This bill will allow us to act swiftly in the future if such events like the Christchurch attacks happen again, and that horrific event is tried to be spread rapidly online. To do this, the bill has six key policy areas. I'm not going to talk about all six, but I would like to highlight a couple of them. Firstly, the bill will make it a criminal offence to knowingly livestream objectionable content, and anyone that commits this offence can face up to 14 years' imprisonment or, if they're a body corporate, a $200,000 fine. Now, the 14-year sentence does bring this consistency with the already existing penalty for distributing or creating objectionable content under the classification Act. These penalties are high because the offence captures a range of behaviours and, at the extreme end, this includes documenting and sharing child sexual exploitation and abuse material. Importantly, this bill also allows the chief censor to make interim classification assessments in urgent situations for content that is likely to be objectionable. This really is important, because it means that there will be no delay and that the public can be informed as soon as possible about content that may be significantly harmful, and authorised inspectors will be able to issue takedown notices to combat the posting of objectionable content online. This is consistent with the already existing powers that they have for physical copies of objectionable content. Again, if people or agencies do not take up those takedown notices, they will be subject to a penalty of up to $200,000. 