So I'll provide an example to illustrate the point I'm trying to make. For example, an offender who intended to cause someone grievous bodily harm and injured them would then be charged with injuring with intent under section 189(1), which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Had the injury been caused by reckless behaviour or with intent to injure rather than grievously injure, however, they would be charged with injuring with intent under 189(2), which carries a maximum sentence of just five years in prison to reflect the lesser harm meant to be caused. However—and I'm sorry this is complicated, but once it's unpacked, hopefully it'll be clear—had the act caused grievous bodily harm rather than merely injury, they would be charged with wounding with intent under section 188(1), which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years' imprisonment to reflect that they intended more harm to be caused to the victim.