It's interesting: the legislative statement that has been made on this bill is that this is—in amending the Coroners Act of 2006, it will facilitate better access to justice. I think the issue is that this bill is going to facilitate the appointment of a coronial associate, in the same way—again, on an earlier bill that I addressed the House, the Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill, when I spoke to that on 2 August of this year—it's appointing another cog in the wheel or in the machinery of the court system. Whether or not it's going to facilitate better access to justice is yet to be evidenced, and the whole point is that there hasn't been a risk assessment analysis in relation to this bill. There's the anticipation that it will provide better access to justice by the appointment of a coroner's associate, but, as I've addressed this House previously on the Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill and also the Coroners (Coronial Cap) Amendment Bill, they are but additional cogs to the wheel. It doesn't necessarily mean to say that it will improve the access to justice. So by the appointment of a coronial associate, it's placing and positioning in within the whole machinery of the coroners' court system another function to ease and to relieve the workload of the coroners.