In respect of the question of utes, again, I think this is actually a broader policy and political debate—I'm not entirely clear on the link to Part 1—but, if I can respond briefly, the point of this scheme as I've described is to ensure that New Zealand's fleet is geared towards cleaner vehicles. We are going to get a supply of cleaner vehicles across all vehicle types. We have that in many cases—in the United States, this year we're already seeing electric vehicles coming into the fleet. Within New Zealand we know that the majority of utes that are bought and sold are actually bought and sold on the used market, which isn't impacted at all by the clean car discount scheme. And of course, yeah there's a little bit of typecasting here. Yes it's well understood that utes are an important of rural life, but actually so are other vehicles, and people in every part of New Zealand will get better access to those and the cost savings and environmental benefits of them, including people in rural communities. We're already seeing those numbers going pretty well there. But, ultimately, providing widespread exemptions in a scheme like this ends up being a mug's game, because the whole range of sectors can make an argument, and you end up undermining the scheme.