The other one that I really wanted to touch on in my contribution here was around the broadening of the scope of the levy. That's an area that, again, has come up in numerous discussions I've had around the ability to utilise I think it's about $60 million - odd worth of surplus levy at the moment to make some proactive changes, or improvements, in different areas, rather than just having that levy there and maybe offsetting it and reducing the levy over time until it dwindles down. But broadening the scope, as proposed here, enables some practical changes to be brought forward, in my view, and I'm really excited by that particular aspect, to give a bit more flexibility to, I think, tick some of those boxes that we're hearing from industry need to be explored in more detail and, obviously, funded alongside that.