NICOLE McKEE (ACT): I stand to take a call in support of this Electoral (Integrity Repeal) Amendment Bill. It's a simple bill that's looking to reverse the waka-jumping bill that the New Zealand First Party pushed through in 2018 that's now called the "Labour Party Act". We've got some quite interesting scenarios in play here, and that encourages ACT to continue to support Dr Smith's bill. It seemed, actually, a simple enough position to take for ACT, because we've been opposing this bill since it was first introduced in 1999, under Richard Prebble. We opposed it in 2018 as being unnecessary, a backward step, a return to the first nine years of MMP rule, and, really, it's just a "Winston Peters No Mates Bill". The result is that we now have a system where, if you fall out with your party, your party leader can have you removed from your position. I've heard arguments from across the floor that, regardless of that, you could go and get a judicial review, but my question to that is: would that occur before or after a taxpayer-funded by-election? And what does that mean for the people who elected the MP into that position in the first place—that, according to somebody else, their vote is now invalid? I refer to Duncan Webb across the floor when he said in his statement, just before, that MPs are put into Parliament by their party. Well, I'm sorry, I thought MPs were put into Parliament by the people!