i've been trying to mount an .iso according to a guide i read here, but every time i run the command sudo mount -o loop /home/varbo/Downlaods/Windows 7 Ultimate SP1.iso /media/iso i get the same (usage) error:  Usage: mount -V                 : print version  ... usage and options deleted ....  Other options: [-nfFrsvw] [-o options] [-p passwdfd]. For many more details, say  man 8 mount .   Any kind of help would be appreciated.
I'm running into trouble trying to mount a large iso:  dev@dev-OptiPlex-745:~$ sudo mount -o loop /home/dev/Hämtningar/matlab2011a_64.iso /cdrom mount: warning: /cdrom seems to be mounted read-only. dev@dev-OptiPlex-745:~$    Can you tell me how I should do it?
Enumerate alignment problem in theorem environment I'm using amsart. When I create an enumeration inside a theorem environment, the numbering is not aligned properly:  Theorem 14. (1) (2) (3) (4)   How do I shift the (2),(3),... to be aligned with (1)?  MWE:  \documentclass{amsart} \newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[section]  \begin{document} \begin{thm} \begin{enumerate} \item Item 1 \item Item 2 \item Item 3 \end{enumerate} \end{thm} \end{document} How do I hide Thunderbird from the launcher while running? I have a question for you all.  It's possible to "hide" thunderbird from the unity application bar when thunderbird is running?  For my is unhelpfull see thunderbird on the "mail" tray ( near shutdown button) and the unity "running" application.  If i close thunder with the close button, it don't notify me new email. I've always been one to simply use:  List&lt;String&gt; names = new ArrayList&lt;&gt;();   I use the interface as the type name for portability, so that when I ask questions such as these I can rework my code.    When should  be used over  and vice-versa? Can we get x comment votes per y minutes, rather than one vote per 5 seconds? I quite often will read a thread of comments, and want to vote up a few of them. I vote one up, read the next few comments, vote up another and get a *giant red box*.  I've seen that "You can only submit a comment vote every 5 seconds" box far too often. Can I vote for 12 comments per minute, rather than 1 comment every 5 seconds? Show that $U_n:=\left(1+\dfrac{1}{n}\right)^n$, $n\in\Bbb N$, defines a monotonically increasing sequence.   I must show that $U_{n+1}-U_n\geq0$, i.e. $$\left(1+\dfrac{1}{n+1}\right)^{n+1}-\left(1+\dfrac{1}{n}\right)^n\geq0.$$  I am trying to go ahead of this step. What does the Visual Studio "Any CPU" target mean? If $(Tx \mathbin{|} x) = 0$ for all $x$ then $T = 0$ Let $T$ be a linear operator on an inner product vector space $V$. I'd like to prove that if $$(Tx|x)=0 \quad \forall x \in V$$ then $T$ is the null operator. I can't figure out this proof using contradiction, do I have to choose an appropriate vector? out file with multiple criteria in python? Wireless connection fails every few minutes I am looking for a multivariable calculus book that is really physics oriented.  Anyone know of any?  EDIT: My wife is looking to brush up on multivariable at the same time she needs to brush up on the related physics. I know that I can make certain blocks only placeable on a specified block, but what is the command to give an item that can only BREAK certain blocks? Why should the Standard Model be renormalizable? Effective theories like Little Higgs models or Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model are non-renormalizable and there is no problem with it, since an effective theory does not need to be renormalizable. These theories are valid until a scale $\Lambda$ (ultraviolet cutoff), after this scale an effective theory need a UV completion, a more "general" theory.  The Standard Model, as an effective theory of particle physics, needs a more general theory that addresses the phenomena beyond the Standard Model (an UV completion?). So, why should the Standard Model be renormalizable? MVC Model require true Properties of p-adic valuations Let $n$ be a integer not equal to zero, $p$ a prime and $$|n|_p = p^{-\operatorname{ord}_p(n)}; |0|_p=0$$  Proposition: $|xy|_p=|x|_p|y|_p$  We want to show: $\operatorname{ord}_p(ab)=\operatorname{ord}_{p}(a)+\operatorname{ord}_p(b)$ So if we suppose there is a largest integral $v$ such that $p^{v}|(ab)$, then we can split up v such that $p^{v_1}|a,p^{v_2}|b$. If we suppose that there exist $v_1,v_2$ with them both being the largest integers such that $p^{v_1}|a, p^{v_2}|b$,  with $v_1+v_2= : v $ then $p^v|ab$. (I don't believe this to be a formal proof but rather my best own "idea" I can come up with...)  The script also mentions that the padic valuations' sums are bounded: $|x+y|_p\le \sup\{|x|_p,|y|_p\}$, how to show this?   Edit:   According to Robert Israel and Bill Dubuques answers, the first proposition is proven, if I understood correctly:   Given $ord(a)= v$ and $ord(b) = u$ which is the same as $a:= p^{v}m, b:= p^{u}n$ with $gcd(m,p)=gcd(n,p)=1$, because $ab=p^{u+v}mn$ with $gcd(mn,p)=1$ it follows that $ord(ab)=ord(a)+ord(b)$ and so $|xy|_{p}=p^{-ord(xy)}=p^{-(ord(x)+ord(y))}=|x|_{p}|y|_{p}$  Now to show: $|x+y|_{p}\le sup\{|x|_{p},|y|_{p} \}$  and the second can be tackled like this: set $a:=p^{v}m. b:=p^{u}n$, then checking two cases $1:(u=v)$ and $2:(v&lt;u)$: $(a+b)=p^{v}m+p^{u}n= p^{v}(m+p^{u-v}n)$ so in case of (u=v) it follows that  $ord(a+b)= u = sup\{ord(a),ord(b)\}$  and in case of $(v&lt;u)$ because the biggest v is $v:= u-1$: $ord(a+b)\le p^{u-1}(m+pn) \le p^{u}(m+n)= sup\{ord(a),ord(b)\}$  It seems that I did something wrong in both cases... I am using UBUNTU 18.10 and I had problem with TL-WN822n v5 driver in UBUNTU and Kali (4.19.0-kali5-amd64)  The problem is driver=rtl8xxxu so I found a driver in this page :   and installed the driver on Kali and it worked perfectly fine but when I wanted to install it on my ubuntu, after I ran the sudo dkms install rtl8192eu/1.0; I got this error :   Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel.  Skipping...  Building module: cleaning build area... 'make' all KVER=4.18.0-25-generic...(bad exit status: 2) ERROR (dkms apport): binary package for rtl8192eu: 1.0 not found Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.18.0-25-generic (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/rtl8192eu/1.0/build/make.log for more information.   and This is my Log file (/var/lib/dkms/rtl8192eu/1.0/build/make.log) :  DKMS make.log for rtl8192eu-1.0 for kernel 4.18.0-25-generic (x86_64) Sun Jul  7 13:35:02 +0430 2019 make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE= -C /lib/modules/4.18.0-25-generic/build  M=/var/lib/dkms/rtl8192eu/1.0/build  modules make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.18.0-25-generic'   CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/rtl8192eu/1.0/build/core/rtw_cmd.o gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mlittle-endian’; did you mean ‘-fconvert=little-endian’? make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:325:/var/lib/dkms/rtl8192eu/1.0/build/core/rtw_cmd.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [Makefile:1534:_module_/var/lib/dkms/rtl8192eu/1.0/build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.18.0-25-generic' make: *** [Makefile:1710: modules] Error 2   What's the problem ?? Why are "baked" and "naked" not pronounced the same? Ways to evaluate $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta$ The standard approach for showing $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta = \ln|\sec \theta + \tan \theta| + C$ is to multiply by $\dfrac{\sec \theta + \tan \theta}{\sec \theta + \tan \theta}$ and then do a substitution with $u = \sec \theta + \tan \theta$. I like the fact that this trick leads to a fast and clean derivation, but I also find it unsatisfying: It's not very intuitive, nor does it seem to have applicability to any integration problem other than $\int \csc \theta \,\mathrm d \theta$.  Does anyone know of another way to evaluate $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta$? Can a function be made to accept a variable amount of inputs? Books for self-studying time series analysis? How to check if a macro value is empty or will not create text with plain TeX conditionals? I have a macro which holds some text value, e.g. \macro{some text}. If it is empty, I would like for nothing to appear in the document, but it has some content of any kind which would produce text displayed in the document, I would like a message to appear, "Text: some text".   \macro{} would be considered empty. \def\somedata{}, \macro{\somedata} would be considered empty. \macro{0} would be considered not empty.   I have tried making a TeX conditional which can check if the value is not empty, but nothing I tried works, e.g.:  \ifx #1 {} \else     Text: #1 \fi  \ifx#1{} \else     Text: #1 \fi  \ifx #1 \nil \else     Text: #1 \fi  \ifx#1!="" \else     Text: #1 \fi   What is the correct syntax for creating a conditional in plain TeX with checks if a value is not empty?