But Omicron has changed the circumstances that we're dealing with. We already have a very high level of vaccination, and Omicron is a different type of COVID to Delta, and the wild strain of COVID. And we know, as I've commented previously in the House, Omicron busts through vaccination, double vaccination, even triple vaccination, and so the impact on transmission is far less effective, and, because of that, we have to bear in mind the impact it's having on rights and the ability for people to opt out of medical treatment. What we are saying to people is that if you choose to work in a particular profession—be it Corrections or be it at an allied health workforce, for example—you have to be vaccinated. That is a pretty big thing for the Government to do. It's a pretty big thing for the State to say to somebody. Now, it's not to say that that can never be justified, but it's to say that the Government has to go through a rigorous rights analysis to figure out when the intrusion on rights is justified and whether or not the efficaciousness or the efficacy of what the Government is doing justifies the intrusion on the right. I would put it to the House that we have approached that point when it comes to vaccine mandates more generally. 