Is it possible to highlight the OP's name in the comments in Android app?
On the websites, whenever the OP comments on an answer, or on his question, his name is highlighted. This is a handy feature because you can easily tell whether the comment is from the OP or not.   But on the Android mobile app (don't know about iOS),  this feature is not there. Can we have it please!?
Modern ice-age/plans for weapon hidden in genome How to write below bullet I have to write something under the symbol \bullet in Latex. Is it possible? I'm using the class beamer. Here it is an example of a frame:  \begin{frame} \begin{itemize} \item&lt;1-&gt; Products Market\mbox{}\\ \footnotesize{where $p_{i,t}=u_{i,t}$, with $u_{i,t}\sim u[0,2]$} \vspace{0.5cm} \item&lt;2-&gt; Credit Market \mbox{} \vspace{0.2cm} \\ \footnotesize{where \hspace{0.1cm} $\bullet_{bank} \xrightarrow{loan} \bullet$} \vspace{0.5cm} \item&lt;3-&gt; Interbank Market\mbox{} \vspace{0.08cm} \\ \footnotesize{where \hspace{0.1cm} $\bullet \xrightarrow{loan} \bullet$} \end{itemize} \end{frame}   In particular I want to write "bank" under the bullet, while now it is only in subscript.  Thanks Don't invite people when moving their messages Omitting "and" in a sentence He called her, emailed her, texted her, tweeted her—all to no use.   Strictly speaking, I would need to write texted her and tweeted her, but I'm omitting and to convey a rhythm and sense of urgency. What do you call this kind of construction, and is it accepted grammar (at least for creative writing, if not in an academic context)? story on forest timescale I'm looking for the title of a short story by Ursula Le Guin about a scientist (?) who is given a drug that slows the timescale of his perception enormously, so that he can perceive that an alien (?) forest is actually behaving as a sentient being, reacting to current events, but at an enormously slow (from a normal human point of view) timescale. It might be in , but I don't remember the title (and it doesn't jump out at me from the list of titles) and don't have access to that collection right now. It is not &quot;The Word for World is Forest&quot;, nor &quot;Direction of the Road&quot; (from ), nor &quot;Vaster than Empires and More Slow&quot;, the latter two of which look at similar plant perception/time-scale issues. Update: it turns out that the description was right, but I had most of the details wrong: not Le Guin, not alien, not a scientist ... Update help center article on search to reflect the new position of the search box The page  says:      Enter search terms in the search box that appears in the upper right corner of every page    But the box is not there. The following could have shown up as an exercise in a basic Abstract Algebra text, and if anyone can give me a reference, I will be most grateful.  Consider a set $X$ with an associative law of composition, not known to have an identity or inverses. Suppose that for every $g\in X$, there is a unique $x\in X$ with $gxg=g$. Show that $X$ is a group.  Note that I’m not asking for a proof (though a really short one would please me!), just some place where this has been published. SQL Server Dependencies Is there an easy way to chase down table/stored procedure/function dependencies in SQL Server 2005+?  I've inherited a giant application with lots of tables and even more stored procedures and functions that are long and interlinked.    At the end of the day is there a way to build a dependency tree?  Ideally what I'm looking for goes in both directions:  For a table/procedure - what depends ON it?:  Show me all the stored procedures that eventually reference it (ideally in a tree view such that sub procedures nest out to the bigger procedures that call them)  For a procedure - what does IT depend on?:  Show me all the procedures and tables that a given procedure will (or could) touch when running.  It seems this tool shouldn't be that hard to make and would be incredibly useful for DB maintenance generally.  Is anyone aware of such a thing?  If this doesn't exist, why the heck not?  The built-in functionality in Management Studio is nice but the information does not appear to be complete at all. Why do modern mountain bike forks no longer use boots on fork stanchions? Why do modern mountain bike forks no longer use boots on fork stanchions? Older mountain bikes used to have them on the forks, and lefty and headshocks still do. Why have these fallen out of fashion and would putting aftermarket fork boots on your stanchions be productive or not? Add transparency to an existing PNG I'd like to use this image on a web site.    What I need to do is change the background from black to transparent, so I can use the arrow on my site maintaining the page background.  I used Gimp to convert the image to .png, but how do I proceed now? How to display Trash and Home folder icons? I've googled quite a bit but nothing I've found works. I just want to display the Trash, Home folder, Computer etc icons on my Desktop in Ubuntu.  The closest I've come is installing dconf-tools, running it, going to org -&gt; gnome -&gt; desktop -&gt; background and checking show-desktop-icons then org -&gt; gnome -&gt; nautilus -&gt; desktop and checking the icons I want to show.  Nothing happens.  I've also tried looking in compizconfig-settings-manager and gconf-editor but can't find anything there.  Ideas? What is the rule for adjective order? I remember being taught that the correct order of adjectives in English was something along the lines of "Opinion-Size-Age-Color-Material-Purpose."  However, it's been a long time and I'm pretty sure I've forgotten a few categories (I think there were eight or nine). Can anyone fill them in? Inequality $\left(a-1+\frac{1}b\right)\left(b-1+\frac{1}c\right)\left(c-1+\frac{1}a\right)\leq1$ Yesterday, one of our computers dropped to grub shell or honestly, I am unsure what shell it was when we turned on the machine.  It showed that it can't mount the root filesystem or something in this sense, because of inconsistencies.  I ran, I believe:  fsck -fy /dev/sda2   Rebooted and the problem was gone.  Here comes the question part:  I already have in her root's crontab:   @reboot /home/ruzena/Development/bash/fs-check.sh    while the script contains:  #!/bin/bash touch /forcefsck   Thinking about it, I don't know, why I created script file for such a short command, but anyways...  Further, in the file:  /etc/default/rcS   I have defined:   FSCKFIX=yes    So I don't get it. How could the situation even arise?    What should I do to force the root filesystem check (and optionally a fix) at boot?  Or are these two things the maximum, that I can do?  OS: Linux Mint 18.x Cinnamon 64-bit.  fstab:  cat /etc/fstab | grep ext4   shows:   UUID=a121371e-eb12-43a0-a5ae-11af58ad09f4    /    ext4    errors=remount-ro    0    1    grub:   fsck.mode=force    was already added to the grub configuration. How to mathematically evaluate a string like "2-1" to produce "1"? PCB opaque coating for anti reverse engineering? Im trying to find a coating for my PCB in order to protect it from reverse engineering. I want it opaque, non-conductive and with a low thermal resistance.  Basically I do not want that someone replicates my circuit easily. I´ve beens searching a lot on coatings but did't find anything that suits to all my requirement. Anyone with an idea? What is the correct way to pluralize an acronym / initialism? For example, if I wanted to write the equivalent of  There are many automated teller machines in this city.  Would it be  There are many ATMs in this city.  or  There are many ATM's in this city. (could get confused with possessive form or contraction).  or just  There are many ATM in this city. (assuming the final s is included in Machines represented by M).  Maybe something else? Replace one Ubuntu with another from USB pen drive First and foremost I am sorry for this; in order to make the questions clear I must first upload the lecture notes from my institution $^\zeta$ for the derivation of Hydrostatic Equilibrium:          $^\zeta$ Lecture notes courtesy of Imperial College London, Astrophysics dept, 2017-2018 edition.    Firstly, in equation $(3.1)$ why is there no negative sign for $F_g$? Last time I checked, Newton's law of gravitation told us that   $$F=-\frac{GMm}{r^2}$$  Nextly, I have a conceptual problem with equation $(3.2)$; when they use the term 'pressure' I am going to assume that they are referring to the radiation pressure that is released due to nuclear fusion reactions taking place in the sun. In that formula it must be the case that $P(r) \gt P(r+\delta r)$ if this is the case then $(3.2)$ should read $$F_p=-\left(\frac{dP}{dr}\right)\delta r\,\delta A $$   Correct me if I'm wrong but Hydrogen nuclei are fused together to generate the more stable Helium and hence lots of radiation pressure acting outwards from the centre of the star. If this is correct then $P(r+\delta r)=0$, since the outside face of that cylindrical volume element in Figure $3.1$ will not 'feel' any of this radiation pressure because this pressure only acts on the inner face. What am I not understanding here?  Moving on to equation $(3.3)$, let's suppose the sign of the gravitational force in $(3.1)$ really is neglected. Does this mean that the negative sign in $(3.3)$ is due to $P(r+\delta r) \lt P(r)$ and hence $$\frac{GM(r)\rho(r)}{r^2}=-\left(\frac{dP}{dr}\right)\,?$$ I know this is the same equation as in $(3.3)$ but I have written it with the negative sign next to the pressure differential as I would like to know where this minus sign originates from. Does anyone know?  My final concern is the sign in $(3.4)$ as last time I checked $$g=-\frac{GM}{r^2}$$ and not $$g=\frac{GM}{r^2}$$  Hence, equation $(3.4)$ should read  $$\left(\frac{dP}{dr}\right)=\rho(r)\,g\,?$$     I forgot to mention that I have done some research and  is the closest derivation I could find, which, needless to say is no less helpful than the notes I have. the output when I start firefox from Terminal