I don't want to overstate the case, but I believe there's an ideological difference between the two sides of the House in this matter: comparing the approach whereby, on the one hand, we favour bringing on board the clubs, communities of interest within our communities more broadly, and expecting and hoping that we would be able to gain some value from understanding on the ground what the situation is with regard to members, and on the other hand, and across the side of the House that is currently in Government, a belief, rather, in the power of the State to understand and to record and to be able to control better than the citizenry can its members, and to understand the dangers that are posed. For that reason, I contrast directly the proposal by the Government in relation to creating a register, which would be envisaged to be omniscient and therefore can be regarded as worthy of omnipotence, as compared with we on this side of the House, who believe that it's more valuable to be able to understand from a practical perspective what those who belong to these clubs are actually all about.