It does remove an ambiguity in the current law, and it's an ambiguity that's existed for far too long, in my view. Bringing a clear definition, for instance, simply to the word "child", in terms of eligibility for bereavement leave, I think is an important thing, and the fact that this House has not done that previously is a sorry state of affairs, to be honest. I would hope that, in future, parliamentarians in this place will have the boldness to actually address issues of this sort in a far more mature, compassionate way than maybe has been done in the past. 