The second issue I just want to raise during this second reading debate is the issue—and the Minister touched on it—regarding new clause 11 in Schedule 1, inserted by clause 5, which is in regards to the exception for the particular appellant. The Minister rightly pointed out that the Supreme Court did find, based upon new evidence which they allowed to be admitted, that they did not believe that this particular person should be able to continue to be on the registry. That was a split decision. Two Justices said that the person should stay on the registry, two Justices found the person shouldn't be on the registry, and one Justice refused to make a judgment on that particular point. 