I do want to address, also, the way in which we went about the question of age, because that was something that came up a lot. There were people who felt that we should have a firmer mechanism for recording the consent of these people who were making these images. It was felt that if we put in a requirement that if you wanted to post something, you had to have someone's written consent—that would magically sort things out. But, actually, when you are talking about young, young people being targeted for this in such vulnerable moments of sexual intimacy, we didn't believe that we could actually rely on written consent being given fully or safely. It was too open to manipulation, and we have seen that happen to women too often. So, instead, we decided to go with an age limit, and we have tied the age of 16 to the age of consent in the Crimes Act. Now, that still allows for the indecent images provisions to come in if it is necessary under the video classification Act, but we feel this is the safest and most sensible way to protect our young people and to ensure that in their vulnerability, they will not be exploited.