David Seymour: Point of order. Mr Speaker, I would never argue with you; I accept your ruling wholly. But I would draw your attention to the Standing Orders, which have the same requirements on the answers. Now, in the answer most recently given by the Prime Minister, rather than addressing the expenditure on benefit, she tried to argue that benefits were going down, while accepting that the money spent was going to go up. Now, those two can't both be true. It was pointless argumentation, it was completely superfluous, and yet she got away with it. I just ask that there be some equivalency between the answers and the questions.