Hon MICHAEL WOODHOUSE: It's still not long enough—that's right, Mr Bridges. I agree it should be longer, but we're trying to find sensible solutions to a situation the Government has found itself in, not of COVID's making but of its own making. We came out of lockdowns last year, and not a single member of Government went, "Gee, maybe it could happen again." No, they wanted to call themselves best in class, leaders in the world, front of the queue. They were too busy giving themselves plaudits and congratulations and pats on the back to actually go, "What if this happens again? Have we got the legislative framework we need to be able to respond without that level of urgency?" Nobody asked that question. Well, I'm asking it now, and I think we should take at least 6½ weeks to be able to do that. That is why I have tabled this motion. It's the least we can do. It will at least give my colleagues, who are actually pretty jaundiced about this bill—and we are supporting it, on a very, very fine basis. Unlikely, if we're not going to get some decent answers to the questions that we have, to continue to be able to support it, and we're not going to be able to get those answers if we give just 16 days for the select committee to come back and tell this House what they found. This is an appalling process, and it can't be supported.