I don't understand why one should take transpose of $\operatorname{tr}(AB^T)$ and why we use the fact that $\operatorname{tr}(M)=\operatorname{tr}(M^T)$ for any $M$ that is a square matrix to solve the problem.
Consider the vectorspace of all real $m \times n$ vectors and define an    inner product $\langle A,B\rangle = \operatorname{tr}(B^T   A)$.    "tr" stands for "trace"        which is the sum of the diagonal entries of a matrix.   How do you prove that $\operatorname{tr}(B^T   A)$ is indeed a inner product?  Kind regards
Execution order of event receivers and workflow on a list Why didn't Harry himself drink Polyjuice Potion instead of all others in Deathly Hallows Part 1? In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1, it is shown that members of the Order of Phoenix come to rescue Harry from his house at Privet Drive. There, they all drink Polyjuice Potion and assume the form of Harry to confuse death eaters in identifying who is the real Harry.  An obvious, more safe, better choice would be to change Harry into someone else. Maybe a muggle, like his cousin Dudley. And then, safely take him to the Weasleys, maybe apparating. That way, death eaters won't ever find out. Isn't that correct?  Why didn't they take this path, and follow a rather complicated and risky one? What happens when one is affected by something such as energy drain, and permanently loses levels when one only has racial HD? Does the victim of the spell die? Or do they permanently lose racial HD? I am playing with LINQ to learn about it, but I can't figure out how to use Distinct when I do not have a simple list (a simple list of integers is pretty easy to do, this is not the question). What I if want to use  on a list of an Object on one or more properties of the object?  Example: If an object is Person, with Property Id. How can I get all Person and use Distinct on them with the property Id of the object?  Person1: Id=1, Name="Test1" Person2: Id=1, Name="Test1" Person3: Id=2, Name="Test2"   How can I get just Person1 and Person3? Is that possible?  If it's not possible with LINQ, what would be the best way to have a list of Person depending on some of its properties in .NET 3.5? Procedure cache (plan cache) size Delete or remove all history, commits, and branches from a remote Git repo? I have a hierarchical category tree and checkboxes next to each item that allow to enable/disable the correpsonding category.    I assume it is an expected default behavior that all subategories of natural environment become checked when I check the natural environment category. But what about unchecking it again: Should this automatically uncheck all subcategories or restore the previous state in case some were checked already?  Furthermore... Should unchecking one of the subcategories cause the parent category to become unchecked? How do I determine which graphics card I'm using? We've just been learning about complex numbers in class, and I don't really see why they're called numbers.  Originally, a number used to be a means of counting (natural numbers).  Then we extend these numbers to instances of owing other people money for instance (integers).  After that, we consider fractions when we need to split things like 2 pizzas between three people.  We then (skipping the algebraic numbers for the purposes of practicality), we use the real numbers to describe any length; e.g. the length of a diagonal of a unit square.  But this is when our original definition of a number fails to make sense- when we consider complex numbers, which brings me to my main question: what is a rigorous definition of 'number'?  Wikipedia claims that "A number is a mathematical object used to count, label, and measure", but this definition fails to make sense after we extend $\mathbb{R}$.     Does anyone know of any definition of number that can be generalised to complex numbers as well (and even higher order number systems like the quaternions)? If $E[X|Y]=Y$ almost surely and $E[Y|X]=X$ almost surely then $X=Y$ almost surely How to get back a declined Outlook invitation Does anyone know whether there are only finitely many of primes of the form $6^{2n}+1$, where $n$ zero or any natural number? How do I create a nice-looking DMG for Mac OS X using command-line tools? At the moment I'm taking an algebraic topology course. In our current exercise we have to prove the following: Consider any topological space $X$ and any two maps $f, g : X \to S^n$, such that $f(x) \neq -g(x)$. It follows that $f$ is homotopic to $g$.  My idea is to use the mapping cylinders $M_f, M_g$ to construct a homotopy via $$M := M_f \amalg M_g/ (x, 0)_f \sim (x,0)_g$$ But this doesn't seem to work. In addition I don't know how $f(x) \neq -g(x)$ is going to help me (I can see how this could help if $n=1$, but I have no clue how this would work for $n&gt;1$).  I would appreciate any hints towards a solution.  Thanks in advance. Statistics and causal inference? Add Fake Display when No Monitor is Plugged In I have an Ubuntu 14.04 server that has no external monitor connected.  I use NoMachine to remote control the machine.  When I do so, the Unity/Gnome interface doesn't see any monitors connected, so I can only use 800x600 when connecting with NoMachine.  If I plug in a monitor, I can set the resolution to whatever size the NoMachine window is on the remote computer.  Is there a way to create a "fake" monitor device on Ubuntu so I can set a desktop resolution in Unity/Gnome? I am interested in the situation where you have a very interesting result. For instance, you have solved a very important open problem. However, you are not known in the field and do not have any remarkable publications. Your supervisor thinks the work is good and you submit the work to a high profile journal, but you get rejected.  The thing is that the contribution is very strong. It breaks what most people believe or what they have already proven: e.g., you solve the P vs. NP problem or any other well known open problem.   The reviewers strongly reject your work with no justification and they do not state why the result is wrong. Examples of reviewer comments include:   "The proof must be wrong."  "You cannot achieve such a result."  "You do not understand well the notion of ..."   My question is what to do in this situation? Where to go? If your advisor accepts the work, but the reviewers from the top journal reject the work without even explaining the mistakes,  what should you do? Is stage.*.example.com valid for a wildcard DNS CNAME? Among other sources,  states that triple DES using three seperate keys (k1, k2, k3) is vulnerable to meet-in-the-middle-attacks, while triple DES using only two keys (k1, k2, k1) is not.  Why is this attack possible if all the keys are different, but not if the first and the third are the same? Benefits & Practicality of Virtual Machines I have been living under a rock for the past 5 - 8 years, and am just now getting up to speed with virtualization, virtual machines and platforms like VMware or VirtualBox.  I think I am starting to get them, but there are two concepts about VMs that I'm just choking on for some reason; one has to do with their intrinsic benefit to the enterprise, and the other has to do with their practicality when being used.  So I understand that you can have multiple VMs running on the same physical machine, all doing their own "thing" as if they were separate machines. So let's say I want to make a nice little virtual network of servers in my home office so I can have a big sandbox to play inside of for all my projects. I set up 2 physical machines as servers, and on each of them I have, say, 4 virtual machines running (1 might be an app server, another might be a RDBMS, another might be a message broker, etc.).   Besides saving me money (as I only have to provide 2 physical machines instead of buying 8 servers), what instrinsic benefit/purpose do these VMs serve here? I don't care how clever virtual machines are, if my computer only has 8GB of RAM, and I have 4 VMs running on it, those VMs only get 8GB of RAM to share between them. Putting 4 VMs on my server doesn't endow it with 4 times that amount of RAM! So, as far as I see it, VMs save you money on hardware, but just end up bogging down that hardware as you have multiple machines competing over the same pool of resources. What am I missing here? Can VMs communicate with each other over your network using high-level protocols like TCP/IP, HTTP, FTP, etc.? Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense to implement all these VMs if you have to feed them separate and independent chunks of data/requests to process.