So in that light, having heard that the Minister was first informed of the possible problems with the Auditor-General on 16 June, and it wasn't until middle of last week that we were informed of this, but a day later we got a bill that, from my reckoning, hasn't changed since it was sent to us on Thursday last week, the issue—there has been no consideration in terms of looking at, if there was a delay of two months, how would we ensure that, from the Government's perspective, key Government organisations were actually audited within the due specified date? This was a central question that you and I did discuss, Minister, and, unfortunately, the piece of legislation that was sent to us on the Thursday—and still remains the same—hasn't changed, and what we understood that if there was to be a delay then there would be a prioritisation around it. I am therefore surprised that there's been no attempt—and I've heard what the Minister said before, that we shouldn't unnecessarily constrain the Auditor-General in terms of prioritisation. That is one argument. But actually, from a Government's perspective, another argument is there are certain key, critical organisations that should be actually audited because they're absolutely essential. 