I am writing a story and would like to know which one is correct:  a) "...and it was impossible to know who was sheltering whom."  b) "...and it was impossible to know who was sheltering who."  I tried to apply the 'replace who by he/him' method, but I didn't figure out yet.  I appreciate your help.
I know that who is used when asking about a subject (Who is at the door?) and whom is used when asking about an object (By whom was the door opened?). How do you determine which one to use when the object becomes the subject of another clause?   For example, take the sentence:      I gave the prize to ____ deserved it most.   Would it be whomever because it's the object of "gave," or would it be whoever because it's the subject of "deserved"? Is their a hard-and-fast rule to rely on in situations like this?
Dealing with suggested edits on question to be closed as duplicate What is the reason behind "non-static method cannot be referenced from a static context"? Solutions to $a+b+c=12$, $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}_0$ Let $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}_0$. If $a+b+c=12$, how many solutions $(a,b,c)$ satisfy the equation?   Is the answer:      $729$ Which meta am I supposed to post on? I'm mostly active on  and we have a separate . Most of my questions on IT Security meta have answers with links here. So my question is, where am I supposed to post what i.e. feature request, bug report, behavior questions? $2+2 = 5$? error in proof $$\begin{align} 2+2 &amp;= 4 - \frac92 +\frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt{\left(4-\frac92\right)^2} +\frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt{16 -2\times4\times\frac92 +\left(\frac92\right)^2} + \frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt{16 -36 + \left(\frac92\right)^2} +\frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt {-20 +\left(\frac92\right)^2} + \frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt{25-45 +\left(\frac92\right)^2} +\frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt {5^2 -2\times5\times\frac92 + \left(\frac92\right) ^2} + \frac92\\ &amp;= \sqrt {\left(5-\frac92\right)^2} +\frac92\\ &amp;= 5 + \frac92 - \frac92 \\ &amp;= 5\end{align}$$  Where did I go wrong \draw not working inside axis environment Judging from the pgfplots manual I expected the following code to work:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pgfplots} \begin{document} \begin{figure}   \begin{tikzpicture}     \begin{axis}[       xmin=0,       xmax=4,       ymin=0,       ymax=4,       ]       \draw (1,1) -- (3,2);     \end{axis}   \end{tikzpicture} \end{figure} \end{document}   However, it doesn't - meaning that it seems the \draw command does nothing at all. I just get an empty axes with no line.    Can anyone shed some light on this? I guess the solution will be really easy... Calculate sum of series $\sum \frac{n^2}{n!}$ I have to calculate sum of series $\sum \frac{n^2}{n!}$. I know that $\sum \frac{1}{n!}=e$ but I dont know how can I use that fact here.. Definitions of connected space I have seen several definitions of connected space, but I would like to discuss those from . I am concerned about these:  $X$ is disconnected, if it is the union of two disjoint nonempty open sets.  What about $[0,1] \cup [2,3] $ ? It is not the union of two disjoint nonempty open sets, so it is connected?  $X$ is connected, when it cannot be divided into two disjoint nonempty closed sets.  What about $(0,1) \cup (2,3) $ ? It cannot be divided into two disjoint nonempty closed sets, so it is connected?   Maybe I don't understand what "divided" means. How to create or recover Windows Bootloader after deleting Ubuntu boot drive I have a computer that dual-boots (or tri-boots) Windows 8 Release Preview, Windows 7, and Ubuntu 12.04. Grub boots between Windows 8 and Ubuntu; for which I use primarily. Recently, I decided to remove Ubuntu, as I hardly used it. I deleted the Ubuntu partition accidentally before replacing the Grub bootloader. Now, whenever I want to boot the machine, it gives me the "grub-rescue" prompt -- I am unable to boot into either Windows (8 nor 7), nor Ubuntu (except via USB, of course). I do not have any Windows 7/8 recovery media, so that isn't an option. Please note that after I deleted the Ubuntu partition, I put the PC into hibernate, and then turned it on. This means the C:\ [Windows 8] drive cannot be mounted. I don't know if that is bad, but it definitely doesn't make things better.  I am currently booting Ubuntu via USB, in an effort to restore the Windows bootloader. I have looked into using boot-repair to solve the problem using the instructions , although after attempting to apply the changes, it gave the error: "Please install the [mbr] packages. Then try again." I don't know why I'm getting this error; is there a way to install the 'mbr packages?' I honestly don't know what exactly they are, nor how to install them. Are there any other options I have not yet exhausted to be able to boot back into Windows, in the case that there is a better way? I want to set the bootloader to boot into Windows 8, but booting into either Windows 7 or 8 is fine (I can use EasyBCD from there). Is there a simple solution to this? I've checked BIOS, and I haven't been able to find a way to boot into Windows. Why is it difficult to differentiate between  and ? Is it because we don't clearly understand how both of these phenomenon takes place?   My thoughts: From an answer to one of my earlier question  I could understand that light waves behave differently when it strikes a slit which is of several times bigger than its wavelength and when it strikes a slit of size comparable to it its wavelength.In the former case the different points on the slit acts as wave-front sources producing circular wave fronts which interfere to form the diffraction pattern but in the later case plane wave-front striking a slit after passing through it forms circular wave-fronts and two such wave-fronts from two different slits interfere to form the interference pattern. But, I'm not satisfied by that because I don't get any intuition about points on the slit acting as wavefront sources. So, what is actually happening? I have the Nikon kit lens that came with a D5100 — the kit lens is  . I was thinking of getting a fast lens and I am looking to buy the .  Should I consider 35mm or instead buy a 55-200mm for better range? Differences between astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology? What's the best way to extend the User model (bundled with Django's authentication app) with custom fields? I would also possibly like to use the email as the username (for authentication purposes).  I've already seen a   to do it, but can't decide on which one is the best. An irreducible polynomial in a subfield of $\mathbb{C}$ has no multiple roots in $\mathbb{C}$ I'm planning to visit a summer school in the Schengen zone. What kind of visa should I apply for? I will be attending a summer school which will last 10 days.  I want to know: for applying for a Schengen visa, is the purpose of my trip considered as touristic or study? Consider the following figure from Faraway's Linear Models with R (2005, p. 59).    The first plot seems to indicate that the residuals and the fitted values are uncorrelated, as they should be in a homoscedastic linear model with normally distributed errors. Therefore, the second and third plots, which seem to indicate dependency between the residuals and the fitted values, suggest a different model.  But why does the second plot suggest, as Faraway notes, a heteroscedastic linear model, while the third plot suggest a non-linear model?  The second plot seems to indicate that the absolute value of the residuals is strongly positively correlated with the fitted values, whereas no such trend is evident in the third plot. So if it were the case that, theoretically speaking, in a heteroscedastic linear model with normally distributed errors  $$ \mbox{Cor}\left(\mathbf{e},\hat{\mathbf{y}}\right) = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1 \\ \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\ 1 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1\end{array}\right] $$  (where the expression on the left is the variance-covariance matrix between the residuals and the fitted values) this would explain why the second and third plots agree with Faraway's interpretations.  But is this the case? If not, how else can Faraway's interpretations of the second and third plots be justified? Also, why does the third plot necessarily indicate non-linearity? Isn't it possible that it is linear, but that the errors are either not normally distributed, or else that they are normally distributed, but do not center around zero? The reCAPTCHA has become too difficult for humans to solve The reCAPTCHAs have suddenly become almost illegible. I regularly have to change it four or five times before I find one I can read. I am tempted to just enter the known word (an easy guess), and leave the other. Can something be done? How to prevent upper case in page header? I just came across this small problem which I can't seem to fix. I have a section which looks like this:  \section{Properties of $C_q$}   The problem is that the header of the page uses upper case and so it displays this section title as if I had written  \section{Properties of $C_Q$}   How can I make sure the q is always lower case? I accepted an answer to this question:    but the bounty was awarded by Community&thinsp;♦ to another answer. Why did this happen? I have a simular issue to the question asked in :  I have tried the solution provided by Jake. This makes that my picture fails to resize (scale) as i intend.  Whether i give Set scale=0.4 or Set scale=0.8 The size of the  picture remains the same  This is the code i use:  \begin{figure}[ht!] \centering \begin{tikzpicture}[Set scale=0.4, every node/.append style={transform shape},] % STYLES \tikzstyle{every node}=[rectangle,rounded corners, minimum width=100pt,     align=center,node distance=3cm,fill=black!10,inner sep=5pt,text width=3cm,minimum height=1.75cm,&gt;=stealth,text badly centered] % Draw forces \node [force, above of=rivalry] (top) {Firm strategy, structure and rivalry}; \node [force, left=1cm of rivalry] (left) {Factor conditions}; \node [force, right=1cm of rivalry] (right) {Demand Conditions}; \node [force, below of=rivalry] (bottom) {Related and Supporting industries}; %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % Draw the links between forces \path[&lt;-&gt;,thick]  (left) edge (right) (left) edge (top) (left) edge (bottom) (top) edge (right) (bottom) edge (right); \path[&lt;-&gt;,thick]  (bottom) edge (top); \end{tikzpicture} \caption{Porter's Diamond source:~\cite{Porter:1980}}% \label{fig:diamond}  \end{figure}