The question I have is what advice the Minister's received on this particular issue, and was the insertion of this clause based upon the fact that the decision would be based on the point of law or based upon the new evidence which the Supreme Court accepted at the time of their hearing, whereby two of the Supreme Court Justices concluded that based on that new evidence, they did not believe that the registration order should have been made in the first place, notwithstanding their view of the point of law. And two of the Supreme Court Justices said that the registration order should remain. Effectively, they said that it should remain. One Supreme Court Justice didn't make a determination based on the new evidence at the time. So, in my view, that issue is inconclusive based upon the new evidence. So my question to the Minister is whether the insertion of this clause is therefore based upon the conclusion that this case be decided on the point of law, which we're not overturning today.