The officials recommended a 25 percent increase, so an infringement fee of $1,250 and a court-imposed fine of $3,750—that was option A—and they said that anything else would have "equity, proportionality, and consistency implications,". Option C was 100 percent higher than the level in the bill, which is an infringement fee of $2,000 and a court-imposed fine of $6,000. It notes here, "The Minister's decision to propose an increase in penalties beyond what is set out in the draft bill was not the preferred option recommended by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.", and so what they've actually gone for is $4,000. It's currently $300. The draft bill that was produced proposed increasing it to $1,000, and now we've ended up with $4,000. So this is a real increase in fines, and it may well be warranted. But it's really interesting that it's gone well beyond what the officials recommended was proportionate and equitable, and I think that is an area we're going to want to get into at the select committee. 