The bill updates the Act to take urgent steps to prevent and mitigate harms being caused by objectionable publications. The objectives are to ensure that the Government and internet service providers and online content hosts can swiftly and consistently take action against objectionable material. Now, I need to be clear that when I say "objectionable", this is already referring to a legally defined category of content, which is already defined in our primary legislation. This is the worst type of material that is already illegal in New Zealand. It includes child exploitation material and violent extremist and terrorist content. Now, the bar for determining objectionable material is already extremely high, and it is the job of the Chief Censor to apply the legal test. In that legal test, the Chief Censor already takes freedom of expression considerations into account. Once a publication is deemed objectionable, it is illegal to possess the content or distribute it; that already exists in law today. I say that because people have got that confused, that this bill was about redefining that definition that exists in current law; it doesn't. We're talking about something that already exists in law.