I think that would be the way that it would be interpreted if there's a line-ball call that the courts might be asked to make or, indeed, the office itself might be asked to make, where there might be accommodation that's perhaps ambiguous as to where it starts and ends, and there might be activities that are ancillary. Maybe it's accommodation to support forestry with workers but the workers might stay on longer in New Zealand if they're temporary for the purposes of a holiday or whatever. So any comments the Minister can make in relation to that to help clarify the intent of the regime, and, indeed, this particular provision, I think would be really helpful and interesting.