But, as I said, the legislation before us was a little bit more complex than we'd anticipated. As Mr Muller said earlier, as it was introduced, the bill required the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs to recommend that mandatory regulations be set to provide a product safety standard under section 29 of the Fair Trading Act. In essence, the intention of this was to move the standard from voluntary to mandatory. But we received advice in the committee that the empowering provisions of the Fair Trading Act didn't appear to allow a product safety standard to be made for the purpose of mandating this Australian – New Zealand standard for sunscreen. Now, we did have quite a lot of conversation on this topic, and I remember not all of us, necessarily, concurred with this particular view, but we did come to a conclusion. The advice that we received was, as I said, that section 29(1) was designed to prevent or minimise the risk of injury by addressing potential harm that was inherent in the product. The feeling was that the product itself wasn't the thing that was going to cause the harm. It was really a little bit like dancing on the head of a pin sometimes. But we did come to a conclusion and provided some legal clarity with the recommendations that you see in the version in front of you, which is to recommend that compliance with the standard should be mandated in the primary legislation. So, accordingly, we recommended replacing clause 5. What this does is it, basically, removes the requirement on the Minister to make a regulation. Instead, it simply mandates in the primary Act that the standards apply as if they were product safety standards made through regulation.