The issue that we need to debate in this House is that by allowing for drug and substance testing are we sure that it is going to make it safer. Now, I was interested in the contribution from Dr Leavasa, and he said, "We need to look at the research from countries like Australia." Well, I think Australia is a good comparison because culturally they're actually pretty similar to us and I would say a lot more similar to us than maybe the Netherlands, which is the only other country that's gone down this path, and I would say that there is a lot of cultural differences. Well, the University of New South Wales did an in-depth study of 392 deaths from recreational drug use. Three hundred and ninety two young Australian lives lost to illicit drug use. What that research showed is not one—zero—were caused by impurities in the ecstasy that they used; zero. So when I hear members from both the ACT Party and the Green Party and the Labour Party saying that we need to make decisions on a research base, saying that this is all about saving lives because of impurities, I challenge them, and say, "Show me the deaths from the impurities, because I can show you 392 deaths of people who have taken ecstasy." So my worry with this bill is that we are going to be saying to young people, "It's got no impurities, it's pure ecstasy. It's OK.", when it is not.