Carrying on what has been a very bad set of puns, Minister, throughout the evening—because I'm sort of wanting to reference the Minority Report and Looper, looking into the future—one of your colleagues, Rachel Boyack, has a bill that's going to be read tomorrow around plain language. I'm curious to know that if, through the bill, where you've mentioned plain language, whether you and your officials have had any thought to what that actually means. And by that I mean what does plain language mean legally right now? Do you have any conception—not an Inception; again, a very bad movie reference. But any conceptions of what this bill, in the future, that one of your party is pushing—what does plain language actually mean? And again, to draw it back to Part 3, clauses 31 and following, why is it that the collective contracts, their form and content, is not prescribed to be in plain language in the same way that we've seen it prescribed in Part 2?