I continue to be aggrieved at new section 20D(2)(a), set out in clause 9 of the bill, that said a person under the age of 18 who is smoking in the motor vehicle, either on their own or while people over the age of 18 are in the vehicle, is not committing an offence under this bill. Well, goodness. We're trying to reduce harm from smoking at any age, for any cause, at any time, anywhere. Who cares? Yet this bill, where we have the opportunity to be a bit firmer and send a true signal that children under the age of 18 at no time, whether it's in this bill or not, whether there's someone else over the age of 18 who's smoking—who cares? There was an opportunity here to say, "Unacceptable." But we're going to leave this weirdness here, where first- and second-hand smoking—certainly, second-hand smoking—is going to be OK, but we're going to wave the crooked finger at third-hand smoking. I would suggest, as I have in a previous reading, actually, that that's a lost opportunity.