Using the definition of Fibonacci numbers, $F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2}$, I can prove that the limit of $\frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n}$ as $n\to\infty$ is $\phi$ if we assume that the limit exists.  How can we prove that the limit does in fact exist?  Is there more than one method?    I do not think this is a duplicate. Please can someone explicitly show how to split the odd and even terms of this ratio sequence into two sequences- one monotonic increasing and one monotonic decreasing- and given that all ratios are between 1 and 2, show that the limit exists and we do not oscillate forever.    Most of the question has been answered.  I have shown that there are two subsequences- one increasing and bounded above by 2 and one decreasing, bounded below by 1. Using the fact that the limit exists, I can show it has value $\phi$. But how can I show the limit is the same for both subsequences?!
How would one prove that $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n}=\frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2}=\varphi$$  where $F_n$ is the nth Fibonacci number and $\varphi$ is the Golden Ratio?
Express $1 + \frac {1}{2} \binom{n}{1} + \frac {1}{3} \binom{n}{2} + \dotsb + \frac{1}{n + 1}\binom{n}{n}$ in a simplifed form I need to express $$1 + \frac {1}{2} \binom{n}{1} + \frac {1}{3} \binom{n}{2} + \dotsb  + \frac{1}{n + 1}\binom{n}{n}$$ in a simplified form.  So I used the identity $$(1+x)^n=1 + \binom{n}{1}x + \binom{n}{2}x^2 + \dotsb   + \binom{n}{n}x^n$$ Now on integrating both sides and putting $x=1$.  I am getting $$\frac{2^{n+1}}{n+1}$$ is equal to the given expression.But the answer in my book is  $$\frac{2^{n+1}-1}{n+1}.$$ Where does that -1 term in the numerator come from? Maybe the underlying question is what the Voltage-Current curve looks like. Can I drive it from a voltage source (like you drive a heater) or from a current source (like you drive an LED)? Or even different than those two options?  ADDITIONAL1: Say (hypothetically) I have two commercially available identical Peltier's, they are spec'd 6V/3A. Can I connect these in series to a 12Vdc power supply without any worries?  CONCLUSION1: Current/Voltage load curve is reasonably linear, both driving from current or voltage source will do fine as long as the device is operated within its spec. (Olin Lathrop, Russell McMahon)  CONCLUSION2: Don't drive a Peltier from PWM, power loss due to current increase, grows more rapidly than cooling power. (Olin Lathrop)  CONCLUSION3: Beware the mechanical wear of the device with continues cycling. Eg. don't use a thermostat on/off controller. (Russell McMahon) Is there a limit of $\cos(n!)$? I encountered a problem today to prove that $(X_n)$ with $X_n = \cos(n!)$ does not have a limit (when $n$ approaches infinity). I have no idea how to do it formally. Could someone help? The simpler the proof (by that I mean less complex theorems are used) the better. Thanks Can i prevent/restrict standard user from installing/uninstalling software in Ubuntu 12.04 desktop? Evaluating $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2^{2n-1}}{5^{n+1}}$ The binomial sum   $$s_n=\binom{n+1}{0}+\binom{n}{1}+\binom{n-1}{2}+\cdots$$   satisfies the Fibonacci relation.   I failed to prove that $\binom{n-k+1}{k}=\binom{n-k}{k}+\binom{n-k-1}{k}$... Any hints or suggestions? Does Dim Light created by an effect override Bright Light in an area? Two examples.     A silvery beam of pale light shines down in a 5-foot-radius, 40-foot-high cylinder centered on a point within range. Until the spell ends, dim light fills the cylinder.      —Moonbeam, Player's Handbook, pg. 261        You create up to four torch-sized lights within range, [...] each light sheds dim light in a 10-foot radius.      —Dancing Lights, Player's Handbook, pg. 230   Now consider that each of these spells are cast on a bright day, obviously covered by Bright Light, as the game understands it.   Do these spells change the Bright Light within the area affected by them into Dim Light? Is the behavior different between Moonbeam ("Dim Light fills the cylinder") and Dancing Lights ("each light sheds dim light"), or do both of them behave the same? I took a bunch of photos at my son's martial arts club using a D90 with a 50mm F1.8.  The club is lit with overhead fluorescent lighting, and I was getting some weird results where some shots are "white", others have an "orange cast", and still others are partly white and partly orange in the same shot.  I suspect it has to do with the combination of the frequency of the light flicker and with the camera shutter speed. Here is a sequence of 3 shots that show the problem.  The shots were taken with 1/500s at F2 and ISO-800 and with Auto-WB.  First shot ("white/normal"):    Second shot ("orange cast" at top):   Third shot ("orange cast" at bottom):   These were taken in burst mode within a second of each other.  Can anybody tell me what is going on?  And, how I can avoid this? Can more than one antibody bind the same antigen I'd like to clear something up about antibodies that I'm not sure I've understood in the articles I've read. Looking at concepts such as "affinity maturation", "monovalent antigens" and "polyvalent antigens" it seems as if there are multiple antibodies which can bind to the same antigen. (Although I think I'm right in saying that individual antibodies can only bind to one antigen?) However, when I read sentences like "It has been estimated that humans generate about 10 billion different antibodies, each capable of binding a distinct epitope of an antigen" on the Wikipedia page (for antibody) it does make it sound like it's one antibody per antigen? Is this the case? Or is it one antibody per epitope. Either way, to put this question in a nutshell:  Is it true to say that the same substance could bind with (and, therefore, be recognised by) more than one antibody, or not?  Also, if the answer is no, does that mean that antibodies with different binding affinities are classed as the same antibody or not? Hot questions no longer work on iPad (ok on iPhone) A result of Erdős on increasing multiplicative functions Erdős proved that if $f(n)$ is a monotone increasing function from the natural numbers to the positive reals, and $f(n)$ is completely multiplicative, then there exists some constant $C$ such that $f(n)=n^C$ for all $n$.  I have not been able to find a nice proof of this online and was hoping someone could provide a proof. Prove that $\left | \frac{a-b}{a+b}+\frac{b-c}{b+c}+\frac{c-a}{c+a} \right | < \frac{1}{8}.$ Usage of "but" in a sentence. I'm reading Robinson Crusoe and came across many of these constructions with "but" in it. I can't help but thought they were a little unusual. I don't consider myself fluent in English, that's why I ask.  Here is an example:     This I saw no remedy for but by making an enclosure about it with a   hedge; which I did with a great deal of toil, and more, because it   required speed.   Second one:      However, as my arable land was but small, suited to my crop, I got   it totally well fenced in about three weeks' time;   By typing the second out I figured it is actually the normal textbook case of "but", just an, in my opinion, screwed ordering in the sentence. Is this what it means?     However, as my arable land was suited to my crop but small, I got it   totally well fenced in about three weeks time;   Why did the author do this? Can you comment on the first sentence too? It's not a textbook-but-usage as I see it. Broken URL for data.stackexchange.com help page When using data.stackexchange.com I fail to remember if as [post link] is the correct alias to get the url for the post. Luckily the site has an  link. Unfortunately it is now broken. Can this be fixed? When going to any page of  with a new reputation gain, the achievements dropdown keeps showing a new badge green highlight:    And then trying to dismiss the notification by clicking on it gets rid of the green badge notification, but the +5 remains even after I've clicked away from the dropdown. FPDF error: Some data has already been output, can't send PDF An inequality involving 4 real or complex numbers Types of photon qubit encoding How many types of qubit encoding on photons exist nowadays? I know only two:   Encoding on polarization: $$ \lvert \Psi \rangle = \alpha \lvert H \rangle + \beta \lvert V \rangle $$ $$ \lvert H \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d\mathbf{k}\ f(\mathbf{k}) e^{-iw_k t} \hat{a}^\dagger_{H}(\mathbf{k}) \lvert 0 \rangle_\text{Vacuum} $$ $$ \lvert V \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d\mathbf{k}\ f(\mathbf{k}) e^{-iw_k t} \hat{a}^\dagger_{V}(\mathbf{k}) \lvert 0 \rangle_\text{Vacuum} $$ Time-bin: $$ \lvert \Psi \rangle = \alpha \lvert 0 \rangle + \beta \lvert 1 \rangle $$ $$ \lvert 0 \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dz\ f\left(\frac{t -z/c}{\delta t_{ph}}\right) e^{-i w_0 (t-z/c)} \hat{a}^\dagger(z) \lvert 0 \rangle_\text{Vacuum} $$ $$ \lvert 1 \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dz\ f\left(\frac{t -z/c+\tau}{\delta t_{ph}}\right) e^{-i w_0 (t-z/c+\tau)} \hat{a}^\dagger(z) \lvert 0 \rangle_\text{Vacuum} $$   Is there anything else? How can I select a point without selecting its reflected side I'm having trouble with this functional equation, to find all functions $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ for which the following is valid for all $x,y\in \mathbb R$: $f(x) + f(x+f(y)) = y + f(f(x) + f(f(y)))$ I haven't been able to pinpoint any solution, nor to prove surjectivity or injectivity. So 0 progress. Tried with $x=y=0, x=0, y=0, x=-f(y), y=f(x)$, and even with some assumptions on bijectivity, but nothing helped. I don't know the source but seems like a pretty difficult problem, maybe even impossible to solve.