CHRIS BISHOP: Well, the thing about immigration—and this was going to be my next point—the thing about Parliament is it's political. It's an amazing thing. We're all elected here. We're sent here to Parliament to do a job. Let's be very clear: immigration is political. It's political because Government policy is decided by politicians. It's Government policy to not act on split migrant families. That makes it political. Managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) resourcing is political because it's the Government that decides how many beds are available in MIQ and how they'll be allocated. Just yesterday, we had the Minister announcing that we're going to have Recognised Seasonal Employer scheme workers coming in, construction workers coming in. We welcome that on this side of the House, but the failure to act on the split migrants is political. Immigration funding is political because it's the Government that decides how much money goes to the immigration department, and that decides how many immigration staff there are, and that decides how quickly they process residence applications. That's why we have, as Miss Stanford pointed out, the longest backlog in New Zealand history. That's political. That's what Parliament is for. That's why we're having this debate. It's to interrogate those issues. That's the whole point of a democracy. So that is, of course, why immigration policy and actions are political, and that's, of course, why we are interested in it. Marja Lubeck says, "Let's not politicise this." Immigration policy is political. Miss Stanford is doing the right thing.