So we heard from some individuals that, where an individual is declared unfit to stand trial in the first place, the individuals who had suffered harm from an act that they had committed would go without justice—whereas, if this bill were to come into force without extending to that group of people individuals who had suffered harm for someone who was declared to have committed the acts but didn't have the actus reus, they would have some space within the courtroom; they would be able to read a victim impact statement. I don't recall whether it was Dr Smith or not, but one of the issues that came up was whether, if you had an individual who was declared unfit to stand trial at the time that they had been charged but subsequently, after receiving an appropriate amount of treatment through mental health services, were deemed to be sufficiently capable—how would they fit into this sort of regime, and are our laws sufficient to ensure that that person is then tried and those individuals do also have the same ability to provide statements in court?