I want to speak, just in summary, to some of the points that have been made in dialogue around how we pay for education moving forward—particularly noting, as Dr Shane Reti did, that we are looking down the barrel of taking on more debt as a nation, and we have to be quite thoughtful about what we choose to spend that money on, and I've had an interesting dialogue with a member of the public on my Facebook page, of all places, about why it should be the place of so-called working people to pay for those who are going through a university education. Here, if I may quote just from the response that I gave this individual, they said, "It is the education that ultimately improves society for all of us, not just the one student. Education builds public infrastructure, technological innovation, stronger and more resilient communities. The argument regularly goes that those who pursue higher education should treat it as a financial bet to earn more in the future, but that's simply not the case for teachers, nurses, or many of the other roles that we have taken for granted historically, who do not do it for the money nor the status, nor the glory, but because those people want to contribute. So why should those who actively improve society for all of us carry the anchor of debt? 