Much of this is stuff that most people would take for granted. This Regulatory Standards Bill, like the Constitution Act and other constitutional innovations before it, codifies and puts them on the record. It also puts in place a number of requirements for good lawmaking questions that lawmakers—which means the Minister responsible in the case of a Government bill, the member in charge in the case of a member's bill, or the chief executive of the relevant department in the case of a piece of secondary legislation—must sign a certificate saying the principles have been met. They must ask what problem we're trying to solve. Do other laws already solve the problem? Is there an easy way to solve this problem without making any law? What are the costs of the law? Who pays those costs? What are the benefits? Do the benefits exceed the costs? All things that, I think, most people in this House would actually want a Government to do, as well as ensuring the relevant people have been consulted. This is just raising the standards of lawmaking and regulation in New Zealand. 