I have successfully made a connection to my access database on my local computer but when I upload my config.php file which contains the connection string on my web server and when the insert command runs it displays a blank page without making entries to the database.   $conn = new COM ("ADODB.Connection")   or die("Cannot start ADO");   $connStr = "PROVIDER=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=/onlineadmission.mdb;Jet OLEDB:Database Password=;";   $conn-&gt;open($connStr);   It works well on my local computer but not when uploaded. Where is the problem?
How can we connect a PHP script to MS Access (.mdb) file?  I tried by including following PHP code:  $db_path = $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '\WebUpdate\\' . $file_name . '.mdb'; $cfg_dsn = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" . $db_path; $odbcconnect = odbc_connect($cfg_dsn, '', '');   But it failed and I received following error message:   Warning: odbc_connect() [function.odbc-connect]: SQL error: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Data source name not found and no default driver specified, SQL state IM002 in SQLConnect in C:\web\WebUpdate\index.php on line 41
Word for people who don't make their deadline Why $¬¬\bot \not\in PROP$? I'm reading Dalen's Logic and Structure.  He gives the definition of the set $PROP$:     Definition $\bf2.1.2$ The set $PROP$ of propositions is the smallest set $X$ with the properties       $\begin{array}{rl} \rm(i)&amp;p_i\in X(i\in N),\bot\in X,\\ \rm(ii)&amp;\varphi,\psi\in X\Rightarrow(\varphi\wedge\psi),(\varphi\vee\psi),(\varphi\to\psi),(\varphi\leftrightarrow\psi)\in X,\\ \rm(iii)&amp;\varphi\in X\Rightarrow(\neg\varphi)\in X.\\ \end{array}$   Then there are some examples:        And he says that $¬¬\bot \not\in PROP$, but I don't understand it. Isn't $¬¬  \bot=\bot$ due to the property of double negation? Considering this is true, $\bot\in PROP$. Of course, in this question, I'm pressuposing some kind of evaluation, that $¬¬ \bot$ becomes $\bot$ due to the law of the double negation, but perhaps it should be hold in an unevaluated form.  Ex:. $1+1=2$ because we presupose the $1$ merges with $1$ and then becomes two. If the merge (evaluation) does not happen, then I guess:  $$1+1=1+1$$ $$2=2$$ $$2\neq 1+1$$ $$1+1\neq 2$$  Perhaps it's something like that, I took the idea from Mathematica. Sometimes it does treats things as different in the absence of full evaluation. Ubuntu non LTS to LTS in the future This is a question in general, not specific to any method or data set. How do we deal with a class imbalance problem in Supervised Machine learning where the number of 0 is around 90% and number of 1 is around 10% in your dataset.How do we optimally train the classifier.  One of the ways which I follow is sampling to make the dataset balanced and then train the classifier and repeat this for multiple samples.   I feel this is random, Is there any framework to approach these kind of problems. What’s the correct URL for placing a call on an iPhone? Prove that $(p+q)^m \leq p^m+q^m$ If $p,q$ are positive quantities and $0 \leq m\leq 1$ then Prove that $$(p+q)^m \leq p^m+q^m$$    Trial: For $m=0$, $(p+q)^0=1 &lt; 2= p^0+q^0$  and for $m=1$, $(p+q)^1=p+q =p^1+q^1$.   So, For $m=0,1$ the inequality is true.How I show that the inequality is also true for $0 &lt; m &lt; 1$.   Please help. Which piece of equipment is holding me back? I am primarily an amateur photographer but I do take small jobs from time to time.  I'm looking to upgrade my equipment but I'm not sure if I should be spending money on my body, glass, or both.  I have two common issues that I'd like to improve.   I shoot a lot at ice rinks and find that even in servo mode I get a lot of shots that are slightly out of focus.  I try to keep the AF target on face masks but many shots will come out focused an inch or two off (ears, hands, etc).  I'm shooting F/1.8-F/2.8 to get action stopping shutter speeds so you can really tell when the focus is even a hair off.  I don't know if this is a limitation of my camera, lens, or the human operator. Most of my paid work is indoors shooting candids where a flash is inappropriate.  I feel like I need to use a higher F-number to get more subject in focus but I usually can't do it without upping to ISO 3200 unless I'm using a flash.  By the time I clean up the high ISO noise in Camera Raw I end up with an image lacking detail.  So far this hasn't been a big problem because the photos are typically used in magazine prints only an inch or two wide but it's still driving me nuts.   Here is the equipment currently in my bag:   Canon Rebel T2i Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II (no IS)   Collecting dust, came with my old Rebel XTi.  Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS   Purchased with my T2i.  This is my workhorse lens but I'm disappointed with the soft images it produces at higher focal lengths.  Stopping down makes the images acceptable but that's not always an option.  My eyes want more contrast and color but considering how inexpensive this lens is I can't really complain.  Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM   This was purchased with an older camera and doesn't get used much anymore.  The images are too soft beyond 200mm and the AF seems sluggish.  Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM   I am extremely happy with the images I get from this lens.  I use it indoors all the time and also paired with extension tubes for some macro work.  Some of my best ice hockey images have been from this lens even though I didn't have sports in mind for this lens.    My initial plan was to upgrade to a 60D or 7D body but after doing some reading it occurred to me that I might invest in better glass first.  I'm unsure of what will help improve focusing, image quality, high ISO shooting, etc.  Maybe it's a new camera, new glass, photography lessons, or a little of everything?  I'm looking to keep my next round of purchases under $3,000 and am willing to trade in some of my used equipment to offset costs.  Would anyone care to make a recommendation?  I'm looking at the EOS 60D and 7D bodies.  Not sure if the 7D is overkill for my needs.  I'm also looking at the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens to be my new workhorse but I'm concerned that it may not be wide enough on an APS-C body and the lack of IS might be an issue.  There's also the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM but I'm thinking it wouldn't be wise to spend all my budget on that lens right now (or maybe not?). What is the most efficient way to concatenate strings in SQL Server? I have this code:  DECLARE @MyTable AS TABLE (    [Month] INT,    Salary INT );  INSERT INTO @MyTable VALUES (1,2000), (1,3100);  SELECT [Month], Salary FROM @MyTable;   Output:    I want to concat the Salary (grouping by month) so that it will be NVARCHAR like this: '2000,3100'  How would I do this efficiently? In the , the key $k = (a, b)$ should have the following property, i.e. GCD of $a$ and the modulus should be 1:     $\gcd (a, m) = 1$, where $m$ is the set of possible moduli   My question is, why it is required that $a$ should have the above property? What is the significance of this? And why is $b$ excluded from this condition? Two particles with initial positions and velocities $r_1,v_1$ and $r_2,v_2$ are interacting by the inverse square law (with G=1), so that  $$ {d^2r_1\over dt^2} = - { m_2(r_1-r_2)\over |r_1-r_2|^3} $$ $$ {d^2r_2\over dt^2} = - { m_1(r_2-r_1)\over |r_1-r_2|^3} $$  (the inverse square law along the line of separation). What is the complete solution of these differential equations? What is the position of the two objects as a function of time?  After reading a lot on Wikipedia, I've come to the definition of center of mass and relative coordinates:   $$R(t) ~=~ \frac{m_1 r_1 + m_2 r_2}{m_1+m_2}$$  $$\ddot{r}(t) r(t)^2 ~=~ (m_1+m_2)G$$  Where $R$ is the center of mass, and $r$ is the displacement between the particles... Is this correct? How do I proceed to solve the differential equation? Given that $x^y=y^x$, what could $x$ and $y$ be? Mount error: "unknown filesystem type 'exfat'" When trying to mount an exfat filesystem, I get the following error:  Error mounting /dev/sda6 at /media/gkp/Backup: Command-line  `mount -t "exfat" -o "uhelper=udisks2,nodev,nosuid" "/dev/sda6" "/media/gkp/Backup"'  exited with non-zero exit status 32: mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'   Exfat is used on some USB sticks and camera sd cards. What can I do to mount this type of filesystem? Would a fast interstellar spaceship benefit from an aerodynamic shape? Some (generous) assumptions:   We have a spaceship that can reach a reasonable fraction of light speed. The ship is able to withstand the high energies of matter impacting at that speed.   Given the amount of matter in inter-stellar space, at high speed, would it encounter enough of it and frequently enough that an aerodynamic shape would significantly reduce its drag (and thus save fuel)? Is it possible to programmatically stop and start ArcGIS Server map services using Python? When I entered the value $$\frac{1}{i}$$ in my calculator, I received the answer as $-i$ whereas I was expecting the answer as $i^{-1}$. Even google calculator shows the same answer (Click  to check it out).  Is there a fault in my calculator or $\frac{1}{i}$ really equals $-i$? If it does then how? With biblatex, is it possible to replace one author of an author list by a bibnamedash or idem string? With biblatex, the author can be replaced by a dash (or “idem”) in the bibliography. Is it possible to have this replacement also if there are multiple authors, and the first of these multiple authors is the same as the author of the book listed before? (It is somewhat difficult to describe, see the attached example instead, where “Buchautor, Hans-Wilhelm” should be replaced in book3 as well.)   I assume that it should be possible by customising \DeclareNameFormat, but I don’t know how.  Minimal example:  \documentclass{scrartcl} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{csquotes} \usepackage{filecontents} \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @BOOK{book1,   author = {Buchautor, Hans-Wilhelm},   title = {Irgendein Buch},   location = {Buch am Wald},   date = {2000} } @BOOK{book2,   author = {Buchautor, Hans-Wilhelm},   title = {Ein anderes Buch},   location = {Berlin},   date = {2001} } @BOOK{book3,   author = {Buchautor, Hans-Wilhelm and Zweitautor, Zoran},   title = {Noch ein Buch},   location = {London and New York},   date = {2010} } \end{filecontents}  \usepackage[ style=authortitle, backend=bibtex8 ]{biblatex} \bibliography{\jobname}  \renewcommand*{\bibnamedash}{%   \bibstring[\mkbibbold]{idem\thefield{gender}}}  \begin{document} \nocite{*}  \printbibliography \end{document}   Edit 15/02/2011 17:14   I should have added that there was a feature request for biber which pointed back to biblatex. See .  Edit 21/06/2011 9:26  Is this somehow possible now with biblatex 1.4/1.5? I played a bit with uniquename/uniquelist, but I could not get it to work. According to the documentation, they're pretty much interchangeable.  Is there a stylistic reason to use one over the other? So, I know that $\max(-X_{(1)},X_{(n)})$ is a sufficient statistic for the parameter $\theta$. But can I also say that $(X_{(1)},X_{(n)})$ are jointly sufficient for the parameter $\theta$ ?  In other words, can a single parameter have jointly sufficient statistics? A star's collapse can be halted by the  due to the Pauli exclusion principle. In extreme relativistic conditions, a star will continue to collapse regardless of the degeneracy pressure to form a black hole. Does this violate the Pauli exclusion principle? If so, are theorists ok with that? And if it doesn't violate the Pauli exclusion principle, why not? I am able to locate files in a folder containing a specific text string using this command:  grep -lir 'string' ~/directory/*   How do I move the files that appear in the above result to another location?