So where does that leave us on this legislation? Well, the ACT Party has looked very carefully at the drafting that is here. There are parts that we agree with. We agree that a prohibited behaviour should be intimidating, interfering with, or obstructing a woman going to seek an abortion. Now, arguably, that's redundant—and the Law Commission said it was redundant because we already have laws against doing all those things—but we agree there should be a law, and we don't mind if this law reinforces that with safe zones. But we take the same position as the Attorney-General who spoke earlier that the word "communicating" is a step too far. A ban on communication, even in a small area, is an erosion of the principle of free speech, that we will all regret eventually having admitted it.