But, secondly, I don't believe that his explanation of why we are considering reverting back to the original wording of the bill is adequate. We have Treaty of Waitangi legislation and principles that are clearly articulated in clause 6 as it was reported back to the House, and the Minister's not happy with that. So he's going to ask the House to do the opposite of what it just did half an hour ago at second reading, and it's doubled down on that, because it's adding a number of other clauses into it which continue to refer back to section 6—it will be—through clause 34 and its schedules. 