We had a great range of submissions—a lot of young people turned up—and that led to one of the most bizarre situations I think any select committee saw last year. We had one person turn up who was a submitter that tried to argue the proposition that second-hand smoke for kids was not bad for them and, in fact, over time, their body would repair. Alarmingly, we found out retrospectively that that person's argument was based on research that had been funded by the tobacco companies themselves, and I think that that very much calls into question the intent of some submitters. 