I am able to talk to Mirabelle but it wont let me accept the quest "Revealing the Unseen" is it a fixable glitch?
I'm stuck in the College of Winterhold questline because of a glitch between the quests "Good Intentions" and "Revealing the Unseen." After talking to the Augur of Dunlain, I return to the Archmage Savos Aren to finish the quest, and he gives me the Mage's Circlet and finishes "Good Intentions." The problem is, the next quest "Revealing the Unseen" doesn't start. He talks about Mirabelle Irvine and tells me to go talk to her, but since the quest hasn't been started, she doesn't have anything to say about the Staff of Magnus. I've tried reloading from before the quest many times and finishing it but still the same result. I've also tried doing other quests and coming back to try and finish it later, but still the next quest doesn't start. I'm on the PS3.  Anyone have a way of fixing this bug/glitch? Thanks in advance.
Downloading US Census data? Regarding field-level security, does Lightning Process Builder run as system-level permissions or user?  That is:   Can I trigger an update to a field that the current user cannot edit? Can I filter based on a field the current user cannot read? Can't format / delete locked partition from GParted? Who was the real "Master Code Breaker"? Is it acceptable to change the vid column of a term programmatically in the database? Possible Beamer bug: Frame number has different color than date in infolines footer I use TeX Live on Mac and I get my weekly updates through the TeX Live Utility. I am working on some slides for an upcoming talk. I am using the same Beamer templates and settings that I always use, so I was surprised to see that the page numbers that I always include at the bottom of my slides suddenly appeared in a different color. Here's an MWE:  \documentclass{beamer} \useoutertheme{infolines} \usecolortheme{beaver} \title{Title} \date{\today} %\setbeamercolor{page number in head/foot}{fg=darkred!60!black} \begin{document} \begin{frame} \end{frame} \end{document}     As you can see in the bottom right corner of the slide the page number appears but its color looks off. Until recently it would look exactly the same color as the date appearing next to it.  By Googling around a bit I managed to figure out how to get this to look normal again using the line commented out in the code above:  \setbeamercolor{page number in head/foot}{fg=darkred!60!black}   By uncommenting this line I got back the desired behavior:    So my question is not so much about how to fix this problem, but about why this is happening in the first place. Is this a bug that was introduced in a recent update, and if so will it be fixed? Is this a deliberate choice on the part of the developers (if so I can't imagine why)? Or am I doing something wrong or is something broken in my TeX setup?  I'd appreciate any insight on this. Thanks in advance! Searching through ODT documents without opening them? Let's say I have 2000 .ODT files. Their names are random numbers. How do I go about searching for, let's say, "pricing list"? How do I find the document I need without opening all of them one by one and checking to see if it's the right one?  Is there some program to search through the words in the documents without opening them? Why don't metals glow from red to yellow to green to blue etc.? Why only red, then yellow and then white? Shouldn't all wavelengths be emitted one by one as the temperature of the metal increases?   If some metals do glow at with different colours, could you give me examples of such metals and the reason why this happens in specific cases? Difference between DispatchQueue.main.async and DispatchQueue.main.sync Chrome S3 Cloudfront: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header on initial XHR request Intuitive understanding of the derivatives of $\sin x$ and $\cos x$ One of the first things ever taught in a differential calculus class:   The derivative of $\sin x$ is $\cos x$. The derivative of $\cos x$ is $-\sin x$.   This leads to a rather neat (and convenient?) chain of derivatives:   sin(x) cos(x) -sin(x) -cos(x) sin(x) ...   An analysis of the shape of their graphs confirms some points; for example, when $\sin x$ is at a maximum, $\cos x$ is zero and moving downwards; when $\cos x$  is at a maximum, $\sin x$ is zero and moving upwards.  But these "matching points" only work for multiples of $\pi/4$.  Let us move back towards the original definition(s) of sine and cosine:  At the most basic level, $\sin x$ is defined as -- for a right triangle with internal angle $x$ -- the length of the side opposite of the angle divided by the hypotenuse of the triangle.  To generalize this to the domain of all real numbers, $\sin x$ was then defined as the Y-coordinate of a point on the unit circle that is an angle $x$ from the positive X-axis.  The definition of $\cos x$ was then made the same way, but with adj/hyp and the X-coordinate, as we all know.  Is there anything about this basic definition that allows someone to look at these definitions, alone, and think, "Hey, the derivative of the sine function with respect to angle is the cosine function!"  That is, from the unit circle definition alone.  Or, even more amazingly, the right triangle definition alone.  Ignoring graphical analysis of their plot.  In essence, I am asking, essentially, "Intuitively why is the derivative of the sine the cosine?" Plotting a Continuous signal Why is the atmosphere transparent in the visible spectrum? One of the great 'coincidences' in physics is that the Sun happens to shine most brightly at exactly the wavelengths our eyes can see; it's an easy explanation that our eyes evolved to make the most out of what was available.  However, this spectral window is also , with Rayleigh scattering and the ozone layer protecting us from the UV and strong water vapour absorption in the IR until way into the radio range.  My question is: is this a coincidence? Were there geological factors that made it so? Or is it just lucky chance? (I also notice other planets in our neighbourhood weren't quite so lucky.) Or had atmospheric absorption been different our eyes would have tuned to whatever spectral window were brighter as a whole? Gel circular polarising filter I am contemplating buying a lens that only takes rear gel filters. Is it possible to buy a circular polarising filter in gel format? If so, who can supply them (preferably UK based)? Why are useful questions on StackOverflow being closed as non-constructive? Useful threads are being closed as "not constructive:"     This question is not a good fit to our Q&amp;A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the .   For example,  was very useful for me since I am new to obfuscation and the question gave me a start. Also that question has lots of votes and bookmarks - these alone are the  markers of usefulness. The question is closed anyway. No idea why.  Same happened to my question, , which received one bookmark immediately.  I was waiting for an answer with the two products downloaded and installed.  I desired that experienced people would share their thoughts and point me to the better one. No. Closed. I.e. I must go to some other forum and ask there or I must search on Google and write down the pros and cons of each myself. I am not asking questions just because I have tons of time and want to chat; I need an answer, that's why I am asking. I am asking because I think that SO has the most professional people to answer and because I didn't find a good answer in Google.  I saw other questions closed which I myself found to be useful and I bookmarked some of the closed questions.  UPDATE  If I want people who have an experience which I do not have with some software products and I want to see which product is better in the terms of usability and reliability, not just better in terms of the price or has a better official website or better described on the official website, how do I ask this question? Or is this a question which I cannot ask on SO? I.e. this sort of information is not available on SO?  Is this one breaking the rules as well:  ? Change Linux Mint to Ubuntu What is a single word in English which means to look down on others (due to their younger age, lower socio-economic position, lesser experience, etc)    Not look down upon everyone else in general, but look down upon some particular person due to a feeling of superiority of oneself over them ( this superiority may come from the fact that one feels has more money, talent, etc)?    By "look down upon" I don't mean just the feeling of having superiority over another, but acting to them in a manner that reflects this pride as well (for example, perhaps he acts very rudely to them, since he feels superior to them and feels he can get away with it, or he feels it doesn't matter at all due to his superiority) Combinatorics - binary - very interesting question I tried to solve this problem without any success. I really hope that you will know the answer. $f(n,m)$ presents the number of binary strings (empty string included) that include at most n times '1', and at most m times '0'.      Prove: $$f(n,m) = \binom{n+m+2}{n+1}-1$$ I  want to download free app in my iPod touch device and i have the following doubts.  Kindly resolve me doubts.   when i try to download it asks my credit card security number. since i am trying to download free app , why do i need to provide my credit card security code? Will i be debited for downloading the free app from app store?   I cant able to find any information regarding this on apple.  Please provide me some references about this from apple and please resolve my doubts.  Thanks a lot. I want to justificate following equation:  $$\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n-k)!}\frac{1}{2k+1} = \frac{2^n}{(2n+1)!!}$$  I calculated the both sides for $n$ from 1 to 10 and it was true. How the mathematical induction can be applied to this equation? Or is there other way to justificate it?