Now, one of the things we expect in this House—particularly amongst the two major parties—is that we act and we vote and we conduct ourselves rationally and consistently, in accordance with principle. I know members opposite have said—they said last week, and, in fact, have certainly said since last Wednesday night—that they voted in a way that they have voted before. That is actually not correct, because there is nothing on record to show, for example, that the National Party supports the idea that disqualified prisoners should be required to enrol. The National Party has never voted for that. There is no record in any Parliament in the history of this country of the National Party—at least since 1936—supporting the idea that disqualified voters or disqualified prisoners should be allowed to enrol. And yet they approved a law that said prison officers are obliged to tell prisoners of whatever length of sentence they must enrol, to collect that information, and to pass it to the Electoral Commission. There is no record from any Parliament since 1936 of the National Party supporting the idea of the Electoral Commission not having the power to remove disqualified voters. But last week the National Party voted for it.