But here is the second reason why I propose this amendment, which, effectively, continues this committee: the work has not concluded. Normal transmission, in terms of our parliamentary democracy, has not been resumed. We have had—I'll start with the positives. This committee has worked extremely well. I'm sure colleagues on all sides of the House have had positive feedback about the manner in which that business has been conducted, and, indeed, I think it was Derek Cheng of the New Zealand Herald who wrote an op-ed piece quite early in the committee's time saying, effectively, if oral question time is the measure of our parliamentary democracy, then we should be very, very worried, but if the Epidemic Response Committee is a measure of our parliamentary democracy and the way in which MPs interact with each other, then we should be greatly encouraged by what is going on.