SIMEON BROWN (National—Pakuranga): Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you to the Minister in the chair, Poto Williams, for the clarification. My understanding of the case was that the issue around whether there was enough evidence was actually not concluded completely, in that two Justices said the new evidence did conclude that issue, that there was new evidence and therefore the offender shouldn't be registered. Two Justices said the registration should remain, and one Justice didn't actually make a conclusion on that matter, which means that the paragraph 3 in the judgment would indicate to me that the decision to have the offender removed from the register was based purely on the point of law, which is the issue that we are, essentially, legislating on today.