I don't need to take much more of the time of the House, I think. We're getting perilously close to the end of the evening's entertainment. And I use the phrase "entertainment" rather loosely, of course, but others can be the judge of that. Anyway, the key point really is that at its heart this is a framework bill—the clue's in the title. I think I'm right in saying that my colleague and friend Melissa Lee made this point in her own contribution: it's a framework, it's a foundation, it allows rules to be set under the primary legislation that this serves. And the way that that happens is a series of rules or regulations—and I use that phrase deliberately. The Regulations Review Committee—speaking of august bodies—wrote to the EDSI committee and made the point that rules could be made either by Order in Council or by the Minister. And the report does a pretty good job, I think, of explaining the distinction being based on the content of the rules. So that's, I think, enough from me—quite enough from me, indeed. So with that I leave my contribution, except only to say that on this side of the House, we've made it tolerably clear we do continue to support the bill.