There are a few issues with the bill, and I think the Hon Michael Woodhouse has certainly covered off his Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 156, which raises the question of why on earth should Statistics New Zealand be allowed to contemplate either holding the election in 2023 or 2024, especially when a decision will be made, literally, in July, which is not that far away. So it raises sort of the most fundamental questions—and I know Minister Clark talked about the potential impact of COVID and all that sort of stuff. Normally, you would not give unfettered power to people or organisations. I think Mr Michael Woodhouse's Supplementary Order Paper is actually good, because it actually lists some specific criteria that might be used in determining whether or not to delay Statistics New Zealand's census, and, of course, he talks about a national state of emergency, an unreasonable level of risk to the public health and safety—so that could be a COVID reason—an unreasonable level of risk to the health and safety of staff employed by Stats New Zealand, or civil unrest. Those are four clear areas where, if they were to occur, that would be a legitimate reason to delay it. But just to say, "Well, we're just going to make our decision and we could delay it, technically, theoretically, for any other reason, for any reason.", then that is a very unusual power to grant any organisation.