So the Green Party acknowledges the many changes that have been made through select committee, and other speakers have noted those—the increase in outdoor space, the increase in outlook, the requirement that buildings interact more with the street through the requirement for 20 percent of the frontage to be windows—but we are doing urban density with urgency, with the bill being passed, potentially, before Christmas. We are not doing anything to protect nature in our cities with any urgency. There has already been wholesale loss of urban trees in centres like Auckland, continuing with the loss of a century-old pōhutukawa just last week in Khyber Pass. This bill does nothing to protect urban trees. We have a 20 percent site being required to be landscaped in grass or plants. The Green Party would like to see that increased to 35 percent to provide a stronger incentive to retain urban trees, because all suburbs should be leafy suburbs and should have the benefits that trees provide in terms of shade, reducing the urban heat island effect, taking up stormwater and helping reduce peak stormwater flows, and improving air quality and buffering from noise.