Moving then to the next aspect of clause 6, and its subclause 3. What we've got there is the replacement of section 88(3)(c) within the Act, and that's the scenario basically where "the person may, … (i) be issued with a ballot paper" or a special vote ballot paper, according to the circumstances that are set out. I'm just interested—again, perhaps from a linguistic perspective as much as anything—that it says that they "may" be issued with a ballot paper. Elsewhere we have the active voice used—it talks about, for example, in the provision I was discussing before that it's the Electoral Commission that may or may not do certain things, and here we've just got that the person "may, … (i) be issued with". I presume it would be the Electoral Commission that would be doing the issuing, but the construction of that sentence doesn't specify exactly who would be doing that. So I don't know if that's a deliberate piece of drafting or if it's just intended that it might be—perhaps it could be issued by any one of a number of different authorities. 