My particular question is around, there has been some commentary around the—I guess you could say they're the carbon farmers, or those looking for permanent forest sinks, and when we're talking about forestry, we're talking about plantation forestry most of the time in our own minds when we're discussing this, but there is also a place for permanent carbon sinks, particularly in the more erosion-prone land. I think we've seen a good example up Gisborne way on the East Coast two or three years ago where we had a significant environmental impact from, perhaps, forestry in areas that may not have been suited to it. So I think part of the mix will be, in some areas, some permanent forest sinks. And it may open us up to some diversification of income around, say, mānuka honey and the like, so it's a different way to skin the cat, I guess. But those investors that are looking to get into that space have expressed some concern that there's a wee bit of lack of flexibility where they've, maybe, taken out existing plantation forestry, that they're looking to maybe not incur the liability there if they can plant somewhere else, and I'd be just interested in the Minister's thinking around that. Is there merit in that suggestion, and getting a bit more of his thinking. Thank you.