And when I move on through the research on this, I come to the next problem with it: there are no safeguards. When you look at the response here, it is not only a one-size-fits-all but there are absolutely no safeguards as to what principals are supposed to do with this information. When a principal is given this information, how is it that they are supposed to address it? There is no guidance here. How are they going to protect privacy? How are they going to ensure that their response does not become the nexus and the catalyst for vigilantism? Because that has happened. I would refer you to the well-known example of the Welsh doctor who was a paediatrician whose house was attacked and who was attacked because people misunderstood. There is an unfortunate fact that in the studies—and there are many—of these sorts of responses, these sorts of registers, between three-quarters and about a third of the information is often out of date and wrong. In the US, there are many examples of innocent people being attacked who happen to live in a house where an offender used to live. Is that the sort of thing that is going to protect children? Absolutely not.