As the Opposition spokesperson for women, I am firmly in support of this bill. It goes without saying that the unauthorised disclosure of intimate visual recordings is a form of gender-based violence, and very shamefully for this country, it affects women at a significantly higher rate. I think, as has been canvased already, the societal consequences tend to fall more heavily on the female victim. I personally could not imagine a more traumatising form of manipulation or abuse, but sadly, though, studies have also indicated that it's our rainbow community, and those youth that Ginny Andersen mentioned—the 16- to 29-year-olds, who are at a very high risk of experiencing this type of what can only be described as sexual exploitation. I understand—and I didn't sit on the Justice Committee, but having read some of the submissions—that throughout the select committee hearing, as was canvased by many, many submitters, it is clear that any non-consensual sharing of intimate recordings could cause harm and should therefore be an offence. It is very clear that if there is no consent, then this is a crime.