So it could have been a shining example to the world of how well we treat our animals, but instead they took the easy option to ban, because banning is what they do best. They could've focused on greater inspections of livestock in ships entering New Zealand. They could have, as my colleague said, restricted stocking density by 90 percent, which would have matched the Australian regulations. They could have increased the reporting from vets, and they could have increased the minimum fodder requirements should something go wrong and the voyage have unplanned delays. But, again, instead of working with the primary sector on a complex issue to bring about workable solutions, they chose banning it—banning it, that will shut off around $261 million of revenue. At a time when we are going to have our greatest level of debt in this country ever, they are going about their way to ban and restrict our revenue. It defies belief that we can be entering such a period of extreme debt and at the same time be virtue signalling with bans that decrease our revenue. But I guess that's because that's the sort of fairy land that this Government works in.