Some submitters and other members of the House have asked why we haven't introduced a definition of unconscionable conduct. I haven't gone with a definition, because that could limit the circumstances in which the protections could be used. I personally wouldn't want to predict the types of situations that could be defined as unconscionable conduct, and so I think it's really important that we don't define those terms in that way. The bill instead provides a list of factors that a court will consider when deciding whether someone's actions meet that test, and that includes things like whether an imbalance exists in bargaining power and whether that's a contributing factor.