I want to make three points. The first point I want to make is that this is not about the royal commission. That's what they're saying. But the reality of it, if you look at what they are really doing with these proposals—which, sure as eggs, they'll turn into law before the end of the year; they'll slam them through this Parliament—they are doing a bunch of things that the royal commission didn't recommend, and they're not doing a bunch of things that it did recommend. The royal commission recommended hate crimes—that is, putting into law that if you assault someone with the motivation of racial hate, for example, it should be a higher sentence and we should enshrine that in law. Actually, I could go along with that. There's a good idea. That is over half of the things around hate that the royal commission recommended. They aren't doing any of that, and yet, in relation to the hate speech part, they've taken their chances and the opportunity to do a whole bunch of other things that aren't in the royal commission.