DAVID SEYMOUR: Potentially—I said potentially. I'm just raising the possibility, but there's a serious point here. The Minister should actually tell the House, in response to the criticism that's been levelled against her, does she value the processes of this place? It's not good enough just to say "Other people have abused it, so I can too." And once she's told us does she value democratic participation and parliamentary procedure and to what extent, then she could maybe tell us how she made the decision that bringing these provisions forward by one election when we've had the provisions for six in a row, at least three of which her party was in power—how did she decide that was more important than parliamentary procedure and respecting it? If she can tell us how she made that decision, I think that would help a lot of people rest a lot easier with the way that this bill's being passed. And if she gives a good answer, then I might not need to ask her any more questions. We look forward to hearing from the Minister.