SPEAKER: Well, I'm looking at the date of the letter, which is 31—I have it in front of me—March, and on the basis that it's been received by the committee, that's been minuted, unless it was part of a confidential part of the business, I don't think there's a problem at this stage with it being referred to. If it is something which was at a very recent meeting and there hadn't been a subsequent meeting and minutes hadn't been issued, then that might be the case. Dr Smith, as the third most experienced parliamentarian, might want to indicate to the House—oh, he's not here, so it doesn't really matter—that he's not breaching any committee confidentiality with it.