I note that the bill also has taken a rather elegant approach to the definition of a disabled person, rather than simply referring to the definition in section 21(1)(h) of the Human Rights Act. Its definition is "a person who has [a] long-term physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairment … that, in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others". That, I would say, is a broad and inclusive definition which is in accordance with the definition and intention of section 21(1)(h) of the Human Rights Act. 