What we as Greens don't agree with in terms of this particular bill, and every iteration of it that has come to Parliament before now, is the subjugation of certain rights below individual property rights, which this bill seeks to elevate. That is not in the public interest. We point, in particular, to the fact—and I would highlight, again, as someone who values the international rules-based order and the package of rights that we've all ascribed to in this country—that human rights are indivisible. So we have civil, political, cultural, economic, all together. That means that you can't say that an individual's property rights can sit above something like putting health regulations and health warnings on tobacco, which this bill may curtail. You can't say that our environmental rights are rights to a healthy environment by setting the carbon price, for example, should be weighed up against an individual person's economic rights. We wouldn't want Governments and Parliaments to engage in a weighing-up process that places special emphasis on individual economic rights, a neo-liberal system that has failed again and again, that has caused havoc across the world, above the collective rights of us all that we know, ultimately, benefit us as individuals.