Ok, as far as I understand a field has to look like $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$. But why? What is the explanation?
Let $F$ be a finite field. How do I prove that the order of $F$ is always of order $p^n$ where $p$ is prime?
Get network utilization from command line In the Windows task manager there is a handy network tab which shows the link speed and network utilization (in percentage of available bandwidth) for connected network adapters:  Is there a way to get this information through the command line? $\hbar \rightarrow 0$ in quantum mechanics We often see a limit $\hbar \rightarrow 0$ in quantum mechanics and sometimes it's related with symmetry breaking. Can someone briefly write the story behind this limit? Do I need to use a comma between two adjectives? You can also contact me to customize your template, or create a new unique one.   Do I need to put a comma between the new and unique adjectives in this sentence?  In my native language (if I am not mistaken) we don't put a comma if the adjectives are of a different type. Not sure about English though, and if it's the case here anyway. Any help would be appreciated! Say an airplane flies at Mach 1. The doppler effect causes the front of the sound emitted by the plane to reach infinite frequency:    $f = \left ( \frac {343+0}{343-343} \right ) f_0 = ∞$  If the plane suddenly stopped, and there was an observer in front of the sound waves to receive the sound, what would the bunched up waves sound like to the observer? Would they cancel each other out and cause no sound? When (and why) should you take the log of a distribution (of numbers)? I've got a weird question. Assume that you have a small sample where the dependent variable that you're going to analyze with a simple linear model is highly left skewed. Thus you assume that $u$ is not normally distributed, because this would result in normally distributed $y$. But when you compute the QQ-Normal plot there is evidence, that the residuals are normally distributed. Thus anyone can assume that the error term is normally distributed, although $y$ is not. So what does it mean, when the error term seems to be normally distributed, but $y$ does not? There are a few "automatically protect questions" requests out there, but I'd like to add another twist.  I'd like to request that questions that have three or more deleted answers by users with &lt;50 rep be automatically protected.  The reasoning behind this is that we have lots and lots of "not an answer" flags in the mod queue.  But we cannot protect a question from the mod queue, so we have to open each answer, evaluate if the question needs protecting, then protect it.    This process takes a long time, and can definitely be automated, as the only thing you really need to check is how many new users are posting non-answers or are spamming their awful products. I don't know how to integrate $\displaystyle \int\frac{1}{x^{4}+1}\mathrm dx$. Do I have to use trigonometric substitution? Let $f: M \to N$ be a mono in $\mathsf{Mon}$. I want to prove that the underlying function $U(f): U(M) \to U(N)$ is injective.   How can this be done ? Thanks in advance. How to calculate the sum of sequence $$\frac{1}{\binom{n}{1}}+\frac{1}{\binom{n}{2}}+\frac{1}{\binom{n}{3}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{\binom{n}{n}}=？$$ How about its limit? bash profile works for user but not sudo What does "+6 to hit, Hit: 13 (2d8 + 4)" mean in a creature's stat block? My friends and I are very new to D&amp;D, played like 3 times. In a monster's stats next to weapon damage it says stuff like "+11 to hit" and "Hit: 5 (1d8+1)". For the premade characters it just says things like "+4, 2d6 + 2 slashing", though. Why are there two "hit" numbers for monsters? Which do I use for the d20 roll to hit against a target's AC?  I mean for example like in the Ogre entry in the "" article on monsters. bash script – for i in {x..y} i am writing a script in bash and I would like to give the two numbers in the brackets, x and y to be precise, as variables.  I wrote the script this way:  echo "x?" read x echo "y" read y  for i in {$x..$y}   but it does not work.  How could I set it up to make it function?  Thanks a lot in advance. Is there a tool that combines zcat and cat transparently? When handling log files, some end up as gzipped files thanks to logrotate and others not. So when you try something like this:  $ zcat *   you end up with a command line like zcat xyz.log xyz.log.1 xyz.log.2.gz xyz.log.3.gz and then with:  gzip: xyz.log: not in gzip format   Is there a tool that will take the magic bytes, similar to how file works, and use zcat or cat depending on the outcome so that I can pipe the output to grep for example?  NB: I know I can script it, but I am asking whether there is a tool out there already. Are dark energy and zero-point energy the same thing? According to Quantum Mechanics is it possible that the famous  and  are the same thing that drives the accelerated expansion of the universe or maybe related to each other? I am using 64bit 2.10.1-Pisa on Windows 10.  When I set up my composer to print, everything looks fine until I try to print or export. The composer goes completely blank and outputs a corrupted PDF using the Export to PDF function. The PDF file won't even open.  I had the same result exporting to PNG.  When I try to use the PDF document printer instead of exporting, QGIS stops responding indefinitely. What does $b_i\mid b_{i+1}$ mean in this context? In the computational topology literature, the reduction algorithm for computing the Smith normal form of a boundary matrix uses the notation $b_j &gt; 1 \: \text{ and }\: b_j\mid b_{j+1}$ in the context of the diagonal elements of the Smith matrix. Can anyone give me an idea for what it means? Equivalence of conditions for Convergence of Non-negative Random Series Question  Let $X_n\geq 0$ be independent for $n\geq 1$. The following are equivalent.  $\sum_{n=1}^\infty X_n&lt;\infty$ a.s. $\sum_{n=1}^\infty[P(X_n&gt;1)+E(X_nI(X_n\leq 1)]&lt;\infty$ $\sum_{n=1}^\infty E(X_n/(1+X_n))&lt;\infty$   My attempt I was able to prove $(1)$ implies $(2)$ and $(2)$ implies $(3)$ but not $(3)$ implies $(1)$. For $(1)$ implies $(2)$, observe that by Borel-Cantelli $\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(X_n&gt;1)&lt;\infty$, else $X_n&gt;1$ infinitely often w.p.1 so that $(1)$ is violated. To see that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty E(X_nI(X_n\leq 1)]&lt;\infty$, apply Kolmogorov three-series theorem (I think). For $(2)$ implies $(3)$ we can write that $$ \begin{align} \frac{X_n}{1+X_n}&amp; =\frac{X_n}{1+X_n}I(X_n\leq 1)+\frac{X_n}{1+X_n}I(X_n&gt;1)\\ &amp;\leq X_nI(X_n\leq 1)+ I(X_n&gt;1). \end{align} $$ Now take the expectation of both sides and sum on $n$ using $(2)$ to conclude $(3)$. For the last implication $(3)$ implies $(1)$, I tried to use Kolmogorov three series theorem. To this end put $Y_n=X_nI(X_n\leq 1)$. First note that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(X_n&gt;1)&lt;\infty$ since $$ P(X_n&gt;1)\leq P\left(\frac{X_n}{1+X_n}&gt;\frac{1}{2}\right)\leq 2E\frac{X_n}{1+X_n} $$ by Markov's inequality. But I am unable to show that $\sum EY_n&lt;\infty$ and $\sum\text{Var}(Y_n)&lt;\infty$. Any help is appreciated. When should "no problem" replace "you're welcome" as a response to "thank you"? How do I unit test code that includes a callout?