So what does it actually do? The hand of the State enters to set this implied clause in commercial leases to require a rent adjustment where a tenant can't gain access to their premises to do business. It then requires that where this is the case, a rent adjustment is required for a "fair proportion of the rent". Of course, the bill creates a whole new box of uncertainty because "fair proportion of the rent" is not defined, and as anyone will appreciate, what that is is as long as a piece of string. It depends utterly on the circumstances of the parties who are affected. So there is no end to dispute promised by this bill, but simply the opening of doors into more dispute, and the bill specifically provides that any dispute must then be referred for arbitration, unless parties can agree to mediation or contract. It makes a grand assumption that the State is better placed to decide how the parties to a contract resolve their difficulties than those parties are themselves, and we take issue with that. 