Lastly, we do take issue with the fact that public conservation land is not covered by the new requirement. While we do not endorse a regime for the Department of Conservation (DOC) to put in place regulations to better regulate this, basically, we do think that there could have been an opportunity to have more cohesion around what DOC is doing and what this bill is aiming to achieve, particularly since the intent of the bill seems to be so heavily focused on the environmental impacts of freedom camping. So it just feels like a bit of an oversight.