I just finally want to highlight that the Australians have dealt with this issue. They have safe areas in their bills, and there was a case that went to the Australian High Court, and it was about the justified limitation of that 150-metre safe area. And this is what they noted: "To force a political message upon another person is inconsistent with the human dignity of that person. While there is an interest to be protected in fostering free expression and political comment by members of the community, the Court argued that this is not to be interpreted as putting an obligation on anyone else in the community to receive such messages. Moreover, the court ruled, a safe zone does not unfairly and unequally put at a disadvantage the views of the anti-abortion movement. In terms of content, the Court pointed out the safe zone is completely viewpoint neutral. No views about abortion, pro or con, can be expressed within them." And therein lies the issue. We're not limiting people's ability to express themselves. This isn't a freedom of expression issue. What we're saying is within a 150-metre zone of accessing a health service, nobody has the right—nobody has the right—to question a woman's right to choose abortion as a health service, or a pregnant person's right to choose abortion as a health service. Fundamentally, it's our bodies—women's bodies; it's our choice—women's choice. Kia ora.