The bill on the table tonight is designed so the Government can basically say, "We acknowledge there's a problem and we want to give some people who have lost their job more recently more money." Now, I can understand they're very bluntly coming at the problem. The reason I oppose the bill is that we don't vote on the intentions of the Government; we vote on what the bill actually does, and what the bill does, as far as we can tell, is it legitimises an incredibly blunt response where if you earn less than $100,000 or if your partner does, then you get money. If you lost your job on one side of a date, then you get money; if you lost your job on the other side of a certain date, you don't get money, and it is just such a blunt instrument. It's going to create, as some of the other members have said, massive and perceptible unfairness, and it's going to build resentment as it does it. 