When I was reading this part of it, which was that "… the remaining land [that wasn't taken through confiscation] was … put through the Native Land Court. Ngāti Maru had no alternative but to use … [that court] if they wanted a title that could be legally recognised and protected from claims by other Māori. A legal title was also necessary if … [they] wished to lease or sell [the] land." However, this individualised the land and it was a complete cultural breach and an enforcement of an individualised, liberalised world view that has caused us so much harm as a country, for Māori and for everybody, I would argue. And, ultimately, at the end of that, Ngāti Maru did not retain any of the land supposedly awarded to them by the Native Land Court. So if we've ever had a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't", I would argue that the Native Land Court was it.