As part of that, I've been fascinated in the two key areas, and that's, first of all, coming up against, you know, the legal requirements of mens rea and actus reus—the very fundaments of what it is in a guilty verdict and how we break that down in a way that meets the needs for the courtroom and the criminal justice system. How those very words, which seem so basic to lawyers, can be so offensive to the ears of victims and their family, and to have a discussion around how that takes place with both lawyers and with mental health and health experts—debating that out, how we take care of those needs. I'd like to see more debates like that in the future for New Zealand. I think it's a great area for us to look at, how two separate worlds intersect and how we can provide more effectively for people in their everyday lives by having conversations that go far beyond just an Act, that go far beyond what the requirements are in a textbook or a statute, and how that filters down into everyday lives. So that's been a fascinating process.