So that brings me to the second question, to which, I guess, his response will be: "Well, I'll be reviewing the targets anyway in June of 2024, and that's my opportunity to sort of deal with those particular issues." The question I've got there in regards to this particular section is symbolic of the challenges in this legislation in that, effectively, again, it just gives the power to the Minister. So instead of the industry having certainty leading up to 2026, now the industry is going to have to wait to see what he or she—whoever the Minister may be—will decide at that point. But, again, the review has a number of criteria here in terms of what the review must take into account, but then it says, "The review may be undertaken by any method the Minister considers appropriate."—any method. Effectively, the Minister could decide however he or she wishes for this particular review to take place. From my perspective, that doesn't sound very methodical when you're dealing with something which is actually—these are big industry players having to plan ahead and the Minister, effectively, has the power to simply just decide how he or she wishes to undertake a review. So whilst a review sounds like a good idea—particularly as the market changes and manufacturing and technology capability no doubt only improves—the other point here is, actually, this just seems to be another power grab by the Minister to decide.