This is the second time I've the delta homes search engine installed in my windows 8 computer without my permission, although I've set the privacy that programs don't get installed automatically! Anyway, I'm trying to remove this and despite the following steps: can't and the delta homes search page opens up each time I click on chrome and firefox.  1) I went to the settings, and removed delta homes from there. Managed search engines, set the pages so that chrome opens only. Nothing worked.  2) I checked for installed programs from the control panel so that I could remove it, no result!   3) I tried to search my computer's files, apps etc by 'delta', couldn't find it.  Last time when it happened, I uninstalled mozilla and reinstalled it, and so did for chrome, and it worked. But this time I tried the same with mozilla, it's not working. I restarted my computer, no change!  Please help!!
What should I do if my Windows computer seems to be infected with a virus or malware?  What are the symptoms of an infection? What should I do after noticing an infection? What can I do to get rid of it? how to prevent from infection by malware?   This question comes up frequently, and the suggested solutions are usually the same. This community wiki is an attempt to serve as the definitive, most comprehensive answer possible. Feel free to add your contributions via edits.
How do I Deserialize this XML document:  &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?&gt; &lt;Cars&gt;   &lt;Car&gt;     &lt;StockNumber&gt;1020&lt;/StockNumber&gt;     &lt;Make&gt;Nissan&lt;/Make&gt;     &lt;Model&gt;Sentra&lt;/Model&gt;   &lt;/Car&gt;   &lt;Car&gt;     &lt;StockNumber&gt;1010&lt;/StockNumber&gt;     &lt;Make&gt;Toyota&lt;/Make&gt;     &lt;Model&gt;Corolla&lt;/Model&gt;   &lt;/Car&gt;   &lt;Car&gt;     &lt;StockNumber&gt;1111&lt;/StockNumber&gt;     &lt;Make&gt;Honda&lt;/Make&gt;     &lt;Model&gt;Accord&lt;/Model&gt;   &lt;/Car&gt; &lt;/Cars&gt;   I have this:  [Serializable()] public class Car {     [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute("StockNumber")]     public string StockNumber{ get; set; }      [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute("Make")]     public string Make{ get; set; }      [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute("Model")]     public string Model{ get; set; } }   .  [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlRootAttribute("Cars", Namespace = "", IsNullable = false)] public class Cars {     [XmlArrayItem(typeof(Car))]     public Car[] Car { get; set; }  }   .  public class CarSerializer {     public Cars Deserialize()     {         Cars[] cars = null;         string path = HttpContext.Current.ApplicationInstance.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data/") + "cars.xml";          XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(Cars[]));          StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(path);         reader.ReadToEnd();         cars = (Cars[])serializer.Deserialize(reader);         reader.Close();          return cars;     } }   that don't seem to work :-( A google search gives number of methods to hide ALL tabs in chrome , but I want to hide 1 particular tab / change the display name of that tab.   Reason: I have an online music playing website open, which keeps showing tracks in the tab name and I just want to remove it from view of my work. I was wondering about generic installations of all applications in linux. And what that means? Well, when I was using windows I knew that if I want to install an application I am double-clicking the .exe file and then next,next,next.  In linux, I have understood that maybe there is a common (not generic) way to install any application. Installing from source maybe? Well is there any step by step method that can be used to install  application like in windows or not?  I am asking because I do not want to keep asking the google, how to? So, I have managed to install recently from source freecad from  and I think that it would be a very nice start as common method, right?  But the thing then is where to find the right source and when an application has a very unique method of installation! Why do we focus so much in math on functions (as a subclass of relations)? Why is it that math so focuses on the subclass of relations known as functions? I.e. why is it so useful for us in nearly all branches of mathematics to focus on relations which are left-total and left-unique? Left- (or even right-) totality seem to be intuitive, since if an element doesn't appear in the domain, we might throw it out. But why left-uniqueness?  I'm looking for something like a "moral explanation" of why they would be the most useful subclass of relations.  My apologies if this is a previous question; I looked and didn't find much. How to avoid being prompted for a password by sudo? I know I can become root (super user) via the su command but I have to authorize it after entering the commands. Is there a way I can become root and authorize (with password) in one line Sum of nilpotent and element is a unit in ring? I can't tell where I went wrong, am still a beginner.    Let N be a nilpotent in a commutive ring , let X be any element.   I'll will be showing X + N is a unit .   Assume Y(X+N) =1   Then YX(N^n-1) =  N^n-1   Multiplying both side by  X+N   We get X(N^n-1) =  X(N^n-1)  Thus nilpotent summed with any element gives unit. How do I change my Chrome language back to English? I'm trying to decide on a higher-end digital SLR, and I'm down to choosing between an APS-C model and a full-frame model.  I understand that the sensors are of different sizes, and as such have an effect on the perceived magnification of the lens, with the smaller APS-C sensor having an effective focal length greater than what it otherwise would be with a full frame sensor. But why does this matter?     What things should drive my choice between one or the other?   In which situations is one better than the other, and why? Open local folder from link Where can I find Ghost/Poison/Psychic type Pokémon? Formal basis for variable substitution in limits So we do a lot of variable substitution in limits at school. Stuff like $\lim\limits_{x\to5}\ (x+1)^2\ =\ \lim\limits_{y\to6}\ y^2$, where we define the substitution $y = x + 1$.  But I've never been clear on what exactly the theoretical basis for this is. What is the formula that you're actually applying when you do variable substitution? What are the formal conditions under which it is possible?  My conjecture would be the following:  For all continuous $f$, and all real $a$: $\lim\limits_{x\to a}\ (f\circ g)(x)\ =\lim\limits_{x\to g(a)}\ f(x)$, where $g$ is a continuous function  So to take my first example, $f$ would be $x^2$, $g$ would be $x + 1$, and $a$ would be $5$.  Am I in the right area? If this is correct, can it be proven using $\epsilon$-$\delta$? I had a half-hearted shot at it the other night and didn't get anywhere. The Stack Imgur service is no longer resizing images correctly Ethernet device not managed I am using Ubuntu 16.10 and recently I have not been able to connect to internet using Ethernet. The network manager shows device not managed. The WiFi network is working fine.      I've tried the solution from this questionn  with no use.  My /etc/network/interfaces file:  # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8) auto lo iface lo inet loopback   My /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf file:  [main] plugins=ifupdown,keyfile,ofono dns=dnsmasq  [ifupdown] managed=true   Output of nmcli d:  DEVICE  TYPE      STATE      CONNECTION  wlp2s0  wifi      connected  eduroam     enp8s0  ethernet  unmanaged  --          lo      loopback  unmanaged  -- Greiner in his book "Field Quantization" page 173, eq.(7.11) did this calculation:     ${\mathcal L}^\prime=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\nu A^\mu-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A^\mu\partial_\nu A^\nu $   $\space\space\space\space=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$        The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations. Thus the dynamics of the electromagnetic field (in the Lorentz gauge) can be described by the simple Lagrangian        ${\mathcal L}^{\prime\prime}=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu$     Yes, if it is a four-divergence of a vector whose 0-component doesn't contain time derivatives of the field, indeed according to the variational principle this four-divergence will not influence the field equation.  And actually I calculated the time-derivative dependence of 0-component of $[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$, in which only $[A_0(\partial^0 A^0)-(\partial_0 A^0) A^0]$ could possibly contain time-derivative, which vanishes fortunately, so whatever the general case it doesn't matter in this present case.  But how can he seem to claim that it holds for a general four-divergence term,The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations?  EDIT: I only assumed the boundary condition to be $A^\mu=0$ at spatial infinity, not at time infinity. And the variation of the action $S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}L \, dt$ is due to the variation of fields which vanish at time, $\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)=\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)=0$, not having the knowledge of $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)$ and $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)$, which don't vanish generally, so the four-divergence term will in general contribute to the action, $$\delta S_j=\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \partial_\mu j(A(x),\nabla A(x),\dot A(x))^\mu =\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \dot j^0 =\int d^3\mathbf x [\delta j(\mathbf x, t_2)^0-\delta j(\mathbf x, t_1)^0]$$ which does not vanish in general! What happens if you call erase() on a map element while iterating from begin to end? Difference between float and decimal data type Programming language books explain that value types are created on the stack, and reference types are created on the heap, without explaining what these two things are. I haven't read a clear explanation of this.  I understand what a stack is. But,    Where and what are they (physically in a real computer's memory)? To what extent are they controlled by the OS or language run-time? What is their scope? What determines the size of each of them? What makes one faster? E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages What's the best counter strategy against battlecruisers? How should I prepare my army when attacking someone who has 12+ battlecruisers? (Protoss/Zerg/Terran answers are more than appreciated) Creating Indexes on DB with Hibernate @Index Annotation