Now, the reason we supported the Minister's Supplementary Order Paper, even though the Minister didn't support Christopher Luxon's Supplementary Order Paper the other day, was because it does give time, because we actually think that Taumata Arowai has got quite a bit on their hands just trying to work through the process for the larger suppliers, let alone the smaller suppliers. But what was interesting the other day, also, during the debate the other day, in response to Penny Simmonds, the very good National MP for Invercargill, the Minister quoted from a letter from Federated Farmers, from Andrew Hoggard, and said, "I want to take from a letter I received"—and I'm quoting this now—"on 21 September, from Andrew Hoggard, national president of Federated Farmers, the following quote, and I apologise for the length of time taken to extract this quote for the committee's benefit. He has said: 'It is encouraging that compliance with acceptable solutions, including end-point treatment, will remove the need for drinking water safety plans and source water risk management plans, and that consumer complaints processes will not apply to various small suppliers. We support more time being provided in the legislation for registration of water suppliers, and we welcome your assurance that registration processes will be simple and free with templates and guidance available. Much will depend on the detail of acceptable solutions for small rural water supplies.' …" So, in the quote that I've just read here, Federated Farmers understand that it will be free, with templates, and there will be guidance available, but much will depend on the detail. So, over here, I'm a little bit confused about what the detail is, because what the bill says, what Federated Farmers says, the seven years—all of this stuff is starting to sound a bit contradictory, which is worrying in itself.