Specifically, I'm looking at clause 4, and I'm looking at section ME 1(3)(a), the replacement of $30,576, up to $31,096. So we've talked a little bit about that. A colleague previously has just discussed the differential in the rate. Minister, what I'm interested in is that you mentioned that $25 a week is going to be the consequence. Most of that is going to go on to essential spend. You did actually note that that won't impact inflation. I'd question that, considering some of that'll go on rent, which we definitely know is going up. But getting back to the point around the question I want to raise: with that rate that you've set, I'd be interested, potentially from officials, in some comments around that. What type of scenario testing did you play out when you were coming up to land that number—