Similarly, the reduction of the period of time in which a person needed to remain in isolation, or quarantine, down from 10 days to seven days—again a sensible move in the context of what was happening at that time. Minister Hipkins already talked about the need for flexibility in relation to when a person would leave a managed isolated quarantine facility—not wanting to have them arbitrarily detained for longer, or by way of unintended consequence, given that the intent we accepted in the committee was to allow an orderly departure and not have someone thrown out on to the street at midnight, not to put too fine a point on it. So this was an example of an engagement with the Minister, by way of letters of course, and it happens over a period of time, but the response was along the lines that the Minister stood by his interpretation, I guess, in terms of the way that order could be interpreted. We were satisfied that that point had been noted and understood, and as the Minister has already said, sometimes these things would flow through to subsequent orders—a lesson having been learnt, as opposed to necessarily meaning that the order would be amended on the spot, or let alone struck down. 