There were some submissions that, I guess, were quite blunt, and I'm not surprised by that. When we heard from one submitter, they talked about the independence of the monitor. In their submission, they suggested that that was an abuse of the word "independent" because, by putting the monitor inside the Education Review Office—and we were told by the Minister earlier tonight that that's the backhouse support—the cold, hard reality is that that is a ministry that is overseen by a Minister, and it is at the will and whim of the Minister and the Government of the day as to how they operate. I would suggest that perhaps what is happening here is that the Government's abysmal performance across a range of their activities is the reason they're absorbing the monitoring of Oranga Tamariki into the Education Review Office so they can better control the results of that monitoring. This role needs to be totally independent of Government and its Ministers, and it cannot have the confidence of the public when it sits inside an existing ministry—it's not even dedicated to this role.