I guess the real point here is that when we're doing that, when we're asking what the triggers are for this, we want to have a proportionate approach. One of the big complaints to date, and I want to say it's a legitimate one, is that people who are looking to invest in New Zealand had a regulatory burden that was too high. So while we're not burning the regulations, we're absolutely seeking to make them a lot more workable in terms of having things like standing consents. We want a proportionate framework. So in this before and after test, which is much more workable as part of it, and also a framework where you won't have to, every time, go through the entire process of ascertaining the credentials of the investor and the nature of the investment and so on and so forth. So we see that as a really important part of it. The before and after test will now simply ask the question, "What is it now? How will it be improved later?"