Now, the Minister has also admitted that a decision would be made in July. And my question to him, which I will examine in the committee of the whole House, is why July? And why, if Statistics New Zealand are so well prepared, would it be necessary to make the decision seven months or eight months out from the due date? Because we can't predict what will happen. At this stage it's eminently possible, given the way COVID is tracking, to be able to hold the census in March next year; if nothing changes, why are we going to make a decision to delay the census for a whole year eight months out from it? Now, the shape the bill is coming back to the House in has that very broad amendment. Now, I'm not averse, the National Party is not averse, to an amendment to the bill to allow the delay. But I think the way clause 34 is currently rewritten is far too broad. There needs to be a reason for the delay. So I will be moving an amendment to the bill at the committee of the whole House to specify the conditions that will need to exist in order for a delay to occur. They will include things like a national state of emergency, a major pandemic—such as we've got very recent experience in—and civil unrest, and something else.