I'm going to go to proxy voting first. There are a number of things I want to talk about, if I get a chance, but I actually want to talk about proxy voting because she has raised it, and this spectre of proxy farming was identified. Now, in another life, I've had a fair bit to do with unit titles, and I know that the politics of unit titles can be almost as fierce as the politics of this place. But I struggle with a rule which refuses the right of one person to give their decision-making power to another, should they choose to do so. If I have a trusted adviser or friend, or even a trusted committee member, or a trusted manager, then why can I not let them exercise my vote on my behalf? Now, I accept that unit titles, as with any neighbour dispute—disputes in unit titles can be fierce, and people can feel that the process was wrong when they don't get the outcome they want. But I'm not sure that proxy voting, or restricting the amount of proxy voting, is the way to address that. 