Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): As my colleague Erica Stanford interjected when the Minister was speaking, the bill may not be materially different, but the conditions under which this bill is being passed are extremely different from 13 May 2020 when this House gave those extraordinary powers to the Minister. And I do acknowledge—as others have; Mr Utikere, I think, mentioned it—that the Minister has discharged his responsibilities responsibly and well. That is not the point, and the reason that the National Party will be opposing this motion—the reason is quite simply this. Twenty-one days—twenty-one days is not sufficient time to give appropriate scrutiny to the impact on the immigration system, on our business and migrant community, of the extension of these powers for another two years. Let's bear in mind, the Minister did not refute my claim, and it's in the Cabinet paper, that he wanted those powers to be indefinite. And had Cabinet not overruled him, we would be debating a motion for the indefinite granting of these powers with a select committee process that lasts three short weeks.