So for that reason those were significant, and for the similar but reverse situation whereby a party might outperform along the lines of the party vote its result in electorate seats and it might be able to gain one electorate seat but, let us say, 4.9 percent of the party vote, of course under the rules of MMP as they currently are, they wouldn't gain any seats in the House by virtue of their 4.9 percent, except that the significance of winning a particular electorate seat would allow that to be so, and of course they'd get the five or six seats that would be afforded to them at that point. So it is significant to contemplate the result in an individual seat, and a combination of such motive and such opportunity as afforded to the bill—namely, the roll-switching at any time up to and including the conduct of a general election—means that we can't support the bill. 