What's changed—and I think the member has hit on, probably, the biggest point here—is that the board as we've previously known it in the Reserve Bank context, to speak very frankly, didn't play that much of an active role in terms of the way we would think of boards of the many different variety of Crown entities and State-owned enterprises and other bodies. They had quite a limited scope and role, and that did—I take the member's point—make some sense in that very pure 1989 model. However, times have changed, the role of the bank has changed, expanded, and looks quite different than what it did. And especially once we moved to that decision-making model with the monetary policy committee, the board's role started to change. So I think at that point it did mean that we took a step back and said, "Well, we want a board that can really have oversight on this." I don't think it does anything in terms of the Minister—far from it, in fact. I think the Minister's role stays largely the same, except that the board will have a greater role in some of the more closer monitoring that I as the Minister, or whoever the Minister is, wouldn't do.