First the question of "Do the waka-jumping provisions curtail an MP's freedom of speech?" Let me start by acknowledging the arguments of my colleagues around the House who have, for the most part, engaged in this debate extremely passionately and respectfully, and the Hon Dr Nick Smith for not only bringing this bill forward but also his 30 years of service. In the time that I have known him, we have never once agreed, but I admire him for his loyalty to his party and the unwavering commitment to those he represented. The Hon Dr Smith gave particular attention to his arguments and the arguments of submitters about the way the waka-jumping provisions curtail an MP's freedom of speech, and I don't wish to underplay that, because I share his commitment to MPs' ability to freely express themselves. The Attorney-General acknowledged it in the section 7 analysis from December 2017, of the 2017 waka-jumping bill, and he concluded the impairment of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act rights, particularly freedom of expression and association, were significant. I'll bring your attention to the Attorney-General's finding that the freedom of expression in this House has a special constitutional value. I think that's true.