Meritorious as some of the arguments were, the select committee felt it was appropriate to keep the bill aligned to its narrow policy intent, but there were technical issues that we had to work through. Firstly, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment officials held the view that the shared sunscreen standard may not fit the criteria of section 29, "Product safety standards" in the Fair Trading Act. A product safety standard made under section 29 of that Act must be one that addresses potential harm that is inherent in the good. The standard must seek to prevent or minimise the risk of injury to a person that could result from something intrinsic to the good, such as the flammability of material of children's pyjamas, as an example. The select committee argued that sunscreen that had not been manufactured to the sun protection factor (SPF) claim on the bottle should be considered in the same light. To resolve the potential reading of section 29 in a manner that would exclude sunscreen products, the select committee agreed to make the standard mandatory in the primary legislation. The bill now mandates that the joint AS/NZS standard is deemed to be a product safety standard for sunscreen products and must be treated and enforced as if it were made as such under section 29 of the Fair Trading Act. This attaches an overarching regulatory framework, including enforcement and penalties that would mean the Commerce Commission could enforce the standard and that all the necessary enforcement provisions would apply. A breach of a product safety standard carries a maximum penalty of $200,000 for an individual or $600,000 for a corporate.