The second part of the bill relates to Treasury's role in this, and Treasury is to report periodically on the state of wellbeing in New Zealand. I think the bill recommends that "periodically" might mean "four years", or four-yearly, which clearly means that you're going to get in one term of Government a year with no report in it, and maybe the other two with a report in them, and you'd never know how that would work out. But how this relates to the first requirement of the Government to report on its wellbeing objectives, I'm not quite sure. There's no clear direction on how that would happen, and I can imagine the vociferous noise coming out of finance Ministers of all ilks when Treasury reports something they don't like, because you only have to listen to the actions of this Government when Treasury's talked about things they don't like to see that Treasury will come under significant criticism if, in fact, it doesn't agree with the Government's view. So I think the whole objective of this is a bit unusual. 