KAREN CHHOUR (ACT): Thank you, Madam Chair. So, just going back to this report, it states, "submissions at the select committee stage were largely opposed to the bill. A lack of independence of the Monitor was cited as one of the key reasons for not supporting the bill. Some submitters recommended the inclusion of a specific legislative independence provision in the bill, however the majority recommended that the Monitor would be established as a Crown entity to ensure independence from Ministers"—then goes on to say, "Cabinet decided that the Monitor would be a departmental agency hosted by Education Review Office (ERO). Advice on the home of the Monitor was addressed that if the Monitor was housed within ERO, the Monitor would face issues regarding the perception of ministerial influence." I'm just wondering what kind of advice did you receive on that, and how damaging the perception of ministerial influence would be on public trust?