Having such a process actually helps universities, as it enables them to clearly identify when a speaker presents a real risk of inciting harm or criminal activity, while protecting those who may have unorthodox or slightly strange or controversial views but are otherwise harmless. Massey University released their own policy—of sorts—on freedom of speech, which cites mental harm to students as a reason that speakers may be de-platformed or events cancelled. This is entirely open-ended and subjective, and it will result in a process that is informal and behind closed doors. Taxpayer-funded institutions, through their management, should not be forcing whatever world view they have and that they possess on students, using dubious claims to do so.