Those principles that I've just outlined, they are consistent with ACT's values, and the private property rights pre-eminence there. These are political choices. I'm hoping that they don't reflect the political choices of other parties in the House. I note that other parties have different views and different choices, so it may be if somebody else was writing a bill like this they might say, "How is a piece of legislation consistent with Te Tiriti o Waitangi and our partnership there? How is it consistent with international treaty agreements? How is it consistent with climate change obligations? How is it consistent with community wellbeing outcomes? How is it consistent with revision of, say, public education, or, say, public healthcare and environmental protections?" These are all good political things that we should be discussing and debating in this House, and it is for this House to decide those priorities.