So what this piece of legislation does is it actually is that small step forward to have 200—just 200—entities report in a consistent, regulated, measured way the risks relating to the investments that they have in terms of climate impacts. Now, that's of itself, not a bad thing, but it's a very small step in the right direction. But it is a part of an evolution in accounting practices, and it's not too dissimilar to the changes in accounting practices that occurred in years gone by in terms of triple bottom line reporting, when businesses started taking into account environmental aspects in their business practices in the way that they reported to shareholders and stakeholders and indeed to customers. And it's also not dissimilar in a way to the changes that occurred in the last few decades around accredited third-party standardisation of a range of factors in business—the International Organization for Standardization accreditation programme, and I can remember being involved in businesses that went through those programmes. It wasn't so much because, initially, the business wanted to do; it was because our customers and stakeholders and shareholders wanted us to do it. An earlier speaker actually made mention of that. So that will be a prime driver. 