The member Chris Bishop is correct that the judgment, whilst it makes no finding that the decision was illegal, because there has not yet been a substantive hearing of that point, suggests that the Government looks at the issue because, as Chris Bishop has said and Minister Verrall has also acknowledged, there is a doubt as to whether the plain words of the existing Medicines Act, which only allows provisional approvals for a limited number of patients, are sufficient to cover the breadth of vaccination that is intended in respect of the COVID roll-out. 