So if we're talking about a fair distribution of income tax, then it turns out that the fairness we need to speak in terms of is fairness in relation to the income earned, not just the single headcount—the single individualistic headcount that the ACT Party relies on. Tell the story, but tell the whole story, and that is what the ACT Party neglected to do; they neglected to look at income distributions. We have a long-established principle in this country that if you earn more income, then you pay more income tax. This is a principle that goes way back to Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations, writing about the principles of fair taxation. Adam Smith said that the more income a person earns, the more that person ought to contribute to the general good—to the general good. So I think we can ignore the stats—the dubious stats—that the ACT Party have presented us with, with only a partial view.