But, look, let's have a look at the problem. What is the problem definition? Well, a top law firm's been looking at this bill. They're asking what's it for, and here's what they tell their clients: "The purpose of the register is explicitly stated to record a member's interests so as to provide transparency and strengthen public trust and confidence"—public trust and confidence—"in local government decision-making processes." Well, this bill goes some way towards doing that, but we actually have to ask ourselves why ratepayers and voters have lost confidence in local government. It's not just because elected members might own a business or have shares in something that ratepayers would be interested in; actually, it's because voters and ratepayers have lost their confidence that the people they elect are actually accountable to the communities for delivering basic services. They've lost confidence that local councils, their elected members, are using public money wisely and making decisions on behalf of the whole community so that businesses, that employers, that the needs of families are taken into account. They've lost confidence because they often hear about grants being made to organisations that they feel really don't deliver for the community.