The expectations include that they "maintain a comprehensive domestic route network that allows people and goods to move across New Zealand in a timely fashion at a reasonable cost"—and again, Mr Robertson has there outlined the expectation at a level; it is up to Air New Zealand to operationalise that. So there is the classic division between the directorship and the operation, and that is preserved. Now, Mr Bayly may wish for that not to be true. Certainly the ACT Party have been champions of letting things fall over. If Hokitika loses their airport, well, boo hoo—that's the ACT Party view of the world. Kerikeri, Gisborne—whoever loses their airport, that's the end of it, and it should be a commercial decision, pure and simple. Well, I think the population of New Zealand would beg to differ, and the exporters in those regions, the people engaged in tourism, the international economy, would beg to differ as to whether that was really in the interests either of Air New Zealand or of our international situation. 