Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: —the unintended consequences were not—well, I try not to speak ill. As one of my colleagues said in the first reading that it was a lazy piece of legislation from our friend in New Zealand First. I probably wouldn't go that far, but there's no doubt that no one on the Finance and Expenditure Committee through the process wanted to see people negatively affected, because the bill as introduced would have had a person on the day that the Act came into effect—say, at the age of 64 years and nine months—who would have had to have waited over 10 years in order to qualify for New Zealand superannuation. I'm sure that wasn't what Mr Patterson intended, it certainly was what he introduced and which we agreed at first reading needed to have some serious panel-beating done to it. So I'd like to thank the officials who contributed, I think, very sensible suggestions. I note the Minister for Social Development may well be interested in the kudos that I think we all would give them, because they worked very hard to make sure that the bill was in good shape when it came out of the select committee.