My view is that the bill, as it was, reflected a political compromise; an unwillingness to take on a vocal lobby, but also a lobby that was uninterested in science. Well, my view is that the science isn't different in Auckland or Amberley. It isn't different in Wellington or Waitara. We will consider local factors, but we will not relitigate the science in every jurisdiction. As you'll see from the Supplementary Order Paper, the director-general would be required to give consideration to the oral health of each community that he or she was making a decision about, and the financial cost and therefore feasibility of the decision. Local factors matter, but we will not be adjudicating the science in every jurisdiction, otherwise the same situation would have played out that we have seen play out with local councils, which is that there can be campaigns run to muddy the science and to overturn sound decision-making on that basis. That's why local government came to central government with this problem. We have been asked to show leadership, and this Government is showing leadership on this vital matter for the oral health of New Zealanders. We have the opportunity here to reverse decades of political failure of looking after New Zealand's health. 