Clause 6 also has an amendment from what was originally intended to be "induce terror in a civilian population", which existed previously, was to be changed to "to induce fear in a population." And although I'm not a member of the select committee, I did happen to sit on it when this question was being raised, and I did ask some questions. I did have a personal concern that that would dilute it too far. I'm pleased to see that it has been amended: "induce terror in a civilian population" would now be "to intimidate a population", which is a higher threshold and I think it is the right one. 