Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: It wasn't retrospective, in any event; we passed legislation under urgency, but it wasn't retrospective. I mean, actually, the Minister, I think, just said "I didn't say that." Well, he needs to go back and read his own Hansard. So this started—well, it started for us as a question to the Minister on 16 February when he appeared before the committee, and I asked him "Would it be necessary to amend primary legislation if it was decided that a delay to census 2023 was necessary?" And his reply was almost theoretical. He said something like "I suspect we would. Yes, that's my understanding." Well, actually, he understood a heck of a lot more than he was letting the committee know, because documents now indicate that they had been working on an amendment to this bill for months, initially as a Supplementary Order Paper, and then some official probably had a eureka moment when they realised that because the bill was still before the committee, a simple amendment to it to allow a delay was possible, and that's what we have before us.