But I think that it's worth addressing, and I'd like to have on record the Minister's thoughts about a situation where a prisoner is imprisoned for more than three years but doesn't have the opportunity within their last three years prior to being released. I think that might be part of the intent underlying the Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) in the name of the Green Party member who's put one forward, and I look forward to hearing from her on that subject as well. I'm curious to know, in the first instance: is it the case that one of the bases for amending the law that the Minister has brought to the House is inconsistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, and, second, whether he intends therefore to support the SOP in the name of Ms Ghahraman, and, finally, on a related point, what he would anticipate his response would be when, inevitably, this matter is brought before the senior courts again, they again declare the law to be inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act? Would he anticipate changing the law or seeking that Parliament change the law at that time? Thank you.