But I also noticed, from the Auckland University Aotearoa New Zealand Indigenous Peoples and the Law report, Time to Taihoa, that they noted that the Waitangi Tribunal has found the specific definitive types of Treaty clauses to be problematic, especially when the legislative provisions that these clauses claim will give effect to the Crown's Te Tiriti obligations fall short of what is guaranteed under Te Tiriti. I think, from the specificity of the Waitangi Tribunal's rulings last year around tino rangatiratanga over kāinga, the way that the current Treaty provisions are worded falls short, and I would love to hear the Minister's outline of how that does not fall short when it has no reference to upholding tino rangatiratanga over kāinga.