So why is the Minister not actually requiring the secretary to monitor and review this scheme, to review the revenue that's being used by the agency for administering it—which I think, actually, is a very good thing. I mean, the reality is that the agency could, effectively, just decide, over time, that it's going to use more and more of the revenue and grow quite an empire to run this thing. There's no requirement for efficiency in this piece of legislation. Effectively, it's just telling the agency to administer it, but this is millions and millions of New Zealand's tax dollars which are being used to run this scheme—millions of dollars being used to run this scheme—and no requirement for efficiency, and, effectively, just saying to the secretary, "Well, if you'd like to monitor it and review it, you may." Why is that not a requirement to actually have that monitoring? I think New Zealanders want to see their dollars that they spend used efficiently and effectively. If we're going to have the scheme, then that should be the expectation that the Minister should be monitoring.