So in recommending the deletion of clause 11, I'm at pains to point out that we are not attempting to ride over the Supreme Court's ruling, which is constitutionally difficult, but rather it should be seen as this House considering, by its numbers, the same question that the Supreme Court did. Now, whether or not that amendment is successful will be a matter for the committee, but I don't want members to think we are setting a precedent here where the stuff we don't like the Supreme Court doing we can simply ride roughshod over. I don't think that is what we are trying to do here. I think we need a careful consideration of our House's intent, the Supreme Court's careful consideration of what that intent was, and to step back from it and say, "What is the right thing to do for New Zealanders? What is the right thing to do for the children, some of whom have been hideously harmed by the images that this individual sought gratification from?" I think that when we look at it through that lens, I believe, Mr Brown believes, and the National Party believes it is appropriate for the individual who was the appellant in this case to be subject to a registration order.