But in response to the second part of his question, you're asking about protections around, I guess, aggressive afforestation. This was a debate that was had last year when we passed the zero carbon bill, when the Opposition got a provision included in the zero carbon bill that there is a mandatory consideration that the commission must include—and then the Government must also include in their response to the commission's advice about the effects of afforestation on rural communities and economies. It's one of several things that they have to consider, and, obviously, they need to come to a balance of those considerations, but that is written into the legislation and the zero carbon bill. Because it is an amendment to the primary Act, and this is also an amendment to the primary Act, that consideration applies to everything in this bill. There are also other protections, but that is written in here.