My question for the sponsor of the bill is: what process of consultation has been undertaken with the Canterbury community in regards to those additional costs that will, in effect, be borne by the ratepayers of the Canterbury region, some 600,000 or so individuals? And in the context of growing costs and the cost of living crisis and all of that, which all Kiwis are facing out there at the moment, what is the level of feedback that was received from that consultation? As any good local bill would do, they are generally, if not always, well consulted with in the community in which they are impacting. That's good process. So I'd be looking forward to some clarity around the consultation around subclause (4) that I'm referring to there, and we'll go on from there.