Windows 8.1 has been setup in legacy boot mode,it means it is MBR. But I want to chane it to UEFI boot mode which means GPT partition. Can I change in bios legacy boot mode to UEFI boot mode? Will my partitions and data will be destroyed?
I've installed Windows 10 in BIOS mode and use MBR. How can I convert it to use UEFI and GPT without reinstalling Windows 10? Is this possible?
This question is the converse to:    In Overleaf LaTeX Editor, if you type some markup that the autocomplete does not recognise, it gets added to the autocomplete. 99% of the time this is great.  However, if you mistype something, such as \bodl instead of \bold, you will forever have \bodl come up as the first suggestion when inputting \bo...!   As the length of the document increases, and the number of typos goes up, the number of incorrect suggestions quickly starts to outweigh the benefit of the autocomplete, which is a real shame.  How can I remove these typos from the autocomplete? On iOS 7, there is a feature under Cellular in Settings called: Use Cellular Data For:. This lists all of the apps I have on my iPhone 4 with individual On/Off Switches to disable or enable cellular data. So, I disable it on several of my apps, one of which being Music. When I open my Music app, it tells me…     Cellular Data is Turned Off for "Music"   You can turn on cellular data for this app in Settings.   This alert does not occur once, but every time I clear the Music app from my multitasking and re-open it. Is there a way to dismiss this alert once and forever?  The alert looks something like this, but for Music: Is there a reason behind the ordering of letters in the English alphabet? Is there a reason behind the ordering of letters in the English alphabet? i.e. why are we taught “A,B,C,D,E,F,...,Z”? Why not “L,A,S,U,I,Z,...,C”?  I am asking this because, in some of the languages I know, I am told that the ordering of the letters in the alphabet is based on the ease with which they can be pronounced or the frequency with which they are used or depending on the part of the vocal cord that needs to be stressed to pronounce the letter.  Is there a similar rationale?  EDIT  You can see a couple of references for arrangement of letters in Sanskrit  and . Is it safe to knowingly buy an oversized (67-inch) suitcase? Are size limits enforced? Derivation of the general forms of partial fractions I'm learning about partial fractions, and I've been told of 3 types or "forms" that they can take  (1) If the denominator of the fraction has linear factors:  $${5 \over {(x - 2)(x + 3)}} \equiv {A \over {x - 2}} + {B \over {x + 3}}$$  (2) If the denominator of the fraction has quadratic factors that don't factorise:  $${{2x + 3} \over {(x - 1)({x^2} + 4)}} \equiv {A \over {x - 1}} + {{Bx + C} \over {{x^2} + 4}}$$  (3) If the denominator has a factor that repeats:  $${{5x + 3} \over {(x - 2){{(x + 3)}^2}}} \equiv {A \over {x - 2}} + {B \over {x + 3}} + {C \over {{{(x + 3)}^2}}}$$    I'd appreciate it if someone could explain to me how these equivalence relationships are derived, essentially how do they take the forms that they do? I sort of understand the first one, but the other two I don't.  Thank you Difference between == and === in JavaScript Story identification - "bless the beasts that bless us" I'm trying to trace what was probably a short story rather than a full novel from my childhood.  I think it starts in the present day (so the 80s or thereabouts) and there was some kind of alternate reality bleed which meant there were (i think) ghost boars or pigs, they were becoming more physical with time, and so problematic. The family escaped when the family dog led them to and through a portal which they couldn't perceive to a safer place.  In the end, they ended up in some kind of rural community who had a religion / custom that required them to say "Bless the beasts that bless us" but some folk shortened it to BTBTBU which irritated the girl who was the principle character.  I used to read a lot of kids short story sci-fi and fantasy including Nicolas Fisk but I don't know whether this was from a compilation of several authors or a single author's collection. Quadratic substitution question: applying substitution $p=x+\frac1x$ to $2x^4+x^3-6x^2+x+2=0$ By using the substitution $p=x+\frac{1}{x}$, show that the equation $$2x^4+x^3-6x^2+x+2=0$$ reduces to $2p^2+p-10=0$.  I can't think of anything that produces a useful result, I tried writing p as $p=\frac{x^2+1}{x}$ and finding areas to substitute but have come with no progress. Could someone offer a slight hint on how to proceed?  Thanks I've been digging through some parts of the Linux kernel, and found calls like this:  if (unlikely(fd &lt; 0)) {     /* Do something */ }   or  if (likely(!err)) {     /* Do something */ }   I've found the definition of them:  #define likely(x)       __builtin_expect((x),1) #define unlikely(x)     __builtin_expect((x),0)   I know that they are for optimization, but how do they work? And how much performance/size decrease can be expected from using them? And is it worth the hassle (and losing the portability probably) at least in bottleneck code (in userspace, of course). What books, journals, and electronic resources are most valuable for expanding knowledge of GIS? What books, journals, and/or electronic resources have you found most valuable for expanding your knowledge in the GIS field, and why? As  says:     [...] the kinetic energy of a non-rotating object of mass $m$ traveling at a speed $v$ is $\frac{1}{2}mv^2$.   Why does this not increase linearly with speed? Why does it take so much more energy to go from $1\ \mathrm{m/s}$ to $2\ \mathrm{m/s}$ than it does to go from $0\ \mathrm{m/s}$ to $1\ \mathrm{m/s}$?  My intuition is wrong here, please help it out! This is a question to experienced people that might help us shed some light on the issue.   We noticed a very strange behavior on our site, in Google Analytics. Some dude from Finland, namely, from Kouvola city is hitting one of our pages - only one page on our site, 'bout a hundred times per day, all with an average bounce rate of 90%+...  This is causing our overall bounce rate to go up by 1 to 3% per day... which is very disturbing.. since we're trying to do our best in order to keep it as low as possible. And obviously having it jumped from ~24% to 27%, just because of that crazy dude is not making us happy at all... We tried implementing a geo-targeted script in order to catch this particular visitor and deliver him a juicy message, and it seemed like it helped in the beginning, it has stopped for a day or two, but now he's back...   The geo-targeted script was also logging all IP addresses for page requests originating from Finland in order to find out more details and (in order to block them on the server level, later).. but thing is, it was all mainly cable or DSL connections with various, but not constantly repeating IPs... we are all wondering what is he up to really ?   I think that this page should be kept updated with ideas on how to combat this and perhaps someone could also shed light on what it might be ? What is the reason for doing this "bounce-rate attack", as I call it?  There was a similar question asked on stackoverflow earlier, with no meaningful answer - here - List all directories that do NOT have a file with a given file name inside How would I go into listing all directories that do not have a file with a given file name inside? e.g. given this tree  /   /a      README      file001      file002   /b      README      file001   /c      file003   I want to list the directories that do not have a file named README, in this case it would be directory /c. How would I do that? I can't think of any syntax using e.g. find. Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 43148176 bytes) in php This error message is being presented, any suggestions?     Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate   43148176 bytes) in php Should I remove non-significant variables from my regression model I have run a multiple linear regression using stepwise regression to select the best model, however the best model returned has a non-significant variable. When I remove this the AIC value goes up indicating the model without the significant variable is a worse fit. Should I remove the non-significant predictor or should I leave it in as it is a better model? What are the technical differences between using a DSLR viewfinder and live view? The earlier question  asks for practical advantages of optical viewfinders. But what's the technical difference, and why does a camera behave differently in each mode?  For example, on my Nikon D5100:   Slower auto-focus — I saw this explained in the related issue, but just partially: "The other major drawback of live view is that because it requires the mirror to be locked up, it means that the auto focusing mechanism is unavailable."  option not available. No . The manual says that it's dangerous to shoot direct light, when it's on live-view. There's no range finder available.   Why are all these things different?  Live view also has some advantages, like:   automatic scene selection grid lines on the screen other smaller things, like possibly easier operation on a tripod where the viewfinder might be inconvenient to look through   Some of these things, like the tripod operation, are natural. But are there technical reasons the others can't be done with an optical finder? Are there other advantages enabled by live view for technical reasons? Is there a law that you can add or multiply to both sides of an equation? Logical explanation why exponentiation operation is not commutative and associative Considering Peano axioms we'll define addition, multiplication and exponentiation operations.  We can then prove that addition and multiplication operations are commutative and associative. The proof for addition operation is pretty straightforward but for for multiplication it a bit more difficult. For example, to prove associativity, we have to prove distributivity first.  Moreover, for the definition itself it is not obvious that commutativity should take place, because the definition is not symmetric.  $a \cdot 0 := 0$  $a \cdot S(b) := a \cdot b + a$  Here $S(b)$ is the "next" function from Peano axioms  This definition is not symmetric with respect to $a$ and $b$, so commutivity is not obvious.  For exponentiation operation neither commutivity nor associativity take place. And I am very curious about the logical explanation why that happens  NOTE: The explanation I am looking for is somehow similar to a Abel–Ruffini theorem which explains WHY there is no an algebraic solution for a general polynomial equation On the order of elements of $\mathrm{GL}(2,q)$. There's a particular property of the elements of $\mathrm{GL}(2,q)$, the general linear group of $n\times n$ matrices over a finite field of order $q$, that I don't understand.  I know that the order of $\mathrm{GL}(2,q)$ is $(q^2-1)(q^2-q)=q(q+1)(q-1)^2$, since there are $q^2-1$ possible vectors for the first column, excluding the $0$ vector, and $q^2-q$ possible vector for the second column, excluding all multiples of the first.  So the order of any element must divide $q(q+1)(q-1)^2$ by Langrange. However, there is a further detail that      any element of $\mathrm{GL}(2,q)$ must have order dividing $q(q-1)$ or $(q-1)(q+1)$.    Is there a reason why one can narrow down the order to divide one of those smaller factors of $q(q+1)(q-1)^2$? Thanks! Is it possible for an American to get a Chinese visa in Hong Kong?