I am having a hard time understanding why the 1/cosine term does not change to lets say cosine theta squared? Can someone explain why?
I can not see how mathematically one can divide the numerator and denominator by theta. Can some one explain this in a different way. When you divide two fractions you multiply the first fraction by the reciprocal of the second. This is not the case here.     Divide numerator and denominator by $\theta$. ($\sin\theta$ also works.) $$\eqalign{\lim_{\theta\to0}\dfrac{\sin\theta}{8\theta+\tan\theta}&amp;= \lim_{\theta\to0}\dfrac{\dfrac{\sin\theta}\theta}{8+\dfrac{\sin\theta}\theta\cdot\dfrac1{\cos\theta}}\\&amp;=\dfrac{\lim\limits_{\theta\to0}\dfrac{\sin\theta}\theta}{8+\lim\limits_{\theta\to0}\dfrac{\sin\theta}\theta\lim\limits_{\theta\to0}\dfrac1{\cos\theta}}\\&amp;=\dfrac1{8+1\cdot1}\\&amp;=\dfrac19.}$$
The equivalence of open-set definition of continuous mappings to the $\epsilon-\delta$ definition How can I change the local origin of an object, without changing the object location in the world space.  This is the object located at position (0,0,0) in the world space    This is the same object located at position (0,1,0) in the world space, but with its local origin offset so that the object is in the same place    Is there a way to do this in a single step? Yesterday, Asaf Karagila's  sparked an extensive discussion on ways of proving that all countable ordinals are embeddable in $\Bbb Q$, and whether particular solutions to this use the Axiom of Choice.  Since the arguments used to prove this can be shady on their use of Choice when formulated tersely, fully fleshed out answers are appreciated.  To be concrete, this question asks for proofs of the following fact:     All countable ordinals $\alpha &lt; \omega_1$ are order-embeddable in the rationals $\Bbb Q$.   Especially answers avoiding the Axiom of Choice are appreciated.    Of relevance and related interest is  (but it's not a duplicate, since that question asks for explicit embeddings). How can I switch off exception handling in MSVC? I was surprised to only recently notice that      An object of any density can be large enough to fall within its own   Schwarzschild radius.   Of course! It turns out that supermassive black holes at galactic centers can have an average density of less than water's.  Somehow I always operated under the assumption that black holes of any size had to be superdense objects by everyday standards.  Compare the Earth to collapsing into a mere 9mm marble retaining the same mass, in order for the escape velocity at the surface to finally reach that of light.  Or Mt. Everest packed into one nanometer.  Reading on about this , it increases proportionally with total mass.  Assuming matter is accumulated at a steady density into a spherical volume, the volume's radius will only "grow" at a cube root of the total volume and be quickly outpaced by its own gravitational radius.  Question: For an object the , what would have to be its diameter for it to qualify as a black hole (from an external point of view)?  Would this not imply by definition that:   The Earth, Solar system and Milky Way are conceivably inside this black hole? Black holes can be nested/be contained within larger ones? Whether something is a black hole or not is actually a matter of perspective/where the observer is, inside or outside? Equivalent of "both" when referring to three or more items? What is the tolerable magnetic field (in Tesla) for a hard disk? I was wondering what would be the safest magnetic field for a hard drive so that the data inside it is safe and not wiped off?  For example I have a 2.1 home theatre system and when I take my android phone near it to check the magnetic field range it gives me a reading of 1000 micro Tesla. Would that be considered safe for a nearby hard disk? Find a plane that passes through a point and is perpendicular to 2 planes Finding the unique rock with its weight I have 12 rocks, all have the same weight except for one rock, but I don‘t know which rock is. How do I know which rock is different from other, and also know that rock heavier or lighter, with maximum 3 comparating steps. My only tool is just a balance that can only compare the weight between the rocks. Difference between 2>&-, 2>/dev/null, |&, &>/dev/null and >/dev/null 2>&1 Lately it's happening to me this:  After completing one or more "First Posts" reviews, I go back to the Review Section main page:   And the post counter shows that there are still posts to review. I click the link to review them, but there is nothing.  Refreshing the page doesn't solve the issue: it shows the wrong number again. Who are the Steam Mascots? So with the Steam Summer Sale in full swing, I've finally taken notice of the Steam Mascots.  Judging by the latest background, the black one, at least, has a name: Cyl.  Do the other two have names as well? Are there only these three?   What's their story? How to prove the function is a constant Let $f\in C[0,1]$ be such  that $\forall \phi\in C[0,1]$ with $\int_0^1\phi \, dx=0$,we have $\int_0^1f\phi \, dx=0$.  Then $f$ is constant.  May be someone can help me proof this problem. Thanks! A Putnam Integral $\int_2^4 \frac{\sqrt{\ln(9-x)}\,dx}{\sqrt{\ln(9-x)} + \sqrt{\ln(x+3)}}.$ This is a Putnam Problem that I have been trying to solve (on and off) for two years, but I have failed. I am in Calculus BC. This problem comes from the book "Calculus Eighth Edition by Larson, Hostetler, and Edwards". This problem is at the end of the first section of the chapter 8 exercises. Here's the problem:  Evaluate $$\int_2^4 \frac{\sqrt{\ln(9-x)}\,dx}{\sqrt{\ln(9-x)} + \sqrt{\ln(x+3)}}.$$  Please. Any help is very much appreciated. So are solutions. Thank you!  Edit: I like the solution given, but I was interested to see if there is any other way of doing the problem? I'm excited to see the results. throwing exceptions out of a destructor Most people say never throw an exception out of a destructor - doing so results in undefined behavior. Stroustrup makes the point that "the vector destructor explicitly invokes the destructor for every element. This implies that if an element destructor throws, the vector destruction fails... There is really no good way to protect against exceptions thrown from destructors, so the library makes no guarantees if an element destructor throws" (from Appendix E3.2).   seems to say otherwise - that throwing destructors are more or less okay.  So my question is this - if throwing from a destructor results in undefined behavior, how do you handle errors that occur during a destructor?  If an error occurs during a cleanup operation, do you just ignore it? If it is an error that can potentially be handled up the stack but not right in the destructor, doesn't it make sense to throw an exception out of the destructor?  Obviously these kinds of errors are rare, but possible. How can we move an object with zero velocity? Is it feasible to convert math in a picture, say written by hand, into LaTeX?   For example, I'd deem it faster to write down (de novo)  a 10 x 10 matrix with long, complex entries, rather than typing it in LaTeX or MathType. If I then take a picture or scan my writing, how can it be rendered or transformed into LaTeX? Here's my problem  I'm trying to do a cleanup of my hard drive, and I'm constantly seeing this scenario:  (1) Aggregate folder size: I check the folder size viewing properties right clicking the folder  (2) Individual folder/file sizes: I check the individual file/folder sizes belonging to that folder viewing properties on the individual file/folder sizes, and then adding them up (with hidden and system files shown).   These two figures are always different, sometimes by a large margin.   For instance, my C drive now, by method (1), shows a consumed space of 42.4 GB.   However, by method (2), by inspecting the respective files/folders, the total consumed space adds up only to 33.1 GB. This is a 28% discrepancy (over the smaller file size) and I have no idea where the rest of the space is going.   My hard drive is constantly in danger of being full (it's bootcamp on a mac with 50 GB of partitioned space), and there's not much I've got installed in terms of software, nor do I have large media files like movies, downloads, temp files, application temp files, torrents, etc.   Most of it's just consumed by the files in C:/Windows, but last I checked, I don't know enough to know which files to delete, and I've heard that you really can't do anything about the space boggling winsxs and system32.   Can you guys recommend a starting point to free up disk space?  Thanks!!  Baggio. Why is it so difficult to pull an immersed mug out of the water? Suppose I put a mug in the water and then tilt it so that the water gets inside. It then floats due to buoyant force. But if I try to pull it out then a lot of force is needed. That's due to suction? What exactly happens at the moment when the force I apply is enough to pull the mug out? And what causes the loud pop sound when that happens? Compute $E(X\mid X+Y)$ for independent random variables $X$ and $Y$ with standard exponential distributions Being $X$ and $Y$ independent random variables distributed as $\mathrm{Exponential}(1)$ and let $T=X+Y$ Calculate $E(X|T)$.  This is my attempt at solving this:  Being $Z=\sum_{i=1}^{n}P_{i}$ where $P_{i}$~$\mathrm{Exp}(\lambda)$ then using it's MFG you have that $$M_{P_i}(t)=\frac{\lambda}{\lambda-t}$$ then $$M_{Z}(t)=M_{\sum{P_{i}}}(t)=(M_{P_{1}})...(M_{P_{n}})=(\frac{\lambda}{\lambda-t})^n$$ with this being the MFG of a $\mathrm{Gamma}$ distribution with parameters $(n,\lambda)$  With this result is easy to see that $T$~$\mathrm{Gamma}(2,1)$  Now $E[X|T]=\int xf_{X|T}(x|t)dx$  Then using Bayes' theorem we can make $$f_{X|T}(x|t)=\frac{f_{T|X}(t|x)f_{X}(x)}{f_{T}(t)}$$ then $$f_{T|X}(t|x)=Pr(T=t|X=x)$$ $$=Pr(X+Y=t|X=x)$$ $$=Pr(x+Y=t|X=x)$$ $$=Pr(Y=t-x)=f_{Y}(t-x)$$  Using this result we can now rearrenge $$f_{X|T}(x|t)=\frac{f_{Y}(t-x)f_{X}(x)}{f_{T}(t)}$$ $$=\frac{e^{-(t-x)}.e^{-x}}{\frac{te^{-t}}{\Gamma(2)}}$$ $$=\frac{1}{t}$$ then $$E[X|T]=\int (x)(\frac{1}{t})dx$$  And this where I got stuck because $1_{x\epsilon(0,\infty})$, I made this explanation step-by-step hoping that someone can se easily check where I went wrong. I would aprecciate a step-by-step answer, thanks.