This was asked 7 year ago    The sites have changed considerably over 7 years. What's on topic has changed, the nature of the internet has changed and there's sites in existence now that weren't then.  Can we please revisit it?  In chat we have a feature to ignore user everywhere,  Can we have this feature so it extends to the SE sites network, or have it separately enabled from within the sites comments?
Stack Overflow has successfully borrowed at least one XBox feature (Achievements).  I'd like to see another feature borrowed as well. Let's say I'm playing Halo online and another player is being a bigot.  I have the option to add him to a list of ignored users.  After doing that, all the racist things he says will never be heard through my headphones anymore. Now, on Stack Overflow, I'd like the ability to add a user to a list of ignored users.  This would hide all of that user's comments, and maybe his questions and answers as well (not sure if hiding questions/answers is necessary). This serves multiple purposes:  It would make it easy for users to avoid other users' flamebait. It would give users a more appropriate response to flamebait. The ability to start flame wars would be reduced, since fewer users would see those comments. Users would now have an incentive to be more diplomatic, as there is now a negative consequence to the behavior (the silent treatment). Administrators could review which users are the most often ignored, which would be a strong indication that someone should be  or even locked out of their account. Administrators wouldn't have to spend as much time dealing with complaints about abusive users, since users would have a better way to respond.    makes a good point in a comment to an answer, that I thought should get more visibility:  I had a problem, reported it and got the response &quot;not bad enough to do anything about, sorry&quot;. Which is kind of true, because the only options available to the mods are the nuclear one (penalty box) and the zero-effect one (do nothing). We need a middle ground option where abuse can be handled for you without also being handled for everyone.
I'm used to creating Java Edition Minecraft maps, where NBT can be used to set many different block, item, and entity properties, like an item's CanPlaceOn/CanDestroy list, a chest's items, and more! To open my maps up to more players, I've started creating maps on Minecraft Bedrock Edition as well. But NBT is inaccessible from commands in BE, which I knew before, but didn't know how much of a problem I would have creating these complicated command chains. One of the things that I've always been doing is giving players items with custom item names, lores, enchantments, and other properties. But there is a problem. All this would have been done in NBT in Java Edition. In Bedrock, NBT is inaccessible from commands, meaning the commands I used in JE don't work. Are my dreams crushed? Gay rights – does Star Trek ever address this issue? I am aware of the picture of the man wearing the 'dress' from TNG, which promotes gender equality, but are gay rights ever addressed in Star Trek at all? (All seasons accepted.) Root of unity for $n+1$ Let $n \ge 1$ and $u_{1},u_{2},...,u_{n}$ are all root of unity for $n+1$ and there are different from $1$.(a) Find polynomial $f \in \mathbb R[x]$ of degree $n$ for which: $f(u_{k})=0$ for $k=1,2,...,n$.(b) Calculate real coefficient and imaginary part for $(2-u_{1})(2-u_{2})\cdot...\cdot(2-u_{n}).$    I have a knowledge about root of unity but I completely don't know how to do it because I think that I need some extra trick to do it but my ideas finished. I know that $\varepsilon_n^{(k)} = \cos\left(\tfrac{2k\pi}{n}\right) + i\sin\left(\tfrac{2k\pi}{n}\right) = e^\frac{2\pi i k}{n}$ and for $n&gt;1$ $\sum _{{k=0}}^{{n-1}}e^{{\frac  {2\pi ik}{n}}}=0$ but I think it is too little knowledge to solve this task.Can you help me? Why is the charge naming convention wrong? After cruising through a lot of material online, and answers over here, my understanding of contravariant and covariant vectors are, in a finite-dimensional vector space, suppose we have a vector, which is contravariant to its basis. However, using the metric tensor, we can map this vector to a one form in the dual space, which acts as a vector space for this example. This one form, or covactor, varies similarly to the basis in our original vector space. However, the covectors have a different basis, which is the dual basis, and are expanded in terms of those. Here's where my confusion arises : Many diagrams over the internet give a geometric picture of the scenario, by claiming that contravariant components of an 'arrow' are found by drawing parallel lines along the axes, and checking where they intersect. Co-variant components could be found by sketching the perpendicular lines on these axes. So, these materials are treating covariant and contravariant as different representations of the same arrow, while I'm inclined to believe they are completely different. However, if we let go of rigour, in exchange for a 'more' geometric understanding, I think we are allowed to do this. The diagrams are usually of the form :  However, even if we assume that contravariant and covariant are different representations of the same object, this particular diagram still seems wrong to me. Particularly the locations of $x_1,x_2$. In this diagram, they are located on the span of the original basis. Shouldn't covector components be located on the span of the dual basis ? This diagram suggests to me, that co-variant components have the same basis, as the contravariant ones. Shouldn't the diagram look more like this ?  This second diagram seems to fit the concept better according to me. This is because the dual vector must be 'contravariant' with respect to the 'dual basis'. This means, their components must be found out by sketching parallel lines along the span of the dual basis. These lines intersect the original axis at a right angle, which is to be expected, as dual bases are orthogonal to the original bases. Moreover, this second picture can also show in a much better way, how scaling up of the original basis, scales down the 'contravariant components' and the 'dual basis', which in turn scales up the 'covariant' components.This shows that the components of the dual vector are covariant to the original basis. This is something that is not readily visible in the first diagram. So, am I correct in assuming this second 'geometrical' representation is correct ? I know this doesn't make much sense, because as the mathematicians said, that vectors are completely different from one forms, and one forms should be represented using the number of hyperplanes intercepted by our arrow. However, I've seen most course material refer to it in this way, and frankly it is easier to visualize. However, most of this material used the first picture. Can anyone point out my mistakes, if any, and tell me if the first picture is correct, or the second one ? Or in this case 'less-flawed'. My question is pretty simple.  Since $n! \gt n!!$, it's clear by the comparison test that $\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {1}{n!!}$ converges.      But what value does the sum converge to? How does one go about determining its value (if possible)? $X$ is homeomorphic to $X\times X$ (TIFR GS $2014$) Question is :  Suppose $X$ is a topological space of infinite cardinality which is homeomorphic to $X\times X$. Then which of the following is true:   $X$ is not connected. $X$ is not compact $X$ is not homeomorphic to a subset of $\mathbb{R}$ None of the above.   I guess first two options are false.  We do have possibility that product of two connected spaces is connected.  So, $X\times X$ is connected if $X$ is connected. So I guess there is no problem.  We do have possibility that product of two compact spaces is compact.  So, $X\times X$ is compact if $X$ is compact. So I guess there is no problem.  I understand that this is not the proof to exclude first two options but I guess the chance is more for them to be false.  So, only thing I have problem with is third option.  I could do nothing for that third option..  I would be thankful if some one can help me out to clear this.  Thank you :) MyClass[] array; List&lt;MyClass&gt; list;   What are the scenarios when one is preferable over the other? And why? Footnotes in tables? I would like to have footnotes in tables, but the \footnote command does not work inside a table environment.  Googling one finds that this is , at least in the UK.  That link contains a list of solutions to the problem, but since the author of the FAQ does not believe that this is good style, no comparison is made between the different methods.  I am sure that there are good typographical reasons why in most situations it is undesirable to have footnotes in tables (although I have never come across them), however I have recently felt the need to do just this in a paper I am currently writing.  Therefore I'd like to ask two questions:   What are the arguments against footnotes in tables? If one really must go against the advice in 1., which method (whether considered in the  or not) would you recommend?   Thanks in advance.  Added  In response to ShreevatsaR's comment: I do not much care for where the text of the footnote appears.  I do however insist on the footnote marks being attached to the relevant entries in the table, so that I can avoid having to reference "the second entry in the eighth line of the table", etc... This is an idea I have seen around, but I have not seen a feature request for it, so here it is.  Downvotes that have no comments are frustrating and difficult to manage.  This is a way to help improve that:   Have a downvote initially cost more to cast for the downvoter (5 points for example) When a comment (from the downvoter) on the downvoted question/answer gets an upvote, you get your points back.   All points (ie all 5) could be refunded or just up till the traditional -1 that is in place now (ie 4 points refunded).    This would encourage good comments and downvotes for real reasons.  (Because comments for questions/answers that are bias related will not get the upvotes as readily.)  This could/should be limited to non-subjective tags.  (ie tags where a downvote just because you "don't like it" is not appropriate.) One click shutdown Ubuntu and load into alternative bootup Is there a way to find out if I need a transit visa for a layover in the UK? Is there a website or some other way to find out if I need a transit visa for a short stop in the UK on my way somewhere else? Ideally this should give me the answer for all nationalities, and take into account any other visas I may have. Why Does Software Updater Say No updates Available, but apt-get upgrade Shows updates available? On average, how many times must I roll a dice until I get a $6$?  I got this question from a book called Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability.   The answer is $6$, and I understand the solution the book has given me. However, I want to know why the following logic does not work: The chance that we do not get a $6$ is $5/6$. In order to find the number of dice rolls needed, I want the probability of there being a $6$ in $n$ rolls being $1/2$ in order to find the average. So I solve the equation $(5/6)^n=1/2$, which gives me $n=3.8$-ish. That number makes sense to me intuitively, where the number $6$ does not make sense intuitively. I feel like on average, I would need to roll about $3$-$4$ times to get a $6$. Sometimes, I will have to roll less than $3$-$4$ times, and sometimes I will have to roll more than $3$-$4$ times.  Please note that I am not asking how to solve this question, but what is wrong with my logic above.  Thank you! Use /testfor to make a custom command Basically, I'm trying to recreate the Faction plugins /f map in my single-player without mods as my PC doesn't run them very well. (I know it sounds strange.) I am trying to use the /testfor to test if I have written '/f map' in chat, and if I have, it would show me a custom generated map. I don't know how to word this better xD Essentially what I want is for it to test if I have written a command in chat, and if I have, display something. Distance between footnote and the line above it What are best practices/important steps when the Windows Server machine hosting SQL Server 2008 R2 is moved to another domain?   What steps definitely/might need to be done for SQL Server before and after the new domain is joined? What are PPAs and how do I use them? I keep reading about  ('PPAs') and people answer questions with a link to a PPA. What's the best way to use these?     There are multiple valid answers for this question spanning over several versions of Ubuntu. For your convenience, an index of each is below. $G$ is a finite group such that $|G|=n$. Let $p$ be the smallest prime such that $p|n$. If $H\triangleleft G$ such that $|H|=p$, then prove that $H\subset Z(G)$.  My Work:  Since $|H|$ is a prime $H\cong \mathbb{Z}/(p)$. Hence $H$ is cyclic and abelian. I was stuck afterwards. Can anyone please give me a hint? $(z_{2n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ and $(z_{2n+1})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to same limit. Show $(z_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to the same limit. $(z_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ is a complex valued sequence such that subsequences $(z_{2n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ and $(z_{2n+1})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to same limit.  How could I show that the sequence $(z_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to the same limit using $\epsilon$, $N$ definition?    For every $\epsilon &gt;0$,  $|z_{2n}-l|&lt;\epsilon$ whenever $n&gt;N_1$, and   $|z_{2n+1}-l|&lt;\epsilon$ whenever $n&gt;N_2$.  We want to show that for every $\epsilon &gt;0$, there exists $N$ such that $|z_{n}-l|&lt;\epsilon$ whenever $n&gt;N$. I tried something like  $|z_{n}-l|\le|z_n-z_{2n}|+|z_{2n}-l|$ but wasn't sure what to do next