So I think that the Minister needs to answer questions as to why that is not something that officials and he have taken into account, because what we are dealing with in this piece of legislation amounts to property rights—property rights given and agreed in good faith between the Crown and the leaseholders. So that's the first question that I would have for the Minister: does he accept that pasture improvements belong to leaseholders? Does he accept that by this piece of legislation requiring consent to maintain all those improvements that if consent is not given then that is, effectively, stealing by the Crown by not granting consent to continue pastoral improvement, taking away a property asset and a right from those leaseholders?