My thinking behind this is that having a specific offence makes it easier for tracking and recording of this type of offence. It creates an alternative offence, previously covered by manslaughter. In the cases of manslaughter there is a degree of mens rea or mental intent that the prosecution has to establish, that a reasonable person, in the offender's position, would realise they were exposing the victim to significant risk of serious injury. In this bill, there is no need to prove that death was reasonably foreseeable. It can be laid as an alternative charge to manslaughter, so there is more opportunity to get a guilty plea as a 20-year maximum versus life imprisonment can be plea bargained out. Now, I know we don't have plea bargaining officially in New Zealand, but it happens all the time. So you have situations where a defence lawyer can negotiate the alternative charge, and, therefore, save the court system the time, the stress, the agony, and the grief that victims' families have to go through. So for that fact alone, it's with bringing this bill in—for that fact alone.