So fast-forward to July of last year, when the Minister for Land Information brought the Crown Pastoral Land Reform Bill to the House and spoke in the House—somewhat predictably—as did I and my colleagues. I spoke very passionately about this issue because when I saw this bill, when I saw what this Crown Pastoral Land Reform Bill was, when I saw what it contained, my question was: what happened to the advice? What happened to that partnership approach? What happened to that enabling approach? Why are we now dealing with a Crown Pastoral Land Reform Bill which does anything but that? Because what this bill before the House, before the Environment Committee, does is it turns a partnership arrangement between Crown pastoral lessees and Land Information New Zealand, the Crown, into one of master and servant. More than that, it takes a partnership which, indeed, could need improving, as alerted by the officials in their advice to the Minister—how have we moved from a partnership to the prescriptive master-servant relationship which is contained in this bill? 