Some months ago (when Meta was still Meta Stack Overflow), I got  that the time a flag get handled is increasing when the first flagging is trigged on a question older than one month compared to when it happens during the first hour. Recently  got implemented which according to me means the percentage of handled flags according to the question age drops. But proving so would require writing a query and as the implementation is still new it would be good to consider past handled flags. For such a query, I would need to access flags which got handled, but currently only PendingFlags with close votes are available on SEDE. The best would be an handled date for each flags. Since there is already a PendingFlags table, please also make handled flags available with there handled date also available on SEDE so I can output a graph of handled flag percentage over time. Update This question ask  asks for data on handled fags.  ask for accessing flagged data in general whether Pending or not which is considered as . Please don’t close it!
I'd love to see if there are trends over time, patterns of improving behaviour after being flagged, consistent reoffenders, most misused types of flag, etc.  I understand the who-said-what-about-who aspect would most likely cause this to be denied, but even anonymised data would be interesting to dig through.
How do I Sort a Multidimensional Array in PHP What would be the right position of "substantially" in the following:     1). Before verb: These optimal values substantially contribute to the success of the methodology.      2). After verb: These optimal values contribute substantially to the success of the methodology.   Here is my issue:  Fact1: When I use Google Ngram, I get , 0 occurrence of option 1.  Fact2: I found an excellent Grammar book that discusses Adverbs, their types and prefered positions. The author defines some rules that I'll summarize as follows:   Connecting adverbs, eg: however, then,..., Position: Beginning of clause. Indefinite frequency, eg: always, usually,..., Position: Mid position (after auxilary verb, before other verbs) sometimes beginning of clause. Focusing adverbs, eg: mainly, only,..., Position: Mid position. Adverb of certainty, eg: clearly, obviously, Position: Mid position. Adverb of completeness, eg: almost, nearly,..., Position: Mid position. Adverb of manner, eg: fast, slowly, nicely,..., Position: End clause, mid and beginning. Adverb of place, eg: upstairs, around, Position: End clause, sometimes beginning. Adverb of time, eg: daily, weekly, ... Position: Mostly end clause, sometimes beginning and mid position.   I think that "substantially" is an adverb of completeness. Therefore, the right position is before the verb "contribute" (option 1). However, Google Ngam indicates that option 1 is not widely used.  What do you think? Any suggestions? A coin with heads probability $p$ is flipped $n$ times. A "run" is a maximal sequence of consecutive flips that are all the same. For example, the sequence HTHHHTTH with $n=8$ has five runs, namely H, T, HHH, TT,H. Show that the expected number of runs is  $$1+2(n-1)p(1-p).$$  I have tried to use some generating function on this but calculus got pretty messy and didn't work. How to install a deb file, by dpkg -i or by apt? When a permanent magnet attracts some object, lets say a steel ball, energy is converted into for instance kinetic energy and heat when attraction happens, and they eventually collide. Does this imply that energy is drawn from the magnetic field and the magnet is depleted, making it weaker and weaker for each magnetic attraction performed?  (if the answer requires Quantum Mechanical explanations, please elaborate :)) I am getting really confused now. I installed Tex Live 2012 on my Xubuntu 12.04 with a backport and I installed TexMaker.  I could user PdfLatex right away and it generated everything I needed except my bibliography. I read that Tex Live 2012 comes with biblatex so I just changed the bibtex command in TexMaker from "bibtex" to "biblatex". However, that does not exist. So I did  sudo apt-get remove biblatex sudo apt-get install biblatex   The package is installed but I don't find the binary. Using bibtex the whole thing crashes. Which does not surprise me since I want to userbiber:  \usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}   Btw does biber come with biblatex? So far I couldn't get any clear explanation what biber and biblatex are to each other.  EDIT: I had to remove texlive completely and install it with the install script form . Apparently the newest version of biber does not work with the older version of biblatex I had. What is a plain English explanation of "Big O" notation? @track vs @api (Lightning Web Components) Let's say we have this code for a LWC:  &lt;!-- helloExpressions.html --&gt; &lt;template&gt;     &lt;div class="slds-m-around_medium"&gt;         &lt;lightning-input name='firstName' label="First Name" onchange={handleChange}&gt;&lt;/lightning-input&gt;         &lt;lightning-input name='lastName' label="Last Name" onchange={handleChange}&gt;&lt;/lightning-input&gt;         &lt;p class="slds-m-top_medium"&gt;Uppercased Full Name: {uppercasedFullName}&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/template&gt;   and this is the JS file:  // helloExpressions.js import { LightningElement, track } from 'lwc';  export default class HelloExpressions extends LightningElement {     @track firstName = '';     @track lastName = '';      handleChange(event) {         const field = event.target.name;         if (field === 'firstName') {             this.firstName = event.target.value;         } else if (field === 'lastName') {             this.lastName = event.target.value;         }     }      get uppercasedFullName() {         return `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`.toUpperCase();     } }   firstName and lastName have been decorated with @track. Now as per the documentation, decorating a property with @track makes it private and reactive, while to mark a property public and reactive, use @api.  So if I just change the decorator to @api for both these variables, it should work. I am referring these from the same component only. But it's not working.  UPDATE: 27th Feb -------------------- Somehow it's working today. I just changed the decorator of the variables to api.  import { LightningElement, api } from 'lwc';  export default class HelloExpressions extends LightningElement {     @api firstName = '';     @api lastName = '';      handleChange(event) {         const field = event.target.name;         if (field === 'firstName') {             this.firstName = event.target.value;         } else if (field === 'lastName') {             this.lastName = event.target.value;         }     }      get uppercasedFullName() {         return `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`.toUpperCase();     } }   So it's working. I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 and there's no fglrx! What happened? I've just started to play with pgfplot. I'm trying to prepare a plot like to following   \begin{figure}[h] \centering \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[minor tick num=1,  axis x line=middle, axis y line=middle, xlabel=$k$, ylabel=$\omega$, ymin=0,xmin=-2,ymax=60] \addplot[blue,domain=0:5, line width=1.5pt] {x^2+25}; \addplot[orange,domain=0:5,line width=1pt]{3*x+22.75}; \addplot[cyan,domain=0:1.5, line width=1pt,dashed]{18.166*x}; \node[coordinate,pin=right:{$v_{\phi}=\frac{\omega}{k}$}]     at (axis cs:1,17) {}; \node[coordinate,pin=right:{$v_{g}=\frac{d\omega}{dk}$}]     at (axis cs:2.5,30) {}; \node[coordinate,pin=left:{dispersion relation}]     at (axis cs:4.5,47) {}; \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \caption{Wave dispersion relation with phase and group velocity} \label{fig:2} \end{figure}   What I would like to do is dropping the x-y tick labels so that we just maintaing the x-y title. How can I obtain it? My ubuntu partition was deleted and I can't boot from either a DVD or USB Sandbox modifies subject on email sent from trigger I am writing a trigger in a sandbox, and am sending an email through the sandbox. I've added a the Account Name to the Subject in my trigger.   When the email is sent from the trigger, Salesforce appends "Sandbox:" before the subject I wrote in apex.   Is there a way to remove the "Sandbox:" subject from emails send out of a sandbox? What is a virtual terminal for? Difference between “with”, “at” and “for” with a business title and a company name The prepositions “with”, “at” and “for” are also used to associate a business title with a company's name. It seems that they are interchangeable, with no (significant) difference in meaning. The following examples taken from The New York Times website seem to confirm that:      Until now, said Justin Nielson, a senior analyst for the media   research firm SNL Kagan, “there really hasn't been any direct   competitor . . .      “The consumer is still deleveraging,” said Jason Goldberg, a senior   analyst with Barclays. “It's not a lack of supply; it's a lack of   demand.”      “There’s the party of fear and the party of despair,” Nikos Xydakis, a   political analyst and an editor at Kathimerini daily, said.   Are they really the same as for meaning? If it isn't so, what is the difference between them? Settings disappeared in Ubuntu 19.10 I usually go to the right top corner and at the drop down menu I select the tool icon to go to the settings.  However, 19.10 does not have a tool icon.  How can I go to settings now? How can I find local IP addresses (i.e. 192.168.x.x or 10.0.x.x) in Python platform independently and using only the standard library? I've heard that Lubuntu consumes less resources than Ubuntu. Is it because of the fact that Lubuntu uses different desktop environment and window manager?  If so, would it be equivalent to install lubuntu-desktop on top of Ubuntu rather than doing a fresh install? How can I use an array of function pointers? How should I use array of function pointers in C?  How can I initialize them? Interval preserving transformations are linear in special relativity In almost all proofs I've seen of the Lorentz transformations one starts on the assumption that the required transformations are linear. I'm wondering if there is a way to prove the linearity:  Prove that any spacetime transformation $\left(y^0,y^1,y^2,y^3\right)\leftrightarrow \left(x^0,x^1,x^2,x^3\right)$ that preserves intervals, that is, such that  $$\left(dy^0\right)^2-\left(dy^1\right)^2-\left(dy^2\right)^2-\left(dy^3\right)^2=\left(dx^0\right)^2-\left(dx^1\right)^2-\left(dx^2\right)^2-\left(dx^3\right)^2$$  is linear (assuming that the origins of both coordinates coincide). That is, show that $\frac{\partial y^i}{\partial x^j}=L_j^i$ is constant throughout spacetime (that is, show that $\frac{\partial L_j^i}{\partial x^k}=0$).  Thus far all I've been able to prove is that $g_{ij}L_p^iL_q^j=g_{pq}$ (where $g_{ij}$ is the metric tensor of special relativity) and that $\frac{\partial L_j^i}{\partial x^k}=\frac{\partial L_k^i}{\partial x^j}$. Any further ideas? What to do when someone other than the author changes a question to fix a substantive problem with the code See . Someone other than the OP changed the code to address a substantial problem with the it that was addressed as part of my answer. The problem was admittedly peripheral to the core question, but it was a primary differentiator between my answer and another answer submitted at the same time.  Any suggestions on what to do in this situation? Leave it be? Edit it back? Something else?  Update: I just found , from the "Related Links" section on the right, which is pretty relevant. I have to keep remembering to check there rather than just searching for answers.