Some people will say, "You're being a bit flippant.", but let me just ask this question: how should people respond when you've got a Government that introduces legislation that shakes the pillars of law and property rights and the rule of law in this country, and does it based on the fact that they got advised over the Koru lounge? Then when they come out to say, "Oh, who was consulted?", they say "The Auckland District Law Society (ALDS) were behind us on this." I asked the Auckland District Law Society, and guess what! The ALDS know nothing about it, they say. That didn't sound like consultation.