What that means is, for Labour MPs who never studied economics, who never went to university to study something that actually is human behaviour—if we have incentives, this is what people will do. They wouldn't necessarily understand that by accepting lower dividends and poorer performance from wholly owned State generators, what they're doing is they're asking taxpayers, including my kids who work at low paid jobs to save a bit of money in between lectures, to subsidise the poor performance of these companies, rather than saying, "Well, look, actually, is there private sector funding—hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars circulating around the world—which could invest in public infrastructure like electricity? Maybe that would free up some Government capital to build things." Like, we've just heard that the Lower Hutt hospital's going to have to be evacuated because of seismic issues. I mean, imagine. It could free up funds through privatising State-owned electricity generators to build things like hospitals or even complete the scope of works for the Dunedin Hospital.