Hon SIMON BRIDGES: Well, I don't always support him—an expiry clause to it. It seems to me there's a very strong principled reason he hasn't mentioned for why we would want a clause like this. If what I have said before and other parts of this bill are true, that it is egregious that it is retrospective—and we've gone through that, and I won't canvass all of those arguments, but if you accept that as so—and if we also accept the urgency of this, the rushing of it and all of the ways that has offended the norms of this House—if all of those things are true—then one thing that won't cure those defects but will go some way to making this better law that is less offensive to this Parliament and to New Zealanders who are reasonably concerned about constitutional-type issues would be to have a time limit set in the law. I note what Nick Smith has said, and he's precisely right. I thought it was a curious thing that they did, but there is a precedent in this from another colleague of Nanaia Mahuta's in this House, not very far long ago, and that is in relation to the pill-testing bill, where they said exactly what the Minister has said, and to make good on their words in this House, the Government did have that time-limited expiry clause.