Now, my submission to you, Mr Speaker, is that that was an invalid process and outside of Standing Orders, particularly Standing Order 141, which says, "The Speaker asks members to answer 'Aye' or 'No' to the question and states the result of the voice vote. Any member present may then call for a further vote to be held." That did not happen. Furthermore, in Speakers' rulings we have a requirement, at Speaker's ruling 66/2, that "When the Speaker declares the result on the voices, that, unless challenged, is final and may not be disputed." Speaker's ruling 67/1 states that "If members want a party vote, they must challenge the Speaker at the time when the result is declared. A party vote does not follow automatically because a voice is given for the Noes." In the case that we're discussing, I'm sure it would equally apply if the voice was for the Ayes.