So I think that, in terms of what's been said already to support that, it strikes that balance of making sure that health professionals are still acting within the best interests of the mental health patient—to make sure that their therapy and their journey back into wellness is being supported as appropriately as possible—but, at the same time, if there's pertinent information provided by the victim or the family, that it's being taken into account when that recommendation is being made to the Minister in terms of what to do. I think it was really interesting to see that there is a lot of effort that goes into those decisions, and I think that, for those submitters that were watching and listening and understanding some of that information, it is not a simple decision being made when someone is being released back into the community, and how that is done. There were some instances given by the Director-General of Health that quite specifically said that it would not be in the best interests of the patient if it was just a trip to the dairy or maybe a trip every second week—like, in the initial stages of someone being supported back into the community, that it's not within the best interests of the patient for that information to be provided to the victim of the offence every single step of the way.