When the bill was introduced to the House, it was clearly stated by the Government that there was a need to ensure that there was consistency in the way that our domestic laws were being applied in terms of enforcement powers into the international waters. I had to go over many of the initial comments made by members across the House to ensure that we were addressing many of the concerns that had been raised. Can I say that there was a number of issues that were raised by members in terms of the classes of enforcement officers. I note the member, the spokesperson for foreign affairs in the Opposition, the Hon Gerry Brownlee, raised the issue of whether or not Department of Conservation (DOC) officers should be considered as enforcement officers. But when we think about the range of activities that take place in relation to the trafficking of endangered species and the way in which both the Wildlife Act and also the trafficking of endangered species are undertaken not only on terrestrial spaces but in international waters—the extension of enforcement powers seems to be a natural progression.