Well, the clue is in the composition of donations returned by each party. You see, if you look at how much each party raised between $5,000 and $15,000, it's not a good picture for Labour and the Greens. You know, people don't give them that much. What they want to do is hackle at donations attracted by ACT and National, because, of that $1.2 million of donations given between $5,000 and $15,000 that would be affected by this rule change, $300,000 was given to ACT, about $575,000 was given to National, about $147,000 to Labour, and only $68,000 to the Greens. Well, the problem they have is that ACT actually raised more money in that category than the Greens and Labour combined. And that's not our problem; that's their problem. There's no undue influence. It's fund-raising. It's people freely expressing their political views in privacy, without any undue influence whatsoever, if these people knew anything about it. What this is, is the Labour Party using the political mandate that they won at the last election to screw the scrum, affect their opponents' funding, and try and tip the balance of the next election in their favour.