Python sort one list from another list
Sorting list based on values from another list
Are they going to start a new trilogy of Spider-Man once again? I was reading Wikipedia's entry on the 2012 movie  to find out about the next movie in the franchise. It says that there were plans for a third movie but it is cancelled now, and Spider-Man is going to appear in . It also says that Sony hired someone (don't remember the name) to write a new trilogy for the franchise.   What is the point of telling the same story once again? They have repeated it twice already. Is it just for business or to compete with the Marvel Cinematic Universe? I am wanting to find a latitude and longitude point given a bearing, a distance, and a starting latitude and longitude.  This appears to be the opposite of this question ().  I have already looked into the haversine formula and think it's approximation of the world is probably close enough.  I am assuming that I need to solve the haversine formula for my unknown lat/long, is this correct? Are there any good websites that talk about this sort of thing? It seems like it would be common, but my googling has only turned up questions similar to the one above.  What I am really looking for is just a formula for this. I'd like to give it a starting lat/lng, a bearing, and a distance (miles or kilometers) and I would like to get out of it a lat/lng pair that represent where one would have ended up had they traveled along that route. piping in real time This is more a conceptual thing than a current problem.  Would it be possible to do this:  tail -f &lt;file&gt; | grep "string" | sed 's/stuff//g' &gt;&gt; output.txt  The problem I'm thinking is that tail -f never terminates so it won't progress in the command. I'm trying to read and output a file in real-time. If this doesn't work how would I do it? style=apa causes bibliography to fail How did Newton discover the universal law of gravitation? I am having trouble comprehending how anyone could come up with this formula:  $$F = \frac{GMm}{d^2}.$$   Could someone walk me through this? Are PHP short tags acceptable to use? Hide the term id on autocomplete widget Using CSS to affect div style inside iframe Coin sequence paradox from Martin Gardner's book After upgrading to Ubuntu 17.10, Ubuntu Dock icons of some of my apps are not appearing. They appear properly in the dash. I verified the *.desktop files for the applications in /usr/share/applications and ~/.local/share/applications.  E.g. dock icon is not displaying for "Terminator". Check out the attached image.    This is how the icon for the same application appears in dash search:    Content of /usr/share/applications/terminator.desktop:  [Desktop Entry] Name=Terminator Comment=Multiple terminals in one window TryExec=terminator Exec=terminator Icon=terminator Type=Application Categories=GNOME;GTK;Utility;TerminalEmulator;System; StartupNotify=true X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain=terminator X-Ayatana-Desktop-Shortcuts=NewWindow; Keywords=terminal;shell;prompt;command;commandline; [NewWindow Shortcut Group] Name=Open a New Window Exec=terminator TargetEnvironment=Unity   Any pointers to debug this issue will be helpful. I'm trying to follow a line in a derivation for $P(Z&gt;X+Y)$ where $X,Y,Z$ are independent continuous random variables distributed uniformly on $(0,1)$.  I've already derived the pdf of $X+Y$ using the convolution theorem, but there's a line in the answer that says:  $P(Z&gt;X+Y) = \mathbb{E}[\ P(Z&gt;X+Y\ |\  X+Y )\  ]$ where $\mathbb{E}$ is the expectation.  I'm not familiar with this result. Could anyone give a pointer to a similar result if one exists?  Thanks. My question is about one particular usage of static keyword. It is possible to use static keyword to cover a code block within a class which does not belong to any function. For example following code compiles:  public class Test {     private static final int a;         static {         a = 5;         doSomething(a);     }     private static int doSomething(int x) {         return (x+5);     } }   If you remove the static keyword it complains because the variable a is final. However it is possible to remove both final and static keywords and make it compile.   It is confusing for me in both ways. How am I supposed to have a code section that does not belong to any method? How is it possible to invoke it? In general, what is the purpose of this usage? Or better, where can I find documentation about this? Change section command in article In the document class article how do I change the command \section to behave exactly like the command \chapter in the document class book? i.e. write Chapter # and then the title and also leave some empty space at the top of the page.  Sorry if my question is not clearly stated and if this question might already exist but I couldn't find anything. sql ORDER BY multiple values in specific order? Can an infinite set A be larger than an infinite set B but still have the same cardinality? Definition. Two sets have the same cardinality iff they can be put into one-to-one correspondence; or,     $$A \simeq B \iff |A| = |B| $$    This definition applies to infinite as well as to finite sets. It follows from the last three definitions that set $A$ has a larger cardinality than set $B$ iff both    a proper subset of $A$ and the whole of $B$ can be put into one-to-one correspondence the whole of $A$ cannot be put into one-to-one correspondence with any proper subset of $B$.   From: A Crash Course in the Mathematics Of Infinite Sets Peter Suber, Philosophy Department, Earlham College  The last part specifically refers to proper subsets of $B$.  That excludes at least one subset of $B$, namely $B$.  So, is it possible that the whole of A cannot be put into one-to-one correspondence with any proper subset of $B$ but may with $B$ itself? Why did he not say "any subset of $B$"? The currently proposed Gravitational wave detection apparatus consists of Michelson Interferometer which is supposed to measure distances of the order of $10^{-22}$m. But the wavelength of the light used is in the order of micrometers ($10^{-6}$m). How is this possible? The conventional way to measure distance is by counting the interference fringes. But for path difference smaller than wavelength of laser light this is not possible. Background - I am doing my PhD in atmospheric physics/photobiology.  Here is a scenario:   The experiments are complete - the results are far better than expected  Successfully got the computer program to work properly and have developed another Papers are published Much of the thesis is drafted   The light at the end of the tunnel is most definitely no longer an oncoming train.  But, at this stage, you just don't feel like working on the thesis, you do other things like cleaning, reading, watching movies - procrastination gets worse, and worse despite the submission deadline coming closer.     The procrastination resulting in more apathy towards the project, despite being fully aware of how much work has been put into the project, how much has been achieved and how little, comparatively, needs to be done.  What strategies are there to overcome this academic-apathy, particularly in this late stage of the thesis? Related questions with over 99 score display incorrectly Intuition behind the definition of a measurable set This week I saw the definition of a measurable set for an outer measure.     Let $\mu^*$ be an outer measure on a set $X$. We call $A \subseteq X$ measurable if $$\mu^*(E) = \mu^*(A\cap E) + \mu^*(A^c\cap E)$$ for every $E \subseteq X$.   This is not the first time I've seen this definition. Unlike most other things in mathematics, over time I have gained absolutely no intuition as to why this is the definition.   The only explanation I've ever seen is that a set is measurable if it 'breaks up' other sets in the way you'd want. I don't really see why this is the motivation though. One reason I am not comfortable with it is that you require a measurable set to break up sets which, according to this definition, are non-measurable; why would you require that? Of course, you can't say what a non-measurable set is without first defining what it means to be measurable so I suppose no matter what your condition is, it will have to apply to all subsets of $X$.     Is there an intuitive way to think about the definition of measurable sets? Is there a good reason why we should use this definition, aside from "it works"? How to solve this integral? $I=\int{e^x \Big(2\log x+\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}\Big)dx}$ $$I=\int{e^x \Big(2\log x+\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}\Big)dx}$$ I have tried to use many methods of substitution  But I am aware of a formula  $$I=\int{e^x[f(x)+f'(x)]dx}=e^xf(x)+C$$  but can this formula be applied to the above equation