CHRIS BISHOP (National): Speaking to the point of order. I think Mr Brownlee has summarised the position, the dilemma, that you have to confront. The implication of the points of order from Ms Davidson and Mr Shaw are quite troubling, because they are asking you to go beyond Speakers' rulings, essentially, which are that you can't call someone, directly, racist, but that labels should be interpreted as, essentially, racist, or some language should be interpreted in that light even if it's not intended in that light. Actually, I point out that no examples have been given around the language that some members—Green members—have found offensive. So we would put it to you, from the National Opposition, that the current Speakers' rulings around improper language more than suffice, and we should allow robust and free debate in this House.