DAVID SEYMOUR (Leader—ACT): Thank you very much, Madam Chair. I want to thank the Minister for answering some of the questions that were asked, but sometimes it's the questions that the Minister doesn't get up and answer that are the most revealing. Now, I just want to restate, as I was asking last time I had the call on this committee—I want to understand what the purpose of this bill is. Is it to get overall vaccination rates up, as some Labour Party members have claimed during this debate? Or is it to protect people from each other, acknowledging that some people who are vaccinated are less likely to infect people who are not? And if it's the latter, which is what the Minister said, and I think that's what should be the purpose of this legislation, then why is there so much reference in the interpretation section, and, indeed, most of the bill, to "vaccination", but very little reference, certainly in terms of interpretation and definition, to what it means to be tested and what sort of testing regimes might be put in place?