Also, just the potential for it to exacerbate existing problems with the approach to treatment injuries by focusing narrowly on cause rather than focusing on the impact of an injury or a person experiencing it was a concern for us. The point about requiring a physical injury before mental injury gets covered, I do just want to point to how problematic that occurs to me to be, particularly for birthing parents in rural areas. I've heard a significant number of stories of people whose births do not go to plan. They may be haemorrhaging, and they have to be airlifted. In this, I've heard several cases from Queenstown area—and I know this will be similar in other areas of the country—have to be airlifted out to another city. Sometimes they have to divert their partners in a car racing to one town to meet them. Then they're diverted to somewhere else, and their life is at stake. There is no physical injury at the end of that that is on that list. But boy, will there be a mental trauma that is a result of the physical process. So I was not convinced that we should not have had a clause to ensure that there was cover for those women.