Nobody can dispute that COVID is extraordinary, because what it has done is it has made businesses legally unable to operate. That is extraordinary. It was not envisaged. It would not have been envisaged by many of those signing contracts. If it was, they would have opted to contract out specifically, as some did, with the Auckland District Law Society clause. But for many, many of them, they didn't, and that is why we need this clause, why we need this amendment to the Property Law Act 2007. The question actually is: how retrospective should it be? Should it go back to the introduction of the bill? Or actually should it go back to the beginning of lockdown? There was some discussion about that as well with many submitters saying that the legislation, the omnibus bill, would be a toothless tiger in this respect if it didn't go back. 