The committee also recommended the bill more specifically address the interaction between safety requirements and a provision in the Juries Act of 1991 relating to a person's qualification to be a juror. The committee recommends that the intent of the provision could most clearly be achieved if the bill provides that a person must not serve as a juror on a particular occasion if their jury service has been deferred or excused on the basis that they do not meet the safety requirements that are set by the judiciary. This change makes it very clear that core juror qualification requirements cannot be overridden by the bill. The committee also recommended an amendment to make it more explicit that safety requirements cannot vary the circumstances in which a court may proceed with fewer than 10 jurors—and this is a useful clarification from the committee. 