Please advise if 'Seldom I am wrong' correct or wrong?
Wrong Sentence:     Never before in the history of the world such a thing has happened, I don't think that will ever happen again.   Right sentence:     Never Before in the history of the world has such a thing happened, I don't think that will ever happen again.   Why “has such a thing happened” is the right form, and why can't I use such a thing has happened?
In Russian we have idiom/saying "To shoot out of cannon into sparrows" (literal translation) which is used to convey an idea of applying too drastic measures to small problems. I believe there should be some native-English equivalents to this saying. Can you share if there are any? Would I need to delete unused assets from my Unity packaged build? I'm going to make a release for my Unity game.  Does Unity include unused assets in build output? Would removing unused assets from a project reduce build size/Time?  I want to know if Unity packages all the assets to my build (which I would need to delete), or if Unity packages only the assets that are actually used in the game. This button is in the new Firefox, but what is the name of it? Prove $\vdash \neg(\square F\land p)$ in $KD$ Why does C/C++ differentiates in case of array index out of bound #include &lt;stdio.h&gt; int main() {     int a[10];     a[3]=4;     a[11]=3;//does not give segmentation fault     a[25]=4;//does not give segmentation fault     a[20000]=3; //gives segmentation fault     return 0; }  I understand that it's trying to access memory allocated to process or thread in case of a[11] or a[25] and it's going out of stack bounds in case of a[20000]. Why doesn't compiler or linker give an error, aren't they aware of the array size? If not then how does sizeof(a) work correctly? Wilcox.test for testing count based data in R studio large W I'm doing a textmining project about a videogame review dataset. I divided de reviews into a positive (reviewgrade > 8) and negative (reviewgrade &lt; 3) and want to draw conclusions based on the frequency of different grading factors mentioned in the text. I now have a dataframe with counts of certain categories mentioned per review.  0    13249 1     1565 2      292 3       65 4       19 5        6 6        4 7        3 8        2 9        1 Name: positive: gameplay, dtype: int64   0    5043 1     348 2      66 3      18 4       8 5       3 Name: negative: gameplay, dtype: int64   For example this are the distributions of the amount of reviews which have a certain amount of mentions of gameplay related words. There are for example 1565 reviews with precisely 1 mention of a word related to the category gameplay.  Now I want to use this data to determine if on average gameplay gets mentioned more in negative context than in positive or vice versa. Because the data is not normal distributed, I assumed a t-test is not appropriate, and found online that a Mann–Whitney U test might be suitable.  &gt; wilcox.test(positive$gameplay, negative$gameplay, alternative = "two.sided", conf.int = TRUE)      Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction  data:  positive$gameplay and negative$gameplay W = 43702925, p-value &lt; 2.2e-16 alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval:  2.963844e-05 4.797412e-05 sample estimates: difference in location            4.995671e-05    I do however get a very high W value, which doesn't seem to be correct. Is this not the appropriate test, or am I interpreting this wrong? Number of elements in the quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^2-3, 2X+4)$ Is it possible to annotate equations (i.e. arrow signs/curly braces) to define each variable? I have quite a simple question. I was wondering if it was possible to do something like this in LaTeX:    But formatted a little more nicely.  It doesn't need to be arrows necessarily. Just some form of annotation marker. Who was the real "Master Code Breaker"? What oil is best for seasoning a cast-iron skillet Numlock turned on on boot-up I have a desktop running ubuntu 10.04  I want numlock to be turned on initially.  What do I have to change to accomplish this?  ~~edit~~  I checked in my BIOS.  It was already set up to have the numlock turned on initially.  Yet it isn't being turned on initially.  I have a USB keyboard: would that break this functionality?   Or, should I ask elsewhere (superuser, perhaps) about how to get that BOIS setting working properly? Is it correct to use that/which in the relative clause when it is referring to the place as an object pronoun? Calculate total sum of all numbers in c:forEach loop I have a Java bean like this:  class Person {   int age;   String name; }   I'd like to iterate over a collection of these beans in a JSP, showing each person in a HTML table row, and in the last row of the table I'd like to show the total of all the ages.  The code to generate the table rows will look something like this:  &lt;c:forEach var="person" items="${personList}"&gt;   &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;${person.name}&lt;td&gt;&lt;td&gt;${person.age}&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/c:forEach&gt;   However, I'm struggling to find a way to calculate the age total that will be shown in the final row without resorting to scriptlet code, any suggestions? Not every open set in $\mathbb{R}^n$, for $n\geq2$, is a disjoint union of countable open balls. I know that every open set in $\mathbb{R}$ can be decomposed as the union of countably many disjoint open intervals and I'm trying to show that this property no longer holds in higher dimensions. For this I'm trying to show that there is no countable, pairwise disjoint open balls whose union is the open square $(0, 1)^2 ⊂ \mathbb{R}^2$. I know that it is because of the corners, but I don't know how to write this in mathematical terms. Thanks for any help. Details on the Origin of Sting Set margins in maketitle Trisect a quadrilateral into a $9$-grid; the middle has $1/9$ the area Trisect sides of a quadrilateral and connect the points to have nine quadrilaterals, as can be seen in the figure. Prove that the middle quadrilateral area is one ninth of the whole area. I'm currently reading a little deeper into the Axiom of Choice, and I'm pleasantly surprised to find it makes the arithmetic of infinite cardinals seem easy. With AC follows the Absorption Law of Cardinal Arithmetic, which states that for $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ cardinal numbers, the larger infinite and the smaller nonzero, then $\kappa+\lambda=\kappa\cdot\lambda=\max(\kappa,\lambda)$.  I was playing around with the equation $k+\aleph_0=\mathfrak{c}$ for some cardinal $k$. From the above, it follows that $\mathfrak{c}=k+\aleph_0=\max(k,\aleph_0)$, which implies $k=\mathfrak{c}$.  I'm curious, can we still show $k=\mathfrak{c}$ without the Axiom of Choice? Is it maybe possible to bound $\mathfrak{c}-\aleph_0$ above and below by $\mathfrak{c}$? But then I'm not quite sure such algebraic manipulations even mean anything, or work like that here. Certainly normal arithmetic does not! Thanks. Is it ever acceptable to have a  in your C or C++ application?  What if you allocate some memory and use it until the very last line of code in your application (for example, a global object's destructor)? As long as the memory consumption doesn't grow over time, is it OK to trust the OS to free your memory for you when your application terminates (on Windows, Mac, and Linux)? Would you even consider this a real memory leak if the memory was being used continuously until it was freed by the OS.  What if a third party library forced this situation on you? Would refuse to use that third party library no matter how great it otherwise might be?  I only see one practical disadvantage, and that is that these benign leaks will show up with memory leak detection tools as false positives. My Indian passport book cover is detached from the main book, but all other information, as well as the book is fine. I am traveling to India in 2 days. What should I do? Will there any problem at the airport?