I have a scene which I want to render in 4k resolution however blender crashes every time when I try that. It doesn't crash if I render at half that resolution so my question is if there is a way to e.g. split the final image into four pieces and render each individually with EEVEE.
I watched a video on youtube (I lost it) that shows rendering parts of the screen to combine them in a single image. I followed it to the point where I couldn't adjust the dimensions under the "set render border", but in the video he had dimensions and I have nothing.  I need it for 4K and 8K renders (without anti-aliasing), but my laptop can't handle it all at once and I don't have time for a 4 hour waiting so this feature will work perfectly.  I'm using version 2.76 so is it moved to another place or removed. Maybe a bug?
Humans don't digest fibre, and nor do any animals, but some creatures have micro-organisms (bacteria, I'm guessing) in their gut which digest fibre for them.  My question is, could humans take some sort of pill and establish our own fibre-digesting colonies in our intestines?  Has this been tried?  Supposing it could be done, would you suppose it would have any negative effects on our health?  (i.e.. would those whose gut digested fibre for them be stuck on a low-fibre diet?).    Purpose of question: just wondering.  It would be cool to be able to eat bark. So I was writing up a simple binary tree in Python and came across [...]  I don't believe this to be related to the Ellipsis object, more it seems to have something to do with an infinity loop (due to Python's shallow copy?). The source of this infinity loop and why it doesn't get expanded while expanding when accessed is something I'm completely lost to, however   &gt;&gt;&gt; a [[[[[], [], 8, 3], [[], [], 3, 2], 6, 3], [], 1, 4], [[], [], -4, 2], 0, 0] &gt;&gt;&gt; Keys(a)#With a+b [0, 1, 6, 8, 3, -4] &gt;&gt;&gt; Keys(a)#With [a,b] [8, [...], [...], 3, [...], [...], 6, [...], [...], 1, [...], [...], -4, [...], [...], 0, [...], [...]] &gt;&gt;&gt; Keys(a)[1]#?? [8, [...], [...], 3, [...], [...], 6, [...], [...], 1, [...], [...], -4, [...], [...], 0, [...], [...], 8, [...], [...], 3, [...], [...], 6, [...], [...], 1, [...], [...], -4, [...], [...], 0, [...], [...]]     Version using a+b  def Keys(x,y=[]):     if len(x):y+=[x[2]]+Keys(x[0],y)+Keys(x[1],y)#Though it seems I was using y=y[:]+, this actually outputs an ugly mess     return y   version using [a,b]  def Keys(x,y=[]):     if len(x):y+=[x[2],Keys(x[0],y),Keys(x[1],y)]     return y   So what exactly is [...]? CUDA writing to constant memory wrong value From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads:  With implements Runnable:  public class MyRunnable implements Runnable {     public void run() {         //Code     } } //Started with a "new Thread(new MyRunnable()).start()" call   Or, with extends Thread:  public class MyThread extends Thread {     public MyThread() {         super("MyThread");     }     public void run() {         //Code     } } //Started with a "new MyThread().start()" call   Is there any significant difference in these two blocks of code ? How can I tell whether a circle and a rectangle intersect in 2D Euclidean space? (i.e. classic 2D geometry) Does standard c library provides linked list etc. data structures? It's $\mathbb{Z}\subseteq \mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^5-1)$ an integral extension? It's $\mathbb{Z}\subseteq \mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^5-1)$ an integral extension?  $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^5-1) \simeq \mathbb{Z}[x]$ where $x^5-1=0$.  So is an integral extension because $x$ is integral  over $\mathbb{Z}$. It's right? How to update to the latest numpy and scipy on Ubuntu 14.04LTS On my Ubuntu 14.04LTS, for python3, I have   &gt;&gt;&gt; import numpy  &gt;&gt;&gt; import scipy  &gt;&gt;&gt; numpy.__version__  '1.8.2'  &gt;&gt;&gt; scipy.__version__  '0.13.3'   I want to update numpy and scipy to the most , I tried with the following commands  sudo pip3 install --upgrade numpy sudo pip3 install --upgrade scipy   both commands ran successfully, but the version numbers didn't change to 1.9.2 and 0.16.0 at all for both python packages (after restarting the computer). Anyone knows how to update to the most version? Thank you very much!! How do I overload the square-bracket operator in C#? DataGridView, for example, lets you do this:  DataGridView dgv = ...; DataGridViewCell cell = dgv[1,5];   but for the life of me I can't find the documentation on the index/square-bracket operator.  What do they call it?  Where is it implemented?  Can it throw?  How can I do the same thing in my own classes?  ETA: Thanks for all the quick answers.  Briefly: the relevant documentation is under the "Item" property; the way to overload is by declaring a property like public object this[int x, int y]{ get{...}; set{...} }; the indexer for DataGridView does not throw, at least according to the documentation.  It doesn't mention what happens if you supply invalid coordinates.  ETA Again: OK, even though the documentation makes no mention of it (naughty Microsoft!), it turns out that the indexer for DataGridView will in fact throw an ArgumentOutOfRangeException if you supply it with invalid coordinates.  Fair warning. Installing QGIS with ECW support on Mac? Does the std::stack in the C++ STL expose any iterators of the underlying container or should I use that container directly? Is there any quality difference between PNG vs BMP image formats? I have just learned that PNG is a lossless image format while BMP can be both uncompressed or lossless format. Should there be a quality difference between these two? If not, does it mean that other lossless formats like TIFF, JPEG2000 and PNG offer the same quality as BMP? Alphabetically display the items in itemize Take as an example the well-known . In the original paper, the regression model was used to model the amount people were willing to pay for improved air quality.  But the 'people' whose behaviour was being modelled was never specified. Presumably, it was not limited to 'residents of Greater Boston'. Only implausibly would it be 'humans anywhere on the planet'. Nor, 'all US residents'.   So what inference are we invited by the authors to draw about the scope they intend for their theory? Perhaps 'all residents of large US metro areas'. But - what about other First World metro areas? The first two sections of the Boston paper scrupulously avoid any reference which might suggest that they had a particular 'population' to which their 'sample' was to apply.  There is also the dimension of time - the data came from the 70s, whereas the theory is has no time limitations spelt out.  Plus - going back to first principles - how could the Boston data be treated as a sample of a population including, say, the Chicago metro area when no data from the Chicago area was considered?   Besides, lots of the covariates in the Boston regression weren't samples at all, but totals - so, for example, the proportion of blacks was supplied from census stats.  My question: how can we conceive the Boston data as supporting the geographically unlimited propositions in the paper? Is there a mathematical way of showing equivalence or approximation of the Boston data analysis to other cities? Or is it just assumed as a matter of common sense - such that the paper's authors would be amazed to think anyone could have any doubts on the matter? If you try to execute a program that is not installed you will get a message  The program 'x' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:  sudo apt-get install x   and instead of offering you to install the program for you, you have to type the actual command. How can this behavior be changed? Prove that any complex matrix can be expressed in term of Hermitian and anti-Hermitian matrices How can we prove that any complex matrix can be expressed in term of hermitian and anti-hermitian matrices of the following form $A = H_1 + iH_2$ Where, $H_1$ is hermitian and $H_2$ is an anti-hermitian matrix I keep running into areas where I see a chest in a section of the room that seems completely walled-off. Is there any way to get to these, or is that just the randomly generated dungeon being a tease?  I had to splice two screenshots together to show an example of what I'm talking about:   Is there any way to get in there? Get three highest values from the array prove that there are infinitely many numbers of the form $x = 111....1$ such that $31\mid x$ tcpdump shows traffic until I use a filter I have a server that is receiving traffic from a mirror port on a switch. The interface that is connected to this mirror port is in promisc mode. When I use just a plain catch all tcpdump on the interface, like   tcpdump -nn -i eth1   I see a ton of traffic.  I can even grep this for certain things like, say, port 443.  tcpdump -nn -i eth1 | grep 443   obviously this shows anything that has a 443 in it, not just port 443. I have visually inspected it and I do see stuff like this:  15:08:08.112550 IP 12.34.56.78.1430 &gt; 87.65.43.21.443: . ack 35124 win 32768   But I want just port 443 so...  tcpdump -nn -i eth1 port 443 ... 0 packets captured   Weird. I am not seeing any traffic when I use a filter. I have tried "ip port", "dst port", and a few other filters. I have also tried filtering by the IP instead of port. Nothing.  eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:81:A5:AD:7A             inet6 addr: fe80::224:81ff:fea5:ad7a/64 Scope:Link           UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1           RX packets:4114781478 errors:0 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0           TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000            RX bytes:2240970313430 (2.0 TiB)  TX bytes:15155497 (14.4 MiB)           Interrupt:98 Memory:fa000000-fa012800    This interface has seen a ton of traffic. And my filter is valid, right? Why do I not see anything?