So as tempting as it could be for people to think that this is a nod to our first responders, this proposed legislation, it really isn't. It is a way for the Opposition to continue to create a divisive society, a society that creates gangs of us and them, they even use the word "gangs"—the last speaker did in his presentation—and it doesn't lead to inclusion, it doesn't lead to social cohesion. We know that societies that are not inclusive ultimately end up with more crime, less security, less productivity. We, in the Labour Party, are about an inclusive society. When we look at people, we look at them as individuals with equal rights, and we then look at their behaviours. We don't lump them into categories, which is what the Opposition is trying to do. The fact that the Sensible Sentencing Trust has earned the participation of the member that previously supported this bill makes me even more secure in the fact that I would not want to support it. The Sensible Sentencing Trust themselves take a very punitive approach to the justice system. So, for these reasons, we cannot support a bill that is divisive, that plays into populist politics, that tries to create an us-and-them mentality, that doesn't have merit, that has not been able to be corrected despite two processes through the select committee, and that when you take out the mandatory sentencing element of it, really, doesn't have anything left to offer this House. I cannot support this bill.