Now, then came, actually, the biggest slap to the Epidemic Response Committee. Often Acts have reviews in them, and it's usually between two and five years after the Act is passed. Twenty-four hours after the Act is passed, the Attorney-General comes to this House, at the death of urgency, and moves a motion to have the scrutiny of the very bill that didn't have scrutiny before it was passed. But which committee does that go to? A committee with a majority of Government members on it, that is already busy enough and that has nothing to do with the bill that had been passed, bypassing this committee that was set up to do exactly that. That was the start of the snub that included the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Tourism, and the Associate Minister of Health thumbing their noses at the most important oversight committee this Parliament has ever established. Why? Because things were getting a bit hot for them. There were some questions—[Interruption] Well, OK, here's the alternative—they scoff at that. So that means they're just too busy and important carrying out executive decisions without stopping and being subject to the scrutiny that a strong democracy requires of it.