Now, although she filed a civil case and was successful—the judge found that she, clearly, had not consented for the images to be splashed around the internet—the police were not able to proceed with the case with the law as it stood until this bill moves forward. The detective inspector confirmed that legal opinions taken under the Harmful Digital Communications Act as it stands said that Mr De Koker's actions didn't meet the evidential test under the Solicitor-General's prosecution guidelines because the person who posted the material—the police had to be satisfied that it was with the intention that it caused harm, and that intention itself was really hard to prove, as my colleague from the Green Party has pointed out. 