This bill really, for the amount of time we spent on it, resulted, as many have commented, in one change, which is, in clause 8, new section 26NB "Wellbeing report". Rather than saying "(2) Using appropriate indicators,", we've deleted the word "appropriate" and said, "(2) Using indicators, the report must describe—(a) the state of wellbeing in New Zealand;"—that's an interesting concept. I'm not sure how that's going to be defined yet. It sounds nice. It's got that warm glow, Minister of Finance. It sounds nice. I don't know what that means. There's "(b) how the state of wellbeing in New Zealand has changed over time;". Well, if we had a starting point—if we knew what the measure was—we could measure it over time, but, actually, we're missing that first instrumental part. And there's "(c) the sustainability of, and any risk to, the state of wellbeing"—again, beautiful language—beautiful language. I do feel warm and glowing from that. But that is the issue—that is the issue about this. It doesn't actually deliver the specific things that we really want to know. 