But while the Minister is consulting with officials on that one, I'm keen to go on to clause 4(4), which repeals the definition of "reception facility". In the spirit of plain English, I would've thought that as a layperson, most New Zealanders would consider a reception facility to be a wedding venue, possibly one that required the deposit be paid. But here we have it in this piece of legislation; a reception facility is nothing further from a wedding venue than could possibly be imagined. It seems that a reception facility is to now include "a facility for the reception of—(a) harmful substances from ships … (b) sediment (as defined in section 444A(3)" and "ballast water from ships" has been removed. But I'm intrigued to know again, given the clarion cry for plain English, why the term "reception facility" is being used when the popular context for reception facility bears no relevance at all to this piece of legislation. I wondered whether officials might assist with that and whether a deposit had been paid on the reception facility.