That is cross-subsidisation, and if this bill supposedly, as the Minister said, evens out and makes things fair, does that mean that every single person who is on a different register will be paying exactly the same levy? Because paying exactly the same levy when it is actually pooled and everybody is dipping into that one pool is what I call fair. But if they are all paying different levies because they belong to different registers and yet the administration of it is being done by one entity and one pool of money where anybody or any entity out of the 16 registers can dip into, that is what I'd call a slush fund for the Government. Effectively, that should be called a tax, not a levy, because a levy is only about recovering the cost. The only way that it can cross-subsidise an unprofitable register is because another register is making a profit. The intention of the original pieces of legislation would have never, and the Parliament that actually made that law would not have made it, because the Government wanted to make a profit by giving a levy or charging a levy to people who were registering for the purposes or registering a company with the companies register, for example. It was purely for the collection of money.