What does it look like when someone offends a couple of times but might not be suitable for something like a maximum sentence? Because I think the public get sold these types of laws as if they are dealing with a premeditated case of someone just callously going through the community committing crimes. What this law, in fact, did is say, for example, if you've committed a couple of this type of offending when you're 17 or 18 and then gone on to have a life without crime—lived a life for another couple of decades, three decades—something else happens, maybe a huge change in circumstances, a relationship break-up, a bankruptcy, and you offend again, the court can't take into account the way that your recidivism took place.