I have installed my Ubuntu 18.10 on a SSD and I also have a another drive which is formatted as NTFS file system. When I click on mount it mounts that drive but I am only able to see the files. I can't seem to write into it.  I am not dual booting. I only have Ubuntu installed as a Operating System.  Can anyone please help me on how to setup my NTFS drive to auto mount at startup with Read and Write Access?
Whenever I boot Ubuntu, I get a message that it cannot mount my windows partition, and I can choose to either wait, skip or manually mount.  When I try to enter my Windows partition through Nautilus I get a message saying that this partition is hibernated and that I need to enter the file system and properly close it, something I have done with no problem so I don't know why this happens.    Here's my partition table, if any more data is needed please let me know.     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1            2048    20000767     9999360   83  Linux /dev/sda2        20002814   478001151   228999169    5  Extended /dev/sda3   *   478001152   622532607    72265728    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda4       622532608   625141759     1304576   82  Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda5        20002816   478001151   228999168   83  Linux
I checked the Wikipedia article and some interviews, and haven't found any specific answer.  What specifically does the "awakening" of the Force in the title refer to?  Was the Force somehow asleep or dormant? (which would, since it Binds The Galaxy Together, explain the Inflationary cosmological models).  Or that there were no active Force users since Vader and Sidious offed every Jedi and then each other? We know Luke's still around.  Or something else?  Canon or word-of-god answers only, please. Differential Equations: solve the system Solve the following system:   $$dx/dt=-.2(y-2)$$ $$dy/dt=.8(x-2)$$  This is what I have so far, but I got stuck.. $$\begin{eqnarray} dx/dt&amp;=&amp;-.2y-.4\\ x'&amp;=&amp;-.2y-.4\\ x'+.4&amp;=&amp;-.2y\\ y&amp;=&amp;-x/2'-2\\ y&amp;=&amp;-x''/2-2\\ \\ dy/dt&amp;=&amp;.8(x-2)\\ dy/dt&amp;=&amp;.8x-1.6\\ y'&amp;=&amp;.8x-1.6\\ -x''-2&amp;=&amp;.8x-1.6\\ -x''&amp;=&amp;.8x+.4\\ x''+16x+.8&amp;=&amp;0 \end{eqnarray}$$  when I used the quadratic formula I got stuck. Is this correct so far? Can someone finish it off for me? Best way to migrate a huge SQL Server database with low downtime over network Problem definition  Our database server needs to be transferred to an other datacenter. It runs on Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Enterprise (64-bit) and contains two databases of about 2TB and 1TB.  Having little to no downtime for this would be ideal.  Workload  Those databases are used for a .NET website and are constantly getting updated.   Having it not available over the weekend would be acceptable though. The currently in use DB would remain the only one in use until the switch over to the new one.  That switch would ideally be made just by changing DNS entries to point to the new DB server while making sure the DB is not being updated.  Also, time taken by this operation does not really matter as long as the switch from one server to the other (downtime) is kept low.  Approaches considered   Backup and restore  This has been done in the past but involved a high downtime even though it was done through an internal network, so more efficiently than through Internet Log shipping  As far as I understand, this approach would minimize downtime by configuring a master/slave and transferring  an exact copy of the master DB to its slave being read only. As mentioned above, no access to the slave would be necessary and we just need a way to have a replica of the master DB without data corruption.   It also seems to be quite efficient in terms of resources utilization and wouldn't impact to much the master performance.   I might be wrong about this approach so feel free to correct me. Database mirroring  I'm not too aware of that approach but it seems like a valid option. No need to have real time sync and performance of the master is quite important so asynchronous would be the way to go if this approach were to be chosen. Other options?  That server runs directly on bare metal hardware so lower level solutions are unfortunately not an option. Maybe there is a better way to get this done?   Constraints  As described, those databases are quite big to the point they are hard to maintain but that's an other problem.  The versions of SQL Server will be the same (Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Enterprise 64-bit).  It will have to be transferred over network between two datacenters so most probably over Internet. Having disks sent from one site to the other for an initial sync is unfortunately not an option. Having some sort of security for the transfer would be ideal but we will do the best of this situation.  That should give a quite good overview of our needs for this task and hopefully some of you had to face that situation before. Can an html element have multiple ids? What does the word treats mean in this context? I don't think it means entertainment, food, drink etc.. Maybe it is an old usage of this word? Does it mean influencing factors or something like that?  This is the first part of the title of the first chapter of the novel "Oliver Twist" by Charles Dickens. The whole title reads:     Treats of the Place Where Oliver Twist was Born and of the Circumstances Attending His Birth VBA Hide Rows that contain N/A Can a Spring form command be a Map? Brackets in if condition: why am I getting syntax errors without whitespace? Complex towers: $i^{i^{i^{...}}}$ If $w = z^{z^{z^{...}}}$ converges, we can determine its value by solving $w = z^{w}$, which leads to $w = -W(-\log z))/\log z$.  To be specific here, let's use $u^v = \exp(v \log u)$ for complex $u$ and $v$.  Two questions:   How do we determine analytically if the tower converges?  (I have seen the interval of convergence for real towers.) Both the logarithm and Lambert W functions are multivalued.  How do we know which branch to use?   In particular $i^{i^{i^{...}}}$ numerically seems to converge to one value of $i2W(-i\pi/2)/\pi$.  How do we establish this convergence analytically?  (Yes, I have searched the 'net, including the tetration forum.  I haven't been able to locate the answer to this readily.) Best Place to put Feature Requests? The only place I am aware of is the . Dual monitors not working with an Nvidia card Even my main monitor is shown as unknown. I have tried setting up dual monitors using Nvidia settings with no joy however it does recognize that I have 2 monitors.  This was not an issue in 11.04. My problem with the Nvidia settings appears to be that my 2 monitors require different resolutions but even when I set them to a resolution that they both can handle, it is then only appearing in cloned mode. I really hope someone can help or I will have to roll back to 11.04.  Why won't Ubuntu 11.10 recognize that I have 2 Monitors?   Here is the contents of my xorg.conf:  # nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings # nvidia-settings:  version 280.13  (buildd@rothera)  Thu Aug 11 17:28:49 UTC 2011  Section "ServerLayout"     Identifier     "Layout0"     Screen      0  "Screen0" 0 0     InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"     InputDevice    "Mouse0" "CorePointer"     Option         "Xinerama" "0" EndSection  Section "Files" EndSection  Section "InputDevice"     # generated from default     Identifier     "Mouse0"     Driver         "mouse"     Option         "Protocol" "auto"     Option         "Device" "/dev/psaux"     Option         "Emulate3Buttons" "no"     Option         "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection  Section "InputDevice"     # generated from default     Identifier     "Keyboard0"     Driver         "kbd" EndSection  Section "Monitor"     # HorizSync source: xconfig, VertRefresh source: xconfig     Identifier     "Monitor0"     VendorName     "Unknown"     ModelName      "CRT-0"     HorizSync       30.0 - 83.0     VertRefresh     50.0 - 76.0     Option         "DPMS" EndSection  Section "Device"     Identifier     "Device0"     Driver         "nvidia"     VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"     BoardName      "GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a" EndSection  Section "Screen"     Identifier     "Screen0"     Device         "Device0"     Monitor        "Monitor0"     DefaultDepth    24     Option         "TwinView" "1"     Option         "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" "CRT-0"     Option         "metamodes" "CRT: 1280x1024 +1024+0, DFP: 1024x768 +0+0"     SubSection     "Display"         Depth       24     EndSubSection EndSection"   ok I have tried disper -e. Problem is that Nvidia settings appear to be treating both monitors as the same one. so changing the settings to one has no effect, but change the other and it affects both screens identically.  Results of disper -l as follows:      carter@carter-desktop:~$ disper -l display DFP-0: HP vs17  resolutions: 320x240, 400x300, 416x312, 512x384, 576x432, 680x384, 640x480, 720x450, 640x512, 800x512, 840x525, 800x600, 960x540, 832x624, 960x600, 896x672, 1024x768, 1152x864, 1280x960, 1280x1024 display CRT-0: CRT-0  resolutions: 320x240, 400x300, 416x312, 512x384, 576x432, 680x384, 640x480, 720x450, 640x512, 800x512, 840x525, 800x600, 960x540, 832x624, 960x600, 896x672, 1024x768, 1152x864, 1360x768, 1280x960, 1440x900, 1280x1024, 1400x1050, 1600x1024, 1680x1050, 1600x1200, 1920x1080, 1920x1200, 1792x1344 carter@carter-desktop:~$ What is the probability one card from each suit will be represented when 5 cards are dealt? I met this equation frequently in Guass-Newton optimizations. But I dont understand why the left and right side of the equation can be equal.  Lets say the Jacobian is $2$ by $2$   and Hessian is $$\begin{bmatrix}\frac{\partial^2f_1}{\partial^2 x_1 } &amp; \frac{\partial^2f_1}{\partial^2 x_2  } \\ \frac{\partial^2f_2}{\partial^2 x_1 } &amp; \frac{\partial^2f_2}{\partial^2 x_2  }\end{bmatrix}$$   But the right hand side of the equation is  $$J^TJ =\begin{bmatrix} \left( \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1} \right)^2  &amp;  \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_2} +\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1}\\ \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_2} +\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1}\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_1} &amp;\left( \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x_2} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x_2} \right)^2\end{bmatrix} $$  Why can these two be equal as presented in papers? ResultSet exception - before start of result set irrationality of $\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}$. The fact that there exists irrational number $a,b$ such that $a^b$ is rational is proved by the law of excluded middle, but I read somewhere that irrationality of $\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}$ is proved constructively. Do you know the proof? Solutions to the equation $ze^{a-z}=1$ Let $a \in \mathbb{R}, a&gt;1,$ and consider the equation $$ze^{a-z}=1$$ How many solutions does this equation have in the unit disk, and how many of those solutions are real?   My attempt to solve was to use the Argument Principle on the function $f(z)=ze^{a-z}-1$, in hopes of recovering the number of zeroes that way. The integral I attempted to compute for this was $$\int_{|z|=1} \frac{e^{a-z}-ze^{a-z}}{ze^{a-z}-1}dz=\int_{|z|=1}\frac{1-z}{z-e^{z-a}}dz$$  I do not know how to proceed from here, as the $e^{z-a}$ in the denominator seems problematic. Thanks for your help! Cannot authenticate without a password multisite: allow only specific users to update sites I would like to know if it's possible to win in Don't Starve? Or is it just the matter of how long until you die? Can I fine-tune my screen brightness? My laptop is Lenovo T400, and my OS is Ubuntu 10.10. I change the brightness of my screen by pressing the FN key and one of the two keys for increasing/decreasing brightness.  The brightness I feel comfortable is between two consecutive levels that are offered. So I wonder if it is possible to fine-tune the screen's brightness?