In wondering that, I think, perhaps, one of the reasons was that many of these offenders and the victims are known to each other. I think probably the whole family were involved in the process, the offender or the patient—we don't know what terminology to use—was actually known to the family themselves. But I think as society's probably moved on a little, and I think of my own career the number of these instances I've been involved in where there were absolute complete strangers involved. I do remember one Saturday night in Christchurch, as suburban a place as you could possibly see, a young man went in there with an axe and ruined a family's life. The father of the family was killed. That family would never have known what happened because it didn't come to trial. As you'll see, many members have spoken before about it, previously what would happen there would be an agreement. The worst part of this is that the trial process, as traumatic as it often can be, is also something of a closure. Many of these families are actually also denied sitting through and seeing a trial process and seeing a judge make a determination. While it didn't bring back their loved one, it actually helped them on a journey moving on. So, again, not only were they denied that, they were also denied any knowledge of what went on with the offender.