What this bill does is it balances the needs of our society. This is long-term investment. It takes back the test from where it was to a better position and it puts it under the "benefit to New Zealand" test. Just to reassure those listening as to what that means in this specific circumstance, one of the things that will be asked is: are the benefits to New Zealand proportionate to the sensitivity of the land? That will depend on the quality of that land. So one of the things that will happen as a practical result is that high-quality land will likely not be sold under this test, but low-quality land, which is not suitable for farming, will be. I think that's a really important balance, and I commend this bill to the House.