So, if the purpose of this legislation is actually to stop some people harming others by carrying COVID-19 and potentially affecting them, then you'd have to ask: is the way to address that purpose not to ensure that somebody is actually vaxxed or tested? Because, you know, if vaccination protection is not 100 percent, then there must be some frequency of testing that actually gives an equivalent guarantee that a person you meet is not going to pass on COVID-19. And I wonder why, in the interpretation section, there's no mention of what it means to be tested. It's all about vaccination, even though testing is mentioned elsewhere in the bill.