With that background, I have, of course, considered, again, along with fellow members of the National Party caucus, a couple of key distinctions when considering the bill. One is the provisions that are in the bill, and one is the provisions that are not in the bill but might be usefully added. I'm foreshadowing a number of conditions of National Party support that have been highlighted and, indeed, explained pretty clearly, I think, already by our police spokesperson, Brett Hudson. We make a distinction, too, between that which looks good and that which does good. Of course, it's possible for a thing to do both, but in the case of some of the provisions of this bill, it appears clear that the intentions and, indeed, as I say, the look of the thing may be good, but the effect is not necessarily one that is beneficial overall for the purposes of maintaining the safety of our population—firearms owners and others alike.