How can i make glitch photos like this picture?    Is there any special software or programming language to make photos like this?
My English is pretty basic, please don't mind. Wondering how to make the liquify wave and distort color effect in Photoshop? I'd tried using distort>shear/wave/zigzag, but still can't make it similar like the photo below.
Laplace equation of composite function Suppose we have $f(x,y)$, which satisfies Laplaces equation: $\frac{\delta^2f}{\delta x^2}+\frac{\delta^2f}{\delta y^2}=0$  Does $f(\frac{x}{x^2+y^2},\frac{y}{x^2+y^2})$ also satisfy Laplace equation? How to use figure inside a minipage? I'm trying to include an image, and keep it centered, and prevent from wrapping from the next page.  The following code works for that:  \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}     \begin{center}         Caption for image          \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{myimage.png}      \end{center} \end{minipage}   I'd like this image to be in a figure, with a caption.  The following doesn't compile:  \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}     \begin{figure}         \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{myimage.png}         \caption{Caption for image}         \label{fig:sample_figure}     \end{figure} \end{minipage}   I get the errors:  ! LaTeX Error: Not in outer par mode. ! Undefined control sequence.   How can I fix this? If $AB = I$ then $BA = I$ If $A$ and $B$ are square matrices such that $AB = I$, where $I$ is the identity matrix, show that $BA = I$.    I do not understand anything more than the following.   Elementary row operations. Linear dependence. Row reduced forms and their relations with the original matrix.   If the entries of the matrix are not from a mathematical structure which supports commutativity, what can we say about this problem?  P.S.: Please avoid using the transpose and/or inverse of a matrix. How do I check if an object has a specific property in JavaScript? How do I check if an object has a specific property in JavaScript?  Consider:  x = {'key': 1}; if ( x.hasOwnProperty('key') ) {     //Do this }   Is that the best way to do it? Topologist's sine curve is not path-connected Coffeescript existential operator sometimes checks against undefined, but not always T-SQL stored procedure that accepts multiple Id values Is there a graceful way to handle passing a list of ids as a parameter to a stored procedure?   For instance, I want departments 1, 2, 5, 7, 20 returned by my stored procedure. In the past, I have passed in a comma delimited list of ids, like the below code, but feel really dirty doing it.   SQL Server 2005 is my only applicable limitation I think.  create procedure getDepartments   @DepartmentIds varchar(max) as   declare @Sql varchar(max)        select @Sql = 'select [Name] from Department where DepartmentId in (' + @DepartmentIds + ')'   exec(@Sql) Listings - Only highlight between delimiters I want to implement a function name color highlighting and I use the listings package. My 'regex' for this is def %s( where def (including space) is the first delimiter %s is the function name and ( is the second delimtier. Now my aim is to color only %s in purple. So basically I want to only touch the part between the delimiters and the delimiters should stay untouched.  Here is what I tried so far:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xcolor,listings} \usepackage[ngerman]{babel} \usepackage{fontspec} \setmonofont{Courier New}  \begin{document}  \lstset{language=Python,     escapebegin=\color{orange},     keywordstyle=\color{blue}\bfseries,     commentstyle=\color{orange!80!red},     stringstyle=\ttfamily\color{gray},     %moredelim = [is][\color{blue}\bfseries def \mdseries\color{purple}]{def\ }{(},     moredelim = [s][\color{purple}]{def\ }{(},     showstringspaces=false}‎ \lstset{literate=%    *{0}{{{\color{red}0}}}1     {1}{{{\color{red}1}}}1     {2}{{{\color{red}2}}}1     {3}{{{\color{red}3}}}1     {4}{{{\color{red}4}}}1     {5}{{{\color{red}5}}}1     {6}{{{\color{red}6}}}1     {7}{{{\color{red}7}}}1     {8}{{{\color{red}8}}}1     {9}{{{\color{red}9}}}1 }  ‎‎\begin{lstlisting}[basicstyle=\ttfamily,mathescape] def fancy_function_name(page_url = 'tex.stackexchange.com'):     return page_url.split('.')[0] \end{lstlisting}  \end{document}   This code will generate:   You can see that it matches the right place but is too greedy and colors the delimiters too. So I thought about the uncommented line: %moredelim = [is][\color{blue}\bfseries def \mdseries\color{purple}]{def\ }{(}, If I use this one and uncomment the line below I get this result:    It's nearly what I wan't but I cannot add the last, now missing ( in black color.  Does anyone has a solution for this without pretouching the code and add all the @@ symbols? What is the problem that gets worse after you try to solve it? Example sentence - This problem is a _____ which gets complicated every time you try to solve it.   Is there such a word that represents a problem which will become worse if/when one tries to solve it?  Note - After seeing the comments and answers I'd like to add that this is not a can of worms or Pandora's box because it doesn't create a new problem but just worsens.   Example: Magic leaves protecting a fruit by enclosing it. Every time a leaf is touched, all the leaves close together further, that is more tight than before. What could happen if I use 2 cycle fuel in a 4 cycle engine? First off, this is NOT to be confused with the following question:    2 cycle oil is used for my weed eater. There is no way I could use a whole gallon in a year.  Sometimes I run out of gasoline for my 4 cycle lawn mower, and that 2 cycle mix fuel is sitting there getting really old.  If I run that in the lawn mower, am I simply going to create extra pollution or could the 2 cycle fuel cause any damage to the 4 cycle engine? "Would" & " Used to" How to calculate what this power series converges against? (double factorials) I am aware it is common practice to standardize the features for ridge and lasso regression, however, would it ever be more practical to normalize the features on a (0,1) scale as an alternative to z-score standardization for these regression methods? Definite integral, quotient of logarithm and polynomial: $I(\lambda)=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\ln ^2x}{x^2+\lambda x+\lambda ^2}\text{d}x$ Uniform convergence of alternating series Show that $$\sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^k\binom nk=0$$ So for odd $n$ we have an even number of terms. So $\binom nk=\binom n{n-k}$ which have opposite signs. Thus the sum is 0.  For even $n$ we have that $$\sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^k\binom nk= \binom n0+\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^k\binom nk+\binom nn$$ Now $$\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^k\binom nk= \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^k\left[\binom{n-1}k+\binom{n-1}{k-1}\right]$$ What would that sum be in the square brackets? Workflow for UV orientation How to I deal with unwrapped UVs orientation?   Delete the default Cube. Add a Cylinder Edit mode and edge select the Top and the Bottom and a single connecting edge. Make them into seams UV Unwrap (standard Unwrap mode)   The unwrapped UV now shows two circles above a row of quads. I can save this and open it in an image editor and paint over those areas and get the texture to align on the cylinder back in blender.  But, the pattern(just happens to be text) that was inserted in place of the row of quads is now upside down on the model. Any attempt to flip or align just makes things worse, from upside down to mirrored or the Top/Bottom not aligning.  So my real question is how could I have known that the quads represented an upside down view of the world?  Do other blender users export UVs and mark them with arrows and colours just to see how they align on a model before actually painting for real?  I tried selecting the edges in step 3 in different orders before making them into seams and it made no difference.  I also looked at the Normals but they appear to be only Inside/Outside not Up/Down.  Blender 2.70 Drive shape key based on relative camera orientation? Define a relation and find its equivalence classes. Am I Running as a Service I am currently writing a little bootstrap code for a service that can be run in the console. It essentially boils down to calling the OnStart() method instead of using the ServiceBase to start and stop the service (because it doesn't run the application if it isn't installed as a service and makes debugging a nightmare).  Right now I am using Debugger.IsAttached to determine if I should use ServiceBase.Run or [service].OnStart, but I know that isn't the best idea because some times end users want to run the service in a console (to see the output etc. realtime).  Any ideas on how I could determine if the Windows service controller started 'me', or if the user started 'me' in the console? Apparantly  is not the answer. I thought about using commandline args, but that seems 'dirty'.  I could always see about a try-catch statement around ServiceBase.Run, but that seems dirty. Edit: Try catch doesn't work.  I have a solution: putting it up here for all the other interested stackers:      public void Run()     {         if (Debugger.IsAttached || Environment.GetCommandLineArgs().Contains&lt;string&gt;("-console"))         {             RunAllServices();         }         else         {             try             {                 string temp = Console.Title;                 ServiceBase.Run((ServiceBase[])ComponentsToRun);             }             catch             {                 RunAllServices();             }         }     } // void Run      private void RunAllServices()     {         foreach (ConsoleService component in ComponentsToRun)         {             component.Start();         }         WaitForCTRLC();         foreach (ConsoleService component in ComponentsToRun)         {             component.Stop();         }     }   EDIT: There was another question on StackOverflow where the guy had problems with the Environment.CurrentDirectory being "C:\Windows\System32" looks like that may be the answer. I will test today.