The words that we use are not "partnership"; the word is called "kawenata", which is a covenant, a sacred, moral obligation that's irrevocable. And yet we find again consistently—I asked the Minister, the Attorney-General, when did he receive that advice? I do know that advice came prior to the bill being drafted and being submitted into the House. So why, again, was it not included? None of the provisions or the submissions that were made were included in anywhere near the draft. I can read from the comments that we hear, and I want to state this. They said, "To ensure that there is no further erosion of goodwill, it is critical that the actions are proportionate and enacted in a high-trust environment. In particular, there must be recognition of the significance of marae and their expression of mana motuhake." That was prior to the drafting of the bill, and that's the point. It's not the fact that you've changed it. And I want to acknowledge the fact of the advocacy. I do. Kiritapu Allan and others that are here; the Hon Peeni Henare, the Hon Shane Jones. I know that you advocate, but, you see, there's a failure in our system—I'm going to own this; our system—where we've not taken on board what should have been included right from the start, a piece of legislation that impacts all of our people. And here's the point: if we can't get that covenant relationship right, how will we conduct ourselves for the rest of New Zealand?