Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE (National): That opening salvo really does behove a response. The idea that actually understanding what the cost of this bill is on, firstly, the taxpayer and then, secondly, potentially on the aged care facilities is not part of the bill, I think is an outrageous comment. The very point of the bill is to pay money to people. The problem we've got as a committee of the whole is that because we're rushing this through under urgency and it hasn't had the scrutiny of the Health Committee and the departmental disclosure statement makes zero reference to the cost, that means this committee—this committee—has to do that work. And it worries me that the Minister deflects what I think are pretty straightforward mathematical questions about the cost of this legislation. Sure, there's no particular clause in the bill that says that's the total sum, but that's the effect of the clause in Schedule 2, and I think we need to know it. 