I had the horns and the head as separated objects and to union them i used a boolean modifier. The problem now is that as you can see in the image there are holes after i smoothed it in the sculpting mode. I used dyntopo which you can also see in the picture. In short the boolean could not union these objects without holes.
I'm trying to model an , but it's not going so well when it comes to the magazine of the weapon.   Next to the magazine is a mesh. I want to cut holes in the mag with that mesh. But the magazine just goes invisible or connects with the mesh when trying to execute the Boolean Modifier. I have tested to invert the normals and some other stuff, but it isn't working.
Convert stored procedure result to model object Autodesk Maya symbol lookup error on start after installing AMD proprietary driver on Ubuntu 18.04 I've installed Maya 2018 on Ubuntu 18.04 and tested it with the amdgpu driver (open source) and it launched without problems, but some components were not working with the open source driver so I tried amd gpu pro 18.20 (amd closed-source driver). I ran  ./amdgpu-pro-install   but since then Maya won't work and gives this warning message:  ./maya.bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/autodesk/maya2018/bin/.. /lib/libOGSDeviceOGL4-16.so: undefined symbol: EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init   My card is hd7770 and it's supported by the amd closed driver, so what am I doing wrong? Is there a term that means "a person who enjoys learning"? This term might be used to describe someone who:   Is a self-motivated learner. Is curious, wants to understand many things.   I understand the term "philosopher" might be a good fit, in terms of its root words, however, the general population has an inconsistent understanding of this term, so I am looking for a more precise term. Word for "blissfully oblivious"? Detect whether Excel workbook is already open What is the definition and purpose of a pre-amplifier? I find in many places mentions of pre-amplifiers being used to boost audio signals prior to feeding to a power amplifier.  Wikipedia's article on  gives some hints at their usage, but it doesn't really explain why it would be necessary to have two amplifiers in series rather than a single one with greater gain.  If a pre-amp is just a power amp with a smaller gain, what's the point, and why the distinction between the two kinds? Is the distinction in function, or simply purpose? Why are angles dimensionless and quantities such as length not? So my friend asked me why angles are dimensionless, to which I replied that it's because they can be expressed as the ratio of two quantities -- lengths.   Ok so far, so good.  Then came the question: "In that sense even length is a ratio. Of length of given thing by length of 1 metre. So are lengths dimensionless?".   This confused me a bit, I didn't really have a good answer to give to that. His argument certainly seems to be valid, although I'm pretty sure I'm missing something crucial here. I'm searching how to remove the chapter+section number on the theorem numbering with a section counter.  With no section counter it's like:  \newtheorem{thm}{Title} Chapter1 ----Section 1 --------thm 1 --------thm 2 ----Section 2 --------thm 3 --------thm 4 Chapter2 ----Section 1 --------thm 5 --------thm 6 ----Section 2 --------thm 7 --------thm 8   And with the section counter:  \newtheorem{thm}{Title}[section] Chapter 1 ----Section 1 --------thm 1.1.1 --------thm 1.1.2 ----Section 2 --------thm 1.2.1 --------thm 1.2.2 Chapter 2 ----Section 1 --------thm 2.1.1 --------thm 2.1.2 ----Section 2 --------thm 2.2.1 --------thm 2.2.2   And I want numbering my theorems like this:  \newtheorem???????? Chapter 1 ----Section 1 --------thm 1 --------thm 2 ----Section 2 --------thm 1 --------thm 2 Chapter 2 ----Section 1 --------thm 1 --------thm 2 ----Section 2 --------thm 1 --------thm 2   I know it's always a pain to remove such things, thanks for whoever will help me ^^ Possible Duplicate:          I sometimes work outside and are using a 3G usb connection with quite a limited data allowance.  I want some fast and easy way to temporary block all incoming and outgoing traffic in windows firewall except for chrome to be sure that Dropbox or something else is not using up my data.  I've tried to set Windows Firewall Properties to "Block" which gives "Outgoing/Incoming connections that do not match a rule are blocked".  Problem: There are many allow-rules like Dropbox that would "override" the block. And I don't want to disable all rules and then enable them, since there are some that I want disabled even when I get to the office...  Any suggestions?  Thanks! A financial planner treated us in a dismissive fashion and I want to say that he "gave us the back of his hand" but that phrase doesn't seem to have the meaning of dismissive. Does it or is there a similar idiom? Why does Stephen Hawking say black holes don't exist? Does the diameter of the aperture increase with increases in the focal length with constant F-number(F-stops)? What I have learned from the definition of F-number is that;  The F-number (sometimes also called focal ratio, f-ratio, f-stop, or relative aperture) of a lens is the ratio of its focal length divided by the diameter of the aperture. And F-numbers are expressed as f/1, f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, f/11, f/16, f/22, f/32 etc. Hence F-number (F-stop) depends on two variables; that are diameter of aperture and focal length of the lens.  Aperture diameter/size is one of the component which governs the amount of light that enters to the camera. As far as I known, at different F-stops values (f/1, f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, f/11, f/16, f/22, f/32) the amount of light allowed to enter the camera is fixed and are with either 1/2 or 1/3 stop increment.  This concept is very easy to understand, in case of prime lenses (with a  fixed focal length and variable aperture), where F-stop is inversely proportional to the aperture diameter. For lower F-number (F-stop) the aperture would be bigger allowing more light and for higher Hence F-number (F-stop) the aperture would be smaller allowing less light in to the camera.  F-numbers (F-stops) have been evolved to allow a definite/fixed amount of light in to the camera (As far as I known). In case of zoom lens (with variable aperture and variable focal length), I am not able to understand the what would be the relationship between F-stop and the diameter/area of aperture at different focal length.  I have two related questions  1 . In case of zoom lens,  for example, Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6  (with variable aperture and variable focal length). At any particular F-number(F-stop), for example at f/5.6 , does the diameter of the aperture increase with increases in the focal length? I mean,  Is the diameter of the aperture at  18mm and f/5.6 would be smaller than that of at 135 mm and f/5.6?   In the above case (i.e. Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ), What is amount of light that would enter the camera at 18mm and f/5.6 compared to that of at 135 mm and f/5.6? Will the amount of lights be same or different? Is the product of two non-holomorphic function always non-holomorphic? Suppose $h(z)$ is a complex function. I have noticed that $h(z) = f(z)\cdot g(z)$, where $f(z)$ and $g(z)$ are non-holomorphic. Can $h(z)$ be holomorphic?   Can a similar statement be made, if $f(z)$ is holomorphic, but $g(z)$ is not? How to print only defined variables (shell and/or environment variables) in bash The bash builtin command set, if invoked without arguments, will print all shell and environment variables, but also all defined functions. This makes the output unusable for humans and difficult to grep.  How can I make the bash builtin command set print only the variables and not the functions?  Are there other commands which prints only the shell variables, without the functions?  Note: bash differentiates between shell variables and environment variables. see here Ok... so this is embarrassing.  I typed in "boobs" on EncyclopediaDramatica's search because, well, it's a really funny page.  But now I've got a problem... EVERY TIME I click a search field in Chrome now, it shows "boobs" as the first suggestion in the drop down!  This is not really socially acceptable as this laptop goes with me everywhere and Chrome is my primary browser.  Is there a way I can isolate and remove just that one entry? Why do people omit the definite article? I'm used to always hearing or seeing a  before certain nouns.  Yet on certain occasions the article is totally omitted, and it bothers me.  I'm wondering what the justification for omitting the article is, especially when the definite article would seem to be required, or if it is just bad English either on the part of the individual in question or more likely by tradition.  The most frequent place I hear this is at the doctor or dentist's office. In every one I have ever visited, the receptionist or assistant always says things like "Doctor will see you shortly" instead of "The doctor will see you shortly."  The wikipedia article linked above says this: "A definite article indicates that its noun is a particular one (or ones) identifiable to the listener".  In the case of a clinical setting, I know who the doctor is, especially if this is not my first visit.  The people in the office know the doctor even better than I, so it would seem to be inappropriate to omit the article. Even the indefinite article would be incorrect. It further says, under "Zero article":  "In languages having a definite article, the lack of an article specifically indicates that the noun is indefinite."  Since the noun is not indefinite, why are they omitting the article?  Another place I see the article omitted is with the word "bar".  Bartenders apparently don't say "I tend the bar" they say "I tend bar".  Unless a bartender works in multiple bars, it would seem like an article would be required.  Furthermore, "the bar" can mean any bar a person goes to, so even in a case like , it seems like the word "the" should be in the sentence.  The only thing I can think of in this case is maybe the speaker doesn't want to confuse the listener into thinking they work in the legal field.  Is this just a bad habit, a historical corruption or tradition, or is there really a valid reason (or perhaps more than one) for these omissions? Query standard input of lightning-input I want to query standard HTML textarea which is wrapped by lightning-textarea. How can I get it?  &lt;lightning-textarea name=&quot;secret_field&quot; label=&quot;Secret&quot; value={secretFieldValue}&gt;&lt;/lightning-textarea&gt; I have seen quoted several places on the internet a rule that one can apply bonuses and penalties in the most beneficial order.  An example I come across frequently (as a druid) is the combination of Natural Bond and . Natural Bond increases your effective druid level for determining the stats of animal companions but cannot increase it beyond your character level. Choosing an alternative animal companion lowers your effective druid level for determining the same stats. The "most beneficial order" rule is used to justify applying the level penalty before the natural bond bonus in order to get around the character level cap on natural bond.  Does this rule actually exist? If so, where does this rule originate? I would like to be able to cite a reliable source for my GM. Remove association with blank file extension? Redirecting cout to a console in windows I have an application which is a relatively old. Through some minor changes, it builds nearly perfectly with Visual C++ 2008. One thing that I've noticed is that my "debug console" isn't quite working right. Basically in the past, I've use AllocConsole() to create a console for my debug output to go to. Then I would use freopen to redirect stdout to it. This worked perfectly with both C and C++ style IO.  Now, it seems that it will only work with C style IO. What is the proper way to redirect things like cout to a console allocated with AllocConsole()?  Here's the code which used to work:  if(AllocConsole()) {     freopen("CONOUT$", "wt", stdout);     SetConsoleTitle("Debug Console");     SetConsoleTextAttribute(GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE), FOREGROUND_GREEN | FOREGROUND_BLUE | FOREGROUND_RED); }   EDIT: one thing which occurred to me is that I could make a custom streambuf whose overflow method writes using C style IO and replace std::cout's default stream buffer with it. But that seems like a cop-out. Is there a proper way to do this in 2008? Or is this perhaps something that MS overlooked?  EDIT2: OK, so I've made an implementaiton of the idea I spelled out above. Basically it looks like this:  class outbuf : public std::streambuf { public:     outbuf() {         setp(0, 0);     }      virtual int_type overflow(int_type c = traits_type::eof()) {         return fputc(c, stdout) == EOF ? traits_type::eof() : c;     } };  int APIENTRY WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPTSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow) {     // create the console     if(AllocConsole()) {         freopen("CONOUT$", "w", stdout);         SetConsoleTitle("Debug Console");         SetConsoleTextAttribute(GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE), FOREGROUND_GREEN | FOREGROUND_BLUE | FOREGROUND_RED);       }      // set std::cout to use my custom streambuf     outbuf ob;     std::streambuf *sb = std::cout.rdbuf(&amp;ob);      // do some work here      // make sure to restore the original so we don't get a crash on close!     std::cout.rdbuf(sb);     return 0; }   Anyone have a better/cleaner solution than just forcing std::cout to be a glorified fputc?