I do also want to comment on the scope of the bill in the sense of the different aspects of New Zealand public life or private life, indeed, that are covered by it. Again, somewhat of a straw man argument to reference heavily music festivals, because there is no such limitation in the bill. But if we're going to focus on that then let's at least interrogate that notion in a way that is giving the proper attention that this category of entertainment deserves. There has been far too little comment on the nature of so-called music festivals at which drug taking is so rife. A drug festival with a soundtrack is not a music festival. If the amount of drug-taking activity endangering the lives of young Kiwis is such that we need to make a law so that they need not be afraid of allowing drug checkers on site then how about we, as a Parliament, legislate better and as a society deal with the problem better of the fact that there is so much illicit drug supply and use going on in the first place. That is at the heart of what we should be dealing with and not the relatively innocuous activity of the checking, the testing, certainly the educational element, but, of course, the handing back of that which is dangerous with or without additional elements, which may or may not be known; that is a straw man. Again, we should resist that notion. We should resist sending the message that drug taking, in the case of these very harmful substances, is OK. We must resist this idea that we could hand back that which will kill or injure our young people under the guise of education and false notions of harm minimisation.