Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): Thank you, Madam Chair. I want to join Mr Seymour in acknowledging the Minister's attempts to address at least some of the questions, and I agree that it's not what he answered; it's what he didn't answer that's important. I think that as we try and tease out what these regulations might look like—because all we've got is another bill to create a regulation-making power, the details of which we are unaware—I'd remind the Minister that as far as I can tell, he didn't answer the question of which classes of work will be required to have a worker vaccinated, or vaccinated and tested. We didn't get an answer to that, and I've found it fascinating that he spent more time in his answers addressing the National Party's Supplementary Order Papers than he did on answering substantive questions on the bill, as if he's as busy as Dr Webb is—a bit busy and important to be bothered with the, sort of, technical details—and he just needs to be somewhere else. Well, I'm afraid we need better answers than that, Minister.