Look, let me talk a little bit about an actual case, the case of Fitzgerald, that happened here in Wellington, where a man was described as having longstanding serious mental illnesses, and what did he do? He kissed a woman in Cuba Mall without consent. He grabbed her and he kissed her, and that is an indecent assault. I want to recognise—the law report records—it was traumatic for the victim. He was up for seven years inside because he had two—this mentally disabled person who had serious difficulties, was sometimes homeless, was up for seven years in prison because he kissed a woman in Cuba Mall. And you know what? The Court of Appeal, when it looked at it, said this: "Mr Fitzgerald should be receiving care and support in an appropriate facility, not serving a lengthy term of imprisonment. He has ended up in prison for a very long term, in circumstances where he should not be there at all." That's what the National Party would have us stick with. In that case, the Supreme Court has had to do linguistic somersaults to find a way for this mentally disabled person to avoid it.