There are also the important points of making sure that we're not putting too much a costly burden on people that outweighs the benefits. And I thought one really good change that the FEC came back with was about the long-term maintenance plans. They said that they "empathise with submitters' concerns and agree that it would be difficult to account for the future unknowns, such as inflation or new technologies," when they were planning on changing the long-term maintenance plans from 10 years to 30 years, and they instead settled on a bit of a middle ground that there should be a detailed cost estimate for the first 10 years and then projections for the following 20 years. So it's important that people know what they're buying into and what the long-term maintenance plans are, but not putting such an unnecessary burden on the people who are living in that development that it's going into too much detail where those costs outweigh the benefits. So I think that is a good middle ground that we've settled on.