Here is a link to the product:
I can buy Dell Latitude E7270 through my employer. It will come with Windows, but I would like to install Ubuntu (most likely 14.04). This model does not appear on the list of certified hardware, however. Does anyone know whether I should anticipate any problems with his laptop? Thanks!
What is the setting in bash for globbing, to control whether * matches dot files I was surprised recently when I did something like mv ./* ../somedirectory and found that files like .gitignore were not moved.  I do most of my work in zsh on OS X, and this surprise bit me in bash on CentOS.  I tried bash on OS X and found the same behavior: * does not match dot files.  This seems very undesirable to me, but apparently it's the bash default.  (It may be the zsh default too for all I remember, but I may have changed it years ago in my .zshrc and forgotten it ever worked differently.)  How can I configure bash to behave as I expected: for * to match all files, and not ignore dot files.  In case this is at all unclear, here's how to reproduce it    cd /tmp mkdir {t,d}est touch test/{.,}{1,2,3,4,5,6,7} ls -hal test mv test/* dest ls -hal test     # notice dot files are still there ls -hal dest     # notice only some files were mv'ed Why won't Amanita move in and settle down? I keep getting an alert that Amanita would like to settle down. I have a house ready for them however they still won't move in. Who is this NPC and why won't they settle down? Allow the author to delete their own question after closure, if other rules permit it I've read through a few "I want to delete my own question" threads on  already, and haven't found any that particularly cover this case.  I asked a question recently on :    This was voted closed as a duplicate of this question:    Since the latter question was obviously an appropriate duplicate, and my question had no votes or answers whatsoever, I decided I would just delete it.  But then, I was greeted by this error:     To allow for possible reopening, you may delete in 2 days     This all happened within hardly 20 minutes of me posting the question in the first place.  I fail to understand the point of this.  Perhaps if there were some up-votes or answers to the question, it might make sense.  However, as it stands, we now have a question with:   No votes whatsoever (up or down). No answers. Only a single (and largely irrelevant) comment not made by the OP. Five 3k+ rep users agreeing it is duplicate and therefore superfluous. The OP expressly desiring the question to be deleted, implying:   The OP has probably reviewed the duplicate question, and found their answer there. The question holds no further value to the OP. The OP agrees (with the close-voters) that the question provides no added value to the community.    At this point, what good reason could there be for disallowing the OP to delete their own question?  Could the system be modified to permit this? I have enum and use the variables like myEnum.SomeNameA, myEnum.SomeNameB, etc.  When I return one of these variables from a function, can I print their names (such as myEnum.SomeNameA) instead of the value they returned? Why is the upper Riemann integral the infimum of all upper sums? I was reading the theory of Riemann integration when I cam across the following ,   If $f$ is bounded on $[a,b]$, and $P = \{x_0,x_1,x_2.......x_n\}$ is a partition of $[a,b]$, let $$M_j = \sup_{x_{j-1}\leq x\leq x_j}f(x)$$ The upper sum of f over P is $$S(P) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} M_j(x_j-x_{j-1})$$ and the upper integral of $f$ over $[a,b]$, denoted by $$\int_{a}^{b^-} f(x)dx$$ is the infimum of all upper sums.  The theorem similarly goes on to state the result for lower sums.  My doubt is : I do not understand how is $$\int_{a}^{b^-} f(x)dx$$ the infimum of all upper sums. I understand that if we refine the partition P, then the upper sum would decrease, so it may be a lower limit for all the upper sums computed on the refinements of P (but still being the lower limit does not prove that it is the infimum) and what about those partitions for which P itself is the refinement of?  How do I know that it will be a lower limit for those, let alone a infimum? Does disabling root login enhance security? I would like to typeset the top part of Pascal's triangle. To get the triangle with the names of the binomial coefficients, i.e., {n \choose k}, I used the following code  \begin{tikzpicture} \foreach \n in {0,...,4} {   \foreach \k in {0,...,\n} {     \node at (\k-\n/2,-\n) {${\n \choose \k}$};   } } \end{tikzpicture}   The result is this   Now I want to be equally lazy and do something like this for the values of the binomial coefficients, i.e., replace {\n \choose \k} in the node label with \CalculateBinomialCoefficient{\n}{\k} where \CalculateBinomialCoefficient is a hypothetical macro that calculates the binomial coefficient. Has anyone done something like that?  The result should look like this: In Fringe's season 1, the episode  (1x13) shows how  travels on VertusAir flight 718. We witness how he develops some strange symptoms, withdraws into a lavatory and transforms into a porcupine-like monster.  At the end of season 3, Peter "switches" the timeline (changing the past and making the present continue in a different timeline henceforth) from blue- to orange-verse. Various statements throughout the 4th season indicate time (the date) was not reset; Olivia and Walter have been working on Fringe cases for some three years etc. - hence it is safe to say that season 4 plays 3 years after season 1.  Then, in the episode  (4x16), the events from 1x13 happen again, up to the point of Bowman's transformation, which this time doesn't happen (not aboard the plane, anyway). As far as I can tell, great care was taken to exactly recreate the events from the season 1 episode, including hiring the same actors to play the flight attendants once again ( and ), so obviously this is supposed to be the same event with slight changes.  Peter, as well as Olivia - who is in the process of regaining her memories from the blue-verse -, remember the events from 1x13 and note the difference that Bowman's transformation happened later this time, implying that in the orange-verse, everything related to flight 718 played out the same way, except for the small difference that the transformation happened a bit later.  BUT ... all of this happened 3 years later!! Is there any explanation for this?  How unlikely is it that in the orange-verse timeline, Marshall Bowman is on the very same flight with the very same flight attendants 3 years after the same would have happened in the blue-verse? Mind you, this is not a "small change" in the course of events while mostly everything else stays the same.  So, why did Peter and Olivia realize the transformation happened a tad later in the orange-verse timeline, but were not baffled by the fact that essentially the same events as in the blue-verse happened, but three years later?  EDIT: Not only the flight and the flight attendants were the same in both episodes. The passenger next to Bowman was the same, an elderly lady played by  both times, as well. Moreover, the transcripts of  and  reveal that the dialogue between Bowman, the passenger next to him, and the cabin crew is the same down to the lines of text until the moment of transformation.  Interestingly, the announcement by the captain in the beginning seems to be different - starting the inflight movie + selling headsets vs. circling before beginning the final descent + selling snacks. On the other hand, this could be presumed to be a slight retcon, as in 4x16, it was crucial for the plot that the plane would be close to landing, and starting the inflight movie would not make much sense right before landing. Problem:  If $\gcd(a, b) = 1$ and If $ab = x^2$ ,prove that $a$, $b$ must also be perfect squares; where $a$,$b$,$x$ are in the set of natural numbers  I've come to the conclusion that $a \ne b$ and $a \ne x$ and $b \ne x$ but I guess that won't really help me.. I understand that if the $\gcd$ between two numbers if $1$ then they obviously have no common divisors but where do I go from this point?  Any tips at tackling this would be great. It looks quite easy though I'm still trying to get my hand around these proofs! Any pointers in the right direction would be great.  Thank you in advance, Say $R$ is a commutative ring and $I\in R$ is an ideal. Let us consider the quotient $R/I$. It is created by taking every element $a\in R$, and adding all the elements of $I$ to it. The elements of $R/I$ are of the form $a+I$ and $b+I$, $\forall a,b\in R$.   Now $$(a+I).(b+I)=(a+i_{1}).(b+i_{2}),\forall (i_{1},i_{2})\in I \times I$$  $$(a+i_{1}).(b+i_{2})=ab+a.i_{2}+b.i_{1}+i_{1}i_{2}=ab+I$$  We know that $a.i_{2}+b.i_{1}+i_{1}i_{2}\in I$.   If $(a+I).(b+I)=ab+I$, then taking suitable $(i_{1},i_{2})\in I\times I$, we should be able to prove $(a+i_{1}).(b+i_{2})=ab+i_{3},\forall i_{3}\in I$. However, can every element in $I$ be generated by taking suitable $i_{1},i_{2}\in I$? And if not, is that the reason why $(a+I).(b+I)$ has to be defined as equal to $ab+I$ in violation of the distributive property of ring elements? This has confused me for a long time.   EDIT: I figured addition does not have to be defined as such because $(a+i_{1})+(b+i_{2})=a+b+i_{1}+i_{2}$, where $i_{1}+i_{2}\in I$. In fact, every element $i\in I$ can be constructed by taking $i_{1}=0$ and $i_{2}=i$. Hence, $(a+I) + (b+I)=a+b+I$ naturally. This is the logic I followed to determine that $(a+I).(b+I)$ doesn't quite work as nicey. I'm not sure if this logic is flawed or not as I haven't had the opportunity to ask anybody.   Thanks for your help in advance! Motivation  I want to include a list of related equations, say, for a proof, in my LaTeX document. As far as I know, I have two good options, eqnarray and align.   Question  What is the difference between eqnarray and align, and how do I know which I should be using? Or does it matter at all? strptime() equivalent on Windows? Is there a good equivalent implementation of strptime() available for Windows?  Unfortunately, this POSIX function does not appear to be available.   - summary: it converts a text string such as "MM-DD-YYYY HH:MM:SS" into a tm struct, the opposite of strftime(). I get this error message   NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [plymouthd:305]    on the startup of my system (even with live-cd).  My PC is a dell inspiron 7559 with intel graphic and nvidia.  UPDATE - this issue also happens when attempting to install ubuntu 18.10 using LiveUSB Simple Linq query has duplicated join against same table? Why is the nucleus of an Iron atom so stable? Lighter nuclei liberate energy when undergoing fusion, heavier nuclei when undergoing fission.  What is it about the nucleus of an Iron atom that makes it so stable?  Alternatively: Iron has the greatest nuclear binding energy - but why? import os xp1 = "\Documents and Settings\" xp2 = os.getenv("USERNAME") print xp1+xp2   Gives me error   File "1.py", line 2  xp1 = "\Documents and Settings\"                                ^ SyntaxError: EOL while scannning single-quoted string   Can you help me please, do you see the problem? Objective: To separate text column from figures column in every page I don't know if this has been asked before. But so far nothing has come up with my search.  In some books, the figures are placed at the outer side of the page like in the picture below.    Is this achievable in TeX/LaTeX? That is how does one set up the page so that all text will appear in a 'text column' and the figures appear in a 'figures column' in every page? Finite Summation of Fractional Factorial Series Do web browsers use different outgoing ports for different tabs? How to set Command Block(s) to test for a particular time and output a message? I simply want one command block to test for the time of day or night (e.g. time = 18000) and output a message in the chat to everyone if that time returns true.  I was trying a simple set-up with two command blocks and a comparator in the middle, but I'm a beginner and am obviously missing the correct syntax (especially to test for a particular time of day, and if true, then trigger the say "message" block).  ETA: Kudos to @Ben for the Daylight Sensor/Redstone idea, but I'd really prefer a Command Block solution for the above, since my plan is to output several messages during the day and night cycle at very specific times in the world. Thanks.