I want to refer to the submission of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. What I remember from their submissions: one, they wanted Ngāi Tahu to engage in communications about pastoral land in the area; two, they wanted the Treaty principles to be included in any plans or frameworks that were there for kaitiaki of the land; and, three, Ngāi Tahu also stressed the fact that they would like the reference to iwi removed and they would like Ngāi Tahu to be considered as a Treaty partner, not a stakeholder. So those submissions are reflected on page 7 of Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 129 in new section 5(2) in clause 8. 