I want to print a invoice page into pdf. But i do not want to use any such a library like a dompdf and any library.This is a client work in project to invoice mail in pdf format. Please help me.
I have an HTML (not XHTML) document that renders fine in Firefox 3 and IE 7.  It uses fairly basic CSS to style it and renders fine in HTML.  I'm now after a way of converting it to PDF.  I have tried:   : it had huge problems with tables.  I factored out my large nested tables and it helped (before it was just consuming up to 128M of memory then dying--thats my limit on memory in php.ini) but it makes a complete mess of tables and doesn't seem to get images.  The tables were just basic stuff with some border styles to add some lines at various points; : I actually had better luck with this.  It rendered some of the images (all the images are Google Chart URLs) and the table formatting was much better but it seemed to have some complexity problem I haven't figured out yet and kept dying with unknown node_type() errors.  Not sure where to go from here; and : this seems to work fine on basic HTML but has almost no support for CSS whatsoever so you have to do everything in HTML (I didn't realize it was still 2001 in Htmldoc-land...) so it's useless to me.   I tried a Windows app called Html2Pdf Pilot that actually did a pretty decent job but I need something that at a minimum runs on Linux and ideally runs on-demand via PHP on the Webserver.  What am I missing, or how can I resolve this issue?
How do I write an Apex unit test? This is a canonical question and answer developed by the community to help address common questions. If you've been directed here, or your question has been closed as a duplicate, please look through the resources here and use them to shape more specific questions. To browse all canonical questions and answers, including more unit test resources, navigate to the  tag.  This canonical question is intended to address several classes of common questions by providing a quick summary and links to comprehensive resources:   How do I start writing my first unit test?  How do I unit test this code?  I need help writing this unit test.   Salesforce Stack Exchange looks for detailed, specific questions that the community can help you with, and can't write tests on your behalf. We feel that working with the resources below can help you get started, and we encourage you to make an attempt to write your test and return to SFSE with your specific questions when you encounter challenges you can't resolve. On equations $m^2+1=5^n$ I am looking for integer solutions of Diophantine equation $m^2+1=5^n$. I found that $m=0,n=0$ and $m=2,n=1$. I could not find any other solutions. I try to prove this but I could not. Could anyone help me to solve this equation? In a finite cyclic group, the generator has the order of the group Let $G$ be a finite cyclic group of order $n$ generated by an element $g$. I want to show that the order of $g$ is exactly the order of $G$.   My try:   We can write $G=\{g^i\;|\;i\in \mathbb Z\}$. Since $G$ is finite, we know that there will be identifications $g^i=g^j$ that will make $G$ finite. By the multiplication law on $G$ we must have $g^0=1$. Also if $i&lt;j$ and if $g^i=g^j$ then $g^{j-i}=1$. I can see all these but not see why $g^n=1$ and not $g^k=1$ for all $0&lt;k&lt;n$? Thank your for your help!! Which site is more reasonable for questions about R, SO or stats.stackexchange.com? I've been using SO for a little over a year now, and recently I've noticed a shift of users between SO and stats.stackexchange.com.   I'm wondering if there has been any discussion on where questions about R, a statistical environment, best fits. Would you say it's better to ask R questions on SO or would it be better to ask over at stats.stackexchange.com? What, if any, determinants would you use to decide to post between the two? What about cross posting? Router to router setup works fine with straight cable up to 2-3 meter it is not working for 45 meter why? Make voting activity on your posts available on site metas (what you would get from rep if metas had rep) Child metas don't have rep, so there's no point in tracking a rep stat or reporting changes.  But one of the things rep updates do on main sites is to alert me when there's activity on older posts.  On metas, unless I revisit a question I'll never notice that there's been a bunch of voting (which might be accompanied by new comments that didn't ping me).  I'd like to know about that activity, not because of any ego reasons but because meta is where site policies get discussed and set and it's useful to know about changes in the community will.  A couple days ago I visited a meta post where, a few weeks ago, my answer had been voted down, and this time it was at the top.  Could we have something like the reputation-changes tab on meta?  I suspect that the data already exists, because I once  (and I see I'm not the only one).  If something akin to reputation is already being tracked internally on per-site metas, can we get it exposed? How do I save terminal output to a file? How do I save the output of a command to a file?  Is there a way without using any software? I would like to know how. Which choice of line-breaking parameters gives the minimum number of lines General Information about Eigenvalues for an 3x3 symmetric matrix How do we find general information about the eigenvalues of an arbitrary 3x3 symmetric matrix without resorting to explicitly computing the solutions to the cubic characteristic equation?:  \begin{bmatrix}     a   &amp; b &amp; c  \\     b    &amp; d &amp; e \\     c &amp; e &amp;f \end{bmatrix}  (In this case the sum and product of the eigenvalues, and the sum of the reciprocals of the eigenvalues.) Since diagonalization preserves the trace and determinant of matrices, would it be best to just find the corresponding diagonal matrix and read off the sum and product of the eigenvalues from there? The problem is I can't think of a way to diagonalize a matrix without explicitly computing the eigenvalues. Understanding the proof of infinitely many primes $\equiv 3\pmod{\!4}$ Theorem: There are infinitely many primes congruent to $3 \mod 4$. Proof: Assume that $p_1 = 3, . . . , p_n$ are primes of the form $p_j ≡ 3 \mod 4$. We will construct a new one by looking at $N = 4p_1 · · · p_n − 1$ (putting $N = 4p_1 · · · p_n+3$ would also work).  There is more to this proof but the rest of it I understand, what I don't get is where it says &quot;$N = 4p_1 · · · p_n − 1$ (putting $N = 4p_1 · · · p_n+3$ would also work)&quot;. I do not understand why we are writing $4p_1 · · · p_n − 1$. Is there a more clear way to prove this theorem? What are the maximum bag space and Pokemon storage? How many upgrades are needed to reach the limits? Coupon Collector Problem with Batched Selections I am trying to solve a variation on the .  In this scenario, someone is selecting coupons at random with replacement from n different possible coupons. However, the person is not selecting coupons one at a time, but instead, in batches.  Here's an example problem formulation: There are 100 distinct coupons. A person makes selections in 10-coupon batches at random (each coupon with replacement). What is the expected number of batches necessary to have selected 80 unique coupons?  I have been able to determine the expected number of selections necessary to have selected k unique coupons when selecting one at a time (much like Henry's ), but I'm a bit stumped as to how to go about solving it with this particular wrinkle.  Any tips/guidance would be greatly appreciated. Proof that Conditional of Poisson distribution is Binomial I've recently come across several statements to the effect "there are questions science can't answer", mostly from proponents of  and , but also from  and  as well.   However it seemed to me that there was an inherent contradiction in statements of the type "Science doesn't have all the answers" or "Science can't answer all questions". This is hinged on what is meant by "answering a question". It seems to me that to answer any significant question is to provide 2 things:    An accurate and objective explanation of the current state of affairs, in terms of relationships, causes and effects.  Based on that explanation, a method for making decisions if one is faced with future scenarios similar to or related to the current state of affairs, and for predicting future states of affairs with a certain amount probability, i.e the explanation is useful for future purposes.   But then if a field of inquiry is able to provide accurate, objective and useful information regarding a question, doesn't that field simply become part of science?   As examples:    If some school of mysticism is demonstrated to truly improve the happiness and well being of it's practitioners, then wouldn't that school's mystical teachings simply be incorporated into mainstream psychology and psychotherapy?  Similarly, if a political ideology is proven to provide better economic conditions and less crime, less pollution, etc...then this ideology's principles would become an accepted part of social sciences?     To put it more simply: Science has all the answers, because science IS anything that can provide objective and useful answers to a question.  Am I not talking about the demarcation problem per-se (at I least I think I am not), because even disciplines which are agreed upon as failing various demarcation criteria (such as astrology or intelligent design) are still trying (and failing) to be scientific in the sense I mentioned above. If they did start to provide answers, science would have to take them into account. Moreover, various philosophical schools of ethics are trying to be scientific in their explanatory framework, they are just not able to provide verifiable and falsifiable statements to prove their precepts (and probably would do so if possible).   My questions then are:    Per those who claim that science can't answer all questions, what type of question are they talking about? Do they have a demarcation criteria for such questions? (I'm not asking for examples, there are already plenty in the links I posted above).  If a field starts providing objective, accurate answers, doesn't it just become a subfield of science?   Is there a second demarcation problem between "carckpot" pseudosciences (such as astrology or numerology) which are providing the wrong answers and legitimate fields of inquiry (such as political theory or ethics) which are trying to provide answers but so far have failed to provide verifiable and falsifiable statements or accurate predictions? How can I resize (not compress) multiple images in a MS Word document? In a blank document, I insert images (screenshots - all are of same size and same format) from a folder. I want to resize the images to a desired size. All now I am doing is selecting one image by one, setting its size. Word does not seem to have multiselect working for images.  Ideally, I want to select multiple images set its size in one go with out use of a macro. I met this equation frequently in Guass-Newton optimizations. But I dont understand why the left and right side of the equation can be equal.  Lets say the Jacobian is $2$ by $2$   and Hessian is $$\begin{bmatrix}\frac{\partial^2f_1}{\partial^2 x_1 } &amp; \frac{\partial^2f_1}{\partial^2 x_2  } \\ \frac{\partial^2f_2}{\partial^2 x_1 } &amp; \frac{\partial^2f_2}{\partial^2 x_2  }\end{bmatrix}$$   But the right hand side of the equation is  $$J^TJ =\begin{bmatrix} \left( \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1} \right)^2  &amp;  \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_2} +\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1}\\ \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_2} +\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1} &amp;\left( \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_2} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_2} \right)^2\end{bmatrix} $$  Why can these two be equal as presented in papers? lualatex MWE not working Any other words that use “dis-” as an amplifying prefix? I remember hearing once about the etymology of disgruntled, probably based around a joke about how people can not be gruntled. The explanation given was that there was never a word gruntled, rather the dis‑  in disgruntled is actually a usage of the old prefix where it acts like an amplifier.   Firstly, is this true?  Secondly, are there any other words that use this prefix in this way? Replace \input{fileX} by the content of fileX automatically Install Java JDK and JRE on Debian 8