The whole issue about the regulations in the regulation power set out in the bill is it is absolutely wide-ranging, and so even if you accepted the principle, what's set out under clause 4(5) is tantamount to allowing a free carte blanche to officials, who will lobby their Minister to get an outcome that may be appropriate and easy to achieve but is actually wrong and maybe, in many cases, I suspect, will always be unfair for many users of those registers. I just reiterate that we do not support this, and in fact it's interesting some of the commentary that has been already written about this pretty uninspiring bill that was passed under urgency. Already, people have written—particularly, for instance, Ian Llewellyn from BusinessDesk: "While the original validation law was passed, officials said it was 'unusual' for the Government to be retrospectively correcting a historic mistake, but the harm done was minimal and the Companies Office has been acting in good faith to keep overall costs down."