I want to take you through a specific example. The example I want to talk to you about, of how the ministry can get these things wrong, is one that's very current in my colleague Hon Dr Nick Smith's electorate in Nelson, which is Nayland College. Now, Nayland College is a coeducational secondary school, and for many years parents from surrounding communities, including in Nelson, have wanted to send their children there because their local school was a single-sex school. Some parents prefer single-sex schools and some parents prefer co-ed schools, and so they've made the choice to send their children a little bit further away to go to the co-ed school. But in recent years, the Ministry of Education has been particularly slow in replacing classrooms that needed to be fixed, has not done a good job of getting them built, and the result is that that school is now reaching capacity constraints, and the ministry have said they're going to impose a zone. Now, this, I think, is a portent of the future we will see under this bill, because what we can expect is that the Ministry of Education will have far less incentive to manage its development of property well, because, actually, it's going to be the one in charge of setting the zone, engaging on the zone, consulting on the zone, and the power of the local board to influence that will be lessened considerably. So we will see more Nayland College - type situations, where a school community wants it to be able to take additional students but it is unable to. We will see more situations where schools are unable to create the community of interest that they wish for their school. This will diminish parental choice, and it will diminish community involvement.