But back to the major two points on which I believe we now seem to have, at very least, by virtue of the leadership of the member in charge of this bill, broad consensus to address and to fix, on disclosure and on proxies. I wouldn't really hesitate to suggest that there weren't many MPs—although, as we just heard, I would never doubt the intellectual prowess of our chair, "Dr Dunc"—sorry, that's Dr Duncan Webb—that many of us could seriously follow the changes made in committee to pre-contractual disclosure statements, nor the rationale for the removal of the pre-settlement disclosure. I'll be the first to admit that I couldn't, which is why I again registered a dissenting view. It has in turn been validating to know that those are sentiments shared by those with property, conveyancing, and broader legal experience. It's heartening to know that the member in charge, Nicola Willis, now agrees and that we will be continuing work together to amend those clauses to a far more practical, accessible, and workable set of rules. I feel that this one, hopefully, will be relatively easily resolved.