So, in many ways, while the joint-management agreement described here in the natural resource redress section of the bill appears to have good intentions, it's actually an example of where you get to with poorly thought out principles that are applied to sorting out issues of private property rights. That's why the ACT Party believes that, if there is a breach of property rights, that should be clearly defined, and that, if a party does in fact have a property right, they should be compensated for that if it's been affected. Otherwise, groups that are unelected should not have decision making powers over other people's property, and that is definitely a risk as these types of redress measures are advanced through legislation. 