Many farmers in New Zealand—as an example—plant large areas of land for conservation purposes. They can get a remission if it's a QEII, but if it's not then there is no remission available. So on one hand, we accept that there's an issue with Māori land and historic debts and the penalties, but the way in which this goes about addressing it disadvantages all other ratepayers. If the Government wanted to fix this, and if the Government is consistent in its approach, then the Government should fund the rates of this land. The Government should fund the rates on the land that is going to be required to be fenced off and unproductive for water quality. The Government should fund the rates for the biodiversity value that New Zealand is going to get if that biodiversity strategy happens. Ultimately, what you're doing is removing the productive base from New Zealand and you're putting extra costs on that very same productive base.