Nevertheless, the purpose of the bill—I will pass to that and move on from the history. I think it's worth actually reflecting on the purpose of the purpose—tautologies, I genuinely didn't mean that one, but a number of purposes in the Act. Actually, these are really important, because they not only are going to set out, sort of, the rationale, of course, of why we have this legislation in the first place but can be meaningful for people wanting to navigate the bill and understand what it's looking to achieve, provide a starting point; also they will produce a yardstick against which the policy aims can be measured later. It does also have a significance, in the sense that the purpose of a piece of legislation is, again, a yardstick against which the regulations that flow from it can be measured. So that's one of the things that can be considered later on: the secondary legislation that flows from it—is that legitimate or not? Well, there are a number of different grounds on which we can consider that, and one of them is whether it's consistent with the purpose of the bill.