I think the member's third and final question was about the protocols that a judge can have and that can change in a particular case. If a protocol was in place in a courtroom or within a tranche of courts—whether that be the High Court or the District Court, for instance—each member of the judiciary has the ability to manage that courtroom in the way in which they see fit. So if they believe that a jury member should stay there, despite their adherence to the safety rules, which is in the interests of justice—if they can manage that, then it is within the purview of each member of the judiciary to manage that in the way that they see fit.