The point I was going to make is in my capacity as the shadow Attorney-General, and to draw attention to the fact that one of the things the select committee would have to take into account is the fact that there has been an Attorney-General's report—and the Attorney-General is in the House at the moment—a section 7 report concluding that the bill is inconsistent with section 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and therefore cannot be justified under section 5. Now, I acknowledge that there is precedent for the Attorney-General's reports, under Governments of both complexions, to be ignored. The Attorney-General has a job to do and he has done that, and I acknowledge that with respect. The point I am making, though, is that the select committee also needs to take that into account. That would be factored into the report that they would send back to the House. It may well be that they would say, "We respect the Attorney-General's conclusion, but nevertheless we believe that matters of public interest override it and therefore we will continue." They've got to have the opportunity to do that work.