So, yes, we consent to this bill. It is a bill very much in the form of the Christchurch Canterbury earthquakes recovery legislation and the Kaikōura recovery legislation, which allowed physical works to be done. There are a number of features in those suites of legislation which enabled both of those communities—or all of those communities, because there are a number of small communities in Canterbury—to find their feet. It was the physical works—getting those physical infrastructure works going—which not only addressed those infrastructure problems but gave the community heart. I would suggest that we are united in this House and we do support this bill, as I said. We've united this country to see that work was being done without the delays which we all are frustrated by under the current provisions of the Resource Management Act (RMA) in terms of consenting, whereby projects can be in the consenting stage for a number of years. In fact, we have a good example right now of Auckland Council being, I think, fifth or sixth in line for their water-take consent from the Waikato Regional Council, and the regional council is saying, "You're in line, and it'll be years." So there's no argument that the delays in consenting for major projects, the like of which Auckland Council are experiencing—there's no denying that there is an issue here in New Zealand with the Resource Management Act. It is frustrating. 