However, that's not the case and what we are seeing here is that, as it stands, the compliance is unclear in terms of what those small businesses would have to do. I'm also not convinced that the police wouldn't get the system and put it in place and then impose some sort of cost or charging or regime—it's a better word—on to small businesses of varying sorts to say, "This is now the system, this would be the cost, and this would be maybe it's annually, maybe it's a template of some sort, but those costs—and then the possible accusations that we are doing this rather than being on the front line." These are just some of the stories that fall into the unintended consequences. Despite the police having a "prevention first" mantra, there could also be an accusation that the compliance costs are such, where we have sworn and non-sworn police officers in the office administering a system which small businesses, those second-hand dealers who I have spoken to have said, "Look, if it was, say, to come for free, if we were going to be supported, given training over a longer period of time than the three months, maybe that would be something that we would look into." But there was a fear that something that was introduced would look good initially but over time would then cost, would add to that, and to sum it up, the compliance costs or the cost of administering such a system over time. 