Why is it a dumb idea? Firstly—firstly—it is not needed. I mean, if Ministers want the civil service to engage in plain language writing in documents that go out to the public, I'm not opposed to that, obviously; I'm in favour of simple, clear, and concise writing. You do not need to pass a Plain Language Act to make that the reality; in fact, it's likely to have the opposite effect. We do not have to waste Parliament's time passing legislation to say that that is the law. There are endless ways for Ministers to do that. They can write letters of expectation. They can write various statutory documents that go to a variety of the Public Service agencies we're talking about here. They can write letters of expectation to the chairs that are involved or to the Public Service chief executives. They can just actually direct it, and I don't know if this story's public or not, but it's about to be: when Gerry Brownlee was the Minister of Defence—I think this is on the public record—endless briefing notes with acronym soup and he said, "Well, this is pointless. You've got 15 different acronyms on one page. You've got to sort this out." And he just made them sort it out. That's what an effective Minister can do. You see, this bill is not needed—that's the first point.