However, for this piece of legislation, it is a good thing. The reason for that is we have hard-working construction companies, small businesses, builders, electricians, plumbers, up and down the country who are out there helping to rebuild parts of the country for us. And, of course, when they are subcontracting, they don't hold the entire contract themselves. Where the larger company that holds the contract fails, they often are left out of pocket, and that can create a lot of additional stress upon their businesses. Of course, there is always money left over. The liquidators come in or the receiver, they look at what the assets are, the liabilities, they free them up. But inevitably, the subcontractors, individuals or companies, are not preferential debtors, and, therefore, they miss out. And it's not right that they do because inevitably, also, money has been paid for the construction work. There was an example of the hospital in Rotorua that was completed. It was finished. There was additional work that the DHB wanted done to make sure it was up to the standard. The subcontractors and others had met their obligation or responsibility. Money was held back as part of the contract with the overall contract holder so that the DHB could make sure the work that they had contracted for was done, and inevitably that company ran into trouble and the subcontractors themselves were likely to miss out. I do understand the DHB came to an arrangement so that they wouldn't miss out, because many of them were good, hard-working local people of Rotorua. So this legislation will help with that.