But leaving all of that to one side, we as a Parliament have a duty not to be marred by prejudice, by the weight of the incredibly sad issues that we're dealing with, with this piece of legislation. And to undermine not only fundamental human rights, not only the rule of law, but the idea that we would only pass law that's actually based on evidence and is going to be effective to address the problems that we're seeking to address—this isn't that kind of legislation. It's a knee-jerk dog whistle. It was when it first came in, as the substantive Act, and now we're going further than that and breaching further rights. We can't apply human rights and principles only when it's convenient and drop them when there is emotion involved and when it does make us look good. 