SIMON COURT (ACT): The member Christopher Luxon has raised some valid justifications as to why a shortened or truncated period at select committee is unacceptable. I've had advice today from stakeholders that this rush to a low sulphur fuel. The case has been made last night that actually it's not a rush, because the treaty was signed some time in the 1990s. However, we're talking about New Zealand here, a couple of dozen ships, many which rely on the fuel that's currently available and manufactured by the refining company in New Zealand, and will have no choice but to switch to—essentially—diesel, at two to three times the price. So at a time when the supply chains are under pressure, where our manufacturers and importers are under pressure, and there's a risk of all of those costs passing through into the economy—we're talking about transport bulk cement and bulk solvents and other chemicals around New Zealand, as well as transporting containers and other goods up to the Pacific Islands. All of these shipping companies will be at risk of increased cost pressures that flow through to the wider economy.