I think what we have to also ensure we don't mix up here is unconscionable conduct and buyer's remorse, and that is a very common phenomenon. People buy something, they think they want it, the next day they think, "Oh no, I don't really want that now.", and we could end up in that situation with this bill. So we don't disagree on the definition that we don't want to see vulnerable people taken advantage of or vulnerable companies taken advantage of. But is this bill going to do it? Well, according to Business New Zealand, it's not going to do it. Also Consumer New Zealand, although they supported it—they thought that the definition of unconscionable conduct to ensure the provisions work as intended and to avoid division about the meaning of the term as there has been in Australia.