At the end of that consideration, the Parliament will have a debate and the executive will have a say as well, and Parliament can, effectively, say, "Well, we think that we're right and the courts are wrong. We're elected. We take these decisions, and if people disagree with us, they can get rid of us and get a new Government, but we think the status quo is justified.", perhaps what might more often happen is that the Parliament might say, "Well, maybe we could modify the arrangements a little in a way that make them rights-compliant.", or on other occasions a new Parliament could say, "With the benefit of hindsight or in the light of the advice that we've had from the senior courts, we should repeal the legislation and deal with the issue that way." So that's what this bill does. It will change the way in which civil liberties are protected in New Zealand in what, in my opinion, is an important way.