So what this is about is about harm reduction, and it's also about making sure that drug-checking services can operate with legal certainty. So as a Health Committee, we received 56 written submissions on this bill and we heard 11 oral submissions. I'd just like to say thank you to all of those who submitted because it did result in some changes being recommended to the bill. And one of the ones that we did change as a result was making harm reduction advice mandatory, because, previously, in the bill that was introduced, 35DB stated: "The functions of a service provider are to do 1 or more of the following:" and, basically, harm reduction advice was listed only as one of the things that could be done. When you think about it, actually, the drug substance checking—part of it's the physical checking of the substance, but much, much more important is the advice that's given, particularly if the substance turns out not to be what the person thought it was. So, basically, what the committee felt was that that should be mandatory and so we've added another section, 35DDF, which actually requires if you have tested a substance that you do give that harm reduction advice.