That's a real shame that might well contribute to where we are here now. We've been very, very constructive as an Opposition towards helping bring the Government towards what might be a more cyber-secure environment. When David Clark was the Minister of Health, we were putting this to him—remember, we actually had a spokesperson for data. I was privileged to have that under Bill English. So I was asking David Clark—and I won't give you the written parliamentary question (WPQ) numbers, but I'll just read them—is the Minister up to date with cyber-security in his ministry? Does the Minister have any concerns for cyber-security in his ministry? Does the Minister have responsibility for cyber-security in this ministry? Will the Minister take action if DHBs come under cyber-attack; and, if so, how quickly will the Minister act and how will the Minister act? I won't go through the wide range of answers to these questions, but there were probably 50 to 60 questions which we were putting to the ministry to try and understand—so this would be the end of 2017—what some of the holes might be so that we could help to get a more secure environment so New Zealanders could believe that their information, their data, was secure in Government hands. That was our purpose. We were asking the health Minister: will he update the Prime Minister on his ministry's cyber-security testing and cyber-security protection? I would think probably 30 to 40 questions. Is the ministry fit for purpose in their data policies? And then there is one WPQ that I posed: how can the Opposition spokesperson for data help the ministry be more cyber-secure? So if you really want to see an episode of collaboration from us to the ministry once we realised that there was a weakness there, there it is right there in a WPQ for anyone to see.