The royal commission is hearing from survivors right now. Yes, they've put out an interim report, which has been mentioned, but at the time they put out the report they'd only heard not even a fifth of the evidence that they expect to hear. They hadn't even started to engage with the Children's Commissioner on the information that they hold. They were only identifying their research gaps to fill. The bulk of their report was starting to tell us the stories and to encourage others to bring their voices. So to be saying in this House that, actually, this bill responds to the royal commission report, particularly when the royal commission forum—made up of survivors and experts who are monitoring that process and have been for many, many years—told all of us to stop this bill, that they saw this as a pre-empting of the process; they did not say, "Go do this now, fix it later. You'll give credit to our voices, our spilling of our trauma, to prevent harm in the future. Don't worry about that, carry on and we'll agree for you to fix it later." That is not what they told us. To hear from the other side that this is so urgent in terms of significant reform that we ignore those voices, that process, gives me a pain, if I'm honest.