But I want to make the point, at the outset, that the fundamental premise of this bill is flawed. The fundamental premise of the bill is that New Zealand should remain a fortress for a long time to come, because the bill extends the expiry date of the Act until May 2023, not May 2022, which is when the current Act expires, but May 2023; a long, long time away, about 18 months away. What we say, in Opposition, is that it is impossible to envisage a scenario—I would hope it is impossible to envisage a scenario—in which we have this elaborate architecture and infrastructure around MIQ in May 2023. What does that say about our attitude to the outside world? What does that say about our attitude to opening up to the rest of the world? It says that we're so limited, our ambition is so small and so reduced and limited that we will still be shut away in "Fortress New Zealand" in May 2023.