So, obviously, it can be understood that, while the parties do sometimes have a different view about the way that competition should be encouraged and how interventionist the Government might be in relation to creating that, or allowing that competition, nevertheless we do share that basic view in this, essentially, market-led democracy and economy whereby we want to encourage competition. So the penalty for anti-competitive behaviour is no small thing, and the suggestion of the select committee, members might recall, was that the penalty shouldn't be delayed from coming into force some 12 months after the bill came into effect, or after the Royal assent, because they point out that, with such a long lead time as a year, it would mean that it wouldn't have its effect. And believing it to have a useful effect, of course, is the whole purpose of it being in there in the first place. So the recommendation from the select committee was that only one month, rather than 12, be the period of time before that would come into force. And, as I say, through you, Madam Chair, I would be grateful for the Minister's response to that and how he thought that maybe the original time frame was justified or perhaps that he thought it would be appropriate to reduce that time frame, as the select committee has recommended.