Hi I'm looking to get the value from a HTML Tables Cell and then display it into a JQuery Dialog Window when the user has clicked in that cell How can I achieve this ? Here's my code currently  &lt;script&gt; $(function() {     $( ".dialog" ).click(function(){            $('#dialog').dialog({             resizable:true,             modal:true,         });     }); &lt;/script&gt;
I am trying to work out how to get the value of table cell for each row using jQuery.  My table looks like this:  &lt;table id="mytable"&gt;   &lt;tr&gt;     &lt;th&gt;Customer Id&lt;/th&gt;     &lt;th&gt;Result&lt;/th&gt;   &lt;/tr&gt;   &lt;tr&gt;     &lt;td&gt;123&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;/tr&gt;   &lt;tr&gt;     &lt;td&gt;456&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;/tr&gt;   &lt;tr&gt;     &lt;td&gt;789&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/table&gt;   I basically want to loop through the table, and get the value of the Customer Id column for each row.  In the code below I have worked out that I need to do this to get it looping through each row, but I'm not sure how to get the value of the first cell in the row.  $('#mytable tr').each(function() {     var cutomerId =  }
The only solution that I have been able to come up with is $d=1$, but because $d&gt;2$, I can't seem to figure out how to find a solution. Double booked - User bookmarking question recorded twice In this  one user is shown as having bookmarked  twice:  This doesn't appear to be the same question as:  or  though it's certainly possible that the cause is the same. A composite integer n is a Carmichael number if the only Fermat   witnesses for $n$ are those $a \in \mathbb Z_n^+$ which are not   coprime with $n$. The smallest example of such a number is $561 = 3 ·  11 · 17$   I think I understand the definition, but I don't quite understand why is the smallest Carmichael number is the above mentioned number. Please clarify. I'm experiencing a strange problem with Outlook 2019. When viewing a message it only shows the first line. On an HTML message, it stops at the first close paragraph tag. On a plaintext message, it stops at the first newline character. This is true if viewing a message in the reading pane as well as if double-clicking the message to open in its own window. I have the preview pane set to show 3 lines and it does show more of the message so it seems like Outlook can see more of the message than it's rendering in the reading pane. If I use View Source, the underlying data seems fine and the whole message is there. I've tried the following:  Deleting and re-creating the user's mail profile Uninstalling &amp; re-installing Office Creating a new Windows account &amp; connecting Outlook to a different Exchange account than the one that originally exhibited the problem Checked for Windows updates Checked for Office updates  Any ideas what might be causing this? I feel like I've tried everything obvious &amp; I'm striking out on Google. Should we host our own nameservers? This is a  about whether to outsource DNS resolution for ones own domains   I currently have my ISP providing DNS for my domain, but they impose limitations on adding records. Therefore, I am thinking about running my own DNS.  Do you prefer to host your own DNS, or is it better to have your ISP do this?  Are there alternatives which I can look into? Change style of labels of Tikz nodes of a given style How can all labels of a given type of node be restyled in Tikz?  Imagine that there are nodes of different styles, and that only the nodes of style X should have red labels. Is this possible without having to change all labels one by one of nodes of style X? Database Design Best Practices Can ANOVA be significant when none of the pairwise t-tests is? Is it possible for one-way (with $N&gt;2$ groups, or "levels") ANOVA to report a significant difference when none of the $N(N-1)/2$ pairwise t-tests does?   In  @whuber wrote:      It is well known that a global ANOVA F test can detect a difference of means even in cases where no individual [unadjusted pairwise] t-test of any of the pairs of means will yield a significant result.   so apparently it is possible, but I do not understand how. When does it happen and what the intuition behind such a case would be? Maybe somebody can provide a simple toy example of such a situation?  Some further remarks:   The opposite is clearly possible: overall ANOVA can be non-significant while some of the pairwise t-tests erroneously report significant differences (i.e. those would be false positives). My question is about standard, non-adjusted for multiple comparisons t-tests. If adjusted tests are used (like e.g. Tukey's HSD procedure), then it is possible that none of them turns out to be significant even though the overall ANOVA is. This is covered here in several questions, e.g.  and . Update. My question originally referred to the usual two-sample pairwise t-tests. However, as @whuber pointed out in the comments, in the ANOVA context, t-tests are usually understood as post hoc contrasts using the ANOVA estimate of the within-group variance, pooled across all groups (which is not what happens in a two-sample t-test). So there are actually two different versions of my question, and the answer to both of them turns out to be positive. See below. Gradient and Swiftest Ascent I want to understand intuitively why it is that the gradient gives the direction of steepest ascent. (I will consider the case of $f:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}$)  The standard proof is to note that the directional derivative is $$D_vf=v\cdot \nabla f=|\nabla f|\,\cos\theta$$ which is maximized at $\theta=0$. This is a good verification, but it doesn't really help me understand the result. How do you choose Spells Known when creating a new character above 1st level? PDOException “could not find driver” How to programmatically close a JFrame When I create beamer frame, the content is centred in the slide. How do I make the content move to the top of the slide by default? Is it "me" or "I" and why? Var[A+B+C] = Var [A] + Var [B] + Var [C] I know that this relationship is correct when A,B and C are pairwise independent. However, I'm finding it difficult to calculate it.  Let's say that: Var [A] = Var [B] = Var [C] = 0.25. How can I prove that Var[A+B+C] = 0.75?  I started to work with the formula: Var[A+B+C] =E[(A+B+C)^2]−(E[A+B+C])^2 but I got stuck.  Thanks! Workflow for converting LaTeX into Open Office / MS Word Format I often have to write up reports based on the analysis of some data. I use R to analyse the data and export tables, figures, and text. This is then included into a LaTeX document either using input or Sweave ().  However, when I collaborate with others, I sometimes need to provide a document in Open Office / MS Word format.  Question:  Thus, assume the simplest scenario   I have a LaTeX document with text, tables, and figures I need to export this reliably into Open Office or MS Word format: this includes mathematical formulas, table formatting, and quality figures) I don't need to go back from MS Word to LaTeX   What is a reliable, efficient, and preferably free process?  Initial Thoughts:   Export to HTML,  LaTeX - LyX - ODF Use odfWeave  that deals with some specific issues associated with LaTeX to Open Office conversion    I was hoping that there is an expert out there who has worked out a good system already. How can I make a deepcopy of a function in Python? This post is an expansion of  For many graduated sites (eg Physics), moderators do not want to apply the unilateral close vote in all cases--it is better to let some community votes pile on first.  We only use the unilateral in obvious cases then. This renders the CV queue useless to us. If we &quot;skip&quot; something, we can't get back to it. If we say &quot;do not close&quot;, it's removed from the queue and our community can't see it. If we use &quot;close&quot;, we are using a unilateral mod vote--we don't want to do that. What I propose is a set of &quot;next/previous&quot; buttons, that let us navigate the queues, looking for closeable questions, and coming back to the others later. Thoughts? Update and bounty reason Due to the recent Great Flag Overhaul, mods no longer see close flags in the flag queue. Which means that the only way to get to them is via the review queue 1 Shog's solution is ideal in this case; let mods view the close queue as a list. (In fact, a list similar to the old flag queue -- which shows a list of mods who have seen the post and what mod actions have already been taken -- would be great) On Physics, the majority of the flags that we get are VTC flags. And the community isn't always able to close things on their own, so we have to step in. However, powering through the close queue isn't an option; because &quot;skip&quot;ing a post2 leads to it being dumped into the void (I can't get back to it unless I have a link). Extremely inconvenient. Could the workflow here be improved? 1. The /tools listing for posts with outstanding close votes doesn't work because it doesn't list posts which have been flagged but not VTCd 2. which I may want to take a closer look at later; gotta be careful with the binding votes. My question was closed for being a "shopping list question", even though it was very much related to the topic of the site. Why? Insert list of figures in the table of contents Is it possible to create a list of all the figures at the end of a document (this I can do) and make it appear in the table of contents?  So in the the table of content there will be a line saying List of figures ... 19 for example?