I think how we've managed to do that was, basically, by prescribing a certain range of things that it would be prohibited for people to do in the safe area, and those are things that could be safely seen and heard by somebody accessing abortion services. I think one of the issues that we were so concerned about was the concept of a protected person, because in the bill as introduced, it was around a protected person being impacted by the behaviour. But a protected person was somebody that was then attending those services for the purpose of accessing abortion services. So the concern we had was the ability for people to be able to testify, but in testifying they would also have to then declare the reason they were in the safe area. We felt that that would actually prevent a lot of people stepping up and saying, you know, "I've experienced this" and testifying in court.