These general compliance costs are exacerbated by the specific way that the bill is actually worded in regards to its record-keeping requirements. The bill's wording requires that the electronic record—and I quote—is "electronically readable and usable by Police computers". That's where it's quite unclear what it's trying to do. Is it trying to talk to the National Intelligence Application, which is the national database that police use for intelligence, or is it for other purposes? So it is quite unclear what is intended by those "electronically readable and usable by Police computers" words in the general policy statement.