There's a second part to this legislation—am I'm almost talking myself out of ACT supporting it? Once upon a time, when it was a bit easier to make caucus decisions, we might have changed direction at this point. This legislation also requires the Government to pay more for Working for Families. Why is that? Because during the first lockdown, inexplicably the Government decided to raise benefits by $25 an hour. Now, I'm not commenting on—[Interruption] By $25 dollars a week, someone corrected me. I tell you what, Mr Robertson, it's very easy to be generous with other people's money, as you well know. The issue is that they had, potentially, a policy to raise benefits, and maybe they should—maybe they should've debated it. But they did it under the cover of lockdown, and that was completely wrong. That was knee-jerk legislation. That was exploiting the situation. People on benefits did not need a pay increase during lockdown. People who didn't have to go to work and were actually given taxpayer money to stay home were some of the least affected people by the lockdown. 