JAN LOGIE: It's just ugly. It really is. And so it is well over time to me that this legislation disconnects from that and really puts in a definition of miscarriage to clarify that bereavement leave could be sought for the unplanned end of a pregnancy, no matter how far along that pregnancy was, no matter whether actually even that the person where the pregnancy had ended—the only kind of test is that really it was an intended pregnancy. It didn't even have to have previously been known to be able to access this leave and that no proof would be required, no weight scales would be introduced into the discussion, which, thankfully, I don't think we heard any examples of that happening. But certainly the committee did hear examples coming primarily through our unions—being the voice for working people in this country—telling us that actually this has been disputed, where, mostly women that I know of but could also have been other pregnant people seeking to access bereavement leave, and their employers saying they weren't entitled to it. And the process for that is somebody deep in their grief having to go through our employment processes to mediate that decision is just impractical and not realistic and adds to the damage of the situation.