Allow me to conclude my remarks by noting that the error that the Government makes—and I make this comment respectfully because I do believe that they wish to have a better system of justice for the Family Court. But the error that they make in the reforms that they are undertaking whereby they are, essentially, reversing the 2014 reforms without saying "Is there another way to improve upon them?" is to conflate access to justice, as a phrase, with access to lawyers. The purpose of resolution being sought in these matters is, of course, that the parties are able to get on with their lives in the most reasonable way that causes the least damage to those involved—including the children, but not only the children—and to allow our system to have out-of-court settlements wherever possible. That is not in the case where there is family violence at issue, because we agree with the Government that in such matters they are naturally adversarial and it is important to have lawyers to protect the fundamental trial rights of those involved. But, wherever possible, this Parliament and, indeed, the Government should be looking for ways to improve access to justice in the holistic sense of that phrase—less of the delays in the justice system that we're seeing increasingly across the sector. For this reason, as others have said, we do not support this bill.