We also have, post that period, a number of tai-ā-pure that have been set up around the coastline and they are very much the local fishing interests, the local community, and Ngāi Tahu are involved in that as well, and they have been enormously successful. We did have an arrangement around the Whanganui River and that has been successful. And then also in the Ureweras; very successful. And the reason for that is because it is a management of a specific location, specific area, with a very specific purpose. ECan has a very broad purpose, a huge purpose, and much of it affects commercial activity that takes place on the Canterbury Plains and into South Canterbury, right up into North Canterbury as well, up to the Alps. So a very, very broad mandate that they have. And the question that sits in my head is: why would we say that this particular part of the community has a much greater interest in the environmental outcomes for that area? If it's just on the basis of principle, which says, "Well, the Treaty demands it.", then show us how that demand is being represented by this Government—because it's not. The Government has run a mile from this bill and allowed it to go through as a private bill. They'll go round and tell people quietly who aren't happy with it—and there were 1,600 submitters who weren't happy with it—"Oh, look, we had no choice. It was what they wanted; we had to give it to them." They, of course, being ECan itself. 