Look, first and foremost, if this bill was truly and simply about conversion practices, as I think most of us intuitively and connotatively understand, it would be a no-brainer to support it. It would be relatively easy. The bill, unfortunately, goes so much further than that. Arguably, a lot of it could be solved by tightening up some of the definitions to give surety, and my colleague the Hon Paul Goldsmith has touched on some of that. Because we did hear from some amazing submitters. I mean, you read through the submissions themselves—deeply, deeply felt, and some who were actually proud supporters of the LGBTQIA+ community spoke against this bill, because it went too far. They don't themselves want to be converted but they do want to have conversations; it's as simple as that. 