Now, there is a lot of wording in this bill that is quite vague. The language is very vague, and so it's hard to understand exactly what is considered conversion practices under the law. In this bill, our primary concern is that this bill exposes parents to prosecution. So if there are people over on the other side of the House who truly believe that there is absolutely zero risk of that, good luck to you, but we want to be sure, we want to sit down, and we want to have the conversation. We want to hear the submissions on this, because one piece of precedent under law—if there was one piece of law that set a precedent around this stuff, then we've got a problem on our hands. Is it too much to ask that we sit down at select committee and we have an adult discussion around this conversation? The history of conversion therapy practices is abhorrent. We want it gone; we just want to make sure that in the process of finding ourselves in a place where we could move to support this bill—and I'm telling you today, and other members of our caucus have told you, we want to support this bill. We just want to make sure that we have the best piece of legislation that is possible to be able to support this bill.