When you look at the regulatory impact statement that accompanied the former Act, what it did actually note was that dead, standing, and fallen trees are an essential or favoured habitat and food source for many species, a normal part of nutrient cycling and forests, and beneficial to regeneration. In that sense, the timber component for which this bill is primarily related to does have a purpose. So it really does, I guess, come down to a balancing act, and the concern that the Government has is that there is simply too much uncertainty. It's too loose, and therefore we simply cannot support it. 