Is there such a thing as a silent (or muffled) door latch? The doors inside my house make a very loud click when the latch snaps into the frame when closing the door.
I have a bathroom door that is quite loud when operated. And when someone goes to the bathroom at night, it innevatibly wakes someone up (and baby room is just across from the bathroom!) there are 3 components of noise, and I was wondering if there is an alternative to fixing them:   door bangs against the jamb (this is fixed with simple foam bumpers) latch mechanism makes a loud CLUNK when door is pushed closed (I was able to dampen it just a bit by putting foam inside strike plate, but it is still quite loud) lock button also makes a CLUNK when the knob is turned and it is released (this can be battled by replacing with a mechanism that needs to be manually opened [twist instead of push] but it is less convenient, and I would prefer something that automatically unlocks)   Any suggestions as to a knob that has a dampening of the latch and lock button? I have only found one youtube video of my ideal handle, but there is no information on how it works, where to buy it, or anything else:
Git error: large files "detected", even though no large files exist I am trying to understand Maximum likelihood estimation but it looks like I am missing something rather elementary.          suppose we have an iid random sample $X_1, X_2,..., X_n$ for which the probability density function of each $X_i$ is $f(x_i; \theta)$ where $\theta$ is an unknown parameter. Then, the joint probability density function of $X_1, X_2,..., X_n$ is given by:          $f(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,\cdots,X_n=x_n)=\prod_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i, \theta)$      In Maximum Likelihood estimation, we try to maximize $f$ as a function of $\theta$.  Question: Why do we maximize probability density instead of probability? In what way does it make sense?  Edit: As explained in the answers, the probability of choosing a finite number of sample points from a continuous probability distribution is zero, so maximizing probability doesn't make sense, but how does maximizing probability density make sense? Finding sharing settings OWD sql server linked server to oracle returns no data found when data exists What is the "wheel" user in OS X? CBC-MAC Padding weaknesses I'm trying to wrap my head around how different padding methods affect the strength of CBC-MAC's. Suppose a message is split into different blocks, m1, m2, m3 etc. and the last block is padded with 0's to fill it if needed.  If the message is intercepted, why can an attacker easily create another message with the same MAC tag for the same key as the message that was intercepted?  If another message is intercepted that does not contain any padding (so it completely fills the last block), how does this make it more difficult for the attacker to create a tag that matches? Does the message need to meet any conditions for the attack to work?  If this padding method is not secure, what is a better method to secure against these attacks? Would it be more secure if the padding was just random? Not sure how that would work. Can an Indian citizen visit Dubai on a layover? I can prove the converse of it, but I cannot do this one. Here is the problem:     Prove that the implicit function theorem implies the inverse function theorem. How can I install a Nautilus script? Can I submit/ArXiv without my advisor? I am being blocked from publishing my work I joined a research group of a faculty member in 201x, and worked with her for three years. During that time, I collaborated with a large hospital to perform research in the domain of medical informatics. I spoke about my research at two conferences; one was a talk, and the other was a poster presentation. My advisor asked me to write up the research in a paper around the second year, which I did. Around the third year, I decided to switch research groups, because of the relationship between me and my advisor going sour, and not having funding from her (I used to work part-time to fund my PhD research).  Once this happened, she withdrew her support from me publishing my paper and ordered that I give up my work to a fellow grad student. I told her, that my manuscript is in its Nth revision, and that I would like to take it to completion as first author. She was dismissive and didn’t offer any comments on my work. I told her, that, should I pass on my work, I would like to discuss authorship issues in advance, which she wasn’t ready to discuss. She ganged up my new advisor against me, and together they forced me to give up my code, results, paper drafts. I had to then leave the university without a degree.  Fast forward couple of years, I receive an email from a student in her lab (the student whom I had to hand over my work to), saying that they are publishing a paper, and have decided I am the fourth author. I read the paper and found out that it uses my experimental setup and design, data collection, and one of the ideas I had presented (the idea wasn’t the main crux of my paper, but I believe it was novel).  I want to   Publish my original draft in ArXiv/BioArXiv, as first author. Request my advisor to cite my work in their publication.    Given how she behaved with me, I know that despite what I am asking for sounds fair, she is likely to object.  I am asking the community: Can I go ahead and ArXiv it without her permission? I could add her as an author, but not take her permission. Also, if you have any other ideas on how to deal with this situation please let me know.  (For the record, this was at a top-10 school in the US in an engineering department). Is $2^{|\mathbb{N}|} = |\mathbb{R}|$? Finding minimum-area-rectangle for given points? Why can't I just think the spin as rotating? I'm going mad about the problem.  I really don't understand why do electron have 1/2 spin number, why they are not actually spinning.  I can accept that the electrons have their own magnetic field, which is certain, but why do they have $\hbar\sqrt3/2$ of angular momentum, and I don't know what the heck is spin number.  I've read the definition of  and  more than a hundred times but there is no betterment. I've smashed my head in my desk more than a hundred times either.  My question is the title. Why can't I just think the spin as rotating?  What I've saw recently,     electron's hypothetical surface would have to be moving faster than the speed of light in order for it to rotate quickly enough to produce the necessary angular momentum. Which graphics formats can be included in documents processed by latex or pdflatex? There several types of graphics files. In no particular order .jpeg .eps .pdf .png .tif .jif (and no doubt others). Some work with latex, dvips and some work with pdflatex. How am I supposed to know which?  Just to confuse matters, metapost produces .eps but I can use these with pdflatex as long as I put in a four line incantation.  Can anyone explain this? I’m having trouble finding an official clarification of this, so I’m wondering if anyone has found a ruling:  Solarians gain powers known as stellar revelations. These are either “photon” or “graviton” revelations. It is specifically mentioned they can be used out of combat, though most include improved effects or separate powers that can only be used “while attuned” - a state a Solarian enters during combat. They may be photon or graviton attuned, at the player’s choice, and are able to increase their level of attunement each round until they become fully attuned to one or the other. However, apart from the very powerful “zenith revelations”, nowhere in the rules mentions whether photon revelations may only be used while photon attuned, or graviton revelations only while graviton attuned. The revelations themselves usually say “while attuned or fully attuned” for the more powerful effects, without mentioning the mode, and there’s no general rule in the class feature that answers this question.  Is there an official ruling on whether the “only while attuned” power of a photon revelation can be used when the character is graviton attuned, or vice versa? I suspect the answer is yes but it’s hard to tell based on the core rules. Integrating trigonometric function problem $\int \frac{3\sin x+2\cos x}{2\sin x+3\cos x}dx$ \begin{eqnarray*} \int \frac{3\sin x+2\cos x}{2\sin x+3\cos x}dx &amp;=&amp;  \int \frac{(3\sin x+2\cos x)/\cos x}{(2\sin x+3\cos x)/\cos x}dx\\ \\ &amp;=&amp; \int \frac{3\tan x +2}{2\tan x +3} dx\\ &amp;&amp; u = \tan x \text{ and } du = \sec^2 x \ dx  \end{eqnarray*} Am I going in the right direction with this one? It seems like not. \numcases with \tag I would like to label some cases with specific tags, and was hoping for something like  \begin{numcases}{A = } \frac{r}{a} &amp; r &gt; a \tag{G} \\ \frac{a}{r} &amp; r &lt; a \tag{H} \end{numcases}   utilizing the numcasesenvironment from the cases package, and \tag from amsmath. However, the two don't seem to be compatible:     ! Package amsmath Error: \tag not allowed here.   Is there any alternatives that would do what I hope to accomplish? I have studied that every normed space $(V, \lVert\cdot \lVert)$ is a metric space with respect to distance function  $d(u,v) = \lVert u - v \rVert$, $u,v \in V$.   My question is whether every metric on a linear space can be induced by norm? I know answer is  no but I need proper justification.   Edit: Is there any method to check whether a given metric space is induced by norm ?  Thanks for help How do I set up new users with skel i have on my server a settings i use for all my users. every time i create a new user i have to copy all the settings over and over.  for example:   .vimrc. .profile .bashrc firefox homepage to our intranet evolution settings (server and username) etc...   i saw skel can do it, is there a easy way to setup a user with my settings when i adduser?  thanks How can I fix the non-stitched seam that is present after applying mirror modifier?