The question then is: if there is an agreement, if there is that trust, and if there is that positive impact from what can happen, why then do we need a hammer over the industry in 2022, where the Minister can just say, "They haven't done enough, but I decide that I want more and I require that this happens in 2025."? How can there be, really, a trust in an agreement when the agreement can be overridden by one party at a later date, without any negotiation, without a sense of fair play? And, for farmers, that is the crucial thing: they have uncertainty in their business every day. The Minister has talked about the fluctuation in prices that are reliant on international prices and exchange rates—all that—and more uncertainty over the weather. You know, droughts and all those things are all part of the uncertainty of farming. And here we add another uncertainty on, where their industry groups go and do a deal with Government in the best interests of their farmers and in the best interests of New Zealand, and yet the Minister isn't really going to trust them. The Minister is holding back something—holding back the ability to override that agreement whenever he feels they haven't met what they want, from the Government's perspective.