I also want to touch on the point that the appellant in this case is excluded from it, and I accept Mr Brown's observations that, to him, it may seem unusual. There are, essentially, two principles in play here, and Mr Penk also observed that. I think he said something like, "Who makes the rules?" Obviously, Parliament, in this case, is supreme. However, there is another strong constitutional principle that I don't think has been identified, and that is that when a court has made a decision about rights which apply to a particular person, this House should be extremely reluctant to take those rights away. 