First, may I place on record what I would hope would be an obvious wish that harassment not be visited upon anyone, at any time, anywhere, for any reason, but that general desire and hope is not the stuff of legislation. We are concerned, of course, in this House, or should always be concerned in this House, with the specific application and implication of laws that we pass in this place. So within my time, I'd like to focus a little bit on some arguments around what this bill might add to the statute book relative to those provisions in other laws that are already on that; second, to give a bit of context in terms of the constitutional interplay that we had with the Attorney-General's original vet and then discussion, effectively, with the House through the select committee on the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act implications; obviously then to look at the specific provisions of the bill, including and especially the extent to which it may capture behaviour that may or may not be intended by the Parliament to be caught; and then, finally, a reflection on the unique nature of the services that have been—protesting about the nature of the services at stake in this particular bill, as opposed to protest more generally. 