Finally, we need an independent monitor to oversee the system and ensure that the horrors of abuse that occurred in our history never happen again. This bill makes it a legal requirement for the monitor to act independently and makes it unlawful for the Government or anyone else to interfere with their monitoring. We know some stakeholders want the monitoring to be in a Crown entity, and, in particular, to be with the Children's Commissioner. However, we heard during hui across the country concerns about monitoring sitting in conflict with advocacy. The monitor will provide objective and impartial information to Parliament, the public, and to Ministers on the performance of the system to support decisions that improve performance of the Oranga Tamariki system; whereas the role of the advocate is to question whether the settings are right in the first place. In response to consultation on the long-term home of the monitor, the Office of the Children's Commission even stated—and I quote—"We do however agree that the advocacy function may conflict with the policy intent as currently stated to be an adviser to the Minister."