I don't have enough rep to view deleted posts yet. So should I be able to see the first few lines of a post via the tooltip?: (ie. rolling over the titile of a post gives you a tooltip with the first few lines of the post, just like hovering over a question on the main question page)    Yes, it's spam, I know, but there are more legit reasons for flagging - should a low-rep user be able to see a bit of this content??
This is sort of a follow-up to a feature request that resulted in obscuring spam / offensive content from 10K-visible answers:   Suggest the same to be done for questions. As of now, spam questions (, ) preserve their titles and content. Suggest to revise the titles to something like     This question was marked as spam or offensive and is therefore not shown   And the text to something like:     This question was marked as spam or offensive and is therefore not shown - you can see the revision history for details".   Where "the revision history" links to the question revision history.    For those interested, here is a link to screen shots of how spam shines through my flagging summary page and is displayed to me when I click the link to one of deleted questions: .  For the sake of precision, flagger having less than 10K rep would see only upper screen shot - the one that lists question titles ("Call giRℒs blah blah &lt;phone number&gt;") - in their  page.
What is that component from the ADP5091 Schematic? I am looking for an explanation what that component does inside of that circuit.  It can be found on page 3 of the Datasheet of ADP5091:   It would help me out a lot. Thank you in advance! Salesforce1 on focus scroll to the top Get Emacs to ignore contents of \Sexpr{} command in Sweave document to prevent incorrect $-based syntax highlighting Potential difference across a zero resistance wire Complex number isomorphic to certain $2\times 2$ matrices? I have been trying to prove this, but I am having trouble understanding how to prove the following mapping I found is injective and surjective. Just as a side note, I am trying to show the complex ring is isomorphic to special $2\times2$ matrices in regard to matrix multiplication and addition. Showing these hold is simple enough.  $$\phi:a+bi \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} a &amp; -b \\ b &amp; a \end{pmatrix}$$  This is what I have so far:  Injective: I am also confused over the fact that there are two operations, and in turn two neutral elements (1 and 0). Showing that the kernel is trivial is usually the way I go about proving whether a mapping is injective, but I just can't grasp this.  $$ \phi(z_1) = \phi(z_2) \implies \phi(z_1)\phi(z_2)^{-1} = I = \phi(z_1)\phi(z_2^{-1}) = \phi(z_2)\phi(z_2^{-1}).$$  So if we can just show that the kernel of $\phi$ is trivial, then it also shows that $z_1 = z_2$. The only complex number that maps to the identity matrix is one where $a = 1$ and $b = 0$, $a + bi = 1 + 0i = 1$.  Using a similar argument for addition we can just say that the only complex number $z$ such that $\phi(z) = 0\text{-matrix}$, is one where $a=0$ and $b=0$, $a+bi=0+0i=0$.   Surjective:  I forgot to add this before I posted, but I honestly don't really understand how to prove this because it just seems so obvious. All possible $2\times2$ matrices of that form have a complex representation because the complex number can always be identified by its real parts and since the elements of the $2\times2$ matrix are real then the mapping is obviously onto.  I have always had trouble understanding when I can say that I have "rigorously" proved something, so any help would be appreciated! When I log in on a Windows 8 machine for the first time with my Microsoft Account (by providing an e-mail address), a new user folder is created:  C:\Users\dzinx_000   In previous versions of Windows, I could choose the name of this folder (it was equal to my username). As I use the commandline often, it is quite annoying to me.    Can I somehow rename it to dzinx?  Does simply renaming the folder break everything? How would I go about identifying a port, card or connector on my system which I am unfamiliar with?  Where would I find information on what these parts are? What would be the steps I would take in identifying a unknown port or cable?   This question comes up frequently, and the suggested solutions are usually the same. This community wiki is an attempt to serve as the definitive, most comprehensive answer possible. Feel free to add your contributions via edits. How to use SSH to run a local shell script on a remote machine? I have to run a local shell script (windows/Linux) on a remote machine. I have SSH configured on both machine A and B. My script is on machine A which will run some of my code on a remote machine, machine B. The local and remote computers can be either Windows or Unix based system. Is there a way to run do this using plink/ssh? How do you show monotonicity of the $\ell^p$ norms? I can't seem to work out the inequality $(\sum |x_n|^q)^{1/q} \leq (\sum |x_n|^p)^{1/p}$ for $p \leq q$ (which I'm assuming is the way to go about it). I have a set of surround speakers, connected to my iMac through the headphone jack. I use a switch to control what goes to the speaker set (iMac, iPod, or MacBook/aux). So that I don't have to be constantly unplugging and replugging, I leave the audio cable in the iMac's audio port. This means that when I'm listening to something from another source, I can't hear anything from the iMac unless I unplug the cable.  Is there a way to force sound to come out of the internal speakers, even if there's something in the audio out port? Let's say we have two models trained. And let's say we are looking for good accuracy.  The first has an accuracy of 100% on training set and 84% on test set. Clearly over-fitted. The second has an accuracy of 83% on training set and 83% on test set.   On the one hand, model #1 is over-fitted but on the other hand it still yields better performance on an unseen test set than the good general model in #2.   Which model would you choose to use in production? The First or the Second and why? Is there a command like head but for line truncation? Prove that 10101...10101 is NOT a prime. So basically we have a number $10101...10101$ that contains $2016$ zeros and can be written as$ \sum _{ k=0 }^{ 2016 }{ 100^{ k } }$ . I want to prove that this number is not a prime without using anything besides a piece of paper and a pen. I'm stuck on this for quite a few days now. Why is uniform prior on log(x) equal to 1/x prior on x? I'm trying to understand Jeffreys prior. One application is for 'scale' variables like the standard deviation $\sigma$ (or its square, the variance $\sigma^2$) of Gaussian distributions. It is often said that using a uniform prior over $\sigma$ is not really non-informative and instead one should either:   Use instead $\ln \sigma$ as the free parameter, with a uniform prior (this is often called a log-uniform prior) Or keep using $\sigma$ as the free parameter but use $1/\sigma$ as the prior (which is not uniform).   Why are the above two methods/priors equivalent? I feel it has something to do with the fact that the derivative of ln $\sigma$ is $1/\sigma$ but I can't take the next step.   Also, why does this even matter, in simple language with minimal jargon? I see all these complicated explanations online involving the Fisher information matrix but in the end all I see is that the above log-uniform or $1/\sigma$ priors preferentially weight lower values of $\sigma$ more highly. Why? If possible, a simple analytic example or python snippet would be very helpful. What is your Instagram password when signing in using Facebook? Do this:   On your phone, create an instagram account using Facebook log in. Now on your desktop web browser, log in using Facebook connect.  Now go to delete your account - edit profile -> I'd like to delete my account.    It will ask for your password.   But you never gave it a password in order to create the account.   I tried using my Facebook password, but that didn't work.   Any ideas? The Instagram account management seems quite broken. UNetbootin is stuck in an "Automatic boot in 10 seconds" countdown loop I made a bootable Windows 7 USB using UNetbootin, and when I try to boot from the bootable USB and select the Default boot menu entry, it gets stuck at the UNetbootin boot menu and it keeps repeating an Automatic boot in 10 seconds... message in an endless countdown loop. Selecting Press [Tab] to edit options and editing the options has no effect. When I go back to the boot menu, it keeps repeating the same countdown loop.   I've tried redoing the UNetbootin extraction, but I still have the same issue. I know that a continuous function which is a BV may not be absolutely continuous.  Is there an example of such a function?   I was looking for a BV whose derivative is not Lebesgue integrable but I couldn't find one. Evaluate $$\int \frac{2-3x}{2+3x}\sqrt\frac{1+x}{1-x}d x$$ What substitution should I use ? $\sqrt\frac{1+x}{1-x}$ suggests $x=cos2\theta $ but its not useful in $\frac{2-3x}{2+3x}$ I can prove the converse of it, but I cannot do this one. Here is the problem:     Prove that the implicit function theorem implies the inverse function theorem. Is an Anti-Symmetric Relation also Reflexive? According to the definition of an Anti-Symmetric Relation if xRy and yRx then x = y  Which means, effectively, x is in relation with itself. Does this mean that anti-symmetry implies reflexive property as well?