I just bought a house and want to replace the locks. Unfortunately, on door has what appears to be an older Schlage double cylinder deadbolt that I can't figure out how to remove. I've tried prying faceplates off with no success. Internet searches talk about screw caps but these don't seem to be capping anything and I can't pry them out. I tried going in from the door edge, but the plate there seems to be attached to the inner mechanism and I couldn't get it out. Does anyone know how I can remove this lock with destroying the door? Image of the inside attached. The outside looks the same but without the two depressions on either side of the key.
Does anyone know how to remove this dead bolt that has no screw heads to use a screw driver? Here's a picture below.
How do I run a command before or after every command written in the console? Timeout for Always On Synchronous Commit Mode For SQL Server Enterprise's Always On availability groups, how can you configure the timeout for Synchronous Commit mode?  Is there a maximum?  Can it work, for example, between continents? Thanks To be truly standards-compliant, must all functions in C (except for main) have a prototype, even if they are only used after their definition in the same translation unit? I have downloaded Python 3.3 from the official site but no idea how to install it.   I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 Prove $X$ is compact iff for each family $\{ F_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}$ of closed subsets of $X$ with the FIP, we have $\cap F_\alpha\neq\varnothing$. I'm reading Intro to Topology from Mendelson.  The entire problem statement is,  Prove that $X$ is compact if and only if for each family $\lbrace F_\alpha\rbrace_{\alpha\in I}$ of closed subsets of $X$ that has the finite intersection property, we have $\bigcap_{\alpha\in I} F_\alpha\neq\varnothing$.  My attempt at the proof is as follows:  First assume that $X$ is compact. For the sake of contradiction, suppose that there exists a family $\{ F_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I}$ of closed subsets of $X$ with FIP such that $\bigcap_{\alpha\in I} F_\alpha=\varnothing$. Since $X$ is compact if $\lbrace F_\alpha\rbrace_{\alpha\in I}$ any family of closed sets such that $\bigcap_{\alpha\in I} F_\alpha=\varnothing$, then there exists a finite set of indices $\lbrace \alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n\rbrace$ such that $\bigcap\limits_{i=1}^n F_{\alpha_i}=\varnothing$. Yet, since $\lbrace F_\alpha\rbrace_{\alpha\in I}$ has the finite intersection property, for every finite index of $J\subset I$, $\bigcap\limits_{\alpha\in I} F_\alpha\neq\varnothing$.  Suppose now that $X$ is not compact, that is, there exists an open cover $\lbrace U_\alpha\rbrace_{\alpha\in I}$ of $X$ with no finite subcover. Consider the set $F_\alpha=C(U_\alpha).$ Then $\lbrace F_\alpha\rbrace_{\alpha\in I}$ is a collection of closed subsets of $X$ with the finite intersection property and were $\bigcap_{\alpha\in I} F_\alpha=\varnothing.$  Thanks for any feedback! How does Newtonian mechanics explain why orbiting objects do not fall to the object they are orbiting? The force of gravity is constantly being applied to an orbiting object.  And therefore the object is constantly accelerating.  Why doesn't gravity eventually "win" over the object's momentum, like a force such as friction eventually slows down a car that runs out of gas?  I understand (I think) how relativity explains it, but how does Newtonian mechanics explain it? If $ua = au$, where $u$ is a unit and $a$ is a nilpotent, show that $u+a$ is a unit.   I've been working on this problem for an hour that I tried to construct an element $x \in R$ such that $x(u+a) = 1 = (u+a)x$. After tried several elements and manipulated $ua = au$, I still couldn't find any clue. Can anybody give me a hint? Is there any way I can separate a List&lt;SomeObject&gt; into several separate lists of SomeObject, using the item index as the delimiter of each split?  Let me exemplify:  I have a List&lt;SomeObject&gt; and I need a List&lt;List&lt;SomeObject&gt;&gt; or List&lt;SomeObject&gt;[], so that each of these resulting lists will contain a group of 3 items of the original list (sequentially).  eg.:   Original List: [a, g, e, w, p, s, q, f, x, y, i, m, c] Resulting lists: [a, g, e], [w, p, s], [q, f, x], [y, i, m], [c]   I'd also need the resulting lists size to be a parameter of this function. How to integrate $ \int x^n e^x dx$? How should ip2long converted IP's be stored in MySQL? Why is Outlook 2010 Changing my Embedded Spreadsheet to a GIF? Years ago I figured out how to embed a spreadsheet in an Outlook email to automate a task I do regularly.  Whenever I want to send a new quote request I open an old email, tell Outlook I want to resend it, fill in the new values in my embedded spreadsheet and then send it off.  This method worked well for years.  After switching to a new computer however, I have found that when I open the latest emails I have sent, I cannot edit the embedded spreadsheet because Outlook interprets it now as a GIF.  Saved emails that I sent with the old computer however, still work fine - I can still open, edit and resend and Outlook interprets the embedded spreadsheet correctly.  I would like to figure out how to setup Outlook in the new PC correctly so that the embedded spreadsheet is interpreted correctly when the email is reopened. Some sort of security setting, maybe?  Any help anyone could provide would be appreciated.  Edit: I developed the spreadsheet originally in Excel. Then I went into Outlook, created a new email, did Insert->Object->Excel Spreadsheet. At that point I had a blank spreadsheet in my email. Then I copied and pasted the spreadsheet from Excel into the blank spreadsheet in Outlook and it worked perfectly (until this recent problem) Is there a cryptographic algorithm which is immune to side channel attacks? Is there any cryptographic algorithm immune to side channel attacks based on scan chain? In VLSI point of view. I had a heck of time while editing my  question. But, I guess, I discovered a new weird problem in the editor while formatting hyperlink text next to  tag.  To illustrate this problem better, I would like to give the following examples:  Has problem with one or none white-space in between:  [meta-tag:status-planned] [details page reads:][2] [meta-tag:status-planned][details page reads:][2]     Gives weird output as:   [details page reads:]   [details page reads:]   But, its okay with two white-spaces in between:  [meta-tag:status-planned]  [details page reads:][2]   Gives the correct output as:      Something is strange here. I don't understand why do I have to insert two white-spaces instead of just one? Are the two white-spaces are mandatory when using [meta-tag:some-tag] with hyperlink text adjacent to it? Or, is it one of those  thing?  But wait, it's get even further complicated if I do like:   1. No white-spaces in between:  [meta-tag:status-planned][meta-tag:status-completed][Moderator-only Tags][3]     2. One white-space in between:  [meta-tag:status-planned] [meta-tag:status-completed] [Moderator-only Tags][3]       3. Two white-spaces in between:  [meta-tag:status-planned]  [meta-tag:status-completed]  [Moderator-only Tags][3]         They all seems to work perfectly fine. Now, thats very strange! Why would the two [meta-tag:some-tag] works like a charm with or without requiring to insert any white-spaces? Can anyone explain this in a better way. I don't want to jump on the conclusion by calling this as a bug yet, so I used  tag instead of  tag. Please share your thoughts. My questions is very simple. How can I set security setting for a PDF file created with PDFLatex?  I should set some password or print permissions, etc. Execute task if tasker profile has been active for some time How can I execute a tasker task only after a certain condition has been true for a certain time?  Normally a profile executes its task as soon as all conditions are met. I want to delay this activation, until the conditions have stayed true for some time.  E.g.    do something after the screen has been continuously off or on for 10 minutes do something after wifi xy has not been near for 10 minutes do something after cell towers x,y,z have not been near for 10 minutes. Is there a unique solution for this quadratic matrix equation? Since Newton's law of gravitation can be gotten out of Einstein's field equatons as an approximation, I was wondering whether the same applies for the electromagnetic force being the exchange of photons. Is there an equation governing the force from the exchange of photons? Are there any links which would show how the Coulomb force comes out of the equations for photon exchange? I know that my question is somewhat similar to the one posted here , but it doesn't really have an answer to my question specifically. I want to assign a class attribute via a string object - but how?  Example:  class test(object):   pass  a = test() test.value = 5 a.value # -&gt; 5 test.__dict__['value'] # -&gt; 5  # BUT: attr_name = 'next_value'  test.__dict__[attr_name] = 10 # -&gt; 'dictproxy' object does not support item assignment Consider a partial function $f$ that is defined only for a few values of its domain (my exact use case is $\delta$ transition functions in automata). One can 'complete' it by saying $$g(x)=0\iff f(x) \text{ is not defined.}$$  Is there a symbol to mean "undefined"? Would it be correct, or accurate, to write $\nexists f(x)$? The Help Vampire problem