There's also a potential risk—although I have faith in the credibility of our EPA. I think they do a very good job, but I think that there would be a potential that we would be somehow out of whack and off beam in terms of some of the work that had been done in other jurisdictions and other parts of the world. So from my point of view, I think that this initiative taken by the EPA themselves—initiated by them, as I said—is something that they should be given some credit for. I think that the fact that they have been able to convince the Minister and his advisers that this is a piece of worthy work that is worth pursuing and that the reasons for it should be brought to the Parliament and that a piece of legislation should go through—I think that they need to be congratulated for that. I think also that the Minister needs to be congratulated for saying, "Well, actually, recognising the EPA, this is a good idea." I think that if we can improve the timeliness of the assessment and reassessment of these hazardous substances, then that would be a good thing.