Tonight as my partner was out riding a car swerved over to the fog line as it passed and laid on the horn before speeding off. While most of the driver around here are extremely courteous something like this happens to one or the other of us several times a year. For the most part we're just thankful that the car only came close and annoyed by the powerless feeling in response to what seems like harassment. Usually the car is gone before we can get a plate or other good identifying information.  So, the question, is there anything worth doing in response to incidents like this? I'm wondering about things like:   Reporting to police Using a helmet camera or something like one in hopes of capturing the plate Letters to the editor of local papers
Fortunately, I have very few strongly negative interactions with cars (most people generally seem to respect the way I ride), but those that do stick with me for a while.  The scenario is almost always the same. Rude driver approaches, does their rude thing (obscenities, "get off the road," unsafe passing, etc...), then speeds off to annoy the next bicyclist (or more than likely arrives at the next red light).  While this is generally a short interaction, I find that I just don't have a good rest of the ride. I find myself angry at the driver, thinking about what I could have done differently, and just generally being pissed off. Clearly I realize that it is possible I'm a jerk, but given the relative infrequency of these events I'm hoping that's not the case and I'm just riding defensively and this driver is having a bad day.  What can I do to get over (or mitigate) my anger at inconsiderate drivers?
If $f$ is a periodic function with $T = \pi$, does that mean that $F$ (a primitive of $f$) has the same period ? What about the inverse implication (periodic primitive implies periodic function) ? Emission of EM radiation from an electron I have read about an electron making a transition between two energy levels and electromagnatic radiation will be emitted. The problem is how and why e.m radiation is emitted. How to integrate $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x^2}}$ using substitution? How you integrate $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x^2}}$ using following substitution? $1+x^2=t$ $\Rightarrow$ $x=\sqrt{t-1} \Rightarrow dx = \frac{dt}{2\sqrt{t-1}}dt$... Now I'm stuck. I don't know how to proceed using substitution rule. How can I set the location (as it's picked up in CoreLocation services) in the iPhone Simulator? Create ArrayList from array I have an array that is initialized like:  Element[] array = {new Element(1), new Element(2), new Element(3)};   I would like to convert this array into an object of the  class.  ArrayList&lt;Element&gt; arraylist = ???; I was wondering what the cardinality of the set of all real sequences is. A random search through this site says that it is equal to the cardinality of the real numbers. This is very surprising to me, since the cardinality of all rational sequences is the same as the cardinality of reals, and it seemed fairly intuitive to me that if cardinality of a set $A$ is strictly greater than the cardinality of the set $B$, then cardinality of $A^{\mathbb{N}}$ should be strictly greater than cardinality of $B^{\mathbb{N}}$. It turns out to be false.  Some technical answers have appeared in this forum elsewhere but I do not understand them. As I am not an expert in this topic, could some one explain me in simple terms why this is happening?  Also is the cardinality of all functions from reals to reals also the same as the cardinality of reals? $\ker \phi = (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)$ for a ring homomorphism $\phi: R[x_1, ..., x_n] \to R$ Let $R$ be a commutative ring, $a_1, ..., a_n$ its elements and  $\phi: R[x_1, ..., x_n] \to R$  defined by  $ \phi(f(x_1, ..., x_n)) = f(a_1, ... ,a_n)$  a ring homomorphism.  Prove: $\ker \phi = (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)$  It is obvious that $(x_1 - a_1, ..., x_n -a_n) \subseteq \ker \phi$. I'm not sure how to prove the converse.  At this point I don't know any division algorithms for multivariable polynomials, only for the ones in $R[x]$(and the book from where I taken the exercise doesn't assume the reader to know something beyond basics of rings and ideals, and the division algorithm for $R[x]$). Though I know this could be solved for $i = 1$ by dividing by $x-a$:   Let $f(x) \in \ker \phi$, divide by $x-a: f(x) = q(x)(x-a) + r, f(a) = r = 0$, so $f(x) = q(x)(x-a) \in (x-a)$. I am starting to see a lot of people claiming that convential current is 'wrong' because Franklin made an error when he first started investigating electrostatics, and that later scientists didn't bother correcting the mistake, but preferred to keep the 'convention' (here is a classic example: )  I always thought he didn't get it wrong. He said that current is positive in the direction that positive charge flows, and vice-versa. He of course had no way to know which side of two sticks behind rubbed actually gained or lost mass. So he wasn't wrong. What were you taught?  P.S. I can't help but feel we are lucky that he got it 'backwards', because clearly many people are confused about electrostastics (including the author of that text book!) and believe electricity has to involve electrons (an unfortunate name... why couldn't they have been named negatrons...) It can be proved that there are two irrational numbers $a$ and $b$ such that $a^b$ is rational (see ) and that for each irrational number $c$ there exists another irrational number $d$ such that $c^d$ is rational (see ).  My question is: Is there an irrational number $a$ such that $a^a$ is rational (and how could you prove that)? sObject ' ' type is not supported Hey everyone I've been seeing this a lot lately and am trying to figure out why this error is thrown when querying the SOAP API directly. I've tried several very basic SOQL queries such as  SELECT Body FROM AssetFeed   Only to be met with the sObject type 'AssetFeed' is not supported. error.  The account that I'm currently querying is just a standard user who accepted permission from an app that was created by a Developer Account, so I'm wondering if it might be permissions from the user or permission from the app itself? Possibly because Developer accounts cannot use 95% of whats offered?  The WSDL used is a v27.0 generated Partner WSDL if that helps narrow it down.  I've noticed this in multiple standard objects, so I'm wondering what the trend really is? Seems like a good informational question for future googling of others?  Running describeGlobal()  Array (     [0] =&gt; AggregateResult     [1] =&gt; Attachment     [2] =&gt; ChatterActivity     [3] =&gt; CollaborationGroup     [4] =&gt; CollaborationGroupFeed     [5] =&gt; CollaborationGroupMember     [6] =&gt; CollaborationGroupMemberRequest     [7] =&gt; CollaborationInvitation     [8] =&gt; ContentDocument     [9] =&gt; ContentDocumentFeed     [10] =&gt; ContentDocumentHistory     [11] =&gt; ContentDocumentLink     [12] =&gt; ContentVersion     [13] =&gt; ContentVersionHistory     [14] =&gt; EntitySubscription     [15] =&gt; FeedComment     [16] =&gt; FeedItem     [17] =&gt; FeedLike     [18] =&gt; FeedTrackedChange     [19] =&gt; Group     [20] =&gt; GroupMember     [21] =&gt; HashtagDefinition     [22] =&gt; Name     [23] =&gt; TaskPriority     [24] =&gt; TaskStatus     [25] =&gt; User     [26] =&gt; UserFeed     [27] =&gt; UserPreference     [28] =&gt; UserRecordAccess     [29] =&gt; UserRole )   Where would all the rest of my SOAP SObjects be? This seems like a very thin list compared to the 295 SObjects advertised I want to create a text file which will add each command I am going to run on the terminal as a new line entry in the text file. i.e., I need to keep a record of what are the things I'm doing in the terminal. Further if I can keep a record of outputs I'm getting in the terminal, along with the inputs in the terminal, as a text file, it will be much better.   Each time I forget a command I have to search again in the Internet for the command.  Can I can make a file like above? Is Einstein's Special Relativity completely inclusive of Newton's 3 laws of motion? Relativity has always been explained to me (in books I've read, etc) as a superset of newton's laws - that is; it encapsulates all of Newton's mechanics in addition to other effects (observer effect, time dilation, space-time geometry, etc).   I can kind of imagine 2 of Newton's 3 laws of motion to be incapsulated within Einstein's Special Relativity, but the one about "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction", I'm struggling to find a place for that within Special Relativity.   Does this sit outside Special Relativity's explanatory power or is it inferred within somehow? Windows 7 finding location of installed program According to specification, to create data that will be signed with server private key for CertificateVerify message, we need to concatenate 64 space characters, the string &quot;TLS 1.3, server CertificateVerify&quot;, null and the hash of all handshake messages to this point. During the handshake process, we choosing the cipher suite and signature scheme... So, if the cipher suite is, for example, TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 and the signature scheme is rsa_pss_rsae_sha256 (different hash algorithms), hash of which algorithm should be used as handshake hash in data to sign, SHA-384 or SHA-256? Find the slope of tangent line to the curve at the point $(1, \pi/2)$  the equation is  $$\sin(xy) = x$$  The right answer was = Slope is infinite   My answer was taking the derivative and I end up in this equation   $$ (1-y\cos(xy))/ x\cos(xy)  $$  I substitute with the points and the calculator showed an error, Does the error means infinite ? Here's what is happening; everytime I go to Stack Overflow (stackoverflow.com, NOT meta) with Firefox, it gives me the "Welcome back" tab that pops up from the top. Whenever I click in the "click here to refresh the page" link, all it does is refresh the page without logging me back in.  Even if I try to log in using the "log in" button at the top, all it does is pop up the tab that says "Welcome name here, you're being redirected." The problem is I'm not being logged in, not to mention that it keeps refreshing the page over and over again without giving me a choice to log in with Facebook.  For some reason, I was capable of logging in to Meta Stack Overflow using Firefox. I am still unable to log in to Stack Overflow. Any ideas? Say I have a module $M$ over a ring $R$ that is   $1.$ finitely-generated, i.e. $\exists$ finite $X \subset M$ such that $M = \sum_{i=1}^{n} Rx_{i}, x_{i}\in X$ (but $X$ is not necessarily free)  $2.$ free, i.e. $\exists$ a basis $Y \subset M$ a.k.a. $Y$ is free and generates M, (but $Y$ is not necessarily finite).  Now I want to show, that there exists a finite basis for $M$. For vector spaces, this would obviously be trivial, but for some  $R$-Modul, I'm not sure how to proceed.   Furthermore, is every minimal generating subset of $M$ a basis? What's the difference between "I love singing" and "I love to sing"? I would like to know what the difference is between "I love doing something" and "I love to do something".  For example:        “I love singing.”      and,        “I love to sing.”      When I was young, I was told that "love doing something" is right, but one day, I found Jessie J wrote "I love to sing" on her Instagram. I am tired of always trying to guess, if I should escape special characters like '()[]{}|' etc. when using many implementations of regexps.  It is different with, for example, Python, sed, grep, awk, Perl, rename, Apache, find and so on. Is there any rule set which tells when I should, and when I should not, escape special characters? Does it depend on the regexp type, like PCRE, POSIX or extended regexps? Forward/Inverse Search Does Not work on certain tex files I have this weird issue with forward and inverse searches. I am using WinEdt + Sumatra combination. The forward and inverse search works perfectly on certain some .tex files, but fails on some others.  Currently, I am working on a .tex file and the inverse search always points to the end of a section. Where ever I double click in a particular section of the pdf, the inverse search points to the end of that section in the .tex file.  Moreover, when I try to perform forward search (Shift+F8) from the .tex file, the section in the pdf file doesn't get highlighted.  There are other .tex files where both the searches work perfectly. What could be the issue with this .tex file?