But the second issue you have is that the bill says that one of its purposes is to have a distribution impact. So this is Jamie Strange's point: that somehow this is going to create a new dawn of fairness in New Zealand. Again, we do need to look at the objective numbers here, because what the analysis from Treasury says is that this will have a tiny, negligible impact on inequality. Absolutely tiny. There is that wonky way that Treasury measure this: it's called the—I'm going to mispronounce this—the Gini coefficient, and what the analysis shows is that that number reduces from 0.493 to 0.491, a 0.2 percent reduction. It is absolutely tiny, and, again, what this does is it shows you that the high level argument, "Oh, it's going to raise a lot of revenue to help pay down debt, it's going to make New Zealand fairer."—none of those arguments are backed up by the numbers.