Now, it's quite possible, I guess, that if they were excluded from the main part of the bill, they could then be part of the consideration for the development of the acceptable solutions relating to those suppliers at a later date, and that might be a much more sensible way of dealing with it. But I do have great concerns about, as I said earlier, the compliance costs that we're going to impose on small rural water suppliers and small water suppliers supplying everything from marae to the example used by the member for Havelock North a little earlier—with the two houses hooked up to the tank that actually performed better than the Havelock North water supply, which was quite interesting. I was surprised, actually, but not really, because I actually have two grandsons who lived in Havelock North too and spent their life drinking my water, and they had no problem with the Havelock North water either. They were immune to anything that Havelock North could have done to them, and that was probably caused by the same thing! But it is kind of interesting where we might get to with this stuff.