But, actually, it's also unique in the sense that it's on our statute book alone as an act to end a human life without the consent of that human—other than in self-defence. I'm conscious that some might say that's just my view. It's also the view of science, of course, that an independent, separate, human life is involved. As I say, that's my view; others have different views. They're entitled to these, and those who hold the same view as me are also entitled to theirs. So for that reason, and with the caveats and qualifications that I've put on it, I cannot support this bill at this, the third and final reading.