In 2017, there was a review, and the review found that the Act was in effect for a purpose but then, later on, it became clear that the Act started to become redundant. For that reason, particularly in the 2019 review, it was noticed that it was necessary to repeal the Act and move some clauses ahead, and that is why there is this particular bill. While we agree that it is necessary to move ahead, we still have some concerns regarding some implementation—for example, because this Act itself still involves a large sum of taxpayers' money, we would still like to know some details, such as whether regeneration will take place in a timely fashion and when we will see the detail of what is going to occur within our own Ōtākaro River Corridor. These specific questions, we still need to really consider, while we agree, in principle, that Part 1 of the bill is largely fine. Thanks.