I bought a Sony Vaio with Windows 8 yesterday.   I want to install Ubuntu, (latest version), alongside Windows. There is an assist button on the laptop to enter the boot option menu, (otherwise, Windows 8 is booted by default.   Whenever I choose the, 'boot from CD' option, it says 'No operating system found'. CD is valid since I tried it on another computer and it worked fine. I have tried both versions, 12.04 and 12.10.  What is the problem, or how should I install Ubuntu on my laptop?
I'm absolutely new to Linux. I would like to know how to install Ubuntu alongside the pre-installed Windows 8+ OS.  Should I do it with Wubi, or through the Live USB/DVD?  What steps do I need to take to correctly install Ubuntu?
How do I suppress the "New release '12.10' available" message? When I ssh into my  box, I get this message:  Welcome to Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-32-generic x86_64)   * Documentation:  https://help.ubuntu.com/  New release '12.10' available. Run 'do-release-upgrade' to upgrade to it.  Last login: &lt;redacted&gt; $   But I don't intend to upgrade to 12.10, because Mythbuntu recommends using LTS releases only.  How do I suppress the "New release '12.10' available" message?  I don't want to be notified until the next LTS release is available.  I've already gone to Update Manager > Settings > Updates and selected "Notify me of a new Ubuntu version: For long-term support versions", but that didn't get rid of this message. How do I assign the output of a command into an array? rewrite access to collection to avoid "double" finding If $a_k\geq0$ is a decreasing sequence converging to $0$, do we have $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n a_k}n = 0$? I flew a long range flight carrying my laptop, a quite heavy one, inside a neoprene briefcase in the passenger cabin. The recommendation by the aircrew was to place it in the overhead compartment or under the seat in front of me. However, during take-off and landing, the vibrations on the plane are quite strong and, as a result, it received minor damage.   Placing them in the overhead compartment might be equivalent to placing it on the floor under the seat, with the added issue of additional luggage in the compartment shifting.  I considered the alternative of holding the laptop by the handle while sitting, so it won't be any contact with the aircraft's floor. This is impracticable during cruise, but I thought it could be better during the take-off and landing segments. Another option I considered is to wrap it with completely with bubble wrap before boarding the plane.   Which is the safest way to transport a laptop during flight? Why is inductance (L) proportional with turns-square (N²)? We start from the   $$ \mathbf{\nabla} \times \mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{J} + \overbrace{\mu \epsilon \dfrac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}}^0. $$  We take surface integration of both sides, for the surface (\$s\$) inside the mean path (\$c\$) of the core.  $$ \int_s \left( \mathbf{\nabla} \times \mathbf{B} \right) \cdot d\mathbf{s} = \mu \int_s \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{s} $$  We use the  to rewrite the left hand side; where \$c\$ is in the same direction with the magnetic flux \$\Phi\$.  $$ \oint_c \mathbf{B} \cdot d \mathbf{\ell} = \mu N I $$  (The integral on the left hand side results \$NI\$, because there are \$N\$ different wires on the winding.)  The magnetic field density inside these kind of cores are considered to be uniform. So, we can write  $$ B \ell_c \overset\sim= \mu NI \implies B = \dfrac{\mu NI}{\ell_c}; $$  where \$\ell_c\$ is the mean path lenght of the core.  We can find magnetic flux from the magnetic flux density we have found by using the cross sectional area of the core \$A_c\$.  $$ \Phi = BA_c = \dfrac{\mu NIA_c}{\ell_c} $$  By definition, inductance is the amount of magnetic flux generated per applied current, that is  $$ L \overset\triangle= \dfrac{\Phi}{I}. $$  So, we find inductance of the system as  $$ \boxed{ L = \dfrac{\Phi}{I} = \dfrac{\dfrac{\mu NIA_c}{\ell_c}}{I} = \dfrac{\mu NA_c}{\ell_c} }. $$  But, all other sources () give inductance of an inductor like this as  $$ L = \dfrac{\mu N^2A_c}{\ell_c}. $$  What is the mistake I did in my derivation? Please explain in detail. Proving “The sum of $n$ consecutive cubes is equal to the square of the sum of the first $n$ numbers.” This   states:      Example $\boldsymbol 3$. The sum of consecutive cubes. Prove this remarkable fact of arithmetic: $$1^3 +2^3 +3^3 +\ldots +n^3 =(1 +2 +3 +\ldots +n)^2.$$   “The sum of $n$ consecutive cubes is equal to the square of the sum of the first $n$ numbers.”      In other words, according to Example $1$: $$1^3 +2^3 +3^3 +\ldots +n^3 = \frac{n^2 (n+1)^2}{4}.$$   Should: $$1^3 +2^3 +3^3 +\ldots +n^3 = \frac{n^2 (n+1)^2}{4}$$ not be: $$1^3 +2^3 +3^3 +\ldots +n^3 = \frac{n^3 +(n + 1)^3}{2^3}$$ as everything in the left-hand side is cubed? Weird line in my mirrored mesh was following a tutorial where I stumbled into this weird line in my mirrored mesh (sorry for the feet lol)      You can also download the blender file Is it "I" or "me" in "Keep Tom and I/me updated"? In this case what is correct?        Keep Tom and I updated.      or         Keep Tom and me updated.      I understand that me is an object pronoun. And therefore I feel the second option is correct.  Especially, because I would say "Keep him updated" and also "Keep me updated". Instead of "Keep he updated" or "Keep I updated". But something about saying "Keep him and me updated" feels wrong.  However I am not sure, because several people have told me that in this case I is the correct option because it is being used in conjunction with a name (Tom) and not a pronoun. Is that correct? How do I fix Outlook only showing the first line of every message? I'm experiencing a strange problem with Outlook 2019. When viewing a message it only shows the first line. On an HTML message, it stops at the first close paragraph tag. On a plaintext message, it stops at the first newline character. This is true if viewing a message in the reading pane as well as if double-clicking the message to open in its own window. I have the preview pane set to show 3 lines and it does show more of the message so it seems like Outlook can see more of the message than it's rendering in the reading pane. If I use View Source, the underlying data seems fine and the whole message is there. I've tried the following:  Deleting and re-creating the user's mail profile Uninstalling &amp; re-installing Office Creating a new Windows account &amp; connecting Outlook to a different Exchange account than the one that originally exhibited the problem Checked for Windows updates Checked for Office updates  Any ideas what might be causing this? I feel like I've tried everything obvious &amp; I'm striking out on Google. Showing that a function is a tensor I am trying to solve question 4 in Munkres Analysis on Manifolds section 26.  The question is determine if the following is a tensor on $\mathbb{R}^4$ and express those that are in terms of the elementary tensors on $\mathbb{R}^4$.   $f(x,y) = 3 x_1 y_2 + 5 x_2 x_3$   I am trying to follow the definition of a tensor (which I don't think I fully understand) to show this. I know I must find a function $T: \mathbb{R}^4 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ that is linear on the $i^{th}$ variable. Since there are only 2, then I believe I have to somehow write $f$ as a projection. I'm just not sure where to  go from here.  Any hints would be great, thanks! Hiding reputation and encouraging thinking time would improve the quality of answers on SO I've only been a member of SO for a couple of months but I must say that the site can be a bit daunting even for an experienced developer.  Part of this is because when users with very high reputations answer questions then it seems that everyone assumes that they have the right answer.  I don't want to go into the self-fulfilling nature of reputation increase for high reputation people.  But I think it is clear that people with high reputation scores get more upvotes () because people assume (usually accurately) that they are correct.    But if reputation was hidden on SO, at least for, say, the first hour after a question is asked then the probability of the best answer being upvoted the most would surely increase.  This might also require the hiding of the names of the answerers if they have very high reps!  As a second method of getting improved answers I would correlate the value of an answer (in terms of reputation gained) with the difficulty of the question.  And the simplest way to do that would be based on the time required for the question to be answered.  So if a question is answered within a minute then it is a 20% question (2 points per upvote), within 2 minutes a 40% question, within 5 minutes a 60% question and so on, on to say a 200% answer (20 points per upvote) on questions that have been hanging around for months.  This would encourage considered answers to new questions and tempt people into reducing the backlog - rather than encouraging people to sit on the 'newest questions' hoping for a gimme.  These two measures would incentivise people to answer the questions that no-one likes the look of and reduce the relative value of answering easy questions. I want to fill a part of a picture with more or less evenly and randomly distributed circles which should not overlap. It would be okay if circles are only partly inside the shape.  The density should be like what you see on this page  with values 80-100. (But I do not need so many circles, 30 should be enough, I could repeat the pattern).   I cannot use a grid and "wobble" the circles a bit: The circles are too large and it simply does not look randomly.   Currently I am thinking about a random attempt: Get some random point, measure its distance to existing circles, either paint or throw the point away. Try 100 times and hope that you get the right number of circles (and that it does not take too long). But perhaps someone has a better idea.   The example draws the circles simply manually:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{backgrounds} \begin{document}   \begin{tikzpicture}[framed,gridded,radius=0.5cm]  \draw[red](0,0) rectangle (5,5);   \draw (1,1) circle;   \draw (2.3,1.1) circle ;   \draw (4.5,0.8) circle ;   \draw (5.1,1.8) circle ;   \draw (0.4,3.3) circle ;   \draw (2.1,2.8) circle ;   \draw (3.8,3.5) circle ;   \draw (4.8,4.2) circle ;   \draw (0.8,4.9) circle ;   \draw (2.1,4.1) circle ;   \draw (3.8,2.0) circle ;   \draw (3.5,0.6) circle ;   \draw (3.0,5.0) circle ;      \draw (4.1,5.1) circle ;             \draw (0.9,2.1) circle ;  \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document} In the definition of , I read the following text:     Many of the act's provisions were to sunset beginning December 31, 2005, approximately 4 years after its passage. In the months preceding the sunset date, supporters of the act pushed to make its sunsetting provisions permanent, while critics sought to revise various sections to enhance civil liberty protections. In July 2005, the U.S. Senate passed a reauthorization bill with substantial changes to several sections of the act, while the House reauthorization bill kept most of the act's original language. The two bills were then reconciled in a conference committee that was criticized by Senators from both the Republican and Democratic parties for ignoring civil liberty concerns.   What does sunset mean? In which cases can the word be used with a similar meaning? Allow collapsing vote-count This is a minor, OCD driven, request but that's never stopped me before...  After showing the vote counts for a post, I would like to re-collapse to the regular view. So far the only way I know to get this is to refresh the whole page. I think that another click on the expanded vote count should re-collapse the votes to the normal total. "No, I didn't see him" vs "Yes, I didn't see him" Bob didn't come to office today.  I was asked "Didn't you see Bob today?"  Should I say "Yes, I didn't see him today" or "No, I didn't see him today"? How to delete all files in a current directory starting with a dot? Loop-cut won't go all the way around Alright so I've seen some postings about loop cuts and done some research. I am very new to blender and modeling overall. I am trying to loop cut this concrete barrier. Now I'm following a tutorial and kind of did my own thing in some areas. I cleaned it up following some instructions in another answer here on stack exchange.  I can't for the life of me figure out why I can loop cut around the whole bottom:   ...but not the whole middle:   I see this marked as answered by another question. That question refers to ngons and inside faces. Now once again I'm totally new to this. I looked on the inside. I don't believe I have inside faces or any ngons by the terms I've read online in my research.  Here is a wireframe picture and the inside view:     Maybe I'm missing something the answers on other posts are saying. If so and you know what it is I'd be very appreciative of what it is. How would I solve the following problem involving elementary matrices? Let $A=\begin{pmatrix}0&amp;5\\ 7&amp;4\end{pmatrix}$.      1) Write $A$ as a product of $4$ elementary matrices.      2) Write $A^{-1}$ as a product of $4$ elementary matrices.   My work. I have managed to find $A^{-1}$, which came out to be this:  \begin{pmatrix}-\frac{4}{35}&amp;\frac{1}{7}\\ \frac{1}{5}&amp;0\end{pmatrix}  However, I am struggling to figure out how I would split each of these matrices into $4$ elementary matrices. Any help? shebang line not working with cr-lf