I'm trying to dual boot Ubuntu with Windows 10. I shrunk my windows 10 partition to create space for Ubuntu but when I try to partition the free space I am told I can't make more than 4 partitions. I'm not sure what to do/if I can delete either one of those 2 450MB partitions?
I would like to install Ubuntu alongside Windows 7 on a HP G62 Notebook. Although I have installed  Ubuntu in a dual-boot many times before, I found out that this model has already four partitions.    Partitions:   SYSTEM (NTFS, 199MB, used 66.59MB) Partition without any tag: NTFS (579GM, used 129GB)  RECOVERY (NTFS 16.74 GB, used 2.42GB)  HP_TOOLS (FAT32, 103.34 MB, used 13.23MB)   Since I am not an expert with partitions I would like to get advice on how to do this.  My first idea is this one:   Free some space from /dev/sda2 (I don't know if could also free some other space) delete the HP_Tools partition (I have already created a backup) create an extended partition with the free space in #1 containing three parititions: swap (1gb); / (EXT4, 30GB);  /home (EXT4, 120GB)   Another option is to use wubi instead.  What do you think? Is there any other way to achieve this?  PS: I really think this HP policy of using 4 partitions is not a coincidence  PS: I tried using gparted from the live CD and I got a warning message saying that if I freed some space from /dev/sda2 I could create serious issues in the system
Setting "checked" for a checkbox with jQuery I'd like to do something like this to tick a checkbox using jQuery:  $(".myCheckBox").checked(true);   or  $(".myCheckBox").selected(true);   Does such a thing exist? better Curve/Text to Mesh generation? Why is any number (other than zero) to the power of zero equal to one? Please include in your answer an explanation of why $0^0$ should be undefined. Can you reuse marinade used with raw chicken? Apologies in advance for the long question.  My understanding is that in GR, massive observers move along timelike curves $x^\mu(\lambda)$, and if an observer moves from point $x^\mu(\lambda_a)$ to $x^\mu(\lambda_b)$, then his clock will measure that an amount of time $t_{ba}$ given by the curve's arc length; $$   t_{ba} = \int_{\lambda_a}^{\lambda_b}d\lambda \sqrt{-g_{\mu\nu}(x(\lambda))\dot x^\mu(\lambda)\dot x^\nu(\lambda)} $$ will have elapsed where $g_{\mu\nu}$ is a metric on spacetime with signature $(-,+,+,+)$.    Why is this so?     Here is how I would attempt to justify this fact in special relativity with $g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu}$.  Consider an inertial observer $O$ in $\mathbb R^{3,1}$, and suppose that this observer sees a clock, which I'll call observer $O'$ moving around on a curve $x^\mu(\lambda)$.  If $O'$ were also an inertial observer, then given any event with coordinates $x^\mu$ as measured by $O$, observer $O'$ would measure the coordinates of the event to be $x'^\mu = \Lambda^\mu_{\phantom\mu\nu} x^\nu + x_0^\mu$ for some Lorentz transformation $\Lambda$.  If $O'$ is not inertial, then this is no longer true, and there is some more complicated family of transformations, say $T_\lambda$ between events as seen by both observers.  I would argue, however, that if we were to partition the interval $[\lambda_a, \lambda_b]$ into a large number $N$ of intervals $I_1=[\lambda_a, \lambda_i], \dots, I_N=[\lambda_{N-1}, \lambda_b]$ with $\lambda_n = \lambda_a+n\epsilon_N$ and $\epsilon_N=(\lambda_b-\lambda_a)/N$, then on each interval $I_n$, $O'$ is approximately an inertial observer in the sense that $$   T_{\lambda_n} = P_n + \mathcal O(\epsilon_N), \qquad (\star) $$ for some Poincare transformation $P_n$.  Then we would note that since $O'$ is stationary in his own reference frame, he measures his worldline to have the property $\dot x'^\mu(\lambda) = (\dot t(\lambda), \mathbf 0)$ so that $$   I_{ba}=\int_{\lambda_a}^{\lambda_b}d\lambda \,\sqrt{-\eta_{\mu\nu}\dot x'^\mu\dot x'^\mu} = \int_{\lambda_a}^{\lambda_b} d\lambda \, \sqrt{\dot t^2} = t(\lambda_b) - t(\lambda_a) = t_{ba} $$ On the other hand the integral on the left can be written as a Riemann sum using the partition above, and we can invoke ($\star$) above to get \begin{align}   I_{ba}  &amp;= \lim_{N\to\infty}\left[\sum_{n=1}^N \epsilon_N\sqrt{-\eta_{\mu\nu}\dot x'^\mu(\lambda_n)\dot x'^\nu(\lambda_n)}\right] \notag\\ &amp;= \lim_{N\to\infty}\left[\sum_{n=1}^N \epsilon_N\sqrt{-\eta_{\mu\nu}\dot x^\mu(\lambda_n)\dot x^\nu(\lambda_n)} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon_N^2)\right] \notag\\ &amp;= \int_{\lambda_a}^{\lambda_b}d\lambda \,\sqrt{-\eta_{\mu\nu}\dot x^\mu\dot x^\mu} \end{align} Combining these two computations gives the desired result.  How do others feel about this argument?  I'm not completely comfortable with it because of the assumption $(\star)$ I made on $T_\lambda$.  I imagine that in GR a similar argument could be made by invoking local flatness of the metric. Prospective PhD contacts potential supervisor but receives no answer after 2-3 emails, what to do? Say a prospective PhD has a high reply rate (90-95%) to first contact emails with potential superviors. He/She has a well thought out e-mail, but a particular professor (here: USA) that is in the top preferences does not reply after two to three e-mails that were sent within a time frame of three months. I also followed the instructions on the professor personal website in the section "prospective PhD students". The student has already contacted some of the advisor students and has received positive feedback about the professor.  Should the student just give up and move on? Should the student keep trying?  Aside from the obvious "I have too many incoming e-mails to answer" or "I am out in the field", what could create a no response behavior from the professor?  I have seen the simplistic answer "move on, bad advisor, doesn't have time, etc". But this seems a contradiction in this case. The PhD students like the professor and say he/she is personable and no e-mail response after a few well written emails. if m varies then find the range of c for which the line $y=mx + c$ touches the parabola $y^2 = 8(x+2)$ .  I tried Put the value $y = mx + c in$ the parabola equation and then done $D = 0$ or $D&gt;0 $  I am getting $16/(m^2 + 8m) &gt;0 $  But in this , how do I neglect m I can't find my other HDD New Ubuntu user here... I have Ubuntu on my 250GB SSD and I have another 500GB on my laptop that Ubuntu can't find. I'm not sure where or how to start finding it. I am solving the TOEIC workbook, by the way, I faced conflict that doesn't match meaning I knew.  The problem is     The newest branch of the library is located in/on Pine Street.   I think either 'in' or 'on' have the same meaning. But the commentary said that 'be located in' is mainly writing in front of building name and city name.   I don't know what is correct? One image per overlay? $127$ has an interesting property: It is the $31$st prime number and its rank ($31$) is also a prime. $31$ is the $11$th prime so its rank is also a prime. $11$ is also a prime number with a rank ($5$) that is also a prime. $5$ is the 3rd prime number and and so its rank ($3$) is also a prime. And finally $3$ is the $2$nd prime so its rank is also a prime... Is there a name for primes whose rank (index in the prime series) is also a prime? That is:     If $a_i$ is the $i$th prime number, then $i$ is a also a prime.   How about numbers like $127$ where going down ranks of ranks always produce prime numbers (down to rank $2$ of course)? The first $11$ :-) primes in this (infinite) series would be:  $3, 5, 11, 31, 127, 709, 5381, 52711, 648391, 9737333, 174440041, \dotsc$  Many thanks! Given the following sentences:        I have even started using them in normal writing.   People can understand your writing better.      Are using and writing gerunds, verbs, or some other part of speech?  Context:  I am prefixing the words in some phrases with abbreviations. Some of the words are giving me trouble in classification. (The message is supposed to be an implicit proof of why adding prefixes to table names in a database is terrible. But I'd like to get it right.)  Here's the full set of sentences for your amusement. However, please restrict your comments to the stated question, for the most part.        com-Don't ver-Listen prep-To adj-Those adj-Other nou-People.    pro-You aux-Should adv-Always ver-Use nou-Prefixes prep-With pro-Your adj-Table nou-Names.    pro-I aux-Have adv-Even ver-Started ver-Using pro-Them prep-In adj-Normal nou-Writing.   com-See adv-How adj-Effective pr-It ver-Is?    nou-People aux-Can ver-Understand pro-Your nou-Writing adv-Better!      (where com means command verb)  This question is part of 3 related questions:     This question   It originally came from 'Some index files failed to download' while updating Can I delete files or folders from /private/var/folders/? C# HttpWebRequest with XML Structured Data Can I set up a Mac for a multi head / multi user environment? Is there a place where one can leave luggage for more than one day in Brussels? It can be either in the airport or the central station.  I know that there are lockers in the central station. The problem is that these are usually restricted to 24h.  Are there any other services, in Brussels, that take luggage for longer than 24h? How to prove $\cos\left(\pi\over7\right)-\cos\left({2\pi}\over7\right)+\cos\left({3\pi}\over7\right)=\cos\left({\pi}\over3 \right)$ Multiple Apple Developer Accounts If I took a picture of a windmill on the horizon — given that I know the sensor size and the focal length of the lens and other factors to do with the shot — could I calculate how far away an object is from the photographer?