Look, as I've said, this bill was clearly going to be passed at its first reading. It's a bill that is back to the future, because it has been to the House before and it was defeated, and it poses a very good question: are we going to start appointing people at local body level that haven't sought or gone through the electoral process—who haven't been elected? Where is the view of the public and where is the mandate of the public in this bill? 