I'd like to refer to the advice that the Minister received on drafting this SOP, from Treasury in particular, as other members have quoted—and here I quote—"on balance the Treasury's preferred option is an extension of the bright-line period" longer than 10 years. It goes on to say that it may be relatively easy to avoid tax liability under a 10-year test by delaying the sale of the property. Treasury then went on to recommend a 20- or 30-year—I believe, off the top of my head—extension to that test. My question to the Minister is: is this extension to 10 years, a mere doubling of the five-year test, not kicking the can down the road? Is it not dealing with the substance of the issue, which inherently is wealth inequality in this country? Two-thirds of wealth in this country is held in property, I might add.