Let's just remind people what the three-strikes legislation did. It was introduced 10 years ago and what it means is that for a list of serious crimes: murder, rape, violent assault leading to grievous bodily harm, serious crimes—if an offender is convicted of that crime and they get a first strike, they are on notice that if, once they come out of prison, they do it again and they repeat, they have a warning that they could get a second strike, and if they get a third strike, the result is that they have to get the full sentence and serve the full sentence of their prison sentence for the crime that they are convicted of. That means that rather than having a heavily reduced sentence—we had an example of a prisoner that had been convicted of a serious crime that the judges thought might normally get two or three years. But the crime itself, under the third strike, meant that they were spending maybe 10 years in prison or even 11 years. 