So this is about the safe harbour provisions for some intellectual property arrangements. Now, the bill would remove the three provisions that prevent scrutiny of certain conduct when it involves intellectual property. The provisions are out of date, as the member has challenged—that on its own is not a sufficient ground. That's shorthand for the reasons that I will give now. They reflect a legacy of discredited thinking, and if you want to put them in the vernacular, basically they cause confusion and ultimately they prevent scrutiny of conduct, which raises genuine competition concerns. 