I need fix wrong wrapped url. I tried a lot of examples but not helped me. Thanks.    \documentclass [ing,male,java,dept460]{diploma} \usepackage [czech]{babel}  \begin{document}  \begin{thebibliography}{99}  \bibitem{radius} s Odmítl prodat Googlu svůj nápad za tři čtvrtě miliardy. Teď na něm  sám vydělává.  \textit {First Class: Svět a myšlení úspěšných} [online]. 20.3.2014 [cit. 2015-01-   12]. Dostupné z: \url {http://www.firstclass.cz/2014/03/odmitl-prodat-googlu-svuj-napad-za-tri-ctvrte-miliardy-ted-na-nem-sam-vydelava/#sthash.JkwV1KGY.nzfkNxcQ.dpbs}  \end{thebibliography} \end{document}   here is my template:
This question led to a new package:      I wish to typeset some relatively long URLs in a piece of text, and when I use \url{..}, the resulting text does not respect the margin boundaries that govern the main text body, instead going all the way to the edge of the paper before wrapping around.   For reference, my preamble looks like this:  \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{mathptmx} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref}   and example of the url I'm including is:  \begin{itemize} \item Some text  \url{very-long-url} ... \end{itemize}   I'm compiling using pdflatex, although I doubt this makes a difference.
Where should I go to ask a question about guns? How to use GROUP BY to concatenate strings in SQL Server? Should I sign, watermark or otherwise label a framed print? And if so how? I have an opportunity to show some of my work in a small local coffee shop.  Are there any guidelines/practices to signing, labeling or watermarking a photo which is to be on display?  Or should a photo be signed, labelled or marked at all? Is signing the back of the photo and showing my name on a separate card below the frame itself the "better" way to do this?   I noticed many people on the web put a very noticeable watermark with their logo, copyright and name right on the photo.  Personally, I find this distracting as it often ruins the photograph itself often turning what could be art to kitsch. Painters most often sign the painting itself but this to me is not distracting because it is done with the painter's own hand and it often "works" with the painting. Modify systemd unit file without altering upstream unit file I have installed the pimd service by means of apt. This comes with an upstream systemd unit file (/lib/systemd/system/pimd.service).  I want the service to be restarted when for some reason it gets killed, hence I wish to add the line Restart = always in the unit file.   However, I don’t want to modify the upstream unit file.  Is there any workaround for this? How to find and compare flights carried out by a specific type of plane? Factors for max CP at a particular trainer level? Today I had some time and felt like writing a relatively good answer on Stack Overflow; explaining both the underlying mechanisms and good practices, unlike usual declarative answers in a "do that" style.  It took me like an hour of time, $50 if I were free lance. It'll bring me nothing but 3-5 occasional views, and - if I get lucky - some ignorant comments.  You know, it's quite discouraging.  Instead of pride for the job that was done, I feel frustrated. I know, this answer may offer help to the OP, if he ever notices it (being already satisfied with other answers).  So the only fate the answer will meet is to sink forever, below thousands other questions, falling like snow.  So, being a programmer, I am thinking of efficiency. It's a waste of time to spend so much effort to answer one question when there is no way to [actually] reuse it. So, I wouldn't do it again but just turn back into short answers mode without explanations.       Seeing other answers, I don't think I am only one with such feeling.  The current policy is driving knowledgeable and educational users away, yet it attracts inexperienced ones in numbers. Ones who will tell you to use [some technology] which they never have laid their hands upon. Ones who write answers just because they have learned some "good practice" from other questions, and this "knowledge" becomes an endless source of rep points.  The idea of Stack Overflow is rotten. It was excellent when trees were high and traffic was low.  It turned bad now; it has become a honeypot for all the "enthusiast programmers" of the world, eager to share their 2 cents faster than you can say the word "close".  You're killing a great resource. Despite all the nice words and proper declarations, it discourages the reuse of the knowledge. And encourages fast on-site answers.  Of course, the rules will tell you contrary. It's all nice and proper (if you don't mind it's strict mutual exclusivity). But mechanically, technologically it works in the way I described.  I tried to write a tag wiki. You know, it was biggest waste of time in my life. As a matter of fact, it is not a wiki at all; you can't even link to a certain section. Not to mention that nobody ever has the idea to read tag wikis.  Reference questions? Don't make me laugh. There is no good mechanism to store and categorize links. Favorites, although intended for the different purpose, are a chunk of crap when you want to use it as a reference. So, you can't compete with 30-seconds answers: a question will get 5 answers before you can even find an appropriate link.  Okay, I can organize links myself but, there are some problems:   I am just a human. I cannot remember everything I am just a human and I cannot answer questions at rate of 1 qpm. One person cannot fight the Tide. It's helpless. When technology makes people writing fast [incomplete] answers -  no good will of proper declarations can do a thing.  Even if a question gets finally closed, it won't hurt anyone - the hydra grew two more already.   You'll call me a brute for insulting honest users and innocent volunteers, but that's fact: There are much more inexperienced users than experienced ones. And inexperienced users have much more spare time to hang over than experts who have their job to do. So, from that fact we can conclude that most of the answers on Stack Overflow have a low quality. Nobody cares. But I do.   There should be a technical way to limit the activity of not-so-knowledgeable-yet-eager-to-answer users. There should be a technical preference for the closing a question over answering it (have a silly answer for the silly question? welcome to comments). There should be a technical solution to accumulate and structure knowledge, a system that lets you choose a good answer instead of writing it by hand.   That's the only way. Otherwise Stack Overflow will remain an automated dispenser of bad practices.  Well, I just felt like letting it out again. Thank you for reading. If $[G:H]=n$, then $g^{n!}\in H$ for all $g\in G$. Order of items in a context menu What does ` (backquote/backtick) mean in commands? I came across the following command:  sudo chown `id -u` /somedir   and I wonder: what is the meaning of the ` symbol. I noticed for instance that while the command above works well, the one below does not:  sudo chown 'id -u' /somedir Site.createPortalUser() returning null in test context Is there anyway to modify stat information like mtime or ctime manually in Python or any language at all? Python: pop from empty list How does the eye perform the equivalent of white balance? Possible Duplicate:          How does the eye perform the equivalent of white balance? Why is the camera not able to replicate it? I have two internet connection from two different ISP. ADSL on eth0 and 4G on wlan0. Is there any way that if one ISP fails, the other take over automatically without a physical router and by Host OS (Ubuntu 18.04)? $ac\equiv bc \pmod{\!m}\!\!\iff\!\! a\equiv b \pmod{\!\!\frac{m}{(c,m)}}$ [Euclid's Lemma, congruence form] I came across this theorem:   For all integers a,b,c and m&gt;0, if d = GCD(c,m) then a*c ≡ b*c (mod m) iff a ≡ b (mod m/d).  The =&gt;proof states this:  a*c ≡ b*c (mod m) =&gt; m|(a-b)*c                    =&gt; m/d | (a-b)*c/d                   =&gt; m/d | (a-b)                   =&gt; a ≡ b (mod m/d)   I don't understand how to go from step 2 to step 3. The proof states that this is possible because m/d and c/d are coprime. To me this means GCD(m/d, c/d) = 1 but how does this cancel out the whole term? how to show only changed rows if want querying the following table :  EventDateTime (DateTime), Host (guid), Flag ( bit) 2013-04-01 05:00, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:01, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:02, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:03, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:04, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:05, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:06, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:07, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:08, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:09, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:10, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:11, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:12, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:13, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:14, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:15, {id-x}, 0   and the result should be:  2013-04-01 05:04, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:07, {id-x}, 0 2013-04-01 05:11, {id-x}, 1 2013-04-01 05:15, {id-x}, 0   i have try it with LAG,LEAD and OVER Clause. but no luck :( Unable to boot into Windows after installing Ubuntu, how to fix? I installed Windows on my computer, followed by an installation of Ubuntu. However, now I'm unable to boot into my Windows install.  What can I do to fix this? Is the money you get from shorting a stock free to use for going long on other stocks? Prove $\frac{1}{1 \cdot 3} + \frac{1}{3 \cdot 5} + \frac{1}{5 \cdot 7} + \cdots$ converges to $\frac 1 2 $ Show that $$\frac{1}{1 \cdot 3} + \frac{1}{3 \cdot 5} + \frac{1}{5 \cdot 7} + \cdots = \frac{1}{2}.$$  I'm not exactly sure what to do here, it seems awfully similar to Zeno's paradox. If the series continues infinitely then each term is just going to get smaller and smaller.  Is this an example where I should be making a Riemann sum and then taking the limit which would end up being $1/2$?