This bill was never proposing anything that hasn't already happened, that hasn't already been tested in both the administration and the practical application, the operations that happen on the ground and within the Department of Conservation (DOC). This bill is simply a continuation of the legislation that was passed back in 2014, and that's been mentioned a lot in this House. But what's also been mentioned is that this is a scale-up. This is not a scale-up. The reality is that this legislation parks the authorisation with the Director-General of Conservation for when, or if, there is another event. Many members on the other side—it must have been in their speech notes—have all said, "We can pass special legislation for specific events." This is exactly what this bill sets out to achieve. It creates the template so that the Director-General of Conservation can, at any time, if there is a scaled event, re-enact this authorisation that he will have to maybe go into the forest and take some of that timber out. It puts a huge amount of methodology into the system that we've already got, because, as I've said, it's been tested over the Cyclone Ita experience that we had.