This process is neither fish nor fowl; it's a Clayton's process. It's the kind of process you have when you're not having a process. And the subject matter, frankly, deserved better than this. I have to say that National members during the first reading proposed a longer run time and more time to discuss it in the select committee. We also formally proposed a practical and good-faith amendment to seek an extension of a week to allow more time for submissions—that could have been used over the COVID delay, and that was wholeheartedly rejected and voted down by the committee. That's a shame because that would have allowed more submitters to have their prospective and to have been heard on it.