We were looking to seek a balance: a balance between what is harmful and, of course, the freedom of speech and the freedom of thought—autonomy in both respects, without having harm to either. We also wanted to address the concerns about the parental rights being lost. Of course, this comes back to the "sustained efforts". Addressing our concerns about the free speech implications, about the unravelling of democracy—and that happens with the removal of a person to be able to consent to what happens to themselves. The United Nations declaration on human rights and our own New Zealand Bill of Rights Act have been justifiably excluded in some of the clauses, and we don't think that is the right route to go down.