This matter wasn't raised at the select committee, and I was quite surprised because we did spend a lot of time on details at the select committee. The reason that it wasn't obvious to us is because, I guess, we had our faith that the system would work until it was pointed out, after we reported back, that a woman could go to a doctor or a chemist in Kaitāia under the current bill and say, "I've got a prescription here for emergency contraception. I need to take it within the next 48 hours for it to be effective." and the chemist might say, "No, I'm not dispensing it. I'm a conscientious objector." Under the current bill, as it's drafted, they would just have to tell them the name of somebody who would, and it could be in Invercargill. That woman would be pregnant by the time she got to Invercargill. So this is trying to avoid something that we don't want to happen and clearly the woman doesn't want to happen. That's why I support the change in this. It's to make the legislation that's outlined in Part 1 line up with the legislation that's outlined in Part 2.