These are not decisions taken lightly. We debate them. We look at the public health advice that we are getting. We weigh it against the consequences of, for example, asking people in Auckland to stay home, asking businesses not to operate, restricting the operations of businesses in other parts of New Zealand by moving to level 2 for those. We have developed a great deal of knowledge of this over the last period of time. For example, the question of balancing the economic consequences with putting in place these kinds of restrictions and the health benefits of that, and the economic benefits of that, is something we come to learn. We stand by the view that the very best economic response to COVID-19 is a strong public health response, and that has been borne out in the results for New Zealand. In the September quarter we actually had higher rates of economic activity than we did before COVID and the Bank of New Zealand's economists tell us that there were only three other economies in the world who could claim that—China, Taiwan, and Ireland. So we are right there in terms of our economic response because our public health response is strong. And the short-term pain that is felt in alert level increases such as those that we're going through at the moment is well and truly eclipsed by the economic benefits that we have, by the fact that we have had a long period of time through our summer where New Zealanders have not only had the opportunity to enjoy summer but we have seen strong economic activity across a range of sectors, from construction through to retail. We know that the best economic response is the kind of swift and decisive public health response we saw on Sunday.