What I need is easy to explain but couldn't do it :-(  I want to grep a command output not showing the matching lines and x lines after that. Eg.  # fdisk -l Disk /dev/ram0: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes   Disk /dev/ram1: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes   Disk /dev/sda: 931.5 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes   I want to skip lines with 'ram' string and 6 lines after that, so the output would be just:  Disk /dev/sda: 931.5 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes   Something like sudo fdisk -l | grep -v "ram" -A 6
Consider a text file with the following entries:  aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii   Given a pattern (e.g. fff), I would like to grep the file above to get in the output:  all_lines except (pattern_matching_lines  U (B lines_before) U (A lines_after))   For example, if B = 2 and A = 1, the output with pattern = fff should be:  aaa bbb ccc hhh iii   How can I do this with grep or other command line tools?    Note, when I try:  grep -v 'fff'  -A1 -B2 file.txt   I don't get what I want. I instead get:  aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff -- -- fff ggg hhh iii
What to do to switch to biblatex? Because of the great answers posted around in the site, I'm finally considering to do the switch and move to biblatex. So, the question is what do I have to do?  To give the question some focus, assume that I already have a somewhat largish .bib file and a bunch of documents using natbib for my references. What do I have to change in my existing .bib and .tex files?  And what about coauthors? Would it be reasonably simple to instruct them how to work with the new documents using biblatex? Do they have to install new software/packages as well? How do I identify which CPU a MacBook uses? I'd like to identify which CPU this notebook is using, in terms of code names such as "Ivy Bridge" and "Haswell". The little Apple logo in the upper left shows some information, but not this. What effect does serial downvoting have on my rep cap? Are Variable Operators Possible? Issues Doing a String Comparison in LINQ How many of Trelawney's prophecies have come true? Why cofinality is a cardinal. Show that $2^n > n^2$ whenever n>4. Let $S(n)$ be the proposition "$2^n &gt; n^2$"  Basis step: $S(5)$ is true, since $2^5 = 32$, $ 32 &gt; 25 = 5^ 2$  Inductive step:  Induction hypothesis:   Assume $S(K)$ is true, $2^K &gt; K^2$.  Then  $2^{K+1} = 2.2^K &gt; K^2 + K^2$   I don't know how to proceed after this. How to complete this proof? Recently I've installed Kubuntu in a newly bought laptop with an Intel WiFi 6 AX200 network card, I can connect to the wifi without apparent problems but when I open the driver manager in the settings I face this weird situation:  Intel Corporation: Wi-Fi 6 AX200 This device is not working.  [ ] Using iwlwifi driver backport in DKMS format from backport-iwlwifi-dkms (open source)  [ ] Continue using a manually installed driver  [x] Do not use the device   Note that "Continue using a manually installed driver" is the only voice selectable in the list.  Here is some additional information:  $ lspci -nnk | grep 0280 -A3 02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Wi-Fi 6 AX200 [8086:2723] (rev 1a)         Subsystem: Intel Corporation Wi-Fi 6 AX200 [8086:0084]         Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi         Kernel modules: iwlwifi  $ rfkill list all 0: hci0: Bluetooth         Soft blocked: yes         Hard blocked: no 1: phy0: Wireless LAN         Soft blocked: no         Hard blocked: no  $ dmesg | grep iwl [    2.888227] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -&gt; 0002) [    2.945179] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-cc-a0-50.ucode failed with error -2 [    2.945217] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-cc-a0-49.ucode failed with error -2 [    2.947244] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 43.2.23.17 [    2.947250] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Found debug destination: EXTERNAL_DRAM [    2.947252] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Found debug configuration: 0 [    2.947697] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: loaded firmware version 48.4fa0041f.0 op_mode iwlmvm [    3.145585] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz, REV=0x340 [    3.159226] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Applying debug destination EXTERNAL_DRAM [    3.160060] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Allocated 0x00400000 bytes for firmware monitor. [    3.336456] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: base HW address: 50:eb:71:d7:0b:40 [    3.353553] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0 wlp2s0: renamed from wlan0 [    4.457920] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Applying debug destination EXTERNAL_DRAM [    4.621843] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: FW already configured (0) - re-configuring [    4.629999] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: BIOS contains WGDS but no WRDS   Someone have idea why this happened? Prove that neither $A$ nor $B$ is divisible by $5$ Cost increase and suspend I am very new to being able to use LaTeX to type up mathematical papers, and I just got my "system" set up. Currently I have installed TexWorks, and MikTex, and I have put together a 'hello world' article which seems to run well.   I have also used the syntax "\usepackage{amsmath}" and "\usepackage{amssymb}" in the beginning of my .tex file to write math symbols, only because some online tutorial said so.   My question is, firstly, are those the only packages I need to use for writing math, and secondly, I remember reading about some shortcuts(?) that can be used for writing math symbols, and/or user defined shortcuts that can be 'set' in the beginning so as to reduce the amount of LaTeX code needed to write mathematical symbols. However, I do not know if this is true, and if it is, how to go about 'installing' such a thing.   Does such a thing exist? Am I able to make my own shortcuts?  Thanks! Prove that for real number $p\geq  0$ we have   $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{(1^{1^p} \cdot2^{2^p}\cdots n^{n^p})^\frac{1}{n^{p+1}}}{n^\frac{1}{(p+1)}} = \exp\left(\dfrac{-1}{(p+1)^2}\right).$$ I'm trying to write a program in C (on Linux) that loops until the user presses a key, but shouldn't require a keypress to continue each loop.  Is there a simple way to do this? I figure I could possibly do it with select() but that seems like a lot of work.  Alternatively, is there a way to catch a ctrl-c keypress to do cleanup before the program closes instead of non-blocking io? What is the fate of the Asgardians at the start of Avengers: Infinity War? For $f$ Riemann integrable prove $\lim_{n\to\infty} \int_0^1x^nf(x)dx=0.$ Suppose $f$ is a Riemann integrable function on $[0,1]$. Prove that $\lim_{n\to\infty} \int_0^1x^nf(x)dx=0.$   This is what I am thinking: Fix $n$. Then by Jensen's Inequality we have $$0\leq\left(\int_0^1x^nf(x)dx\right)^2 \leq \left(\int_0^1x^{2n}dx\right)\left(\int_0^1f^2(x)dx\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2n+1}\right)\left(\int_0^1f^2(x)dx\right).$$Thus, if $n\to\infty$ then $$0\leq \lim_{n\to \infty}\left(\int_0^1x^nf(x)dx\right)^2 \leq 0$$ and hence we get what we want. How correct (or incorrect) is this? Set "this" variable easily? Please add a reply button to messages in the pinned/starred section I've run into this a few times; I'll rejoin chat after being away for a while and notice something interesting in the starred section.  I'd like to reply directly to the message but there's no reply button.  Currently, the only ways to explicitly reply to one of those messages are either:-   find the message by scrolling up and looking for it, then click the reply button or; copy and paste the permalink, deleting all the way up to the fragment identifier and adding the colon at the start.   Please add a reply link, even if it just goes in the popup menu it's an improvement. Table of contents numbering is strange Proof that any self-complementary graph has to have $4k$ or $4k+1$ vertex, for some $k \in \mathbb N$