Then, perhaps, my question—as we're nearing the ends of the parts of the bill—as well for the member is just reflecting on pace of change. I think there are a number of pieces of legislation that are upcoming in the House, including the safe areas bill at some stage, where we've seen moves from the likes of Australia in those areas before New Zealand has gone into those areas ourselves. I know that there have been moves in New South Wales to review their legislation in this space. I also know that Canada have made an attempt to change the verdict requirements. And the question is really: have the changes that have been made across all parts of this bill done justice to the pace of change internationally? Are we keeping up with our neighbours across the Ditch? Are we keeping up with like jurisdictions—for example, Canada—but also the most recent research in terms of the experience of victims and the experience and also the rights of patients who are in the care of mental health facilities as well?