As other speakers have noted, one of the other key changes in the legislation is around the counterfactual test. That counterfactual test arose from the courts in the Crafar cases. It was built, really, on the analytical framework that the Commerce Commission use when assessing anti-competitive behaviour. A counterfactual test is quite hypothetical, because the decision makers under the Overseas Investment Act had to consider what would be the benefits to New Zealand of the status quo and what would occur with the investment and without the investment. It got to be quite hypothetical and somewhat divorced from reality. This bill, in simplifying the test to what it will be before the potential overseas investment and what it would be after the proposed overseas investment is actually a clearer framework and a clearer criteria for Ministers and the Overseas Investment Office to make decisions on applications.