After a nine-month break from posting the recordings, while Tarryn thought her nightmare was over and she was trying to get her life together, the predator once again reposted the screenshots and the woman was victimised again. She was re-traumatised, she was harmed all over again, and yet the police could do nothing because under the current law—as we've heard today—if harm or intention to harm are not proven, then the police don't have the grounds to prosecute. This misuse of intimate visuals can be done, as we've heard, to make money. It can be done as some kind of a sick joke. It's often part of relationships which break up. In each case, whatever the reason, the posting of these images is just plain wrong, and, thankfully, that has been recognised across this House. So there is no public interest defence, there's no threats to freedom of speech. 