The first thing that we were occupied on as a committee is around the issue of what covenants should be kept under this bill. And we heard from Katherine Rich, particularly, who identified a whole raft of covenants that grocery retailers have already put in place—and they are very varied. So we worked our way through the different types, and the first question is: are we capturing all the appropriate covenants? And what we were concerned with in the original definition in the bill was a sort of limiting factor around how you define covenants. And, to some extent, we were particularly concerned about side letters. You might enter into an agreement in a land arrangement with a landlord to tenant a property, but there might be a different agreement that deals with how you're going to pay the landlord, which might be based on a turnover arrangement that may in fact be in a separate agreement. And then there might be a side letter which says if there are going to be changes to the planning laws in this area that you operate in and you have your supermarket or you own a mall, then we require the landlord, in this case, to pose those changes in planning laws. And, again, that might be captured in another area of documentation. So the first thing was to make sure that the definition was broad enough to capture what was meant by "agreement", and, obviously, the changed or amended wording captures and adds things like arrangements and other such technical terms to describe broadly agreements that may exist in varying forms between the grocery retailer and the landlord. So that was the first thing.