My spouse is a teacher in NJ. He is 61 years old. We file federal income taxes as married filing jointly. His w-2 shows, in box 14 (other) a pension plan with code 414(h). It shows an amount of just over $6,000. We want to get a tax benefit for the year 2014 by starting two individual IRAs at the bank, one each, for the maximum allowed. I will start one for $6,500, according to how I understand the limits (I am 60 years of age. We are confused about what my husband is permitted to do because different people have told us differently, and going to the IRS site is very hard to understand. My husband asked the person at the school who is the resource for tax questions, and was told he could still do an individual Ira for the maximum amount. However a friend who also assists me doing my tax return, said that as long as box 13 (pension) is checked off, that he cannot. What is correct?
My husband is a teacher in New Jersey; 61 years of age. He has a pension plan listed on w-2 in box 14 (other). It is coded as 414(h). He asked the tax advise person at the school if he could still contribute maximum yearly amount to an individual Ira and was told yes. An accountant we know told us this was incorrect. Can he deduct the amount placed in individual Ira?
I have two integers, x and y so that x &lt; y. How many prime numbers are there between x and y (exclusive). Is there a formula or algorithm to compute? Non-pejorative synonym of "notoriety" I'm trying to say:       He probably gained some __________ [good notoriety] from this picture.   I was thinking publicity, but that connotes some kind of negative to me as well (like the stuff you see in gossip magazines at the checkout line).  I want a word as powerfully positive as notoriety is powerfully negative. Suppose that, for a real application, I have ended up with a sorted list A = {$a_1, a_2, ..., a_{|A|}$} of elements of a certain kind (say, Type-A), and another sorted list B = {$b_1, b_2, ..., b_{|B|}$} of elements of a different kind (Type-B), such that Type-A elements are only comparable with Type-A elements, and likewise for Type-B.  At this point I seek to count the following: in how many ways can I merge both lists together, in such a way that the relative ordering of Type-A and Type-B elements, respectively, is preserved? (i.e. that if $P_M(x)$ represents the position of an element of A or B in the merged list, then $P_M(a_i)&lt;P_M(a_j)$ and $P_M(b_i)&lt;P_M(b_j)$ for all $i&lt;j$)  I've tried to figure this out constructively by starting with an empty merged list and inserting elements of A or B one at a time, counting in how many ways each insertion can be done, but since this depends on the placement of previous elements of the same type, I've had little luck so far. I also tried explicitly counting all possibilities for different (small) lengths of A and B, but I've been unable to extract any potential general principle in this way. What is the origin of elements heavier than iron? In all the discussions about how the heavy elements in the universe are forged in the guts of stars and especially during a star's death, I usually hear that once the star begins fusing lighter atoms to produce iron (Fe) that's the end of the star's life and the whole system collapses onto itself; and based on how massive the star was initially, it has different outcome - like a white dwarf, a neutron star or a black hole. I have rarely heard a detailed explanation of how the elements heavier than iron are produced. I would appreciate a convincing explanation of this process. Let $f$ be a holomorphic function defined on $\Bbb C$ such that $f^{-1}(\Bbb R)=\Bbb R$. Prove that there exists $a,b \in \Bbb R, \; a \neq 0 \;$ such that $f(z)=az+b \;$ for every $z \in \Bbb C$.  I was given a hint: define the function $g(z)=\frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z}$. such $g$ is also holomorphic in $\Bbb C$ since the only singularity is in $0$, and it is a removable singularity since we can define $g(0)=f'(0)$. Next I thought about proving $g$ is bounded, and thus constant (using Liouville's theorem), but pretty much out of ideas. How can I finish the proof/solve in another way? Everywhere I get to read statements like EM radiations and EM fields carry "energy as well as momentum " . I wonder if energy and momentum are inalienable . Is it possible for a field to carry only energy without having any momentum term ? I mean isn't it sufficient to say that fields or EM waves carry energy or Doesn't the ability to transfer energy, of the fields, automatically imply that they can change the momentum of another particle while transferring energy to them? A "Cantor-Schroder-Bernstein" theorem for partially-ordered-sets If A and B are partially-ordered-sets, such that there are injective order-preserving maps from A to B and from B to A, is there necessarily an order-preserving bijection between A and B ? Modules over commutative rings I'm trying to get my head around modules, and there's a problem that's bothering me regarding scalar multiplication from the left vs from the right.  In many books/articles I've read, the author may refer to a left $R$-module $M$, and then continue to talk of terms such as $xr$, where $x\in M$, $r\in R$. What is right scalar multiplication in a left module? Does it even make sense to talk about it?  I've been trying to show that over a commutative ring, right scalar multiplication and left scalar multiplication are the same thing, but I've not managed it so far. I've googled it to no avail, and I can't see why the distinction between left and right modules disappears when the base ring is commutative.  Thanks for any replies! Is there a way to save composite node presets? Is there any way in Blender to save settings in your compositing node setup. For example say for my shadow catcher I have it setup for a hard shadow for sunlight, and then I also have a setting for diffuse light shadow for indoors. Is there any way I can save these settings individually so I can quickly switch to them rather than having to individually change the nodes every time. I am a little bit confused by early stopping and in particular by how it can be inserted inside a CV framework. As far as I understand, I can fix the optimal number of epochs (for NN, or number of trees for XGB) by early stopping, that is:   pick a validation set, train with increasing number of epochs until a predefined metric evaluated on the validation set starts worsening that is the optimal number of epochs to prevent overfitting   and that's fine. But then I would like to insert this early stopping framework inside a CV framework: Suppose I have a model with 10 hyperparameters I want to fix via CV. And suppose that there is an eleventh hyperparameter, the number of epochs. My feeling is that one can do like this:   create the K resampled folds, for each of which you have a training and validation set choose a suitable grid for your 10 hyperparameters for each point on the grid train your model in each fold with early stopping, that is use the validation set of the fold to keep track of the preferred metric and stop when it gets worse take the mean of the K validation metric choose the point of the grid (i.e. the set of hyperparameters) that gives the best metric   Questions:   What number of epochs should I choose as optimal? in each of the K folds I have, in general, a different number of stopping epochs.  seems to suggest they take the mean of the K stopping epochs. Is this right? Is it actually a "fair" practice to use the validation metric coming from the early stopping as a proxy of the out-of-sample metric? As  in section 3.4.5, maybe the best thing to do would be:     ...if you want to do early stopping, then in each fold you should take your training set and split it again, holding out a small early-stopping-set to guide the early stopping, and then evaluate the model on the validation set of that fold.   But this seems to me a really intricate process...   Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find references where this issue is presented in a clear and transparent form. Is there a simple way to fill in a grungy font to make it solid? I'm looking to make the entire letter solid. I want to complete the grungy white space and fill it out with solid black. Is there a simple way to do this? How can I connect the top loop to the down loop with faces Hey I want to connect the bottom loop with the top loop so that it forms a solid.  I have tried selecting multiple vertices and pressing F but that just creates a large face which I do not want. I have tried using grid fill bu that doesn't work either. The solution that seems to work is by selecting four vertices and pressing F and then selecting the next 4 and pressing F and on and on. That just takes too long. Finding the search terms behind 'not provided' We use Google Analytics to track the vistors to our websites, were currently putting together a big audit of our SEO and one of the things we want to see is what search terms are working for us.  About 90% of our organic search traffic comes under 'not provided' which as i understand means a user is signed into a Google account when coming to our site, thus Google doesn't track their search terms.   This makes it really hard to conduct a meaningful study, (i suppose we could get the data of the 10% that we do have search terms for and multiply them it but i dont think thats a particularly good or meaningful approach).  Is there a workaround to see behind the 'not provided' data and see the search terms actually used ?    UPDATE  I read  last night from Hacker news, which states :     [using https will allow you] more complete referrer information in Google Analytics for people   visiting from sites already using HTTPS   and contained a link to this , it seems to say that because Google's users are using https that an https site cannot pass data to an http site, as the http site is not secure, none of the sites i manage have https / sll setup, could some one confirm if Google will pass you more referrer data if your site has https implemented ? Lazy loading properties after an insert How to create a "heat distortion" effect with a cycles procedural node set up without compositing I know how to do a heat distortion effect in compositing.   What I am looking for is a way to do the same effect with a material set up in cycles.   What would be the best way to create a procedural material that can be placed in front of any object and make it look like heat is rising in front of it (without compositing)?  Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Proving that any permutation in $S_n$ can be written as a product of disjoint cycles I have attempted a proof of this, but upon looking at my notes, I feel it might be incorrect: it is noticeably simpler than the one in my notes.  Proposition: any permutation in $S_n$ can be written as a product of disjoint cycles.  Proof (attempt): $s\in S_n$. Let $\langle s\rangle$ act on $X=\{1,\cdots,n\}$. Define $x\sim x'\iff x'\in\text{Orb}(x)$ for $x,x'\in X:$ this is clearly an equivalent relation, hence the orbits partition $X$. Each orbit corresponds a cycle in $s$, so we are done.  Does this hold, or have I missed something vital? What finite groups always have a square root for each element? Texture messes up after extruding a modified plane How do you print the current month, day and year using awk and date? I can't seem to grab the month, day and year using   awk '{print $2, $3, $6}' date    Does anyone know how to? mv * folder (avoiding 'cannot move' error)