I have an andriod device.Can I access files of another android device ? I am connected to his wi-fi network. if yes how??
I'd like to be able to easily transfer large files wirelessly, fast, between Android devices - preferably without requiring root.  As a secondary objetive, it wouldn't hurt if the same solution could be used, to transfer files between the Android devices and a Windows PC.   Specifically, I'm trying to exchange files between my Nexus 7 (Android 4.2.2) and Samsung Galaxy S2 (Android 4.0.4).   Bluetooth is simply too slow, so that's out of the question Transfer via the Internet is also not an option, hence so is cloud-based solutions Only Nexus 7 supports NFC, so that's out too  looked promising and very simple, but does not work on "Devices that don't have WiFi Tethering setting, such as the Nexus 7"   Wi-Fi direct ( and up) seems to be a decent lowest common denominator between my two devices, however...  Galaxys S2's native Send via Wi-Fi Direct sees the Nexus, but seems to get stuck in the "Connecting..." most times. When there finally seems to be breakthrough, I get "Waiting..." and a spinning circle. Even if it worked, it would only allow me to send from the Galaxy S2 to the Nexus 7, as a similar option os not present on the Nexus 7.  J4velin's  is no longer available in the Play Store, with the following explanation:     WiFi Direct drivers are broken on many devices, which led to users leaving negative reviews for this app. As I don't see any sense in keeping a free app published when only getting 1-star-ratings (for an issue which only your device manufacturer can fix), the app is no longer available at the Play Store.   Nick Adams'  seems flaky at best. Invations from Nexus 7 to Galaxy S2 are never received. Invitations from Galaxy S2 are mostly received, but even when accepting promptly, the peers doesn't always show as connected. When they finally do, usually after quite a long wait, I can select a file to send but it's never transferred -  "Transfer failed" it says almost immediately in the notification bar.  budius inc's  is working slightly better, but still very unreliable. I actually managed to (occasionally) send files both ways, but never when attempting connection from the Nexus 7. To send from the Nexus 7 to the Galaxy S2, I had to go through this akward manoeuvre:   Share the file on the Nexus 7 via the WiFi Shoot intent Start the Receive WiFi Shoot app on the Galaxy S2 Invite the Nexus 7 from the Galaxy S2 (never the other way around!) Accept the invitation on the Nexus 7 Press the Shoot button on the Galaxy S2   Take the whole switching back and forth between devices, and garnish with random delays or failures in any step of the process...  Is there really no easy, reliable, fast way to transfer files directly between different Android devices?  Generally, my experience with Wi-Fi Direct is all but positive...   A device often won't even see a device lying next to it Sometimes, it will see the other device, only to have it disappear from the list, before I have the chance to connect When I do have a chance, invations are not realiably received (from Galaxy S2 to Nexus 7 mostly reliable, but never worked the other way around) When invitations are received (and accepted), a partnership rarely manages to be setup ("invited" or "connecting") And even when that happens, some apps can't seem to transfer files through it...   *Sigh*  Maybe J4velin's explanation pretty much sums up the sad state of Wi-Fi Direct on Android, which otherwise seemed as the best solution to my quest?
Cycles in permutations of a given size If $p$ is prime, then $(x+y)^p=x^p+y^p$ holds in any field of characteristic $p$. However all the proofs I have seen use induction and some relatively nasty algebra despite how fundamental this fact seems.  What is the nicest, "highest level proof" you know? I plugged in my external harddrive (which was formatted on my Mac into HFS+ journaled) to my Ubuntu desktop 9.04 64bit.  I am not able to get the drive to mount with write capability, how do I do that?  Right now all I'm getting is read access, I tried  sudo mount -t hfsplus /dev/sdf2 /media/"Portable HD"   but that still gave me only read access...  ideas?? How to run BitTorrent Sync? I am in Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) 64bit and downloaded the btsync executable from  but running it doesn't seem to have any effect. Double-clicking the executable does nothing, and running ./btsync in the terminal also exits immediately without any output.  Has anyone successfully ran this under Ubuntu, and if so, is there any special configuration changes that need to be made to make it work? The word or phrase I am looking for is quite opposite to that of the situation when people, such as students or sports players, sing their national anthem with the same tone and words.  I want a single word or even phrase that can describe the situation when two or more people speak at the same time with different tone and words . . . and at the end, the listener cannot get what they are saying. This situation can be found while debating, telling a news about any incident or even while complaining.     Due to _____ , the teacher could not get what they are saying.   If it's not feasible to find a noun or phrase for such situation, then here I request to have an adverb standing alone to describe how they are speaking, for instance, what is the adverb for "at the same time"?.  Here is how, I want to convert sentence 1 into sentence 2.        They spoke at the same time, and the teacher could not get what they are saying.   They spoke _____ , and the teacher could not get what they are saying. I mistakenly typed cd // instead of cd /. To my surprise, current directory showed up as //.   What is that directory? Why does it exist?  apple@snipped $ pwd /home/apple apple@snipped $ cd / apple@snipped $ pwd / apple@snipped $ cd // apple@snipped $ pwd // apple@snipped $ cd /// apple@snipped $ pwd / You can start fire by focusing the sunlight using the magnifying glass.   I searched the web whether you can do the same using moonlight. And found  and  - the first two in Google search results.  What I found is the thermodynamics argument: you cannot heat anything to a higher temperature using black body radiation than the black body itself, and Moon isn't hot enough.  It may be true, but my gut feelings protest... The larger your aperture is, the more light you collect, also you have better focus because the airy disk is smaller. So if you have a really huge lens with a really short focus (to keep Moon's picture small), or in the extreme case you build a Dyson-sphere around the Moon (letting a small hole to the let the sunlight enter), and focusing all reflected light into a point it should be more than enough to ingnite a piece of paper isn't it?   I'm confused. So can you start fires using the Moon? What insect is this? (India) Can anyone tell me what kind of insect (if it is one) is this...!! Or is it the pupa of some insect?  Well I don't think that the whole big thing is the insect itself, it appears to be just a kind of protection or shelter which moves along with the tiny little thing that keeps on popping out and going it so as to move. Location:  India One server with multiple desktops "heads" with VNC I am managing a system of kiosks.  Each kiosk currently is running a web browser with the application for the kiosk running in the browser.  Each kiosk needs to be able to display separate content.  At times, the application running in the web browser freezes.  Thus, I have to go out to the site to refresh the page.  I want to see if there is a way to have one central server that has multiple browser heads.  Then each kiosk would run a program like VNC to display one of the heads.  This way when the program freezes, I just have to login to the central server and refresh the page.  Getting VNC or another remote desktop software installed on the clients is no problem.  What I am looking for is a way to have VNC remote into a specific head of a head of a web browser.  Does such a thing exist?  Or do I have to run a VM for each kiosk to remote into?  Any advice, pointers, or solutions would be helpful. How do I fix a NoSuchMethodError? I'm getting a NoSuchMethodError error when running my Java program.  What's wrong and how do I fix it? Differences in development between .NET and Mono I'm reading An Introduction to Manifolds (Tu) and got confused on p.123 Theorem 11.13. Let me briefly explain what was done before that.  The author defines an embedding between two manifolds $f: N\rightarrow M$ as an injective immersion (differential is injective everywhere) with the additional property that $f(N)$ as a subspace of $M$ is homeomorphic via $f$ to $N$. Then a canonical form theorem is proven, namely, that for any point $p \in N$, there are charts $(U,\phi = x^1, \ldots, x^n) \ni p$ and $(V,\psi = y^1, \ldots, y^m) \ni f(p)$, such that the transition map takes the following form:  $$\psi \circ f \circ \phi^{-1} : (r^1,\ldots,r^n) \mapsto (r^1,\ldots,r^n,0,\ldots,0).$$  (I guess it is implicitly assumed that $f(U) \subset V$).  Now in the process of proving that $f(N) \subset M$ is an , he states that $f(U) \subset V$ is defined by the vanishing of the coordinates $y^{n+1},\ldots,y^m$. I can prove that $$ f(U) \subset \{q \in V: y^{n+1}(q) = \cdots = y^m(q)\} $$ but not the reverse inclusion. Can anyone explain why this should be true? I'm making all my diagrams in SVG format using Inkscape and then I export them to some other format (e.g. PDF, EPS or PNG). I wrote a short script that does this for me automatically, but I'd like to avoid this step, if possible --- sometimes the conversion from SVG converts the text labels into vectors, and that's annoying. Hence the question:  Is there a way to include SVG diagrams directly without conversion to an intermediate format?  Package suggestions, or instructions for specific LaTeX distribution are welcome. Tips and personal experience on which tools you have found to be working reliably would be also appreciated. How can I automatically enable large text when logging in to the ubuntu session? Brackets in if condition: why am I getting syntax errors without whitespace? I was browsing flight price at Singapore Airlines website, and a one-way flight from SIN to SFO cost this much:    That's quite expensive. I tried browsing around and found that a return flight from SFO to SIN and back to SFO cost much cheaper:    It's really weird because the second ticket includes the exact same flight that cost 1900+, but it's almost half the price. The reason for this counter-intuitive situation is explained in the answers this question   If I am located in Singapore and my intention is to fly one-way to SFO, is it safe to book the flight in the second picture and only board SFO-SIN leg? Will they deny me because I miss the SIN-SFO flight? Is there a difference between single and double quotes in Java? Is there a difference between single and double quotes in Java? In the Landau theory of phase transitions, is the order parameter a thermodynamic variable of state? In the Landau theory of phase transitions, one typically considers a "free energy" $F$ as a function of the temperature $T$ and the "order parameter" $\psi$: $F(T, \psi)$.  For the sake of clarity, let's consider the liquid-gas transition, in which the order parameter is usually taken to be the difference of densities between the ordered phase and the disordered phase.  In this case, it looks that the order parameter $\psi$ is closely related to the the volume $V$, a global variable of state.  What is the correct interpretation of $\psi$ as a thermodynamic variable?   I consider several logical possibilities, but all interpretations look troublesome to me:    $\psi$ is a variable of state replacing the volume. In this case I have a few related concerns:   Is the "free energy" $F$ the Helmholtz or the Gibbs free energy?    If $F$ is the Gibbs free energy, $F$ should depend on the temperature $T$ and the pressure $p$ (the conjugate variable of the volume), so it shouldn't depend on $\psi$.  If it is the Helmholtz free energy, it's ok that it depends on $\psi$, but the experiments are usually carried out at constant pressure, not constant volume.  Usually, state variables are something one can select at will [for instance, think of the phase diagram $(p, T)$]. However, the order parameter $\psi$ is not selected at will, but it is selected by the system as a result of the minimization process according to the Landau theory.  $\psi$ is yet another variable of state in addition to volume and temperature.    Why the pressure is not usually taken into account as a variable of state, and only the temperature is considered? What is the conjugate variable to $\psi$? Can really $\psi$ and $V$ be taken as independent?  $\psi$ is not a variable of state, is something else.   What else can $\psi$ be from the thermodynamic point of view? Same question as above, why is pressure not usually taken into account in Landau theory? The following problem was on a math competition that I participated in at my school about a month ago:      Prove that the equation $\cos(\sin x)=\sin(\cos x)$ has no real solutions.   I will outline my proof below.  I think it has some holes.  My approach to the problem was to say that the following equations must have real solution(s) if the above equation has solution(s):  $$ \cos^2(\sin x)=\sin^2(\cos x)\\ 1-\cos^2(\sin x)=1-\sin^2(\cos x)\\ \sin^2(\sin x)=\cos^2(\cos x)\\ \sin(\sin x)=\pm\cos(\cos x)\\ $$  I then proceeded to split into cases and use the identity $\cos t = \sin(\frac{\pi}{2} \pm t\pm y2\pi)$ to get   $$ \sin x=\frac{\pi}{2} \pm \cos x\pm y2\pi\\ $$  and the identity $-\cos t = \sin(-\frac{\pi}{2}\pm t\pm y2\pi) $ to get   $$ \sin x=- \frac{\pi}{2}\pm \cos x \pm y2\pi.\\ $$  where $y$ is any integer.  I argued that $y=0$ was the only value of $y$ that made any sense (since the values of sine and cosine remain between $-1$ and $1$).  Therefore, the above equations become   $$ \sin x=\frac{\pi}{2} \pm \cos x\implies \sin x \pm \cos x=\frac{\pi}{2}\\ $$  and   $$ \sin x=- \frac{\pi}{2}\pm \cos x\implies \cos x\pm\sin x= \frac{\pi}{2}.\\ $$  Then, by a short optimization argument, I showed that these last two equations have no real solutions.  First, does this proof make sense?  Second, if my proof makes sense, then I feel that it was not very elegant nor simple.  Is my approach the best, or is there a better (i.e., more elegant, shorter, simpler) proof? In my native language, we can say:     I have dog   Because I don't want to say a dog (one dog, how many dogs) or the dog (that dog, the listener don't care which dog).  p.s. after 3 years later, I have to say, why I ask this question, is I still cannot grasp how to use the right 'article word'. sometimes, a noun will use an article, sometimes, a noun could not(or omit) the article word before it. there aren't a formula for this. So, I have to remember all the time! I feel so frustrate