Now, the Minister believes that because he's done a good job and he's a nice guy, he can have two years, because he doesn't want to have to come back in a year's time and do this all again, because it's just a bit of a pesky annoyance. But every single submitter on this bill, including the Law Society, who made this argument a year ago, could see that this wasn't right, that this can't go on for ever, and, in fact, that he must come to this House to justify the need for extension of these powers after one year.