So I'm speaking in support of the amendment in the name of my colleague Simeon Brown. It's the amendment that would amend clause 5. It's numbered (f) on the Table. It would amend clause 5 to read that, in clause 5, replace new section 167A(5A) with "Before recommending the making of regulations, the Minister must consult with (a) stakeholders in the motor vehicle sector; and (b) any other such person as the Minister considers appropriate." And so I think that that makes practical common sense. It's the sort of practical logic that is often lost, I think, on a Government that brings to this Parliament agenda-driven policy that is party political rather than pragmatic. If there's one thing that we've learnt over the years, watching this Government—five long years—it is that they do like to have things done their way, and they don't particularly like to hear from people who might have a contrary or a divergent view from their own. But, in this particular case, it seems to be painfully obvious, with a piece of legislation that so dramatically impacts on the day-to-day operation of the motor vehicle sector, that they should be, by definition, included in the legislation—be a group of stakeholders that are named for consultation by the Minister in terms of his implementation and decisions he makes about the regulatory impacts of this legislation.