The third point I wish to make is actually really important in terms of the role of a constituency member of Parliament. One of the amendments is in my name as the member of Parliament for Nelson. It affects the Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, which is the second-largest public institution in my electorate. It's been around for 115 years. It is unique and different—and this is important in terms of the substantial question—in that it's the only polytech in New Zealand where the land was actually funded by the ratepayers of Nelson. We're talking about a substantive asset being transferred over to central government, going from the control of a board that is 100 percent locals to one that has no locals on it. So I would put to you that for the committee of the House not to allow a constituency member of Parliament to individually have their amendment voted on—that is the second-biggest institution in Nelson that's been around for 115 years—is infringing on my rights to be able to advocate for the 70,000 people that live in the constituency of Nelson, who feel very strongly about this issue.