The matter that the member wishes to debate appears to have been a possible clinical error. While Ministers answer to the House for the health system and the response to COVID-19, the concept of administrative or ministerial responsibility is narrower for urgent debates than for oral questions. The fact that questions have been addressed to a Minister does not necessarily mean that it involves ministerial responsibility on which an urgent debate can be founded—Speakers' ruling 200/4, from Dr Smith and a more recent one. Having considered the matters raised by the member in his letter, I'm not convinced that it reaches the threshold that warrants setting aside the business of the House. The application is therefore declined. 