Then at what would be new section 116E(2)(b), in SOP 38, it says "whether the benefits of adding fluoride to the drinking water outweigh the financial costs, taking into account"—and here is the change. It says "(i) the state or likely state", which is new, "of the oral health of", and instead of "its residents, population", it's now "a population group or community where the local authority supply is situated." And the other provisions are very similar. Another change that I'm sure the select committee will be interested in is new offence provisions at what will be new section 166J. So most of the provisions remain the same with that change from DHB to director-general and this different mechanism in terms of how the Act works. 