There are some questions that I think the member needs to answer fairly quickly in order for us to progress a reasonable debate on this particular bill. The first is: was this bill discussed inside the Labour caucus, much as the Rotorua bill was, given that the two of them are extremely similar? Second question is: did the Attorney-General issue a New Zealand Bill of Rights Act statement that was consistent with the statement issued on the Rotorua bill? And the third point would be: what was the reference that the current Environment Canterbury council membership took from their constituencies to advance this bill? Because as a ratepayer in Canterbury, I do not recall ever being asked by the current council what my view was. It probably would have been a very favourable one—along the lines of let's get the democracy making the choices that would see this type of representation on the board, around the council table.