I am sending mail to a recipient that is using Outlook.  Normally Outlook opens winmail.dat files automatically. However, this is not happening. Instead he is receiving the winmail.dat file as an attachment. This is probably happening because the email was sent encrypted.  How can he open the ATTACHED winmail.dat file using Outlook?  Note: I have changed settings so that I am sending in plain text format (see below) and he STILL cannot open it (it is still being sent in winmail.dat) so those settings are not working.
Currently I am using Outlook 2010, and sometimes customers claim that they will received an attachment in Windows.dat format.  I have searched online for possible solutions, but mostly the suggestion is to change the sending format to plain text. However, by using plain text format, there is some limitation.  So I just wonder, besides the plain text format, is there a ways to solve the winmail.dat issue?  Besides, does plain text format really 100% avoid the issue?
I've been studying the postulates of QM and seeing how to derive important ideas from them. One thing that I haven't been able to derive from them, however, is the identity of the momentum operator.  For simplicity, I'm only thinking about no relativistic effects, no spin, no time-dependent potentials, and one spatial dimension. Also I'm assuming the position operator is simply multiplication by $x$, as in, I'm in position space. So the Hamiltonian operator is  $ H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V$.  I know that the momentum operator is $p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$.  But how do I get there from the postulates? I know that it makes sense, as it results in the Ehrenfest Theorem, the De Broglie wavelength hypothesis, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (for $x$ and $p$), the momentum operator being the generator of the translation operator, and possibly many other desirable theorems, and correlations with classical momentum.  But none of these are postulates (at least, not in the various formalisms I encountered), so you can't derive $p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ from them. Rather, they are consequences of it. You need to know the operator beforehand to see that they are correct. Yes, this is just semantics, but that is the core issue for me:  Regardless of how much sense it makes, is the identity $p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ (under the assumptions I made) a Postulate, meaning that you can't derive it from other postulates, or can it in fact be obtained from them? And in the latter case, could you show me how?  Note: I know that there are many different and equivalent sets of postulates for QM. But in none that I saw did they name it as a postulate nor properly derived it. Show the Dihedral Group $D_n$ is generated by rotations and reflection along the x axis. I have already proved Triangle Inequality $\lVert v+w\rVert \le \lVert v \rVert+\lVert w \rVert$ in vector space $\mathbb{R}^n$. However, I'm having difficulties proving the Reverse Triangle Inequality in the vector space.  I have started with   $$\lVert v \rVert^2=v \cdot v-w\cdot w+w\cdot w \le \lVert v-w \rVert+\lVert w \rVert^2$$ $$\lVert w \rVert^2=w \cdot w-v\cdot v+v\cdot v \le \lVert w-v \rVert+\lVert v \rVert^2$$  based on the Triangle Inequality but I don't know if it is correct. If this is right, I think I can go on with proving it the same way I would the normal Reverse Triangle Inequality. Should words be capitalized for being religious terms? While googling about whether "atheist" should be capitalized, and skimming past posts by people blogging about atheism rather than about English grammar, I came across    It says     [Capitalize] Religions and religious terms       Examples:      Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddha, the Bible, Christian, the Ten   Commandments, Baptist church, Mt. Zion Methodist Church      NOTE: Do not capitalize the following:       Examples:      church, communion, atheist, agnostic, spirituality   but I don't recall hearing of such a prescription before. Wouldn't most of the examples listed be capitalized because they're proper nouns? Are there good examples of words being capitalized solely because they're religious terms?  I'm mainly interested in modern English, rather than days of past where a lot more words were capitalized than they are nowadays.  Somewhat related:  - use "God" when referring to the name of the god of Judaism and Christianity (a proper noun), but "god" when referring to the general concept of a deity (common noun). This question is here just to avoid you choosing the wrong Ubuntu version number.  So, this is not about:     nor about   nor   nor   nor   nor .   So in the answer below a simple guide as to what Ubuntu version is good for you, independent of future releases! Continuous function on closed unit ball Take a continuous mapping $f: \bar{B^{n}} \rightarrow \bar{B^{n}}$, where $\bar{B^{n}}$ is a closed unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$. Assume that $f(x) \neq x$ for every $x \in \bar{B^{n}}$. Define another function $r$ by following the directed line segment from $f(x)$ through $x$ to its intersection with $\partial B^{n}$, and let the intersection point be $r(x)$. Is it immediately evident that $r$ is a continuous function? Is so how does it follow? Thanks. What is the simplest way to convert char[] to/from tchar[] in C/C++(ms)? This seems like a pretty softball question, but I always have a hard time looking up this function because there seem there are so many variations regarding the referencing of char and tchar. Windows 10 update broke my MBR / GRUB After I ran Windows 10 update this afternoon my partition table broke... I had dual boot with Windows 10 and Ubuntu 14 with Grub as the boot loader. The error that came up was "Error no such partition, Entering rescue mode... grub rescue>". I googled it,  about the boot-repair ISO, installed it on a USB, ran the repair, got this report, but still no luck:    Now the boot skips Grub entirely and goes to Windows boot manager which fails with "The boot configuration data for your PC is missing or contains errors". So now instead of dual boot I have zero boot. Thanks Microsoft.  Anyway can you guys help me interpret the disk info in the pastebin link? I don't remember my partition configuration but I believe Ubunut had slightlty less disk space than Windows. Questions I have:   Is the Ubuntu partition still there? Could it be the one named "Extended"? (sda4) Where would GRUB be? Gone? Can it be reinstalled? how?   I don't really care about the Windows partition anymore, but it would be nice to rescue Ubuntu. Consider the following 2-variable function:     $$f(x,y) = \frac{x^2y}{x^4+y^2}$$   I would like to find the limit of this function as $(x,y) \rightarrow (0,0)$.   I used polar coordinates instead of solving explicitly in $\mathbb R^2 $, and it went as the following:  $$ x = r \cos \theta, \qquad y = r\sin\theta $$   Hence,  $$\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{x^2y}{x^4 + y^2} = \lim_{r \to 0}\frac{r^2\cos^2\theta(r\sin\theta)}{r^4\cos^4\theta + r^2\sin^2\theta}$$  This simplifies to,  $$ \lim_{r \to 0} \frac{r^3 \cos^2\theta\sin\theta}{r^2(r^2\cos^4\theta + \sin^2\theta)}$$  Simplifying $r^3/r^2$, we finally get;  $$\lim_{r \to 0} \frac{r (\cos^2\theta\sin\theta)}{r^2\cos^4\theta + \sin^2\theta}$$  Now from the above, we find that as $r \to 0$ the limit is $0$.   I wanted to verify this answer so I checked on Wolfram Alpha. Explicitly without changing to polar coordinates, it said that the limit does not exist at $(0,0)$ and rightly so. Then how is it that with polar coordinates, the limit exists and is $0$? Am I doing something wrong in this method?  Also, what should I do in this situation, and when should I NOT use polar coordinates to find limits of multi-variable functions? Profile Gravatar get change Do not know whether someone else observe it or not but today I found my profile Gravatar changed. It is now different than earlier I have. Is it because today I have updated my profile information?        My previous gravatar looks like: Strange distance measurements in distance matrix I'm trying to create a distance matrix between two point shapefiles in QGIS 2.6. Both are in WGS84 UTM Zone 30N co-ordinates (and so is the project file), but the distance matrix returns values such as 5673346.938, instead of expected numbers of between 1 and 5km.  I saw a similar thread mentioning disabling 'on the fly projection changes' - I've done this, and no change. Threads already checked:     Here are samples of the two shapefiles I'm using, stripped down to just ID and location. Expression Functions for Lightning Web Components How can expression functions similar to Visualforce and Lightning Aura Components be achieved within lightning web components?   For example, &lt;template if:true={index % 5 == 0}&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/template&gt; expression index % 5 == 0 is not compyling at all.  accountList.html  &lt;template&gt;     &lt;template if:true={accounts.data}&gt;         &lt;template for:each={accounts.data} for:item='item' for:index='index'&gt;             &lt;!--LWC DOES NOT SUPPORT EXPRESSION FUNCTIONS--&gt;             &lt;!--&lt;template if:true={index % 5 == 0}&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/template&gt;--&gt;             {item}         &lt;/template&gt;     &lt;/template&gt; &lt;/template&gt;   accountList.js  import {LightningElement, wire} from 'lwc'; import getAccounts from '@salesforce/apex/TestController.getAccounts';  export default class AccountList extends LightningElement {      @wire(getAccounts) accounts;  }   Since LWC doesn't support Expression Functions, I'd like to know how to implement them. Getting a vector into a function that expects a vector Error when creating data with special characters and numbers My code will not project and store the feature layer in the scratch.gdb. "ERROR 999999 ... The table name is invalid. The table was not found. [17_5330_51961Lake]"  The interpreter doesn't like "-" characters or beginning or ending in a number. Does anyone know of a work around?  import arcpy import os  mxd = arcpy.mapping.MapDocument("Current") mxdpath = mxd.filePath (filepath, filename) = os.path.split(mxdpath) MCP_Path = str(filepath)  srl = os.path.join(MCP_Path, r"CoordinateSystems\NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N.prj")  WBYLID = "17-5330-51961"  WBYLIDlabel = WBYLID.replace("-","_")  LakeOut = os.path.join(MCP_Path + "\OutputData\Scratch.gdb", WBYLIDlabel + "Lake") arcpy.Project_management(fl, LakeOut, srl) Title bar settings missing in GNOME Tweaks on Ubuntu 20.04 I tried to move my "close, minimise and maximise" to the right + add the macOS theme to it. However, I have not been able to find any settings for that. In GNOME Tweaks > Windows the settings to put the buttons to the right are missing completely. Let $K$ be a field and $f \in K[x]$ a polynomial of degree $n&gt;0$. Assume that $E$ is an extension of $K$ such that $f$ can be expressed as a product of linear factors over $E$:  $$f(x)=\gamma (x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\dots(x-\alpha_n).$$  I want to show that $\lvert K(\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_2) : K \rvert$ is a divisor of $n!$. I also want to show that if $\lvert K(\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n): K \geq (n-1)!$ then $f$ is irreducible over $K$ or $f$ already has a root in $K$.  The problem has a hint. It says: "Use induction on $n=\deg f$. If $f=gh$ in $K[x]$ with $\deg g =r$ and $\deg h=n-r$, then $r!(n-r)!$ is a divisor of $n!$.  Any idea for solving this problem would be appreciated. I've been trying to develop an intuition based understanding of Bayes' theorem in terms of the prior, posterior, likelihood and marginal probability. For that I use the following equation: $$P(B|A) = \frac{P(A|B)P(B)}{P(A)}$$ where $A$ represents a hypothesis or belief and $B$ represents data or evidence. I've understood the concept of the posterior - it's a unifying entity that combines the prior belief and the likelihood of an event. What I don't understand is what does the likelihood signify? And why is the marginal probability in the denominator? After reviewing a couple of resources I came across this quote:     The likelihood is the weight of event $B$ given by the occurrence of $A$ ... $P(B|A)$ is the posterior probability of event $B$ , given that event $A$ has occurred.   The above 2 statements seem identical to me, just written in different ways. Can anyone please explain the difference between the two? For valuation rings I know examples which are Noetherian.      I know there are good standard non Noetherian Valuation Rings. Can anybody please give some examples of rings of this kind?    I am very eager to know. Thanks. Question mark or bold citation key instead of citation number I've browsed the forums and found a number of posts that have addressed this issue, but none of the solutions seem to work for me. I have the following script that I just copied from the bibtex home page to get familiar with it. Instead of the citation number I get a question mark. I compile using Latex+Bibtex+Latex+Latex+PDFLatex+ViewPDF just as has been previously suggested and the problem persists.   \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{cite}  \begin{document}  \title{My Article} \author{Nobody Jr.} \date{Today} \maketitle  Blablabla said Nobody ~\cite{Nobody06}.  \bibliography{mybib} \bibliographystyle{plain} \end{document}   My bibliography (Bib.bbl)  @misc{ Nobody06, author = "Nobody Jr", title = "My Article", year = "2006" }    Looking at previous posts one thing that is concerning is that my .bbl looks empty as shown below. Further, I don't have a .blg  \begin{thebibliography}{}  \end{thebibliography} Product of quotient maps and quotient space that is not Hausdorff I am looking for easy(!) counterexamples that the product of two quotient maps is not necessarily a quotient map and that the quotient space of a Hausdorff space is not necessarily Hausdorff.