The sense of justice—which is obviously a pretty nebulous concept—I think needs to be understood alongside the aims of deterrence, and we've talked about that. But also prevention, and it's often missed by those opposed to the three strikes regime that there's an important preventative role; namely, that those who are incarcerated having committed at least three very serious violent crimes will be prevented from offending in the community during that time that they are behind bars, and, of course, that's an opportunity for rehabilitation. I think there's common ground across the House that rehabilitation is one of the very worthy aims of our criminal justice system, and it is not incompatible, it is not mutually exclusive, it is not inconsistent with the idea of the three strikes regime. Because we allow people the opportunity to, you know, gain education or generally mend their ways, and a chance to reflect on that while they are quite literally a captive audience. 