My concern that I raised in the committee stage was around whether that was still too restrictive in terms of not allowing for other uses, such as shearers to use those same accommodation premises, or school camp groups, for example, when they're not being used by forestry groups. The Minister didn't seem to understand that; he certainly didn't address or give an answer to the committee on that, and so that is one area I will be interested to see how that is interpreted. My view is that there should be scope for a slightly more lenient allowance under that category to recognise that whilst the main purposes of that accommodation or neighbouring general curtilage group of buildings in that area is for forestry use, there may be some additional uses that would also still be appropriate and wouldn't negatively impact on the ability to use that accommodation for forestry purposes. So I would hope that that would be looked upon favourably, to allow those sorts of things to happen, still, in remote rural areas.