In these situations, the courts should go back to the intent of this bill: what is it that the implementation of this bill is trying to achieve? Well, quite simply, it is to prevent people whose behaviour and actions represent a high risk of violence or reflect an underlying risk of violence from accessing firearms or restricted weapons. Police should know the difference between the two types of people, and strive to rebuild the trust and confidence between themselves and the firearms community again before bringing charges that do not meet the intent of the bill. This law should not be used to punish those with no ill intent, but we should all be mindful of the unintended ignorance of the extent of arms law changes. Really innocent licensed firearm owners should not get caught up in this regime. But, as we know, the police gave gangs licences in their dozens, so many legitimate licensed firearm owners are already feeling the pain of that agency's incompetence.