But the other issue that was raised by the Attorney-General, as we've had spoken about in a number of the meetings, was that clause 5 of the bill he felt was not sufficiently narrow enough, so it was inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, and that the term "communicating" in his view was overly broad and it may not be interpreted as just relating to issues around abortion or abortion related matters. He thought that might be a problem also about inadvertently capturing, say, discussions by family members that were accompanying people into the services. There were also other broader issues with clinicians who might be discussing bad news about a baby, and that might be inadvertently captured. So, basically, I think where we've ended up as a committee is the recommendations that we've made, I think, have achieved the right balance between protecting women's privacy and dignity, but ensuring that we've gone sufficiently narrow in terms of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act.