And it's fair to say that this actually, at third reading, is a very much improved and better bill than the bill at first reading, and that's largely due to the good efforts done at Environment Committee, and I too want to acknowledge the role played by my colleagues on that select committee, but in particular I want to acknowledge the chair of the select committee, the Hon Eugenie Sage, who, I think, did a terrific job reading, literally, a thousand or more documents. We received close to a thousand submissions, and we heard from nearly 200 submitters over a very condensed period of time. Some of the most compelling submissions, from my point of view, were not those submissions that came from people who, for one reason or another, objected to the general concept of intensification, but those submissions that came actually from young people, I found most compelling—those people, those young people, who said, "This bill gives us hope. It gives us hope for the potential that one day we too can be property owners, and that we can buy a house and that we can get a foot on to the property ladder." We are interested, actually, they said, as young people, in going further than this bill has gone. They wanted, actually, even more radical reform than this bill proposes. So I was heartened by that response and encouraged by it, and I was less compelled by those who came to the select committee and actually said, "Oh, no—well, enough is being done" and, "We're working towards it" and, "Things are happening", and "We've got a plan." Well, actually, more than 4,000 people tonight will be asleep in a motel unit because we have such a shortage of affordable and easily obtained, purchased houses in New Zealand.