So I commend the member for bringing this bill to the House, the Local Government (Pecuniary Interests Register) Amendment Bill, so that at least voters know that elected members who have interests in business or shareholdings or property—that that's understood, so that decisions they might make in their role as elected members, where there's a conflict of interest, that that conflict of interest can be reduced as far as practical. But there are a couple of opportunities that I'd like the member to consider, particularly when we get to the committee of the whole House—some amendments, in fact, that could actually make this bill far more effective. We need to consider whether, in fact, it would be helpful to the functioning of local government—to actually restoring trust and confidence in local government decision-making and processes—to include the pecuniary interests of those individuals appointed to chair and as board members on council-controlled organisations where they have the ability to sign off on procurements worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.