I also would like to commend the work that the committee did around the age of consent and clarifying that consent cannot be given by somebody under the age of 16, because they are not in a position to be able to understand the implications of that image being shared. I also note that, while that doesn't apply for 16- and 17-year-olds, actually, as the committee pointed out, the posting of an intimate visual recording of a 16- or a 17- year-old could still be considered objectionable under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act. So there is an interesting kind of graduation in our legislation coming in with this. 