I am new to the world of making games and all. Well its been a few months or so. There are many tutorials that I have been watching. On the way, I made a few games that I saw and made. I am not asking about those. In fact I don't want to publish those games in my name ever. But then there are some small games that I made which are modified version from what I learnt of those games. Like I changed the game-play style, made it simpler and ignored some features from a game.  Can I publish them in play store? Or this would be any break of law or something? or Something that I should not do?
Most games build on other games' successes and many are downright clones. Where is the limit of imitation before legal issues come into play? Is it down to literary or graphic work like characters and storyline that cause legal problems, or can someone actually claim to own gameplay mechanics?  There are so many similar clone games out there that the rules are probably very slack or nonexistent, but I'd like to hear the views of more experienced developers / designers.
How to invite friends to Stack Overflow, Server Fault and Super User? Since we're all into this OpenID thing, I think it would be really useful (and quite easy) to implement a friend invitation feature that grabs a list of friends from one's webmail contact list with an option to choose who to invite to SO, SF or SU. Something in the line of Facebook's friend invitation and recommendation feature. Reviewed suggested edit view for title-only edits takes body of last revision? Yesterday I was pointed at some rejected suggested edits. Some of the corrections were valid, so I edited the posts accordingly, while making several further edits. Looking at the suggested edits now however, it seems that for those posts where only changes to the title were originally suggested, the post mortem suggested edit view now incorporates the body of the latest revision. (Or at least it appears like that to me)  Take for example . If you take a look at  of that post, you will see my later edits. The edited body seems to have been incorporated in the suggested edit view. For edits where originally changes to the body were suggested, there is no such confusion.   Why does this matter? In the case of some post mortem discussions or explanations it might help to see the actual situation as it was when the edit was suggested. Especially in the case of edits that might be considered too minor.   So have I stumbled upon a bug here? Doesn't the end of Looper create a time paradox? I guess this is more a question about the nature of time travel more than anything else.  At the end of the movie,      Joe shoots himself in a field and changes the course of history.   Does this create a paradox as it changes the history that led up to that point?      If his future self had never existed he'd never have gone on the mission he did and thus he never would have ended up in the field.   Once he did what he did, he could no longer have done it, and so theoretically, time and space should have just folded in on itself and popped out of existence.  Is there something I'm missing that would explain how the movie could have ended where it did without the events at the beginning to lead it there? Is it possible to prove a null hypothesis? Prove $\int_{a}^{b}{f(x)dx}>0$. Let $f\ge0$ be integrable on $[a,b]$. Let $f$ be continuous on $x_0\in (a,b)$ and let $f(x_0)&gt;0$.   Prove $$\int_{a}^{b}{f(x)dx}&gt;0$$  It is easy to see it, graphically, because $$f\ge 0 \Rightarrow\int_{a}^{b}{f(x)dx}\ge0$$  and if $f&gt;0$ somewhere between $a$ and $b$, then the zone of $F$ between those point is "real" (positive) and $\ne 0$.  My problem is, how do I show it formally?  I would appreciate your help. How to login to gamecenter at PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator? How do I login to the Gamecenter on PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator, if you have not done it when they asked? Unresolved external symbol on static class members Future humans build using dirt, go to war over small amounts of it I am looking for a short story that I read in the 1970s (It may have been published in the 60s) about humans using the Earth's dirt to make stuff; as a result the Earth has shrunk and is smaller than the moon; also how nations go to war over a country's amount of dirt; Microcosmic God was in the same book.  Bought book through a science fiction book club; a collection of short stories. Split string every nth character? Which gears combinations shouldn't be used? Is there any general rule or recommendation to avoid usage of certain gears combinations (for 2xN and 3xN gears systems)? Do they differ for mtb and road bikes?  I know that it's recommended not to use biggest front chainring with big chainrings on cassette (and opposite) because parts will wear faster and I will loose a bit of pedaling efficiency, but I'm not sure, if I should avoid 2 or 3, or even more biggest (smallest in opposite case) chainrings on cassette. How can you describe someone who gives up too easily? Problem  I have various footnotes, which are hyperlinked from the text to the bottom of their respective pages. When I click on the hyperlinks (in the main text), they always take me to the first page of my document. I also have footnotebackref which puts a hyperlink at the footnote to take the reader back to the main body of text and these links for fine.   Edited MWE  After a lot of deletion, I have managed to reduce the document to the following lines. One might say that I have found the problem, since the removal of \usepackage[hang, flushmargin]{footmisc} stops the problem, but I would still like to have non-indented footnotes.  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color} \usepackage[colorlinks=true]{hyperref}  \usepackage[hang, flushmargin]{footmisc}         %Problem line. \usepackage{footnotebackref}  \begin{document} \tableofcontents             \newpage                 \section{Section} This is some text\footnote{This is a footnote.}. \end{document} This  gives this comparison chart for the four Windows 8 Editions (Core is usually just called Windows 8). I notice specifically, about half-way down, the max physical processors is listed as 1 for "Core" and 2 for all other.  In the second image i see physical processors listed as 8 in a Windows 8 Task Manager.  My question is, what is the limit then? Can anyone verify the article or the screenshot?  Was this a mock-up? Another Edition? (Server perhaps?)      To clarify, i am looking for links to official microsoft.com articles detailing these specifications.  I have been unable to find any. Scorched3d will not launch Scorched3d worked then stopped. Unistalled and reinstalled did not help. Running Ubuntu 16.04.04LTS. I think it was after installing new release.  I think the problem is the Ubuntu 16.04.4LTS. The newer version has no Scorched3d in the Ubuntu Software Center. I have 3 systems. After updating to new version. Scorched3D will not install and work after updating.  ron@RonsComputer:~$ sudo objdump -p $(type -p scorched3d) | grep NEEDED  NEEDED libwx_gtk2u_adv-3.0.so.0  NEEDED libwx_gtk2u_core-3.0.so.0 NEEDED libwx_baseu-3.0.so.0 NEEDED libfreetype.so.6 NEEDED libz.so.1 NEEDED libSDL-1.2.so.0 NEEDED libSDL_net-1.2.so.0 NEEDED libexpat.so.1  NEEDED libstdc++.so.6 NEEDED libm.so.6 NEEDED libgcc_s.so.1 NEEDED libpthread.so.0 NEEDED libc.so.6   ron@ron-desktop ~ $ objdump -p $(type -p scorched3d) | grep NEEDED | awk '{print $2}' | xargs -n 1 dpkg -S  libwxgtk3.0-0v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_adv-3.0.so.0.2.0 libwxgtk3.0-0v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_adv-3.0.so.0 libwxgtk3.0-0v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_core-3.0.so.0.2.0 libwxgtk3.0-0v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_core-3.0.so.0 libwxbase3.0-0v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_baseu-3.0.so.0.2.0 libwxbase3.0-0v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwx_baseu-3.0.so.0 libfreetype6:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6.12.1 libfreetype6:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6 libfreetype6:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6 libfreetype6:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6.12.1 zlib1g:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1.2.8 zlib1g:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 zlib1g:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 zlib1g:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1.2.8 libsdl1.2debian:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.4 libsdl1.2debian:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libSDL-1.2.so.0 libsdl1.2debian:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.4 libsdl1.2debian:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL-1.2.so.0 libsdl-net1.2:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL_net-1.2.so.0 libsdl-net1.2:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libSDL_net-1.2.so.0 libsdl-net1.2:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL_net-1.2.so.0.8.0 libsdl-net1.2:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libSDL_net-1.2.so.0.8.0 libexpat1:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1.6.0 libexpat1:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 libexpat1:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1.6.0 libexpat1:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 libstdc++6:amd64: /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21-gdb.py libstdc++6:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++6:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++6:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 libstdc++6:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 libstdc++6:i386: /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21-gdb.py libc6:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 libc6:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 libgcc1:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc1:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 libc6:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 libc6:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 libc6:i386: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 libc6:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ron@ron-desktop ~ $ Orthogonality of Hermite functions I would like to prove to myself that Hermite functions, defined by $\varphi_n(x)=(-1)^n e^{x^2/2}\frac{d^n e^{-x^2}}{dx^n}$, $n\in\mathbb{N}$ are an orthogonal system in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$, i.e. that, for any $m\ne n$, $$\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{x^2} \frac{d^m e^{-x^2}}{dx^m} \frac{d^n e^{-x^2}}{dx^n}dx=0 $$ I have tried by integrating by parts as the book where I find such a statement, Kolmogorov-Fomin's Элементы теории функций и функционального анализа, says that it can be proved, but I am landing nowhere since I have no experience in manipulating such integrals... Thank you so much for any answer! If $xy + yz + zx = 1$, then show that      $$\dfrac{x}{1-x^2} + \dfrac{y}{1-y^2} + \dfrac{z}{1-z^2} = \dfrac{4xyz}{(1-x^2)(1-y^2)(1-z^2)}$$   I tried doing the sum algebraically, that is, by solving the LHS but, that method isn't really getting us anywhere.  Also, I found this sum in an a book on trigonometry. So how can I solve it with trigonometry? I have an app installed on my phone, which I've installed from the Google Play Store.  If I update the app and don't like the upgraded version, is there a way to undo the update and downgrade back to the version of the app that I had previously installed?  I tried searching a bunch on this site, and I found lots of questions about downgrading the OS/ROM/firmware, but nothing about downgrading app versions or reverting an app update. Assume  $$\lim_{n\to \infty}  (y_{2n} - y_n)=0$$  then  $$\lim_{n\to \infty} y_n$$  exists.  I know it's not true, and I can see a sequence that disprove that $(1,1,2,1,3,2,4,1,5,3,...)$ but I want a sequence that has formula.  hint/help?  thanks Google analytics: Tracking Not Installed Book for proof writing