My question is to the Minister on Part 2, clause 18, amended section 3(1), where we're amending the interpretation of "arms". I'm referring here to a submission that the Council of Licensed Firearms Owners (COLFO) placed. Actually, if we're going to refer to their submission, it's paragraphs 15 to 18 within the COLFO submission. They talked about inconsistencies in the use of words in the interpretation, and it appears that it is quite untidy. This legislation now introduces "firearms or related part" to the terminology in the Arms Act 1993. Some of the terms listed under this new definition are already listed and some are slightly differently defined.