Recently, a collaborator of mine received a paper to referee from a journal, and he proposed me that we review the paper together. When he submitted the report, he indicated to the journal that he reviewed the manuscript with me. Am I allowed to write in my CV that I am a reviewer for this journal?
My professor sometimes asks me to referee papers for him.  Should I list the corresponding journals in the professionals activity section of my CV?
What is the limit of series $\frac{1}{2 \cdot 3 \cdot 4} + \frac{1}{4 \cdot 5 \cdot 6} + \frac{1}{6 \cdot 7 \cdot 8} + \cdots $?  The $n$th summand is $\frac{1}{(2n)(2n + 1)(2n+2)} = \frac{1}{4} \frac{1}{n(2n+1)(n+1)}$.  I have tried expressing this as a telescoping sum, or as the limit of Riemann sums of a partition (the usual methods I normally try when doing this type of question- what are some other strategies?) Are Stack Overflow people *still* nice? The title is a reference to . We had the good fortune, to start this experiment with a really positive culture and have managed to hang onto it through vast growth and several fairly bitter internal arguments. But that does not guarantee we'll keep it forever. Lately I've had a unscientific feeling that Stack Overflow has been a bit rougher on newbie mistakes. The actual composition of this question was triggered by the comment thread on  (now with pending delete votes, so it is in danger of being 10k only). The  currently has 3 reputation points and has been a member for all of two days. The question bear the obvious (to me, at least) hallmarks of being written by a non-native English speaker with a shaky grasp of the tongue, and it is a rather simplistic question that could be answered fairly easily by Google. Question body:  Sir, I am mc student, I have knowledge in c,c++,J2EE. I want to ask you should I command in Linux with J2EE. Is it worth?  Instead of trying to improve the question, to discern exactly what the OP meant, or explaining how the question should be improved we get this comment thread instead (without wanting to call out these posters in particular, this was just the thread that got be off my duff):  2 Can you elaborate? – Dave McClelland 21 hours ago 1 Absolutely yes! If it can run on your Blu-Ray player, imagine the possibilities it can do on Linux. – The Elite Gentleman 21 hours ago 1 Basically, it's as worth as running Java on any other platform. – Alexander Gessler 21 hours ago 1 @The Elite Gentleman, You can try run it on your sim-card too) – Stas Kurilin 21 hours ago 1 @STas Kurilin, really? What heapspace size must I give? sarcastic laugh – The Elite Gentleman 21 hours ago 1 @The Elite Gentleman I don't know. But there are some) See for details oracle.com/technetwork/java/javacard/overview/… – Stas Kurilin 21 hours ago @The Elite Gentleman, you're absolutely right given a full fledged desktop machine with Linux, Java would run so fast his program could go back in time and rescue whales from extinction. – Quaternion 21 hours ago @Stas Kurlin, if you have a program that runs on a sim-card isn't it hard to get output? I've always found processorless environments problematic. – Quaternion 21 hours ago @Quaternion - It was a joke) I've newer wrote such programs. But, I think there should be some processor. – Stas Kurilin 20 hours ago @Stas Kurlin, I was joking too, but I have to apologize after reading that page you liked to. You can run Java off a smart card... that's crazy and cool. +1 on account of good learning for the day. – Quaternion 20 hours ago @Quaternion Thanks. I heard about this stuff several weeks ago. Java at a sim card is a really cool argument) – Stas Kurilin 20 hours ago @Quaternion, lol, without having to worry about Segmentation Faults along the way. – The Elite Gentleman 19 hours ago  I've been leaving comments on threads like this from time to time, asking them to be a little more forgiving, but that is a drop in the bucket. Nothing flag-worthy here, but not a &quot;nice&quot; as things once were. There is very little effort to understand what the question may really be, nor why to explain why the question has been closed, what other resources exist, or how that decision could be reversed. With a brand new user who probably has a hard time with English. Ouch. Do we need an official re-iteration of &quot;Be nice.&quot;? Is there something else we can do to encourage our big city to keep the small-town feel we grew up with? It seems that a common operation needed when defining new commands is to scan over a list of arguments (separated e.g. by a comma, but maybe by something else) and do something with each argument in the list, find the last one, or whatever.  For example to write commands that look like \Command{a,b,c} or \Command{c.d.e} and do something with each a, b, and c. See e.g. questions on  and .  Some solutions have been posted there, but what would be the best idiom to perform such kind of operations? LaTeX's \@for looks very nice, but is it possible to use it to scan anything other than comma-separated lists? Given: $a = qb + r$. Then it holds that $\gcd(a,b)=\gcd(b,r)$. That doesn't sound logical to me. Why is this so?    Addendum by LePressentiment on 11/29/2013: (in the interest of  and averting a duplicate)  What's the intuition behind this result? I only recognise the proof and examples solely due to algebraic properties and formal definitions; I'd like to apprehend the result naturally. My task is to write a precise mathematical statement that "the sequence $(a_n)$ does not converge to a number $\mathscr l$"  So, I have my definition of a convergent sequence: "$\forall\varepsilon&gt;0$ $\exists N\in\Bbb R$ such that $|x_n -\mathscr l|&lt;\varepsilon$ $\forall n \in \Bbb N$ with $n&gt;N$"  Would the correct negation of this be "$\forall\varepsilon&gt;0$ $\exists N\in\Bbb R$ such that $|x_n -\mathscr l|&gt;\varepsilon$ $\forall n \in \Bbb N$ with $n&gt;N$"?  It doesn't seem that this is the answer as the next part of my task is to prove that a sequence is divergent using my formed proof, but it'd be difficult to do since it's a general proof of divergence and not just a proof that $(a_n)$ doesn't converge a specific number $\mathscr l$  Perhaps I should find a prove that $(a_n)$ tends to $\pm\infty$? This is more simple but it does not include monotone sequences such as $x_n:=(-1)^n$.  Can someone assist me with this task? All comments and answers are appreciated. I am going to put an additional (non-USB) hard drive in my system. I already have Ubuntu on my other hard drive so I do not want to install Ubuntu on the additional drive but only use it for storage. How do I add the additional hard drive to my Ubuntu system, e.g. make Ubuntu recognize it and mount it properly? When does the 'Lost City' become Atlantis in Stargate In Stargate SG-1 they are searching for the Lost City in season 8, however in the Stargate Atlantis pilot it is referred to as Atlantis. When is the name found? Or the connection between the Lost City and Atlantis made? How to vote on friends / colleagues ' questions (or answers) Almost every time a colleague of mine asks a question, we have discussed this problem beforehand. Also, we sometimes meta-discuss the question for stackoverflow (why did I get the &quot;this might be subjective&quot; warning, is this understandable enough, etc). This is less so with answers, but I could believe for some groups this works the same. For now I'll stick to questions, but you could s/question/answer if you like. The resulting question is almost always  Interesting for me, and a problem I don't know the answer to. I probably would favorite it According to me a valid and good question (as we talked about it beforehand) I would probably want to upvote it.  Now I believe to read that &quot;ring voting&quot; is a thing, and I tried to find some questions about this, but didn't find many. I did find and read this blogpost from 2008:  . It reads to me that upvoting 'fraud' is more commonplace then downvoting and it might seem anomalous that I would upvote almost all questions from one user. If all colleagues would do this to their team, you'd get some mediocre questions getting a lot of votes, and some users getting a lot of attention, points etc from that. If you would -as seems to be done -, sort the amount of upvotes for my colleague, you'd get me being 'anomalous' in front of the crowd. On the other hand, as explained above, I do want to upvote almost all stuff some of my colleagues put on here for (I believe) the right reasons: they are questions I consider good and interesting. It's just that I know of all their questions (as they tell me about them), which obviously isn't the case for a random user. So what is the deal?  When is upvoting content from one user frowned upon? Would my usecase be in danger of being a (what I consider 'false') positive for the fraud-detection? (and would you agree with that or not) How to prevent this false positive (if you agree with me it is one, otherwise this is a moot question) -&gt; As noted in the comments: I'm not looking for tricks, so an answer could be &quot;don't vote for your colleagues&quot;. I agree that there should be no to 'tricks' around that could be used for real fraud of course Can I speed up iCloud photo sync between iPhone and Macbook? I have an iPhone 5 running iOS 9.1 and a Macbook Pro running Yosemite.  Both devices are set up to sync photos to and from iCloud.  When I take a photo on the iPhone (for further processing on the Macbook), it takes an inordinate amount of time until the photo shows up in the Macbook's photos library - sometimes up to 10-20 minutes. Sometimes it seems to work faster if I quit the Photos app on both devices, and start it again.  I often end up sending myself photos through E-Mail because it's quicker. That seems ridiculous!  Is there a way to force a sync on the iPhone, or to speed up the process some other way? Replacing the core of a solenoid to increase the pulling force Question: Let $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ with $a &lt; b$ and let $f: [a,b] \rightarrow [a,b]$ continuous. Show: $f$ has a fixed point, that is, there is an $x \in [a,b]$ with $f(x)=x$.  I suppose this has to do with the basic definition of continuity. The definition I am using is that $f$ is continuous at $a$ if $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists and if $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$. I must not be understanding it, since I am not sure how to begin showing this... Should I be trying to show that $x$ is both greater than or equal to and less than or equal to $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ ? I'm using IEEEtran to format an article, and I wanted to include an image. I included the graphicx and hyperref packages, and used the following code, like normal, to include an image.  \begin{figure}[!t] \centering \includegraphics[width=3in]{fetch} \caption{Pipeline: Fetch Instruction} \label{fig:fetch} \end{figure}   What appears, however, is this:    Fetch.png is a file in the directory, and if I remove it, pdflatex errors instead of producing an output. I'm using MiKTeX 2.9 on Windows 7. Any ideas? Definition of injective function Why does default auto.arima stop at (5,2,5)? Proof of Funds for Canadian Visa I am a Romanian citizen.  Our co-national friends who are established in Canada will provide me and another person free accommodation and food. We are both EU citizens and we will stay in Canada 1 month.  These days we are gathering documents for our online visa application and we need to prove that we have enough money to spend there.   How much money is generally required in order to be sure we are eligible? We don't plan to spend more than 1000 EUR, but I intend to bring at least 2000 CAD. Is it enough? Prove that $∂A$ is closed given $∂A = \text{Cl}(A) − \text{Int}(A)$ Similar questions have been asked, but none with the given information. My textbook doesn't give me the fact that  $∂A = \text{Cl}(A) − \text{Int}(A)$. If that were the case, I could just state that definition and note that it's the intersection of closed sets.   I have very little knowledge of set theory and proofs, so I'm not sure how else to prove this. As always, I appreciate any help.  The question comes from “Introduction to Topology: Pure and Applied” by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa.   "Let $A$ be a subset of a topological space $X$. Prove that $∂A$ is closed given  $∂A = \text{Cl}(A) − \text{Int}(A)$" I've got a weird question. Assume that you have a small sample where the dependent variable that you're going to analyze with a simple linear model is highly left skewed. Thus you assume that $u$ is not normally distributed, because this would result in normally distributed $y$. But when you compute the QQ-Normal plot there is evidence, that the residuals are normally distributed. Thus anyone can assume that the error term is normally distributed, although $y$ is not. So what does it mean, when the error term seems to be normally distributed, but $y$ does not? Suppose you have a physical . It is true that as amplitude increases, the period increases. Can we demonstrate this fact without explicitly finding the period (which is pretty involved and pretty messy) in:    an intuitive fashion,  rigorously? Let $S = \bigoplus_{n\ge 0} S_n$ be a graded commutative ring. Let $f$ be a homogeneous element of $S$ of degree $&gt; 0$. Let $S_{(f)}$ be the degree $0$ part of the graded ring $S_f$, where $S_f$ is the localization with respect to the multiplicative set $\{1, f, f^2,\dots\}$. Suppose $S$ is finitely generated algebra over $S_0$. Then $S_{(f)}$ is a finitely generated algebra over $S_0$. Can current be induced in a superconductor?