So what I would propose, and what the ACT Party proposes, is that, in the absence of the concerns which potentially underlie the purpose of this piece of legislation being effectively articulated, it's not clear what the purpose of this legislation is to achieve. It's quite clear the purpose says that it's to have two members of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu appointed to Environment Canterbury—to an otherwise elected body—but it doesn't say what the objective of that is. So I would ask the member: what's the objective? Why is this necessary? Is it because Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu are concerned that, essentially, decisions about natural resources—fresh water, land use, for example—are being made and they don't recognise their customary rights, they don't recognise the cultural impacts? Because, if that's the case, Mr Tirikatene, I would say, look, that's what the Resource Management Act is for.