What we have seen is a Children's Commissioner causing trouble, raising voice, challenging Government for not getting it right, not being able to do that effectively enough because they were under-resourced. What we're being told with this piece of legislation is: well, they were stretched too thinly, so we're going to take that role away from them, even though, in recent times, they have been that voice within the system, alongside Māori who have raised the alarm. It was not our Government agencies raising that alarm, was it? I don't think anybody in the House could say that it was our Government agencies—any of them—raising the alarm. It was Māori, communities, whānau, and the Office of the Children's Commissioner. The fact that they were stretched too thinly—now, who's fault is that? That was the decision of successive Governments, and to restrict their role, I would suggest, when, actually, the Māori advisory group set up to support Government in making the changes to Oranga Tamariki said that their first preference was for the monitoring agency to be within the Office of the Children's Commissioner. So now we're saying that we're going to be partnering and showing a new way forward, but we're not going with their first choice; we're going with something that they're willing to accept, and we're building-in an advisory body to that new department, telling everybody that that's going to provide the model of partnership that's needed, that will address that tenfold increased likelihood of tamariki Māori being in care. And yet we're not actually taking the advice of the Māori advisory group who are sitting there already. Can't say I buy it. So the Greens, unfortunately, will be unable to support this bill at this stage.