We'll be laying out a couple of Supplementary Order Papers in the name of my colleague Chris Penk on a couple of issues that have been raised, and I thought I'd start with the one around clause 8, which is in relation to the sexual experience or connection between the complainant and the defendant being relevant or discussed in the course of the hearing. I think, again, widespread concern about practices in the past, dredging up all manner of stories and accusations or implications against the complainant or even, potentially, the victim of the crime and getting into territory that is not relevant, and so the rules have been tightened over the years. This tightens it even more in relation to really reflecting at all on a prior relationship between the complainant and the defendant. So I'd like the Minister to explain exactly how he is confident that what is being proposed here and not being changed at all will still ensure defendants have the ability to raise important and relevant issues in the case. I'd like him to justify that a bit more.