In bash, what is the shortcut to recall the last command without any arguments?  That seems to be the one shortcut that is missing form the various guides I have found, such as   I would like the last used command to appear on the command line with the cursor at the end of the line so I can type the new argument I wish to supply.  Furthermore, I would like to achieve this with a single shortcut key combination along the lines of CTRL+P  !:0 does not work because it actually executes the command without giving me an opportunity to enter new argument(s).  Meta+Ctrl+e fails to produce any results in bash for me. However, the following indicates it should work, assuming \e refers to Alt  bind -P | grep shell-expand-line shell-expand-line can be found on "\e\C-e".   I'm running Arch.
Example: I type man ls, than I want to get man only.   By using !! I can get man ls but how do I get man?
Has any Dark Force user/ally ever said "May the Force be with you"? How do I create a key binding that allows me to mount my google drive? I want to mount/unmount my google drive using with a key binding without having to open a terminal. How can I set this up? How is $\dfrac1{(1-x)^5}=\sum_{n\geq0}{n+4\choose4}x^n$ Can someone please explain to me how is $$\dfrac1{(1-x)^5}=\sum_{n\geq0}{n+4\choose4}x^n$$  Thanks! Heroku deployment failed because of sqlite3 gem error Why don't files from Xbox 360 show up when USB drive is plugged into computer? Has the speed of light changed over time? Could someone judge my (stoner) hypothesis that the speed of light has changed over time -- i.e. as the universe has expanded in volume light has slowed down, perhaps going so far as back to the big bang when it was infinitely fast and there was no time because everything happened at once etc. Thinking that the speed at which information can propagate through the universe is linked to the size of it seems intuitive to me. My question -- is there an easy disproof of this? Would Einstein have to be wrong? Does it violate anything supposedly more fundamental such as quantum or string theories? Do any current experiments invalidate it? If not can you show me in any case why you think its unlikely.   Edit 8/24  I'm accepting Mark M.'s answer but will post this here because there is a character limit on comments  @Mark M thanks, good answer but as someone who has only read some popular physics, and should leave this to the experts, I'm still muddled in my personal theory. I don't see why you should need two units to measure the speed of light. The thing I have a hard time wrapping my head around is the relation of time and distance. They seem like they could fundamentally be the same thing. If you say time is measured fundamentally by the vibration of so and so quantum object in space... why can't we just measure that vibration distance as the constant... I'll repeat myself to try to be clear... there is a certain minimum distance that particles have to go to interact with each other... if it wasn't vibrating there wouldn't be time,its what creates the illusion of time...so instead of talking about speed or c as distance/time.... can't we simply talk about that distance a quantum object vibrates....I'll lead up to my point.....perhaps there can need be only one constant here, and that is the physical size of the universe. a tiny metal tuning fork doesn't appear to be vibrating at all but if you blew it up to the size of the empire state building the metal rods would move from window to window. perhaps as our universe expanded in size the length of that minimum vibration (perhaps infinite at point zero) would have expanded, and therefore created the illusion of time and the speed of light, which, as the universe expands, will continue slowing down. perhaps we are like a big balloon and we have been blown up and all the fields/particles-without-size are vibrating more and more in that space.. am i missing something obvious here? Determining the characteristic of a field If $\mathbb{F}=\{ 0,1,x,y\}$ is a field with four elements, why is the characteristic 2?   In a field with four elements, the characteristic is 2 or 3(since it has to be a prime). Is there any way to determine precisely the characteristic of this field, and in general any finite field? Can I recover app data after the phone has been Factory Reset? Without remembering application data, I reset my Galaxy S3 to factory state. Now, I lost data for one expense manager app. Is there any way to recover the data? Print on terminal and into file simultaneously? Proving that $GF(p^n)$ contains a unique subfield isomorphic to $GF(p^m)$ if and only if $m$ is a divisor of $n$. I am looking to prove that $GF(p^n)$ contains a unique subfield isomorphic to $GF(p^m)$ if and only if $m$ is a divisor of $n$. In the Wikipedia article:    They say that this statement has been proven by E. H. Moore in 1893.  How to go about proving the theorem? I know first I need to generate a subset, prove that it's a subfield, and then assume they are two and show it's unique.  But how to generate it in the first place? Consider the set of polynomials of the form $x^{p^m}-x=0$? Is there a way to show that it's a subfield without checking all the axioms? Every subsequence of $x_n$ has a further subsequence which converges to $x$. Then the sequence $x_n$ converges to $x$. The entire  site is blank right now.  The header and footer are shown, but no questions. Use Listing in newenvironment I am trying to do a new environment or command (i tried both) where i can put in the name, description and code of a Method in c++ and it gives me a new section with the MethodName, the code listed and the description below. But i am not able to use the listings environment in a new command or new environment.. Consider my MWE   \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article} \usepackage{listings}  \newcommand{\method}[3] { \section{#1}\label{#1} \begin{lstlisting} #2 \end{lstlisting} #3 }   \begin{document}  \method{MethodName}{Method Void MethodName()}{Description of the Method blablabla}  \end{document}   How can I fix this?   I would prefer to do it using a macro since I don't need an ending. Grandi's Series; tends to $1/2$, but why is this considered a valid sum? Disallow closing of questions with a certain number of question / answer upvotes With reference to this currently open question   At the time of writing, it has 3 close votes yet has 7 question upvotes and the single answerer (11 upvotes) will have been awarded the enlightened badge (silver).  Therefore in the opinion of many (i) the question adds value and (ii) the answer adds value.  As a staring point for discussion, I suggest that 5 net question upvotes (and perhaps 5 answer net upvotes) should be enough to keep a question permanently open. Let's haggle over the numbers though. Thoughts? How can I prove the following?  $\gamma (t)$ is unit speed, $\dot \gamma(t) \not= 0 \Rightarrow \ddot \gamma(t)$ is perpendicular to $\gamma(t)$   I don't really see where a problem would arise when $\dot \gamma(t)=0$ would cause such a problem Typesetting a function defined by case analysis Can any one suggess me the code to write this equation in LaTeX. Capital letters in "Theorem", "Conjecture" etc This is my first post and as you can probably guess I am a mathematician so I have no clue about grammar. I am writing a mathematical document at the moment and I would appreciate some advice on my usage of capital letters. Can somebody please confirm if the following are correct?  1) "We know by T​heorem 4.6.1 that..."   2) "the following c​onjecture, due to..."  3) In order to prove the "Mckay-Stevens $k$-covering C​onjecture, once needs to show that..."  I'm particularly confused about 3).  Many thanks for any help opengl storing multiple indices into indices buffer LaTeX template for resume/curriculum vitae If you have a TeX'ed resume, did you use a template or make your own? Are there any useful packages? What looks the most professional? How about special considerations for different areas of work (e.g. in academia)?