The Resource Management Act is a self-made blockage against housing, against rail projects that make sense, against roading projects that unlock our greenfields development or help deal with congestion or improve safety, which everyone agrees we need to improve. So I just think, symbolically, the fact that we are here doing this just epitomises the failure of Parliament over the last 20 years, really, to deal with the Resource Management Act. And I have to say that, frankly, the Greens—there is some deep irony in the Greens supporting this bill, because the Greens have been the biggest barrier in the last 20 years to the Resource Management Act. Simple changes, minor changes to reduce the interminable consultation, to speed up the process—all of those changes have been opposed by the Green Party; not just opposed and they vote against them and go through the motions, but vociferously and voluminously. They've run petitions against any changes to the Resource Management Act, and they've had their fellow travellers in the wider environmental movements telling us that the end of the world is nigh. We've had Geoffrey Palmer telling us that the model is fine, and we've had endless opinion pieces from Sir Geoffrey and legal opinions about how everyone is wrong on the Resource Management Act other than him. Well, he's the guy who wrote it, so I think there may be a slight vested interest there and conflict of interest in relation to it.