Section 39(2)(b)(v), though, is exactly the same, as far as I can see, as replacement section 39(2)(c). But the bits in between are the bits that I have some questions about, and I, with due respect, don't think that there was an actual response that would allay our fears that the standard hasn't been lowered, and I think that's the point that the submitter Julia Durkin was making as well, which Michael Wood relayed to the House. That is the removal of those three bits in between, and the requirement for an overall operating statement, a statement of cash flows, and any other statements necessary to fairly reflect the amenity's financial position, the resources available to it, and the financial results of its operation.