Let me finish in this, the first reading speech—and I sense I'll have other opportunities as the afternoon and evening wears on—with a little analysis that I have taken the liberty of bringing to the House in relation to what it means to negotiate. Now, Supplementary Order Papers are not normally a good tool for negotiation, but the reason that the Opposition, from time to time, will have the opportunity to negotiate with the Government through SOPs is that there are very few other options, but it is a rare opportunity for the Opposition to say, in the way of a negotiation, that party A has something that party B wants. Party B has, within its power, the power to give to party A that thing. Conversely, party B has something that party A wants. In this context—and the analysis goes that the National Party had the ability to vote for the Green Party's Supplementary Order Paper in both Part 1 and Part 2—the Green Party had something that the National Party wanted, which was the ability to bring to the Table an amendment to the legislation that could help to prove a point about the inconsistency of the law.