Because my understanding of the way that the law has changed by the last Government with the Greens, who now want to reverse it—they can yell over there, but it only happened because they voted for it in the previous Parliament. So, to the Minister, the only difference is that if somebody from overseas wants to come and buy a dairy farm of 999 hectares, they don't need approval as long as they put it into forestry and they're going to. So all this amendment put forward by the National Party does is say that all land should be treated the same in this situation, whether it's dairy or whether it is sheep and beef or whether it is for forestry or the intended use thereof. The Minister may want to take another call. We'd be interested in: is my interpretation of the Act as it is in place correct; and, if so, what is the difference and why are the Government now not changing it if this was done merely because New Zealand First was there?