In the man of find the -ctime is said to be :  -ctime n            File status was last changed n*24 hours ago.  See the comments           for -atime to understand how rounding affects the interpretation           of file status change times.  -atime n           File  was  last  accessed n*24 hours ago.  When find figures out           how many 24-hour periods ago the file  was  last  accessed,  any           fractional part is ignored, so to match -atime +1, a file has to           have been accessed at least two days ago.   I know from  that the ext4 file system stores the creation date , and you can get it using stats , is the status change times they are talking about in the manual the same as the one given by stats ? or precisely , is the ctime the date of creation of a file ?
In what order are the dated ordered by? Certainly not alphanumeric order.  ls -lt sorts by modification time. But I need creation time.
Combining the first and second law of thermodynamics we can get the following equation  $$TdS=dU-P_{ext}dV$$  First question: Is this equation applicable for irreversible processes such that that $dS≠\dfrac{dQ}{T}$?  Second question:If the system temperature $T_{sys}$ is smaller than the surrounding temperature $T_{sur}$, which temperature should we put in the equation?   I have this question because sometimes people use $T_{sur}$ instead of $T_{sys}$ (e.g. , ) but the equation is supposed to describe changes in the system. Expressing $1.24\overline{123}=1.24\;123\;123\;123\;\ldots$ as the ratio of two integers I was trying to accomplish this through a trigger, but its not really working. Is there a way to get this done through Process Builder? If so, what is that process?  I'm trying to have ProductB being added to the opportunity automatically once ProductA is manually added to the opportunity.  Also, is there a way to have the $ amount of ProductB being 0.5% of ProductA?  Trigger that I have so far:  trigger Attempt1 on OpportunityLineItem (after insert) { List&lt;OpportunityLineItem&gt; oliList = new List&lt;OpportunityLineItem&gt;();  for( OpportunityLineItem item: [SELECT  OpportunityId,                                          Name                                  FROM    OpportunityLineItem                                 WHERE   Id = :Trigger.new AND                                          Name = 'NAME OF PRODUCTA'])  {   oliList.add(new OpportunityLineItem(     OpportunityId = item.OpportunityId,      PricebookEntryId ='01uA000000QPDldEAt',     Quantity = 1,     UnitPrice = 25)   );  }  Insert oliList; } How do I get started with Translations? My friend and i would like to translate Ubuntu. where should we start? where to find translation tools? I need to keep a session alive for 30 minutes and then destroy it. What does the x mean on MCB? Any clue? Or is it just there for better visual? What to do about rep inflation? Overall reputation scores are headed nowhere but up.  Pretty soon there will be thousands of mods.  What to do?  Thoughts on possibilities:   Thousands of mods is fine.  Carry on. Adjust the threshold values for high-level SO privileges. Do a straight-up inflation adjustment.  You had x rep, then at the turn of the year we applied the Consumer Rep Index to all scores, now you have (x / inflation) rep. Implement a rep decay mechanism, so that inactivity sheds some of the overall rep that's built up. Intuitive explanation of why $\dim\operatorname{Im} T + \dim\operatorname{Ker} T = \dim V$ I'm having a hard time truly understanding the meaning of $\dim\operatorname{Im} T + \dim\operatorname{Ker} T = \dim V$ where $V$ is the domain of a linear transformation $T:V\to W$. I've used this equation several times in many problems, and I've gone over the proof and I believe that I fully understand it, but I don't understand the intuitive reasoning behind it. I'd appreciate an intuitive explanation of it.  Just to be clear, I do understand the equation itself, I am able to use it, and I know how to prove it; my question is what is the meaning of this equation from a linear algebra perspective. How to get a vertical bar which is longer than \mid ? sometimes when writing mathematical expression with partial derivatives, one needs to write a vertical bar afterwards and write the value at the which the partial derivatives are being computed as subscripts. See for example the bottom post here:    However, the \mid symbol doesn't produce a tall bar that corresponds to the size of the partial derivatives term. Is there a way to have a taller bar?   PS: Some other posts here mention \middle| but this doesn't compile on my computer.  Thanks in advance.... What do solid/striped lines on a wire indicate? What do solid or dashed lines on a wire indicate?  Is there a difference between the solid and dashed indicators? How many individual lights can an arduino control I want to use a regular Arduino board to control LEDs - what is the most lights I can control individually from the board?  Is there a tutorial on how to hook it up? Evaluating $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} e^{-n} \sum\limits_{k=0}^{n} \frac{n^k}{k!}$ I'm supposed to calculate: $$\lim_{n\to\infty} e^{-n} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{n^k}{k!}$$ By using WolframAlpha, I might guess that the limit is $\frac{1}{2}$, which is a pretty interesting and nice result. I wonder in which ways we may approach it. Would a 9V alkaline power a 12V DC motor? I am thinking about buying a 12V DC motor but want to keep everything, including the motor, battery, and power switch somewhat compact. I am not very knowledgeable about these kind of things and am curious whether or not my 12V DC motor would run at all on a 9V battery. What happened to the voting buttons? Starting from yesterday, the up-/downvote buttons seem to have moved from the left of a post towards above (in the middle) of the bodies of all questions and answers. Here is a screenprint of a sample (containing such buttons for both a question and an answer to it):    This happens on an iOS device (running 9.3.5), using various browsers and this in any SE site. No idea so far how it looks like in the most recent iOS version. Same for the (green) checkbox below those voting buttons (to mark an answer as accepted). Is this intended to be like this (IMO it looks ugly ... and a huge waste of available space), or is it rather some sort of CSS related issue that needs to be fixed? PS: Looking at the same page around the same time on a Win PC (using any of the common browsers) seems to work fine. I've read a new study which suggests that yawning may help you keep a cool head. Also, the findings might hold some hope for sufferers of insomnia, migraines, and even epilepsy.  Is there any conclusion about what the function of yawning is and why do we yawn? Why do mathematicians use single-letter variables? Ways to evaluate $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta$ Long boot delay on Ubuntu loading/splash screen following regular dist-upgrade on clean SSD install (18.04) I'be been running 18.04 since a clean SSD install on the day of it's official release, without issues. Power on to login was seconds (max 10)  Then, I did a regular upgrade this morning:  $ sudo apt update &amp;&amp; sudo apt dist-upgrade   The packages installed/upgraded were:  Install: linux-headers-4.15.0-24:amd64 (4.15.0-24.26, automatic), linux-headers-4.15.0-24-generic:amd64 (4.15.0-24.26, automatic), linux-modules-extra-4.15.0-24-generic:amd64 (4.15.0-24.26, automatic), linux-modules-4.15.0-24-generic:amd64 (4.15.0-24.26, automatic), linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic:amd64 (4.15.0-24.26, automatic) Upgrade: gnome-control-center-data:amd64 (1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1.18.04.1, 1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1.18.04.2), linux-headers-generic:amd64 (4.15.0.23.25, 4.15.0.24.26), gnome-control-center:amd64 (1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1.18.04.1, 1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1.18.04.2), linux-image-generic:amd64 (4.15.0.23.25, 4.15.0.24.26), linux-signed-generic:amd64 (4.15.0.23.25, 4.15.0.24.26), gnome-control-center-faces:amd64 (1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1.18.04.1, 1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1.18.04.2), linux-generic:amd64 (4.15.0.23.25, 4.15.0.24.26)   I rebooted once the upgrade had completed, and noted a 2-3 minute delay on the Ubuntu loading/splash screen (prior to login) (without any progress/activity indicated on the dots).  I powered off and tried to boot again, but am getting this delay consistently now. Also close down is much slower too.  Update #1 (2018-07-03): Analysis on systemd:  $ sudo systemd-analyze blame 3min 53.073s plymouth-quit-wait.service     2min 20.699s snapd.seeded.service          49.949s snapd.service           6.186s NetworkManager-wait-online.service           1.148s dev-sda2.device           1.098s plymouth-start.service   Showing that plymouth-quit-wait.service (which I now believe is related to the Ubuntu loading/splash screen) and snapd.seeded.service were by far the longest running services to initiate. So I compared the times before the dist-upgrade and after:  $ journalctl -u plymouth-quit-wait.service --since today -- Logs begin at Fri 2018-04-27 13:01:30 BST, end at Tue 2018-07-03 12:38:05 BST. -- Jul 03 04:15:43 user-laptop systemd[1]: Starting Hold until boot process finishes up... Jul 03 04:15:46 user-laptop systemd[1]: Started Hold until boot process finishes up. -- Reboot -- Jul 03 04:21:17 user-laptop systemd[1]: Starting Hold until boot process finishes up... Jul 03 04:24:52 user-laptop systemd[1]: Started Hold until boot process finishes up.   Before the upgrade plymouth-quit-wait.service took 3 seconds. After the upgrade it took 3 minutes 35 seconds  $ journalctl -u snapd.seeded.service --since today -- Logs begin at Fri 2018-04-27 13:01:30 BST, end at Tue 2018-07-03 12:42:14 BST. -- Jul 03 04:15:43 user-laptop systemd[1]: Starting Wait until snapd is fully seeded... Jul 03 04:15:43 user-laptop systemd[1]: Started Wait until snapd is fully seeded. -- Reboot -- Jul 03 04:22:47 user-laptop systemd[1]: Starting Wait until snapd is fully seeded... Jul 03 04:24:49 user-laptop systemd[1]: Started Wait until snapd is fully seeded.   Before the upgrade snapd.seeded.service took 0 seconds. After the upgrade it took 2 minutes 2 seconds.  Update #2 (2018-07-06): This morning's boot saw the return of the delay. So I guess we're still waiting for the kernel/plymouth/snapd update.  Update #3 (2018-07-12): The problem seems to be resolved, but I didn't see any update to snap or plymouth, and I'm still running 4.15.0-24 kernel. So I'm not sure which package update fixed the problem, or if it just resolved itself somehow. Reading the bug updates on launchpad it's unclear to me what was done (or is being done) to what package/s. If anyone can clarify that would be very useful. Show the series $a_n/(1+a_n)$ converges absolutely My internal storage capacity is running low,  what can I do? Currently, my internal storage is running low on space.    What can I do besides moving applications to the external memory, as to free up more space, but preserve my current applications and avoid uninstalling?  (Some of them won't be moved)