13.04 raring ringtail  - 64 bit  How do I repair or remove the package so that I can install netflix on my laptop?  I get this error message from apt-get:  dpkg: error processing ttf-mscorefonts-installer (--configure):  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer is not ready for configuration  cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
After a recent update, ttf-mscorefonts-installer prompted me to accept its license agreement.     ┌─────────────────┤ Configuring ttf-mscorefonts-installer ├─────────────────┐  │                                                                           │   │ TrueType core fonts for the Web EULA                                          │                                                                               │ END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE                             │                                                                               │ IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This Microsoft End-User License Agreement           │ ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual or a          │ single entity) and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software           │ accompanying this EULA, which includes computer software and may include      │ associated media, printed materials, and "on-line" or electronic              │ documentation ("SOFTWARE PRODUCT" or "SOFTWARE"). By exercising your          │ rights to make and use copies of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, you agree to be        │ bound by the terms of this EULA. If you do not agree to the terms of          │ this EULA, you may not use the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.                              │                                                                               │                                  &lt;Ok&gt;                                         │                                                                           │   └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    Screenshot:   For some reason my terminal will not allow me to accept, or for some reason I am pressing the wrong hotkey...  I've tried every letter on the keyboard and Enter among others...  I'm sure there is a very simple and obvious solution to this.  I've also just tried to remove the package completely however the terminal states that due to the package not being correctly installed, I should reinstall the package before removing it.  Very frustrating!  Essentially, because I cannot successfully install this package, I can't really ever upgrade my system because I always have to end up terminating the terminal with the license agreement (thus the upgrade fails).
Correctness of questions without inversion, relying on intonation Avoid large spaces between text and equations I use the options  \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.25} \setlength{\parskip}{0pt} \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}    in the preamble of my document and most of the time the document looks like intended. Once in a while though, especially when I use multiline-equations, I get huge spaces right before and after the equation and the surrounding text, for example:    Is there any way I can avoid that without removing the \parskip option? Let $f: K^\bullet \to L^\bullet$ be homotopy equivalence. From theory of triangulated categories it follows that $C(f)^\bullet$ is contractible. But how can i produce explicit formula for homotopy of $Id_{C(f)^\bullet}$ and $0_{C(f)^\bullet}$? Find the limit of $\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\left(\sqrt{1+\frac{k}{n^2}}-1\right)$ Probability of an even number of sixes We throw a fair die $n$ times, show that the probability that there are an even number of sixes is $\frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n]$. For the purpose of this question, 0 is even.   I tried doing this problem with induction, but I have problem with induction so I was wondering if my solution was correct:   The base case: For $n=0$, our formula gives us $\frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^0] =1$. This is true, because if we throw the die zero times, we always get zero sixes.  Suppose it's true for $n=k$. Then the odds of an even number of sixes is $\frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n]$, and thus the odds of an odd number of sixes is $1 - \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n]$.    For $n=k+1$, there are two ways the number of sixes are even:  a. The number of sixes for $n=k$ was even, and we do not throw a six for $n=k+1$: $ \frac{5}{6} \cdot  \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n]$  b. The number of sixes for $n=k$ was odd, and we throw a six for $n=k+1$: $\frac{1}{6}(1 - \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n])$  So the probability $p$ for an even number of sixes at $n=k+1$ is $ \frac{5}{6} \cdot  \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n] + \frac{1}{6}(1 - \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n])$  I have two questions   How do I get from $ \frac{5}{6} \cdot  \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n] + \frac{1}{6}(1 - \frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n])$ to $\frac{1}{2}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n]$? I seem to have done something wrong, I can't get the algebra correct, I get $p = \frac{1}{3}[1+(\frac{2}{3})^n] + \dfrac{1}{6}$ Other than that, is my use of induction correct? Is it rigorous enough to prove the formula? CSOM: Identify "columns" created by user rather than built-in When iterating the fields of a list how do you know which columns are yours and which are built-in ?  I know a solution for "classic" SDK using SPField.SourceId  but I can't find one for CSOM.  I thought UserCreated was the way to go for but   So how do you tell apart theirs and mine ? Using a combination of Hidden CanBeDeleted FromBaseType ? Checking for a list of special internalNames ?          ClientContext context = new ClientContext(siteUrl);         context.Credentials = creds;         Web web = context.Web;         var list = web.Lists.GetByTitle(listName);          context.Load(list.Fields);         context.ExecuteQuery();          foreach (Field field in list.Fields)         {         bool thisColumnWasCreatedByUser =                        field .FromBaseType == false &amp;&amp;                     //this.InternalName != "Title" &amp;&amp; // builtin but I'd rather keep it                     field .InternalName != "_dlc_DocId" &amp;&amp; // probably safe                     field .InternalName != "_dlc_DocIdUrl" &amp;&amp;                     field .InternalName != "_dlc_DocIdPersistId" &amp;&amp;                     field .InternalName != "Combine" &amp;&amp; // sucks                     field .InternalName != "RepairDocument" // sucks too         }   EDIT  Mixing suggestions by Viraj Gorajia and Dikesh Gandhi, my current solution is  bool thisColumnWasCreatedByUser =  field .FromBaseType == false &amp;&amp; (!field .SchemaXml.Contains(" SourceID=\"http")) &amp;&amp; // remove "Title", "Combine", "RepairDocument"  (!field .EntityPropertyName.StartsWith("OData__")) // field .Sealed == true could be working too but I don't know if it could exclude valid results How to find multiple blank lines in Notepad++ and join the the separated text lines with a macro?  Below is screenshot of the file, where I want a macro to find out this blank line and correct the SEE and FIGURE should come to one line. Why doesn't a commutator cause the rotation to reverse periodically or stop? I understand the field magnets attracting/repelling the armature/coil so that it turns one half-turn and then, because the commutator is turned, its contact with the brushes has switched sides, and the current goes in the opposite direction, reversing the electromagnetic polarity. Then, because the polarity is swapped, it attracts/repels to complete the second half-turn. The thing is, isn't it a bit of a gamble that it will turn in the same direction? Couldn't the it just be pulled/pushed back, more or less undoing the half-turn?  I'm also a bit confused how the rotation doesn't just stop once the commutator is oriented so that the brushes are contacting both sides of the commutator. In other words, there's a brief period just as the commutator switches the current directions where each both the brushes are in contact with both sides of the commutator where the current is neutralized. Shouldn't this stop the motor?    For reference, I'm just talking about a simple DC motor. Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, I'm new to the site :/  My issue is this: when editing in vim, my syntax file highlights underscores and carets when found in non-math text, which is fine, except vim doesn't recognize that "align" is a math environment. What do I need to do to fix this? Is it possible to search by posts that contain an image? Sometimes when going back through e.g. my previous answers to find some information, I know the question I am looking for contains an image, and I know the language tag, but I'm a little hazy on the other parameters.    Is there a search option to restrict results to only those posts that contain an image? Akin to filtering email to show only those with attachments I guess.  I see that with  you can filter by user, votes, answer count or whether a question has an accepted answer, or has been closed or migrated. But not images? How to fix invisible form fields in Firefox while using Adwaita Dark Theme (or any other dark theme) I have this issue with some form fields in Firefox and using the adwaita-dark theme. In some webpages where the field background is white, you cannot read the text because it is also white.   This question was edited in order to clarify that this kind of wording of the question might help people who are not familiar with what a GTK+ theme. I also thing that the wording will help to get more hits through search engines. If it's still considered a duplicate, I'll accept it. Prove equation with binomial coefficient I honestly have no idea how to approach this question. I have done easier questions eg. show $gcd(a,b)lcm(a,b)=ab$ by letting $a=Alcm(a,b)$ and $b=Blcm(a,b)$ and then using the fact that $A$ and $B$ are coprime. However this approach only works in two variables. Any help with the question in the title would be greatly appreciated, as well as the thought process behind the answer so that I can approach similar problems. We have a sequence $(x_{n})_{n=1}^\infty$ in a Hilbert space $H$ and we know that:   for every $n \in \mathbb{N}$ holds $\|x_{n}\|\le1$ for every $m\ne n$ holds $\|x_{n}-x_{m}\|\ge r &gt; 0$   How I can show that $r \le \sqrt2$ ? I want to appropriate line segments that share the same geometry with a particular line width and labels based on the aggregated values of one field "GIS@BUS_5_Min".  My attribute table and polyline objects look as following, see image below   "BUSLINIE" means a bus line, "Overlap" means if the line has overlaps, i.e. it's geometry repeats.  Values of the field "GIS@BUS_5_Min" for these three objects has to be aggregated as one value and represented as a label sum("GIS@BUS_5_Min").  And the width of this line (selected in yellow) will be sum("GIS@BUS_5_Min")/100 = 19.10/100 = 0.1910  How can I achieve such output?  I assume it is possible with Layer Properties &gt; Width &gt; Data defined override &gt; Edit..., but I do not know how to check the same geometry and how to sum the values of certain features with CASE WHEN condition THEN result END conditional function?  Dissolve function does not work in my case because I do not have any key-fields.    References: Simple chessboard exercise I'm granted a one-entry Schengen visa and now I can't go. Will having an unused visa in my travel passport have any consequences like future visas refusal? Do I need to do anything special? Error on \usepackage {geometry} text property I have a function defined as follows: $f(x,y)= \dfrac{x^2-y^2}{\left(x^2+y^2\right)^2}$, if $(x,y)\neq (0, 0)$ and $f(x,y)=0$ if $(x,y)=(0,0)$.  Now, $$\int_0^1\int_0^1 f(x,y)\,\text{d}x~\text{d}y=-\frac{\pi}{4}$$ and $$\int_0^1\int_0^1 f(x,y)\,\text{d}y~\text{d}x=\frac{\pi}{4}.$$   The question I have is this: why does this not contradict Fubini's theorem?    thanks. Is it possible to scale specific apps on Windows 10?