Now, the important thing to look at here is that the bill makes live streaming of objectionable content a criminal offence. Objectionable content is something that I think we are not confused about. "Objectionable" is deemed "likely to be injurious to the public good."—i.e., torture, sexual violence, terrorism, and child sexual abuse. The slippery slope argument is not one that I find powerful. I think that we are all clear that incidents such as the acts of terror that we witnessed on that day are objectionable, and I would really like to challenge anybody who feels that streaming information like that and images like that across the country without restriction or the ability to prevent them being spread, as they do, like wildfire is something we really need to have the capacity to do. We can't wait for five days. 