Recently, the New Zealand Parliament also addressed the topic of digital exclusion through select committee petitions, most notably the one by the Citizens Advice Bureau, which recently reported back to the House, and is soon to be debated in its own right, in several weeks' time. I note that there are many New Zealanders who cannot, for many reasons, engage digitally. The issue is not just the rural-urban divide; there are cultural issues, there are socioeconomic and demographical reasons, and also the specific region that they live in where they actually have digital exclusion. It is vital to ensure public institutions continue to be able to engage with those people who cannot engage online as a part of a due process for all people in New Zealand. That is one aspect of select committee discussions that I'm glad that we have managed to put in the mind of the officials when we were actually working through this. The digital identity framework must be complementary to existing identity tools and not a tool for digital exclusion. It must not become a means to disregard New Zealanders' access to Government and public services who prefer the traditional method of official identification, trusted for many, many decades.