As I said, we supported it in good faith. The fact is that this was better late than never, at first reading. We can see no reason for it now at second reading, given that for the courts to be in a more stringent environment than the world outside the courtroom makes no sense, just as it made no sense for the courts to have an uncertain environment when there was certainty in the rest of New Zealand from the time that the COVID-19 Protection Framework was passed. For the Minister to suggest that it's important to have parliamentary scrutiny for legislation such as this in a very highfalutin kind of way that suggests that it wasn't important for the remainder of the COVID-19 response legislation in late last year, I think will be viewed very dimly by everyone outside the court system who has, obviously, been affected by those strictures. 