So, for a Cabinet to go right through all the processes, committees, and to get to that stage—they have a sign-off—and then realise subsequently that there was an issue that they may end up being in a situation where the Government issues a whole lot of units, and it could be millions of units, to find that the strike price, which is the term, is below the current market. It could in fact be below ETS, the secondary trading market, right now. I just think it's an indictment, actually, on commerciality of members of the Government, and particularly the Cabinet, who allowed this to go through, and not one person must have stood there and gone, "That's not how markets work." So here we are, rushing through a piece of legislation under urgency, or just about, I understand—under a real strict time frame—and we're here to deal with an issue that had been flagged but deemed not sufficiently robust or important enough to be dealt with. 