For example—and I know that the Food & Grocery Council's Katherine Rich's submission was actually quoted by Mr Bayly. But would you think that even childcare services is considered a supermarket activity? Banking, finance, arts and craft, even men's shoes and hairdressing is considered supermarket activity, and it is actually built into some of these leases, which makes it potentially unable for one of these shops, a hairdressing salon, to open up at these stores, whether it's actually a Westfield, that one of the supermarkets might have an exclusive covenant in. So it could also mean that a childcare centre could not potentially open up, because it would be deemed part of the lease where the supermarket entity, the grocery entity—one of the two duopolies—have an exclusivity with the landlord. I'm sure that that's not what they intended to do, perhaps, but it is there and it does actually prevent these entities from actually opening up other competition to the supermarket entity that exists.