In relation to the details of the provisions, I just want to delve into one aspect of the changes to "terrorist act", which, of course, have to be proven as part of this new precursor offence of planning and preparation, and that's the debate that was had in wider society and media articles and also in the select committee. It was a very civil debate, I might say. There was not strong fundamental disagreement on these points about whether, in the offence, we were to use in terms of the intent that a perpetrator would have on the population, "terror"—coming down a bit—"fear", or even, at a lower threshold, "intimidation" as the operative word, as the intention as part of that act that needs to be proven.