Initially, when I saw this bill, I thought "Yep, this is quite a simple bill dealing specifically with two covenants that the Commerce Commission had actually identified.", and they are the restrictive covenants that actually put restrictions on how land can be actually developed for land that might be attached to a shopping complex that the supermarket doesn't actually—or the grocery entity, the two big duopoly might be connected to. They could potentially put restrictions on how those lands can be developed, to make sure that competition doesn't actually develop. The other is the exclusive covenant provision that is often placed in, for example, big shopping complexes where they don't actually want another competitor in the same complex—for example, let's say in a Westfield shopping complex, they might have one grocery entity and they don't actually want their competitor to actually have leases on that area.