I currently have a plugin in the global WordPress plugin directory that I'd like to remove. It is currently broken, outdated, and I do not intend to provide continuing support for it. To spare people the heartbreak of installing it, I'd like to remove it.  Unfortunately Google is flooded with how to remove plugins installed on WordPress sites, so that makes it hard to find a clear answer for this.
I wanted to create a WP plugin. So I requested and my request was approved by WordPress.org But I don't want to develop that plugin anymore. How can I delete the repository forever or request its deletion.
Prove that if $\gcd(a,b)=1$ then $\gcd(ab,c) = \gcd(a,c) \gcd(b,c)$ I'd like to do some URL rewriting (Why? See .) so that instead of users seeing addresses like   labouseur.com/course-compilers.html    they can instead see and use simply   labouseur.com/course-compilers   (Even better, maybe I should restructure that so that it's courses/compilers.)  I'm using a Linux-based shared hosting service for my website, so I do not have administrative control of the server, but I do have control over .htaccess. The references I've read online seemed less than clear to me, so I'm looking for a little clarity and advice here. Encouraging software publishers to use StackExchange as support mechanism Whenever I deal with an application publisher's custom support mechanism because I can't see any evidence of activity on StackExchange, I always wish they'd just migrate to StackExchange, particularly when I get a prompt response from them. What a waste, I think, that my question and answer weren't captured on SE.  In cases where there is some activity for the application on SE, I'll post my question there and, if I get no response, reference the SE question in my email follow-up. In the case of , that had a happy ending where the support person posted the answer to the SE site at the same time they emailed me.  My related meta questions are:   Are there any obvious downsides to publishers effectively "giving up" their custom support mechanisms, or at least their custom forum, in favor of the appropriate SE site? Are there any obvious downsides to SE for publishers making this transition? Is SE staff engaged in any systematic marketing efforts to get publishers to make this transition? Is there any SE documentation which lists the advantages of publishers making this transition? We are Indian passport holders, with valid visas for Canada. Plan is to take the EgyptAir flight Mumbai to Toronto, via Cairo. Problem is Egypt embassy website says we don't need Transit Visa if transit is up to 12 hours but here transit is 14 hours.    Has anyone with a Indian passport traveled this route? What was your experience at Cairo? Did you need a transit visa? Torque relationship to speed in a DC motor I have a conceptual doubt about torque-speed relation in a DC motors. It's probably a gap in my thinking but I'm posting this question anyway.  Torque and speed in a DC motor are said to be inversely proportional. But doesn't an increase in torque result in increase in Angular Acceleration and consequently, angular speed?  I know that back EMF/counter-EMF is responsible for the inverse relation but it seems counter intuitive to me. What happens to the angular acceleration, angular speed when the torque is increased and where does all that work go? How to cancel a credit card and verify it was closed The Follow Questions and Answers feature is now live across the Network I asked a  on stackoverflow at the end of last year for a beta or pre-release product and got the answer I wanted.  3 months later someone else answered the question with the correct answer for a newer release.  This answer got way more upvotes than the one I accepted.  I only noticed this today so changed the accepted answer.  Can I get a notification email when an answer gets say 10 more votes than the one I accepted.  Just to let me know something might be up. Can I use Wubi for manual installation? Is it possible to use Wubi for Ubuntu 13.04? I read that it will not be supported in the official release due to some problems. Is this going to change in the future, and can we expect to see a future release with support for 13.04? Prove that $\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x^p}\, dx$ converges for $0<p<2$ What focal length lens do I need for photographing the moon? I would like to know whether it is possible to photograph moon without any flaws with a canon EOS 550d..   Also to get an image of the moon as close as the following image, what kind of equipment(lens,etc) is need to be used with the 550d Body Change default CSS of Google Chrome I would like to be able to change the default CSS used by chrome, such as removing the underlines for links, etc. However, I cannot find the default CSS file used by Chrome. Does anyone know where it is? Not packages and not all applications. Just the applications user installed by himself from whatever source (Software Center, manually added PPA, etc.). If the above is not possible - a list of all installed applications or at least a GUI which lists the applications so I can take screenshots of it.  I've read a dozen of similar questions and people posting answers usually don't even get close to OP question merit. Please note that my question includes 'user installed'.   Answer: It is not currently possible in Ubuntu Linux.  (choosing tijybba's answer as the closest one though) The following question is taken from Royden's Real Analysis $4$th edition, Chapter $3,$ question $28,$ page $67:$     Question: Show that Egoroff's Theorem continues to hold if the convergence is pointwise a.e. and $f$ is finite a.e., that is.       Assume $E$ has finite measure. Let $\{f_n\}$ be a sequence of measurable functions on $E$ that converges pointwise almost everywhere on $E$ to the real-valued function $f$ which is finite almost everywhere. Then for each $\varepsilon&gt;0,$ there is a closed set $F$ contained in $E$ for which    $$\{f_n\}\to f \text{ uniformly on }F \text{ and }m(E\setminus F)&lt;\varepsilon.$$   My attempt:   Let $A = \{ x\in E: f_n\not\to f \text{ pointwise} \}$ and $B=\{ x\in E: |f|=\infty \}.$  By assumption,  $$m(A)=m(B)=0.$$ So $A$ and $B$ are measurable.  Note that  $$m[E\setminus (A\cup B)] = m(E) - m(A\cup B) = m(E).$$ Fix $\varepsilon&gt;0.$ Since $\{f_n\}$ converges to $f$ pointwise on $E\setminus (A\cup B)$ to the real-valued function $f,$ by Egoroff's Theorem, there exists a closed set $F$ contained in $(E\setminus (A\cup B))\subseteq E$ for which  $$f_n\to f \text{ uniformly on } F \text{ and }m[(E\setminus(A\cup B)) \setminus F] &lt; \varepsilon.$$ Since $E$ has finite measure and $F\subseteq E,$ by monotonicity,  $F$ has finite measure. As $F$ is closed, it is also measurable.  Therefore, by Excision property, we have $$m(E\setminus F) = m(E) - m(F) = m[E\setminus(A\cup B)] - m(F) = m[(E\setminus(A\cup B)) \setminus F]&lt;\varepsilon.$$  Is my proof correct? I ask for verification because in this  Kenny's comment about countable union of null sets. I do not use this anywhere in my proof. So I wonder whether my proof miss out something. Adding Maximum and Minimum Latitude and Longitude as features in ArcGIS for Desktop? Simple way to see a list of installed iOS apps with their storage space size? The storage on my iPhone is nearly full. Most of the space is used by apps. I'd like to see which apps consume the most space on my device.  Is there a way to get a list of the apps with their corresponding used space? By "used space I mean the installation size (bonus for added user data). I have the following code that shows either a bug or a misunderstanding on my part.  I sent the same list, but modified over an ObjectOutputStream.  Once as [0] and other as [1].  But when I read it, I get [0] twice.  I think this is caused by the fact that I am sending over the same object and ObjectOutputStream must be caching them somehow.  Is this work as it should, or should I file a bug?   import java.io.*; import java.net.*; import java.util.*;  public class OOS {      public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {         Thread t1 = new Thread(new Runnable() {             public void run() {                 try {                     ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(12344);                     Socket s= ss.accept();                      ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(s.getOutputStream());                     List same = new ArrayList();                     same.add(0);                     oos.writeObject(same);                     same.clear();                     same.add(1);                     oos.writeObject(same);                  } catch(Exception e) {                     e.printStackTrace();                 }             }         });         t1.start();          Socket s = new Socket("localhost", 12344);         ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(s.getInputStream());          // outputs [0] as expected         System.out.println(ois.readObject());          // outputs [0], but expected [1]         System.out.println(ois.readObject());         System.exit(0);     } } Is the function strcpy always dangerous? "To which", "by which", "on which" etc I have come across the phrases like "to which","for which", "by which", "on which" and so on(using a preposition with a relative pronoun).   e.g. The chair on which the body was found..  Could someone please explain if there's a particular rule to be followed when building/using them?   Can I use any preposition before 'which'?  What if I say "The chair which the body was found on"? How would I decide which preposition to be put? Can I use other relative pronouns too?  Thanks in advance. Which files shouldn't be checked in into version control in Android Studio