I want to talk through some of the issues that have arisen as we work through this very hasty, ill-thought-through, and disorganised piece of legislation. I realise that that description fits every bill that's been passed under urgency these past three weeks, and I want to highlight what I mean by this. Earlier today, the Hon Louise Upston noted to the honourable Minister Carmel Sepuloni that the current rules would see a woman with a husband on $99,000 per annum who loses her job because of COVID-19 and receives a $29,000 redundancy payment be eligible for this income relief payment of $490 a week, tax-free. In the meantime, a woman—perhaps a sole provider for her home—who loses her job and receives a $30,000 redundancy payment will not be eligible for the income relief package. Where is the fairness in how this is being applied? 