So the first thing that we raise is that process matters. It matters if a lockdown is legal. We deserve, as a country, to know the answer to that, and there are many questions that are being asked about that. We also deserve more than 24 hours' notice on a piece of legislation that is going to impact the freedom of New Zealanders, whether that is religious freedom, whether that is freedom of association. On this side of the House, we have said that, with a reduced media, with significant police powers, with a reduced Parliament, it is entirely appropriate to expect a larger lead-in time than that on a piece of legislation as important as this legislation. So process does matter, and we would say never more than in a national emergency is it important to get to the table with the Opposition and work that through. And what played out today—and we've seen a bit of a backdown from the Government—is that people in New Zealand said, "Hang on a second. We believe in reducing the public health impacts of COVID-19, but we expect you as leaders to be able to explain your public health rationale for restaurants versus schools versus funerals and tangi." That is entirely reasonable. On this side of the House, we will continue to ask for maximum transparency around the decisions at a public health level, and that is what New Zealanders would expect from us.