I have to say that what was unique about this case is that we were able to, largely, have consensus across the House. I'm grateful to members for their participation in our dialogue leading up to the bill coming to the House, and I'm also grateful that there have been times when we haven't always agreed. As I said in earlier readings of this particular bill, dissension is not a bad thing. It does allow us to examine different perspectives, and we should allow for that healthy, robust debate to occur, never more so than in bills such as this where we are looking at the protection of our children. 