I had a constituent who called my office just last week, who was angry, irate at the fact that this bill was preventing him to have a conversation with his child or his grandchild, and he was fearful that this conversation would be criminalised. When I spoke through the clarifications, the examples the select committee had done to spell out what, in fact, was a conversion practice—to say that it was specifically encouraging someone to believe that their sexual orientation needs to be changed or fixed because it's broken, to say that somebody is wrong, and to use shame or coercion with the intention of giving a person an aversion to same-sex attractions—his response was "Well, who would do that to a child?" It was so important to be able to have that conversation with some people who had, quite clearly, received misinformation about what this bill aims to achieve. Because it aims to do exactly the opposite: it aims to have open, frank, honest conversations with young people who need our help, who need our support, who need to have their own pathway found to find their identity.