That is a wonderful addition to our constitutional framework. It means that people's concerns get ventilated in a democratic fashion. But it also solves what could have been a growing constitutional problem of a stand-off between two branches of Government. Because without this, we could have ended up with the courts frequently telling Parliament that they got it wrong and Parliament being completely aloof to the courts. I don't like annoying judges, because you never know when you might end up before one. So I think it's a very positive thing that we've found a way for Parliament to accept what judges and courts say, acknowledge it, give the public an opportunity to be part of ventilating an issue that's arisen in the courts, and then, ultimately, as the people who are actually elected in a democracy, make a decision about what to do about that in a fulsome, open, and transparent way. 