Imagine, you add an object to the scene and you get the redo-panel (F9 menu). If you want to modify the options of the newly created object but you mistakenly click elsewhere, the menu disappears. That's not a problem, since you can bring back this menu using F9. However, imagine you move the object (using G) first and then want to access the F9 menu again. When you press F9 now, the menu of the translation will appear instead of the initial options for the object! How can I bring back the initial F9-menu?
When you first add a cylinder, you have the option to change the number of vertices, etc, but once you do anything else in blender, it seems you no longer can edit those parameters.   Is there a setting anywhere or an add-on that allows these parameters to be edited later on? If not, how easy would such an addon/feature be to create for anyone reading this?
Why does the zoom sometimes stop at a point? I often find that I can zoom in to a point, but then cannot zoom any more, even when there is a lot of room to zoom to the meshes on the scene.   This is particularly annoying in the following scenario:  I often land up left clicking on the scene and the 3D cursor shifts there. I use Shift+C to shift the 3D cursor back to the origin. However, this also centers the view on the cursor and shifts the view to show all objects, and sometimes this zooms things way out &ndash; at this point, if I try to zoom in, I can zoom in to a point (using the pinch/zoom on trackpad), but then it stops zooming in.   How do I zoom in after that? Is there anything else I am doing wrong in this case? How do I get my Sony A7 II to avoid over-exposure and look more like my Canon camera? Hai.  I have a question, I switched from Canon to Sony a while ago and I found out that if I shot bright places, like the sky, the cloud that is supposed to be seen clearly, looks like a blown-out highlight (like real crazy), as you can see on my picture.  I have to set a low exposure just so the highlight is not blown out, and it’s only happening on Sony, not on Canon. On Canon the object is visible, but the background (cloud) is still seen all just fine.  Do you guys know what to change on the Sony to get that good look? Is it the setting or the lens? (BTW, I’m using a Sony 35mm f/1.8 lens.) I'm using a BooleanToVisibilityConverter in WPF to bind the Visibility property of a control to a Boolean. This works fine, but I'd like one of the controls to hide if the boolean is true, and show if it's false. Prove that if a function $f$ has a jump at an interior point of the interval $[a,b]$ then it cannot be the derivative of any function. Prove that if a function $f$ has a jump at an interior point of the interval $[a,b]$ then it cannot be the derivative of any function.  I know that for $f$ is differentiable in $(a,b)$ and that it has one-sided derivative $f_+' (a)≠f_-' (b)$ at the endpoints. If $C$ is a real number between $f_+' (a)$  and $f_-' (b)$, then there exists $c∈(a,b)$ such that $f' (c)=C $. How can I use this to prove the above? How do I calculate someone's age based on a DateTime type birthday? Given a DateTime representing a person's birthday, how do I calculate their age in years? What will Sony do if someone uses my account as primary on another ps4 without my knowledge? What will Sony do if someone uses my account as primary on another ps4 without my knowledge? Will the account be banned? Or will the other guy that has my account as primary be banned? After how long? I have no credit card on my account so I don't care too much but I want to know.   He uses my account on his ps4 as a primary account. I think to use my digital games as free (Sharing, but without my knowledge). I just deleted a file on my Nexus S that I really need back. (It was actually part of an app using a sqlite database that did a drop table when upgrading to a new version.)  Presumably I need to root the phone first (which I hear is easy on Nexus phones) but am I in a catch-22 here? Namely, does rooting the phone mean wiping/overwriting the partition where the data lives?  If not, what do you recommend for data recovery tools? Presumably the file was just unlinked and not actively overwritten (per usual when "deleting" a file) so technically the data must be there... Where can I find information about ubuntu compatible or certified hardware/PC models? I am trying to install ia32-libs on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (x86).  I enabled all the repository sources but I'm receiving the error message below:  ~$ sudo apt-get install ia32-libs   Reading package lists... Done   Building dependency tree          Reading state information... Done   Package ia32-libs is not available, but is referred to by another package.   This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or   is only available from another source    E: Package 'ia32-libs' has no installation candidate   output of sudo apt-cache policy ia32-libs    ia32-libs:     Installed: (none)     Candidate: (none)     Version table:     output of cat /etc/apt/sources.list  (removed similar hyperlinks)    deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise restricted main multiverse universe   deb-src archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties   deb security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security main restricted universe multiverse   deb-src security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security main restricted universe multiverse #Added by software-properties   deb archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse   deb-src archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse #Added by software-properties Cardinality of set of real continuous functions How to connect to a MS Access file (mdb) using C#? Fact  The intersection of a closed set $A$ and a compact set $B$ is closed.  Background  I wanted to prove that the intersection of closed and compact sets is compact. There might be other ways, but I am not interested in them for now and am looking to prove the above statement.  Relevant Facts  I don't have much idea what to use. $A^c$ is open. Every cover $\cup_{i\ge1}U_i$ of $B$ contains a subcover $\cup_{i=1}^kU_i$. I might want to prove $A\cap B^c$ is open. Limit points may be another points to consider but I don't get any idea in that direction.  I also don't have that $B$ is closed otherwise it would be trivial.  Some Clarification  I am aware that compact sets are not closed in arbitrary topological spaces. The reason why I was motivated to believe tha intersection of closed and compact set is compact is true is: See Matt E.'s Answer      So if $K$ is compact in an arbitrary topological space (which is just to say that   it is a compact topological space when given its induced topology) and     $L$ is closed then $K \cap L$ is a closed subset of $K$ in its induced topology   Is it true if $A$ and $B$ are not whole spaces?  I would appreciate any hints. Proving that either $2^n-1 $ or $ 2^n+1$ is not prime How to batch import Wavefront OBJ files? Is it possible to batch import Wavefront .obj to blender? I'm working on 2.69. If I select multiple .obj files, only one gets imported. Also if I hit A on file selection window to select all files (.obj and .mtl) I get an error, nothing gets imported. I have to import several hundreds of .obj into the blender file, is this possible? This question came up after reading , in which it is re-iterated (as it has been many times on this site), that investing in the stock market, especially an index fund that tracks the top 100 / 500 companies in a country, basically always has great returns in the long run.  So my question is: Why isn't everybody rich?  If it is so easy (basically invest as heavily as you can in your youth to be rich into middle age and older), why doesn't everyone do this? There would be no need for pensions or any other savings or financial security that way, why even bother investing in assets like property that you have to manage when you can just have an index fund work for you?  I'm guessing that something is being missed here. Why does \noindent have such an effect on \rlap and \llap.? Alice and Bob play the following game with an $n \times n$ matrix, where $n$ is odd. Alice fills in one of the entries of the matrix with a real number, then Bob, then Alice and so forth until the entire matrix is filled. At the end, the determinant of the matrix is taken. If it is nonzero, Alice wins; if it is zero, Bob wins. Determine who wins playing perfect strategy each time.    When $n$ is even it's easy to see why Bob wins every time. and for $n$ equal to $3$ I have brute-forced it. Bob wins. But for $n = 5$ and above I can't see who will win on perfect strategy each time. Any clever approaches to solving this problem? Does $G\oplus G \cong H\oplus H$ imply $G\cong H$ in general? What is the difference between these two:     Suzuki was nearly close to go out of business just after the World War period.   Vs.     Suzuki was nearly close to going out of business just after the World War period.(from a video)   When talking about the past, do these two sentences different from each other? Like, if you use verbing(going) with infinitive(to) in the past, does it mean that there is another event happening? Or none. Evaluating $\int_0^{\large\frac{\pi}{4}} \log\left( \cos x\right) \, \mathrm{d}x $