My other Stack Exchange account Find Me In The Woods was linked to a google account of mine that was accidentally deleted. I need to recover the account. I know my old google account email and password. Can anyone help me get back in to my old account?
How do I log in if my OpenID is not available, or maybe even no longer exists? Can I restore my lost account, or do I need to start over?  See also:
Let $(X, Y)$ be distributed as a multivariate normal with parameters  $$ \mu = \begin{bmatrix} \mu_X \\ \mu_Y \end{bmatrix} \qquad \Sigma = \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_X^2 &amp; \sigma_{XY} \\ \sigma_{XY} &amp; \sigma_Y^2 \end{bmatrix}. $$   I would like to calculate $E(X | y_1 &lt; Y &lt; y_2)$, where $y_1$ and $y_2$ are constants.  From , I have managed to work out that $$ E(X | Y &gt; y_1) = \mu_X + \frac{\sigma_{XY}}{\sigma_Y} \left[\frac{\phi\left(\frac{y_1 - \mu_y}{\sigma_Y}\right)}{1 - \Phi\left(\frac{y_1 - \mu_y}{\sigma_Y}\right)}\right]\\ E(X | Y &lt; y_2) = \mu_X - \frac{\sigma_{XY}}{\sigma_Y} \left[\frac{\phi\left(\frac{y_2 - \mu_y}{\sigma_Y}\right)}{\Phi\left(\frac{y_2 - \mu_y}{\sigma_Y}\right)}\right] ,$$ where $\phi(\cdot)$ and $\Phi(\cdot)$ are, respectively, the p.d.f. and the c.d.f. of the Normal distribution. I could not figure out how to calculate $E(X | y_1 &lt; Y &lt; y_2)$, though.  I have searched for an answer in similar posts from the Stack Exchange network, but I couldn't get a clue from them that would solve this issue. For the record, here are some of them: I think we can all agree, this sucks:  If you've been around a little while, you've probably encountered hundreds of answers like this in various forums, some of them even marked as &quot;The Answer&quot; by well-meaning1 forum admins looking to close a thread. We could try to enumerate the commonly-observed problems with it...  Link is probably broken If link isn't broken, it's spam If link isn't spam, it's to some broadly-related resource that the answerer found by pressing &quot;I'm feeling lucky&quot; when googling the question's title.  ...but the real issue here is that we don't know! Even if the link was originally pointing directly to the most awesomeest answer ever for exactly the question being asked, there's nothing in the answer itself to even hint at what direction we're being pointed in. Strip the markup, and this is what you're left with:  i think you should take The tutorial HERE! This will help you a lot  Is there even one tiny speck of information there? No. Even the title of the page being linked to would have provided something to go on, but that was entirely too much work. So let me be clear: this sort of response is not an answer. If you see this, flag it. Moderators, if you see it flagged, delete it. There's really only one valid exception to this rule, and that's when the question is:  Suggest me some tutorials where i can learn quick.  Don't get me wrong, it's still a bad answer - but when the question is kinda asking for bad answers this is to be expected. Close or flag the question and move on - this is much more efficient than hanging around to babysit it by deleting every crap answer that inevitably shows up. If you're still reading, you're probably getting really bored by now. &quot;Gee, Shog - answers that contain ZERO information are terrible, horrible, very-bad things? What shocking revelations will you share next?&quot; Yeah. It's really simple... Except, . See, the problem is that once you step away from black-and-white &quot;answers / doesn't answer&quot; decision-making, things get... Interesting. And all those other answers with links in them See, this is an answer:  And so is this:  Yes, they're both very short, and yes, they contain links. But strip the markup, and you still get at least a little bit of useful information. Does that mean these answers should forever hang around the site? No, not necessarily - if it turns out they're just not that useful, they should probably still be removed - or at very least, down-voted so that they rank below other answers. Just remember: if the text of the post contains an honest attempt at answering the question, then it is an answer - so don't flag it otherwise, and if you do, don't complain if your flag gets declined. Answers &amp; Apples If you're still confused, forget about answers. Think about apples instead:  Answers are just like that, but less tasty in pies.  1 By which I mean to say, &quot;criminally lazy&quot; Rigorously proving equal tension on both ends There is always one point in introductory mechanics that has been continuously bothering me ever since I had taken my freshman physics course - Why does a massless rope have its tension equal on both ends?  I have been searching for a good explanation on various textbooks at different levels, but none of them provided me a satisfactory explanation. They either   State directly "we assume the string is massless and the pulley has no friction, therefore the tension must be the same throughout the string" without further any elaboration and continue the calculation, Claim without any reasons that "whenever the rope and the pulley are massless and frictionless, the tension will be the same on both sides", or Explain using a lot of hand-waving arguments regarding infinite acceleration, non-zero moment of inertia, etc. , in one line or two.   Although those hand-waving arguments of type $(3)$ do sound quite reasonable to me and will convince me for a while every time I review them. But after a while, I will start feeling not well about this whole tension concept again.  Therefore, I am looking for a rigorous (in the physicist's sense) proof of exactly why and when do the tension in rope will be uniform, and hopefully from that I can clean up all of my conceptual difficulties. How can I stop applications and services from running? When my phone starts up there are several application/services running in the background that I would rather not.  And when I press the Home button while using an app, that app usually goes into the background without exiting.  How can I stop these apps from running? How to remap an existing keybinding in Zathura How can I set an external display (monitor) as the primary one? Currently the MacBook's display works as primary, so every application I open gets open on the 13" and I have to drag it to the 24". I also don't have access to the dock on my 24".  Is is possible to turn off the MacBook screen and use only the one attached via DVI?  (I've just connected my 24" HP LP2475w via Mini DisplayPort to DVI to my MacBook Pro 13", which works great except for this one thing.) When is $\mathbb{F}_p[x]/(x^2-2)\simeq\mathbb{F}_p[x]/(x^2-3)$ for small primes? Unlock by fingerprint only Do Squibs have to be pure-blood? If a Muggle was born of a wizard/witch and a Muggle, is that person a Squib, or is that reserved to people born from pure-blood families?    (Related: ) How many Marvel Earths (Universes) are there? I know that there are at least 3 Marvel Universes:  Marvel Cinematic Universe -    Has all of the main ongoing Marvel movies    (1, 2)  (1, 2, 3)  (1, Age of Ultron) etc    Marvel's Ultimate Universe -    Has the other Marvel movies    (1, 2, 3, Origins: Wolverine, First Class, The Wolverine, Days of Future Past)  (1, 2)  etc       Main comic book continuity This is the big one, it contains         etc     Then there are apparently off-shoot Earths, continuities which deviate from the main continuity (Earth 616). How many Marvel Earths (Universes) are there?   Further Reading: How can I tell how long (more or less) it will take me to complete a game? I'm going down my huge backlog of unplayed Steam games and I'm thinking the best way to tackle the list is to go through the shortest games first and then concentrate on the 20+ hour ones. I'm wondering if there's a website or something else that has an estimated amount of gameplay time for games.   Is there anything like that? Package in Java Can I simplify an expression into form which uses my own definitions? Review Audit failed when "late answer" answer is a duplicate I just got a review audit where the "late answer" was a duplicate of the accepted answer, but flagging it on that basis failed the review. That seems like a bug to me.  Question here:   I found that by clicking the question to view the entire Q&amp;A, and noticed that the copy was from a generic "user12345" account (probably with 1 rep as well) and the original from a real-looking account. Viewing the whole Q&amp;A is often useful when reviewing, especially late answers (which are often repeats of earlier points, disagreements with those, or random addendums better submitted as edits). I looked at the duplicate and thought "weird, rep harvesting maybe?" so I clicked "needs moderator attention" and wrote "copy and paste of accepted answer". FAIL!  I think that this review type can't ever work, because to avoid the problem I found you'd need to make up whole new "late answers" which by definition the review bot can't know anything useful about. Either that or to pass you'd just need to take any action at all, including upvoting the original of the duplicated answer. Which I didn't do, BTW, because I had no idea or opinion about the question or answer.  (this is not a duplicate of "What are review tests", it predates that and focuses on a particular defect within the process. See the comments below). Are the PUT, DELETE, HEAD, etc methods available in most web browsers? I've seen a couple questions around here like , which mentions:     Unfortunately that same browser won't allow me to test HTTP PUT, DELETE, and to a certain degree even HTTP POST.   I've also heard that browsers support only GET and POST, from some other sources like:        However, a few quick tests in Firefox show that sending PUT and DELETE requests works as expected -- the XMLHttpRequest completes successfully, and the request shows up in the server logs with the right method. Is there some aspect to this I'm missing, such as cross-browser compatibility or non-obvious limitations? Who is responsible for defining a site logo? I mean, there are moderators of the site that define it, or stackexchange defines it? I am trying to understand model vs. interpretation of sentences vs. theories, with respect to a propositional calculus.  Is a model of a wff just a sentence that is true under some interpretation?   Or a set of wffs that are all true under some interpretation?   Or when an interpretation satisfies a wff (or set of wffs)?   Does it make sense to say that an interpretation is a model if all valid propositions are true? Or an interpretation being a model iff all theorems from the theory are still valid under the interpretation? Differentiation - simple case Can generated OpenVPN keys be used on multiple clients? We are experimenting with running an OpenVPN server for our business. One question I can't seem to find the answer to is this:  When we generate keys for one of our users for them to use at home, can their use the same keys on their home laptop as well as their home desktop? Or do we need to generate separate keys for each user's client machine? Fermat's Last Theorem for Gaussian Integers (excluding the integers or  same pure imaginaries) I am investigating solutions to Fermat's equation $$x^n + y^n = z^n$$ with $x,y,z$ in the Gaussian integers, excluding integers and pure imaginaries.  I have found out that there are only trivial solutions for the $n=3$ and $n=4$ cases, e.g. .   I would be grateful if you let me know of the current status or if it is already a theorem.