I'll start with the issue of smoking when the vehicle is used as a dwelling. The Minister, I believe, said that it was "stationary or used as a dwelling", and that's not what the bill says. The bill actually says that the vehicle needs to be stationary and used as a dwelling. Otherwise, anytime the car was stopped, the bill would not apply, and, indeed, I think that was probably just an error in the speech-writing. But it still strikes me as absolutely ludicrous and a reflection on the failure of the Government to fix what they saw as a problem of homelessness and people living in cars, to the point where they know that such dwellings are going to be used into the future and they are not prepared to extend this bill to exclude those situations. We think that's a mistake, and we will be introducing an amendment to this bill in the committee of the whole House deleting that provision. It is ridiculous, it is ludicrous, and it should not be in law. Indeed, what we are doing is proposing to Government that it removes its admission of failure—failure to fix the issue of homelessness and living in cars. 