My question is the same as in the link provided below but when I go to Google Search Console it asks me to verify my Github profile https://github.com/[xyz] by inserting an HTML file. I am unsure about how to do that or are there any other ways that I can verify my GitHub profile.  Similar question:   Google serch console:
Is there any way to index my Github account to google search. I see that many people's account show up as soon as I type their name, but mine doesn't show up even after I type my name followed by github n search.
Are there philosophers who examined the reasons for believing in the existence of other people? While I am familiar with Descartes and the oft-quoted idea, I think therefore I am, I am not familiar with any philosophy that actively sought to rationalize that anybody else exists.  Are there philosophers who analyzed this question? Or is it taken for granted that it is (im)possible for anybody to validate their own existence to somebody else? Books for Condensed Matter after Ashcroft/Mermin What are some good condensed matter physics books that can fill the gap between Ashcroft &amp; Mermin and research papers? Suggestions for any specialized topics (such as superconductivity, CFT, topological insulators) are welcomed. Can I run Android apps on Ubuntu? Voldemort ordered Nagini to kill Snape in hopes of claiming the Elder Wand's ownership.  Let's suppose that Snape was indeed the owner.  In this scenario, would the Elder Wand's ownership truly pass to Voldemort?  I ask this because, after all, the one who overpowered Snape was Nagini, not Voldemort.   Voldemort ordered Nagini to kill Snape. However, this would be equivalent to ordering a Death Eater to kill Snape, in which case the Death Eater would gain the ownership - in a similar manner, Nagini is the murderer. Nagini isn't a "spell": remember how Draco summoned a snake to attack Harry back at CoS? If that snake kills Harry, I'd imagine that Draco gains the ownership (if Harry had the Elder Wand) because that snake was a "spell" casted by Draco - but this time is different, because Nagini isn't a "spell" casted by Voldemort, but rather an actual third-party creature.   The curious thing is that Voldemort did cast some sort of spell (he flicked his wand), which I think caused Nagini's barrier to break so Nagini could kill Snape. In some way, Voldemort did provoke Snape's death - however, it was mostly indirectly.  So, would the ownership pass to Nagini or to Voldemort? If it passes to Nagini, would the Elder Wand's "ownership cycle" end, or would it continue if Voldemort decides to kill Nagini?    The simplified version of this question is: if an animal kills the owner of the Elder Wand, what happens to its ownership? Set Xorg to use only part of the screen On the one hand, I'm aware that  in the US do not have a valid government ID. On the other hand, traveling within the US requires you to show a piece of ID wherever you go - even when taking a Greyhound.   So let's say you're an American who has a large number of cash in their pocket but no ID whatsoever. Would you be able to get from New York to San Francisco or from Seattle to Miami? If so, what are your options? Even though I do have plenty of identification documents, I find it enjoyable to be able to travel anonymously. How can I install Minecraft? I have tried many tutorials but none of them are clear enough. I have also tried installing it using Wine but it won't update and Wine goes gray and stops working.  Does anybody know an easy way to install Minecraft though the Java file without using Wine? JSonNet boolean serialization In my Computer science class I was given a problem where I have to simulate a bouncing ball using "real physics". I have been trying to find a equation that will simulate the height of the bounce given a gravity and an arbitrary mass. And I will need to calculate the next bounce and it's height. A lot of the equations I've found require a time. But I don't really care about a time, all I want is to get the next height after the previous bounce until it finally hits height of 0 or close to it. I haven't taken a physics class since high school( 5 years ago) and that was basic physics. What's the difference between importing and extending a class? Inside the alley I found myself cornered by unpleasant sights: walls covered with cracks and peeling paint, storm drains clogged with moss, dumpsters overflowing with bags, cans, and rotten trash. Inside the alley I found myself cornered by unpleasant sights: walls covered with cracks and peeling paint; storm drains clogged with moss; dumpsters overflowing with bags, cans, and rotten trash. Inside the alley I found myself cornered by unpleasant sights. Walls covered with cracks and peeling paint. Storm drains clogged with moss. Dumpsters overflowing with bags, cans, and rotten trash.  Or maybe the three of them are orthographically correct in their respective contexts? EDIT (based on dockeryZ's answer): I think second example is right, regardless of the context. Explanation: . What does The Doctor's Speech in The Rings of Akhaten refer to? I recently watched the brilliant speech from The Rings of Akhaten again. For those who haven't seen it or don't remember it:     I walked away from the last Great Time War. I marked the passing of   the Time Lords. I saw the birth of the universe and I watched as time   ran out, moment by moment, until nothing remained. No time. No space.   Just me. I walked in universes where the laws of physics were devised   by the mind of a mad man. I've watched universes freeze and creations   burn. I've seen things you wouldn't believe. I have lost things you   will never understand. And I know things. Secrets that must never be   told. Knowledge that must never be spoken. Knowledge that will make   parasite gods blaze. So come on, then. Take it! Take it all, baby!   Have it! You have it all!   Some of these I understand:     I walked away from the last Great Time War.    Clear enough     I marked the passing of the Time Lords.   Again makes sense, given he "killed" them.     I saw the birth of the universe and I watched as time ran out, moment by moment, until nothing remained. No time. No space. Just me. I walked in universes where the laws of physics were devised by the mind of a mad man. I've watched universes freeze and creations burn.   I'm very vague on this put is some of it related to The Big Bang?     I've seen things you wouldn't believe. I have lost things you will never understand. And I know things. Secrets that must never be told. Knowledge that must never be spoken. Knowledge that will make parasite gods blaze.   Possibly relating to the question which must never be answered, but at this point we've not been to Trenzalore so does he even know what knowledge is and why?  What do the unknown sections of these speech refer to? I was reading a  where the author mentions: "The coefficient of variation is primarily a descriptive statistic, but it is amenable to statistical inferences such as null hypothesis testing or confidence intervals. Standard procedures are often very dependent of the normality assumption and current work is exploring alternative procedures which are less dependent on this normality assumption."  The paper is from 2010. So my question is: has there been any recent "advancements" in terms of a coefficient of variation statistic that is not dependent upon the normality assumption? And, is this what one may call a non-parametric CV? Revision history & community wiki links show the same page I have this statement and I need to say if it is true or false:  Let $\{a_n\}$ be a real sequence.  $$\lim_{n\to +\infty} a_n = 0 \quad \implies \quad \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^na_n \quad \text{converges}$$  I know, from the Leibniz criterion that:     If $a_n \to 0$, $a_n$ is decreasing and positive then $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^na_n$ converges   From this fact I believe that the statement is false but I couldn't come up with an infinitesimal sequence that isn't decreasing and for that reason is divergent. I tried some function with $sin(\frac{1}{n})$ without any luck. Any help would be very appreciated, thank you! Why does TeX prefer an overfull box to hyphenating here? I know the definition of Airplane mode is all communications and radio signals are blocked. But is it possible to turn off the "calling/receiving" part of the phone so your phone is not connecting to a cell tower and only allow Wifi? I've looked into a couple of apps in Google Play but they're either not working or out of date with newer versions of Android.   I know there is strong opinions on both sides of the issue but I'm worried about radiation from my phone since i use it a lot in bed and I hold the phone close to my head and face. At night I'm not worried about receiving calls, so I just want to turn off the phone part and  use WiFi. Is there a way? Or am i just crazy and paranoid? Odd behavor with POSIXct/POSIXlt and subsecond accuracy Difference between $\sum_{i=1}^{k}{\frac{s_i}{kn_i}}$ and $\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{k}{s_i}}{\sum_{i=1}^{k}{n_i}}$ I am getting confused at how to calculate the average probability.  Suppose we repeat a kind of binary survey $k$ times each of which was done on a completely separate sample group.  For each $i^{th}$ group, $i=1,2,3,...,k$, Let $n_i$ be the number of samples and $s_i$ be the number of positive results. With this we know that the probability $p_i$ of the positive result for the $i^{th}$ group is $s_i/n_i$  With my ignorance, I happened to use two ways to calculate the average probability in my work wrongly assuming that they are the same:  $$\frac{p_1+p_2+p_3+...+p_k}{k}$$ and $$\frac{s_1+s_2+s_3+...+s_k}{n_1+n_2+n_3+...+n_k}$$  I don't know which is the correct way to calculate the average probability. So could you please explain the difference of these two and when to use which? For which positive integer values of $n$ does $a|mn-b?$ I am taking a number theory class, and I was not able to solve this homework problem.   Let $a,$ $b,$ and $m$ be constant positive integers. For which positive integer values of $n$ does $a|mn-b?$   I tried this out for a couple of values, and the values of $n$ satisfying this expression seem to occur in a cycle.  (For example, let $m=2019,$ $a=20,$ $b=19.$ The values of $n$ that work are $1,21,41,61,....$) However, I am not able to show that this always happens.