My next point is that it relates to the status of the unborn child in a similar way that SOP 475 of Parmjeet Parmar does. Dr Parmar stated in an earlier part of the bill that in her preference it would be that sex selection, or gender selection, as it's also known, would be a practice that was explicitly outlawed in New Zealand, namely that—and I relate it to this current proposal on a similar philosophical basis—the personal characteristics, or the demographic characteristics, if you will, of the unborn child should not be determinative of her right to continue to be able to live. 