Does the member think that that mandate, having been elected, would confer greater mana and respect on those people taking a seat at Environment Canterbury, or is being appointed and having voting rights—does that indicate that they're in fact more suitable than if they were elected? It's quite confusing to understand even why these two elements are in the same bill: the opportunity to create a Māori constituency, and, of course, the extended membership rights, or special rights, accorded to those members of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. So I would like the member address that discrepancy. 