Here's the "but", though: however, if you're under 17, and the medical professional thought that the person refusing consent was deliberately trying to harm you by refusing consent, they can seek support from Oranga Tamariki, and potentially the Family Court, to make a guardianship order. That's a very, very rare—but occasional—thing. I have to say, in my time as a surgical chief executive, we never allowed a procedure, regardless of what it was, to be undertaken on a child without the child—a mature child; so a teenager usually—you know, when we felt that it was necessary and appropriate for them to have a say about what's going on. And that's almost all cases, apart from babies. If the child consented and the parent consented, we'd go. If the parent consented, but the child did not consent, we didn't proceed until we had those ducks in a row. And vice versa: if the child consented, whether it was a tonsillectomy or breast reduction or augmentation, and the parents didn't consent, then further conversations would need to be had. That is the overwhelming clinical practice. 