This piece of legislation has come about by two reviews by the Law Commission in 2015, and one undertaken and delivered back under my predecessor, the Hon Andrew Little in 2019. My recollection of the second reading debate, again, was relatively overwhelming support for most of the components of this piece of legislation. But some debate and concern around fair trial rights around two clauses within the piece of legislation—around clause 8 and clause 14, I believe. Clause 8 is around the admissibility of evidence about a complainant's sex life, and a higher threshold in which evidence can be brought into the court process—about the particulars of a complainant's sexual experience with someone who is a defendant, or parties who might be a defendant, other than to state or claim of fact that there has been sexual experience between the complainant and defendant or defendants. There has been some concern around that from the legal fraternity and from Opposition parties around the obligations under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act around fair trial rights. I would point out—because they obviously made, at the second reading stage, a plea for a change of policy within this piece of legislation—we do believe that the bill as it stands does protect the rights of defendants, and gives judges the discretion in cases where further information or further evidence may need to be gleaned about particular instances between the complainant and a defendant. That can be done to ensure that a fair trial is heard.