Can't use smart update (Delta update)
Why app updates download entire app instead of only "updates"?
Why is "letter" not plural in "two letter words"? Why is "letter" not plural in "two letter words"?  For me it's very strange as the equivalent in French would be plural but my English friend finds it totally normal. How do I fill an area with faces lined up in a grid over a not flat surface? Hello to everyone again,  I'm looking for an addon or a short cut to fill fast and simmetrically a NOT FLAT surface that needs to be closed with vertices. Doing it manually it takes a lot of time. I tried to do CTRL F and then Grid fill,but it didn't work. Neither F key works. Check the attached screenshot. thanks. Is there a name for this layout? I have a card with a due date of today. The task is complete, and we've moved it to our "Done" list.  How can I update the card so that the due date icon is not red implying that it is late while retaining the date for historical reference? Query Activity for ORDER BY xxx DESC LIMIT I'm trying to create a query activity in order to show, from a Data Extension, only the last 5 articles ids. I tried with the formula ORDER BY xxx DESC LIMIT 0,5 as in SQL but it is not working and it is returning this exception:     The ORDER BY clause is invalid in views, inline functions, derived tables, subqueries, and common table expressions, unless TOP or FOR XML is also specified   How can I use ORDER BY in a Data Extension? Effects:  +25 attack damage +15% life steal +40% attack speed Passive  Unique: Your attacks deal 5% of the target's current health in physical damage (60 max vs minions and monsters). Active   Unique: Drains target champion, dealing 15% of the champion's maximum Health in physical damage and healing you by the same amount. Additionally you steal 30% of their movement speed for 4 seconds - 60 second cooldown. (500 range)  Cost: 3200g VS.   Effects:  +70 attack damage +12% life steal Passive: Gain +1 attack damage and +0.2% life steal per kill (maximum +30 attack damage and +6% life steal). Half of the bonuses are lost upon death.  Cost: 3200g What is better for what situations, and when should you build BT instead of BotRK and Vice Versa. Which provides more lifesteal, the only variable being the stats of the weapon? I find myself constantly questioning my decision on which weapon to get and would really love some in depth answers. Would be great if any examples given were given from the ADC side of the house. How to label using just numbers from start of text field? I'm practicing proofs and given the following statement:  Let $\Sigma$ be an alphabet, $\epsilon$ the empty word and $\sigma:\Sigma^{*}\rightarrow\Sigma^{*}$ an operation which for $a\in\Sigma$ and $w\in\Sigma^{*}$ is defined as $$\sigma(\epsilon)=\epsilon,\\\sigma(wa)=a\sigma(w).$$  I would like to prove through induction that $\sigma$ is equal to the word reversal operation $rev$ meaning that $\sigma(w)=rev(w)=w_{n}...w_{1}$ for every $w=w_{1}...w_{n}\in\Sigma^{*}$.  My suggestion is as follows:  For $w=\epsilon$ we have $$\sigma(w)=\sigma(\epsilon)=\epsilon=rev(\epsilon)=rev(w).$$  Let $w=xa$ with $x\in\Sigma^{*}$ and $a\in\Sigma$, then $$\sigma(x)=x_{n}...x_{1}=rev(x).$$  Thus we also have $$\sigma(w)=\sigma(xa)=\sigma(x_{1}...x_{n}a)=a\sigma(x_{1}...x_{n})=ax_{n}\sigma(x_{1}...x_{n-1})=...=ax_n...x_{1}=rev(x_{1}...x_{n}a)=rev(xa)=rev(w).$$  Does that constitute a correct and sufficient proof? If not, I would very much appreciate your feedback. Spacing issue for newenvironment wrapper of equation environment If I create a custom environment based on the equation environment, I get a spacing issue: the next line of text after my environment closes doesn't start on the left margin.  Example code:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \newenvironment{myenv}{\begin{equation}}{\end{equation}} \noindent $| \leftarrow$ this is the left margin. \begin{myenv} e ^{i \pi} + 1 = 0 \end{myenv} $| \leftarrow$ this isn't the left margin. \end{document}   Output:    Removing the newline after \end{myenv} solves the spacing problem, but the resulting code is not readable.  Of course, in this example I could just use the equation environment itself. My real issue involves a more complex custom environment that suffers from the same problem, and which also includes an equation environment within it. How to use custom icons with mapKit framework? Mac equivalent of Ctrl + Space to select an item on a list I want to select non-consecutive items on a list, without using a mouse/trackpad - there should be no clicks involved.  In Windows and Linux (at least Ubuntu) an item can be selected using Space/ button, which, in combination with arrows and Ctrl key allows me to select multiple items in any environment (file manager, IDE etc.) - e.g.  Enter a directory -> hold Ctrl -> down arrow twice -> press Space -> down arrow twice -> press Space.  Now I should have items 1, 3 and 5 selected. Is there a way to do the same thing in OS X?  PS. Sorry for such a verbose description, but so far every answer I encountered advices using Command + Click, and this is something I don't want to do. Word for an event that will likely never happen again I've read , but none of them are what I am looking for. I once read a book that used a word to describe an event that has happened in the past, but the odds were so astronomical that it will likely never happen a second time. The context I read these words in were the creation of the first life on earth (without any theological ideas). Basically, the text said that the scenario for the creation of the first living organism happened on a planet where conditions were just right by complete chance, and that the odds of this were so astronomical that it would likely never happen again anywhere in the universe over any length of time.  Sample sentence: "The creation of the first organisms was incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a _________ event, or an event that will likely never happen again."   I can't pretend to understand the validity of the claims by the text, but the words they used to describe these events were quite clever (and scientific sounding) that it would make a fun hyperbole.  I thought it was something along the lines of singularity event, but that doesn't sound quite right. Locking an iPhone if button is broken? My friend's iPhone's sleep/wake button no longer works. Is there any way to turn off the screen besides setting up auto-lock and waiting a few minutes? What really goes on in a vacuum? I've been told that a vacuum isn't actually empty space, rather that it consists of antiparticle pairs spontaneously materialising then quickly annihilating, which leads me to a few questions.  Firstly, is this true? And secondly, if so, where do these particles come from?... (do the particles even have to come from anywhere?) How do we know an $ \aleph_1 $ exists at all? I have two questions, actually. The first is as the title says: how do we know there exists an infinite cardinal such that there exists no other cardinals between it and $ \aleph_0 $? (We would have to assume or derive the existence of such an object before we label it something like $ \aleph_1 $.)  My second question is, can we say for certain if there's any limit to the number of cardinals existing between $ \aleph_0 $ and continuum (i.e. $ 2^{\aleph_0} $)? I mean, how could we know that there&#39;s not an infinite number of cardinals between the two - perhaps even more than $ \aleph_0 $? Is there a way to take a mesh, cut it with seams or sharp edges and flatten it, so that the faces stay the same shape and size?  Making paper models is one aspect, where you could use that technique.  No, I'm afraid SZ0Return is not going to do it properly.  And misusing the UV-unwrap is only a last option.    Note, while it's an option to revert to Blender 2.49 which had a script to do this, I'd like a solution that I can use inside the current workspace. Negative probabilities in quantum physics From :      ‘We all believe, up at the Lodge, Rachael, that he will be freed from suspicion, sooner or later.’    ‘The better I know it to be so believed there, my dear,’ said Rachael, ‘and the kinder I feel it that you come away from there, purposely to comfort me, and keep me company, and be seen wi’ me when I am not yet free from all suspicion myself, the more grieved I am that I should ever have spoken those mistrusting words to the young lady. And yet I— ’   We usually use should have to say that something was not done, despite being desirable. But in this example, the mistrusting words were indeed spoken (earlier in the book). How would one explain the use of the should have construction then?   Would the following be fully equivalent to the above quote:     ‘We all believe, up at the Lodge, Rachael, that he will be freed from suspicion, sooner or later.’    ‘The better I know it to be so believed there, my dear,’ said Rachael, ‘and the kinder I feel it that you come away from there, purposely to comfort me, and keep me company, and be seen wi’ me when I am not yet free from all suspicion myself, the more grieved I am that I have spoken those mistrusting words to the young lady. And yet I— ’ I'm a Georgian national holding a multiple entry Schengen visa.  Last summer I was traveling to Hungary, spent a few days there, then flew to the UK. The Hungarian border official did NOT stamp my passport on exiting the Schengen area. I had to enter it again a few days later and the German border guards were confused by what had happened. Finally they let me enter.  Now I have one more entry stamp into Schengen than exit stamp and run into problems EVERY time at a Schengen border.  Is there a way to fix this? Using Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation to find distance, with the question not giving sufficient information to substitute into the equation. Problem:  $F = \frac{(G m_1 m_2)}{r^2}$  An object of unknown mass is placed directly between the Earth and the Moon such that the forces of gravity acting on the object are equal from both the Earth and the Moon. The distance from the Moon to the object is exactly one-tenth of the distance from the Moon to Earth. Using the above formula, determine the distance from the Moon to the Earth.  Given is:  The factor $G≈6.67∙10−11\mathbf{N(\frac{m^2}{kg^2})}$ is a universal constant.  Mass of Earth $≈5.972∙10^{24}\mathbf{kg}$   Mass of the Moon as $≈7.348∙10^{22}\mathbf{kg}$  Mass of unknown object = $m$  My solution:  $F = \frac{(6.67 *10^-11) m (7.348*10^{24})}{R^2}$  $F = \frac{(6.67 *10^-11) (5.92* 10^22) m}{10R^2}$  As gravitational force acting on the object is equal   $\frac{(5.92\cdot 10^22)}{100r^2} = \frac{(7.348*10^{24})}{r^2}$  $R = 1.24 \cdot 10^4 KM$  Is this a viable solution to the problem? Please provide feedback. Thank you!