I guess, if you could imagine the situation where you are on a sole parent benefit, you're not necessarily having the support of a wider family or whānau, you're not necessarily having a good social structure around you, and then you have a second child—and don't even get me started on contraception in this country and the rights of our mums to carry children or not—and somehow you are punished for that. You're not supposed to be able to have another child while you are a beneficiary, apparently, and you're required to go out to work after one year. That, to me, smacks of beneficiary bashing, and I will say that—I will say that. It does not enable anyone to do better by forcing a person to go out and do that work, particularly if you are a single parent, you are on a sole benefit, and you are lacking in resources. 