Really, on a moral basis it's pretty difficult to argue that you want to make sure that no more people take safer pills at the cost of some people taking very dangerous ones—because that's effectively the argument. When you're a parent and you know your kid is going to get invited to festivals and go along to these things in the summer, do you really want to take the risk because you think, "I hope my kid won't try anything but if they do, I want there to be a facility to make sure they don't really take bad stuff."? That's the politics of it, for the opponents of this bill. Do you really want to say to parents, "We want your kids to go along and risk taking really dangerous stuff, but at least it will stop a few people from experimenting because they're too scared."? Do you want to say to parents, "Do you really want to bet that your kid's not going to be one of the ones that tries it anyway?" That's the politics of it. 