Officials say that there is no need to have thought about the Treaty of Waitangi. Again, perhaps quite odd coming from me, but I think they probably should have. I would actually like a little bit of analysis to have been done around unemployment rates and which ethnicities have been particularly affected early on in the piece versus later. Now, I could well be wrong—so I don't have the answer—but this is a bill which, effectively, starts giving support from 1 March and not before. It would be fascinating to know, in the early stages of the pandemic—so we're talking middle of January onwards, up to but not including 1 March—what was the breakdown of people losing their jobs there? Was it more predominantly Māori, Pasifika, European, or not? Because if it turns out, for example, that more Māori were losing their jobs before 1 March, that's a Treaty of Waitangi issue. I could well be wrong, but all I'm saying is that you'd expect that to be looked at.