It's important, as indeed the member who has just resumed her seat, Brooke van Velden, says, that there is transparency and openness, and it was because of those deaths—it was straight after the first death that the investigation, which is the subject of this report, was commenced. It was a day later that the second death happened and the report was amended to include that second death as well. The report was conducted by a group of people, a number of clinicians, as well as those working in the welfare front line as well. They have concluded their report. They've made their findings and they've made some recommendations, and they have done that in a matter of weeks, and we now have the benefit of their report. The report writers of course acknowledge that their review and their focus was on the processes from the time at which these men entered the care in the community system to the time of their deaths, but it is for the coroner to rule on cause of death. So I think we do need to pay heed to the content of the report in terms of the processes that they examined for two patients who came under the care of the care in the community system. 