I have a code that is badly disorganized. I wish to receive input from experts regarding how I can make it more understandable for me and for others.   Is that a question suitable for SO or is it 'too vague/not a real question' ?
There seems to be more than a few computer science/programming Stack Exchange networks (is that the correct term?). Stack Overflow, being the first, has by far the most users, questions, and answers.  What is the reasoning for creating the others, and are there clear guidelines for which kinds of questions should be posted? I can see a large amount of potential overflow, many cases of people not getting a good answer to their question, because the person who has the answer isn't browsing that particular network at the moment.  I understand that they were probably created for organizational purposes, but wouldn't it almost make more sense to just have them as categories under Stack Overflow, keep them separated but still connected, instead of making people have to create multiple 'account's, one for each network?  I am sure there was a very good reason to break them up, but as someone that is new to SE, it can be somewhat intimidating to decide which one to post in to ensure you get a good answer. For example, if I am a computer science student, my first instinct might to be to post in the computer science network, until I see that it literally has 1% of the users as the Stack Overflow network, which still seems to be for programming/computer science related questions.  So my second instinct would then to be to post it into the Stack&nbsp;Overflow site on the basis that I have a significantly higher chance of my question being seen and getting a good answer. Then I notice that there is also a 'programmers' network, and I don't even begin to know where that fits in. I, and I am assuming most people, will probably just post on Stack&nbsp;Overflow to be safe.  My question is, other than the short little description blurb of each one, is there a clear cut set of guidelines which what each network is intended for, what kinds of questions should go to each one, and is anything being done to encourage people to post in these newer, smaller (more specialized?) networks as opposed to just posting in big daddy Stack Overflow?  Now again, this is for computer science/programming/"why isn't this code doing what I want?" related questions, I am not saying that if I had a question about Linux or WordPress or something I would have the same confusion.
A matrix and its transpose have the same set of eigenvalues/other version: $A$ and $A^T$ have the same spectrum Let $ \sigma(A)$ be the set of all eigenvalues of $A$. Show that $ \sigma(A) = \sigma\left(A^T\right)$ where $A^T$ is the transpose matrix of $A$. Why does everyone do 9-overlord, not 10-overlord? What is the advantage on saving the money for the overlord when you have 9 drones, and not filling your supply first and then getting the overlord?  In my theory, in the first case you get to wait the saving time with 9 drones, and get to wait almost the same time with 10 drones in the second case. Second case should be better, since 10 drones mine faster than 9? So why does everybody go with the first case?  All this is assuming you go 12 pool or something like that, where you will get more drones after the overlord. 6- and 8-pools are obviously different. With a two-party system, our nation will divide the people (who/whom)   most need to be brought together.   Do I use who or whom for this sentence?  I think that "people" is the direct object and warrants the use of "whom", but I want to make sure I'm right. Does GTA V Online Network Merge Xbox 360 and PS3 players? Let $f:R\rightarrow R$ be a function such that all its successive derivatives exist in all $R$ and also $f(x)f''(x)\leq 0$ everywhere.  If $\alpha$ and $\beta$ be two successive roots of $f(x)=0$.   Then prove that $f'''(x)=0$ for atleast one $\gamma \in(\alpha,\beta)$.  My Attempt:  I began by taking an example $f(x)=(x-1)(2-x)$ and let $x=1$ and $x=2$ be its two successive roots.The statement is trivially true.  Then I took the function $f(x)=e^{-x}(x-1)(2-x)$.The statement is true here also so on and so forth.  But what would be the exact proof I wonder. It appears to be a question of Rolle's Theorem. Every time I insert the SD card from my camera into the card reader, I get this dialog:    Of course there is no need to scan it. Is there a way to disable it? Have a web-part display only sub-folders? I am new to SharePoint 2013. I was curious how to put a WebPart for a Document Library on a page with SharePoint 2013, not 2010.   This WebPart would then show the content of a specific library folder and not start at the root of the folder. So say I have a library with multiple folders like "Marketing", "Finance" etc,   I want to be able to create a web part that would only show the contents within the “Marketing subfolder and all of it contents. Is this possible? What is the difference between logistic regression and Fractional response regression? As far as I know, the difference between logistic model and fractional response model (frm) is that the dependent variable (Y) in which frm is [0,1], but logistic is {0, 1}. Further, frm uses the quasi-likelihood estimator to determine its parameters. Normally, we can use glm to obtain the logistic models by glm(y ~ x1+x2, data = dat, family = binomial(logit)). For frm, we change family = binomial(logit) to family = quasibinomial(logit). I noticed we can also use family = binomial(logit) to obtain frm's parameter since it gives the same estimated values. See the following example library(foreign) mydata &lt;- read.dta(&quot;k401.dta&quot;)   glm.bin &lt;- glm(prate ~ mrate + age + sole + totemp,                 data = mydata, family = binomial('logit')) summary(glm.bin)  return,  Call: glm(formula = prate ~ mrate + age + sole + totemp,      family = binomial(&quot;logit&quot;),      data = mydata)  Deviance Residuals:      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max   -3.1214  -0.1979   0.2059   0.4486   0.9146    Coefficients:               Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(&gt;|z|)     (Intercept)  1.074e+00  8.869e-02  12.110  &lt; 2e-16 *** mrate        5.734e-01  9.011e-02   6.364 1.97e-10 *** age          3.089e-02  5.832e-03   5.297 1.17e-07 *** sole         3.636e-01  9.491e-02   3.831 0.000128 *** totemp      -5.780e-06  2.207e-06  -2.619 0.008814 **  --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)      Null deviance: 1166.6  on 4733  degrees of freedom Residual deviance: 1023.7  on 4729  degrees of freedom AIC: 1997.6  Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 6  And for family = quasibinomial('logit'), glm.quasi &lt;- glm(prate ~ mrate + age + sole + totemp,   data = mydata ,family = quasibinomial('logit')) summary(glm.quasi)  return,  Call: glm(formula = prate ~ mrate + age + sole + totemp,      family = quasibinomial(&quot;logit&quot;),      data = mydata)  Deviance Residuals:      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max   -3.1214  -0.1979   0.2059   0.4486   0.9146    Coefficients:               Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|)     (Intercept)  1.074e+00  4.788e-02  22.435  &lt; 2e-16 *** mrate        5.734e-01  4.864e-02  11.789  &lt; 2e-16 *** age          3.089e-02  3.148e-03   9.814  &lt; 2e-16 *** sole         3.636e-01  5.123e-02   7.097 1.46e-12 *** totemp      -5.780e-06  1.191e-06  -4.852 1.26e-06 *** --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  (Dispersion parameter for quasibinomial family taken to be 0.2913876)      Null deviance: 1166.6  on 4733  degrees of freedom Residual deviance: 1023.7  on 4729  degrees of freedom AIC: NA  Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 6  The estimated Beta from both `family` are the same, but the difference is the SE values.  However, to obtain the correct SE, we have to use `library(sandwich)` as in this [post][1].  Now, my questions:  1. What is the difference between these two codes? 2. Is frm about to obtain robust SE?  If my understanding is not correct, please give some suggestions.      [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37584715/fractional-response-regression-in-r How can I remap Caps lock to both Escape and Control? How do I put a backdrop behind the model that I am creating so that I can compare the picture to the model while editing? I've been looking for a simple regex for URLs, does anybody have one handy that works well?  I didn't find one with the zend framework validation classes and have seen several implementations. Do I really need to encode '&' as '&amp;'? Hey guys I am currently working on a scene with multiple objects.  There is one object (a wheel) that I need to rotate the origin for without rotating the wheel itself.  I have the exact angle that I need so a manual solution would be the best.  Any help would be much appreciated. I am used to parametric modeling and Blender is a little out of my depth. Will Stack Overflow's engine be (someday, or ever) open sourced? Recover scaling factor in TikZ Does it exist some tikz register (let say \zoomfactor) that provides the curent scale factor. For example can I do something like :   \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2]     \begin{scope}[scale=1.5]         \draw (0,0) circle (\zoomfactor);     \end{scope} \end{tikzpicture}   and to obtain circle of size 3=2*1.5 ? Accelerating electrons via microwaves In Synchrotrons I think they use microwaves to accelerate the electrons bundles that fly through-how does putting a microwave through a cavity accelerate an electron? I know that the Electric and Magnetic fields could and do have an effect on the electron, but if the radiation is moving parallel to the electron, wouldn't the force be perpendicular? Also, how exactly does the microwave radiation look in the vacuum chamber? Are the two ends constant nodes? Login failed for user - Error 18456 - Severity 14, State 38 Solving multiple congruences by CRT = Chinese Remainder Theorem How do I get the solution given by CRT to match another solution, e.g. the least positive? For example say I have X = 1234. I choose mi as 5, 7, 11, 13. This satisfies the simple requirements of . More precisely given in my example k = n = 4, and the product of any k - 1 is smaller then X how come simply computing the remainder of each won't give equations that solve to X = 1234. In the case of the example, x = 4 mod 5 x = 2 mod 7 x = 2 mod 11 x = 12 mod 13  Which resolves to  (won't CRT produce the smallest?) Any hints?  Below is the solution linked to on &quot;Math Celebrity&quot; (cached to avoid link rot). Prove that $\int f\ d\lambda = \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\ dx,$ for any $f \in \mathcal R[a,b].$ Theorem $:$ Let $f : [a,b] \longrightarrow \Bbb R$ be a Riemann integrable function. Then $f \in L_1[a,b]$ and $$\int f\ d\lambda = \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\ dx.$$  The proof given in my book is as follows $:$     At the fag end of the proof $f$ has been proved to be measurable which uses the completeness of the measure space $\left ([a,b], \mathcal L \cap [a,b], \lambda |_{[a,b]} \right ).$ Then it has been stated that $f \leq \Phi_n,$ $\forall$ $n$ and hence $f \in L_1[a,b]$ since $\Phi_n \in L_1[a,b]$ by the proposition $5.4.3 \ $(i) which states the following $:$  Let $f \in \Bbb L$ and $g \in L_1[a,b].$ If $|f(x)| \leq g(x)$ for a.e. $x(\mu).$ Then $f \in L_1[a,b].$  I don't know how to use this proposition to claim that $f \in L_1[a,b].$ Also I don't understand the way dominated convergence theorem used here. What I know about dominated convergence theorem is as follows $:$  Let $(X, \mathcal S, \mu)$ be a complete measure space. Let $g \in L_1(X)$ and $\{f_n \}_{n \geq 1}$ be a sequence in $\Bbb L$ such that $|f_n(x)| \leq g(x)$ a.e. $x(\mu).$ Let $f_n(x) \to f(x)$ as $n \to \infty$ a.e. $x (\mu).$ Then $f \in L_1(X)$ and $$\int f\ d\mu = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \int f_n\ d\mu.$$  From here how to conclude that $$\Psi_n\ \bigg\uparrow\ f \implies \int f\ d\lambda = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \int \Psi_n\ d\lambda.$$ Please help me in this regard. Thanks in advance. Opposite of "straight talk"