So the problem currently where the law sits is that section 22 of the Harmful Digital Communications Act passed back in 2015 stipulates that there is a requirement that the perpetrator intended to cause harm. So while there's the act of posting the image, the mens rea or the intent that the prosecution needs to demonstrate is that there was an intention to cause the victim harm. So it is very easy in a courtroom setting for that perpetrator to argue that it was a joke or it was done in jest, or it was unintentional or not required. So for that purpose, those images have been able to stay online, to be duplicated, to be shared, to be replicated on multiple different platforms, and having those removed is incredibly difficult once they've been uploaded. So there's been a real barrier to law enforcement and to New Zealand police in the past because of the difficulty of proving that intent that the perpetrator intended to harm the victim as opposed to just show off to their friends.