In respect of Mr Goldsmith's questions, I mean, they really go to the fundamental reason why we have this piece of legislation in place. The Government's view is that we're actually dealing with some pretty fundamental rights that workers have, and should have, and that are generally internationally recognised—that being the right to engage in collective bargaining. It's not the view of the Government that we should be taking away what are fundamental international labour rights for any reason, including the whims and wishes of international companies. Those are basic building blocks of a decent, civilised society. International labour rights, including the right to collectively bargain, are generally considered, under international jurisprudence, to be an important part of the human rights framework. So we simply don't have any truck with the arguments that there might be someone who wants to invest here that wants us to remove fundamental rights and, therefore, we should do that—we just don't accept that. The member opposite might, but that is a fundamental difference of view.