I think what became clear is that the transition from the public health assessment, which was what the system was geared up to do primarily because they knew that once a person had returned a positive test they'd be whistled off to managed isolation or to hospital—but the shift from public health assessment to personal, clinical, and welfare assessment was too slow. The system did not keep up and so the right assessments were not carried out by the right people at the right time. But the reviewers, as they recorded in this report, have noted that changes that they have recommended should be made were already being changed at the very time that they were examining the processes. And I can say with confidence that those processes have changed, and when I see the way the system has responded in other places where the outbreak has just emerged—so, for example, in Nelson last week where an outbreak emerged, I'm confident that the DHB, which like all DHBs had engaged in the preparation planning, was prepared, was ready, was waiting, and was able to respond effectively and quickly and properly to the needs of that community and those who returned positive tests. And that has happened. 