So the second question is: is this the right way to do it? Now, the Government in its regulatory impact statement said this about the choice between an immediate modification order (IMO) and changing the legislation. It said, "Consideration was given to replacing the current IMO with one that also allows for the delivery of a fourth dose, but Ministers decided that this was not an option due to its temporary nature and vulnerability of being tied to the temporary Epidemic Notice.", and that raises some fascinating questions. "Ministers decided that this was not an option"—of course it's an option. It's an option they've used in the past, it's an option that's part of the epidemic response Act, and it's an option that they can use in the future. They've just ruled it out. 