Question regarding Euler's form
How to prove Euler's formula: $e^{i\varphi}=\cos(\varphi) +i\sin(\varphi)$?
Ubuntu installation does not recognize drive partitioning I have a 1TB drive and installed Windows 7 on a 128GB partition.  When I now try to install Ubuntu 11.04 it does not recognize the Windows partition but offers the complete 1TB drive to install Ubuntu on instead. It displays:    However, in the Ubuntu Disk Utility the Windows partitions are recognized.    What do I need to do in order for Ubuntu to recognize the Windows 7 partition and install Ubuntu as a dual boot?   Response to comments  The following commands were executed and the results are shown below:  fdisk -l  WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk  doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.  Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x34a38165     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1   *           1          13      102400    7  HPFS/NTFS Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda2              13       16318   130969600    7  HPFS/NTFS  Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x14a714a6     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sdb1               1       60801   488384001   83  Linux   parted -l  Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system).  /dev/sr0 has been opened read-only. Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label Conjugate subgroup strictly contained in the initial subgroup? Let $G$ be a group, $H\subseteq G$ a subgroup and $a\in G$ an element of the group. Is it possible that $aHa^{-1} \subset H$, but $aHa^{-1} \neq H$?   If $H$ has finite index or finite order, this is not possible. Equation number enclosing parentheses misplaced with Polyglossia+Hebrew+amsmath In Visual Studio, I can cycle through my clipboard history by pressing CTRL+SHIFT+V rather than CTRL+V. I believe it's called a clipboard ring. But that feature doesn't seem to exist outside of Visual Studio, at least not with the same key combination. Is there a key stroke combination built in to windows to do the same, i.e. be able to cycle through your clipboard history while pasting? Benefits & Practicality of Virtual Machines I have been living under a rock for the past 5 - 8 years, and am just now getting up to speed with virtualization, virtual machines and platforms like VMware or VirtualBox.  I think I am starting to get them, but there are two concepts about VMs that I'm just choking on for some reason; one has to do with their intrinsic benefit to the enterprise, and the other has to do with their practicality when being used.  So I understand that you can have multiple VMs running on the same physical machine, all doing their own "thing" as if they were separate machines. So let's say I want to make a nice little virtual network of servers in my home office so I can have a big sandbox to play inside of for all my projects. I set up 2 physical machines as servers, and on each of them I have, say, 4 virtual machines running (1 might be an app server, another might be a RDBMS, another might be a message broker, etc.).   Besides saving me money (as I only have to provide 2 physical machines instead of buying 8 servers), what instrinsic benefit/purpose do these VMs serve here? I don't care how clever virtual machines are, if my computer only has 8GB of RAM, and I have 4 VMs running on it, those VMs only get 8GB of RAM to share between them. Putting 4 VMs on my server doesn't endow it with 4 times that amount of RAM! So, as far as I see it, VMs save you money on hardware, but just end up bogging down that hardware as you have multiple machines competing over the same pool of resources. What am I missing here? Can VMs communicate with each other over your network using high-level protocols like TCP/IP, HTTP, FTP, etc.? Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense to implement all these VMs if you have to feed them separate and independent chunks of data/requests to process. Why can't I say “She died from drinking 18 cans of Coca-Cola”? Instead, the correct sentence would be “She died of drinking 18 cans of Coca-Cola”. Why does that happen? Why does an argument similiar to 0.999...=1 show 999...=-1? I accept that two numbers can have the same supremum depending on how you generate a decimal representation. So $2.4999\ldots = 2.5$ etc. Can anyone point me to resources that would explain what the below argument that shows $999\ldots = -1$ is about? Here is the most usual proof I see that $0.999\ldots = 1$:  $x=0.999\ldots$ $10x=9.999\ldots$ $10x - x = 9$ $x=1$  Using this same argument template I can show $999\ldots=-1$:  $x= \ldots9999.0 $ $0.1x= \ldots9999.9$ $0.1x - x = 0.9$ $x=-1$  What might this mean? Edit from one of the comments: $$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}{9 \cdot 10^k}=-1$$ How to fix the MBR for Windows 7? Etiquette on sending a thank you e-mail to respondents who gave me helpful information I'd like to use a sequence of boxes to show how TeX works. I read some time ago that everything (or almost) in TeX are boxes.  So, how to show only the TeX boxes that surround each character, each line, each paragraph?  I'd like something similar to the image below, not fbox which contains blank space around it. How to remove Home Folder icon from desktop in Ubuntu 20.04? When I start Ubuntu I had my &quot;home/user&quot; in my Desktop. test is my User.   How do I make the folder not be on the desktop? ibus Avro in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I used the instructions given  to install ibus Avro in my ubuntu 14.04 LTS (64 bit) but ibus avro was not installed. Can anyone help me to solve this case? After giving the commands in terminal nothing happens. From the limit definition of differentiability, determine where the function $f(x) = \sqrt{x}$ is differentiable? For the function $f(x) = \sqrt{x}, \hspace{2 mm} f: [0, \infty) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, I wish to find all points $a$ at which $f(x)$ is differentiable, from the definition $$ f'(x) = \lim_{x \rightarrow a}\frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a} $$  Clearly, for our function $f(x) = \sqrt{x}$, this gives us $$ f'(x) = \lim_{x\to a}\frac{\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{a}}{x-a} $$  So the question boils down to showing for what values of $a$ this limit exists. How would this be done? Intuitively, I know that the answer is that the limit exists for all $a \in [0, \infty)$ and is given by $\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{a}}$, but I'm unsure of how to prove this from the limit definition of differentiability. How to shop for a lens filter? What should I consider when shopping for a lens filter?    I see filters that range from $15 to $115 and more.  What are the differences between the $15 and the $115 filter?    I'm asking in the generic sense but if you need specifics, I'm looking to buy a UV filter and a polarizing filter for a Panasonic GF1 w/ 20mm pancake lens.  EDIT: I've read some of the other posts and some refer to multi-coating but doesn't explain what is this and why it matters.  What I've gathered from reading related posts is that price is generally the only indication of quality in the case of choosing a filter.  Is this right? Prove the series $ \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(n!)^2}$ converges to an irrational number How can one prove that the series $\displaystyle \sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(n!)^2}$ converges to an irrational number? There's no need to use Taylor expansion, integrals or any advanced/professional techniques. It can be proved using only basic techniques. My first attempt was to assume that the series does converge to a rational number $ \frac{p}{q}$ and then it follows by definition that for every positive epsilon there exists an integer k such that $ {\sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{(n!)^2} -\frac{p}{q}}&lt;=\epsilon$ I tried to get a contradiction but I failed. Headers of \chapters* take the headers of their previous \chapter When using book.cls and using \chapter* after a \chapter, the header used in \chapter* is wrong. An example is pasted below.   Is there any known workaround for that? I have tried quite some tricks without success.   \documentclass[]{book}  \begin{document}  \chapter{First Chapter} aslkjdf  \chapter*{Unnumbered Chapter} The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.  The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.  Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.  For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.  Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.  Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.  The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.  \end{document} How do I interpret the Mann-Whitney U when using R's formula interface macro definition containing #include directive Is there a way to define a macro that contains a #include directive in its body?  If I just put the "#include", it gives the error  C2162: "expected macro formal parameter"   since here I am not using # to concatenate strings. If I use "\# include",  then I receive the following two errors:  error C2017: illegal escape sequence error C2121: '#' : invalid character : possibly the result of a macro expansion   Any help? Are there any rules in baseball which prohibit teams from "borrowing" players via trade? Every season near the trade deadline, we see teams that are out of it trading expensive players and/or free agents-to-be, typically for younger players or prospects.  For example, Matt Garza, set to become a free agent after the season, was traded to the Rangers for a few prospects.  It made sense for the Cubs to trade Garza, because he wasn't under contract any further than this season, and thus doesn't have much value to them.  Compare Garza to someone like Mike Trout, who is likely the most valuable property in baseball, given his skill and inexpensive cost over the next several years.  There's no way the Angels would trade him, because he'll be the cost-controlled centerpiece of the team for years to come.  However, with the Angels out of it this year, what if they wanted to trade Trout to a contender (say the Pirates), but only for the remainder of this season?  That is, they'd get several top prospects now, and would have an agreement with the Pirates that they'd trade him back in the offseason (for something pretty worthless, say for a journeyman minor leaguer).  The Pirates get Trout for the stretch run and are happy to give up a few prospects.  Trout doesn't have much value to the Angels this year, but he has a ton of value for next year.  So they get a few prospects for him, in exchange for the part of his career which has very little value to them.  So in effect, the Pirates are renting or borrowing him for the remainder of 2013.  Why don't trades like this happen?  Are there any rules prohibiting trades like this? What is the difference between # and . when declaring a set of styles for an element and what are the semantics that come into play when deciding which one to use?