I'm also interested in the question of—so all individual contracts have to have everything, it seems, included in a collective contract, if there is one in place, and then can improve on it in terms of conditions. But you're limiting the ability to have any lesser conditions as part of an individual contract, and I was just curious—I could understand partly the thinking behind it, but is not the purpose of an individual contract, assuming that it is within all the other laws of the land, in terms of minimum wage and all those sorts of things and provisions—why it has to be exactly the same as the collective contract.