In terms of some of the things that the Minister actually said, he began his speech by saying that, you know, he didn't want to define the unconscionable conduct. That was at the very first beginning sentence of his speech tonight. The issue is that back in 2013, the Fair Trading Amendment Act—actually, I'll go back. The bill follows the updates of the New Zealand Fair Trading Act and the Consumer Guarantees Act and the Auctioneers Act, which was passed between 2010 and 2015. The Fair Trading Act went through the select committee process, and the select committee at the time opted not to include the unconscionable conduct law, which was similar to that that existed in Australia. The reason why they opted not to include it at the time was because they wanted to wait for a body of case law built up around what unconscionable conduct actually means. Now this Labour Government is actually introducing this law without the body of case law, I believe. I just think it is unfair for people to actually spend more money, because when laws are created, regulations are actually created for businesses. It means, particularly for small businesses, it's extra burden on them, extra money to figure out what unconscionable conduct actually means. It means money for lawyers. Lawyers can actually, you know, test this in a court of law, but for businesses, it means extra burden, extra costs. I think this Minister is actually putting those costs on businesses that should not have to spend that kind of money. When good laws are created, they shouldn't have to spend money on legal advice to define what unconscionable conduct means.