I have very significant misgivings, which I would like to be allayed by the Minister's responses to questions I have in relation to the courts and tribunals of New Zealand. This is a portfolio area of mine, but should also be of interest to every member of Parliament and all those who care about the reasonable conduct of public life in New Zealand as protected by the courts. So my question, which is an overarching one, which I'll break down into a number of more specific points, is: what effect does this legislation have on the courts of New Zealand? For example, are judges who are duly appointed—and are not subject to political or, indeed, other branches of Government interference as to their employment—affected by the vaccine mandates or the operation of these orders in a way that would cause them to conduct the affairs of their courtroom in a way that is, effectively, directed by the Executive? For example, is a witness to a court case required to be vaccinated, and if he or she is not, is he or she able to participate or not participate in accordance with this so-called traffic light system, which we'll use by way of shorthand? Likewise, defendants, plaintiffs, those who deserve to have their day in court—a constitutionally protected right under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, which, along with other rights and freedoms contained therein, you would not necessarily know if you're a casual observer, but which we were assured by the Government, it bears in mind, as the Minister has stated, perhaps in slightly patronising tone, those on this side of the House who have been Ministers before know that such advice is privileged. Well, others know that too, and that doesn't lessen our desire to see the working, see the justification, at least to understand where the Government's head is at in terms of some of these restrictions.