It's not so much, therefore, the principle of the bill that I object to but the practicalities of the way it has been managed. I feel that the Government misled the Parliament and misled the nation in moving the adjournment and suggesting that no non-urgent bills would be covered and then they did. I feel that members of the public are right to feel outraged about the fact that they didn't know that it was happening, as a result of which many of them who would have submitted on this bill didn't, because they were ignorant of it. Now, that's outrageous in a democracy when you have people who really would have a strong interest in a bill not having the ability to know about it. We asked them whether it had received much media attention in their areas, and the vast majority of people asked that question said, "Absolutely not. We've heard nothing about it whatsoever." 