I'm a great believer in the less definition around crimes, the better. In fact, something that my ACT colleagues have often spoken about is "do no harm". And the more broad a defence is and a well-trained, well-directed judiciary who can actually take the facts of the case and it not to be quite so important around the definitions, and those who are going to be deciding on the charge—or, certainly, those who are deciding on the penalty—look at the facts of the case, as outlined by our colleague Nicole McKee, and look at those circumstances and apply the sentence based on the circumstances before them and not allow definitions. So I will not be supporting this bill to the House.