Zoom Issues,Hello, I am a noob when it comes to blender, so I apologize up front for not being able to communicate the problem better.  I am following blender guru tutorial on how to model a donut with icing and I have the camera zoomed in for a close up of the donut but when I hit render it is in a zoomed out position, the donut is far away.  My clipping distance is .001 so I don't think it's a clipping issue.  It's as if no matter where I position or zoom camera to, the render is operating on it's own and positioning the camera and focal length farther from my object. I've tried with both EEvee and Cycles but still have the same results. I've also tried different focal lengths, 35mm 50mm and 175mm but still resulting in a zoomed out render instead of a close up shot.
I am new to blender (yes, laugh at the obligatory doughnut) and I when I set up the camera (I use NUM 0 to access the camera and move it into position with &quot;Lock camera to view&quot;) in the viewport it shows as the first attached image, but when I render it the image is further back as shown in the second image. Is this normal behavior or am I missing something?
Can I use Beetel 450TC1 as wireless router? Why comment reply auto-completion feature (@) sometimes doesn't work? I am learning basics of the category theory (CT).  I do understand that CT is a modern powerful framework to describe various branches of mathematics in a unified way.  I do admit that category's definition tells a lot about the whole thing and focuses on the most important properties, shadowing unnecessary details. However, the more I go forward, the more it feels like it should explicitly require a notion of morphisms equality (like it does with morphism composition). It feels so because equality or inequality of morphisms arises everywhere, since the very beginning: any commutative diagram eventually reduces to an equality of two different paths and many other things involve equality as well. Even composition is defined grounding upon an (implicit) equality!  I'll try to give an example of my concern. Consider $\mathbb{SET}$. Its objects are sets and morphisms are functions. Now, let's recall that functions are sets as well - to be more precise, a function $f : A \mapsto B$ is a subset of a $A \times B$ obeying certain properties, which I omit. Thus, one could argue that $f$ is both a morphism between objects $A, B \in Obj(\mathbb{SET})$ and an object defined as a set of pairs $\{ (a_1 \in A, b_1 \in B), ..., (a_n \in A, b_n \in B) \}$ and those are equal because both are essentially exactly the same thing.  I hope my concern is clear and I need some kind of "conceptual insight" from knowledgeable people to move forward. Please give me the right perspective. Is there a word to describe a highly desirable cursed treasure? Is there a single word to describe an object or idea that is so desirable that everyone wants to attain it but once they have it they are immediately cursed?  The idea is often used in literature—some examples:   In Lord of the Rings, the 'one ring' is a perfect example of this. In Guy de Maupassant's story , the necklace might be considered to be this. There are many stories of people making deals with the devil (see question: ), or being granted three wishes by a Djinn or fairy, which inevitably turn out bad. In the Twilight Zone episode , Bemis's desire to be left alone with his books would be an example of this word.   'Bane' covers the cursed part, but no one desires it.  Is there a single word to describe a most highly desired treasure that (knowingly or unknowingly) comes with a curse? I was reading through some of the questions and answers here on the Rings of Power and I just wondered why the ring effects, affected different races in a slightly different way.  I know other questions ask and answer some of these things, but I just wondered why the Rings of Power caused greed in Dwarves for ever more amounts of treasure.  It's true that Dwarves loved mining and loved wealth and were built of sturdier stuff than men, but why did the Rings of Power not control Dwarves in the way the other Rings of Power controlled men and why did it produce greed and not invisibility? Realtek RTL8723BE Wi-Fi incredibly weak I have a HP 14-AN001NA laptop. It came with Windows 10 installed on which the Wi-Fi worked fine anywhere in the house.   However I removed Windows 10 and installed Ubuntu 16.04 instead and since I have had terrible Wi-Fi anywhere aside from about three foot away from the router. I don't know if it's relevant but my Wi-Fi is not called wlan0 but wlo1 for some reason (I didn't change it).  When running lspci -knn | grep Net -A3     I get the following output:  05:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8723BE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [10ec:b723] DeviceName:   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company RTL8723BE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [103c:81c1] Kernel driver in use: rtl8723be Kernel modules: wl, rtl8723be There are often situations where buying two separate one-way tickets from A to C via B is cheaper than buying a normal multi-leg ticket. This can be especially useful with airlines such as Ryanair, which specifically avoids selling multi-leg tickets.  Is there a search engine which allows one to search for such flights? Is there a way to monitor an SSD state and predict its failure in case of active read-write usage? As far as I know, the only con against switching to an SSD except its price is the tendency to fail soon (relatively to conventional HDDs) in case used in active read-write operation. Is there an efficient way to predict the failure? Badge symbol in notification is of the site you're on, not where badge was earned It's so cool that the notification reminds you of the colour of badge you've earned. But I am a little puzzled by the symbols:      Is it feasible to use the symbol from the earned site? At the moment it uses the symbol from the site I happen to be on (as you can see by looking to the left of the dropdown in each case.) Suppose $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is Borel measurable. I want to show that $\displaystyle \int_a^b f(x)\mathrm dx=0$ for all $-\infty&lt;a&lt;b&lt;\infty$ with $a$ and $b$ rational implies that $f=0$ a.e. I'm really not sure how to approach this problem; any help would be welcome. What is the REST endpoint URL to get list of site collections? If I go to SharePoint 2013 site, click on Admin -> SharePoint, you will see a list of site collections (the link is https://somename-admin.sharepoint.com/_layouts/15/online/SiteCollections.aspx)  What is the REST endpoint URL to get this list of site collections ?  I was trying _api/search/query?querytext='contentclass:sts_site' or _api/search/query?querytext='contentclass:sts_web', but it doesn't give the whole list... What is the difference between old style and new style classes in Python?  When should I use one or the other? When is it appropriate to use the original pronunciation of a foreign word versus the English pronunciation? When reading to an audience, or speaking in conversation, when is it appropriate to use the original pronunciation of a foreign word versus the English pronunciation (assuming you know the appropriate pronunciation for it)? Is it considered rude, or condescending? Or is it considered a mark of being knowledgeable?  One of the things to consider are place names. When referring to Paris, France, should it be pronounced with the silent 'S' as the French would say it, or with the 'S'? Should Hiroshima be pronounced as a Japanese speaker would pronounce it slightly more emphasis on RO, rather than the SHI? Should Mount Pinatubo be pronounced as a Filipino speaker would pronounce it with shorter stronger vowels, or the longer vowels? (e.g. Pi as is 'pick' rather than 'pea'.) Should Wichita be pronounces as the original "shi" rather than the modern "chi"?  Pronounce pesos or sombrero as a Spanish speaker 'eh' or the English 'ay'?  (I can't think of other common words right now that aren't words taken from other languages like hurricane, boondocks, tornado, etc. which I think have (correctly) changed to English pronunciations.) Conditions: do not modify the original lists; JDK only, no external libraries. Bonus points for a one-liner or a JDK 1.3 version. Is there a simpler way than: List&lt;String&gt; newList = new ArrayList&lt;String&gt;(); newList.addAll(listOne); newList.addAll(listTwo); IE11 making background image text blurry Inverse of a matrix is expressible as a polynomial? Let $A$ be an $n \times n$ matrix. Prove that if A is invertible, then there exists a polynomial $p$, such that $A^{-1}=p(A)$  Thus far:  Let $W$ denote the $k$ dimensional A-cyclic subspace spanned by a vector $v$.  Then, $I_n=\sum_{i=0}^{k} a_{i}A^i$ for some scalar $a_i$.  What I want to do is multiply both sides by $A^{-1}$, so that way it just falls into my hands, but Im not sure that is 'legal'. Since I updated the system to 10.11.5, the Facebook message notification is not showing message text.   Is this a bug in this software upgrade of OSX? Why does main method in Java always need arguments? Is there an English phrase for an inability to actually *leave* already? There is a Hungarian expression, küszöbgörcs, which literally means "threshold-cramp", and is used to describe that long conversation you have in the entryway, with all the guests awkwardly holding their coats and purses, and every so often somebody says something like "Ok, we really have to leave now, but just one more thing...", and then the conversation is good for another half an hour at least.  I've searched in vain for an equivalent idiom in English, yet I feel sure it must exist: I know English speakers are equally susceptible to this malady, it's not a uniquely Hungarian thing. I will sometimes use literal translations, like the aforementioned threshold-cramp (or doorway-spasm), but then I need to explain it, and that's less than satisfactory. (Plus it leads to more threshold cramping.) How do I keep both the background and foreground in the image in focus at the same time? How do you have both the background and foreground in the image in focus at the same time?  Last week I was attempting a shot where I had the back of a hat in focus and in the distance you could see a mountain. I wanted both in focus, but could either focus on the mountain or the hat. I ended up taking the in-focus shots of both and merging them in Photoshop. While that isn't difficult I would prefer to shoot the shot as accurate as possible. From what I have read aperture is important in the depth of field but what are the techniques for keeping both the background and foreground in focus?  I am using a Nikon D5100 with a 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 (standard kit lens) and a 55-200mm  f/4.5-5.6.    almost answers my question, but I am a bit confused. Can someone explain this a bit differently? Thanks!