Possibly also known as the question of which comes first, epistemology or metaphysics?  My worldview is conservative Protestant.  Any resources are welcome that delve into this.
In attempting to wrap my mind around the basic vocabulary, concepts, and methods of philosophy, I find myself wondering what the difference is between a philosopher and a theologian.   can have two meanings: 1. Theology is a rational study of the existence of God/gods and the nature of religious ideas. 2. Theology is simply a study of a particular religion (or all religions), really more the practice than the theory, but maybe a mixture.  It seems from an immediate reading that definition 1 would lead to the conclusion that a theologian is a philosopher (perhaps that theology is a branch or subset of philosophy), but definition 2 appears to be rather unphilosophical in nature.    So, how does philosophy answer this question?   Is theology considered a proper subset/branch of philosophy overall? Does it depend entirely on which of the above 2 definitions of theology fits a particular theologian as to whether he is a philosopher or not?   I think this answer is simple and fairly self-evident, but somewhere in my gut I feel like I'm missing something.  Is there a treatment of this question in the literature?    Edit: the answers so far seem to want to redefine theology or other terms - that is fine, but please be clear that you are redfining them, and provide, if possible, sources for why the term should be different than given (support from historical works, other sites, etc.).
How can I make subsections lose the section number within the section and gain the section number outside it? For a paper I am typesetting, the author wants subsections to be written with single numerals.  So far, OK,   \renewcommand{\thesubsection}{\arabic{subsection}}   does the job.  Yet frequently, he wants to cite the subsection in a later section, and wants both section and subsection numbers in references; i.e., he wants to quote Section 1.1 from Section 2.      My current workaround is to give both the section and subsection numbers in the reference.   MWE  \documentclass[11pt]{amsart} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage[backend=bibtex,citestyle=alphabetic]{biblatex} \renewcommand{\thesubsection}{\arabic{subsection}}  \begin{document} \section{A section} \label{sec:first} \subsection{A subsection} \label{subsect:first} Something cool. \section{New section} Now I want to cite the coolness in Section~\ref{sec:first}.\ref{subsect:first}. \end{document}     This works fine, except that the hyperref is set up so that if you click on the first 1, you go to Section 1, not Subsection 1.  Yet I would prefer that both numerals go to the same place in the hyperref links.       I could just wrap each such citation in \renewcommand{\thesubsection}'s, but is there  an easier way to add section numbers when citing subsections from a different section?   Note: Since I'm using biblatex, titlesec is not applicable. Give an example of a relation R on $A^2$ which is reflexive, symmetric, and not transitive I am just looking for some clarification on this exercise:  Let $A = \{a,b,c,d\}$. Give an example of a relation $R$ on $A^2$ which is reflexive, symmetric, and not transitive.  I understand that if I was only dealing with $A$ and and not $A^2$ I could give an answer similar to:  $R = \{(a,a),(a,b),(a,d),(b,a),(b,b),(c,c),(d,a),(d,d)\}$  Here $R$ is reflexive, symmetric, and not transitive.  What is confusing me is the fact that we have $A^2$. I am not sure what I am missing here. I am looking through my book to see if I can figure this out, but if someone could help shed some light on this it would be appreciated.  Thanks,  Tony Closed-form expression for $\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}kk^p$ for integers $n,\,p$ Is there a closed-form expression for the sum $\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}kk^p$ given positive integers $n,\,p$? Earlier I thought of this series but failed to figure out a closed-form expression in $n,\,p$ (other than the trivial case $p=0$).  $$p=0\colon\,\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}kk^0=2^n$$  I know that $\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}k=2^n$ and $\sum_{k=0}^nk^n=\frac{k^{n+1}-1}{k-1}$ but I am unsure of whether these would be of much use now.    Additionally, what about the similar series $\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}kk^n$ where $p=n$? How to hide TabPage from TabControl After Doomsday was defeated, a spec-ops team sent to the Kryptionian ship in Metropolis found Luthor submerged in water, in front of a... thing, which "held" three metal cubes. The thing looked up, roars, and dissipates into thin air.    What the hell was that all about? I am really confused. What was that creature and what was Luthor doing with it? What is the difference between these two ways to calculate average velocity? Average velocity:  $$v_{\rm avg,1}=\frac{v_{\rm final}+v_{\rm initial}}{2}$$   and average velocity:   $$v_{\rm avg,2} =\frac{\rm total\;displacement}{\rm time \;taken}=\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t} $$  What is the difference between them and when do we use them? is there a better way to do this XML scraping task in R? I have a formula in a cell which counts the values in 2 other cells. Normally, after entering in the values in these 2 other cells, the formula cell updates automatically when Enter is pressed or when the cells are clicked out of.  However, for some reason, the value calculated by the formula does not update automatically. I am having to click on the formula bar, then I have to click enter for the formula cell to do its thing.  Why is this happening? A question about a primitive root mod $p=2^{2^k}+1$, where $p$ is prime. How to prove the inequality $a_1^{a_1}a_2^{a_2}\cdots a_n^{a_n} > \left(\frac{a_1+\dots+a_n}{n}\right)^{a_1+\dots+a_n}$? If $a_1,\dots,a_n$ are all unequal positive quantities, then prove that: $$\prod_{i=1}^n a_i^{a_i} &gt; \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n a_i}{n}\right)^{\sum_{i=1}^n a_i}$$ No other conditions are given. I tried to solve it using logarithms, but I could not understand how can I prove $${a_1\log a_1}+{a_2 \log a_2}+\dots+{a_n\log a_n} &gt; {(a_1+\dots +a_n)}  \left(\log(a+\dots+a_n)-\log(n)\right)$$ And please tell me, is there any standard method to solve this kind of problems? Can anyone make me understand in simple language why the second condition for being an Euclidean domain is superfluous ?  Why $v(a)  \leq v(ab)$ is not needed?  How we can deduce from the first one? In bash, how do I escape an exclamation mark? I want to do something like bzr commit -m "It works!". I can sort of escape the exclamation mark by doing bzr commit -m "It works\!". However, then my commit message includes the backslash. How do I escape the exclamation mark, while still ignoring the backslash? Heartbleed: What is it and what are options to mitigate it? How can I see the "implementation" of protected commands such as \LaTeX? After reading another question relating to how to see definitions of commands, I tried:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \show\LaTeX \end{document}   But this shows me in my logfile:  \LaTeX=macro: \protect \LaTeX   I just want to see where the \LaTeX command deep down somewhere finally says "OK, make the 'L' big, then make a little raised 'a,' then ..." Is my mobile AMD card being used? I have a new Sony E Series Vaio with an intel i5 and an AMD 7xxx mobile card. Despite making sure sure my app (game) is set to High Performance in switchable gfx and choosing high performance power plan I'm not entirely convinced the gfx card is being used over the CPU's HD4000 chipset. Is there anyway I can prove for sure the AMD card is being used?  thanks for reading  (OS is Win8 64bit) What is the use of multiple main methods? Is using only HTTPS bad in a SEO perspective? How can I keep low resolution textures pixelated? Reading a file used by another process I have installed the Citrix Receiver 13.0.0.256735 as described for Ubuntu 13.10 here:   The installation has succeded under Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit. But if I start the Citrix Receiver nothing happens.  Is there someone who has it running with Ubuntu 14.04?