Hon MARK MITCHELL: Well, that's very true. They've obviously been told what they're going to do with it. The reality of it is this: when the charges are laid, the police decide what the appropriate charge is—not the judges, not us as parliamentarians or legislators. It's the police that decide what charge is going to be applied. So to stand in this House—and I feel sorry for the other Labour speakers that are going to stand and respond to this, because they've got their speaking notes and they're going to get up and say the same thing. They're going to say, "Oh yes, we didn't like the mandatory part of the bill." We've taken that out. Simeon's put a very good Supplementary Order Paper in around cumulative sentencing, which we think goes a long way to actually sending that very positive message out there to our first responders. But they're going to get up and they're going to say, "The mandatory piece has been taken out, but, actually, now there's no substance to the bill." Yes, it's true. We are creating an offence, and, actually, that's substantive. That's important—that is important. But they're going to say it's disrupting the hierarchy of offending. Define that for this House and explain it to—