I have a dedicated 240 volt circuit that's hard wired into my air conditioning unit.  The circuit has a 30 amp breaker at the main box and another 30 amp breaker on the wall next to my air conditioner.  Since the main breaker box is on the opposite side of the house from the garage, another run would be price preclusive.  Instead, I am considering the install of a switch (e.g. DPDT Center-Off) like the Leviton 1288:   (see figure 3)  The goal is to keep the circuit dedicated - regardless of which load it is directed to (i.e. air conditioner OR NEMA 14-30).  The NEMA 14-30 would be used in the garage for charging an electric vehicle.  The air conditioning unit is outside (just on the other side of the wall).  Two questions:   Does this use case violate NEC code? Is DPDT a reasonable choice for this use case?   Another answer in the forum (slightly different question) stated that it is 'more elegant' to switch the Neutral wire (since it too is a conductor).  I have not been able to locate a wiring diagram depicting Neutral with a DPDT.  What's the scoop?
I've got a situation where I have a 240V 30A dryer line, and I want to power something else from the same circuit, but NEVER at the same time as the dryer. I'm looking for a switch to use, like a DPDT ON-ON break-before-make switch. There are tons of DPDT switches I've found, and most seem to be ON-OFF. Hardly any show their wiring diagrams, so if they don't give more details, I don't know if they'll work. Note: the second circuit will not use more than 15A, maybe just 12A.  I'm hoping someone can recommend specific switches that will do what I want. Manufacturer and exact part# is what I'm looking for.   Personally, I don't care if it's a knife switch, something that looks like a standard light switch, two buttons, has relays, I don't care. The breaker box is full, it's a long and difficult wire run, and I do not need a separate circuit because I'll NEVER need to run both devices at once.  I could resort to just using one plug and unplugging one then plugging the other one in, but I don't see the point of constantly exposing live wires (the plugs) where something could inadvertently fall on them or water could be sprayed, instead of keeping things all sealed in the wall with a safe, simple switch between two plugs.
How to find the joint PDF? Ley X,Y two random variables with density $f(x,y)=8xy \  \text{if} \   0&lt;x&lt;y&lt;1$  Find the joint distribution F(x,y).  I find that $F(x,y)=2x^2y^2-x^4\ \text{  if}  \ 0&lt;x&lt;y&lt;1$ but I dont know how to find the didtribution in other points. How do you make Ubuntu accept files sent over bluetooth I have a problem when I send my files from phone to ubuntu 12.04 via bluetooth as the phone prompts with the message "the file not sent"! I can send any files from ubuntu 12.04 to my android phone. Transpose/Unzip Function (inverse of zip)? I have a list of 2-item tuples and I'd like to convert them to 2 lists where the first contains the first item in each tuple and the second list holds the second item.  For example:  original = [('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 3), ('d', 4)] # and I want to become... result = (['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], [1, 2, 3, 4])   Is there a builtin function that does that? to infinitive as direct object?! (as in : I promised to get there in time.) I'm a passionate Korean English-learner, and I would like to ask you a question about grammar.   It was 3 years ago when I first started to study the to-infinitive as studying grammar with Grammar In Use series and English Grammar series by Longman, having been exposed to English for 3 years. There wasn't any mention of the author saying that the usage of the to-infinitive is as an (direct) object. And for me also, the times I have encountered sentences in which the usage of the to-infinitive, so to speak, as direct objects were used, I've read them as some kind of obligatory adverbial that shows what the verbs are about, not as objects, which means they are noun phases! 100% of Korean textbooks say the usage is as a direct object, but I doubt it. I think it's some kind of obligatory adverbial that shows what the verbs are about.    I thought it was better for me to ask Americans themselves. Do you read this usage of to-infinitive as a noun phrase or an adverbial? I admin a handful of cloud-based (VPS) servers for the company I work for.   The servers are minimal ubuntu installs that run bits of LAMP stacks / inbound data collection (rsync). The data is large but not personal, financial or anything like that (ie not that interesting)  Clearly on here people are forever asking about configuring  and such like.   I use a bunch of approaches to secure the servers, for example (but not restricted to)   ssh on non standard ports; no password typing, only known ssh keys from known ips for login etc https, and restricted shells (rssh) generally only from known keys/ips servers are minimal, up to date and patched regularly use things like rkhunter, cfengine, lynis denyhosts etc for monitoring   I have extensive experience of unix sys admin. I'm confident I know what I'm doing in my setups. I configure /etc files. I have never felt a compelling need to install stuff like firewalls: iptables etc.  Put aside for a moment the issues of physical security of the VPS.  Q? I can't decide whether I am being naive or the incremental protection a fw might offer is worth the effort of learning / installing and the additional complexity (packages, config files, possible support etc) on the servers.  To date (touch wood) I've never had any problems with security but I am not complacent about it either. When your body burns calories and you lose weight, obviously mass is leaving your body.  In what form does it leave?  In other words, what is the physical process by which the body loses weight when it burns its fuel?    Somebody said it leaves the body in the form of heat but I knew this is wrong, since heat is simply the internal kinetic energy of a lump of matter and doesn't have anything do with mass.  Obviously the chemical reactions going on in the body cause it to produce heat, but this alone won't reduce its mass. This is a question that arose in the comments here:   I normally hide footnotes from the TOC by doing this:  \section[title]{title\footnote{This is a footnote.}}.   This works in a lot of document classes (memoir, article, ...), but not in all of them. amsbook, for example, uses the optional argument only for the running heads so the footnote mark still ends up in the TOC. So what is the 'universal solution'? What would happen if every person in the world gathered at a minimum possible area and jumped all at once? Would that have any effect on Earth? I want to know the general formula for $\sum_{n=0}^{m}nr^n$ for some constant r and how it is derived.  For example, when r = 2, the formula is given by: $\sum_{n=0}^{m}n2^n = 2(m2^m - 2^m +1)$ according to   Thanks! Why does reversing serial upvoting not reverse the Mortarboard badge? user has serial up-voting reversed, but he still have badge Mortarboard.   Is it correct behavior of badges? I suppose it should be reversed too.  And will this 200 daily reputation (2012-03-20) score for the Epic, and Legendary badges? Does an Animagus's animal form change along with their Patronus? In the two examples shown of an Animagus capable of casting a corporeal Patronus (Minerva McGonagall and James Potter) both had the same animal as their Patronus and as their Animagus animal.  Now, it is also shown that extreme circumstances can change one's Patronus. I think the only example of this was Tonks, which turned from a jackrabbit into a wolf in response for her love of Lupin.  If Tonks (or any other wizard who had their Patronus change) had been an animagus, would her animagus have changed as well? So that I could resize the window to a certain size from within Terminal. What are the numbers / symbols to the right of my reputation counter? Does the sequence $\{\sin^n(n)\}$ converge?   Does the series $\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \sin^n(n)$ converge? Show that $\lim _{r \to 0} \|T_rf−f\|_{L_p} =0.$ Texture messes up after extruding a modified plane I want to make some 3d models of pixel art. I started by adding a plane, adding a texture to it, added loop cuts to my plane, 15 loop cuts because it's a 16x16 texture, then I selected the blank faces and deleted them. As I extrude this plane, A &gt; E &gt; $0.1$, the texture messes up on the edge of the item, as shown below  Although not all faces mess up on the edge, a lot still do. I tried recalculating normals, unwrapping the object again, but I ended with the same problem, no change at all. Though I may have done it wrong, since I never did it before. I tried smart UV project and cube projection, but they just mess it up even more. Does anyone have a solution to this? This question is similar, but not identical to:   Whereas the aforementioned question is about whether the hand’s movement is measured from the hand’s point of view or from the caster’s, this question revolves around the total distance the hand can travel to reach its destination.  To illustrate, let me give an example: Two narrow stone pillars stand next to each other, 10 feet apart. They are several kilometers high and on top of each pillar stands a wizard. One wizard casts Maximillian's Earthen Grasp and lets the hand made from compacted soil rise from the ground on his own pillar. With another action, he wants to move the hand in order to restrain the other wizard, who is within range of 30 feet.  Would the hand retract into his own pillar, then rise again from the ground on the other pillar? Or would the hand move several kilometers down the first pillar, across the floor, then several kilometers up the second pillar? What if both pillars would float in the Astral Plane, without a direct ground-based connection between them?  This might seem like a stupid and unnecessary convoluted question, but lo and behold, something similar happened in one of my games. "My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner" I just stumbled upon a :     My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner. How does it look?   Sure enough, the top comment immediately points out that it should be "my wife's and my". However, a cross-post to the Grammar subreddit produced :     It's fine as it is written. "my wife and I" is a noun phrase, functioning as a subjective pronoun in the singular and made possessive with the apostrophe. It is exactly the same as "our".      It seems weird because you would never use "I's" on its own but it is not on its own here - it is part of a noun phrase.   That's a rather intriguing argument. Does it hold any water? ${\rm Aut}(G)$ is cyclic $\implies G$ is abelian I would appreciate if you could please express your opinion about my proof. I'm not yet very good with automorphisms, so I'm trying to make sure my proofs are OK. Proof: Since ${\rm Aut}(G)$ is cyclic, ${\rm Aut}(G)$ is abelian. Thus for any elements $\phi, \psi \in{\rm Aut}(G)$ and some elements $g_i \in G$, $\phi\psi(g_1g_2)=\phi\psi(g_1)\phi\psi(g_2)=g_3g_4=\phi\psi(g_2)\phi\psi(g_1)=\phi\psi(g_2g_1)=g_4g_3$. Hence, $g_3g_4=g_4g_3\implies G$ is abelian. The proof seems to be quite straightforward, but I'd rather ask for advice. The swarms of dead men fighting for the good side always seemed wrong to me. I know they did it to be released from their plight, but.... It's one thing to curse somebody, it's quite another to back it up. How did Isildur back up his curse on the oath breaking men of Dunharrow?