If we just come to the proportionality of suffrage—this is a really important point. We understand that about 18,700 members of Ngāi Tahu live in Canterbury, of the 36,000 Māori New Zealanders which Stats New Zealand indicate live in Canterbury. So about half of the Māori New Zealanders who live in Canterbury are Ngāi Tahu, and this piece of legislation would benefit only those 18,700. However they have voting rights already—it's not required because they don't have voting rights. They can already vote in local government and general elections, or potentially on the Māori roll in an election. Yet the 563,000 people who live in Canterbury who this legislation doesn't cover, they will have 14 representatives—about one per 40,000—whereas the Ngāi Tahu representatives appointed, they will represent about 9,000 each. So the democratically-elected representatives will only have one-quarter of the representation of those that Ngāi Tahu represents. So, look, this is going to result in unelected members having much greater voting powers compared to democratically-elected members. It's a completely unacceptable act to Cantabrians and to most New Zealanders. 