I can make similar remarks about the other main policy of the bill, which is to get rid of provisions that prevent scrutiny of certain conduct involving intellectual property. So long as there are possible instances—competition harm safe harbours will undermine the Act's promise to protect competition. As I hope I've made clear already, I do not believe practices involving intellectual property are always anti-competitive. Intellectual property rights are typically used in ways that advance the aims of competition law. But it's not safe to assume this conduct is never anti-competitive just because it involves intellectual property. The bill repeals these provisions to reflect the Government's view that intellectual property rights should be treated no differently under competition law to any other form of property.