BRETT HUDSON (National): Thank you, Madam Chair. I'd like to draw attention to clause 23, what will become section 23, particularly clause 23(2), which states "The Minister may decline an application for any other reason, whether or not the project meets the referral criteria." Now, accepting the fact that if the project traverses one of the mandatory declination criteria it can't be approved, but setting that aside as a given, this clause gives near absolute discretion to the Minister to decline an application, even if that application were to tick every box—and I mean every single criteria under clause 19. So I'd like to hear from the Minister, well, one, does he agree that the wording, as it stands, does confer that near absolute discretion? Secondly, what justification—does he believe that this is reasonable in a bill of this nature? And thirdly, just because it's so related, does that, therefore, mean that the criteria in clause 19, because they're not determinative of a decision, are actually not necessary in primary legislation anyway? Because if meeting them doesn't mandate a positive decision, why have them in there?