RICARDO MENÉNDEZ MARCH (Green): Following on the issue of lack of pathways for residency, whether it's young people or people who don't meet the salary criteria, I recognise that the Minister in the chair, Kris Faafoi, mentioned the need to grow skills locally, and I think everyone in this House would support that notion but, I think, also acknowledging that that may take some time and, in the meanwhile, we do have a workforce that is currently on temporary visas and does not have access to fully participate in society. So, seeing as in the period that we're reviewing, we know that there's a large portion of that workforce that still depends on migrant communities and that those gaps may not be filled for some years, would it not make sense for these communities to be able to access residency class visas, to be upskilled, and, as we fill those skills locally, acknowledging that it actually may take some years, because those gaps may well not be filled in six months; meanwhile, the workforce here is suffering with uncertainty and without the ability to access State support services. If we were to go back to alert level 3 or 4, that migrant workforce is always more at risk of COVID-19 due to the lack of support. So I'm interested in knowing what the rationale is for keeping these people on temporary visas for such a long time when they would fill the gaps of skills.