Then finally, there are the really more technical amendments. Again, just wanting to thank those who submitted to the select committee as, no doubt, many of these very technical points would've come from those submitters. So what they did do is they wanted to clarify how the concept of stability and confidence referred to at various points in the bill interrelated with the bill's purposes. We've just heard very clearly from my colleague Barbara Edmonds about how that was able to be brought to bear. They were also looking to bring into force certain additional provisions of the bill at the day after the Royal assent. They wanted to adjust the circumstances where derivatives counterparties can exercise certain close-out rights against an FMI operator in statutory management, and, again, that is for protection of those working in the markets to make sure that there is an equal weighting and balance of power so that we don't have a change where some of those working in the system are able to be exploited. They also wanted to clarify that security interests in the assets of an FMI operator in statutory management continue in existence if those assets are transferred to a new operator under a new operating scheme. They wanted to provide a Crown indemnity for the statutory manager of an FMI operator. Again, that's around providing confidence to the market more generally. They wanted to enhance the rules around confidentiality notices issued by the regulator, and my colleague Duncan Webb has spoken to that. They also wanted to adjust the rules around the confidentiality of information held by the regulator so that the relevant confidentiality rules in the Financial Markets Authority Act 2011 apply to the Financial Markets Authority (FMA)—that's obviously about consistency of legislation—and to make a technical amendment to the Financial Markets Authority Act 2011 to ensure that the FMA can also make use of its powers under that Act in respect of FMIs.