The panel that looked into the 2014 changes found that the system doesn't necessarily recognise child participation and it is not widely recognised or valued. The panel also identified that there was limited participation by children in issues that affect them. There is a concern whether their views are obtained or considered when decisions are made. Again, I think, similar to the concerns in Part 1, in order to make this process as effective and efficient in reducing the harm that sometimes the system and delays in the system can have, making sure you have representation early in the system is important. Resolutions outside of the courtroom can mean that significant delays can be prevented. At the end of the day, those delays for the children, I think, can increase massive amounts of anxiety for them. So, again, these changes mirror the care of children process for the family dispute resolution process. Again, we look forward to being able to debate this as part of Part 2.