In terms of access, under clause 68(2), to the best of my knowledge and my judgment, I think that the provisions there are pretty comprehensive and cover likely scenarios where there might be an issue to be considered about the appropriateness of access. And I do note that, at the select committee process, there were no concerns or issues raised with that access or provisions. You would have expected that companies, producers, if they had thought additional things should be added, might have suggested so at that stage, but they did not. Coming to new clause 75A, as raised by Mr O'Connor—the review after five years—I do believe that is an appropriate juncture. It gives time for a new piece of legislation like this to settle in, for people to get used to it, to really assess how well it may or may not be working. Of course, not every piece of legislation that comes to this House has an inbuilt review mechanism. It's, effectively, an optional extra that we have decided should be built in, given that this is a new and novel regime. My judgment is that five years is about the right level of time to conduct that.