It does preserve the possibility for India to opt in when it can, and I know it was expressed with great enthusiasm from the submission from Federated Farmers to see India opt in. I echo the words of Todd Muller that that is something that this side of the House feels will really strengthen the trade agreement. But I also see that this is a way of securing trade as part of a rules-based order. It's so important to have multilateral relationships, to honour the old relationships that we've had but also to forge new ones. We are moving into a time when the combined GDP of autocracies outstrip the GDP of democratic countries. That's really interesting, because we can only influence values-based trade—or trade for a purpose, as it could be called—and we can only mitigate against the potential for the weaponising of trade if we are actually connected globally, if we have rules-based trading relationships, and if we are in supply chains ourselves so that we know how those supply chains operate. 