I want to speak briefly about the assumptions that are too often made about the radius of consent. Consent to one act doesn't mean consent to a second. Consent to taking or sharing a recording of an act doesn't equate to consent to it being shared further. Consent to being in a recording does not transfer ownership rights to a recording. So why has society allowed this for so long? We've grown from roots that have historically shamed women for sexual activity—actually, both consensual and non-consensual. In this context, blurring the radius of consent seems to matter less, as moral judgment follows regardless. Here's where we have more work to do. Every act has an ecology. For those posting intimate recordings without consent online, they are indeed individually responsible. But we have work to do to ensure that the culture we promote in schools, at workplaces, and online makes it clear that shaming by use of intimate imagery is never permissible. I hope soon, if asked "Surely that's already an offence?", instead of saying "Maybe", we can simply say "Of course it is". I commend this bill to the House.