Now, the wage subsidy, yes, it was a, sort of, quick and dirty, but very effective, way of getting money out the door, as James Shaw mentioned in his speech earlier. He kind of didn't really understand the points that had been put forward by my colleagues on this bill, because, yes, no one disputes that that has done a good job of keeping some people in work, but it was quite surprising, really, that the Prime Minister was so shocked that The Warehouse announced that they were going to lay off 1,080 people. The way it sounded, she was personally insulted by it, that that company would make a decision to actually lay people off, because they had a wage subsidy. Well, actually, I don't think there would be anyone more altruistic than Sir Stephen Tindall. I think he runs his company with his employees in mind, as I'm sure the rest of the board members do. But, actually, when you are a director of a company, you have your first loyalty to the company—that is what's enshrined in company law. They would not have laid those people off had they not needed to do so. Yes, the wage subsidy has got us through to now, but, actually, it's putting off the day. What we need to do is to get businesses back functioning as quickly as possible. That was what was so concerning, was to get our businesses back in operation.