So what we have, again, is this ideology of centralisation, of us taking a sledgehammer to a walnut instead of taking a practical, pragmatic, and sensible approach to these smaller schemes. Had the Government been prepared to think about something that was more practical and more sensible, we could have supported it. And, as my colleague Barbara Kuriger said, if we had been able to exempt these smaller suppliers for that seven-year time period, developed the practical and pragmatic and sensible, acceptable solutions, then they would have been flocking to go into it. So why is the Government not confident enough that they will be able to show how wonderful these acceptable solutions are and therefore there will be no need to enforce it? The water schemes and their suppliers and the people that run it will be flocking to go into them. But my fear, like the fear of many of my colleagues, is that this legislation will develop a life of its own. I think Ian McKelvie may have said something about this earlier on last week when he said it could be like the health and safety legislation where it develops a life of its own.