Now, the Prime Minister has commented today during interjections that, no, he couldn't have been because he was subject to an appeal. But then looking at the Act, the Immigration Act, at sections 163 and 164, and also looking to the UN convention on refugees, it appears, certainly on first reading, that he could have been removed, because if the Crown even accepted or said, "Well, he's a refugee.", he could still be removed as a refugee whether or not he was legitimately one or not. 