So the question has to be: why does the Minister seek not only, I should add, powers for two years but the Cabinet paper, as I read it—Mr Faafoi took a Cabinet paper to remove the time limit altogether. And, obviously, there was a Cabinet discussion where he was overridden. I have the Cabinet paper here, and the Cabinet paper makes it very clear—if I can just find the appropriate paragraph—at paragraphs 15 to 18: "I propose the removal of the expiry date from the powers." No expiry date whatsoever. He said, at paragraph 18 to the Cabinet, "I consider the power to suspend the ability to make visa applications remains critical as long as borders remain closed. Under the Immigration Act, visas cannot be granted if the holder is unlikely to be allowed to enter, but they cannot be declined if they meet the relevant policy settings." And that was his reason for removing any time bar on those significant powers he was given. Cabinet, clearly, didn't agree with him, because the Cabinet minute and the bill we are discussing extended it by what he would say is "only" a further two years. I would suggest, and the National Party believes, that, if this bill is appropriate, it is appropriate for no more than 12 more months.