One key point the Greens want to make is that when the EPA is using information from overseas regulators, they need to ensure that they are not relying on the data and research produced by chemical companies when they're assessing impacts. The information must be scientifically robust and it must be from independent sources. The EPA must also demand much more transparency from applicants and agrichemical companies around the chemical formulation of proprietary products so that the public and regulators know exactly what they're dealing with and can better assess the impacts. Apiculture New Zealand made a submission on the consultation document, and they noted that they had attended a pre-hearing meeting for approval of an insecticide containing sulfoxaflor—I'm not sure that's correctly pronounced—but the applicant had withheld all of the information. They were only allowed to see the data, but not to take it away and study it. 