In the committee of the whole House, the member Nicole McKee asked for clarification on clause 4, the amendment to section 167, and which I will now clarify because it is really important that I do that. It is about warrant to seize property. In the new section 167(2)(a)(iii): "if the judgment debtor is a disabled person or is a principal caregiver for a disabled person, any item that is necessary for the care, support, or independence of, or to promote the inclusion and participation in society of, the judgment debtor who is the disabled person or, as the case may be, the disabled person for whom the judgment debtor is the principal caregiver (for example, without limitation, any mobility device, specially adapted motor vehicle, or medical equipment);". It also covers any item necessary for the care, support, or independence of a disabled person who is in the care of a judgment debtor. It is important to understand the example provided, that it is without limitation; it means that this example given does not limit it to these examples. Therefore, it also futureproofs any new technology that is yet to be invented.