How to set a border-radius for a table. Read a lot of information about this, but nothing concrete.  &lt;table id="table-prices"&gt;      &lt;tr&gt;       &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td colspan="2" class="table-main"&gt;Длина&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;       &lt;td&gt;Ширина&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td&gt;190 см&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td&gt;200 см&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;       &lt;td&gt;80 см&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td&gt;5496&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td&gt;5496&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;       &lt;td&gt;140 см&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td&gt;5496&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;td&gt;5496&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;       &lt;td colspan="3"&gt;Цены указаны в грн.&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;   &lt;/table&gt;  table {  border: 1px solid #f00;  border-radius: 10px;  border-collapse: separate;   border-spacing: 0; } td {  border: 1px solid #f00; }   Almost done. But after border of table the angles are displaying. When I seting the owerflow-hiding - the grid inside table is lost
Edit - Original Title: Is there an alternative way to achieve border-collapse:collapse in CSS (in order to have a collapsed, rounded corner table)?  Since it turns out that simply getting the table's borders to collapse does not solve the root problem, I have updated the title to better reflect the discussion.  I am trying to make a table with rounded corners using the CSS3 border-radius property. The table styles I'm using look something like this:  table {     -moz-border-radius:10px;     -webkit-border-radius:10px;     border-radius:10px }   Here's the problem. I also want to set the border-collapse:collapse property, and when that is set border-radius no longer works. Is there a CSS-based way I can get the same effect as border-collapse:collapse without actually using it?  Edits:  I've made a simple page to demonstrate the problem  (Firefox/Safari only).  It seems that a large part of the problem is that setting the table to have rounded corners does not affect the corners of the corner td elements. If the table was all one color, this wouldn't be a problem since I could just make the top and bottom td corners rounded for the first and last row respectively. However, I am using different background colors for the table to differentiate the headings and for striping, so the inner td elements would show their rounded corners as well.  Summary of proposed solutions:  Surrounding the table with another element with round corners doesn't work because the table's square corners "bleed through."  Specifying border width to 0 doesn't collapse the table.  Bottom td corners still square after setting cellspacing to zero.  Using JavaScript instead- works by avoiding the problem.  Possible solutions:  The tables are generated in PHP, so I could just apply a different class to each of the outer th/tds and style each corner separately. I'd rather not do this, since it's not very elegant and a bit of a pain to apply to multiple tables, so please keep suggestions coming.  Possible solution 2 is to use JavaScript (jQuery, specifically) to style the corners. This solution also works, but still not quite what I'm looking for (I know I'm picky). I have two reservations:    this is a very lightweight site, and I'd like to keep JavaScript to the barest minimum  part of the appeal that using border-radius has for me is graceful degradation and progressive enhancement. By using border-radius for all rounded corners, I hope to have a consistently rounded site in CSS3-capable browsers and a consistently square site in others (I'm looking at you, IE).   I know that trying to do this with CSS3 today may seem needless, but I have my reasons. I would also like to point out that this problem is a result of the w3c specification, not poor CSS3 support, so any solution will still be relevant and useful when CSS3 has more widespread support.
What are the most suitable filter holders for my Samyang 14mm autofocus prime lens? I've looked into the ones from Haida and Nisi which are both suitable, though they're quite pricey for me currently - does anybody know of any cheaper possible alternatives? I understand there's the 160mm specifically made for use with this lens, though obtaining filters for it is difficult and limited. I'm hoping for something which may be cheaper than both Haida and Nisi, and still suitable for the 14mm lens. Thanks! Replace dynamic content in XML file With an  of archive/compression file formats, is there a single free/open-source command line tool to rule them all? Perhaps something with a consistent / unified set of flags? (note my  friendly )  I once run into a set of aliases meant to largely simplify the task of compressing/de-compressing files with bindings to tar and other utils, but I can't find this anymore.  Update: How can I configure something like atool to not use unzip to extract zip files (which apparently can't handle files larger than 4GB) and to use gunzip instead?  $ aunpack large_file.zip error:  Zip file too big (greater than 4294959102 bytes) Archive:  large_file.zip warning [large_file.zip]:  1491344848 extra bytes at beginning or within zipfile   (attempting to process anyway) error [large_file.zip]:  start of central directory not found;   zipfile corrupt.   (please check that you have transferred or created the zipfile in the   appropriate BINARY mode and that you have compiled UnZip properly) aunpack: unzip ...: non-zero return-code A topological space $X$ is said to be irreducible if it cannot be written as a union $X = A∪B$, where $A$ and $B$ are proper closed subspaces of $X$  I want to try the following:  Show:  $(i)$ That every set with the indiscrete topology is irreducible, and every infinite set with the finite complement topology is irreducible.  $(ii)$ That an irreducible Hausdorff space contains at most one point.  Can you give me any suggestions on how to try this? Nonabelian semidirect products of order $pq$? Normal + Connected -> Uncountable Here's a solution (to the exercise "prove that if $X$ is a space with more than one element, and is normal and connected then $X$ is uncountable"):   by Urysohn's lemma, given $A$ and $B$, closed and disjoint in $X$, there exists a continuous function from $X$ into $[0,1]$ such that $f(A)={0}, f(B)={1}$.   If $X$ were countable, so it would be $f(X)\subset [0,1]$; choose $r\in (0,1)\setminus f(X)$, then $X=f^{-1}([0,r))\cup f^{-1}((r,1])$, so $X$ is disconnected.  But the full power of the lemma wasn't used, all that was used is that there exists a continuous function $X\longrightarrow [0,1]$, so the condition of being normal seems too much.  So my question is, what are the weakest conditions on $X$ for the existence of such continuous functions into $[0,1]$ (or $\mathbb{R}$, for that matter)? A complete ring with respect to an ideal I would like to know what does it mean to say " a ring $R$ is complete with respect to some ideal $I \subset R$.  Is it like, we define a metric by saying two elements in $R$ is "close" if the difference lies in a higher power of $I^n$ and $R$ is a complete metric space? Name for “having no concern about the truthfulness of one’s own remarks” Take the following statement:     I hate the ease with which X makes disparaging remarks about their rivals without the least concern as to whether they are truthful or fair.   Now I would like a word expressing this lack of concern, so that I could just plug it in the blank below and keep the meaning of the sentence above:     I hate the _________ with which X makes disparaging remarks about their rivals.   This is an all too common attitude and I think it deserves a name of its own. The word that came to my mind was levity, but I haven’t come across this word very often and I’m not sure of its particular tones and shades of meaning.      Simple definition   : a lack of seriousness   : an amusing quality   Full definition   1 : excessive or unseemly frivolity   2 : lack of steadiness: changeableness     The attitude I’m trying to name certainly displays lack of seriousness as to the truthfulness and fairness of the remarks, but I do not want to imply they are made in jest or that X is being silly or thoughtless. X could be very serious about their aims: “I’m going to say this; don’t give a dam whether that’s true or not; even if it’s not true I’ll get away with it.” This excludes, I think, all the words Merriam-Webster lists as related to levity, which probably means it excludes levity too:     facetiousness, flightiness, flippancy, frivolousness, frothiness, frivolity, light-headedness, light-mindedness, lightness, silliness   So I’ll accept an answer that despite my reservations shows that one of these words is indeed the one that works best in the sentence above; or gives a more fitting word; or shows that no word really fits (I am of course aware of the difficulties of proving a negative).  I prefer a single word but I’m willing to trade singleness for meaning: so I would take a short phrase it fits better than any single word.  Update  I’m spoilt for choice. But I wonder whether the various suggestions implying lack of concern would in my sentence imply lack of concern specifically for truth, which is what I’m after, or could instead be interpreted as lack of regard for norms of polite behaviour, rival’s feelings, or consequences (say, libel lawsuits, rivals reacting with violence, people feeling encouraged to attack the rivals, etc.)  Tweak the example sentence if it helps (say, I hate the ____ of X’s remarks). Help with packages in java - import does not work I've posted a question or an answer, and I have received one or more downvotes. I am not really sure why I was down voted, or I think I know why, but I disagree.  Why did this happen, and what should I do about it? Extracting one band from three band raster in ArcMap? How to capture a still image from digital video? How to show that $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty} f'(x) = 0$ implies $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{f(x)}{x} = 0$? How many non-negative integer solutions does the equation $3x + y + z = 24$ have? This is a  about redirecting from http to https in Apache Related:     I have an Appache web server which serves both http://example.com/ and https://example.com/. I want to redirect all http requests to https. Currently I'm using this .htaccess rule to redirect http requests to https. RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}   It's working as expected for example.com but the same rule is not working for sub links, when I access existing links, like example.com/about it will still load in http, no redirection happens for existing links. How can I make Apache redirect all http requests to https? Avoiding if statement inside a for loop? What is code coverage and how do YOU measure it?  I was asked this question regarding our automating testing code coverage. It seems to be that, outside of automated tools, it is more art than science. Are there any real-world examples of how to use code coverage? Is it normal for BibTeX to replace similar author names with "------"? In my .bib file, I have two entries with exactly the same author names:  @article{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....  @article{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....   When cited after each other, and typeset with the IEEEtran bibliography style, the .bbl file reads:  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St} K.~Seshadrinathan, R.~Soundararajan, A.~C. Bovik, and L.~K. Cormack, ``A   subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms,''   \emph{SPIE Proceedings Human Vision and Electronic Imaging}, 2010.  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec} ------, ``Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video,''   \emph{IEEE Transactions on Image Processing}, 2009.   As you can see, the author names have been replaced with ------. It looks like this in the final PDF:    Is this normal behavior? Determiners: anyone versus someone I have not been able to watch CBS all access for some time now. Error 2004. I have not found another browser for ubuntu that will play all access either. However firefox for windows plays it fine? Is there a fix in the works for ubuntu firefox?