ACT believes that this shows two intents. The first is to prohibit product, some of it originally purchased from Government sources, and then, two, to justify not having to pay for it. They pulled the rug out from under the feet of people who have done nothing wrong and they have been justifying it ever since. Much like the significant natural areas on those that own their own land, this is a devious way to impinge on a person's private property rights. How can the fundamental right to own what you have purchased be secured in an environment of confiscation? This is a fundamental principle that the Government decided to ignore and trample over. They did not need to do this. They chose to do this.