But I would say that there are aspects of this report that are slightly vague, and while it is clear that there was no responsibility being particularly sheeted home to any Government organisation, the suggestion that there had been a wrong focus, etc., tends to ignore the history that we had seen post the Terrorism Suppression Act of 2002. That Act was in response to the Twin Towers attack in the United States. That was an event that saw all of the security arrangements around travel in New Zealand change—massive changes—and, on top of that, we saw the emergence of ISIS and its absolute perversion of the greater good that comes from the adherence to the Islam religion. In that environment, I think it's a little bit of a harsh criticism. It's also a worry that in this new look, we might miss something once again. 