Again, I take the member's point that she made that there are different standards that we should require of for-profit entities and not-for-profit perhaps, but, having been in the NGO sector myself for many years and knowing that these organisations are also entrusted with money, I think it's a fair point to raise that people should be confident in the fact that those moneys are being used in a way—and I'm not in any way trying to cast aspersions upon these charities, but I do think it's a fair point that we have a reasonable standard of financial reporting. With due respect, I think that was the point that Michael Wood was trying to make as well. So the response that I would seek from the member in the chair, then, is that those three bits that are now, effectively, removed by replacement section 39(2)(b) still give us confidence that the intent of those three bits will still be kept, in a sense, or, if not, why not. Thank you.