I think the bill would be better named the "Taxation (Annual Rates for 2020-2021, Feasibility Expenditure, Brightline Extension, Property Price Escalation, Rent Escalation Assurance, and Remedial Matters) Bill", because that's what the effect of this is going to be; there's nothing surer. If it was a bill that was perhaps having the brightline test attached to provisions that increased supply of housing, it might be a little more acceptable. But in this case, just stand alone, it's a bit like saying, "We're going to take the 52 weeks of the year and turn them into 100. We're going to take, you know, any number of things here, and do some kind of loaves and fishes exercise to make scarcity go far." It can't be done, and tax will not achieve it. 