I have gone through various sites and some say there is NADPH2 and some say there is no NADPH2 there's only NADP+ ...WHich is the correct view....Please dont mark this answer as duplicates since I have asked a similar question related to photosynthesis in the past but there too I have not received any satisfactory answer bythe community .
I've been reading a lot about the oxidative dissimilation etc, and often I see different sources use NADH and NADH2 in the same reactions. One source uses NADH and another uses NADH2 in the exact same way. Is there a difference or is it just a different name for the same substance?
What do I need to consider to choose between dSLR, mirrorless, or a compact as my first "serious" camera? How do I avoid rendering glitches from overlapping faces? Is it okay to vectorize this image to make a poster out of it even though the image is not Creative Commons or anything like that? I'm not using any part of the image directly and only going to use it as a guide to make my own SVG version.  This is the image:    Here is .  It says that it is CC licensed but the original NatGeo one isn't, I don't think.  I don't plan to make money off it or anything, I just want a nice poster and the quality of the original isn't that good. Design for Facebook authentication in an iOS app that also accesses a secured web service What is EV, when used as an absolute measurement? On convergence of Bertrand series $\sum\limits_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^{\alpha}\ln^{\beta}(n)}$ where $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}$ Study the convergence of $$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}  \frac{1}{n^{\alpha}\ln^{\beta}(n)}$$ where $\alpha, \beta \in  \mathbb{R}$   I have proved that:   This series diverges when $\alpha \leq 0$. This series converges when $\alpha &gt; 1, \beta &gt; 0$ This series diverges when $0 &lt; \alpha &lt; 1, \beta &gt; 0$ This series converges when $\alpha = 1, \beta &gt; 1$      Question: What happens when $\alpha &gt; 0$ and $ \beta &lt; 0$?   There are other questions on MSE which ask about this series, but this question is distinct because   I would like an argument which does not rely on the integral test for series convergence, and this question considers all real $\alpha$ and $\beta$, while other questions ask only about $\alpha, \beta &gt; 0$, where we can apply Cauchy condensation criterion What's the subject of "There is my biscuit!" ? And how about "There is one biscuit left"? What's the subject, grammatically speaking, of these sentences?   There is my biscuit! My biscuit is there! There is one biscuit left.   I don't really know how to analyze these. The following observations seem to be relevant, though:   The verb to be doesn't take an object. In the first two sentences, there is a demonstrative pronoun. It is therefore potentially a subject, I think. I don't know what part of speech is taken by there in the third sentence. In favour of reading my biscuit and one biscuit as the subjects is that if there were more than one biscuit then, in each case, the verb would become plural (There are my biscuits! etc.) In favour of reading one biscuit as the subject of the third sentence is that if we recast it as (the slightly unidiomatic) There remains one biscuit, it seems that one biscuit would have to be the subject.   All of this leads me tentatively towards thinking that my biscuit and one biscuit are the subjects here, but I'm not totally confident about this.  One other possibility: since to be doesn't take an object, does that mean it can have two subjects? In I am he, presumably both I and he are subjects, if neither is an object? In January, some additional whitespace  below h1, h2 and h3 headings,  more whitespace below the headers than above them.  Could we have the whitespace above the headings be more than the whitespace below them?  I find some posts a bit hard to read, like the current rendering on the left:   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; How can I safely create a nested directory in Python? What is the most elegant way to check if the directory a file is going to be written to exists, and if not, create the directory using Python? Here is what I tried:  import os  file_path = "/my/directory/filename.txt" directory = os.path.dirname(file_path)  try:     os.stat(directory) except:     os.mkdir(directory)         f = file(filename)   Somehow, I missed os.path.exists (thanks kanja, Blair, and Douglas). This is what I have now:  def ensure_dir(file_path):     directory = os.path.dirname(file_path)     if not os.path.exists(directory):         os.makedirs(directory)   Is there a flag for "open", that makes this happen automatically? How can I play encrypted DVD movies? My machine can't play encrypted DVDs on a fresh install.  How do I add this capability?  Another useful bit of information would be what programs are best for playing DVDs, once I'm able to do so.  See the .  Will I be able to play DVD movies from ? I'm looking for a way to search files where two word instances exist in the same file.  I've been using the following to perform my searches up to this point:  find . -exec grep -l "FIND ME" {} \;   The problem I'm running into is that if there isn't exactly one space that between "FIND" and "ME", the search result does not yield the file.  How do I adapt the former search string where both words "FIND" and "ME exist in a file as opposed to "FIND ME"?  I'm using AIX. How to derive the standard symplectic form on a 2-sphere in cylindrical polar coordinates? I have already know that at a point $p\in S^2$ with $u,v$ the tangent vectors at $p$. Then the standard symplectic form is $\omega_p(u,v) :=\langle p,\,u\times v\rangle$ where $u\times v$ is the outer product. My question is: How can one deduce from this that the symplectic form is $dz\wedge d\theta$ in the cylindrical polar coordinates $(z,\theta)$ on $S^2$? Here, $z$ is the height and $\theta$ is the angle. Thanks. Universal Chord Theorem Let $f \in C[0,1]$ and $f(0)=f(1)$.   How do we prove $\exists a \in [0,1/2]$ such that $f(a)=f(a+1/2)$?  In fact, for every positive integer $n$, there is some $a$, such that $f(a) = f(a+\frac{1}{n})$.  For any other non-zero real $r$ (i.e not of the form $\frac{1}{n}$), there is a continuous function $f \in C[0,1]$, such that $f(0) = f(1)$ and $f(a) \neq f(a+r)$ for any $a$.  This is called the Universal Chord Theorem and is due to Paul Levy.  Note: the accepted answer answers only the first question, so please read the other answers too, and also this answer by Arturo to a different question:     This is being repurposed in an effort to cut down on duplicates, see here: .  and here: . If every element of set A ia an element of set B then we say that A is subset of B. A is said to be proper subset if A does not equal B.  My question is - whether the symbol we use to show subset is  same as that for proper subset? I have seen that A is subset of A itself is shown by the same symbol as that for the subset while when we write improper subset, we usually write equal to sign with symbol of subset. So, please help me to know this. Normally Star Trek seems to based on some sort of logic, but the time travel in "Star Trek: Enterprise" seems to have no logic at all, or  am I just missing it?  Example: If they go back in time to change something it takes time until it has any effect in the future? I can't see any reason for this. Let $a$, $b$, and $c$ be complex numbers with $a\neq0$. Show that the solutions of $az^2+bz+c=0$ are $z_1,z_2=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$, just as they are in the case when $a$, $b$, and $c$ are real numbers. How does gravity escape a black hole? Canonical URL for a home page and trailing slashes extracting energy from cosmological expansion This question is a more concrete reincarnation of an .  Are there mechanisms to extract energy from the cosmic rate of expansion? putting some extremely long ropes across the universe and extract work from their increase of separation?  assuming this is possible ( i don't see why it would not ), what form would take the back-reaction force? in all physics, every time you extract work from some system by some force, this system will exert a force back. Can we slow down cosmic expansion by variations of these mechanisms? Should outdated answers be voted down? On Stack Overflow, there are many questions that relate to currently-developing technologies such as HTML5 and CSS3. The accepted answers to these questions may become outdated, and better answers may appear. However, because the answers are accepted, it is likely that they will continue to be upvoted by users reading the answers, and the OP will likely not notice that a better, more up-to-date answer may exist.  Should these outdated answers be voted down? If not, what should we do with them?