So, to go through each of those four areas in turn, the first, I think, is actually really interesting, because that's clause 14, the section 36 prohibition against the misuse of market power. There's a philosophical distinction, I suppose, oftentimes between the left and the right about the way that we ensure competition, the way that we seek to decide how it is that different players in a marketplace can perform to the maximum potential, because that's good for them and, of course, that's good for the consumer. That allows the market as a whole to function. But I think the good news is—and I do want to acknowledge it, because it seems that the bill is attracting bipartisan support. I do want to acknowledge that we have, at least in this matter, a fundamental starting point that is the same, which is to say that in a market such as the New Zealand economy, let's say—roughly speaking, just to simplify grossly—that we do believe that allowing competition is a mechanism for ensuring the best outcomes overall. We assume—again, somewhat of a simplification, but—the consumer's a rational beast and will make decisions in their best interests, and so the way to ensure that the best possible outcomes occur in an efficient manner is to allow the most possible options in front of that consumer.