So if the Minister took that out, took that override provision out, it wouldn't make any difference. We're looking at two or three years where everybody has to work together anyway. He's got plenty of time to always come back and negotiate with those parties. He's got plenty of time to come back to this House—or whoever the Minister may be—but, no, he's going to retain a power to enforce something that isn't needed at this time, and that would take a lot of uncertainty out of farmers' interests at the moment if they knew they were working in an industry agreement, they knew that they were working under those agreements to get the best options. But, now, they don't have that, because all they know is that, in two years' time, the Minister, at a whim, could decide that they haven't performed and then create a new level of regulation. So I implore the Minister, in his good nature and the way he treats issues, to actually do that in practice as well and not have a bill that actually does the opposite from good faith, because I've never heard of a negotiation where you come to an agreement and then, two years later, one party can override it.