Thank you for the point of order that was raised a little earlier. I'm referring to Speaker's ruling 16/6. There isn't a clear ruling on the specific incidents but generally, in terms of a member changing seats to make a contribution, it is generally regarded to lead to disorder because a member can tend to move to their advantage. In this case, however, my ruling is that the member in question, relying on Speaker's ruling 16/6 as I have, but more specifically the Minister is appearing in a financial review as part of a Minister's team and, therefore, I judge that to be in order.