So I guess my concern and question for the Minister is, given that this bill removes the substantive appeals process that normally is in place under the RMA and it still provides for appeals on points of law and judicial reviews, which—Madam Chair, it is in Part 1; it's clause 13. I see you looking at me. Given that the only real way in which a challenger could challenge a project like this, and given there are some meaty issues in some of the projects around water, and given the strong views held by iwi in this country over the issues of water and the use of water, the way in which the Minister's SOP changes the dynamic in relation to the consideration of the Treaty of Waitangi—where panels don't just have to give consideration to the principles; they have to act in a manner that's consistent with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi—it almost sets up a situation where the more stringent wording that will be in this Act versus the more relaxed wording under the RMA—challengers to any of the projects could simply use a High Court attack on the panel's decision on the basis of Treaty of Waitangi principles.