hi how can I change the setting so I can see the whole object. When I zoom in I see different parts of the object.
I'm having an odd issue - When I try to zoom in on a detail using my MMB, the "camera" in the 3D view seems to be cutting off the exterior surface of my object and showing me the inside instead. I'd expect this behavior, but only when I was much more zoomed in.  If I zoom out a bit (one click on the scroll wheel) then I can see the exterior as I intend.  Is there any way to adjust this behavior?  Thanks!
Show that if $a$ and $b$ are positive integers with $(a,b)=1$ then $(a^n, b^n) = 1$ for all positive integers n By 18 years of age, I want a brand new car that's $43,668 I'm from Arizona and I will be 18 in 4 months. I make about $1,200 a month from my job. I have $600 in my bank account and I don't plan to  spend any of it until I'm  18.     I'm looking to get a brand new Jeep Wrangler Rubicon that costs about  $43,000. The down payment is 10% (about $5,000) with an APR of  4.28%. The duration is 60 months with a monthly payment of  $800.  I don't have any credit. My friend suggested that I ask my parents to put my name on one of their credit cards so that I can build some credit. I'm not sure how that works. Can someone suggest a good way of going about this so I can get this car on or around my birthday?  My mom does finance work  for a big company and she told me that I should get a cheaper car. I really want this one and I'm willing to work for it. I'm getting a second job to get more money rolling in. My mom said that the only way that this would work is if I have a down payment of $15-20k. She also said that not everyone qualifies  for a car like this one. What can get me to qualify ASAP when I turn 18? Coordinate-Free Definition of Trace. $\DeclareMathOperator{\tr}{trace}$ I am reading the  on the trace operator. The section titled Coordinate-Free Definition defines the trace as follows.  Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space over a field $F$ and define a bilinear map $f:V\times V^*\to F$ as $f(v, \omega)=\omega(v)$ for all $(v, \omega)\in V\times V^*$. This maps induces a unique linear map $\tr:V\otimes V^*\to F$. Since $\text{End}(V)$ has a canonical isomorphism with $V\otimes V^*$, we have now a notion of trace of a linear operator on $V$.  The Question: The second paragraph of the section in the article says that  This also clarifies why $\tr(AB)=\tr(BA)$.  I can't see how $\tr(AB)=\tr(BA)$ follows from this definition at all. Can somebody give me a hint? Reference: Why are my "special" Unicode characters encoded weird using json_encode? Custom Button on Lightning Experience I created a custom button Send Email in Lightning Experience. The problem is that button in visible in feed section layout, but I want to put it in the upper right corner of page layouts near Edit, Clone, Delete ecc....  How Can I do that? Thanks  I add an image that explain the situation.    EDIT: I would like to explain you better my problem.  I have created three custom quick action:   I have added them to the case page Layout as you can see    I would like to understand the reason why I don’t see these three custom action in the Page Layout in the section in the top right Can't operator == be applied to generic types in C#? X, along with Y, "were" or "was"? I was interested in the following sentence which appeared in a   in The Washington Post, Politics, (WHO RUNS GOV).     She, along with Mark Childress, were set to be Daschle's deputies at   the White House before he stepped down.   Can someone clarify if the fragment "She, along with Mark Childress, were set to" is ungrammatical, as I think it is?  I would reword were with was because I think that the subject of the sentence - obviously, in grammatical terms - is "She", not "She" and "Mark Childress", but I'm not sure on this correction.  More precisely, I'm not so sure that "She, along with Mark Childress" is equivalent to She and Mark Childress with regard to the effects on the grammatical numbers. Generalized Euler sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{H_n}{n^q}$ I found the following formula   $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{H_n}{n^q}= \left(1+\frac{q}{2} \right)\zeta(q+1)-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{q-2}\zeta(k+1)\zeta(q-k)$$  and it is cited that Euler proved the formula above , but how ?  Do there exist other proofs ?  Can we have a general formula for the alternating form   $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^{n+1}\frac{H_n}{n^q}$$ Salesforce Internal Server - What's in a GACK? Background  I have been working with Salesforce Support for several weeks now trying to get them to escalate an internal server error with GACK 2134764861-123797 (1611479512) (1611479512). After a long period of waiting I was told that in order to escalate quickly they needed to reproduce the issue in a controlled way. This was again taking them a considerable amount of time so I created a reduced test case myself () that concisely reproduces the issue with a very small amount of code. I was told that this wasn't a valid reproduction because it caused a different GACK (1291518605-518052 (1659192199) (1659192199)) despite reproducing the exact same user experience.  My Question  What makes up a GACK? Is there any information that I can take from their structure that can give me clues on which errors are related without access to the full back-end tools that Salesforce Support uses? It is not infrequent that without premier support it takes me upwards of two weeks to escalate platform bugs and I am hoping that I can somehow use the information from the GACK to reduce this time. From this , I now understand the gradient to be the directional derivative that returns the steepest slope at a point. However, reading my textbooks, they all say that the gradient is normal to the tangent plane. In the above SE question, the gradient sounds like it should be parallel to a direction in the $xy$ plane, not actually up on the surface.   My question is therefore do I have a misunderstanding of the tangent plane, gradient or directional derivative?   In addition, I question how the gradient always passes through the origin or the $xy$ plane? If for instance in the graphic, the gradient had been another direction (say horizontal), then it wouldn't pass through the origin! In addition, the gradient of other points in the graphic would satisfy this example. Many thanks! How can I create a Windows bootable USB stick using Ubuntu? I'd like to create a Windows bootable USB stick, but I don't have a Windows machine with me at the moment to do so. How could I achieve the same using Ubuntu? Let $L$ denote the set of all lines in the Euclidean plane $\Bbb R^2$. We say that two lines $L$ and $M$ are parallel if either $L = M$ or $L$ and $M$ have no points in common.  Using Euclid’s Parallel Postulate prove that parallelism is an equivalence relation on the set $L$.  I need some help determining if I have the right idea about this.  $L=L$ which means that $L$ is parallel to itself. So this is reflexive.  Suppose we have $L || M$. Then Either $L=M$ or $L$ and $M$ share no points. So Then $M=L$ or $M$ and $L$ share no points. Then $M||L$. So this is symmetric.  Suppose we have $L || M$ and $M || N$. So then either $L=M$ or $L$ and $M$ share no points and either $M=N$ or $M$ and $N$ share no points. So we have that either $L=N$ or $L$ and $N$ share no points. So $L || N$. So then this is transitive.  So from all of this, parallelism is an equivalence relation. I'm not sure if this is correct or not. Any help would be appreciated. I have a vector file containing thousands of points. Where points are within x distance from each other, I wish to delete one of the points and keep the other (either by snapping to one point, or simply erasing one of the two points)  However, in Whitebox the vector cleaning tool only works with polygons and lines.  Is there some other way I can do this with my shapefiles? How do I unlock privacy in multiplayer modes mission settings? How to check if file exists on FTP before FtpWebRequest show that the interval of the form $[0,a)$ or $(a, 1]$ is open set in metric subspace $[0,1]$ but not open in $\mathbb R^1$ On the metric subspace $S = [0,1]$ of the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^1 $, every interval of the form $A = [0,a)$ or $(a, 1]$ where $0&lt;a&lt;1$ is open set in S. These sets are not open in $\mathbb R^1$   Here's what I attempted to show that $A$ is open in $S$. I have no idea how it is not open in $\mathbb R^1$.  Let $M = \mathbb R^1$, $x \in A  = [0,a)$ . If $x = 0$, $ r \leq \min \{a, 1-a\}, \\\  B_S(0; r) = B_M(0,r)\cap[0,1] = (-r, r) \cap[0,1] = [0,r) \subseteq A $  If $x \neq 0, r \leq \min \{x,|a-x|, 1-x\},  \\B_S(x; r) = B_M(x,r)\cap[0,1] = (x-r, x+r) \cap[0,1] \subset (0,x) \text{ or } (x, 1) \subset A$ I always see commands like this  apt-get -y install    What is the -y tag for and what is the difference between apt-get install with and without the -y tag? How to change default viewport shading in 2.8? Is it possible to change the default mesh color/shading in 2.8 to be more like 2.79? I'm finding it hard to see finer detail in 2.8. On the left is 2.8 and the right is 2.79 Can whole chilli peppers be frozen? I have some  chilli peppers bought from the local supermarket.    Aren't they lovely?  :)  Well, unfortunately, my local supermarket (I think the only one in the UK that stocks them) doesn't always have them in stock, so when they do appear on the shelves, I quickly stock-up on them.  Storing them in the fridge, they'll last maybe a week or so before starting to deteriorate.  My question is, can these chili peppers be frozen and, if so, will freezing them have any "negative" effects ?  I buy these particular peppers for their heat (and also their great smoky flavour), so I'd hate for either the heat or the flavour to be negatively impacted if they were frozen. C programming: How to program for Unicode?