I tried to drag and drop a file from desktop to an opened folder (not to the folder icon), but it doesn't work. How can i fix it? Thank you in advance.
If I insert a flash drive and try to drag any files onto desktop - nothing happens.  Or from any other folder.  Drag 'n copy only works if you open desktop in nautilus ("show desktop in files").  I already ran the command:  gsettings set org.gnome.nautilus.preferences use-experimental-views false   It didn't help. How to fix this?
solving third-order nonlinear ordinary differential equation Convert date to another timezone in JavaScript Recursive matching with regular expressions in Javascript Multiple Sub Query using child parent relationship Consider in my basket, I have a package (Main Product-just a holder) which will have 2 standalone products (child) and again the standalone products will have child products (Grand Parent). All these products are from same object called Product Configuration.   We have a child relationship to itself(Parent Configuration) using a custom lookup field. The problem here is, I could only fetch details only up to 1 level (i.e.,package and child details) and I was not able to drill deeper to grand child products.  Query I used to get 1 level of relation ships is below:  SELECT id, name, Access_Type__c, Circuit_Bandwidth_Value__c, QuoteType__c,     Upstream_Speed_Value__c, IP_Address_Type__c, Care_Level__c, Base_Plan_Value__c, Site_Address__c,      cscfga__Quantity__c, Quantity_of_Ip_Address__c, cscfga__Contract_Term__c, Connection_Price__c,      Monthly_Rental_Conga__c, Total_Annual_Rental__c,      (         SELECT id, name,cscfga__Product_Family__c,Upstream_Speed_Value__c, cscfga__Quantity__c, Quantity_of_Ip_Address__c,              Connection_Price__c, Monthly_Rental_Conga__c,cscfga__Parent_Configuration__r.Circuit_Bandwidth_Value__c,Circuit_Bandwidth_Value__c          FROM cscfga__Related_Configurations__r         WHERE cscfga__Parent_Configuration__c &lt;&gt; ''          ORDER BY name     )  FROM cscfga__Product_Configuration__c  WHERE cscfga__Product_Basket__r.cscfga__Opportunity__c='{pv0}'      AND cscfga__Product_Basket__r.csordtelcoa__Synchronised_with_Opportunity__c=True     AND cscfga__Parent_Configuration__c = ''  ORDER BY name   Not sure how to write another sub query to get grand child details. When I tried the below query:  SELECT id, name, Access_Type__c, Circuit_Bandwidth_Value__c, QuoteType__c, Upstream_Speed_Value__c,      IP_Address_Type__c, Care_Level__c, Base_Plan_Value__c, Site_Address__c, cscfga__Quantity__c,      Quantity_of_Ip_Address__c, cscfga__Contract_Term__c, Connection_Price__c,      Monthly_Rental_Conga__c, Total_Annual_Rental__c,     (         SELECT id, name, cscfga__Product_Family__c, Upstream_Speed_Value__c, cscfga__Quantity__c,              Quantity_of_Ip_Address__c, Connection_Price__c, Monthly_Rental_Conga__c, cscfga__Parent_Configuration__r.Circuit_Bandwidth_Value__c, Circuit_Bandwidth_Value__c,         FROM cscfga__Related_Configurations__r         WHERE cscfga__Parent_Configuration__c &lt;&gt; ''          ORDER BY name     ),     (         SELECT id, name, cscfga__Product_Family__c          FROM cscfga__Related_Configurations__r         WHERE cscfga__Parent_Configuration__c &lt;&gt; ''          ORDER BY name     ) FROM cscfga__Product_Configuration__c  WHERE cscfga__Product_Basket__r.cscfga__Opportunity__c='0066E000002Xrr0'      AND cscfga__Product_Basket__r.csordtelcoa__Synchronised_with_Opportunity__c=True      AND cscfga__Parent_Configuration__c = ''  ORDER BY name   I got below error:     MALFORMED_QUERY:  from cscfga__Related_Configurations__r ^ ERROR at   Row:6:Column:6 Cannot follow the same aggregate relationship twice:   cscfga__Related_Configurations__r   Can someone please help here. Note: I am executing these queries in Workbench. Logging into Ask LibreOffice with my Stack Exchange OpenID If I'm on , I click on OpenID and then enter  and click Log In, I get a page that says:  An error occurred on the server  This event has been recorded.  If you believe you encountered this message in error, please report it.   I clicked report it and here I am reporting it! Using Firefox 26 How are pronouns resolved? Are pronouns in English resolved syntactically or semantically? Do they always refer to the closest matching noun?  A  has these examples:        We gave the bananas to the monkeys because they were hungry.   We gave the bananas to the monkeys because they were ripe.   We gave the bananas to the monkeys because they were here.       My understanding was that pronouns are resolved syntactically, and so sentence 2 is semantically incorrect (unless the author really meant that the monkeys were ripe) and sentence 3 is not ambiguous. Is this wrong?  Citations and references are most welcome. Electric circuits in TeX, LaTeX, and Friends What are some ways to draw electric circuits in TeX systems?  I'm making this community wiki since I haven't found a question related to this.  I was thinking along the lines of . What do you think of that? Other examples are more than welcome, of course. “between” vs. “among” Today I was cut off in the middle of the following sentence:     Between Cook, Strauss, and Pietersen—   My friend said I was wrong. He said that for more than two entities, among/amongst are used, and that between is only for two entities.   I vaguely remember some rule like this, but I asked him to hear the whole sentence, which was:     Between Cook, Strauss, and Pietersen, they’ve notched up 56 centuries in Test cricket.   Should I have used among here? Seems correct to me to use between, but my friend was certain.   Another friend pointed out the following sentence:     I’m still choosing between Harvard, Yale, and MIT.    Certainly among doesn’t seem to fit here, and she, to me, was correct in using between. Why the principal value of complex number argument is taken within $(-\pi,\pi]?$ Why the principal value of complex number argument is taken within $(-\pi,\pi]?$ What is the harm in considering similar other intervals like $[0,2\pi)$ for the purpose? How do you performance test JavaScript code? CPU Cycles, Memory Usage, Execution Time, etc.?  Added: Is there a quantitative way of testing performance in JavaScript besides just perception of how fast the code runs? How to place the intercept of x and y axes at (0 , 0) and extend the x and y axes to the edge of the plot Proof of continuity $f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)$ PHP conditionals, brackets needed? I was just browsing a forum and someone asked about a PHP file they had found on the web.  It has several spots like this in the code:  if ($REMOTE_ADDR == "") $ip = "no ip"; else $ip = getHostByAddr($REMOTE_ADDR);  I have always thought brackets are needed to enclose what you want to do if the condition is true.  Is there some other alternative, such as if it is on the same line you don't?  There is also another line like this: if ($action != ""): mail("$adminaddress","Visitor Comment from YOUR SITE",  My instinct is to say this wouldn't work, but I also don't know if it is an outdated PHP file and it used to work? Why do we use the simple past but not the present or future in the following expressions:  Don't you think it's time we went a little further Don't you think it's time we ate Don't you think it's time we went home Optimizer not choosing index union plan Why is the following query slow?  select count(*)   from [dbo].[mt_dispatch_link]     , [dbo].[_mt_dispatch] [_mt_dispatch]  where   (mt_dispatch_link.contract_id_1 = _mt_dispatch.contract_id       and mt_dispatch_link.dispatch_id_1 = _mt_dispatch.dispatch_id)     or   (mt_dispatch_link.contract_id_2 = _mt_dispatch.contract_id       and mt_dispatch_link.dispatch_id_2 = _mt_dispatch.dispatch_id)     It takes over 10 minutes, and then I tend to stop it at that point. My question is more about how to make sense of the query plan.  Looking at the query plan I can see that the bottom clustered index scan is returning about 250000 records, but the cost is 0% and it is being put into a temporary table.  The top index scan is about 25000 records.  But the cost of 95% comes from the nested join. What conclusions should I draw from this?  The above query plan shows two index scans, does that mean it is doing 25000 + 250000 index scans, or does it mean that it is doing 25000 * 250000 index scans?  If I change the query to this (adding FORCESEEK):  select count(*)   from [dbo].[mt_dispatch_link]     , [dbo].[_mt_dispatch] [_mt_dispatch]       WITH (FORCESEEK)  where   (mt_dispatch_link.contract_id_1 = _mt_dispatch.contract_id       and mt_dispatch_link.dispatch_id_1 = _mt_dispatch.dispatch_id)     or   (mt_dispatch_link.contract_id_2 = _mt_dispatch.contract_id       and mt_dispatch_link.dispatch_id_2 = _mt_dispatch.dispatch_id)   I end up with a much better plan and the query runs instantly:    I ran update statistics on both tables. Didn't fix it unfortunately. The table design is not very good, so I think SQL Server doesn't really understand and is thus coming up with a poor query plan. Some more info about the table design at .  Why is the query optimiser not coming up with the optimum plan? My cat sat on my laptop and now if I type either L or P, it inputs 3 or * instead. The rest of my keyboard still works correctly. The problem is bad enough that I had to use the touch screen of my computer to type this in.  How can I restore the correct working behaviour of my keyboard? Low Voltage AC Smoothing Capacitor Calculation I have a 9V AC source which will have a max load of 100mA.  I'm trying to figure the value of a smoothing capacitor with less than a 10% ripple.  I don't have a scope or else I'd just try a bunch out.  I'm just a hobbyist, but I'm trying to understand this.  Since I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, I'll just step through what I've done so far.  First I found this formula: $$V_{ripple}={V_p \over R_LC} \times \Delta T$$  I'm using 60Hz 9VAC that is full wave rectified and I want a 10% ripple so:  $$(9V \times .1)={9V \over R_LC} \times {1 \over 60Hz}$$  I'm calculating my resistive load with Ohm's law. $$R = {9V \over .1A} \quad R = 90 \Omega$$  So plugging that in I get: $$.9V={9V \over 90\Omega \; C} \times {1 \over 60Hz}$$  If I solve for C (admittedly using wolfram alpha), I get: $$C={1\over 540}F \quad C=1851 \mu f$$  1850µf seems pretty high to me...  And if I lower the ripple percent it get crazy high.  Is this the right way to find this?  Or did I screw up somewhere?  Also, my circuit has the capacitor between the full bridge rectifier's positive and negative outputs.  I've only seen this type of smoothing circuit, but maybe my circuit needs to change? Please help me prove this. I'm not sure how to apply the parallelogram law to the norm. I extracted simple example:  require 'pp' x = 1..3 pp x.map do |i| {:value =&gt; i, :double =&gt; (i*2)} end pp x.map { |i| {:value =&gt; i, :double =&gt; (i*2)} }  pp(x.map do |i| {:value =&gt; i, :double =&gt; (i*2)} end) pp(x.map { |i| {:value =&gt; i, :double =&gt; (i*2)} })   I am wondering why first pp produces:  [1, 2, 3]   While all the oders are giving:  [{:value=&gt;1, :double=&gt;2}, {:value=&gt;2, :double=&gt;4}, {:value=&gt;3, :double=&gt;6}]   I assume it has something to do with operator precedence. Where can I find good explanation? I feel that there is a subtle difference in meaning between 'efficacy' and 'efficiency', but I couldn't find any authoritative sources that could help me confirm or refute this. Is there any difference between the two words, especially in scientific context?