The specific point that both Ms Radhakrishnan and I have been making in respect of section 39(2)(b) is why have we also changed the wording in terms of some of the reporting standards to seemingly lessen what has to be reported on—OK? We could do what the member in the chair, Ms Parmar, has said and not do that, and have a slightly smaller bill. We could simply change it to make sure that they had to report according to the generally accepted accounting standards. Fine—we can do that. But we don't also need to change the wording in section 39(2)(b), which has been pointed out in Julia Durkin's submission and was pointed out in my comments before, and Ms Radhakrishnan has also touched upon it. So that is a specific question and concern that we're coming to. 