Now, I will be very, very interested to know not only what the submitters have to say to the select committee but what the very fine chairman of the Regulations Review Committee will say about the legality of the regulation-making power in these circumstances. Now, I've read McGee. He's not that specific about it, but he strongly implies that the levy needs to be matched to the cost, and slush funds of this nature may well fall foul of the Regulations Review Committee. In fact, it's probably necessary and, I think, appropriate for the Regulations Review Committee themselves to make a submission before the select committee. We could have one select committee making a submission to another select committee. We have select committees that meet jointly. Why not have them across the table and actually duke this out? Because this is very poor regulation-making power and it's certainly very lazy lawmaking power.