The other issue is around the way in which the benefit to New Zealand test operates. The fact that the changes that the select committee is recommending mean that the Minister is not able to take into account negative impacts, normally when a cost-benefit analysis is done, you look at the positive impacts and the detrimental ones. Yes, there was a High Court decision, but the way in which the law is evolving here, in the Green Party view, is contrary to common sense and focuses largely on a very narrow definition of benefits, which means that decision makers—Ministers—cannot weigh the negative and detrimental impacts, which we don't think is commonsensical. And it's not just Resource Management Act (RMA) issues here, but being able to look and make an overall broad judgment, which is the way decisions have been made in other areas of the law, such as the RMA, but is being excluded from happening in terms of assessing whether an application to purchase farmland is to the benefit of New Zealand. You should be able to weight the impacts of that as well as the economic benefits. So, overall, support the bill but still have some outstanding concerns with it.