Problem:  Title for references are formatted automatically in lower case.  Minimal Working Example:  \RequirePackage{filecontents} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @book{RN518,    author = {Naughton, J.},    title = {What you really need to know about the Internet: From Gutenberg to Zuckerberg},    publisher = {Quercus},    address = {London},    year = {2012} } \end{filecontents}  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[swedish,english]{babel}  \usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite} \bibliographystyle{apacite}  \begin{document}  Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque varius maximus enim in scelerisque. Aliquam dictum mollis fringilla. Donec eu ullamcorper erat. Curabitur sit amet dolor eget tellus convallis rutrum consectetur elementum ligula. In a cursus magna. Maecenas nec tristique tortor. \citep{RN518}.  \bibliography{\jobname}  \end{document}   The title is:  What you really need to know about the Internet: From Gutenberg to Zuckerberg  But renders as (notice the words Internet, Gutenberg, Zuckerberg):
Titles of articles I'm about to cite contain upper case letters and when using BibTeX it converts them to lower case ones. This happens only in the title and only the first letter conserves its case. For example, when I cite an article about HF, the reader won't know if it is about Hafnium (Hf) or fluorine acid (HF).  I know that I can fix it manually in the .bbl file but I would like to avoid it, or fix it automatically.
Grammar-checking tool for use with LaTeX? I am looking for a grammar-checking tool, i.e., something that checks for mistakes such as "two dog" or "a books".  It has to work on Linux (Ubuntu).  Also, since I use macros to generate some of the prose, it has to somehow work with LaTeX.  I don't think that such checkers are LaTeX-aware, so it has to work with some compilation product of LaTeX: DVI or PDF.    If you suggest a grammar checker that checks plain text, please explain how to you extract the text.  catdvi does a nice job, but it leaves some garbage like page numbers. Where do I put item tags on items inside a chest or your inventory? Why there's a finite $\Gamma '$ such that $\Gamma ' \vDash \varphi$? Suppose $\Gamma$ is an infinite set of formulas in FOL. It is given that for a structure, $M$: If $\Gamma$ is satisfiable in $M$ then $\varphi$ is valid in $M$.  Why is it true that there's some finite $\Gamma ' \subset \Gamma$, such that $\Gamma ' \vDash \varphi$?   It reminds the compactness theorem in a way, but it's not quite the same. Why is $\gcd(x^4+1,x^2-1) = 1$ but I get $2$? [unit normalization of gcds] I need to find the gcd of two polynomials: $f(x) = x^4+1$ and $g(x)=x^2-1$ using the Euclidean algorithm.  Wolfram shows that the gcd is equal to $1$, but for some reason I don't get the same answer.   First I divided $f(x)$ by $g(x)$ and got that the remainder is $2$. Then, I divided $g(x)$ by the remainder, $2$, and got a remainder of zero, hence concluding that the gcd is $2$.   What am I doing wrong? Compile gvim from sources? NSXMLParser chokes on ampersand & Running 64 bit programs on a 32 bit system How far can/should one press philosophical doubt? Should we keep on questioning until nothing is left to question or is there a point on which we need to stand (which we often tend to do)? Descartes used 'I think' as this fixed point where the skepticism abates, there may be others. But what is a rational way to find one, if any? How is this question addressed in modern philosophy? For example:     There's two options here   or     There are two options here   I hear a lot of people say the first line (or something similar), but isn't that incorrect? Isn't it plural and therefore you should use "there are"? Word for "to make music" Integrating the inverse of a function. $f(x)$ is a strictly increasing, and continuous, function on $[0,+\infty)$. Consider the integral,  $$\int_0^a f^{-1}(x) dx.$$  Reasoning  The interval $[0,a]$ is "reflected" across the line $y=x$ onto the interval $0 \leq y \leq a.$  $f(x)$ and $f^{-1}(x)$ are symmetric across the line $y=x$. So, the integral is equivalent to the area bounded by $y = 0$, $y=a$, and $f(x)$.  So, "integrating $f$ along an interval on the $y$-axis" is the same as integrating $f^{-1}$ along the same interval on the $x$-axis?  Question  Is my reasoning correct? Digitally selectable filter I have asked a  but I did not get an answer, as it was too specific. So I will build on it but make it a bit more broad spectrum.  I would like to make a digitally selectable BPF using transistors to select a component in the filter; resulting in the center frequency being changed.  I have used FilterPro to generate quick second order filters and get a rough filter response.  For all the designs, a Multiple-feedback was selected:  In the first picture, a center frequency at 108KHz with a bandwidth @ -3dB of 103K to 113KHz is given.    For the second, a center frequency at 117.5KHz with a bandwidth @ -3dB of 112.8K to 122.2KHz is given.    The only difference between these two circuits is R3.  If I were to implement a circuit as shown below, would it work and what transistor would be recommended? I have selected the  as the Opamp in the circuit design as that is what was used for the .    For the transistors, I was thinking of using the MOSFETs (2N7002) used in the ST7590 design as well. Convolution operator has norm 1 with respect to $L^2$ norm Let $C_c(\mathbb{R})$ be the following:  $$C_c = \{ f \in C(\mathbb{R}) \mid \exists \text{ } T &gt; 0 \text{ s.t. } f(t) = 0  \text{ for } |t| \geq T\}$$  Let $T_n \in L(C_c(\mathbb{R}))$ be a linear operator such that:  $$T_n u = \delta_n *u, \forall u \in C_c(\mathbb{R}),$$  where  $$ \delta_n(t)= \begin{cases}        n^2(t+1/n) &amp; -1/n \leq t \leq 0 \\       -n^2(t-1/n) &amp; 0 &lt; t \leq 1/n \\       0 &amp; \text{elsewhere}     \end{cases} $$  I have to prove that with respect to the 2-norm, the operator $T_n$ has $\|T_n\| = 1$ and I have succeeded in proving that $\|T_nu\|_2 \leq \|u\|_2, \forall u \in C_c(\mathbb{R}).$  Now, I remained  to prove that $\exists \text{ } u \in C_c(\mathbb{R}) \text{ s.t. } \|T_nu\|_2 = \|u\|_2$, but I really don't get how $u$ should be shaped in order to satisfy it. How do I overload the square-bracket operator in C#? DataGridView, for example, lets you do this:  DataGridView dgv = ...; DataGridViewCell cell = dgv[1,5];   but for the life of me I can't find the documentation on the index/square-bracket operator.  What do they call it?  Where is it implemented?  Can it throw?  How can I do the same thing in my own classes?  ETA: Thanks for all the quick answers.  Briefly: the relevant documentation is under the "Item" property; the way to overload is by declaring a property like public object this[int x, int y]{ get{...}; set{...} }; the indexer for DataGridView does not throw, at least according to the documentation.  It doesn't mention what happens if you supply invalid coordinates.  ETA Again: OK, even though the documentation makes no mention of it (naughty Microsoft!), it turns out that the indexer for DataGridView will in fact throw an ArgumentOutOfRangeException if you supply it with invalid coordinates.  Fair warning. I am new to salesforce. I dont have coding background. Please let me know bst way to learn apex coding? Using sets of arguments from a list I am running Ubuntu 14.04 on think-pad T450.  When using an external monitor with higher resolution than the in-built laptop screen, the text of dialog boxes are getting messed up.  Looks like I need to replace the Graphic card driver. Anyone found a solution to this?  Updated to add requested information:  lspci -nnk | grep '\[03' -A2   gives the following:  00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Broadwell-U Integrated Graphics [8086:1616] (rev 09)     Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:5034] Kernel driver in use: i915   Below is a screenshot, see how the letters are messed up on the screen. Cannot detect wireless driver intel ac wireless 9560 [logs included] Currently using Ubuntu 18.04, and my wireless driver is not being detected.  I've included a .  $ dmesg | grep iwl [    6.212724] Loading modules backported from iwlwifi [    6.212724] iwlwifi-stack-public:master:6988:0d8892f2 [    6.224583] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: enabling device (0000 -&gt; 0002) [    6.229811] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Direct firmware load for iwl-dbg-cfg.ini failed with error -2 [    6.230540] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-39.ucode failed with error -2 [    6.230547] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-38.ucode failed with error -2 [    6.230552] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-37.ucode failed with error -2 [    6.230557] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-36.ucode failed with error -2 [    6.230562] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-35.ucode failed with error -2 [    6.236670] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: loaded firmware version 34.0.0 op_mode iwlmvm [    6.248314] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Detected Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 9560, REV=0x318 [    7.264081] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: SecBoot CPU1 Status: 0x3, CPU2 Status: 0x2477 [    7.264084] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Failed to start INIT ucode: -110 [    7.276165] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: Failed to run INIT ucode: -110   sudo modprobe iwlwifi returns no output. I'm trying to graph the function $y = \frac{x^2-4}{x-2}$.  I factored the numerator into $(x+2)(x-2)$, and then canceled the common factor (x-2), leaving the function as $y = x + 2$.    Is it acceptable to graph the original function as $y = x + 2$, a straight line with domain and range all real numbers?  Or do you have to restrict the domain as in the original function?  Thanks, Sean When using sudo powers and calling gedit the top level menu with File Edit View Search Tools Documents Help is missing.  If I create user ID root and sign in once and call gedit will it create the necessary user configuration files that might fix this?  Will this also make the annoying error messages go away whenever I use sudo, gksu or pkexec as a regular user with elevated privileges togedit ?  Will there be other benefits with Nautilus and other Gnome derivative Ubuntu applications?  NOTE: by sudo powers you can google pkexec gedit 3.5k hits, gksu gedit 40k hits or sudo gedit 500k hits. I'm in the minority using the first method but I believe it will become the standard in Ubuntu 17.04.    June 12, 2017 Update Here are a list of errors you get when using pkexec gedit:  (gedit:13003): Gtk-WARNING **: Calling Inhibit failed: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.SessionManager was not provided by any .service files  ** (gedit:13003): WARNING **: Set document metadata failed: Setting attribute metadata::gedit-spell-enabled not supported  ** (gedit:13003): WARNING **: Set document metadata failed: Setting attribute metadata::gedit-encoding not supported  ** (gedit:13003): WARNING **: Set document metadata failed: Setting attribute metadata::gedit-position not supported   On this  there is a commitment to fix these distracting messages as of June 5, 2017. No indication is given for when the fix will be upstream nor if the functionality will be implemented or the error messages will simply disappear.  Note the bug report was filed over a year ago and over that time it only effects 18 people.