I'm using the find command to list files with their name containing a string:  find ~/ -type f -name "*inductive*"  I would like to use a pipe to sort the resulting list of files.  I would like to be able to sort by file size, date created, date accessed ...  How can I do this? Thanks.
How do I list all files under a directory recursively and sort the output by modification time?  I normally use ls -lhtc but it doesn't find all files recursively. I am using Linux and Mac.  ls -l on Mac OS X can give  -rw-r--r--    1 fsr  user      1928 Mar  1  2011 foo.c -rwx------    1 fsr  user      3509 Feb 25 14:34 bar.c   where the date part isn't consistent or aligned, so a solution have to take this into account.  Partial solution  stat -f "%m%t%Sm %N" ./* | sort -rn | head -3 | cut -f2-   works, but not recursively.
Is "coachee" even a word? If I am Rita's coach, is Rita my *coachee? (yikes) Is that even a word? Would it be correct instead to say she is my ward? What about terms for people at the other end of a mentor, sponsor relationship? error: file '/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod' not found error: file '/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod' not found. grub rescue&gt;   What can I do? I just sit and stare at it.   I found my old netbook (Dell Inspiron 1010) which I have not used for about four years. I replaced Windows XP with Ubuntu 12.10. I used my bootable USB drive. I installed and rebooted. I got the message that normal.mod is not found.   What should I do? Type exit, reboot, or quit? Should I re-install? Every time I open a folder from the desktop, a prompt is shown that the said folder is opened. How do I stop that? How many physical degrees of freedom does the $\mathrm{SU(N)}$ Yang-Mills theory have? The $\mathrm{U(1)}$ QED case has two physical degrees of freedom, which is easy to understand because the free electromagnetic field must be transverse to the direction of propagation. But what are the physical degrees of freedom the $\mathrm{SU(N)}$ Yang-Mills theory?   I believe that the $\mathrm{SU(N)}$ Y.M. theory has four degrees of freedom, and it is easy to see that by gauge fixing (such as the Lorentz condition or the Coulomb condition) that we can always remove one redundant degree of freedom. But then we still haven't completely fixed the redundant degrees of freedom. Thus my question is:     How many physical degrees and how many are redundant degrees of freedom does the Y.M. theory have?    I would be interested to understand how we can determine this mathematically, and also to understand what the physical intuition behind this is? Calculating MEAN and STANDARD DEVIATION confussed Algorithm to return all combinations of k elements from n I want to write a function that takes an array of letters as an argument and a number of those letters to select.   Say you provide an array of 8 letters and want to select 3 letters from that. Then you should get:  8! / ((8 - 3)! * 3!) = 56   Arrays (or words) in return consisting of 3 letters each. I've done some research, and found this on Wikipedia. \begin{matrix}a\uparrow b=a^{b}=&amp;\underbrace {a\times a\times \dots \times a} \\&amp;b{\mbox{ copies of }}a\end{matrix} \begin{matrix}a\uparrow \uparrow b&amp;={\ ^{b}a}=&amp;\underbrace {a^{a^{{}^{.\,^{.\,^{.\,^{a}}}}}}} &amp;=&amp;\underbrace {a\uparrow (a\uparrow (\dots \uparrow a))} \\&amp;&amp;b{\mbox{ copies of }}a&amp;&amp;b{\mbox{ copies of }}a\end{matrix} I'm still a bit confused on this topic. I've done a lot of research, but I can't seem to understand this. Could somebody explain this in an understandable way? From what I can gather, for example 2↑↑3 would be 2^2^2 = 16? Then 2↑↑↑3 would be 2^2^2^2 = 256? Am I correct, or have I mis-interpreted this? Multiplicative inverse questions This is my first time posting on Math exchange. I have been self-teaching myself Mathematics and recently started learning some Algebra. I was posed the following questions, in which I would like to answer before I proceed, but having some trouble finding proper solutions. So the format will be question, and my answer.      What name do we give an element $a \in \mathbb{Z}_n$ that has a multiplicative inverse?   A modular multiplicative inverse of an integer $a$ is an integer $x$ such that $ax \cong 1 (\mod m)$. This means that the remainder after dividing $ax$ by integer $m$ is equal to $1$.      Give an example, for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$, of an element of $\mathbb{Z}_n$, that does not have a multiplicative inverse?   This question is throwing me off because - does the $n$ we speak of matter for both $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_n$ ot solely $n$? My guess here would be $0$ because we cannot have an inverse of $0$.      Prove that multiplicative inverse are unique; an element $a \in \mathbb{Z}_n$ cannot have two multiplicative inverses.    Suppose that an element $a\in\mathbb{Z}_n$ has an inverse $a'$. Next, suppose that $a^*$ is also an inverse of $a$. Then, $a'$ is a solution to $a \cdot_n x=1$, and similarly $a^*$ has a solution to $a \cdot_n x=1$.   Lemma: Suppose $a'$ is multiplicative inverse of $a$ in $\mathbb{Z}_n$, then for any $b \in \mathbb{Z}_n$ the equation $a \cdot_n x=b$ has a unique solution, such that $x = a' \cdot_n b$.   By Lemma, equation $a \cdot_n x = 1$ has a unique solution, namely $x=a'=a^*$. Therefore, an element $a\in \mathbb{Z}_n$ cannot have two multiplicative inverses.    Thank you for the help. I would love any constructive feedback for these. If you can help me elaborate on some ideas, that would be really helpful also.  Thank you very much! unblock slime presta valve My Son's bike has slime inner tubes.  The bike has been sitting in the garage since last summer and the front tyres valve now seems blocked.  Its has what feels like 15-20 psi in it but I can not get the valve to let any air out or take any more in.  I have no idea at this point how to get it to unblock the valve so I can use it again.  For that matter I don't know how I could get the tire off as it has a reasonable (not ridable) amount of air in it without slashing the tyres (nice kings 2.2 which are pretty new).  I have tried putting the pump on it and putting a bit of air into it to try and clear the blockage but that didn't do anything.  Any ideas please? Let $f$ be an entire function with $|f(z)|\le 100\log|z|,\forall |z|\ge 2,f(i)=2i, \text{ Then} f(1)=?$  I have no idea how to solve this one!  $g(z)={f(z)\over \log|z|}$ Then Can I say $g$ is constant by Liouville Theorem? How to hide "Share", "Copy Link", "Copy to" buttons in my site? I'm using SharePoint Online modern UI.  And, I want to hide Quick edit, Sync, Export to Excel, PowerApps, Automate, Share, Copy Link, Copy to from my site.  Please check below picture.     I found the easy solution about PowerApps, Automate, Sync buttons in below URLs.        But I can't find solution other buttons. I don't want to use SPFX if possible, but is there no choice to use SPFX? If $\operatorname{rank}\left( \begin{bmatrix} A &B \\ C &D \end{bmatrix}\right)=n$ prove that $\det(AD)=\det(BC)$ It's driving me nuts! I just want to transfer one simple file from laptop to server.  I'm using ubuntu on both machines.  So I have:  -rwxr-xr-x 1 sandro    414622 2011-10-14 23:42 sandrophoto-html.tar.gz   And I'm sending it using:  sudo scp -P XXXX sandrophoto-html.tar.gz usern@server.local:/media/xx/xx/xx   And I get: scp: /media/xx/xx/xx/sandrophoto-html.tar.gz: Permission denied  p.s. I might be doing this other way around - I want to send file tar.gz that is located on my desktop, to remote server into the folder /media/yadayda prove every connected manifold is path connected manifold .       my thought:      connected space : Let $ X$  be a topological space. A separation of $ X $ is a pair $U, V$ of disjoint    nonempty open subsets of $ X $ whose union is $X$. The space $ X $ is said to be connected    if there does not exist a separation of  $X$ .      Components: Given  $X$ , define an equivalence relation on $X$ by setting x~y if there    is a connected subspace of $X$  containing both $ x$  and $ y$ . The equivalence classes are    called the components (or the "connected components") of $ X$.       Path Component: I define another equivalence relation on the space $ X$  by defining x ~ у    if there is a path in $ X$  from $ x$  to $ y$ . The equivalence classes are called the path components of $ X$ .       Theorem  : The path components of $ X$  are path connected disjoint subspaces    of $X$  whose union is $X$ , such that each nonempty path connected subspace of $X$  intersects only one of them.       thank you so much What exactly determines depth of field? There are several questions here about , about , and about . And of course there's the basic . And plenty of  questions. There's related questions like . But there's no be-all-end-all question asking:  What exactly determines depth of field in a photograph?   Is it just a property of the lens? Can lenses be designed to give more depth of field for the same aperture and focal length? Does it change with camera sensor size? Does it change with print size? How do those last two relate? Why is everything floating in space so cold? Of course there is pretty hot stuff too. For example Suns.  But isn't the vacuum of space the perfect containment for heat? And shouldn't the rare collision with particles even heat up an object that floats around in space?  Why aren't they hot from time to time? Is it because they loose their heat by radiant heat?  And if so does radiant heat emission always occur until the object is the same temperature as the surrounding or does it depend on other factors? Feedback for The Loop - May 2020 May’s “The Loop” blog post was just posted, you can read it . A popular response last month to our post about how we receive, prioritize and implement feedback was a question around how this framework gets utilized in the practical sense. We thought that Dark Mode was a great feature to dig down into as it was so widely requested and anticipated.   We hope you enjoy this month’s post, please leave any questions or comments you have in this thread and we will respond ASAP. Mathematical physics text with plenty of applications I'm looking for texts on mathematical physics. I've seen various other threads, but the texts recommended in those threads were mathematical methods of theoretical physics texts, that is to say those texts focused on the math methods useful for physicists and assumed the applications of those methods would be covered in some other text. What I'm looking for is a book which introduces some math and then looks at its applications (back and forth) rather than a text which just goes over some math. (Example of books which are NOT what I'm looking for: Mathematics for physicists by Dennery, Math methods for physicists by Weber and Arfken etc)  I've taken courses in multi-variable calc, linear algebra, real analysis, and I'm currently taking a course in abstract algebra. But so far I've only seen applications of multi-variable to physics. I'm looking for books which look at the applications of the other subjects mentioned above to physics, of course books which cover subjects beyond those mentioned are also welcome.   So far I'm liking the flavor of the text "A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics" by Szekeres, but I'd prefer a text which got to the physics side of things more quickly (in the Szekeres text the first eight chapters are strictly on pure math).   After some amazon searching it looks like Theoretical Physics by Joos, Mathematical Physics by Henzel, and Physical Mathematics by Cahill may be good bets? Which shells don't support dollar-parenthesis expansion, and demand backticks? Is it possible to create a "weak reference" in javascript? Is there any way in javascript to create a "weak reference" to another object?   Can anyone think of a way to implement this  behavior in javascript?