This bill is not about putting people off standing for office within local government. And while that was a view that may have been expressed by some at the first reading, reason has prevailed and the bill before us, I think, strikes a very good balance between the requirement to disclose interests alongside that of maintaining a level of personal privacy. It's certainly my view that those who are elected to public office can expect to forego some degree of privacy, but they should not be expected to forego all aspects of their privacy, and some of the changes certainly do cover that. A change in particular around what would be publicly available would be a summary of the information rather than the register itself. That also takes into account the importance of personal safety issues that was raised as part of the committee of the whole House stage. Where the bill has eventually landed, I think, is again a good balance between transparency but also the views that have been expressed by the Privacy Commissioner and the initial view expressed by the Attorney-General on the initial vet of the bill.