In a democratic society, we should be able to express our views with freedom. We should be able to share content and have it taken down later if it's deemed objectionable. I mean, Facebook do it all the time. What ACT does have concerns about is a new offence in section 132C(1), which is sharing objectionable livestreamed material when it's not necessarily been made objectionable yet. We see this as just going after innocent people. It was actually noted by the select committee that the intent can be difficult to determine, and it gave examples of where it would be OK to share certain types of objectionable material. It was warning people that a judgment needs to be made on background factors. Well, it seems a bit to me like, "You know it when you see it." It's not needed. It will potentially capture youth and the unsuspecting internet users. I am witnessing a few laws which are going through, where the police or our judiciary are the ones that are being left to interpret what we mean, because our laws are becoming so unclear, probably because they're unnecessary.