So I think one of the things that will be really useful to do in the committee of the whole House stage of this debate, assuming that the bill passes through the second reading, is just to make sure through that process that the House is really comfortable and that we're doing the right thing there. I'm not necessarily casting doubt on that. It seems to me that in the select committee's report back, they've identified that, effectively, what has been validated is something that does no harm, something that wasn't done with any malice or intent or ability to gain anything that these institutions would have otherwise not had, and that it's justifiable because there was also, effectively, an oversight in legislation. None the less, I think it is the duty of the House to look into that very closely as this bill progresses, to make sure that we are satisfied that this relatively extraordinary step of going back and validating in a retrospective way is something that we are properly comfortable with.