Then they said that the regulatory impact statement identified above did not meet the threshold for receiving an independent opinion—it wasn't anywhere substantial enough. And has any further analysis been offered for this bill? All we've seen is just another example of the Government coming in, putting out a discussion document, getting feedback from the stakeholders, they say "Yes, we agree that there should be some more information being made available.", and they develop a voluntary code and it happens. All the information is being made available, but the Government decides they need to legislate anyway on top of that, and then they come in with very broad legislation which leaves that uncertainty within the broader sector about what's coming next and how will their shoulder be tapped, in what way, for new information.