So what are those disagreements? The first is that we could have done this quicker, had we rewritten that member's bill. I was a member of the Justice Committee which considered that member's bill very closely. We made a number of changes, especially around things like penalties. But, in the end, it was premised on a different sort of restriction on who could not associate with people who did legitimately own guns. That National Party member's bill before the House last year was, in my view, fundamentally flawed, and it's not the way to implement a successful FPO regime. Their bill, as introduced by Brett Hudson in the previous Parliament, was a mess, and that remained the case despite the Justice Committee's work. It would only cover gang members with convictions, leaving gaps about who would be covered, and it didn't extend to people convicted of terrorism offences.