Procedures for dealing with conflict of interest are important, but I'll be looking forward in the committee to find out just how often this happens, because if you take that example over the Rugby Union, with over $160 million worth of income or turnover every year, they already will have procedures for dealing with conflicts of interest or dispute settlement, as opposed to some of the smaller societies that may never have to do so. But I do think it is a good provision that for the societies where there is a conflict of interest, board members of committees actually can declare that and then have an ability to still take part, rather than have to exempt themselves—particularly for some of those smaller ones—under certain circumstances. 