There are a number of questions that we're going to be asking in select committee that do require some contemplation. Firstly, how robust is the modelling for each policy initiative and what are the underlying assumptions? The regulatory impact statement says this when it looks at the limitations of the analysis: "Most of the measures being considered have yet to be widely implemented internationally, and in some cases, New Zealand will be the first in the world to implement them. There is therefore significant uncertainty in the outcomes." A second question for the select committee to address is: what is the strength of existing evidence for tangible outcomes for each of the policy initiatives? And, three, given the likely huge impact on dairy and small-business owners and the overall contribution they make to communities, do all three of the initiatives need to be implemented, given nicotine reduction is modelled to almost meet the smoke-free New Zealand goal by itself? That is, can we be as Government-lite as possible, the least heavy-handed, and, at the same time, achieve or near achieve the objective? 