I'd say it's also a little bit odd, I think, that DOC officers are considered to be—or DOC rangers can be considered as having these powers when, in fact, it would be expected that, firstly, the surveillance system in New Zealand would have identified a ship that might be engaged in some kind of criminal activity or might be the harbinger of criminal activity and therefore when a pursuit took place that there would be appropriately capable police on board regardless of whether there was Defence involved. But then the reality for New Zealand is that in a pursuit like that Defence will always be involved. So I don't quite understand why there needs to be the extension to DOC officers, to DOC rangers, as proposed in the bill. I have to say that, notwithstanding the excellent work done by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade lawyers, what has been provided to us was more about the fact of what might happen rather than a specific reason for it.