Been looking around and can't see to find any information on how to enable alt+right click for window resize?  edit  My mistake  Running Unity 12.04, I am logged in under failsafe graphics mode as i can't get my 590GX Nvidida card to boot up without being in safe, but thats another problem.  Currently, my alt+click works and i can drag windows around.   But i can't currently, alt+right-click to resize.
The title says it all. I want to resize windows with an right click while holding the alt key, instead of the new default alt+middle click.  I have found no way to enable this behaviour in 13.04. The gconf-Key suggested in this , doesn't seem to exist any longer.
I know the so-called textbook definition of unit tests and integration tests.  What I am curious about is when it is time to write unit tests... I will write them to cover as many sets of classes as possible.  For example, if I have a Word class, I will write some unit tests for the Word class.  Then, I begin writing my Sentence class, and when it needs to interact with the Word class, I will often write my unit tests such that they test both Sentence and Word... at least in the places where they interact.  Have these tests essentially become integration tests because they now test the integration of these 2 classes, or is it just a unit test that spans 2 classes?  In general, because of this uncertain line, I will rarely actually write integration tests... or is my using the finished product to see if all the pieces work properly the actual integration tests, even though they are manual and rarely repeated beyond the scope of each individual feature?  Am I misunderstanding integration tests, or is there really just very little difference between integration and unit tests? I've been looking around and I can't seem to find an automatic (i.e. buzz- or Twitter-like) way to follow users inside Stack Exchange. Why haven't the developers added such a feature? It could help beginner users follow other beginners with the same interests. We would be able to learn from each others' questions and pitfalls. Also, it would reduce double posting. Can 'home' be an adjective as well as an adverb or a noun? All the dictionaries I've consulted say that 'home' is an adverb and a noun, depending on context. For example:  (1) He went home. [adverb] (2) He is at home. [noun]  Also, there's  that seemingly resolves the issue of why 'home' sometimes should be analyzed as an adverb. But what about this example?  (3) I can find my way home.  Can you also say that home in (3) is an adverb? It seems to me that home in (3) cannot be an adverb, because I think it functions as a complement of the noun way and that my way home as a whole is a noun phrase. Even if we accept John Lawler's analysis in the above quoted answer of considering home &quot;one of those idiomatic locative nouns that are allowed to drop determiners and occasionally even prepositions,&quot; we cannot say home in (3) is an example of &quot;how a noun can be used as an adverb&quot;, because (3) can be analyzed as John Lawler suggests:  (3') I can find my way (to my) home.  Here, to my home is not an adverbial prepositional phrase but an adjectival prepositional phrase that acts as a complement of the noun way. So, to take what John Lawler said and adapt it to (3), &quot;what it is is an [adjectival] prepositional phrase that has been stripped of its prepositions and determiners, leaving only a naked noun to stand for the whole phrase. That's how a noun can be used as an [adjective].&quot; Now, does this mean we should call home a noun, an adverb, or an adjective, depending on context? What are the differences between proofs based on simulation and proofs based on games? Let $X,Y,Z$ be subspaces of $V$ so that $X$ is a subspace of $Y$. Prove that $Y\cap (X+Z)=X+(Y\cap Z)$ Let $X,Y,Z$ be subspaces of $V$ so that $X$ is a subspace of $Y$. Prove that $Y\cap (X+Z)=X+(Y\cap Z)$  I know that I need to prove that $Y\cap (X+Z)\subseteq X+(Y\cap Z)$ and $X+(Y\cap Z)\subseteq Y\cap (X+Z)$ but I´m having a hard time.  Can you lend me a hand please? I would really appreciate it Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be a continuous map such that $\overline{f(\mathbb{N})} = \mathbb{R}$. Prove that $f$ is surjective.  I tried to use the definition of the continuity and $\overline{f(\mathbb{N})} = \mathbb{R}$ to show that $f$ is surjective but it didn't work. Since $f$ is continuous, the preimage of every open set is open. Also it results in $f(\overline{A})\subseteq \overline{f(A)}$ for every set $A$. How this couples with $\overline{f(\mathbb{N})} = \mathbb{R}$ to show surjectivity? I'm new to Linux. I got the "Unix And Linux System Administration Handbook" It speaks of several verisons of linux and unix, and the commands for viewing linux man pages and not specific to ubuntu.   How do I view the manpages? MySQL strip non-numeric characters to compare I'm looking to find records in a table that match a specific number that the user enters.  So, the user may enter 12345, but this could be 123zz4-5 in the database. I imagine something like this would work, if PHP functions worked in MySQL. SELECT * FROM foo WHERE preg_replace(&quot;/[^0-9]/&quot;,&quot;&quot;,bar) = '12345'  What's the equivalent function or way to do this with just MySQL? Speed is not important. Keytool Signing Problem: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect What does high credit utilization really mean? How do I disable this:    after taking screenshot? I have a sword that currently rotates around a pivot point thats off of the actual object. Im new to blender and im not sure how i would go about changing it so that the sword rotates around the handle. Any help would be appreciated! How do I perform a Perl substitution on a string while keeping the original? My keyboard is typing by itself, could there be a ghost in it? The keyboard on my laptop seems to be typing by itself:   It sometimes types characters like 134, whether by itself or when I hit certain keys. Repeating characters may appear unexpectedly. The system volume may change by itself, or windows like the Print dialog or Web browser may appear.   This can happen without any input or as I type, and may occur more often when certain keys are pressed. Sometimes, the keyboard fails to respond altogether. This is happening regardless of the software involved.  Is there a ghost in my keyboard—is my keyboard broken?  A sample of text from the keyboard might look like this (normal QWERTY...ASDF...ZXC... sequence is expected):   QWERTYUIOPASDF)(G@*HKLZXCVBN QWERTYIOPASDFGL!#ZXCVB13 QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVB!#N qwertyu41iopasdf19g13h28j113k4113zxcvb4n qwerty4u1iopasdf0g7h1jklzxcvb13m qwert13uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiopasdf87091134ghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh13jk13zxcvb14      This question comes up often and the answers are usually the same. This post is meant to provide a definitive, canonical answer for this problem. Feel free to edit the answer to add additional details. Elsevier article with APA references I'm writing an article for Elsevier Journal which follows APA6e references; everything is fine except that the article starts from page 2 leaving page 1 blank with just double hyphen (==) in the middle. Here is how I write.  \documentclass[preprint,12pt,authoryear]{elsarticle} \usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite} \usepackage{float} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage[ruled,vlined,commentsnumbered]{algorithm2e} \journal{Expert Systems with Applications}  \begin{document} \begin{frontmatter}  \bibliographystyle{apacite} \bibliography{myrefers}  \end{document}   How Can I rectify the problem? First and foremost I am sorry for this; in order to make the questions clear I must first upload the lecture notes from my institution $^\zeta$ for the derivation of Hydrostatic Equilibrium:          $^\zeta$ Lecture notes courtesy of Imperial College London, Astrophysics dept, 2017-2018 edition.    Firstly, in equation $(3.1)$ why is there no negative sign for $F_g$? Last time I checked, Newton's law of gravitation told us that   $$F=-\frac{GMm}{r^2}$$  Nextly, I have a conceptual problem with equation $(3.2)$; when they use the term 'pressure' I am going to assume that they are referring to the radiation pressure that is released due to nuclear fusion reactions taking place in the sun. In that formula it must be the case that $P(r) \gt P(r+\delta r)$ if this is the case then $(3.2)$ should read $$F_p=-\left(\frac{dP}{dr}\right)\delta r\,\delta A $$   Correct me if I'm wrong but Hydrogen nuclei are fused together to generate the more stable Helium and hence lots of radiation pressure acting outwards from the centre of the star. If this is correct then $P(r+\delta r)=0$, since the outside face of that cylindrical volume element in Figure $3.1$ will not 'feel' any of this radiation pressure because this pressure only acts on the inner face. What am I not understanding here?  Moving on to equation $(3.3)$, let's suppose the sign of the gravitational force in $(3.1)$ really is neglected. Does this mean that the negative sign in $(3.3)$ is due to $P(r+\delta r) \lt P(r)$ and hence $$\frac{GM(r)\rho(r)}{r^2}=-\left(\frac{dP}{dr}\right)\,?$$ I know this is the same equation as in $(3.3)$ but I have written it with the negative sign next to the pressure differential as I would like to know where this minus sign originates from. Does anyone know?  My final concern is the sign in $(3.4)$ as last time I checked $$g=-\frac{GM}{r^2}$$ and not $$g=\frac{GM}{r^2}$$  Hence, equation $(3.4)$ should read  $$\left(\frac{dP}{dr}\right)=\rho(r)\,g\,?$$     I forgot to mention that I have done some research and  is the closest derivation I could find, which, needless to say is no less helpful than the notes I have. How can I stop Nautilus from dereferencing symlinks? I use symbolic links to tidy my home folder. This works well in the terminal, since the links create the illusion of normal folders:    In Nautilus, however, the links behave more like , immediately teleporting me to their target:    This is particularly troubling when¹ I later want to navigate "up" to the parent folder, as it strands me somewhere outside of the tree I've carefully tidied.  How can I make Nautilus show symbolic links as normal folders, like the terminal does?  Details   Nautilus did not dereference symlinks in Ubuntu 12.10:   Maybe this new behavior is just a bug? I'm not sure how to tell. Here's what I know:   It's not on the . I've skimmed the  and didn't see anything related. The Nautilus mailing list archive . I received no response from about 120 idlers when posing the question on the GNOME IRC channel. A change was made in Nautilus 3.6 to .  ¹ This is an example. A workaround for this particular scenario does not constitute an answer to my question. Since people seem to be interested in discussing it, though:   Using the Back button is not a suitable workaround; it does not always take me to the parent folder. You can navigate up by pressing Alt+Up. The desired behavior in this example is for "up" to navigate to the parent folder of the symbolic link. The current behavior is to navigate to the parent folder of the target of the symbolic link. How to get the type of T from a member of a generic class or method Mathematica Sec and Csc How do I set up a Cron job?