Except that I will acknowledge the extent that the Tāmati Coffeys of it—because I presume, you know, in speaking, he's seeking, as is Willie Jackson, as is every other member of the Government who speaks to this bill, to try and say it does do something; there really is an engine in this car to get it moving. What it does do, in truth, is provide for different treatment between a Māori land owner and another landowner in precisely the same circumstances. Again, colleagues on this side have made the point that, actually, it's not just Māori land owners that have underutilised, underproductive land with ownership issues and governance problems and all the things that are the purported reason why we're giving—I'm sorry to say it—special treatment to one category and not the other: Māori land owners over all other landowners. They're not going to today, to me, because they're probably getting ready to go home in 45 minutes, but so often on the other side of the House, what we hear when we say that sort of thing is, "Well, that's racist. That's dog-whistle politics."—all of these things. No, it's not. It's actually just pointing out that in this bill—the extent that it does anything new is it's special, differential treatment for one group over others in exactly the same circumstances, and I don't like that.