CHRIS BISHOP: I was young once, yeah, exactly. We will be supporting this bill through first reading with the caveat that this process is a shocker—it really is. I've expressed privately, and I'm happy to say publicly, our disappointment to the Minister at this. To have a bill drafted up, go through Cabinet on a Monday, be introduced to the House the next day, and then set down for first reading under urgency the next day is not a good process. It was justifiable last year. You could make a case it was justifiable last year because we were dealing with the teeth of the pandemic and people had to move quickly and legislation was taking effect and having effects that we needed to delay, fair enough. But a year later or more than a year later—18 months later—to not have the i's dotted and the t's crossed, so to speak, to use the vernacular, is not good practice. And we will support it to first reading, because we accept the case that there are a variety of different things that are happening that it would probably be good for Parliament to delay or alter or make changes to because COVID has had various effects on things and the alert levels are having those effects, but I want to say to the House now that the Finance and Expenditure Committee will have to do a very thorough vetting job and iron out some of the fishhooks in it before we in the National Party will support this bill at second reading and beyond.