Child poverty—the reason the Prime Minister came into Parliament, she says—material hardship got worse from 2016-17 to 2018-19. Fees-free gave a lot of money away to kids in tertiary education, but the numbers went down rather than up. When they first got in, the target was to raise the number of students receiving tertiary education, and then the numbers went down. So what did they do? They changed the targets. Instead, the target was literally, "We will measure success by how much money is spent, rather than how many kids actually get into tertiary education." What an indicative sign of the Government's priorities. The Prime Minister says child poverty is why she's in politics. That's why she's here: to eradicate child poverty. And what was the first thing, the first multibillion-dollar spending commitment of the last Government? Not child poverty. Not the hard social reforms to end the enduring misery of kids who grow up in appalling State houses, in appalling misery. Not any investment into that. Not using data and analytics and the best minds that we developed in National in Government—not that. The first investment was to pay kids from Remuera free money to go to Auckland University and get a law degree for free. The most regressive policy the Government could come up with: that was what they did. 