So let's have a look at the reasons why the 2011—oh, sorry, the 2021 predecessor—bill was comprehensively panned, because they were very, very good reasons, and those reasons have only gotten stronger in the intervening 10 years, or, as we say it in Parliament, millennia. The changes that we have had in the last 10 years have addressed the original concerns, and they do it better than this bill ever will. We have the Cabinet Manual, which now makes changes and checks required for Government bills. We have the disclosure statement, where Ministers must explain the policy and process reasons behind the proposed bill. The principles that govern a disclosure statement under the Cabinet Manual are far more inclusive than those that are involved in this particular bill. Furthermore, they're slightly more inclusive in the sense of the other Acts that they take note of, such as the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, the Human Rights Act, the Privacy Act, the Legislation Guidelines and the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee, the Cabinet Manual, and—oh my goodness—the Treaty of Waitangi. Who would have thought that it might be important in selecting the principles to take into account when you review your legislation that we might look at the founding document of this country? Not Mr Seymour, apparently. 