Taking into account the feedback from the submitters, the Justice Committee has recommended a few technical changes to make what the bill is trying to achieve even clearer, such as changes to the purpose clause and the definition of "serious harm" within the bill. The committee's most extensive changes clarify the types of conduct which would and would not meet the definition of a "conversion practice". A number of submitters thought that the definition of a "conversion practice" in the bill could be more specific, to remove any ambiguity about what a conversion practice is. This definition is a key part of the bill, and the committee has fine-tuned it, and I thank them for that. The committee has clarified that a conversion practice can be a "practice, sustained effort, or treatment". 