Rt Hon JACINDA ARDERN: What the member is not taking into account is the position that experts such as Tony Blakely have continually reinforced, as have other modellers. The issue with, of course, the wider management of any outbreak is the management of the ongoing seeding of additional cases. And when you look overseas, you'll see that there are other countries who continue to use border controls and requirements at their border to reduce the seeding of additional cases into the community. What we have already said is that, yes, we will continue to change our settings at the border in line with our new strategy. So we are currently trialling self-isolation, because the next stage for us will be to remove what has been one of the constraints on the system, which is our ability to manage a person's isolation period through MIQ, because it has a natural cap on the number of people that can do that. By moving to self-isolation, you open up wider opportunities to bring more New Zealanders home. But if the member is arguing to remove those requirements entirely, then the member is actually arguing that all of New Zealand should have to live with a higher level of domestic restrictions as a result, because if the member chooses to look at Austria, the Netherlands, Ireland—even the UK are discussing additional restrictions—if you continue to seed cases, then you will continue to have to have additional restrictions domestically.