Lets say I have Firefox and my IDE opened. Input language is set to English. Then I open chat in Firefox and change language to Russian.    Then I alt-tab to my IDE and have language set to Russian too. So language is changed system-wide. What I want is to not change language in my IDE and keep it English.  Is it possible to have windows-like behavior: different languages for different applications?  Ubuntu version: 16.04.3 LTS
I'm working under 12.04 and suppose I have a Firefox windows active (or in foreground) with English as input language and I need to type a document in other language using some text editor.   With the text editor in foreground (or active) and the input language set to a non-English one, when I bring Firefox in foreground (or making it active) the input language remains set to the non-English and the language flag does not switch to English (as it would be expected, since I do not alter the language during the whole Firefox session).  Because of this, I have to make extra moves and change the input language manually every time I switch from the text editor to Firefox and back to text editor. This was not happening with 10.04, and each application windows had the corresponding input language set to its default or previous session every time I was bringing it to the foreground!   How will I make 12.04 to behave the same way?
When and why should I use % !TEX TS-program and % !TEX encoding? Why comment reply auto-completion feature (@) sometimes doesn't work? Capturing emoticons using regular expression in python Question regarding the Fibonacci sequence Given the Fibonacci sequence $(F_1, F_2,F_3, ...)$ how do I prove that if $m|n$ then $F_m|F_n$? Can this be proven with mathematical induction? $(a_n+a_{n+1})$ is convergent implies $(a_n/n)$ converges to $0$ Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence such that $(a_n+a_{n+1})$ is convergent. Prove that $(a_n/n)$ converges to $0$.   $(a_n+a_{n+1})$ convergent to $L$ means that for all $\epsilon$, there exists $N$ such that for all $n\geq N$, $|L-a_n-a_{n+1}|&lt;\epsilon$, or in other words $L-\epsilon&lt;a_n+a_{n+1}&lt;L+\epsilon$. How to proceed from here? Is it okay to copy-paste answers from other questions? This one leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth, but I defer to others as to whether it is appropriate or not. In , I wrote an answer to a question based on my experiences; it was upvoted and accepted, woo.  Now, today, in response to a different &#8212; but related &#8212; , someone has pasted my answer nearly verbatim (awkward English intact, I may add) as an answer.  Is that really okay? Is it a behavior that should be encouraged? Discouraged? Mount cifs Network Drive: write permissions and chown I have access to a cifs network drive. When I mount it under my OSX machine, I can read and write from and to it.   When I mount the drive in ubuntu, using:  sudo mount -t cifs -o username=${USER},password=${PASSWORD} //server-address/folder /mount/path/on/ubuntu   I am not able to write to the network drive, but I can read from it. I have checked the permissions and owner of the mount folder, they look like:  4.0K drwxr-xr-x  4 root root    0 Nov 12  2010 Mounted_folder   I cannot change the owner, because I get the error:  chown: changing ownership of `/Volumes/Mounted_folder': Not a directory   When I descend deeper into the network drive, and change the ownership there, I get the error that I have no permission to change the folder´s owner.  What should I do to activate my write permission? The choice between the gerund and the infinitive in a certain construction I am pretty much sure that for native speakers the issue I am going to bring up might look as an uncalled question as they can easily figure out which form of a verbal part of speech should be used, be it a gerund, an infinitive, or a bare infinitive. However, it can be pretty much misleading for a foreigner because the same construction works differently with different words and I don’t see a logical explanation. For example:  The purpose of this article is to analyze the issue…  My hobby is reading. One may assume, and many foreigners really come to this conclusion, that it’s OK to switch the “gerund” and “infinitive” as the meaning will stay the same, that is:  The purpose of this article is analyzing the issue… (same as 1 above)  My hobby is to read. (same as 2 above)   However, as I was told, this assumption is erroneous. Another example: His task was watching after them. (not good) His task was to watch after them. Is there any principle which governs the choice of the right form in such cases? How do I install the Nvidia drivers? I just ordered the Nvidia GTX card. I have a dilemma, though. Should I keep using the driver which is available in "additional drivers" in Ubuntu, or should I install the driver from the Nvidia site?  So which driver is the best for me? Spontaneous electroweak symmetry breaking (i.e. $SU(2)\times U(1)\to U(1)_{em}$ ) is at scale about 100 Gev. So, for , gauge bosons $Z$ &amp; $W$ have masses about 100 GeV. But before this spontaneous symmetry breaking ( i.e. Energy > 100 GeV) the symmetry $SU(2)\times U(1)$ is not broken, and therefore gauge bosons are massless.  The same thing happens when we go around energy about $10^{16}$ GeV, where we have the Grand Unification between electroweak and strong interactions, in some bigger group ($SU(5)$, $SO(10)$ or others). So theoretically we should find gauge bosons $X$ and $Y$ with masses about $10^{16}$ GeV after GUT symmetry breaks into the Standard Model gauge group $SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$, and we should find massless X and Y bosons at bigger energies (where GUT isn't broken).  So this is what happened in the early universe: when temperature decreased, spontaneous symmetry breaking happened and firstly $X$ &amp; $Y$ gauge bosons obtained mass and finally $Z$ &amp; $W$ bosons obtained mass.   Now, I ask: have I understood this correctly? In other words, if we make experiments at energy above the electroweak scale (100 GeV) we are where $SU(2)\times U(1)$ isn't broken and then we should (experimentally) find $SU(2)$ and $U(1)$ massless gauge bosons, i.e. $W^1$, $W^2$, $W^3$ and $B$ with zero mass? But this is strange, because if I remember well in LHC we have just make experiments at energy about 1 TeV, but we haven't discovered any massless gauge bosons. Mysterious Windows 7 Autorun Location I have Acer Aspire One A521 with brand new SSD disk, on which I've just installed brand new Windows 7 HE 64. After installing system I installed all drivers, including Conexant audio driver. Starting from that moment, after each system restart I see Windows prompt asking me, if I really want to run application C:\Program Files\CONEXANT\cAudioFilterAgent\cAudioFilterAgent64.exe.  Situation like that is quite normal to me, and I always use some "startup scanner" to find such software and purge system out of it. I have very, very old Startup Control Panel 2.8 by Mike Lin. It can have even ten years, but it has never disappointed me, so I continue using it. It scans Startup folders for current user and common one, HKLM Run, HKCU Run and Run Once sections of Windows Registry. For past ten years I thought that these are all locations where application, that is being autorun during system startup can coexist. Turns out, I was wrong.  Since this is brand new Windows, just installed, its autorun locations are empty. The only entry I do have is ATI graphic card driver manager startup string in HKLM Run. I have checked that fact ten times (but only with above mentioned program and manually) and I'm 100% sure, that in none of known to me autorun locations there are no traces of Conexant program startup string.  What do I miss? Does Windows 7 introduces some new startup location or a new method of autorunning programs, that is beyond, what I know and what Startup Control Panel scans?  Solving this problem is a snap for me. I can use brute-force method of removing manually that file or renaming it or I can uninstall Conexant audio driver at all (for the very, very limited use of audio in my laptop, that I have, Windows driver will for sure be enough, I've installed Conexant one "just in case"). But I'm really, really curious, how Windows is possible to run this program each time I restart it? Where autorun string for it can exists? Does an increasing sequence of reals converge if the difference of consecutive terms approaches zero? $SU(3)$ irreducible representations with tensor method I am dealing with the tensor product representation of $SU(3)$ and I have some problems in understanding some decomposition.  1) Let's find the irreducible representation of $3\otimes\bar{3}$  we have that this representation trasforms like   $${T^\prime}^i_j=U^i_k {U^{\dagger}}^l_j T^k_l $$  hence I observe that  $$Tr(T)=\delta^j_iT^i_j$$ is an invariant and so  $$T^i_j=\left(T^i_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^j_iT^i_j\right)+\frac{1}{3}\delta^j_iT^i_j$$  allows me to write $$3\otimes\bar{3}=8\oplus1$$ Here comes my questions: I have heard that this $8$ representation is an "$8_{MA}$" where MA is for "mixed-antisymmetric". The meaning of "mixed-antisymmetric" shold be: "the tensor $\left(T^i_j-\frac{1}{3}\delta^j_iT^i_j\right)$ should be antisymmetric for an exchange of 2 particular indexes but not for a general exchange of 3 indexes". What does this mean? I see only 2 index in that tensor.  2) Consider this representation: $$3\otimes3\otimes3=3\otimes(6\oplus\bar{3})=3\otimes6_S\oplus3\otimes\bar{3}=3\otimes 6_S\oplus8_{MA}\oplus1$$  and now on my notes I have $$3\otimes6_S=10_S\oplus8_{MS}$$  Where "MS" is for "mixed symmetric": symmetric for an exchange of 2 particular indexes but not for a general exchange of 3 indexes.  I could not demonstrate this last decomposition using tensor method. I started noticeing that: $$3\otimes6_S=q^iS^{k,l}$$ where $S^{k,l}$ is a symmetric tensor But then I am not able to proceed in demonstrating the above decomposition (note: I would like to demonstrate this decomposition using only tensor properties, not Young tableaux). I tried to look on Georgi, Hamermesh, Zee and somewhere online but I have not found any good reference which explains well this representatin decomposition...  EDIT: the demonstration should not include the use of Young diagrams...my professor started the demonstration by writing $\epsilon_{\rho,i,k}q^i S^{k,l}=T'^l_\rho=8_{MS}$ and then stopped the demonstration. What is the cardinality of the set of all topologies on $\mathbb{R}$? This was  on Quora. I thought about it a little bit but didn't make much progress beyond some obvious upper and lower bounds. The answer probably depends on AC and perhaps also GCH or other axioms. A quick search also failed to provide answers. Why did Voldemort stop employing Occlumency against Harry in Deathly Hallows? I have a data set for a predictive model(predicting survival rate with certain acute medical condition on some animals) with 25 predictors where around 30% of the predictors are complete, 3 predictors are sitting at 30%,25% and 20% missing, and the others are missing at around 5% level. Around 50% of my data are complete cases. I'm new to dealing with missing values so I have a couple of questions regarding how to deal with it:   What can I do with the variable with 30% missing assuming it's MAR? Is 30% too high for imputation? What kinds of metrics can I use to make the decision between removal of the predictor, listwise removal, imputation or some other options? How should I deal with a predictor with 20% - 25% missing when I have reason to believe that it's MNAR? I'm thinking of using imputation on the remaining predictors with around 5% missingness. How do I make the decision on which imputation methods to use? Are they chosen on a case by case basis based on the individual predictors? How does one impute categorical values?  How does(should?) the imputation carry out in practice? Should it use complete cases or compute it iteratively somehow?  Does feature selection comes in before or after dealing with missing values? if at all? What is the point of Sauron making the One Ring? Why would Sauron make himself a ring that he invested most of his power in? Wouldn't it be better to keep the power in his physical form and not risk leaving his power in a physical form that could be stolen (which did happen when Isildur took it). Because of its being in the form of a ring, its power could be abused by someone else to attack him. How do I force Excel (and other Microsoft Office products) to stop opening files in the same application? Whenever I "double click" on an Excel file and another Excel file is open, the newly opened file automatically opens in the same application window as the previously opened Excel file. This isn't limited to just Excel, as I've seen Word do this as well. This poses a problem when wanting to compare documents side by side.    The current solution I have for this is to actually open another Excel or Word instance, and then open the file from within that application window itself. Is there a way to force Office to open a new instance of the application when double clicking on the file icons?  I'm currently using Office 2007 and Windows XP, but I've seen this on Office 2010 and Windows Vista and 7. I'm looking for an overall solution if possible. I am running Xubuntu 11.10 and everything works nicely. I have selected a nice Xfce theme and everything looks beautiful, except Libreoffice.  While other programmes (Gimp, Inkscape, Thunar etc.) integrate with the selected Appearance &amp; Window Manager theme, Libreoffice looks like a Windows 98 programme.  Does anyone know how to fix this? I have already tried this solution, without success:   Thanks for your help! When the trace of the Frobenius homomorphism is zero? Let's consider an elliptic curve over a finite field $\mathbb F_p$.  The trace of the Frobenius homomorphism is defined as:  $$a_p=p+1-\#E(\mathbb F_p)$$  See for example .  I read that this value is zero if and only if the elliptic curve is supersingular. Unfortunately there is no proof give. So I am looking for a proof of this. (For example a good reference).