I want to take a moment to talk about the zero-suicide approach, because people get stuck on the term "zero suicide". This approach is less about the target and more what sits behind it. It's a continuous quality improvement process, where we look to see what works in each of the sectors. This is bigger than health. It needs to be rolled out across all of Government, because what will work for suicide prevention for a 60-year-old dairy farmer in North Canterbury is different to what will work for suicide prevention for a young teenager in South Auckland, and this is the value in a zero-suicide approach—a continuous quality improvement approach that is not a one-size-fits-all. It looks to look at all the differentiations on how it can make a difference, and we know it works. It was launched in 2012 in the United States, it's been adopted in the US, the UK, and Australia. This will work, but what it's going to take is political will, and what we're talking about here today, we have representatives from each of the parties, is to debate how we are going to come together and we are going to endorse a zero-suicide approach. We're not going to play politics and say, "Well, you set a target, you didn't meet it, you're not good enough." It's about what sits behind it: the process and the policy, because I firmly believe, in the 53rd Parliament, New Zealanders have spoken. They want us to work together. They want us to make a difference. They want us to put politics aside and to agree on policy that has a long-term setting.