I'd just invite members opposite, now that we've got to this point, to accept, even though they've disagreed with the fundamental policy—they must do, because their party voted for the 2010 law change. But that law change has been subject to considerable scrutiny, and this Government would not be doing its job—and, indeed, if they were still in Government, they would not be doing their job—in the face of that overwhelming judicial consideration and inquiry consideration by the Waitangi Tribunal if it did not at least consider reversing the law change that it promoted in 2010. Well, that has happened. We've discharged our obligations as responsible parliamentarians, we've discharged our obligations as a responsible Government, we have respected the relationship of comity between the judiciary and this House, and we have come up with this law change and it has been supported, and whatever kinds of games might have been played in the committee stage last week, the reality now is we have a substantial law change, a coherent law change, and a principled law change that many New Zealanders respect. 