My suggestion is that we include three examples that are not conversion practices, to make it very clear that, just for clarity, so that prosecutors, so that lawyers and parents understand what is not a conversion practice, and I would include the expression of any opinion. Secondly, another example of what is not a conversion practice under this legislation: a parent, or caregiver, withholding consent for a medical intervention, in relation to gender transition, in what they consider the child's best interests, for example. The third one would be a health practitioner frankly outlining the risks, consequences, and merits of medical intervention in relation to gender transition. Now, the officials have said, "No, no, they're not captured." They've given us that assurance—well, why don't we use that as an example of something that is not a conversion practice according to this bill, so that we can have that reassurance. The purpose of it is simply to say, yes, let's make sure this legislation is properly targeted on conversion practices that cause harm, but it doesn't, in any way, restrict the important, and necessary, and appropriate discussions that parents and medical practitioners should have with young people, in particular, before they're making important decisions about what could potentially be life-changing medical decisions.