SIMON O'CONNOR (National—Tāmaki): Thanks, Madam Chair. It's a quick question to follow up on, basically, the consent of a foreign power, which absolutely makes sense. I don't think the Minister would be wanting to ride roughshod. I'm not going to go into the particulars; I don't think that would be the correct thing to do. But I know, under the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) Act, to do with a foreign ship in the Ross Sea which we wanted to interdict, which I believe the foreign State eventually did not want to be involved with the prosecution of what that ship was involved with—in other words, New Zealand and others knew what the ship was up to, pursued a prosecution. The flag State, the foreign State, involved—and maybe the officials will know which country I'm referring to—decided not to pursue any action or prosecution. I want to be clear: that's to do with CCAMLR; that's to do with a fishery. But I would like to extrapolate that into this law. If a foreign State who does not wish to follow the rules chooses not to give consent, does she see a problem with that? In other words, are we not going to be able to exercise our sovereign right through this bill because another nation is not going to follow the rules of law?