Just to be really clear on how this legislation operates, it does so by simplifying the test that presently exists when it comes to harmful digital communications, particularly in what is colloquially referred to as revenge porn. At present, my understanding is that the Act operates by way of requiring that the person who is sharing the material has to have an intent to cause harm, it must have an objective standard of harm caused, and the victim must have actually experienced that harm, obviously where the burden of proof on those exists within the present court system as status quo. 