Now, the reason for this is quite simple. These places, and some have been farmed for 160 years—they didn't have consents 160 years ago, and Land Information New Zealand might not have records for all of those tracks and almost certainly do not. It's just the way things are done. And yet this is sneaking something in, and an unintended consequence of this is that there are going to be a lot of activities that would have been normally carried out on a property that were not considered necessary to have consents in this bill—because it's already in there—but for this omission of these tracks that don't have consents. And what's more, if the Crown was concerned about that, the commissioner should have actually notified the property owner that those tracks, paths, etc., don't have consents, and they could have done something about it, but they haven't done that. 