I also acknowledge that these changes represent a significant shift and the legal profession has some concerns about the preservation of defendants' rights. Trial fairness is non-negotiable, and it gives out justice system its legitimacy. It is not in anyone's interests to jeopardise the fairness and robustness of verdicts, but I do not think that justice is a zero sum. Improving complainants' experiences procedurally does not automatically entail restricting defendants' fundamental rights. The interests of justice and the right to a fair trial are paramount and explicit consideration in parts of the bill that we have heard most concern about. The flip side must be: if a procedure is not contrary to the interests of justice and the circumstances of the case, and if it does not risk the fairness of a trial, how can we deny complainants the better treatment that these changes will provide? Complainants have an integral role in bringing perpetrators to justice, thereby reducing future harm, a societal benefit. They do so despite the harm that they have experienced. We have a positive duty to support them on that unavoidably difficult journey, and this bill is one part of how we fulfil our duty to that. I commend the bill to the House.