I'm not too familiar with the correct terminology for bike parts so please bear with me.  I recently bought a mountain bike and have started to notice a loud creaking sound coming from the pedal/bracket area.  I have noticed that it makes noise when I put more pressure on the pedals from accelerating from a standstill.  I also hear the noise when I am riding while standing up.    Any tips, suggestions, or knowledge on the matter would be greatly appreciated.
I have a Trek 3900 Mountain bike that had a serious creaking problem whenever I would pedal.  I found that the ring that holds the Shimano sealed bearing was really loose.  I tightened it up and it helped somewhat.  It loosened up again and I put loktite on the threads and really tightened it up but it is still creaking a little.  The bearing cartridge seems fine.  Any ideas?
When applying for post-doctoral and faculty positions you are typically asked for three (sometimes more) reference letters to support your application.    Given that it is competitive out there, it also makes sense to apply for all positions that are good matches to your qualifications and career development goals (in the case of post-docs).  Sometimes this may mean asking for several reference letters (or pre-application "can you support me if required?" requests) in a short space of time.  Also, there may only be a small pool of people (i.e. 3 or 4) who know your work sufficiently well to give an excellent reference.  I have also been told that referees want to help you out, and that there is no reason to fear asking them.  And, that in many cases once a letter is written it can typically be quickly repurposed.  But there must be a breaking point.  How do I manage this without being disrespectful?  How many requests in a given unit of time is too many, or harms my credibility?   I am asking this question in this forum, as I am interested in the norms in the academic world, which are often somewhat different than the rest of the working world. "Subject, verb, direct object, object complement" versus "subject, verb, indirect object, direct object" Reading English Grammar (HarperCollins College Outline, published by HarperResource, an imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers) I found a chapter (Sentence Basics) that explains that in English there are different sentence patterns; in particular   Subject, verb, direct object, object complement Subject, verb, indirect object, direct object   The chapter reports the following example for the patterns:     Alice called Charles Professor Miller.   Alice gave Charles the rabbit.   What is the difference between the two kind of sentences? What is the difference between the object complement in the first case, and the indirect object in the second case?  PS: The question, which could appear silly, comes from the fact in my first language there is only the object complement. Properly discontinuous actions and discrete groups in complete Riemannian manifolds. I was reading the article "The Geometries of 3-manifolds" by Peter Scott and in the end of page 406 he states the following:     If $G$ acts properly discontinuously on a space $X$, then $G$ is a   discrete subset of the space of all continuous functions $X \to X$   with the compact-open topology. The converse is false, in general, but   is true if $X$ is a complete Riemannian manifold and $G$ is a group of   isometries of $X$.   How do I prove the last statement?     If $X$ is a complete Riemannian manifold and   $G$ is a group of isometries of $X$ acting properly discontinuously on $X$, then $G$ is discrete.    Observation: We say a group $G$ of homeomorphisms of $X$ acts properly discontinuously on $X$ if for every compact $K \subset X$ the set $$\{g \in G: gK \cap K \neq \emptyset\}$$ is finite. Background: I'm making a retro style game for both fun, and an unofficial contest.   I have bought a song, song X. However, I then found notation for song X, and all the instruments. So basically, it's a program recreating song X in a sense.  I took the notation, and used another program to make it sound like a chiptune does (just for the fun of it, and it sounds good :P). However, I would like to use this in my game. It's non-commercial, but is this allowed? I would've said yes, because I'm not actually using the original, copyrighted song.  I think the main point is can I:   Use the music with no reference to the author Use the music with a reference, since it's non-profit. Not use the music at all since the melody and rhythm is copyright. Show $\lim \limits_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = \|f\|_{\infty}$ for $f \in L^{\infty}$ I have a question that I need help with getting started (possibly I would be back for more help).     I have a measure space $(X,A,\mu)$ that is finite, and $f \in L^{\infty}(\mu)$. Also, defined is $a_n = \int_X\,|f|^n\,d\mu$. I need to show that the limit is: $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\,\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} = \|f\|_{\infty} .$$   I am stuck on getting started, anybody have any suggestions?  thanks much Reason for the current trend to use «she» as the gender-neutral pronoun? There are some questions on gender-neutral pronouns both  and on .  User Christine Letts :     In academia, there is currently a   movement toward using the feminine   pronoun at all times.   I wonder why that is. I came across several examples on papers I read, but the only one I can remember at the moment is a book: Seth Godin's . While some might not be comfortable labeling it as part of academia, it suits my point perfectly. Every time he refers to a person, he uses the feminine pronoun.  User Senseful  the following, potentially identifying affirmative action as the precursor for this trend.     I remember reading somewhere that it   was recommended to use the opposite of   what most people stereotype the   profession as. So, for example, when   talking about a chiropractor, you   would use "her", and when talking   about a secretary, you would use   "his".   So, where do you think this trend comes from? Determine $4$ specific digits in $34!$ Find the values of $a,b,c,d\in\mathbb{N}$ such that      $$ 34!=295232799cd9604140847618609643ab0000000 $$   My Attempt:  The factorial of $34$ contains a $3$, so the RHS must be divisible by  $3$. Similarly, it must be divisible by $7$, $11$, $13$, $19$ etc.  But I do not understand how can I calculate $a,b,c,d$ in this equation. Can you deliver it [when,after] it [is | will be] assembled? Is there an international taxonomy of academic titles/ranks? Looking at the  on Wikipedia shows that the same academic rank/title can mean quite different things in different countries. For instant, a "research assistant" in the US can stand for an undergrad student doing an internship, while in the UK it can stand for a postdoc. Similarly, the term "lecturer" might stand for a permanent position (e.g. in the UK) or for a teaching assistant position, open to graduate students.   However, when thinking about it, there are not so many kind of possible positions (permanent or not, with teaching or not, with research or not, with PhD supervision or not, with team responsibility or not, etc), and having a clear title could help a lot (for instance, in my case, I've been working in four different countries, with a different job title each time!).    Is there some kind of official taxonomy that one could refer to?  If not, who could be in charge to create it? (the EU, if only for intra-Europe mobility?) Sum with binomial coefficients: $\sum_{k=1}^m  \frac{1}{k}{m \choose k} $ When I view most glass from the side it's green which I've found out is due to impurities in the glass specifically from iron oxide. Why is it when I view the larger face from an oblique angle, it isn't nearly as green? I cannot personally notice any different on the piece I have next to me even when I hold it at an angle that would be almost looking at the edge of the glass. It is pretty small (about 2.5" x 5" x .0625" or about 61mm x 127mm x 2mm, l x w x h) but I feel like it's big enough that I'd be looking through enough glass to get the green. Issue with 'StringVar' in Python Program Should I sign, watermark or otherwise label a framed print? And if so how? Direct proof that nilpotent matrix has zero trace How to Backup and Restore Android OS without Rooting losing ligatures when switching font series or color in the middle of a word How fast would the Earth need to spin for us to feel weightless? It's a classic question with many answers all over the Internet, but none here so I figured I'd ask it:  How fast would the Earth need to spin for a person (or anything for that matter) to feel weightless while on the surface at the equator?    In this situation everything on the Earth's surface would essentially be in orbit around the Earth at the radius of the Earth's surface (let us assume the atmosphere was also spun up to this angular velocity so there would be no air drag slowing things down).  Let us also say by "surface of the Earth" we mean mean sea level.  You can decide for yourself if/how to factor in the bulge of the Earth.  You can assume that the Earth somehow is able to maintain its present shape while spinning up.  Any comments on whether an Earth spinning slightly faster than this speed will cause it to break apart or not will also be appreciated. Pygame - blitting from x and y cordinates of image How can I set desktop defaults for new users? How can I set up desktop defaults, much like most distributions do, for every new user? (ex. default wallpaper, apps, etc) How to dump a man page?