Dividing polygon layer into multiple layers by values in attribute table column using ArcGIS for Desktop?
Exporting feature class into multiple feature classes based on field values using ArcGIS Desktop?
Prefix or adjective meaning "one and a half" Is there a prefix or adjective that means "one and a half", as "tri-" or "triple" is for "three"?  The exact usage I have is to describe "18" in terms of a dozen. Where I live they've started making 18-egg cartons, and the local grocer was wondering what name to give them in his computerised cash register, hoping for a single word.  Even slang, informal or invented term would do if there isn't such a term already. Units in gravitational $N$ body simulations I am trying to use a file repository for updating linux/ubuntu on a non-connected machine. The architecture for this machine (uname -a):  x86_64 GNU/Linux   The results of dpkg --printarchitecture are:  amd64   It is a Trusty Tahr amd64 machine, and it specifically says this, for example, in the aptitude sources.list file. Also, the "About this Computer" in ubuntu specifically says the machine is 64-bit. So, I installed the amd64 packages on the machine. However, when I try to do apt-get update, I get errors such as:  W: Failed to fetch file:/var/spool/apt-mirror-trusty/mirror/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty/main/binary-i386/Packages  File not found   So, in other words, even though it is a 64-bit machine, apt is inexplicably trying to read i386 packages. Why is it doing this and how can I make it use the 64-bit packages?  Note that there is nothing in sources.list that specifies i386.  The only uncommented line in the sources.list file is:  deb file:///var/spool/apt-mirror-trusty/mirror/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main restricted universe multiverse Get on what tile has mouse clicked Does walking fast prevent eggs hatching? What is the lifetime of a static variable in a C++ function? How can I have one keyboard input layout and multiples languages in Ubuntu 17.10? If I have English language I can't type "'e" and get an "é", as I can do in Portuguese and Spanish.  When I manage to do that on Settings -> Region &amp; Language, I'm able to change languages, but it also changes the keyboard layout.  Is there any way to change language (Portuguese or Spanish for example) and set the keyboard input layout (US International for example)? Why does the checkbox stay checked when reloading the page? I would like to create some kind of feature matrix with available classes in columns and implemented features as rows. Problem is, that the class names are quite long.  Rotating them by 90° simply looked quite silly, so am looking for alternate ideas.  The only idea I had so far was to write the heading text horizontally with a arrow (or similar) matching the "heading row" with a column. But frankly I have no idea how to do something like this in latex.  An minimal example of my naive approach looks like this.  \documentclass{beamer}  \usepackage{tabularx}  % I am actually using a custom theme % The space ``wasted'' is similar for PaloAlto though \usetheme{PaloAlto}  \begin{document} \frame {   \frametitle{Comparision of boost implemented graph classes}   \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{X c c c}     %     % Column Headers, first column is empts     %     & \rotatebox{90}{adjacency\_list}     & \rotatebox{90}{adjacency\_matrix}     & \rotatebox{90}{compressed\_sparse\_row\_graph}      \     %     % Rows, I suspect I need about 10     % Class               adjlist          adjmatrix     csrg     \hline      AdjacencyGraph        & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#2         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#3         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#4         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#5         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#6         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#7         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#8         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     Interface \#9         & Yes            & No          & Yes \\     % Rest omitted   \end{tabularx} } \end{document}    If its important: I am doing this for a presentation with beamer. My friend had a  on the board with 10 counters on it.  If I destroy it and he sacs it in response to gain the life, is there anything that can be done about that?  Like, can I put another destroy artifact on the stack to resolve before his sac resolves? How can I stand on the ground? EM or/and Pauli? There is this famous example about the order difference between gravitational force and EM force. All the gravitational force of Earth is just countered by the electromagnetic force between the electrons on the surface of my feet and the ground.  But also wave-function of electrons(fermions) do not overlap each other due to Pauli exclusion principle.  So which one is the true reason of me not flopping inside the earth forever? Is it only one of them(my guess is Pauli exclusion) or is it both? Which offences result in indirect free kicks? If a player commits a direct free kick offence in their own penalty area, this results in a penalty kick instead of a direct free kick. However, if the offence is an indirect free kick offence, it remains as an indirect free kick .  What offences result in an indirect free kick? I'm trying to remember the title of a book.  The plot was a group of people are stranded on a comet or asteroid.  They establish kind of a colony inside it, and rig up rockets on the surface to move it.  Some of the people discover some sort of algae type life form inside it, which bonds with and mutates people helping them to survive.  They set the asteroid to head for Earth but have to change the course when authorities on Earth threaten to blow the asteroid up because of the mutations. Suppose a book consists of three sections:     The book is/was divided into three sections.   I am thinking the past tense option "was" should be used, because the act of dividing the book into three sections happened at the time of writing. Is my analysis good? Shimano Deore front derailleur occasionally sticking I have a question about my front derailleur sticking occasionally.  I've had this bike for a 1.7 years and have ridden it through 2 winters.  It has only been after this last winter that my front derailleur has been sticking on occasion where it's like grit has jammed in somewhere (which I'm sure it is the case).  When I'm on the fly I just knock it with my heel and it will downshift and I can push the shifter hard enough to go back up when I need to.  The first time I decided to overhaul both the front and back ones.  Took them apart, cleaned/degreased, regreased the two back cogs, and used WD-40 professional silicone on the rest of the parts as to not attract more dirt.  Then after about a month it got stuck again, and I couldn't see anything that could be jamming it (while it was still stiff as heck).  Didn't take it apart this time just used a tooth brush and silicone again and it's fine at the moment.  I'm assuming it may be that since that the roads have been grittier/dirtier from the winter with some recent rain and slush that it may just be normal.  I haven't been on the trails yet this year so I know it's not that.  Is this normal, has some kind of bur that I can't see come up and is catching grit?  EDIT:  I should also note that this is a hardtail mtb that I use for trails and winter commuting (a lot of salt and grit on the roads). So, I was given the following problem as part of a homework assignment.     Suppose $f'(x) &gt; 0$ in $(a,b)$. Prove that $f$ is strictly increasing in $(a,b)$, and let $g$ be its inverse function. Prove that $g$ is differentiable, and that   $$g'(f(x)) = \frac{1}{f'(x)}$$   I have proven that $f$ is strictly increasing in $(a,b)$, and I could prove that $g'(f(x)) = 1/f'(x)$ if I could prove that $g$ is differentiable. The problem is that I am having trouble with a proof of that. Any advice?   Also, as a reference, this is exercise 5.2 from Baby Rudin. Counting surjective functions We have $r$ objects and $n$ boxes. I have to count all the combinations possible if the objects and boxes could be both different. If that happens I can count the number of variations from $n$ to $r$ (number of functions between objects and boxes). I mean, $n^r$.  But if I have to count all the combinations possible if anyone of the boxes is empty ($r\ge n$). Now I have to count the surjective functions.  For example if I have $r$ objects and 1 box. The number of surjective functions is 1. Then, if I have $r$ objects and 2 boxes, the number of surjective functions is $2^r-2$. And finally if I have $r$ objects and 3 boxes, I will count $3^r-2\cdot[3\cdot2^r-3]$. How do I get the formula for $r$ objects and $n$ boxes? The following are two methods of building a link that has the sole purpose of running JavaScript code. Which is better, in terms of functionality, page load speed, validation purposes, etc.?    function myJsFunc() {     alert("myJsFunc"); } &lt;a href="#" onclick="myJsFunc();"&gt;Run JavaScript Code&lt;/a&gt;     or    function myJsFunc() {     alert("myJsFunc"); }  &lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="myJsFunc();"&gt;Run JavaScript Code&lt;/a&gt; Since the version of the word "that" might matter to the correct answer, I'll provide the actual title in question:  Title:  Existing Solutions that Didn't Work  If someone could explain the why of the answer, I would be appreciative.  EDIT:  It has been suggested that this is a duplicate, and that may be, in a sense.  However, the after reading the suggested prior question, I'm no closer to my answer.  I think it may have to do with my use of the word "that."  Perhaps it is incorrect?  Using these definitions of the word "that:" I'm having trouble figuring out which definition of that matches my title.  Am I even using it correctly?  Perhaps I should use which instead:  Possible Title:  Existing Solutions which Didn't Work  If my original usage is incorrect, and I should use which, then the answer is simple since which is always a pronoun or adjective, and those are both capitalized in a title.  However, I'm having difficulty understanding which part of speech that is in my original title. I am taking an abstract algebra course and I am really interested about the topic.  So much so that I spend most of my time reading supplementary materials.  I consequently know a lot more theorems than the ones covered in class.    In a recent quiz, I used a theorem in one of my proofs that was not mentioned in the lecture since.  My professor gave me partial marks for my answer for the reason that we didn't cover this theorem in class even though the proof was completely valid!  I can't really see where he is coming from.  How would someone be able to use a theorem correctly if he doesn't know its proof?  I was quite baffled by his comment.   Do you agree with this?  EDIT: The professor just Emailed me and said that after thinking for a while, he decided to award me the full mark for the question. He also mentioned that he didn't want discourage me from studying the subject (since he saw most of my previous quiz grades were full marks) and I was passionate about it, but kindly requested that I include any proof for a theorem that I cite from now on in his exams. He also sent a broadcast message to the whole class indicating this.