But we haven't had a second—sorry, the second reading has come in without a select committee process. We haven't delved into the inconsistencies that I was pointing out in the first reading. Why an arbitrary date of 1 March? I know there was a glorious attempt by the speaker after me in the first reading to point out why 1 March was not arbitrary. We danced around a little bit. We didn't seem to note the pandemic declared on 31 January, or that we closed the border to China on 3 February. Somehow, 1 March just popped up. We haven't looked at those inconsistencies. We haven't looked at why a redundancy payment of $30,000 is the right limit. This House has not addressed the question yet, and maybe it will in the committee stage, of why there are not transitional phases, if you will. 