What worries me is that they're not well remunerated, as the submissions and the report says. I use this at a macro level, because I don't want to highlight any individuals, but what we risk doing is having a lot of people for whom the meeting fees and the stipend looks pretty attractive, and a lot of people for whom they've got so much independent income or wealth that it doesn't matter, and, actually, we're losing a really solid rump in the middle who might make excellent councillors but who are too busy in their day-to-day lives to actually put themselves up for office. 