So, in closing, what I'd like to say is the ACT Party supports it, but we believe that property should be treated equally under the law, and this bill does not appear to treat the property of certain groups of people equally. In fact, it gives them unequal opportunity to avoid paying historical costs that other ratepayers have to pay. These rates fund local government infrastructure. Local government is going to miss out, and until the underlying issue of collective ownership and the stresses and strains between large groups of people, which, I can only reflect on, must be the most complex body corporate arrangement ever—and we know how difficult it is to get bodies corporates in places where they have weathertightness issues and other issues around shared driveways. You know, one party won't agree to install the duct for the fibre up the driveway. I can only imagine how complex and difficult it is for land that's in shared ownership, in this context, to be advanced for development. I don't think this bill will do anything to advance that.