I mean, your closer-to-home example is in relation to Oranga Tamariki, and I appreciate there'd be a wide variety of views on that—the taking of babies. Again, is that objectionable? Regardless of anyone's view, I would doubt there would be a member—I'd hope there isn't—who'd say that that sort of thing shouldn't be allowed on the internet and the power of it for people to see. Yet what we've got here is a law ultimately about internet filters and the control that I'm talking about, and that's wrong. It's overreach. It's something that shows us the instinct of this Government, and I for one—but I'm not alone—don't like it. 