SIMON COURT: So, look, imagine that there are decisions that Environment Canterbury are faced with around who gets access to resources, who gets consents to do stuff like mining or quarrying, and who gets to get consents to build access roads, and if there is a potential conflict of interest between the appointed members of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, which is a massive conglomerate that operates somewhere maybe $700 million, maybe a billion dollars' worth of property and infrastructure and operations. What I'd like the member to respond to is: what provision is there, what controls are there, on the risk of a perception of conflict of interest? Now, I'm not saying there is a potential conflict of interest but the perception of one. Where there are decisions that come to Environment Canterbury that materially affect the corporate and business interests of Ngāi Tahu, how on earth will this bill, any provision of this bill, address that perceived conflict of interest, and, therefore, decisions made by Environment Canterbury that, essentially, could undermine people's trust and faith in local government to make decisions about resource allocation? This bill opens up a can of worms.