I remind members of this House that rates—some countries call them "taxes"—are really the way in which we fund the local authority to operate and all the things that it operates for. Everybody that owns a property has a requirement to pay their share of those costs, and that is set on basically land or capital value, generally. If the land is unproductive for whatever reason, you can mount an argument to say that there is no loss to the community for that land because it's not being used. You can also mount the case on Department of Conservation (DOC) land. DOC land is not being used apart from the keeping of the New Zealand estate. It may be used for tourism purposes, but in many parts of New Zealand it's not rated for. The net result of all of that is that the people who have the productive land or the use, they fund—whether it's houses, businesses, commercial operations, or industrial operations—the cost for that community.