When constructing tag wikis, it seems that the tag wiki of the same tag in different websites must be built every time.  It seems that there is something can be improved. It repeats much and is not .  For example:  The information of  in  softwareengineering.stackexchange.com could be the information of  on stackoverflow.com.  I guess most tag wikis of different websites of stackexchange.com could be the same.  Because the knowledge is there, and it reflects the truth.  On the other hand, different websites of stackexchange.com has their own feature. So the community wiki may be has a content offset accordingly.  The tag wiki is unified and has its own feature on different websites of stackexchange.com.  I don't know how to achieve it.    I don't think this question is a duplicate of .  The question is based on the fact. I found that many tags information on other websites programming-related is to copy small part of the tag info on Stack&nbsp;Overflow.  Another example:  on codereview.stackexchange.com is not much like the answer below at least now, compare to  on Stack&nbsp;Overflow.  The naming duplicate question seems that it looks good, and "I" think it is reasonable.  Talk is cheap; what I discussed exists on programming-related websites, not cooking.
Was unable to find rationale for separate tags accros SE sites.   Tag function According general definition in information systems, a  (such as an Internet bookmark, digital image, database record, or computer file). This kind of metadata helps describe an item and allows it to be found again by browsing or searching. Tags are generally chosen informally and personally by the item's creator or by its viewer, depending on the system, although they may also be chosen from a controlled vocabulary.  On SE - the same:  is a () word or phrase that describes the topic of the question help you identify  or relevant to you.  tag origin and quality  Where from tags are originated and what are tag quality parametres?  problems and contradictions examples related with SE tags  Humanity is facing information overload.  are created for collecting and sharing personal knowledge on questions or problem solving. But tag's descriptions are not matter of personal knowledge - it's just matter of , i.e. vocabulary/dictionary, or taxonomy/ontology or, speaking in general, human lexic conceptual apparatus / framework. So why time has to be spent on fact's duplicating and sharing?  At the same time We are living at the linked data times. IMHO it's the biggest blunder having same tags with different descriptions in different SE sites unlinked. Tags (and so - descriptions) should be unified.  So I'm calling to unify all tags across SE sites as feature request. Maybe automatic linking to Wikipedia and/or some other decent dictionary would be reasonable.  solution examples  This is not a duplicate of
How do I use the Cherokee keyboard layout to type English characters? Wow, I've really done it this time. I've locked myself out of my machine.  In preparing for a Cherokee language course, I added the Cherokee keyboard layout to my options. However, I was unable to generate any Cherokee characters by selecting that input device.  I found an article on the web which instructed me to use the dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration command in a terminal.  Once I did that, I rebooted as instructed. Once I was presented with the login screen, I entered my password as usual only for it to fail.  After failing a few times, I gave my attention to what is usually a mundane exercise (i.e., logging in).  While I carefully entered my password, each time, I get the message, "Sorry that didn't work..."  So, I brought up the onscreen keyboard... But the password box displays an asterisk for only the first character of my password.  I attempted to use the direct Unicode input method (ctrl-shift-Uxxxx) but the Cherokee keyboard has no "U" key.  Can anyone please help me troubleshoot this? Line breaking with hyperref href with an underline in itemize I have a simple itemized list like the following MWE:  \documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{lmodern} \usepackage[left=2cm,right=2cm,top=2cm,bottom=2cm]{geometry} \usepackage{lipsum} \begin{document} \begin{itemize} \item \href{http://google.com}{[ID1]: \underline{\lipsum[1]}} \end{itemize} \end{document}   This unfortunately doesn't break the block of text as expected, as shown below:    How can I fix this item so it will line break properly? Export nodes from Drupal 4? I am looking into updating a Drupal 4 site. The Node Export module does not seem to have a release suitable for Drupal 4. Can anyone recommend an alternative module or procedure?  The site is running Drupal 4.6.3. There's vs There are How can I assign the output of a command to a shell variable? I want to assign the result of an expression (i.e., the output from a command) to a variable and then manipulate it – for example, concatenate it with a string, then echo it.  Here's what I've got: #!/bin/bash cd ~/Desktop; thefile= ls -t -U | grep -m 1 &quot;Screen Shot&quot;; echo &quot;Most recent screenshot is: &quot;$thefile;  But that outputs: Screen Shot 2011-07-03 at 1.55.43 PM.png Most recent screenshot is:   So, it looks like that isn't getting assigned to $thefile, and is being printed as it's executed. What am I missing? Some Windows 10 UWP icons not displaying on search, or in settings I am in the process of updating my CV. Since I often get labeled as "the bioinformatician" I get to play with many different languages and technologies, and similarly what people expect from a bioinformatician varies from person to person. So I figured it would be a good idea to indicate how much I feel I know in respective fields/languages.  Inspired by , I came to wonder whether or not its acceptable to have self-assessed ratings of your technical skills, such as: proficiency programming languages, familiarity with relevant software etc.   My own feeling is that such ratings are useful to indicate what you feel most confident or comfortable with. It would also be useful to show any potential future employer the level of competence you have in different fields. If you think about it a bit, it is common to have some type of rating for the languages one speaks, so I think an analogue to programming language proficiency should not be that alienating.  On the other hand there is the risk of rendering your CV like, as a friend of mine put it, a role-playing game character sheet.   Is it common to have such ratings on skills? Are there any potential problems with it?   Edit: What I was thinking is a small listing something like: Better understanding of Drupal behaviors I read about Drupal behaviors today, and I tried writing the following code.  (function ($) {    Drupal.behaviors.mymodule = {     attach: function (context, settings) {       $('#mymodule_id', context).change(function () {         alert('Handler for .change() called.');       });     }   };  }(jQuery));    Is Drupal.behaviors.mymodule the namespace? What are the context and settings parameters passed to the Drupal behavior? Is this the equivalent of document.ready()?   Can I attach any number of functions?  Can I define JavaScript functions which will be called somewhere? launch app, capture stdout and stderr in c++ Can I enter other Schengen countries with EU residence permit but without passport? I have some travel plans to go from Netherlands to France by car. I possess Dutch residence permit, but I am non-EU citizen. The problem is that I might need to submit my passport to get visa to another country I plan to go to later. So I have: residence permit and photocopy of my passport. Is it    legal to cross borders by car with this set of documents what are possible fines and other repercussions if police or other authorities ask for my documents in France or Belgium? This is a follow-up question to the discussion about the finite axiom of choice .  Suppose we have a countable collection of non-empty sets $\{A_1, A_2, A_3,\cdots\}$ Reasoning as indicated in that discussion, we can prove the existence of a choice function $c_n$ such that $c_n(i)$ belongs to $A_i$ for $i = 1,\cdots,n$  Again reasoning as suggested and using induction, we can prove the existence of a function $C$ defined over $\{1, 2, \cdots\}$ such that $C(n)$ is a choice function defined for $i=1,\cdots,n$ with $C(n)(i)$ an element of A_i. We can require in addition that $C(n)(i)$ and $C(n-1)(i)$ are equal for $i=1,\cdots,n-1$.  Now it would it seem that we can prove the countable axiom of choice by taking the union of $C(1)$, $C(2)$, $\cdots$  The question is as follows: why is that proof wrong? I suspect the answer may have something to do with the axiom of union. Why did Voldemort take the wand of one of his most loyal servants? In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, chapter one The Dark Lord Ascending, Voldemort believes he must use a wand other than his own in order to kill Harry, when Harry is moved from Privet Drive. He demands Lucius Malfoy's wand, and gets it.   My question is, why did Voldemort take the wand of one of his most loyal servants, rendering Lucius Malfoy useless if a battle was to occur?  If I remember correctly, he had Ollivander at his disposal, and he was the one who told him to use another wand in first place. Why not ask Ollivander to create another wand, or just use ones that he had ready to sell in his shop at Diagon Alley? He could even have taken Ollivander's own wand. If my memories are correct, a wand's importance was compared to that of a limb. Cardinal of quotient rings of gaussian integers. It is known that $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ is a PID and that $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(a+bi)\mathbb{Z}[i]$ is finite for all $(a,b) \in \mathbb{Z}^2\backslash \{(0,0)\}$.  My question :      Is there any result on the cardinal of  $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(a+bi)\mathbb{Z}[i]$ ? Test Class for a Custom Controller (This question is only as reference, I will add the answer myself)  Suddenly the search in the expl3 documentation interface3.pdf no longer works. As an example searching for "divis" gives this as the first hit:    In sumatra there is no problem, other files (e.g. source3.pdf) works fine. What could be the reason?) SHA-256 "almost unique"? I have seen numerous references on the internet of people describing SHA-256 as generating an "almost unique" hash.  . there are more.  Is there some mathematical basis to the almost uniqueness? I would have thought that as SHA-256 is an evenly-distibuted (?) hash algorithm which can accept any message (infinitely many) as an input and produces a fixed length (finite) hash - then there will in fact be an infinite number of each possible output - which I would think hardly qualifies as "almost unique".  Is there a basis for this statement? Why would you not want to rollover a previous employer's 401(k) when changing jobs? Are there any valid reasons to not rollover a former 401(k) when changing jobs?  I have several little ones that I never quite got around to rolling together - with an upcoming job change, should they all be combined into my new employer's retirement plan?  If not, what else might be considered? I am a grad student developing an interest for statistics. I like the material over-all, but I sometimes have a hard time thinking about applications to real life. Specifically, my question is about commonly used statistical distributions (normal - beta- gamma etc.). I guess for some cases I get the particular properties that make the distribution quite nice - memoryless property of exponential for example. But for many other cases, I don't have an intuition about both the importance and application areas of the common distributions that we see in textbooks.   There are probably a lot of good sources addressing my concerns, I would be glad if you could share those. I would be a lot more motivated into the material if I could associate it with real-life examples. How can I left-align a caption? I have a hierarchical category tree and checkboxes next to each item that allow to enable/disable the correpsonding category.    I assume it is an expected default behavior that all subategories of natural environment become checked when I check the natural environment category. But what about unchecking it again: Should this automatically uncheck all subcategories or restore the previous state in case some were checked already?  Furthermore... Should unchecking one of the subcategories cause the parent category to become unchecked?