In terms of whether or not the courts are the right people to make the decision about whether or not someone should be subject to a firearms prohibition order, the Government's view is that they should be. If you took the member's implied argument in that question to its logical conclusion, the judges would have no discretion and there would be mandatory sentences in legislation. But we don't do that as a Parliament, by and large, because we acknowledge that, you know, the judges have a difficult job to weigh up all of the circumstances of a case and to make sure that the sentence is proportionate.