These cases show that we have made the world very small with a dominant culture lens, and it is time to go back to the drawing board and rethink things like free speech, surveillance, privacy, security, who we are as a nation, and whether the restrictions that we have in place today and the freedoms that we have reflect what is fit for purpose in this world compared to the changes that have happened over those times. And, of course, one of the big changes is the social media platforms which allow unfettered speech. We've had the advancement of weapons, including automated drones. We have the digital footprints and handprints that we leave everywhere every day that enable the State to track our movements. So we really do need to go back to the drawing board and rethink how we see these competing rights and privileges and how we get the balance right. So the review of the intelligence legislation does allow us to do just that. It asks questions like: how do we gather information? Who do we gather information on? It will enable us to get a 360-degree picture of the world that we live in and shine a light on the assumptions that our legislation makes. Of course, this technical bill is just the tip of the iceberg of some very difficult conversations and very robust conversations that we will need to have in this House later as we continue to implement the 44 recommendations from the royal commission. 