Now, let's go into some of the significant amendments that I think warrant a much, much longer consideration. I am absolutely amazed at the degree to which the Government is prepared to inject itself into the private property rights and contracting obligations through Schedule 5. I think a number of speakers—Mr Seymour, others; Julie Anne Genter, for goodness' sake, has revealed what an interventionist, socialist party she represents, because this is without doubt a significant incursion into the private contracting rights of individuals. It's true: COVID has created an enormous amount of tension. My party has advocated for increases in rental supports for commercial rental lessees and lessors who are facing difficulty through these times. That's a better way to deal with this, and I expect submitters to actually come and tell the Finance and Expenditure Committee just that. But I think we need to hear from legal scholars, from constitutional lawyers, from property lawyers, from property owners, lessees, lessors. And we're going to do that in 16 days and actually pretend that the committee is able to give itself an ability to say, "We listened carefully, we reacted."? I find that incongruous and completely implausible in the extreme. It pays lip service to the select committee process, to the parliamentary process, and to democracy itself.