Speaking of delay, I think it's worth considering the issue in this case of judicial delay. This place, this branch of Government, is always very careful to separate itself from the judiciary, but we have a responsibility (a) to pass laws guiding things like sentencing and when things should be done, and also to resource the courts accordingly. The fact that a case of this import, of this threat, of this seriousness was still before the IPT at the time of the attack I think is a question that warrants examination. Was it a resource issue? Was it a triaging issue? The Immigration Act actually requires the IPT to expedite a case of deportation liability for a person who was incarcerated and to make that determination prior to the person's parole in order that if the appeal is not upheld, deportation can occur straight away. There's no legal basis in this scenario, but I think there should be. That's one of the things that I think we can look at as a law change.