Kelly: I'm going to Paul tomorrow and again i feel I don't know what is expecting me there
Ann: We never know what expects us tomorrow
Kelly: But maybe it's how it should be
Jenny: Yes
Jenny: a partner is not a dog
Jenny: They are free to go away any minute
Ann: Or a Disney princess (I am watching sleeping beauty now on TV)
Kelly: 😂😂😂 Yes, so they have the right to leave us and we should be able to see life after them always
Ann: Yes, this is the biggest problem of the ideology of love. The idea that love is life. Love has been equated with life. Especially for women, but not only, also for men. People can't imagine life without it
Kelly: Yes, but we love this dream of life that is love and love that is life
Ann: And this creates dependency, jealousy, frustrations, drama
Ann: It's not even a very beautiful dream to be with someone all your life. The promise of no change. Stability forever. It is what capitalism needs from us - 40 years of mortgage and marriage
Kelly: Ahaha, yes and that somebody will take care of us when we are sick. 
Ann: Love is beautiful, intense, crazy and brief. And it was transformed in a long lasting good, a house. Something like this.
Kelly: But i think, or I suppose that we should be able to love for life potentially. We cannot approach love with a plan
Ann: Yes, sure, but a substantial group of people, not one. But the problem is that love is mostly approached with one plan. Being together, get married, etc
Ann: Or now, under the new regime of supposed sexual freedom, with the opposite plan: nothings lasts and love doesn't matter. But this is substituting an ideology with another, when we should just let it be.
Ann: Simply 😅
Kelly: Yes, I agree
Jenny: and most of all this myth of love as life is a disappointing lie that makes people suffer a lot
Ann: Yes, the dependency that it creates is horrible
Ann: I see it with my friends, it breaks my heart
Kelly: sounds sad
Kelly is going to Paul tomorrow and doesn't know what to expect. Ann and Jenny share their views on the ideology of love. 