As I already mentioned, the submissions from Age Concern looked particularly at this issue—Auckland Disability Law also argued the same—where we could have a scenario where something essential for the care of a disabled person was uplifted by a bailiff because the caregiver was owning that debt. So that was an important extension that was agreed by all members—that if there was a caregiver to a person with a disability, it would also apply in that context, because uplifting it from the caregiver would also have an impact upon the inclusion of the person with a disability within the wider community. So it was important to extend it to that further level.