There's inherently a tension, I suppose, when one tries to extend the national jurisdiction to international waters, with "international", of course, meaning between nations in a sort of metaphorical sense, but literally between nations, literally between territorial waters—lines on a map, if not in that actual ocean, of course—out at sea and, therefore, areas which perhaps are something of a grey area legally. To provide some clarity in that space, which is the intent of the bill, is a very worthy objective, but it will, of course, be important to understand exactly what that means in different scenarios where the ships are flagged with, perhaps, the insignia of another sovereign nation—and, to be clear, the bill does provide the procedures that will be followed in such a case—or perhaps unflagged, and so on. So a certain amount of detail has already been provided, and that's valuable as far as it goes, but it will be interesting at select committee for those who are lucky enough to be on that select committee and to be able to interrogate the detail to just try to thrash out some of those issues. 