In the bill as introduced, there was some lack of clarity which meant that there may be a potential expectation for members to have to declare their salaries or wages from employment, and there was a sense there that that may discourage people that were well connected within the community from standing, not wanting to be doing that. Because already in the bill, local authority members were required to disclose the names of each employer they were working for and a description of the main business activities. What the committee felt was that was sufficient to be able to give people a sense of if there was any potential conflicts of interest there without having to go down into the detail of every single payment which potentially could have be required. So what they recommended was adding clarification that payments of interests already disclosed under section 54E, which includes employment—but also directorships and trusts—don't have to be included in the register any further. So I think that was an important change as well.