But hopefully I'm wrong and she's going to get up and answer a simple question: how much does she respect public participation in the parliamentary process and consultation? Why was it so important that after six or seven council elections under the current rules, it was so critical to retrospectively change the rules for this next one? And how did she go about reconciling the two? Was it a conscience matter for her? Did she have a debate with her colleagues? Did she seek advice about the importance of going fast versus respecting the procedure? I think if the Minister could stand up and answer that question, it would allay a lot of the concerns, because people are sitting there, saying, "How is it so important to bring forward a change by one electoral cycle after seven in a row that were the same, so important that we're actually going to have almost no meaningful parliamentary process and no opportunity for the vast majority of the public to be consulted?"