I want him to take that out of the bill, because, if he really believed what he's been telling us tonight—that there are positives that are going to come out of this legislation—if he really said and believed that that agreement is something that is standing and positive and shows the direction forward, which we all want, then why does he control in the end the ability to override it at his will, at any point in his time? And, as a Green Party that espouses the values of trust and negotiation and fairness and equity, how can somebody have an agreement that can be overridden by one party at a later date without giving the people that will be affected that certainty around their business—that certainty around what they're doing for New Zealand at this point in time and what they're going to be asked to do in the next couple of years to save the budget of this country?