So, just going back into that question of deterrence, it's true enough to say that deterrence doesn't occur for crimes that we might call crimes of passion—excuse the shorthand—but, of course, there isn't such a categorisation in the existing law that's sought to be repealed. It's entirely possible that an act is conducted in a cold-blooded, calculating fashion, and that's a three-strike offence. I don't think that we should give up a legitimate tool in the tool box of the legislature for actually stopping such premeditation. Deterrence, the extent that it can be effective, should be used by our jurisdiction.