My colleague talked about migrants. Where was the consideration for migrants if there's an interest in supporting people who've lost their employment? If it was a proposal that was just looking at the fact that a partner had kept their job, why wasn't that a consideration at the job seeker rate? Why does it have to be twice the rate that another job seeker is getting? These are the sorts of issues that if you'd had Action Against Poverty, if you'd had the Salvation Army, or if you'd had the Children's Commissioner in front of the select committee, we could have actually pulled those issues out. Actually, as we've seen, a lot of those advocates who stand alongside the people outside the Ministry of Social Development's office and outside Work and Income—the beneficiary advocates—they're pretty angry today. They're pretty angry because this is clearly a piece of legislation that disadvantages and treats the most vulnerable New Zealanders unfairly, and that's why it's on the issue of fairness that National isn't supporting this legislation. 