NICOLA WILLIS (National): I thank the Minister for addressing that question. I would invite him, if he would, to comment more specifically on why he rejected the alternative option put forward by officials, which was to prohibit oppressive conduct. Because to the point that the Minister has just made, officials advised that the definition of oppressive conduct already has a body of case law associated with it in New Zealand, and to quote the officials, "that appears to strike a suitable balance between prohibiting conduct that is grossly unfair, while not unnecessarily intervening in everyday, reasonable commercial conduct.", whereas the lane that the Minister has chosen to go down with unconscionable conduct creates this risk of interpretation from the courts. So I'd invite the Minister to comment on that if he would.