A third question is somewhat in response to his timing. We on this side of the Chamber are very aware of his exceptionally large Supplementary Order Paper. The issue is not whether it was a month or, obviously, moving out to three months; it's the fact that he's bringing the whole legislation in now when, arguably, we have a screen sector in crisis, and so to that end I would ask him again—in the whole point of Part 1—what conversations, if any, his officials had with Amazon, and have they indicated their reasons to him for why they were leaving? And was part of that a concern about the very legislation that he's bringing to the House right now?