What we don't want to do is to raise the level of eligibility, because that, simply, would not be fair. It has been done in Australia, up to the age of 67. Todd Muller—several National Party leaders ago—suggested he was going to do that. But if you look at the statistics about life expectancy for New Zealanders, the overall life expectancy for men in New Zealand is 80 and for women is 83.5. When you break that down though, Māori men can be expected to live to 73; Pasifika men, 75.5; Asian men, 85; and so on. So if you look at the differential, 85 years for an Asian man compared to 73 years average for a Māori man, how could it be fair to then raise the levels when already there is a benchmark that cuts across that has them on different playing fields to start with?