The views of the submitters and main issues raised can fit into a few distinct but clearly interconnected categories, as we have detailed in our final report. And many have spoken on it, but I'd just like to reiterate that. Firstly, there was an overarching concern when it came to the resource and funding that would be required to give effect to this bill, and the Minister himself mentioned the hundreds of millions of dollars of extra funding that would be required. But also, we did hear very clearly from our advisers that this bill would impose obligations on schools that they cannot fulfil. Submitters told us that there was a relatively small workforce equipped with teaching second languages, and that leads to predictable issues with retention of teachers or even just having to resource them in the first place. Already there is an obligation on schools, we mentioned this in our report, and I quote, "Take all reasonable steps to make instruction available in tikanga Māori and te reo Māori." But several principals and education unions expressed that meeting this obligation is already a real challenge for the school's capacity. We heard from the Waitakere Area Principals' Association representing over 100 schools, and he told us that while they're in support of any initiative for our children, they also called themselves pragmatists. They said that this bill would increase the workload and put pressure on the schools to a point that it wouldn't be to the best experience of the students because of that additional pressure. So we heard that from several principals with up to and even over 30 years of experience and teaching background.