E tū, PSA, and a number of other key stakeholders were present, and they expressed their vehement opposition to that plan. So in May, the ministry and the Government flip-flopped and said, "Look, what we'll do is we'll put $300 million over four years. That is $75 million per annum, is what the agreement will be." There was no bargaining with this. It was a mandate, as has been the mandate for the rest of the sector—"This is what you will get." Fundamentally, it relates to 70c per hour for those on the lowest wages, and about 3 percent per annum is what that $300 million over four years equates to. What then happened was that the unions and other stakeholders, other organisations, said "No, that's not going to cut it.", and they walked away from negotiations. That's actually what's happened; that's what brings us here today. Amongst other things, it's been pointed out to me that the lowest rate under this bill, at $22.49, is less than the living wage of $23.65.