The criteria that are set out in this legislation are simple enough on their face. As others have said, at the select committee it will be an interesting exercise to understand the limits of the powers and maybe interrogate that a little bit. The Minister herself may already have a good feel for that, because it is the Minister of Foreign Affairs from time to time who is given such authorisation. I don't know the extent to which she or he would be able to delegate those powers again. That's, to me, quite an interesting point and, again, it might be thrashed out at the select committee. But the Minister must be satisfied that the person is in distress—"satisfied" as in satisfied that that condition is met, of course, not satisfied in the sense of deriving any satisfaction from it—also, that exceptional circumstances exist. So not only some manner of distress but also, I presume, an inability to gain equivalent assistance elsewhere, maybe an inability to take out a loan locally for reasons of not having a banking or other sort of commercial arrangement possible in that country, maybe due to lack of a legitimate or acceptable local identification and so forth; also, that short-term assistance would be provided. 