So finally, then, but most importantly, the victims of crime deserve not only that general sense of justice, not only that physical, real, tangible notion of safety, but also they need to have some sort of certainty, where possible, in relation to the conduct of their victims, the movement of their victims, the ability of their victims to threaten and revictimise them. So to the extent that there is certainty provided by the three strikes regime—yes, to the extent that that's inconsistent with judicial discretion, that's unusual—but to the extent that provides some certainty for the victims about the amount of time from which they will be free from being terrorised by their previous tormentor, then that's a good thing, we say. We are on the side of the victims and we therefore, for all the reasons we have said today, oppose the repeal of the three strikes legislation.