Then it says that in section 9A(1)(b), it could also be that a building product is something "declared by the Governor-General by Order in Council to be a building product." Now, this leads to a very interesting conundrum. So a building product can be something that fits the definition of being expected to be used as a component of a building, according to the list that is relevant but not determinative, and, presumably, that would ultimately be interpreted by the courts. 