I wanted to touch on one of the submissions that was co-written by Beryl Anderson and Sue Kedgley, one of our former Green members of Parliament, from the National Council of Women of New Zealand. They felt really strongly about clause 9, which is around the directions to leave premises or not enter premises. I acknowledge that, as Naisi Chen mentioned, there are communities that are actually far more vulnerable and feel much more targeted by door-to-door salespeople, and this includes women, people who do not speak English, people who are disabled, and so I do think that the intent of this bill to safeguard and protect consumers is really important. I think back to a time where I—in between being a student and finding a more permanent job—took a very, very brief stint as a door-to-door salesperson for an electricity retailer. I have to say that the experience was so uncomfortable, because you were encouraged to actively try and get into someone's home and to be as coercive as you could to get that commission. And I think about the fact that we've created a culture where companies are incentivised to push workers towards unsafe situations that ultimately put our households into unsafe situations. So I think the intent of this bill, in terms of protecting consumers and actually making sure that our companies are not also putting workers in a situation that is not safe, is really important and a really key move to ensure that the way that we conduct commerce does not put people in danger.