In answer to Mr Goldsmith's question that sort of went to the broader issue of flexibility, I think the answer to that lies in the graduated structure. So for a worker, for example—taking Mr Goldsmith's example—an extra who might, as a contractor, move from production to production, employer to employer, the occupation-level bargaining will ensure that that worker has the certainty of there being a basic level of fair negotiated terms and conditions that apply across that occupation wherever he or she moves. But over the course of a year or two years, that worker might move between different productions and different employers, and, to Mr Goldsmith's point, yes, one of them might be large and have more means, and one of them might be small and have lesser means. And that's where the enterprise-level bargaining, should it occur, in the individual-level contracts will allow differentiation which is fit for purpose for that organisation and its ability to engage. So I think the graduated nature there is the answer to his question. Whether he agrees with it or not, that is the way the system is set up.