Some positive changes were made and we supported those accordingly with amendments at the select committee stage. But we did, none the less, have questions, and we do still have questions that relate to certain key aspects of the bill—that it doesn't seem to us the Minister has been sufficiently on top of it to give us much confidence and, more to the point, the justice community and those involved in it, the confidence of how this thing should be operating going forward. A key example, as highlighted by a submitter at the select committee, is in relation to court security officers. Under the bill, they're expected to provide legal advice, in effect, about why they are excluding persons from the ability to attend court or denying them access or, indeed, removing them, and that seems, to us, a strange way to go about dealing with fundamental rights and freedoms of New Zealanders in a courtroom context. 