The Minister is right, and he mentioned it in his first reading speech, that, actually, the way in which immigration instructions are framed, if somebody meets the policy criteria for the acceptance of a visa, there are no legal grounds to decline that visa. We know we can delay them for a long, long time; look what is building up and the backlog to the residence class visas, skilled migrant, partnership, family—every one of those categories is now in quite significant backlog and delay. But, if that was the problem, solve that problem. And the Government can do that by one of two ways: (a) they could pass a bill with a much, much narrower term of reference to enable the Minister to be able to suspend those criteria, or (b) he has the power to do so under the immigration instructions. He can simply issue a new instruction suspending those criteria. Now, it probably would be better for the Parliament to give that power rather than for the Minister to act unilaterally, but nevertheless that should not be used as a reason to extend the powers much more broadly to whole classes of visas, even if that is not unfavourable and can be favourable to the visa holder or the class of visa holder.