I will quickly spell out what this bill does in order to make the clear points that I wish to. It aims to tighten the rules around evidence regarding a complainant's sex life to ensure that they are protected from irrelevant and unduly invasive questioning, which we know does happen. It will also allow complainants in sexual cases to give their evidence in other ways, and this has been a significant factor in the past. Pre-recording of evidence, we know from research, makes it far more likely for complainants to give evidence and for that trial process to be far less traumatising. It also requires judges to intervene if there is inappropriate questioning—so this would go to the sexual history, to what the victim was wearing at the time, whether the victim had had a sexual history with the complainant. I know in some instances judges do do that anyway when questioning becomes unduly forceful, but in this legislation it will require judges to intervene at those points in time. It will also extend the availability of communication assistance to any witness who needs it to understand questions further, so that they're more familiar with the court process and the cross-examination process that they're undergoing.