At the select committee, we had a process that was relatively short in time, but that reflected no shortage of attention or consideration by the committee, but rather, and in fact to the contrary, a commitment by all involved to move rapidly so that we'd be able to pass this legislation prior to the House rising in advance of the upcoming election. The select committee process, which was ably chaired by Gareth Hughes, whose impending retirement I acknowledge, featured a large amount of advice and feedback provided to us as members of this House from those who wish to see amendments made to the way that we regard the subject of veterans affairs in this country. The bill does amend the veteran definition within the parent legislation, as we call it, but only in ways that are relatively limited. That means that veterans who made contributions to the select committee—in a number of different fields we have had to say as a select committee, in our report back to the House, that we were unable to make such changes; it was not within the scope of the bill. But I do want to acknowledge as part of the select committee process that we heard a number of those. I'll categorise them in a number of different ways, briefly, if I may.