Just going back to the specific tensions that were identified in the submissions we had before us, the first one was really about whether or not it was appropriate for a victim, their family, a member of the public, for their submission, their statement in terms of how the Act had impacted them, to influence a decision about release, whether that was short-term release or longer-term release. I think we did hear that from several of the submitters. So what we were really balancing was the need to be heard, the very valid concern of safety concerns, but also a question about what a decision maker in a health context should take into account as they were making this decision. We heard that, again, from a number of submitters.