Another area I wanted to touch on is in relation to body corporate governance rules—particularly in relation to proxies. The bill as reported back still makes several changes to the existing body corporate governance provisions. The changes seek to create better transparency and accountability for unit holders while ensuring there is sufficient flexibility and autonomy for bodies corporate to govern their unit title developments. The changes are intended to strike a balance between benefits for unit holders and additional compliance costs on the body corporate. The majority of the select committee recommended that clause 10, included in the bill as introduced, be removed. Now, clause 10 proposed a limit to the number of proxies a person can hold. Now, the current Act provides that unit title owners can nominate another person to vote on their behalf. Currently there are no limits to the number of proxies a person can hold. In clause 10, it proposed that a proxy cannot act for more than one principal unit owner if there are fewer than 20 principal units—for developments with 20 or more units, hold more than 5 percent of the total number of votes. Submissions received on this matter were less than universal.