The first observation I would like to make is that $5,000 is not a great deal of money if a service is making some money by performing certain activities. I take at face value the report of the select committee that a number of the providers aren't large-scale, commercial operations, and, indeed, they might be volunteers in some cases. However, there's nothing in the legislation to say that an outfit can't conduct these activities for profit. There's nothing to say that they can't be paid by the music festival operators, other operators, or other proprietors, or, indeed, by the taxpayer, as others on this side of the House have made the point. So even with the fine increased to some $20,000 in respect of unlicensed drug-checking, it seems to me as though a reasonably half-hearted attempt is being made to regulate, if that's the intention of the legislation—to regulate and to regularise—an activity that is currently legal. It's relatively toothless at that level, that quantum of penalty, I would suggest.