NICOLE McKEE (ACT): Thank you, Madam Chair. When I look at clause 11 and hear the arguments from my colleagues across the way there, I can understand and hear both sides of the argument, and what concerns me is our intent could be erroneous again if we don't get the wording just right. What I mean by this is with that first bullet point, "apply to the particular appellant in" the decision, so while you, Minister, tell us that it's about the decision that was made in the Supreme Court at that time, the argument is: is that clear enough in that bullet point? Because what we don't want to occur is for the potential for the appellant to go on and reoffend and read that bullet point the same way that the National Party and the ACT Party have. We want to make sure that this bill goes through absolutely watertight. To be honest with you, I'm not quite sure how we go about doing that. But that's just the concern, that I think that that particular bullet point can be read in two different ways and therefore leave a door open for that appellant and a smack on the hand to us from the Supreme Court once again. Thank you.