I feel like I know the answer to this, but how do you feel about justified type when it comes to common ux principles.  My gut tells me not to use it, but I'd like a better reason than that. I'm finding some issues with dyslexia and users who suffer from it could have a lot of issues reading the type.
Are there any studies on the use of justified text in web apps? How does justification affect screen legibility?  Example of justified text:
Fit a table into one page How to revert to GNOME Classic Desktop? var self = this? Using instance methods as callbacks for event handlers changes the scope of this from "My instance" to "Whatever just called the callback". So my code looks like this  function MyObject() {   this.doSomething = function() {     ...   }    var self = this   $('#foobar').bind('click', function(){     self.doSomethng()     // this.doSomething() would not work here   }) }   It works, but is that the best way to do it? It looks strange to me. Interior of closure of open set in topological space If $U$ is an open set in a topological space, is it true that $U$ is the interior of the closure of itself?   If $U$ is open, it must be the interior of itself. But is it the interior of the closure of itself? In the closure, we include all points $x$ such that any open set containing $x$ also contains a point in $U$. In the interior of the closure, we take the union of all open sets contained in the closure. Please add a spell checker to the Markdown editor It would be nice to see a built-in spell checker into the main text-panel for posts. Every time I post here or Stack&nbsp;Overflow I quickly open up Gmail, paste my post there, and use its spell checker to make sure I didn't make any stupid mistakes. I know other services have these types of features, and it would be nice to see Stack&nbsp;Overflow have one as well.  Agree/disagree?  (BTW, I found two small mistakes for this short post.)  I know I made a comment about this on ChrisF's answer, but I thought that I should also mention it here in the question. I know there are many third-party tools to add spell checker functionality to Stack&nbsp;Overflow. But some (if not many) people out there do not have these tools. They are either at work (like me), or some other place where they using a machine that is not owned by them, or they aren't power users and just don't have these tools installed.  If Stack&nbsp;Exchange becomes used for other non-technical sites, then you will probably have to count on the fact that people are using  or something just as bad. That's why it would just be nice to have a built-in spelling tool. Again, it may not be worth it, but I think it would be interesting to discuss it at least. What are sentences like "the longer X, the more Y" called and can they be used in formal written English? What is the type of sentence exemplified below called? Is it appropriate to use it in a scientific paper and formal written English in general?     1. The more pronounced the variation, the   more the waste.      2. The more you give, the more you get.      3. The longer I live, the more I realize the impact of attitude on life. Negative values for AICc (corrected Akaike Information Criterion) I have calculated AIC and AICc to compare two general linear mixed models; The AICs are positive with model 1 having a lower AIC than model 2.  However, the values for AICc are both negative (model 1 is still &lt; model 2).  Is it valid to use and compare negative AICc values? Why can't we downvote our own posts? Once in a blue moon, I've wanted the ability to downvote my own answer to some question.  ()  Obviously upvoting one's own posts is out of the question.  But down is different.  Voting my own answer down can help me improve the site by pushing my answer lower in the ranking than another answer with a better or more situation-appropriate alternative.  It's not something I'd do often, but I would use this feature if it were available.  If implemented, I'd expect this feature to operate just like downvotes on other user's posts.  That is:   I get a few seconds to undo the downvote;  I get to remove the downvote after an edit to the post;  I lose a point for placing the downvote (CW excepted); I lose two points for receiving the downvote (CW excepted).   If you're noticing that I'd lose 3 points for downvoting my own non-CW post, congratulations! You can add!  I can think of a couple of potential downsides to this change.  The first one may be a dealbreaker; the second is probably not that big a deal.   Strategic downvoting of oneself: since you can undo the vote after an edit, and you can always edit your own posts, someone could downvote themselves soon after posting (especially on a FGITW answer) to garner extra sympathy upvotes. Badge collecting: the Peer Pressure badge just got easier, because if you have a -2 score on an answer, just downvote and delete for an instant badge. What if a light clock travels perpendicular to mirrors that make up the clock? I took this photo of the blood moon this morning and I am finding many of my photos, especially landscape photos, have a significant lack of clarity. I'm not looking for a photo critique because I know this particular photo is crap. I'm looking to identify my source of failure to nail a significantly clear photo.     Setup  Canon EOS 70D with a 100-300 telephoto lens (I'm sorry I don't know the exact model. It's from Canon but not one of their professional quality lenses.)   Aperture: f/5.6 Shutter: 1 sec. ISO: 1000 Focal Length: 300mm Metering mode: Spot White Balance: I manually set the WB to 5500 kelvin, it looked fine in live view. Focus Mode: Manual Drive: 2 sec timer delay   Mounted on a decently stable tripod  Process  I turn on live view, and square up the target in the display. I then set my focal length, focus in using live view, adjust the focus as sharp as possible and take the pic. I've noticed that in this case, the picture was incredibly grainy, which doesn't translate to the final photo, but wonder if it has anything to do with it.  This particular shoot I found it difficult to balance out the variables with a dark sky and a moving moon that starts blurring after 1-2 seconds of exposure, which is why I had the aperture wide open and the ISO cranked up.  I can't tell where I'm failing:  Equipment:  The 70d takes great photos but the telephoto is not great when it's totally zoomed in. My wallet doesn't hold enough cash for a motorized mount to track objects in the sky.  Circumstance: I've seen great photos of the moon with the use of a camera and a tripod, so I know this is possible. Although, I keep seeing pictures of this big gorgeous moon over the landscape, and when I use my wide-angle, the moon shows up as a dot. What the hell are people doing to get the moon so big?  Beginner skill level: I know this is the biggest culprit, but being the beginner, I'm unable to know where to adjust. I have some non-Gaussian distributed variable and I need to check if there are significant differences between the values of this variable in 5 different groups.  I have performed Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (which came up significant) and after that I had to check which groups were significantly different. Since the groups are kind of sorted (the values of the variable in the first group are supposed to be lower than the values of the variable in the second group which are supposed to be lower than the values of the variable in the third group and so on) I only performed 4 tests:  Group 1 vs Group 2 Group 2 vs Group 3 Group 3 vs Group 4 Group 4 vs Group 5   I have performed this analysis with two different methods. I started by using Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test but nothing came up significant. On the other hand if I use Mann-Whitney test and correct for the number of tests (4) using Bonferroni, 3 tests come up significant.  What does it mean? Which results should I trust? Proof for alternative definition of the derivative I read somewhere recently that you can define the derivative as follows:  $$f'(x) = \lim_{h, k \to 0^+} \frac{f(x +h) - f(x - k)}{h + k}$$   I have been trying to prove this for about 2 hours, and can't seem to get it done. How should I proceed?  Edit: Assume $f$ is differentiable for all $x \in (x - \delta, x + \delta)$ for some $\delta &gt; 0$. When should I start the DLC? I'm late to the Borderlands 2 party, but I picked up the Season Pass for a steal.  I'm still only in the teens as far as my level is concerned.  However, there are now 3 DLC packs out and I've got them all installed.  Sometimes it's tempting to go away from the main quest and just jump into something new and potentially interesting.  In BL1, I played through the DLC between playthroughs of the game, treating the add-ons like continuations of the game post-final-boss.  I'm not sure if this is a good idea in BL2 (or even if it was smart in BL1, honestly...)  Is there a recommended level for starting the DLCs?  Will I encounter enemies that are too hard if I go early, or too easy if I go late?  Are there some weapons or quest rewards that I really can't get the most of until after I'm a certain level? How can I get id,class or name attr an element with jquery How to use Class in Java? There's a good discussion of Generics and what they really do behind the scenes over at , so we all know that Vector&lt;int[]&gt; is a vector of integer arrays, and HashTable&lt;String, Person&gt; is a table of whose keys are strings and values Persons.  However, what stumps me is the usage of Class&lt;&gt;.  The java class Class is supposed to also take a template name, (or so I'm being told by the yellow underline in eclipse).  I don't understand what I should put in there.  The whole point of the Class object is when you don't fully have the information about an object, for reflection and such.  Why does it make me specify which class the Class object will hold?  I clearly don't know, or I wouldn't be using the Class object, I would use the specific one. I am trying to solve a variation on the .  In this scenario, someone is selecting coupons at random with replacement from n different possible coupons. However, the person is not selecting coupons one at a time, but instead, in batches.  Here's an example problem formulation: There are 100 distinct coupons. A person makes selections in 10-coupon batches at random (each coupon with replacement). What is the expected number of batches necessary to have selected 80 unique coupons?  I have been able to determine the expected number of selections necessary to have selected k unique coupons when selecting one at a time (much like Henry's ), but I'm a bit stumped as to how to go about solving it with this particular wrinkle.  Any tips/guidance would be greatly appreciated. How to build a custom kernel? Group of even order contains an element of order 2 I can't add a book that I've written that's not on Amazon Is there any chance that there will be support to my Careers profile for adding books that aren't available to purchase through Amazon.com? My book was published through Smashing Magazine and it isn't available there. My character has a bite attack from his race.  What happens if he gains another bite attack from class abilities or spells?  Does the damage increase?  Can he make more than one attack?  Or is it simply that only the better version applies?  I would prefer answers from a Pathfinder context but 3.5e is also acceptable.