SPEAKER: No, no. Order! Order! If the member had raised a matter of privilege with me, then it would be inappropriate for her to raise it in the House before I had ruled on it. The member has not raised a matter of privilege with me. I have had two letters from the member; reading both of them—and I stand to be corrected—no matter of privilege has been raised, and if it had been raised it would have been ruled out as being out of time. The member should know with her experience that matters where members disagree on answers can be matters of privilege if raised in a proper way, as long as the member gives an indication that a statement was deliberately misleading. If it is a matter of correction, or the member disagrees with a statement, then that is not a matter of privilege, and there are lots and lots of precedents for that. I can remember a very wise speaker from Clutha-Southland—I think—Sir Robin Gray, who made it very, very clear that he did not have the jurisdiction to intervene in disagreements between members on matters of fact.