And it empowers the judiciary to decide when audiovisual (AV) will be used. Things like in sexual violence cases, which this Government has made important changes around allowing the use of AV in those cases. Now it's a very specific set of circumstances where you would use that. It's important the politicians aren't making that call, because politicians think that we might use Zoom in all situations, in Ruatōria or the Employment Court. But that's not what AV is for. It is used in a specific set of circumstances where that aids access to justice, something that we are all committed to in this House. We use AV in the specific set of circumstances where you would not want someone to appear in court, because they have had the kind of traumatic experience that we do not want them on the stand talking about them in there. It is a specific tool for a specific use, and it's not what this bill does.