The elephant in the room, as I've described previously, relates to the status of what is variously known as the unborn child or the fetus or, most creatively of all within the Abortion Legislation Bill select committee report, "contents of the uterus". This is a reference in relation to surgical techniques that are used. In fact, the phrase "unborn child" is currently used in the Crimes Act, in section 182, and will remain so. The bill, despite what proponents have sometimes claimed, will not entirely remove, essentially, the practice of abortion from the Crimes Act. Section 182 of the Crimes Act is amended by the proposed bill, but it is not removed from that. So it is—bearing in mind that description of an unborn child, as I say, existing on the statute book that we have at the moment—that phrases such as "choice", "freedom", and "the ability to choose what one does with one's own body" should be viewed in the context of the alternative language to that of "unborn child", dehumanising as it is.