We look at the earthquake-prone heritage buildings. It's a reduction of the authority provided by clause 7 of the appropriation. I'm not sure why that's reduced. Certainly, all around New Zealand and provincial New Zealand there are buildings that are vacant and they're vacant because they are considered to be earthquake-prone. The problem with that is that they've been standing for well over 100 years. They're not being slept in. They could actually be opened, I would have thought, during the daytime for people to run business from or even the odd time that they could be used for some event. What worries me tremendously in provincial New Zealand is that we have these heritage buildings being left to rot because nobody can afford to put them into the earthquake safeness that we now require for buildings, for heritage buildings. And here we have money that seems to be being lost to that account. So I'm not quite sure why that is and I'm sure that the Government would like to explain that to the people of Whanganui, of Napier, of Hastings, of all around New Zealand, where right now they need money into their economies and this Government seems more intent on taking it off them rather than giving it to them and building their economy. Thank you, Madam Speaker.