But in that same clause is the word "prayer". Now, prayer is a channel between an individual and their deity, however loudly or however individually or collectively it is done, and I simply can't support a piece of legislation that cuts across an individual's right to pray, for whatever. What worries me about that is that for 99.9 percent of the rest of the bill I'm supportive of it, but that is a bottom line for me. I think it undermines a fundamental human right, and that is the right to religious worship in whatever form and of whatever belief. A prayer is, I say, a channel between one person and a deity. It may harm even if that's not the intent, or even if it is the intent—it's a kind of a sticks and stones moment. So I worry, and I think we have an opportunity to clarify that that's not the intention of the Government by supporting my amendment to clause 5.