SIMEON BROWN (National—Pakuranga): Thank you, Madam Chair. I think my colleague Michael Woodhouse makes a very good point. The point I'd like to make, though—another argument in favour of removing this, which I'd appreciate the Minister's consideration of—is, this clause 11 is an exception for the particular appellant as it relates to them. It says here, clauses 5 to 8 do not apply to the appellant in that case, or affect the judgment as it relates to that appellant. I can understand (b), which is the constitutional issue, but (a), essentially, gives this individual an exemption around any other offending that he may have done prior to 2016 and this legislation coming into effect. This is a very broad exception, in my opinion, to this individual, which I think needs to be taken into account very seriously.