Those are all covered by our law. So, you know, we stand here, and we've got this new piece of criminal law being proposed, which at best is unnecessary and at best has been brought to the House under a misconception about the current criminal law. At worst—and we see this in the House from time to time—it's a branding exercise for political parties so that they can talk about themselves as being tough on crime. Appealing to the plight of victims, to the fears of our communities so that politicians can look tough on crime is callous. It's abhorrent. On this side of the House, we want to care for victims by providing for mental health care, by providing for hospitals, by providing for rehabilitation, reintegration—under that Government, reoffending of violent crime was at around 50 percent. So the victims that we talk about, that people have talked about tonight, who are laying in comas, in hospital, were laying in hospitals where the walls were rotting—the hospital walls were rotting. That's how much that side of the House cares about victims while we rewrite the criminal law based on what already exists.