In the , it says normal types have no effectiveness against ghost types. Since Haunter is a primarily Ghost type (aside from being Poison type), it should receive no damage from Normal types right?  I'm asking this because I thought I was sneaky with my 450 CP Haunter battling a 1400 CP Snorlax... It did not turn out so well...  Follow-up question, if the answer is that "because Haunter is also a Poison type", are there any Pokémon in Go that are immune to any other pokémon's attacks?
Only generation-I Pokemon are available, however it seems that the types which did not exist in Gen-I do exist in Pokemon Go (e.g. Dark type moves).   So I'm wondering which type chart the game is using for move effectiveness.    According to Bulbapedia, in Gen I Bug attacks were super-effective against Poison, but in Gen II-V Bug attacks are not very effective against Poison. What is it in Pokemon Go? Similarly, in Gen II-V Ghost attacks are not very effective against Steel, but in Gen VI Ghost attacks are normal effective against Steel. Does anyone have a Magnemite, is it Steel type? Does it resist Ghost? Does STAB exist in this game?
I'm flying Etihad Airways to Melbourne and I've a 14 hours layover at Abu Dhabi.  Some say that as long as you are inside the airport terminal you don't require a transit visa while some say you need a transit visa if your layover is more than 10 hours.  Can I stay inside the airport without a transit visa? "register" keyword in C? What does the register keyword do in C language?  I have read that it is used for optimizing but is not clearly defined in any standard.  Is it still relevant and if so, when would you use it? Lower bounds for ${{2n} \choose {n}}$ What are common lower bounds for ${{2n} \choose {n}}$?    Edit:  I made a mistake in my original question.  It doesn't change my question but there is no reason for me to include the mistake. Present and future of bots on Stack Exchange There are discussions on Meta already for some time now about the potential usage of bots on Stack Exchange (SE). The earliest I could find goes back to  , but there have been others , .  Here’s an  about having a bot that tries to answer “easy” questions. The scenario is that (almost) duplicate, simple questions are asked time after time, despite SE’s efforts to prevent this by listing related questions at posting time. This is where the bot could be of service: it could quickly retrieve and post an answer from a previous duplicate (or with smarter Artificial Intelligence - AI)  even from elsewhere on the web, like a user manual or a mailing list discussion). I imagine this might save some review time for moderators, and perhaps users would also enjoy not having to answer over and over again to the same question. Besides, answers would be very fast, which should make everyone happy if they are also of good quality.  This idea of “janitor” bots can have more use cases besides answering “easy” questions (see also discussion ), like suggesting missing tags and re-formatting what should have been code blocks, to name a few.  Yet, despite a long time since these discussions, better Machine Learning Classifiers (ML) and AI over the years, and   , it doesn’t seem that any such bots are among us (except maybe ). As part of a research project at the university, I am trying to understand why this is the case.  For this reason I’d like your opinion on the following:   Do you consider a bot “harmful” for the SE communities?   If yes, would you consider the bot harmful even if   it operates in an automatic manner only in limited scenarios (e.g. specific tags) it operates in a semi-automatic manner (namely with the supervision of a moderator who decides for posting or not the answer).  it operates only for a limited amount of time in a small community (e.g. here).   Would you consider it too risky to give a bot a try? Would you accept an answer provided by a bot?   If not, why ? (e.g. you don’t trust replies from machines)  Would you consider useless a “sloppy” answer by a bot, even if it is provided in just a few seconds? Answers may be not perfect, but they may link to other relevant threads that can help the asker to fix the problem without waiting extra time for a human response. I'm absolutely new to Linux. I would like to know how to install Ubuntu alongside the pre-installed Windows 8+ OS.  Should I do it with Wubi, or through the Live USB/DVD?  What steps do I need to take to correctly install Ubuntu? Difference beween wiki page, application page, web part page and publishing page There are lots places in msdn sharepoint forums and blogs where these terms are used and I am confused between them. Can anybody clarify? Why does $\lim\limits_{t\to-\infty}te^t=0$? Intuitively, $\lim\limits_{t\to -\infty}te^t=0$, since $e^t\to 0$ much faster than $t\to -\infty$.   Is there a way to more rigorously compute this? Writing it as $e^t/(1/t)$ seems resistant to l'Hopital's rule. Attempting to compile kernel yields a certification error I'm currently attempting to follow  guide in order to install the 4.5.7 kernel with Grsecurity on my Kali Linux desktop.   I am following that list of instructions verbatim, except for the fact that I'm trying to use Grsecurity's test patch for the 4.5.7 kernel and I'm running Kali Linux instead of straight Debian.  Every time I attempt to compile the kernel, however, I get this error following the line "CC certs/system_keyring.o":    CC      certs/system_keyring.o make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'debian/certs/benh@debian.org.cert.pem', needed by 'certs/x509_certificate_list'.  Stop. Makefile:951: recipe for target 'certs' failed make[1]: *** [certs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jc/Downloads/linux-4.5.7' debian/ruleset/targets/common.mk:295: recipe for target 'debian/stamp/build/kernel' failed make: *** [debian/stamp/build/kernel] Error 2   I get this error, as I found out, for any kernel even if I apply no patches or modifications, so it has something to do with the tools I'm using to compile the kernel (apparently a system keychain of some sort). Can someone out there tell me how to fix my OS and compile my kernel?   P.S. Here is the output of cat /proc/version:  Linux version 4.6.0-kali1-amd64 (devel@kali.org) (gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Debian 5.4.0-4) ) #1 SMP Debian 4.6.2-2kali2 (2016-06-28) Addition with NULL values Easy to bypass "Are You paying Attention" test by viewing question in detail I think many of us already aware, still I wanted to let you know that First Post and Late Answers review posts are generated on specific time interval. When time comes for post generation I follow some tricks   Click and till a Post appears for review Then right-click and select Open in new tab 5-8 time. Then in every page follow the below steps   Open the Question of post appeared in review in New tab If Page/Question not exists then simply downvote since post was deleted because of -ve response. Else if page exists then   Check the review post's Net Reputation If reputation is -ve then simply downvote the post came in review Else one may select No Action needed.    This way if in any case a post comes for "Are you paying attention" can be handled easily.  I think if a post comes in review should not allow to view post. Why Didn't People Think That Voldemort Died After His Attack on Baby Harry? After the Avada Kedavra curse rebounded from Harry onto Voldemort, Voldemort disappeared. I'm curious as to why so many key players believed Voldemort was still "alive" somewhere, his powers decimated, but, under the right circumstances, able to return to full power. It seems the witches and wizards in chapter one of Philosopher's Stone, The Boy Who Lived, were happy to believe that Voldemort was gone forever. Why didn't everyone believe Voldemort had died, rather than just disappeared? Was it the lack of a body? Or were there other reasons?  Here's a couple of quotes from Philosopher's Stone if anyone wants to review them. Otherwise, just disregard.     ‘A fine thing it would be if, on the very day You- Know-Who seems to have disappeared at last, the Muggles found out about us all. I suppose he really has gone, Dumbledore?’   ‘It certainly seems so,’ said Dumbledore. ‘We have much to be thankful for.’   Philosopher's Stone - page 13 - Bloomsbury - chapter 1, The Boy Who Lived   ‘But what happened to Vol– sorry – I mean, You-Know-Who?’   ‘Good question, Harry. Disappeared. Vanished. Same night he tried ter kill you. Makes yeh even more famous. That’s the biggest myst’ry, see ... he was gettin’ more an’ more powerful – why’d he go?   ‘Some say he died. Codswallop, in my opinion. Dunno if he had enough human left in him to die. Some say he’s still out there, bidin’ his time, like, but I don’ believe it. People who was on his side came back ter ours. Some of ’em came outta kinda trances. Don’ reckon they could’ve done if he was comin’ back.   ‘Most of us reckon he’s still out there somewhere but lost his powers. Too weak to carry on. ’Cause somethin’ about you finished him, Harry. There was somethin’ goin’ on that night he   hadn’t counted on – I dunno what it was, no one does – but somethin’ about you stumped him, all right.’   Philosopher's Stone - pages 46-47 - Bloomsbury - chapter 4, The Keeper of the Keys Which function ($f$) is continuous nowhere but $|f(x)|$ is continuous everywhere?   I found this question , the question seems much interesting but for obvious reason it is closed there, I was wondering how to derive such a function? Construct a network of citations What caused the oathbreakers in the Paths of the Dead to turn into shades? In Return of the King, we are told that the shades who populate the Paths of the Dead are the spirits of oathbreakers who refused to aid Isildur in the first fight against Sauron.  First, we are told of the oath (Book 5, Chapter 2):     But the oath that they broke was to fight against Sauron... For at Erech there stands a stands yet a stone that was brought, it is said, from Númenor by Isildur... and upon it the King of the Mountains swore allegiance to him in the beginning of the realm of Gondor.   Then, when they fail to honor the oath, we are told about Isildur's curse on them:     "...this curse I lay upon thee and thy folk: to rest never until your oath is fulfilled."   And as we see in the following chapters, the Sleepless Dead are indeed subject to this curse exactly as Isildur descibed it. What seems less clear, however, is how Isildur's curse manages to alter the fundamental nature of the oathbreakers' mortality, so that they became undead shades instead of simply dying in disgrace.   Do we have any other examples of Isildur performing similar acts of magic? Based on what we are told in LotR, Isildur appears to have been a great warrior, but not a regular practitioner of magic. Is the stone at Erech somehow magically involved? (If so, do we know anything more about it or how it works? Does its origin in Númenor have any significance?) It is mentioned that the oathbreakers had worshiped Sauron; could this be a clue? When running Internet Explorer from the the modern UI, I can't find out how to access tabs.  I can create tabs using Ctrl + T, but I'm not sure how to switch between tabs, see what tabs I have open, etc.  How do I navigate between tabs when using the modern UI Internet Explorer? Allow only alphanumeric characters for a UITextField Given that , I wonder if every intelligent biological species is capable of producing beings that are Force-Sensitive?   Or are there some species characteristics that can make it 100% impossible for them ever to produce a Force-sensitive individual.  NOTE: Let's exclude - if they exist in EU - things like random new-species-creating mutations - e.g. the individual should be 100% the same species, able to interbreed. What is the meaning of the term "linear" Confusion with floating point numbers How to setup synctex with vim, pdflatex and an open-source PDF-viewer under Linux?