Planning a  trip overseas that goes from A to B; B to C; C home to A. How do I search flights for this if I don't know best cities for multiple stops on each leg of trip.
Several airline and trip planning sites will allow you to check "I am flexible with my dates" or a similar option.  Is there any way to also search more broadly for location?  For example, if you wanted to leave from YYZ or YKF and arrive at any airport in California, can a search for such flights be done somehow?  I ask because when I plan plane trips, I want the lowest price.  I'm OK with leaving a day or two later if I save $200 (same with the return trip).  There are 3 airports within 80 km of me, I'll leave from the one with the cheapest flight. And I'm also OK with changing the trip to spend time exploring San Francisco instead of lying on the beach near San Diego, and that sort of thing.  Normally this would take dozens of searches, but I'd like to see it all at once.
how to set camera to the same view as I turn my cursor? I want to turn the camera to get the view I want, but everytime I turn the camera, I need to go to render window to check if it's the view I want. I turn the view with my mouse cursor, but that does not affect the actual camera view in rendering, can I set the camera view the same as I turn my cursor? Suppose $f$ is an isometric (i.e., distance preserving) function on $\mathbb{E}^2$ such that $f(0,0) = (0,0)$.  Then I want to show that $f$ is necessarily linear.  Now $f$ is linear iff $f$ is both additive and homogenous.  The following is an attempted proof for the homogeneity of f (missing the last step); still more, I have no idea how to argue for the additivity of $f$.  Any ideas?  Let $x \in \mathbb{E}^2$ and $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$   We know that $\forall x \in \mathbb{E}^2$, $\Vert x - 0 \Vert = \Vert f(x) - f(0)\Vert = \Vert f(x) - 0 \Vert$ so that $\Vert x\Vert = \Vert f(x)\Vert$.  From this we immediately have the following facts:  $\Vert x \Vert = \Vert f(x) \Vert$  $\Vert \alpha x \Vert = \Vert f(\alpha x) \Vert$  We can then argue that since $\Vert \alpha x\Vert = |\alpha| \Vert x \Vert = |\alpha| \Vert f(x) \Vert = \Vert \alpha f(x) \Vert$, we also have that $\Vert f(\alpha x) \Vert = \Vert \alpha f(x)\Vert$.  Finally, we have that  $\Vert \alpha x - x \Vert = \Vert \alpha f(x) - f(x) \Vert$   iff $ \Vert (\alpha - 1)x \Vert = \Vert (\alpha - 1) f(x) \Vert$   iff $|\alpha - 1| \Vert x \Vert = |\alpha - 1| \Vert f(x) \Vert$  Since the last of these statements is in fact true, we now have $\Vert \alpha x - x \Vert = \Vert \alpha f(x) - f(x) \Vert$ as desired.  Now at this point it seems like I have all of the facts required to assert that $f(\alpha x) = \alpha f(x)$, but I can't figure out how to formally state why without illegally appealing to visual intuition.  Any ideas? Normal ubuntu desktop will update ubuntu-desktop package and it's dependencies on release upgrade. Will Ubuntu minimal cd install ubuntu-desktop on release upgrade or just installed packages? How to copy the contents of a file in UNIX without displaying the file contents. I don't want to cat or vi to see the contents.  I want to copy them to clipboard so that I can paste it back on my windows notepad.  I can't copy the file from that server to another due to access restrictions. For , his accounts tab shows three entries for "Database Administrators". It's the same account listed three times: My ESTA approval if I have previously had a B1 refusal I applied for a B1 visa to attend a conference in the USA in 2013. I had another nationality (Non- VWP) at the time and my B1 application rejected under section 306 of border security. I now can apply for ESTA under my new nationality. Can my ESTA application get approved? If not and I need to apply for visa is it every time I need to travel to stated or is it just the first time? Mongo find documents where array contains x values of given array Is it possible to build a single mysql query (without variables) to remove all records from the table, except latest N (sorted by id desc)?  Something like this, only it doesn't work :)  delete from table order by id ASC limit ((select count(*) from table ) - N)   Thanks. How to get a drive formatted with exfat working? In Ubuntu 13.04 there was an option to use the PPA by Relan in order to get ExFat functionality. Seeing that in Ubuntu this functionality is now available from the repositories without the PPA I tried this but failed to make it work.  So my question is how do I enable exfat support? I want to emphasize that I only have 5 dollars, so can I use the sentence:     Five dollars is all I have.   Or must it be:      Five dollars are all I have.   Please give the explanation as well. Why is ${x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$ the same as $\sqrt x $? Why is ${x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$ the same as $\sqrt x $?   I'm currently studying indices/exponents, and this is a law that I was told to accept without much proof or explanation, could someone explain the reasoning behind this.  Thank you. No splitter widget in new separate window I am new to Blender and I am trying to find my way through its interface. I want to have several windows (I mean OS windows, not Blender windows). So I create a separate window by dragging splitter widget while holding Shift.  The problem is there are no splitter widgets in the newly created OS window. So I can't have multiple blender windows in it. The new window does not have a Layout type drop down menu either. So how do I add new Blender windows in a new OS window? (Sorry if I'm using the wrong terms, but hopefully its clear what I am trying to achieve). How to turn off magic quotes on shared hosting? I want to turn off PHP's magic quotes.  I don't have access to php.ini.  When I tried to add php_flag magic_quotes_gpc off to my .htaccess file, I get a 500 internal server error. This is what my .htaccess file looks like:  AddType x-mapp-php5 .php php_flag magic_quotes_gpc off   Then I tried to use ini_set('magic_quotes_gpc', 'O'), but that had no effect.  How do I turn magic quotes off? I submitted a manuscript last year to an IEEE journal, and the paper was accepted for publication. I recently submitted a new manuscript to the same journal, but, this time, the paper was rejected, and I was told that I should submit to another journal since my paper was not within the journal's scope. The two papers both target similar applications. Furthermore, the second paper uses some work in the first paper, making substantial improvements at solving a much more difficult problem. Based on the reviewer's comments (and my own personal assessment), I do not believe that the work presented in the second paper was "incremental" in nature. Far from it. Two of the three reviewers gave positive reviews. The third reviewer, however, mentioned the "outside of journal's scope" issue and the associate editor and editor-in-chief both sided with the 3rd reviewer, and the paper was stopped dead in its tracks.  I'm scratching my head trying to come to terms with how in the world my first paper could be accepted by this journal, but the second paper focused on the same application space and achieving substantial improvements on a much more difficult problem (backed up with measured results) could be rejected. Any ideas? prove that : $ i = \sqrt {-1}\ $ i have a pretty nasty question. i was glancing through a few olympiad papers and stumbled upon this question:  prove that  $ i = \sqrt {-1}\ $.  i tried the conventional methods namely euler's formula  but could not figure what to do next. how do you actually proceed further? i have checked a few books and a proof is not available.are there any proof available for this Fisher's exact test on 2x4 table I am working on 4 different plants. I have the (RNA-Seq) data from sequencing. I look for two events E1 and E2, say, at certain positions in their genome. Let's say E2 is the common one and E1 is a special event. The positions I look for are identical across all 4 (in the genome). And let's say I see that the observation I have for 1 particular position is:      P1   P2  P3  P4 E1   0   20   0   17 E2 100   80 100  120    Here, P1 through P4 refers to plants and E1 and E2 refers to the events. E2 is more common. So, my objective is to actually check if E1 occurs more often in one or more plants than in the others. If they occur at the same proportion in all, of course it is not interesting to me.  I have 2 questions: (I have already asked  before but didn't get an answer)     Will a fisher test be right for this problem?    I hypothesize (Null) that the proportion of E1 is not different in occurrence between the 4 plants. Now, I set out to find if the proportion I have here is by any means significantly different. I use R, fisher.test() and I get p-value=2.5e-10. So, I reject my Null hypothesis for this case because I find strong evidence against it.  Sometimes, I have an observation like this,        P1   P2  P3  P4 E1   0   20   0  17 E2   0   80   0 120    then fisher.test() gives me a p-value of 0.147. So, I don't reject the Null   hypothesis. However, from a biological point of view, I would consider this significant. However fisher test answers the question I originally asked. I guess the proportion 0/0 for P1 and P3 are not useful (or not used).  So, my question is: Is it possible to modify the test such that it is sensitive even if E1 and E2 are 0 in 1 or more plants for a particular observation?     Having thought a bit to frame this post, I guess, in that case I have to ask a different question. A word for a symbol which has outlived its origin I am quite sure that there is a word for a symbol which was originated by a real-life, physical prototype but has since then outlived its origin.  Most notable example: the save button with floppy drive on it. Also, to a lesser degree, envelopes in email clients, and so on.  The "anachronism" or "metonymy" are close, but not exactly what I'm searching for. Get names of all keys in the collection According to this , if at least one of the nouns involved is plural then it should take the plural form of the verb. Otherwise, it should take the singular form of the verb. But in the last part it says not all grammars agree to those rules thus proximity rule applies. However, it doesn't explain when to apply the proximity rule and when not to use the former rules. Let $n$ be a positive integer. Show that the matrix  $$\begin{pmatrix} 1 &amp; 1/2 &amp; 1/3 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1/n \\ 1/2 &amp; 1/3 &amp; 1/4 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1/(n+1) \\ \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp;  \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots\\ 1/n &amp; 1/(n+1) &amp; 1/(n+2) &amp; \cdots &amp; 1/(2n-1) \end{pmatrix}$$  is invertible and all the entries of its inverse are integers. This is an exercise in Hoffman and Kunze's linear algebra book. Any hints will be appreciated!