I am trying to identify a film that I saw a trailer for around 5 or more years ago. This century at least. The film was about a peaceful, low technology (maybe rural,) community isolated by a forest or perhaps a wall. I don't think any of the actors or anyone else associated with it were well known and I don't think the film was popular. I think it was American made but I'm not sure. It was similar to The Village, but I think the place was peaceful and without a threat from outside. It kind of had a similar conveyance of perspective as in the book Phoenix Without Ashes. I wanted to see the film but it dropped out of the theaters quickly. The recent film "The Maze Runner" reminded me of it. The film in question had at least one pair of young people, a man and a woman, who were protagonists. I think the young man said he was going to venture outside of the community into the unknown dangers, hence, the film's conflict. This missing knowledge has bothered me for a while. I'm sure you can relate.
Yes, the plot is pretty weird. There is this "star" (whose incarnation is a woman dressed in white) and some random guy who falls in love with her. There's the arc of "if you cross a specific border you'll die" which applies to our lady "star". Well, I also remember that they have some kind of a tubular case, and when one opens it, lightning files out.  I watched the film somewhere around 2010, it's in English and when I try to remember it, I get the vibe of a mediocre Hollywood fantasy romance.
Leave bash script running on remote terminal while not logged in? I have a bash script that takes several hours to run.  While it's running, I would like to do other things, which may involve logging out or disconnecting from the internet (my script runs network tests on various computers).  I understand that there is a command that would allow me to run my tests from a remote terminal and logout of the terminal while it runs.  Does anyone know what this command is? Can an illusion give a player partial cover? I'm in an argument with a player at my table, he says hiding behind some bushes while shooting arrows at my monsters gives him partial cover because they can only see his head and shoulders. So they're limited in what they can even aim at. I accepted that. And now he's trying to use minor illusion to create fake bushes/walls and continuing to claim he has partial cover.  I thought cover was based on having a solid obstacle between you and the target... Like, if a magical attack, or penetrating attack can pass through your cover, wouldn't that negate the AC bonus from partial cover? Or is it about "aiming"? I use ${\dot \hat E}$ to put a hat and dot on top of an E simultaneously. However, an error occurs. I have a lot of 3D objects of various sizes, shapes in blender 2.76b and I would like to set the origin to the bottom center of the objects bounds.  I cannot select the bottom edge and snap to cursor etc as each shapes edges are in different X/Y positions.  Is there a script or tool that will allow me to set the origin to the lowest edge z position? WoeUSB Error Code 256 with NTFS formatted USB I tried to create a Windows 10 USB boot medium with WoeUSB. I formatted a USB drive with an NTFS partition, but WoeUSB complains with:  Installation failed! Exit code: 256 Log: WoeUSB v@@WOEUSB_VERSION@@ ============================== Mounting source filesystem... Error: File "/media/woeusb_source_1543626298_6098/sources/install.wim" in source image has exceed the FAT32 Filesystem 4GiB Single File Size Limitation and cannot be installed.  You must specify a different --target-filesystem. Refer: https://github.com/slacka/WoeUSB/wiki/Limitations#fat32-filesystem-4gib-single-file-size-limitation for more info. Unmounting and removing "/media/woeusb_source_1543626298_6098"... You may now safely detach the target device   I've also tried to start WoeUSB via command line, did not work.  sudo woeusb --partition Win10_1809Oct_English_x64.iso /dev/sdb   My iso is located in:     home/sawyer/Downloads/Win10_1809Oct_English_x64.iso  Thanks in advance! I've been trying to get windows installed for three nights now, so any help towards that goal is greatly appreciated. $\mathbb{F}_p[X]/(X^2+X+1)$ is a field iff $p \equiv 2 \bmod 3$ Looking for a book I read in the 90's (not sure if it was published in the 90's or not).  The story as far as I can remember goes like this. Human-looking aliens evolve on a very hostile planet. They encounter some big bad threat and they cast about for help. They encounter a rich industrialist on Earth and they send a woman to recruit him. She teaches the guy to use magic and how to transform his body. They build a ship and travel to her planet but just before they arrive, she vanishes and he crash lands on this hostile planet.  He goes through many trials and tribulations in order to get to her and eventually he has enough and uses the ability she teaches him on how to transform his body. He transforms himself into a half-man, half-dragon-like creature which allows him to travel to the other side of the planet to get to the girl. On the way he manages to neurally link into a large flying creature that flies very fast, only to discover that it is intelligent and they soon become friends. When he gets to the girl she doesn't recognise him so he gets mad and starts attacking only to realise that it's all been a test set up by these people to allow him to reach higher levels of magic.   There were supposed to be sequels but I never got around to reading them.  I remember the cover art depicted a large dragon like creature with a torso of a man and a woman standing in front of it looking back at him.  Any idea what this book may be? When I was younger (11-12 years old, so the early 2000s) I once read a story where a young boy, who may have been either a young prince or a squire of some sort, is recruited by a wizard and taken to a city to train as a mage.  I seem to remember him living in dorms with the other children at this school, until he gets into difficulty with another of the boys in the dorm. He is kicked out of the dorms and ends up living above a blacksmith shop (I think).  I remember it being the first book in a series of books of which there were about 3 out at the time. I think one of the stories was about the boy going to a tower to do something or other.  Does anyone have any idea what this book series is? I haven't been able to find it for years now but it was a story I really loved. Undefined reference to static class member Can anyone explain why following code won't compile? At least on g++ 4.2.4.  And more interesting, why it will compile when I cast MEMBER to int?  #include &lt;vector&gt;  class Foo {   public:       static const int MEMBER = 1;   };  int main(){       vector&lt;int&gt; v;       v.push_back( Foo::MEMBER );       // undefined reference to `Foo::MEMBER'     v.push_back( (int) Foo::MEMBER ); // OK       return 0; } Blender 2.80 AV Sync missing? I just installed Blender 2.8 and for the life of me I can not find AV Sync anywhere and video editing has become impossible. Is there some new setting I am unaware of? Abort Ajax requests using jQuery Is it possible that using jQuery, I cancel/abort an Ajax request that I have not yet received the response from? One post with multiple questions or multiple posts? I want to ask several questions about the same problem domain but each question is independent from the others. Should I put all the questions in a single post or should I split them and send multiple posts? Possible bug in sidebar "question asked:" date Suppose $K/F$ is an extension field, and $E_1$ and $E_2$ are two intermediate subfields of finite degree. Let $E$ be the subfields of $K$ generated by $E_1$ and $E_2$. I'm trying to prove that $$ [E:F]\leq[E_1:F][E_2:F].$$  Since $E_1$ and $E_2$ are finite extensions, I suppose they have bases $\{a_1,\dots,a_n\}$ and $\{b_1,\dots,b_m\}$, respectively. If $E_1=F$ or $E_2=F$, then the inequality is actually equality, so I suppose both are proper extension fields. I think $E=F(a_1,\dots,a_n,b_1,\dots,b_m)$. Since $\{a_1,\dots,a_n,b_1,\dots,b_m\}$ is a spanning set for $E$ over $F$,  $$[E:F]\leq n+m\leq nm=[E_1:F][E_2:F]$$ since $m,n&gt;1$.  Is this sufficient? I'm weirded out since the problem did not ask to show $[E:F]\leq [E_1:F]+[E_2:F]$ which I feel will generally be a better upper bound. Simple examples of uncorrelated but not independent $X$ and $Y$ The standard font packages make global changes to the fonts in my document. What if I want to use a particular font for just a portion of my text?   How do I find the right name of the font? How do I select the font? How do I restrict the scope of the font change?     There are separate answers for different flavors of TeX (quick links): Usage of "they" / "them" / "their" when the person's gender is not known I know that one can use "they" / "them" / "their" in place of "he" / "him" / "his" or "she" / "her" / "hers" when the subject's / direct object's gender is not known; for instance, just looking at the default user's about me section on Stack Exchange sites:     Apparently, this user prefers to keep an air of mystery about them   My question is what happens when someone wants to reference the subject using a pronoun instead.  Should the verb be conjugated accordingly to the pronoun? E.g.:     Apparently, they prefer to keep an air of mystery about them   Or should the conjugation be retained? E.g.:     Apparently, they prefers to keep an air of mystery about them   The former looks unclear because it wouldn't allow the reader / listener to understand if the writer / speaker is talking about a single person or about a group of people, however the latter sounds very weird, at least just to the non-native speaker which I am. Monotone functions and non-vanishing of derivative This is a  about RAID levels.    What are:   the RAID levels typically used (including the RAID-Z family)?  deployments are they commonly found in? benefits and pitfalls of each? How can I port forward with iptables? I want connections coming in on ppp0 on port 8001 to be routed to 192.168.1.200 on eth0 on port 8080.  I've got these two rules  -A PREROUTING  -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8001 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.200:8080  -A FORWARD -m state -p tcp -d 192.168.1.200 --dport 8080 --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT   and it doesn't work. What am I missing?