I would like to send personalized fields from a Data Extension  through a Cloud Page using an Inbox PUSH. When a client open the message in the Inbox section from the APP , I would like to show for example the name from each client. The idea is to show personalized data from the client and be able to keep for a period this info in their inbox . This is the simple code I am using , but the name is not showing up . Is something missing? Is it possible right now in Marketing Cloud ? Any help is appreciated. %%[ var @sk, @Name set @sk = RequestParameter(&quot;data_extension&quot;) set @Name = Lookup(&quot;data_extension&quot;,&quot;Nombre&quot;,&quot;Id_Cliente&quot;, @sk) ]%% Your name is : %%=v(@Name)=%%
I'm trying to use push with AppInbox/Cloud Pages. I want the Cloud Page that is linked to the push message to be able to display dynamic content based on an attribute for that contact. This page -  - says that it is possible to personalise Cloud Page content but doesn't say how. I've already had a Salesforce support case opened and closed with no luck - apparently it's not their job to assist me with how to do something even if they say something is possible but back it up with no documentation for how it might be done. I've tried the normal way you'd do it from an email, using both the _subscriberkey personalisation string as well as the RequestParameter function with fields from the entry source DE, but neither of these work. Given you're selecting a static Cloud Page when you set up the send and there's no visible way to add attributes, how do you actually get a Cloud Page to pick up these values?
Can I answer my own questions, even if I knew the answer before asking? Does Earth's Rotation Affect Its Shape? Suppose there are two users that have commented on an answer. Both have the same user name, and I want to reply to one of them. How can I do this?  It appears that, under the current system, there is no way for me to do this. Specifically, from , I see that:     4. Matching is performed in reverse chronological order, so if five people named John are participating, @john will match the most recent John   So, consider this a request to add this feature using an -n suffix or something similar; e.g. @john-2 could be used to reply to the second John from the top.  Update Thanks to  for nice answer of @name(userid) based auto-complete suggestion which has no loophole. It involves no counting from top &amp; has no consequences when a comment is deleted. But, I think @name(userid) should be used directly in comment as all form inputs at SE are text (nothing embedded).  Now, I'm trying to finalize it based on it: The system should allow optional @name(userid) format for reply. Provided userid with this format, system should ignore name. And, in the situation of duplicate name based confusion, system should demand this format as mandatory to submit comment.  How to get userid? In case of duplicate name based confusion, system should append (userid) in hypertext to their profile. It'd work for mobile version too. On full version, for easy fill-up, a hover reply icon would be fine (like hover vote up icon). Upon clicking it, system should fill @name(userid) in comment text box.  From reply reader side: Multiple Johns could be confused even if they didn't come from notification (because nobody remembers his/her own userid). So, highlight the background of comments which are replied to them. In Peter Jackson's film The Fellowship of the Ring, when the Council of Elrond takes place it shows a total of 22 members:    We all know the names of the ones who were part of the Fellowship, but I want to know who are the rest of the people in the council. Who are the elves that came with Legolas? The men next to the dwarves? The three old men sitting next to Boromir? Or the two elves next to Aragorn?  Starting from left to right:   Frodo Gandalf Elf Elf Legolas Elf Old Man Old Man Dwalin Gloin Gimli Nori Old Man Boromir Old Man Old Man Elf Elf Aragorn Elladan Elrond Elrohir Multivariable limit proof: $\lim\limits_{(x,y)\rightarrow (0,0)}\frac{\left|x\right|^a\left|y\right|^b}{\left|x\right|^c + \left|y\right|^d} = 0$ Which is correct, "neither is" or "neither are"? Bob: "Can I set the font color? Can I customize the text?"  Frank: "Neither of these options is available. Sorry!"    Is "neither is" always correct or should one use "neither are" in some cases and what are the exact rules?  of this-is-why-stackexchange-exists :P How can I enable shell-escape? I need to enable shell escape for a package that I want to use. What is shell escape exactly, and how do I enable it in my editor or compiling toolchain? Links to answers for different editors/toolchains, in alphabetical order:   AUCTeX (Emacs) ,         Note: this is a FAQ post. Related Meta question: . Please add an answer for your own editor/toolchain if it is missing. Thank you! When adding an answer, please indicate if the setting is permanent or per-document, and/or describe how you can add a button, shortcut, menu item, etc. to make it easy to switch between shell-escape and regular compilation. How to change password using usermod? I am superadmin of a server and like to change password of an existing user . How can I do that ?  I tried   usermod -p 'new-password' john   but it didn't worked ? When Dirac found his equation for the electron $(-i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu+m)\psi=0$ he famously discovered that it had negative energy solutions. In order to solve the problem of the stability of the ground state of the electron he invoked Pauli's exclusion principle and postulated that negative energy states well already filled by a "sea" of electrons. This allowed him to predict the positron, viewed as a hole in the sea.  This interpretation was ultimately discarded owing to its inapplicability to bosons and difficulties with explaining the invisibility of the infinite charge of the sea.  According to my understanding, the modern argument goes something like this. There is a discrete symmetry of the lagrangian called charge conjugation $\psi \rightarrow \psi^c$ which allows the negative energy solutions to be interpreted as positive energy solutions for a second mode of excitation of the electron field with opposite charge, called positrons. The decay of electrons to positrons is then suppressed by the $U(1)$ gauge symmetry of the lagrangian forcing conservation of electrical charge.  According to this interpretation What Dirac would have missed was the lagrangian formalism. Is this historically and physically correct? Is it acceptable to insult god in a user profile? Like always I hang around in Stack Overflow's chatrooms. Today, someone posted a link to his new "reloaded" user profile.  Along the lines I read in Arabic "god is a pig". So I asked him to remove it:     Me: I have a lot of respect towards you because of your knowledge but what you wrote there in Arabic is offensive. Could you remove it please?   OP: if it were in English, would it be equally offensive?   I will write it in Dutch because you ask it so kindly.   Me: yeah, I mean what's your goal? You're just seeding hatred   OP: It is an experiment.   After that, the user changed it to Dutch.  My question is: are such statements acceptable by Stack Exchange's standards? If not, should I flag one of his posts like stated ? If yes, could you state why?  My answers to possible questions:   This happened on SO, why don't you post it on MSO?   This happened on SO but I think it's applicable to all SE sites.  Why didn't you link the user or the chat conversation?   I want the user to remain anonymous unless he or she chooses to reveal him/her self. I will give the user a link to this question  Why do you care?   I find it offensive, not only to my religion but to any religion that believes in god. I posted this question to know what you guys and girls think about this. I live by the rules, so if it's acceptable by SE then so be it and I won't bother you again.  If you don't like it then move on.   I know that this is not a mosque/church/temple and that swearing  to a certain degree. But I don't see the point in insulting god, a religion or a race in a public profile. More over, it's not even built on arguments. Draw Lewis structures like a book I want to draw a Lewis structure as in the picture. I tried to do with chemfig but does not perform the separation of the points and a minus in the superscript. Remove application from Google Launcher I am flying to Tbilisi, Georgia with Turkish Airline. My stay in Istanbul is 12 hours. Can I get transit visa to visit Istanbul city ?    I am from Pakistan with Oman employment visa. Constructing $g$ holomorphic differentials on $\omega^3=(z-1) \cdots (z-8)$ Let us have a surface $X$ which satisfy the equation $\omega^3 = (z-1)(z-2)\cdots (z-8)$ It's stated in the task, that there are exactly $g$ holomorphic differentials on the curve. How can I find $g$ and construct them?  The genus $g$ of this curve (I tried to use Riemann-Hurwitz theorem)  The map $X(z,\omega) \to CP^1(\omega)$ has degree 3. and we have 8 branching points with 3 leaves at each. $\chi(Domain) = DegreeOfMap * \chi(Target) - \sum_{points}(BranchingLeaves - 1) $ $2-2g = 3 *(2) - 8*2 $ hence $ 12 = 2g$ and  $g = 6$ I know that in case of hyperelliptic curve there are $g-2$ (If i'm not mistaken) holomorphic differetials and they are of sort $\frac{z^k dz}{w}$. But the form of the curve equation was heavily used. UPD: there is a branhing point at $\infty$, because if we go around all points $ 1 \cdots 8$ at once, we get that cubic root of the right side is multiplied by $\exp{4 \pi /3}$ $2-2g = 3 *(2) - 9*2 $ hence $ 12 = 2g$ and  $g = 7$ (I hope that this is true) Command to switch to tty1? I want to make a list of commands to install everything so it's easier the next time I do it, however, I wanted one of the commands to do CTRL+ALT+F1 for me. Given an array of n Objects, let's say it is an array of strings, and it has the following values:  foo[0] = "a"; foo[1] = "cc"; foo[2] = "a"; foo[3] = "dd";   What do I have to do to delete/remove all the strings/objects equal to "a" in the array? This question is in the spirit of , an example of an apparently non-deterministic system in Newtonian mechanics. Under certain restrictions, the  guarantees the existence and uniqueness of solutions to differential equations with initial conditions. However, Norton's dome does not satisfy these restrictions. The ball may sit on top of the dome for an arbitrary period of time before sliding down in a particular trajectory, without violating Newton's laws of motion.    Is there a plausible example of a system of interacting point-particles such that the equations of a point-particle are continuous but not , and therefore fail to have a unique solution? Why do we even need the "delete[]" operator? This is a question that's been nagging me for some time. I always thought that C++ should have been designed so that the delete operator (without brackets) works even with the new[] operator.  In my opinion, writing this:  int* p = new int;   should be equivalent to allocating an array of 1 element:  int* p = new int[1];   If this was true, the delete operator could always be deleting arrays, and we wouldn't need the delete[] operator.  Is there any reason why the delete[] operator was introduced in C++?  The only reason I can think of is that allocating arrays has a small memory footprint (you have to store the array size somewhere), so that distinguishing delete vs delete[] was a small memory optimization. TestMethod do not support Web service callouts, test skipped Show the number of up-votes and down-votes on the mobile site theme It seems we can't view the number of up-votes and down-votes a question has from the mobile site. Can this be added or is there a reason it isn't available?