There is no need for this registration—registration for what? I mean, what are we going to do, register—OK, we've got financial advisers that are registered and real estate agents that are registered; that's been mentioned tonight. Why don't we register car salesmen? Why don't we do that to make sure that they're all satisfactory and of good character. Why don't we do that? I'll tell you what: why don't we have a gun register, see if that works? Oh, no, that's right—they've already tried that idea and that's not going to work, either. Registration is a layer of cost that is totally unnecessary. It's patronising to the industry. The industry do not and have not asked for this. They do not need it. The processors do not ask for it. The logging sector is not asking for it. The small foresters are not asking for it. And, in fact, the reasoning in this bill—that the small foresters will account for a larger proportion of logs coming to the market—is not correct. I've seen contradictory numbers to say that those small operators who planted in the 1990s are harvesting now and will not be such a large influence in 10 years, as the document in the bill suggests. So that's the registering of the advisers.