I use overleaf while I am writing my thesis and I want the authors in each citation to appear in chronological order. I use biblatex: \usepackage[style=authoryear,sorting=nyt,dashed=false,uniquelist=false,maxnames=1,minnames=1,maxbibnames=99,backend=biber,sortcites=true]{biblatex}  An example from my text is the following: these paleolakes could have hosted habitable conditions and contributed organic material to sediments sinks at the landing site. There are many potential fluvial valleys and sediment fans in the study area  \parencite{molina2017coogoon,fawdon2018ancient,dickeson2020topographic}.  but when I recompile it appears like that:
I want to sort in-text citations by year, but bibliography by name. It sound exactly like .  However, suggested solution (using \usepackage[sorting=ynt]{biblatex} and \printbibliography[sorting=nty]) does not work for me (see MWEB below). Indeed, the list of references remains year-sorted instead of name sorted.  Question: How to force sorting=nty in \printbibliography?      \documentclass{article}     \usepackage[%         backend=biber,%         style=authoryear-comp,%         natbib=true,%         sorting=ynt%     ]{biblatex}     \addbibresource{\jobname.bib}     \usepackage{filecontents}  \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}     @book{key2000,       author = {Author, A.},       year = {2000},       title = {Alphabetical fist \&amp; Year last},       publisher = {Publisher},     }     @book{key1900,         author = {Boathor, B.},         year = {1900},         title = {Alphabetical last \&amp; Year first},         publisher = {Publisher}, } \end{filecontents}  \begin{document}     Citation should be year-sorted, even if \verb+\citep+ is random \citep{key2000, key1900}.% citation NOT year-sorted      \printbibliography[sorting=nyt] \end{document}   P.S.: At the opposite, using  \begingroup     \newrefcontext[sorting=nyt]     \printbibliography \endgroup    overrides the \usepackage[sorting=ynt]{biblatex} option (i.e. LoR is name-sorted, but in-line citations as well).
Was the "Eye of Sauron" Sauron's actual physical form? During the time frame of the Lord of the Rings, was the Eye of Sauron Sauron's actual physical form? If not, what form did he have? Form inside a table Hey I want to connect the bottom loop with the top loop so that it forms a solid.  I have tried selecting multiple vertices and pressing F but that just creates a large face which I do not want. I have tried using grid fill bu that doesn't work either. The solution that seems to work is by selecting four vertices and pressing F and then selecting the next 4 and pressing F and on and on. That just takes too long. Get a "step-by-step" evaluation in Mathematica Back transforming regression results when modeling log(y) I'm fitting a regression on the $\log(y)$.  Is it valid to back transform point estimates (and confidence/prediction intervals) by exponentiation?  I don't believe so, since $E[f(X)] \ne f(E[X])$ but wanted other's opinions.  My example below shows conflicts with back transforming (.239 vs .219).  set.seed(123)  a=-5 b=2  x=runif(100,0,1) y=exp(a*x+b+rnorm(100,0,.2)) # plot(x,y)  ### NLS Fit f &lt;- function(x,a,b) {exp(a*x+b)}  fit &lt;- nls(y ~ exp(a*x+b),  start = c(a=-10, b=15))  co=coef(fit) # curve(f(x=x, a=co[1], b=co[2]), add = TRUE,col=2,lwd=1.2)  predict(fit,newdata=data.frame(x=.7)) [1] 0.2393773  ### LM Fit # plot(x,log(y)) # abline(lm(log(y)~x),col=2) fit=lm(log(y)~x) temp=predict(fit,newdata=data.frame(x=.7),interval='prediction') exp(temp)         fit       lwr       upr 1 0.2199471 0.1492762 0.3240752 . If you filter out a range of wavelengths, how can you calculate the energy from the remaining wavelengths?   To make it concrete, say we filter everything below 450nm or alternatively above 700nm. Please help me to answer the following problem:  Let $f(x)=x^3-3x-5\in\mathbb{Q}[x]$  Thanks I'm currently using the below script to timestamp when an edit is made to column 7 on a sheet named "Sheet 1".  function onEdit(e) {    if ([7].indexOf(e.range.columnStart) != -1) {    e.range.offset(0, 7).setValue(new Date()).setNumberFormat("dd.MM.yyyy at HH:mm");    }   }     I have a second sheet "Sheet 2" which I need to run the same script on but against column 5.  function onEdit(e) {    if ([5].indexOf(e.range.columnStart) != -1) {    e.range.offset(0, 7).setValue(new Date()).setNumberFormat("dd.MM.yyyy at HH:mm");    }   }     I've tried .getSheetByName("Sheet1") but just cant seem to get it working correctly. Assume a p x n data matrix  (e.g. p independent samples of n variables). The n variables are correlated according to a correlation matrix $\rho$. Now if you consider the data matrix as some state t (t=time)  and based on this state I would like to calculate the next timestep (t+1). Therefore the correlation matrix would be allowed to have values &lt; 1 in the diagonal, which means that the diagonal elements would indicate the influence from each variable $x_{p,i}[t]$ on $x_{p,i}[t+1]$. So I would be interested to find a function f like this: $x_{p,i}[t+1] = f(x_{p,i}[t],\rho)$ so that the p x n data matrix  consisting of the $x_{p,i}[t+1]$ replicates the $\rho_{ij}$ (except the diagonal element). f should be something like this: $x_{i,j}[t+1] = \sum_{(k=1\ldots n)}\rho_{i,k} \cdot x_{kj}[t] + e_{i,j}.$ This means specifically, I not only want to calculate a data matrix, that replicates the correlation matrix as such, but also to let each observation be depending on its own state and linear dependent on the previous state of all the intercorrelated variables of its own state. For ease one can assume that the p variables are distributed normal and $e_{ij}$ are independent and distributed with mean$(e_{i,j}) = 0 $. Then for a numerical simulation it would be interesting  to find a formula to calculate the variance/standard deviation of each of the j variables (sd($e_{[.,j]} = ?).$ Thank you for any help! Make account merges propagate to chat When two accounts are merged, all the posts/votes are moved over to the "master" account, and the other account ("slave"?) is deleted. The merge is propagated network-wide, so a similar thing happens on each site.  But, this does not happen to the chat user. The "slave" chat user is kept, with a 404 parent profile link. I feel that the chat user should be merged as well, re attributing all the chat messages.  Thoughts? How to harden an SSH server? What measures can/should I take to make sure that security around my SSH server is absolutely impermeable?  This will be community wiki from the start, so lets see what people do to secure their servers. How do popular free RAW editor/converter compare to each other on Windows? I'm looking for a free RAW editor/converter on Windows. Can you tell me some strong/weak points of them comparing with Capture NX and/or Adobe Photoshop Elements?       - conversion &amp; EXIF  - white balance  - registration not possible anymore   EXIF editing would be a nice bonus.  Related: Is there a way to set transparency of windows in GNOME? Sometimes ago I used KDE 3.5 I think, and really liked the transparency option for windows, which gave all my text editor a really killer look and feel, really nice/ethereal environment for coding.  I haven't managed to find such a possibility with GNOME.  Any idea if it is possible and how? How can I calculate this limit? ideas? How can I calculate this limit? $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{7^{\sqrt{n+1}-\sqrt{n}}\cdot(\frac{n+1}{2})!\cdot(\frac{n+1}{2})!}{(n+1)\cdot(\frac{n}{2})!\cdot(\frac{n}{2})!}$$ I don't have idea and I will be happy for help. How do I convert two lists into a dictionary? Is an option missing in the new off-topic reasons? I am going to install Ubuntu to dual boot with Windows 8 soon, but one of my friends warned me that partitioning my hard drive will slow my computer down. I run on a 500GB HDD and 8GB of ram if that helps at all. Is that true if I do it? Showing a function on $[0,1]$ is the zero function Can I use Facebook's fb:friend-selector in an iframe? The Canon L lenses are much more expensive and presumably much better quality than non-L lenses. What makes an "L" lens? How much better are they over a similar length/speed "ordinary" canon lenses?