I want to start my contribution tonight talking about exactly where the Minister has left off, and that is in clause 5 particularly. Now, the Minister has made mention of the high-level purposes that are defined in new section 167A(6)(a) "that the fees or charges are appropriate to sustain a scheme designed to increase consumer demand for zero- and low-emission vehicles and decrease consumer demand for high-emission vehicles:". So this is, essentially, a high-level purpose that seeks to manipulate a market place; that's what it is trying to do. It's trying to use market forces to change behaviour. Essentially, what that clause does is define at a very high level: what is perceived by the Government to be "good" purchasing behaviour will be rewarded and what is considered to be "poor" purchasing behaviour on the part of the Government will be punished. And my concern is the potential for perverse outcomes to be achieved by a market manipulation of this sort by a Government that likes to control from the centre, to centralise, and to manipulate markets as they see fit—will have outcomes that are unintended.