Now, the Minister, in his first reading speech, made it very clear that it was—despite the proud shouts of socialism from the many speakers for Labour in this bill—still at least the Minister of Revenue's intention that our framework should enable work to be more valuable than not working, and I think, despite the Greens' interventions and then their abstention, almost every other member of this House would say that work is always better than not productively working, with all the qualifications that the Greens would put around the value of unpaid work, which nobody denies, and the importance of volunteerism and parenting and all of those things. But, actually, paid work is the thing that pays the bills. It pays the bills for the household, it pays the bills for the Crown, because the Crown doesn't have any money except that which it taxes or borrows and then spends. So it strikes me that while there is this incremental adjustment, the gap in a proportionate basis has actually diminished a small amount and, therefore, the value of work as compared to income support for job seekers has actually closed, and I wonder if he could just explain whether or not that's the case.