I uninstalled Cortana because I found it was an annoying feature that bothered me more than it helped me. After uninstalling it though I realized that some other windows features such as the search option disappeared with it, which is why I want it back.  I used this method to uninstall it -   It seems to have completely removed all Cortana files, which is why all other options of installing/re-installing it that I have found don't seem to work. If instead of adding it there were a way of just getting the search option back I would appreciate that also.
With reference to:    I removed the Cortana packages from my running Windows 10 using the method posted by magicandre1981 and using  win6x_registry_tweak.   My question is how can I re-install Cortana (or for that matter any other package removed similarly)?  I have opened up the install.wim image (converted from a Win 10 install.esd file) and found Cortana in the system apps folder, but don't know how / what to use to re-install it.  Any help please?
Touching the front wheel with my foot when turning $f : S^1 \to\mathbb R$ is continuous then $f(x)=f(-x)$ for some $x\in S^1$ Question is to prove :  $f : S^1 \to \mathbb R$ is continuous then $f(x)=f(-x)$ for some $x\in S^1$  I guess it would be helpful to use intermediate value theorem  Assuming $f(x)\neq f(-x)$ then given any $p\in (f(-x),f(x))$ (assuming $f(-x)&lt;f(x)$) there exists $y\in (-x, x)$ such that $f(y)=p$  I am not very sure of how to use this..   It would be helpful if someone can give some hint which would help me to solve this..  Thank you. Are Living Beings Turned Into Horcruxes Suceptible to Age, Disease, or Injury? From the HP books I know that Horcruxes grant a form of immortality. So, it is not possible for someone who created a Horcrux to die from old age or succumb to diseases. I guess the same is true for living beings turned into a Horcrux. But do living Horcruxes age normally? Is it possible to cripple them or sever their limbs, head or something like that, or do they instantly "repair" themselves like inanimate Horcruxes? When I press the power button a dialog opens, but I want to shutdown the system without receiving "Do you really really want to shutdown?". How can I choose a direct shutdown action on a pressed power button?   I had the same problem with the 11.04 version, but I don't remember the solution and yesterday I upgraded to Ubuntu 11.10. I would like to typeset some easy polyomino puzzles and therefore need a suitable LaTeX package. I could not find an easy to use package (other than using TikZ of course). Is there any approach other than using TikZ/PSTricks?  For anybody not aware of what polyominos are:   Edit: With a polyomino puzzle, I mean something like this:   So my intention is to put a set of polyominos into a given shape. In the Stack Overflow podcast #36 (), this opinion was expressed: Once you understand how easy it is to set up a state machine, you’ll never try to use a regular expression inappropriately ever again. I've done a bunch of searching.  I've found some academic papers and other complicated examples, but I'd like to find a simple example that would help me understand this process.  I use a lot of regular expressions, and I'd like to make sure I never use one &quot;inappropriately&quot; ever again. When I have equations, as in  \begin{equation} ... \end{equation}   Can I arbitrarily assign the numbers to the equations? Instead of the usual order (1), (2), (3), ..., I'd like something like (1), (2.1), (2.2), (2.3), (3.1), (3.2), (4), ... How to search for list of papers citing both papers A and B? For given papers A and B, I would like to search for all papers that cite both A and B. I guess one can generalize to papers {A,B,C,...} and find all papers that cite all of them.   A quick Google Scholar and Web of Science search revealed nothing. Google Scholar has a "cite=..." thing in the URL, which I messed with a bit to no avail. Bring back review numbers to the top bar Though I never quite understood what those numbers were and they were quite ugly, they were the only reason I ever visited the reviews page.   Can we have similar functionality back on the top bar please? Open Mapping Theorem: counterexample Class of sets of a given infinite cardinality This question was inspired by the question on .  From the discussion in the comments there, it seems there does not exist a set of all sets of a given cardinality.  To me, it seems easy to see that this is true for any nonzero finite cardinality $n$. Given any set $x$, you can always make a set of size $n$ by adding $n-1$ other sets to $x$ to make a set of size $n$, which exists by repeated use of the pairing axiom.   But how would you do this for infinite cardinalities? For suppose $\kappa$ is some given infinite cardinality. To show that the set of all sets of cardinality $\kappa$ does not exist, it seems you would have to show that for any set $x$, there exists a set of that size with $x$ as an element, and then you could take the union of that set to find the set of all sets, and thus a contradiction. But it doesn't seem reasonable to simply say, for a given set of size $\kappa$ if $x$ is in the set, we have no problem. If not, just take an element out of the set and put $x$ in. Something about that seems like it would not be allowed.  So how would you do this for infinite cardinalities? Clipping raster with vector boundaries using QGIS In QGIS I would like to clip a raster precipitation layer using an admin boundary layer that is vector data. However the Geoprocessing tools seem to be usable only for vector data. How can I clip this precipitation layer? Playstation Plus for PS4 on multiple Console accounts? Is there any standard notation for specifying dimension of a matrix after the matrix symbol? I want to explicitly specify dimension of matrices in some expressions, something like   $$\boldsymbol{A}_{m \times n} \boldsymbol{B}_{n \times m} = \boldsymbol{C}_{m \times m} \, .$$  Is there any more or less standard notation for this?    While this notation is generally unambiguous, I think it become ambiguous, for example, in the following case. Suppose that I have some column or row vector which is conjugate transpose of correspondingly row or column vector. If I write it in the following way  $$\boldsymbol{A}_{n \times 1}^{\dagger} \, ,$$ we can have 2 different interpretations:   matrix $\boldsymbol{A}_{n \times 1}$ is $n \times 1$ column vector and by $\boldsymbol{A}_{n \times 1}^{\dagger}$ I'm referring to its conjugate transpose which is $1 \times n$ row vector; matrix $\boldsymbol{A}_{n \times 1}^{\dagger}$ itself is $n \times 1$ column vector which is conjugate transpose of $1 \times n$ row vector $\boldsymbol{A}$. Is it worth buying a 5D Mark I or an EOS 1Ds II today? Show that the determinant of $A$ is equal to the product of its eigenvalues Show that the determinant of a matrix $A$ is equal to the product of its eigenvalues $\lambda_i$.   So I'm having a tough time figuring this one out. I know that I have to work with the characteristic polynomial of the matrix $\det(A-\lambda I)$. But, when considering an $n \times n$ matrix, I do not know how to work out the proof. Should I just use the determinant formula for any $n \times n$ matrix? I'm guessing not, because that is quite complicated. Any insights would be great. Can't access pre populated SQLite database using PhoneGap/Cordova in Android If $a > b$, is $a^2 > b^2$? Given $a &gt; b$, where $a,b ∈ ℝ$, is it always true that $a^2 &gt; b^2$? A well-supported wireless PCI adapter for Ubuntu 12.04? Why is LaTeX3 taking so long to come out? I feel as though I have been hearing about the LaTeX3 project for a very long time.   Why is it taking so long for it to come into fruition? Are there major technical difficulties, or is it purely a lack of developers that is causing a bottleneck?