So it is of concern to me that the Minister's own officials, when advising him on these clauses in the bill, said that this was not their preferred option—to create this offence of unconscionable conduct. They, instead, preferred a different option, which was the prohibition of oppressive conduct, and the reason that they, according to the documents released to us, had that preference was that they saw a particular threat of the potential for uncertainty associated with the new offence of unconscionable conduct. They said that they thought there was a risk that prohibiting that kind of conduct could lead to the courts either interpreting the prohibition too narrowly, which is to say that it wouldn't capture the range of offences that the Minister may or may not have in mind, and of course the reverse is also true: that, where things are ill defined, they may be interpreted too broadly and may end up as a prohibition of a much broader range of conduct than the Minister has in mind.