When I say that the work hasn't been done and that it's addressing the wrong part of the issue—which is reflecting what Darroch Ball said—that's the point. What this bill does, which is double the maximum penalties for the possession and misuse of the high-powered lasers to six months' imprisonment or a fine of $4,000, and it extends the offence to be in possession in a public place to being in any possession of a high-powered laser pointer without reasonable excuse—and I note that there's no definition of "reasonable"—is that, unfortunately, it is just putting forward a piece of legislation that just expands on the penalties and it doesn't address the enforcement, the education, and the monitoring of how these lasers are actually entering the country or address how they're getting into the possession of people. That is actually where the focus needs to be, and that's the reason for the opposition to the bill. I think that's probably the key factor. 