Hon Gerry Brownlee: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. We didn't interrupt the Minister answering that question—we appreciate it was a bit of a flick from the Rt Hon Winston Peters, which most of the House is used to—but it does raise the question. If you consider the answer to the last question from Louise Upston to Carmel Sepuloni, there was no reference or requirement in that question for her to start talking about the coalition partner. There would have been if the last question that you disallowed was allowed to be asked. So the question is: how is it that a question about a Minister's capacity to garner votes across a coalition is unacceptable to the House, but it's acceptable, in an answer, for the Minister to explain that despite public statements from many prominent Green members, they're actually going to support this two-tiered system? 