I just want touch on some of the aspects of redress in the settlement, recognising there have been 36 sites of cultural significance and three jointly vested sites returning to Maniapoto and a separate site as a recreation reserve. Then there are overlay classifications and statutory acknowledgment and a deed of recognition for another, I think, 31 places of significance, and place-name changes to 12 sites, 10 of which is adding the macron that was missed out, which is a very common thing in this country. It is, I guess, when English is the dominant language—sometimes the nuances and the differences of language are missed altogether, even when they are glaringly obvious, so it is a correction to those names. Also acknowledging the natural resources arrangements that are in the settlement around Ngā Wai o Maniapoto and provide for Maniapoto to develop an environmental plan and joint management agreement with the Waikato Regional Council, separate to, of course, from the Waipā River, which had already been covered by a previous settlement—then also for conservation to have regard to Maniapoto's environmental management plan when preparing the relevant conservation management plan in Maniapoto's areas of interest. I do think that these are of particular note, because we know the water and the land are the life that sustains. And as I will say in every settlement bill, the Crown has been a very, very poor caretaker. 