It says, "enabling decision-makers to consider the impacts of investments [including] water bottling … bulk water extraction for human consumption [or] water quality and sustainability;". So hang on a minute. We have a resource management regime in this country that is supposed to mean that any kind of activity complies with environmental sustainability. That's what the Resource Management Act (RMA) says. Then we're saying there's going to be a different test if foreign investment's involved. Well, that's very interesting. The suggestion seems to be that somehow the RMA is not enough, and if that's true, we should be really worried about all the locally owned water bottling and extraction operations. On the other hand, if the RMA is adequate and we are properly managing the environments in New Zealand, why would we care who the investment was from on environmental grounds? So again, needlessly making the law more complex.