I do want to thank the members of the Education and Workforce Committee for their diligent consideration of this bill. I want to thank the 236 individuals and organisations that took the time to submit on the bill. The select committee's proposed amendments demonstrate that their submissions have been carefully considered. Some submitters thought, for example, that for the New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology (NZIST)—the new, unified network of delivery that I spoke of—academic freedom should be unfettered by the functions of workforce development councils, while others indicated that the current provisions provided too much academic freedom to the New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, and more preference needed to be given to industry. That is probably a good sign that we're about in the right place, but there are improvements that can be made. The committee amended the bill to clarify, in particular, how academic freedom provisions interact with the workforce development councils.