The other thing I find about this overseas investment bill, and I've spoken on it a few times already—the thing I find about the Government's attitude to overseas investment is this paternalistic approach. So if I'm an entrepreneur and I decide that I'm going to set up a new business, and I might have to buy a facility with a bit of land on it and I take all the risks of setting up a brand new facility, all the financial risks, all the market risks—I might mortgage my house to do it, which is the normal way that people start—and I get over many, many years to a situation where it is a substantial business and a foreign investor wants to come in, somehow the members on that side, the Government members, think that they have the right to say, "Well, you know that business that you took all the risk on and we as the Government didn't do anything about it or didn't support you, you did it of your own right?" Somehow, under certain circumstances, you want to say that that business is so important that some Minister—and we don't even know who the Minister might be; it might be David Parker today and it might be someone after 19 September—probably with very few commercial skills, sitting in Wellington, now has the divine right, and it is a divine right in the sense that he or she can decide whether or not you can sell that business to a foreigner. That paternalistic attitude around it I find slightly grating.