So I want to understand what the Minister's intent is regarding (a) the exclusion of people on main benefits, the exclusion of under-18-year-olds who may be doing paid work, and what the reasoning was to aim to exclude those groups. Does he not think that they're facing cost of living pressures, and whether broadening, perhaps, the intent of the bill to include them would support more New Zealanders, as spoken about by many of his colleagues? So this is why we've put a tabled amendment around making it really clear that this bill should actually be including people on main benefits, and also people who may be superannuitants who may be struggling. I want to note, as well, that many of our over-65s who may be in rentals are facing massive cost of living pressures, and those pressures exist despite the winter energy payment. So is it his intent to exclude those people, and why?