So if you have a third strike, irrespective of the nature of offending or anything else, that creates this potentially absurd consequence of such a rigid rule, and that was clear from day one when this legislation was passed. It's not something that we've learnt over time, because sentencing should take into account things like deterrence, whether offenders who are punished are less likely to re-offend and their punishment will deter others. Things like incapacitation—punishment can make it difficult or impossible for offenders to re-offend. That's an important part of the way that we sentence our offenders. 