I note that there was a case that went to the Waitangi Tribunal seeking to overturn the mandate, which was not successful; the Waitangi Tribunal acknowledged that the mandate should stand and have basis to stand but did acknowledge significant flaws in the Crown's actions in the process of this settlement. I do also at this point note that in that settlement, the Waitangi Tribunal noted that the Crown still had no policy or strategy for engaging with groups that did not fit neatly into its large natural groupings rubric, and this left these groups and their claims with no clear pathway forward. This is outstanding work of this Parliament—for us to be able to find that way—and I do encourage, as is always the case, that through the select committee process people bring their voices to have them acknowledged in this process, for us to be able to hear them and to see if there are ways to be able to acknowledge them. But on that moment, we can note the limitations on the process and the flaws on the behalf of the Crown; none of that undermines the work of the negotiators and iwi getting to this point, and it does—we can celebrate and critique at the same time. 