In response to my colleague Rachel Brooking, a hard-working member of the Environment Committee, I know, she is correct. There is currently a lease on that land that falls or is drawn in favour of the tennis club. What this, effectively, would do, in terms of the legislative change, is the bill makes section 3 of the 1966 Act apply to this piece of land by vesting it in the 1966 Act. It removes the trust requirement of the 1877 Act and, therefore, how the 1922 and the 1953 or the 1977 Act—it's a little bit confusing—is basically applicable. But it specifically leaves all current leases in place, such as the one for the tennis club—that would still be a contractual negotiation between the two parties, of course. But probably what's also worth noting is that the encumbrances that are currently in place, and there are some that the member probably may recall from the drone footage and the maps, there were some that ran around the skirt of the carpark to Palmerston North Girls' High School. So those access opportunities to any of the surrounding land are still preserved under this process.