There were some changes that were recommended by the select committee. Generally, they were to address minor and technical concerns that were either raised in submissions or by officials. I'll just go through a couple of them. One of them was that applicants of forestry standing consents must demonstrate a strong record of compliance with the Act, or corresponding laws in other jurisdictions. However, the common practice of creating a local special purpose vehicle for investment can also be a barrier to demonstrating a record of compliance, so the select committee suggested that the bill clarify that when considering an application for a forestry standing consent, the regulator can also consider the compliance record of the applicant's wider group of associates and individuals with control.