But, anyway, back to the clause, because that's what we're here for. So what I'm looking for—the question for the Minister is to clarify, one, why have we decided to just take the opportunity to extend this for perpetuity? Two, how does he see that the detail—and, I guess, my concern is there's a bit of a weakness in terms of the drafting here around, you know, what is in relation to COVID-19. And, therefore, also, I guess, if there's no end date, then I guess the question is: what's the incentive to actually work to close the availability of that power? What incentive is there to actually do that? Because you'll just say, "Well, it's in regards to COVID-19, so it'll continue and continue." So I'd be interested for a little bit of context in regards to that.