The issue around the advocacy and monitoring was pointed out to us in one submission, and I'd just like to point to a couple of those—the Human Rights Commission, for example. Its functions include to advocate and promote, to be an advocate, and to monitor and analyse progress. The other one, the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission, their functions include: to advocate for the collective interests of people who experience mental distress or addiction, and to monitor mental health services and addiction services and to advocate for improvements to those services, because robust monitoring leads naturally to advocacy. So I suggest that this is a bill looking for a problem to solve, because there is no need to separate the functions of advocacy and monitoring. It's worked extremely well in other departments, and I can tell you that this is not unique to New Zealand. Those advocacy and monitoring roles are used across Australia, in many states over there, as well.