So, as you look through the bill, you'll see some of these things that, on the surface of it, may look like common sense, but it is absolutely necessary to give protection to, really, all parties, not just the purchaser but actually those that are selling to make sure that they can't actually be accused of having pulled the wool over sellers' eyes, because there was the information able be collected. Just, interestingly, in preparation for speaking tonight, I was speaking to someone who related their own, probably typical, experience of having a building which they purchased stand-alone or there was some shared space and there was subsequently an apartment built. That shared space had drawn them into the body corporate, and all of a sudden that apartment that was built became a "leaky"—that terrible word that's entered our lexicon—and they found that they were actually then responsible for the costs of the apartments, even though theirs was a relatively stand-alone affair with only shared costs, or "shared" being some parking areas. That, for them, began a very expensive exercise for that particular person to ensure they came free of that.