On the other hand, to be less positive about the situation, even with the best will in the world, while the advocacy from the lawyer's point of view might be in the best interests of the child as well as one or other of the parties—generally the parents, let's say, for shorthand—the trouble with that, of course, is that there can be a hardening of positions, there can be a crystallisation of positions such that it makes it harder and slower to reach resolution. I think the previous contributor to the debate, Ginny Andersen, made a fair point in that, you know, the hoary old truism, justice delayed is justice denied. That's fine as far as it goes, but the potential for this legislation to move us in entirely the wrong direction in that regard is very high indeed. The involvement of lawyers, traditionally, would lengthen rather than shorten proceedings, and while there are good reasons that we have lawyers advocating on behalf of parties in an adversarial system, and also in ways of operating our justice system that are perhaps a bit softer, the reality is that it seems inevitable to me that time frames will blow out even further with the greater involvement of lawyers.