Just quickly, on maths illiteracy and numeracy—as Paul Goldsmith has mentioned, some of the stats that New Zealand faces at the moment are not good. Typically, the studies that he will be referring to are the likes that Programme for International Student Assessment tend to be surveying and sampling secondary school students. I point out to him that all of those secondary students being sampled are the national standards generation. They went through the vast majority of their schooling at a time when national standards were there. Without national standards, what are our alternatives? More robust statistical sampling is a way of getting good information. We do have those very robust studies available that actually provided genuine national snapshots. National standards didn't; they weren't national and they weren't standard. Different schools were interpreting them differently and the results were not comparable. So the sampling studies that we have are actually more reliable. We have got a big focus on professional development on strategies for how we can improve our literacy and numeracy teaching. Those sorts of things are going to do far more to turn those statistics around than something like national standards, which actually did the opposite.