Another is that a person has the right to be present and present a defence at their own trial. In fact, what we are seeing by the proposal that as a matter of course pre-trial cross-examination may take place is that a person will not only not necessarily be present at their trial, as other provisions might indicate, but actually that the trial need not be the complete record of the interaction used to determine whether a person is innocent or guilty of the crime as charged. I know that wording is somewhat laboured, but I've attempted to explain in a clear and concise fashion the fact that we would have trial activity before the trial is undertaken, and the problematic nature of that for determining whether a trial has been carried out in a fair fashion should be obvious to all.