So the bill does require the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs to recommend the setting of mandatory regulation. And by way of background, Mr Muller's already touched on the standards between Australia and New Zealand, which prescribes product tests and labelling requirements for both broad-based spectrum and water-resistant sunscreen products, and there's now powders. But both countries take a very different approach to how they apply this. In Australia the standard is mandatory, but here New Zealand's compliance is voluntary. This means that a sunscreen product in Australia can't go on to the shelf without meeting the standard but in New Zealand it means that anyone can make a sunscreen and sell it without having to test it provides the claims and protections that it states. There's clearly a market failure here, and even though the ACT Party is light on regulation, I think this is a good case for it.