8eamer prosper produces slides like power-point. Is it possible to produce non-linear presentation like the one produced by prezi?
Prezi is a proprietary software .   I found beamer, powerdot, HA -prosper, prosper, slides and seminar. Which one or something similar should I use to create something like Prezi-style zooming dia -presentation?
Thus is a picture of both of my hard-drives:    My C Drive and my D drive. I want to put Ubuntu onto my D Drive. Now my question here is if i do install onto my D Drive then how should I do it in order to retain use of the drive. I intend to partition about 60 gigs from it. Now after doing that I should still have about 830 gigs left. I want to still be able to use that in Windows. So how and will I be able to retain use of the drive after Installing? I have installed once before and I believe i did it wrong because not only could Windows not recognize my D drive but I also lost all the data on it.   My computer is a Lenovo Y700 It is a UEFI (I believe i got that right). Is convex surface normal in cast iron skillet? I am new to cast iron skillet. I have cooked with it several times and found the Lodge 12" cast iron skillet has a convex surface which is not observable unless you pour oil on it.  When I cook, the oil move to rim of the skillet and makes the center short of oil. Is it normal?  EDIT: I added the photo of the stove and skillet for reference How to Disable Copy Paste (Browser) I am interested in good integer approximation from below and from above for binary Log(N!).  and  provides only a general idea but not exact values. In other words I need integers A and B so that  A &lt;= Log(N!) &lt;= B How to succeed with making omelette "User accounts" or "users account" Where does the energy required to stop a moving body come from and go? For a long time, I have been thinking about this: In order to stop a moving body, I have to apply impulse to change the existing momentum to $0$. For the impulse I have to impart force on the moving body . That means I have to eliminate all the kinetic energy associated with the moving object in order to bring it to a halt. Thus, work is done on the object, right? If work is done, energy must be given by me...  Here is where my confusion arises:   If I eliminate the associated kinetic energy of the body, where does this energy go? The work(?) done by me on the moving object to stop it obviously uses energy from me. Again, where does this energy go? My headphones are not playing voices, but only the music MAC OS for Intel based PCs I have an Intel dual core PC with 4GB of RAM and Graphics card. For on of my student Assignment I need to install Latest possible MAC OS on my system as a secondary OS.  Like on boot it asks me that which OS i want to boot with Win 8.1 or Mac Os..  I searched on the internet and found two conflicting opinion some people said there are few MAC OS Version which can be directly installed on Intel PCs some says there aren't?   I am here to get rid of the confusion that is an official latest possible MAC OS version for Intel based PCs? If not what are my options if I want to run MAC OS on my PC.   Please not that Virtualization options won’t work for me, it has to be working as full OS not an os inside another. I am doing an animation. The images I have attached show 2 different render layer view node results.    Image one shows a cube on layer 1, and 2 icosphere on layer 2. I have layer 2 set to fast blur. I have to use transparent film and therefore I use the Alpha over nodes in composition.  Image two shows a cube and 1 icosphere. Image 1 should not be showing 2 icospheres, as the left most one is behind the cube.    Image 2 is from the same render result, and is correcting showing only 1 icosphere. However, that icosphere should be blurred as it is on layer 2. It seems for whatever reason I can not have both the correct composition effect and also have every object's visibility render correctly. I can only either have everything work fine, with no composition, or composition with every emission object showing through every other object in the scene.   I am aware that masks would solve this problem, but because of the complicated setup of object materials and particles, masking produces these very strange and suddenly appearing artifacts. Material Indexing also produces odd artifacts and does not consistently effect the appropriate materials.   This is also a new problem, I did not have this issue in the last blender version. So, material indexing is out, masking is out, object indexing is out.       I want to use the compositor to blur certain layers, but every emission object in the scene shows through. It shows through as though it was on x-ray, regardless if it is behind another or inside another object. The first image is an example of this, the left icosphere is behind the cube, and should not be visible. That is the problem. Why is it visible when it shouldn't be? How to enable iptables (instead of firewalld) services on RHEL 7 and Fedora 18? The newest fedora has firewalld as new firewall aplication. I liked old iptables services. I want them back but have no idea how to do that. I have tried :  systemctl disable firewalld.service systemctl stop firewalld.service systemctl enable iptables.service systemctl enable ip6tables.service systemctl start iptables.service systemctl start ip6tables.service   But it does not work! Didn't find any help on wiki or google.  Disabling firewalld work ok, but when I'm trying to enable iptables.service I get:  systemctl enable iptables.service Failed to issue method call: No such file or directory Show that $S$ is compact. Let $A \in M_n(\bf C)$ and let   $S=\{ A \in M_n(\bf C) : A=A ^*$ and  $\rho (A) \leq 1 \}$, $\rho(A)$ denotes spectral radius of $A$.     Show that $S$ is compact subset of $M_n(\bf C) \cong \bf C^{n^2} $ with usual topology.    $S$ is subset of $\bf O_n(C)$ which is compact so I think its enough to show that $S$ is closed.Please help. What is a natural response to &quot;Good to see you. How you doing?&quot;? Will a natural response include &quot;doing&quot; as in &quot;I'm doing okay&quot; or will &quot;I'm okay&quot; be more natural? Finding the radius of convergence for $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(n!)^kx^n}{(kn)!}$ I'm reviewing some calculus concepts right now, and this series stumped me. I'm trying to figure out what its radius of convergence is, but it's not falling for any of my old tricks. Using the root-test, I want to compute: $$ L_1=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \left|\sqrt[n]{\frac{(n!)^k}{(kn)!}}\right| $$  where $k$ is some positive integer. Passing the limit through the absolute-value bars and $n$th root symbol, I now want to compute the simpler (?) $$ L_2 = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \sqrt[n]{\frac{(n!)^k}{(kn)!}}$$  Which I can't seem to pin down. Numerical tests indicate it goes to 0, and that jives with an intuitive notion I have that there are always $k$ terms on the numerator, but $kn$ terms in the denominator. But since all of these terms themselves depend on $n$, proving that $L_2 = 0$ escapes me. Once we get this result (if it's correct), then clearly $L_1$ is also 0, and the radius of convergence of the series is $\mathbb{R}$. Thanks for any ideas you may have. How do you apply colormanagement settings to EXR files? How do you apply colormanagement settings to EXR files?  When i do some color adjustment by using colormanagement and try to save exr file and open it in photoshop it looks like colormanagement settings was not applied to it. block certain dangerous commands? How to run a server on port 80 as a normal user on Linux? I have Googled about a solution for quite some time, but couldn't find an answer.   I am on Ubuntu Linux and want to run a server on port 80, but due to security mechanism of Ubuntu, I get the following error:      java.net.BindException: Permission denied:80   I think it should be simple enough to either disable this security mechanism so that port 80 is available to all users or to assign required privileges to the current user to access port 80. Let: $P(x) = a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + ..... + a_1x + a_0$ where $a_0a_n &lt; 0$ I have to prove that the Polynomial $P(x)$ has at least one positive root how can I prove it? Any ideas? Require reputation earned on the main site to vote on a per-site meta Upvoting requires 15 reputation, but the association bonus is taken into account, so if you have at least 200 reputation on any site, you can upvote on all sites in the network.  This is a bit problematic when it comes to per-site metas. The votes there are used to gauge the opinion of the community, and they are often taken into account when implementing new policies.  What can happen is that a post from a per-site meta is linked in an unrelated high-traffic chat room, usually because there is some entertaining drama going on or because someone posted a particularly bad idea. This can lead to an influx of votes from external users that usually wouldn't visit or use the site, but currently still can vote on their meta due to the association bonus.  I think a very low minimum participation on the site should be required to vote on meta issues. This would make the votes on the per-site meta more robust and less easily skewed by being linked from outside.  Not counting the association bonus for the upvote privilege would be enough, then all users would have to earn 14 reputation on the site itself. File upload with Javascript without user intervention