It is worth noting—and I do so in an entirely non-cynical manner—that for a lawyer to zealously represent the interests of their clients in a courtroom may result in a more lengthy, more adversarial process than would otherwise be the case if, for example, there were out-of-court settlements. That is a feature of that system, not a bug. So the question then in the background to this bill, and, indeed, any changes that may be made in the Family Court and children-affected system in particular, is whether there's a better way. Is there an opportunity instead to have disputes or scenarios resolved other than by involving lawyers and adversarial court processes? The answer of course is yes, and notwithstanding that our court system as it currently operates is not perfect, we have an opportunity every time we stand in this House to speak on a piece of legislation or Government policy to suggest a way that things could be done better than is being proposed, which is not, of course, the same thing as to say that the system as it currently exists is perfect—frankly, it is not. 