I have some themes installed on ubuntu 16.04 right now and im running plank as well, i wanted to know if i could safely just update to 18 right now or would i have to restore defaults and uninstall any extra features
I tried to upgrade from Ubuntu 16.04 to Ubuntu 18.04. First, after downloading and installing of packages, I was unable to login. Login screen hanged completely and it showed Failed to authenticate. But then I logged into tty1 and then logged in Ubuntu. It was saying that I am in Ubuntu 18.04. Then it asked for reboot. So I rebooted Ubuntu from terminal. It got stuck at something like /dev/sda4 : Cleaning files. After trying for a few times, I got into tty1 and here I logged in as root user and tried to update and upgrade. But now I am getting errors like unmet dependencies and broken packages. I have done sudo dpkg -- configure -a. I don't want to do a reinstall of Ubuntu. How do I get access to my Ubuntu Desktop?
Today in a match the setter set the ball too low for me to spike it, so I just dinked it over.  The bottom of the ball was lower than the top of the net at the point where I made contact.  When the defender made contact, again, the bottom of the ball was lower than the top of the net (the top of the ball was over the top of the net though).  I felt that this wasn't technically a block and that he shouldn't have been allowed to hit it a second time, but I wasn't sure so I just let it go.  Was this a legal block or should it have been our point when he hit it a second time in a row?  Edit:  I don't think I was clear about the part where, after I hit the ball, the ball travelled over the net onto the other team's side of the court.  The other player did not reach over the net so there is no issue there.  It's just an issue of whether or not their first contact was a block or a hit.  I believe it was not a block but I can't find a specific ruling to address it. I would like to know if my brother can fly by United Airlines from USA to El Salvador, and my father, from El Salvador to USA using the same round trip ticket, both of them have the same name. Is there any way to deserialize JSON into an object using JSON.deserialize if some of the property names in the JSON are reserved words in apex? I want to do something like this:  string jsonString = '{"currency" : "ABC"}'; public class JSONResult {     public string currency; } JSONResult res = (JSONResult) JSON.deserialize(jsonString, JSONResult.class); system.debug(res);   but of course I get an error that the identifier name is reserved. How can I recover a deleted file on Android? Why do we get the same differential equations from both principles? Surely there is a fundamental connection between them? When written out, the two seem to have nothing in common.   $$\sum _i ( \mathbf F _i - \dot{\mathbf p}_i) \cdot \delta \mathbf r _i = 0$$  $$S[q(t)] = \int ^{t_2} _{t_1} \mathcal L (q,\dot{q},t)dt$$  After playing with d'Alembert's principle  we find that we can rewrite the whole thing as $$\sum _i \left[ \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{q}_i} \right) - \frac{\partial T}{\partial q_i}-Q_i\right] \delta q_i$$  This can further be rewritten under certain conditions so we get the exact form of the E-L equation.   It seems to me that both ways of arriving at the result are fundamentally different.   A function must obey the E-L equations in order to minimize the action over a path, but when we look at the virtual work, it appears that they come from the fact that (quoting Goldstein) "particles in the system will be in equilibrium under a force equal to the actual force plus a 'reversed effective force'."  I think I understand the principle of stationary action, I can see how it leads to the E-L equations, but d'Alembert's Principle seems so arbitrary, I can't see any motivation for it. 1N5819-E3/73  1N5819-E3/53 1N5819-E3/54   the first one is 4x cheaper than the last, why ?  aren't they all the same ? Finding an uncountable chain of subsets the integers How to find an uncountable subset of $P(\mathbb{N})$ such that every two elements of it can be compared. In fact, give an uncountable subset of $P(\mathbb{N})$ such that has totality property. We mean by $P(\mathbb{N})$, the powerset of natural numbers set $\mathbb{N}$. Hypernym for “import” and “export”? Persistent do not disturb toggle in Yosemite possible? Proof that $A_n$ the only subgroup of $ S_n$ index $2$. I have what seems to me a very simple proof that $A_{n}$ is the only subgroup of $S_{n}$ of index 2.  Since I've seen other people prove it with what feel like really complicated methods (), I'm wondering if I've overlooked something.  Proof: Let $H$ be any subgroup of index 2 in $S_{n}$.  Then $H\cap A_{n}$ is a normal subgroup of $A_{n}$ and since $A_{n}$ is simple, $H$ is either the trivial or the improper subgroup of $A_{n}$.  If it's the trivial subgroup it doesn't have index 2 in $S_{n}$, and otherwise the theorem is proved. Recently I found a claim saying that  $$  \int_0^\infty \left( \frac{\sin ax}{x}\right)\left( \frac{\sin bx}{x}\right) \mathrm{d}x= \pi \min(a,b)/2  $$ from what I can see this seems to be true. I already know that $\int_{0}^\infty \operatorname{sinc}xy\,\mathrm{d}y = \pi/2$, and so independant of $y$. My suspicion is that this is closely related to the integral above.   Can someone give me some suggestions for evaluating the integral above? Also are there any generalizations for the integral? Eg $$ \int_{0}^{\infty} \left( \prod_{k=1}^N \frac{\sin (a_k \cdot x)}{x} \right) \,\mathrm{d}x $$ Where $a_k, \cdots, a_N$ are arbitrary positive constants. It seems related to the , but there are some subtle differences. split file lines based on first field I have file with content like below and want to convert my output like below   Input  1,a,b,c 2,b,c 3,e,f 4,l  Required output  1,a 1,b 1,c 2,b 2,c 3,e 3,f 4,l    Values on first field is unique and no duplicate lines for 1st field in the input.  I am new to scripting and not sure how can we do this. How do I limit the running time of a BASH script I have a long running BASH script that I am running under CYGWIN on Windows.  I would like to limit the script to run for 30 seconds, and automatically terminate if it exceeds this limit. Ideally, I'd like to be able to do this to any command.  For example:  sh-3.2$ limittime -t 30 'myscript.sh'   or   sh-3.2$ limittime -t 30 'grep func *.c'   Under cygwin the ulimit command doesn't seem to work.   I am open to any ideas. Is $\{\emptyset\}$ a subset of $\{\{\emptyset\}\}$? Prove that the graph is connected I was wondering if someone can help me understand how prove that this graph is connected.  Given a graph with n vertices, prove that if the degree of each vertex is at least $(n − 1)/2$ then the graph is connected.  So far I know that about connected graphs:  An undirected graph is called connected if there is a path between every pair of distinct vertices of the graph  The distance between two vertices in a graph is the length of the shortest path between them.  The diameter of a graph is the distance between the two vertices that are farthest apart. Initialization of an ArrayList in one line How do I get object names to appear in the render? In my scene I have multiple objects (30+). In the viewport I have the handy control of selecting (in the Properties Editor) Object> Display> Name and copying to selected.  This is beautiful for diagrams etc. as wherever my view is at whatever distance these labels have been placed instantly, always face me and are always the same size.  How can you get these to display in a rendered view?  Is the ONLY option to manually create a label for each object, get them to track to your camera (Probably have to track to an empty miles behind your camera rotation otherwise they offset if your camera isn't facing exactly front on to an object) and add some sort of scaling property to change depending on how far away you are? “between” vs. “among” Today I was cut off in the middle of the following sentence:     Between Cook, Strauss, and Pietersen—   My friend said I was wrong. He said that for more than two entities, among/amongst are used, and that between is only for two entities.   I vaguely remember some rule like this, but I asked him to hear the whole sentence, which was:     Between Cook, Strauss, and Pietersen, they’ve notched up 56 centuries in Test cricket.   Should I have used among here? Seems correct to me to use between, but my friend was certain.   Another friend pointed out the following sentence:     I’m still choosing between Harvard, Yale, and MIT.    Certainly among doesn’t seem to fit here, and she, to me, was correct in using between. Energy-momentum tensor transformation I've been trying to find how the energy-momentum tensor changes if we add a total derivative to the lagrangian: $$L\to L+\mathrm d_\mu X^\mu.\tag{1}$$   From the answer key:  $$T^{\mu\nu}\to T^{\mu\nu}+\partial_\lambda F^{\lambda\mu\nu}\tag{2}$$ Where $$F^{\lambda\mu\nu}=\frac{\partial X^\lambda}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\partial^\nu\phi -\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial(\partial_\lambda\phi)}\partial^\nu\phi.\tag{3}$$ Is the above answer right? I'm not able to get this result! any help? One way to prove that there is an infinity of consecutive powerful integers is to just note that there are infinite solutions to the equation $x^2-8y^2=1$, because clearly $x^2$ and $8y^2$ are clearly powerful. But this uses a bit of theory.  I found this problem under an induction worksheet, and all of the surrounding problems are easy. Is there really an elementary solution to the problem?  All of my attempts have been fruitless.  Note: a number is powerful if whenever a prime $p$ divides it we have that $p^2$ also divides it.