Why is the Minister—there's a piece of paper sitting in the police department office that shows exactly who those two referees were. Doesn't this Parliament have a right to know whether those two referees were compliant with the law of the land as it was, before we go down these extensive exercises of completely rewriting our arms laws? I say that Minister, in refusing to answer those questions in this House, is acting negligently, and that there is no good reason to withhold from this Parliament, that is being asked to pass another major raft of arms laws, to not answer the most basic question, and that is: why and how that madman was issued with a firearms licence that led him to being able to get his arsenal of weapons and for him to then go on and perpetrate the awful evil that occurred on 15 March.