Then at the last minute—and we've tabled a Supplementary Order Paper—we dealt with one of the remaining issues that was around access. These are sensitive pieces of land. They're also beautiful, and a lot of the public want access to get out there, and I don't blame them. I like that myself. As was stated, most of those lessees provide access for the public, subject to sensible behaviour, which is absolutely what they should expect. There have been a couple of cases—not that many—where access has been unreasonably withheld. So after some discussion between the High Country Accord and ourselves, we worked through to what was a fair balance between land that is owned by the taxpayer, owned by the Crown, leased in perpetuity for pastoral purposes by the lessees, how we could find the right balance to ensure that unreasonable access was not withheld. So we said at the time of the transfer of a lease if someone decides to sell it—and, indeed, I hope we don't ever have another National Government, because I'm suspecting that they will open the door. They will open the door once again to wholesale overseas purchase of farmland and most likely, because these are quite expensive properties, we will see what we had seen in under previous National Governments, a lot of these iconic properties went into foreigners' hands.