My question for the Minister is, I hope, actually a very simple one, with no tricks to it, as it were. I simply want to have a sense from the Minister that he believes that the High Court decision of Justice Downs from what was a year or so ago, involving the perpetrator of the LynnMall supermarket attack—has the gap that he believed was present in the law, and I haven't got the case in front of me, around planning and preparation—that we've now as a Parliament in this law comprehensively addressed that, really, and we now feel confident as a Parliament, the Government feels confident, and therefore, you know, given that Government and Parliament feels confident, New Zealanders can feel confident that we've comprehensively addressed that. I wouldn't say that that would mean that we will never see the like of an attack such as we saw at the supermarket—and we all regret, and we thank those involved in keeping people safe there, the police and so on. I'm not saying we'll never see that again, but does he feel that with the law it does comprehensively address Justice Downs' gaps, as written to the Attorney-General and so on, and that this should keep, on that basis, more New Zealanders safe and make something like the supermarket attacks less likely in the future?