But my final message is that trade is critical for all of us in this House, for the wider country, and it does deserve the best of us in terms of our negotiating strategy and our political perspectives and contribution. I do feel that opportunity and value is being left on the table with the fact that the experience that sits on this side of the House in terms of trade and commercial export arrangements—not only in my context but many other of my colleagues—is simply not being used in a way that benefits "New Zealand Inc.". When we were the Government, we reached out to David Parker, we reached out to Phil Goff, we reached out to David Shearer, when they each had time in the trade spokesman role, to ensure that they were well-briefed, shoulder-to-shoulder with the Government, so we could present a "New Zealand Inc." face. What I'm seeing back is too defensive, not engaging at the level that should be occurring, and, actually, I don't think that works in New Zealand's interests, and it certainly doesn't work in our communities' interests, who want the best of our thinking brought to negotiations. Thank you, Mr Speaker.