So let's go through why we need this bill, because what the court found was that the Teaching Council broke the law because it failed to consult before imposing annual certification fees. So that's the first thing the Minister of Education does with this bill—he says, "Look, they broke the law, that's a bit tricky and embarrassing, but I'll tidy it up with a little bill to cover their tracks." The second thing that the High Court said was that "the Teaching Council failed to properly consider the merits of annual certification". Then they said, in a very clear judgment, that they had misled the Minister on the payment by instalment idea—they had misled the Minister of Education. But, you know, don't worry, he's here to tidy it all up for them! Then, they said that they didn't properly consider the pros and cons of annual certification. Then, they said that they imposed a blanket one-year period of certification inconsistently with the Act, and that they set an unlawful fee—and set an unlawful fee—which bundled together all of the costs of the council services.