But the Government itself is acknowledging that the environment's changing, and yet it's pushing ahead with this piece of legislation. It's probably around the question of audiovisual links—or AVL or AV; whatever acronym you choose to use—where, if you will, the nub of this discussion and debate comes up, and, for me, for at least two reasons. We've heard from previous speakers one of the concerns is that there's lots of talk about how we might use AV in our various courts. I won't list them all off—I think it was 35, I heard from a colleague—but there are a number of courts. The problem is that for all the good intentions in this legislation that the courts, the judges, may be able to decide to use this technology under this COVID response courts safety bill, what we also know, of course, is that we don't have AV technology in most of our courts. I think, unfortunately, it's a missed opportunity by this Government. Instead of, if you will, having wasted, ultimately, I think, the Parliament's time on this piece of legislation, if they'd taken the time, particularly through justice and the Minister of Justice, to find the funds—and the Government is profligate with cash. I'm sure they could have found the tens of millions required to actually get the audiovisual technology into those courts so they could be used.