I have 1 TB SSD and a 120 GB SSD. I'd like to use the 120 drive for    / /var /etc    and so on and make a very minimal home folder on that drive. I would then like to mount another drive (which I would name home) over my home folder.   Is this possible?
I have 2 HDD drives in my computer. At the moment second drive is mounted as /media/storage.  How can I move my user data from /home to /media/storage/home?  Can I just move the data over there and then simply symlink it back?
Why 'mkpasswd -m sha-512' produce different result every time it is called? I am using this function to create a password in the shadow file  $ mkpasswd -m sha-512 password $6$o50n4EfNOBzfs$K5l5AcOI5e0I9n2df0LmR11OLSPKSVM6AGBOnWVfDDfMubb46MrAj0zehdLNEoYzD2fj5q4XUdDwexj/dWLHy/ $ mkpasswd -m sha-512 password $6$ADmDOhDpW$gsYQuiKPpV1ewaUpRq2VGAvrcocffLQ8XGF94e6LNLZfKIjy6Ku.cZoR/5exeCi1ESjPB9TRM6HxCiY5BCNCV0 $ mkpasswd -m sha-512 password $6$Efj1agaI$HGkny3q1OTYT4KREh18gueHJae/3Bvil0iOEhfXj8bD.qy9Lg2UIQJMuBcq0XtG3xzueK.7cp0GfKr7tEo5YI/ $ mkpasswd -m sha-512 password $6$zdVPlCPai4Y$x3CBvlP99xZXZcr4PTiE..YLpZx39h5OHDxqazd9wFLImPuwsXF0M6KmqLzlCCrnQhI2lmEPdCzfmHA/fDiOz.   It makes me wonder how does the output value work as a password Linear Discriminant Analysis for $p=1$ I'm studying 'Introduction to Statistical Learning' by James, Witten, Hastie, Tibshirani.   In page 139, of their book, they began by introducing Bayes' Theorem $p_k(X)=P(Y=k|X=x) = \dfrac{\pi_kf_k(x)}{\sum_{l=1}^k \pi_l f_l(x)}$. $\pi$ is not mathematical constant, but denotes the prior probability. Nothing is strange in this equation.   The book claims that it wants to obtain an estimate for $f_k(x)$ that it can plug into the equation given above. To estimate $f_k(x)$, it assumes that is normal. In the one dimensional setting, $f_k(x)=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma}\exp(-\dfrac{1}{2\sigma^2}(x-\mu_k)^2)$, where $\mu_k$ and $\sigma^2_k$ are the mean and variance for the $k$th class. It is assumed that $\sigma^2_1 = \sigma^2_2 = \cdots = \sigma^2_K$. (I began to get confused from the last statement.)   Plugging $f_k$ into $p_x$, you have this quite messy equation (1) :   $$p_x(k)=\dfrac{\pi_k \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma}\exp(-\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}(x-\mu_k)^2)}{\sum_{l=1}^K \pi_l \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma}\exp(-\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}(x-\mu_l)^2)}. $$  Again, no surprises here since it is just substitution.     The Bayes' Classifier involves assigning an observation to the class for which equation (1) is the largest. Taking the log of Equation (1) and rearranging terms, it is not hard to show that this is equivalent to assigning the observation to the class for which the following is the largest:  $$\delta_k(x)=x \cdot \dfrac{\mu_k}{\sigma^2} - \dfrac{\mu_k^2}{2\sigma^2} + \log(\pi_k) $$  Question: I do not understand where this came from, and what it means. I tried doing the log of equation and it doesn't become this. Are we taking the derivative somewhere here, since this is the largest observation? Solve $x^2+5x+6 \equiv 187 \mod 187$ Solution $$x^2+5x+6 \equiv 187 \mod 187$$ $$ (x+\frac{5}{2})^2 \equiv \frac{1}{4}$$ $$ 4(x+\frac{5}{2})^2 \equiv 1$$ $$ y:= x+\frac{5}{2} $$ $$ 4y^2 \equiv 1 \mod 11 \wedge 4y^2 \equiv 1 \mod 17  $$ $$ ( 2y \equiv 1 \mod 11 \vee 2y \equiv 10 \mod 11 ) \wedge ( 2y \equiv 1 \mod 17  \vee 2y \equiv 13 \mod 17)  $$ $$ ( y \equiv 6 \mod 11 \vee y \equiv 5 \mod 11 ) \wedge ( y \equiv 9 \mod 17  \vee y \equiv 15 \mod 17)  $$ Combining that from CRT I got: $$ y \in \left\{49, 60,83,94 \right\} $$ and for example: $$ x+\frac{5}{2}  \equiv 94 \mod 187$$ $$ 2x  \equiv 183 \mod 187$$ some calculus and get... $$x \equiv 185 $$ And the same thing for each other case. Question Is there any faster (or smarter) way to solve equations like that? Two domains (when SSL) on same directory How to know if Mac OS X machine is being remotely viewed? Currently I have no way to know if my machine is being remotely viewed by our tech support, and would prefer to know, given the massive privacy breach that would entail should this be happening. I am running Mac OS X Snow Leopard.  Running  ps -A | grep Remote   I know this service is running:  /System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAgent   My knowledge of administration of Macs on a network is limited, so I don't know what tools allow this. Walking up/down a level road/street Is walking up/down the road/street applicable if the street is not sloped?  I think I heard something about "with/against the numbering of houses" but I'm not sure if it's correct.  Also, if that were correct, why is walking down the street  than walking up the street? Why not use "which"? What to use then? Who uses Dual_EC_DRBG? Recent news articles have suggested that the NSA may be involved in trying to influence the cryptography in public standards or commercially deployed software, to enable the NSA to decrypt the encrypted traffic.  For example, .  The New York Times article specifically mentions a 2006 NIST standard, where two Microsoft engineers later discovered a serious problem in the scheme.  The New York Times article explains how the standard was written by the NSA, who pushed the scheme hard:     Simultaneously, the N.S.A. has been deliberately weakening the international encryption standards adopted by developers. One goal in the agency’s 2013 budget request was to “influence policies, standards and specifications for commercial public key technologies,” the most common encryption method.      Cryptographers have long suspected that the agency planted vulnerabilities in a standard adopted in 2006 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the United States’ encryption standards body, and later by the International Organization for Standardization, which has 163 countries as members.      Classified N.S.A. memos appear to confirm that the fatal weakness, discovered by two Microsoft cryptographers in 2007, was engineered by the agency. The N.S.A. wrote the standard and aggressively pushed it on the international group, privately calling the effort “a challenge in finesse.”    After some sleuthing, I'm pretty certain this is a reference to the  pseudorandom number generator scheme described in NIST SP 800-90.  The weakness is that Dual_EC_DRBG appears to contain a backdoor, and anyone who knows the backdoor can totally break the PRNG.  The weakness was first described in  and was subsequently .  As a consequence, there are now good reasons to suspect that Dual_EC_DRBG contains a NSA backdoor, and the NSA might be able to spy on anyone who is using Dual_EC_DRBG.  My questions:   Who uses Dual_EC_DRBG? Do any commercial products use Dual_EC_DRBG? Does anyone use it? Already I have lost all hope of looking at late answers etc. It's just a parade of meh. I can't make any kind of intelligent decision because I can't see the other answers to the question, for instance. There's no Looks Good, only Skip, and those feel different to me. So I've been more interested in .  But people keep approving crap while I'm looking at it. Two or three "the post was already approved; please visit to edit" and I'm just "screw this whole thing".  Can we do something like one reject bounces all existing votes: you need three approves in a row? Because a lot of people are stupidly approving and actually driving me away from the queue.    Note this is less about letting bad edits through and more about keeping reviewers motivated. How to identify the process that's sending error messages to terminal? Short story: people rediscover how to do math and want to put people in bombs Many years ago I remember reading a short story about an advanced civilization at war that rediscovers how to do math mentally. The reason I remember it is the guy tells it to government officials who are delighted because it means they can put people inside bombs or missiles instead of computers, which were thought to be more valuable.  I believe this is one of those stories I read in a science fiction anthology my father brought home on one of his business trips in the sixties or seventies. Feedback Request: New Timeline Question View There is an experimental timeline view for questions now available on meta ONLY! (Now working on SO, SF, and SU as well)  This is partially motivated by comments about how difficult it is to follow very active questions which have a lot of activity, and also the feedback on the API which was heavily dominated by "we need to know what happened in this time range" type responses.  It can only be accessed through URL hackery at the moment. To get to it, enter question URLs like so:  https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/{id}/timeline  This is a chronological timeline of everything that happened on a question, including   initial question ask answers  revisions comments closure, deletion, reopen, undelete, etc votes   all based on when they happened in chronological order.  We are thinking about making this a fourth tab on the question, like so:  Timeline | Oldest | Newest | Votes  Please try it out and provide feedback. It is still a little rough, so we are not looking for highly detailed bug reports, just more general feedback.  Timeline view for this question: Shouldn't the twoside option produce a wider margin at the binding/spine edge, rather than the other way around? I'm using \documentclass[twoside]{report}. I'm currently an M. Phil student in Math and I failed a course last semester because I was not able to hand in a home work assignment (which was worth 40% of my grade) on time (I was 30 minutes late).   Apart from that I'd say I'm a fairly decent student, I got an upper second class honours bachelors degree, I have a B+ and A's for all my other courses in my current programme and I'm almost finished with my first paper to be published.   I've however been deeply worried about this failure as it would reflect poorly on my transcript if I were to apply to a Ph.D or another Master's programme.   Will my failing grade affect my chances of getting into a competitive programme or greatly lower my chances of getting a scholarship? Unable to disable assignment rules I have a condition where I need to disable standard Lead Assignment Rules if certain criteria are met.   if(emailWithAccIdMap.containsKey(ledRec.Email) &amp;&amp; emailWithAccIdMap.get(ledRec.Email) != null &amp;&amp; !openOppMap.isEmpty() &amp;&amp; openOppMap.get(emailWithAccIdMap.get(ledRec.Email)) != null &amp;&amp; openOppMap.get(emailWithAccIdMap.get(ledRec.Email)).Owner.isActive ==true){                     ledRec.Status = 'Duplicate';                     System.debug('Changing the Status');                     //then assign the original lead owner to new lead owner                     ledRec.OwnerId = openOppMap.get(emailWithAccIdMap.get(ledRec.Email)).OwnerId;                     ledRec.Account_Name__c = openOppMap.get(emailWithAccIdMap.get(ledRec.Email)).AccountId;                     ledRec.Field_for_Lead_Workflow__c = true;                     Database.DMLOptions dmo = new Database.DMLOptions();                     dmo.assignmentRuleHeader.useDefaultRule = false;                     ledRec.setOptions(dmo);                     //since owner is assigned, it shouledRec not pass through round robin                     ledRec.checkAssignment__c = false;  }   This is my code snippet which is running on before insert. The control is entering the IF condition as the debug statement is getting printed. Yet, the owner assigned through this snippet is being overridden by the assignment rules.  I also tried executing this in after insert trigger context but it did not work. Can somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong? Replace preg_replace() e modifier with preg_replace_callback Prove every odd integer is the difference of two squares I know that I should use the definition of an odd integer ($2k+1$), but that's about it.  Thanks in advance! How can I define a mathematical function as a LaTeX macro? In the comment field on StackOverflow (and other StackExchange sites as well, I presume) you're required to write 15 characters for the server to accept your post. If a shorter post is submitted, an information message states that the comment is too short. That is all good.  However, below the comment field is a counter, which counts up to 15 and then down from however many characters you're allowed to type minus fifteen. This counter doesn't always act the same as the actual validation: if I pad my message with whitespace, the validation notices and still says the message is too short, but the counter does not notice, and counts as usual.  Suggested fix: make the character counter trim the message before it counts, so the two messages say the same thing. Had it not been vs If it were not for I've just seen the following sentence on a band's biography:     Had it not been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.   Then I was wondering if I can change this sentence to:     If it were not for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.   Is the second sentence correct? Are they interchangeable?   Thanks in advance.