But the most important thing is—and I want to, in my very short contribution, touch on that—that the main concerns that we heard through the submissions were, in fact, addressed. The way that we reported this bill back to the House made a couple of changes through the Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) that the Minister spoke about in the last debate. So that was the concern on the council potentially being able to set unreasonable fee increases and teachers' fees being used to fund the council's leadership functions. People didn't agree with it, we heard it, the Minister agreed, the Minister made changes. While those changes sat slightly outside the scope of this original bill, the concerns were addressed by way of the SOP debated last week, and so the SOP made it very clear that the leadership functions cannot be paid for by teachers' fees or levies.