The committee also specified the circumstances where property cannot be seized from a judgment debtor. Initially as drafted, the bill only referred to the judgment debtor with disability. However, the committee were concerned that this would not prohibit seizure of property from a judgment debtor who was the principal carer to a person with a disability. So I thank the committee for their inclusiveness and their concern, which they have proposed a new subparagraph 167(2)(a)(iii) to cover any item necessary for the care, support, or independence of a person who is in the care of a judgment debtor. So thank you. Thank you, select committee. You've really done fantastic work on this bill. 