I agree with the Minister it's far better when you're trying to balance various rights, because quite often rights can sometimes be conflicting and to work your way through that—it's appropriate for elected representatives to do that. As the Minister said, if they get the judgments wrong or the public doesn't agree with them, they get thrown out and that's how the system works. I, for one, think we should do that on a regular basis every three years rather than four. And only because I just don't think in a system that doesn't have so many checks and balances, doesn't have an Upper House and other issues, I think there's a good argument for reasonably regular opportunities for the population to have their say, but that's another matter for another day. 