I first want to be reassured that the Government is not going to try to bring that back in some different way, but the question I have is that a second bill then came along, doing the same thing in a slightly different way in Canterbury, moving away from equal voting rights, because everyone gets a vote for the 14 councillors but Ngāi Tahu get to appoint two more, therefore altering equality for all the votes, but, on this occasion, the Ministry of Justice said, "Well, yes, it does breach the Human Rights Act, because it treats people differently on the basis of race, but it's OK because the Treaty demands it." So those two different pieces of advice were rather contradictory and hard to fathom—how one was not OK and one was OK. So I'd be interested to get some reassurance from the Minister as to whether she has any confidence that this advice that we're spending $39 million on is any good.