Just this week, the Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand has posed the need to start talking about rent controls in Aotearoa New Zealand, because what we saw in response, in particular, to the Government's suite of tax changes to try and dampen the demand side of the supply and demand issues with regard to housing in this country was a huge number of property investors being wheeled out and talking about mum and dad investors and just how bad this was going to make things for those who own property in this country. But the part of the equation that the Green Party thinks was entirely neglected from that mainstream narrative and debate were mum and dad renters—just renters, actually, as a matter of fact, because we know that a third of this country rent and we also know, based on Statistics New Zealand's data, that those renters are, typically, paying more of their income towards housing costs. But we also know that if you look at the distribution of homes in this country—and I've spoken about this before in the context of wealth inequality, because we know that the spread is such that the top 10 percent of this country owns 59 percent of the wealth, and the bottom half, the bottom 50 percent of New Zealanders, own just 2 percent. How that plays out in the housing market, noting that a third of people rent—based on Real Estate Agents Authority New Zealand data—is 30 percent of homes in this country are owned by people who own between four and more than 20 properties. You don't start to rebalance this issue or tilt that balance through timidity, but you do it through bold steps to address a problem that has been percolating for a long time. 