Look, I think the bill in itself is relatively simple. We can see the purchase. My colleague explained the issue of: is the funding, is the costing, enough, is it accurate, and is it appropriate? He's also raised the question of: what about the exemptions? Do they apply to everyone equally and fairly? I think that's a discussion we can have across the House. But I would commend the Minister to have a think about—and think about whether there's something in the committee of the whole House that she needs to address—the service I am purchasing and, if that service is not adequate, if that service is not up to standard, what is my recourse, first, just to complain anyway—it's not clear to me there's a complaints procedure—and, secondly, what is the remedy if it truly is found to be unsatisfactory. 