There's been a lot of debate on the Opposition side about the absence of a definition of "unconscionable" in the bill. For those who weren't listening to Deborah Russell, she clearly went through that. If members go to the bill, look at clause 6, and look at the provisions that the bill puts in the new section 8 inserted by clause 6, which are the factors that the court has to consider in determining whether unconscionable conduct has occurred. There is a page of factors that enables the courts to build good case law around this. It ensures that we don't put in the legislation a limited definition. It allows it to be built through case law, but there has been a lot of thought on the factors that the court will take into account. I am heartened by the comments of the honourable Jonathan Young that the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee under his chairmanship is going to do a professional job. Look closely at those terms. I think they have been well drafted. They aim to ensure that "unconscionable" doesn't have an excessive extent and that it will be determined by the court.