I don't want it to rain in my world, it is annoying and I always have to type /toggledownfall.  Can someone please tell me how to make it so that it doesn't rain unless I want it to? Like if I would like it to rain, I would do /toggledownfall so that it rains, but I want it to not start raining naturally.  How can I stop rain in my world forever unless I want it to?
The arrival of Minecraft Beta 1.5 brought weather conditions. However, it can at times be inconvenient when you're trying to screenshot something and show it off (as it reduces lighting and obstructs your view slightly). Is there anyway to turn weather off?  Alternatively, is there a way to speed up the duration of weather or "skip" it?
Is reusing old code for a new assignment considered self plagiarism? How to protect yourself if you consider it to be, and a group partner does not? I need to install a new TeX/LaTeX/ConTeXt package on my computer.  I'm running Ubuntu/Fedora/Slackware/Some-Version-Of Linux.  What are the possible ways to do this?    Note:&nbsp;&nbsp; We get a number of questions that essentially reduce to this one; it was felt a good idea to have one question-and-answer that can cover all the standard methods.  See  for the discussion.  The question-and-answer are CW so that more information can be easily added.  If you have information to add, please do so.  If you are unsure, leave a comment here or (preferably) in .  Comments on the question and answer will be periodically removed to ensure that the information is clear. Is it possible for information to be transmitted faster than light by using a rigid pole? How to set systemwide "XP style DPI scaling" in Windows 8.1? I run my ThinkPad with a system DPI setting of 140%. In Windows 7 and 8, I enabled the "Use Windows XP style DPI scaling" checkbox in the Custom DPI Setting dialog. When this setting is off, non-DPI-aware applications get DPI virtualization via bitmap stretching, which results in large but fuzzy text. Turning on the checkbox disables this bitmap stretching, so non-DPI-aware apps get smaller text but without the fuzzy stretching. I find most apps to be more readable with the smaller crisper text, so I enable XP style scaling (i.e. disable DPI virtualization).  Windows 8.1 RTM has removed this option completely. After upgrading, all of my non-DPI-aware apps are running with ugly bitmap stretching. I'm able to fix this by going into the Properties for each app and setting the "Disable diplay scaling on high DPI settings" box in the Compatibility tab, but that is a bit of a pain.  Is there any way to restore the systemwide XP-style DPI scaling in Windows 8.1? Custom ordering of duplicate targets is not necessarily honored on mobile apps Screen Resolution Problem with Ubuntu 14.04 and VirtualBox How could I write my name, for example, to look like the \LaTeX logo? How could I write my name, for example, in a \LaTeX style? It is just interesting, as in Google all other things pop up when I try to search for an answer! Prove $\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin^4x}{x^4}dx = \frac{\pi}{3}$ I recall :    It was one that I knew could use a bit more spit and polish, but I didn't have the inclination or energy to edit it myself, so I skipped it.  I wander my way over to  (10K only), and look at the listing...    ...so, when did I approve this again? I skipped the question; that doesn't mean I gave my tacit approval, does it?  Seems like the dashboard needs to agree with the suggested edits view. I shall come, not will Native speakers, how can you comment such a sentence:  I shall come, not will  Can I use it for  I will definitely come, not maybe    Adding some information other people asked me about.  How I came to such a question.  Here   I asked about "Shall I win?" pointing that it could have some variants of understanding:  1) Shall I win? = Should I win? (suggestion)  2) Shall I win? = Will I win? (archaic with 1st person)  3) Shall I win? = is it 100% that I will win? (predestination\inevitability)  The excellent guy Mixolydian said either variant was possible, that it didn't matter what person you used "shall" with, it could have this "predestination\inevitability" anyway. Out of this we're getting that nowadays we can use "will" for simple future actions and "shall" for almost predicted (almost 100% surety of happening) future actions.  If I want to say to someone:  Don't be afraid, I will come anyway.  Don't get panicked, I will definitely come  Be sure, I will come in any case  I can use "shall" for it meanining an action into which I will put 100% effort:  I shall come!  And what if my original sentence is  Don't doubt, I will definitely come, not maybe or probably  Can I use  I shall come, not will  pointing that "shall" guarantees me putting all my strengths into it while "will" doesn't give any assuarance that I will do everything to finally come.  As I understood, it wasn't very easy to ask such a question because English was different everywhere - US, UK, Australie, Ireland etc. I heard it was acceptabse to use even "thee\thou" in Ireland or somewhere like that while all other world has already forgotten such words...  P.S. What I got from the answers ias that it was better to forget about the existence of "shall" cause it created so many misunderstandings:D How to derive the conjugate prior of an exponential family distribution I am trying to derive the conjugate prior of the univariate Gaussian distribution over both the mean and the precision. I know that the prior I'm looking for is the normal-gamma distribution, but the idea is to derive this result.  It seems that you can write down the conjugate prior of an exponential family distribution immediately if you represent it in the canonical exponential family form.  suggests a way to do just that. So far I have written the Gaussian probability function in this form and equated the following, but I don't see how the form of the conjugate prior is immediately obvious.  $$p(\mu, \lambda | D) \propto p(\mu,\lambda)p(D | \mu, \lambda)$$ Proving an inequality involving the logarithm function: $\frac{1}{n+1} \leq \ln \left(1+\frac 1n\right) \leq \frac 1n$ The question is to prove the inequality $$\frac{1}{n+1} \leq \ln \left(1+\frac 1n\right) \leq \frac 1n\\\forall n \geq 1, n\in \mathbb N$$  I tried using Taylor expansion but couldn't figure out anything. Any ideas? Thanks. How to work with "FIFO" in C# .NET? I want to kill all running processes of a particular user from either a shell script or native code on a Linux system.  Do I have to read the /proc directory and look for these?  Any ideas? Is there a dynamic mapping of the pids under UIDs in Linux? Isn't this in the proc?  If not, then where is this list maintained? Should I read from it? Also where is the static list of all UIDs in the system so I can validate this this user exists and then proceed to kill all processes running under it? Fix formatting errors of page number > 99 in table of contents? This is a follow up question of .  The formatting problem has nothing to do with cleanthesis.sty.  The problem is that if I use the charter font, page numbers greater than 99 are not formatted correctly in the table of content.  \documentclass[draft=on]{scrbook} \usepackage{blindtext} \usepackage{charter}  \listfiles  \begin{document} \tableofcontents \section{Section 1} \blindtext[100] \section{Section 2} \blindtext[500] \section{Section 3} \end{document} distribution with point support Epsilon delta proof for $\lim_\limits{x\to a} \sqrt{x} = \sqrt{a}$ where $a>0$ $f(x) = \sqrt{x}$. For right limit, $x-a &gt; 0$. Let $x-a &lt; \delta$ then $(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{a}) \lt \frac{\delta}{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}}$. Then chose we must choose $\epsilon $ so that $\epsilon &gt; \frac{\delta}{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}}$. Is this correct? How would I conclude the proof?  Edit - Follow up  From answers, I try a proof for the same limit but this time Left side:  For left side limit, $x-a &lt; 0$ so $a-x &gt; 0$. Let $a-x &lt; \delta$ then $\sqrt{a}-\sqrt{x} \lt \frac{\delta}{\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{x}} \lt \frac{\delta}{\sqrt{a}}$.   So let me begin the proof by saying to choose $\delta = \epsilon \sqrt a$ then $a-x \lt \delta $ so $(\sqrt a - \sqrt x )(\sqrt a + \sqrt x) \lt \epsilon \sqrt a$ so $\sqrt a - \sqrt x \lt \epsilon$ How can I find such a $z$? (Injectivity of $T(z) = \lambda z + \mu\bar{z}$) We consider $T:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}$ defined by $T(z)=\lambda z+\mu\overline{z}$, where $\lambda ,\mu\in\mathbb{C}$. I want to prove that if $T$ is injective, then $\lambda\cdot\overline{\lambda}\neq\mu\cdot\overline{\mu}$.  Clearly, if $\mu =0$, then $\lambda\neq 0$ because $T$ is injective.  Now, if $\lambda\cdot\overline{\lambda}=\mu\cdot\overline{\mu}$ and $\mu\neq 0$, then I wanted to find a $z\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}$ such that $z=-\dfrac{\overline{\lambda}}{\overline{\mu}}\overline{z}$, because we would have that:  $T(z)=-\lambda\dfrac{\overline{\lambda}}{\overline{\mu}}\overline{z}+\mu\overline{z}=\overline{z}(-\lambda\dfrac{\overline{\lambda}}{\overline{\mu}}+\mu)=0$  ('Cause this would prove that $\lambda\cdot\overline{\lambda}=\mu\cdot\overline{\mu}$ implies $T$ is not injective.)  So, the question is, can we always find such a $z\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}$? submitting a form when a checkbox is checked When should unions be used? Why do we need them?