The bill is a simple change which will give an added layer of political neutrality to the setting of fees for judicial officers, and that's been canvassed by previous speakers in the House this evening. The Remuneration Authority is seen as the fair, the independent body who should be tasked with determining remuneration for the judicial officers. So the Remuneration Authority already sets the various rates or remuneration for judges, including justices of the Supreme Court; so the judicial independence from Government is important as it enhances public confidence in the operation of the law and the importance of the separations of the powers of State, which is the executive, the Government; the legislature, we as parliamentary members forming Parliament to make and pass laws; and, of course, the judiciary, the judges, who are affected, and quasi-judicial officers affected in this setting of their remuneration.