate during the kind of final passages of that bill around audiovisual link (AVL) systems. The genesis of that debate didn't necessarily lie in fact. The numbers that were being bandied around, from my understanding—is those are courtrooms that have fixed AVL facilities within them. But a rather large majority of those that was being said that they don't have any AVL actually have portable monitors that can be used in different spaces within a courthouse and that they do have a capacity. I don't have the numbers on me. I think it's as little as nine may have little or no AVL facilities at all, but a vast majority of our courthouses and other facilities that we use that require AVL do have it. It might not be fixed, it's mobile, but they certainly have the ability to hold audiovisual link proceedings in order to make sure that it's as efficient as possible.