SIMON COURT: Thank you, Madam Speaker, for clarifying that. But it is difficult to hear home truths, and when you're between a rock and a hard place I understand that it must be difficult to bring this type of legislation under urgency to the House, essentially asking forgiveness on one hand and asking permission on the other: "Please can we take it to select committee for another go at this thing that we didn't get right?" And the reason that the legislation that we are amending is so flawed is because it addresses a problem that is entirely of the Government's making. There are businesses in New Zealand that are exposed to international markets. They produce things here, they do very well, they minimise their emissions here in New Zealand, and they export them to other countries which probably don't have the same level of environmental controls that we do. So it's very important that New Zealand continues to have those businesses here to support jobs and communities. But the issue with the emissions trading scheme, as it's been set up by this Government, is that in order to preserve those export-exposed businesses and those import-exposed businesses which make things like cement and steel here in New Zealand, and to protect them from the risk that a high carbon price, which is the thing that this Government has said it wants to achieve, to protect those businesses they need to drop a whole lot of carbon credits on to the market. But, of course, as those familiar with markets will know, if you suddenly release a massive supply of a commodity on to the market you'll tank the price, and that's why the market that this Government has set up is rigged and that's why they have proposed to amend it in this way.