ANDREW BAYLY: Thank you. Well, I think that the response that we've just had from the Minister of Finance to David Seymour's question just shows the simplistic argument that he always runs, which is either it's all or nothing. And the issue is that as my colleague pointed out, New Zealand had the second highest response to COVID in the entire OECD—basically the world. So we have had a Government—and I'm looking at you, the Minister of Finance—which has allowed an incredible amount of money to be pumped into this economy. And my first question is really—look, with Mr Seymour's question, it is not that we shouldn't have done wage support. I'm sure Mr Seymour supported the wage support mechanism. That was a $25 billion package. You were right, Minister: other people, including myself, asked for more support for businesses because we didn't think it went far enough. There is probably another $10 billion, roughly, I don't know—take a guess of it—that was good quality spending. But when you look at the totality, there was another $20 billion to $25 billion of absolute crap spending, that has delivered no benefit to New Zealand. And that is the issue that we're raising. It's not we should have not spent it; the question is we should not have spent all of it. And there are 150 projects we identified that literally have delivered no benefit to New Zealand. So it's not an all or nothing debate. It is a question of quantum, and the Minister is overseeing a huge spend up on basically a whole range of wasteful projects.