And I'll take a moment there just to note that I did ask the Minister yesterday, in the committee of the whole House stage: what would be the potential remedy for a juror who felt that the judge had imposed requirements on them that they thought were a breach of their rights, and what appeal rights they might have? I don't know if the Minister had entirely turned his mind to that aspect of this. And it's an important one, because a judge may regulate the proceedings within the court, but if they are not complied with, the judge does have the potential discretion to hold a person in that court in contempt of court, and they can actually hold them in custody. So it is an important point and one I don't know if the Minister agrees completely adequately, when I questioned him on it yesterday, but that's another matter. 