See, Andrew Little, he refers to the Victoria one. That is literally the only one in The New Zealand Herald, in Stuff, on RNZ, and that he can refer to. By the way, it is a self-selecting sample study. It's not remotely scientific in terms of the kind of studies internationally from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Europe that I've referred to, both in the earlier bill which passed this—against National Party wishes temporarily—or this one. Even on that self-selecting sample though, I just make this point, because they go on so much about evidence without actually citing any of it. Even on that self-selecting sample, and there's something like 90 pages in that report, there is a lot of evidence, or so-called evidence, that goes the way of the National Party view on this.