There's a real problem, because this is some of what we heard from the submitters supporting the legislation. What we heard from employers, not all of them but a large number who presented, was that they opposed it because they saw it as a cost. They didn't recognise the fact that, if people are sick, they're sick; they're either coming to work and not doing a great job, because they're sick, or they're not turning up to work and you're just not paying them. But you're not getting the job done, because that person is actually sick, or you're losing great staff because they can't sustain their health or their kids' health and your limited provision of sick leave. That is an increased cost.