In terms of the second question, how I view that advice, I think the bill makes it very clear in new section 35DDF(2), "The advice must be about the following harms and how they may be reduced". And then, if the test is a positive test, there's a certain amount of advice that has to be given, and if the test is not positive, nevertheless, advice has to be given on harm reduction and the risks and dangers associated with the consumption of that particular substance or any substance of that sort of nature. 