I want to acknowledge Simeon Brown for the way that he has briefed and kept our caucus up to date in terms of what has happened, and I want to echo some of the comments that Minister Chris Hipkins made and just briefly touch on the fact that the reason why this ended up in the Supreme Court with a split decision is because the Supreme Court felt that the intent of Parliament was not clear enough around how we handled the retrospective side of the charging and then sentencing after the legislation had been passed. But the only thing that I would say in comment to that in terms of my own personal feelings on it is that both the District Court and the High Court were very clear about the intent of Parliament. It was a split decision in the Supreme Court. 