CHRIS BISHOP: Well, indeed. I think the judgment is correct. It's hard to escape the logic of the judgment. But I also think it's worth noting Her Honour's conclusion at paragraph 73 around the margin of appreciation given to the Government is the right one as well. It's quite an elegant judgment in the sense that basically Her Honour says, "Applicants have a point. It is probably true that the granting of provisional consent is ultra-vires the Act, but I'm declining to order relief that they have sought"—which is basically stop the roll-out—"because of the massive impact that would obviously have on the country." We're well under way, or at least tolerably well under way, in terms of the Pfizer vaccine roll-out in New Zealand. The last thing, I hope everyone in Parliament will agree, is that we have to stop doing that, and so Her Honour declined to order relief. I'm sure that constitutional scholars out there watching, like Dean Knight from the Victoria University law school, are going to love the idea that the margin of appreciation has yet again been entered into the High Court register of cases. 