Now, this is important because the conceit that the Minister of Finance had with the New Zealand public and that he had maintained throughout was that the land at Ihumātao, the purchase of it, was nothing special. It was just buying land for housing, much as the Government did with KiwiBuild—that no additional funds would be used, that no precedent was being set, that there was nothing particular about this. What this time line shows us is that that was demonstrably false and that the Minister knew it, because his officials had advised him that he would have to sign off on a specific new appropriation. And my question is: at the point of signing off on that specific new appropriation, why didn't the Minister, or the Minister of Housing, come clean with the New Zealand public about that?