The fifth I want to talk to is academic freedom, and this received a lot of submissions from people who were very concerned that their academic freedom was going to be compromised. The solution that the committee came to was to, effectively, put in a removal-of-doubt clause, and I think that goes some way towards resolving that issue. However, net-net, I would submit that academic freedom is less in this bill than before. The reason for that is the academic boards from the regional ITPs, the regional polytechnics, are disestablished and aggregated back to the one mega polytechnic, the New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology (NZIST). How can that be improving academic freedom? The bill is taking it away from the regions. That is a net-net loss of academic freedom. So we still have grave concerns that that's not addressed, and we do not believe that a mega polytechnic will satisfactorily respond to that.