As my colleague said, Parliament still is operating under restrictions, and to not have every member of Parliament able to sit in this Chamber and to take their place and participate in our democracy is a significant challenge. My colleagues have mentioned written questions, which is the normal vehicle, and Official Information Act requests. Legislation that the Government has been considering around the COVID-19 response hasn't required regulatory impact assessment. So a lot of the mechanisms of a normal scrutiny of Parliament haven't been in place and are still not in place, as well as the fact that Parliament also isn't operating in its normal manner. Back in the electorates, electorate offices aren't all able to open, to be staffed, to serve the constituents. Even simple functions like recruitment by the Parliamentary Service can't operate in the normal manner. So it is really important in dealing with this one-in-100-year event that the public have the confidence in the Parliament operating in a way that's clearly different because it is restricted. But Parliament needs to be able to have an alternative mechanism while these restrictions are in place to enable and to ensure that there is some scrutiny, and, actually, as my colleagues have given examples, that scrutiny has meant changes—the Government moving, shifting, and those decisions have been in the long-term interests of New Zealand.