The other one that's been discussed—again, by others, and I don't intend to go into it more fully than needed—is in relation to a complainant's previous sexual experience with the defendant. That seems instinctively to be a different category from saying that her or his sexual disposition is one thing—and, of course, we all would say, I believe, that we wouldn't want someone to not receive a fair hearing if she or he were to say or for it to be said of them, "Oh, they always act in a certain way"; you know, that they were "asking for it", or whatever. I think we can safely assume that no one here would think that that was a reasonable basis for dismissing a good-faith complaint, but, at the same time, it might be that if two people—or more, I suppose—have engaged in a certain activity in the past, that is at least potentially relevant and should not be something that is necessarily precluded or which is regarded as not likely to be relevant in a court.