I'd like to turn now to the $500,000 support package. When I was down there being driven around by one of my constituents, who is a very practical sort of a guy, he rattled off a whole lot of numbers and he said, "What would $500,000 actually do?" And I said, "Can you put that in an email?", so he did. I'd like to refer to that now. He said, "$500,000 would purchase 4,166 bales of baleage.", which is helpful, but that's not going to go very far. He said, "Or you could get 5,000 bales of meadow hay." Again helpful, but not going to get very far. And he said, "Well, 38 kilometres of sheep netting." And that's helpful, but there'd be 38 kilometres of it gone missing. I was in paddocks beside a riverbed, where a person had been out there shifting sheep to high ground, parked his ute, no water, turned around a few minutes later and saw his ute floating past, and they had to drag it out of a tree—written off because of the flood damage. And there are metres—many metres, hundreds of metres—of deer netting and sheep netting just all over the place, ripped out, useless. So 38 kilometres of sheep netting is not going to go a long way. Or diggers are needed; we know that—4,166 hours of 12-ton digger hire. I would say you could soon get rid of that digger hire, let alone the work required in the river beds, with a large bulldozer.