One of the questions that was asked before, about the introduction of the victim impact statements—and, again, standing in the shoes of a victim: that they are a victim of a crime through no fault of their own, and so many of them have no or very little understanding of the justice system, and definitely, probably, less of the health system around mental health. As we as a country have progressed the rights of victims, one of the areas that has become more and more important for—and "closure", in this instance, just sounds trite, but I can't think of a better word. The ability of the victim to give a victim impact statement in court is a really important part of the process for them to resolve some of the trauma that they have dealt with by the very nature of being a victim. That trauma exists whether you are a victim of a sane person or an insane person. So these amendments in Part 4 provide more of that equivalence between the health and justice system that we talked about before, but very much in the ability of a victim to get some form of closure or to get to the next stage of their grief and trauma.