The other issue which is in the bill, which is very different from the bill that I brought to Parliament last year, is the fact that this bill now requires someone to go and commit an offence prior to the courts being able to put in place a firearms prohibition order. Now, I don't know about other members on the other side of the House, but I would've thought the police should be given the ability to put these in place against people who have already committed violent offences, so that they have less access to firearms, so we can protect the public. But, in this bill, it's saying, "No, no, no. We want these people—before we're going to put in place the FPO—to actually go out and commit another serious offence and create more victims of crime." So instead of actually trying to be preventative and trying to prevent crime, we are actually saying, "Well, if you commit a serious violent crime, we'll give you an FPO. But until you've done it, well, fair game!" I mean, that's the reality. So I just think that's something which, actually, New Zealanders will be very concerned about it, and I think people are going to be submitting on that point because, actually, this bill should be preventative. 