Now, there is a lack of a regulatory risk assessment, a lack of regulatory validity about what the Government has proposed here. It is another example of slogans over substance. There is nothing in this bill that will deliver more gas—having more information about the fact that the gas is running out, and that Government policy directs it to run out much faster, we've heard, than even the Climate Change Commission would accept is reasonable. The Climate Change Commission has told the Government that they'll need gas out to 2040 or 2050. The industry, and even the Government's own advisers, have said that there's a risk that major users, including electricity generators, will not have access to sufficient gas from 2026 or 2027. That is a very significant risk that having more information about the lack of gas won't help this Government solve. In fact, it's more likely that businesses that rely on gas, rely on affordable energy, actually choose to leave New Zealand and take their high-paid jobs with them.