So these are the issues that I think have been raised, and I think that if you actually look back at what it says in the legislation, a lot of those concerns disappear. So, Mr Speaker, with your leave, I'm going to do what a lawyer does and I'm going to look at the Act. So what I want to direct everyone's attention back to is actually section 3 of the "Jurassic" Act 1993, because section 3 defines the meaning of "objectionable", and it is one of three sections doing so. It's really, really important to look back at, because if we do look back at it, I don't think there's any way the baby uplift, the George Floyd whistleblower broadcaster, or the innocent bystander would ever be caught, and that provision—that definition of "objectionable"—has not changed in this new bill. That's really crucial. 