Can anyone tell me what the dimension of the stress energy tensor is? Also, if it represents energy density, will calling it kinetic or potential energy be appropriate?
There is an image in the Wikipedia about the :    I have a rough understanding of the stress tensor: you imagine cutting out a tiny cube from the fluid and form a matrix out of the forces on each side of it: it's not hard to see that the forces that push the faces outwards so the x direction of the force on the x side, the y direction of the force on the y side, etc. is the pressure, while other forces directions are the shear stress (these can be non-zero is some jelly-like substance).  Now the first question: Why is the lower half of the spatial part is the momentum flux, while only the upper one is the shear stress on the image? Is the image wrong? Isn't the spatial part describe the classical stress tensor?   The second question is: what's the intuition behind the temporal part?  So if I have a Minkowski spacetime and cut out a cube of it, then it's quite hard to see why "pressure" on the temporal face means density, also why "shear stresses" on the temporal face translate to momentum density, not speaking of the "temporal force components" the spatial faces...  Also stresses are measured in Pascals, mass density is measured in $kg/m^3$ while momentum density is in the units of $Ns/m^3$. These units doesn't seem to be compatible, but still they are in the same matrix, why?  EDIT: It has been pointed out that momentum flux refer to the entire blue part, it indeed have a lighter frame I didn't notice. Then yet another subquestion: what's the difference between the momentum density and momentum flux?
Showcase of beautiful typography done in TeX & friends If you were asked to show examples of beautifully typeset documents in TeX &amp; friends, what would you suggest? Preferably documents available online (I'm aware I could go to a bookstore and find many such documents called 'books'). Extra bonus for documents whose LaTeX source is available.  This is not an idle question. Seeing great examples of any craft is both educational and inspiring, let alone explaining why we prefer TeX to Word or other text editors.  For instance, I like how Philipp Lehman's  looks. I don't know enough LaTeX to realize how much customization was done, but the ToC looks polished.  Your nominations, please ... T-Shirt print resolution What counts as a 'large' raid 5 array? Mysql crashed, dumped DB's in recovery mode. What now? Why is vim frozen? Distribution of Product of Random Variables with one being the normal distribution. Why we don't use gamma rays, x-rays or ultraviolet to transmit data? The greater the frequency range of a transmission medium, the greater the number of bits per second it can transmit. In other words, the bigger the bandwidth in hertz available, the bigger the bandwidth in bits per second that can be transmitted.  Given that, why we don't use gamma rays, x-rays or ultraviolet to transmit data instead of e.g. visible(light) in optical fiber or microwaves(cell phones)? The following time-frequency correspondence illustration is in .    Also a gif animation version (if the animation doesn't show, please open the following image in a new window):    This picture has so much explanatory power, and I would like to replicate it in TikZ for future use.  Here is what I came up with:  \documentclass{minimal} \usepackage{tikz}  \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} [x={(1cm,0.5cm)},z={(0cm,0.5cm)},y={(1cm,-0.2cm)}] \draw[-&gt;,thick,blue!90] (0,6.5,0) -- (6.2,6.5,0) node[right] {Frequency}; \draw[-&gt;,thick,red!90] (0,0,0) -- (0,6.5,0) node[below] {Time}; \draw[-&gt;,thick] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,2) node[above] {Magnitude}; \foreach \x in {0.5,1.5,2.5,3.5,4.5,5.5}{   \draw[blue!50] (\x,0,0)   \foreach \y in {0,0.02,...,6.28}{     -- ({\x},{\y},{sin(\x*\y*(157))/sqrt(2*\x)})   };   \draw[blue!90, thick] (\x,6.5,0) -- (\x,6.5,1/\x); }  \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   This is the output so far.    I have two questions:   How to produce that red superposed sine wave of all the blue sine waves? I don't know if there is a sum function or I have to use loop yet again? How to make the camera projection in TikZ more similar to the perspective in that wikipedia illustration?   Any suggestion and tweaking of the parameters I used in the sample drawing are welcome as well.  Thanks in advance!    Update 1:  Here is a new version using tikz, more readable than the first one. Yet the superposition of the sine waves are done manually...I still don't know how to use foreach to produce a sum.  \begin{tikzpicture}[x={(1cm,0.5cm)},z={(0cm,0.5cm)},y={(1cm,-0.2cm)}] \draw[-&gt;,thick,black!70] (0,6.5,0) -- (6.2,6.5,0) node[right] {Frequency}; \draw[-&gt;,thick,black!70] (0,0,0) -- (0,6.5,0) node[below right] {Time}; \draw[-&gt;,thick] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,2) node[above] {Magnitude}; \foreach \y in {0.5,1.5,...,5.5}{ \draw [cyan!50, domain=0:2*pi,samples=200,smooth]   plot (\y,\x, {sin(4*\y*\x r)/\y }); \draw[blue, ultra thick] (\y,6.5,0) -- (\y,6.5,1/\y); } \draw [red, thick, domain=0:2*pi,samples=200,smooth]  plot (0,\x, {sin(4*0.5*\x r)/0.5 + sin(4*1.5*\x r)/1.5 + sin(4*2.5*\x r)/2.5 + sin(4*3.5*\x r)/3.5 + sin(4*4.5*\x r)/4.5 + sin(4*5.5*\x r)/5.5} ); \end{tikzpicture}   The result is as follows: Are both of the following sentences correct?  a: You can call me, if you need me.  OR  b: You can call if you need me.  Note that in a:, the comma is placed before the "if" and is not present in case b.  From this link, I gather that it isn't necessary because it's a short sentence:   But can someone point out an "official" source on this usage? Does a MCMC fulfilling detailed balance yields a stationary distribution? I guess I understand the equation of the detailed balance condition, which states that for transition probability $q$ and stationary distribution $\pi$, a Markov Chain satisfies detailed balance if $$q(x|y)\pi(y)=q(y|x)\pi(x),$$  this makes more sense to me if I restate it as:   $$\frac{q(x|y)}{q(y|x)}= \frac{\pi(x)}{\pi(y)}. $$  Basically, the probability of transition from state $x$ to state $y$ should be proportional to the ratio of their probability densities. Is it somehow possible that I can extend the link to something which I produce by using \ref with a label by the word standing before \ref? If I write something like that: For further information, have a look into chapter \ref{chap:abc} and figure \ref{fig:def}  then the only thing being &quot;clickable&quot; are the chapter number and the figure number. Is it somehow possible to make the words &quot;chapter&quot; and &quot;figure&quot; being linked to those objects as well? I commonly use the word 'guys' to refer to a group of males colloquially. It's colloquial but not rude, off putting, condescending, patronizing (though I wouldn't use it with a group of men at a board meeting (hypothetically of course), unless I knew them). So, some that I would not consider as replacements would be    buddies: too old-fashioned dudes: too informal boys: too patronizing men, gentlemen: too formal or false respect   I realized that I had also been using it for any group of people, males and females, even just females. It worked for me and I didn't think of the gender implications, that women might not care for it. No one ever complained, directly or indirectly (rule of life: sometimes people don't complain about things they should).   But it occurred to me (maybe by reading something that sparked realization) that the intended hearers might not all care for it.  What might be a female gendered or non-gendered version of 'guys'?  Some that I've considered don't feel right about (though these may be reasonable answers) are:   dolls: too old-fashioned babes: too informal  ladies: too formal or I've heard from women, too creepy women: too factual girls: too patronizing (as much as 'boys') everyone, you all: too bland y'all: perfectly non-sexist but too regional (might work, but not everywhere)   Hopefully I haven't eliminated all the possibilities -- any suggestions? Why does an unhinged body rotate about its centre of mass? For a graph $G$, let $W$ be the (random) vertex occupied at the ﬁrst time the random walk has visited every vertex. That is, $W$ is the last new vertex to be visited by the random walk. Prove the following remarkable fact:      For the   random walk on an $n$-cycle, $W$ is uniformly distributed over all vertices different   from the starting vertex. The tag  and meta-tag  syntax generate much nicer looking results than merely surrounding your tag with [square brackets].    However, they only work when you're talking about the site you're on.  On Area51, in Chat, and on Meta sites, this is frequently not the case, leading to attempts at syntax like [[tag:failure]](https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure), which produces:    Hmm, must be some subtle syntax thing:   : [tag:failure](https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure) []: [[tag:failure](https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure)] : [tag:[failure]((https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure))] : &lt;a href="https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure"&gt;[tag:failure]&lt;/a&gt; : [tag:failure][1] \n\n [1]: https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure : [more text is a [tag:failure] too](https://superuser.com/questions/tagged/failure)   I give up!  How can I create a link to a tag on another site with tag markdown? I've used Windows for many years, using Dreamweaver as my editor as it had a file tree which is based on a project (via Local, FTP or SFTP).  I need a web development IDE with the following functionality:   syntax highlighting for PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript  file tree - Local, FTP, SFTP, Project-Based (e.g. via the methods of Local/FTP/SFTP) in other words, like Dreamweaver can open multiple files (tabbed)   Additionally, I wouldn't mind features like debugging, class listings, etc, as long as I can hide them away. Find the limit: $\lim_\limits{x\to 0}{\frac{\left(1+x\right)^{1/x}-e}{x}}$ Once I reach 15 reputation, will my old votes be taken into account? Users below 15 reputation can't effectively vote. It says:     Votes cast by those with less than 15 reputation are recorded, but do not change the publicly displayed post score   Does it mean that they will take effect after I reach 15 reputation or because they were cast before, they're recorded but ignored? Gravatar profile image not showing sometimes It seems that with some profiles the Gravatar image is broken. I am not sure if this is an issue with SE or Gravatar, or both, so posting here.  As an example,  shows an error on , which shows a HTTP 500 on Gravatar.  Profile image on SO:        Image on Gravatar:        Switching to the MSE profile of the user, the image is working (but has a different hash).  Is this a bug on the SE side? Can anything be done to make Gravatar fix this?    Update 2016-10-04:  It happened to me again two times today. The last user profile was . Calling the service two or three times fixes the issue. I'm currently reading a little deeper into the Axiom of Choice, and I'm pleasantly surprised to find it makes the arithmetic of infinite cardinals seem easy. With AC follows the Absorption Law of Cardinal Arithmetic, which states that for $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ cardinal numbers, the larger infinite and the smaller nonzero, then $\kappa+\lambda=\kappa\cdot\lambda=\max(\kappa,\lambda)$.  I was playing around with the equation $k+\aleph_0=\mathfrak{c}$ for some cardinal $k$. From the above, it follows that $\mathfrak{c}=k+\aleph_0=\max(k,\aleph_0)$, which implies $k=\mathfrak{c}$.  I'm curious, can we still show $k=\mathfrak{c}$ without the Axiom of Choice? Is it maybe possible to bound $\mathfrak{c}-\aleph_0$ above and below by $\mathfrak{c}$? But then I'm not quite sure such algebraic manipulations even mean anything, or work like that here. Certainly normal arithmetic does not! Thanks.