The objectives are to ensure that the Government and internet service providers and online content hosts can swiftly and consistently take action against objectionable material—and that's the role of the chief censor. Just to acknowledge that the bar for determining objectionable content is already really, really high and it is a job of the chief censor to apply the test, and in that legal test the chief censor already takes into account freedom of expression and so that once a publication or, in this case, a potentially live streamed video is considered objectionable, it will give them the power to actually take it down and that's a good thing.