The third thing is you talk about the cost to the business owner, but what about the cost not only to the police but to the people who have had their goods stolen, who have suffered the crime? They're the people who have lost their mementos, their housing, stuff that in many cases is precious to them. These are the bits that are taken to these second-hand dealers and sold. It's not the only way they get rid of it, but it's an important avenue for crime. So what about the cost to them and to society in general for not allowing the police the right to be able to get data that's already collected in a machine-readable form? I just don't accept the proposition about compliance costs. There is a cost to the police. There is a cost to the individuals who have lost those items. There is a cost to society in general. This is an easy way of dealing with that.