That wasn't by chance. It didn't just happen. It wasn't easy. People made sacrifices at every level and in every sector of our society, and it ill behoves members of this House to write that off, just to say, "We've got a big moat," as I heard earlier on in this debate from across the House, "So of course, it was going to be easy for New Zealand." People stayed at home. People shuttered their businesses. Some people lost their businesses and their jobs. Kids didn't go to school. Churches, mosques, and synagogues didn't open. People came together in the spirit of solidarity to save the lives of their fellow New Zealanders. What is so important about the approach that New Zealand has taken—and our Prime Minister and our Minister of Finance Grant Robertson, have said this right throughout and throughout the Budget—is that the best health response was also the best economic response. We did not say, as countries like Sweden did, that we'd, effectively, sacrifice lives. We said we would not do that because not only is that the wrong thing to do—New York City, let me give you an example of that. In the over-75 age group in New York City, one in 60 people have died. That's what we face, potentially. So not only have we saved lives and done the right thing, but, because of that decisive action, because we did go hard and we did go early, because our lockdown was strong—and, yes, I say to members on the other side of the House, it was stronger than most other places, and that was the right call—because we did that, we are in this position where we have substantially beaten back COVID, where we're on the cusp of elimination, and we now have amongst the freest economic and social conditions in the world, with the serious prospect next week that we might be able to free things up further if the evidence continues to stack up. That is a significant achievement for New Zealanders, and it is also due to the decisive leadership of our Prime Minister and of the Government.