I will leave him with some homework in respect of Part 1, but I want to touch on a couple of things that he did say. One is: the fact that we're here is because the Act is old. As a Minister who was born two years before the Act was born, I'm sure he'll agree—and one who, I think if memory serves, is probably only a few months away from a certain milestone birthday—that something approaching 50 years old isn't necessarily out of date. His children might disagree, but I'll go into bat for him on that point.