So I want to make a particular note here around noting a member's remuneration. This is a particular issue where, as the bill was originally drafted, it may have been read to require someone to disclose their actual earnings from employment. The committee was quite clear that that level of detail is just not required. If someone works in a role, whether it be a supermarket worker or a consultant, they shouldn't be required in their interest to actually disclose what their salary is. Absolutely, they'll be required to disclose that they have that employment—but not, for example, the level of detail that would actually just go a little bit too far in disclosing that member's individual and private information.