Then it says, "better recognising Māori cultural values. For example, the bill would require decision-makers empowered by the regime to take into account an applicant's plans to protect or enhance wāhi tūpuna, wāhi tapu areas, and Māori reservations." Well, really? I mean, why is that actually different from the regulatory regime we have for land use in the rest of New Zealand? It's only if you're a foreign investor? We could argue about the level of commitment we have to preserving and upholding Māori culture, but why would we have a different regime for people to do that if they don't happen to be born in New Zealand? Surely, we would want to have a regulatory regime to protect Māori culture—if, indeed, it needs protection by regulations—that applies to everybody. 