It's worth noting that credible public polling conducted by Curia concluded that 90 percent of New Zealanders opposed sex-selective abortions. Now, that was the subject of an SOP in the name of Dr Parmjeet Parmar in Part 1, but I would argue that, by analogy, I would be surprised if there isn't a similar result in relation to disability selection, which is the subject of an SOP in the name of Melissa Lee relevant to Part 2, on which I have previously spoken and on which I won't dwell now. But suffice to say that, even on that basis, it is worth this committee of the whole House considering the fact that it is obvious to many outside this Chamber, if not to a majority within it, the rights and wrongs of that particular issue. 