That is a constitutional abomination, really, and I would have thought that—notwithstanding their desire as a Government to emulate, in every possible way, the worst aspects of Robert Muldoon and his administration, particularly towards the end of that administration. Here they are adopting exactly the same kind of modus operandi that got him into trouble. It is potentially possible, I would imagine, with the passing of this legislation, that some bright-spark law student somewhere may want to dig out the judgment relating to Fitzgerald v Muldoon, and think to themselves, "Well, actually, there are very similar parallels here". And perhaps a case could be brought in the judiciary to test out the legitimacy of this Government actually by fiat, by regulation, by proclamation saying, "Oh, well, we're going to start paying out before the legislation is passed, and we'll worry about the detail, we'll worry about the mere passing of legislation in the Parliament of New Zealand—that's a mere detail—