And the other piece is that a CEO in a local council can actually write off those rates arrears. And they're the two big bits. But when you look into it, it turns out that the aggregation and the separation of blocks of land, the adjustment of uniform rates, and also the write-offs can all be done under existing legislation as it exists today. And there are good examples of councils and mayors that are doing it today. We had Lawrence Yule talk about it in the first reading. He says, "I've been a mayor where I've remitted those rates, so I know it can be done. I've been a mayor when we have put the uniform charges together on several properties, so the rates per property have been reduced. It can be done." And likewise, there was a quote from Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Ward in Auckland, who just sort of said, "Nearly all the changes proposed are already delivered by Auckland Council through its rating policy and Māori land rates remission and postponement policy." And so that's the kind of question that we've got as the second question: what is the fundamental added value or incremental benefit that we're getting from this piece of legislation? So that's kind of important, because what's the point of going through all this process if, at the end of it, we're delivering very little marginal benefit to actually get the goal that we're trying to create, which is greater productivity?