To use the app, users have to increase the brightness of the screen and this causes the battery to run out faster and still the best experience is not perceived.  It is an app that users use daily for 6 hours under sunlight taking meter readings located in the customers' house.  They make a tour in the street visiting around 500 houses.
I am designing the layout for a touchscreen for outside use, What are some good color combination to use that will be visible under the sun light for outside use? Maybe bright neon colors?
I tried control+shift+power button as well as command+shift+power button. Neither seem to work. combinatorics circular arrangement problem If $n$ distinct things are arranged in a circle, then what are the number of ways selecting three of these things so that no two of them are next to each other? Adding the PHP json extension How to fix "Package is in a very bad inconsistent state" error? I can't update my system because it freezes while installing a third-party update (zramswap-enabler)! Sometimes I get the following message in Update manager:  Could not initialize the package information An unresolvable problem occurred while initializing the package information. Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the following error message: E:The package zramswap-enabler needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it.  I tried to remove the zramswap-enabler, but it's impossible because I get the following message: dpkg: error processing zramswap-enabler (--remove):  Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should  reinstall it before attempting a removal. Errors were encountered while processing:  zramswap-enabler E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)  Actually I would really reinstall that package, but it is unable to do it! If I remove this third-party PPA then the system is warning me about a very very serious problem. So why can I not install/reinstall/remove/update this package and why freezes the updater if I try to update? Getting polygon boundaries of City in JSON from Google Maps API? I want to have a page-filling and -breaking longtable, so I decided to try xltabular. Unfortunately xltabular seems to screw up the booktabs rules in the normal tabular environments, see:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{booktabs, xltabular} \usepackage[active,tightpage]{preview} \PreviewEnvironment{tabular} \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{ccc}     \toprule     col1 &amp; col2 &amp; col3 \\     \midrule     row 2: &amp; more and moooooooooooore &amp; test \\     \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{document}     Not loading xltabular resolves the issue.  Did I miss some package option or some incompatibilities? Is there a better package than xltabular which doesn't break booktabs?  (I am using TeXLive 2019 and compile with lualatex)    EDIT (by Skillmon)  I reduced the bug to the following MWE (which doesn't make much sense on its own), it looks like booktabs tries to be smart detecting something, but fails badly.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{longtable} \let\xltabular\relax \usepackage{booktabs}  \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{ccc}     \toprule     col1 &amp; col2 &amp; col3 \\     \midrule     row 2: &amp; more and moooooooooooore &amp; test \\     \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{document}   It seems to suffice that longtable is loaded and \xltabular is defined (even if it's just \relax). How do I clone a single branch in Git? Desktop shows a white or black background instead of wallpapers I would like to know where to find the source code of Ubuntu. I'd like to see how far it is "open source". "going to" vs "will" I know several questions were asked about the difference between "going to" and "will". Based on several answers (see, for instance, ,  and ), I understood that "will" is more spontaneous and "going to" is used with more planned actions.  So, it seems that everything is pretty fine. However, in , Kosmonaut has an answer in which he states: "Let's say that tomorrow you will walk your dog from 7 - 8 AM".  On the one hand, you probably planned to walk your dog long before and thus I should use "Let's say that tomorrow you're going to walk your dog from 7 - 8 am".   On the other hand, since I'm saying "let's say...", I'm deciding right now (thus, unplanned) that you will walk your dog. So, even though in this hypothetical situation you made a plan, I'm in a more spontaneous mood deciding right now that that's what you will do tomorrow, and, thus, I should use "will".  Which one (if any) of the above explanations is right? Hyperref - Token not allowed Possible Duplicate:          The following code:  \subsection{The classes $\mathcal{L}(\gamma)$}   generates the errors:  Package hyperref Warning: Token not allowed in a PDF string (PDFDocEncoding): (hyperref)                removing `math shift' on input line 1938.   Package hyperref Warning: Token not allowed in a PDF string (PDFDocEncoding): (hyperref)                removing `\gamma' on input line 1938.   Package hyperref Warning: Token not allowed in a PDF string (PDFDocEncoding): (hyperref)                removing `math shift' on input line 1938.   What do I have to do to keep \gamma in the subsection, so that it is also listed in the table of contents? Strategies to Defeat Memory Editors for Cheating - Desktop Games The user who first created a tag wiki is treated as owner for suggested edits was declined by the user who created the tag wiki excerpt, who doesn't yet have the reputation to be a trusted user. (The site is still in beta, and the reputation necessary to be a trusted user is 4000.)        Should the user who first proposed a tag wiki, or a tag wiki excerpt be the one who can unilaterally decide about a proposed edit for a tag wiki? The user who first proposed it isn't necessarily the one who knows if the tag's purpose can be better described with different words, nor does that user necessarily know if the tag has been lately used differently from how it was first used. Since a tag wiki is different from other posts, there should be an exception to the rule "the author of a post can unilaterally decide about any edits."  The paradox is then that the creator of a tag wiki still needs two users to approve their suggested edit. That's what happened in .        The funny fact is that in the revisions for the tag wiki, or tag excerpt (as in the screenshot), the tag wiki/excerpt is said to be created from the Community user.        This bug is  definitely . showing a collection of sets contain all closed sets Let $X$ be infinite set and $a \in X $. Let $$\mathscr{F} = \{ A \subset X: |A| \; \; finite \; \;, a \notin A \}$$  Then $\mathscr{F}$ is the set all of all closed sets for some topology $\mathcal{T} $ on $X$. Also, any two continuous maps $f,g: (X, \mathscr{T}) \to Y$ ( $Y$ is metric space) have the property that if $f(b) = g(b)$ for all $b \neq a $, then $f(a) = g(a)$.  In my notes my professor posted this theorem without proof, so I was wondering what is best way to proof this theorem. So what I decided to do is to start a small case with only 3 people. There are three possible combinations that I could pair up the people, using the symbols A, B, and C to represent the persons involved: A&amp;B, A&amp;C, B&amp;C. The probability of each pair having the same birthday is $1\over365$ (the first guy gets any birthday, and the second guy only gets one birthday to choose from). What my intuition directed me to do next is to find the probability that any of the three events are true, or the union of the three events, which involved adding up the probabilities.   To put this generally, the equation for the probability SHOULD be:  ${n \choose 2} \div 365$  However, clearly this is not the case since $n \choose 2$ gets over 365 when $n = 28$. And with 28 people, there is obviously still a chance that they all have different birthdays (Person 1 has Jan. 1, Person 2 has Jan. 2. ... Person 28 has Jan. 28). Could anyone tell me what's wrong with my intuition? I don't want to know what's the right solution, I just want to know what's wrong with my solution .. it makes sense to my intuition, even though it's incorrect. Differentiation between passive and active components How does the radius of a pipe affect the rate of flow of fluid? Poiseuille's law states that the rate of flow of water is proportionate to $r^4$ where $r$ is the radius of the pipe. I don't see why.  Intuitively I would expect rate of flow of fluid to vary with $r^2$ as the volume of a cylinder varies with $r^2$ for a constant length. The volume that flows past a point is equal to rate of flow fluid, and thus it should vary with $r^2$.  I cannot understand the mathematical proof completely. Is there an intuitive explanation for this? Animated movie that had black robots that turned people into stone late 1960s to 1970s It was a weird sci-fi animated movie I saw only a little bit of it. This is what I recall:   It was old but had color, so I assume it was late 1960s to early 1970s. The animation and style reminded me of  but it wasn't as psychedelic. The setting was an alien planet with all sorts of bizarre creatures. The tech was advanced but not a dominant aspect of the planet's culture. The people lived simple and peaceful. The protagonist is a man with bluish skin like the others. The antagonists were humanoid shaped black robots that shot a beam that would turn people into stone. Learn Bayesian inference applied to astronomy / astrophysics? I'm looking for resources (books, articles, sites, etc.) to learn about Bayesian inference, but specifically applied to astronomy and astrophysics. Marketing Cloud Landing Page: pass values to a data extension