What I was about to ask the Minister to do was to focus on clause 19 in Part 2. He has already drawn our attention to it, he referred to it in his opening comments, but I don't feel that he's really given an explanation as to why that particular clause is necessary and—to the average punter reading it—it could seem to be slightly convoluted. So I would be interested to know—and I think some who are listening to this debate at this moment would be interested to know—why is this particular clause necessary after the votes have been cast? And I mean necessary in the sense of why does it have to be written into this particular bill when it's something that would be happening anyway? Is he concerned that it might otherwise not happen? I'd just be interested in his comment on that. There may be a very good reason and, if so, I look forward to hearing what it is.