So what I felt we did in many ways is we actually revisited where the member was initially with that section. To me, it gives that same sense of highlighting the act while making it clear that both elements of the offence hadn't been met. I mean, I would like to just have that assurance—the words from the member in terms of her sense of whether that did bring us back to where she initially saw that piece of the bill, because I do think that that is the most significant change to the bill.