The amazing thing about this piece of legislation is that it's not actually required, and the reason it's not required is that councils already have the ability to remit rates, and they do that through their own rates remission policy. So where is the need for legislation? Councils write off rates every year. But the unintended consequence—or maybe it is the intended consequence of this piece of legislation—and I'll take you back to how the pie is broken up in local government. A council has to look at its intended costs for a year, and all of the projects, maintenance, the new assets they're developing, and then they put a cost on that. They work backwards from the cost of the expenses for the coming year, and they set their rates based on that. So the less ratepayers that you have that are contributing to those public assets, the more that is landed on the people who actually do pay their rates, and so what we've got here is a bit of a cost transfer into those people who are the multiple owners of Māori land. If we think about 1.4 million hectares of land that is available, then there is a huge amount of equity tied up in that land, and surely the cost of rates is not the barrier to development; it is probably more a willingness, or an unwillingness, to take on financial risk and do that work on that land.