I just want to step back a bit, though, in terms of, again, the intent behind this bill, which is, of course, an omnibus bill. And this part is the mental health compulsory assessment and treatment amendments. So when Graeme Moyle came into my electorate office in 2010, his first concern was that a special patient, the special patient that had killed his brother, was out in the community having unsupervised visits. So his primary concern was actually public safety and that an unsupervised visit by a special patient could lead to harm in the community. So then if you think about—one of the other significant policy intents is equivalence between the justice system and the health system. And if you are a victim in the justice system, you have the opportunity to present to the parole board. Although, as we worked through this, we clearly identified significant differences in terms of why that was not appropriate in the mental health system, and the bill was vastly improved in the select committee from where it started. So I want to acknowledge the select committee's effort in that. What was important is that victims wanted to be able to be heard, and they also wanted to be notified. So those are the two key parts of the policy behind the changes that appear in here. 