Whether he is correct or not—and the Minister's obviously deep in discussions with officials—this just goes to show why this bill, which has such a magnitude around it, should've gone through a proper process of evaluation and consideration, not only from a select committee process, where we have people like Hon Michael Woodhouse making very valuable contributions to making sure that this bill is the best we can get, but I think it also raises a wider issue, around this is not an insignificant issue that this new Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 23 will have on mum and dad investors. It is a major imposition. It has financial consequences that many people will be wondering about tonight and worrying about tonight, and I think this is a real prime example why the Minister should have been much more judicious—in fact, I say the Government should've been much more judicious in the way that they brought the SOP to the House.