The other aspect is in regards to clause 95(1), in regards to the phrase "sell, exchange, mortgage, or charge of land". I guess in this regard this is also relevant, because a number of health boards across the country own assets and land and buildings that are no longer required for the provision of health services, and a lot of that has a historical legacy aspect. But, again, I can only assume that the role of the Minister of Health is a busy one, and the fact that, again, ministerial approval in writing is going to be required every time that these type of transactions are required, again, just simply looks to me like a bureaucratic burden which could have been avoided with at least, I guess, a little bit of devolved consideration around that. So those are the questions I've got in regards to clause 95.