I don't think the Minister actually understands what he's actually asking for. He says it can only be used for good. Well, I'm sure there are lots of authoritarian Governments that have said that very thing. That's not the point, Minister. The point is we have these laws, and we don't have "Henry VIII" powers just because you're a decent bloke and you're not going to use them inappropriately. That's not the point. Every action that the Minister has, particularly when he has these special directions powers, will have some effect. It might be positive—it might only be positive—but they will have an effect, and that is why we normally have processes. Otherwise, we would have only good laws that the Minister could make and change as they chose as they went along. That's not how our system works, and, quite frankly, Minister, to get the powers that you're seeking we have not heard a convincing argument yet. All we've heard is a whole lot of bluster about things that aren't backed up by numbers or facts. I think even your officials aren't looking that confident there, and I think that says it all, quite frankly. So I'm very interested to hear your response. 