I'm a complete novice at photography, but I want to learn to take pictures of "bottle lights". I have included an image which I took with my Samsung ST60, but as you can see, it looks terrible and doesn't do the light justice at all. If purchasing something will help, I'm willing to spend a max of £250. Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated!
I have a Canon Powershot A710 and I previously had a previous Powershot A-series model. I love them due to the high amount of control they offer. Sadly, they both suck in low light conditions, their flash is very unresponsive, and the camera takes several seconds preparing itself for the next shot after a flash shot. And even then, the pictures they take in low light/flash are as bad as good are those with good light.  I'd like a camera which gives a lot of control options, but what do I need to look for to find one that's great in low light, with or without flash?
running rmi server, classnotfound As part of the definition of a cone spell in the handbook:     A cone's point of origin is not included in the cone's area of effect, unless you decide otherwise.   As an example, what would either case be for a casting of Burning Hands?   Could the caster include themselves? or does this mean that they can exclude the first square of the cone? What do you call somebody who asks a question and somebody who answers a question? Is something wrong with StackOverflow's spam filter? Recently there have been huge numbers of spam topics related to football streaming. They have all been spam flagged and deleted but there are more getting posted all the time, I just flagged another 6 or so a few minutes ago. This has been going on for around 3 days now with these topics getting constantly posted over and over again in the  tag. How do I change the plymouth bootscreen? Prove that the set of palindromes are not regular languages using the pumping lemma. Firstly I pick a language $xyz$ where $x = \epsilon$, $y = (abb)^{k}$, $z = (bba)^{k}$ where $|y| \ge$ the number of states in the automaton representing my language. Then $xyz = (abb)^k(bba)^k$ is a palindrome.  Now I split $y$ into $uvw$, where $v \ne \epsilon$ contains a state visited more  than once. If the language is regular then $xuv^iwz$ is within the language $\forall i \ge 0$.  I choose $i = 2$, then $uv^2w = (abb)^n$ where $n &gt; k$.  Then $xuv^2wz = (abb)^n(bba)^k$ where $n &gt; k$, which is not a palindrome.   Firstly, is my reasoning for this particular proof correct?  I'm unsure about how to properly apply the pumping lemma to this problem. And secondly the question asks me to state a proof for palindromes in general, whereas I only attempted to prove it for a single case. Is there an example I can choose which proves the conjecture for all palindromes? I assume not, seeing as I can't think of how that could be represented using regular expressions. Limit $\lim\limits_{x\to0}{\frac{\ln{(e+x)}-e^x}{\cos^2{x} -e^x}}$ Dealing with multiple private DNS servers What happens if both players die simultaneously? If both players are very low health and someone plays this card:    Both players could die simultaneously. What happens in Arena when this event occurs? Does it count as a loss for both players? Does it count at all for your Arena record?  Side note: Holy Nova + Auchenai Soulpriest could cause the same scenario. Kolmogorov proved, that, as one considers independent (not necessary equally distributed) Random Variables: $\{X_n\}_{n\ge0}\subseteq \mathcal L^2$   With $\mathrm{Var} (X_n)=\sigma^2_n$ and without loss of generality $E[X_n]=0$.  If $\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\sigma^2_n}{n^2} \lt \infty$ then SLLN holds, that is:  $$\frac1n\sum_{k=0}^n X_k \rightarrow 0 \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{a.s.}$$  Something different:  Also it is known, that if $\sup_{n\ge0}\sigma^2_n =: v \lt \infty$ pairwise uncorrelated $(X_n)_{n\ge0}$ will suffice for SLLN to hold.  My question in view of this situation: Is it possible to weaken the condition of $(X_n)_{n\ge0}$ beeing independent and instead merely consider pairwise uncorrelated $(X_n)_{n\ge0}$? Discriminant analysis vs logistic regression I found some pros of discriminant analysis and I've got questions about them. So:     When the classes are well-separated, the parameter estimates for   logistic regression are surprisingly unstable. Coefficients may go to   infinity. LDA doesn't suffer from this problem.      If number of features is small and the distribution of the predictors   $X$ is approximately normal in each of the classes, the linear   discriminant model is again more stable than the logistic regression   model.    What is stability and why is it important? (If logistic regression provides a good fit that does its job, then why should I care about stability?)      LDA is popular when we have more than two response classes, because it   also provides low-dimensional views of the data.    I just don't understand that. How does LDA provide low-dimensional views? If you can name more pros or cons, that would be nice. Reverse polarity protection What's the difference between asymptotic unbiasedness and consistency? Does each imply the other? If not, does one imply the other? Why/why not?  This issue came up in response to a comment on an answer I posted .  Although google searching the relevant terms didn't produce anything that seemed particularly useful, I did notice  on the math stackexchange. However, I thought that this question was appropriate for this site too.  EDIT after reading the comments  Relative to the math.stackexchange answer I was after something more in depth, covering some of the issues dealt with in . Also, as I see it the math.stackexchange question shows that consistency doesn't imply asymptotically unbiasedness but doesn't explain much if anything about why. The OP there also takes for granted that asymptotic unbiasedness doesn't imply consistency, and thus the sole answerer so far doesn't address why this is. If $f: \mathbb Q\to \mathbb Q$ is a homomorphism, prove that $f(x)=0$ for all $x\in\mathbb Q$ or $f(x)=x$ for all $x$ in $\mathbb Q$.  I'm wondering if you can help me with this one? Going through the spells, I see the phrase "Willing creature" used to determine who you can cast some spells on. I don't ever see a proper definition of what a willing creature is, but I would assume that it would go something like if you asked them "Can I perform this spell on you" they would answer yes. Is there a more formal definition of what makes a target willing in 5e?  What are the ways I could make an otherwise unwilling creature willing? Suggestion spells, for instance, should probably work but what other options do I have? Smart Phone's camera socket Currently I have a script.sh file with the following content:  #!/bin/bash wget -q http://exemple.com/page1.php; wget -q http://exemple.com/page2.php; wget -q http://exemple.com/page3.php;   I want to execute the commands one by one, when the previous finishes. Am I doing it in the right way? I've never worked with Linux before and tried to search for it but found no solutions. I am a US Green card holder with an Indian passport expiring in 4 months planning a short weekend trip by road to Canada next month.  Will I be allowed to enter Canada considering my passport won't meet the "valid passport" criteria of 6 months? Apt-get stuck at 0% [Working] returning a local variable from function in C