I have a file called ttsql in linux and windows machine. But that ttsql file builded separately for windows and linux. The windows file is working properly. But In linux , Which is not working. How Can i convert .exe into linux excutable file.
I have an executable program (no source code, just the compiled executable) that was made in windows (.exe extension).  It doesn't use any graphics... it simply reads and writes files.  I want to be able to run it in a linux shell script so that I don't have to switch operating systems to get my output.  Is there a way to use or convert the executable for linux operating systems?
Can US stocks list on one stock exchange but trade on other US stock exchanges? I am trying to understand how the US stock market works. From my understanding, there is one stock exchange where a company is &quot;listed&quot;. This stock exchange listing requires the company to adhere to the regulations of the stock exchange where it is listed. Once a company is &quot;listed&quot;, its shares can start to trade on any stock exchange. For example, once a company lists on NASDAQ, its shares can be traded on NASDAQ, NYSE, Boston Stock Exchange, Philadelphia Stock Exchange, National Stock Exchange, EDGX Exchange, EDGA Exchange, NYSE Arca, etc. Is my understanding correct? Is it true that once a stock is listed on a US stock exchange, the stock can then trade on any US stock exchange? Consider the Level 2 quotes for Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT). Microsoft is only listed on NASDAQ, but it also trades on the NYSE and other stock exchanges:  My questions are:  Does this mean that companies only need to be listed on one stock exchange in order for their stock to trade on other stock exchanges?  If so, do companies need to adhere to the &quot;listing requirements&quot; of all the stock exchanges where their stock is traded, even though they are not &quot;listed&quot; on those stock exchanges? Does Microsoft have to follow the listing requirements of the NYSE even though it is not listed there?  If stocks can trade on any US stock exchange regardless of which US stock exchange the stock is listed on, why don't NYSE-listed companies reduce their yearly listing fees by listing on NASDAQ instead? What is the effect of having correlated predictors in a multiple regression model? I learned in my linear models class that if two predictors are correlated and both are included in a model, one will be insignificant. For example, assume the size of a house and the number of bedrooms are correlated. When predicting the cost of a house using these two predictors, one of them can be dropped because they are both providing a lot of the same information. Intuitively, this makes sense, but I have a some more technical questions:   How does this effect manifest itself in p-values of the regression coefficients when including only one or including both predictors in the model? How does the variance of the regression coefficients get affected by including both predictors in the model or just having one? How do I know which predictor the model will choose to be less significant? How does including only one or including both predictors change the value/variance of my forecasted cost? During this travel ban (COVID) can my wife come visit me in the USA? I know I can visit there but not sure about her coming here What makes a good entry level road bike? I've been riding a mountain bike for years, but I prefer to go longer distances on paved ground, so I think a road bike would be better. When I ask what is a good bike, I don't need brands or models - more like what components of the bike should I look for, and what should I avoid? Additionally, is it necessary to "go big or don't go at all" as far as spending - getting a real good quality road bike for $500 to a few thousand, or should I cheap out on a $100-200 road bike, as it is my first, then get a better one when I'm more experienced? How do I find least cost path over a DEM based on slope magnitude and direction? What sort of algorithms can I use to find a least cost path through a DEM where it costs more to traverse a cell going downhill or uphill than it does to follow the contour of the land?  All the examples I've seen involve creating a least cost surface where the magnitude of the slope is part of the cost - but the direction isn't.    Additionally, the examples assume the cost to travel through a cell does not depend on the direction of travel. What and how does Darth Vader see? Are there any sources that talk about  about Darth Vader's visual acuity?  His life-supporting armour is quite advanced but does it provide any useful augmentation to his visual abilities? What is the sum of this series: $\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \dfrac{a^n}{(3n)!}$ I tried getting it into a closed form but failed. Could someone help me out?  $$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \dfrac{a^n}{(3n)!}$$ Cropping the exact same part of several pictures I have several pictures that are exactly the same except for some small variations. It was one picture that was photoshopped in several different ways. Now, I need to crop them all (13 in total) but I need to crop exactly the same part of it. It needs to be pixel perfect.  How do I do that with Pixelmator? I'm trying CTest in CMake in order to automatically run some of my tests using make test target. The problem is CMake does not "understand" that the test I'm willing to run has to be built since it is part of the project.  So I'm looking for a way to explicitly specify this dependency. What is the difference between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? icons missing from libreoffice toolbars New Ubuntu 16.04.2 installation.  Uninstalled the default libreoffice installation. Then I installed libreoffice 5.4.0.3 from this PPA:  sudo add-apt-repository ppa:libreoffice/ppa   Now all icons are missing from toolbars:    Is this a bug or a funk setting? Any thoughts on how to reset the toolbar to get the typical configuration? I already tried the basic stuff (rebooting, disable/enable toolbars, etc.) I have searched through the internet and in AskUbuntu, but I could not find a working solution for my little problem.  The RTL8723ae WLAN is behaving strangely on Ubuntu 14.04 and drops the WLAN connection constantly. I am using the notebook MSI GE40 and have already seen on the web that there are other people having the same problem but there was no permanent solution. The problem did not exists on the original Windows 8 on the device and the router is a TP-Link, which I can control (channel change and so on, I use WPA2-PSK WLAN security). Except when we use right to denote direction, what is the difference between these two terms?  Also, which one is the preferred construction between these two     Am I right?   or     Am I correct? Union of the conjugates of a proper subgroup Let G be a finite group and H be a proper subgroup. Prove that the union of the conjugates of H is not the whole of G.  Thanks for any help I'm running into trouble trying to mount a large iso:  dev@dev-OptiPlex-745:~$ sudo mount -o loop /home/dev/Hämtningar/matlab2011a_64.iso /cdrom mount: warning: /cdrom seems to be mounted read-only. dev@dev-OptiPlex-745:~$    Can you tell me how I should do it? When does $120$ divide $n^5 - n$ Find n such that $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $120$. (*Here $n$ belongs to the natural number set)  Seems a trivial problem, but the answer mentioned in the text book seemed incomplete to me so I'm here just to ensure whether approach to this problem is correct or not.  So my approach is as follows: We know that $n^5 - n$ can be written as $n^5-n = n(n-1)(n+1)(n^2 + 1)$  Now since it's product of three consecutive natural numbers so it's divisible by $3! = 6$. Now using Fermat's Little theorem we can prove that $n^5= n \mod5$ hence $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $5$ as well. So $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $30$. Now to ensure their is another factor of $4$ in the term we need to ensure that $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $8$. I found that all odd natural numbers and multiples of $8$ makes $n^5 - n$ divisible by $8$, hence $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $120$. But in the text book they have only mentioned odd natural numbers as answer, which seemed incomplete to me.  Thanking everyone in advance:P There is some behavior I can't understand in the Unity Desktop.   Open nautilus via. clicking in the launcher onto the home-button Navigate to for example the windows-partition in nautilus Minimize nautilus Click on nautilus in the launcher doesn't open the nautilus with windows-partition, instead it opens a new window with the home folder.   Is there a workaround for this strange behavior?  Regards, Arthur I had originally coded the program wrongly. Instead of returning the Fibonacci numbers between a range (ie. startNumber 1, endNumber 20 should = only those numbers between 1 &amp; 20), I have written for the program to display all Fibonacci numbers between a range (ie. startNumber 1, endNumber 20 displays = First 20 Fibonacci numbers). I thought I had a sure-fire code. I also do not see why this is happening.  startNumber = int(raw_input("Enter the start number here ")) endNumber = int(raw_input("Enter the end number here "))  def fib(n):     if n &lt; 2:         return n     return fib(n-2) + fib(n-1)  print map(fib, range(startNumber, endNumber))   Someone pointed out in my Part II (which was closed for being a duplicate - ) that I need to pass the startNumber and endNumber through a generator using a while loop. Can someone please point me in the direction on how to do this? Any help is welcome.    I'm a learning programmer and I've run into a bit of a jumble. I am asked to write a program that will compute and display Fibonacci's Sequence by a user inputted start number and end number (ie. startNumber = 20 endNumber = 100 and it will display only the numbers between that range). The trick is to use it inclusively (which I do not know how to do in Python? - I'm assuming this means to use an inclusive range?).  What I have so far is no actual coding but rather:   Write Fib sequence formula to infinite Display startNumber to endNumber only from Fib sequence.   I have no idea where to start and I am asking for ideas or insight into how to write this. I also have tried to write the Fib sequence forumla but I get lost on that as well. Chain length. how long or how many links I measured from the middle of each sprocket and it's 17 inches. Not sure what length of chain I should get Looking out into the universe means looking back in time - how does that work? This is a question that has been gnawing on me for many years now. Back a long time ago, as I recall in reference to a scene in a popular science show on TV, I was asked the following.  The claim is that when you look out into the universe, you see the universe as it appeared at some past time. (This follows from the speed of light being finite, and looking at objects by observing their emitted light or other EM radiation.) The amount of time that one looks backwards is equal to the distance to the observed object in light-distance (so looking at something ten lightyears away means you are observing it as it was ten years ago).  Matter moves at a rate of speed less than the speed of light (it has to, since matter has mass, even if miniscule at the atomic level). So $v_{mass} \lt v_{EM}$ (probably significantly less, since $v_{EM} = c$).  So let's say you're looking at an object $10^{10}$ lightyears away by observing something for which $v=c$. To the observer, that object appears as it was $10^{10}$ years ago. But the Earth is much younger than $10^{10}$ years and we established that matter moves at a slower speed than EM radiation, so wouldn't the radiation that was emitted $10^{10}$ years ago long since have passed Earth's current position?  If, say, $v_{mass} = 0.5 \times c$ (a big assumption, but bear with me for a second), it would seem that the radiation emitted $10^{10}$ years ago would have passed Earth's current position $10^{10} - (0.5 \times 10^{10}) = 5 \times 10^{9}$ years ago, around the time when the solar system was still forming. Setting $v_{mass} = 0.25 \times c$ (which seems more realistic) means the radiation would have passed "us" around $7.5 \times 10^{9}$ years ago. So how could we be observing it now?  I'm not sure I'm posing this question in the best possible way (I'll admit I do find the concept somewhat confusing), and I'm sure that there's a simple explanation for it all. Just what am I missing?  I did find  which seems peripherally related but not quite the same thing. Qmechanic brought up  but that question seems to be about whether it is so, not why it is so.