Unfortunately, what we saw though, with the rules that were put in place by the Labour Party four years ago, was a significant skewing of the playing field, as it were. The level was significantly different in terms of the bureaucracy, the hoops you had to jump through if you were wanting to invest in forestry—a much easier and streamlined process compared to if you're wanting to invest in the food and fibre sector; a much more cumbersome process. In my mind, that just shows how dangerous it is when you have a Government prepared to meddle in the markets like that. You get this negative or perverse impact as a result of Government interference in market processes. Ultimately, it has, in part, contributed to a significant shift in the values paid for farmland, and there are other factors around that, too, but we have seen, in many cases over the last couple of years, New Zealand farmers being outcompeted, food and fibre farmers being outcompeted from forestry interests for the same piece of land. 