This is something that often we see with members of the Green Party, who live in a world that tends to be rather idealistic, and then when the science is applied to the ideas that they come up with and they're given some science and they're given some official advice, at the end of the day they turn round and go, "Well, that wasn't such a good idea, because something we were proposing that we thought was a good idea might actually backfire on us, so we decide it's not such a good idea any more." So I'm not sure how confused Julie Anne Genter is over all of this. I know we do have to be careful with regulations and we do have to be careful with what we're proposing and we do have to know that the drug testing is doing the right thing, but science will do that. And we're hearing in the House tonight that there are ways and means around that—doesn't mean we shouldn't be cautious, but it doesn't mean that you can completely do an about turn when you don't like the advice that you've been given because it backfires on your good intentions in the first place. So I have to wonder, in proposing this legislation in the first place, how much homework that Minister did at the time, because she should've taken that advice and decided what was the right course of action for her as a Minister before she actually got up and proposed it.