For myself, I come from a place of restorative justice and spent many years working in this field with both victims and offenders of crime, with communities affected by crime and impacted by crime. It's always interesting, because we often got criticised in restorative justice because it was just a slap over the wrist, or a once over lightly, or a kumbaya and a cup of tea afterwards, but it was far deeper than that. Many times I sat in restorative justice conferences with gang members—with seriously freaky people, to be honest, who I wouldn't want to cross in a light alley, let alone a dark alley—but the difference in the restorative justice process was seeing the fear and the trepidation on the offender's face when they walked into the room, because it was so different to a courthouse; it was so different to standing here and seeing the judge at the other end of the room, with tables and lawyers in the way, whereas, in this situation, you were coming face to face with the person that you hurt, the person that you harmed, and that was far greater and far more impactful than the current justice system and how it operates. In many ways, in this three-strikes system, there is no accountability, but seeing the restoration—and no, not the shaking hands and hugging and walking away and all being friends again, but being in a place where the voice of the victim was heard, where the offender was able to understand the harm that was caused, to understand the ripple effect not only for the victim but for the victim's family, for the victim's community, and it goes on and on and on.