The proposed amendments will address some but not all of our concerns—for example, the definition of "health professional" has disappeared altogether and been replaced by "suitably qualified third party", which we're now told will be defined post facto in regulation. Most people in this House are aware that definitions of terms in legislation should not be left for regulation unless there's very good reason to do so and I'm not convinced that such a reason's here. We should be dealing with as many issues as possible up front; not kicking them down the road. I'm also concerned about the 18-month transition period that the Minister's mentioned. My view is that we are better if we can agree the detail and get the work done immediately rather than leave them to be worked out for another year and a half, bearing in mind this bill has already been before the House almost four years. But we in the select committee can have a look at these issues in detail, along with other legal uncertainties detailed in that Crown Law advice.