There are also serious questions around immigration, and these have been summed up today by Justice Cooke, where he says, "I also accept they have an arguable case."—this was in Afghan Nationals vs the Minister for Immigration and Chief Executive of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment—"As I understand the allegations the applications were no longer processed because the introduction of the Covid-19 border controls meant that the applicants would not be able to enter New Zealand if their applications were granted. But when the evacuation attempts commenced only those who had actually been granted visas qualified for evacuation. I accept that there is an argument that this outcome is not rational. The visa applications were not processed because the applicants could not enter New Zealand, and yet they were not eligible to be evacuated because they did not hold a visa. That is a catch 22 that may not be consistent with the lawful exercise of the statutory powers." Well, that's a tremendous amount of understatement by the judge there.