The Abortion Legislation Committee did not choose model A, a model that would have no statutory framework, much like, say, Canada, a country with lower abortion rates than New Zealand. The select committee has gone with option B, which has a statutory test after 20 weeks. I want to put on record that I think that's a mistake. The select committee chose to continue including these protest zones, these restrictions on freedom of expression. Now, in my view, abortion protesters in New Zealand are not like American ones. They're not scary, they're not dangerous; they're people to feel sorry for. They are not a threat in the way that American abortion protesters are. However, these protest zones in this legislation are an impairment of freedom of speech so arbitrary and so ad hoc that those particular impairments of freedom of speech could be used as a precedent for any other restriction. I intend to put up a Supplementary Order Paper that will remove that section and allow other parts of our law, such as the Summary Offences Act, to deal with harassment as it should, and I'd invite members who are in favour of this cause and in favour of freedom of speech to join together and support that amendment, which is already prepared.