Probably one of the most concerning things is that it said in the documentation that they were going to have to hire 750 fulltime-equivalents to facilitate that cost-of-living payment. We all know, under a Labour Government, 750 fulltime-equivalents actually means about a thousand. A thousand new bureaucrats on top of the extra 10,000—well, 14,000 now; the clock's ticking. And what was interesting is the Minister, in his first reading for that bill, had to get up and admit they don't have over 200,000 bank details for people who are entitled to that payment. That's over 10 percent of the amount of people who are entitled. So you couldn't make this up; it's like Dad's Army. And you can see why in the documentation the Treasury was saying, "No, IRD should be the lead agency", and IRD said, "No, the Treasury". They knew this was all made up off the hoof, and here we have a Government coming kicking and screaming to the cost of living. And now they're saying, in the height of a pandemic, they're taking a wrecking ball to 20 DHBs, and they're saying, "Don't worry; trust us. We know how this works. All you do is pump a lot of money into it. It doesn't matter." And that's why the Auditor-General said, in his report for all their announcements of funding, there are no performance measures. The public doesn't know if they get value for money on outcomes. That's typical Labour.