As some colleagues have said, there are some sensible, necessary, appropriate—albeit incredibly late—changes rendering this, effectively, retrospective legislation. Well, if it was that retrospective, one begs the question as to why it's taken the Government so long to bring this bill to the House and why it thinks it's appropriate for it to give itself and its officials and the Cabinet weeks, months at least, to prepare this and then give submitters 16 days, and then to look the public in the eye and say that is consistent with good parliamentary process, good democratic process. I, frankly, think that will massively fail any sort of test of consultation and of communication. I don't know how long—I would like to hear from a member on the other side, if they can explain, how long it's taken them to prepare this legislation, because, frankly, if it took less than six months, let's give the public the same respect. Let's give the public the same amount of time that they would need to give a considered response to what the Government believes is a considered bill.