But my question is a separate one, which is about this phrase "employment relations aims." It is a technical point, but I think it's important, because what I am trying to understand is why we wouldn't just leave it at "Subsections (5B) and (5C) apply to conditions or purposes—(b) that relate to employment matters (for example, remuneration)." Why is it that we're clarifying that the Minister may be trying to achieve employment relations aims? I would put to the Minister and to this committee that if we are trying to achieve employment relations aims, generally the place that that's done is in an employment relations Act and it is done between an employer and their employee. It is not something one would expect to see in the Education Act, which is about educating people. So why are employment relations aims in here, when it would seem that, for the technical point that the Minister is trying to achieve, simply clarifying it down to remuneration would be sufficient?