In terms of the ongoing comments around the suitability of Department of Conservation (DOC) rangers, I think we have to keep in mind that the relevant expertise of each class of enforcement officers is a high consideration. So I am aware that the select committee received a table of advice setting out the comparable powers of each class of enforcement officers and what they are able to do. So, for example, DOC warranted officers and rangers have comparable powers under the Wildlife Act 1953, which enabled them to stop any vehicle or boat, enter or board it, search it, seize evidential material, detain a person, and arrest a person. Similarly, DOC endangered species officers, who have powers under the Trade in Endangered Species Act 1989, have powers to stop a vehicle, which includes a ship, enter or board it, search it, seize evidence, detain a person, and arrest a person. And so it goes through the relevant class of enforcement officers including Customs and the relevant Act, the New Zealand Defence Force and the relevant Act, and, in this case, the Fisheries Act and the Crown Minerals Act, also the Wildlife Act and the Maritime Crimes Act, and also the Police, who have comparable powers under the Search and Surveillance Act. It sets out very clearly the range of Acts that provide those identified enforcement officers with the subsequent powers that they can exercise into national waters.