I want to make it very clear for the House that we worry on this side of the House around whether or not there is any utility of vaccine mandates and vaccine passes any more. As the judge comments in the Yardley decision, it is worth bearing in mind that mandates impose on rights. I think, possibly in the last year or so, we have worked out that we've been too quick to impose on rights. It's been interesting that the Attorney-General has not really ventilated and had a discussion, publicly at least, about the intrusion on rights that mandates have on individuals. There are two particular rights—and, again, these are covered in the Yardley judgment—that are intruded upon. One is the right to be free from medical treatment or the right to choose your own medical treatment, and the second is, of course, freedom of religion, which is touched upon as well. So it's very clear—I think everyone would agree—that vaccine mandates intrude upon individual rights and freedoms. So the question is whether or not the intrusion on those rights is justified. 