I've read how the use of the word I isn't always necessary when writing a resume as the employer already knows that the resume belongs to the job applicant. However some of these sentences sound incomplete without the word I, So i would like to know if its really necessary to include the word I in the beginning of these sentences.   1.I have maintained a clean record, both at school and work, by always acting with honesty.   2.I grew up in a respectable household and was brought up to appreciate and uphold moral values.  3.I strictly  adhere to instructions and devote undivided attention to details.  OR  1.Maintained a clean record, both at school and work, by always acting with honesty.   2.Grew up in a respectable household and was brought up to appreciate and uphold moral values.  3.Strictly adhere to instructions and devote undivided attention to details.  Note: I am not asking anyone to proofread my sentences , I just want to know if i can use the sentences with or without I in the beginning.
Possible Duplicate:          Is it correct to start a sentence with did.     Did my work.   instead of      I did my work.   while answering my emails?
The correct omission of the definite and indefinite articles Homomorphism between compact Hausdorff spaces. Rstudio is duplicating commands in the command line In  related question (), the OP asks if it is grammatical to use the definite article before phrases like Advanced programming in Java whitepaper and Microsoft Office 2010 product. The accepted answer by @Kosmonaut was:     Yes, it is. This is because the "Advanced programming in Java"   whitepaper phrase forms a syntactic unit, with whitepaper as the head   of the unit. The definite article for a phrase always corresponds to   the head of the phrase, so using the definite (or indefinite) article   for these phrases makes perfect sense and is correct English.   My question is whether the same answer applies to phrases like Heathrow Airport, Hyde Park,  Waterloo Station, Edgware Road and Parliament Square. I ask becase it seems to me that airport, park and station, etc. sound like they are part of the proper noun itself, and not simply a common noun. Moreover, I think the head of the unit in these cases would be the place name (first noun) and not the place type (second noun). If that's true, then I assume that no definite article should precede these phrases. Is that correct? Due to the implementation of Java generics, you can't have code like this:   public class GenSet&lt;E&gt; {     private E a[];      public GenSet() {         a = new E[INITIAL_ARRAY_LENGTH]; // error: generic array creation     } }   How can I implement this while maintaining type safety?  I saw a solution on the Java forums that goes like this:  import java.lang.reflect.Array;  class Stack&lt;T&gt; {     public Stack(Class&lt;T&gt; clazz, int capacity) {         array = (T[])Array.newInstance(clazz, capacity);     }      private final T[] array; }   But I really don't get what's going on. How to add a Skype indicator? What does a de Broglie wave look like? What does a  wave look like? Are de Broglie waves transverse or longitudinal?   Can they be polarized?    What about the de Broglie wave of a ground state neutral spin-zero Helium 4 atom?   What experimental evidence do we have that supports the detailed nature of a de Broglie wave?     I have always assumed that de Broglie waves were mathematically  identical to electromagnetic waves, but I just realized there is no basis for this assumption, and in fact it must be false, unless there is an analogue to both the magnetic and the electric components of the electromagnetic wave.  So what does a de Broglie wave "look like"? Preimage of codimension one subspace of the quotient $g/D^1 g$ I am trying to prove the following.  Proposition Let $g$ be a Lie algebra such that the first derived algebra $Dg$ is a proper ideal of $g$. Consider the quotient $g/D^1 g$, and show that the preimage of any codimension 1 subspace is   an ideal, and has codimension 1.   I could show that the preimage is indeed an ideal, but I need some help with the part about the dimensions:  So suppose that $\phi: x \mapsto [x]$ is the quotient projection. And write $[h] + Dg$  for a codimension 1 subspace of $g$ (here $h\subset g$). Then the preimage of this subspace is just the linear span $h+Dg\leq g$. Let $y+z \in h+Dg$ with $y\in h$ and $z\in Dg$. Let $x\in g$. We want to show that $[x, y+z]\in h$, ie that $h + Dg \lhd g$. We can write $x$ as $x_0+x_1$ for $x_0 \in Dg$, $x_1\not\in Dg$. Then  $$[x,y+z] = [x_0, y+z] + [x_1, y] + [x_1,z] \in h + Dg$$  The inclusion follows since $Dg$ is an ideal so the first and third terms belong $Dg$; and $[x_1, y] \in D_g$, as $g/Dg$ is abelian. I installed Ubuntu yesterday, so I'm trying to get used to it.  I'm really close to my router, but my wifi signal gets too low. Sometimes I'm in Facebook or Youtube and the signal is high, almost full, but it is usually in one or two bars, and sometimes none.  I can use Internet normally, I can watch videos and stuff, but the problem is when I try to update something or Ubuntu is downloading stuff, the downloads get stuck or get cancelled telling me that I should check my connection.  How can I fix this? I should be getting a really good signal, I'm really close to my router, my phone has full signal, and a notebook with Windows 7 has full signal here too.  Sorry my bad English and I hope you can help me.  $ lsusb Bus 009 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0bda:8179 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.  Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0458:003a KYE Systems Corp. (Mouse Systems) NetScroll+ Mini Traveler / Genius NetScroll 120 Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub How do Natures work? In at least some Pokemon games there are modifiers called "Natures" which affect pokemon stats. What do they do and how do it work? Also, what specific games possess it? I want to have a page-filling and -breaking longtable, so I decided to try xltabular. Unfortunately xltabular seems to screw up the booktabs rules in the normal tabular environments, see:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{booktabs, xltabular} \usepackage[active,tightpage]{preview} \PreviewEnvironment{tabular} \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{ccc}     \toprule     col1 &amp; col2 &amp; col3 \\     \midrule     row 2: &amp; more and moooooooooooore &amp; test \\     \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{document}     Not loading xltabular resolves the issue.  Did I miss some package option or some incompatibilities? Is there a better package than xltabular which doesn't break booktabs?  (I am using TeXLive 2019 and compile with lualatex)    EDIT (by Skillmon)  I reduced the bug to the following MWE (which doesn't make much sense on its own), it looks like booktabs tries to be smart detecting something, but fails badly.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{longtable} \let\xltabular\relax \usepackage{booktabs}  \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{ccc}     \toprule     col1 &amp; col2 &amp; col3 \\     \midrule     row 2: &amp; more and moooooooooooore &amp; test \\     \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{document}   It seems to suffice that longtable is loaded and \xltabular is defined (even if it's just \relax). How should a family with young children apply for UK visas? Why does `\texttt` repeat and shrink my equation? When I use \texttt with the caret symbol in an amsmath equation environment, I get a very weird result. Specifically, the text repeats itself four times while shrinking.  MWE:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath}  \begin{document}  \begin{equation*}     \texttt{y^o} \end{equation*}  \end{document}   Compiling this document with pdflatex produces the following result:    The same result occurs even if I remove the o character. To fix it I could modify the offending line to \texttt{y$^o$}, but why is this repeating happening in the first place? Replace Builtin commands with Custom Commands for CMD.exe Admob SMART_BANNER size PTR record won`t update Patching commands to remove surrounding whitespace I'm using the todonotes package to add little margin notes to my text, however writing  Hello\todo{test} World!   removes the interword space as is already pointed out in . So I tried  \pretocmd{\todo}{\@bsphack}{}{} \apptocmd{\todo}{\@esphack}{}{}   and this adds the interword space but simply outputs all parameters instead of passing them to \todo.  Full MWE:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{etoolbox} \usepackage{todonotes}  \makeatletter \pretocmd{\todo}{\@bsphack}{}{} \apptocmd{\todo}{\@esphack}{}{} \makeatother  \begin{document} Hello\todo{test} World! \end{document} Where can I find Obsidian in the Pocket Edition? I have looked everywhere for lava or obsidian in 0.7.1. I've looked all the way from top to bottom and all around, in about a 100 block diameter, but I can't find any. Where can I get some? How do I cherry pick packages from a PPA? Is there a way to cherry pick packages from a ppa repository you add? That is, to exclude some from updating while including others?  For example, I want just the chromium-browser package from  but not the others. So I don't want my sudo apt-get upgrade to have that ppa's other (besides chromium-browser) packages install over my existing ones, just that one.   I realize this is a license to shoot myself in the foot if I misread dependencies and exclude ones that are needed to ones that I included, but I know for a fact in this case that the other packages are not dependencies for that one.  Is this at all possible? Maybe there is some whitelist/blacklist file or something? does not appear to actually define what a rigid shape is. Rather it defines 'same shape' and 'rigid transformations' without giving any definitions of what is necessary and sufficient for a shape to be considered rigid.  For instance, I've seen the following image:    I understand intuitively why the triangle is rigid and quadrilateral is non-rigid. It is also my understanding that inserting a single diagonal connection into the quadrilateral would make the shape rigid? However, given the following image (labeling the shapes $S_1$, $S_2$ and $S_3$ in sequence left to right):    If $S_1$ had a single diagonal connection AB, it would be possible to flip ADB over axis q to obtain a shape similar to $S_2$ with the addition of connection AB (my explanation may not be the greatest). This shape is clearly not the same as $S_1$, so how can we say $S_1$ with a single diagonal connection CD is rigid? I feel I am unclear on what the definition of rigidity actually is.