So the bill provides some limited terms and conditions, and we heard the member talk about those; those are found at clause 9(3). But it specifies that the Resource Management Act (RMA) sections 9, 13, 14, and 15 do not apply to this bill—so that's at clause 18. This is rather curious, because section 4(3) of the RMA already can exempt conservation land from section 9(3) of the RMA. Section 9(3) of the RMA relates to land use consents, so it is what district councils govern. So I am not sure why this bill needs to say that the RMA doesn't apply, first of all; and, second of all, I'm not sure why sections 13, 14, and 15 of the RMA don't apply, and these relate to water. 