I used my Wintel box to download Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Burned an install DVD and installed on my laptop (Dell Inspiron 8500). When I try to boot the laptop from the hard drive I get a GPU Lockup message. If I let it sit, after a few minutes I get messages about a channel failing to idle. These repeat every few minutes. I have read some other posts and it sounds like I still ought to be able to do something, but I have no idea what. My GPU is an Nvida GeForce 4 4200. I am a total newbie at Linux. I have mark Sobell's Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux. I will search it as well. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I was able to install Ubuntu 12.04 using the alternative version of the image, (64 bit) but when I start the system it tells me the GPU  locked up, and instead presents a text only screen.  I understand that this site is not for bug reports, but at the same time, I know that there are some versions of the installer than have to be compatible with my graphics card (Nvidia GTS 360M).  I assumed that the mere fact that the alternative installer ran was an indication that I could get some sort of graphical interface running after the install.  Is there some way of getting some type of graphical interface running on my machine? Even better would be is there a way to get the rest of the system running as normal (i.e. GPU up and running)?  If an internet connection is required to download driver support or something similar, directions for how to configure a wireless connection with WPA2-Personal protection from the text-only interface (bash).  Any help would be appreciated.  Note: I was able to find  which tells me that the card is supported.  Note 2: In the install software stage of the install, I was unable to install anything (no internet connection)  Update: The exact error message is [8.591394] [drm] 0000:01:00.0: GPU Lockup - switching to software fbcon  Update 2: If I try to install with the regular version of Ubuntu, the screen goes staticy. This also happens if I install with Wubi (distasteful I know) and then try to use Ubuntu.  Update 3: I've tried xforcevesa, nomodeset and xforcevesa nomodeset as my wubi boot options.  Update 4: Thanks to jokerdino, I can now connect to the internet, so internet tools would now be a possibility.
Gnome terminal will not start I just tried to install python 3.6 on my Ubuntu 16.04 system, and now I can't run the terminal from the launcher or from Ctrl + Alt + T. I tried to run gnome-terminal from XTerm and got the following message:  Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/bin/gnome-terminal", line 9, in &lt;module&gt;     from gi.repository import GLib, Gio   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gi/__init__.py", line 42, in &lt;module&gt;     from . import _gi ImportError: cannot import name '_gi' Error in sys.excepthook: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 63, in apport_excepthook     from apport.fileutils import likely_packaged, get_recent_crashes   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/__init__.py", line 5, in &lt;module&gt;     from apport.report import Report   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/report.py", line 30, in &lt;module&gt;     import apport.fileutils   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/fileutils.py", line 23, in &lt;module&gt;     from apport.packaging_impl import impl as packaging   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/packaging_impl.py", line 23, in &lt;module&gt;     import apt   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/__init__.py", line 23, in &lt;module&gt;     import apt_pkg ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'apt_pkg'  Original exception was: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/bin/gnome-terminal", line 9, in &lt;module&gt;     from gi.repository import GLib, Gio   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gi/__init__.py", line 42, in &lt;module&gt;     from . import _gi ImportError: cannot import name '_gi'   How can I fix this error?  It should also be noted that:   My gnome-terminal file is now a python script. The gnome-terminal.real file will open the terminal as expected. python3.5 gnome-terminal will open the terminal as expected. Where can I rent a decent mountain bike in Zürich? I am going for a 4 day trip in Zürich and I would like to bike quite a lot. Though biking is quite advertised, I failed to find a decent bike rental shop in the city. Would highly appreciate some tips! I am constructing a bibliography of as much of the prior research in a field I am working in. I would like to use BibTeX to print the citation in the pdf, and then I would like to add the details of the paper after the citation. Only then would I like to print the next citation. For example:  [1] Jahan M. Dawlaty and Yunquing Chen. Measurement of the optical absorption of graphene in the terahertz. Applied Physics Letters, 2008. Research Group: Cornell Pump Wavelength: 500 nm. Probe Wavelenth: 7 microns. Relaxation Time: 50 fs. [2] Paul George and Dmitry Vekslar, Measurement of Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics in Graphene. Applied Physics Letters, 2009.  . . . and so on. Does anyone know how this could be done? How does $ \sum_{p<x} p^{-s} $ grow asymptotically for $ \text{Re}(s) < 1 $? Adding tags to files in OS X: How to use, where are tags stored, and will they work on a network? Why use apparently meaningless do-while and if-else statements in macros? In many C/C++ macros I'm seeing the code of the macro wrapped in what seems like a meaningless do while loop.  Here are examples.  #define FOO(X) do { f(X); g(X); } while (0) #define FOO(X) if (1) { f(X); g(X); } else   I can't see what the do while is doing.  Why not just write this without it?  #define FOO(X) f(X); g(X) Reduction Integration of $I_n=\int{\frac{x^n}{\sqrt{x^2+a^2}} dx}$ How do I derive this using reduction formula?  $$I_n=\int{\frac{x^n}{\sqrt{x^2+a^2}} dx}$$  I got $\sqrt{x^2+a^2}(x^n) - \frac{1}{n-1}(x^{n-1})\sqrt{x^2+a^2} + \frac{1}{n-1}(I_n) $ . I'm not too sure if this is correct. I would appreciate any form of help or correction to my answer. Thank you. How do I access my Windows partition? I have Ubuntu 12.04 installed on my HP G62-453 TU Laptop. I cannot access the contents of my hard disk partition E. Find the maximum likelihood estimator for $\theta$ when $f(x)=2\theta^{-2}x, 0\leq x \leq \theta$ Find the maximum likelihood estimator for $\theta$ when $f(x)=\frac{2x}{\theta^2}, 0\leq x \leq \theta$.  This should be a really easy question but I somehow cannot seem to get the right answer. My likelihood function is $\prod\limits_{i=1}^n \frac{2x_i}{\theta^2}$ which gives me after some simplification $n\ln(2\theta^{-2}) + \sum\limits_{i=1}^n ln(x_i)$ as my log-likelihood function. Then the derivative becomes $\frac{-2n}{\theta}$. If I equate this to $0$ to obtain the maximum I obtain $\hat{\theta}\rightarrow\infty$. However, this answer does not seem plausible. What did I do wrong? Mistakenly filed as Exempt from income tax witholdings for entire year 2019 I am a basic 30 year old filing Single, W2, healthy working individual. No dependents, no additional schedules, capital gains or losses other than Student Loan interest expense.   I started a new job in January 2019 and somehow during my new hire enrollment, "I or someone" marked in my file as Exempt... I am pretty familiar with filing my own 1040 (as its pretty basic)and I know for a fact that I would never for under any reason think that I am Exempt from absolutely anything tax related. Nobody in my new job's HR department reached out to confirm whether this Exemption was correct or not with me personally. My CPA said that anytime they receive an Exempt W-4 form, that they automatically return the form to the employer to confirm.   I unknowingly went 11 full months in 2019 without any taxes being withheld. Of course my paycheck was more than before, but I also got a better/higher salary job, so I never thought about the difference being from not paying taxes. And, no I do not print out my paystubs. It’s all through Paycom and it clearly shows you your gross pay &amp; a "$XXX" amount in deductions/withholdings - kicker is, you have to click the drop down menu to actually see the entire breakdown. At which point, I never saw the big $0 in taxes being withheld... I know the taxes have to be paid one way or another, but I don't feel like I should be entirely responsible for a $5k-$6k tax liability for a HR clerical error. Even if I did actually input it incorrectly the first time.   Is there a way to check with the IRS to see if they indeed receive my file as Exempt and if they did actually return it to my Employer? I’m just wondering if either HR forgot to follow up with me or even IF the IRS does actually cull these exempt requests in the first place? I don't have the liquidity to simply pay the IRS all at once.   What would be my best option going forward? I have Ubuntu 18.04 LTS installed. I inserted USB-flash to my laptop. It was automounted to /media/username/DISKLABEL and opened in Nautilus. I can read and write objects to it. How can I access it from the application, which is installed as Snap? I tried snaps of the following applications such as gedit, arduino-mhall119, organize-my-files. All them show me errors if I navigate to /media folder:    Could not read the contents of Media Error opening the directory of '/media': permission denied  Output of active Snap  is below: $ snap interfaces  | grep -v &quot;.*-$&quot; Slot                             Plug :browser-support                 organize-my-files :core-support                    core:core-support-plug :cups-control                    gedit :desktop                         gedit,organize-my-files :desktop-legacy                  gedit,organize-my-files :gsettings                       gedit,organize-my-files :home                            arduino-mhall119,gedit,organize-my-files :network                         arduino-mhall119,gedit,organize-my-files,pulsemixer :opengl                          organize-my-files :pulseaudio                      organize-my-files,pulsemixer :unity7                          arduino-mhall119,gedit,organize-my-files :wayland                         gedit :x11                             arduino-mhall119,organize-my-files,pulsemixer gnome-3-26-1604:gnome-3-26-1604  gedit gtk-common-themes:gtk3-themes    gedit gtk-common-themes:icon-themes    gedit gtk-common-themes:sound-themes   gedit -                                arduino-mhall119:serial-port -                                gedit:avahi-observe -                                gedit:mount-observe  Updates:  connecting mount-observe to Gedit with snap connect gedit:mount-observe does not help. it seems that we need special Snap with support of  interface. Word whose form is contrary to its meaning? Is there a word for a word whose form is contrary to its meaning?  For example, "quotidian" is anything but quotidian. Configure tab-switch hotkey in gnome-terminal I used to use Alt+number to switch between gnome-terminal tabs. In my recent 19.10 installation, this does not work. When I press Alt+1, instead of switching tab, the command line shows this: (arg: 1)   and if I press Alt+2, it becomes: (arg: 12)   I checked the options in gnome-terminal, it is set to use Alt+number to switch between tabs. I would like to know which application is hijacking the hotkey, and how to fix it. PS. I do NOT want to use Ctrl+PgUp/PgDn for this. Thanks. Given that   $x^x = y$; and  given some value for $y$   is there a way to expressly solve that equation for $x$? Is it ok to leave a slow cooker unattended? consider positive numbers $a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots,a_n$ and $b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_n$. does the following in-equality holds and if it does then how to prove it  $\left[(a_1+b_1)(a_2+b_2)\cdots(a_n+b_n)\right]^{1/n}\ge \left(a_1a_2\cdots a_n\right)^{1/n}+\left(b_1b_2\cdots b_n\right)^{1/n}$ Class of sets of a given infinite cardinality This question was inspired by the question on .  From the discussion in the comments there, it seems there does not exist a set of all sets of a given cardinality.  To me, it seems easy to see that this is true for any nonzero finite cardinality $n$. Given any set $x$, you can always make a set of size $n$ by adding $n-1$ other sets to $x$ to make a set of size $n$, which exists by repeated use of the pairing axiom.   But how would you do this for infinite cardinalities? For suppose $\kappa$ is some given infinite cardinality. To show that the set of all sets of cardinality $\kappa$ does not exist, it seems you would have to show that for any set $x$, there exists a set of that size with $x$ as an element, and then you could take the union of that set to find the set of all sets, and thus a contradiction. But it doesn't seem reasonable to simply say, for a given set of size $\kappa$ if $x$ is in the set, we have no problem. If not, just take an element out of the set and put $x$ in. Something about that seems like it would not be allowed.  So how would you do this for infinite cardinalities? How do I read a file into a std::string, i.e., read the whole file at once?  Text or binary mode should be specified by the caller. The solution should be standard-compliant, portable and efficient. It should not needlessly copy the string's data, and it should avoid reallocations of memory while reading the string.  One way to do this would be to stat the filesize, resize the std::string and fread() into the std::string's const_cast&lt;char*&gt;()'ed data(). This requires the std::string's data to be contiguous which is not required by the standard, but it appears to be the case for all known implementations. What is worse, if the file is read in text mode, the std::string's size may not equal the file's size.  A fully correct, standard-compliant and portable solutions could be constructed using std::ifstream's rdbuf() into a std::ostringstream and from there into a std::string. However, this could copy the string data and/or needlessly reallocate memory.    Are all relevant standard library implementations smart enough to avoid all unnecessary overhead?  Is there another way to do it?  Did I miss some hidden Boost function that already provides the desired functionality?     void slurp(std::string&amp; data, bool is_binary) Java toString() using reflection? I have this alias set in my system /etc/bashrc file:  alias root="sudo !!"   The intention of this being to run the last used command using sudo of course. When used, it of course appears to substitute the last command in history to the bashrc file upon shell initialization, and not the actual command that you would get if you were to run sudo !! in an interactive shell. I've also tried alias root="sudo fc -s" to no avail.  I realize this is probably something to do with how the BASH does command substitutions, but can someone explain why this is, and provide a usable substitute?  I'm running BASH version 3.2.51(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin13).