I tried to post the following comment and it claims it was less than 15 when it was more.  Based on Tim's comment and testing I believe it would not let me post because with @Shadow removed it is less than 15. However, the characters left message indicates I have passed the 15 character minimum thus it is wrong.  This is the bug I'm reporting:  The characters remaining message and the characters left message do not take into account striping out @name prefixes.
In the comment field on StackOverflow (and other StackExchange sites as well, I presume) you're required to write 15 characters for the server to accept your post. If a shorter post is submitted, an information message states that the comment is too short. That is all good.  However, below the comment field is a counter, which counts up to 15 and then down from however many characters you're allowed to type minus fifteen. This counter doesn't always act the same as the actual validation: if I pad my message with whitespace, the validation notices and still says the message is too short, but the counter does not notice, and counts as usual.  Suggested fix: make the character counter trim the message before it counts, so the two messages say the same thing.
"more than one does" or "more than one do"? However, if no x satisfies the equation or more than one x does—that   is the solution is not unique—the problem is said not to be well   posed.   In the line(source: ) above it uses "more than one does", but logically and intuitively it should be "more than one do" since "more than one" means two or more, then it is plural. I have tried my best to interpret it as it is, but hardly can I convince myself to make "more than" collocate with "does" as an adv., which may only make it make sense. $\lim_{x \to 0} f(x)=\frac{\tan 3x}{\tan 2x}$ without L'Hospital Map not loading when using getLegend and showing error for getView() I was able to run my application on using Legend earlier but now I want to update my Legend when scrolling on the map. So I tried to used this code  . And I got the gist of how he is able to do that but when I am trying the same I keeping getting the error var graphicUrl = wmsSource.getLegendUrl(currentResolution);  I think this is mainly due to the wmsSource not declare. But I tried to initialize  seems wmsSource in TileWMS but does not seems to work. var getExtent = function () {     return map.getView().calculateExtent(); } var getProjectionCode = function () {     return map.getView().getProjection().getCode(); }  var updateLegend = function() {     var currentResolution = map.getView().getResolution();     var graphicUrl = wmsSource.getLegendUrl(currentResolution);        const crs = `&amp;CRS=${getProjectionCode()}`;     const bbox = `&amp;BBOX=${getExtent().join(',')}`;     const height = getHeight(getExtent());     const width = getWidth(getExtent());     const heightAndWidth = `&amp;srcwidth=${height}&amp;srcheight=${width}` ;     const legenOptions = &quot;&amp;legend_options=countMatched:true;fontAntiAliasing:true;hideEmptyRules:true;forceLabels:on&quot; ;        var img = document.getElementById('legend');     img.src = `${graphicUrl}${crs}${bbox}${heightAndWidth}${legenOptions}`; }; //Updated Legend End   //View var myview = new ol.View({     center : [8717490.201868,2788422.791843],     zoom : 4 })  var firstSel = document.getElementById(&quot;City&quot;); var secSel = document.getElementById(&quot;Sector&quot;);  //var LayerArray = [baseLayer, firstLayer]  //Map var map = new ol.Map({       target : 'mymap',       view: myview,       layers: [         new ol.layer.Tile({             source : new ol.source.OSM({                 attributions: 'Surveyor Allpication'             })         }),         new ol.layer.Tile({             source : new ol.source.TileWMS({                url: 'http://localhost:8089/geoserver/India/wms',                params: {'LAYERS': 'India:India', 'TILED': true,'TRANSPARENT':true},                ratio: 1,                serverType: 'geoserver',                transition: 0,             })         })       ] }) updateLegend();   This here is my JS &lt;div class=&quot;innerMap&quot;&gt;     &lt;div class=&quot;map&quot; id=&quot;mymap&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;         Legend:     &lt;div&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;legend&quot;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;     &lt;!--    &lt;div&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://localhost:8089/geoserver/wms?REQUEST=GetLegendGraphic&amp;VERSION=1.0.0&amp;FORMAT=image/png&amp;WIDTH=20&amp;HEIGHT=20&amp;LAYER=India%3AIndia&amp;RULE=Agra&quot; /&gt;%Name&lt;/div&gt; --&gt; &lt;!--    &lt;div&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://localhost:8089/geoserver/India/wms?SERVICE=WMS&amp;VERSION=1.1.1&amp;REQUEST=GetLegendGraphic&amp;FORMAT=image/png&amp;WIDTH=20&amp;HEIGHT=20&amp;LAYER=India%3AIndia&amp;SRS=EPSG%3A4326&amp;STYLES=&amp;SRCWIDTH=742&amp;SRCHEIGHT=768&amp;BBOX=75.4541015625%2C14.21630859375%2C91.7578125%2C31.09130859375&amp;LEGEND_OPTIONS=countMatched:true;fontAntiAliasing:true;hideEmptyRules:true&quot; /&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  --&gt;     &lt;/div&gt;  This is my HTML. How do I make this work? How exactly does Knuth's Up-Arrow notation work? Show that $a \star b=a \cdot b+a+b$ is binary operation for the group $\Bbb{ Q} \setminus \{-1\}$ The group $\left(\Bbb{ Q}\setminus\{-1\},\star\right)$ has as its underlying set the rational numbers different from $-1$ and the operation $\star$ is defined as $a \star b=a \cdot b+a+b$ where multiplication/addition are the usual operations with rational numbers.Show that this is a binary operation.  What I did (Please help verify):  identity element has to be 0 since $a\star 0 = a+0+a(0)$ so for $a\star b=0$ we have  $ab+a+b=0$ $$ab+a=-b \\ a(b+1)=-b \\ a=\frac{-b}{b+1}$$ so $b$ cant be $-1$ since that solution is not in $\Bbb{Q}$. Similar question might have been answered here. Is this operation true for all groups? I think so.  Thanks for the tips and help. Suppose that $f : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ is entire. Let $\Omega = \{ z : \frac{1}{2} &lt; |z| &lt; 2\}$. Furthermore, suppose that $ \mathcal{F} = \{f(kz) : k \in \mathbb{C}\}$ is a normal family of analytic functions defined on $\Omega$; the family $\mathcal{F}$ is normal on $\Omega$ iff each sequence from $\mathcal{F}$ has a subsequence converging uniformly on compact subsets of $\Omega$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial.  I'm studying for my qualifying exam in complex analysis, and this question appears on an old exam. Usually, when I want to show that some entire $f$ is a polynomial, I just try to show that there exists some $N$ so that $f^{(k)}(0) = 0$, all $k \ge N$, but I'm having trouble getting that strategy to work here. I've been looking at the sequence $f(\frac{z}{n})$ trying to make something work, but have not had any success.   I would prefer to receive a hint or two, and then I'll try to post my own solution. Thanks in advance! Auto-sort column Google Spreadsheet on incoming Google Form response How can I get the Google Spreadsheet to automatically order the incoming form responses alphabetically (2nd column)?   I know how to do this manually or by going in and editing a cell, but cannot get it to do this as an onevent for incoming response. What is the proof that the total number of subsets of a set is $2^n$? How can I correct a reviewer's opinion? Note: The legacy Skype for Linux application (v4.*) is now discontinued and was removed from Canonical’s partner repositories, so this question and its answers are obsolete. Please refer to  of our .  Skype 4.3 is just released with considerable improvements. As a regular Skype user I want to use the latest Skype on my Ubuntu 14.04, but there is no updates from Update Manager. Even in Skype website only Skype 4.3 is available only for Ubuntu 12.04. Is there anyway to use this latest Skype on Ubuntu 14.04 or how much we have to wait for the update? Why wont my 'background' render? I'm having this problem in Blender that it is only loading the text, I am very new to this and don't know why it is cutting out what is even in the camera view and making it black. If you could help me, I would really appreciate it.   It's only rendering 'Kenny Miller" and not the green/black back:  [ I read the definition of  as  $$W ~=~ \vec{F} \cdot \vec{d}$$  $$\text{ Work  =  (Force) $\cdot$ (Distance)}.$$ If a book is there on the table, no work is done as no distance is covered. If I hold up a book in my hand and my arm is stretched, if no work is being done, where is my energy going? How come unpolarized light does not undergo destructive interference? If an elephant can apply 250N force and a rabbit can apply 25N force , and if they are pulling each other , then elephant will pull with 250N force and according to newtons third law the rabbit should also pull the elephant with 250N force.then from where do the rabbit got the extra 225N i.e.(250-25=225) force??? can anyone please explain. Error on \usepackage {geometry} text property The following produces error! The error is solved if no space exists between text= and {5in,8in}. This is really weird! Why is this happening with LaTeX?  \documentclass[a4paper,10pt,onecolumn,oneside, portrait]{article}  \usepackage[text= {5in,8in},centering]{geometry}  \begin{document}      \section{What Endogenous uncertainty is:}  yes  \subsection{Type as it is : Stochastic and determ! } on  \subsubsection{Well there is more than it} Yes    \end{document} I'm looking for a more politically correct substitute for the expression "poor man's", meaning an inferior improvised or makeshift substitute. Usage examples:   "Guncotton is the poor man's TNT" "Poor man's oyster" (mussels, or coughed up phlegm)    My hesitance is mainly because it is not as gender neutral as perhaps it once was. The closest I can think of is "pauper's", but I don't know many examples of usage. What is the typographic reasoning here? Does it make the text look less crowded? Quantum entanglement: does it necessarily imply superluminal information transfer? 80's Animated movie: An old man joins mission to save a boy stranded on a hostile world A guy on a space ship picks up a distress call, a boy is stranded on a planet with a hostile environment. He &amp; his crew go to the rescue, stopping on the way to pick up an old man who comes with them. Most of the top of the old guy's skull is metal, from an old injury.  They've various adventures on the way (their ship is boarded by pirates/bandits/hostile forces at one point).  They get to the planet with the boy. They've limited time to save him as the planet is being moved back in time. (I can't remember why) When they find the boy, he's being attacked by giant wasp-type-things.   The boy is injured on the top of his head. The old guy dies protecting him. The boy gets shifted back in time with the planet and - you guessed it - survives, grows up and turns out to be the old guy.  Now that I've remembered some of it, the bits I can't remember are driving me crazy. I'd love to see this again, if I could identify it I might be able to track down a copy.  I'd swear I saw this mid 80's on morning TV, but it I could be out by 5 years either way. Thanks Citing a range of papers using numeric keys as in \cite{a, b, c} -> [1-3] How can I cite a range of papers, the output is a range of numbers, instead of a list of numbers? In other words, when I type  ... some dummy text here is due to me \cite{me1, me2, me3, me4} ...   I want the output to be     ... some dummy text here is due to me [3-6] ...   instead of     ... some dummy text here is due to me [3.4.5.6] ...   (I use LaTeX, and am currently using the amsart class and whatever it includes. But I am open to other suggestions.)