I created a blog via Github Pages and as I started writing articles I wanted to check if it was indexed by Google. The blog is:  After a few weeks I manually added it to Google Search Console. Then, in a day or two, it displayed only one page () which is a repo page, but seemed to totally ignore the main blog pages. I noticed my sitemap had not been fetched so I added it manually. Waited again a week or two and still no luck. Google still displays &quot;Unable to fetch sitemap&quot; (well, something like that, my Google is not in english) next to it. My sitemap () is generated by the jekyll plugin and looks good to me. Robots.txt () do not seem to be the problem either. So, now my Google Search is still empty except for this repo page mentioned earlier. Maybe I should wait longer, I did wait 1~2 months already though. Have you had any similar experience or have any idea I could try ? Thank you for your time !
This is a general, community wiki  question and answer pair intended to address any questions   concerning the reasons a site or specific site contents do not appear   in search engine results.      If your question was closed as a duplicate of this question and you   feel that the information provided here does not provide a sufficient   answer, please open a discussion on .   My site (or specific pages on my site) is not appearing in search engine results.  Why isn't my content indexed and what can I do about it?
Inner border over images with CSS? What do I do when glitched? I was playing Grand Theft Auto Online on Xbox 360, and a player teleported to me.  I shot them, but they placed a campfire on me.  Now, I am constantly being burnt to death. How do I get out? Logical Volume, Physical Volume and Volume Groups How to Make This Block Diagram with LaTeX I understand that there are some questions here regarding the block diagrams. However, I am strongly interested in one particular style shown as below:    This is a picture from a paper. As can be seen, the text can be selected there. So it is not an attached picture. I suppose it is done by LaTeX.  Could anyone point me to the right direction to achieve this?  (I specially LOVE the colored "thin grid"! It is much more beautiful than the fully filled color!) Why is printf better than echo? I've heard a lot about the Undying Lands but I don't fully understand how they're different from Middle-earth and why only certain people/races are allowed to go there.  Can someone explain? How do I put big brackets under different parts of an equation so that I can write, e.g., text specific to these parts? For example: f =  x^3 +  2     |___|  |__|        |     |    text 1  text 2 Should I remove non-significant variables from my regression model I have run a multiple linear regression using stepwise regression to select the best model, however the best model returned has a non-significant variable. When I remove this the AIC value goes up indicating the model without the significant variable is a worse fit. Should I remove the non-significant predictor or should I leave it in as it is a better model? \nameref breaks for star versions of section/paragraph when titlesec is loaded \nameref breaks for the star versions of section, paragraph when titlesec is loaded. I have a document that numbers paragraphs by default, but I have a few I do not want to number but would like to refer to. These are marked with \paragraph*, however, if the titlesec package is loaded at the same time, it causes nameref to display an empty string (the link box of hyperref is still visible).  MWE:  \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[sf]{titlesec} %comment this out and it works fine. \usepackage{hyperref} \begin{document} \section{Sections} \label{sec} This is \nameref{sec} \paragraph{A named Paragraph} \label{par} This is \nameref{par} \paragraph*{A starred named Paragraph} \label{par:star} This is \nameref{par:star} \end{document}   I suspect titlesec causes this defect for ALL star variants of sectioning commands but have not tested this. For me only paragraph* is relevant however a fix for all variants would be the best.  I have a hunch it might be related to this:  however this happens to go way beyond my latex knowledge and is just "magic" for me. "Knowledge of" vs. "knowledge on" Buying a "blender" that can purée a potato My wife had a "smoothie" made by a co-worker that is based on green apples and raw red potatos.  Our smoothie maker can't do that and leaves unchopped bits and a gritty feel.  Her friend uses a Vitamix blender, and looking up the model number not only induced sticker shock, but reviews raised concerns with the item leaving bits of teflon in the food etc. And the price for just a replacement pitcher is so high that it appears overpriced.  What is it about a blender that allows it to make a good purée rather than just mixing things easily?  I think it might be the design of the blade and base, not just raw power: even a modest powered blender doesn't stall or run out of power; but it doesn't chop any finer no matter how long it is left running.  It might also involve speed vs torque usage of power.  Does anybody know what makes a machine capable of making a good purée as opposed to just blending, especially when both kinds are sold as “blenders”.  Should I be looking for ones with different options for blades like a food processor, to make it well suited to different purposes? E.g. I have seen blades just for milkshakes.  In general, how do you shop for one when the only information a seems to be total power and the number of presets? When is it correct to use "yourself" and "myself" (versus "you" and "me")? Accept Multiple Answers or Split Bounty among Several Users Often more than one person contributes to the community coming up with the final accepted answer to a question. However, it is only possible to accept a single answer. Restricting to one final answer does make sense for the sake of referencing that answer later, but in many cases that answer is the product of the input from several individuals. I would like to be able to decide how much of a bounty goes to different users, or some other mechanism to recognize the contribution of multiple users. Of course I could always upvote their previous answers, but this is really incorrect if their previous answers aren't the complete, final answer I've accepted.  What think you metaSOrs? I am confused about the usage of the words like and unlike in sentences. Like and unlike make me confused because I see them being used everywhere almost interchangeably, and to make matters worse I even saw commas making difference in meaning.  Which of the following sentences is most correct, and least ambiguous?      Unlike Xbox, Playstation can't play Halo.     Playstation can't play Halo unlike Xbox can.     Playstation can't play Halo, unlike Xbox can.     Like Xbox, Playstation can't play Halo.     Playstation can't play Halo like Xbox can.     Playstation can't play Halo, like Xbox can.     Playstation can't play Halo unlike Xbox.     Playstation can't play Halo, unlike Xbox.     Playstation can't play Halo like Xbox.     Playstation can't play Halo, like Xbox.    In case you don't know what I actually wanted to say in those sentences: I'm trying to say that Playstation can't run the Halo video game and Xbox can run that game. I probably should have tried sentences with no brands but I can't imagine any meaningful sentences at this moment which contains like/unlike. Animations with movie15 and swf files I am trying to use movie15 to embed vector animations in my presentation. The trouble is that embedded SWF files refuse to display on Acrobat Reader X sometimes with a "This Media requires an additional player" message. Eg. this  doesn't work. Animated GIFs won't display either, with no error message.   Maybe this is an Acrobat issue but I tried the flashmovie package with the same SWF files and that does work (but only with the embedded player option so no controls are visible). But flashmovie is supposedly unstable with beamer so I was wondering if someone had run into the same problem with movie15.  I am using Windows 7, Acrobat 10.1.2 and MiKTeX. Inexact measurement and wavefunction collapse As is usually said, measurement of an observable $q$ leads to collapse of wavefunction to an eigenstate of the corresponding operator $\hat q$. That is, now the wavefunction in $q$ representation is $\psi(q)=\delta(q-q_0)$ where $q_0$ is result of measurement.  Now, in reality measurements are never exact, so the wavefunction should not have that sharp peak. Instead it should be broadened depending on precision of measurement. In this case, can we still introduce an operator, an eigenstate of which would the new wavefunction appear? Is it useful in any way? Or does the new wavefunction depend too much on the way it was measured so that each instrument would have its own operator? How would such opeartor look e.g. for a single-slit experiment? How to reinstall Windows 10 on new hard disk I've been using Windows 10 for a couple of month now (joined the Insider Preview).  Now my hard drive started ticking so I've bought a new SSD and I want to move the windows installation to the new hard drive, which has been connected to the computer (unpartitioned). I don't mind and I even prefer reinstalling it over again.   Since I have the free version of Windows 10 pro, can I still reinstall it anew? Does the windows 10 installation offer disk management and partition like the older Windows installations used to? How should I reinstall Winodws 10 x64 the easiest but still remain on free mode? I am reading Introduction to Quantum Computing by Kaye, Laflamme, and Mosca. As an exercise, they write  "Prove that if the operators $P_{i}$ satisfy $P_{i}^{*}=P_{i}$ and $P_{i}^{2}=P_{i}$ , then $P_{i}P_{j}=0$ for $i\ne j$.''   In the context of this problem, it has been assumed that $I=\sum_{i=1}^{n} P_{i}$, where I suppose that $n$ could be infinite. I have shown that this is true in the trivial case $n=2$, but the general case has been eluding me. How should I attack this? Moment generating function (MGF) of the ratio distribution $\displaystyle\frac{X}{Y}$ If we know the moment generating functions (MGFs) of the random variables $X$ and $Y$ to be $M_{X}(s)$ and $M_{Y}(s)$, respectively. The MGF of the sum $X+Y$ will $M_{X}(s) \cdot M_{Y}(s)$.  So what is the MGF of the ratio distribution $\displaystyle\frac{X}{Y}$? Display Database Instance Relationship with TikZ I'm trying to display all of my corporate database instances and their relationship to each other, so to speak the database links. I found the geometry shape cylinder using TikZ \usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}, but I'm new to the whole TikZ stuff and it doesn't worked out that well so I thought maybe you could help me getting something like the following figure:    There will be a ton of instances and arrows, but I hope that you guys could give me a start so that I could do the rest on my own.