This would seem like simple stuff. I do want to have a shout-out to the poor folks at Waikato DHB having, in a previous life, been responsible for designing and implementing electronic health records and rolling them out. This is an invidious position to be in. You know, you think about the laboratory results that you need in real time—radiology, even some of your outpatient clinics, when you're doing or calculating chemotherapy. There's a large number of attributes that you take into account for how many milligrams, if you like, per kilogram this person needs and a wide range of attributes; that's all done in a computerised way. I recall my head of division in Boston when we'd go for funding to the head of medicine. Every year, we'd go through this funding cycle. And my mentor, Professor Charles Safran, would say to the head of medicine, "Our department—the informatics department—can kill more people more quickly than any surgeon could in this hospital. All we've got to do is mess around with the oncology formulas, all we've got to do is give faulty information—not through our own choosing, but if we mess up the IT, we will kill more people in this hospital than any other mechanism." Needless to say, we usually got the funding we were asking for after we had that sort of conversation. But I make my point how critical information technology and informatics is in a hospital system.