I understand, of course, from the explanatory note of the bill and from the legislative statement that's come out in conjunction with the bill, that, of course, it's in response to the increase in benefit rates. But I wonder if the Minister has considered other ways in which the amount might or might not be said to keep pace with current economic, fiscal, and, indeed, monetary trends. I refer, of course, to the spectre of inflation, which I think is a very real possibility and prospect following the Budget that we've heard today and in the context of other changes that the Government has announced and implemented recently. When wages are increased in an artificial or arbitrary manner, that is to say with no connection to increased production or productivity, then, of course, it's only right to consider any legislation in the realm of taxation in connection with the possibility—indeed, some might say the likelihood—of inflation getting away on us as a nation and as an economy.