As it's noted in the legislation, the associate's role is very similar to the coroner's, but there are limitations on that, and I think it will be interesting to tease that out to exactly where we draw the line. Maybe the Minister's got it right in the first go, and that's quite reasonable and possible, but I think it'll be good for the committee to tease that out. A second change—and it was alluded to; actually it wasn't really alluded to, it was directly spoken to by the chair of the Justice Committee—talking about a new category of what's known as "unascertained natural causes" around a death. Again, I think that makes sense. It's basically when the duty coroner sees there's nothing suspicious in the death, or it's not self-inflicted. It enables that coroner on duty to say, "Look, this is un-ascertained natural cause of death."