once user choosing the auto filling option in chrome browser it will auto automatically change the value of this select box according the some deflate values in chrome browser so how can i stop this issue.  I have fond some solutions while i'm googling so it also not working. is there any other solution  1st option is put autocomplete="off"   2nd option is creating fake select box and put style="display: none;"  &lt;form:select path="quote.toLocation[${varstat.index}]" multiple="false" cssClass="select_typ1 bigselect drpView_ti" cssErrorClass="errorInput select_typ1 bigselect" onchange="removeError(this);" cssStyle="margin-top: 0px;float: left;" autocomplete="off"&gt;                             &lt;form:option value=""&gt;Please select destination&lt;/form:option&gt;                             &lt;form:options items="${countryList}" itemLabel="displayName"                                  itemValue="code" cssClass="countrySelectClass" /&gt;                         &lt;/form:select&gt;
When using the xhtml1-transitional.dtd doctype, collecting a credit card number with the following HTML  &lt;input type="text" id="cardNumber" name="cardNumber" autocomplete='off'/&gt;   will flag a warning on the W3C validator:     there is no attribute "autocomplete".   Is there a W3C / standards way to disable browser auto-complete on sensitive fields in a form?
Can I travel to the USA while working remotely for my non-US employer? Getting server name during servlet initialization A friend of mine accidentally left a carton of eggs on her counter, unrefrigerated, for three days. The eggs had been previously refrigerated both at the store and at home. Now she's planning to do some more cooking which requires eggs, and is wondering if it's still safe to use them for baking. I believe she is planning on baking cookies with them, so they would be baked at fairly high temperatures for probably at least 10 minutes. Would this be safe, or are eggs left unrefrigerated for that long not safe for consumption? Two independent Poisson process question I have an external hard disk, and for some reason, it is reporting wrong free space.  In Windows Explorer, it is showing the used space is 378 GB.    I tried running chkdsk H: /f /r, it seems to report the same usage as Windows Explorer, and it says that there is no problem.    But when I tried selecting all the files inside this drive, it is showing much lesser usage.    I've already set the setting to show all hidden files and folders, also show the protected OS files, but it still cannot find about those missing files. And the difference is huge (282 GB). I've already cleaned the Recycle bin as well.    What I am missing here and how do I identify those missing spaces?  [UPDATE]: I used  to help identify and it seems to find some gigantic files, of which filename is quite weird. Anyone knows what this is and is it safe to delete? I have the following image    that was created with this code:  \documentclass[varwidth=true, border=2pt]{standalone} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{tkz-euclide}  \begin{document} \usetkzobj{all} \begin{tikzpicture}     \tkzSetUpPoint[shape=circle,size=10,color=black,fill=black]     \tkzSetUpLine[line width=1]     \tkzDefPoints{0/0/A, 3/0/B', 2/2/C, 4/4/C'}     \tkzDefLine[parallel=through C](B',C') \tkzGetPoint{Phelper}     \tkzInterLL(A,B')(C,Phelper) \tkzGetPoint{B}     \tkzDrawLine[add=0 and 0.2](A,B')     \tkzDrawLine[add=0 and 0.2](A,C')     \tkzDrawSegment(B',C')      \node at ($(A)+(-0.1,-0.2)$)  {$A$};     \node at ($(B')+(0.2,-0.2)$)  {$B'$};     \node at ($(C')+(0,0.4)$)  {$C'$};     \node at ($(B)+(0.2,-0.2)$)  {$B$};     \node at ($(C)+(0.28,0.5)$)  {$C$};     \tkzDrawPolygon[ultra thick,color=blue,fill=blue!20](A,B',C')      \tkzDrawPolygon[line width=0.3pt,color=red,fill=red!20](A,B,C)      \tkzDrawPoints(A,B',C',B,C)     \tkzLabelSegment[below,red](A,B){$c$}     \tkzLabelSegment[left,red](A,C){$b$}     \tkzLabelSegment[right,red](B,C){$a$}     \tkzLabelSegment[below,blue,pos=0.8](A,B'){$c'$}     \tkzLabelSegment[left,blue,pos=0.8](A,C'){$b'$}     \tkzLabelSegment[right,blue](B',C'){$a'$} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   As you might notice, the space above C' is bigger than necessary. This is because of Phelper. I need Phelper for the construction, but it should not influence the image size in any way. I've tried to get Phelper closer to C, but that seems not to be possible.  How can I stop defined (but not visible) points from influencing image size?  Please note: I wrap code like this in a figure. So images like the one above are only a part of the whole document. So working with standalone does not solve my problem. A better serial voting trap Why can ECC key sizes be smaller than RSA keys for similar security? When is "EDIT"/"UPDATE" appropriate in a post? I often see questions edited into this form:     Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet blah blah blah paragraph paragraph original question.            UPDATE: The Lorem disappeared and left this message: "new information".   I find this format unaesthetic (since Stack Exchange posts are supposed to be useful in the long term and update boundaries are artifacts of the creation rather than the content) and feel that new information should, whenever possible, be incorporated into the original text “as if it had always been that way” if practical, and pointing out an update should be done mostly in comments.  Is this an appropriate writing style, and if so under what circumstances? If not, should it be removed or discouraged? Get total height of webView's content using Javascript Why the name 'Rogue One'? So far, is there any suggestion, or speculation as to the reason for the name 'Rogue One' for the next Star Wars film?   To me, the name seems very close to the Rogue Squadron, most known from Hoth (their leader Luke Skywalker), especially the number following Rogue like a callsign.   However as far as I know, they were formed after the first Death Star destruction. So why Rogue One? My model has a clear plastic (or glass) dome with objects inside.  The objects appear dark.  I've tried the glass shader with color 100% RGB, with very small IOR, and using just a refraction shader.    I know Cycles has problems with caustics, but I just want broad illumination to fall clean through the glass.  The light-to-column path can ignore refraction, but is blocked or tremendously attenuated. The camera-column path needs refraction, and seems to work fine anyway.  This demo image offers all optical paths of interest:   light upon object, seen directly light upon object, seen through glass (looks okay) light through glass onto object, seen directly. This is the shadow on the lit side of the column just below the glass tubing.  I expect full illumination, but there is shadow.  There is some light, but it's diffuse light from the floor. light through glass onto object, seen through glass. This     I did at one point try non-progressive rendering, and find extremely coarse light where there shouldn't be shadow, but this is not a practical way to make nice images. I've even tried cranking up certain sampling settings to many thousands, but still get bad noise though less, at the cost of long render times. I  would like to finish my creations sometime before "Star Trek, the Generation After the Next" becomes real life, if you know what I mean.  The next image is an example. I think Transmission in Sampling was 5000, but not sure.    I'm using Cycles in Blender 2.67 on a quad core Linux machine, 16GB RAM. Machine limits have never been a problem for 3D rendering.  Possibly, I screwed up some setting when I made my startup file, and just need to fix it. OTOH maybe this is just a limitation of path tracing, or of the way Cycles does it. If that's the case, what to real-world Blender artists do when they need to produce images on a budget and schedule?  What is the practical real-world fix? Running a .desktop file in the terminal From what I can gather, .desktop files are shortcuts that allow application's settings to be customized. For instance, I have lots of them in my /usr/share/applications/ folder.   If I open that folder in nautilus, I can run these applications just by double clicking its associated file, e.g. double-clicking firefox.desktop runs Firefox. However, I can't find a way to do the same thing via terminal.   If I do gnome-open foo.desktop it simply opens foo.desktop as a text file. If I make it executable and then run it in bash it simply fails (which is expected, it's clearly not bash script). EDIT: Doing exec /fullpath/foo.desktop gives me a Permission denied message, even if I change ownership to myself. If I make executable and do the same command, the terminal tab I'm using simply closes (I'm guessing it crashes). Finally, if I do sudo exec /fullpath/foo.desktop, I get an error reporting sudo: exec: command not found.  That's my question, how can I run a foo.desktop file from the terminal? How to restore Windows 7 MBR without a CD I have been playing with Ubuntu for a few weeks now, and I'd like to revert my computer back to it's original - factory - defaults.   On the computer I have a recovery partition (it's a netbook). I went through the process of recovery and everything seemed fine. However, when I restart the computer I'm presented with   grub rescue &gt;   Now, my understanding is that when I installed Ubuntu "side by side" it replaced the MBR or something like it, with GRUB.   I've read on a slew of forums, that I need to use a Windows Recovery Disk.   Here are my issues:   a) I don't have a recovery disk, I have a recovery partition - it's a netbook. b) I don't have an external cd drive.   What I do have is a USB key that has about 1gb of space on it.   Thanks in advance. How to echo a bang! In  (scrolled to 5:55) there's a claim that replacing an AC high voltage transmission line with a high voltage DC transmission line allows for having seven times fewer powerlines (the video shows how seven lines evaporate, then one line appears and the cutting in the forest gets narrower).  How is that possible? I've read the  and it claims that     The power delivered in an AC system is defined by the root mean square (RMS) of an AC voltage, but RMS is only about 71% of the peak voltage. The peak voltage of AC determines the actual insulation thickness and conductor spacing.   but that doesn't explain seven times less power lines.  How is such massive (seven times) saving possible when switching from AC to DC transmission? "This one is" OR "This is" I have seen people using "This one is Daddy's" with the word "one" before a form of the verb be. I am confused about which is more accurate, to use:     This is Daddy's.   or     This one is Daddy's.   Hope you can address my concerns, thank you. I have created some search entries in Google Chrome using 'Edit search engines'.  How can I share some of these entries with my colleagues? There are many beings that have very big powers. There are beings that are worshipped as gods (Asgardians; and I would lump Azazel into that as well since Marvel seems to imply that he's - while a mutant - someone people consider to be "Devil"). There are mutants whose power would clearly have been considered as "god like" by people worshipping Greek or other polytheistic pantheons where the threshold to what made you a god was pretty low.  But are there any actual major "Gods" in Marvel universe?  Since there are many different definition of what a "god" is, the one that is pertinent to this question:   Power wise, being able to create Universe(s); e.g. gods more in a sense of Christianity/Judaism scale rather than "Pan" or "Hestia" in Greek pantheon who merely have some limited supernatural powers over small domain of natural events. Effectively immortal, at least excluding specific exotic attacks. Origin-wise, be "supernatural", not merely a human mutant or a powerful alien with advanced technology. Desire/demand/like followers' worship or prayers. Why is the mean function in Gaussian Process uninteresting?