So it is to ask Minister Parker again: what was the consideration given—or was there consideration given—to moving a tax rate so that those people who are in work would only be paying tax that would get them back to that $31,096? It seems to me that that would put them somewhere, under current tax rates, in the upper 40s, or perhaps just mid to upper 40s. If their rate was lower, then they may, in fact, keep a little bit more than the $31,096, but administratively it's got to be a heck of a lot cheaper for the wider tax base.