We've heard a lot of kōrero in the House today, and as the member of Parliament for Te Tai Hauāuru, it's my great pleasure to add to everyone else's kōrero, and to acknowledge all of the kōrero as well. We've heard from a number of members, including the Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations, some of the historical aspects of this claim. We heard from Joseph Mooney and from Jan Logie as well, who read some extracts from the summary of the historical account, and, might I add, that's a negotiated historical account. Everything in the settlement is negotiated, even down to the history. I suspect that every iwi that comes to this House to hear the pānuitanga of their bill knows that there's other history as well that didn't make the cut. I want to say in this House that it would be highly unlikely that that is the full story, as bad as it is—and it is bad. I recommend to every member that actually did read the summary of the historical account in the bill that they also go to the deed of settlement and read the full account, because there you will get a true understanding of the magnitude of what Ngāti Maru went through. I say that not only as an acknowledgment that there's a lot more to this story but that what makes it to this House is as stark as the difference between redress and compensation, because everything in this settlement is redress, not compensation. If we were to have compensation, as my whanaunga Debbie Ngarewa-Packer stated in this House, we would have a different kind of settlement.