The member is also right in that the bill itself does enable the council to sell the land. Whilst that might be the intention of the Council—and what was placed before the select committee were some examples in terms of potential developments on that site, and that will be subject to a resource consent and other consenting process—none the less, the council has been quite clear in its view that there would still need to be some public consultation process. So whilst this frees up the land, it doesn't necessarily direct the specific type of development that might follow. The position of the council is that that is a conversation that would still have to be taken with the local community. The meat, as I'm advised, is in clause 5 of the bill, and the amended section 3, which is the amending component to that 1966 Act, does the changeover from those three Acts to the 1966 Act—noting, however, that any subsequent decision of the council will be still subject to a consultative process.