Is this, in fact, another example of where Inland Revenue, through sleight of hand or perhaps through an error or a misunderstanding of the English language, has identified here in new section 81A(3)(a) that a liable parent can keep paying or is required to keep paying—the receiving carer gets less. But what happens to that big chunk of money in the middle that is coming from a liable parent's PAYE or whatever means Inland Revenue uses to compulsorily take that money? It would be extremely unfortunate if there's an error here in this bill—either by omission or commission. I mean, this does refer to the commissioner, so we assume it's by commission—where they intended to carve out this apparent exemption or ability for reassessment, which actually ends up being to the monetary benefit of Inland Revenue. That would be extremely unfortunate. So, Minister, would you care to explain that, please, to the committee?