Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): While we're on the subject of what the bill does and does not say, I want to draw attention to the amendment to clause 11(3) in Mr Doocey's Supplementary Order Paper 509, which talks about promoting a social investment approach in carrying out the functions of the Act. I recall from the report—and I can just about give the member the page number; it's 201—in its summary of the core functions of the mental health commission, that it is specifically identified in the recommendations that the commission "Develop an investment and quality assurance strategy for mental health promotion and prevention". Yet the functions and powers of the commission as listed in clause 11 do not include that. I think that's a really, really important additional function that the commission should have in law, because what an investment approach does is it takes the question of where the investment in our mental health resources is best put, and, at the moment, frankly, I think the DHB system is one that works against where the best investment should be going, which is into that low to moderate mental health need, which the report specifically identified. Whereas I think there are plenty of examples, including in the Minister's own home city, where the DHB has probably diverted—well, not probably: it has diverted resources into that secondary care sector at the expense of the very much needed primary and community NGO-type mental health for low to moderate conditions, where that was the better investment.