Now, the problem with debating part by part is that we have in the next part, Part 3, provisions that give life or cause question around the bank's objectives. So if you go—if you will indulge me, Madam Chair—to that in order to make sense of what I'm about to ask the Minister, clause 121 says an "Order providing for different economic objective or objectives". So on the one hand, we have a bill that sets out in Part 2 very clearly the objectives of the bank, but then in Part 3 it makes it very clear that there could be an Order in Council passed which changes those objectives. Then clause 121 goes on to say that "only 1 of the objectives specified in section 9(1)(a) (instead of both);" could be part of that. It goes on to say, "1 or more new objectives in addition to or instead of either or both of the economic objectives specified in section 9(1)(a)" could be part of that.