I think sometimes when you're looking at commerce bills, it is rather dry. Often, people don't quite understand how it's going to impact them, and what Mr Tangi Utikere said was that consumers need to be considered, and I agree completely. But under the changes in this bill, it is when businesses have to consult lawyers, for example, or the very fact that every time they want to change prices, which doesn't necessary mean that they're actually acting against the bill in the guidelines of the bill, they are becoming more—for example, if they're presenting competition by setting a new price on their particular item or business, they may have to consult a lawyer to see if, in fact, they are breaching the rules of section 36 in this new amendment bill. If that is the case, that is an additional cost to the business, and what happens to additional costs to a business? Businesses never want to own those costs. They always pass it on to the customers. So, effectively, what it means is that the fee that the businesses have to pay will be passed to the consumers. So this bill has, potentially, the end result or the effect of the changes in the bill being more cost for the consumers, and I think that's one of the reasons why on this side of the bill we are moving a little bit cautiously.