Now I come to the rights of indigenous peoples. A commitment that this Government makes over and over again to partnership with Māori, to upholding the values of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and actually, in fact, meeting our obligations, because they are enforceable obligations. We've heard that this agreement does include a clause on the protection of our obligations pursuant to the Treaty of Waitangi. We've also heard from the only independent expert arbiter of what, in fact, fulfils our obligations pursuant to Te Tiriti, the Waitangi Tribunal, that this exact clause is a breach, falls short. Why is it still in here? Why has the Government continued to use the exact words that were ruled to fall short of meeting our obligations pursuant to Te Tiriti o Waitangi? Of course, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade came to select committee and said that, in their opinion, it meets our obligations. They wrote it. That judgment was a finding against them. So the Government can't hold up their opinion that's already been ruled to fall short as meeting the obligation, as evidence that the obligation's being met. It's an absolute failure.