So on balance, ACT will support this bill, but it is important at this time that we actually question whether giving co-governance or joint management responsibilities and roles to Ngāti Maru—just as an example—is as effective as actually addressing the breach of property rights. Would be it be more effective, rather than giving joint management, to say, "Well, actually, there's some property rights", whether it's rights and interest in water, and that, potentially, in the future giving property rights in water would be more effective than management and decision making over how other people use the water. 