It has been interesting, and I recognise the tension that has been mentioned as we try and balance a business owner's freedom to determine how they deploy resources, with their obligations and the responsibilities that come with Government funding. So bulk funding of salaries actually enables business owners to determine resource deployment, supports innovation and setting up their centres so that they've got appropriate conditions for their learners' needs. But, unfortunately, the burden that comes with inappropriate funding models, or inadequate funding, actually falls on the provider. It leads to those providers having to make compromises, usually on pay or conditions. What happens is: conditions become a priority because things like staffing ratios and release times are the things that are most closely and obviously connected to learners' conditions. So what happens is that the business owner compromises and says, "Well, I can't do pay and conditions, or I choose not to, so I'll stick to conditions because that's important for the company."