I just did a quick Google search of police Minister and firearms prohibition orders and every time this bill gets talked about or the issue gets talked about, it's really interesting. Normally what happens is the Labour backbench insult the whole idea. They talk about human rights and they talk about warrantless searches and they talk about how the bill's an affront and we can't possibly tolerate it, and then halfway through their speech they suddenly realise that they're actually meant to be at least in favour, theoretically, of the concept, so they kind of start changing their mind and say, "Oh, but it's just the way this one's drafted. We don't like this particular version of the bill." Even though, as I say, the committee's actually improved this.