But one thing I have been asked to spend time on is the hierarchy of offending, and this is the second way in which this particular bill is simply not going to achieve what it needs. The hierarchy of offending, and we're talking sections 188 to 192 or so of the Crimes Act, sets out a scale of offending that starts at the most serious and goes to the least serious. So I think if you consider what a common assault is—I wonder if it is worth just taking a moment to remind the House of what an injury and an assault and a wound, in fact, are. Because an injury simply means—an assault is a touch. It may not have any physical impact whatsoever other than a touch. An injury leaves some sort of mark, but it may be very transitory. A red mark from being grabbed is considered an injury. A wound is when you break the skin, that level of greater seriousness, and then you get to grievous bodily harm (GBH) and you're talking broken bones and serious injury.