There has been several times where in response to written parliamentary questions, gaping holes have appeared. What I mean by that, there is $339 million that has been appropriated for the Centre for Climate Action. Where will this actually go? Is it an indictment of a Government that's making things on the fly? Now, I could contextualise this further, notably in response to written question No. 15729—and I'm paraphrasing for my colleagues here—it did not inform us that the explicit funding allocation decisions within the investment have not been made. Well, $339 million and we don't actually know where it's going. Reply to No. 16177 when asked "Will the new Centre for Climate Action on Agricultural Emissions hire farm advisors, if so, how many farm advisors will it hire?" Fair question I asked. The answer, if anyone in this House can make sense of it, it reads "The Centre for Climate Action will accelerate the research, development, and commercialisation of tools and technology to reduce biological emissions for agriculture." Well, that's a fair statement. But then he goes on, "The Centre will not hire any farm adviser." Seriously? If we are taking this problem seriously, which I hope we are, we are not hiring farm advisers in this slush fund. Are we going to create a centre for farmer emissions where they have the tools at their disposal and the advice?