I have read that infinity is not an element of R, the set of all real numbers and infinity is not a number. So can we say that infinity and minus infinity does not belongs to R ? Or can we say that plus infinity and minus infinity belongs to the set of all real numbers ? Please help .
Is infinity a real number?  If not, why not?  I want some very good arguments.   Thanks.  $$\rightarrow\leftarrow\Huge\Huge\Huge\boldsymbol\infty$$
A specified Include path is not valid. The EntityType does not declare a navigation property with the name * Use a vector as an index to a matrix Is every invertible matrix a change of basis matrix? I just came over this syntax in some of the questions in this forum, but Google and any other searchengine tends to block out anything but letters and number in the search so it is impossible to search out "=>".  So can anyone tell me what it is and how it is used? What is a good introductory book on quantum mechanics? Custom hard edges in Blender Summation of Central Binomial Coefficients divided by even powers of $2$ Whilst working out  the following summation emerged: $$\sum_{m=0}^n\frac 1{2^{2m}}\binom {2m}m$$ The is equivalent to  $$\begin{align} \sum_{m=0}^n \frac {(2m-1)!!}{2m!!}&amp;=\frac 12+\frac {1\cdot3}{2\cdot 4}+\frac{1\cdot 3\cdot 5}{2\cdot 4\cdot 6}+\cdots +\frac{1\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot \cdots \cdot(2n-1)}{2\cdot 4\cdot 6\cdot \cdots \cdot 2n}\\ &amp;=\frac 12\left(1+\frac 34\left(1+\frac 56\left(1+\cdots \left(1+\frac {2n-1}{2n}\right)\right)\right)\right) \end{align}$$  and terms are the same as coefficients in the expansion of $(1-x)^{-1/2}$.  Once the solution  $$ \frac {n+1}{2^{2n+1}}\binom {2n+2}{n+1}$$ is known, the telescoping sum can be easily derived, i.e.    $$\frac 1{2^{2m}}\binom {2m}m=\frac {m+1}{2^{2(m+1)-1}}\binom {2(m+1)}{m+1}-\frac m{2^{2m-1}}\binom {2m}m$$  However, without knowing this a priori, how would we have approached this problem? How to enable root login? Possible to click on an object in the viewport and the object list hierarchy automatically goes to that object also? I have some files/directories on an external hard drive connected using USB to my Windows XP laptop. I am trying to delete those files but every time I try, I get an error "Cannot delete ....: Access Denied. Make sure disk is not full or write protected and that the file is not currently in use".  I checked that the directory is not is use. However, the permissions are set to read-only. Even if I remove the "read-only" checkbox, in Properties->Attributes, it automatically comes back again. How do I fix this? Is it a virus that is automatically changing it back to read-only?  regards,  JP I cannot see WiFi option in my Ubuntu 15.04. What should I do? Revert asap  lspci -nnk | grep 0280 -A2 output:-  03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros Device [168c:0042] (rev 30) Subsystem: Foxconn International, Inc. Device [105b:e09a]   rfkill list output:-  0: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 1: acer-wireless: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no      dmesg | grep ath [    9.545199] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: pci irq msi-x interrupts 8 irq_mode 0 reset_mode 0 [   10.029684] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/cal-pci-0000:03:00.0.bin failed with error -2 [   10.029701] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-5.bin failed with error -2 [   10.029704] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not fetch firmware file 'ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-5.bin': -2 [   10.029711] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-4.bin failed with error -2 [   10.029713] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not fetch firmware file 'ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-4.bin': -2 [   10.029719] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-3.bin failed with error -2 [   10.029721] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not fetch firmware file 'ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-3.bin': -2 [   10.029726] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-2.bin failed with error -2 [   10.029728] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not fetch firmware file 'ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware-2.bin': -2 [   10.029733] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/QCA9377/hw1.0/firmware.bin failed with error -2 [   10.029735] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not fetch firmware (-2) [   10.029737] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not fetch firmware files (-2) [   10.029739] ath10k_pci 0000:03:00.0: could not probe fw (-2) If $a$, $b$, and $c$ are sides of a triangle, then $\frac{a}{b+c}+\frac{b}{c+a}+\frac{c}{a+b}<2$. Let $a,b,c$ be the lengths of the sides of a triangle. Prove that $$\sum_{\text{cyc}}\frac{a}{b+c}=\frac{a}{b+c}+\frac{b}{c+a}+\frac{c}{a+b}&lt;2\,.$$  Attempt.  By clearing the denominators, the required inequality is equivalent to $$a^2(b+c)+b^2(c+a)+c^2(a+b)&gt;a^3+b^3+c^3\,.$$ Since $b+c&gt;a$, $c+a&gt;b$, and $a+b&gt;c$, the inequality above is true.  Is there a better, non-bruteforce way? Covariant derivative ambiguity I'm studying general relativity and am running into an ambiguity with the covariant derivative. The covariant derivative acting on a scalar is, in a co-ordinate basis, simply $$\nabla_X f = X^a \nabla_a f = X^a \partial_a f $$ whilst when acting on vectors or tensors, the covariant derivative includes extra terms involving the connection coefficients $\Gamma$. My problem is that I'm not sure what happens when the covariant derivative acts on the components of a vector. So the $X^a$ in the above expression are each scalar functions, and so when we write $\nabla_Y X^a$, do we assume the covariant derivative acts on $X^a$ as scalars, or do we include connection coefficient terms?  To clarify, consider $$ \nabla_X Y = X^a \nabla_a(Y^b e_b) = X^a (\nabla_a Y^b) e_b + X^a Y^b (\nabla_a e_b) = X^a (\partial_a Y^b) e_b + X^a Y^b \Gamma^c{}_{ba} e_c $$ As you can see, when the covariant derivative acts on the $Y^b$, it acts as a simple partial derivative, since the $Y^b$ are here considered functions premultiplying the vectors $e_b$.   However, in this equation from  page: $$(\nabla_X \nabla_Y Z)^a = X^c \nabla_c Y^b \nabla_b Z^a = X^c Y^b \nabla_c \nabla_b Z^a + (X^c \nabla_c Y^b) \nabla_b Z^a = (\nabla^2_{X,Y} Z)^a + (\nabla_{\nabla_X Y} Z)^a$$ When the covariant derivative acts on the $Y^b$ term it treats it like a vector.  What's going on here? Thanks. Is better healthcare a bane to the long-term survival of the human race? The theory of natural selection has it that individuals with better genes tend to survive and reproduce, passing their genes to their offspring. This gradual process results in a population more adapted at survival. However, due to the advancement in medical science, humans with poorer genes tend to survive and reproduce just as well.  For example, in the past, many people, excluding those with natural immunity due to some genetic mutations, would have succumbed to illnesses such as malaria and typhoid. But with better hygiene and medical treatment, these patients tend to survive.  Now, imagine a future where all illnesses including cancer can be treated. How would it impact the survival of the human race? Would we become more and more vulnerable such that our survival hinges heavily on medical technology, analogous to how an astronaut's survival is dependent on his spacesuit? What is the difference between new/delete and malloc/free? Can one of Newton's Laws of motion be derived from other Newton's Laws of motion? Can one derive Newton's  second and third laws from the first law or   first and third laws from the second law or  first and second  laws from the third  law  I think Newton's laws of motions are independent to each other. They can not be derived from one another. Please share the idea. How should I structure my URLs for both SEO and localization? When I set up a site in multiple languages, how should I set up my URLs for search engines and usability?  Let's say my site is www.example.com, and I'm translating into French and Spanish. What is best for usability and SEO?  Directory option:  http://www.example.com/sample.html http://www.example.com/fr/sample.html http://www.example.com/es/sample.html   Subdomain option:  http://www.example.com/sample.html http://fr.example.com/sample.html http://es.example.com/sample.html   Filename option:  http://www.example.com/sample.html http://www.example.com/sample.fr.html http://www.example.com/sample.es.html   Accept-Language header:  Or should I simply parse the  header and generate content server-side to suit that header?  Is there another way to do this? If the different language versions don't have different urls, what do I do about the search engines?    UPDATE 2011-12-06  Google has new recommendations for meta tags for explicitly pointing to other language content: .  UPDATE 2012-05-25  Related but not precisely:   UPDATE 2013-06-12  includes discussion of several URL schemes directly relevant to the question. Does English have any singularia tantum besides mass nouns? and  are, respectively, nouns that have only a singular form and nouns that have only a plural form.  In English, we have a handful of pluralia tantum that are mass nouns which take the plural form (e.g. "riches" and "remains"), a whole load of pluralia tantum that refer to things that come in pairs (e.g. "trousers", "sunglasses", "knickers", or "scissors"), and at least one plurale tantum that fits into neither of the above categories ("clothes", meaning multiple items of clothing - it's clear what the hypothetical singular "clothe" would mean, yet it mysteriously isn't a word). Singularia tantum, on the other hand, seem less varied. As far as I can tell, they are all  - things like "information", "milk", and "racism".  One can imagine there being a singulare tantum that is not a mass noun. For example, we can imagine an alternate universe in which it is still correct English to talk about "a dog", but talking about "dogs" in the plural is incorrect and funny in the same way that it is incorrect and funny to talk about a "scissor". It might seem unintuitive to think that such a noun even could exist - surely, if it is not a mass noun, then people would just pluralise it with an "s" on the end like most other words? But the converse argument could just as well be made about countable pluralia tantum, and I still cannot go to a shop and buy a "clothe". Hence my question: do we have any such countable singularia tantum in the language? Have we in the past? In my .bib file, I have two entries with exactly the same author names:  @article{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....  @article{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....   When cited after each other, and typeset with the IEEEtran bibliography style, the .bbl file reads:  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St} K.~Seshadrinathan, R.~Soundararajan, A.~C. Bovik, and L.~K. Cormack, ``A   subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms,''   \emph{SPIE Proceedings Human Vision and Electronic Imaging}, 2010.  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec} ------, ``Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video,''   \emph{IEEE Transactions on Image Processing}, 2009.   As you can see, the author names have been replaced with ------. It looks like this in the final PDF:    Is this normal behavior? To do a patch manually I must type this command   sudo ./playback_delete_data_patch.sh 09_delete_old_data_p.sql     There is a space just before the 09:   sudo ./playback_delete_data_patch.sh [space] 09_delete_old_data_p.sql   How can I run this inside a script?  There are also several other commands but this one is giving trouble.