The same goes for a statement of cash flows. There's a point I make here, which is that the reporting statements of large organisations are often exceptionally complicated. Here we have organisations which do take in public money—it's publicly appropriated—and some of these simpler documents, like an operating statement and a statement of cash flows, are far more accessible for the average Auckland ratepayer, who, ultimately, is paying to support these organisations. So I want to have assurance that the average Auckland ratepayer who wants to know how this money is being spent doesn't have to wade through a 150-page document that they can't make head or tail of and that there's some good, simple, transparent information that they can get to—and, at face value, an overall operating statement and a statement of cash flows would really help with that. But we've removed that through this legislation, so we do need to hear from the member in the chair who's overseeing this bill why that is, why that's being removed, and her level of confidence that we're still going to have reporting that's done in a really accessible way, and her response to Julia Durkin's assertion that we're, effectively, lowering the reporting standards here, when, in fact, we should have higher reporting standards.