Within that context, the select committee talked about the age of consent. And I find this, actually, the most interesting part of this piece of legislation, because I think it now has implications across the Crimes Act. They have amended clause 4 and inserted a subsection that would mean that someone under 16 years of age actually cannot consent to the posting of an intimate visual recording of which they are the subject. And so at the heart of that was our desire to ensure we protected children. Therefore, children cannot give consent within this context because they're unable to understand all possible consequences of allowing an intimate visual recording of them as the subject to be posted digitally. We framed this within the conversations in the select committee as image-based sexual abuse. Other definitions include cyber-harassment, cyber-stalking. But, fundamentally, this points to the consequences of this type of offending, and it is about the mental health consequences; it is about how it damages relationships and leads to social isolation. 