The final area that we thought actually there needed to be a change—and we put in proposals for this, the House didn't agree—was around the need for those who have no impact on them at all from climate change to still have to go through a lengthy period or process to be able to report that it has no impact upon them. We think, actually, they should have the ability just to explain if it is the case that climate change doesn't have an impact upon their investments—not even their investments, on their business, then just explain the reason why and that would be enough, but they have to go through a process. It could be lengthy, it could be very, very expensive to say, "Nothing to see here." In the case that a company did that, explained it doesn't have an impact upon them and it does, they've broken the law. These are very large companies, many of them listed. Actually, they take their responsibilities seriously. We are burdening some that this legislation shouldn't apply to, but that's just very much the way of this Government, I suppose.