I was able to mark questions as favourite in Stack Exchange app for android, but now could not find how to get list of it to revisit them.
I haven't been able to find my favorite questions in the official Stack Exchange Android app.  Looking at my accounts page gives nothing on them.
How to install Hp laser jet 1020 plus printer? I had posted a  last week about customizing a ToolValidator class and got some very good answers.  In working with the proposed solutions, I have created a custom module that performs queries on a db, and will be called by both the ToolValidator class (to provide values for the drop-down lists) and later in the geoprocessing script (to get other parameters based on items selected in drop-down lists).  However, I can't seem to actually call the custom module in the ToolValidator class.  I have been trying to append to path with no luck.  When I try to apply these changes to the script, I get a runtime error:  [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor.  If I comment out import line, no errors.  sys.path.append('my_custom_module_directory') import my_custom_module   Many of you may be asking why don't I just implement a custom tool with ArcObjects.  The reason is that my end users don't have the privleges necessary to register ANY dlls on their computer.  UPDATE:  This was happening to me in ArcGIS 10.  Interestingly enough, I was initially appending to the path inside of the initialiazeParameters function of the ToolValidator class.  If I do the append outside (i.e., on top of) of the ToolValidator class, everything works as expected.  sys.path.append('C:/Working/SomeFolder') import somescript --------&gt;THIS WORKS  class ToolValidator:   """Class for validating a tool's parameter values and controlling   the behavior of the tool's dialog."""    def __init__(self):     """Setup arcpy and the list of tool parameters."""     import arcpy     sys.path.append('C:/Working/SomeFolder')     import somescript -------&gt; THIS DOESNT WORK     self.params = arcpy.GetParameterInfo()   UPDATE 2:  I think I found the true cause of my problem.  In the code snippets in this post, I have been appending what appear to be real paths (ex C:/Working/SomeFolder) to the sys.path.  In my actual ToolValidator class, I was constructing a relative path using os.path.dirname(__file__) +"\my_special_folder...".  I was anticipating that os.path.dirname(__file__) would return the path of the toolbox, since that contains the ToolValidator class.  I have come to find this is not the case.  As far as I can tell, the ToolValidator class is never actually written to a .py file, and I speculate the the this code is passed to the python interpreter in memory, so __file__ is useless, or some temp script is persisted and then execfile(path_to_script) is called, again rendering __file__ useless.  I'm sure there are other reasons I am missing as well.    Long story short, if I use a hardcoded path, the sys.append works anywhere, relative paths don't work so well in the ToolValidator class. When I loaded the review page (in Stack Overflow, though I have no specific reason to think it is related) I got a weird hat in the upper left hand corner.    See the hat in the upper left hand corner?  That's belonging to user # .  His profile page also has the hat in a ... weird ... location, but not this weird.    I'm guessing this is due to the not-loaded image for the avatar (adblock blocks Facebook avatars for me often)?  It also causes the toolbar notification to show his link unless I'm hovering over something else.  It also changes the location of the gray box to the upper left hand corner when I hover over the hat (and hovering over the white box does nothing).  It's definitely him (or any not-loaded avatar perhaps), once he fell off the last 6 reviewers it stopped appearing. Absolutely continuity and Lipschitz-like continuity I'm trying to figure out if the following is true or false:  Let $\mu$ and $\nu$ be finite measures on Borel subsets of $[0,1]$,and $\nu \ll \mu$ ($\nu$ is absolutely cts with respect to $\mu$). Does there exist always a $C \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $\forall A \subseteq [0,1]$ that is Borel, we have $\nu(A)$ $\lt$ $C \mu (A)$.  The Radon-Nykodym theorem seems to almost suggest that is true, if I knew it was bounded, then I could say $\nu (A) \le \int_{A} g \ d\mu \le \int_{A} C \ d\mu \le C\mu (A)$, where $C$ is the bound. However, I don't know if it is bounded and in fact, I could take an unbounded function that is still integrable on $[0,1]$, such as $\frac{1}{\sqrt x}$.  I can't even be sure if it is true or false.   Thank you! What is the word or term used to describe doing an activity or work with a high level of concentration and intention, trying your best? Is there a preinstalled or automatic firewall? Does Ubuntu come with a preinstalled or automatic firewall? If not, do I need one?   I've read some articles about the advantages of Linux over other operating systems about security (no need to have antivirus, ...) but would like to be sure. 3/4 circle with plus in it? I'm giving Deus Ex a quick playthrough as a refresher before jumping into Human Revolution. In the interest of expediency, I've decided to cheat. ^.^  Normally, cheats must be re-enabled for each level when playing the original DX. I've encountered instructions on several sites (word-for-word identical instructions, so clearly copy/pasted) for permanently enabling cheats, but they aren't working for me:     Because you will need to redo this for every level, you can open up 'user.ini' and add 'bCheatsEnabled True' in the [DeusEx.DeusExGameInfo] section of the file to allow cheats to be activated forever.   Not only is that not working for me, it doesn't even look right compared to the rest of the file (space instead of =). With increasing desperation, I've tried adding that line (both verbatim and switching to an equal sign) to every section of both User.ini and DeusEx.ini which looks even remotely plausible — even creating a [DeusEx.JCDentonMale] section, just in case.  Does anyone know how to get this working? I'm running DX:GOTY version 1.112fm from Steam on Windows 7. Prove that sequence $ x_{(n+1)}= \frac {a}{1+x_n}$ is convergent to positive root of $x^2+x-a=0,$where $a >0$ and $x_1 >0$ Prove that sequence $$ x_{(n+1)}= \frac {a}{1+x_n}$$ is convergent to positive root of $x^2+x-a=0,$where $a &gt;0$ and $x_1 &gt;0$  we have $$x_{(n+2)}-x_n=\frac{-a(x_{(n+1)}-x_{(n-1)})}{(1+x_{(n-1)})(1+x_{(n+1)})}$$  Hence from this we see behaviour of even terms subsequence and odd terms subsequence  is opposite. how to proceed from there. any hint please For example, in this text:     Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc eu tellus vel nunc pretium lacinia. Proin sed lorem. Cras sed ipsum. Nunc a libero quis risus sollicitudin imperdiet.   I want to match the word after 'ipsum'. Delay in 4-bit ripple carry adder? In pic below I have drawn a full adder and mentioned their delays, please help me to verify my answer. QGIS Graphics Glitch after changing CRS I would like to see a full how-to guide on how to install Ubuntu. Why isn't Derivative equal to NeumannValue? How do i prove that continuous linear transformation between normed spaces is bounded? Let $(V,||\cdot||_V),(W,||\cdot||_W)$ be normed spaces over $\mathbb{C}$.  Let $T:V\rightarrow W$ be a linear transformation.  Assume $T$ is continuous.  Then, how do i prove that $\exists c&gt;0$ such that $\forall v\in V, ||Tv||_W&lt;c||v||_V$? Number of Homomorphisms from $\Bbb{Z}_m$ to $\Bbb{Z}_n$ This question coutesy of Allan Clark's "Elements of Abstract Algebra" (60$\zeta$).   Find the number of homomorphisms from $\Bbb{Z}_m\to \Bbb{Z}_n$ as a function of $m$ and $n$.  This is stumping me, can anyone help? Creaking from cranks/spindle. How to fix? Can we get wordpress.stackexchange.com added to the list of off-topic redirection sites? I'm noticing a lot of WordPress questions being asked on Stack Overflow lately. I can't flag these to be moved to wordpress.stackexchange.com because it's not in the list:    Can it be added? Are there any other Stack Exchange sites worth adding? Calculating peaks in DEM using GRASS I can't work out why Altium is doing this, or how to undo it, or how to make it stop doing it.  It happens when I use the 'Find Similar Objects... ' option; all of objects that it hasn't found are faded out and I can no longer select them.  Anyone know how to fix this?  Additionally, if anyone knows how to change, en masse, the components' footprint library to 'Any' through the SCH inspector, that'd be really helpful too.