So while I'm talking specifically about improving the reporting period for when the NZIST is established, these same arguments could equally apply for when the subsidiaries are established. It's going to be a substantial upheaval. Why would we not want to look closer so we can fix things if they look like they're broken on the way? I think that's the question I'd like the Minister of Education to address: how much harm can there be? If he has concerns—he's mentioned the risks that are put up in the programme business case and how he's mitigated them. Surely, this would seem to be a sensible mitigation as well, to look more closely at the reporting period. I'm suggesting for the NZIST, but I'd also suggest for the subsidiaries.