The judiciary and the ministry will set the requirements subject to the safeguards I've described. I understand they have two key priorities: strengthening the foundation of existing entry requirements and setting new requirements to support the safe selection and running of jury trials. I understand the judiciary's considering requirements under which all potential jurors will be asked for evidence of vaccination, but an alternative will exist: a recent negative COVID-19 test and willingness to undertake testing during the course of a trial. A person could also be deferred or excused from jury service if they are not willing to meet these requirements. A judge will also have a discretion to allow a person who did not meet these safety measures to none the less be a juror if this was necessary in the interests of justice. A person who has been deferred or excused from jury service can appeal against that decision. For the vast majority of people, these changes won't change the way—