So for me, it's a reminder that freedom of speech does not mean freedom of reach. I think that there is no right to algorithmic amplification: with the algorithm there's thousands and thousands of bits of content on there but about a hundred of them will only show up on your newsfeed as well. Who determines what that is? Who determines the prioritisation? You can find whatever you want to on the internet but who prioritises the way that we access our media? Of course, those of us around the House in many ways have to dance to the tunes of their algorithm, so do the journalists as well, and so those engagements kind of lock us into particular behaviours as well. Some of those behaviours, I think, kind of keep us in really circular arguments here in Parliament as well and by keeping us within those circular arguments that actually distracts from the real mahi that we need to actually be doing as well.