If I just take the first one, and we talk about Māori land and productivity, that's actually a goal that we would support. But in the National Party, we support improving productivity across the whole of the country. We know that that's a big problem for us. We know that productivity is the single biggest thing that we can do to improve our collective standard of living. And, as a result, we're very supportive of that. And so anything that improves Māori land benefits and productivity and utilisation is good, but, equally, so is what can improve general land use as well. And I think that's the fundamental question we still don't understand after engaging with the Minister—is, fundamentally, why does this just look through a Māori-only lens if it could be looked at through a local government or a national lens? Why wouldn't we want to talk about the impacts that sit with general landowners as well? We want, fundamentally, all unproductive land to be available, to be utilised, and to be productive—it's important for everybody. It's not just Māori that have situations of unproductive land, who own land collectively, and who could benefit from rates remission.