Dr EMILY HENDERSON: Oh, my apologies, sir. My apologies—withdrawn. "In determining for the purposes of this Act", says subsection (4), "whether or not any publication … is objectionable … the following matters should be considered:", and I draw the House's attention to "(a) the dominant effect of the publication as a whole: … (c) the character of the publication, including … in relation to … social [matters and] other matters:", and also "(e) the purpose for which the publication is intended to be used:" and "(f) any other relevant circumstances". Now, what I would strongly say to this House is that that precludes from the definition material of obvious social and political value such as the George Floyd video, and it precludes the baby uplift videos. Those are matters where it is about political speech, they are matters of social importance, and that in itself should be cover. 