There is, in my view, considerable confusion about what the Speaker's true position is. He has said that on the morning of 22 May 2019 he believed that a rapist was in the building. He's told the Governance and Administration Committee he knew within 24 hours that that was not true. He's apparently maintained the position that it was true and done so in legal proceedings for many months afterwards, and, in spite of his apology at the select committee and his settlement and payment to the person who was accused, or at least the taxpayers' payment, tonight he appears—or at least the Minister appears to have repeated the accusation almost acting as judge, jury, and executioner about what happened in the matter.