Local government actually has a really important role in delivering positive social outcomes to its communities. So when a piece of land is surplus, they should have maximum flexibility in how that land is used, and if it's disposed of, that should be of no consequence. Despite what we've heard from the Green member today, that it's a great worry that councils might want to sell a bit of land and use that revenue to put back into some other council asset—I mean, heaven forbid that they might want to sell an asset, get some money for it and invest in something the community actually wants, rather than a weed-infested piece of land down the road.