I have a discrepancy between the bib keys I write inside my LaTeX editor and the printed bib keys.   See my MWE please:  \documentclass[fontsize=12pt,a4paper,oneside,  listof=totoc,                   % Tabellen- und Abbildungsverzeichnis ins Inhaltsverzeichnis bibliography=totoc,             % Literaturverzeichnis ins Inhaltsverzeichnis aufnehmen titlepage,                      % Titlepage-Umgebung statt \maketitle headsepline,                    % horizontale Linie unter Kolumnentitel %abstracton,                    % Überschrift beim Abstract einschalten, Abstract muss dazu in {abstract}-Umgebung stehen DIV12,                          % auskommentieren, um den Seitenspiegel zu vergrößern BCOR=0mm,                       % Bindekorrektur, die den Seitenspiegel um 6mm nach rechts verschiebt. geometry package überschreibt diesen Wert ]{scrreprt}  \usepackage[ngerman]{babel}     % deutsche Trennungsregeln und Übersetzung der festcodierten Überschriften \usepackage[style=authoryear, backend=biber, isbn=false, doi=false, maxcitenames=2, uniquename=false, maxbibnames=10]{biblatex} %sorting=none if not alphabetically, maxcitenames, maxbibnames  \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @misc{OReilly.2005,  author = {O'Reilly, Tim},  year = {2005},  title = {What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software} } @misc{OReilly.2005b,  author = {O'Reilly, Tim},  year = {2005},  title = {Web 2.0: Compact Definition} } \addbibresource{\jobname.bib} \end{filecontents} \begin{document}     \cite{OReilly.2005} \cite{OReilly.2005b} \printbibliography \end{document}   My first citation points to the second bib entry inside the compiled pdf and vice versa. Reading the compiled pdf is no problem in this case but it confusing the heck out of me when I write.   I guess biblatex is doing this because it is sorting the bib entriey alphabetically... I would expect this behavior:   \cite{OReilly.2005} => OReilly 2005a  \cite{OReilly.2005b} => OReilly 2005b  Is this changeable without a lot of effort or am I doing something wrong here?
I have the following problem illustrated by a simple example: If I cite the paper of an author T. Coven in my document, the outcome is 'Coven (2004b)'. If I cite the appendix to this paper, the outcome is 'Coven (2004a)'. Now the appendix pops up much less frequently than the original paper, therefore I would like to reverse the order (exchange 'a' and 'b' in the citations). Is this possible?  I am using Biblatex. Here is the bib-file of the above example (named: lib.bib):  @article{co:2004, author = {T. Coven}, title = {Title A}, journaltitle = {The X Journal}, date = {2004} } @article{coapp:2004, author = {T. Coven}, title = {Appendix to Title A}, journaltitle = {The X Journal}, date = {2004} }   MWE:  \documentclass[a4paper, 12pt, headsepline, headings=small,]{scrreprt} \usepackage[backend=bibtex8,     style=authoryear-icomp,     dashed=false,     autocite=footnote,     maxcitenames=3,     mincitenames=1,     maxbibnames=100,     firstinits=true,     sorting=nty     ]{biblatex} \bibliography{lib}  \begin{document} \cite{co:2004} and \cite{coapp:2004} \end{document}
How do I include lines in resolv.conf that won't get lost on reboot? I have finally migrated to 12.04 from 7.10. I have one last part to complete but I am stumped. I am using Puppet on each server, and in the past I have included a nameserver address and a search domain name for the puppetmaster in resolv.conf.   search puppetmaster.com nameserver 192.168.1.XXX   In 12.04 resolv.conf gets overwritten when rebooted. I cannot use a static IP for these, so using the /etc/network/interfaces to help me out is a nill point.  # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8) #     DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN nameserver 127.0.0.1   Is there a way to get resolvconf to handle this either in the head, tail or base? If there is, are there any examples I can use to tweak on my server.   Any help is much appreciated. If $A$ is a non-square matrix with orthonormal columns, what is $A^+$? If a matrix has orthonormal columns, they must be linearly independent, so $A^+ = (A^T A)^{−1} A^T$ . Also, the fact that its columns are orthonormal gives $A^T A = I$. Therefore,  $$A^+ = (A^T A)^{−1} A^T = (I)^{-1}A^T = A^T$$  Thus, $A^+ = A^T$. Am I correct? Thank you. Functions of Independent Random Variables Is the claim that functions of independent random variables are themselves independent, true?   I have seen that result often used implicitly in some proofs, for example in the proof of independence between the sample mean and the sample variance of a normal distribution, but I have not been able to find justification for it. It seems that some authors take it as given but I am not certain that this is always the case. What happens if you use a Clone Effect on a Double Faced Card that's Transformed? Say someone has , which is a 0/3 Defender, and after some mechanics, transforms into a 13/13 Lizard Horror with Trample.  Say this someone managed to transform said card into its 13/13 Trample form, and then cast  on it (or any other clone type card if it would matter between different ones). Does the Metamorph/Clone/etc. come into play transformed, or as the 0/3 Defender? Why the pressure of atmosphere doesn't crush you when you e.g. walk outside? Why the pressure of atmosphere doesn't crush you when you e.g. walk outside? I mean the density of air is $1.26 kg/m^3$, so with $100 km$ above us, it exerts much pressure on you when you walk outside. Multiple forms in delphi My current idea is to use the dual graph, and prove that that is a bipartite graph, and so proving the statement. But I can't seem to figure out how even degree for all verticies means that it is bipartite.  Any help is appreciated. Thanks! Why are there no discrete zero sets of a polynomial in two complex variables? Why is the zero set in $\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}$ of a polynomial $f(x,y)$ in two complex variables always non-discrete (no zero of $f$ is isolated)? I am trying to determine if the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n+4^n}{n+6^n}$ is convergent or divergent.   In attempting to solve this problem I began by seeing if I could do the divergence test - in this case it is not helpful. The terms $4^n,6^n$ look like geometric series type terms but the $n$ in the numerator and denominator are troublesome. I first tried factoring $n$ out of the expression:  $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n+4^n}{n+6^n} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1+\frac{4^n}{n}}{1+\frac{6^n}{n}}$$  Next I tried comparing to the series $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\frac{4^n}{n}}{\frac{6^n}{n}} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{{4^n}}{{6^n}} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^n$$  This is a convergent geometric series as $r = \frac{2}{3}\lt1$  now I reason that the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1+\frac{4^n}{n}}{1+\frac{6^n}{n}}$ is neither smaller not greater than the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty{(\frac{2}{3})}^n$ Am I able to conclude anything in this case by a direct comparison test or can I only conclude that the first series is convergent if the second is greater than the first?  Thanks So I understand that this has happened in the past: , but all of the &quot;duplicate&quot; posts are marked as  so here is a new bug report: On the , I am listed twice:  While that's fun and all, it isn't exactly right. Upon the risk of being down voted as no MWE is present, but at the moment just trying to get some pointers. I updated my MiKTeX installation to the newest available version at the moment (MiKTeX-pdfTeX 4.1 (MiKTeX 20.12)) and now I get an error while building my documentation: Appendix D. (../html/examples/group/latex/refman_doc.tex (../html/examples/group/latex//gro up__group1.tex) [243] ! I can't write on file `../html/examples/group/latex//group__group2.aux'. \@include ...mmediate \openout \@partaux &quot;#1.aux&quot;                                                   \immediate \write \@partau... l.3 \include{group__group2}  Please type another output file name ! Emergency stop. \@include ...mmediate \openout \@partaux &quot;#1.aux&quot;                                                   \immediate \write \@partau... l.3 \include{group__group2}  *** (job aborted, file error in nonstop mode)  some small background:  Started normally with pdflatex doxygen_manual.tex in here is the statement: \subinputfrom{../html/examples/group/latex/}{refman_doc} and in this file again: \include{group__group2} as far as I know the disk is not full and the protections of the files and directories are OK as well  It looks like that now an attempt is made to write to the directory ../html/examples/group/latex/ whilst in the past the file was written to the current directory. I already tried -shell-escape and -enable-write18 (as well as --shell-escape and --enable-write18) but to no avail.  Any known changes in respect to writing the aux file? Any hints  edit I asked another question () with the details and MWE but that was closed with the reason that it was a duplicate of this one ... So I'm adding the information now here: In the question  asked about the problems I encountered due to an update of my MiKTeX distribution, but didn't take the time (at that moment) to create a MWE, so it didn't attract much response. I have the directory structure:  main  manual.tex   group  group__group2.tex refman_doc.tex    manual.tex \documentclass{book} \usepackage{import} \usepackage{hyperref}  \begin{document} \subinputfrom{../group}{refman_doc} \end{document}  group__group2.tex \hypertarget{group__group2}{}{The Second Group}  refman_doc.tex {Module Documentation} \include{group__group2}  When running in the directory main the command pdflatex manual.tex I get the error: ... (../group/../group/refman_doc.tex [1{C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/MiKTeX/2.9/pdf tex/config/pdftex.map}] ! I can't write on file `../group//group__group2.aux'. \@include ...mmediate \openout \@partaux &quot;#1.aux&quot;                                                   \immediate \write \@partau... l.2 \include{group__group2}  Please type another output file name:  but in a non interactive mode (the usual way to run. i.e. with \batchmode) one doesn't get an opportunity to specify the file and the generation crashes. As written in the original question adding options like -shell-escape and / or -enable-write18 didn't help.  Is there a solution for this problem?  edit 2 I did some further test. I replaced the \subinputfrom with an \input statement, although this worked for the limited example above it didn't work for my larger codebase as here (again just a limited view) we have in the refman_doc.tex {Module Documentation} \input{group__group1} \include{group__group2}  with the contents of group_group1.tex similar to group__group2.tex and the file is also parallel to group__group2.tex. This results in the error: (manual.out) (manual.out) (../group/refman_doc.tex  ! LaTeX Error: File `group__group1.tex' not found.  Type X to quit or &lt;RETURN&gt; to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: tex)  Enter file name: ! Emergency stop. &lt;read *&gt;  l.2 \input{group__group1}  !  ==&gt; Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! Is there a 'biblatex in a nutshell' guide out there? I'd like if someone explained to me the essentials on how to use biblatex (what lines I have to write in my document, which files I have to have, how many times and what I have to compile), so then I can go to  to customise it further. Can colliding gravitational waves create a black hole? Square of a function with an essential singularity Let $a$ be a point on the complex plane such that the function $f$ has an essential singularity. I am trying to prove that the square of that function also has an essential singularity.  I suppose that it does not have an essential singularity. Then $\exists ;k$ such that $(z-z_0)^{2k}f^2(z)$ differentiable. Then if I could take the square root and preserve the differentiability I would have finised. Can I do that? What is the need of acceleration? As we can usually predict the various forces that a body might be undergoing based on its position and its velocity.Hence what is the need of acceleration? Split comma-separated values How to remove or hide the GRUB boot menu? What is a Generic Handler in asp.net and its use? Adobe Reader and xcolor within a table breaks the line render I'm using the xcolor package to colour the top row in a table. This is displayed properly using PDF viewers such as Preview or Skim (Mac). But using Adobe Reader 10.1.3 (either Windows or Mac) doesn't display the table line properly.   But removing the colouring for the table fixes it. Here is the example that works as expected:  \begin{table} \caption{Table showing Feature 5's Functional Tests} \hspace*{-0.5in} \begin{tabular}[h!]{|p{0.6cm}|p{4cm}|p{5cm}|p{4cm}|p{1.5cm}|} \hline {\bf Test ID } &amp; {\bf Task } &amp; {\bf Expected} &amp; {\bf Actual} &amp; {\bf Outcome} \\ \hline    5.1 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.2 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.3 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.4 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline \end{tabular}  \end{table}   And here is the example with a coloured row:  \begin{table} \caption{Table showing Feature 5's Functional Tests} \hspace*{-0.5in} \begin{tabular}[h!]{|p{0.6cm}|p{4cm}|p{5cm}|p{4cm}|p{1.5cm}|} \hline \rowcolor{gray!25} {\bf Test ID } &amp; {\bf Task } &amp; {\bf Expected} &amp; {\bf Actual} &amp; {\bf Outcome} \\ \hline    5.1 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.2 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.3 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.4 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline \end{tabular}  \end{table}   Removing the \rowcolor{} command replacing it with \cellcolor{} creates the same view. Any idea how to fix this?  I've tried printing it out of Adobe and the lines print fine, but as this will be read on as a soft copy it's pretty important. .  Any idea how to fix this? I would like to show the author names using \citet but I get just the reference number. Here is a minimal code:  \documentclass{report} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{natbib}  \begin{document}   The author \citet{toschi09} has shown that ..  \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{foo}  \end{document}   And here is foo.bib  @article{toschi09, author = {Toschi, F. and Bodenschatz, E.}, title = {Lagrangian Properties of Particles in Turbulence}, journal = {Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics}, volume = {41}, number = {1}, pages = {375-404}, year = {2009},  }   What I get is:     The author (author?) [1] has shown that ..   Any help will be more than welcome, thank you!