Let me respond to some of the points he made. So he's a bit worried, as I understand it, as I infer from his contribution, that if there is a future court ruling perhaps on this law that says it's still inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, therefore, what are we going to do. I'd just make this point: the laws of this land are in the hands of this House. The laws of this land are in the hands of this House. This House will decide. And even under the declaration of an inconsistency with legislation that we've got going through the House at the moment, it is very clear. Courts may well declare laws to be inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and it will come back to this House and this House will decide. And one of the decisions the House might make is it's going to carry on, for the very good reason that at a political level we decide that inconsistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act is one that is tolerable. So there is no further risk there. 