I want to install Ubuntu 17.10 32-bit on my ASUS laptop, but when I tried to download it I got these two screens. Note that these screenshots were taken on my Windows 10 desktop. Is there any other way to install Ubuntu 17.10 32-bit?   Edit: I'm sorry everyone I should've explained myself clearer last night. The thing was, I've read the news about no 32-bit support on omgubuntu site, but it said there that you can still download it. Then I was looking for something familiar I skimmed 64-bit variants for obvious reasons and server because it was vague to me. So I checked to netboot, I saw a tree file and I was like - that's what I need, apparently I just need to download all of those files to the usb and that's it but some of them were like blanks I mean I clicked them but they weren't downloading. So I checked the installation guide - but it lead to 404 mistake so my question was how to make that netboot? Also I'm using Windows 10 on my desktop to download 17.10 to burn USB-stick that I can use to my old laptop on which it ran Windows 7 poorly so I thought of trying Ubuntu Gnome 17.10 because it's new and I wondered if it would run smoothly or not since the change of Unity. I get it that the lightest distros like Xubuntu will be more effective but I kind of dig it to the Ubuntu design. So that's it probably.   Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) Netboot   404 Not Found
The new 17.10 only has 64 bit ISOs. However 32 bit is still supported, there just are no live ISOs for it.  I have a 32 bit machine with WIFI, and I need to install from a USB disk. I tried the "mini.iso" but it doesn't have WIFI support.  What options do I have?  (PS I don't want another distro, and I can't use ethernet for installation, must be WIFI).
How do I extract all the external links of a web page and save them to a file? How do I enter a file or directory with special characters in its name? Find the minimum of $\sqrt{(x+1)^2+(y-1)^2}+\sqrt{(x+2)^2+(y+2)^2}+\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2}$ For real $x,y$ Find the minimum of $\sqrt{(x+1)^2+(y-1)^2}+\sqrt{(x+2)^2+(y+2)^2}+\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2}$ For real $x,y$. It is the distance of a point in a triangle from its vertexes which gives the minimum when $(x,y)$ is on the Fermat's point.  But now I am stuck in finding the location of Fermat's point.  $(1) \quad 4$ $(2) \quad 5$ $(3) \quad \sqrt{3}+2\sqrt{5}$ $(4) \quad 4\sqrt{2}$ Do Stack Exchange sites allow editing of comments and posts from other users? How do you start Windows 10 in safe mode? When is the present perfect tense used instead of the past tense? Groups of order $pq$ without using Sylow theorems Adverb-adjective compound premodifier with or without hyphen? Remarkably low condensation temperature  or  Remarkably-low condensation temperature?  The focus of remarkable is that it is such a low temperature. We are having an office disagreement and any help is much appreciated. Can I change some but not all Apple keyboard function keys (dim vs F1, bright vs F2)? I want to override F1 and F2 behavior, since I have external display and Mac can't control display's brightness. The rest of the keys should retain their non Fx  I know about "Use all F1-F12 keys as standard function keys.", but I don't want to change all of the keys to be F when pressed, just some of them. (For me single press music and volume control is necessary.)  Is there a way to pick some of the function keys to default to numbered function instead of the "Apple" definitions system wide? How can I play Pokémon GO without Internet? Why is there not a simpler way to calculate the standard deviation? Steps of getting standard deviation. :        Work out the average (mean value) of your set of numbers   Work out the difference between each number and the mean   Square the differences   Add up the square of all the differences   Divide this by one less than the number of numbers in your set -   this is called the variance   Take the square root of the variance and you've got the standard   deviation      Am I missing out something, or why do we need to square the differences in step 3?  Why not simply do a Abs (multiply all negative numbers by -1) in step 3?  Also, my second question is why do we need to divide by one less than the number of numbers in the set in step 5? why not simply divide by the number of numbers? Show that there exists a unique $v_0 \in H^1(0,1)$ such that $u(0)=\int_0^1(u'v_0'+uv_0), \forall u \in H^1(0,1)$ Show that there exists a unique $v_0 \in H^1(0,1)$ such that $u(0)=\int_0^1(u'v_0'+uv_0), \forall u \in H^1(0,1)$. Further Show that $v_0$ is the solution of some differential equation with appropriate boundary conditions. Compute $v_0$ explicitly.   Let $f: H^1(0,1) \to \mathbb{R}$ be defined by $f(u)=u(0)$. Then I showed that $f$ is linear and continuous. Hence there exists $v_0 \in H^1(0,1)$ such that $u(0)=\int_{0}^1u'v_0'+\int_{0}^1uv_0$  The differential equation is given by $f=-u''+u$ with the conditions $u'(0)=u'(1)=0$.   How do I compute $v_0$ explicitly?? PHP function to build query string from array I'm looking for the name of the PHP function to build a query string from an array of key value pairs. Please note, I am looking for the built in PHP function to do this, not a homebrew one (that's all a google search seems to return). There is one, I just can't remember its name or find it on php.net. IIRC its name isn't that intuitive. Inverse Green's Function identity in derivation of Hedin's equations I'm trying to work through a derivation of Hedin's Equations in Effect of Interaction on One-Electron States by Hedin and Lundqvist (1969) and I've come across an identity that is given without much explanation that I'd like to understand.   We start with an equation of motion with single particle Green's functions G:   $\left[ i\frac{\partial}{\partial t_1} - h(1) - \phi(1) - V_H(1)\right] G(1,2) - i\int v(1^{+},3) \frac{\delta G(1,2)}{\delta \phi(3)} d3 = \delta(1,2)$  where $1=(x_1,t_1)$, $h$ is the one-electron kinetic energy and ion interaction, $\phi$ is a small perturbing field that is set to zero at the end, $V_H$ is the Hartree potential, and $v$ is the Coulomb interaction.  They then insert the identity  $\frac{\delta G(1,2)}{\delta\phi(3)} = -\int G(1,4) \frac{\delta G^{-1}(4,5)}{\delta\phi(3)} G(5,2) d(4,5)$  which is then used to define the self energy  $\Sigma(1,2) =  -i \int v(1^+,3) G(1,4)\frac{\delta G^{-1}(4,2)}{\delta\phi(3)} d(3,4)$.  I know this identity is related to the definition of the inverse Green's function  $ \int G(1,3) G^{-1}(3,2) d(3) = \delta(1,2)$  but I can't figure out how to get from this definition to the identity that is inserted into the equation of motion. Any ideas?  Thank you! Virtual Host not working as expected when I'm using .dev domain extension I'm doing a Laravel project and I need to set up a virtual host example.dev in my system. For that I've created a copy of 000-default.conf and named it as example.dev.conf and placed in /etc/apache2/sites-available. The contents of the file is given below (comments removed):  &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;     &lt;Directory /var/www/html/example/public/&gt;         Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews         AllowOverride All         Require all granted     &lt;/Directory&gt;      ServerName example.dev     ServerAlias www.example.dev      ServerAdmin admin@example.dev     DocumentRoot /var/www/html/example/public      ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log     CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;   Then I've enabled the site using a2ensite command and disabled 000-default.conf using a2dissite command. Then it will open my project when I try localhost (/var/www/html) in my browser and not example.dev. The virtual host example.dev always produce "The site can't be reached" error in browsers.  Any suggestions? Prove existence of a real root. Book recommendations for fluid dynamics self-study I have my bachelors degree in engineering science: computer science, option electrotechnic. I have a good understanding of basic mechanics and dynamics, calculus (differential equations).  The books I'm now having a look at are:       What book do you recommend for studying fluid dynamics on my own and why? Word for "reading carefully" Sometimes we read books rather quickly and don't give them much (or any) thought, so the action 'reading' does not necessarily imply that we have given enough thoughts to any book we read.   Is there a word that describes reading a book with great care; usually but necessarily slowly over a long period of time. How do you improve Drupal performance? Add title uniqueness to the heuristics for detecting low-quality questions This feature request is a response to  Two days ago,  suggested that we . However, given that  (hat tip ) as well as ...  262  103   ... I suggest that we take it a step further. Let's extend the heuristics for detecting—and blocking—low-quality questions to enforce unique titles, or at least flag new questions with duplicate titles automatically. We can leave the precise heuristics of detecting a duplicate title up to the Stack Overflow development team. I have no delusions about the fact that a few questions will &quot;slip through the cracks.&quot; The goal here is to be proactive about minimizing the number of duplicates, and I think that the best place to start is the existing heuristics for detecting low-quality questions. After all, duplicate question titles are bad for a number of reasons: They often indicate a question that is itself a duplicate, but perhaps just as importantly, they decrease the signal-to-noise ratio when searching for questions. I honestly can't think of any reason that duplicate question titles are helpful, unless you are asking for a solution to the same problem in a different programming language. Even then, I think that it would be acceptable to rephrase the question to say &quot;How do I do X in (insert programming language here)?&quot;  makes a good point about the potential problems with this solution:  I have a hunch that if we do that, people will find ways to circumvent it (changing case or punctuation, adding random spam), and we'll end up stuck in a an arms race.  We may get stuck in an arms race with some users, but I honestly think that many people new to Stack Overflow just don't understand the etiquette of asking questions here. If we could even convince people to rephrase their question more clearly 20% of the time, I think that it would be a tremendous boon to the community. Furthermore, remember that heuristics for low-quality questions already exist, arms race or no.