But what this bill does is it ensures that road users who pay for roading improvements will actually end up with fewer roading improvements—and this bill undermines that. This bill undermines that principle that roading upgrades should be paid for by road users. It says that the National Land Transport Fund should be used for rail, that road users should be subsidising potentially uneconomic rail projects. A colleague across the House—Gareth Hughes—has questioned some of those, I suppose, economic metrics, and yet he didn't come up with any economic metrics of his own to describe how those, in many cases, projects that have very low benefit-cost ratios could in any way—in any way—be regarded as economic under whatever metric he proposes. 