I think one of the benefits that we can look to see in terms of this overall legislation—I, sadly, don't sit on the Primary Production Committee. I know there's pretty big competition within our caucus to get on to that team. And we've got a number of very astute members that will be sitting there going through this bill, no doubt, in significant detail, and asking those good and proper questions as any select committee should. But the process around ensuring that we've got the balance right in terms of this legislation, and the fact that, actually, is it going to achieve the outcomes that we need it to achieve, in regards to mitigation of the risks around that illegally harvested timber and getting that balance between regulatory burden that that places on domestic providers—getting that balance between the two is going to be very important. I can imagine the select committee process that will follow this will go into that. And so I'm looking forward to having a little bit of a read through the select committee's findings in regards to this bill, because I'm sure there's going to be a lot more that will come out of that process. 