A little bit of background, just at the fact that the bill's come back in, I guess. We go back to the reality: this is Crown-owned land. There was the tragedy of the commons going way back, prior to 70 years, and, of course, the Crown realised that, actually, the land wasn't being looked after because there wasn't some vested interest. So they set up these Crown leases, which didn't give ownership of the land—that remained with the Crown—but gave the lessees the right to pasturage. It didn't give them the right to soil, but pasturage in perpetual renewal, which gave them certainty and quiet enjoyment—those were quaint kinds of things when you look back at them now. But none the less, we recognise the questions around the purpose; we recognise and respect those legal rights, and we're not trying to take them away. 