The first one is really about what's in the bill, to the extent that there is much in it, because I agree with Christopher Luxon: there's really not much substance in this bill. I was thinking about it. It's like one of those sandwiches in the tuck shops, where they push all the meat to the front, but you get to about the second half of the sandwich and there's nothing in it, right? I mean, it's just Vogel's with a little bit of margarine and nothing—it's a slogan. It's window dressing. It's the chance for people like Tāmati Coffey to get up and pretend that he's doing something in the Bay of Plenty, when the reality just isn't that. 