One of the issues that we raised repeatedly was around the issue of advances from companies as a way of some people trying to get around disclosing income that would normally be paid either by way of dividend, interest, or salary, or even drawings. So we raised this quite often in the select committee and, obviously, the officials tried to help us on that matter. But what we heard at the end of the day was that they hadn't had time to consider that. I was surprised about that, particularly with the background of the Minister—why he hadn't had regard for the issue of shareholder advances being used as a way for people to supplement their income but without being assessed as income for the purposes of determining what payment should be made. So I am interested in what his view is on that and why he didn't include that form of payment that should be taken into account, into the definition of "income".