This a just a suggestion. . .  The whiteness makes the website so bright it stresses the eyes for users like me. Can we have an option to change to a darker theme?  It's kind of what  does  Option:    Bright:    Dark:    I feel this would definitely be a great addition as far as user interface designs go.  EDIT::  I installed this :   Custom stylesheet for SO. It's dark, but ugly as hell.
Each Stack Exchange site should provide users the option of using a dark mode design/theme.  Why is this feature missing?  The major IDEs are already a letdown regarding dark color schemes.
Adding Custom Menu "Run Script" Button Causes Duplicate Is there a way to use the Blender Text Editor for adding a custom menu and not get a duplicate every time I click on "Run Script" to test the menu? For example, in the text editor, load the template like so:  Template -> Python -> UI Menu  Then notice every time you press "Run Script" you get another menu in your main menu bar. How can I update my menu without getting a duplicate?  I tried simply commenting out register() but then new updates don't show up. I am new to Salesforce and hence a lot of silly questions. What is the rational behind defining future methods as Static? I mean has these methods been not static what harm would have they caused? I am just a high school student, and I haven't seen much in mathematics (calculus and abstract algebra).  Mathematics is a system of axioms which you choose yourself for a set of undefined entities, such that those entities satisfy certain basic rules you laid down in the first place on your own.  Now using these laid-down rules and a set of other rules for a subject called logic which was established similarly, you define certain quantities and name them using the undefined entities and then go on to prove certain statements called theorems.  Now what is a proof exactly? Suppose in an exam, I am asked to prove Pythagoras' theorem. Then I prove it using only one certain system of axioms and logic. It isn't proved in all the axiom-systems in which it could possibly hold true, and what stops me from making another set of axioms that have Pythagoras' theorem as an axiom, and then just state in my system/exam "this is an axiom, hence can't be proven".  EDIT : How is the term "wrong" defined in mathematics then ? You can say that proving fermat's last theorem using the number-theory axioms was a difficult task but then it can be taken as an axiom in another set of axioms .  Is mathematics as rigorous and as thought-through as it is believed and expected to be ? It seems to me that there many loopholes in problems as well as the subject in-itself, but there is a false backbone of rigour that seems true until you start questioning the very fundamentals . Prove that $\cos\theta$ is root of equation $8x^3-4x^2-4x+1=0$, given $\theta=\frac{\pi}{7}$.   I put $\cos\theta$ in equation, but couldn't show the left-hand side to be zero. tag:* links incorrectly when using Save And Copy Profile To All Stack Exchange Accounts The  tag in my Stack Exchange profile links to different sites depending on where it's being viewed:  Profile on StackOverflow:  [tag:CSS] =&gt; https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/css   Profile on StackExchange:  [tag:CSS] =&gt; https://stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/css   Profile on CodeReview:  [tag:CSS] =&gt; http://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/css    I'd like to have these all link to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/css. You can ; why not add the ability to specify the site with tags? &lt;!-- tag: stackoverflow --&gt;[tag:css] &lt;!--tag: meta --&gt;[tag:feature-request]  The current behavior also cause a bug on my :    All tags send me to find a Panda aka 404 Page Not Found. I'm having an odd issue - When I try to zoom in on a detail using my MMB, the "camera" in the 3D view seems to be cutting off the exterior surface of my object and showing me the inside instead. I'd expect this behavior, but only when I was much more zoomed in.  If I zoom out a bit (one click on the scroll wheel) then I can see the exterior as I intend.  Is there any way to adjust this behavior?  Thanks! LaTeX on Stack Overflow? in questions, answers, and comments. Can we get something like this going on Stack Overflow?  I think it’d be appropriate as I at least pretty often want to write something like n^2 and would benefit greatly from prettier markup. A problem about Vandemonde matrix Correlating filename with package Say, I'm given a filename like libasound.so.2. Is there a way to query the package manager to correlate the filename with its corresponding package?  I'm interested to get answers for any package manager, but my primary focus is on apt and yum. House address is not listed on Google Maps When I search for my address on Google Maps it cannot be found which means I can't order takeaway etc.  Is there a way of adding my address to Google Maps or even add a street address?  I want the address to be publicly available so others can search it. There is a shop in the starting area on the island of Koholint, and if you are fast enough to dance around the shopkeeper, you can steal from him. Once you steal from him, though, your title in the game changes to "THIEF".    Is there any way to change your title back to your name without reverting to a different past save or starting over? How can I download an entire website? PrintWriter and PrintStream never throw IOExceptions Some days ago I realized that  (as well as ) never throw an IOException when writing, flushing or closing.  Instead it sets an internal flag (trouble=true) when an error occurs. It's not possible to get the exact exception, but only if there was some exception ().  My question is: why would one want to have such behavior? Isn't that bad API design? finding examples for a non negative and continuous function for which the infinite integral is finite but the limit at infinity doesn't exist Question:  a. Find an example for a non-negative and continuous function s.t. $\int _0^\infty f(x)dx$ is finite but the following limit doesn't exist: $\lim_{x\to \infty} f(x)$.  b. Is it possible that $\int _0^\infty f(x)dx$ is bounded but $f(x)$ is not bounded?  What we did with A: We suggested the function $|sin(x^2)|$ which has periods that get smaller and smaller until they no longer imply on the sum. But since it's a trig function it doesn't have a determinate limit. Wolfram didn't have the integral value for that func, and we were wondering if it really converges and if it is really a good example.  What we did with B: We thought about the function: $f(x)=  { x\in \Bbb N },{e^{-x} \notin \Bbb N }$ and we had a disagreement whether f(x) is integrable. I said no because similarly to Dirichlet function, one sum's limit will be 0 while the other one's will be infinite. My partner said that if I find a $\delta&lt;1$ then the definition of Riemann's integral does hold and so this integral is equal to that of $f(x)=e^{-x}$ She was trying to say this functions integral will be 0, but still it won't be bounded. I disagreed. Who's right? Change elements on different positions within a list If $x,y,z\in\mathbb R\setminus \{1\}$ and $xyz=1$, prove that $\frac{x^2}{(x-1)^2}+\frac{y^2}{(y-1)^2}+\frac{z^2}{(z-1)^2}\ge 1$. My model has a clear plastic (or glass) dome with objects inside.  The objects appear dark.  I've tried the glass shader with color 100% RGB, with very small IOR, and using just a refraction shader.    I know Cycles has problems with caustics, but I just want broad illumination to fall clean through the glass.  The light-to-column path can ignore refraction, but is blocked or tremendously attenuated. The camera-column path needs refraction, and seems to work fine anyway.  This demo image offers all optical paths of interest:   light upon object, seen directly light upon object, seen through glass (looks okay) light through glass onto object, seen directly. This is the shadow on the lit side of the column just below the glass tubing.  I expect full illumination, but there is shadow.  There is some light, but it's diffuse light from the floor. light through glass onto object, seen through glass. This     I did at one point try non-progressive rendering, and find extremely coarse light where there shouldn't be shadow, but this is not a practical way to make nice images. I've even tried cranking up certain sampling settings to many thousands, but still get bad noise though less, at the cost of long render times. I  would like to finish my creations sometime before "Star Trek, the Generation After the Next" becomes real life, if you know what I mean.  The next image is an example. I think Transmission in Sampling was 5000, but not sure.    I'm using Cycles in Blender 2.67 on a quad core Linux machine, 16GB RAM. Machine limits have never been a problem for 3D rendering.  Possibly, I screwed up some setting when I made my startup file, and just need to fix it. OTOH maybe this is just a limitation of path tracing, or of the way Cycles does it. If that's the case, what to real-world Blender artists do when they need to produce images on a budget and schedule?  What is the practical real-world fix? self referential struct definition? I haven't been writing C for very long, and so I'm not sure about how I should go about doing these sorts of recursive things... I would like each cell to contain another cell, but I get an error along the lines of "field 'child' has incomplete type". What's up?  typedef struct Cell {   int isParent;   Cell child; } Cell; My company has purchased a product that renders an ASP.NET control on the page. This control uses jQuery 1.2.3 and adds a script tag to the page to reference it. The developers of the control will not support use of the control if it modified in any way (including modification to reference a different version of jQuery).  I'm about to start development of my own control and would like to use the features and speed improvements of jQuery 1.3. Both of these controls will need to exist on the same page.  How can I allow the purchased control to use jQuery 1.2.3 and new custom development to use jQuery 1.3? Also out of curiosity, what if we were to use an additional control that needed to reference yet another version of jQuery? Why does \cal{M}_n give “M>”?