This bill was written by Mojo to address discrimination for people with disability assist dogs, with an amendment to the Human Rights Act 1993 to include a definition of "disability assist dog" to make it clear that any individual, organisation, or business that discriminates against a person—for example, by denying a service to that person on the basis that they have or use a disability assist dog—then they are, in fact, denying the service to a person on the basis of their disability and, therefore, illegally discriminating against them. A "disability assist dog" is helpfully set out in the Dog Control Act as a dog certified by an organisation specified in that Act as being a dog trained to assist or being a dog in training to assist a person with a disability, and while the Dog Control Act says an assist dog can enter and remain in any public space, there's no clear way to seek resolution under the Dog Control Act like there is with the Human Rights Act and the Human Rights Commission. Rentals are one of the greyer areas, as they are not a public space, so are only covered by the insufficient protection in the Human Rights Act. So this bill, in practice, replaces "guide dog" in the Human Rights Act with "disability assist dog". It's pretty simple. 