How can I apply the Meet-in-the-Middle attack to the 3DES algorithm, and why does the literature say that 3DES is more secure than DES?
Among other sources,  states that triple DES using three seperate keys (k1, k2, k3) is vulnerable to meet-in-the-middle-attacks, while triple DES using only two keys (k1, k2, k1) is not.  Why is this attack possible if all the keys are different, but not if the first and the third are the same?
So, as the title read I happened to overstayed my Schengen visa for 6 months does anyone know what the consequences could be. If I wanted to return back to Saudi Arabia. The set of convergent points of a sequence of continuous functions is Borel Suppose that $f_n$ are continuous.  Prove that $E=\{x\in \mathbb{R}:f_n(x)\text{ is convergent}\}$ is Borel.   My first instinct is to take balls around $\lim_{n\to\infty}f_n(x)$, for each $x$ in $E$, and then show that there has to be some ball small enough so that everything inside that ball is a member of $E$. But this would imply not only that $E$ is Borel, but moreover that it is open, so I don't think that can be right.  Can someone show me how to do this? How to install a deb file, by dpkg -i or by apt? android - out of memory exception when creating bitmap What is the difference between "AS" and "IS" in an Oracle stored procedure? I see Oracle procedures sometimes written with "AS", and sometimes with "IS" keyword.   CREATE OR REPLACE Procedure TESTUSER.KILLINSTANCE (INSTANCEID integer) **AS** ...   vs.  CREATE OR REPLACE Procedure TESTUSER.KILLINSTANCE (INSTANCEID integer) **IS** ...   Is there any difference between the two?   Edit: Apparently, there is no functional difference between the two, but some people follow a convention to use "AS" when the SP is part of a package and "IS" when it is not. Or the other way 'round. Meh. What is wrong with "Where should this car be parked?"? How to prove there are no more positive integers that are products of 2 and 3 consecutive numbers? Are there any banned subjects on Area 51? I know of the following rules for creating a proposal on Area 51:  The scope must be reasonably well-defined, not too unclear (e.g. &quot;cool stuff&quot;), too opinion-based (e.g. &quot;car reviews&quot;), too broad (e.g. &quot;life on Earth&quot;), or too narrow (e.g. &quot;The 1995 academic misconduct scandal at East Oak Mews High School&quot;). One  come to Area 51 with an already existing community rather than hope to build one on Area 51. Proposals that are subsets of existing sites are not acceptable (e.g.  — deleted). These get closed as &quot;This subject is already well-covered by a live Stack Exchange site. We generally do not split off subjects simply to give them their own space.&quot; Proposals for non-English sites .  Other than the criteria above, are there any per se restrictions on site content for an Area 51 proposal? If so, what topics are currently banned? I would expect a proposal for a &quot;Let's organize a lawsuit against Stack Exchange&quot; or &quot;[Specific SE staff member] sucks, amirite?&quot; would get closed for obvious reasons, but I'm interested if there are any non-obvious topics that are not currently allowed in proposals regardless of how well-defined, well-scoped, original, and well-supported by a community they are. Having a list of banned topics would be helpful to potential proposers as well as the communities that back them. For example, I wouldn't want to go to all the effort of organizing a community, bringing them to Area 51, etc., only to have my proposal closed with a curt &quot;Sorry, due to the political climate, we are not currently accepting proposals for sites about real-life weapons.&quot; custom closure. To be clear, I am asking solely about topic restrictions (e.g. &quot;no sites about fishing, hunting, or weapons&quot;). I'm not asking about clarity requirements, the requirement to have a pre-existing community, not duplicating an existing site, or the requirement to not use sock puppets to artificially inflate proposal stats. Those requirements are already well-defined elsewhere or else are common sense. Also to be clear, I don't have a specific proposal idea in mind right now or the community to make it happen. I'm asking in general. The question could be rephrased as &quot;What are those topics where I shouldn't even bother to try to define, gather a community, etc. because any attempt to propose a site will be summarily closed due to covering a banned topic?&quot; This is not a duplicate of  because that question is about the appropriateness of expanding a proposal to cover things that are acceptable proposal topics but arguably don't make sense in combination with the original proposal scope. My question is about topics that are completely banned from proposals regardless of whether they are included in the original proposal description or tacked on by the community later. let a,b be real  numbers and $\varepsilon&gt;0$. prove the above inequality. I dont know how to even start. please, I need your help. Solve $z^2+|z|=0$ Solve for $z$: $$z^2+|z|=0$$ I found this question on my textbook but I unable to derive an answer to it as a modulus of $z$ is present. I am unable to take an approach please guide me ..thanks I am looking for a short story I read long ago about the phone system 'waking up'. It talks about how the phone system had just reached the number of connections as the number in the human brain. They lead you somehow to wonder (maybe characters speculating?) and it ends with a 'baby cry' of all the phones in the world ringing. I think I read it at least 20 years ago, maybe as many as 30. I think it was after 1978 because I think it was after I went to work at Bell Labs - so the phone connection resonated:-). It was definitely pre-internet.   What was the title? Who was the author? Any more on the plot since my memory is very hazy? I remember really liking the story and this site has got me thinking about my ATF's. Is there evidence of "think tank" meaning "the brain"? The  Random House Dictionary defines the expression  as:         a research institute or organization employed to solve complex problems or predict or plan future developments, as in military, political, or social areas.      According to  the above connotation  is an extention of an earliar sense  which referred to "the brain":        also think-tank, 1959 as "research institute" (first reference is to Center for Behavioral Sciences, Palo Alto, Calif.); it had been colloquial for "the brain" since 1905.      : shows usage of "think tank" only from the late '50s.  Is there evidence  of earlier usages of "think tank" meaning "the brain"? Despite  its colloquial   usage I assume  the expression was quite widespread before it was adopted by the Stanford University. How do we control web page caching, across all browsers? Uninstalling Ubuntu from Windows Dual Boot if I don't have Windows recovery CD I installed Ubuntu (I had already had Windows 8.1) from USB (I still have live Ubuntu on it). Is there a way I can uninstall Ubuntu in a way that my Windows will remain bootable? All the tutorials I have seen say that uninstalling ubuntu will delete GRUB also so I will need a Windows recovery CD to boot into it, but I don't have one. Is there a solution? How to add click event to an element? How do I run .sh scripts? Whenever I open a .sh file, it opens it in gedit instead of the terminal. I can't find any option similar to Right Click → Open With → Other Application... → Terminal.  How do I open this file in the terminal? MT7610U - Unable to install wifi driver Obtain user and kernel time of a running process? Is there way to determine using standard Linux/Unix tools how much a process has spent in User mode and how much waiting for kernel?  In other words, exactly the "user" and "sys" values that you get when using time, but during process runtime?  NOTE: one way is to use WBEM and enumerate Linux_UnixProcess, but I need to use other tool than this; my aim is to verify what WBEM provider tells me, i.e. I need to use different tool. I have the following validation rule:  AND(  $Profile.Name &lt;&gt; 'System Administrator',  OR(  ISPICKVAL(PRIORVALUE(Level__c), "Archived"),  ISPICKVAL(PRIORVALUE(Level__c), "Closed")  )  )   This validation rule is on the opportunity object, and what I want to achieve is, if the picklist Level__c is either set to Archived or Closed, the opportunity record can only be edited by the System Administrator.  For some reason though, the validation rule also triggers, when I want to set the Level__c to Archived or Closed. But this is not what I want.   Any idea what's wrong with the validation rule? invalid EFI file path on windows 8