So what this legislation will enable us to do—and it's the first time, and it's something I've been advocating strongly for—is actually meaningful asset seizure. So if you front up in a big, flash piece of bling—and it's about bling—and you have been unemployed and you can't prove where it came from, authorities—police—can take it. That is the type of activity and that is the type of response that will actually make a move on these gangs, because it's all about money. There's many apologists for it, but it's actually all about money. I'm aware of someone I know very well who has actually been approached and offered some significant money to join a gang. That's how they're getting people. So, unless we talk about and focus on the money, everything else we do is basically rhetoric. Scaring the heck out of the public of New Zealand is not going to do it, because it actually works in their favour because the more fear that is generated among the New Zealand public around gang activity, the more successful they are. I do warn particularly those who think that they're doing the best for the public of New Zealand by scaring the heck out of the public, you're actually working for the gangs in doing that.