That brings me to this bill, which addresses the issues of unwanted digital communications and child exploitation. Sadly—in fact I'd probably use a stronger word than "sadly" and say "tragically"—it's not uncommon for adults to try and contact children and young people online for bad purposes; and the purposes can include the procurement of graphic pictures through to the sexual grooming for actual sexual conduct that, again, the member has spoken of—whose bill this is in the name of. I'm sure the entire House stands as one in condemning such behaviour. This bill, if passed—it seems to me—would assist with adding criminal offences and criminal penalties for such terrible behaviour. I note what the member has said, "It's based on Australian law"—that's not always a bad thing and I'm sure, actually, to some extent copying what they've done is a good thing. I'll be interested to see, at select committee, the experience a little way in—of Australia—given they have a similar law.