The final argument is—and I guess it's by way of summarising the ones that I've already been making, and others too on this side of the House—if it's not the case that the epidemic has gone away, such that we no longer need to respond to it, and if it's not the case that there are issues that continue to rise in relation to the response, not the epidemic itself but also the Government response to that, however impressive or otherwise that might have been—well, I think we can say, rightly, that the people of New Zealand will continue to be affected not only by the epidemic but also the Government response to it, and so it's appropriate for that committee to remain in force, not be disestablished. So I too add my weight and support to the motion as amended in the name of Michael Woodhouse, namely that it not be disestablished but remain in force for as long as those two things that we spoke about earlier remain true.