Because we're not talking about, as I think members of the Opposition seem to believe, a registry that the police can refer to. The police have access to convictions. The police already know if you're a convicted sex offender; the conviction doesn't disappear. We're talking about a registry that's accessed by other agencies, that will apply to—Housing New Zealand case workers may have access to it. It may come into your Ministry of Social Development file. So we're talking about much broader access than that, and we're talking about something that both the Supreme Court and the Attorney-General agree constitutes further punishment than what the Sentencing Act has sentenced someone to. We're talking about going beyond what sentence a person has already served. We're talking about the idea that rehabilitation after a sentence of imprisonment, after the rehabilitation programmes the courts have already sentenced someone to, then applies and undermines any idea that our justice system can be fair, that a sentence can be finite, that a case can actually finish and a person can rejoin society. 