Issues around the question of the role of the governor and him being on the board have been live discussions throughout the process. The decision was made—and this was an example in response to my comments that I made to Mr Bayly earlier—of where there were differing views amongst the stakeholders involved in this about exactly how this should work in terms of the governor, and the judgment that we made was that given the very particular role of the governor, it is best that they were represented on the board. That is also the position in a number of other central banks as well, and it's largely to do with the coordination of monetary and financial policy and the fact that the governor still occupies a very unique role. Even though we've now moved to the position of a committee-based structure for monetary policy, the governor can provide that level of coordination between financial policy and monetary policy that makes him an appropriate member of the board. 