SIMON O'CONNOR: Well, the problem is I have read it, and that's actually probably one of the fundamental issues, because the Minister—sorry, for those listening—said I'd better read it. The funny thing is, I've read it multiple times. I've read the original, I've compared it with the existing, I've gone and talked to QCs, even, who are giving us quite interesting opinions of where this could go—even talking to justices and judges who say, "Well, actually, with the way it's defined at the moment, we could end up with an array of interpretations."