Now, when an immigration officer considers refugee status, they can decline refugee status but apply a protected person status. The last time that was done—in fact, I'm not revealing anything because this is spread across the New Zealand Herald, I think—was a Zimbabwean national who had been one of Mugabe's secret police and had committed war crimes, and therefore it made him ineligible for refugee status, but he was given by the immigration officer protected person status. He complained to me and requested—when I was Minister of Immigration—that he be granted residence as an exception to policy in order that he could work. I declined that. It's one thing not to be able to get rid of that fellow; it was another thing to legitimise his stay in New Zealand and allow him to work. Interestingly enough, having declined that, he left the country. I think that underscores the fact that sometimes what people say about their threats to their welfare is not always the case. That's, I think, what happened here. I'm speculating, but if the immigration officer in the first place did not believe his claims for protection and then revoked his refugee status because of fraudulent statements that had been made, it's almost certain that the immigration officer who nevertheless has that power did not deem him to be a protected person.