So he is wrong to say this is a reinstatement bill. This is new. It's a stepping over the top of the democratic process and allowing an iwi group in this country to decide that they will put two particular representatives on to a board, effectively, whether we like to look at it any other way, giving that group—because, clearly, they will be reporting back to the people who appointed them—veto rights over the activities of that council. That is a substantial shift from the concept of appointing commissioners. In many ways, the argument put forward for this bill by the promoter, on behalf of the Canterbury regional council—ECan—is a justification and almost a call for the reappointment of commissioners in Canterbury. And I tell you what—there would be very widespread support for that, because the current ECan group is, to say the least, somewhat woolly, and if we look at the reason why those commissioners were put in place in the first instance, which is the argument in favour of this bill from the proponents, it was because ECan had failed for over 20 years to bring down a water plan for Canterbury. The commissioners did that—they did it very successfully. 