I am using Ubuntu 15.04. Where can I get the Miktex for this platform ?. I could not find in any Ubuntu software sources.
There are many different kind of options that you can do  in order to start using LaTeX on Ubuntu. I would prefer doing that through Eclipse, but if there is a better way of doing it, feel free to write your opinion on why using this instead of something else.
What is the proper way of creating installation media from Ubuntu iso? This is the third time I've tried to install Ubuntu Server 14.04.03 64-bit on the same laptop, and each time it caused different problems.  Each time I wrote the same iso image to a USB flash drive by using a different application and OS.   Universal USB Installer (pendrivelinux.com) from Windows WinImage writer from Windows built-in image writer from Linux Mint 17.2    The iso image is the same in all three cases, the USB flash drive is the same, and the laptop is the same. However each time the installation of Ubuntu gave me different installation options. For example, the last time I installed Ubuntu, it didn't show all the packages to choose while installing (Basic Ubuntu server, etc.). If $L_i/K$ are Galois extensions of number fields, $i=1,\ldots,n$, and $L=L_1\cdots L_n$ is the compositum. Then it's true that a prime $\mathfrak{p}$ of $K$ splits in $L$ if and only if it splits in all of $L_i$. Does this also hold if the $L_i$ are not Galois extensions of $K$?  The proof that I know regarding the compositum uses the fact that the $L_i/K$ are Galois, so is this true in the more general setting and how would one prove it? Okay the scenario I'm thinking of is as follows:   I control a ,  and 3 untapped lands (2 swamps, 1 Island to be perdantic). In my opponents turn he casts a burn spell to kill my duskmantle.   I activate his first ability in response.   The way I am hoping the following interactions will go is:   Duskmantles ability will hit the stack at the top and resolve The burn spell resolves dealing its damage to Duskmantle The burn spell card hits the graveyard and triggers the infinite loop for duskmantle and mindcrank killing my opponent Duskmantle perishes   Is this the way that the stack would pan out? Do I win in this situation regardless of the stack being correct or not above? (I am not fully familiar with how the stack really works in magic) You can see the cards from my deck . Janrain has , one of the many OpenID providers. MyOpenID will not be available starting February 1, 2014. (An   hinted at the same but did not set a date for end of service.)   This decision was made by Janrain, and Stack Exchange did not have any part in it. You can still use myOpenID to log in to Stack Exchange, but be aware that any outages in the myOpenID service will mean that you are unable to log in to Stack Exchange until Janrain fixes it – which may take several days, or weeks, or never. After February 1, you will no longer be able to use myOpenID to log in to Stack Exchange. Stack Exchange will not be able to answer any questions about why myOpenID is down or when it will be working again. If you do not have any other login credentials on your account by February 1, you will be locked out, and Stack Exchange will be unlikely to help you recover your account.  To avoid getting locked out of your Stack Exchange account, we strongly suggest that anyone using myOpenID as their primary (or even backup) login add a new login method to their Stack Exchange account.  We're also going to remove the "myOpenID" button from the sign-up/login page soon, in order to discourage new users from signing up using myOpenID.  Here's how to add a new login to your account. You must be logged into your account when you begin. (This information is also available .)  Open up your user profile page (by clicking on your login name at the top of the screen) and click the "my logins" link above the bio box on the right hand side.   You should see a list of all of your logins.  To add a new login, click "add more logins..." at the bottom of the box. Choose the new login from the list and follow the steps to confirm.    If you choose, you can remove your myOpenID login by clicking the same "my logins" link, then clicking "remove" next to myOpenID.  If you are adding a Stack Exchange OpenID, you will receive a confirmation email. You must click the link in the email to confirm your email address before the Stack Exchange OpenID will show up under "my logins". Please make sure that you are already logged into your account when you click the confirmation link; otherwise, you will create a new account that needs to be merged with your old one.    If you encounter any trouble adding logins, or accidentally create a separate account that you would like merged, please fill out our . Making Change for a Dollar (and other number partitioning problems) I was trying to solve a problem similar to the "how many ways are there to make change for a dollar" problem.  I ran across a  that said I could use a generating function similar to the one quoted below:     The answer to our problem (293) is the   coefficient of $x^{100}$ in the reciprocal   of the following:      $(1-x)(1-x^5)(1-x^{10})(1-x^{25})(1-x^{50})(1-x^{100})$   But I must be missing something, as I can't figure out how they get from that to $293$. Any help on this would be appreciated. "Writ large", "Writ small", and others I have seen this used with other words besides "large" and "small".  What other words can be used? Can this structure be used more generally with other adjectives? prove that $24 \mid a(a^2-1)$ If $a$ is an odd integer, prove that $24 \mid a(a^2-1)$.  I proved in my class that $a^2=8k+1$ for some $k$, provided $a$ was odd.  So $$a(a^2-1)=(2k-1)(8k+1-1)=8k(2k-1)$$ but I can't pull a $24$ out of it. Extend a language with additional keywords? Ubuntu 18.04 not detecting full RAM size Overriding "+=" in Python? (__iadd__() method) Why is the complex number $z=a+bi$ equivalent to the matrix form $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}a &-b\\b&a\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ Possible Duplicate:          On Wikipedia, it says that:     Matrix representation of complex numbers   Complex numbers $z=a+ib$ can also be represented by $2\times2$ matrices that have the following form: $$\pmatrix{a&amp;-b\\b&amp;a}$$   I don't understand why they can be represented by these matrices or where these matrices come from. In today's pattern recognition class my professor talked about PCA, eigenvectors and eigenvalues.   I understood the mathematics of it. If I'm asked to find eigenvalues etc. I'll do it correctly like a machine. But I didn't understand it. I didn't get the purpose of it. I didn't get the feel of it.        I strongly believe in the following quote:     You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother. -- Albert Einstein   Well, I can't explain these concepts to a layman or grandma.   Why PCA, eigenvectors &amp; eigenvalues? What was the need for these concepts? How would you explain these to a layman? Multiple simultaneous downloads using Wget? There are two schools of thought on how to best extend, enhance, and reuse code in an object-oriented system:   Inheritance: extend the functionality of a class by creating a subclass. Override superclass members in the subclasses to provide new functionality. Make methods abstract/virtual to force subclasses to "fill-in-the-blanks" when the superclass wants a particular interface but is agnostic about its implementation. Aggregation: create new functionality by taking other classes and combining them into a new class. Attach an common interface to this new class for interoperability with other code.   What are the benefits, costs, and consequences of each? Are there other alternatives?  I see this debate come up on a regular basis, but I don't think it's been asked on  Stack Overflow yet (though there is some related discussion). There's also a surprising lack of good Google results for it. How can I produce the text Word_one_two in LaTeX?  I tried:  Samp\_Dist\_Corr   But, it doesn't quite look right. Also, I want it in the typewriter font, so actually, I'm doing:  \texttt{Samp\_Dist\_Corr}   I find it looks a bit like the underscore is merging in to the bottom of the "D", but maybe it's just because of the typewriter D? This is probably easier to show than tell...   On the recent question , I see the following:    As you can see, the first five links render properly, but after that, they stop converting.  Unfortunately, this isn't obvious to the person writing the post, which I discovered when I went to edit the post to fix the "broken" links. In the edit window, it renders all of the links just fine:    I understand that this behavior is expected based on balpha's answer :        Links to questions on the same site are unlimited.   Links to other sites are limited to             a) 5 linked-to sites and     b) N questions per target site, where N is 200 on meta sites and 10 on non-metas (this is about the site that the post containing the link is posted on, not the site that is being linked to)         So if this rule is still going to stay in effect, please fix the edit view to also not automatically convert more than five linked-to sites to help people writing posts know that they need to manually title the links to the other questions.  That said, I'd prefer that (at least on MSE) this limitation be removed or raised. Even in the answer, balpha says:     The restrictions are currently as follows, but note that they do look a bit contrived, resulting from the fact that they have grown over time (from single site to cross-site, from "there are no subsites" to "facebook.SO", etc.), so it's not unlikely that we'll revisit them.   So, if it's not hurting performance, can we please increase the limit or remove it? Why Normality assumption in linear regression I am interested in finding out how confident my model (say Logistic Regression) is in predicting the label of a new data point. For example, if it is not confident, I better abstain from making a prediction.   Logistic Regression outputs probabilities, which gives you a notion that there is confidence in prediction. But in fact, it is not. $P(y|x)$ being 0.3, doesn't tell me that the model is confident in its prediction or not. All, we can say is that it believes 100% that class A is 0.3 and other class is 0.7.  Can we use confidence intervals of LR as some sort of confidence in prediction? E.g., larger the difference between upper and lower bound for a particular data point, less confident it is, and vice-versa?  If not, how can we build confidence in our prediction? Can anybody guide me to some paper or field of study? Prove that $k[x,y,z,w]/(xy-zw)$, the coordinate ring of $V(xy-zw) \subset \mathbb{A}^4$, is not a unique factorization domain I want to show that $k[x,y,z,w]/(xy-zw)$, the coordinate ring of $V(xy-zw)\subset\mathbb{A}^4$, is not a unique factorization domain.    Morally, all we need to do is find some nonzero element that can be written in two distinct ways as a product of irreducible elements, but nothing is coming to mind immediately. Thoughts? Port error while changing chrome extension from manifest v1 to v2