The wording of the amendment is too ambiguous and it won't provide that greater clarity in law which the member is striving to achieve in order to facilitate that front-line ability to prosecute. It will not achieve that outcome. The wording of the amendment of the bill, "or unlawful taking", provides no definition and no reference, furthermore, as to where we might find this definition. So it is leaving it to the courts or it is leaving it to be further divined, and that is not good legislation and not good use of this House's time.