It is disappointing that this legislation does not have the full support of this House, and I do want to speak briefly to those who oppose it. Listening to some who've opposed this bill, it is clear that they have a view of free speech that is divorced from reality. As Vanushi Walters said in an earlier contribution on the bill, free speech has never been absolute in our laws—think defamation, think obscenity, think profanity. More than that, for me it's about the principle that all rights come with some form of responsibilities. The right to speak or act in a way that will cause serious harm does not meet the test of responsibilities that come with those rights.