Following the submissions on this clause, it was acknowledged that a blanket removal of the "safe harbour" provisions would lead to unintended consequences, and that it's not appropriate for platforms to be held responsible for content that is uploaded or shared on their platform that they have no knowledge of. So the select committee and the officials agreed that the removal of the "safe harbour" provisions should only apply in instances where it is subject to a take-down notice and where knowledge of the element is met. So a take-down notice would specify the material that is objectionable and require it to be removed. So then they would have knowledge of that at that point. It is appropriate and consistent with existing offences in the Act that an online content host becomes liable once they have that knowledge that they are hosting objectionable content and refuse to take it down. It gets a little bit confusing, but it's about the fact that they then know and have that knowledge, and if they refuse to then take it down after having the knowledge, then they become liable.