The  on main sites are well-established: comments are transient Post-it notes, they are second-class citizens, they can be deleted at any time for a number of reasons, and so on.  However, those guidelines explicitly say "These guidelines are for main Q&amp;A sites (not meta sites).".  Fair enough.  So what about meta sites, especially site-specific meta sites?  Should comment moderation follow the same guidelines?  Or should comment moderation be "looser"?  If it should be looser, what guidelines should be followed on meta sites?  I realize that each site and community might evolve its own culture and expectations regarding comment moderation on its meta site.  But what would be a good default or starting point?  Are there any guidelines or principles that are likely to be appropriate for many/most meta sites?
We all know , but that guidance is, naturally, geared toward main sites, where we want to keep things clean and focused.  Meta, on the other hand, is a site's "second place", with some different rules and conventions.  For example, questions on main sites can be closed as primarily-opinion-based, but meta is all about opinions.  There's a "discussion" tag and such questions collect many opinions.  Meta is different.  Occasionally I see comment flags on metas and I'm never sure what to do with them.  Setting aside things that are blatantly offensive or spam (that's a no-brainer), is there such a thing as "too chatty" or a comment discussion that should be moved to chat on meta?  I am very conservative in deleting things on per-site metas (except on  posts, which like main should stay focused).  Are there any guidelines specific to per-site metas?  I'm specifying per-site metas and not MSE because MSE seems to have conventions that fall somewhere between "main site" and "per-site meta".  If the answer is the same for all metas then great, but I don't want to assume it'll be the same.
What command should I use to rotate wood to S,N,W,E,D and U?  I read the entire world edit guide and tried some things but all the results are not satisfactory. How to change the style of the title attribute inside an anchor tag? When should N-Gons be used, and when shouldn't they? Support for N-Gons (polygons consisting of more than 4 vertices) has been in Blender for a while now, but many of us still may not know when to use them, and how to do so effectively.  In what situations do N-Gons really come in handy? When should they be just plain left out? Do they have any place in finished models? What is the limit of How can I solve this functional equation, where $x,y$ are any real numbers and $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb R$ is a function such that : $$f(x+y)+f(x-y)=2f(x)\cos y$$    I tried substituting $x=0$ to get $f(y)+f(-y)=2f(0)\cos y$ . Taking $x=y$ gives $f(2x)+f(0)=2f(x)\cos x$. I similar get some more relations like that, but its not really helping me in finding anything useful. I also think the function must either be $\sin$ or $\cos$ looking at the product to sum formulae. Can anyone tell me how should I solve this? Like when you want to say that you'll tell a short version of something which would alter the accuracy of the original version.  I was thinking of "In a nutshell" and "To make a long story short", but I felt like those phrases did not place emphasis on the "there might be an insignificant loss of accuracy" aspect. Why does this sort ignore the +/- character prefix? My chain broke and in a moment of silliness (I was cold wet and slightly annoyed)  I threw the broken one away before thinking about measuring the new one.  Is there a guide to getting the chain length/tension correct ?  It's an 8 speed road bike (Shimano Sora back, double ring front) How to restore original size and unboot my bootable USB pendrive Where is the denoiser? I'm looking for a way to search files where two word instances exist in the same file.  I've been using the following to perform my searches up to this point:  find . -exec grep -l "FIND ME" {} \;   The problem I'm running into is that if there isn't exactly one space that between "FIND" and "ME", the search result does not yield the file.  How do I adapt the former search string where both words "FIND" and "ME exist in a file as opposed to "FIND ME"?  I'm using AIX. Can every even integer be expressed as the difference of two primes? Is God either immoral or not omnipotent? The usual (Christian) justification for suffering/evil in the world created by a benevolent God is freedom of the will. However, the more interesting question is not about the source of evil (which the free will may very well be) but why God chose to create the world such as it is. Why not create a world with freedom of the will, but without suffering? Even assuming that God is bound by logic such combination doesn't seem to be logically impossible: creatures certainly can do good of their own free will. There are two alternatives.  1) God is powerful enough for all practical intents and purposes, enough to be called God, but not omnipotent. He created only the best of all possible worlds (Leibniz). This position is perhaps the most defensible philosophically, it also avoids logical problems with , etc., but it does diminish deity's status and invites unpleasant questions like what limits God (logic only, inert matter, outer chaos, other beings), is there someone/thing more powerful, etc.    Interestingly enough, the original Christian theodicy wasn't free will. St.Augustine says poetically "the canvas of creation requires both the black and the white paint". "Requires" here can be interpreted differently,  is to explain the black by the "just punishment" for the original sin, which brings us to Adam and Eve, and back to the free will. But if God is still omnipotent and hence omniscient creating creatures he knew would sin, and then punishing them for it is hardly an improvement.   2) However, Augustine can be read more straightforwardly. Evil is "required" for the perfection of the world just like black paint is required for the perfection of a painting (evil can be interpreted as lack of good rather than something onto itself but that is beside the point). God is immoral, and he is beyond our conception of morality, his notion of perfection is his own. This is much bolder, and similar to Plotinus's position on the existence of the One, the One can not exist because it is "prior to all existence". But it does evoke the unpleasant taste of "ends justify the means". It is one thing to use "God is beyond our logic and comprehension" to get rid of unliftable stones, it is quite another to convince people to worship an immoral perfectionist.  Formally, there is another logical possibility of asserting both morality and omnipotence, but defending the morality of creating a world full of suffering, for a higher purpose perhaps. For example, the suffering only appears bad to us, not to an absolute being in its wisdom. But this simply redefines morality and is only different in phraseology from the Augustine's position. The question is asked in human terms and has to be answered in kind. One is free to argue that God is beyond human logic and/or morality, but it still leaves him immoral as commonly understood.   There does not appear to be a way to square this circle, one has to accept Leibniz's or Augustine's alternative (or both) and deal with the downsides. Option 2) looks more consistent, but it is rarely embraced, at least not openly. Perhaps, for "public relations" reasons it is more attractive to dismiss the question with something like "this is beyond us" or change the subject to the free will.      What are the modern theological positions on the morality/omnipotence in catholisism, protestantism, etc.? Is the question relevant to other religions?   EDIT: I am not sure that it came through but by immoral I did not mean morally deficient or evil. Rather at the God's plane of being morality becomes meaningless, like tastes or smells are meaningless when applied to elementary particles. How to suppress scientific notation when printing float values? Here's my code:  x = 1.0 y = 100000.0     print x/y   My quotient displays as 1.00000e-05.  Is there any way to suppress scientific notation and make it display as 0.00001? I'm going to use the result as a string. What permissions should my website files/folders have on a Linux webserver? This is a  about File Permissions on a Linux web server.   I have a Linux web server running Apache2 that hosts several websites. Each website has its own folder in /var/www/.  /var/www/contoso.com/ /var/www/contoso.net/ /var/www/fabrikam.com/   The base directory /var/www/ is owned by root:root. Apache is running as www-data:www-data. The Fabrikam website is maintained by two developers, Alice and Bob. Both Contoso websites are maintained by one developer, Eve. All websites allow users to upload images. If a website is compromised, the impact should be as limited as possible.  I want to know the best way to set up permissions so that Apache can serve the content, the website is secure from attacks, and the developers can still make changes. One of the websites is structured like this:  /var/www/fabrikam.com     /cache     /modules     /styles     /uploads     /index.php   How should the permissions be set on these directories and files? I read somewhere that you should never use 777 permissions on a website, but I don't understand what problems that could cause. During busy periods, the website automatically caches some pages and stores the results in the cache folder. All of the content submitted by website visitors is saved to the uploads folder. This was talked about a few podcasts ago. And they referenced some other site that does this.  Currently location is a string but adding a country dropdown (and for the usa a state drop down) could be a great addition to the site.  Then allow for user filtering by country / state. how to set Image and text at the center of the button Can I nohup/screen an already-started process? This is a question that has been addressed several times, not only here, but also in other sites of the stack exchange network (e.g. ). However, I cannot make any of the solutions work for me.  I'm running a command through ssh. Whenever I exit ssh, I want the command to die as well. This command is a daemon called ktserver that runs indefinitely until you press Ctrl-C.  I run it as follows: ssh -t compute-0-1 ktserver and, indeed, when I press Ctrl-C, the process ends gracefully and the ssh session ends.  However, if instead of pressing Ctrl-C, I kill the ssh process using the kill command (for example, sending SIGINT or SIGHUP), the ktserver process stays alive.  How can I make the ktserver always die independent on how ssh is killed?  EDIT: If, instead of ktserver I run something completely different, such as gedit, everything works like a charm (i.e. gedit dies when the connection dies). Therefore, there might be something wrong with the process itself. For example, I thought that it might be ignoring SIGHUP or SIGINT. However, when I run kill -1 ktserver or kill -2 ktserver, the process dies as expected.  EDIT2: As Mark Plotnick points out, the issue is related to the fact that there is no communication circulating on the ssh channel. I've confirmed by running ssh -t &lt;host&gt; read and killing the ssh process afterwards. readwas still alive and kicking. If $m^4+4^n$ is prime, then $m=n=1$ or $m$ is odd and $n$ even I have been stuck on this one for months, really simple to state, really giving me trouble.     Show that if $m^4 + 4^n$ is prime, $m&gt;0$, $n&gt;0$, then $m$ is odd and $n$ is even, except when $m=n=1$.   The case $m=n=1$ gives $5$, so that is why it is excluded. Clearly $m$ is odd, for if it was even, the number would be divisible by at least $4$, but I can't seem to get rid of the case where $n$ must be odd.   The only thing I've managed to try is to write $m$ as an odd number, say $m = 2k+1$, and $n = 2\ell + 1$, then get $$ m^4 + 4^n = (2k+1)^4 + 4^{2\ell+1} = 16k^4 + 32k^3 + 24k^2 + 8k + 1 + 4^{2 \ell + 1} $$ and this is congruent to $0 \mod 5$ unless $k \equiv 2 \mod 5$, and now it gives you an even more ugly polynomial if I write $k = 5j+2$, and it's not working. I've tried other inconclusive approaches, like trying to see if two numbers of some form generate numbers of the same form.. (for instance primes of the form 8k+1 and 8k+7 always generate primes of the same form when multiplied together, stuff like that).  Any ideas? Even just ideas you haven't gave a thought... they're welcome!