Is it possible for an action to lack a verb?  For example - to answer my own question - there is a verb for smell bad ("stink"), but there is no counterpart for to smell good.  Is there?
When one hears that something smells, one would generally assume that it smells bad.   Isn't there a word which wouldn't bring to mind the idea of a bad odor? For example, how would you describe pot-pourri (assuming you like the smell of pot-pourri)? If possible, I would like an adjective, or a word that could takes the place of an adjective.
Do file descriptors optimise writing to files? How did R.A.B get to know about Voldemort's Horcruxes? I have a bit of code where I've written a SOQL query that returns a list of SObject records, however I need a Set&lt;Id&gt; structure to pass to another method that I don't have control of (and thus can't change the method signature of).  How can I turn my returned List&lt;SObject&gt; into a Set&lt;Id&gt;? Is the best option just a for loop? Find total number of relations that are equivalence as well as partial order set. Assume set contains total $n$ elements.     My attempt:  As equivalence relation has property reflexive, symmetric and transitive and POSET has property reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive.  Symmetric and antisymmetric will cancle each other except reflexive relation and transitive relation can case antisymmetric, so it's also absent on resultant relation.  Therefore, all diagonal element should be present to satisfy conditions of equivalence as well as POSET.  So, it's independent of number of total number of element of set and answer will be $1$.     Can you explain in formal way, please? Comprehensive list of tools that simplify the generation of LaTeX tables Checking if two Poisson samples have the same mean Generalized Euler sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{H_n}{n^q}$ Has a double slit experiment ever been done using a track chamber or even contemplated? I tried searches and the question has been posed in other fora, but no experiment came up.   Track chambers (cloud chambers, bubble chambers , time projection chambers, solid state detectors like the vertex detectors at LHC)  give the track of the particle as it ionizes the  medium, and could be carried out in geometry after the particle has passed the double slit. The straight track should be pointing back to the slit it came from and its record could be used as the points on the screen in the classical double slit experiment.  The set up as I see it would be the classical setup for single electron through the double slits but instead of a "screen" one has a detector and detects the track.  It should be a long enough detector to get an accuracy less than the slit difference so it could point back to the slit, as the interslit distance is of the order of 100 microns and detectors are giving order of microns accuracies.  This experiment, if possible,  would resolve the controversy whether the detection of the slit destroys the interference pattern or the  at the slits change the boundary conditions and destroy the interference pattern.  An expert's opinion is necessary whether the experiment is possible, whether the energies of the electrons to show interference with a specific d separation is enough to create an accurate track in a solid state detector. If not a cloud chamber would do , but again the energy of the electron would be important because it would have to pass the barrier air/chamber.  It could succeed if the double slits were within a cloud/ bubble chamber; the beam count was low  (10 to twelve per picture) but it was spread in the vertical direction. If the beam could be focused on the slits , it should be doable. Unupvote immediately followed by an upvote gives me a net -10 reputation points I have a string variable that represents the name of a custom class. Example:   string s = "Customer";   I will need to create an arraylist of customers. So, the syntax needed is:  List&lt;Customer&gt; cust = new ..    How do I convert the string s to be able to create this arraylist on runtime? seem to be well-regarded for their versatility and accuracy of metering.  What puzzles me about them is how can they account for the different light transmittance of different lenses? It's easy for an in-camera metering system that meters  so any peculiarity in transmittance is already applied to light when it reaches the metering sensor. But a standalone meter does not have the privilege of looking at the world through the lens it meters for. I tried looking it up in  and , but this issue was not touched upon at all.  This leaves several variants how it could be handled -   light meter uses  for aperture display/input, and photographer is expected to perform the adjustments to and from  (which are used by cameras); light meter assumes some median transmittance of lenses of its era, and automatically accounts for that; photographers simply ignore the matter - even a 75% transmitting lens will be off only by about half a stop, no big deal; each light meter used is expected to know that you have to dial in some exposure compensation to account for the light loss; ...   So how does it work in real world? How to add the word "Figure" to the list of figures? Systems of equations with a single number Both the Romulans and the Federation have regularly violated the Treaty when it suits them. Starfleet has obviously developed and manufactured cloaking/stealth technology and the Romulans make regular excursions across the Neutral Zone. They obviously aren't declaring all-out war, so what penalties or sanctions have been imposed for violations?  -edit added for clarity-  Has either side ever 'punished' their own people for any violations of the Treaty? Cat 5/6 in same conduit as power: is NM-B required, or is THHN acceptable? Preface: I'd like to avoid the question of whether one should run data and power together; my question is focused on Code compliance.  I'm trying to ensure I interpret Code correctly when running Cat 5/6 cabling and power together in the same conduit.  For starters, I understand that nothing in Code prohibits one from doing this; I'm trying to ensure I understand how to do it properly.  I'm wiring a basement office for power and data, and I'll be running the electrical in EMT.  My plan was to pull THHN for the power rather than pull NM-B, but then 800.133(2) Exception 1 made me scratch my head.  Is my understanding of the Article that if I want to run both data (Cat6) and power in the same conduit, that the power needs to be sheathed (i.e. NM-B).  Is it unacceptable to pull individual THHN conductors and the Cat6 together in the same conduit?     800.133 2) Other Applications. Communications wires and cables shall be separated at least 50 mm (2 in.) from conductors of any electric   light, power, Class 1, non–power-limited fire alarm, or medium-power   network-powered broadband communications circuits.      Exception No. 1: Where either (1) all of the conductors of the   electric light, power, Class 1, non–power-limited fire alarm, and   medium-power network-powered broadband communications circuits are in   a raceway or in metal-sheathed, metal-clad, nonmetallic-sheathed, Type   AC, or Type UF cables, or (2) all of the conductors of communications   circuits are encased in raceway. GPS PPS signal corresponds to data time? I currently have an Adafruit Ultimate GPS connected to an Arduino that outputing GPS data (nmea sentences) once per second.  There is also a pin on the GPS outputting 1 PPS signal.    My question is whether the pulse of the PPS suppose to match the time that the GPS data is coming in i.e are they are coming in at the same time?    Also does PPS pulse come in at the beginning of a UTC second or is it random and simply once a second? In general, when can I omit that from a sentence?   Can I omit that (emphasized) in sentence (2) below?        We say that such algorithms handle concept drift and can learn from time-changing data streams.   When the statistical properties of the target variable change, we say that concept drift has occurred.   She told me that some of her classmates failed.      To me, sentences (1) and (3) sound better without that. If I omit that from (2), it just doesn't sound right when I read it out loud. (I should point out I'm not a native speaker.)  How do you decide when to omit it? Is it just a matter of taste? (I know that is sometimes mandatory.)  Can you think of sentences that "sound better" with that? Can you think of sentences that "sound better" without that? Can you think of a few sentences where it is wrong to omit that? Can't do comparison on PageReference System settings won't open on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS after adding System76/pop PPA I'm trying to open System Settings but it won't open in any way. Using GUI, Settings are trying to load for a moment and then they are gone. Using Terminal (gnome-control-center), I get: (gnome-control-center:8823): GLib-ERROR **: 14:44:15.433: ../../../glib/gmem.c:138: failed to allocate 13477064712 bytes Trap Trace/breakpoint (core dumped)  I tried: sudo apt-get remove gnome-control-center sudo apt autoremove sudo apt-get install gnome-control-center  With multiple reboots, but I had no result. UPDATE!: Same errors persist BUT, when I type: sudo gnome-control-center  (instead of just &quot;gnome-control-center&quot;) suddenly System Settings appear! Is it a user permissions issue? Any suggestions? UPDATE#2: After some system updates, sudo gnome-control-center now spawns &quot;Segmentation fault&quot;. Rainbow Six Siege Insane Load times? Computer or Internet? I have a high-end computer with decent ethernet yet whenever I join a game in Siege everyone finishes loading and it takes me 1-5 minutes. Is this because of my internet or computer?   Specs:  CPU - i7-7700k GPU - GTX 1080 16GG RAM 5900 RPM 4TB Hard drive