So there's two elements to this hierarchy of offences. One is that it is based on the seriousness of the injury. The other is it is based on the culpability, on the mental element. And these are the two ways in which this particular offence really doesn't do justice to anyone. First, it completely conflates reckless or unintentional offending and actual intentional offending. And for some reason, both of them are given exactly the same sentence. The second point is it doesn't pay attention to the actual seriousness of what's done. It leaves the bizarre possibility that we could end up having a police officer who has suffered GBH, whose offender is charged with GBH and who gets a sentence of seven years, while his friend who just got a red mark on his arm, his offender's sentenced for 10 years. This is just a nonsense.