So part of me thought that wouldn't it be great if we didn't need something like this? Because you saw a trusted relationship across multiple entities who could build homes and housing of all sorts. So I thought earlier today that this is obviously what success looks like, and long may it be. From the conversation that I had with the main contractor there—I said, "Look, this is what's happening in Parliament." People are always eager to know—believe it or not—what we're doing. I said that this piece of work is coming through. I thought, how relevant could it be considering the work that they are doing and the work we are doing? So one of them sent me an article about retentions and the insights from the Ebert Construction insolvency case and some practical advice for subcontractors. It actually came from Lane Neave, a national legal company. But in here, it gave some really good definitions about the very issues that that are covered by this bill. Even when I looked at the situation with Ebert here, it actually says that for the most part Ebert had complied with all of its statutory obligations, however, just during those final months, accounting systems etc. began to break down, other administrative errors crept in, and then it fell short of the total retentions owed to subcontractors. 