But I think we should be really measured in the degree to which we think this is going to make material improvements, and on that I do agree with Miss van Velden. The definition of "overseas persons", the improvements in the 25 percent control, the unproductive farmland, and one or two other amendments, I think—the removing of the requirement for certain existing overseas owners, and particularly when they're selling one overseas owner to another overseas owner, not materially affecting the degree of foreign ownership in this country. All good stuff, but I've got to say, I did choke on my water a bit when I heard the Labour member Anna Lorck talking about how this is going to be protecting farmland from foreign ownership. Well, if the Labour Party really wanted to protect farmland from foreign ownership, they shouldn't have agreed to the sop to New Zealand First to have the carve-out for very highly productive farmland to be converted into forestry, an industry that itself is already owned—70 percent, I think—by overseas owners.