If Mr Mitchell or my other colleagues across the House had read down another paragraph, they would have been able to spot this little gem: "Looking simply at changes in the rate of these three categories of offences since the New Zealand three strikes law came into effect we can see few changes that are easily attributable to the new law." If they'd read on just a couple more paragraphs—I know there's big words there, I know it's difficult to deal with all this data, but if they'd read on just a few more paragraphs, they would have come to this little gem: "Convictions have proven to be"—wait for it—"stable." Even increasing since the law was enacted, we're talking since 2010—that was on you guys. Based on the data alone, there is no distinct indication that the three strikes legislation is deterring individuals from committing qualifying offences.