That task force was commissioned by the Minister with an extraordinarily broad mandate. It came back and it made radical proposals, the shadows of which are still apparent in this bill. I will, in this contribution, take you through where that shadow still lies. When that task force reported back, it proposed centralised bureaucratic hubs that would control schools, instead of parent boards. It proposed absolutely marginalising parental involvement in the governance of schools. It proposed that all school property management would be taken over by the Ministry of Education, that the New Zealand Qualifications Authority and the Education Review Office would be discarded, that intermediate schools would be abolished, and that an education service agency would take over all servicing of schools. This idea was abhorrent to National, and that is why Nikki Kaye embarked on 30 public meetings throughout the country. In those public meetings, she engaged with parents, she engaged with teachers, and she engaged with education experts, and their feedback was resounding. The feedback was that that sort of radical change would take New Zealand's education system backwards, would reduce the achievement of children, would loosen the engagement between parents and their schools, and would, all in all, be bad for our education system. So that was rejected.