I find it deeply offensive when language is used such as "Mothers make decisions in spite of what the medical professionals might say." when they talk about a diagnosis around Down syndrome. That language is the discriminatory language which then gets applied in our community against those mothers and those fathers who do have children who are Down syndrome and who pour their hearts and their souls and their lives into raising them. I just say to members in this House to be careful with the language they choose. Choosing language like "in spite of"—"in spite of what the doctor said", "in spite of what the scan said"—I find deeply offensive. I know that the family which Louisa Wall mentioned—and I think that's offensive language to them as well in terms of what she says and the language that she chose when she talked about Down syndrome children and the choices that parents have to make. I implore Parliament to consider these Supplementary Order Papers, which seek to put in place provisions on the issue of not just discrimination on the basis of disability but also discrimination on the basis of sex. I know my colleague Dr Parmjeet Parmar brought an SOP on this issue, which was voted down, and I just want to acknowledge Melissa Lee for continuing the advocacy on this issue of sex selection. We know that this is an issue which is seen around the world.