I think we've talked about previously—and certainly I've recorded in the Supplementary Order Paper regarding the pre-trial recording of cross-examination—the fact that, under section 103 of the Evidence Act already, evidence can be directed to be given in an alternative way, including, for example, pre-recorded by way of cross examination that is before the trial starts. That does lead to an interesting point around the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, section 25(e), which I don't believe was traversed particularly thoroughly, with all due respect, in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act vet and advice in relation to the bill. So that's the right of a person to be present at the trial and to present a defence, and if the discussion—that is to say the cross-examination—has taken place before the trial and cross-examination can't take place on the basis of things that have emerged during a trial, that is potentially quite problematic in terms of that New Zealand Bill of Rights Act freedom or right that's supposed to be protected in that instrument.