The reason I'm asking this particular question is in relation to my amendment, which seeks to have an independent review of that confidential reserve price mechanism to actually look at the whole reasoning behind it, and whether not only is it working in the way intended and not actually increasing the risks rather than reducing them but also in going so far as to consider whether or not the market is actually able to function as it should. And there may not, in fact, be a need either for a reserve at all or a secret reserve price, which would take away all of the concerns that we have on this side of the House around who sets that mechanism that flows through into the price and all of the bits and bobs that go around that that we're worried about.