There may be some members—in fact, we have seen one in the last term who has chosen to take that risk. Jami-Lee Ross spoke out against the National Party on a number of matters, and he did it with energy, to say the least. To suggest that there was some kind of chilling effect—simply not there. We know that there will be members who will balance up, as Dr Smith said, what they see as their loyalty to their electorate and to this nation with their loyalty to their party. The suggestion that members will look to their position and abandon their ethics is disrespectful and utterly underestimates all of the members of this House who are quite capable of making their own decisions and making their own hard decisions. So I simply do not accept that a person who commits, in the way we all do, to the future of New Zealand will be dissuaded by some kind of shadow of a threat of removal from office from a clear path of their convictions. We're here because of our convictions. Why would we not leave because of our convictions, if that was the appropriate course of action?