Can I briefly comment on some of the points that were raised in the speeches—firstly, that this should have been done earlier. I think the situation warrants a targeted, bespoke approach to sanctions in light of the actions of Putin and the continued aggression. I left New Zealand on 19 February, and at that time, while it was potentially imminent that an invasion or an attack could occur, actually what we were seeing at that moment was militarisation along the Ukraine border. I was over in Europe on the 24th when the invasion occurred, and things escalated very quickly. But once we saw as a country that things were escalating, as has already been said by many speakers in this House, we applied all the sanctions that we had available to us: travel bans, export controls, and we undertook diplomatic representations at a range of levels to ensure that we were reflecting our concern as a country to what we were seeing. And certainly, once an invasion occurred, we called in the ambassador here in New Zealand and we preserved our ability as a country to keep diplomatic channels open. Why I point to that is that I don't think we acted too slowly on the way in which New Zealand expressed its position on this significant issue.