I'm trying to handle an exception to avoid my program crash if double.Parse(string) tries parsing invalid values (such as strings instead of numbers). Here's what I've got:  do {     //asking customer the amount of shirts he would like to buy any shirts they want.     numbershirtString = Console.ReadLine(); // customer types in amount of shirts they want.     numbershirts = double.Parse(numbershirtString);      keepLooping = true;      if (numbershirts &lt; 10)     {         Console.WriteLine("You would be buying " + numbershirts + " shirts");         keepLooping = false;     }      if (numbershirts &gt; 10)     {         Console.WriteLine("You cannot order more than 10 shirts. Please try again.");         keepLooping = true;     }  } while (keepLooping);   I would appreciate your help. Thank you in advance!
What is the difference between Parse() and TryParse()?  int number = int.Parse(textBoxNumber.Text);  // The Try-Parse Method int.TryParse(textBoxNumber.Text, out number);   Is there some form of error-checking like a Try-Catch Block?
biblatex: per-entry language switching According to biblatex manual (p.24), the hyphenation field in a bib-entry switches language on per-entry basis:     hyphenation field    The language of the bibliography entry. The identifier must be a language name   known to the babel package. This information may be used to switch hyphenation   patterns and localize strings in the bibliography.   This functionality seemed to not work. I just used an example of bib base that comes with biblatex documentation to print the entire bibliography.   \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[german,american]{babel} \usepackage{csquotes} \usepackage[style=numeric,backend=biber]{biblatex} \addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib} \begin{document} \nocite{*} \printbibliography \end{document}   The bibliography contains few entries in German. However in the printed list of references they are formatted with english strings.     [8] Averroes. Drei Abhandlungen über die Conjunction des separaten Intellects   mit dem Menschen. Von Averroes (Vater und Sohn), aus dem   Arabischen übersetzt von Samuel Ibn Tibbon. Ed. and trans. by J. Hercz.   Berlin: S. Hermann, 1869.   Per-entry language switching is provided by the  bundle of bst style for BibTeX. Looking through biblatex internal code, I've got an impression that biblatex needs major re-implementation in order to provide similar functionality. Or am I wrong? $\forall$ At the beginning or at the end? I have a set of real numbers $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ and two functions $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ and $g:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$.  What are the differences between the following statements?   $\forall v \in \{1, \ldots, n\} ~f(x_v) = 0 \vee g(x_v) = 0$ $f(x_v) = 0 \vee g(x_v) = 0 ~\forall v \in \{1, \ldots, n\} ~$ Transfer subtype Descriptions form long integer value into a string at new diffrent field Correct usage of suspended hyphens I have seen some people using them while others not. Should I still use a suspended hyphen in the following snippet?     I have used upper- and lowercase in my script. Short story identification: society partitioned off by high wall Complete induction proof that every $n > 1$ can be written as a product of primes $K/F$ is a field extension of finite degree $n$. How can I prove that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring of $n\times n$ matrices over $F$, so the ring of $n\times n$ matrix over $F$ contains an isomorphic copy of every extension of $F$ of degree $\leq n$? Reason for the discreteness arising in quantum mechanics? What is the most essential reason that actually leads to the quantization. I am reading the book on quantum mechanics by Griffiths. The quanta in the infinite potential well for e.g. arise due to the boundary conditions, and the quanta in harmonic oscillator arise due to the commutation relations of the ladder operators, which give energy eigenvalues differing by a multiple of $\hbar$. But what actually is the reason for the discreteness in quantum theory? Which postulate is responsible for that. I tried going backwards, but for me it somehow seems to come magically out of the mathematics. The bikeshed problem and Stack Exchange In short, :     If you go before the Board of   Directors and ask for 1.5 billion   dollars to build a nuclear reactor, no   one will review or discuss the details   of the plant. They will assume that   experts have been over every inch of   the plans, and not want to look   foolish by asking a silly question.      However, if you ask the same group to   approve a 30 dollar expenditure for   lumber with which to build a bikeshed   (presumably a British term for the   smallest possible building) then be   prepared for a 45 minute discussion   about all aspects of the bikeshed,   including the color of the paint. The   explanation for this is that everyone   can grasp the scale of a bikeshed.   To transform this problem to Stack Overflow terms, questions that are trivial such as "How to convert a C string to a QString or "What is the difference between . and ->" get a lot more views, answers and votes than real questions of the form "How do I frob this widget" that bother real professionals. Fewer views mean less possible votes for good answers and hence less incentive for people to answer.  How can Stack Exchange solve this problem? How to calculate a heading on the earths surface? Given an initial position and a subsequent position, each given by latitude and longitude in the WGS-84 system.  How do you determine the heading in degrees clockwise from true north of movement? Position vs Part Yesterday I started the upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04, but I interrupted it because it was taking too long. Now if I restart it, it doesn't proceed.  Is there any possibility to clean the mess it left when I interrupted it and make a clean restart of this update? I worked, I've worked, I have been working. I need some clarifications Could you help me with these sentences:   I lied to her. (I'm just making a statment)  I've lied to her because the truth would have hurted her.   Second example:   I have been working at Google for 10years. (Meaning I am still working there) I've worked at Google and it was nice.(I don't work anymore) I worked at Google. (Not sure about the difference with the previous one)   I'm learning the different tenses and it isn't so easy for me. Any help would be welcome.  Regards, I am aware of the basics of evolutionary theory, however I don't understand how mutations can add genes over time.   Am I correct in thinking that creatures within the same species who mutate to have an additional gene in their genome would normally be infertile?  Or am I misunderstanding that?  Can someone explain the process of the creation of genetic material through evolution?  Citation to a decent academic paper or book on the matter would be appreciated too. How FluentWait is different from WebDriverWait? How is the FluentWait is different from WebDriverWait? I am using WebDriverWait having the polling interval set to : 500 miliseconds. Still, WebDriverWait returns after some delay (i.e. 2 - 3 seconds after the element load is completed)? Any opinion here? I am using the function below to match URLs inside a given text and replace them for HTML links. The regular expression is working great, but currently I am only replacing the first match.  How I can replace all the URL? I guess I should be using the exec command, but I did not really figure how to do it.  function replaceURLWithHTMLLinks(text) {     var exp = /(\b(https?|ftp|file):\/\/[-A-Z0-9+&amp;@#\/%?=~_|!:,.;]*[-A-Z0-9+&amp;@#\/%=~_|])/i;     return text.replace(exp,"&lt;a href='$1'&gt;$1&lt;/a&gt;");  } Can a character escape the  (DMG p. 177, listed in the SRD as the ) with the  spell? To clarify, I am not asking if the bands prevent teleportation. I am asking whether the bands are teleported with the character as he teleports using misty step. A geometric reason why the square of the focal length of a hyperbola is equal to the sum of the squares of the axes? When estimating variance, why do unbiased estimators divide by n-1 yet maximum likelihood estimates divide by n? I am totally confused: On the one hand you can read all kinds of explanations why you have to divide by n-1 to get an unbiased estimator for the (unknown) population variance (degrees of freedom, not defined for sample size 1 etc.) - see e.g.  or .  On the other hand when it comes to variance estimation of a supposed normal distribution all of this doesn't seem to be true anymore. There it is said that the maximum likelihood estimator for variance includes only a division by n - see e.g. .  Now, can anyone please enlighten me why it is true here but not there? I mean normality is what most models boil down to (not least due to the ). So is the choice "division by n" yet the best choice for finding the best estimation for the true population variance after all?!? Give an example of a continuous function $f : [0, ∞) \mapsto [0, ∞)$ such that $\int_{0}^{\infty}f(x)dx$ exists but $f$ is unbounded. Give an example of a continuous function $f : [0,  ∞) \mapsto [0, ∞)$ such that  $\int_{0}^{\infty}f(x)dx$ exists but  $f$ is unbounded.   I have been thinking about this. And I have come to the conclusion that I will need to construct a function, $f$, such that $f$ is a sequence of triangles of increasing height, but decreasing base. I obviously need $f$ such that both the height of the triangles, and sum of the bases tends to infinity. But I also need that the $\sum (\text{height} \times \text{base}) \leq \infty $