It's about recognition and celebration of Te Ao Māori. It's about strengthening the Māori/Crown relationship. It's about whanaungatanga, close connection between people and whānau. It's about revitalisation of Te Reo Māori. It's about reaffirmation of our connection to the natural environment. It's about increased wages for employees working on the public holiday. It's about increased tourism and spending, and additional leisure time for employees and their families. If we're going to tell the story, let's tell the entire story. So I encourage members on that side to have a read of the departmental disclosure statement. Where it talks about the impact on businesses, I want to draw the House's attention to the regulatory impact statement—again, on the Table in front of us. I want to acknowledge the extensive external consultation that has gone about with this bill, particularly with Business New Zealand and the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions. It's interesting to note the comment from the tourism industry, where they say—and I want to use their quote—that they noted that visitor spending "over a long weekend is two to three times a standard weekend because it gives people the incentive to take a trip to other parts of New Zealand". So I'm really disappointed that the member from the Coromandel doesn't actually value tourism in the Coromandel. Because, on this side of the House, we actually welcome tourism to our neck of the woods, whether it's the mighty Tai Rāwhiti or whether it's from Te Matau-a-Māui because they come, and not only do they come but they spend—they spend. So I want it really clear, in standing in support of this bill, that we recognise the financial benefits from this public holiday bill, as well as some of the challenges and costs that's prevailed in some of our business sector.