That law was the subject of scrutiny on a number of occasions, by no lesser institutions than the High Court of New Zealand, the Court of Appeal of New Zealand, the Supreme Court of New Zealand, and the Waitangi Tribunal—all of whom found that law to breach our international obligations, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, and the Treaty of Waitangi. It was found to be manifestly unfair and unreasonable. There is a basic principle underpinning the law as it was up to 2010, and that is that if you are a prisoner at the time of an election but you are sentenced to less than three years, you are going to be free before the next election and you should have the right to have a say on those who are leading the country that you're going to be released into. That's the fundamental principle. It wasn't what Parliament decided in 2010, but it had decided this year. So this legislation went through. 