Let's talk about hard-working New Zealanders. I want to talk to you about an actual hard-working New Zealander: Chloe—not the one over there but another one I know. She's a single mum. She's got a pre-schooler and she's got an intermediate school kid. She works three days a week as a support worker, one day a week for a not-for-profit. So she's got two jobs. She's looking after two kids, and she earns $48,000 a year, or thereabouts. What would the tax cuts give her? They'd give her $112 a year. What would the tax cuts give someone who earned $288,000 a year—which just so happens to be what the Leader of the Opposition gets paid? They'd get $7,522. If you earn $288,000, you get that much. If you're a hard-working New Zealander with two jobs and two kids, you get $112. That is not a New Zealand I want to live in, and that is why there won't be any tax cuts of that ilk from this side of the House. It's $112 for Chloe, and $7,000 for Chris, thus exacerbating the very inequality that this party is committed to addressing. So that's why the majority of the select committee did not agree with the ACT Party and did not agree with the National Party, and agreed to confirm the reasonable and progressive tax system we have.