That creeping influence that we are seeing by some of the changes in this bill does give me cause for concern. Not of the individual who holds that warrant right now—mostly, at the moment—but of future Labour Ministers of Finance who may not act in a way that's consistent with the arm's length. I want to know, actually, what changed between this bill being introduced—and, actually, I don't think the recommended changes—if memory serves me, we weren't able to have submissions on this point because the amendment that we are talking about only came through officials to the committee after the select committee submissions process had been concluded. So my question is: what changed? What was the problem the executive is trying to solve with the amendments that were confirmed in the second reading, but through which we seek to improve through Mr Bayly's Supplementary Order Paper? Because it's still not clear to me what problem we are trying to solve and why we are so concerned at the degree of oversight of the executive.