Now, one of the earlier speakers, Mr O'Connor, was describing this harassment as an isolation of views that we disagree with. I fundamentally disagree with this assertion. This is not an isolation of views that we disagree with; this is about people who are literally going about the business of accessing lawful healthcare. As Jan Logie said, just now, you can do that from a maximum of 150 metres away. The safe area provision is literally a maximum of 150 metres, and so those banners can be held, those chants can be chanted, and the very loud prayers can be prayed, but 150 metres maximum away. The safe area isn't going to be applied automatically. The individual providers will need to apply for a safe area and there'll have to be a good reason for it, although previous harm or threat will not be one of those contingencies. I think we need to ask ourselves, if you disagree with this and you feel that the rights—the need to bring those banners into the faces of people accessing healthcare, some of whom are going through extremely difficult and challenging times—if you feel the need to be allowed to have overt and often fact-bereft banners in people's faces, I think you need to ask yourself why. Why do you need to do that in the faces of people that are providing healthcare? Why do you need to do something that you know, because you've been told, is threatening, is harassment, is challenging, and does cause trauma. It's not about hurt feelings or feeling offended; it's about actually, literally, causing trauma and pain to somebody who may already be in a great deal of it, although sometimes not. 