Particularly, they were concerned around new section 9B(1)(a) of clause 7 just being a bit vague, and that's where it comes back to that first comment I'd made around having consistency or certainty that we aren't just getting ourselves into a bit of an ambiguous space. That particular clause specifies that "(1) In this Act, building method means a method—(a) for using 1 or more products or things as part of building work;", but "products or things" has no definition under this bill. Whereas what they've proposed in their submission was actually to change that to "for using building products as part of building work;", which just gave it a little bit—it felt like it was a bit tighter.