CHRIS BISHOP (National): Just very briefly, Mr Chair, I want to ask the Minister about his comments in relation to the baselining process, and in relation to the contingency. The information that I have received says that in the original $6.8 billion programme for the New Zealand upgrade, there was a $46 million only contingency—I'm referring to emails between the Ministry of Transport and Treasury here. I make it a $46 million contingency, and we've got $6.8 billion in total. On 14 January, there's a "the Minister has just asked for additional Wellington rail infrastructure package", so the contingency is "pretty much gone". And on 23 January, bearing in mind that the package was announced five days later, the attached shows that a further $47 million worth of projects have been added to the Canterbury package by Minister Twyford's office". The contingency across the package is now just $47 million. Why did the Government allow just $47 million in a $6.8 billion programme, and why are we now expected to believe—why do we now think it's reasonable for us to tolerate a baselining process when the Government should have done that when they put the package together in the first place?