Just in the spirit of not filibustering, I'll keep my contributions brief. I was keen to unpack the assertion by the Minister around the expectations he had around this bill having a positive distributional impact. I wanted to understand what is that being based on, who's going to benefit from this—is it lower-income people or which groups is he expecting to sort of benefit the most, proportionately—and have there been any other alternative interventions considered that perhaps could have a more equitable distributional impact that, unfortunately, may have not been brought forward by the Government? 