But there are a few things that we really would dispute, and I think the four-month window for us to discuss this bill and some of the implications, and particularly the implementation plan around it, is something that we can pick up and discuss later on, but we have some issues with that and would oppose that. We think it is important that we really do properly understand what low sulphur fuels are going to be needed in this country, where they're coming from, how they'll be distributed, who can access them, and which ports—all of that implementation plan needs to be completely understood. We know that for a lot of our New Zealand coastal shipping fleet, they've got to be able to use fuels that have a 0.5 percent level of sulphur in it. They can fit their ships with scrubbers, but that's actually not very economic for that fleet. We know also, here in New Zealand, that, fundamentally, Refining New Zealand isn't going to be refining this kind of fuel and sending it down the main pipeline, so we're going to have to import that fuel from overseas. Obviously, low sulphur fuels are in huge demand globally. So the real thing we want to use that time for is to understand exactly how that implementation plan will come together and what is New Zealand's ability to make sure that when we make a declaration like this, we can actually meet our commitment and support our coastal shippers and our shipping community that actually need to be able to use these fuels.