We needed the judges to tell us that they needed the support. But having said that, what that also gives us is the support to know that this is going to be OK, because unlike my friend on ACT's benches, I am aware that when we say that judges will run things according to the interests of natural justice and that they will do things that are reasonably necessary to ensure the interests of justice and to ensure access, that doesn't come out of nowhere. That comes from 400 or 500 years of legal tradition as to what those things need. We are giving the courts the backing to know that they can continue to innovate when they need to without fear of appeal or repeal.