Does anyone know what happens to unreserved seats of Premium Tatkal. Like for a train in evening tomorrow, still 05 seats are left in 3AC against Premium Tatkal and Tatkal 3AC current status is 03 W/L while general quota waiting list is 12 W/L.  I want to ask, that after chart preparation, how will these 05 vacant seats be allotted among tatkal and waiting list/RAC?  Does anyone has any idea?
After the  of registering an account to book train tickets online using my British VISA card, I finally got into a position of being able to book a ticket, but what it appears to be telling me is that I'm only being added to a wait list, which I assume means my tickets aren't confirmed.  Can someone explain how the wait list works, and what my chances are of getting on the train successfully?    It currently says the wait list is 7 The train is the Mandor Express, from Delhi to Jodhpur on the 18th of Nov   Update: So I got the train! Although it didn't get confirmed until a few hours before it was due to leave.
I asked this question  but I haven't gotten a useful answer. Could you tell me the difference in meaning between these sentences?        Do you think you will visit them next week?     Will you visit them next week?     Are you going to visit them next week?     Are you visiting them next week?     Are you going to be visiting them next week?     Are you planning to be visiting them next week?     Do you plan to visit them next week?      Will there be any difference in the answers?        I think I will visit them next week.     I will visit them next week.     I am going to visit them next week.     I am visiting them next week.     I am going to be visiting them next week.     I am planning to be visiting them next week.     I plan to visit them next week.      Can I use "planning to" instead of "going to"?  (E.g. "Are you planning to visit them next week? — Yes, I am planning to visit them next week.") Which of these sentences show that the subject of conversation has already been discussed? For example, I talked with a friend of mine about my plans to visit somebody. So my friend is aware of my plans.  And my last question. Which of these seven sentences express that the action will certainly take place? What is the cause for the validity of Newton's third law? What, specifically, causes newton's third law?  For instance, if I push on a wall, why is it that I experience a force in the opposite direction?    I seem to vaguely understand that is has something to do with electronic repulsion or molecular compression (maybe that's completely wrong, I don't know).  As a related question, what would happen if two objects that were /infinitely/ immovable (at the molecular level, it cannot be broken or compressed) collided with each-other? Imagine a black hole that is fast-approaching its final exponential throws of Hawking evaporation. Presumably, at all points in this end process there will remain a region that identifiably remains &quot;the black hole&quot; until the the very end, as opposed to huge swarm of fundamental particles that is being radiated out from it. As the mass of the black hole descends to that of individual particles, it would seem entirely feasible that the very last fermionic Hawking radiation event available to the almost-deceased black hole could leave it with an unbalanced charge, e.g. -1, and an unbalanced spin, say 1/2. It would also have some kind of mass of course, but that aspect of the final residue could be fine-tuned to any specific value by photon emissions of arbitrary frequencies. After photon emission mass trimming, the resulting black hole residuum would reach a point where it is no longer be able to evaporate into any known particle, because there is no longer any lower-mass option available to it for removing the -1 charge and 1/2 spin. The black hole residuum will at that point be stuck, so to speak, stuck with exact charge, spin, and mass features of an electron. And so my question: Is it an electron? And if so, by equivalence, is every electrons in the universe really just a particular type of black hole that cannot evaporate any further due to the constraints of charge and spin conservation? And if so, why are charge and spin so uniquely combined in such black hole remnants, so that e.g. a remnant of -1 charge and zero spin is not permitted, at least not commonly, and the mass is forced to a very specific associated level? Is there anything in the current understanding of general relativity that would explain such a curious set of restrictions on evaporation? The full generalization of this idea would of course be that all forms of black hole evaporation are ultimately constrained in ways that correspond exactly to the Standard Model, with free fundamental particles like electrons being the only stable end states of the evaporation process. The proton would be a fascinating example of an evaporation that remains incomplete in a more profound way, with the three quarks remaining incapable of isolated existence within spacetime. The strong force, from that perspective, would in some odd sense have to be a curious unbalanced remnant of those same deeper constraints on the overall gravitational evaporation process. This may all be tautological, too! That is, since Hawking radiation is guided by the particles possible, the constraints I just mentioned may be built-in and thus entirely trivial in nature. However, something deeper in the way they work together would seem... plausible, at least? If an electron is an unbalanced black hole, then the particles given off would also be black holes, and the overall process would be not one of just particle emission, but of how black holes split at low masses. Splitting with constraints imposed by the structure of spacetime itself would be a rather different way of looking at black hole evaporation, I suspect. (final note: This is just a passing thought that I've mulled over now and then through the years. Asking it was inspired by  by Ben Crowell. I should add that I doubt very seriously that that my wild speculations above have anything to do with Wheeler's concept of geons, though.) Navigation to section/subsection from Beamer headline titles Beamer infolines themes, like CambridgeUS, insert the titles of the current section and subsection in the headline. These titles appear to be clickable (the screen pointer changes as if they were so) but nothing happens when one clicks them.   Is there a way to link the headline titles to the first frame of the corresponding section or subsection? Something like this already works on the theme footline: clicking on the presentation title takes you to the title page.   Edit: MWE  \documentclass{beamer} \usetheme{CambridgeUS}  \setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{} \title{Click on Headline} \author{A.~U.~Thor} \institute{X-University} \date{2015} \begin{document} \begin{frame}   \titlepage \end{frame} \begin{frame}[t]{Contents}   \tableofcontents[subsectionstyle=hide]  \end{frame} \section{Section 1} \begin{frame}{Section 1}   \centering \Large Section 1 \end{frame} \begin{frame}[t]{Section 1: Contents}   \tableofcontents[currentsection,hideothersubsections] \end{frame} \subsection{Subsection 1.1} \begin{frame}{Frame 1.1.1}   A frame of subsection 1.1 \end{frame} \begin{frame}{Frame 1.1.2}   Another frame of subsection 1.1 \end{frame}   \subsection{Subsection 1.2} \begin{frame}{Frame 1.2.1}   A frame of subsection 1.2 \end{frame} \begin{frame}{Frame 1.2.2}   Another of subsection 1.2 \end{frame} \section{Section 2} \begin{frame}{Section 2}   \centering \Large Section 2 \end{frame} \begin{frame}[t]{Section 2: Contents}   \tableofcontents[currentsection,hideothersubsections] \end{frame} \subsection{Subsection 2.1} \begin{frame}{Frame 2.1.1}   A frame of subsection 2.1 \end{frame} \end{document} EDIT: Summary  I think I've found the best definition of what I want thanks to the discussion with @M. Tibbits:  When I open or refresh the SO, I get a notification of new activities that are of interest to me. Today these are (hard-coded): answers to my questions and comments addressed to me. I want a bit more control over it, that's all.     Yes, I've read  and , but I think I add new (good :) ) reasons for re-asking it:  The first question was answered before this so handy "inbox" notification feature was implemented. So now using favorites for "watching" a question is wrong, IMHO, for 2 reasons:   it splits essentially the same functionality (of getting notified when there is an activity you are interested in) between 2 very different user interfaces it's cumbersome - I need to: 1) add question to favorites; 2) click on my profile dropdown; 3) click on the "favorites" line; 4) see all my favorites with recent activity; 5) select the one I watch; 6) repeat this process occasionally to get updates; and 7) possibly remove the question from favorites at the end. All this as opposed to this little red button when there are news.   Favorites are different in nature that watching. I add a question to Favorites when I find the answers useful to me in my work, so I may want to have it handy in the future. By watching an interesting question I will be able to decide whether I want it in faviorites, after I see the answers.  EDIT: I see that I was not clear enough.  I want to add a question to Favorites when:   it has some good answers the question and answers are relevant in my work I want to keep them handy as my long-term (persistent) knowledge base   I want to watch a question for short while (matter of days/weeks) when:   it is interesting / relevant I want to follow it to see what are the answers. Then I can decide whether I want it in my favorites   As you see, the main differentiators are good answers and long/short term. For short-term, automatic notification is better.  Bottom line, all I ask is "watch this question" checkbox (which may expire after say a week if there is a need to free resources) Calculating residue of pole of order $2$ Is there a good way to compute the residue of $f(z)=\dfrac{1+z}{1-\sin z}$ at $z=\pi/2$, which is a pole of order $2$?  Using the residue calculation formula yields  $$\text{Res}_{z=\pi/2}f(z)=\lim_{z\rightarrow\pi/2}\dfrac{d}{dz}\left(\left(z-\dfrac\pi2\right)^2f(z)\right)$$  The derivative is quite ugly, and calculating the limit requires L'Hospital probably twice (or more). The calculation is just too much. Is there a better way? How to retrieve the first n characters of a variable in Bash? Leave Convert to Edit button enabled all the time in the moderator flag list In the moderator flags list, there is a &quot;Convert to Edit&quot; button on answers which are posted by the person who posted the question. This button is disabled at times, and I am not sure that the algorithm used is useful. My proposal is that the Convert to Edit button in the flag list should always be enabled, as it seems fairly frequent that it's disabled when it would be useful. Justification When the button is disabled, it is required that we pop open the answer view in the flag list, and use the regular Mod menu and choose convert to edit there. When we do that, however, we experience this issue:  (that should also be fixed, by the way!) Here are two items currently in the queue:    Note that one has the button enabled, while the other does not. The only differences I can see in those two answers is the age and the number of answers. Neither question has an accepted answer, but the one with the button disabled only has that single answer. I've only just now noticed that difference with these two posts, so I'm not 100% sure if that's the determining factor. 1 It is perhaps coincidental, but these buttons being (dis)abled are reverse of the action needing to be taken. The one with the disabled button needed to be converted to an edit; the one with the enabled button was an attempt to answer their own question. If I'm right about the determining factor here (that the answer is the only one), I'm not sure that's useful. A good bit of the time, an asker will post an answer due to people requesting additional information. In such cases, it seems like it will be likely there are no other answers. 1  Note 1: I was looking to create a userscript to enable these buttons, and I found something that I think is related as to the reason. It looks like the ones which are disabled are on answers which have comments on them. I noticed the title attribute of those buttons says, &quot;There are comments on the post. Please review&quot;. That does seem to make some sense in theory. However, it still seems like I am often converting them, anyway. With the above-linked, separate issue regarding how the 'mod' link on the expanded view works, this is still a bit of an impediment to our workflow. It occurred to me to check if the button was reenabled once you expanded the view, but it does not. Maybe that's an alternate solution. My plan for my userscript is to enable the button, but change the text color (and leave the title attribute), to point out that there are comments. Sometimes when I am debugging code in Eclipse it happens that although I can see and inspect class member variables without any difficulty I am unable to inspect the values of variables declared locally within functions. As an aside, any parameters to the current function lose their 'real' names and instead one sees their values listed in the Variables window as arg0, arg1, arg2, etc but at least the values are visible.  This is occurring at present in relation to classes defined within the core JDK. I have verified that the installed and current JRE is a JDK.  Is anybody able to shed some light on this behaviour? I can use my mobile broadband to access Internet with Firefox but when I want to install any package from terminal or make 'apt-get update' command I got the following error:  got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)   apt-get update output:  Get:1 extras.ubuntu.com trusty InRelease [213 B] 98% [1 InRelease gpgv 213 B] [Connecting to archive.ubuntu.com] Splitting up /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_trusty_InRelease into data Ign extras.ubuntu.com trusty InRelease E: GPG error: extras.ubuntu.com trusty InRelease: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)    output of `cat /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_trusty_InRelease  &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"&gt; &lt;html&gt; &lt;head&gt; &lt;title&gt;404&lt;/title&gt; &lt;meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache"/&gt; &lt;/head&gt; &lt;body&gt; &lt;p&gt; Not Found &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;   output of wget:  wget -O - http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty/InRelease  --2014-06-01 09:23:35--  http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty/InRelease Resolving extras.ubuntu.com (extras.ubuntu.com)... 91.189.92.152 Connecting to extras.ubuntu.com (extras.ubuntu.com)|91.189.92.152|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 213 [text/html] Saving to: ‘STDOUT’   0% [                                       ] 0           --.-K/s              &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"&gt; &lt;html&gt; &lt;head&gt; &lt;title&gt;404&lt;/title&gt; &lt;meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache"/&gt; &lt;/head&gt; &lt;body&gt; &lt;p&gt; Not Found  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt; Is there a difference in ++i and i++ in a for loop? Is it simply a syntax thing? I'm trying to show that the group $U(Z_{54})$ is cyclic.  To start, I found the divisors of 54 = {1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18, 27, 54}  Then I started to find the elements using the powers of a.  Where $U(Z_{54})= &lt;a&gt;$  Therefore, $&lt;a^{54/1}&gt;$={ e }  $ &lt;a^{54/2}&gt;$= { e, $ a^{36}$ }  and such, where the last would be &lt; $a^{54/54}$> = { e }  The things I would like to know is, how does this process show that it's cyclic? Is it because the first divisor (1) and the last divisor (54) is equal to e? Therefore creating a cycle?  Also, what would the &lt; a > to the powers finding the elements process be called?  Thank you! Show $a\Bbb Z+b\Bbb Z = \gcd(a,b)\Bbb Z$ In Java, arrays don't override toString(), so if you try to print one directly, you get the className + '@' + the hex of the  of the array, as defined by Object.toString():  int[] intArray = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; System.out.println(intArray);     // prints something like '[I@3343c8b3'   But usually, we'd actually want something more like [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. What's the simplest way of doing that? Here are some example inputs and outputs:  // Array of primitives: int[] intArray = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; //output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  // Array of object references: String[] strArray = new String[] {"John", "Mary", "Bob"}; //output: [John, Mary, Bob] Is a GUID unique 100% of the time? Possible Duplicate:          Let $X$ be a compact metric space and $f$ be an isometric map from $X$ to $X$. Prove $f$ is a surjective map. I entered the USA on a Visa Waiver Program (VWP) on 1 July 2012 and stayed until 16 Sep 2012 (78 days).  On what date in 2013 will I be able to travel to USA again under VWP? GDBus.Error when trying to enable second screen I connected an external screen to my laptop, but my desktop didn't automagically extend to it, as it used to do about a year ago (older version of Ubuntu).  I went to the display settings. The screen was listed there (correct resolution, brand name, etc.). But when i put the switch on 'on' and click 'apply', i get this error:   Failed to apply configuration: %s  GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface `org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.XRANDR_2' on object at path /org/gnome/SettingsDaemon/XRANDR   It's been like this for a few months now, but i'd really like to be able to use an external screen/beamer again.  Any ideas?  Thanks. How are Dementors created/born? This is inspired by some discussions in .  In the Harry Potter universe, how are Dementors born?  Or are they artificially created by some magical means? Orphaned tag wiki edits have broken activity entries