Another amendment that the select committee has recommended is amending the special forestry test's existing restriction on using the land for residential purposes other than for forestry workers, by replacing this restriction with a non-occupation outcome. One submitter—who was a very good submitter and raised such a good point, which is why the select committee came to this agreement to amend it—raised that this change may create outcomes inconsistent with policy intent by restricting the ability for forestry workers to reside on the land, because what's not unusual with these pieces of land is for there to be, say, some sort of temporary housing or some sort of infrastructure, some improvement, for the forestry workers to be able to live on. So the select committee agreed with that submitter, and the bill now clarifies that forestry workers may continue to occupy land acquired via the Act's forestry provisions on the same terms as allowed under the Act's current restrictions on residential use. 