The title says it all.  I have some conditional formatting rules, it seems I'm limited to some basic formatting options;    Is there any workaround to apply further formatting options (such as border)?
I'm looking to have cell borders automatically applied when a cell is not empty. I thought I could use conditional formatting for this, but it doesn't seem to be an option.
I'm having some problems with listings and UTF-8 in my document. Maybe someone can help me? Some characters work, like é and ó, but á and others appear at the beginning of words...  \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{scrbook} \KOMAoptions{twoside=false,open=any,chapterprefix=on,parskip=full,fontsize=14pt}  \usepackage[portuguese]{babel} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{listingsutf8}  \usepackage{inconsolata} \lstset{     language=bash, %% Troque para PHP, C, Java, etc... bash é o padrão     basicstyle=\ttfamily\small,     numberstyle=\footnotesize,     numbers=left,     backgroundcolor=\color{gray!10},     frame=single,     tabsize=2,     rulecolor=\color{black!30},     title=\lstname,     escapeinside={\%*}{*)},     breaklines=true,     breakatwhitespace=true,     framextopmargin=2pt,     framexbottommargin=2pt,     extendedchars=false,     inputencoding=utf8 }  \begin{document} \begin{lstlisting} &lt;?php  echo 'Olá mundo!'; print 'Olá mundo!'; \end{lstlisting}  \end{document} \end{lstlisting} Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author? Primary ideals in Noetherian rings Where does a layman go to get a basic understanding of AKS primality testing. I am not talking about the optimal choice of $r$ (which I am told is the hardcore number-theoretic part of the algorithm). I mean basic things, like what does $\bmod(n, x^r-1)$ mean (how can something be mod two things?) And what does binomial expansion have to do with anything?  I can't find anything in Wikipedia that is appropriate for my level. Given $a + b = 1$, Prove that $a^ab^b + a^bb^a \le 1$; $a$ and $b$ are positive real numbers. Using while loop to ssh to multiple servers This question was prompted by questions about ls' -1 option and the recurring tendency of people to ask question and answers that includes processing the output of ls.   This reuse of the output ls seems understandable, e.g.: if you know how to sort a list of files with ls you might want to use the output in that way as input for something else.  If those Q&amp;A don't include a reference to the file name list produced consisting of nicely behaving file names (no special characters like spaces and newlines), they are often commented upon by someone pointing out the danger of the command sequence not working when there are files with newlines, spaces etc.  find, sort and other utilities solve the problem of communicating "difficult" file names to e.g. xargs by using an option to separate the file names with the NUL character/byte which is not a valid character in file name (the only one in addition to /?) on Unix/Linux filesystems.  I looked to the man page for ls and the output for ls --help (which has more options listed) and could not find that ls (from coreutils) has an option to specify NUL separated output. It does have a -1 option which can be interpreted as "output file names separated by newline")  Q: Is there are technical or philosophical reason why ls does not have a --zero or -0 option that would "output file names separated by NUL"?  If you do something that only outputs the file names (and not use e.g. -l) that could make sense:  ls -rt -0 | xargs -r0 …   I could be missing something why this would not work, or is there an alternative for this example that I overlooked and that is not much more complicated and/or obscure.    Addendum:  Doing ls -lrt -0 probably does not make much sense, but in the same way that find . -ls -print0 does not, so that is not a reason to not provide a -0/-z/--zero option. Selecting ARIMA orders based on ACF-PACF vs. auto.arima The easiest way to explain this question is with a thought experiment:  Consider God, the ultimate of everything, who is wholly omnipotent (all-powerful) and omniscient (all-knowing). Let's just say, hypothetically, that he wanted  (this is a totally random example I just happened to be reading about; I could have just as easily said He wanted Bob to score a free-throw in basketball 3 times in a row tomorrow, or Sally to knit a blue sweater on Sunday, November 4th, 2012).  But anyways, one way He could do this (get X group of people to save a man from a burning car) is: At the beginning of time, God could instantly plan out the future and set in motion a massive chain of events, from the creation of light and stars, the creation of Earth and the creatures, mankind, then civilization with all the conflicts and progress and glory that comes with it, such that one day, a few people would come from out of nowhere—complete strangers to each other—and save this man (also a stranger) from under a burning car. God need not intervene at all this whole time, He merely "ignited" the chain of events from day 1 and watched it unfold exactly as He planned. Let's call this Universe A.  He could also, being all-powerful, just freeze time for a bit and skip a few steps, creating the world and universe instantly, with all the civilizations and animals and things in place, putting all the strangers there together next to a car which is already on fire and the man trapped under it. Then press play, and presto, you have the exact same scenario, without billions of years of buildup. Let's refer to this as Universe B.  God is obviously capable of doing both. My question thus is whether there is an  (really any difference at all) between Universe A and Universe B. Personally, I don't think this kind of power is outside of God's capability; he should, after all, have no problem with creating identical universes which match up exactly once they reach "biker under the car" moment where He unfroze time in Universe B. At that moment, Universe A and Universe B are exactly the same, right? Or is there somethinge special about Universe A, with all it's buildup, that separates it intrinsically from Universe B? In other words, is it outside of God's ability to make them exactly equivalent? Why does Ubuntu 14.04 LTS use a non-LTS kernel version? I only recently became aware that LTS wasn't just an Ubuntu thing - there's LTS kernel versions too. Yet the kernel version used (3.13) in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS is not an LTS kernel version. Is it considered unimportant whether or not a kernel version is LTS? Can I programmatically open the devtools from a Google Chrome extension? Whoa! What is this "Linked" thing? As per the title, what is this new feature? How to move 100 files from a folder containing thousands? I have a directory with thousands of files. How can I move 100 of the files (any files will do) to another location. Why do the directories /home, /usr, /var, etc. all have the same inode number (2)? Prove that free modules are projective It was a useful answer. How to show $(a^b)^c=a^{bc}$ for arbitrary cardinal numbers? One of the basic (and frequently used) properties of cardinal exponentiation is that $(a^b)^c=a^{bc}$.  What is the proof of this fact?  As Arturo pointed out in his comment, in computer science this is called . An image alt="" text should contain information about that image in the context of the page, so for instance if you have an article about cats on skateboards and then a photograph of the cat on his skateboard you'd probably give it the alt text of alt="Fluffy pulling some mad tricks on his pimped-out board".          &ndash; Wireframes created with   However, what should happen when that image is a link to a page (such as the Wikipedia cat page)?  I don't think there is any point using the title attribute here because screenreaders just ignore that when an alt attribute exists - the only people who would see the title attribute are mouse users who hover over the image, so that excludes keyboard only users too. It's not really any benefit to accessibility to include a title in this situation (Overall the title attribute is a bit useless really).  So, what should the image ALT text say in this case?   states:     Provide text alternatives for any non-text content so that it can be changed into other forms people need, such as large print, braille, speech, symbols or simpler language.    Therefore giving it the alt text of cat article page on Wikipedia is incorrect because that doesn't describe the image, neither does skateboarding cat image that links to the wikipedia article because the alt text should refer to the image itself, not the link associated with it. Compiling with g++ using multiple cores Why did Dumbledore drink the potion in the attempt to get a Horcrux?