Like I said, he and a number of his colleagues didn't get to reap the benefits of this system that they spent years contributing to. So the suggestion from across the House that we heard earlier tonight that the solution to the affordability of our superannuation system is to raise the age of eligibility does not sit well with me. That is why I say that there is a fairness issue here and I am glad that we have the opportunity to debate this in the House tonight. How is it fair when someone has spent their full entire working lives contributing to a system that they don't get to reap the benefits from, yet someone living here for 10 years could receive the full entitlement for longer than they spent contributing to that system? 