Now, to take away the democracy in the commencement date does that, because the Minister has made it very clear in this Chamber in the last half an hour that the reason behind this commencement date is to take away unnecessary expense. It takes away local democracy. That's what this bill is about. The Minister just admitted it. I would like the Minister to explain what she considers to be unnecessary expense. That is the fundamental reason why they've got a commencement date—that is the one we are seeing here today. How she defines "unnecessary expense", how that actually relates to local democracy and decision-making processes, and then, finally, what sanctions do the public have if they don't have the ability to actually make their voice known? Just say the public have a different point of view from the councillors—shouldn't they be listened to? Shouldn't they have the ultimate sanction like they do at election every three years? 