As I said in my second reading speech, and it was said again on the weekend by all of the early childhood centres that were at that conference, they were never talked to about the fact that pay parity, the money that was going to be granted, would be attached to conditions like the fact that it would be a tenure-based scale rather than performance based, and the fact that the centres themselves wouldn't get to decide where, in fact, their own staff started on that scale. These things were never mentioned. In all of the lead-up to this bill and during the bill and during the select committee, it was never mentioned, until we dragged it out of the officials, and said, "Hang on a minute. What other terms and conditions of the kindergarten teachers collective agreement will be imposed?" The Minister said, "Oh, no, none at all. None at all.", and the officials said, "None at all.", but then they did actually have to say, "Well, there will be a couple of conditions that will mimic the KTCA.", and those will be the fact that the centres will not get to decide where their staff start on the scale, nor how they go up the scale. That will not be up to them; that will be as per the kindergarten agreement—never mentioned, but confirmed. They were blindsided by this, and the feedback from the conference was, "We are private businesses. You are foisting a collective agreement on to private businesses who want to manage their own employment affairs." They do not want to have it put on to them in such a manner that it's done under urgency, without any consultation, and sort of slipped in at the last minute.