The case of a prisoner on remand is somewhat like Schrödinger's box. They're, in a funny way, potentially both guilty and not guilty, except that the law, of course, determines someone to be not guilty until such time as they've proven otherwise. But the case of a prisoner who has been found guilty but not yet sentenced might, in another distinction, be sentenced to a period of greater than three years or a period of less than three years. So the fact that the law treats those differently from sentenced prisoners in this bill is quite correct. I think it's appropriate, for example, that new section 86A, in clause 7 of what is currently the bill, talks about prisoners who are serving a sentence of imprisonment for less than three years as opposed to those who are detained for a period of less than three years at the relevant time by virtue of them being on remand. 