The author of this bill notes that when products failed, to quote consumer reports, they failed significantly. A number of them were rated at 50+, and when they were independently tested they turned out to be about 20+, so not even close—actually half of what they were promoting. I think when we focus on the SPF factor in this bill, it strikes me that it's not a bill of science. It's a bill of consumer affairs because it fundamentally says that what we want is for you to be honest with your labelling, honest with your claims, honest with your statements. You do need to have the laboratory certification to back up the statements you're making. 