One of my concerns is that we have a separate approach, where we have a capital allowance and an operating allowance, and it doesn't allow us necessarily to invest in the services which are operating expenses, which would actually create more jobs and more value for the economy and for the benefit of the New Zealand public. Yet we can quite easily justify concrete, tarmac, or a building, which has its own depreciation, and does create jobs but not in such a direct sense as, say, employing early childhood educators would. We can do the economic analysis that says that the return on investment for early childhood education is far higher than return on investment for a road, but somehow—are the Government's hands tied, is there something that the Government is looking at that would allow us to better invest in people? Because that does bring real economic value to New Zealand.