So the real argy-bargy is on the ability for people to enrol to vote on the same day. I just want to touch on what has been raised by the National Party in their view—not their minority view, given that it is a split committee, but in their view from the Justice Committee—because I wasn't quite able to discern what they were saying in their numerous contributions, because, indeed, it seemed to spill over into other political issues of the day. There are three reasons that they have given in this Justice Committee report to opposing that ability for same-day enrolment, and the first is—and I quote—"[the] balancing of the objective of maximising participation with concluding the election efficiently." Fast-forwarding through that point (1), they say, "We do not believe that 99 percent of voters who did enrol should face the cost and uncertainty of delay for less than 1 percent who did not bother to enrol." I think that's kind of lacking in empathy. There are a number of reasons that people face in their day-to-day lives. For both sides of this House, who regularly talk about the day-to-day struggles that people are facing and how, you know, we should give people a little bit of slack to make decisions about their own lives and how we need to streamline processes, I would've thought that the party that talks about being the one of consumer choice and freedoms would be on board with this move. So I find that a perverse or interesting rationale.