But, in good faith, we did support the bill at first reading for all the reasons that the Minister has said—that it was better later than never; that's my phrase, not his, to be fair—but in the intervening period of time, the Minister needs to acknowledge the fact that the Prime Minister, who is, obviously, part of the same Government, has put in place rules reducing vaccine mandates and pass requirements. For him not to acknowledge that and the fact that the world has changed, not only in terms of the shape of the pandemic but in the Government's whole-of-Government response to this thing—for him not to realise that there is a difference between the environment in which we are living, from a policy perspective, from the first reading to now, and the intervening months that we've had, with a shortened period, as it's been, at select committee, is, frankly, negligent. I take issue with the Minister suggesting that there be some sort of politicking involved in terms of the National Party's response.