I won't repeat all that I was saying before the dinner break, obviously, but just briefly, by way of recap, I was just drawing to the attention of the committee the distinction between a remand prisoner and a sentenced prisoner for the purpose of Part 2 and, more particularly, the discussion that we've ended up in as a committee about the implication of the legislation, whereby we're saying that it might be that if a person who is in prison for less than three years is able to be on the electoral roll and thereby qualify to be a candidate for office—if I've understood that point correctly, and I say openly that I'm not 100 percent confident that's the case. But I think I've understood correctly that that might be the case. The Minister responded somewhat reasonably—I think genuinely wishing to point out that, potentially, if that is indeed a problem, there would be a problem also with the fact that a remand prisoner could also be a candidate for election. But I think it's worthwhile distinguishing between remand prisoners who are awaiting trial and therefore should be presumed innocent in the absence of a trial in which to establish their guilt or otherwise and, of course, remand prisoners who have been found guilty at trial but not yet sentenced.