Hon DAVID PARKER (Minister for the Environment): I am happy to say that the reason for that can be seen in the contrast between the discretion that the panel has in respect of listed projects compared with other projects. If members care to refer to clause 32 of Schedule 6 on page 95 of the bill, you'll see that the panel can decline a listed project on only two grounds: one, which is at subclause (1)(a), says that "the panel considers that the granting of a resource consent or confirming or modifying a notice of requirement, with our without conditions, would be inconsistent with any national policy statement, including a … coastal policy statement;" or "(b) … the panel considers that granting a resource consent or confirming or modifying a notice of requirement, with or without conditions, would be inconsistent with any Treaty settlement." So those are the only two bases upon which a listed project can be turned down. 