So the prospects of positive changes from this bill coming out of the select committee process are almost nil. I'd put it to this Labour-led Government that it would be more honest to have just said, "We aren't going to do a public consultation." What they could have said is, "Look, there's no meaningful opportunity for people to participate, and the opportunities to participate in such a rapid process are inherently inequitable because it's only those who can afford to retain specialists, lawyers, and lobbyists, who are highly networked, who are actually connected enough to do this at the speed it's happening." The Labour Party should say, "We don't like consultations that aren't meaningful; we think that erodes trust in the democratic institution of Parliament. And we certainly don't like processes that are inequitable. The whole foundation and point of our party was to stand up for the working people."—who are much less likely to have any opportunity to be represented in this process the Labour Party's created. They should have said all that, and said, "We're just going to be honest, we don't really care about public consultation or participatory democracy. We're just going to rush it straight through under urgency, all three stages, wham, bam, thank you, Madam Speaker." That would have been more honest from the Government. Thank you, Madam Speaker.