Also, it would be really interesting if you've done a breakdown on the revenue per hectare. The effective argument that was being made was that the forestry industry in New Zealand employs 25,000 people or something like that and is only a quarter of the land, and yet sheep and beef is 66,000 people for four times the area of land. Well, let's have a look at the real economics of that. What's the revenue per hectare from those bits of land? Is the sheep and beef farm providing a revenue per hectare of $1,000 a hectare and forestry $200 a hectare? What's the revenue for New Zealand that comes from those blocks of land? Do you have those numbers?