Now, there are a number of things that I want to cover, and I am going to cover them in some sort of order and this is going to be it. So the first thing I really wanted to talk about was just how important this Act is on a general level. This is a remarkable piece of legislation, and I've said this in second reading, but I think it's worth saying again, it's a remarkable piece of legislation for what it does for the whole panoply of sexual violence offences in this country. When we were investigating how this Act was going and whether this bill was necessary, we looked at the other pieces of legislation that cover off this type of offending. And what we saw there was that there is a sense that if you're going to be offended against digitally, it was only women who were not at fault or had not taken agency who were going to be protected by the law, in many ways. So, for example, we start with section 216G of the Crimes Act, which is the upskirting offence where you will be prosecuted if you post unauthorised digital communications involving someone's intimate person, but only if they didn't know about it. Then you look to the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act, where, again, you will be prosecuted for posting indecent images, but only of people under 18. So, again, it's a case of talking about consent, and these are children we consider too young to be able to take ownership of their sexuality.