The reason it's not as a tabled amendment is because I think there are different views about an appropriate governance structure for an organisation like this. And the departmental report does point out, although the Minister has informed the committee, quite rightly, that around the world this is not an uncommon arrangement, but, in my experience, executive directors on boards in a commercial sense, in New Zealand at least, is probably not the predominant governance structure, and in Government, in the public sector, it's quite rare. Now, the committee was informed by officials that commissions often have the commissioner on the board, but commissions, I think, are different—the Law Commission, the Commerce Commission—and it also acknowledged that, actually, for other Crown entities, it's very unusual. In fact, I don't think there are any other Crown entities where the chief executive is a member of the board.