Original Post:  I recently attended a lecture with highly technical content.  One of the middle slides in the deck had a particular phrase that reminded me of something that I had read several years before.  It took me a few minutes, but I found the original source (another slide deck) and am shocked to find that the professor lifted 35 slides verbatim from the original source.  The University holds students accountable for plagiarism and strictly defines plagiarism such that this clearly fits.  The slides were used verbatim and no credit or reference was provided.  Further, logos were added and color schemes were changed to make make them look slightly more like original content.  What should I do?  This professor has a professional full time job and I can imagine this getting swept under the rug, but this is clearly plagiarism and is spelled out very clearly in the student conduct code.  Is this an overreaction or should I pursue this?  This is confounded by the fact that I am very disappointed by the rigor of the course and feel like the professor lacks adequate technical background to teach the course (I guess my suspicions came true).  I'm really busy at work so don't want to deal with a big todo, but believe this really discredits the academic integrity of the course.  Additional content in response to comments:  The University defines plagiarism as "Using another writer's words without proper citation."  There is no proper citation given here, and these are not educational materials.  This is 35 slides from someone else's tutorial presentation.  I do not believe that the professor and the author of the original content have a relationship.  I have emailed the author to enquire about any permissions or relationship.  Still, even with permission, this is still plagiarism as defined be most people and as defined by the University.  All original works in the US are implicitly copyright protected, so there is also a copyright issue, but this is not currently my concern, though it could be of interest to the original author.  I have emailed him, so this is up to him.  This is a US institution and is a top tier highly respected school.  I am also not a lay student, but a Ph.D. with a degree from a top tier university who has served as a faculty member at two top tier universities (including this one).  I have also taught undergraduate courses in the past.  I have never engaged in this type of plagiarism, have never known colleagues to do so, and am shocked that so many people suggest this is par for the course in teaching.  My doctorate is from a school that prides itself on its honor code and takes honor code violations very seriously and I have served on the honor council and deliberated on a case of plagiarism in the past.  I really am shocked by this incident.  Response from Original Author of the Slides:  I have received a response from the author of the slides and he states that the work is his original work, that there are no additional authors of the work, that no one has been given permission to present the work, and that he believes his copyright on the work has been infringed upon.  He has requested additional information to assert his claim on the copyright.
I have a professor at my university who uses content from an un-cited textbook that he has never referenced anywhere, including his green sheet (syllabus), as an additional resource. At least some slides he has used include parts of content that have been re-worded and others that are 100% the same. I noticed this by Googling for textbooks on the material we're studying in class and found that examples given in one that I found were exactly the same as what he has provided.  Would this technically be plagiarism? Should he be given the benefit of the doubt in this situation?
For all $x,y∈\Bbb{R}$ define that $ x\equiv y$ if$ x^2=y^2$ For all $x,y\in\Bbb{R}$ define that $x\equiv y$ if $x^2=y^2$ . Then $\equiv$ is an equivalence relation on $\Bbb{R}$ , there are infinitely many equivalence classes, one of them consists of one element and the rest consist of two elements.  Solution  True. To show that $\equiv$ is reflexive we need to show that $\forall x\in\mathbb{R} :x\equiv x$. Let $x\in\mathbb{R} , x\equiv x \mbox{ if } x^{2}=x^{2}$, which is obvious.  $[x] ={y\in\mathbb{R} |x\equiv y} =[0]={y\in\mathbb{R}|0\equiv y}={0}$. Hence $y^{2} =0^{2} =0$ which implies that $y=0$.  Can anyone please give me correct answer to this question. Delaunay triangulation to generate abstract networks and nodes Is it possible to use Delaunay triangulation to generate an image like the below from a raster or vector of an object (in this case, a human heart)? What software and techniques would be required to make something like this? My intention is to make and use something like this in Inkscape without having to draw all the nodes/lines/effects manually. WPF textblock binding with List does anyone know if there is a simple way to bind a textblock to a List. What I've done so far is create a listview and bind it to the List and then I have a template within the listview that uses a single textblock.  what I'd really like to do is just bind the List to a textblock and have it display all the lines.  In Winforms there was a "Lines" property that I could just throw the List into, but I'm not seeing it on the WPF textblock, or TextBox.  Any ideas?  did I miss something simple?  Here's the code  &lt;UserControl x:Class="QSTClient.Infrastructure.Library.Views.WorkItemLogView" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"          Width="500" Height="400"&gt; &lt;StackPanel&gt;     &lt;ListView ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Logs}" &gt;         &lt;ListView.View&gt;             &lt;GridView&gt;                 &lt;GridViewColumn Header="Log Message"&gt;                     &lt;GridViewColumn.CellTemplate&gt;                         &lt;DataTemplate&gt;                             &lt;TextBlock Text="{Binding}"/&gt;                         &lt;/DataTemplate&gt;                     &lt;/GridViewColumn.CellTemplate&gt;                 &lt;/GridViewColumn&gt;             &lt;/GridView&gt;         &lt;/ListView.View&gt;     &lt;/ListView&gt; &lt;/StackPanel&gt;     and the WorkItem Class  public class WorkItem {     public string Name { get; set; }     public string Description { get; set; }     public string CurrentLog { get; private set; }     public string CurrentStatus { get; private set; }     public WorkItemStatus Status { get; set; }     public ThreadSafeObservableCollection&lt;string&gt; Logs{get;private set;}   I'm using Prism to create the control and put it into a WindowRegion          WorkItemLogView newView = container.Resolve&lt;WorkItemLogView&gt;();         newView.DataContext = workItem;         regionManager.Regions["ShellWindowRegion"].Add(newView);   thanks How to completely remove virtualbox I had installed VirtualBox but it started giving me problems. So I uninstalled it using:-  sudo apt-get remove virtualbox-\* sudo apt-get purge virtualbox-\*   But when I reinstalled VirtualBox it again resumed to previous settings and started giving same problems. How can i completely remove VirtualBox from my laptop and then reinstall it such that it wont give same problem again? Best way to strip punctuation from a string Let $A$ be an $n \times n$ matrix with real enteries. Define $\langle x,y\rangle_A = \langle Ax,Ay\rangle, \quad x,y \in \mathbb R^n$ , where $\langle,\rangle$ is a standard inner product on $\mathbb R^n$. Then  $\langle x,y\rangle_A$ is an inner product iff  1)  $\ker A = \{0\}$.  2) $\operatorname{rank} A= n$.  3) all eigenvalues of $A$ are positive.  4) all eigen value of $A$ are non negative.  Clearly if $\ker A \neq \{0\}$, then there exist $x \neq 0$ such that $Ax =0$, then $\langle Ax, Ax\rangle_A = 0$, then $\langle ,\rangle_A$ is not inner product, so $\ker A = \{0\}$, thus rank of $A$ is $n$.  I am unable to check the 3) and 4) option. Please help to check the other option. Thank you Identify duplicate lines in a file without deleting them? I have my references as a text file with a long list of entries and each has two (or more) fields.   The first column is the reference's url; the second column is the title which may vary a bit depending on how the entry was made. Same for third field which may or may not be present.  I want to identify but not remove entries that have the first field (reference url) identical. I know about sort -k1,1 -u but that will automatically (non-interactively) remove all but the first hit. Is there a way to just let me know so I can choose which to retain?  In the extract below of three lines that have the same first field (http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/49569/), I would like to keep line 2 because it has additional tags (sort, CLI) and delete lines #1 and #3:  http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/49569/  unique-lines-based-on-the-first-field http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/49569/  Unique lines based on the first field   sort, CLI http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/49569/  Unique lines based on the first field   Is there a program to help identify such "duplicates"? Then, I can manually clean up by personally deleting lines #1 and #3? Is there a way to find comments you made on YouTube? It has been said that everyone lives by selling something.  Can I substitute the bold part with &quot;it is said&quot;? I think since it is kinda like a saying, using present simple is more appropriate. But I also feel &quot;it is said&quot; can also mean this sentence was said before, and the impact on the present is that now people generally accept that. And present perfect I think carry the implication that people now may or may not say this anymore. Can a package overwrite the original commands in Latex? An example:  Without the amsmath package:   The equation environment numbers the equation automatically. The align environment cannot be executed.   With the amsmath package:   align and equation work seamlessly in numbering equations: I can use equation to write my first two equations, and align to write my third equation, and Latex will still number them correctly.   My questions are:   Is the code for the command equation after loading the amsmath package still the same as it was before loading the package? Moreover, if this is the case, then, in general, can loading different packages cause conflicts? And how do we avoid it? Does a four-divergence extra term in a Lagrangian density matter to the field equations? Greiner in his book "Field Quantization" page 173, eq.(7.11) did this calculation:     ${\mathcal L}^\prime=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\nu A^\mu-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A^\mu\partial_\nu A^\nu $   $\space\space\space\space=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$        The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations. Thus the dynamics of the electromagnetic field (in the Lorentz gauge) can be described by the simple Lagrangian        ${\mathcal L}^{\prime\prime}=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu$     Yes, if it is a four-divergence of a vector whose 0-component doesn't contain time derivatives of the field, indeed according to the variational principle this four-divergence will not influence the field equation.  And actually I calculated the time-derivative dependence of 0-component of $[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$, in which only $[A_0(\partial^0 A^0)-(\partial_0 A^0) A^0]$ could possibly contain time-derivative, which vanishes fortunately, so whatever the general case it doesn't matter in this present case.  But how can he seem to claim that it holds for a general four-divergence term,The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations?  EDIT: I only assumed the boundary condition to be $A^\mu=0$ at spatial infinity, not at time infinity. And the variation of the action $S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}L \, dt$ is due to the variation of fields which vanish at time, $\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)=\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)=0$, not having the knowledge of $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)$ and $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)$, which don't vanish generally, so the four-divergence term will in general contribute to the action, $$\delta S_j=\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \partial_\mu j(A(x),\nabla A(x),\dot A(x))^\mu =\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \dot j^0 =\int d^3\mathbf x [\delta j(\mathbf x, t_2)^0-\delta j(\mathbf x, t_1)^0]$$ which does not vanish in general! What are the uses of "using" in C#? Is there console mode in Mac OS X? WoeUSB Error Code 256 with NTFS formatted USB I tried to create a Windows 10 USB boot medium with WoeUSB. I formatted a USB drive with an NTFS partition, but WoeUSB complains with:  Installation failed! Exit code: 256 Log: WoeUSB v@@WOEUSB_VERSION@@ ============================== Mounting source filesystem... Error: File "/media/woeusb_source_1543626298_6098/sources/install.wim" in source image has exceed the FAT32 Filesystem 4GiB Single File Size Limitation and cannot be installed.  You must specify a different --target-filesystem. Refer: https://github.com/slacka/WoeUSB/wiki/Limitations#fat32-filesystem-4gib-single-file-size-limitation for more info. Unmounting and removing "/media/woeusb_source_1543626298_6098"... You may now safely detach the target device   I've also tried to start WoeUSB via command line, did not work.  sudo woeusb --partition Win10_1809Oct_English_x64.iso /dev/sdb   My iso is located in:     home/sawyer/Downloads/Win10_1809Oct_English_x64.iso  Thanks in advance! I've been trying to get windows installed for three nights now, so any help towards that goal is greatly appreciated. Examples:        Why, I'd love to.   Why, of course!      I get the concept of starting a sentence with a word not completely related to the overall response, but this one seems to be a particularly odd choice&nbsp;— is there any semantic meaning I'm missing? Interpreting the residuals vs. fitted values plot for verifying the assumptions of a linear model Consider the following figure from Faraway's Linear Models with R (2005, p. 59).    The first plot seems to indicate that the residuals and the fitted values are uncorrelated, as they should be in a homoscedastic linear model with normally distributed errors. Therefore, the second and third plots, which seem to indicate dependency between the residuals and the fitted values, suggest a different model.  But why does the second plot suggest, as Faraway notes, a heteroscedastic linear model, while the third plot suggest a non-linear model?  The second plot seems to indicate that the absolute value of the residuals is strongly positively correlated with the fitted values, whereas no such trend is evident in the third plot. So if it were the case that, theoretically speaking, in a heteroscedastic linear model with normally distributed errors  $$ \mbox{Cor}\left(\mathbf{e},\hat{\mathbf{y}}\right) = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1 \\ \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\ 1 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1\end{array}\right] $$  (where the expression on the left is the variance-covariance matrix between the residuals and the fitted values) this would explain why the second and third plots agree with Faraway's interpretations.  But is this the case? If not, how else can Faraway's interpretations of the second and third plots be justified? Also, why does the third plot necessarily indicate non-linearity? Isn't it possible that it is linear, but that the errors are either not normally distributed, or else that they are normally distributed, but do not center around zero? When electric dipole placed in non uniform electric field, what is the approach to calculate torque acting on it? Can it be zero? Stack Overflow provides good tools in the question editor, like "Links" and "Styling".  Another thing that for me would be nice is a color selector. Although an HTML editor is available, a direct click on tool would be good, and users can select different colors, as for marking errors in their program with red, and more important data with blue. Who invented "dooblidoo"? The word  is used by several different youtube channels as a different word for the youtube description bar. I've seen it used by the  and by .  Who was first to use and invent the term? Differential Equations: solve the system Solve the following system:   $$dx/dt=-.2(y-2)$$ $$dy/dt=.8(x-2)$$  This is what I have so far, but I got stuck.. $$\begin{eqnarray} dx/dt&amp;=&amp;-.2y-.4\\ x'&amp;=&amp;-.2y-.4\\ x'+.4&amp;=&amp;-.2y\\ y&amp;=&amp;-x/2'-2\\ y&amp;=&amp;-x''/2-2\\ \\ dy/dt&amp;=&amp;.8(x-2)\\ dy/dt&amp;=&amp;.8x-1.6\\ y'&amp;=&amp;.8x-1.6\\ -x''-2&amp;=&amp;.8x-1.6\\ -x''&amp;=&amp;.8x+.4\\ x''+16x+.8&amp;=&amp;0 \end{eqnarray}$$  when I used the quadratic formula I got stuck. Is this correct so far? Can someone finish it off for me?