Click on dynamically added table row to get index number
Event binding on dynamically created elements?
[Probability]need help to understand the following expression So assume $Y$ and $X$ are exponentially distributed with parameters $y_1$, and $x_1$ respecitively.  assume c is a constant.  I am having huge trouble to understand the integration of the following expression.  $P(Y&lt;c/u(X))$  $=\int_{t}^{\infty}f_X(x)\int_{0}^{c/u(x)}f_Y(y)dydx +\int_{0}^{t}f_X(x)\int_{c/u(x)}^{\infty}f_Y(y)dydx$  where t is the cross-point that $u(x)$ change sign    here $c/u(x)$ is given by the plot below, t is the point crossing the zero:   Confusion:   I don't understand the second integration of the second term "$\int_{c/u(x)}^{\infty}f_Y(y)dydx$", this isn't right because Y an X only defined for y>0, and x>0. So it's the first quadrant in this plot. Does an ability or spell grant me the bonus action with which to use it? The  description of casting times says that spells with a casting time of &quot;bonus action&quot; require a bonus action to cast (p. 79, emphasis mine):  Most spells require a single action to cast, but some spells require a bonus action, a reaction, or much more time to cast. Bonus Action A spell cast with a bonus action is especially swift. You must use a bonus action on your turn to cast the spell, provided that you haven't already taken a bonus action this turn. You can't cast another spell during the same turn, except for a cantrip with a casting time of 1 action.  It's pretty clear that bonus actions aren't automatic (p. 69):  You can take a bonus action only when a special ability, spell, or other feature of the game states that you can do something as a bonus action. You otherwise don't have a bonus action to take.  So to cast a spell like Healing Word (p. 93), do I  need to be granted a bonus action that I can use, or do I have a bonus action I can use?  I guess I'm unclear on whether I need to have a bonus action before I can spend it on something, or whether having an ability, spell, or whatnot that can be done as a bonus action grants me the bonus action I need to use it. How can I query SEDE for tags I've created? How can I query the  for tags I've created? Generating data with a given sample covariance matrix SQL Server FOR XML Enclosing Element? Deriving Heaviside-Feynman formula for the electric field of an arbitrarily moving charge from Lienard-Wiechert potential When is it appropriate to end a question without a question mark? Set of branch points isn't discrete, but branch points are isolated? I refer to , which I understand says that the branch points of a nonconstant holomorphic map $F: X \to Y$ between Riemann surfaces $X$ and $Y$, both of which are not necessarily compact, form a discrete subset of range $Y$ of the map $F$. (Not sure if 'connected' is part of the definition of Riemann surfaces in other textbooks, but it is here.) Question 1: Do I understand correctly, and is this indeed true? What else I understand:  $A$ is a discrete subspace/subset (I just assume everything here is the usual subspace topology) of $B$ if and only if every singleton subset of $A$ is open in $A$ if and only if every point of $A$ is isolated.  This overflow question () seems to suggest this is not true but is true if $F$ is proper. However, I'm not sure the definitions of Riemann surface are the same (maybe some answers use definitions where Riemann surfaces are not necessarily connected or something).  2.1. I know $F$ is 'discrete' (meaning that its fibres are discrete; here, i refer to a ): see definition before Lemma 3.1, on p. 7), by Proposition II.3.12, and open, by open mapping theorem, which is Proposition II.3.8, but I'm not sure these help show $F$ is proper or are otherwise helpful. Ostensibly 'discrete' maps don't map discrete subsets to discrete subsets.   This stackexchange question () seems to suggest this is true.  I think this is true if $F$ is injective or at least something like locally injective. (Please don't make me type up all the stuff I did for this part.) However based on the question in (3) and based on the , which I think uses the term 'branch points' to mean the same thing as what Miranda means by 'ramification points' (and thus is different from Miranda's 'branch points'), it seems that no neighbourhood $U$ of a ramification point $p \in U \subseteq X$ of $F$ is such that the restriction $F|_U$ is injective.  Kinda related:    This page () says    Now, the ramification and branch points must form a discrete set  I don't think the page assumes anything like $F$ is proper.  The  text in (2.1) actually seems to assume proper based on the '3.7. Proper holomorphic maps' part, but said part refers to 'Lemma 3.17', so I think proper can be replaced with closed. Maybe $F$ is closed or something.  Kinda related (see Question 2 below):     says    If $F$ is proper then the image $\Delta = F(R)$ is discrete in $Y$.   This seems to have all the same assumptions as with Miranda. Ostensibly, either Miranda is wrong or there's some higher level machinery that allows us to omit $F$ proper.  Question 2: To possibly generalise this, what are the minimum requirements on $F, X$ and $Y$ to make $F$ map discrete subsets to discrete subsets? I mean, I'm not sure we really need 'holomorphic' here. I have a feeling this applies perhaps to maps that are just open/closed, continuous and discrete and spaces that are just Hausdorff and locally compact or something.  (again) Kinda related: In Fringe's season 1, the episode  (1x13) shows how  travels on VertusAir flight 718. We witness how he develops some strange symptoms, withdraws into a lavatory and transforms into a porcupine-like monster.  At the end of season 3, Peter "switches" the timeline (changing the past and making the present continue in a different timeline henceforth) from blue- to orange-verse. Various statements throughout the 4th season indicate time (the date) was not reset; Olivia and Walter have been working on Fringe cases for some three years etc. - hence it is safe to say that season 4 plays 3 years after season 1.  Then, in the episode  (4x16), the events from 1x13 happen again, up to the point of Bowman's transformation, which this time doesn't happen (not aboard the plane, anyway). As far as I can tell, great care was taken to exactly recreate the events from the season 1 episode, including hiring the same actors to play the flight attendants once again ( and ), so obviously this is supposed to be the same event with slight changes.  Peter, as well as Olivia - who is in the process of regaining her memories from the blue-verse -, remember the events from 1x13 and note the difference that Bowman's transformation happened later this time, implying that in the orange-verse, everything related to flight 718 played out the same way, except for the small difference that the transformation happened a bit later.  BUT ... all of this happened 3 years later!! Is there any explanation for this?  How unlikely is it that in the orange-verse timeline, Marshall Bowman is on the very same flight with the very same flight attendants 3 years after the same would have happened in the blue-verse? Mind you, this is not a "small change" in the course of events while mostly everything else stays the same.  So, why did Peter and Olivia realize the transformation happened a tad later in the orange-verse timeline, but were not baffled by the fact that essentially the same events as in the blue-verse happened, but three years later?  EDIT: Not only the flight and the flight attendants were the same in both episodes. The passenger next to Bowman was the same, an elderly lady played by  both times, as well. Moreover, the transcripts of  and  reveal that the dialogue between Bowman, the passenger next to him, and the cabin crew is the same down to the lines of text until the moment of transformation.  Interestingly, the announcement by the captain in the beginning seems to be different - starting the inflight movie + selling headsets vs. circling before beginning the final descent + selling snacks. On the other hand, this could be presumed to be a slight retcon, as in 4x16, it was crucial for the plot that the plane would be close to landing, and starting the inflight movie would not make much sense right before landing. I'll be traveling to Berlin, Germany from Colombo, Sri Lanka via Turkish Airways.  The itinerary would be: Colombo  &lt;--> Istanbul- || Istanbul- &lt;--> Berlin   The flights are all on one ticket. Would I be required to claim and re-check my baggage at Istanbul or can I check it in all the way from Colombo to Berlin without re-checking in the baggage again? For what powers $k$ is the polynomial $n^k-1$ divisible by $(n-1)^2$? Distributing elements across a list of lists I have to try to add a field called 'Name' to a bunch of different feature classes using python, and then access the name of the feature class to fill in the field. I have no idea how to even start this! I know I need a loop but that's all I know. Number of labeled trees which have one vertex of degree 4 How many labeled trees which have one vertex of degree 4 can we have? A tree with $10$ vertices has $9$ edges, so the sum of the degrees of the vertices is $2\cdot 9=18$. If there is one vertex of degree $4$, the sum of the degrees of the other $9$ vertices must be $14$. I don't know what to do next. Should I count all possible vertex degrees? Moving set of polygons in ArcGIS Pro? Do Dragonborn get tails/wings? How to show hidden folders in File Manager (Nautilus) on Ubuntu? I am trying to animate a change in backgroundColor using jQuery on mouseover.  I have checked some example and I seem to have it right, it works with other properties like fontSize, but with backgroundColor I get and "Invalid Property" js error. The element I am working with is a div.  $(".usercontent").mouseover(function() {     $(this).animate({ backgroundColor: "olive" }, "slow"); });   Any ideas? miktex-makepk - PK font HieroB could not be created I am depressed, after trying to install HieroTeX with MikTex 2.9 and TeXnicenter for four weeks without succeeding. I installed hieroglf, it works perfectly, but has only 60 signs. I followed the main advices, so I created a folder texmf-Local , throwed in  the content of HieroTex3.5 and Hiero-Type1.3.1.4 , put the axmf , mf and sty files where I think they belong, put that directory  texmf- local in the path searched by Miktex, updated map and file databases fo Miktex. Still the files can be compiled but Hiero fonts are not found.  Te main errors I can detect from log are the following:   " No file egypto.sty.tex found" and  "  "miktex-makepk - PK font HieroB could not be created." and similar for other fonts Thanks How many Avatars have there been?