Ingrid Leary made a point that a number of people have made, which is why would you want to introduce more red tape, and this kind of intersects with an argument that also Rachel Brooking made that there's already a number of provisions which require high standards of lawmaking. You can't have it both ways. Either these provisions are already there and are required—I would argue they're not—and, if they are, then there shouldn't be any problem, because no one will ever get a declaration in court that laws haven't been made properly. One way or another, if they think everything's perfect, they should support the bill—why not put it into law? On the other hand, if they think lawmaking is currently inadequate, then perhaps we do need the bill.