So, worth looking at the principles. These are all very good and worthy, as outlined in the bill. So key aspects such as avoiding the diminishment of a person's liberty, personal security, and so forth, except as is necessary to provide or protect such liberty, freedom, etc. of other persons—classic libertarian philosophy, but I also happen to think something that any right-thinking person would actually say is entirely sensible stuff. Of course, subjective opinions might differ as to where we draw the line in any individual case. Value judgments are involved and the proposal of the bill is, of course, that we allow the court of law to make those judgments, as well as the lawmakers in the traditional sense of the word, the legislators in the executive of the day.