Now we know what that means when it comes to land-use consents and resource management consents when there are a whole lot of organisations that have no skin in the game but have their own axe to grind—activists, Extinction Rebellion, climate activists—who might want to protest or object to a particular product that they feel doesn't meet their social test, and are climate shaming and fearmongering about products that are used every day by people with no evidence of risk. It's important that any regulation very clearly sets out what risks need to be evaluated, who are the people qualified to evaluate them, and which voices, while well-meaning, will not be considered in any look at hazardous substances. Because it's no good saying, "Well, we need to adopt a precautionary principle.", actually, we need to be not just thinking about protecting our environment and human health. We need to be ready to accept that there are many new products coming on the market much faster, at a much more rapid rate than previously, developed to deal with some real, real problems. 