The second is, I wonder if the Minister can advise me and, not having been particularly involved at previous parts of the passage of the legislation—it's a genuine question and I don't know the answer; it might have been contemplated. I wonder if there was a scenario where the Minister has considered a half-way house whereby a person might be well enough to work, in their own right, but presenting to a physical workplace would represent a risk to their colleagues. That spectre has been raised by the Minister and others in proposing the bill. But I wonder if there will be a more nuanced approach, particularly in the light of COVID-19, which, again, has been referenced quite extensively across the committee, whereby there might be a scenario where a person is willing and able, indeed actively would rather not—excuse me, I'm confusing myself here, Minister and Madam Chair. I'm thinking of a scenario where a person is willing and able to work and would actively rather not have time off—and, believe it or not, those situations do arise. It can be difficult and stressful not to turn up to work and to have deadlines missed or obligations to third parties not fulfilled and so on. Is there a scenario in which a person, under this proposed legislation, might be able to be absent from work, work from home, but not be taking sick leave as such? I don't know if that's in the scope of the bill, so a genuine question there as to whether that was part of the Minister's consideration in putting forward this proposed law change.