I want to acknowledge the previous speaker Ginny Andersen and the work that she's done, taking the bill through the Justice Committee. She used, I think, at one level appropriately, a quote from Harvey Milk, talking about dialogue. The irony of this bill is it's not actually about dialogue; it's trying to limit speech. It's actually stopping dialogue. The explicit intention of this bill is to stop dialogue. It's to deter. That's probably the underlying reason why I have concerns about this bill. It's firmly in the area of free speech. I've always been very wary, and will continue to be very wary, of any legislation that comes into this House which seeks to limit or compel speech. Arguably, and we've heard it from a couple of others who have spoken earlier, the definitions that have come through the select committee process make it more ambiguous, and maybe we can tease that out little.