The committee itself, as the member Melissa Lee said, raised concerns that a designated grocery retailer may be able to make unreasonable claims for compensation or damages from their landlord because of the bill making exclusivity covenants in their lease unenforceable. And that's the nub of it. Section 89 of the Commerce Act has the potential to facilitate a process of renegotiating the lease, if this is appropriate, to reflect actual losses incurred by the supermarket from greater exposure to competition in the area. The committee's concern—at least, as I understand it—was about landlords having little protection against the potential for supermarkets to abuse that process.