Rt Hon JACINDA ARDERN: Well, firstly, I would question the member's rationale on that last point. But I would also then ask the member the question: what was it of the support that we put into New Zealand families and businesses that he would choose to cut, because even with a return to surplus sooner than what we saw under National in the GFC—and yet the economic crisis we've experienced has been worse—the member seems to suggest that, instead, we should not have invested in businesses to keep them afloat with the business support scheme, that we should not have ensured that people's incomes were covered through those income supports, and that we should not have had the extra support through the winter energy payment or benefit increases, all of which have contributed to the lowest unemployment we have seen in New Zealand, at 3.2 percent. So, instead, my question to the member is: what would he have cut? Because it would have left our recovery far worse. 