I have the follow code in a js file:      $(".dropmenu").on("click", function(event){       event.preventDefault();       $(this).parent().find("ul").slideToggle();     });   And i have the follow code in my webpage:  var append="&lt;ul&gt;";  $.each(items, function(i, v){   append += "&lt;li&gt;&lt;a class='dropmenu' href='#'&gt; Option &lt;/a&gt;" +               "&lt;ul&gt;" +                  "&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href='somelink'&gt;somelink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;" +               "&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;";  }  $("div").append(append);   The point is when my ul tag its filled, the click event doesn't fire. I think because the class into anchor is dynamic.  How can I add the click event after the append function?
I have a bit of code where I am looping through all the select boxes on a page and binding a .hover event to them to do a bit of twiddling with their width on mouse on/off.  This happens on page ready and works just fine.  The problem I have is that any select boxes I add via Ajax or DOM after the initial loop won't have the event bound.  I have found this plugin (), but before I add another 5k to my pages with a plugin, I want to see if anyone knows a way to do this, either with jQuery directly or by another option.
Background reflected in glossy glass, but I didn't set it I've made a roughness 0 glass pane, when I'm in lookdev mode it's reflecting a background that I didn't put there. I know I could just ignore it, but I'd rather be able to see what it'll mostly look like when I'm in the later stages. I also just want to know how on Earth I managed to set this background without realising it  Reflection completely ignores any objects I put in front of it. If I placed this glass inside my house, it would still just reflect trees (This is the point where I felt I couldn't ignore it - reflections are going to play a big part in my project and I don't want to be in render mode all the time)  The nodes are the default glass BSDF, except I set roughness to 0  The glass is set to 20mm thick, if that makes a difference  The background moves with my perspective and moves when I relocate the glass  I have a few HDRI's on my PC, but none look remotely like this   Also, I'm using cycles as I find Evee buggy as hell Common binaries with support for command execution, like `awk` and `vim`, not respecting setuid bit? I have to prove that if $E$ is a connected space, then so is $\overline{E}$ (the closure of $E$) a connected space. I tried to prove the contrapositive. So suppose that $\overline{E}$ is not connected in a metric space $X$. This implies there are $A\subset X$ and $B\subset X$ such that $A\cap B=\emptyset$, $A\cap \overline{E}\neq \emptyset$, $B\cap \overline{E}\neq \emptyset$ and $\overline{E}\subset A\cup B$. I will try to prove that this $A$ and $B$ will also work for $E$. Suppose that $A\cap E=\emptyset$ and $B\cap E=\emptyset$, this implies that $A\cup B$ is a subset of the limit points of $E$, because $A\cap \overline{E}\neq \emptyset$ and $B\cap \overline{E}\neq \emptyset$. This contradicts the fact that $\overline{E}\subset A\cup B$, so we have to conclude that $A\cap E\neq \emptyset\neq B\cap E$. Since $E\subset\overline{E}\subset A\cup B$, we have that $E$ is also not connected.  My question is whether my proof is correct, because I have a little bit doubt. If it's not correct, what is the best I can do? Thanks in advance!   Edit1: The definition we use for a connected space $E$ in a metric space $X$ is that if $E$ is connected, then there are no open $A,B\subset X$ such that $A\cap B=\emptyset$, $A\cap E\neq \emptyset\neq B\cap E$ and $E\subset A\cup B$.  Edit2: $A$ and $B$ must be open. How did Harry's blood being inside Voldemort save him? There are, of course, an incredible amount of theories on how Harry Potter survived. Problem is that the most important one, the one that is canon, is the one I don't get: how Harry's blood inside Voldemort saves him?  Because all that I have read so far, leaves me with questions. I understand why Voldemort wanted Harry's blood, but why does it save Harry? Why is that necessary to keep the sacrifice alive, while it's still inside Harry? And if Harry lost it at 17 (I have seen some different ideas on this as well), why does Voldemort still have it at 69 (give or take a few)?  To clafiry, the parts I'm talking about:     "For a fleeting instant, Harry thought he saw a gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore's eyes"    (GoF, right after Harry tells Dumbledore that his blood now goes through Voldemort.)  And:     "He took your blood believing it would strengthen him. He took into his body a tiny part of the enchantment your mother laid upon you when she died for you. His body keeps her sacrifice alive, and while that enchantment survives, so do you"   (Albus Dumbledore in DH)  I just don't get why the blood transfusion thing suddenly gave Harry the chance to survive the whole thing, and it's never really been satisfyingly answered, not to my knowledge at least, as every answer I've read raises more questions. Can we get an alternative to the "That solved my problem!" button that doesn't make the presumption that it solved my problem? I.e. "Yes, that's the problem I have."  In some cases, SE (et. al.) answer something, but the answer really doesn't solve it, it was a "cop-out" -- a "we know there's a problem, but there's currently no fix or workaround". Can we get a button that indicates that "Yes, I acknowledge I have that same problem, and I may have even tried those solutions, but it's not solved by any means." button or something?  I get the purpose of it - make it more friendly and easier to remove duplicates, but I refuse to say "That solved my problem!" if I still have a problem (mostly on principle). I'd rather have a "Ah yes, that's my issue! But, it seems like there's no actual solution there."  As an example: SD card partitioning? why? how? Ubuntu 18.04 bond with netplan duplicate MAC address after cloning How to make pipes work with Runtime.exec()? Number of possible permutations of n1 1's, n2 2's, n3 3's, n4 4's such that no two adjacent elements are same? Command-line to switch between profiles in gnome-terminal I created a new profile for gnome-terminal and I can switch between &quot;Implicit&quot; profile and the new created profile as you can see in the below image:  Now I wonder how can I switch between profiles using a command-line/script or maybe using a shortcut for this.  Note: Solutions like: gnome-terminal --tab-with-profile=Implicit &amp;&amp; exit   are excluded because I prefer not to close and open another terminal or get another terminal window in this process of changing the profile. Why does evolution not make our life longer? Why does evolution not make life longer for humans or any other species?  Wouldn't evolution favour a long life? What's the difference between $(stuff) and `stuff`? My keyboard has no "media" keys; can I control media without them? My USB keyboard does not have "media" keys -- that is, dedicated keys for play, stop, next, prev, volume up/down, etcetera.    For the sake of this question, I would prefer not to install additional software if I can avoid it.  Is it possible to issue some standard key sequence on a generic USB keyboard that emulates these play, stop, etc. multimedia keys?  Like Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12 or something obscure like that? "Give him a box that everyone knows what it contains." "Give him a box that everyone knows what it contains."  Is this correct English? It sounds wrong to me. I've just installed MariaDb on a fresh Ubuntu Gnome and ran  afterwards where I set a decent admin password, removed the anonymous user etc.  Afterwards I realized some strange behavior regarding the admin password:   If I try to login from my normal user account using the command mysql -u root -p I always get an error: ERROR 1698 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' I'm pretty sure I entered the correct password which I set with  earlier... When I run the command from root using sudo mysql -u root -p, I always get access to the database, no matter which password I actually enter...   Is this normal behavior, am I doing anything wrong or have I somehow screwed up the installation? I shifted to Ubuntu 10.10 now I am facing problem to have C/C++ compiler. What are the possible ways so that I can use C/C++ compiler using all the libraries (like graphic, math, conio, stdlib, etc) as in Microsoft Windows creating executable file? How to remove the left part of a string? I have some simple python code that searches files for a string e.g. path=c:\path, where the c:\path part may vary. The current code is:  def find_path(i_file):     lines = open(i_file).readlines()     for line in lines:         if line.startswith("Path="):             return # what to do here in order to get line content after "Path=" ?   What is a simple way to get the text after Path=? Say you take a dice and you roll it twice so that you have a pair (X,Y) where X represents the first roll, Y represents the second.   When you have a distribution like max(X,Y), what type of distribution is that? It's not uniform, obviously, because the outcomes of max(X,Y) are clearly more favorable towards the higher numbers. I'm being asked to "describe" the distribution. I know that we can look at each distinct outcome, like:  max(1,1) = 1  max(1,2) = 2  max(1,3) = 3  max(1,4) = 4  max(1,5) = 5  max(1,6) = 6  max(2,1) = 2  max(2,2) = 2  max(2,3) = 3  max(2,4) = 4  max(2,5) = 5  max(2,6) = 6  max(3,1) = 3  max(3,2) = 3  max(3,3) = 3  max(3,4) = 4  max(3,5) = 5  max(3,6) = 6  max(4,1) = 4  max(4,2) = 4  max(4,3) = 4  max(4,4) = 4  max(4,5) = 5  max(4,6) = 6  max(5,1) = 5  max(5,2) = 5  max(5,3) = 5  max(5,4) = 5  max(5,5) = 5  max(5,6) = 6  max(6,1) = 6  max(6,2) = 6  max(6,3) = 6  max(6,4) = 6  max(6,5) = 6  max(6,6) = 6  But is that the most effective way to look at a distribution like this? Is there a faster and more concise way to describe this distribution other than saying the probability of each outcome?  i.e.,  P(max = 1) = 1/36  P(max = 2) = 3/36 = 1/12  P(max = 3) = 5/36  P(max = 4) = 7/36  P(max = 5) = 9/36 = 1/4  P(max = 6) = 11/36  So, obviously, I understand how to LOOK at a discrete distribution and see what the probabilities are, but not until I look at each possible outcome. But what does it mean to "describe" a distribution? This isn't uniform or any sort of discrete distribution we're taught. Can someone provide clarity? No hair theorem for black holes and the baryon number I watch a lot of old movies, and I've noticed that American actors of the 1930s and 1940s often spoke in a quasi-generic-posh-British accent.  Katherine Hepburn's accent would be the perfect example. It seems exaggerated, and I imagine it was not common off the stage and screen. What was that? Was it just an accent or was it a dialect? Did real people actually speak that way?