The next way in which I think we are actually even more profound in this bill—and it is so important in terms of how we see this adversarial system developing in a more humane but also a more accurate model—is in the victim impact statement. Now, for those who don't know, a victim impact statement is one of the still very few ways in which we allow someone who was the proven victim of an offender to make a statement as to the impact on them of what's happened. In a normal case, where you've got a judge who has a sane offender before them, who's been found guilty, that victim impact statement is essentially evidence for the sentencing judge. It's a point at which the victim is able to be in the adversarial system because they are still a tool. They are still something that is useful to someone else. Not so, when you allow a victim impact statement from someone whose offender is insane, because in that case, there is no sentence. This person is a patient. To describe them as offenders is actually wrong. They do not have the mental element. 