Now, I'd like to get into the debate, the Address in Reply and the Speech from the Throne, by picking up on some of the points that were made by the Hon Michael Woodhouse in his earlier contribution, where he pulled out a bunch of Thatcherite slogans and threw them around completely devoid of meaning. I mean, one of the reasons that we were very proud of our, kind of, low deficits and our low debt-to-GDP ratio over the course of the last couple of decades in this country was because we actually failed to invest in our infrastructure. So whilst we might have been carrying a low debt-to-GDP ratio, we were carrying an astonishingly high deficit in virtually every category of public infrastructure that you can imagine—whether that is transport, where in every category of transport, whether it's roads, whether it's rail, whether it's light rail, whether it's cycleways, whether it's walking and cycling, we have a chronic under-investment—and the results of that are being felt in our sclerotic cities at the moment. Of course, the previous National Government, as was well advertised at the time, essentially strip mined the transport budget to put in a few short but astonishingly expensive four-lane highways, leaving a huge deficit for this Government to cover.