So I'd like to ask the Minister if he actually stands by his statement. If so, why? If not, why not? There are also a couple of other questions that I'd actually like to ask. In terms of that, I note that the new legislation will amend the recently inserted section 34A of the COVID-19 Public Health Response Act 2020 that was only just debated last week, as I said, Groundhog Day. In particular, it amends subsection (1) to add the following further subsection as new subsection B, and I quote, "enforcing the Act or a COVID-19 order (including for the purposes of proceedings against a person for non-compliance)". Why does the Minister actually believe this new section is, in fact, needed, when he said we didn't need to actually amend anything last week?