So the reason for this is because I am, as we all are, deeply concerned about the process that we have gone through for this bill—not only for this bill but, actually, for the bill last year where we set the rules around the auctioning—and also around the Minister's actions and what he knew and didn't know and when he was told that this might be an issue. We've seen in the Cabinet papers that the Minister, in fact, was advised that this could have potential problems and financial problems for the Crown. But he, at that time early last year, said that he didn't think it was a problem, and nothing happened. So, I guess, in his response to my tabled amendment, I would like for him to delve into why he didn't think that this was a problem all of last year, when we went through the bill in June, and then all the way to the end of the year. We are left in a situation where we are debating a bill that is making changes to an auction that's happening in just over a week, as we mentioned earlier. This is highly, highly complex legislation.