The select committee process had two major or substantive contributions, I guess, in terms of their process. One was around the administration of the riverbed within the Wanganui River catchment area—that process—and the committee considered that. The other aspect that was substantive in terms of amendments that were done by the select committee was around the resource consent process—in particular, clause 87(1)(b)—for which the committee recommended amending the bill to remove what was, in effect, an error in the original thing. So that brought value and that has made the bill even better than before.