Now, the Attorney-General's findings are clear, and this is where I want to come back to all that's been said about our duty to protect children and young people. Because the Attorney-General, the Supreme Court, and, indeed, the select committee in the previous Government, were clear and are clear—this does not contain a measure, the keeping of a register is not a measure that keeps children and young people safe. There is very little evidence that it works at all in the jurisdictions where it has been applied. Children and young people are most often abused, in terms of the types of offending that this piece of legislation encompasses, by those who are very well known to them, in their own homes. They are very rarely abused by strangers. So that's one thing, but in any case we have the evidence. These registers have existed and been applied in other jurisdictions for many years. It's a measure that we've taken; we've decided to take it. It's neither here nor there, I guess we could say, if there's no evidence that it works. But to persist with it, to lie to ourselves, to lie to victims and the public and say that we're doing something that is essential to protecting children and young people whilst we weaken the rule of law as a Parliament is, I would say, unacceptable. 