Again, we've seen this in a number of instances from this Government where they have put forward a reduced or shortened report-back time on a piece of legislation for no particular reason, it appears, other than perhaps it was late getting to the first reading stage and they've been wanting to rush it through. The issue that raises is it potentially takes away the ability of everyone who might wish to have their voice heard to do so, given that shortened window. Granted, it's not excessively short like we've seen on some of the other pieces of legislation, but my question would be why do we need to cut that back at all. Why can we not allow a fulsome process to occur on this bill, given, as Mr Muller mentioned, it has taken quite some time to get to this point? Why are we now rushing it and cutting down those few months for submitters to make their case heard when I believe it is absolutely critical that those submitters are heard? 