The decision of the courts to not uphold those two orders has only just been released, and we do need to take time to consider that. I do want to be clear that the judgment's quite clear that it's not questioning the role of mandates per se but whether they are required specifically for Police and for Defence in terms of business continuity purposes. So we need to take time to just carefully consider what the court's ruling is—not have a knee-jerk response to that. So we will do that, and then we'll make further decisions. We have been really clear, though, that where there is no longer a justification for a vaccination mandate to be in place, we would look to remove that in a timely manner. So, in some cases, in the case of the Police, very high rates of vaccination have now been achieved, and it may well be that there is no replacement for that mandate. But we'll work through a careful process to look at that, and then we'll make decisions in due course.