So National supports this bill to the committee of the whole House. We support the vast majority of measures in this bill, and we really do want to support it, but we do have issues with two of the measures in the bill, and they're the issues that the Hon Simon Bridges laid out to you this afternoon. He spoke about legal concerns from the perspective of him being a lawyer in a past life. I'm not a lawyer, but we do have a number of lawyers who sit in this House as members of Parliament, and what I would urge this Parliament to do is have a really sensible discussion when we get to the committee stage of this bill—let's have that debate. I don't want to see this as one of those committee stages where there are parties that are opposed to this bill—where, you know, we get into a battle and we disregard these arguments. Let's actually have the arguments properly, because, you know, the committee received advice about the current law already allowing witnesses to give evidence in an alternative way, and a number of submitters highlighted that a Court of Appeal judgment in 2011 detailed the rare and exceptional circumstances that would make that course of action appropriate. We don't feel that it's appropriate that this needs to happen in all cases. There are ways of doing this that might suit various trials in different ways.