Then it goes on to say, "the Government intends to reduce the burden that the overseas investment regime imposes on investors and the regulator. The bill would achieve this by: no longer screening non-residential leases of less than 10 years"—I'm sure there will be some benefits in that. "Allowing investors that have previously been screened and approved to use a streamlined consent process for future investments"—well, that sounds like something that should have been done years ago, so that's not such a bad thing. "No longer requiring a large range of low-risk transactions to get consent. For example, the bill would no longer require consent decisions on investments in less sensitive land that is only screened because it adjoins sensitive land"—well, these are sensible but minuscule, minor changes. 