The new offence in this amendment bill would involve a simpler test, where it is established that sharing without consent implicitly recognises an intent to cause harm. That, to me, is just logical, and it is fantastic to see this problem being solved this simply, I think. The select committee has made an exception for scenarios in which posting of an intimate visual recording may be necessary, involving educational, legal, medical, scientific, or law enforcement purposes; so they've made sure that removing the intent to cause harm doesn't result in too broad a reach. 