I've touched on consistency, and it's been disappointing to observe, at a distance, but relying on advice from contacts within the legal profession that courts have developed almost in an ad hoc fashion their own procedures in a way that is different from other courts who likewise have been seeking to fill the legislative gaps. Certainty is important because, as the Minister has alluded to, we need certainty in the court process for those involved, not only so that they can participate with some confidence at the time but also for the integrity of the system such that we will not see large numbers of challenges to the results or the judgments of courts on the basis only that procedural aspects have not been properly provided for and requirements such as this legislation provides haven't been put in place. So that's a pretty high-level discussion about the issues at stake. I've said my piece on the timing. My colleague Chris Bishop may wish to say more, including recalling those points that we'd made at the committee the whole House stage.