I put together a build, and I'm having some issues. When I boot up the PC all fans and LEDs come on, but nothing ever pops up on the screen.   The manual states I should be prompted with a BIOS screen. It also says some beeps should come through my audio, but there's been no sound. I've tried taking the GPU out and booting that way, but there's no change except that a white LED on the motherboard stays on.   From what I've read that'll stay on until a GPU is installed. I've also tried replacing the RAM with RAM from a different computer, but there's still no change. I've also tried booting with a single stick of RAM. Customer support stated that my RAM is likely the issue, but there wasn't much more said than that.   Does anyone have some other troubleshooting or likely causes that I should look into? It seems like everything is starting up as intended and that it just doesn't display anything on the monitor.   Specs:   &nbsp;&nbsp;CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4 GHz 8-core processor &nbsp;&nbsp;RAM: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3200 memory &nbsp;&nbsp;SSD: Samsung - 860 EVO 500 GB 2.5" SSD &nbsp;&nbsp;PS: Corsair - RMx (2018) 750 W 80+ gold certified fully modular ATX power supply &nbsp;&nbsp;Motherboard: Asus - ROG STRIX B450-F gaming ATX AM4 motherboard &nbsp;&nbsp;CPU Cooler: Thermaltake Frio silent 14 &nbsp;&nbsp;GPU: MSI Armor Radeon RX570    Link for pictures of the build ?
I have a fairly modern desktop computer, an AMD Athlon II X2 based silent PC, that does not work.  When turned on, it will start physically (all fans are rotating, disks start up...) but not give a signal on any of the graphics ports (DVI, VGA, and HDMI, I tried all three). Also, the reset button does not seem to have any effect.  I have stripped the mainboard bare of all SATA connections, extension cards, and the one 2GB RAM chip to eliminate them as the problem source, but to no avail, so I think it's fair to assume it's either the mainboard or the processor that are at fault.  However, I have neither a replacement mainboard, nor a replacement processor handy to identify which one is broken. The cause of the defect is unknown, so for all I know, it could be both. Therefore, I'm reluctant to buy replacement hardware blindly before knowing more.   Is there any way to further diagnose (or at least get some indication) which component is broken without buying replacement hardware?
When I was a kid we had a VHS tape of some Disney live action (not animated) sci-fi movie. It may have been a mini-series or a made-for-tv movie, but I'm not sure. I'm also not sure about the year but it would probably have been late 80s or early 90s based on when I would have seen it. I know it was Disney because they had some live action Goofy and Mickey running around the movie's set as an introduction discussing the plot with a host before the movie.  The plot is basically as follows:   A starship is loaded with mostly children and teenagers as a cross-galaxy human settling effort. Accidents (which are not really accidents and later revealed) cause adult crew members to be killed.  They travel to another planet and face all sorts of troubles. It arrives at the new planet after overcoming obstacles.   Other memorable scenes that may help:   Navigating out of earth's asteroid belt made out of space junk. One of the adults was killed via an airlock malfunction. The ship was supposed to be peaceful with no weapons. At one point they bring on board some crazy guy who puts together a rail gun. There's a memorable line like "Do you want no weapons at all or a well aimed rock?"  There's a planet or space station (I can't remember which) that has a fight scene with the evil bad guy. This scene takes place on what looks to be a carnival or fairground. The bad guys are trying to steal the ship the kids are on because it has some kind of really good futuristic space drive.   Hopefully you remember it better than I do! I've tried looking online for it before with no luck. Moment generating functions/ Characteristic functions of $X,Y$ factor implies $X,Y$ independent. This is solely a reference request. I have heard a few versions of the following theorem:     If the joint moment generating function $\mathbb{E}[e^{uX+vY}] = \mathbb{E}[e^{uX}]\mathbb{E}[e^{vY}]$ whenever the expectations are finite, then $X,Y$ are independent.   And there is a similar version for characteristic functions. Could anyone provide me a serious reference which proves one or both of these theorems? How exactly does curved space-time describe the force of gravity? I understand that people explain (in layman's terms at least) that the presence of mass "warps" space-time geometry, and this causes gravity. I have also of course heard the analogy of a blanket or trampoline bending under an object, which causes other objects to come together, but I always thought this was a hopelessly circular explanation because the blanket only bends because of "real" gravity pulling the object down and then pulling the other objects down the sloped blanket. In other words, to me, it seems that curved space wouldn't have any actual effect on objects unless there's already another force present.   So how is curved space-time itself actually capable of exerting a force (without some source of a fourth-dimensional force)?  I apologize for my ignorance in advance, and a purely mathematical explanation will probably go over my head, but if it's required I'll do my best to understand. Limiting Length of Input in JTextField is not working Why are Bitmap-Fonts used automatically? How to diagnose computer lockups and freezes? Why is a conservative force defined as the negative gradient of a potential? I'm learning about work in my dynamics class right now. We have defined the work on a particle due to the force field from point A to point B as the curve Integral over the force field from point A to B. From math I know that if a vector field has a potential, we only need to evaluate the potential at point B minus the potential at point A to get the result of the curve Integral. In the text that I'm reading, it's explained that if the integral over a force-field is path-independent, then the force field $F = -{\rm grad}(V)$, where $V$ is the potential. Why is it defined as the negative gradient? Doesn't one determine the potential from $F$ mathematically. Why do we impose the sign on the potential? Throughout the Star Wars saga, no matter the era, no matter who's broadcasting, blue holograms are exceedingly common.       Additionally, Snoke's hologram occasionally flashes blue.    However, multi- and full-color holograms do exist.      If these more advanced holograms exist, why aren't they more commonly used? And what exactly makes the holograms blue in the first place? How do I restrict scaling to a specific axis? Im new to Blender but have some experience with 3dsmax. In blender, when i select some polys and try to scale them, i have no control on the amount and especially relative axis on which the scale would happen, where as with 3ds max i could scale restricted to x, y, z or any combination of using the handy widget. Is there a way to replicate this, or to get any control over the scale ?  thanks, SemanticImport vs Import differ on same CSV file? One of us is wrong, aren't we? I have just learned from what I consider a reliable source, that the following sentence is correct:     One of us is wrong, aren't we?   I would never in my life have written this, but I am assured that   As I realize comments don't live forever I will quote the relevant parts:     oerkelens : So you  would really write One of us is wrong, aren't we? I guess by analogy you would not bat an eyelid at One of these balls is blue, aren't they?   Matt Эллен : yes, "Then one of us is wrong, aren't we?" is exactly how it would be written. Same for the balls.   Could someone please enlighten me how it is possible that the number in a question tag supposedly has to be in discordance with the subject of the main clause?  I admit that I am not the youngest any more, and my school days are long gone, but back in the days, I was taught that  1. a verb and its subject concord in number 2. a question tag concords with the subject of the main clause  I was given examples like:     It is warm today, isn't it?   We will be on time, won't we?   Mary is pretty, isn't she?   John isn't the brightest, is he?   Some people may notice that the subject of the main clause seems to determine every time the subject of the question tag. When the main clause subject is singular, so are verb and subject in the question tag.  I was under the impression that a) this made sense and b) this would be a general rule.  I fully realize that grammar does not have to make sense, so a) is immaterial. As for b), today I learned I was wrong :)  So when (and possibly why?) do we form question tags that are different in number from their main clause?   To exemplify, also the other example sentence that I used and was corrected on:     One of these balls is blue, isn't it? (so this is wrong)   One of these balls is blue, aren't they? (and this is correct)   As an afterthought, does this strange grammatical number mix-up only appear in question-tags, or should I always refer to singular subjects in the plural if certain conditions are met? And what are those conditions?  Which versions are correct?     One of the cars is broken, aren't they? They (the car(s?) that is(are?) broken) should be fixed.   One of the cars is broken, aren't they? It (the car that is broken) should be fixed.   One of us must be wrong, mustn't we? We (the one(s?) that is (are?) wrong) should make amends.   One of us must be wrong, mustn't we? He (the one that is wrong) should make amends.   (In the last one, they could of course be used as the singular they, but that would avoid the issue...) Difference between JOIN and INNER JOIN Both these joins will give me the same results:  SELECT * FROM table JOIN otherTable ON table.ID = otherTable.FK   vs  SELECT * FROM table INNER JOIN otherTable ON table.ID = otherTable.FK   Is there any difference between the statements in performance or otherwise?   Does it differ between different SQL implementations? Cannot vote to close immediately after edit The question is $$\text{If }\, p, \ q\in \mathbb{N}, \;1-\frac12+\frac13-\frac14-\dotsb-\frac{1}{1318}+\frac{1}{1319}=\frac{p}{q}.\qquad \text{Prove that } 1979\mid p.$$ So my solution went like this:  $$S=1-\frac12+\frac13-\frac14-\dotsb-\frac{1}{1318}+\frac{1}{1319}\Rightarrow S=\sum_{k=1}^{1319}\frac{1}{k}-2\sum_{k=1}^{659}\frac{1}{2k}=\sum_{k=660}^{1319}\frac{1}{k}$$ Now this is equivalent to finding the sum of the roots of the equation $$\left(x-\frac{1}{660}\right)\left(x-\frac{1}{661}\right)\dots \left(x-\frac{1}{1319}\right)=0$$. Rewriting this equation, we get $(660x-1)(661x-1)\dotsc(1319x-1)=0$ (we can discard the $\displaystyle \frac{1319!}{659!}$ since $1979$ is a prime). Calculating the sum of the roots, we get the required value to be equal to $(1320+659)\times 330$ which is obviously divisible by $1979$ (again discarding the coeffecient of $x^{660}$).  Now my question is: Using the same method of converting the problem into finding the sum of roots of a polynomial, we get from the original equation something like this: $$(x-1)\left(x+\frac{1}{2}\right)\dots \left(x-\frac{1}{1319}\right)=0 \Rightarrow (x-1)(2x+1)\dotsc(1319x-1)=0$$ So, the sum of roots would be $-1+2-3+4-\dotsc+1318-1319=-660$ But this is not divisible by $1979$. Why does the former solution work while the latter doesn't? Is there a flaw in my reasoning? Note: I know that the question can be solved by some other methods. Please only explain my given doubts and don't instead give another solution  I realised my mistake after some hours of pondering over it. (In the 1st equation) To get the required sum I would need to take calculate $\displaystyle -\frac{\text{coeffecient of }x^{659}\,}{\text{coeffecient of }x^{660}}$. However what I've done is calculate this:  $\displaystyle -\frac{\text{ coeffecient of }x}{\text{coeffecient of }x^{660}}$ which is actually equal to $\text{sum of roots taken }659 \text{ at a time} $. It was just a coincidence that the value I calculated was divisible by $1979$. The correct way, indeed, would be through the link supplied How do I create an empty array/matrix in NumPy? I can't figure out how to use an array or matrix in the way that I would normally use a list. I want to create an empty array (or matrix) and then add one column (or row) to it at a time.  At the moment the only way I can find to do this is like:  mat = None for col in columns:     if mat is None:         mat = col     else:         mat = hstack((mat, col))   Whereas if it were a list, I'd do something like this:  list = [] for item in data:     list.append(item)   Is there a way to use that kind of notation for  arrays or matrices? Do sensors wear out? We all know that shutters wear out and they have a limited number of actuation's.  The question I have is, do sensors wear out too? Do they suffer any kind of damage after each shot?  Should I be concerned about this or is the sensor lifespan way longer than the shutter lifespan? What are quarks made of? So atoms are formed from protons and neutrons, which are formed from quarks.  But where do these quarks come from? What makes them? How Can I Concatenate Column A and Column B into Column C in Excel? Column A has first name.  Column B has last name.  I need column C to be "display name" (first name and last name separated by a space).  I assume this involves the concatenate function.  Bonus Question: Column D is email address.  I need column E to be "username" (everything in email address left of the @ symbol).  I assume this involves some regular expression function. I have heard from people who have switched either way and who swear by the one or the other.  Being a huge Eclipse fan but having not had the time to try out IntelliJ, I am interested in hearing from IntelliJ users who are "ex-Eclipsians" some specific things that you can do with IntelliJ that you can not do with Eclipse.  Note: This is not a subjective question nor at all meant to turn into an IDE holy war. Please downvote any flamebait answers. Repeating (or not) "to" in a sentence involving infinitives set in parallel I googled it but I couldn't find the answer... maybe I didn't seek it in the proper way. My question is if &quot;to&quot; must be repeated in sentences such as the following ones:   In the past, women used to do the housework and to take care of children.  The aim of this meeting is to control their progress and to discuss the new working plan.    If I had to bet, I would omit the second to... But I am not sure about it.