Now, what is it about the Labour, Green, and New Zealand First parties that somehow they think it's OK that convicted criminals have more legal rights than those who are victims of crime or those who are law-abiding citizens? I'd love the New Zealand First member, who hasn't taken a single call on this bill, to explain to me why he voted at first reading for new section 115 in this bill, which says that if you are a convicted rapist or murderer, you'd get more legal rights to be on the unpublished roll than if you were the victim of a murder or rape. Would the New Zealand First member care to explain that? 