So the Government parties have realised that in order to negotiate, they need to understand what will keep their coalition members happy if they are to get across the line. The alternative view is that they had negotiated and the agreed position was that the Greens would put up something that they knew that the other parties wouldn't support and knew very well wouldn't pass, which is, I suppose, firmly in the realm of virtue signalling more so than virtue itself. That's, I suppose, troubling enough, except that we're in an election campaign, effectively, now, certainly that period, and so it is that, you know, again, that's to be expected. It's something that this side of the House expects from Government parties—fair enough; good luck to them—and we respond accordingly. But they should not pretend that they're not doing the same when they put up amendments that will not be supported by their side of the House that highlight the logical inconsistency. The logical inconsistencies, as far as I can go there—he said, checking himself in the last 10 seconds to not say a bad word in parliamentary terms, having already said "cock-up", which is pretty bad. And so for all these reasons—