I heard, again, the Minister saying that the evidence was that this bill, the three-strikes legislation that was introduced a decade ago, has been "ineffectual". There is no such evidence. That was nonsense. He should really come back into the House and apologise for saying something which is completely unjustified. The Ministry of Justice brief on this bill was that "There is no substantial international or New Zealand evidence on the effect of three strikes laws on crime." There is no evidence—no evidence. "The existing evidence is"—I continue with the quotation—"mixed and more robust research is needed to understand the true effects of these laws." Well, that doesn't strike me as a strong, sound basis for repeal, does it? It certainly doesn't justify all the nonsense that we've heard on the other side of the House saying, "Oh, these haven't worked. This bill hasn't worked; therefore, we need to throw it out." There is no evidence—that's what the Ministry of Justice says.