Lastly, I want to take the opportunity to highlight an amendment that I proposed. I spoke about the issue of deep fakes in the first reading of this bill. And so I proposed or recommended that the bill also provide for intimate visual recordings that have been digitally altered or created. The select committee didn't make a recommendation to that effect, and I wasn't privy to all the discussions that the select committee had. So, in good faith, they undertook due diligence and decided not to recommend it. I have since contemplated that position, and so I have gone to David Wilson, our Manahautū o te Whare Māngai, and he has advised me—and I'd like to quote this, because I want this in Hansard—and I quote: "The amendment essentially treats synthetic intimate visual recordings as another type of intimate visual recording. That is relevant to the subject matter of the bill, intimate visual recordings, and its principles and objects which are the requirements in Standing Order 300(1). In my view, it is in scope of the bill as introduced." So I'm giving notice to the House that I intend to propose an SOP to clarify that an intimate visual recording includes a digital recording that has been created or altered to appear to be an intimate visual recording of an individual.