There are some situations where tag synonyms make perfect sense the way they currently are. In SF&amp;F, the "lotr" tag is a synonym for "lord-of-the-rings". As we all know, LOTR is just an abbreviation for Lord of the Rings.  There are certain scenarios where tags are related, but not necessarily the same. The Hobbit (the-hobbit) and Lord of the Rings (lotr) are similar subjects since they have the same author, and contain some of the same elements such as plot, setting, and characters. Yet, these are two distinct subjects with their own tag.   If the question is specific to The Hobbit, then it should not have a "lotr" tag. because of this, it creates two "islands of data" when dealing with tags. These two subjects are tied together by author J.R.R. Tolkien, but they don't always carry the "tolkien" tag.  My request would be to create a tagging "class" system where adding a tag would implicitly reference another tag if the tag is a subset of the same subject. For example a question with the tag "the-hobbit" should implicitly also have the "tokien" tag. Subscribing to "tolkien" would then automatically include posts for The Hobbit, Lord of the Rings, The Silmarillion, and his other works. Of course, if you only want to subscribe to "lotr", you would still have that option.
The prime example is C# and .Net. 95% of C# questions are also tagged .Net. The reverse isn't the case so it's not a synonym. Basically, C# is a child of .Net.  Would it be possible to create some sort of one-way linkage like this?
What inspired Tauriel's story arc? I know Tauriel is a Jackson created character, but I wondered if anywhere in the legendarium there was fodder for the story arc between her and Kili.  I do not have access to all my books for the time being and recall stories of love between men and elves in the Silmarillion and Appendices but don't remember any such stories between elves and dwarves and wondered if there was any basis of inspiration for this aspect of their relationship within Tolkien's works.   This movie, of course, departs even further from the original than those made before it, but as a story unto itself, I can still appreciate the ride, so if there is no Tolkien basis, what inspired Jackson, Boyens, and Walsh to create this particular arc?  Is there interview info or anything? I find myself constantly looking up the syntax of  find . -name "FILENAME"  -exec rm {} \;   mainly because I don't see how exactly the -exec part works. What is the meaning of the braces, the backslash and the semicolon? Are there other use cases for that syntax? X,Y,Z missing in F3 When I press F3 to see the debug screen in I use Minecraft 1.8.1, some information is missing.   Most notably, there are no X, Y, Z coordinates.     What happened to my debug overlay? Show that$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\sin( nz)}{n}$ diverges if $\mathfrak{Im} \,(z)\neq0$ We have to show that$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{sin( nz)}{n}$ diverges if $Im\,(z)\neq0$  My try:$$\sin (nz) = \mathfrak{Im}(e^{nzi})$$  $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin nz}{n} = \mathfrak{Im} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(e^{zi})^n}{n} = - \mathfrak{Im} \ln\left(1-e^{zi}\right). $$ Then how to proceed? I would like to delete, from the following figure:  the top circle, but without removing the black edge that separate the orange part from the gray part. The figure above has been obtained by the following code: \documentclass[border=0.2cm]{standalone}  % Required packages \usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor} \usepackage{tikz}   \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[thick, set/.style = {circle,      minimum size = 3cm,      fill=black!30}]  % Set A \node[set,label={135:$A$}] (A) at (0,0) {};  % Set B \node[set,label={45:$B$}] (B) at (1.8,0) {};   % Intersection \begin{scope} \clip (0,0) circle(1.5cm); \clip (1.8,0) circle(1.5cm); \clip (0.9,1.5) circle(1.5cm); \fill[orange!60](0,0) circle(1.5cm); \end{scope}  % Circles outline \draw (0,0) circle(1.5cm); \draw (1.8,0) circle(1.5cm); \draw (0.9,1.5) circle(1.5cm);  \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}  A rough example of the desired result is: What's the term when you ask a question which implies a lie? Solving recurrence relation. Recurrence I am following Carroll's GR book. He explain that it is convention to parameterize geodesics of photons by a parameter $\lambda$ such that  $$p^\mu ~=~ \frac{d x^{\mu}}{d \lambda}.\tag{3.62}$$  But this is the definition of 4-velocity for a massive particle in the case of $\lambda=\tau$ equal to proper time. My question then, is $$u^\mu = p^\mu$$ for all massless particles? I ask because it's well-known that proper time $\tau$ freezes for massless particles. Is there such a thing as a deposit-only bank account? My employer wants me to give my routing-numbers, social-security numbers, and basically everything else required to take money out of my account, to several third-party direct-deposit websites (one for weekly paychecks, one for mileage reimbursements, etc.).  I am not comfortable giving my identity information away to all these places.  I'd like to give them access to an account which they can only deposit into, never withdraw (either a separate account, or, even better, a deposit-only alias to my real account).  Does such a thing exist?    [Edit] I'm not worried about the companies so much as I am worried about bad guys who inevitably hack those companies' databases, or get hired to work there.  This type of account would also be handy for giving read-only access to sites like mint.com or quicken.com, easing my mind about their hackers/unscrupulous employees. I recently spilled water on my computers keyboard, and as a result the left shift key seems to be stuck in the on position. This means that the system always boots into safe boot unless I hold down the option key. I have managed to change my password to one which is all caps and once I login I use keyremap4mac but it is still very annoying. Is there anyway which I can remap the keyboard during boot? Possibly with a startup bash script or something similiar? If that is not possible is there any way to use a script to bypass safe boot? I was planning on installing a new bootloader anyway in order to dual-boot linux, I don't know if this will help. Advice is appreciated. Where do object file "Version References" come from? Back when the first discussion about deleted questions came up, I  building an official unofficial read-only archive for good deleted SE content.  I had a plan to build something like this:    Each link would point to a 1:1 scraped StackOverflow (or other SE network) deleted question (of course with a big fat disclaimer to the top, historical data, legal stuff, yada yada yada - and of course after asking Stack Exchange for permission, seeing as this would go far beyond what the CC license allows.)   I also registered a domain name that would (IMO) suit nicely, overflown.org.  However, when thinking about it, I realized doing this properly is a lot of work. You would have to:   build a scraper that can use a 10k+er's OpenID to fetch the deleted question (using the API or the data dump is for wusses. If we go through all this trouble, we want a historical document of what the site looked like "back then", right?) edit the page's DOM to remove dynamic elements, remove the "deleted" CSS classes, remove all the voting abilities from the buttons, and add the "this is historical data" disclaimer fetch - this is the biggest part and applies even if you use the API or data dump - all linked image resources (even those from imgur - even images used only in deleted questions could be purged one day), store them, and link them fetch all associated CSS style sheets and store them intelligently - preferably in a way that you don't fetch a copy of each file for each page (as normal page scrapers do), but also in a way that doesn't break if SE update their style sheets   long story short, I won't be in a position to build this any time in the foreseeable future - with old work, new work, and studying, I really have enough on my plate already.  Of course, if somebody else in the community feels like giving this a try, cool! But what I was really thinking is - maybe this is something Stack Exchange should build after all?   I know Jeff's  on these questions is used to be     @system I did think about a sweet place for them, in the bitbucket. – Jeff Atwood♦ Dec 29 '10 at 1:54   but come on. Think about it:     Future deletion discussions and changes in on-topicness policy would become way more relaxed because the popular and loved stuff has a place to go. A site for "overflown" questions could be curated by selected community members, who decide whether a contribution deserves to be archived or not.  A separate domain name (I'm happy to donate overflown.org for the purpose if desired) and the separate site design would create enough distance to the Stack Exchange network: it would be crystal clear that this read-only archive is for historical purposes only, and the existence of a question there does not mean you can ask something similar on one of the live sites. The pages would be 1:1 scrapes of what the site looked like at the time of the scraping, making it a general historical archive as well. These questions traditionally drive a lot of traffic. The possibility of continuing to show ads in the usual places would allow Stack Exchange to take advantage of that traffic without endangering content quality on the SE network. Hosting an archive like this is a job for a business, not us regular joes. A private project hosted by some community member can go down once they forget to pay a bill, or decide they want to password protect their private blog or photo album. The ideal place to host a site like this is at a company with professional admins that intends to stay online for a long time.    How about it? Given the following class  public class Foo {     public int FooId { get; set; }     public string FooName { get; set; }      public override bool Equals(object obj)     {         Foo fooItem = obj as Foo;          if (fooItem == null)          {            return false;         }          return fooItem.FooId == this.FooId;     }      public override int GetHashCode()     {         // Which is preferred?          return base.GetHashCode();          //return this.FooId.GetHashCode();     } }   I have overridden the Equals method because Foo represent a row for the Foos table.  Which is the preferred method for overriding the GetHashCode?  Why is it important to override GetHashCode? How to get to the GRUB menu at boot-time? Cardinality of separable metric spaces Find the probability that a geometric random variable $X$ is an even number How can I view the time of a text message in iOS 7? Why Faces eat each other? Trouble understanding Landau & Lifshitz writing about Lagrangians and Galilean Relativity We have two inertial coordinate systems, $K'$ and $K$. $K$ is moving with infinitesimal velocity ${\epsilon}$ relative to $K'$. Using Galilean relativity we can transform this into $v'=v+{\epsilon}$. Here Lagrangian is only a function of speed $L=L(|v|^2)$. $L'$ may differ from $L$ only by a total derivative of function of coordinates and time, i.e. $L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}f(q,t)$  $"$We have $L'=L(|v|^2+2{v}·{\epsilon}+{\epsilon}^2)$. [1. ] Expanding this expression in powers of ${\epsilon}$ and neglecting terms above the first order, we obtain $L(|v'|^2)=L(|v|^2)+\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{|v|^2}}2v·{\epsilon}$ [2.] The second term on the right of this equation is a total time derivative only if it is a linear function of the velocity $v$ $"$  I understand nothing in the quoted part. How do we get [2.]? Why does $\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{|v|^2}}2v·{\epsilon}$ being a linear function of velocity imply that it's a total time derivative? Connect two computers with SSH in a home LAN I have two ubuntu computer shared the same wifi and desire to reach another from one's terminal.  First create an user on the second computer named "Second" and hostname "Algorithms"    Then tried to reach it from the other with SSH,  but get error report as   $ ssh second@Algorithms   ssh: Could not resolve hostname algorithms: nodename nor servname provided, or not known   The solution I tried is based on   What's the problem with my experiment?