we have recently implemented social login to our website. We are running ads to that website and after implementing the social login we lost all conversion data - everything is accounted to facebook.  Also we have kind of "sub-website" shop-domain.com where are some products that are sold separately and user can migrate between domain.com and shop-domain.com and vice versa. Can this loose conversions as well?   My question is:  how can we configure analytics / ads / website to correctly count the conversions?  What have I done:  In google analytics documentation I found something called linker to fix user migration between domains and page referrer after login. But it doesnt seem to help  gtag('config', 'UA-XXXXXXX-1', {         'linker': {             'domains': ['domain.com', 'domain.eu', 'shop-domain.com', 'shop-domain.eu']         },         'page_referrer':'domain.com'     });   Thanks for any suggestions
I am seeing quite a few conversions which have as source "accounts.google.com" (almost 40%).  AFAIK, in the new Universal Analytics as soon as a user has a Referrer set a new session is started. So if a user is getting on my page, and creates an account using social auth (e.g. Google accounts) when being redirected back, will this create a new session? I guess this would explain that there are many conversions coming from accounts.google.com - is it safe to enter accounts.google.com into the Referral Exclusion List? And more - what about Facebook logins, those would show up as facebook.com, but i probably don't want to exclude facebook.com as referrer?  Any ideas how to deal with UA referrers and social logins?
Im not familiar with Ubuntu or Linux in general but have succesfully installed dual-boot windows7/Ubuntu on a single harddisk on my private PC. I used the "Install Ubuntu alongside them"-option.   On my work PC I have an existing windows 7 64-bit installation that boots from BIOS firmware on a SSD drive (C:), and have my working data (documents etc) on a partition on a separate disk (D:). I now want to install Ubuntu (v 14.04.3) on the remaining unformatted space on D:\ using with the option of choosing system using GRUB. There are of cause fine descriptions around (e.g.  and ). My question is how to setup the partitions in the "something else"- option during the Ubuntu installation.   In  tutorial they assume that all partitions on the D-drive can be deleted; however I only obviously want to keep the working data on the existing D-partition, and place Ubuntu on the residual space (or part of it) on the D:-drive.  A) How is this ensured ? B) how many partitions should I make (boot, root, home, swap ?)  C) and should boot be made primary, and the others logical ? D) Should I set Device for boot loader installation as/dev/sdb - will this not erase the existing D-partion ? 100% Delete U2 from iPhone? I've looked up many ways on how to deal with the U2 songs on my phone, but they will not go away what ever I try.  The most common solution for this problem is to "Show all" music, go to the Music, click the iCloud download button to download it and then turn off "Show all" button again. Generally, this would work but in my situation, it says I haven't purchased the song and I can't download the song again. The song still plays when I click on it, but I can't swipe left to delete and I can't hide it. And yes, I am signed into iTunes. And no, it is not under my purchased section.  Is there any other way to rid of this song?   EDIT:  I'm running iOS7.1.2 on a iPhone5c And the song(s) aren't in my iTunes. It says I have zero items in my iTunes library and it isn't under my purchased songs. The song is only on my iPhone, and I can't redownload it (to delete it again) because then I'd have to purchase the song again.  Thanks. Is there a cleaner proof of convergence for this almost-telescoping series I was wondering how the convergence of the series $$\sum_{k\geq1}\frac{(k+1)^y-k^y}{k^x},$$ depends on $x$ and $y$, where $x$ and $y$ are real numbers. I've been able to show that it converges if and only if $y\leq x$, by distinguishing nine cases; whether $x$ and $x-y$ are positive, negative or zero. If desired I can include a sketch of my proof. My question is whether there is a proof that works for all real $x$ and $y$? Or at least a proof that seems less artificial? Sort arrays of primitive types in descending order What's the blue pentagon for in Pokemon XY? On the Pokemon status screen, underneath the Pokemon and to the left of the custom markings, is a small blue pentagon:  This doesn't seem to be present on Pokemon obtained through the Pokemon Transporter from Gen V:  I've looked into it myself, and popular opinion seems to be that it's either some kind of &quot;Legitimate Pokemon&quot; mark or simply to indicate that the Pokemon originates from Gen VI. The latter seems far more likely to me, but do we know for sure what this blue hexagon means? How Get Parent Field in Attachment? Please Help me...  Account sObject is Parent of Attachment. Now I want to bring Read-only Field Custom field (isReadOnly__c).  SELECT Id, Name, Account.isReadOnly__c FROM Attachment   How It Gets ?  Thanks in Advance  Manu How to round a number to n decimal places in Java In a particular textbook, the work function of a metal (in the context of the photoelectric effect) is defined as:     the minimum amount of energy necessary to remove a free electron from the surface of the metal   This sounds similar to ionisation energy, which is:     the amount of energy required to remove an electron from an atom or molecule in the gaseous state   These two energies are generally different. For instance, Copper has a work function of about 4.7eV but has a higher ionisation energy of about 746kJ mol-1 or 7.7eV.  I've sort of figured it's because the work function deals with free electrons whilst ionisation is done with a valence electron still bound within the atom. Is the difference due to the energy required to overcome the attraction of the positive nucleus? This is tricky. I would like to install Ubuntu on a machine that is intended to work as server, and for some reason I do not have an option to connect a screen to it.  I expect this may be similar to remote installation. However, there is currently no OS on that machine, so I will have to set up everything from scratch.  On the other hand, I do have a physical access to that machine. Therefore I can get it to boot from a CD/USB. But that's not enough.  Is there a way to do such installation remotely? Is there a version of Ubuntu image that comes with a SSH server preinstalled, and starts it once booted, so that I can boot the machine with such image, connect to it via SSH and process the installation from a different computer?  If not, what other options do I have? How to prevent Command-I/Command-Shift-I from opening Mac Mail when in browser? When in a browser (Chrome or Safari), the following keyboard shortcut will always bring up a window that says "Welcome To Mail":  Command+Shift+I  I would like to use this shortcut for another purpose.  Is there any way to disable this shortcut? subcaption vs. subfig: Best package for referencing a subfigure Are all stormtroopers as poor soldiers as the ones in the movies? In the Star Wars films we consistently witness just how poor soldiers stormtroopers are. They show very sub-par marksmanship, crappy house searching tactics, and are easily fooled and defeated by Ewoks and Rebels.   That being said, I remember reading a character guide that defined stormtroopers as the very best of the best (best marksman, above average intelligence, etc.). So, in the realm of the Expanded Universe, does the mold that the movies set continue to hold true or are they just the exceptions to the rule? "Can’t help but" vs. "can help but" (p.236)  has a proof that the equation $e^z-z=0$ has infinitely many complex solutions:    I'm curious if there are any particularly elegant ways to see this, other than that given in the text. Prove that $(p+q)^m \leq p^m+q^m$ If I put a DX lens on a Nikon D700, it will reduce megapixels to 5.1.  I understand that FX pixels are about 2.5 times larger than DX pixels. Would I be correct to assume that, therefore, my FX image using 5.1 megapixels will produce quality equivalent to at least a 10 megapixel image on a DX camera, all other things being equal? Is it true that $A^A\simeq P(A)$? Let $A$ be an infinite set and $$A^A=\{f | f:A\to A\,\,\, \text{is a function}\}.$$ Is there any natural bijection between $A^A$ and $P(A)$? It's my understanding that "easily" is the regular adverb for "easy", e.g. "He makes friends easily".  But in some collocations one still uses "easy", e.g. "Take it easy", "Rest easy" or "Slow down easy". Is there any rule when "easy" would be used over "easily", or does one just have to know these collocations? About the absence of metal in machinery and buildings of the past Book about space alien cats