The phrase that sort of leaps out at me a little bit is the "reasonable opportunities to participate in" decisions affecting a child. I'm quite pleased to see that the Justice Committee—for which I can take no credit; I was not a member—has talked about "reasonable opportunities", plural. It seems to me that what's indicated in that is an intent that the opportunities would be regarded as arising on an ongoing basis. So, hopefully, the intent is that the family dispute resolution (FDR) provider does not merely consider at the start of the process, or perhaps in "taking initial instructions", in quote marks, or in having an initial briefing, but really regards the obligation, actually, to have an ongoing consideration of what the children might be given by way of opportunity or opportunities to participate in decisions. Of course, it's an ongoing process—a lot of back and forth in these things, often. So that's my first observation. Again, as in Part 1, I sort of offer it as a comment that Minister Faafoi's obviously welcome to contradict, but, failing which, I would hope we can take that I'm on the right track and that the record will reflect accordingly that intent from the legislature as a whole.