But, in this instance, this bill is a temporary and limited response particular to our COVID response and it has within it a number of safeguards in place to ensure that it doesn't impede unduly on rights. In the context of COVID there's a need to ensure that access to justice, to courts, remains fair and safe for judges, for staff, for the accused, for witnesses and for juries. And the big risk, as my colleague Ginny Andersen mentioned, is without this bill people who are compelled to attend court could be exposed to a heightened risk, and for some, that may put them in the impossible position of having to make a decision about their safety versus being compelled to attend court. So, clearly, the best way to do that, to address that situation, is to ensure the courts themselves have the powers they need to support the safe and effective operation of both the courts and tribunals by making amendments to reduce the risk of transmission for those who visit the courts or carry out work there. 