Now, one of the things that has been said that I want to put on record first and foremost is that this is what the Government did, the previous Government did, in the Canterbury earthquake recovery. That's not accurate. It's not accurate, and I want to explain that clearly for the House and for those who are watching. In the Canterbury earthquake response, there were two packages of support: one was similar to the wage subsidy, which has been picked up by the Government, which is fantastic. That was in place for a short period of time, about eight weeks. Then, at the end of that, what happened instead was there was a temporary lift for all those on benefit: $50 a week for those single people, $80 for a couple. So it is not accurate to say this is exactly the same as what happened in the Canterbury earthquakes. It's not. It's not. What happened after the Canterbury earthquakes is the National-led Government increased benefits for those directly affected in the rebuild, and it was a temporary increase related to Christchurch. So it is important to put that on record. 