I agree with the member for Auckland Central's comments that to create some sort of chilling effect, which risked arbitrary detention, is a very unintended consequence of this bill and is certainly not the outcome that we want to see. I do think that Ministers who hold the health portfolio, and responsibility for this, have a duty to consider these issues of release of this particular class of offender very carefully so as to not confuse the issue with any political sentiments of the day, which is hard to do in these situations where often there is public outcry about a case that has garnered media attention—like the case of Sarah Preece, for example. I think, though, that this bill strikes the right balance. It creates a system where victim impact statements are about centring the victim in the court. They're about giving a victim standing in the court as their own person, not just, sort of, an incendiary of a process which has happened between the Crown and the offender and by not introducing those victim statements at a point at which clinical decisions are being made and at a point at which judicial decisions are being made, we avoid that harm, we reduce it to something that is absolutely manageable for the Minister who already exercises these sorts of powers in other decision-making capacities. 