I wanted to talk to Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 93 in the name of the Hon Todd McClay. This relates to clause 14, which is in Part 1. In it, he proposes a new section 36 after subsection (2), which states "(3) Nothing in this section applies to any conduct carried out by a person where that person can demonstrate … (a) it engaged in the conduct for the dominant purpose of protecting a legitimate business interest; and (b) the conduct was reasonably necessary to protect that legitimate business interest." There is a further addition to this, in clause 14, new section 36A, after subsection (5), which is: "Nothing in this section applies to any conduct carried out by a person where that person can demonstrate that: (a) it engaged in the conduct for the dominant purpose of protecting legitimate business interest; and (b) the conduct was reasonably necessary to protect that legitimate business interest." So there were two definitions: "reasonably necessary" and for the conduct.