So I first want to start off by talking about the shoddy process that's led us here to the third reading, because I think it gives context to the issues that we've found in the bill throughout the process. Not only was it rushed, it was put forward in a very unusual manner. This is a bipartisan approach with two parties that have zero credibility on solving the housing crisis. That's why they stood up to have a bipartisan approach, because they wanted to abandon attacking each other on an issue that they both have no credibility on. They considered the benefit of standing up on podiums side by side in the media, saying that they had found a solution, before they considered the people that would be affected by their law change. They considered themselves before the people of New Zealand, and that's why we ended up in a process that was secret, because it was so much more important that they wouldn't spoil the surprise and the announcement that they'd somehow just solved the housing crisis, and they couldn't possibly tell anybody what they'd been up to because, you know, that would spoil it for everybody. And that's a shame, because bipartisan approaches shouldn't be a bad thing, but the result is a bad policy that won't actually work and it won't solve the problem, because they've misdiagnosed it.