The real nub of the bill, which I'll get to because I can see the clock's ticking, is that it does two things, and these two things are really important. So the first thing it does is it creates a new offence. So, under the existing law, it's an offence of causing harm by posting a digital communication, but you have to prove in the prosecution that there is intent, the mens rea. You have to prove that there is intent to cause harm. And that is what has been incredibly difficult for police or prosecutors to demonstrate—that there was an intent to cause harm—because you can say, "Oh, well, you know, we made it, you know, under consent, and I thought it would have been fine. I just put it up there, you know. I didn't know." Proving that intent has been difficult. So what this bill does is it says that intent is implicit in uploading without consent. So if you upload an image knowing that it was not provided with consent, then there is not a requirement in law now to prove that you intended to cause harm; the very action of uploading that image on to a platform demonstrates that harm was intended. So that makes a really significant difference, and, to be quite frank, it makes it a lot easier for the New Zealand Police to prosecute in this space. 