So why do we support this bill? In essence, Labour supports the reform of the Unit Titles Act because of the changes that we think do need to be made in this space. We acknowledge the fact that owners should pay for what they use. Also, some additional areas that the member's bill could still do some work on—I think it's important to flag now, because those are areas that submitters can also bring to the select committee. It would be good to also specify whether this would be a blanket approach or subject to agreement by body corporate committees. In addition to this, it would also be good to elaborate on how proportionality might be forecast when disclosed to buyers; how is that communicated in those types of sale-and-purchase arrangements? It would be important to discuss how proportionate utility costs might affect decision-making processes such as how owners contribute to the body corporate decisions in the services that they have little or maybe even no interest in. And, finally, it is important to acknowledge the likelihood of disputes over proportional service costs or how these disputes will be dealt with. So they are the sorts of details that members on this side of the House look forward to the select committee process nutting out over time. I commend this bill to the House.