So we opposed this bill in the first reading, regrettably. We were somewhat concerned that we didn't have bipartisan support for such an important legislative thing, but we were certainly open to being able to be convinced to support it at remaining stages. The biggest concern we had was the reach of the Government into what was the independence of the Reserve Bank by some of the changes that were being made. And I regret to inform the House that rather than making changes in the bill to maintain the independence between the Government, having set its remits and its financial strategy and then leaving the Reserve Bank to do its job, something of the opposite has happened. Indeed, these changes were made after the submissions on the original bill had been heard. Officials, apparently of their own volition, but, I think, the quiet hand of the Minister of Finance, who decided that even the interference and the fingers in that he was seeking when the bill was introduced wasn't quite enough, actually made more changes to quietly increase his influence over the ability of the Reserve Bank to do its job. It's for that reason, rather than maintaining the independence that was initially foreseen by this Act, and, actually, that has stood the test of time, we are quietly eroding that independence.