To those who have said, "Yes, housing is a crisis in this country. Yes, it saps the economic productivity of our country. It saps the hope of a generation of New Zealanders. It leads to a distorted market, and, yes, we need a circuit breaker" but who have somehow found other reasons to oppose concrete progress, let me address those arguments. One of those arguments is that we already have enough zoned land. Now, if you'll forgive me, I'll give you an analogy, because at its simplest I would say, "More competition leads to more choice", and it is the same for land; the more land available for development, the better choices people can make about where development should occur. But I would give you an analogy of our education system, where it would be perfectly reasonable for the Minister of Education to say, "There's already enough room in our schools. There's already enough ability to build more classrooms and provide more spaces for pupils." I would say to the Minister of Education: "That doesn't mean you should rob people of choice." The market should be able to respond where people want to have their kids educated, and the housing market should be able to respond to where people wish to build homes. Where we can remove Government regulation, we can. To those who are concerned about infrastructure: I would put to you that a core responsibility of local government is to fund the pipes, to fund the footpaths, and to ensure for the growth in our cities that is necessary to them being flourishing processes.