My questions in relation to Part 2 are just to ensure that I understand—for my own sake, truth be told, but also for the sake of the record, I think it might be helpful in future for those wanting to understand the scope of the bill, as the Minister and therefore the Government intends, in relation to the idea of serious wrongdoing. So we've got a number of different kinds of behaviour that are characterised as serious wrongdoing, and that's in clause 10. One is a serious risk to public health or public safety. I just want to test with the Minister the idea that that shouldn't preclude individual health or safety as being effectively protected, and I understand that that's covered elsewhere in the bill.