ciao come faccio a fare un cd di ubuntu auto istallante con Brasero poi devo istallarlo in un pc con XP DOVE VORREI ISTALLARE UBUNTU E CANCELLARE TUTTO (XP COMPRESO) GRAZIE  Translation(using Google translate):  hello how do I make a CD of ubuntu istallante car with Brasero then I have to install it in a PC with XP where I want to install Ubuntu and delete all (including XP). Thanks!
I would like to see a full how-to guide on how to install Ubuntu.
Via command line, I have a log file I'd like to keep track of.  What I want is to have, basically, a tail that refreshes when the log is updated making the text scroll upwards as new lines are appended to the log file.  Is there anything out there that does that without having to write some code? Curve Bevel function, scale? Is there a way to scale up the bevel object on one end of a curve, a little bit over each point?  I notice the vertex "weight" slider will tweak how much influence each vertex has on the others, is there something like this that can scale the bevel object up a little bit?  Preferably with the option to constrain X,Y,Z independently Prove that $\lambda = 0$ is an eigenvalue if and only if A is singular. I'm trying to prove that statement: Prove that $\lambda = 0$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $A$ is singular.  I'm not sure if my proof is totally correct:  Suppose that $\lambda = 0$ if det(A) = $\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_2 . . .\lambda_n = 0$ then A is singular.  If anyone could show me a better proof that would help. What nutrients can humans absorb in the mouth? For instance, I realise being able to absorb simple sugars in the mouth is pivotal in the rapid action of oral glucose gel. Thus I was wondering what nutrients in general can be absorbed directly within the mouth, and at what speed? How are Anonymous inner classes used in Java? What is the use of anonymous classes in Java? Can we say that usage of anonymous class is one of the advantages of Java? UnboundLocalError on local variable when reassigned after first use The following code works as expected in both Python 2.5 and 3.0:  a, b, c = (1, 2, 3)  print(a, b, c)  def test():     print(a)     print(b)     print(c)    # (A)     #c+=1       # (B) test()   However, when I uncomment line (B), I get an UnboundLocalError: 'c' not assigned at line (A). The values of a and b are printed correctly. This has me completely baffled for two reasons:   Why is there a runtime error thrown at line (A) because of a later statement on line (B)? Why are variables a and b printed as expected, while c raises an error?   The only explanation I can come up with is that a local variable c is created by the assignment c+=1, which takes precedent over the "global" variable c even before the local variable is created. Of course, it doesn't make sense for a variable to "steal" scope before it exists.  Could someone please explain this behavior? Understanding dummy (manual or automated) variable creation in GLM If a factor variable (e.g. gender with levels M and F) is used in the glm formula, dummy variable(s) are created, and can be found in the glm model summary along with their associated coefficients (e.g. genderM)  If, instead of relying on R to split up the factor in this way, the factor is encoded in a series of numeric 0/1 variables (e.g. genderM (1 for M, 0 for F), genderF (1 for F, 0 for M) and these variables are then used as numeric variables in the glm formula, would the coefficient result be any different?  Basically the question is: does R use a different coefficient calculation when working with factor variables versus numeric variables?  Follow-up question (possibly answered by the above): besides just the efficiency of letting R create dummy variables, is there any problem with re-coding factors as a series of numeric 0,1 variables and using those in the model instead? I have a box that I have extruded to the shape I want. Then I placed a cylinder so that it intersects the box. After that I deleted the bottom faces of both the cylinder and box.  Now what I want to do is delete the portion of the cylinder that is inside the box and join the nodes so that it is one object. I have already joined the meshes so I can select points/edges/faces from either shape. It seems like the easiest way would be to just put nodes where the edges of the cylinder and box intersect and then delete the parts I don't care about. I can't find a good way to do that though.  What's the best way to accomplish what I'm trying to do? Lost passport with Schengen visa How do I transfer programs from my old computer to my new Windows 7 computer? I know about the Easy Transfer tool included in Windows 7 that will transfer all my files but I want to transfer my programs. Also, I don't want to buy any gimmicky program if I don't have to. Using (or not) the word "to" in a sentence ending with "be able" Which of these is grammatically correct?   As educators, we are always looking for ways to reach all the learners in our classroom as effectively as we are able.   As educators, we are always looking for ways to reach all the learners in our classroom as effectively as we are able to. Creating Workflow -> Error How to limit current of an AC signal For my project, I'm trying to work with the principle of electrovibration. This principle is about simulating textures using low current electricity on an insulated conductive surface ().  In order to do this, I will be experimenting with generated AC signals of 80 to 160 Vpp at 60Hz to 400Hz. I will do this by using an DC - AC converter, usually used for EL lamp applications.  My only concern is how to limit the current coming from the converter. Are the techniques for limiting AC current the same as DC, by using a simple resistor? Or is it, as I expect, more complex?  I need to limit the current to 0.5mA, for safety reasons. Nonphysical entities cannot be observed. Therefore such entities cannot be verified by observation. How could statements like "God exists" be even considered true? Why would anyone appeal to the metaphysical realm at all?  It seems to me that the best method by which we should go about in understanding the world is by initially ruling out the possibility of the metaphysical altogether for the simplest answer (a sort of null hypothesis). Once we can get a hold of a natural cause of some phenomenon, we should be satisfied that that is all there is to it. Formulating some nonphysical cause would be unnecessary, superfluously complicated, or even cluttered. Now if there was some problem that we were certain could not be solved by observation or experimentation or whose solution could not possibly exist in the observable realm, yet must be true, I would consider the possibility of a metaphysical cause.      That said, I don't think that if you can't empirically observe something, it doesn't exist; rather, I would declare total agnosticism and say that it is unknowable. Let's assume that one has some HP printer and/or scanner and checked its support status on the corresponding page of HPLIP site - .  So one have the following information: the device Model name, Min. HPLIP Version and Driver Plug-in need.   What should one install to make Ubuntu fully support the HP printer and/or scanner? WMI object to get current sessions with client name? Dihedral group - elements of order $2$ How to find correctly the .bib file? I'm trying to continue the numbering of examples in enumerate environments in beamer. For example, I'd like one slide to feature   Foo Bar   and the next slide   Zip Yadda   My strategy so far has been to define a counter that saves the enumerate counter at the end of the first environment and can then be queried to set the enumerate counter at the start of the second enumerate environment. (This is essentially the proposal also found at )  That works wonderfully so long as I don't try to uncover elements of the slide sequentially. The problem, of course, is that as each of the pdf-pages that make up the slide is created, the counter is advanced. Here's a MWE.  \documentclass{beamer}  \setbeamercovered{highly dynamic}  \newcounter{saveenumi} \newcommand{\seti}{\setcounter{saveenumi}{\value{enumi}}} \newcommand{\conti}{\setcounter{enumi}{\value{saveenumi}}}   \begin{document}  \begin{frame}[&lt;+-&gt;]   \begin{enumerate}   \item foo   \item bar%     \seti   \end{enumerate} \end{frame}  \begin{frame}[&lt;+-&gt;]   \begin{enumerate}     \conti   \item zip   \item yadda%     \seti   \end{enumerate} \end{frame}  \end{document}   As the second slide is progressively uncovered (pages 3 and 4 of the resulting PDF), the counter at the beginning of the enumerate environment is advanced each time. So page 3 of the PDF has the right numbering, (3) and (4) respectively, while the fully revealed page has the wrong numbering. Pictures follow:   on one of the slides    on the following one Adding a comment should not make me fail the review audit I just failed these   in First Post, I read the question and thought it seemed reasonable but the user was deleted so to be on the safe side I clicked add comment and I failed the audit.  I'm not sure why adding a comment would be considered a negative action, is the correct option to click No Action Needed or edit?  What was I supposed to do in this situation?  Adding a comment should not be a review audit fail.