I also support moves to increase the penalties for non-compliance. And I'd like to highlight this part of the regime, because the principle that is being followed here by the Minister is a simple one. It is that if we believe that compliance with the law is important in order to protect from potential victimisation, to prevent people from failing to adhere to it, then one way of encouraging their adherence to the law is to increase penalties. I would just invite members opposite in particular to consider why it is in this case that the Government views that an increased penalty regime may increase compliance but that that is not the approach that is applied in other areas of the law, particularly when it comes to the criminal law, where victimisation is more than just money; it can be lives and livelihoods. There is an interesting practice at play there. The example I would offer is with the health and safety regime where I think we have seen quite a direct correlation where increased penalties have increased directors' adherence to, and the management knowledge of, the law in the area and the need to apply it carefully. 