One is the idea that these powers are given—for example, to New Zealand - flagged vessels in international waters or indeed to offences that take place on a foreign-flagged vessel in international waters but for which we've got extraterritorial jurisdiction. And then the idea that at the point that they come into New Zealand's more standard sphere of influence, that the powers would actually somehow go away, and that's the last thing we would want, of course, is for the certainty that this law is trying to provide that's given to the Customs or the navy or other law enforcement agency, to actually disappear at the point that they are getting closer to shore. Actually, the closer they get in a way you would think that the stronger New Zealand's influence and ability to detain and control would be. So the select committee in its wisdom—and I do mean that genuinely—recommended amending clause 33 to state explicitly that the powers may continue to be exercised in New Zealand's territorial seas, internal waters, in any port in New Zealand, or at any place where a ship reaches land, even though that exercise of power under the legislation had actually started considerably further out. So I think that's a really useful little confirmation there. You don't want to be having these arguments out at sea. I don't know how technical the legal arguments would be and how much it would be more a matter of force, but of course it's important to have a proper legal basis for these things, which is of course the very basis for us being here tonight.