What is really clear is that there was a clear intent of the Parliament at the time for this law to apply retrospectively to those offenders, even if they were charged and convicted after the passing of the law. I think that is why there is support across the House: because we as politicians were clear about that. However, the point was made by Arena Williams, prior to me, that the Supreme Court and our courts can not imply that; it has to be explicit. So what we are doing here tonight is making that absolutely explicitly clear so that we don't have this situation again. It is a lesson to all of us that we can't necessarily foresee all of these things happening, but that is why we do the process that we do—we give it that scrutiny, we try and think those steps ahead, so that we don't end up in this situation.