How can I check the debug logs for my trigger when some goes to my website and clicks a button that inserts records on salesforce?
I am trying to setup a trace flag to debug. When I select User in the dropdown and try to find System in there. It doesn't show up. What can I do ?
How to get the key for a given object from an NSMutableDictionary? What are the different endings in Dishonored? HP PSC 1410 all scanner's images are black I have a HP PSC 1410 printer with scanner inside.  I've been scanning documents and images with it for the last couple of years.  Recently my scanner has stopped performing as excepted and i can't scan or copy images\documents.  My problem is that every images\document i'm trying to scan - the result from the printer is a black page.  I've been googling about this issue and couldn't find any helpful stuff beside replacing the whole printer - which is something i'm trying to avoid.  Any ideas ? I've read something about the shipping lock of the scanner but couldn't find any information about how to check it.. Landscape topography from grayscale image Why are my objects in all layers? Here is my situation: I know almost nothing about Perl but it is the only language available on a porting machine. I only have permissions to write in my local work area and not the Perl install location. I need to use the  Perl module from CPAN   How do I use this Parallel::ForkManager without doing a central install? Is there an environment variable that I can set so it is located?  Thanks  JD Is there any hint that the MoM or anywhere else got support in combating voldemort the first time around? Or is everything completely UK-centric?  I can't remember anyone in the second war being specifically sent from europe to help, even though we see international wizards in book 4. But I don't think all the events of the first war are covered in the books.  So are other bodies like the MoM involved in the first war, or was it isolated in the UK? What is the difference between == and ===?  How exactly does the loosely == comparison work? How exactly does the strict === comparison work?  What would be some useful examples? how to redirect output to multiple log files How large is it possible for a PC to get? How large is it possible for a PC to get?  For clarity, here are my parameters:   This is about size categories, not 'feet' or 'inches' or 'meters' or any other precise measurement. This is about Medium to Large to Huge to Gargantuan categories.  This is for an NPC charlatan using this to trick people. (It's an NPC but will have a full PC sheet, so the distinction between PC and NPC doesn't matter). Any means of size category enlargement works for this purpose, including magic spells, magic items, etc. Illusions do not count because it's about actually becoming larger, not just casting an illusion of a gargantuan giant version of yourself.  The character must remain the same physical structure. Polymorphing into a Gargantuan Dragon would not satisfy the need here. Consumable items are fine. This does not need to be permanent. onChange event doesn't trigger Pumping Lemma for $L=\left\{0^i 1^{j} \mid \gcd(i,j) = 1\right\}$ Let $L=\left\{0^i 1^{j} \mid \gcd(i,j) = 1\right\}$ I want to prove that this is not a regular language, but I am having trouble finding a string I can pump resulting in the string not being in the language. Ideally, rather than a full solution, I'd like suggestions for a string that I could use in this proof. I've played with the idea of setting $j = 2$ and $i = 2n+1$, but I don't think that would work. Inequality ${n \choose k} \leq \left(\frac{en}{ k}\right)^k$ This is from page 3 of  ().  Copying the relevant segment:     Stirling’s approximation tells us $\sqrt{2\pi n} (n/e)^n \leq n! \leq e^{1/12n} \sqrt{2\pi n} (n/e)^n$. In particular we can use this to say that   $$ {n \choose k} \leq \left(\frac{en}{ k}\right)^k$$   I tried the tactic of combining bounds from $n!$, $k!$ and $(n-k)!$ and it didn't work. How does this bound follow from stirling's approximation? How do I calculate the challenge rating of monsters that feature abilities that do not directly do damage?  For example, my homebrew monster has the two following abilities:     The target takes a Constitution saving throw. On a failure, it drops to 0   hit points.   This one could be used on a character with 10 hit points, or 100, which creates drastically different damage results depending on character level.     All creatures within 60ft take a Wisdom saving throw. Each target that fails is stunned for 1 round.   This can be extremely dangerous if this monster is paired with monsters that can make use of the stun condition, but it is virtually useless if the monster is alone.  I'm sure there are infinitely more examples of this type of thing.  How do we calculate CR for monsters that do not rely on standard attacks? Oracle 11g: increasing buffer cache with AMM On a 2-node RAC we have enabled Automatic Memory Management. The advisor views indicate that increasing the buffer cache by 4 GB will half the physical reads, and we have 4 GB to give.   How must we do this? By increasing memory_target and letting Oracle grab more memory for the buffer cache? Or by explicitly setting a value for db_cache_size (which now is zero)? I am preparing a paper in the field of Computer Science.  In order to report test results, we usually run a number of tests and report the average of those tests.  For each test, we generate random data.  Because of the randomness, at some points, the results may come out not as expected.  For instance, a graph may be like:   Usually, one should explain why on points 8, 11 and 12 there is a decrease on the plot. Probably, it is because of that randomness.  Not hand-crafting all the graph, but just manipulating a few points makes the graph acceptable:   Since three weeks or so, I work my ass off and try to figure out why my resulting graph looks like the first one. Sometimes I feel like yielding to temptation and just modify the raw data before I go crazy.  I believe, at this point the title became misleading, so let me make it clear:  I am not seeking an advice on data manipulation. I will not manipulate my data. However, I ask to myself "how the hell this can be detected?"  And now, I don't only ask to myself, but to whole community. How is this detected? For editors, referees out there, have you ever detected something like this? How to explain dropout regularization in simple terms? Indecomposable limit ordinals A limit ordinal $\gamma&gt;0$ is said to be indecomposable iff $\nexists\alpha,\beta&lt;\gamma$ such that $\alpha+\beta=\gamma$.  In view of this definition, I’m trying to prove the equivalence of the following statements for limit ordinals $\gamma$:  (1) $\gamma$ is indecomposable.  (2) $\alpha+\gamma=\gamma$ $\forall\alpha&lt;\gamma$.  (3) $\gamma=\omega^\alpha$ for some $\alpha\in\mathrm{ON}$.  I’ve been able to get $(1)\implies(2)$ and $(3)\implies(1)$, but I have nothing more than scratch work for $(2)\implies(3)$.  Any suggestions would be appreciated. Let $X$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space. Prove that every Hamel basis of X is uncountable. Let $X$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space. Prove that every basis of $X$ is uncountable.  Can anyone help how can I solve the above problem? Product and sum of positive operators is positive I want to show that for $S,T\in B(H)$ bounded operators on Hilbertspace with $S\geq 0,T\geq 0$ and $ST=TS$,  we have $S+T\geq 0$, and $ST\geq 0$.  $T\geq 0$ means $(Tx,x)\geq 0$.    To me it seems that $((S+T)x,x) = (Sx,x)+(Tx,x)\geq 0$. But for $ST$ i like some help.   There is a theorem in Rudin (12.32) that says that for every $T\in B(H)$ we have an equivalence:   $T$ is positive $\Leftrightarrow$ $T$ is self adjoint, i.e. $T=T^*$ and $\sigma(T)\subset [0,\infty)$.   Since $S, T$ are self adjoint we know that $ST=TS = S^*T^* = T^*S^*$ ($ST$ is selfadjoint since $S,T$ commute). Also I read somewhere that if $S,T $ commute then $\sigma(ST)\subset \sigma(S)\sigma(T)$, but I am not sure if this is true. Clearly I cant prove it, but if it were true by this ''Theorem'' it would follow that $ST \geq 0$.   Is there a more straightforward way?