I was wondering if it is possible to install the official stock android operating system from google without the customization of the manufacturer like Touch Wiz on Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 s7270, is there a way to do this
Is it possible to flash a smartphone like the Samsung Galaxy SIII or an LG Optimus 4X with a vanilla Android ROM like the one that has been flashed on Galaxy Nexus or Motorola phones (I think)?  I am asking because manufacturers like Samsung, LG, HTC tend to make ROMs for their smartphones and tablets with preinstalled launchers like Touchwiz or HTC Sense. They explain their decision by saying that they want to make their devices to look unique against their rival devices. The problem is that Android updates for their phones and tablets get delayed and there are incidents in which some devices - which are more than capable of running the upcoming version of Android - fall way behind or never get updated at all.   So, what I am basically asking here is if there is a way to install vanilla Android, excluding CyanogenMod or any other modified vanilla ROMs, on an Android based smartphone?
I edited a question, on Stack overflow and when submitting preview, got red bar telling me my account isn't allowed to make suggested edits.  On the Sandbox android question it works fine, but that is editing an answer to my question.   The message I receive is:     Account is not allowed to suggest edits   Are the rules for suggested edits different for Android app? How do I set a background image while I am editing? How do I put a backdrop behind the model that I am creating so that I can compare the picture to the model while editing? Ubuntu 18.04 opening system settings logs me out Clever bounty reputation hack I say "hack" in the most favorable light. It's a clever idea and theoretically beneficial.  I noticed that an old question of mine suddenly started getting a lot of renewed attention. The question had been answered, with an answer accepted. But another user added a well reasoned and insightful answer to the list. He also opened a +100 bounty on that question.  The resulting increased attention quickly got his answer quite a lot of up-votes. Well more than the 100 points he had spent on the bounty. Therefore, he gets a net rep profit out of the transaction.  So here's the hack:   Find an interesting question Research and provide a very good answer Open up a bounty on that question to attract attention and votes to your new answer Profit!!!   2 and 3 may be out of order--I didn't see the timing of it. But either way, assuming he gets more than 10 votes, he still gets increased rep out of the deal.  I don't think this is necessarily bad for SO - it does generate some useful discussion and insightful answers. Plus you can increase your own rep very rapidly by making your answers highly visible, and therefore frequently voted upon.   However, it does slightly change the meaning and purpose of bounties away from starting a discussion and toward self-promotion. Still, interesting. Is it Safe to Delete Files From /var/tmp? How to return default PS1 prompt? Why doesn't "its" have an apostrophe? I know that its is the possessive and it's is the contraction, and know when to use them.  But why doesn't the possessive have an apostrophe?   "The bear's eating a fish." [contraction] "The bear's coat is brown." [possessive] "It's eating a fish." [contraction] "Its coat is brown." [possessive] "One's eating a fish." [contraction] "One's coat is brown." [possessive]    lists the etymology as "From  +‎ ", and  says that this is actually the original form:     Originally written it's, and still deliberately spelled thus by some writers until early 1800s.   So what happened to the apostrophe?  When did people stop using it, and why did they?  It seems that it's as the possessive is more natural, as most people do this until they're taught that it is wrong (or even after).  Update: Online Etymology Dictionary has been updated to include two potential explanations:     The apostrophe came to be omitted, perhaps because it's already was established as a contraction of it is, or by general habit of omitting apostrophes in personal pronouns (hers, yours, theirs, etc.).   Can anyone back up either of these arguments?  The possessive one's still has the apostrophe, despite these. Compute the sum of the series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n \cdot 2^n}$ What would be the sum of the following series?  $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n \cdot 2^n}$$  Thanks Examples:   In a car, van, etc. On a bus, boat, motorcycle, etc.   How can one decide which preposition to use? Is memorization the only way or is there a better way?  Note: People generally explain this by either distinguishing between open and closed vehicles or between large and small vehicles. However, the examples I've given defeat both explanations. At work we are being asked to create XML files to pass data to another offline application that will then create a second XML file to pass back in order to update some of our data. During the process we have been discussing with the team of the other application about the structure of the XML file.   The sample I came up with is essentially something like:  &lt;INVENTORY&gt;    &lt;ITEM serialNumber="something" location="something" barcode="something"&gt;       &lt;TYPE modelNumber="something" vendor="something"/&gt;     &lt;/ITEM&gt; &lt;/INVENTORY&gt;   The other team said that this was not industry standard and that attributes should only be used for meta data. They suggested:  &lt;INVENTORY&gt;    &lt;ITEM&gt;       &lt;SERIALNUMBER&gt;something&lt;/SERIALNUMBER&gt;       &lt;LOCATION&gt;something&lt;/LOCATION&gt;       &lt;BARCODE&gt;something&lt;/BARCODE&gt;       &lt;TYPE&gt;          &lt;MODELNUMBER&gt;something&lt;/MODELNUMBER&gt;          &lt;VENDOR&gt;something&lt;/VENDOR&gt;       &lt;/TYPE&gt;    &lt;/ITEM&gt; &lt;/INVENTORY&gt;   The reason I suggested the first is that the size of the file created is much smaller. There will be roughly 80000 items that will be in the file during transfer. Their suggestion in reality turns out to be three times larger than the one I suggested. I searched for the mysterious "Industry Standard" that was mentioned, but the closest I could find was that XML attributes should only be used for meta data, but said the debate was about what was actually meta data.  After the long winded explanation (sorry) how do you determine what is meta data, and when designing the structure of an XML document how should you decide when to use an attribute or an element? Building a version of ubuntu without any USB functionality Improving "demonstrate a minimal understanding" close reason Note: the eventual outcome of this discussion involved dropping this particular off-topic reason, along with other changes. See:  &nbsp; &mdash;Shog     I was using the reason "demonstrate a minimal understanding" myself quite frequently, but the more I review, the more I have doubts about it and I think this reason can either be dropped entirely or at least rephrased, so I started to use "problems with code you've written must describe the specific problem" instead:     Questions asking for code must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved.   So the poster has posted some description, maybe even a snippet of code and in his mind that already proves that he has that minimal understanding required. After all he described the problem and what he tried to solve. So telling him that he lacks that understanding is rather rude, and from the posters point of view doesn't even apply. What both version of the reason not emphasize is that a description of a problem is not various versions of     it doesn't work   but that we rather mean really specific details (see below). I can often see in the reopen review queue that the "improved" version just includes a more verbatim description, while what usually would be expected is some specific error message, a trace or a log, or whatever applies.  Then it continues with:     Include attempted solutions, why they didn't work, and the expected results. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist   comparing it to:     problems with code you've written must describe the specific problem — and include valid code to reproduce it — in the question itself. See SSCCE.org for guidance.   Which says essentially the same, only in more detail.   So the "minimum understanding" reason is IMO a more rude version of the reason telling the user that an SSCCE is missing.  The intent of giving this reason is to tell the user that he needs to give exact details to be able to help him, so IMO a checklist would be much better. Something like:     Your question was closed because it may not provide enough details. Things you can do to improve your question to get an answer include:         Format the code in a way that makes it readable and easily understandable.   Provide the smallest working sample of code demonstrating the problem (link to SSCCE)   Include your input and output.   If applicable provide logs (i.e. Android debugging log, stack trace, etc.).   If applicable provide the exact error messages (compiler, etc.).      And something like this should be best included already in the banner that appears when a question is closed instead of being hidden in some pages you often enough have to actively looking for.  It might be helpful to adjust this, based on the tags or close reason, as I realize that I'm more focused on the programming area, and the above list may not apply to other areas of SO.  Update  Another thing I forgot to mention (but wanted to) is this:     Questions asking for code   Is IMO essentially an invitation of the type of questions     I have a problem, can you provide the solution? (with an optional please)   while     Questions concerning problems with code you've written   puts at least some emphasis on the fact that the poster has to put some effort himself in trying to solve the problem by providing the code which he used to attempt the solution. How to convert Wubi install into regular install? I have installed Ubuntu on my D: partition using Wubi. Is there any way in which I can remove my Windows from C: drive and move my existing Ubuntu installation to C: drive and make it a regular install. What does "I have got some time on my hands" mean? My shift at work's kinda long, so I've got some time on my hands to, you know...whatever. Think, I guess.   What does "I have got some time on my hands" mean in the above quote? How do I find out which DOM element has the focus? I would like to find out, in JavaScript, which element currently has focus. I've been looking through the DOM and haven't found what I need, yet. Is there a way to do this, and how?  The reason I was looking for this:  I'm trying to make keys like the arrows and enter navigate through a table of input elements. Tab works now, but enter, and arrows do not by default it seems. I've got the key handling part set up but now I need to figure out how to move the focus over in the event handling functions. How do I duplicate a whole line in Emacs? Strange grey bordering/outline in Illustrator I made a couple of vector shapes in AI and I get this strange thin border appearing around them. I can't get rid of it. Any suggestions?    Zoomed in: Delta-like symbol in LaTeX I'd like to write a majuscule delta-like symbol in LaTeX but I can't find it's syntax anywhere. You can see the symbol on equation (12) of the following paper:  "". These questions are really bothering me. Any help would be much appreciated.  Let $p$ be prime  a) If $(G, \oplus)$ has order $2p$, prove that every proper subgroup of $(G, \oplus)$ is cyclic  b) If $(G, \oplus)$ has order $p^2$, prove that $(G, \oplus)$ has a subgroup of order $p$ I'm looking for the name of a sci-fi series, intended for children. Robots have control over the humans. There is a squad of humans who attack them. Every member in this squad has a badge on their suit, and when they touch this badge the suit becomes armed. This series was not cartoon series, it was performed by real people. The main robot character is very similar in style to Darth Vader in Star Wars. The series aired in the 1990s. I am sorry but I can't recall many details.