So I think the balance—and as others have said—is struck right with this bill, in honouring parliamentary sovereignty, which is significant and paramount in our system, because we are the elected representatives; upholding the responsibility and accountability of the executive branch of Government to respond to us as an elected body, but also to the independent word of the judiciary; and, of course, the work of our judicial system. It's not a system that's particularly accessible at the best of times, but when somebody does get there and brings a case, and they do decide that rights have been breached and they do decide that those rights have been breached by a legislature, that we actually do need to come back here, consult, and then actually make our decisions again and debate the issues. So that balance is struck in terms of being both reactive and still upholding democracy.