So the select committee had to think and had to consider, "Is there a problem?" And we recognised that some submitters are concerned about proxy farming, which may reflect their personal experiences. However, there were many submitters who did not support proxy limits who were body corporate managers and other professionals. The committee took the advice of the officials and agreed that these submitters cumulatively have experience across a large number of bodies corporate and were not concerned. Without strong evidence of a widespread concern, the select committee returned that the limits on proxies be removed from this bill. It is possible that the number of proxies that could be given will reduce over time anyway, as officials advised us, and that's due to the ability to attend by remote access, which this bill allows. There are also many other ways for interested unit owners to get involved in the meeting: they can attend in person, the current law and proposed amendments allow them to attend by remote access, and they can make a postal vote. The motions proposed for a general meeting are provided for with the agenda. So, therefore, the committee, by majority, did not agree to proxy limits, and we agreed to remove clause 10—as recommended in the revised, tracked version of the bill.