Now, some provisions I think are fine. The questions of intimidation, interference, and obstruction are probably unlawful anyway, and to the degree that that could be a belt and braces approach, I think I could support that. But communicating with or even standing silently, expressing a view with imagery, even if it causes emotional distress, could go too far. Does simply standing in a safe zone expressing those views constitute a breach of this legislation, and who decides what constitutes that breach? 