Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: In two weeks, and we have seen nothing of the structure—yes, that's right, Mr Brownlee, it'll be nine days that that becomes effective and we've seen nothing of those details. I don't know if the Minister is intending to introduce a Supplementary Order Paper on this bill in order to give effect to that, but by the time we see it, whether it's that or a new piece of legislation, it will effectively be retrospective taxation, and that is wrong. We're hearing about what the Minister described as the "removal of an exemption", some kind of loophole where councils are putting tax exempt strategies in place for council-owned companies. Well, all that will do is increase the ratepayer burden because they need to get their income from somewhere, and if their after-tax rate of return on the council-controlled organisations goes down, they will have to increase the general rate in order to compensate. So this change is going to take more money out, not only of the pockets of hard-working taxpayers but of hard-working ratepayers, often the same people. Very little detail about the brightline test anomalies. We've got one fix in here, but there's about 10 others that haven't been addressed.