However, the new clause 6A would also ensure that the kaitiaki group's approval wouldn't be required for the programme's internal processes that are not intended to result in publication. The real practical effect of that is that, as it was, they would potentially have to go and seek approval every single time they were wanting to use that information, which would make it clunky and slow the process down. I don't think that was what was actually intended by those kaitiaki regulations. If we look at why the kaitiaki regulations exist, as Dr Kerekere mentioned in her earlier contribution, they "must have regard to the … sanctity of Te Whare Tangata; the need for culturally appropriate protection for the taonga of the information covered by the regulations; [and] the need to ensure that the information is used for the benefit of Māori women." 