Also, the Minister highlighted that the sensitivity of the farmland is part of the assessment of any application by an overseas company, but, in our view, there's far too much reliance on production values and the sensitivity is often determined by the land-use classification—whether it's class 7 or 8 land and is marginal for farming, then it may be more easy for an overseas company to buy it for forestry. But that land-use classification and productivity for farming does not, in our view, recognise that even if land has a low carrying capacity for stock or it's unsuitable for horticulture or viticulture and it might generate little income for the current owner, it can have significant value in terms of landscape, in terms of biodiversity—I can only think of a lot of the regenerating mānuka. And so we need to move—and this bill doesn't do that—away from just highlighting that land is sensitive in terms of its farming use just because it has high production values. You need to look at those other biodiversity values as well.