I'd also like to know from the Minister—who's saying she has listened to a lot of stakeholders and is engaged and has had the conversations—if any of those stakeholders asked for just these small changes and said they were fine with the monitor staying as a departmental agency. I have not spoken to one person who is advocating for change on this who has had that position. So I do think, if the Government is listening, that is an absolutely core point in the opposition—as well as the timing point. I understand the Minister's saying that's not in scope in this part of the debate at the moment, but the fact that we are debating it does mean that the timing when everybody said, "Please, hold off. Don't do this now. Wait until the royal commission." Ensure that those voices and the experiences of people who have—and there are almost a quarter of a million of those people—been hurt in our supposed care who are telling us what we need to do to fix the system can be heard. The advice that's informed this bill, which we were told links to the royal commission, was at such an early stage, before those voices had really been heard.