The fortunate thing is that, in the legislation, the chief executive has discretion to apply on a case by case basis where someone has a relevant, valid case, and then they won't get their superannuation cut. What I would encourage that member to do is, rather than cast aspersions in the House over our handling of these, be much more constructive and actually bring any cases where she thinks that the decision made was incorrect—where there needs to be a review of decision—because the review of decision policy is in place for a reason. Then, certainly, we would be willing to—we're not doing an amnesty, because the law is in place for a reason and the discretion allows us to deal on a case by case basis. But if the member doesn't bring the cases to us that she's concerned about, we will not be able to resolve the ones that she seems to have come across.