This is something new—or reasonably modern—in the last 20 or 25 years: the idea that health practitioners not only have standards but can be held to account for them. We possibly have the Cartwright Inquiry into National Women's Hospital to thank for that. But that is the way the medical profession operates. I know medical professionals who, at some point in their medical professional career, are terrified at the standards that they are held to—or some of the older ones anyway, because they never expected that when they entered the profession. It is a good thing for consumers of health services that we now have that in New Zealand, and the same will apply to women seeking an abortion. So, in addition to those relevant legal, professional, and ethical standards, the health practitioner has to consider the woman's physical health, mental health, overall wellbeing, and the gestational age of the fetus. That threshold does mean something. It has to mean something, and it has to be taken into account. So I reject those who submit that that is somehow meaningless. 