I have found questions similar to mine, but none of the solutions given solves my problem.  Because my algorithm is too long to fit on one page, I want it to be split on two pages. Solutions I've found involve splitting the algoritm into two algorithmic environments, and add in the second something like:  \Continuedfloat   However, I use  \begin{algorithm} \begin{algorithmic}   and I need to keep the float environment, because I want to use a caption and other things. Perhaps there is a way of defining a caption in the algorithmic environment... is there? I haven't found one.  Another problem associated with splitting the algorithm in two is that I would need to define my for loop, which spans the whole algorithm, twice; I would like to avoid this.
I am writing a few rather large pseudocode functions using algorithm and algorithmic, i.e. my code looks something like:  \begin{algorithm}                      \caption{Coolest Algorithm ever}           \label{findme}                           \begin{algorithmic} [1]                   % enter the algorithmic environment \REQUIRE    Here are a few variables \\             variable 2 \\             variable 3  \ENSURE     this is the output \\             output 2  \STATE $some cool code here$ \STATE $some cool code here$ \STATE $some cool code here$ \STATE $some cool code here$ \end{algorithmic} \end{algorithm}   Unfortunately this code does not fit on one page and I am definitely not able to split it into some subfunctions or so (I already did that as far as possible).  So now I need to split up the algorithm into two pages, but I have no idea how.  The easiest way I can imagine is just to start a new algorithm on the new page, but this time letting the line counter start at line 35 or so instead of 1. But how can I do that?  Please not that there is already a similar question here on this site, but it deals with the package algorithmicx.
The phrase for when: working in a group to divide responsibility and reduce malicious intent In this kind of sentence the second half is an inversion of the first half. Is it a rhetorical artífice? What kind? Show that $2^n > n^2$ whenever n>4. Let $S(n)$ be the proposition "$2^n &gt; n^2$"  Basis step: $S(5)$ is true, since $2^5 = 32$, $ 32 &gt; 25 = 5^ 2$  Inductive step:  Induction hypothesis:   Assume $S(K)$ is true, $2^K &gt; K^2$.  Then  $2^{K+1} = 2.2^K &gt; K^2 + K^2$   I don't know how to proceed after this. How to complete this proof? Attempting official deploy process with single sandbox may reset/remove all existing work? Visit the UK with Schengen tourist short-stay visa I'm Russian, and I have touristic  Schengen short stay visa. I want to know, can I stay for some period in UK without getting UK visa, or it is not possible (I heard about 36 hours free of visa staying or something like that) $\aleph_1$ is the cardinality of the countable ordinals. It is the least cardinal number greater than $\aleph_0$, and assuming the continuum hypothesis it's equal to $\mathfrak{c}$, the cardinality of the the real numbers.    My question is, is it possible for all $\aleph_1$ subsets of $\Bbb{R}$ to have Lebesgue measure $0$?  This is, of course, impossible assuming the continuum hypothesis, because then all sets of real numbers would have measure $0$, which is absurd.  But is $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + $\lnot\mathsf{CH}$ + "all subset of $\Bbb{R}$ of cardinality $\aleph_1$ have Lebesgue measure $0$" consistent?  If not, what if we replaced Lebesgue measure with some other measure?  It may be worth noting that, although there may be subsets of $\Bbb{R}$ with cardinality $\aleph_1$, there are no subsets of $\Bbb{R}$ which have the order-type $\omega_1$ (the order-type of the countable ordinals) under the usual ordering on $\Bbb{R}$.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you in Advance. When to use an interface instead of an abstract class and vice versa? What does "calculus" mean? "calculus" and "formal system"  From      a calculus is a formal system that consists of          a set of syntactic expressions (well-formed formulæ or wffs),    a distinguished subset of these expressions (axioms), plus    a set of formal rules that define a specific binary relation on the space of expressions.      From      Formal systems in mathematics consist of the following elements:         A finite set of symbols (i.e. the alphabet), that can be used for constructing formulas (i.e. finite strings of symbols).   A grammar, which tells how well-formed formulas (abbreviated wff) are constructed out of the symbols in the alphabet. It is   usually   required that there be a decision procedure for deciding whether a   formula is well formed or not.   A set of axioms or axiom schemata: each axiom must be a wff.   A set of inference rules.      what is the difference between a formal system, and a calculus, then? I think they are the same? "calculus" and "logic system"  "Calculus" appears in "propositional calculus" and "first-order predicate calculus", which are also called "propositional logic" and "first-order logic" respectively. So I thought "calculus" and "logic" mean the same, and "a logic" is, according to ,      A logical system or, for short, logic, is a formal system together with a form of semantics, usually in the form of model-theoretic   interpretation, which assigns truth values to sentences of the   formal language, that is, formulae that contain no free variables.    But then I saw "calculus" also appears in "lambda calculus", which is also a formal system. I think a lambda calculus isn't a logic system, right? What does "calculus" mean in "lambda calculus"? Furthermore  "calculus" can also mean computational real analysis for first-year college students.   Thanks. Android: How to draw route directions google maps API V2 from current location to destination How do I find slimes in Minecraft? In early alpha I remember Minecraft videos showing slimes deep underground. I think you would attack them then they split into several smaller slimes. But I've never found a slime for myself. In what conditions can you find slimes? Are they definitely still in Minecraft? says:  Bash attempts to determine when it is being run with its standard input connected to a network connection, as when executed by the remote shell daemon, usually rshd, or the secure shell daemon sshd. If Bash determines it is being run in this fashion, it reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists and is readable.  This Bash sources ~/.bashrc: ssh user@host :  But this Bash sources ~/.bash_profile: ssh user@host  I don't see a difference in these two commands according to the spec. Isn't stdin connected to a network connection in both cases? Prove that $Y=-2\sum_{i=1}^n \ln F_{X_i}(X_i)$ have distribution $\chi^2(2n)$ How can I highlight text before a character with listing? If parsing the output of ls is dangerous because it can break on some funky characters (spaces, \n, ... ), what's the best way to know the number of files in a directory?  I usualy rely on find to avoid this parsing, but similarly, find mydir | wc -l will break for the same reasons.  I'm working on Solaris right now, but I'm looking for a answer as portable across different unices and different shells as possible. Do I need a flight ticket or a flight reservation for my UK visit visa application Am compiling documents for my visa application and I read that I need to present go and return flight tickets to prove that I will return at the end of my visit. Then a while ago I got to know that I can just get a flight reservation with out buying the flight tickets because the visa application can be refused and you have already bought the tickets.  So l request to know which of the two , having a flight ticket or flight reservation is more compelling to the visa officer and more convenient me because I would buy a flight ticket and my application is refused Calculate integral $\int_{-1}^{1} (1-x^2)^n dx $ Are there guidelines on how much free RAM a phone should have - specifically Samsung Galaxy S? I have a Samsung Galaxy S (AT&amp;T Captivate) that is rooted.  I have various ways to tweak the amount of free RAM the OS leaves on the phone.  The default is 48 MB, but I was wondering if I could actually go lower without impacting phone performance.  Are there guidelines posted anywhere, or that can be deduced based on knowledge of the Android platform?  Or should I trust that the default settings are appropriate?  I understand that when it comes to free RAM, more isn't necessarily better, but I understand that there is still a threshold that I don't want to dip below.   I'm running a 2.3.6 Gingerbread based ROM.  For what it's worth, I'm running the Zeam launcher. I have to create a report on some student completions. The students each belong to one client. Here are the tables (simplified for this question).  CREATE TABLE  `clients` (   `clientId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,   `clientName` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '',   `courseNames` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '' )   The courseNames field holds a comma-delimited string of course names, eg "AB01,AB02,AB03"  CREATE TABLE  `clientenrols` (   `clientEnrolId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,   `studentId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',   `courseId` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL default '0' )   The courseId field here is the index of the course name in the clients.courseNames field. So, if the client's courseNames are "AB01,AB02,AB03", and the courseId of the enrolment is 2, then the student is in AB03.  Is there a way that I can do a single select on these tables that includes the course name? Keep in mind that there will be students from different clients (and hence have different course names, not all of which are sequential,eg: "NW01,NW03")  Basically, if I could split that field and return a single element from the resulting array, that would be what I'm looking for. Here's what I mean in magical pseudocode:  SELECT e.`studentId`, SPLIT(",", c.`courseNames`)[e.`courseId`] FROM ... Differences between hosting options for SharePoint apps How to show that $f'(x)<2f(x)$ This is question B4 in 1999 Putnam Exam. I would appreciate if somebody could help me with this.      Let $f(x),f'(x),f''(x),f'''(x)&gt;0$ , $f'''(x)$ is a continuous function and $f'''(x)&lt;f(x)$ on $\mathbb{R}$. Then show that   $$f'(x)&lt;2f(x),~ \forall x\in \mathbb{R}.$$