So one of the questions I'd like to put to the Minister is: given these overarching powers to create new regulations on the hoof, in effect, why was consideration not given to specifically make any changes subject to consultation? And it may be a "must" or a "may", but I'd prefer if it would have been a "must". First of all, the Chief Human Rights Commissioner, Professor Paul Hunt, would have been a natural person to specify in that case, as a way to make sure that any of these provisions are actually appropriate for New Zealand and for New Zealanders who, some are, quite naturally—and I know that my good colleague from the ACT Party is very much on the same line of thinking here that people do have freedoms. I think it's important that they are protected and that bills like this do not overreach and actually unnecessarily impinge on people's activities to be able to go about things that they like to do on a day-to-day basis. 