I want to translate Ubuntu in fon (my language). The Fon is most spoken language of Benin.  Could someone let me know how I can do it ?  Thanks.
My friend and i would like to translate Ubuntu. where should we start? where to find translation tools?
Problem: Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent and suppose that each has a $\text{Uniform}(0,1)$ distribution. Let $Z = \min\{X, Y\}$. Find the density $f_Z(z)$ for $Z$. Hint: It might be easier to first find $\mathbb{P}(Z &gt; z)$.  Attempted Solution:  Given that $X, Y \sim \text{Uniform}(0,1)$, how do we not just have the following?  $$ f_Z(t) = f_X(t) = f_Y(t) = \begin{cases} 1 &amp; \text{if } 0 \le t \le 1 \\                                           0 &amp; \text{otherwise}                             \end{cases} $$  Of course I'm highly suspicious of this answer because it's not making use of the fact that $X$ and $Y$ are independent, nor is it making use of the provided hint. I'm getting a PC with Windows and I want to dual boot using Ubuntu as my primary OS.  I want to create a Home partition to store all my files and hopefully be able to access them on Windows 7 without having to manually mount the partition or anything.  I want to know what kind of partition should I create and if I can share my Home partition to simplify matters.  Thanks Do I say "I study computer science," or "I study Computer Science"? Similarly, "I really liked that computer science course," vs. "I really liked that Computer Science course." I'm trouble with exercise 1.8 of Carroll's Space-Time and Geometry:     If $\partial_\nu T^{\mu \nu} = Q^\mu$, what physically does the spatial vector $Q^i$ represent? Use the dust energy momentum tensor to make your case.    First of all, since the momentum energy tensor of dust $T^{\mu \nu}=\rho U^\mu U^\nu$ is symmetric, one has the energy-momentum conservation law $$ \partial_\nu T^{\mu \nu} = \partial_\nu T^{\nu \mu}  =0.$$ A vector $Q$ is constant in any frame related by a Lorentz transformation, while this isn't the case for the components $Q^\mu$. But here $Q=0$ and hence $Q^\mu=0$ also for every component $\mu =0,\cdots,4$?   Even if a straightforwardly apply the equation: $$ Q^i = \partial_\nu T^{i \nu} = (\partial_\nu \rho) U^i U^\nu + \rho(\partial_\nu U^i)  U^\nu + \rho U^i(\partial_\nu  U^\nu ),$$ doesn't seems to yield something...   Is my first reasoning right ? Otherwise: can someone give me a hint ?  Thanks Trichromelibrary was suddenly downloading from Google Play Store From nowhere, my friend got a notification that com.google.android.trichromelibrary was downloading together with a progress bar.  Why? What is the gradient of $f(x, y, z) = \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$?  I know that $\nabla f = \left\langle\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\right\rangle$ or equivalently $\nabla f = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\mathbf{i} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\mathbf{j} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\mathbf{k}$.  Eventually, I am going to evaluate this gradient at a point and then dot it with some given unit vector to find a directional derivative. I think maybe what is troubling me is the radical in $f$. Will I have to use the chain rule in order to find the three partial derivatives?  I tried this:  $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{2}(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{-\frac{1}{2}}2x$$ $$= \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}}$$  That result looks ugly to me. However, if I did that partial derivative correctly, then I think I know what I am doing. Why is it true that every finite-dimensional inner product space is a Hilbert space? A Hilbert space is, by definition, a complete inner product space. If $(V,|.|)$ is finite dimensional inner product space of dimension $n$ then it is (topologically) isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^n$ which is of course complete. My instinct here is to say "and therefore, $V$ is also a Hilbert space". I'm not sure about this step however since completeness depends on the norm and the norm depends on the selected inner product (assuming the induced norm $||x|| = (x | x)^{1/2}$ is used). So, must we place some condition on the inner product or is the topological isomorphism between $\mathbb{R}^n$ enough to guarantee that V is Hilbert? A Particular Two-Variable System in a Group Suppose $a$ and $b$ are elements of a group $G$. If $a^{-1}b^{2}a=b^{3}$ and $b^{-1}a^{2}b=a^{3}$, prove $a=e=b$.   I've been trying to prove but still inconclusive. Please prove to me.  Thanks very much for proof. An example of a non-abelian group $G$ where, for all $a,b\in G$, the equality $(ab)^{n}=a^{n}b^{n}$ holds for two consecutive integers $n$ I am looking for an example of a group $G$ where the equality $(ab)^{n}=a^{n}b^{n}$ holds for two consecutive integers $n$, but $G$ is not an abelian group. I've started do some calculations in the group $D_{4}$ (I gave up!) Do you know where I can find that example? Is it possible find such example without doing a lot of calculations?  Thanks for your help! I have recently installed lubuntu 11.10 on my old laptop (acer aspire 5315 celeron) and observed that fan is not working properly on lubuntu side.I find it strange that it is working perfectly under window vista.   How could I solve this problem? How can I restart a Windows 7 computer without screen or mouse? Can't see a glass object through another glass object in Eevee I was just testing Eevee and found that you cannot view a glass object through another glass. Is there any workaround? It works fine only If I rotate the glass window or put my camera to the back side of the scene Why is $\mathbb{R}^2$ not a subspace of $\mathbb{R}^3$? Compute $P(Y<3X)$ using joint PDF I'm given a joint pdf  $f_{X,Y}(x,y)=2e^{-x-y}, 0&lt;x&lt;y, 0&lt;y $  and asked to compute $P(Y&lt;3X)$. To do this, I let $Y=3X$ (the boundary) and found that the region of integration is under this line.  To find $P(Y&lt;3X)$, it seems to me that the integral for this region be written as   $P(Y&lt;3X)=\int_0^\infty \int_0^{3x} 2e^{-x-y} dy dx  $  However this isn't right, as the boundaries are actually   $P(Y&lt;3X)=\int_0^\infty \int_x^{3x} 2e^{-x-y} dy dx  $  Why is this? I'm having a hard time seeing how to construct these boundaries (especially the fact that the $y$ boundary goes from $x$ to $3x$ instead of $0$ to $3x$)  Thank you. How to select a Master's thesis topic if your advisor won't suggest one? If a master's degree candidate needs to select a thesis topic, but their advisor is unwilling to offer suggestions on the matter, how should one go about selecting a thesis?   How might one select an area to study? How can one evaluate if if is a suitable topic? Does the thesis need to focus on an area which is relatively unexplored by prior research? If refraction slows down light, isn't it possible to hold light still? I have a quick question about the refraction of light, and I'm sorry if it seems a bit simplistic or even stupid, but I'm still learning.  We know that when light passes through a denser medium, it slows down. However, is there a limit to that slowing down? If no, wouldn't it be possible, with some type of medium we make ourselves (like a crystal), to decrease the light's speed down to a point where we would be able to "see the photons moving forwards"?  I know it is way more complicated than that and that you can't see light unless some other light bounces off it, what I mean is slowing down light to an extreme and unusual speed). That sounds completely absurd but I can't seem to find what is wrong. Can anyone can explain it to me? :) Is it possible to boot Ubuntu using the Windows bootloader? As noted by many people, Windows 8's UEFI requirements might will won't get in the way of installing Linux (or whatever), as the replacement bootloader will also need to be signed somehow. Some systems All systems will let you disable the signature requirement, but the feature might be hidden to disable or you might not be willing to give up on the benefits of a secure bootloader.  Is it necessary to replace the bootloader in the first place? To keep ourselves to software that's gone golden, how can I install Ubuntu 11.04 using Windows 7's own bootloader? Show in linked/related questions sidebar whether a question has answers or not Currently, in the linked/related sidebar, without opening the question the user can only distinguish whether the question has an accepted answer (green icon) or not (grey icon).  I often eagerly open an interesting-sounding question with a grey icon, only to find myself disappointed because it has no answer yet.  To avoid this, I suggest adding a third type of icon for questions that have at least one answer, but no accepted one. Probably a darker/lighter icon or some kind of frame or glow. I've made a quick example with Paint (if relevant, the screenshot I used is from ). I'm in no way satisfied with the look of it, but at least it demonstrates the general idea.    What do you think about this proposal? Would it be a useful addition to the StackExchange interface? "This is a favorite question" tooltip when not favorite When viewing a question, when I hover over the star icon (under the voting module) the tooltip says I've made it a favorite when I haven't yet. Sometimes when I write, for example, "the boundaries of segments", I am suggested to use "segments' boundaries" or even "segment boundaries".   Or "the page's content" vs. "the content of the page" vs. "the page content". Then I would like to know is it always preferred to use phrases with apostrophe or adjective?  For example      In our terms, they are mainly textual elements within the page content, which serve as the starting point  of a data region (or a data region's starting point ?)  or a distinctive feature within it