Certainly we don't have an issue with protecting consumers, in particular, and we acknowledge there are some issues of power imbalances that are extraordinarily serious for some small business owners, but we have a very big issue with the failure to seek to define what unconscionable terms will mean and what those terms will be. I mean the Minister, in introducing this bill, actually gave a potential definition, saying that "the courts in Australia have found that unconscionable is" and he read that piece. Why did they not put that into the bill then? Why not define this? Instead, they give some areas where the court may give consideration—it's not saying that they define unconscionable conduct at all—it's saying they can give consideration to certain matters.