The timely execution of these internal processes is vital to the quality of cervical-screening programmes. As clause 6 was not considered in the development of the bill, an independent panel of reviewers with expertise on the screening pathway considered its impact. It also included expertise on Māori health, and it has considered that to both meet the intent of the Health Committee and mitigate the risk of unintended consequences, a legislative response is required. To this end, I've tabled a Supplementary Order Paper that would replace clause 6A as recommended by the Health Committee with a new clause 6A. The new clause will retain the Health Committee's clear intent that the screening programme employees must gain the kaitiaki group's approval for using programme information but only when that information is intended for publication. This would include annual reports, monitoring reports, cancer case reviews, parliamentary review committee reports, any public-facing component of a new electronic application, other publication of information captured by the legislation, and external requests for information captured by the legislation.