I don't understand the argument that the chair of the committee was trying to put up around disrupting the hierarchy of offending, because, ultimately, in our criminal justice system, the people that decide what charges to lay are the police. The police will do the investigation. The police will look at the ingredients that go towards the type of offending and the offence that's been committed, and they'll take all those issues into account before they make a very clinical decision around what charges will actually be laid and what charges are most appropriate and what charges they feel will have the most success or are most appropriate when they go into our court system. So I think that the argument around disrupting the hierarchy of offending is a moot one and doesn't have any standing at all. 