The national planning framework, which is dealt with in this bill, is one of the significant changes, I think, in terms of the way I understood it might roll out from the Randerson review. The Randerson report was a very comprehensive and commendably clearly written, accessible report. It highlighted the need to make sure there was more integration across the instruments of national direction, national policy statements (NPSs), national environmental standards, and the like. What I see in the exposure draft of the bill, the national planning framework is a suite of national direction which will happen through regulations and it's not clear, although the Minister did comment in answer to a question in the House today, as to whether the independence of a board of inquiry will assist with that process. At the moment, under the RMA, the board of inquiry process is very helpful in hearing public submissions and providing very cogent advice, as the board of inquiry chaired by Judge Sheppard did in relation to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management. The fact that then National Government changed that NPS was unfortunate but there was transparency between what came out of the board of inquiry and then what Government proceeded to do. And then, of course, Minister Parker as environment Minister has subsequently changed it and significantly strengthened it. 