Now, this bill seeks to dismantle the role of the Children's Commissioner, a position that has been held for 33 years. It is extremely trusted, it is well known to the public, and I believe that it is of particular concern to those children and young people who are in State care. We do say, and I support the fact, that the bill's objectives are to strengthen the independent monitoring and complaints oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, because they are admirable goals, but this bill will not get us there. If we compare this bill to other radical changes that this Government has implemented into systems across sectors like health and tertiary education, we can have no faith that the changes in the oversight of Oranga Tamariki will be successful and deliver the outcomes that are suggested. The role of the Children's Commissioner is a precious one, I believe, and even the appointment of a Children's Commissioner is a very special position to hold. No one should be afraid of having someone who is completely independent of Government. I have to say, in my observations over the years, the former Children's Commissioner Judge Andrew Becroft did no favours to the Government that appointed him, and nor should he, because that was not his role; his role was to monitor and advocate for children, and that's exactly what he did. Sometimes those messages are difficult to hear, but that is how you build a system that is in continual improvement mode and will always be open to that improvement.