Here's where I want to challenge the Minister. The Minister asserts that we need to extend the period to count the vote because the population is growing. That is garbage. Are we really saying that the United States, it's got 340 million people, needs longer to count their votes than the country of New Zealand that's got 5 million people? That doesn't make sense. Are we saying the UK—it's got 65 million people. Does that mean that they need 13 times as much time as New Zealand to count the votes? Oh, come on, pull the other one. There is no logical argument that says that as your population grows you need to extend the period of which you count the vote. Here's the part on which I think the Minister isn't correct, and that is that in an MMP environment every one of the eight elections that I've been involved in has actually been quite close; the determination of the special votes, one or two seats here or there, can make a marked difference. I'd give the example of 2017. In my view the change that resulted in two seats changing in the final count of the vote from election night was significant; equally so in each of the preceding elections. The argument that the 10 days makes no difference is factually incorrect.