I also want to point to—in every speech, in some way, on these settlements; I can't help myself in terms of these problems—some of the problems in the retelling of that history, as it is agreed, and the imbalance that is existing in our settlement process, and that the agreed historical record is still biased towards the power of the Crown. I want to point to the use of one word in particular: the "vesting" of sites to hapū or iwi. "Vesting" means the generous bestowing of something on somebody. It denotes a position of power over, and an ownership from, the group who is giving to the other, whereas my understanding of the settlement process is an acknowledgment that the Crown in possession of this land that has particular meaning and purpose and original ownership from hapū does not actually have the right to bestow that. It's actually a returning of what was always owned by—and should have always been in the ownership of—hapū.