So can I finish just by saying that there has always been, since 1840, conflict over all sorts of littleish aspects of life in this country that shouldn't exist. Some years ago I was the chairman of the Riccarton Bush Trust that administers a piece of land that I think is correctly named Pūtaringamotu. And when that remnant of native bush was being put into a management plan that we were very keen on—I remember that they used to mow underneath that bush so that you could see from one side to the other, completely destroying the fauna and flora that was underneath it. So a management plan was being put in place, and we consulted with Ngāi Tahu, asked them if they wanted a representative on the trust, etc. And the answer came back no, and that wasn't necessary. And when the management plan was launched, it was Rick Tau who came and was the representative for the occasion on which that document was launched. What I remember him saying is that when the English came to Canterbury, both the Presbyterians who were in Riccarton and the Māori who were all over the rohe got done over. And I've got to say immediately that is not a Catholic having a go at the Anglicans and the Presbyterians, it is simply an acknowledgment that there has been a long time where there have been dealings that aren't appropriate. But I don't think for one minute that you can rectify all of that history by setting aside some of the good aspects that were achieved through the agreement of the Treaty, and use a process like this where there has not been the sort of public debate that there should be.