I think the two fundamental tensions involve the role of the lawyer and the role of the child, if I may put it like that. In the case of the lawyer, we've heard already a couple of different perspectives across the House about the positive or negative aspects of a lawyer being involved, and I think it's probably fair to say that all would agree that there are pros and cons to the involvement of the lawyer. Of course, the general thrust of the legislation is to increase the role of the lawyer, whereas the reforms of the last Government had been in the direction of wanting disputes to be settled without recourse to legal representation. The opposite now is true, and so I just want to explore a little bit the ways in which that might be helpful and also unhelpful.