Others have mentioned the fact that the purpose has been added to through the select committee process. So it seems, I suppose, something of a "motherhood and apple pie" statement that the purpose of the Act should include such things as promoting the maintenance of a sound and efficient financial system, avoiding significant damage, promoting confident and informed participation, and so on. But actually, it is quite significant, or potentially significant, that the legislation now has a mandate, essentially, to respond to threats to the stability of, or confidence in, the financial system. So that allows, it authorises, actions to be taken subsequently if we were to have such extreme circumstances as that, and such action would be legitimate because the purpose of the bill includes that. So that's pretty helpful, I think. Again, I think that the process of the bill, as well as the substance of it, has been pretty constructive, and I think we're going to get a pretty good result at the end of it for that.