ACT maintains what was stated in the first reading speech, where I said, "While ACT believes that such legislation is justified, the onus is firmly on us elected lawmakers to make sure that the problem the legislation is seeking to solve is well defined, that the provisions are justified, and that we are also balancing infringements on liberty with the needs of suppressing the risks of potential terror [attacks]." In the next paragraph, I'd made a statement about trusting in the robust process, allowing the full time to be set aside for select committee. Such is our distrust in some of the lawmaking processes where speed, for no real reason, is at the heart of how our law is made—at times with errors and to the detriment of others.