The point I make here is that even though members of this House might not find that at all surprising because we, as parliamentarians, give our opinions all the time, freely and generously, there's a different status of lawyers who give legal advice. That legal advice should be able to be relied upon. It should be true. It should be correct. And it should put someone in a position where they know the law, the law is knowable to them, and that they can follow it to the letter. And I think the select committee would be wise to consider that issue very carefully about inexperienced lawyers being able to provide pro bono services without checks and balances.