The question is, should somebody who writes books be included in that? I think there's a few people who might say that if you wrote books, for example, with material that could only have come from a burglary, material that it turned out was stolen, and if you had some form at writing such books, then some people might ask, "Well, perhaps that person should be subject to the full force of the law." Perhaps actually committing crimes to pry into people's privacy is not something that could be included in journalism. And if the purpose of this particular bill is really to protect one person who's an outlier, maybe it's not so noble at all. That's what we want to see tested at the select committee. We think that the freedoms of a free press are important enough to warrant putting through, but we have some real questions over whether this bill does it.