But secondly, as well as why we don't agree with the change, we don't agree with the way that it is being done, because, as the introducer said, this is an historic bill, an evolution of Aotearoa. And it will set a precedent—there's no question about that across local government. Some argue that it's unique to Canterbury. I can't understand how you would say this is a modern expression of the Treaty, but it only applies in Canterbury. I'm sure there will be many other councils to which this logic will flow to, and then potentially to central government. But the thing that offends me is that, given this is a historic change that is being perpetrated, we have not heard once from the Prime Minister on the topic. In fact, for most of the debate, Ministers have refused to answer any questions about this bill. They've said, "It's nothing to do with us. It's a local bill; nothing to do with us." But the Labour Party is voting it and making it pass. I still haven't heard a word on the subject apart from some flummery in the House yesterday from the Minister of Justice. We haven't heard Ministers actually defending the logic of this bill. No case has been mounted. It's been carried through in a local bill, and so that's where we're at.