The previous speaker, Brett Hudson, was concerned that we had not defined what unconscionable conduct is in this bill, that we had not given an explicit definition, but he also complained that we hadn't allowed case law to provide a definition over time. Now, I cannot reconcile those two statements. In fact, this bill does find a way of drawing on the strengths of case law and drawing on the strengths of providing guidance in legislation. If the previous speaker would care to look at clause 6 of the bill, he would see that clause 6 inserts two new sections into the Act, sections 7 and 8. Those clauses give an understanding—it says that a person must not trade in or engage in unconscionable conduct, and then it sets out a series of criteria that the court may take into account when determining whether something amounts to unconscionable conduct. It doesn't define it exactly, but it sets out a series of criteria.