If I move on to the settlement itself, I know in particular for this one, since the '60s, they have certainly made petition, submissions, and claims to seek that redress for breaches. For this, the Crown acknowledges those well-founded breaches in its obligations, and the failure to protect those tribal structures, for example, to act in good faith in terms of leasing and purchasing land, those land blocks, and really, at the end, failing to protect Ngāti Rangitihi from becoming virtually landless. That's something that's been hurtful across many settlements but I acknowledge it here also. Also, the failure to protect the Tarawera awa and te reo and to encourage its use. There's a number of things there that culminate in the—I guess it's summed up as the taking of excessive land for public works purposes. I want to acknowledge those issues there. The settlement, however, does provide for 19 sites—those have been mentioned previously—of deep significance to Ngāti Rangitihi, and those are part of that cultural redress. There are two properties there, and they are in the Waimangu Volcanic Valley and five properties at Matatā.