class Student{     public **static** void main (String[]arg){     }     }   Here why we are using static keyword to start a main method. From my knowledge I can say      Static will get memory and it can retain its value   Is that only reason for using Static key work in main.   Explain in detail thanks   .
The method signature of a Java main() method is:  public static void main(String[] args){     ... }   Is there a reason for this method to be static?
How can I derive effect sizes in lme4 and describe the magnitude of fixed effects? Opposite of "trendy" without a negative meaning I am looking for an opposite to the word trendy without giving a meaning that those who adopted the trend are old-fashioned in hindsight. For example,     Service Oriented Architecture is the trend as of now. But what is trendy in 2014 can become ______ in 2015.   So in 2015, the trend becomes widespread to the extent that it is no longer trendy, but not necessarily old-fashioned.  Edit: I am currently thinking of using mainstream. But still any other thoughts are welcome! I am developing an application and can not figure out a proper abstract term that would fit an interface that defines an object as Movable and Resizable (In essence, something that has a defined size and defined position). Calling it Movable and resizable is kind of silly. Layout was a term that came to my mind but it is not good as layout is something that is responsible for defining position and size, not containing it. Thanks a lot. How to do a Point to Polygon analysis with multiple variables in QGIS? I have a database of almost 10k crimes, which are divided in to 10 categories and plotted on a map  I also have a database of 12k addresses, which are also plotted on the map.   I aim to perform a multiple regression to determine whether there are correlations between types of crime and house price.  I have created a buffer of 250 meters around each of the addresses, and would like to list a count of each of the crimes which are located within this buffered zone for each of the addresses, however, I can only get QGIS to give me a count of all types of crime, rather than the specifics.   Does anyone know how to do a point to polygon analysis of this type? I am in the middle of breaking the crime databases to analyse each one separately, which is a bit difficult! Prove: if $|z|=1$ than $\frac{z+1}{z-1}$ is an imaginary number Prove: if $|z|=1$ than $\frac{z+1}{z-1}$ is an imaginary number    I have tried to look at $$\frac{z+1}{z-1}=\frac{z+1}{z-1}\cdot \overline{\frac{z-1}{\overline{z-1}}}=\frac{z+1}{z-1}\cdot \frac{\overline{z}-1}{\overline{z}-1}$$  But did not get far Topic models and word co-occurrence methods What is this socket/port/connector on my laptop? I've have this socket on my laptop (Lenovo Z570).  What is this port and what is it used for? And what does that symbol mean (I expected a LOCK symbol)? Replace preg_replace() e modifier with preg_replace_callback Is a block of cotton heavier than a block of iron? if i have a block of cotton and a block of iron each containing a weight of 100 kg when measured on a weighing machine, in reality which one is heaver than the other, which one is heavier and why?  This question was in my physics worksheet. The teacher gave the following answer: the apparent weight of both of them is the same, but the buoyant force of cotton is high since the volume of cotton is more than iron. Therefore, true weight of cotton is more. Does this answer make sense? What is the right answer? I have requested for a French long term (Type D) student visa from a consulate in India. It's a national Type D visa and not a Schengen visa. My question is that can we still go to other Schengen countries on this visa? If not then can we get a Schengen visa from a consulate in France? Can Windows use a Linux shell instead of cmd? I was wondering if it is somehow technologically possible for Windows to add some sort of Linux interface?  I think it would win over many programmers to develop on Windows.  Any ideas on this? I have recently upgraded Ubuntu 19.10 to latest LTS Ubuntu 20.04. After updating, I get serious artifacts on my screen. Every time I reboot (or log-in), my screen is fuzzy or scrambled (picture attached):     This is temporary. The fuzzy screen goes away when I change the background. But it reappears the moment I reboot or log back in.   I have Intel HD Graphics 520 (Skylake GT2).  The output of lspci -nn |grep -E 'VGA|Display' is:  00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Skylake GT2 [HD Graphics 520] [8086:1916] (rev 07)   Update:   On enabling Wayland in Ubuntu 20.04 and logging in to, these artifacts are however cured.   This is okay for now, but I am not sure about Wayland as I have not yet used it before.   Is there a way to correct the graphic issue with normal Ubuntu startup? How does QGIS Zonal Statistics handle partially overlapping pixels? How to restrict awk math output to 2 decimal places My Command is below and its print Free CPU and Used CPU below format.  I want to restrict awk output to 2 decimal place.  grep 'cpu ' /proc/stat | awk '{usage=($2+$4)*100/($2+$4+$5)} {free=($5)*100/($2+$3+$4+$5)} END {print "Used Cpu:",usage "%"} {print "Free Cpu:",free "%"}'   Output :   Free Cpu: 98.9588%  Used Cpu: 1.04125%   Desired output :  Free Cpu: 98.95%  Used Cpu: 1.04% Unit testing void methods? What is the best way to unit test a method that doesn't return anything? Specifically in c#.  What I am really trying to test is a method that takes a log file and parses it for specific strings. The strings are then inserted into a database. Nothing that hasn't been done before but being VERY new to TDD I am wondering if it is possible to test this or is it something that doesn't really get tested. Explicit formula for Bernoulli numbers by using only the recurrence relation It is not hard to show, by induction on $m\in\mathbb N$, that there exist a sequence $(B_n)_{n\geq0}$ of rational numbers such that  $$\sum_{k=1}^nk^m=\frac1{m+1}\sum_{k=0}^m\binom{m+1}kB_k\,n^{m+1-k},\ \style{font-family:inherit;}{\text{for all}}\ n\geq1\,.$$  These are the Bernoulli numbers of the second kind, that is, $B_1=+1/2$. A corollary of the proof (by induction) of the fact above is a recurrence formula for such numbers $B_n$, which are known as Bernoulli numbers:  $$\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\binom nkB_k=0\,.\tag{$\ast$}$$  On the other hand, there are a number of explicit formulae for $B_n$, which are obtained using the equality $\frac x{e^x-1}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty B_n\,\frac{x^n}{n!}$; see  and . For example:  $$B_n=\sum_{k=0}^n\frac1{k+1}\sum_{r=0}^k(-1)^r\binom krr^n\,.\tag{$\ast\ast$}$$  Is there some clever way to manipulate the recurrence $(\ast)$ in order to obtain $(\ast\ast)$? Is my model any good, based on the diagnostic metric ($R^2$/ AUC/ accuracy/ RMSE etc.) value? Current measurement maximum time On my multimeter I have two current measurement connection. One for the mA and one for the A.  On the ampere one there's a time limitation but not on the mA one. Also they mention in the manual a kind of "cooldown time" after the measurement for the A one. So, basicaly, probing with this input can really slow down my project. (max 15 sec every 5 minutes)  My question is, I have to switch to that A one for a 600-700mA current (mA input is 500mA), as it's not a "big" current, can I bypass this limitation ? Is it design for higher current only or any measurement done on that input ? It's a middle-end multimeter but even the online datasheet is not complete about what. (Was excepting a kind of measured current/cooldown time graph) Prove that the Interior of the Boundary is Empty Suppose X is a Metric Space  Let S $\subset X$  Prove that if S is Closed then, the Interior of the Boundary of S is Empty  Totally stuck on how to solve this. Why should the Standard Model be renormalizable? Effective theories like Little Higgs models or Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model are non-renormalizable and there is no problem with it, since an effective theory does not need to be renormalizable. These theories are valid until a scale $\Lambda$ (ultraviolet cutoff), after this scale an effective theory need a UV completion, a more "general" theory.  The Standard Model, as an effective theory of particle physics, needs a more general theory that addresses the phenomena beyond the Standard Model (an UV completion?). So, why should the Standard Model be renormalizable?