So, coming back to the purpose of the bill, if the purpose of the bill is to recognise that mana whenua—Ngāi Tahu in the South Island—have a special status and that that special status is so special that they require to have two members appointed to have voting rights over all the people of Canterbury, then it would be very difficult to not assume that that special status could be accorded to other iwi who could claim special status in other regions of New Zealand and seek to have the precedent—the special status precedent that the member describes—applied to other forms of local government, whether that be in Auckland, for example. It turns out that Auckland Council, when it was established, responded to the need to co-operate with and have an active engagement with mana whenua by having two members of mana whenua appointed to Auckland Council in just the role that the member describes Ngāi Tahu should have on Environment Canterbury. So there's actually a precedent already set—in fact, it's been demonstrated to work very effectively—to give a voice on Auckland Council for all of the mana whenua groups who are represented in Tāmaki-makau-rau.