The bill that the member has put up seeks to either go along side or usurp—I can't quite work out which—the Bill of Rights, which are based on human rights, and Mr Penk, again, has talked about any right-thinking person agreeing with those principles. He also admitted that the devil is in the detail and that that would be for the courts. My point is that it is not for the courts to decide the devil in the detail. Those are matters for elected representatives, not for appointed court officers. 