To get some scope as to how many people are involved in compulsory treatment orders, we know that roughly 10,000 people a year are subject to the mental health Act, and that at any one time 102 people per 100,000 are receiving compulsory treatment. I think what I found particularly interesting—I've delved into this in preparation for making this contribution—in the rates of compulsory treatment orders is the regional variation across the country, more specifically by district health board (DHB) and how we explain that. So as I look across all DHBs—and I'll break it down in a moment for Māori and non-Māori—there's quite a lot of regional variation per 100,000 population for the number of compulsory treatment orders. The highest number of compulsory treatment orders per capita is actually Northland, which surprises me a little bit. The least is South Canterbury and Wairarapa. So you'd have to sort of say, "Well, how do we explain that?" How do we explain such a high incidence of CTOs in Northland—almost three times the lowest amount anywhere else in the country? If we then look at it for Māori and non-Māori, there's roughly a threefold—or it's a multiplier of three—increase in Māori who receive compulsory treatment orders versus non-Māori. Again, if we look across the country, it turns out Waikato has the highest—again, that average of three—at 3.91. 