CHRIS PENK (National—Helensville): Thank you, Madam Speaker. The Ombudsmen (Protection of Name) Amendment Bill is not worth the paper that it's written on, which is just as well because there's not much of that. Only two pages, admittedly printed on both sides of the paper, but the first bit's blank—notwithstanding my notes, which is the best bit about it. Lots of blank space in there; there really isn't much to it, much like the Government's programme in this space. Even part of the content is repeating the title of the bill—well, that's a sort of a standard format, so fair enough. But it goes on to say, you know, "the principal Acts"—well, that much is implied in the name of the bill. There really isn't much going on here at all. 