Basically, down in Rakiura, these pāua divers are talking about increased encounters with sharks since the shark cage diving operations were happening, and also others, recreational users talking about increased encounters and sharks following boats, etc. So there are concerns. I think the Department of Conservation went and did a review to see whether this was indeed founded in terms of this changing the behaviour of sharks. I think what the conclusion they came to is that they couldn't make a call either way on whether it changed the behaviours of sharks in areas that weren't immediately in the vicinity of shark cage diving but were slightly further away. But what they did say is that what shark cage diving did is attract sharks that were in the vicinity to one place. The problem, then, is that you couldn't then undertake other activities in close proximity—so recreational fishing, other commercial fishing activities in that same space—because it increased the chance of encounters. So their view was that then you needed a greater separation between those activities. But in the bill, while you can make a submission, there's no real weighting of the safety impacts of that. So if you've got two groups saying, "OK, we would like to operate in the same space.", there's no consideration that those human safety risks would be taken into account in any other way compared to other operational issues.