Going further, the question is: why would you do it over just this? If you were to have political party consultation on the regulations, why would you confine it to just the confidential reserve price? Why wouldn't you do it for the many dozens of other components of the regulatory environment, and then why would you stop at the emissions trading scheme? Why wouldn't you also do it for the electricity market, upon which much of the design of this is based? It is really outside the boundaries of what's appropriate in terms of how Governments set regulation. So I have considered it and reconsidered it, and I will not be supporting the amendment. 