Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): Thank you, Madam Chair. The advice of the briefing of the Minister in late March or early April is consistent with the time line provided to the committee by the chief executive in his letter dated 17 December. Although, I do note that he didn't decide to formally reopen the investigation until 13 May. But what we're asked now to believe is that, having been briefed on what the Speaker himself describes as a serious sexual assault, that he drew no nexus between that information and a subsequent 30-second conversation he'd had with the chief executive. The Francis Review, which highlighted this very fact—that it was an entire coincidence that on the day that he was talking about the Francis Review that he was talking about a rapist being in the building and that the threat had been cleared by that afternoon. That he simply didn't know that they were one and the same thing—I'm sorry, it frankly fails the sniff test. 