By the way, if the objective here is to reduce transaction costs to increase certainty, well, it's going to take several years for the courts and the sector and the commission itself to work out how these new rules actually work. So we're moving to what is probably a less certain paradigm and we have the uncertainty of the transition. So the idea that this is automatically good and is going to get us a more competitive market doesn't stand up to a great deal of scrutiny prima facie. Buddle Findlay also identify the possibility that if there was to be a purchaser of goods, perhaps a State sector purchaser, and they don't spread around their purchasing in a sufficient way, then they might actually be liable for distorting the market. Now, they're not willingly exploiting their power, but what they are doing is having the effect, or doing something that's likely to have the effect, and are liable under this legislation. So what it's going to do is it's going to mean people are going to have to watch their back all the time to make sure they're not too successful or occupying too much of a market, because they could become liable. Despite having good intentions, just trying to do their job, people could become liable under this legislation. 