But, just because we put out there clear guidelines as to the expectations of both sides of an arrangement, as to what the liabilities and responsibilities will be, is not a disrespect to either side of the equation. When we rent a house, we pay a bond against the possibility that we will not be honourable renters. When we sue someone, there are occasions when we are required to pay security for costs so that an ultimately successful person on the other end of our suing is not left out of pocket. It doesn't mean that we are behaving in a dishonourable fashion to be clear about the responsibilities of both parties. This is straightforward, simple legislation. It creates a clarity of obligation on both sides; it gives financial security for costs, should the company not fulfil its responsibilities; and it enables effective monitoring of their finances so that we can find out whether that is in fact going to be the case. I commend this bill to the House.