I often think about the speeches that we give in here. As a lawyer—and there are a few of us in the room—I think we were taught in statutory interpretation that sometimes the courts, and lawyers will use it, will come back to the Hansard and look at the parliamentary debates and try and determine what was the intent of Parliament when we were passing certain laws. So I often find it difficult to filibuster—you know, if we are required to do it, or those speeches that you give at short notice—because it doesn't lend itself to helping when courts get stuck and they are trying to figure out, "Now what was the intent of Parliament in that?" So I think it is really important.