But I've got a number of questions here. New section 11AA starts by saying, "(1) The Minister may make a COVID-19 order under section 11AB in accordance with the following provisions: (a) the Minister must be satisfied that the order does not limit or is a justified limit on the rights and freedoms in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990;". My first question relates very much to that point, which is the fact that all New Zealanders have accepted their rights being limited in the past 18 months in regards to COVID-19. And I think most New Zealanders would accept the need for their rights to be limited in some way going through what has been a global pandemic. But the question I've got coming through this is when it comes to how the Minister is satisfied going forward—because we've spent the last 18 months dealing with what initially was a major crisis, a new disease which no one knew much about. Now we're moving into a traffic light system, which is apparently safer, and we've, obviously, got the vaccine, we've got boosters, and we've got rapid antigen tests. We've got so many tools that we didn't have 18 months ago to be able to manage and address COVID-19. And so my question here in regards to the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act is: how is the Minister going to be satisfied that an order does not limit or is a justified limit on the rights and freedoms in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act? 