this is my code and when I run this example it gives NullPointerException could you help me please to find the error or why I've got this exception ! my code :  public class Frame extends JFrame {     public Frame()     {         JLabel label;         label.setText("test");         add(label);         setSize(200,200);         setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);      }     public static void main(String[] args)      {         new Frame().setVisible(true);     } }
What are Null Pointer Exceptions (java.lang.NullPointerException) and what causes them?  What methods/tools can be used to determine the cause so that you stop the exception from causing the program to terminate prematurely?
How to remove snap completely without losing the Chromium browser? I am wondering whether or not there is a way to completely remove snap from Ubuntu 19.10 without losing the ability to install important applications like Chromium.   When I just recently updated to the newest Ubuntu release I realized that the installer programmatically reinstalled snap, although I had manually removed it before. Additionally the installer removed Chromium, which was installed via the repositories, and reinstalled it via snap.   As I don't want snap to be installed on my machines for various reasons my question is if anybody knows a safe way to remove it, and to get the Chromium DEB back to the sources?  Is there a PPA? Could I use a source of an Ubuntu flavor additionally, which didn't remove the Chromium Deb from its sources? Movie/TV series with a scene of spiky, black goo growing out of a lab container? There was a scene from a sci-fi horror video, not animated, don't know if it's a movie or TV series, where there was this black goo in a glass container and some scientists were looking at it under a microscope.   The pitch black goo grew and grew so fast, eventually breaking out of the inner box and the scientists that were inside the "inner lab" were begging to get out but the scientists outside that inner lab refused to open the door. The black goo was spiky (had spikes).  It's not any of the "Alien" movies, "The Blob", "Life", or "The Thing". It's not vintage. It was made after 1990, I'm pretty sure. How to prove $\text{Rank}(AB)\leq \min(\text{Rank}(A), \text{Rank}(B))$? Compiling documents online I have heard rumors that you can compile documents online, and more specifically that Google has a free online compiler, but I have never been able to find any. Is there a way to compile documents online, so that I can write and compile documents even if I don't have a TeX distribution installed on my computer? I've rooted my phone.  Now what?  What do I gain from rooting? This is a common question by those who have just rooted their phones.  What apps, ROMs, benefits, etc. do I get from rooting?  What should I be doing now? This is a Putnam Problem that I have been trying to solve (on and off) for two years, but I have failed. I am in Calculus BC. This problem comes from the book "Calculus Eighth Edition by Larson, Hostetler, and Edwards". This problem is at the end of the first section of the chapter 8 exercises. Here's the problem:  Evaluate $$\int_2^4 \frac{\sqrt{\ln(9-x)}\,dx}{\sqrt{\ln(9-x)} + \sqrt{\ln(x+3)}}.$$  Please. Any help is very much appreciated. So are solutions. Thank you!  Edit: I like the solution given, but I was interested to see if there is any other way of doing the problem? I'm excited to see the results. How can i disable totally the prompts that appear while installing a Debian package, i've used all the options that i've found but there are some packages that are still prompting.  I'm using this command:  apt-get -y --allow-unauthenticated --force-yes -o DPkg::Options::="--force-overwrite" -o DPkg::Options::="--force-confdef" install x11-common   Why the x11-common package is still prompting? how can i get rid of these prompts?  Thanks in advance  --Victor  Edit: just to clarify, the prompts are not "yes/no" prompts, are open questions in a coloured screen (typical two color screen) but i want to set the default option of these questions Boundary condition with spatial derivative is ignored by NDSolve How to recover a deleted NTFS partition with data I am trying to find the name of a direct to TV movie, possibly a 2-3 part miniseries which I believe aired on the SciFi channel in the 90s. I don't remember who starred in it, but the movie opened with an astronaut attempting reentry whose shuttle ends up exploding. He awakes in a large bubble of air in a river and after reaching the surface and swimming to shore, meets several other people, from seemingly many different times throughout history (including one alien, who died on Earth).  Over the course of the movie, we learn the world is the afterlife, where everyone goes when they die. The major plot involves launching a steamboat (built by Mark Twain, no less) to travel up a river to the mountains, where the beings responsible for bringing everyone to this world are.  Does anyone know what the title of this movie/miniseries is? Icon for pinned tabs in Safari? It would be nice to  for .  As it is, SE kind of stands out (in a not cool way): Do shots fired before the match starts count towards your end-of-game statistics? In Overwatch, there is short countdown for a few minutes before the match begins. During this time, the defending team is allowed to roam the map to set up their defenses, while the attacking team sits in a small lobby until the game starts and the doors open. (Or in KotH-type maps, both teams wait in a lobby.)  While players wait, it's not uncommon for them to fire off random shots, especially since a lot of the environment is destructable (it's entertaining to watch plush onions sail through the air in the arcade).   Do shots fired before the match starts count towards accuracy statistics at the end of the game? Proof explanation $A\setminus B = A \setminus B \cap A$ $A\setminus B = A \setminus B \cap A$  Proof $A\setminus B \subseteq A \setminus B \cap A$:  $x\in A\setminus B \to x\in A \land x \notin B$  $x\in A \land (x \notin B \color{red}{\lor x\notin A})$  $x \in A \land (x\notin B \cap A)$  $x \in A\setminus B\cap A$  Proof $A \setminus B \cap A \subseteq A\setminus B$:  $x \in A \setminus B \cap A \to x\in A \land x\notin B \cap A$  $x \in A \land (x\notin B \color{red}{\lor x\notin A})$  $x \in A \land x \notin B$  $x \in A \setminus B $  Therefore $A\setminus B = A \setminus B \cap A$  I am confused how the stuff in the red is formed. Can we add an or statement to anything and ignore if its true or not if the first part of the or is true? Solutions to $a+b+c=12$, $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}_0$ Let $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}_0$. If $a+b+c=12$, how many solutions $(a,b,c)$ satisfy the equation?   Is the answer:      $729$ Display Animated GIF The future of meta.stackoverflow and meta.stackexchange Historically this site, , has been the place to ask questions about not just Stack Overflow, but the functioning of the entire Stack Exchange (2.0) network, including Area 51 and stackexchange.com and careers.  (Yes, there was a , but that dealt with the old legacy Stack Exchange 1.0 sites. It was deprecated a while ago, and currently redirects here.)  Now that we've gotten many, many months under our belt from the SE 1.0 days, I think it's time that we gave Stack Overflow its own, true per-site meta, and moved the higher level network meta discussions to meta.stackexchange.com.  Over time, it's begun to bug me more and more that requests for Stack Overflow, the site, kind of get buried here on meta.stackoverflow under the avalanche of network issues. Retag requests, synonym requests, things truly specific to Stack Overflow, the site, not the network. This is unfair to our vastly largest and flagship Q&amp;A site, and it's unfair to the Stack Overflow users to mix their requests in with network level concerns.  It's also odd that Stack Overflow is the only network site without a proper, dedicated per-site meta, where its meta has its own reputation system not tied to the parent site in any way.  This is mostly a quirk of history more than anything else, and I believe it is now an appropriate time to split into two sites:   , a proper per-site meta for Stack Overflow with integrated rep , a global network meta with its own reputation system   Yes, this will be painful. But I believe it is a good, necessary, and healthy step both for the future of the network and the future of Stack Overflow.  Some things to discuss:   which questions should be migrated from here to meta.so? Obviously site-specific things like the retag-requests, and perhaps questions with the  tag. Anything that is 100% wholly specific to Stack Overflow and not generalizable to the rest of the network should be moved over. This may be a pretty small, narrow list of questions, and that's OK. Should we do some meta spring cleaning in our transition? Which questions / tags should be blown away as no longer relevant, referring to ancient versions of Stack Overflow or issues that have long since ceased to exist and aren't instructive for any future visitors? Your meta reps will generally be unaffected, except insofar as we delete for spring cleaning, or move site-specific things to meta.so. We still plan to have a distinct reputation system for the new meta.se site, just like here.   I do not have a timeline for this change, that is up to Jarrod and David to decide. It may be months away. However, we feel pretty strongly that this is something that we need to do to clean things up and pave the way for the future -- so I expect it will happen in the next few months, giving us lots of time to decide how we want to do it, per the above.  Update  . When should I use a List vs a LinkedList Given a PRF $F$ , is $G(s) = F_s(1)\|F_s(2)\|\cdots \|F_s(n+1)$ a PRG? If $F$ a PRF, and we construct $G$ using $F$ in the following way:  $$G(s) = F_s(1)\|F_s(2)\|\cdots \|F_s(n+1)$$ where $|s|= n$.   Is $G$ then a PRG? If so how can I prove this? If not how can $G(s)$ be distinguished from a random $r$? And what if $n+1 &lt;$ range of $F_s$? or it could be for any $n &gt; |s|$. Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7 ASPH vs Olympus M. Zuiko 25mm f/1.8 Let $f$ be a bounded measurable function on a set of finite measure $E$.  For a measurable subset $A$ of $E$, show that $\int_A f = \int_E f \cdot \chi_A$     Lemma: Let $f$ be a bounded measurable function on a set of finite measure $E$.  Suppose $A$ and $B$ are disjoint measurable subsets of $E$.  Then $\int_{A \cup B} f = \int_A f + \int_B f$.   My first approach was to view the problem like this utilizing the above lemma:  $$\int_E  f \cdot \chi_A = \int_{E\setminus A} f \cdot X_A + \int_A f \cdot \chi_A $$  I'm not really sure how the result follows from the above.