But, really, this is a serious issue, although I jest, because what we're looking at is a bill which seeks to restrict access to synthetic urine, and working on the assumption that 1) we have a significant problem with cheating workplace urine tests, and 2) the second assumption is that cheats cheat with synthetic urine and, therefore, that banning synthetic urine will make workplaces safer. There's a couple of issues that I have with that, because I actually see that the key problem is actually impairment at work. I think what we're all trying to achieve is a safe workplace, and a safe workplace is going to be achieved by identifying impairment rather than using testing, which is significantly flawed, and experts do agree in many situations that they are significantly flawed in detecting drugs at a level which cause impairment. And, actually, impairment's the issue.