If this legislation was actually about creating a safer environment for those people who choose to use those drugs, why does the legislation not require the drug-checking service people, if there's a substance, if some young person comes along and says, "Look, I've got these pills. I was told they're MDMA. I just want to have them checked to make sure before I take them."—put them through the machine and it comes out and says, "Actually, you've got a dud. It's a bit of MDMA; it's a bit of rat poison."—shouldn't the bill say that those drugs should be confiscated? If it's about reducing harm, wouldn't it make sense to actually say, "Hey, hey, hey, we're taking those back off you because of the fact they're not what you expected of them." And, actually, the safest thing to do, particularly in light of the fact there's an 80 percent chance that person is going to go and use them anyway, is you take them off that young person. But this piece of legislation does not do that.