Hon DAVID PARKER: Well, I'll actually read out exactly what I read last time so that there can be no ambiguity, because it's the same words I'm reading from: there are three reasons why the general benefit to New Zealand balances these objectives. First, the most stringent farmland benefit test would discourage the productive investment needed to support the sustainable growth of the production forestry sector. Additionally, the risks to productive learning could be managed under the general benefit to New Zealand test because an investor must demonstrate benefits in proportion to the sensitivity of land. "Proportionality" in this sense means that overseas investment in our most sensitive land must demonstrate a higher degree of benefit than land that is not so sensitive. The assessment of the sensitivity of the land goes beyond its economic productivity and includes land of high conservation value, for example.