We know that New Zealanders may travel to Hong Kong to protest the Draconian application of laws and changes in law by the Chinese Government in their home State, and they may be seen as terrorists. We also know that there are jurisdictions overseas where, even if the definition of terror accords with ours, that due process would not apply, that convictions may be entirely unsafe. And I want to remember as well—because the memory of the 9/11 attacks has been invoked in this House tonight and I stand here as a Middle Eastern woman—that this type of legislation, these broadening of powers for tyrannical institutions that operate with prejudice have resulted before. It happened here in New Zealand after 9/11. We pandered to the George Bush era war on terror rhetoric and we held an asylum seeker without charge or trial for some two years when the SIS wouldn't release information pursuant to which he was held. That was Ahmed Zaoui. That was under the jurisdiction of a very popular, very powerful Labour Party Prime Minister.