One of the things we also notice with successive Governments is that they do not trust iwi to take care of their own assets. They require iwi to jump through multiple hoops and add heavy administrative and compliance burdens. For the Treaty settlement, we see this in the requirement for iwi to establish post-settlement governance entities, or PSGEs. As we have travelled the country to visit land occupations, we have heard from many iwi that their PSGEs are using their status, as the organisations with the cash, to override the wishes not only of the iwi leaders and their rūnanga and trusts but also the wider iwi. In the case of Māori aquaculture, iwi are required to establish iwi aquaculture organisations, or IAOs. Some submitters suggested that whānau and hapū should have greater recognition in decision-making in relation to those IAOs. Let's remember that hapū signed Te Tiriti o Waitangi, not iwi—hapū.