Finally, I note the committee raised concerns that a designated grocery retailer may be able to make unreasonable claims for compensation or damages from their landlord because of the bill making the exclusivity covenant in their lease unenforceable. So section 89 of the Commerce Act has the potential to facilitate a process of renegotiating the lease to reflect actual losses incurred by the supermarket from greater exposure to competition in the area. The committee's concern was about landlords having little protection against the potential for supermarkets to abuse that process. There are general provisions in contract law, the Commerce Act, and the Fair Trading Act which prohibit the kinds of behaviours the committee was concerned about—for example, undue influence, coercion, or unconscionable conduct. I considered these provisions should provide protection to mall and shopping centre owners. I also considered that the SOP would help mitigate some of these concerns by giving the commission the ability to proactively monitor these arrangements, including the process of renegotiating them as a result of the bill to assess compliance with both the Commerce Act and the Fair Trading Act.