I can't get past the : apt install linux-headers-$(uname -r) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package linux-headers-4.18.0-kali2-amd64 E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-headers-4.18.0-kali2-amd64' E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-headers-4.18.0-kali2-amd64'  I checked my sources.list which contains: deb http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free  uname -r returns: 4.18.0-kali2-amd64  And when I run apt-cache search linux-image I get: linux-headers-4.18.0-kali3-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.18.0-kali3-amd64 linux-headers-4.18.0-kali3-cloud-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.18.0-kali3-cloud-amd64 linux-headers-4.18.0-kali3-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.18.0-kali3-rt-amd64 linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-amd64 - Linux 4.18 for 64-bit PCs linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-amd64-dbg - Debug symbols for linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-amd64 linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-cloud-amd64 - Linux 4.18 for x86-64 cloud linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-cloud-amd64-dbg - Debug symbols for linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-cloud-amd64 linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.18 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-rt-amd64-dbg - Debug symbols for linux-image-4.18.0-kali3-rt-amd64 linux-image-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) linux-image-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux amd64 configuration (meta-package) linux-image-cloud-amd64 - Linux for x86-64 cloud (meta-package) linux-image-cloud-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux cloud-amd64 configuration (meta-package) linux-image-rt-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), PREEMPT_RT linux-image-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux rt-amd64 configuration (meta-package) linux-image-4.18.0-kali2-amd64 - Linux 4.18 for 64-bit PCs  I'm running kali on an external SSD with live persistence. I did update and upgrade.
I am trying to install Linux headers for Kali Linux on my machine and I have tried every possible solution on the internet but it always show "Unable to locate packages "  root@kali:/usr/sbin# apt-get install linux-headers-4.6.0-kali1-amd64 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package linux-headers-4.6.0-kali1-amd64 E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-headers-4.6.0-kali1-amd64' E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-headers-4.6.0-kali1-amd64'   Here is my sources.list file :  # Regular Repositories deb http://http.kali.org/kali sana main non-free contrib deb http://security.kali.org/kali-security sana/updates main contrib non-free # Source repositories deb-src http://http.kali.org/kali sana main non-free contrib deb-src http://security.kali.org/kali-security sana/updates main contrib non-free   Uname -a output :   root@kali:/usr/sbin# uname -a Linux kali 4.6.0-kali1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.6.4-1kali1 (2016-07-21) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Why is sudoers NOPASSWD option not working? Intuition of the meaning of homology groups Prevent Windows 10 from installing/updating a specific driver? It seems that the recent Synaptics driver update for Synaptics SMBus TouchPad on Windows 10 (build 100049) somehow doesn't see my middle-button. Uninstalling, and installing an older driver for Windows 8.1 from the HP site (my machine is HP EliteBook 8570w) restores the middle button functionality.    Few days later, the driver updates itself again, and I lose the middle-button.  I realize I'm running unsupported software, but is it possible to prevent updating this particular driver, without either disabling updates altogether or preventing other drivers from updating? I am considering attacks on Two-Key Triple-DES Encryption assuming $2^{32}$ known plaintext/ciphertext pairs (that's a mere 32 of ciphertext) by the method devised by Paul C. van Oorschot and Michael J. Wiener:  (in ), or another published method not requiring significantly more DES computations. As a synthetic information for decision makers, I am looking for an independent estimate of how much time this is expected to require, assuming all the RAM ever built by mankind to that day (of April 2012) was put to full use. Note: I'm purposely not asking when the attack could become feasible using all the RAM ever built by mankind, because estimates on the amount of RAM mankind will build, and when, are less falsifiable. Update: I am not considering cost; neither of RAM, power, logic including DES engines (as long as the number of DES operations remains within $2^{90}$). I am willing to assume that the amount of RAM used, and its effective speed, are the only factors to account for in determining the expected duration of the attack. This is similar to the hypothesis made by the authors of the linked paper, that their attack is limited by the amount (or cost) of RAM used, with all other factors of secondary importance. Update: sadly, nobody dared answer the question and the bounty period is over. Thus  is a first order answer to criticize. A gold reviewer badge? Prove existence of a real root. Add anchors to the how-to-ask and how-to-answer pages A well-supported wireless PCI adapter for Ubuntu 12.04? ''will'' or ''going to'' Calculating the total number of surjective functions If $a_{1},a_{2},a_{3},a_{4}\in \mathbb{R}$ and $a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3}+a_{4}=0$ and $a^2_{1}+a^2_{2}+a^2_{3}+a^2_{4}=1.$ Then Range of $$E =(a_{1}-a_{2})^2+(a_{2}-a_{3})^2+(a_{3}-a_{4})^2+(a_{4}-a_{1})^2$$ is  Try: From $$(a_{1}-a_{2})^2+(a_{2}-a_{3})^2+(a_{3}-a_{4})^2+(a_{4}-a_{1})^2$$ $$=2(a^2_{1}+a^2_{2}+a^2_{3}+a^2_{4})+2(a_{1}a_{2}+a_{2}a_{3}+a_{3}a_{4}+a_{4}a_{1})$$ $$=2-2(a_{1}+a_{3})(a_{2}+a_{4})=2+2(a_{1}+a_{3})^2\geq 2$$ and equality hold when $\displaystyle a_{1}=-a_{3}$ and $a_{2}=-a_{4}$ Could some help me how to find its upper bound, Thanks What is the difference between building from source and using an install package? I was wondering: when installing something, there's an easy way of double clicking an install executable file, and on the other hand, there is a way of building it from source.   The latter one, downloading a source bundle, is really cumbersome.  But what is the fundamental difference between these two methods? How to remove shutdown option in start menu of Windows 10 I have a PC that should always be on. I recently upgraded to Windows 10 from Windows 7. In Windows 7 I changed the default action of the power button in the start menu to log off from my machine so that I could not accidentally shut it off. However in Windows 10 the start menu changed and this doesn't appear to be possible anymore?   I wonder how the shutdown option can be removed from the start menu. I cannot find any information about it but I expect this to be possible. Per line text gradient (ala beeline reader) How to disable Macbook Pro internal display when using external monitors I have a Late 2011 Macbook Pro 13" (running Lion - OS 10.7.4) which I use with a dual external monitor setup. I have two 21" LCDs that I use as external monitors. One uses the built in Mini Display Port on the Macbook Pro and the other is connected via a USB to DVI adapter (Diamond DVILink).  The problem I am having is with the 13" built in display of the Macbook Pro. I would like it to remain closed and unused (I prefer the dual monitors at same resolution), however I cannot seem to "disable" the display in the display preferences applet. So even though the Macbook Pro lid is closed the operating system still makes use of the display, even though the apple logo on the back of the display is unlit. I have tried to move the laptop screen off out of the way in display preferences but I find when I "sleep" my setup that any applications that remain open move to the laptop screen. This makes it difficult to locate the application windows when resuming from sleep.    Does anyone know of a way to disable the laptop built in display so it is not seen by the OS when external monitors are being used? Of course preventing them from getting stolen is the top priority, but invariably, someone is going to get jacked. What are some good practices to minimize the damage incurred when your PC is stolen?  Given most of our PCs contain our entire lives, its frightening to know that all this information can be in someone else's hands.   Some ideas i had (a bit paranoid, i admit).   keep encrypted backups.  Use truecrypt to have double encrypted (with strong password) volumes where you store your personal data. schedule Eraser to run every evening so that potential thieves couldn't undelete (and subsequently retrieve) sensitive data do all your banking in a virtual machine.  Keep the virtual machine volume encrypted, and on a portable usb drive that you carry with you / keep in a safe. have applications that phone home (or hit something to leave an IP trace) upon connection to the internet (can someone suggest a good solution for this?)   Does anyone have any other suggestions? What are the rules of engagement with respect to SEO in HTML 5?  Examples of things we have been mulling over with no conclusion:   Are you penalised for not using &lt;head&gt; and &lt;body&gt; tags? Do links in &lt;nav&gt; blocks get prioritised for follows? With &lt;aside&gt; (no bside though), &lt;section&gt;, &lt;summary&gt; and &lt;details&gt; which ones carry the most weight for content, one-liner descriptions and keyword tags are there search engine implications? If you use CSS to put a &lt;footer&gt; element at the top and a &lt;header&gt; element at the bottom (not that you would but it may be construed as such by an incomplete spider implementation)? Does the use of placeholder attributes on &lt;input&gt; show you are more user focused?   At the minute we are haphazardly pinning the content on the donkey with regard to tag usage but would be interesting to know if anyone has any insight into the "correct" tags to use with regards to SEO. Keeping track of where everyone is is hard.  I could be out in the wasteland while Dogmeat will let me know he found something. That's great, but then it's a chore trying to find him a lot of times. Sometimes, he'll even run ahead and attack enemies and I'll lose sight of him. Only if I leave an area sufficiently far enough, he'll come back and meet with me which isn't always possible. I know I can listen out for him but visual indicators would be better. But none of this works if I sent him to a settlement but needed to find him and he hasn't returned yet.  Is there anything we can do to make locating companions in the world easier? I can't figure how to print the string "-n" with the over 30 years-old command echo.  I tried these:  Michaels:Scripts$ echo -n Michaels:Scripts$ echo "-n" Michaels:Scripts$ echo -e "-n" Michaels:Scripts$ echo -- -n -- -n Michaels:Script$ echo -- "-n" -- -n Michaels:Script$ echo "\-n" \-n   I use Mac OS X ML. I consider this behaviour very weird and unexpected. How can metagaming retries on poor skill checks be prevented? I'm sure every DM has had this happen: one PC is trying to find something cool on a dead monster's body. The player rolls poorly, and instead of accepting the paltry 2 copper pieces, the PC calls all the party members over to also try looting the corpse. Invariably, a different player rolls well, and everyone walks away satisfied that everything's been taken down to the poor dead monster's last holey sock.   Another example: One PC is trying to find some useful information in a library. There're no guards, no reason anyone would be bothered, and no time restraints to stress about. The player rolls poorly, so all the other PCs try, too.  I'd describe this as well-intentioned metagaming. The players are afraid of losing out on content, this despite multiple sessions of me making it clear that I don't structure my games to penalize gameplay that way.  These are situations that require a roll to determine the degree of success. (At least I think so; perhaps I'm wrong here?) Failure could set back the PCs a cool item or a bit of information that would have helped a little, but these minor failures aren't game-enders or anything. As a DM I can't see a reason to say "No" and disallow the practice, but it feels vaguely like cheating to let the players roll multiple times to get better results.  How do I prevent players ganging up on skill checks after they've seen someone roll poorly?