The ACT Party says that if we want a culture of aspiration and a united country, then we cannot have a tax system that is filled with tall poppy syndrome, where the majority of people vote at the ballot box to take money off the minority, where they're less concerned about the quality of Government spending—because, hey, it's only this little group that we're taking all the money off. And we have, fundamentally, division and exploitation, and tall poppy syndrome in our tax code. That's why ACT can't support Andrew Bayly's amendment to adjust those thresholds. It's one way of giving money back to people—or letting them keep it, to put it more accurately—but it is not the best way, because it perpetuates that tall poppy syndrome in the tax code. What the ACT Party is proposing—and we hope that our colleagues around the House will join us—is a fairer, flatter, more consistent tax policy that will allow people to keep, on the average wage, around about $2,000 more of their own money.