The bill also deals with some issues that arose from reform of the Teaching Council back under the period of the last Government, and they were some changes which we, as an Opposition, scrutinised vigorously and, on balance, supported because we were concerned, as everybody was, that there should be a very rigorous process for dealing with issues around teacher misconduct and particularly any concerns around inappropriate behaviour by teachers. I think, on balance, on reflection, we could all agree that the pendulum swung too far and that what we created—what the House created—in passing those changes was a system that was overly cumbersome, one that resulted in far too many complaints ending up having to be dealt with by the disciplinary tribunal, adding significant stress and significant cost to teacher registration in a way that was not proportionate to the overall level of risk that was being dealt with. So the changes that we're making here do swing the pendulum back to something that's more pragmatic and sensible. It allows the Complaints Assessment Committee, for example, to resolve some of those issues without having to go through a full disciplinary tribunal hearing, and that is something that will reduce the impost on the profession and, potentially, the level of compliance cost that the Teaching Council faces. That, of course, will flow through into what they have to ultimately charge the teaching profession in teacher registration fees. So we've listened to the concerns that the council have raised about that current process and about the effect that has had on the level of costs that they face and therefore the level that they are having to charge teachers in registration fees.