So when the Minister says in his ministerial statement, "On 8 July … it was deemed that the individual was likely a protected person.", who deemed that? I doubt it was the Refugee Status Branch. The IPT had not heard the appeal, so it could not have been the IPT. Media have reported on a Crown Law Office opinion that he may be a protected person, but that status did not apply to him, and that was probably something that the IPT were going to consider in its appeal. I note also, however, that the notice of cancellation of refugee status on the basis of fraud was issued on 1 June 2018, but the individual lodged an appeal against that determination on 30 April 2019. Now, my reading of the Immigration Act is that that is significantly out of time for an appeal of that decision. So one of the questions I want to know is, why was the appeal being heard when the dates that have been reported by the Minister in his ministerial statement suggest that the individual had no legal basis to do so?