I am using Windows 7 Ultimate (32 bit). I downloaded Ubuntu 14 LTS through torrent. But the installation does not go through. I get the error "Can not download the metalink and therefore the ISO". I have tried this 3 times, and each times I get same error.  Kindly suggest me an installation method that does not require internet connection or solve this problem.
I would like to see a full how-to guide on how to install Ubuntu.
Compute $\iint\limits_R\frac{y}{x+y^2}dA$ where $R=[0,1]\times[1,2]$ Compute $\displaystyle\iint\limits_R\frac{y}{x+y^2}dA$ where $R=[0,1]\times[1,2]$  $\displaystyle\int_0^1\int_1^2\frac{y}{x+y^2}dydx=\int_0^1\int_1^2y(x+y^2)^{-1}dydx$  How do I integrate the denominator if the superscript is $-1$?   Hints are appreciated! Do megapixels matter with modern sensor technology? Run true multiple process instances of gnome-terminal short view distance in 3d view? Biblatex/biber fails with a strange error about missing recode_data.xml file How to safely change OS name in grub boot menu? I have a system where I am dual-booting Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 and Ubuntu GNOME 16.04, however after installing Ubuntu GNOME 16.04, I have found that in the GRUB boot entry list it is called "Ubuntu", whereas the other one is called something like "Ubuntu GNOME 15.10", is there any way I can change the text of the "Ubuntu" one to "Ubuntu GNOME 16.04"? And also change the names of the other options so that instead of "Advanced options for Ubuntu" it says "Advanced options for Ubuntu GNOME 16.04" etc?  I rather do it manually if it is safe to do so, or a piece of software could be recommended, however nothing from a PPA or other untrusted not official source (I will only install software from the Ubuntu official repositories). How to change horizontal alignment of \frac? Typing \frac{W+W^*}{2} gives a fraction in which the denominator appears to the eye to be in the wrong position. Is there a way to correct this, i.e. place the 2 in under the + (without using arbitrary negative spacing)? A continuation of .  I'm fighting a page-limit in a single-column layout and I need to put a Figure and a Table side-by-side and provide them with independent captions. However, the style guide for the publishers (LNCS) wants Figure captions below and Table captions above (probably something to do with ).   =======================================================  If I adapt @lockstep's floatrow example from  accordingly to have a Table caption above ...  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{floatrow} % Table float box with bottom caption, box width adjusted to content  %% ********************************** %% just adding \captop to original example %% ********************************** \newfloatcommand{capbtabbox}{table}[\captop][\FBwidth]  \usepackage{blindtext}   \begin{document}  \blindtext  \begin{figure} \begin{floatrow} \ffigbox{%   \rule{3cm}{3cm}% }{%   \caption{A figure}% } \capbtabbox{%   \begin{tabular}{cc} \hline   Author &amp; Title \\ \hline   Knuth &amp; The \TeX book \\   Lamport &amp; \LaTeX \\ \hline   Knuth &amp; The \TeX book \\   Lamport &amp; \LaTeX \\ \hline   Knuth &amp; The \TeX book \\   Lamport &amp; \LaTeX \\ \hline   \end{tabular} }{%   \caption{A table}% } \end{floatrow} \end{figure}  \end{document}   =======================================================  The problem becomes clear ...    =======================================================  The floatrow doesn't correctly line up the Table and Caption. I reluctantly tried to use vspace to solve the problem, but it didn't work out.  Any suggestions on how to get these two to align? I'm happy to accept any alignment that ensures that the Table and Figure fit within the same "box".  (A similar-ish question was , but specific for subfig and with a very localised problem it seems.) Ability to update profile from the Stack Exchange Android App What are the current travel restrictions on individuals entering the United States from regions affected by Covid-19? Sometimes, a question is perfectly solved by suggestion or actual resolution given in "comments" under it. In such case, how to mark that answer (comment) as "Accepted Answer"? Due to this, the question remains unanswered even if solution is provided in comment. How to draw arrows between parts of an equation to show the Math Distributive Property (Multiplication)? There is a part of my paper where I use the distributive property and it might not be clear to the reader to see the operation result (I'm using in proposional logic for a proof). The logic equation (part of) is: $$ (l_{1}) \vee \big( (p \vee q) \wedge (\neg p \vee q) \wedge (p \vee \neg q) \wedge (\neg p \vee \neg q)\big) $$ $$ (l_{1} \vee p \vee q) \wedge (l_{1} \vee \neg p \vee q) \wedge (l_{1} \vee p \vee \neg q) \wedge (l_{1} \vee \neg p \vee \neg q) $$  So I was wondering if there is a way to represent this operation like a 'shower' (see another example in pic ). Maybe there is some hidden magic mathmode command or pkg for this. At last we can also rely on tikz. How to find and delete files older than specific days in unix? Is the money you get from shorting a stock free to use for going long on other stocks? Disabling OBSOLETE error in C# Is it possible to instantiate an object at runtime if I only have the DLL name and the class name, without adding a reference to the assembly in the project? The class implements a interface, so once I instantiate the class, I will then cast it to the interface.  Assembly name:     library.dll    Type name:      Company.Project.Classname     EDIT: I dont have the absolute path of the DLL, so Assembly.LoadFile won't work. The DLL might be in the application root, system32, or even loaded in the GAC. I'm talking about this nonsense:   Now, I'm aware that there are problems with the practicalities (or possibilities) of methods involving exotic matter with negative mass, and that kind of thing has been addressed here:   But in this case my question is different and more specific. Sweeping all the other problems of constructing such a beast under the rug, wouldn't this violate causality?  SR says that the simultaneity and relative ordering of events is dependent on the relative motion of the observer, but that no matter how it works out, if event A causes event B, no observer will see B first. One of the many problems with FTL travel (or signals) is that if any information is sent faster than light, there will exist an inertial frame in which the signal arrives before it is sent, a blatant violation of causality. (I think we can all agree, can we not, that the threshold should be extremely high before breaking assumptions that we're in a causal universe?)  So how is any scheme to travel faster than light, even if it may locally satisfy the equations of GR, not a blatant violation causality according to SR?  Is my understanding of GR incomplete and there's something in it that obviates the causality implications of SR? Or am I correct that FTL claims should be dismissed with extreme prejudice on this basis alone? (Pending a serious replicable experiment showing causality to be breakable.) What can I use instead of the arrow operator, `->`? Why is polyploidy lethal for some organisms while for others is not? is the multiplication of number of chromosomal sets from 2n to 3n (triploidy), 4n (tetraploidy) and so on. It is quite common in plants, for example many crops like wheat or Brassica forms. It seems to be rarer in animals but still it is present among some amphibian species like Xenopus.  As I know in mammals polyploidy is lethal (I don't mean tissue - limited polyploidy). I understand that triploidy is harmful due to stronger influence of maternal or paternal epigenetic traits that cause abnormal development of placenta, but why there is no tetraploid mammals? calculation of $\int_{0}^{1}\tan^{-1}(1-x+x^2)dx$ Compute the definite integral   $$ \int_{0}^{1}\tan^{-1}(1-x+x^2)\,dx $$   Failed Attempt:  Let $1-x+x^2=t$. Then  $$ \begin{align} (2x-1)\,dx &amp;= dt\\ dx &amp;= \frac{1}{(2x-1)}dt \end{align} $$  Changing the limits of integration, we get  $$\int_{1}^{1}\tan^{-1}(t)\cdot \frac{1}{(2x-1)}dt = \int_{1}^{1}\tan^{-1}(t)\cdot f(t)dt = 0 $$  where $f(t)=\frac{1}{(2x-1)}$.  Is it true that $\int_{a}^{a}f(x)dx = 0$? If not, then where have I made a mistake in my attempted solution?