Let me take a step back, first of all, by noting that the Regulations Review Committee is known as a collegial committee. That's how we operate internally, so to speak, but it also marks our interactions with other key players—for example, Ministers of the Crown or in a broader sense, hearing complaints with complainants, of course, but also relevant Government agencies, and so on. But I do also want to acknowledge an element of collegiality or comity—which is often the specific word used—in relation to the committee as a creature of Parliament and the comity or collegiality of Parliament with the other branches of Government. So in this case we're acknowledging the fact today that Parliament has recognised that the court has made a judgment that is in a similar sphere to the substantive policy basis of a couple of COVID-19 orders, and Parliament has respected that the court had the right to make that determination on the facts in a case that was particular to the complainants, so to speak, before it, and the Government has respected that by removing the orders in relation to the Police and the New Zealand Defence Force members who had brought that motion. So I don't really want to talk too much about the case specifically but I do want to commend the Government for recognising that appropriate separation between the powers of those respective branches of Government. So that's, I think, an interesting development, and I think it's very appropriate. 