Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I think this a very important issue, and it's been raised two or three times in the last month. To the last point that Ms Davidson just raised, the Standing Orders are very clear that, while accusations of racism are not to be levelled, it is entirely within the Speaker's prerogative to rule matters out and to judge them, or for a member to take offence. In respect of Speaker's ruling 44/1, I would suggest to you that Speaker Kidd's ruling is enduring, because it goes to the question of the perception of things that are interpreted in questions or in speech comments that may or may not be the intention of the speaker—and it's very clear, in that second sentence, or third sentence: "I understand the feelings of members who feel that the policies or views of other members are objectionable. They must be permitted to criticise those policies or views in strong terms." So that goes both ways. But to automatically presume that because a certain line of questioning, which you've ruled is in the Standing Orders, should be ruled out because somebody has a perception that it carries with it an inference I think would demean the quality of the debate and the freedom that we have, the privileges that we have, in this House to engage in robust but reasonable debate in accordance with the Standing Orders.