I also would like to speak to three amendments—specifically, Marama Davidson's SOP 474 to improve the safe zone provisions from the existing legislation. I want to say that I don't see this as a freedom of expression debate. I see this as how we can prevent a specific form of harassment that is proven to cause harm. We've got really, really strong evidence of that harm. It's not about protesting; it is about intimidation and harassment and the fact that our current settings, as I've seen in some communities where there have been attempts to get councils to pass bylaws, where there's been the attempts to get the police to enforce harassment laws, when women have come to others and are saying that they're feeling really harmed by these approaches, and nobody would intervene—and my concern is that criminalising is too high a threshold. We're not going to get the police intervening when they think it's going to criminalise people. So this is a compromise in terms of setting up an infringement process, and I think it balances freedom of speech and having an active vehicle to prevent harassment. 