SPEAKER: I have received a letter from the Hon Michael Woodhouse seeking to debate, under Standing Order 389, the resignation of the Hon David Clark as a Minister. This is a particular case of recent occurrence that involves ministerial responsibility. Not all ministerial resignations will lead to an urgent debate—Speaker's ruling 199/7, Hunt. I have permitted debates where ministerial probity has been a central issue, and where Ministers have been removed from their roles. I do not think Dr Clark's resignation reaches this threshold, and I'm not convinced of the need to set aside the business of the House to debate—which member was that? Which member made a noise then?