Now, secondly—and I do want some feedback on this—matters in respect of the Holidays Act, because he described this as a legacy of the previous Government. So my question to him is this: has he had any advice from his officials that the previous Government were warned about the risks to the DHB balance sheets from the Holidays Act that the previous Government did not act on? Is it also the case that these issues date back prior to the 2008 general election, and, therefore, one could argue, are a legacy of the Clark Government? Indeed, it was the Clark Government in 2003 that passed the Holidays Act into law against the warnings—including from me as vice-president of the Private Hospitals Association—that it would be a complete dog's breakfast. So if we're going to talk legacies, Minister, please advise the committee how far back that legacy goes, because I reckon that for 17 years, people have been underpaid on a technical reading of the Holidays Act. It wasn't known to the Clark Government. It wasn't known to the Key-English Government. The Minister smiles and shakes his head—that's my question to him.