But my question for the Minister is: why is this legislation required? I know that sounds funny, but if you read 3.6 of the departmental disclosure statement, there's actually quite a serious policy discussion around, basically, cutting a long story short, whether or not the bill's required. I draw the Minister's attention to the legislation design and advisory committee, who were asked by the IRD officials for their view on whether the eligibility criteria should be set out in secondary legislation or in an administrative notice. The LDAC, as they're called, says, basically, "On balance, we think the balance is slightly tilted in favour of treating this as an administrative scheme, principally due to its nature as a short-term response to its immediate problem". Well, as I understand it, that's not what's happened. The question for the Minister is why the Government's done what they've done.