In the logic of the National Party, we should do away with that and, instead of trying to come to an arrangement between the two parties in the contract, we should load up the cost on taxpayers. Now, this does not make sense in terms of the plan that National outlined last week or the week before that, because that will then increase the impost on taxpayers at the same time that the National Party says it wants to be decreasing spending and reducing debt. So which one is it? You can't have it both ways. 