Now, I want to address three issues to flag for further consideration at the select committee stage. I think these issues go to the heart of what we mean when we say on this side of the House that we absolutely support access to justice within our communities and that we absolutely support lawyers being able to provide legal services in a way which is appropriate and in a way which actually serves our communities and means that people are getting good, useful legal advice. The first is this issue of where lawyers who have been admitted to the bar but who are not entitled to practise on their own account, are employed by one employer and are allowed to give legal advice to that one employer. I was one of those lawyers. Within five years of graduating from law school, I became an in-house counsel to an iwi and then was elevated to be that iwi's counsel practising on my own. I wasn't, at that point, allowed to practise on my own account because I hadn't gone through the extra training that you might see partners in law firms stepping up to do or barristers who practise on their own accounts. Under this provision, a lawyer in that situation, who is young and inexperienced, but a subject matter expert, in my case in iwi governance and corporate governance, I would have been able, under this bill, to be able to provide pro bono services without any supervision, without any senior lawyers to turn to and consider the advice that I was giving to anyone who came through my door and asked for it. I would be able to provide housing advice for renters who sought advice about their landlord's treatment of them. I would be able to provide my opinions about immigration law, which is an area which is highly specialised.