Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): Thank you, Madam Chair. I just want to add a perspective to the intervention from Mr Brown on the tabled amendment in his name, deleting clause 11. I want to look at it from the constitutional perspective, because this is, on the face of it, quite a drastic action by this committee. But as Mr Brown describes, if one looks deeper into the decision of the Supreme Court, there were obviously quite different views amongst the Justices about what to do, firstly, in respect of whether or not even the legislation passed by this House in 2017 was insufficient to prevent someone convicted in that window between the commission of the offence and the passage of the law. I'm moved by Justice Young's consideration in paragraph 9. I quote the judgment: "[Justice Young] considers that at the time the appellant was sentenced, he posed a real or genuine risk to the lives or sexual safety of one or more children or children generally. The making of a registration order was therefore appropriate. He would have dismissed the appeal."