This is a carve-out. It's, quite frankly, a nutty piece of legislation. It's unfortunate, because if the member had appeared and given a speech in the House tonight that actually talked about overcrowded prisons, backlogs in the courts, making sure that our police were well equipped, making sure that we were ensuring that we were addressing poverty and the reasons why domestic violence occurs, and why people go out and cause these crimes, then the member would have more respect when he got up and spoke in the House about these things. I guess describing this as being tough on crime—it's a subcategorising of manslaughter, a piece of legislation that will complicate the law. It won't work as law. It, basically, I guess—and, you know, it would be useful when the member gets up at the end of this first reading and actually gives his summation of what sits behind it, that he doesn't believe that judges can be trusted to make the right calls and that there's something wrong with the justice system, that we have to subcategorise a crime that should already be dealt with within our existing justice system.