So I heard what the Minister's said, but I just don't think the arguments are persuasive that we need to have a system where all the penalties need to go to the IRD to cover their costs, given the fact it's now largely electronic and we're trying to minimise penalties. At the end of the day, I suggest to the Minister that he's actually not looking at the purpose and intent of this bill. The purpose and intent of this bill is to look after those children in broken homes, who are in difficult family arrangements, where one parent may not even be providing any care at all, or very limited care, and the recompense in monetary form is not taking place. I think that's what we should bear in mind in this bill.