User can sudo from terminal but not when logged into gnome
terminator: permission denied for sudo
What is the correct pronunciation of the word “processes”? Example of $\deg(fg)<\deg(f)+\deg(g)$ New top bar quick reference guide / Where has the link to  gone? How to write file into another I see a lot of questions comparing full frame (e.g EF for Canon, FX for Nikon) and crop lenses (e.g. EF-S for Canon, DX for Nikon) but I can't find the answer to what would be the differences between the photos taken with say a 50mm f/1.4 EF and EF-S lenses both used with   same APS-C sensor sized camera same ISO same f/1.4 f-stop same focal length same shutter speed   What would be the resulting differences in the photos? Which one would   be brighter than the other due the EF-S lens concentrating the light more? no that's wrong. Both put the same amount of light from the same FoV on the sensor. have greater depth-of-field? neither less problems towards the edges? generally the full frame more lens flare? generally the full frame lens unless there is, or you provide more shading anything else? not really, unless you start down the road of which one is typically of better build quality.   Edit: Added the answers from what seems to be the general consensus from the multiple answers and comments.  Results: My desire to buy a fast medium-high quality lens compatible with both full frame and crop camera's doesn't have to be hampered by the APS-C sensor size of my current camera.  This means I'm willing to part with more money to get a higher performance/quality lens as the performance/quality will be useful now and when I upgrade my camera.  Though reading reviews of some full frame lenses with short focal lengths, look out, as some are really only made to perform well on crop cameras even though they fit on a full frame camera and will give you a full frame picture, the edge quality is very bad. Space $\mathcal{L}^p(X, \Sigma, \mu)$ is separable iff $(\Sigma, \rho_\Delta)$ is separable Let's consider the space $\mathcal{L}^p(X, \Sigma, \mu)$ of all functions $f\colon X \to \mathbb{R}$ (or $\mathbb{C}$) for which: $$ \int\limits_X|f|^p \mu(dx) &lt; \infty. $$ Here $X$ is a metric space, $\Sigma\subset 2^X$ — sigma-algebra on $X$ and $\mu$ — is the measure on $\Sigma$. As usual, functions that are equal almost everywhere considered to be equivalent, so technically we are dealing with classes $$[f]=\{g\in \mathcal{L}^\infty(X,\Sigma, \mu) \colon \mu \{x\in X\colon f(x)\neq g(x)\}=0\}.$$ This space is endowed with integral metric $$\rho_p(f,g)=\left(\int\limits_X|f-g|^p \mu(dx)\right)^{1/p}$$  The statement is that space $\mathcal{L}^p(X, \Sigma, \mu)$ is separable iff $(\Sigma, \rho_\Delta)$ is separable, where $\forall A,B\in\Sigma$ $$\rho_\Delta(A,B)=\mu(A\Delta B)$$ Here, again, we consider $A\in \Sigma$ as a class $[A]=\{A'\in\Sigma\colon \mu(A\Delta A')=0\}$ to have the identity of indiscernibles.  How do one prove the statement? How assign shortcut to custom function? Let $a$, $b$, and $c$ be integers, where a $\ne$ 0. Then $$ $$ (i) if $a$ | $b$ and $a$ | $c$, then $a$ | ($b+c$) $$ $$ (ii) if $a$ | $b$ then $a$|$bc$ for all integers $c$; $$ $$ (iii) if $a$ |$b$ and $b$|$c$, then $a$|$c$.  Prove that if $a$|$b$ and $b$|$c$ then $a$|$c$ using a column proof that has steps in the first column and the reason for the step in the second column.  My book is really vague. I'm not really sure what to do..  First I was thinking something like this: $a\mid b\Rightarrow b=as$ and  $b\mid c\Rightarrow c=bt$ and $a\mid c\Rightarrow c = au$ $$ $$ $b + c + c = b + 2c$  $$ $$ $=as + 2(bt+au)$  Yea then I just got lost. Is it possible in Latex to make a triangular hat? The one that is used in math over three letters representing points to indicate a triangle.  Something like: How to safely upgrade from an older Ubuntu version to a newer one? Facebook: Ways to preserve image quality of uploaded images? PHP Session data not being saved I have one of those "I swear I didn't touch the server" situations. I honestly didn't touch any of the php scripts. The problem I am having is that php data is not being saved across different pages or page refreshes. I know a new session is being created correctly because I can set a session variable (e.g. $_SESSION['foo'] = "foo" and print it back out on the same page just fine. But when I try to use that same variable on another page it is not set! Is there any php functions or information I can use on my hosts server to see what is going on?  Here is an example script that does not work on my hosts' server as of right now:  &lt;?php session_start(); if(isset($_SESSION['views']))     $_SESSION['views'] = $_SESSION['views']+ 1; else     $_SESSION['views'] = 1;  echo "views = ". $_SESSION['views']; echo '&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="page1.php"&gt;Refresh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;'; ?&gt;   The 'views' variable never gets incremented after doing a page refresh. I'm thinking this is a  problem on their side, but I wanted to make sure I'm not a complete idiot first.  Here is the phpinfo() for my hosts' server (PHP Version 4.4.7): Will grammar errors become correct after enough people use them for enough time? First let me state the obvious—based on my own experience—that hordes of people are confused about certain basic grammar principles. For example, I so often see mistakes in choosing the pronoun to use with direct objects, especially when introduced by and with another person, as in "Joe talked about the book with Anna and [I/me]." Another one is the near 100% usage of "lay" instead of "lie" (and "laid" instead of "lay") nowadays, even in published sci-fi books that most certainly had professional editors proofread them.  Do you see these kinds of changes as predictors of the future? Will they become correct after enough people have used them long enough?  Both of these problems drive me bonkers, and I fight my own little battle against them when possible.  I know that dictionaries are descriptive rather than prescriptive. They're technically history books. But grammar and style books seem less so, to me. Those seem as though they ought to be prescriptive in order to reduce the erosion of structured and meaningful language.  In this tension between "what people are doing" and "what people should be doing," are we doomed to forever bear these errors just because too many people don't know the proper way? Is it worth fighting against them? Do I capitulate to the people who are quick to accept any mass public usage as a fait accompli?  Update  I don't imagine for a second that my own writing is error free. The difference with me is that when I do learn I have something wrong in my mind, I immediately change once I clearly understand it.  I also am not imagining that language is static or ignorant that today's correctness is all too often yesterday's error. The whole point of my question here, then, is: is there value in slowing the change, and if so, how is that done and how effectively?  Another way to look at what I'm trying to ask is that in a way I am hoping to define the limits of pedantry. If being pedantic is slavish adherence to outdated rules in the face of actual and foregone changed reality, then when do we conclude that a change is a foregone conclusion?  Poking fun at my own errors to highlight supposed pedantry on my part is to miss everything I am trying to say.    Update 2  It may not be an easy question, but since language change actually does or does not happen, and every person acts with more or less intention in regards to language change, there must be an answer. What I wanted to explore is the value in efforts to teach the "proper way" vs. the opposite end of the spectrum where any new usage is not just accepted but welcome or even sought out. You know, I'm reminded of something: the conservative/liberal scale:     |------+------+------+------+------+------| radical              moderate             radical liberal                                 conservative   The funny thing about those at the ends of the spectrum is that they both want things to change. The radical liberal wants language to change to something new quickly, just for the sake of newness or evolution or some other not-necessarily-realistic ideal. Similarly, the radical conservative wants things to change just as much, but back to the way it used to be, just for the sake of sameness or continuity or some other just-as-not-necessarily-realistic ideal.  I'm not particularly asking where we should be on this scale as that's purely subjective. I'm trying to ask about something purely practical and real-world: what is actually effective? Is language change inevitable, and how fast? Are efforts to reduce its rapid morphing either effective or worthwhile in any measure? All these things considered, what position with respect to language evolution is livable, practical, and sensible?  Feel free to edit my grammar. No comment necessary.  Update 3  Something that may be of interest to both my supporters and detractors: . I enjoyed it. I don't disagree with him, but I am not sure I am wholehearted in this lack of disagreement. Do adjustable length lightsabers exist in Star Wars universe? I always see blades of lightsabers have more or less the same length (dual blades are double). Why is that?  Can't a longer or shorter length be advantage in some case?    I am NOT expecting infinite length lightsabers (due to energy issues), but have we seen adjustable length blades in the Canon? Check if url has domain name and not an ip Can I sync or transfer save games and settings from one platform to another? I would like to know if the same Minecraft account used on a computer can be used on a different platform like the Xbox 360? I am not asking about playing on each simultaneously as each platform has been purchased - I am asking if you can cross play on multiple platforms with the same account. Basically I would like to know if all the saved stuff and settings from one platform will carry over to another. Why do people risk death by joining Starfleet if not for money or preservation of their homes? Watching Star Trek made me think of a few "deeper" questions about Starfleet, which are all related to the Star Trek TV series.  So, let's take for example the Dominion War: people are dying every second, ships get destroyed and cadets are still joining although they know they are probably going to die unless they are with Picard or Sisko.  As I read and got to understand, money has no value anymore, latinum is the general trading currency in the universe. But people on Earth don't trade and don't earn their paychecks. Earth is a much better place than today and yet young boys and girls from every culture/civilization are joining Starfleet as they are willingly signing their death note.  Why are they joining, what motivates them? They might know that they're probably going to die.  They don’t earn paychecks. They could be doing any other job, yet they choose this. And what's more interesting how many died on battlefields must be lined up in front of StarFleet every day?  What do they receive after service? Why are they doing it other than preserving their homes? How can I find the XY coordinates of an HTML element (DIV) from JavaScript if they were not explicitly set? Can I enter Croatia with single entry visa Schengen? Securely erasing all data from a hard drive I am about to sell my old desktop PC and I am cautious about some of my sensitive information being available to the purchaser, even after reformatting the hard-drive, using data recovery software.  How can I securely wipe the hard drive so that the data on it cannot be recovered?  Although I specifically want help with my Windows PC, it wouldn't hurt if there were suggestions for Macs as well.