But as it stands, this structure would mean that those two Ngāi Tahu representatives virtually had a veto over council decisions. Think about the 14 members sitting around the table, look at their current political representation, and recognise that the majority of them could be overturned anytime by the Ngāi Tahu representation. And I have to say to this House that the current representation of that particular council is not at all along the lines that my political view would like to see there, but I can see that it is not appropriate to have a veto power inserted into the council structure—inserted onto the council—that would be able to be exercised against the judgment of elected members. And I say, again, that given the member's claims that there is such widespread support in Canterbury for this, then surely any candidate going into an election with the imprimatur from Ngāi Tahu would be successful in their quest.