And I want to just end with I suppose it's just one last little observation, because you can sort of feel that this bill—as I say, it's a bit like trying to break a chestnut with a sledgehammer. It's just that intuitive feel that it just goes a little too far; in fact, far too far. And it's an interesting observation: the two examples the Minister chose to use in his speech. Why, of the thousands of submissions, was the Minister so interested, of all things, to quote the Anglican Church? For those who know me well, there's possibly a double entendre there. But why quote the Anglican Church? Why such a focus on the Christian churches? I'm not going to answer it. I think those at home have their suspicions. But this is ultimately a bill which has to be opposed because it is an attempt to limit speech. 