In my role as Attorney-General, I am the guardian of civil liberties. I exercise that role largely through reflecting the advice that is given to me by very careful consideration of those issues that comes through the Ministry of Justice, who service this House, through me in respect of New Zealand Bill of Rights Act assessments with respect of every piece of legislation. Now, I abhor the intimidation of women—I abhor the intimidation of women, particularly when they're in a vulnerable situation, or staff that, as Louisa Wall has said, are legitimately going about their duties to perform what is a very valuable albeit difficult social service that we need in society. None the less, the advice that I have received, which I reflect in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act vet that I have tabled in the House, suggests that the drafting of this limitation of freedom of expression goes further than is necessary to achieve the purpose which it seeks to achieve. I agree with the purpose which it seeks to achieve. I have made some suggestions that have been worked up as according to the advice that I have received from the department as to how it might be limited in a way that meets the purpose of the bill whilst not infringing the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act protections that are all so important.