If a website is cached, does it mean that it has been indexed too?    In this snapshot cache date is shown as 18th may but when i did site search for this domain I found 0 pages were indexed by google last week.
My website's google cache copy looks broken.   Below is link to cache.  http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://paintcollar.com  Can this affect the SERPs and crawling by google?  What can I do to rectify it?  PS. Few pages are being cached properly though.Below is URL to one such page. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://paintcollar.com/aneel
Accessing the iPhone's Call log with the iPhone SDK How to get the pid of the last executed command in shell script? I want to have a shell script like this:  my-app &amp; echo $my-app-pid   But I do not know how the get the pid of the just executed command.  I know I can just use the jobs -p my-app command to grep the pid. But if I want to execute the shell multiple times, this method will not work. Because the jobspec is ambiguous. Is there a word for happiness made possible by a tragic situation? I frequently find myself needing a word to express happiness that acknowledges a tragic or unfortunate circumstance underpinning that happiness. Preferably the word could have both adjective and verb forms. For example, "Gregory [verb-ed | felt adjective about] the balmy February day, suspecting it was yet another consequence of catastrophic and irreversible climate change."  "Bittersweet" is close, but not precisely right. It implies ambivalence rather than genuine gladness. "Schadenfreude" is also in the neighborhood, but I don't want to imply that the tragic part of the situation is what causes the pleasure. (Also, I recognize that the word may not quite exist in English, and I don't know if this is forbidden for this forum, but I'd welcome a loan word or phrase if there's a better one.) Does a shortcode with a single attribute have to use an array? I want to build a shortcode that takes a single attribute.  Everything online is telling me to make it using an array:  // Add Shortcode function bg_comparison_points_shortcode( $atts ) {     // Attributes     $atts = shortcode_atts(         array(             'custom_field' =&gt; '',         ),         $atts,         'comparison_points'     );     return bg_calculate_points($custom_field); } add_shortcode( 'comparison_points', 'bg_comparison_points_shortcode' );   But in my mind something like this would be much simpler  // Add Shortcode function bg_comparison_points_shortcode( $custom_field ) {     return bg_calculate_points($custom_field); } add_shortcode( 'comparison_points', 'bg_comparison_points_shortcode' );   Is there a problem doing this simpler version? Does a magic item used as an improvised weapon count as a magic weapon? Tilde (~) File in Macintosh Directory Last night I discovered what looks like an unusual file named "~" (tilde) in the root of my "Macintosh HD" directory on my MacBook.    Finder reports the file is 2.2MB in size, of kind "TextEdit.app Document", and was created on 22nd January 2014 (so about a month ago).  I haven't noticed any operational issues with OS X or it's applications.   I haven't yet touched the file but would obviously like to remove it.  I am very conscious that '~' is a special alias to the user home directory and thus I would appreciate any recommendations in removing the file in a safe manner that isn't likely to nuke my home directory or screw up the operation of applications or OS X. I don't know whether to delete or rename and whether to use Finder or the command line.   It's entirely possible that I created the file by accident since I've recently been drafting and running various shell scripts that use the ~, user home alias.  MacBook Pro 15" (Retina, Mid 2012) Yosemite What is the easiest way to find and replace text in 20 text files in a directory? I have 20 text files with various extensions in a directory.  I want to replace "nnn" with "ooo" in all files.  I could import them into a project in Eclipse or Visual Studio to replace them all but that is overkill and would add other meta files etc.  What is a simple way to do this, I'm thinking: select all files, right click, choose some tool called (e.g. "QuickReplacer") and fill in find and replace, click and done.  Does anyone know of a tool like this? Usage of into vs in vs inside When should 'into', 'in' and 'inside' be used?  What are the differences between the three?   For example, what are the differences between the following statements?  Are any of them incorrect?        The frog jumped into the well.   The frog jumped in the well.   The frog jumped inside the well. What is the difference between "Build and view" and "Compile"? Find all solutions to $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {91},\ 91 = 7\cdot 13$ I split this into $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {7}$ and $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {13}$.  For $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {7}$, i did: $$ (\pm1 )^2\equiv 1\pmod{7}$$ $$(\pm2 )^2\equiv 4\pmod{7}$$ $$(\pm3 )^2\equiv 2\pmod{7}$$ Which shows that the solutions to $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {7}$ are $\pm1$.  For $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {13}$, i did: $$ (\pm1 )^2\equiv 1\pmod{13}$$ $$(\pm2 )^2\equiv 4\pmod{13}$$ $$(\pm3 )^2\equiv 9\pmod{13}$$ $$ (\pm4 )^2\equiv 3\pmod{13}$$ $$(\pm5 )^2\equiv {-1}\pmod{13}$$ $$(\pm6 )^2\equiv 10\pmod{13}$$Which shows that the solutions to $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {13}$ are $\pm1$.  Thus, I concluded that the solutions to $x^2\equiv 1\pmod {91}$ must be $\pm1$. I thought that $\pm1$ were the only solutions, but apparently I am incorrect! How do I go about finding the other solutions to this congruence? SEO preference: does a site with WWW rank better than without WWW? After having read various articles on this site about WWW or Non-WWW website setup, ,  and , and after having setup a correct redirection rule in .Htaccess to at least eliminate duplicate contents (currently the non-www solution (e.g. http://example.com) I have a feeling that my site rank less since I changed this.   My confusion was strengthened by these two opponents:     &amp;     Could the change of www.example.com >> http://example.com have a factual impact on ranking?  say either is better or worse. Are they holding information back?  I am confused fellow folks...  As much as I would like to separate facts from fiction, I am aware that not all the good valid information is written. Not on google webmaster site and perhaps not elsewhere. If so it seems out of date!  Does or does not a WWW domain impact SEO/rank better than its NON-WWW version? (Given that you have setup a proper redirect to avoid duplicates and go with one) What is the correct way to pluralize an acronym / initialism? For example, if I wanted to write the equivalent of  There are many automated teller machines in this city.  Would it be  There are many ATMs in this city.  or  There are many ATM's in this city. (could get confused with possessive form or contraction).  or just  There are many ATM in this city. (assuming the final s is included in Machines represented by M).  Maybe something else? Let $f(z)$ be an entire function such that $$|f(z)|&lt;\frac{1}{|\text{Im}(z)|},\qquad z\in\Bbb C-\Bbb R.$$ The question asked me to prove that $f(z)=0$. At least looking at it, it really seems to have an application of Liouville's theorem lurking around somewhere, but I haven't found it.   My thoughts first led me to think about doing this by contradiction and using Picard's little theorem. So, I've considered a strip containing the real axis (say of width $2$ for simplicity). This will imply the complement maps into the unit disk, which implies that this strip has to map almost everywhere else on the complex plane. Now, on the imaginary axis, I know that $f(z)$ will vanish as $z\to\infty$, and this seems like it might be useful. I'm sort of under the impression $f(z)$ might have an essential singularity at $\infty$, which would mean $f(1/z)$ has an essential singularity at $0$. Either way, it of course can't have a pole at $\infty$ because of $f(z)$ vanishing on the imaginary axis, and if it is a removable singularity, it must be $0$, which still gives the solution. Therefore, I think it must have something to do with $f(z)$ having an essential singularity at $\infty$.   I was hoping to combine this with the above inequality and deduce a contradiction, but I haven't thought of one yet.   Any hints or suggestions? I'm studying for a prelim. exam, so this isn't homework.  Update: So, in the spirit of searching methods using the essential singularity at $z=0$, we have $$\left|f\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|\leq\frac{1}{\left|\text{Im}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|}=\frac{|z|^2}{|y|}.$$ Thus, for $|y|&gt;1$, we have $$\left|f\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|&lt;|y|\left|f\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|&lt;|z|^2.$$ Thus, if I can show that $|f(1/z)|$ is a polynomial, we'll know it can't have an essential singularity at the origin, concluding my proof. How to prove $\text{Rank}(AB)\leq \min(\text{Rank}(A), \text{Rank}(B))$? How to prove $\text{Rank}(AB)\leq \min(\text{Rank}(A), \text{Rank}(B))$? In a ring $(A,+, \cdot)$ if $aba = a$ then $bab = b$ and all non zero elements in $A$ are invertible. Let $\left(A,+, \cdot\right)$ be a ring with $1$  that satisfies the following condition:  For any nonzero $a\in A$, there exists a unique $b\in A$ such that $aba = a$.  Show that $b$ also satisfies $bab = b$, and that all nonzero elements of $A$ are invertible. Efficient online linear regression I have 2 quartz crystal resonators in my pcb board: 32.768 kHz &amp; 20 MHz. They are connected to a Freescale MC12311 transceiver IC, which has an HCS08 micro-controller embedded in it. I want to test if these crystals are working properly or not.  Available tools: Oscilloscope, Frequency-Meter (Digital Counter), Digital Multimeter.  How should I use these tools to test the crystals in board?   Note: The capacitive load-effect of probes should probably be considered. If not, the measurement would not be accurate, or even worse, the crystals would not work at all.     Edit1: I used both the oscilloscope and the frequency-meter (with x10 probes), but unfortunately there was nothing monitored at all. Permission denied, are you root? Does an Echo Knight fighter's echo provoke an opportunity attack when it moves? Proving $\mathbb{F}_p/\langle f(x)\rangle$ with $f(x)$ irreducible of degree $n$ is a field with $p^n$ elements I am attempting to prove what the title says, that $\mathbb{F}_p/\langle f(x)\rangle$ with $f(x)$ irreducible of degree $n$ is a field with $p^n$ elements.  I have already proven that for any field $K$ and polynomial $f(x)$ in $K[x]$, $K[x]/\langle f(x)\rangle$ is a field if and only if $f(x)$ is irreducible in $K[x]$. So I know that $\mathbb{F}_p/\langle f(x)\rangle$ is a field for sure. Where I'm lost is figuring out how to know for sure that there are $p^n$ elements. It's fairly clear if $n\in\{ 0 ,1\}$, but I don't think induction is going to help.  I know from a proposition in class that since $F_p = \mathbb{Z}/\langle p\rangle$ and $F_p = \mathbb{Z}/\langle p\rangle$ is an integral domain, $F_p[x] = (\mathbb{Z}/\langle p\rangle)[x] = (\mathbb{Z}[x])/(\langle p\rangle[x])$, but I'm not sure whether or not that's helpful information.