There are farmers across the country—we talked about it in the second reading and in the committee stage as well—who are fundamentally invested in indigenous biodiversity, they've taken waterways land, done riparian planting, there's lots of general land use for trees, there's large families with multiple dwellings on farms as well, and so the question, fundamentally, is why aren't the benefits and incentives that we're talking about in this bill being extended to everybody across this country? And I just still don't fundamentally understand why the Government comes at it through a much narrower lens of just looking at this through Māori land, rather than saying, actually, there's an opportunity to actually solve a problem across the whole of the country, so why don't we go do that? Why don't we fundamentally look at doing something bigger, bolder, and braver as a consequence? So we don't, fundamentally, I guess, understand why we can't move this across to all general land-owners. Why does it have to be specific to Māori land only?