The second change that was made in the select committee process is actually a very important one, a change that is really important to all these Auckland regional amenities, and that change is about retrospective validation. I'm mindful, and all members on the select committee were mindful, that it's not a common practice for us in Parliament to make any changes that have a retrospective validation, especially where there is some non-compliance. But in this case, it's a very different case because this is a minor, a technical, change that we are making to benefit all these Auckland regional amenities. This non-compliance is not harming any other entity or third party. I have already talked about this before the dinner break—that the standard that is required as per the Auckland Regional Amenities Funding Act 2008 doesn't apply anyway to these Auckland regional amenities because they are registered as charities under the Charities Act 2005. So this is actually something that we should have fixed when section 42A of the Charities Act 2005 commenced, but it got overlooked. That's why the Auckland regional amenities are required to prepare their financial statements as per these two different standards that are prescribed in these two different pieces of legislation. But they have been complying with the Charities Act 2005, and they have been preparing their financial statements in accordance with public benefit entity standards. So this is something that we must note: that they have been complying with one of these two standards, and they have been complying with the Charities Act 2005.