I want to move on to the question of fair pay agreements, where in the Estimates there is extra funding for the potential use of taxpayers funding for particularly the union side, but also the employer representations in these proposed fair pay agreements over the next four years, about $6 million or so. We've traversed this and we, obviously, don't support the fair pay agreements as in principle we're just adding rigidity to labour markets at a time when we need flexibility and innovation more than ever. But I'd be interested to know from the Minister whether he'd given any thought in this legislation—if they were to ram it through, there are a couple of categories of things that need to be either mandatorily included in any fair pay agreement to be considered by parties or optionally considered—whether he'd given any thought to ensuring that discussion and debate around the issue of productivity in the sector or the industry should be a mandatory part of the discussion. Because if you're discussing all sorts of things such as pay and conditions and hours and, potentially, superannuation and safety and a whole bunch of things—research. But nowhere is it ever mentioned, this issue of the productivity of the sector, and I think it should be—if you were to press ahead with this—part of the discussion. I'd like to know from the Minister whether he agrees with that.