Look, what it's going to enable is—across various sectors in society, including the public sector, but not exclusively—a much simpler way of engaging around what we term whistleblowing. Now, let's be really clear, the law is not going to allow, I think fortunately, vexatious, ongoing—I suppose that's a tautology. It's not going to enable continuous campaigning for the sake of it. I know there's been various debates in the House as the law has progressed to whether or not it should be much, much broader in scope and the flexibility of who can speak and what they can say, but I think, again, on this side of the House, we're relatively happy where the law has landed. Fundamentally, that's to allow someone who has serious concerns about the conduct within their workplace or a piece of policy or otherwise to raise that safely. So that's the first, I suppose, critical element here, that someone who is a whistleblower will be protected. I think that's probably a message that will be repeated if there are more speeches, one hopes optimistically. That actually those who choose to whistle blow will know that this Parliament, or the law rather, has their back.