It does one other thing, too. It preserves the existing use of the name by private organisations who have it, so they don't lose anything, and for the one organisation who has applied to use it and is awaiting determination, it preserves them the right to have that application determined, but, of course, it doesn't predetermine what the outcome of that application will be. But now it is very clear that the name "Ombudsman" cannot be used willy-nilly by private organisations or any other organisation. It is very clear about the basis in which it can be used.