It would be interesting to know, under current rates, what does someone have to earn to actually be right on that cusp of $31,096, and are we, in fact, seeing a situation where they drop below that amount, because of the tax they're paying on their income, and then have it rebated back to them? It would seem a simple thing to do would be to change the actual rates so that they don't have to go through this exercise of saying, "Look, I'm sorry, I need to top myself up; would you please give me some of my tax money back?" For that to occur, of course, it would be a simple matter of the Government recognising that this might be a better way to do things and at least considering it. I suspect, though, that, despite the nature of this bill being fundamentally one that deals with a tax rate, it will probably be knocked out—ruled as inappropriate. I think that's unfortunate. 