I want to echo a point that Chris Bishop raised that I think is extremely important. I don't believe in vaccine mandates in the sense of forcing a person to be vaccinated unconditionally, but it is also true that a lot of people in our society are going to find conflicts of rights over vaccination, and I think in future orders we are going to have to consider what sorts of rights people have to stipulate vaccination, not that another person must be vaccinated unconditionally but that they will only transact with a person if that person is vaccinated. This is very important. It's not a question of being mandatory; it's a question of being able to lay claim to the right to only interact with vaccinated people in certain contexts.