But I emphasise that we already have laws in place which can be used to hold those to account who try to exploit vulnerable consumers. Even if we take the Minister's argument at its highest that this bill improves market conditions for consumers, such a proposition fails the sniff test. Again, if we look at Australia—which has a much larger and more complex trading environment—since the unconscionable cultural trading legislation which passed in 2010, 11 years ago, they've only had 16 cases that have been brought to their courts. The bottom line: this bill is a solution in search of a problem. The problem has been clearly defined and the definition has not been clearly defined. It fails to provide the certainty that is the responsibility of Government to provide to our business community. So with that, I would say I do not recommend this bill to the House.