Hon CHRIS HIPKINS (Leader of the House): I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I want to draw your attention to Speaker's ruling 32/4 and ask you a question with regards to that Speaker's ruling. It's a longstanding ruling from 1989 by then Deputy Speaker Terris, where he said that "There are no grounds for ruling against a member making a statement that there is a legal action in existence." My question there is, really, around the definition of "legal action", whether the fact that there is a legal action taking place in the court—whether referring to the fact that that is happening is something that members cannot do, or whether that is, in fact, acceptable. I accept that having read all of the relevant Speakers' rulings around matters before the court, it's important that the Parliament doesn't get into the specifics of the case or seek to influence the court in any way, but surely a member must still be able to refer to the fact that there is an action in existence.