root@mcdartey-hp-g56-notebook-pc:/home/mcdartgey# dpkg -i google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb Selecting previously unselected package google-chrome-stable. (Reading database ... 221126 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb ... Unpacking google-chrome-stable (51.0.2704.63-1) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of google-chrome-stable:  google-chrome-stable depends on libappindicator1; however:   Package libappindicator1 is not installed.  dpkg: error processing package google-chrome-stable (--install):  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ... Processing triggers for gnome-menus (3.13.3-6ubuntu3) ... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.22-1ubuntu5) ... Processing triggers for bamfdaemon (0.5.3~bzr0+16.04.20160415-0ubuntu1) ... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf-2.index... Processing triggers for mime-support (3.59ubuntu1) ... Errors were encountered while processing:  google-chrome-stable
How do you install Google Chrome on Ubuntu?
When Dirac found his equation for the electron $(-i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu+m)\psi=0$ he famously discovered that it had negative energy solutions. In order to solve the problem of the stability of the ground state of the electron he invoked Pauli's exclusion principle and postulated that negative energy states well already filled by a "sea" of electrons. This allowed him to predict the positron, viewed as a hole in the sea.  This interpretation was ultimately discarded owing to its inapplicability to bosons and difficulties with explaining the invisibility of the infinite charge of the sea.  According to my understanding, the modern argument goes something like this. There is a discrete symmetry of the lagrangian called charge conjugation $\psi \rightarrow \psi^c$ which allows the negative energy solutions to be interpreted as positive energy solutions for a second mode of excitation of the electron field with opposite charge, called positrons. The decay of electrons to positrons is then suppressed by the $U(1)$ gauge symmetry of the lagrangian forcing conservation of electrical charge.  According to this interpretation What Dirac would have missed was the lagrangian formalism. Is this historically and physically correct? How to exclude/delete files only? Is there a way to exclude all files, in all subfolders, and keep the folder structure? Clicking on  doesn't connect me with the meta S.Ex.SE site.  EDIT: For some entry points, . Observation courtesy Gilles.  I consider it a pity that the devs have not paid attention to this issue nor have indicated that they noted the problem. While HTTPS is not yet official on this network, I refrain from using unencrypted connections. I can't participate in metas, oh well.  EDIT #2 (2015-11-07) - with the switch to CloudFlare SSL the problem looks finally resolved.  EDIT #3 (2015-11-17) - still getting 403 Forbidden from CloudFlare. D'rats!..  EDIT #4 (2016-01-11) - We're still there. It's 2016 already... Starting a bounty. I want a single word embedded in whole logo. How do i do it in adobe illustrator?  I want to design a logo like this. Kindly help me At the start of the movie it says:      "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...."   Does this mean that the entire Star Wars saga takes place in a single galaxy? To my understanding a galaxy isn't very big compared to the universe itself. Star Wars has many different sentient races, and the way they are presented suggests that most planets are host to only one of them (some exceptions like naboo). This strongly leads me to believe there should actually be more galaxies in the Star Wars universe (hehe).   Another thing, I think it's safe to assume that even if the entire saga takes place in one single galaxy, their researchers can observe other galaxies (I think we started doing that in the 1600s, and they are a lot more technologically advanced than we were back then). When Obi-wan is looking for Kamino (the rain planet with the cloners) the librarian says something like "If it's not in our records, it doesn't exist", so she must be convinced that the entire universe has been explored.    If the entire universe has been documented, why wouldn't they go to those other galaxies? The technology seems to be advanced enough to hop to another galaxy. Is there any canon material that suggest that traveling between galaxies is done? If not, is there a canon explanation why they don't? What to do with bounty on question which is no longer relevant? Was Hogwarts named such because of a connection to warthogs? Was Hogwarts named 'Hogwarts' because of a connection to warthogs?  Or was it named for hogs and warts separately, or something else entirely? Is this correct: "Our listeners are what make X"? Can I run the python interpreter without generating the compiled .pyc files? I found several plugins (like  and ) to get the ability to attach a picture to a WP user. But these plugins are not maintained any more.  Since there's apparently no plugin that does it today, is there an easy way to do it manually? How to install Hp laser jet 1020 plus printer? Cartoon with a young unicorn and a demon A very easy probability problem but opinions diverge greatly. Need some help. The question itself is a very easy one:     Somebody has got two kids, one of whom is a girl. Then what's the probability that he's got at least one boy?   My answer is that, since he's already got a girl, then "he's got at least one boy" amounts to "the other kid is a boy", whose probability is apparently $\frac{1}{2}$. But my friends argue that the probability should be $\frac23$: they say this is a binomial distribution, all the possible cases are (girl,girl),(girl,boy),(boy,girl) which yields that the probability is two cases out of three and is thus $\frac23$. But I think this is totally unacceptable. I don't think it is a binomial distribution at all, at least not what my friends explained to me. However, I just can't disuade them of their opinion, nor can I prove that I am wrong. So what on earth is the probability? and why? Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance. Esp. Can anybody show why my explanation is wrong? Isn't it that whether the other kid is a boy or a girl a 50/50 event?  EDIT: Thanks for all the help you provided for me, and special thanks will go to @HammyTheGreek and @KSmarts, who have made it clear to me that there is in fact some ambiguity in my statement in this problem. As is pointed in  ,two distinct interpretation of the statement "one of whom is a girl" that gives rise to ambiguity:     From all families with two children, at least one of whom is a boy, a family is chosen at random. This would yield the answer of 1/3.   From all families with two children, one child is selected at random, and the sex of that child is specified to be a boy. This would yield an answer of 1/2. Git - how to force merge conflict and manual merge on selected file Ubuntu 14.04 System Logging How do I prevent widow/orphan lines? How do I prevent a line from appearing by itself:  Orphan: at the bottom of the page, or Widow: at the top of the page? I get this error when trying to use apt-get:  E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable) E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/) is another process using it?     How can I fix this? apt-get update fails to fetch files, “Temporary failure resolving …” error I am a newbie to Drupal, and I really don't understand the difference between sub-theme and base theme. Why can't I directly edit the base theme?  I am working on a website which is live and has bartik as default theme. I don't know where to start. How to create this curved 90-degree-angle quickly