Now, I can't for the life of me fathom why it isn't treated the same as other farmland. The Labour Party were elected, and the Green Party supported them, on the basis that they were going to stop overseas investment in foreign land. This bill still allows that. It's under a more permissive general test for forestry to buy farmland than for any other purposes to buy farmland in New Zealand. So New Zealand farmers need to be aware of that detail. This is another smoke and mirrors attempt by the Government. It does make a change in that area and we do support it because it is a step in that area. But if the Parliament and the Labour Party were genuine about treating farmland the same, then why isn't it under the farmland test? Why is it under a general test that is more permissive? It's because they still want forestry to go ahead, and they still want people to come in and buy forestry. 