What our proposals are about is not a tax cut, it's actually about just scaring back to 2017 and allowing people to keep what they might otherwise have had, if it hadn't been for this Labour Government. Taking into account inflation over the last four, five long years—gee, it's getting to that stage, isn't it, Mr Little, five long years. We propose that we just reverse the tax thresholds to take into account inflation. That would have meant that the first 10.5 percent is normally paid up to 14; it would mean extend it to 15.6—$15,500. Next threshold, rather than $48,000 at 17.5 percent would go to $53,500 and of course the 30 percent goes up to $78,000 rather than $70,000. That means that someone on $55,000 would be better off a year by $800. Someone on the average wage would be $870 a year better off, and someone over $78,000 would be better off by $1,000. Of course, the Labour members love to misconstrue the figures, because we were careful not to make any adjustments to the 39 percent tax thresholds. Of course, superannuitants would be better off by $540. What this is about is returning money that has been ripped off them by this Labour Government, and that's the central opposition of this bill.