When you think of the exact nature of the support that this change in definition will make, it's diverse, and it depends on the dog and its owner's needs. It's exactly what should be recognised in law, because a change like this actually changes people's awareness. It changes their understanding, broadens our minds a wee bit. So, often, unless we experience it ourselves or unless we know someone closely that is experiencing a hardship, it's only natural—unless a particular exposure is made—that we may not have a very good understanding. So to make a change like this, it actually alerts us that people that have hearing difficulties can get assistance through dogs, people with severe epilepsy can get assistance through dogs. Assistance to retrieve objects for people in wheelchairs, for example; help a handler with limited mobility; interrupt undesirable behaviour like self-harm—that one there really stood out to me, because the power in the connection of humans to animals is incredibly strong. 