I don't come here to belittle or criticise the work of the Epidemic Response Committee in any way. It's met 24 times since it was established; I think that I've sat on it for 23 of those meetings. I agree with members around the House that its work has been important and that it's been something of a parliamentary and constitutional innovation that I think basically did work well. I acknowledge, very genuinely, the chair of the committee across those meetings, the Hon Simon Bridges. Members on this side sometimes had disagreements around the process of meetings and sometimes around the way that they were run, but, basically, it was a committee that worked. It had members from across the House engaging in good faith, engaging with Ministers, engaging with officials, and engaging with members of the public. But as David Seymour said in the course of this debate, it's not a substitute for Parliament. We have Parliament back now. That's the reason that this motion has been put forward in the House.