Going back to the first question I think the member was raising, which was that point in time in which the possessor of the drug or substance waltzes up to the place where they're going to get checked and all the time committing a criminal offence in possessing it, then hands it over. There's that little point in time—or, in fact, there's a point in time when, having handed it over, they're no longer in possession, therefore not committing a criminal offence anymore; the drug checker has it in their possession, protected from criminal offence under this bill. And so I have to say in the early drafts there was consideration given to some sort of protection for the possessor of it, of the substance or drug, but it was difficult to define at what point that should sort of stop and start. The reality is we are not stopping people who possess drugs or substances from being criminally liable; they are. They remain that. It's only if they're carrying out testing services they're free or if they're the controller of the premises or the place where it happens they are protected from liability for criminal prosecution.