Some of these things, with all the best intentions in the world, the regulators are tied to the legislation that they have to work under. And if they can't work efficiently through that, then it is not only an economic cost but also potentially a health cost and an environmental cost. I note that there's only a relatively small cost-benefit here of $10 million to our economy over 10 years, which doesn't sound like a lot. I actually wonder about that assessment, because I seriously doubt that includes the cost to the users of these chemicals, the opportunity cost that's lost because of these chemicals not coming into the country in a timely manner or, in fact, being removed if they are no longer appropriate, because I suspect that would be a lot more than $10 million. But we will explore that through that process. 