So the first question: has he discussed it with the gaming industry? I'd love to hear whether he has and what the response was. The second thing—part of this discussion was the transitional period for existing intellectual property agreements. There in the bill, it proposes that all this takes place within a year. We also oppose this because it is—at the moment it's a three-year period, and we suggested that moving it to one year was too short. I've got to say that I've had companies that have created intellectual property and applied for patents—very expensive. Incredibly expensive, not only in New Zealand but to seek them around the world to make sure they are binding, and every five years to actually make the application or pay the application fee to renew those patent fees—very, very significant costs. Companies that have created and gone down that expense do want to make sure that if they're going to do that, they would have entered into commercial arrangements.