I am running Windows Server 2012 R2.  When I run Process Explorer (as Administrator) I can see that the System process is listening on port 443. More specifically, it shows the following:        Protocol: TCPV6   LocalAddress: [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0]:443   Remote Address:    [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0]:0   State: LISTENING      There is no entry for TCP 443, only for TCPV6.  In my running services, I have checked for all the usual suspects mentioned in the other posts concerning this issue. Below you can find an overview of the services running on this system:  Application Experience Application Host Helper Service Application Information Background Intelligent Transfer Service Background Tasks Infrastructure Service Base Filtering Engine ccmsetup Certificate Propagation COM+ Event System Cryptographic Services DCOM Server Process Launcher Dell SupportAssist Service Dell Update Service DHCP Client Diagnostic Policy Service Diagnostics Tracking Service Distributed Link Tracking Client Distributed Transaction Coordinator DNS Client DSM Essentials DA Service DSM Essentials Host Service DSM Essentials Task Manager DSM SA Connection Service DSM SA Data Manager DSM SA Event Manager DSM SA Shared Services File Server Resource Manager Group Policy Client IKE and AuthIP IPsec Keying Modules IP Helper IPsec Policy Agent Local Session Manager Microsoft iSCSI Initiator Service Microsoft Software Shadow Copy Provider Modular Disk Storage Manager Agent Modular Disk Storage Manager Event Monitor Netlogon Network Connections Network List Service Network Location Awareness Network Store Interface Service Plug and Play Power Print Spooler Remote Desktop Configuration Remote Desktop Services Remote Desktop Services UserMode Port Redirector Remote Procedure Call (RPC) RPC Endpoint Mapper Security Accounts Manager Server Shell Hardware Detection Smart Card Device Enumeration Service SNMP Service System Event Notification Service System Events Broker Task Scheduler TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper Themes TSM Client Scheduler User Access Logging Service User Profile Service Volume Shadow Copy Windows Connection Manager Windows Event Log Windows Firewall Windows Font Cache Service Windows Management Instrumentation Windows Modules Installer Windows Remote Management (WS-Management) Windows Sync Share Windows Time Windows Update WinHTTP Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Service Workstation   Other analysis options that I have tried:   netstat -ao: This shows the same information as Process Explorer. System with PID 4, is listening on port 443 wmic process: PID 4 is System... no further information. Opening a browser to localhost:443, or a raw PuTTY session doesn't work.   Any suggestions are welcome...
I am having problems starting my Apache server, because port 443 is already in use.  It turns out, the system process (PID 4) uses the port 443. I don't have IIS installed, the services.msc shows (predictably) no Exchange server running, nor WWW-Services, nor IIS. I have no idea how to find out what service uses that port, short of just disabling each service one after the other, and I am not even sure that would help.  I would be grateful if someone could point me towards how I can get my SSL port back, thank you :)  P.S.: Of course "just switch Apache to another port for SSL" would solve the problem of not being able to start Apache. But I'd still like to know what is so insistent about hogging port 443. :)    I by now took the 'hard route' and disabled services one after the other. It turned out that the "Routing and RAS" service was the culprit.  Thank you all for the valuable input and the new tools in the combat against "WTF does my system do now?".
durbinWatsonTest() in R for non time-series data I am trying to understand whether the Durbin-Watson test is meaningful at all when applied to regression data that have no temporal order (eg. blood pressure ~ bodyMassIndex + exercise).   I would say no, as the autocorrelation should obviously vary with the order of the subjects (which is random), but I wonder whether the durbinWatsonTest in R involves a bootstrapping of the data, where order of the bootstrapping data is shuffled each time, and then perhaps an average autocorrelation is computed over the bootstrapping samples (but then again, shouldn't this average autocorrelation be zero for randomly sampled data?).  On the other hand, the value of the statistics seems to be quite stable over multiple runs of the function, so I am even more confused...  I came across it in Andy Field's book "Discovering Statistics with R", where it is used is an example with non-time series data, although in another, more recent book of the same author ("Adventures in Statistics") it does say that the test is applicable only to time series data. I would like to sell my Macbook Pro, but I want to make sure that there is no way to retrieve the deleted data from my SSD. Is there a way to completely delete all files on a hard drive so that even a forensic expert cannot recover anything? Trouble understanding Landau & Lifshitz writing about Lagrangians and Galilean Relativity We have two inertial coordinate systems, $K'$ and $K$. $K$ is moving with infinitesimal velocity ${\epsilon}$ relative to $K'$. Using Galilean relativity we can transform this into $v'=v+{\epsilon}$. Here Lagrangian is only a function of speed $L=L(|v|^2)$. $L'$ may differ from $L$ only by a total derivative of function of coordinates and time, i.e. $L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}f(q,t)$  $"$We have $L'=L(|v|^2+2{v}·{\epsilon}+{\epsilon}^2)$. [1. ] Expanding this expression in powers of ${\epsilon}$ and neglecting terms above the first order, we obtain $L(|v'|^2)=L(|v|^2)+\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{|v|^2}}2v·{\epsilon}$ [2.] The second term on the right of this equation is a total time derivative only if it is a linear function of the velocity $v$ $"$  I understand nothing in the quoted part. How do we get [2.]? Why does $\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{|v|^2}}2v·{\epsilon}$ being a linear function of velocity imply that it's a total time derivative? I'm having trouble understanding how to access each individual result returned from a subquery. The picture shows the code which:   takes fields and objects chosen by a user and assigns them to String variables, the string vars are used to query a dynamic query string, the query string is feed into a database.query and the result is stored in an array I can individually access each of the query results from this array (parent object results),  But I have not been able to individually access the subquery results.   If I feed the subquery results into an array...something like:  SObject[] c = p.get(i).getSObjects(childO);   I still can't get to each individual child record per parent. I can only see all child records per each parent. I need to get to each child record per adult, so that I can roll up results.  Can anyone help?  // These strings will be populated dynamically from a VF page String parentO  = 'Account'; String parentF  = 'Products_Purchased__c'; String childO   = 'Opportunity';     if(childO  == 'Opportunity'){ childO = 'Opportunities'; } String childF   = 'Product_Type__c';  // create dynamic SOQL query string String query = 'SELECT id, (select ' +childF+ ' from ' +childO+') FROM ' +parentO;  // query and store 33 results in variable p SObject[] p = Database.query(query);  for(Integer i = 0; i &lt; p.size(); i++){     system.debug('Parent result from SOQL query: ' +p[i]);     if(p.get(i).getSObjects(childO) &lt;&gt; null){         system.debug('Child result(s) from SOQL query: ' +p.get(i).getSObjects(childO));         system.debug('Child field: ' +c.get(i).get(childF));     } } When is the Killing form null? How should a bot earn enough reputation to perform the actions necessary for that bot? Why is OpenJDK 10 packaged as openjdk-11-*? Physics history book with some math I am looking for a book explaining physics from, say, Galileo and Newton till now; the book should be written using some math, similarly to my physics books when I was at the university (Halliday Resnik). I am searching a book that take care of explaining the true "evolution" of reasoning, discoveries, experiment to prove or disprove something.  I do not like a book that gives definitions without explaining what had happened. I also like to find, on that book, explanations on how actual measurements are taken (how can we measure the speed of light, the mass of celestial bodies, the attributes of electron, and how were the measurements taken in the past - how was possible to measure the speed of light in 1700-1800?).  I am not very interested in recent theories like strings, branes.... so it is OK if these are not discussed.  I like to find a lot of discussions on concept that are related, like for instance the implications on space dimensionalities, ether non-existence, strange facts, missing explanations. Android Syntax Highlighting? How to prove those "curious identities"? How to prove $$ \prod_{k=1}^{n-1} \sin\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right) = \frac{n}{2^{n-1}}$$ and $$ \prod_{k=1}^{n-1} \cos\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right) = \frac{\sin(\pi n/2)}{2^{n-1}}$$ Let $m \in \mathbb{Z^+} , n \in \mathbb{Z^+}$ and let $d=\gcd(m,n)$. Prove that $m\mathbb{Z}+n\mathbb{Z}=d\mathbb{Z}$ What's the name for the relativistic paradox with the train/car travelling over a gap? There is a relativistic paradox I was introduced by a friend in Ithaca (Courtenay Footman). It involves a vehicle travelling over a ravine relativistically, so it's in the general family of ladder paradoxes. There are many ways to phrase it, but here's a simple one.   A three-car train with each car of length $L$ is travelling over a bridge across a ravine. (Assume that the couplings between cars are stiff: this train does not bend.) Unfortunately, some evil genius has precisely removed a length $6L$ of the track. The train however is relativistic, travelling at a speed such that $\gamma \approx 12$.  In the reference frame of the ground, the train should appear to be 1/24th the size of the gap, which suggests that it will fall a little and should crash into the bridge opposite. But in the reference frame of the train, each car of the train is at least twice as long as the gap and aside from the very front wheel and the very back wheel, which need to be supported by rigidity, everything is constantly well-supported. This suggests that the train makes it. Who is right?  I vaguely remember that as an undergraduate knowing only a little relativity, I trusted the train's perspective because it's at rest in that perspective, and Courtenay said that this was ultimately correct after a lot of details got resolved. But I do not remember all of these details such that I could work it out for myself. So I'm looking for some discussion that's a little more well-sourced or authoritative.  What is this paradox called, and what literature has addressed the issue? How do I change file permissions on a FAT32 drive? How to detect Safari, Chrome, IE, Firefox and Opera browser? Why upload to academic preprint sites like arXiv? The recent question  made me realize that I don't have any understanding of why one would upload to a preprint site.  (I don't work in a field where they seem to be common.)  Why would one be concerned about getting a manuscript on arXiv, if it's already under review with a journal?   Is it because of the long publishing timeline of journals?  (That could explain why computer science &mdash; which publishes much more in conferences &mdash; doesn't seem to do much with them.) Repair disk from single user mode (fsck fails) Let $(X, \mathcal{T})$ be a metrizable space. Prove that $X$ Lindelöf   implies that $X$ is separable.   My attempt:  Let $d$ be the metric that induces the topology $\mathcal{T}$.   For every $n \geq 1$, consider the open cover: $$\{B_X(x,1/n)\mid x \in X\}$$  Because the space is Lindelöf, this implies that for every $n \geq 1$, there is a countable (or finite) subcover given by $$\mathcal{B}_n:= \{B_X(x,1/n) \mid x \in I_n, |I_n| \leq |\mathbb{N}|\}$$  Now, define $D:= \bigcup_{n\geq 1} I_n$. Let $y \in X$. Let $\epsilon &gt; 0$. Choose $m$ a positive integer so large that $1/m &lt; \epsilon$.  Because $y\in X =\bigcup\mathcal{B}_m$, it follows that there exists $x \in D$ such that $y \in B_X(x,1/m)$, meaning that $d(x,y) &lt; 1/m &lt; \epsilon$, such that $x \in B_X(y, \epsilon) \cap D$. Hence, $y \in \overline{D}$ and it follows that $D$ is a dense countable set in $X$, such that $X$ is separable.  Is this correct? What's a word for knowing something from experience? I'm trying to figure out a word that describes subconsciously knowing something from experience. My initial attempt was "instinct", but that has more gifted and primal connotations.  The use case I had in mind was as follows:     "If we assume that the model is applicable, it tells us what we've ________ known for a while [...]"     Update:  The word that fits best for my use case seems to be intuitively.  Another good one was empirically, but it tends to imply there were some experiments carried out to glean the knowledge, which wasn't the case. What is the function of the RNA primer in DNA replication? Adding PDF (especially GeoPDF) to ArcMap as data? I receive a lot of PDF maps (vector, image, with georeference and without) and I am having to convert them to an image file before I can add them to ArcMap and georeference.    I can't see any obvious out-of-the-box utility that would allow me to add and georeference a PDF directly without having to convert to an image file first.   Any ideas?  I would prefer to add a PDF to map directly without any prior "pdf to image" conversion