One other concern I had that came up through the committee stage was around one of the amendments that had been put forward by the Finance and Expenditure Committee, which sought to allow an exemption for accommodation on forestry land, because, effectively, the rules said there can't be residential properties on the land; it's only for forestry purposes. But that was believed to create a risk for any investor or any landowner who had accommodation on a particular forestry block that would have supported the forestry activities from time to time, for example, old shearers' quarters, or something to that effect that the forestry workers would stay in, carry out the pruning task, for example, and then head away again. Often these forestry blocks can be in quite remote areas, and so having accommodation on site can be very important. So adding in that carve-out, as was done at the select committee stage, was a way to try and recognise and allow for that variability that is present on some blocks, but not all forestry blocks. 