We talked about in our report limits on personal freedoms, and the reason we did that was not because we were approving or disapproving of where the Minister was drawing the line—those decisions are her purview. That's the prerogative of Government to make these orders in a way that they think is suitable from a medical or an epidemiological perspective, and the Minister herself is better placed than most to make those decisions. But we were interested in the limits on personal freedoms, not to second-guess that, as I say, from a policy perspective, but because we said that if we've got a voluntary admittance regime whereby a person could actually apply—not being required, but could make the decision to apply—to Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment—its chief executive, to be precise—to isolate at a managed isolation quarantine facility, and then if we say, well, if it's a voluntary scheme, then, actually, there should be a pretty light touch in terms of what was then required. 