So in order to do that, we really first need to have an independent statutory review. And the questions they will be asking are things like this: what are our current threats? Can the Intelligence and Security Act be strengthened? What specific parts of the Act are problematic, as raised by the royal commission? Members opposite have talked about the balancing of rights. Certainly advice was sought from the Attorney-General as to whether it would limit any rights and freedoms under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, and the Attorney-General's office found nothing inconsistent with the Bill of Rights. There will, of course, be a short foreign affairs select committee process, and I'm privileged to be sitting on that select committee in part of that process. As has also been mentioned by Minister Radhakrishnan, the wider implications around human rights, the substantive elements will go through a further substantive review, through a full committee process, and no doubt there will be more advice sought from the Attorney-General regarding any implications on the Human Rights Act. 