I also might just want to point out this whole—again, it's these faux straw arguments which are put up that the doctor in Kaitāia, or arguably, again, it's sort of a moot point around the ECP because you don't need to go and spend $20, $40, or $60 with the doctor; you can just go to the pharmacy. But for the sake of fact and truth for Ruth Dyson, she'll find that if you went to the pharmacy in Kaitāia and the pharmacist chose to send you to Invercargill, you'd be able to take said pharmacist against the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act and, basically, put them in their place, because that's right against what they are meant to do as a competent person. In other words, the pharmacist who has a conscience problem and sends them to Invercargill from Kaitāia is already doing the wrong thing.