Firstly, in relation to the scope of the bill and the way in which other countries may well be considered, I would point the member to both clause 3 and clause 8(2)(a) and (b). Effectively, when we drafted the bill, it was intended to be quite wide in its intent, so Belarus was factored in when we drafted the bill because there was evidence of their support for the activities that were undertaken by the Putin regime. In terms of the broadness of the scope, there was also consideration that were the military incursion or invasion to extend to bordering countries of the Ukraine, perhaps we needed to provide scope for the inclusion of sanctions for those particular instances, as well. 