Because they now have removed a definition of who a protected person is, there will be no requirement for that person to give evidence in court. There is an exception to that rule, and it is related to the visual recording of a particular person. They have, through their deliberations, said that within the context of someone being visually recorded, the police have been very clear that they would interpret this provision to mean that a person would need to give evidence about their reason for being in a safe area. The committee were comfortable with this approach, and, obviously, with their comfort comes my comfort as well.