The other reason that this bill needs to be delayed is because of the farce of the consultation process that was conducted. The outcomes are significant once they're implemented, so those with the most to contribute needed time to gather their thoughts, to discuss with colleagues, to think about those that this bill will impact on, and then to prepare and offer feedback. So what did the Government members on the select committee choose to do? They chose to put out the consultation, open it up for submissions on 22 December, and the submissions period closed on 26 January. To give full credit to those submitters, the 374 submissions that the committee received, thank you for giving up your Christmas break to put your thoughts into your submissions on this bill. And, out of those 374 submissions, eight submissions expressed their support for the bill. In fact, one submitter told the select committee they were consulted in the preparation of this bill, they were consulted about the aspiration and what they wanted to achieve, but, sadly, they were not told what the mechanism for doing that was going to be. So there were a few boxes ticked in the consultation phase, but the cold, hard reality is that those with the most to contribute were excluded: the voice of care-experienced children and young people. I do give credit to VOYCE Whakarongo Mai for the time that they have put into their submission on behalf of those people.