I set out at the start what I thought was a reasonably rational rationale—can I say that? Too late, I have. Anyway, I've set out what I thought was a reasonable basis for the law. I didn't claim it was anything particularly large—indeed, it's not—and no one here would make the mistake of thinking that. Even the most generous supporters of the bill wouldn't claim that it's going to save every problem in the world. But I will just say, at the risk of being ever so slightly defensive, that it was interesting to hear Dr Duncan Webb rebuke me for almost wasting the time of the House when I remember that he spoke at some length on no lesser subject that the Ombudsmen (Protection of Name) Amendment Bill, and that was produced with the resources of the whole Government in the last term, I believe. Actually, maybe it was a member's bill. In any case, it came from that side of the House. 