Hon CHRIS HIPKINS (Leader of the House): Having just had a quick read of the Speaker's ruling in question, I think the overall objective here was to get members debating the substance of an issue rather than using labels in order to characterise one another. I think members expressing concern about sentiments being expressed on one side of the House or another is absolutely legitimate; it is a legitimate part of debate. I think what Speaker Kidd—and, in fact, I think he maybe even references that in his ruling—suggests is that using a single word as a lazy shorthand to characterise a member's concerns isn't the way to go; that, if you have an objection with what someone is saying, elaborate on that, debate it, rather than simply throw labels at each other.