So the question I have is: in the education framework, what does the Minister see as what the Treaty requires in how decision making is made? We've seen a couple of examples recently in the development of curriculum. So in the history curriculum, I noticed the advisory board was 50:50—Māori and everybody else. Is that a deliberate decision and is that a basis of how he intends to make decisions? And, likewise, in the development of the commerce area, I was interested—so I'm interested in decision making around curriculum, but also the broader structures of how the ministry and decision making is organised and what he believes the Treaty requires in terms of how those decisions are made.