Under the Overseas Investment Act, currently, if foreign investors are looking to buy a New Zealand investment, they have to do what's called a counterfactual argument, which is to say that this is what the best New Zealand investor would have done with this asset that they're proposing to buy, and the foreigner has to then substantiate not only would they meet that test of what the best New Zealand investor, with all the resources—no limit on that—would do, but what in addition the foreign investor brings to that investment. That counterfactual test, under this proposed bill, is going to move to what is called a before and after test. Again, if we do want to enshrine some legislation that has permanence around it and is long lasting and acceptable to foreigners as well as to New Zealanders, I think that's a very substantive technical change. So those are two examples why I think the technical nature of this bill requires a lot more consideration than our hoping some people are going to turn up and our just relying on advice from officials, which may be very pertinent, but may not encompass all the various aspects. 