What we have raised through the process are some concerns about the way this particular bill has been drafted, and serious issues around the extent of what is captured by a "conversion practice". And that is, of course, exactly what we should be doing here in this House as legislators: looking at what the bill in front of us actually says, because what we're dealing with in Parliament is not what our intentions are—that we want to just stop a particular practice—it's what the piece of legislation in front of us actually achieves. So my three concerns that I wanted to see rectified were—just being absolutely clear—around free expression, around making sure that the legislation doesn't in any way inhibit the proper discussions that people need to have before making life-changing decisions, particularly in the context of medical interventions around gender identity, which has been included in the broad scope of the bill, and, finally, that parents, who don't agree with or aren't prepared to give permission to significant medical interventions wouldn't be captured.