Would the phrase read "Run, Joey, run!"...or does the placement of the vocative commas make absolutely no sense?
According to some grammars[1][2] and CMS...  "Interjections and vocative should be separated from the rest of the sentence by commas".  The vocative case [1] is used to indicate direct address (i.e., to show when you are talking to somebody or something directly). Nouns in the vocative case are set off using commas. CMS 6.38  As direct address (i.e. vocative case), the parenthetical element should be set off using commas (CMS 6.30). An absolute phrase is always treated as a parenthetical element, as is an interjection.  So,      Hello, world!   That is a very classical way to hello the world.  But, languages change. I am not sure, but today, I feel that it is very uncommon helloing someone with an interjection, providing a small pause and clarifying who is helloed. I have an impression that usually people use hello as a ("kind of") verb, not an interjection.   Question: Is that just a personal (bad) impression or some linguistic has already studied that phenomenon?     [1] - Nelson, Gerald C., Director Survey of English Usage Sidney Greenbaum, and Sidney Greenbaum. An Introduction to English Grammar. Routledge, 2013. [2] - Advanced Grammar in Use with Answers: A Self-Study Reference and Practice Book for Advanced Learners of English. 3 edition. Cambridge University Press, 2013. CMS - Chicago Manual of Style
Random plot based on a specific random seed So, this sounds like a stupid question I know but in the bleachverse 'names' are very important and you can only unleash the power of your zanpakuto if you can call out its name. Therefore, if a shinigami is mute, will they ever be able to achieve shikai/bankai? If so then how? Only one case that I know of is for shinigamis who have already achieved bankai to be able to release their shikais without a command.  Answers based on LN are welcome, but if you are citing from a dubious source or a source whose canon status can be question, please specifically mention it. I am mostly interested in an answer based on a  canon source. Visual Studio Editor does not underline errors anymore My Visual Studio (2008) Editor has stopped to underline Errors (this nifty wavy red lines). I can't really tell when, but it can be related to the installation of .Net Framework 3.5 SP 1 or the MVC Beta (which I guess is unlikely). Furthermore have I installed and uninstalled both CodeRush and Resharper for evaluation purposes (decided not to keep either one of them).  Does anyone know the problem and how to restore this functionality again? I'm examining a proof I have read that claims to show that the Cartesian product $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ is countable, and as part of this proof, I am looking to show that the given map is surjective (indeed bijective), but I'm afraid that I can't see why this is the case. I wonder whether you might be able to point me in the right direction?  Indeed, the proof begins like this:  "For each $n \in \mathbb{N}$, let $k_n, l_n$ be such that $n = 2^{k_n - 1} \left(2l_n - 1 \right)$; that is, $k_n - 1$ is the power of $2$ in the prime factorisation of $n$, and $2 l_n - 1$ is the (necessarily odd) number $\frac{n}{2^{k_n - 1}}$."  It then states that $n \mapsto \left(k_n , l_n \right)$ is a surjection from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$, and so ends the proof.  I can intuitively see why this should be a bijection, I think, but I'm not sure how to make these feelings rigorous?   I suppose I'd say that the map is surjective since given any $\left(k_n , l_n \right) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ we can simply take $n$ indeed to be equal to $2^{k_n - 1} \left(2l_n - 1 \right)$ and note that $k_n - 1 \geq 0$ and thus $2^{k_n - 1}$  is both greater or equal to one so is a natural number (making the obvious inductive argument, noting that multiplication on $\mathbb{N}$ is closed), and similarly that $2 l_n - 1 \geq 2\cdot 1 - 1 = 1$ and is also a natural number, and thus the product of these two, $n$ must also be a natural number. Is it just as simple as this?  I suppose my gut feeling in the proving that the map is injective would be to assume that $2^{k_n - 1} \left(2 l_n - 1 \right) = 2^{k_m - 1} \left(2 l_m - 1 \right)$ and then use the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic to conclude that $n = m$. Is this going along the right lines? The 'implicit' definition of the mapping has me a little confused about the approach.    On a related, but separate note, I am indeed aware that if $K$ and $L$ are any countable sets, then so is $K \times L$, so trivially, taking the identity mapping we see trivially that this map is bijective and therefore that $\mathbb{N}$ is certainly countable (!), and thus so is $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$. Hence, it's not really the statement that I'm interested in, but rather the exciting excursion into number theory that the above alternative proof provides. I need to externally limit a process/session to a certain number of cores.  Are there any other possibilities than CPU affinity (I don't like the need to specify the actual cores) and cgroups (hard to integrate into our project)? I'm having troubles with rendering my datatable correctly. There are actions added but it seems the datatable is not high enough to view it correctly. Is it something I'm doing wrong? Or is it a bug?    This is the code for the datatable  &lt;div class="slds-text-heading_medium"&gt;Search results&lt;/div&gt; &lt;lightning:datatable data="{! v.persondata }"                      columns="{! v.personcolumns }"                      keyField="id"                     onrowselection="{! c.getSelectedPerson }"                     hideCheckboxColumn="true"  /&gt;   Here is the code for initializing the columns  //init datatable component.set('v.personcolumns', [             {label: 'Last Name', fieldName: 'LastName', type: 'text'},             {label: 'First Name', fieldName: 'FirstName', type: 'text'},             {label: 'Mailing Zip/ Postal Code', fieldName: 'PersonMailingPostalCode', type: 'text'},             {label: 'Mailing City', fieldName: 'PersonMailingCity', type: 'text'},             {label: 'Billing Street', fieldName: 'PersonMailingStreet', type: 'text'},             {label: 'Email', fieldName: 'PersonEmail', type: 'text'},             {label: 'Primary Phone', fieldName: 'PersonHomePhone', type: 'text'},             {label: 'Secondary Phone', fieldName: 'PersonOtherPhone', type: 'text'},             {type: 'action', typeAttributes: { rowActions: actions}}         ]);   And the code for adding data (the response is a list of Accounts)  component.set('v.persondata',response.getReturnValue()); How could C-3PO see Luke? Solving of a seperable differential equation What is the most "pythonic" way to iterate over a list in chunks? I have a Python script which takes as input a list of integers, which I need to work with four integers at a time.  Unfortunately, I don't have control of the input, or I'd have it passed in as a list of four-element tuples.  Currently, I'm iterating over it this way: for i in range(0, len(ints), 4):     # dummy op for example code     foo += ints[i] * ints[i + 1] + ints[i + 2] * ints[i + 3]  It looks a lot like &quot;C-think&quot;, though, which makes me suspect there's a more pythonic way of dealing with this situation.  The list is discarded after iterating, so it needn't be preserved.  Perhaps something like this would be better? while ints:     foo += ints[0] * ints[1] + ints[2] * ints[3]     ints[0:4] = []  Still doesn't quite &quot;feel&quot; right, though.  :-/ Related question: How to measure capacitance without LC meter? I would like to use capacitors salvaged from old electronics, but I currently don't have an LC meter.    What would be some really simple circuits, that would convert capacitance to something I can measure (voltage, current, frequency)? In my grammar book (English Grammar, HarperCollins Publishers), I read that none is occasionally treated as plural, but it is usually regarded as singular. Can you give me an example of sentence where none is used as plural pronoun? $\gcd(a,b)=1, x^a = y^b\Rightarrow x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for an integer $n$. If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.  I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=&gt;$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.   I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :) How to capture a series of screenshots in Web Driver using Java Let users editing a question know if editing it would add it to the reopen queue This is sort of similar to , which was positively received, but was declined for technical reasons. I propose that users who are editing a post that was closed within the last five days be shown a notice on top of the edit form indicating that the post will be added to the reopen queue if edited, and that if one does not plan on editing the post into a state where it can be reopened, one should wait until five days after closure to make the edit. Closed questions are only added to the review queue once per closure by editing, and if a user comes by and makes a minor (yet benign) edit, the diff that reopen reviewers see is just that of the minor edit, and as such they dismiss the task as &quot;Leave Closed&quot;, which prevents it from being added to the queue again by another edit. This deprives the post author (and others interested in seeing the question reopened) of their chance to get the post reopened by editing. While some of these edits may be performed by users using (semi-)automated tools who would thus not see or overlook the warning, this will be a big help because 99%+ of users make edits solely manually and would thus see and possibly respond to such a notice. To help make this request more technically feasible, I propose that it instead only be loaded with the edit form, and that it should only be shown to users who can make binding edits. (Suggested edits occur at the time of approval, and the request to let the reviewers know has already been declined.) Here's an example of what I'm expecting:  This question was recently [closed/marked as duplicate]. This question will be added to a queue for possible reopening if you make this edit. If you are not planning to edit this post into a state where it can be reopened, please wait until [date and time after 70 days] to make your edit. If you are only making edits to the question's tags, please ignore this notice. How to tail multiple files using tail -0f in Linux/AIX I tried tailing two files using the option:  tail -0f file1.log -0f file2.log   In Linux I see an error "tail : can process only one file at a time".  In AIX I see the error as "Invalid options".  This works fine when I use:  tail -f file1 -f file 2   in Linux but not in AIX.  I want to be able to tail multiple files using -0f or -f in AIX/Linux  multitail is not recognized in either of these OS. Do I need to use The Loop on pages? I'm writing my first WordPress theme and have a question about the use of The Loop in page templates. The page templates I've looked at all follow basically the same pattern (example from Twenty Twelve):  &lt;?php while ( have_posts() ) : the_post(); ?&gt; &lt;?php get_template_part( 'content', 'page' ); ?&gt; &lt;?php comments_template( '', true ); ?&gt; &lt;?php endwhile; // end of the loop. ?&gt;   But a page will only have one post associated with it so iterating through the posts seems unnecessary. My page template is more readable and seems to work fine:  &lt;?php the_post(); the_title('&lt;h1&gt;', '&lt;/h1&gt;'); the_content(); ?&gt;   Is this a good practice? Are there any downsides? What is "preimage resistance", and how can the lack thereof be exploited? How is this different from collision resistance, and are there any known preimage attacks that would be considered feasible? Suppose that I create Material001  and Material002  in Material Properties and set them to some color. Can I use this 2 items in other buttons like Texture Properties, Object Data Properties etc. ? Where and how do I intertwine them with this button ? Is spell level a character concept or a player concept? Is there anything in RAW that supports spell level as a character concept, or alternatively that supports it as solely a player concept?  On the one hand, I see nothing that explicitly states that a character knows that there are spell levels. On the other hand, I don't see how a spellcaster could manage spell slots without knowing about spell levels. Diamond is not shown for mod name under wiki posts If a diamond mod is an author of a wiki post then the diamond is not displayed besides the mod name. E.g. :        Even when the name refers to the user profile page (in case of more then one author) like in :        Is it intentional or a bug?