But let us look at the other pieces of legislation that might be relevant here: the Immigration Act. What do we do with somebody to whom we grant protection; to whom we say, "This is a safe place for you, you have persuaded our authorities that you were in danger in your home country, and this is now a safe place of refuge for you". We have an international obligation to offer that to those who seek asylum, to those who come across our border in fear for their lives because of the place that they have come from. But that cannot be unconditional. When we offer a place of refuge and respite to those who genuinely need it, that cannot be an excuse for those who then want to cause harm to New Zealanders and turn that status on its head. Does our law adequately reflect that? Does our law allow us to act in those circumstances, in the very rare circumstances, I expect, that that would ever arise in? Perhaps it doesn't, and so perhaps we should reconsider it, and we will have a look at that. 