So the problem that this bill, modest as it is, does seek to rectify is that whereas at the moment a company cannot have an identical or nearly identical name to another company under the Companies Act, a limited partnership about to be incorporated can't have the same name as another limited partnership under the Limited Partnerships Act, and a limited partnership under the Limited Partnerships Act cannot have a name that is identical or nearly identical to an existing company, it is not currently the case that a company yet to be formed cannot have an identical or nearly identical name to a limited partnership under the Companies Act. So I'm sure I've made that very clear, but suffice to say that there is one category in which it's possible to have crossover whereby someone wishing to set up a new company and seeking registration approval—the approval of the registrar of companies—can actually slip that past the keeper, so to speak, and accidentally or deliberately end up with a very similar name, a confusingly similar name, to that of an existing legal entity. 