The third SOP I put up was around making sure that, if there is a change to the remit—and the Minister talked about implementing section 68B after I asked him to use it and after he called me Muldoon, including the Prime Minister calling me Muldoon, subsequently did it, I think, 10 days later. He used that power to actually instruct the Reserve Bank, under the new bill—under this bill, there was a new process; it's called a remit process. We said that, if that is to take place, that should be debatable in this Parliament. And the missed opportunity with section 68B is that I should have requested of the Speaker a special debate on it. Unfortunately, because I didn't, there was no opportunity for anyone in this House to actually debate a major change to the remit of the Reserve Bank, one imposed by the finance Minister. And that is the type of thing that should be open and transparent and subject to debate so at least the Minister has the opportunity to explain why he—and I'm talking about Mr Robertson, in his case—did that change and make sure that it is transparent for people, and that industry and everyone hears why that has been put in place. We said it should be subject—the Minister should still be able to make those changes in a remit, but it should be confirmable in Parliament, which means it is subject to debate. Unfortunately, Mr Robertson chose not to follow that advice.