I've seen a user on Stack Overflow who lost all of his reputation, meaning he now has 1 reputation, when he had tens of thousands, and also multiple gold (JavaScript, jQuery, PHP, HTML, etc.), silver and bronze badges. I can post the link to his profile if needed.  How can something like this happen?
My account has been , besides the following restrictions:  an account will be locked at 1 reputation the user page will have a visual indication that the account is in timed suspension, and for how long the account holder will be unable to vote, ask, answer or comment  What else does timed suspension prevent me doing? For example, can I still edit my own posts or delete content? And what is a network-wide suspension?
Subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}$ with finite index Equal standard errors for all levels of a categorical factor in lmer I have a question about the standard error of mixed model parameters estimated using the lmerTest package.  I have 12 sites with 6 treatments over each site. I measured a response variable (biomass_of_insects) (which has a Gaussian distribution).   library (lmerTest)   model &lt;- lmer(biomass_of_insects ~ as.factor(treatments) + (1 | sites))   However, the model summary shows the same standard error for every treatment (see below: 114.065). Why is the standard error always the same?   Fixed effects:                                Estimate    Std.err      df       t        p (Intercept)             501.333     80.656  66.000   6.216 3.91e-08 *** as.factor(treat)F       126.667    114.065  66.000   1.110    0.271  as.factor(treat)I        -8.333    114.065  66.000  -0.073    0.942      as.factor(treat)I+F1/3  -75.000    114.065  66.000  -0.658    0.513    as.factor(treat)I+F2/3   18.333    114.065  66.000   0.161    0.873     as.factor(treat)I+F3/3   15.917    114.065  66.000   0.140    0.889 Having just  from any of the queues, it was reviewing close votes; however, this audit was flawed in that I didn't even cast a close vote.  Often I press the Close button to preview greater detail and sentiment of the closure, spawning the Why should this question be closed dialog box:    Especially for duplicates, where functionality is solely dependent on spawning this dialog.  From Closing > Duplicate, I can search or view selected duplicates:    Although, I realize general closure reasons are summarized on the page:    This question had 6-upvotes, but seemed very localized referencing subjective query is "taking too long" and even had a sqlfiddle link.  Maybe overly broad regarding performance tuning, the OP was posting like a forum with two answer posts to his own question  and  with one of those answers asking follow-up questions.    Wanting to gauge community response, current closure totals struck my curiosity.  So, I pressed the Close button and boom - oh, the humanity!  I failed, and didn't even cast a close vote.    Votes are not cast until a reason for closure is selected and Vote to Close is pressed.  Taking any review very seriously on this site, it only seems fair that my review quality is tested through actionable steps instead of clicking for more detailed information, leveraging the functional design of the close vote user interface.  Sure, it's complex to seed fake vote totals, and then there's controversy of mindless voting in the majority or people who simply cherry pick 4-vote questions.  Still though, it seems unfair I should hesitate to review further information of vote totals and duplicates before skipping due to the implementation of this audit. Tracking the questions you've recently viewed or visited On your user profile page there are six (6) tabs; stats, activity, reputation, favorites, prefs and accounts.  I would like to see in a new tab, maybe named 50 latest viewed questions, which would contain the 50 latest viewed questions.  This would help when I want to follow a question but don't want to bookmark it or add it to my favorites list.   Sometimes, or a few hours later, I can't even find it again. I think this would be good for when you're viewing questions at work and want to check it up at home but can't because it's not in the same browser history. Bounded in Probability and smaller order in probability I wanted to prove that if $X_n$ is bounded in probability and $Y_n = o_p(X_n)$, then $Y_n \rightarrow 0$ in probability   I  know the following definitions that is $X_n$ is bounded in probability meaning that   $P(|X_n|&lt;M)&gt;1-\epsilon$  and I know that $Y_n = o_p(X_n)$ implies that $Y_n/X_n \rightarrow0$ in probability Background Nowadays, I see &quot;them&quot; used to mean &quot;those&quot; a lot. I don't know if it was as common in the past. For example, take &quot;one of &quot;. On researching about it, I found some people say it comes from a dialect of British English. Some others say it is a &quot;non-standard&quot; usage. I see this usage in Canadian English also, and it seems some people use it in a sarcastic way. Moreover, I have seen a song titled &quot;one of them days&quot;. I also read, in the book called &quot;A Broken Promise&quot;, &quot;&quot; Finally, Wikipedia says that it is a usage in  (a common name for the Southern Midland dialect of American English):  Pronouns and demonstratives &quot;Them&quot; is sometimes used in place of &quot;those&quot; as a demonstrative in both nominative and oblique constructions. Examples are &quot;Them are the pants I want&quot; and &quot;Give me some of them crackers.&quot;    Question(s): What would you say about the usage of this word? Is it correct? Could we use it in daily speech? Could this usage go beyond a specific dialect and be used in other dialects, regions, etc.? Does it really originate from Appalachian English? Why did this usage become popular among other English speakers? Note: I have already seen a similar question:  However, it only says, &quot;ungrammatical,&quot; there. This question is specific to this situation only, and there is more to it. I just came over this syntax in some of the questions in this forum, but Google and any other searchengine tends to block out anything but letters and number in the search so it is impossible to search out "=>".  So can anyone tell me what it is and how it is used? In his first lesson (transcripted in "Tips on Physics"), Feynman talks about math for physicists in a very cool and practical way. And at the end of the section he talks something like "so the first thing to do is to learn to learn derivative, integral and algebra" (I don't know how much precise I'm being because I've read it in Portuguese). I would to know if there is some book that deals with math as Feynman did it in this lesson (respecting formalities, but teaching how to use the practical rules)? Also, someone have any recommendations for algebra book (college level)? Determining if a file is a hard link or symbolic link? I'm creating a shell script that would take a filename/path to a file and determine if the file is a symbolic link or a hard link.   The only thing is, I don't know how to see if they are a hard link. I created 2 files, one a hard link and one a symbolic link, to use as a test file. But how would I determine if a file is a hard link or symbolic within a shell script?   Also, how would I find the destination partition of a symbolic link? So let's say I have a file that links to a different partition, how would I find the path to that original file? In , they give rules so that players can make all the rolls, rather than the DM sometimes rolling for enemies. In one section, there are specifically , which the players roll against, rather than the DM. However, after doing some math, I think they've made a mistake. They say that you convert a Saving Throw into a Saving Throw Check by adding 11 to the defender's saving throw modifiers, and using that as the DC for the check.  The player then rolls against this DC, adding their spellcasing ability modifier and proficiency bonus.  However, according to the following math, this conversion does not produce the same results. In this math, I compare the chances of a player succeeding on a saving throw check, using the rules in the UA article, and of a monster failing its saving throw using the standard PHB rules. If the math is correct, both of these results should have the same chance. These are the formulas I used.  Chance to succeed Saving Throw Check = (20 - DC + 1 + proficiency + casting mod) / 20 Chance to FAIL a Saving Throw = (DC - 1 - save proficiency - save mod) / 20  Assuming a proficiency bonus of +2, +0 for all ability mods, and no save proficiency:  Monster's Saving throw Check DC = 11 + save mod = 11 Chance to succeed a saving throw check DC11: (20 - 11 + 1 + proficiency + casting mod) / 20 = 12/20 = 60% Player's Saving throw DC = 8 + proficiency + spellcasting ability mod = 10 Chance for monster to fail saving throw DC10: (10 - 1 - save proficiency - save mod) / 20 = 9/20 = 45%  If this were a valid conversion, both formulas would result in the same chance of success for the player, and failure for the monster respectively, however, they are off by 15%. This suggests that the unearthed Arcana's rules are not a valid conversion. Are the Unearthed Arcana rules wrong, or is my math wrong? magit: how to diff the same file between two different commits on the same branch? Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? I already have the "Edit Questions And Answers" privilege. Yet, if I approve someone else's edit, I'm told that more votes will be required before the edit is accepted.  This seems a bit peculiar to me, since I could just copy the edited version and paste it myself. I installed kali linux OS on my laptop.  The installation went well but when I booted in kali linux the screen was backwards. I signed in as root and the screen flipped back but the mouse is reverse (x &amp; y axis).  When I move my mouse left it moves right when I move it down it moves up. If I want to press a button at the upper right I need to press it at the down left.  The screen is acting backwordes (x &amp; y axis)but I see the graphics straight and the mouse is acting backwordes.  I installed kali linux again with a fresh installation. I have the same problem as before.  I installed kali linux again with a fresh installation. I have the same problem as before.   I searched the web And I don't find information on a problem like this Separate long math text under sum symbol into different lines? How do I make animations a steady speed? When I make an animation, it always starts out slow, then speeds up, then slows down at the end.  I cannot figure out how to fix this. Finding files by only knowing extension? I'm somewhat disorganized in my file saving habits, so I wind up using the Search function in Windows Explorer more often than one should. I was wondering, is it possible to have Windows find all files of a certain extension ( like, say for example all .rar files) if it is, how? How to install latest HPLIP on my Ubuntu to support my HP printer and/or scanner? Let's assume that one has some modern HP printer and/or scanner which is not supported by HPLIP package from official repository. Currently Ubuntu versions have :  trusty (14.04LTS): 3.14.3-0ubuntu3.4 xenial (16.04LTS): 3.16.3+repack0-1 bionic (18.04LTS): 3.17.10+repack0-5 focal (20.04LTS): 3.20.3+dfsg0-2 groovy (20.10): 3.20.5+dfsg0-3build1 hirsute (21.04): 3.21.2+dfsg1-2   What can one do if printer is supported in newer version of HPLIP (checked this in )? I don’t like the behavior of the new tab page in Google Chrome 29+. How can I restore the old behavior?  The new tab page (if you have Google set as the default search engine) now shows the Google logo (or, apparently, the doodle of the day if there is one), a search box, and a few recently visited websites. It also added an Apps button to my favorites bar, seemingly the only way to access my apps page, which has easy access to things I use regularly (Calendar, Gmail, Docs, G+, Facebook, Feedly, Google News, Netflix, Play Music, Pandora, Drive, Keep, etc.) I don’t like this behavior. I actually don’t mind having the logo of the day and search box, but I want my apps linked to on my new tab page.  Is there any way to get the old behavior back? I checked the settings and it doesn’t seem like it’s possible to set chrome://apps to be the new tab page (which would restore the old behavior) or to configure the new new tab page to display apps instead of recently visited sites. I have some plasterboard screws like this:     However, without a drill I have a job getting them into the wall. Am I safe to use normal screws on hangings that aren't going to be taking a great deal of weight? In this case it is a rack of coat hooks. Fight 707 arrives at/in Washington D.C. in ten minutes Fight 707 arrives at Washington D.C. in ten minutes. Fight 707 arrives in Washington D.C. in ten minutes.     Do we have to use 'at' or 'in' in this case? Washington D.C. is a big city, so we have to use 'in' normally. However, because the plane leaves the city soon, the city can be a particular point on a map. So, can we use 'at' in this case?