But look, can I just say that this is a sophisticated answer to a very difficult problem, because if we look at some other constitutions, we have either the absolute sovereignty of Parliament or the absolute sovereignty of the courts, whereas this ameliorates that and, essentially, it says that through a series of steps, Parliament, the courts, and the executive have to have a conversation with each other. There may be a declaration of inconsistency, as Mr Goldsmith said. A decision of the court which does that will be very thoughtful and carefully worked through, and that is then notified to Parliament, and Parliament, through its select committee process, is expected to examine that and to further put the case, if you like, for whatever solution they respectfully might think of to the executive, who in turn is expected to respond. Now, that's not going to be a quick process. The court process itself could take several years because it's triggered by a final decision, which means the conclusion of any appeal rights. 