It's interesting, the way that the bill seeks to achieve these things. It's got a number of different mechanisms within it. One is that it actually requires certain compliance activities by those who are engaged in timber exporting, for example, and your administrative measures to help exporters furnish proof of legality. And that might sound like a burden on them—and, no doubt, to some extent it is—but the burden is designed, ultimately, to provide a benefit, which is to provide the assurance to the end-user or the purchaser or the export market of the bona fides of the timber. And so, to that extent, it's actually for the benefit of the New Zealand market and, indeed, the New Zealand provider—the harvester of the timber, if you will—to comply with those.