Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: —as a consequence of this—so far; quite right, Mr Simpson. I'd like an update. I've heard that there has been another $7,000 of legal fees that have been paid. We now know that the $331,000, as it was in December, and the extra $7,000 is not the end of the story, because we have had a revelation that there is a separate legal process under way, which is almost certain to cost the taxpayer more money, and that is—I now know and the chief executive wasn't prepared to say it, but it is a personal grievance under the Employment Relations Act—that he told the Governance and the Administration Committee, on 10 March, that he was not prepared to settle. In fact, the Minister answered a written question about whether he thought settlement could be achieved before reaching the Employment Court. The one-word answer was "No." When I asked Mr Gonzalez-Montero, "Why?", he was quite bullish; he said he would rather lose the case and be right than settle with this fellow. Now, that is, I think, a reflection of a process that is going to lead to a significant sum of money needing to be paid by the taxpayer. It's not his money, it's not Mr Speaker's money, either; it's the taxpayers' money.