I have a page named "calientes" with a complex loop that's working perfectly. This page is located at domain.com/calientes/. Now I need to use this page as the home page, so I went to "Settings -> Reading" and chose that page as static page.  The problem now is that the pagination no longer works. On the actual page it shows like domain.com/calientes/page/2 and it work perfectly! but now it shows as domain.com/page/2/ when i really want to go to domain.com/calientes/page/2  I didn't do any other changes, just chose that page as front page basically.   What can i do to made my pagination call domain.com/calientes/page/2?  This is my query on my page "Calientes" :   $paged = ( get_query_var('paged') ) ? get_query_var('paged') : 1;  $args = array(   'posts_per_page' =&gt; 9,   'paged' =&gt; $paged,   'meta_query' =&gt; array(      array(        'key' =&gt; '_wti_like_count',        'value' =&gt; 10,        'compare' =&gt; '&gt;=',        'type' =&gt; 'numeric'      )   ) );  $wp_query = new WP_Query(); $wp_query-&gt;query( $args );  if( have_posts() ) : ?&gt;  &lt;?php while ($wp_query-&gt;have_posts()) : $wp_query-&gt;the_post(); ?&gt;  &lt;?php get_template_part( 'content', get_post_format() ); ?&gt; &lt;?php comments_template( '', true ); ?&gt; &lt;?php endwhile; // end of the loop. ?&gt;  &lt;?php twentytwelve_content_nav( 'nav-below' ); ?&gt;
I've got a custom loop that I'm using to display some Real Estate listings that will be available within 60 days. I'm calling it with the following function:   &lt;?php  $sixtydays = date('Y/m/d', strtotime('+60 days')); $paged = (get_query_var('paged')) ? get_query_var('paged') : 1; $query = new PostsOrderedByMetaQuery(array(   'post_type' =&gt; array('post', 'real-estate'),   'meta_key' =&gt; 'Time Available',   'meta_compare' =&gt; '&lt;=',   'meta_value' =&gt; $sixtydays,   'paged' =&gt; $paged,   'orderby_meta_key' =&gt; 'Price',   'orderby_order'    =&gt; 'ASC' )); ?&gt; &lt;?php while ($query-&gt;have_posts()) : $query-&gt;the_post(); ?&gt;   While the loop works great, I can't get it to paginate. It shows the first 10 (my default) posts but doesn't show the pagination. The only way to display all posts is to show them on one page by adding 'posts_per_page' =&gt; -1, I have similar loops on other pages that have no problem paginating. The only difference with this one is that there are two meta keys that are filtering the posts.   I'm using WP Page Navi for this and the rest of my pages. I'm closing the loop and adding the pagination using the following code:   &lt;?php endwhile; // End the loop. Whew. ?&gt; &lt;?php wp_pagenavi(); ?&gt; &lt;?php wp_reset_query(); ?&gt;   How can I go about fixing this?
What are the prerequisites for studying mathematical logic? I am looking to study mathematical logic, however, I find that introductory books are very daunting, which kind of disheartens me. You see, slowly but surely, I started to realize that the maths which I have learned did not just pop out of thin air, but is a collection of systems, which must of been developed via some other system, i.e, maths did not develop itself.  So I began to look into the origins of mathematics, and read that it was developed via a type of logic, which exists sort of by 'default', via a set of axioms, and then of course I looked up the definition of axioms.   So given that I'd be studying a type of logic whose origins are self evident axioms, naturally I believed there would be no prerequisites. However, in looking up mathematical logic, I have come across things such as Boolean algebra, sets, first order logic, some other type of logic, called 'traditional logic', as well as references to a sort of calculus, though not in a mathematical sense, I think.  So all in all, I am trying to develop a type of mental spider web, and I am trying to find out the strands which lye at the absolute bounds so that I may learn this mystique logic. Though I have no idea where to start.  Side note: This is the book I have started reading:   Credit goes to Wolfgang Rautenberg. How to add/subtract months from given date in Excel Effects:  +25 attack damage +15% life steal +40% attack speed Passive  Unique: Your attacks deal 5% of the target's current health in physical damage (60 max vs minions and monsters). Active   Unique: Drains target champion, dealing 15% of the champion's maximum Health in physical damage and healing you by the same amount. Additionally you steal 30% of their movement speed for 4 seconds - 60 second cooldown. (500 range)  Cost: 3200g VS.   Effects:  +70 attack damage +12% life steal Passive: Gain +1 attack damage and +0.2% life steal per kill (maximum +30 attack damage and +6% life steal). Half of the bonuses are lost upon death.  Cost: 3200g What is better for what situations, and when should you build BT instead of BotRK and Vice Versa. Which provides more lifesteal, the only variable being the stats of the weapon? I find myself constantly questioning my decision on which weapon to get and would really love some in depth answers. Would be great if any examples given were given from the ADC side of the house. Does a US citizen traveling by plane in Mexico (international flight), for example from Mexicali to Mexico City need to have a passport? Seeking appropriate statistic to measure spatial autocorrelation of points with binary values I am trying to determine the level of spatial autocorrelation in a point dataset.  The attribute I'm interested in is binary (presence/absence of a species), for which Moran's I is not appropriate.  On the other hand, Joint Count statistics, which are typically recommended for binary or categorical data, apparently are not appropriate for point data. What is an appropriate statistic to measure global and/or local spatial autocorrelation of points when the attribute of interest is binary? I see lots of tutorials telling me how to root my phone (Motorola Droid), but none of them mention any potential "side effects."  Aside from a few relatively minor issues that seem to require rooting to fix, I'm basically happy with the phone and therefore a little leery of messing with a device that cost me a lot of money and is only a few months old.  Assuming that I'm just talking about rooting, and none of the typical post-root actions (like installing a custom ROM), am I taking any risks by choosing to root?   Does it have the potential to brick the device? Will it void my warranty? Will I stop getting updates? Will the cops show up at my front door the next day? (Yes, I'm being facetious.) Anything else I should be aware of?   (See also: ) Can a website know about my browsing history? When I visit a website it sometimes puts cookies on my browser. Usually cookies keep track of browsing info from that particular site. If I don't delete those cookies and browse other websites, will the cookies be able to know which site I am browsing? Also, can any website read browsing history which is saved by browsers? Can any website know about my browsing history by help of cookies, browsing histories saved by browsers, or by any scripting language e.g. javascript? 6-digit password - a special decoding method In Walter Rudin's Principles of mathematical analysis Exercise 5.21, it is proved that for any closed subset $E\subseteq \mathbb{R}$, there exists a smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $E=\{x\in \mathbb{R}\mid f(x)=0\}$.   Since $E^c$ is open in $\mathbb{R}$, $E^c$ is a countable disjoint union of open intervals $(a_i,b_i)$. On an interval $(a,b)$, if we let $f(x)=\exp(\frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)})$, $x\in(a,b)$; $f(x)=0$, $x\notin(a,b)$, ($f(x)=\exp(\frac{1}{(x-a)})$ or $f(x)=\exp(\frac{1}{(x-b)})$ on $(a,\infty)$ and $(-\infty,b)$ resp.), then $f$ is smooth. Hence we can get a smooth function on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $E$ is the zero point sets of $f$.  (1). How about a closed subset $E$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$? is it true that for any closed subset $E\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, there exists a smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $E=\{x\in \mathbb{R}^n\mid f(x)=0\}$?  An open set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ cannot be written as a disjoint union of countable open balls hence the proof above is not valid. The partition of unity only claims that for an  open set $U$, there exists open $V$ in $U$ such that $\bar V\subseteq U$ and a smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $supp f\subseteq U$, $f|_V=1$.   (2). The taylor series of $f(x)=\exp(\frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)})$ does not converge around points $a,b$ hence $f$ is not analytic at $a,b$. Is it true that for any closed subset $E\subseteq \mathbb{R}$, there exists an analytic function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $E=\{x\in \mathbb{R}\mid f(x)=0\}$? Ubuntu 16.04 Jan 3 2018 update causing screen/access issues Bit error rate calculation for LIN protocol I am having this microcontroller -   I am using an 8MHz external clock. I want to calculate the Bit error rate of my LIN Communication. My LIN Communication Baud rate is 19.2kbps. My questions :  Can I use the LPUART Module in the Mirocontroller for the LIN Communication?  How to find the Bit error rate for the LIN Protocol communication for my baud rate of 19.2kbps and external clock of 8MHz.   I found this below from the reference manual. But not sure, how to calculate the Bit error rate from this.   How to calculate the SBR Register value, OSR and the LPUART ASYNCH Module clock?  Please help tl;dr : For SEO, should I redirect from one to the other or list both on the DNS records?    It seems that most experts think that both www and non-www should exist. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.) And Google Webmasters Tools lets you choose which is the main one.  But: will a redirect give all SEO weight to one of them instead of splitting it? (There are other search engines after all, so setting the main one in Google Webmasters Tools might not be enough.) Will having both on the DNS records give them more importance? No difference? What is the difference between the Circle-K and Lawson Power Cube? The below statement is a true/false exercise.  Statement: For all square matrices A and B of the same size, it is true that $(A + B)2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2$.  My thought process: Since it is not a proof, I figure I can show by example and come to a valid conclusion based on such example.  My work:  Come up with a square matrix A and B let both be a 2 by 2 matrix(rows and cols must be same).  Matrix $A$:  $A = \begin{array}{ccc} 3 &amp; 5 \\ 4 &amp; 6 \\ \end{array} $  Matrix $B$:  $B =  \begin{array}{ccc} 5 &amp; 8 \\ 9 &amp; 4 \\ \end{array} $  $A + B =  \begin{array}{ccc} 8 &amp; 13 \\ 13 &amp; 10 \\ \end{array}$  $(A + B)^2 =  \begin{array}{ccc} 233 &amp; 234 \\ 234 &amp; 264 \\ \end{array}$  $A^2 =  \begin{array}{ccc} 29 &amp; 45 \\ 36 &amp; 56 \\ \end{array}$  $(AB) =  \begin{array}{ccc} 60 &amp; 44 \\ 74 &amp; 56 \\ \end{array}$  $2(AB) =  \begin{array}{ccc} 120 &amp; 88 \\ 234 &amp; 112 \\ \end{array}$  $B^2 =  \begin{array}{ccc} 97 &amp; 72 \\ 81 &amp; 88 \\ \end{array}$  $A^2 + 2AB + B^2 =  \begin{array}{ccc} 246 &amp; 205 \\ 265 &amp; 256 \\ \end{array}$  Based my above work, the answer is false.   Is there another way to approach the problem? It seems like a lot of work needed to be done for a true/false question which raised my suspicion about whether there is a better way to look at the problem. Why are Perl 5's function prototypes bad? Prevent applications from opening browser Is there a free application out there that will intercept requests from applications to open a URL and prompt me as to whether or not I want the URL to be opened? (For instance, after Adobe Reader installs, it opens its website to get feedback about the install process.)  Ideally, it would be lightweight software for just this task, but if a larger firewall/security app provides this feature, that would be acceptable.  I'm using windows 7 32-bit.  As stating in a comment below, the idea is that you don't want the browser to open (assume it's not already running), so an extension (e.g. for Chrome, ffox) wouldn't be relevant. siunitx uses math mode for symbols - workaround needed when using different fonts for math and text This is a follow up question from . The original problem has been solved using siunitx instead of dcolumn. However, the problem is that I am using mathpazo with osf as my main body font and eulervm as my math font. With siunitx used to decimal align tables this results in []() symbols being drawn in the math font, but the digits being drawn in the text font, as the following MWE example illustrates.  Is it possible to draw the symbols in the normal text font or redefine the mathfont for S columns completely?  \documentclass{scrartcl} \usepackage{booktabs} \usepackage[osf]{mathpazo} \usepackage[euler-digits]{eulervm}  % For Tables created by estout \newcommand{\sym}[1]{\ensuremath{^{#1}}} % for symbols in Table \usepackage{siunitx} \sisetup{ detect-mode,            group-digits            = false ,           input-signs             = ,           input-symbols           = ()[]-+ ,           input-open-uncertainty  = ,           input-close-uncertainty = ,           table-align-text-post   = false          } \begin{document} \begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}{     l @{\extracolsep\fill} *{2}{S[table-format=4.4]} @{}} \toprule \multicolumn{1}{@{}l}{\emph{Age}}  \\[0.5ex] 18--24 &amp;   [-1360.228]\sym{*}  &amp;  -1371.941\sym{*}  \\        &amp;       (6.915)         &amp;    (-7.953)        \\ 25--34 &amp;     -219.216          &amp;   -240.271         \\        &amp;     (514.894)         &amp;   (515.348)        \\ 35--44 &amp;     -310.715          &amp;   -311.438         \\        &amp;     (485.780)         &amp;   (486.013)        \\ 55$+$  &amp;       -5.135          &amp;     [2.656]        \\        &amp;      (53.267)         &amp;   (533.875)        \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular*} \end{document}   Edit: Thanks to David the problem has been solved including a fix for amsmath and extending to XeTeX. On a side note, the command for * generated by estoutshould now be simply plain text:  \newcommand{\sym}{#1} % for symbols in Table  \newcommand{\sym}[1]{\rlap{$#1$}} % Thanks to David Carlise again. I am new to Stack Exchange. I know there is a lot of discussion sites for Stack Exchange. I would like to know about there were any Stack Exchange site available for discussing and solving personal psychological problems. I was trying to prove following inequality:  $$|\sin n\theta| \leq n\sin \theta \ \text{for all n=1,2,3... and } \  0&lt;\theta&lt;π $$  I succeeded in proving this via induction but I didn't get "feel" over the proof. Are there other proof for this inequality? Why is it usually "friend of his", but no possessive apostrophe with "friend of Peter"? As  shows, we nearly always use the possessive form of personal pronouns for friend of mine/his/ours/etc.  But when it comes to actual names, we prefer  without the possessive apostrophe. That preference is even more marked with, say, . Not that I think the usage itself is particularly American - it's much the same with .  Personally, I find friend of him grates. In general I've no strong feelings either way as to whether it's friend of Peter or friend of Peter's (though I deplore the possessive in ), but in line with many others, I really don't like the possessive in relation to things like countries.  Why is this?   Edit: Noting an apparent "progression" (pronoun -> person -> nation) marked by reduction in use of the possessive, I checked at a finer "granularity". NGram shows that although it does occur,  virtually "flatlines" against friend of mine. But the bias reduces through of you, of us, and by the time I get to  it's much less extreme. There seems to be something "egocentric" about the double possessive.  Presumably when babies learn to speak, they soon notice that possessive pronouns, possessive apostrophes, and the word "of", all do the same job. Parents would correct a child who says "of mine's", but probably wouldn't even notice the same "redundancy" in "of Peter's". Younger speakers are unlikely to even be talking about something "of America's". Perhaps as we mature we tend to discard the "double possessive" for the more "distant" things that only adults are likely talk about, but we keep it for "closer" people because that's how we spoke when we were younger.  EDIT2 I note that I'm a great fan of him is vanishingly rare compared to ...fan of his, but with ...fan (of John) the double possessive occurs far less often than ...friend (of John's). Usage seems to be affected by the noun before "of" as well as the one after it. This is getting complicated...