This bill is very straightforward. It is a good thing. It says it should "not diminish a person's liberty, personal security, freedom of choice or action, or rights to own, use, and dispose of [their own] property" by regulation. Well, a law might do that, but we would have a full debate and a full process. When was the last time a committee in Parliament actually got to debate a regulation in full, as it does a law? The point of this is that they don't get to. This draft legislation says "not take or impair property without the consent of the owner unless certain criteria are satisfied". How is it the members opposite think it's a good thing that a Government can pass a regulation or, even worse than that, that, actually, as lazy members of Parliament and a lazy Government, their Ministers allow their officials to do it, to set the regulations and bring them forward? There are lots of Ministers on that side that sign them off, because the papers are very large and, actually, to read through them late at night would be too hard.