I had the experience in the End of Life Choice Bill debate of funding some people with disabilities to come to Wellington and campaign for the bill, and the costs involved were absolutely eye-opening and, frankly, eye-watering for somebody in a wheelchair with their carer to come and engage in our politics. As Chlöe Swarbrick said in her opening speech, no doubt many people in that circumstance who either couldn't afford it or didn't have benefactors who were prepared to support them simply wouldn't see representation in Parliament as an option, and I think that's wrong. I think that's one area where the State should be an insurer of last resort, so I'm supporting this bill, first and foremost, because it is good public policy, but, secondly, because it is something that makes us a more inclusive, humane, and compassionate society to put on our statute book that we as a society are committed to helping people participate in our democracy if they have additional challenges that are experienced as absolutely no fault of their own, then that's when there's a role for us to help.