The interesting thing about that is that it doesn't end up being all too controversial and therefore is relatively representative of a form of incrementalism. I guess to that point, I just refer to a quote that I was literally just googling just now about incrementalism, because I was trying to conceive of that in terms of the types of theories of change that all of us in Parliament as representatives of our respective communities bring to this place. And that is by Seth Godin and states and I quote, "Incrementalism ceases to be a good strategy when there's a cliff on the route." That is, effectively, I guess, the kaupapa and the perception that the Greens are bringing to this debate: that it is incredibly important, of course, that we are doing these things with regard to harm minimisation but there was an opportunity to do much more—much more—with this piece of law change, as evidenced by that committee of the whole House stage and the SOPs that were brought before the House. But nonetheless, the Greens will, of course, be supporting this because it is a good step in the right direction. 