But what I'm most concerned at, and you heard it from Simon Bridges—but we also have heard it from others today—is that there's considerable potential for an adverse unintended consequence in relation to the proposal given that the existing right of recall under section 99 of the Evidence Act will remain on the statute book, and that is the ability to recall a witness. So, in other words, it will remain possible that a witness, including the complainant, will be recalled, to be cross-examined later, at the trial, despite having already been cross-examined. This would actively work against the bill's stated aim to reduce the extent to which a complainant may be re-traumatised by the process of that cross-examination. Now, as I said, I'm not a lawyer, but if I thought that that had the potential to happen, then that's one of the things that makes me stand off supporting this bill in the long term.