I have usb dongle Netis wf2180 (Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0bda:0811 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 802.11ac WLAN Adapter)  Neither automatically installed driver nor manually(manufacturer provided and dkms) works propertly. System doesn't recognize device as wlan adapter. Maybe someone knows solution?
I was running my OS off a USB stick fine and the wifi was working. I installed it to my SSD and setup again but not the WIFI adaptor isn't working.  I followed the first time  and it worked but since installing onto the SSD and doing the same its not working.  No wlan0 interface found Please check drivers, try lsusb to check USB device is present root@goldminer:~# lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:0811 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.  Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub   On the working device  root@coalminer:~# dkms status amdgpu, 18.10-572953, 4.13.16-hiveos, x86_64: installed amdgpu, 18.10-572953, 4.4.0-127-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia, 390.59, 4.13.16-hiveos, x86_64: installed nvidia, 390.59, 4.4.0-127-generic, x86_64: installed rtl8812au, 4.2.2, 4.13.16-hiveos, x86_64: installed rtl8812au, 4.2.2, 4.4.0-127-generic, x86_64: installed   On the SSD  root@goldminer:~# dkms status amdgpu, 18.10-572953, 4.13.16-hiveos, x86_64: installed amdgpu, 18.10-572953, 4.4.0-127-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia, 390.59, 4.13.16-hiveos, x86_64: installed nvidia, 390.59, 4.4.0-127-generic, x86_64: installed rtl8812au, 4.2.2, 4.13.16-hiveos, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) rtl8812au, 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg: added rtl8812au, 5.2.9: added   Any advise? I think from trying to fix it ive been making it worse.
I was looking for some package (nautilus-terminal), and accidentally did this:  $ sudo apt-get install nautilus- Reading package lists... Done                                                                                                                                                                                                  Building dependency tree                                                                                                                                                                                                       Reading state information... Done                                                                                                                                                                                              The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:                                                                                                                                                  apturl apturl-common libgail-3-0 linux-headers-4.4.0-57 linux-headers-4.4.0-57-generic linux-image-4.4.0-57-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-57-generic                                                                       Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.                                                                                                                                                                                      The following packages will be REMOVED:                                                                                                                                                                                          gnome-session-flashback nautilus nautilus-sendto nautilus-share ubuntu-desktop                                                                                                                                               0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 5 to remove and 69 not upgraded.                                                                                                                                                                After this operation, 2 031 kB disk space will be freed.                                                                                                                                                                       Do you want to continue? [Y/n] ^[[^C                                                                                                                                                                                             That's quite dangerous because remove is much harder to mistype than a simple dash from a failed autocompletion.     Is that an equivalent of apt-get remove? I couldn't find any documentation for that. Edit: except for overlooking the man page... How to avoid noisy renders in Cycles? Strange folder in my home folder after a failed run of BleachBit Prove that $\frac{(n-2)s^2}{\sigma^2}\sim \chi^{2}_{n-2}$ When users create a node, they should be redirected to a payment page; if payment is successful, the user can see the node.  Is there any way to achieve this? What determines the direction of precession of a gyroscope? I understand how torque mathematically causes a change to the direction of angular momentum, thus precessing the .  However, the direction, either clockwise or counterclockwise, of this precession seems to me a bit arbitrary beyond mathematical definitions. (What if torque were defined by a "left hand rule", for example?).  What's the fundamental physical reason that the precession of a gyroscope would be directed in a certain direction? I am looking for an adjective, similar to "holding a grudge" I am looking for an adjective that describes a person who is not willing to forgive or excuse someone's faults or wrong-doings from the past (other than "unforgiving"). For the ones who speak German, that word would be "nachtragend". How to find a 4D vector perpendicular to 3 other 4D vectors? In 3 dimensions it is possible to find a vector c (one of infinitely many) perpendicular to two vectors a and b using the cross product. Is there any way of extending this to 4 dimensions, i.e. given three vectors a, b, and c finding a vector d perpendicular to all of them?  I realize that this can be done by solving the equation system:  dot(a, d) = 0 dot(b, d) = 0 dot(c, d) = 0   and imposing an additional constraint, for instance setting the length of d to or one of its components to 1, but is there a way of doing this that does not involve solving an equation system? On Ubuntu 18.04, I have connected my laptop to an external display and I am able to set the external display as primary and external display only mode. But when I turn on my laptop or log out from my session the display login screen is displayed only on my(internal) laptop screen. But once I login the display switches to external only and my laptop screen turns off as expected. Is there a way I can make the login screen appear only on the external screen on bootup or on logout as in 16.04? Also the login screen does not follow my cursor as in 16.04. Here's an image from another question:    I get what the pull down resistor is there to do, but I don't really understand exactly how it works.  When there is no voltage applied through the base wire, why does any induced current then go through R2, but when a voltage is applied, it goes to the transistor? My understanding is that voltage always follows the path of least resistance, so if applying say, 5v turns the transistor on, that means that the transistor has a lower resistance than R2, so I would also assume any induced current would also flow through the resistor - so why does it then go through R2? Does Stack Exchange use caching and if so, how? Example 1) Let's say I have some random creature with protection from white, and my opponent plays , a white card with the effect "Destroy all creatures." Can my creature with protection from white be destroyed by a white card that isn't actually targeting it specifically?  Example 2) I was playing a match with a friend where I had  on the field against his 3 zombies. Is he able to declare his zombies as blockers even though Elite Inquisitor has "protection" from zombies?  If he can declare them as blockers, does protection mean that no damage is dealt by the zombies to  Elite Inquisitor? Prove that if $ f\mathrm{(}z\mathrm{)} $ is analytic at the infinity  ,then :  $ {\lim}_{{z}\mathrm{\rightarrow}\mathrm{\infty}}{f}\prime{\mathrm{(}}{z}{\mathrm{)}}\mathrm{{=}}{0} $ My problem is simple. I think that the strange deformations on the top are there because there are so many vertices in one face. How do I fix this while maintaining nice topology?  Although I triangulated the top polygon, the problem still persists. The movie "Die Hard" or The "Die Hard" Movie? Sometime like this case I don't know if I can put the name before or after the label (movie in this sentence)...  The movie &quot;Die Hard&quot; or The &quot;Die Hard&quot; Movie? The variable &quot;X&quot; or The &quot;X&quot; variable?  Are they both correct? What is their difference? What is the application of each? My question is not about &quot;the&quot; (), but the order of the &quot;movie&quot; and &quot;Die Hard&quot; Why doesn't the Windows command prompt window maximize to the full screen size? Anyone know why doesn't the Windows command prompt window maximize to the full screen size?  To the best of my knowledge, even in the new Windows 7 the command prompt window(cmd.exe) doesn't maximize to the full screen size like all other windows. This behavior is quite annoying for me, and I'm sure to many others as well.   Note: The size of the command prompt window can be , but the size remains fixed regardless of the screen size. For some reasons my brush stroke suddenly looks like this:     As the picture showed, the edges are jagged and pixelated. It doesn't happen before and it's just one of the built-in inking brush.  I know there are a lot of similar questions here but please don't mark this as duplicate. I double checked all the thing the other answers suggested: It's brush tool, not pencil, and my mode of brush and layer is Normal, not Dissolve. It's pixelated even if I draw with mouse so it's not tablet driver issue. I disabled GPU render but nothing changed. How do I fix this? Up to now I don't understand well what \null actually is and when we need it. I have only known that it can be used to create hypothetical anchors as follows.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[a6paper,margin=2cm]{geometry} \parindent=0pt  \begin{document} \hfill xport \hfill\null\\ \null\hrulefill{} never \hrulefill\par \hrulefill{} dies. \hrulefill\par \hfill really? \hfill\null\par   \newpage \null \vfill \hfill The End \hfill\null \end{document}    What is \null and when do we need to use it? Why do \hrulefill and \hfill need starting \null when they follow \\ but not need \null when they follow \par? Why does \hfill always need ending \null but \hrulefill not need it? Why are polymorphic values not inferred in Haskell? Can we simulate the whole universe in computer? Here is an idea: As human kind we discovered many laws, formulas, events, etc. in our surrounding environment.here is a way to discover the unknowns :   Now if we simulate a virtual world with our knowledge in computers we expect it to work, because we guess that we know all of it. If a bug occurs in the simulation or something acts differently from the expected in the real world, that may tell us that there is something new; a thing (law, formula, ...) that we didn't know, which causes that bug or that anomaly.  For examples imagine that we created a virtual simulation for motion dynamics and we didn't add the friction to our simulation. Everything in the simulation will work fine but in a different manner. So if we hadn't discovered friction yet, would it help us to think about if there is something we didn't add? Or if there is something we don't know?       But can we simulate the whole universe, everything we know, in one simulation? I know it will require a deadly high computational power. Something like what they did for DNA; two years of computation to analyse their pattern. can we simulate everything we know to create a virtual universe to compare it to our real universe?