As I have read, a "thread" in Linux is just a process.  Say that a process created two "threads", now when the process is terminated, the two "threads"/processes that are associated with the process will also be terminated.  Where the information about the "threads"/processes that are associated with a process (that created them) is stored?
Linux doesn't actually distinguish between processes and threads, and implements both as a data structure task_struct.  So what does Linux provide to some programs for them to tell threads of a process  from its child processes? For example,   Thanks.
How did Sauron remain in control of the Nazgûl? The One Ring gave Sauron control of the Nine, yet when it was taken from him he still possessed the power to control them (or, at least he regained it towards the end of the third age).  Why is this?   mentions that he drew the Nine to him, but not how. Cauchy principle value of $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\sin(x)/(x-a)dx$ Is "coachee" even a word? If I am Rita's coach, is Rita my *coachee? (yikes) Is that even a word? Would it be correct instead to say she is my ward? What about terms for people at the other end of a mentor, sponsor relationship? As a non-native speaker, I feel that it is ridiculous that can and can't could sound so similar in American accent.  Just now, I was just listening to a video in which the speaker with an American accent says     Fat cells can't reproduce themselves.   The speaker dragged the word "can't" longer for emphasis, but perhaps as a result, what I heard at first was     Fat cells can reproduce themselves.   Of course from the context I later figured out what he was really saying, but I felt extremely surprised by how these two words which literally mean the opposite could sound so similar in American accent. How is that not affecting American people's daily conversations? As a non-native speaker, is there a way for me to further clarify them when my listeners are confused? (Like when you say "one-eight" to clarify that you were trying to say "eighteen" as opposed to "eighty".) Is it possible to highlight text inside of a textarea using javascript? Either changing the background of just a portion of the text area or making a portion of the text selected? Langage to declare a circuit board Why is the copy-constructor argument const? Where does the term $|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|$ come from while calculating the expectation value? I put a video in my pdf with Acrobat and there I can watch my video. But if I open the pdf on my mobile, I can't watch the video, I only see an image. Is there a way to watch videos of a pdf in a mobile? I have a samsung J5. Simulating Key Press C# Sudo not available in guest login Is linear algebra more “fully understood” than other maths disciplines? In , it was discussed how LA is a foundation to other branches of mathematics, be they pure or applied. One answer argued that linear problems are fully understood, and hence a natural target to reduce pretty much anything to.   Now, it's evident enough that such a linearisation, if possible, tends to make hard things easier. Find a Hilbert space hidden in your domain, obtain an orthonormal basis, and bam, any point/state can be described as a mere sequence of numbers, any mapping boils down to a matrix; we have some good theorems for existence of inverses / eigenvectors/exponential objects / etc..  So, LA sure is convenient.  OTOH, it seems unlikely that any nontrivial mathematical system could ever be said to be thoroughly understood. Can't we always find new questions within any such framework that haven't been answered yet? I'm not firm enough with G&ouml;del's incompleteness theorems to judge whether they are relevant here. The first incompleteness theorem says that discrete disciplines like number theory can't be both complete and consistent. Surely this is all the more true for e.g. topology.  Is LA for some reason exempt from such arguments, or does it for some other reason deserve to be called the best understood branch of mathematics? I installed Redhat 6 x86_64. I am using the Network connection screen to set a static IP address like below (I want two PC's in my house to see each other: one Redhat PC and one Mac)   192.168.0.5   255.255.255.0   192.168.0.1     When I run ifconfig it displays only lo and virbr0 information. I don't know what these items are (I don't really know much about network settings).   When I try ifconfig -a it displays eth0, lo, sit0 and virbr0. The information for  eth0 is as follows:   Link encap : Ethernet HWaddr 90:2B:34:74:05:30 BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:192 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes 53811 (52.5 KiB) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b) Interrupt:29 Base address:0xc000   Could someone help me to point out if anything wrong with my setting or how to resolve this problem? Fastest way to move Collection from Sharded MongoDB Cluster to a another Sharded MongoDB Cluster I did setup an easy scene with an area light behind a window. In the glass (simple plane) which is in front the area light is visible - how can I turn this off so that the background is shining throgh? Isomorphism equivalence implies fundamental group is abelian The whole multi-continent aspect of A Song of Ice and Fire seems to be getting out of hand. Do the other continents suffer those long winters?  Can the Others harm the other continents?  In The Lord of the Rings there were other realms than Middle-earth, but Middle-earth was still all of humanity and dwarf population and hobbits.  Sure there are stories like Romeo and Juliet where the only thing that matters is whether those 2 are going have a chance to love.  But in these fantasy / sci-fi stories there's usually danger of world domination by evil.  It's not usually just one continent is going to be a terrible (or impossible) place to live but other civilizations will flourish. Index with exercise numbers I have got this problem on limits  $$ \lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\left(\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\right)^\frac{1}{x^2}$$ What I am doing here is that taking log and then applying L-Hospital's Rule $$y= \lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\left(\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\right)^\frac{1}{x^2} $$ then $$\ln(y)=\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{x^2}\ln\left(\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\right)$$ now it becomes $\frac{0}{0}$ type , but problem is how to take derivative here? when differentiating $\ln\left(\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\right)$ it will become $\frac{x}{\sin(x)}$ then we'll have to differentiate one more time like we do in case of $f(f(x))$ ? $\sin(x)$ and $x$ will be separately differentiated or together ? How should a user's death be handled? It is a bit of a morbid concept, but having recently had a friend die unexpectedly and having to deal with the online repercussions of this event has gotten me to thinking about what should happen to my accounts when I kick the bucket.  I haven't had any great insights yet, but here are some things I think are worth thinking about:   an entry in the FAQ telling the person's loved ones what to do with respect to the account would be extremely helpful, specifically who to contact, how to contact them, and what proof is necessary some form of optional date of death on the user account screen some way to mark the user as no longer being able to generate content and blocking any attempt to login as the user.   The danger I see in implementing such features is the possibility of someone faking another person's death and thereby locking a user out of his or her account or worrying his or her friends.