Now, at a high level, global level, it's fine. We want people to not invest in emission generating businesses, or certainly reduce their level of investment in those and migrate to clean energy type investments, particularly into better types of technologies. But I put it to you, the way it's phrased and the way that it's going to operate will mean if you take, for instance, a concrete producing company, which, we all know, produces a lot of emissions, and if a pension fund wanted to invest in a new technology that produced an element of green concrete but still produced a lot of emissions, but much lower than the current level of emissions—i.e., we're getting a better outcome, and because concrete is still a requisite requirement of our construction industry—I would dare say that a pension fund is going to be very, very unlikely to contemplate an investment like that, because of the public notification of that and the possible victimisation as a result of the disclosure around that investment. 