In respect of the question that Mr O'Connor raised about clause 26 and the good-faith provisions, I think the important point to note here is that we're talking about how good faith must apply during bargaining. In fact, in clause 26(1A) it's very specifically set out what those provisions are. I just think these are basically things that are very difficult for a reasonable person to argue about as being conditions for reasonable conduct between parties in bargaining. Parties should use their best endeavours to agree a process for conducting the bargaining in an effective and efficient manner. They should agree to meet with each other. They should consider and respond to proposals from one another. They should continue to bargain about matters if they haven't quite got to a point of agreement and try to find a way of getting through that. They should recognise the role and the authority of another person, not undermine one another.