My question to the Minister is this. He explained in his first reading speech—which I went back and read—about how he extended the Government subsidy to the Teaching Council shortly after they took office to recognise some of the changes that were made, including reinstating elections to the council. My question is: why did the Minister not do that again, reinstate transitional funding—and my colleague Paul Goldsmith talked about this—to cover the council for a period that would have allowed a more full and proper select committee process in order to allow for some of those unhappy stakeholders—and they were very unhappy—to have their say?. I mean, even given the short time frame, we heard from a lot of submitters. But we know there were hundreds more who didn't get to have their say, and the one comment from all of those submitters, or a great proportion of those submitters that came to the select committee or appeared on Zoom, who were visibly angry and upset at the way that this bill was being rammed through—the one thing that they all said was "Why is this being rammed through so quickly? Why is this not a full process?" 