The Minister is, effectively, through these mechanisms, in our view, setting the price. I know that he's splitting hairs and saying, "Oh, well, I just do the mechanism that then sets the price; it's two different things", but, effectively, the Minister is setting the price. We have made it very clear in round two of our speeches that we do consider that anything akin to setting a tax needs—the long-established principle of this place is that the Parliament alone has the power to tax, not the Government, not the Minister of Climate Change, but this Parliament. That is our view. We do understand that this Parliament can't debate the mechanism, because then it would be public and that would defeat the whole purpose of having a secret mechanism to set a secret price—we understand that. But what we're asking the Minister tonight, very clearly, is to consider a compromise whereby he involves the leaders of the Opposition parties when he is setting that mechanism. As per Stuart Smith's tabled amendment, that's the compromise that we're asking for. As Scott Simpson said, in the words of Kennedy Graham, and the Minister has said this himself on many occasions, that this legislation needs to have the buy-in of all parties, that we want cross-party support, we want cross-party work. Well, this is the opportunity for the Minister to put his words into action by supporting our tabled amendment and allowing the Opposition leaders to be consulted over this particular part of the legislation. 