Therefore, to have a cogent screening regime, we needed to include forest registration rights. We did that. The National Party didn't favour that legislation and we were reliant on votes from the New Zealand First Party to get that, and the New Zealand First Party—and there was some good reasons for this. They didn't want to disrupt overseas investment into our forestry sector, because they wanted more trees planted for climate and environmental reasons as well as for the interests of that industry. Therefore, they said, "Well, we will agree to forest registration rights being included in the Overseas Investment Act, but we want what the Hon Shane Jones called the primrose path.", which was a very low regulatory route applied to forestry relative to other sectors. In order to pass the legislation, in order to have a cogent overseas investment regime, we agreed with that request, and, as a consequence, we got to where we got to.