This is just simply not necessary. This is just going to be another confuser, and it's not going to make anything—it's going to be another trade-off. It'll be another thing that Crown solicitors will be lambasted with by lawyers who are saying, "Well, if you charge with this, we'll let you off that." It just adds another layer. I can't help but be passionate about this. If you confuse the issue, the only people who will benefit will be the defence lawyers, because where you don't have a clear set of facts, clear law to work on, where you have alternatives, that's what any good lawyer will say: "Right, we've got an alternative here. We've got a trading point here." Once you've got a trading point, you've got a weakening point, and that's what this will do.