In the committee of the whole House stage, I raised questions regarding new section 132C(1)(b), and that was about the sharing of live streaming events. So while the ACT Party can say if there's an objectionable live streaming taking place, we understand the ability to charge and possibly convict a person who is live streaming, but subparagraph (b) there actually talks about the crime of live streaming and then sharing that live stream. And when I looked up what is "objectionable", for the purposes of this particular Act, it is a publication that if it describes, depicts, expresses, or otherwise deals with matters such as sex, horror, crime, cruelty, or violence in such a manner that the availability of the publication is likely to be injurious to the public good, then we understand exactly what "objectionable" is.