I just want to quickly rehearse one of the arguments about these so-called safe harbours, these exemptions for the directors' liabilities. I think it's really important at this time when we are saying, "Haven't the officials done such a wonderful job and the Minister done such a wonderful job?" The officials told the Epidemic Response Committee that it was necessary to change the law to a more liberal version, because the law was already liberal but directors didn't understand that. And if that's difficult to follow, I don't blame anyone who doesn't follow that. It was difficult for us too. The problem with that is that if it's true that directors are just too dumb to follow the law—according to officials advising the committee—then surely the right thing to do is educate them on what the law is, not change the law to what the law is supposed to be so somehow they'll understand that the law is what it is, which is, effectively, the argument that we got from the officials on the committee. 