Here's another problem with this piece of legislation: the fact that it's being done under urgency. Now, there are sometimes good practical reasons to put things through under urgency. The temporary bill to deregulate party pill testing for one summer, with an expiry date on the legislation—that was a good use of urgency, because it actually is urgent, because the problem is right before us. The reason for urgency that was given by the Leader of the House on this legislation is "Well, we campaigned on it and we want to do it really quickly." So forget checks and balances. Forget the right of the public to have a say; it's another case of "We won. You lost. Eat that." Maybe the Labour Party think that's kind of fun for now, but they should reflect on what sort of contribution that is to our democracy—what sort of leadership, what sort of kindness, dare I say it, are they bringing by putting a bill through under urgency for purely political purposes? I think that that is a great shame.