So in terms of the issue that was raised by the Attorney-General, his view—with which I agree, for what that's worth—was that the phrase "communicating with" was too broad in the bill as introduced at first reading. So we have now three sets of behaviour, if you like, that are prohibited under new section 13A, set out in clause 5. The first is that a person cannot be obstructed in a safe area. Well, that's already covered by existing law. The second is to make a visual recording of another person in a safe area in a way that might cause emotional distress. I do actually have sympathy with that. As I've said, I'm happy to place on record I don't believe that such behaviour is valid anywhere in New Zealand, including in this context. So, as I said, that fits in with a more general view I have about the need to protect New Zealanders' privacy in any kind of intimate situation, notwithstanding that such recording may take place in a public space.