The reality of that legal position here—in relation to the commencement clause, which by its very nature is retrospective as applied here, because we're passing this law at this current time—is there's seven communities where, in each of those communities, quite a number of thousand people signed the referendum petitions and, in fact, for a series of rohe, if you want to put it that way, of about a million people, who won't get the chance to vote on this, notwithstanding the several thousand that signed the petition. I can tell the House about a woman who I'm sure is watching. Some of my colleagues may know her: Margaret in Tauranga, who went out to Grey Street—I'm sure I'm right. She set up the stall, she had the pieces of paper for people to sign this petition, she had the pens, the biros, the refills, and rain, hail, sunshine, she was there collecting the signatures to trigger the 5 percent on the basis of the law that should be in place, and would be in place, and would still be in place if it wasn't for the fact that the commencement clause here is, in practical effect, retrospective in this bill. 