So in the BORA vet—the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act advice to the Attorney-General—as tabled along with the bill, does note the fact that there is a possibility of a, or rather—or I may as well quote directly: "a potential chilling effect on legitimate expressions of opinion within families/whānau about sexuality and gender,". I think it's probably fair if I do acknowledge that that is under the heading in the view of the officials who have provided the advice of justified limitation, and they do believe that there is a measure of consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act for a few key reasons. I would potentially disagree with at least one of those, but in the time available to me I'll not dwell on that aspect. But I think it's a fair point that the chilling effect is to be considered seriously alongside what is in the bill and what might be subject to interpretation by some members of the House differently from others and by, for example, individual police constables and so on who might be asked to give a view in any individual case. 