Now, the courts' role in that after the event, and the Supreme Court ruling that's basically been the catalyst for this legislation, is, I think, important, but it's also really important that we remind ourselves that this place is sovereign. We have exclusive cognisance. We have the ability to pass laws even if, in the opinion of either the Attorney-General or subsequently the courts, there might be a finding that there is a breach potentially—or an inconsistency rather, not a breach—with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. This is really important because, in my experience, passing bills that are a bit edgy in respect of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act generally carries with it a consideration of those issues as we pass the bill. I think the three-strikes legislation is an example of that. The legislation on prisoner voting rights that precipitated this process is also a good example of that. And, of course, the deprivation of liberty is indeed a prohibited thing under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act unless it's justified under section 5, I think it is, incarceration for convictions is the obvious one.