So what then does the bill seek to do? Well, it would kick in, related to an adverse weather event, and that's not defined, but I accept the member whose bill this is did suggest in her opening remarks in the first introductory speech that the select committee process would be one where that could be sort of looked into. But it does none the less still raise a number of concerns, because when you look at the relevant clauses within it, I turn my mind to issues around the process of removal. So, OK, it's clear in the bill that items must be authorised by the Director-General of the Department of Conservation, and when I have a look at clause 8(4), there are, essentially, four things that the director-general could do in his or her absolute discretion. The first is they could accept an application, the second is they could decline one, the third is they could enter into some sort of private negotiation to try and get some agreement, and the fourth one is to reject all applications. 