I think it was a very good point that was made earlier in the debate that we worry all the time about privacy in this country. We strengthen privacy laws constantly. But then, under urgency, to try and get enough money to pay 1 percent of the debt—if we're lucky—each year for the next 200 years, we suddenly change privacy laws. It seems to me that this is a bill that's very poorly conceived and that's written in a hurry simply to accommodate the ability for Labour politicians, Labour members of Parliament, to go out and say, "We promised to put that top tax rate up, and we did it.", and then, of course, to hope that no one asks them why, because the answer to why can only be because people earning over that much shouldn't keep as much of the income as they're earning. It can't be anything else. It can't be, "Oh, we want to reduce the debt.", because it won't do it.