It is what my colleague Chris Bishop would probably describe as an absolute shemozzle. This bill canvasses that point. It says, quote, "The passage of the Electoral (Registration of Sentenced Prisoners) Amendment Bill … now places unworkable obligations on the Department of Corrections … and the Electoral Commission."—it goes on to say, "Those obligations are not in line with the intended policy that only prisoners serving sentences of less than 3 years should be able to enrol to vote." And so my question for the Minister, which I do hope he will address in a later contribution later on tonight, is in respect of other inconsistencies in the bill, because as much as this bill tries to remedy the inconsistencies that were created last week, it also creates other ones. So, for example, why is it that the example that was being given by the Government of their position is that prisoners should be allowed to vote on the Government that will be in power when they are released? And yet this bill doesn't actually do that, and nor does the bill that was passed last week. Because all this bill does is extends the right to vote to prisoners—or both bills, in fact, extend the right to vote to prisoners who are sentenced to a term of imprisonment of less than three years. What it doesn't do is what the Minister has described, which is give all prisoners the right to vote in their last three years, as in those prisoners who are going to—