Now, what we've done here is put in a third limb that I and my colleagues felt was, combined, very, very concerning, and that is the possibility that the Minister could provide a change—an amendment or revocation of visa rights—to a whole class of people and then not give reasons, and that could be done at the Minister's absolute discretion. Now, because that had the potential to negatively affect that class of people, we in the select committee were looking for some kind of backstop provision that said that that wouldn't be the case and there wouldn't be a negative impact on a class of people. Because we understand what the Government is trying to do, and we know that, by and large, it's actually going to be very good for the visa holders—unless they're offshore, but that's another issue. So we wanted some kind of backstop in. 