On the , they stated (in a very big banner):     "There are eleven long-established and prestigious wizarding schools   worldwide."   But they only listed 6 schools, with Hogwarts, this makes 7. So there are still 4 schools that don’t appear on the Pottermore site.  On the , we can find that they have one more entry. They included  in Russia.  So I’m looking for the other 3 long-established and prestigious wizarding schools.  (I guess some more in Asia or Oceania would be most likely.)
With the new  and the upcoming release of  film, JK Rowling has been awesome and given us new writing on the .  In the introduction it is stated that there are eleven established/registered schools. There are writings for six of them. I don't think we need a new writing for Hogwarts... so that means seven have been located and defined.   Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry - Great Britain  - France  - Northern Europe (possibly Estonia, Latvia, or Belarus)  - Japan  - Africa (possibly Congo/DRC)  - Brazil  - United States   Do we know anything of possible location or names of the other four schools? I know Koldovstoretz was mentioned as school in Russia, but is that still canon?   Koldovstoretz - Russia (maybe depending on current canon)   The final three are my guesses based on the population and geography on the world.   Name Unknown - China (based on population) Name Unknown - India (based on population) Name Unknown - Australia (based on geography)   Related:
Ireland Transit Visa when flying from IND - Abu Dhabi - Dublin - US How does the CS:GO ranking system work? When you watch a video in YouTube, you can seek it with the thumbnail preview. Many Windows' and MacOS' video players have this feature, but what about Linux's? I've already read , but the information in it seems out-of-date.  is still alive but the project is neglected (see ), and actually the player doesn't work on the latest Ubuntu or Linux Mint.  Is there any video player which has the feature and works on the latest linux distributions? Or must I use Windows' one with VirtualBox? If only VLC would implement this feature, but it seems that won't happen as far as I read .  YouTube's seek preview: What are the pros and cons of adding a vapor barrier behind shower backer board? Lets say we have a dependent variable $Y$ with few categories and set of independent variables.    What are the advantages of multinomial logistic regression over set of binary logistic regressions (i.e. )? By set of binary logistic regression I mean that for each category $y_{i} \in Y$ we build separate binary logistic regression model with target=1 when $Y=y_{i}$ and 0 otherwise. I understand that faster-than-light communication is impossible when making single measurements, because the outcome of each measurement is random. However, shouldn't measurement on one side collapse the wave function on the other side, such that interference effects would disappear? Making measurements on "bunches" of entangled particles would thus allow FTL communication, by making observed interference effects appear or disappear. How does such an experiment not:  1) Clearly imply that faster-than-light communication is possible?  or  2) (if #1 is rejected) Imply that measurement of one half of an entangled pair does not cause the collapse of the other half's wave function.  Why doesn't this thought experiment clearly show that if we maintain that FTL communication is ruled out, we must also rule out "universal collapse" in the Copenhagen interpretation?  EDIT: Here is an example of an explicit experiment (though I think experts could come up with something better):  You can entangle a photon with an electron such that the angle of the photon is correlated with the electron's position at each slit of a double slit experiment. If the photon is detected (it's outgoing angle measured), then which-path information is known, and there is no interference. If the photon is not detected, the interference remains.   The experiment is designed such that the photon and electron go in roughly opposite directions, apart from the tiny deflection which gives which-path information. You set up a series of photon detectors 100 ly away on one side, and your double slit experiment 100 ly away in the opposite direction. Now you produce the entangled pairs in bunches, say of 100 entangled pairs, each coming every millisecond, with a muon coming between each bunch to serve as a separator.   Then the idea is that someone at the photon detector side can send information to someone watching the double-slit experiment, by selectively detecting all of the photons in some bunches, but not in others. If all of the photons are detected for one bunch, then the corresponding electron bunch 200 ly away should show no interference effects. If all of the photons are not detected for one bunch, then the corresponding electron bunch 200 ly away would show the usual double-slit interference effects (say on a phosphorus screen). (Note that this does not require combining information from the photon-detector-side with the electron-double-slit side in order to get the interference effects. The interference effects would visibly show up as the electron blips populate the phosphorus screen, as is usual in a double-slit experiment when which-path information is not measured.)  In such a way the person at the photon detectors can send '1's and '0's depending on whether they measure the photons in a given bunch. Suppose they send 'SOS' in Morse code. This requires 9 bunches, and so this will take 900 milliseconds, which is less than 200 years. The point is that such an experiment would only work if you assume that the measurement of the photon really does collapse the wave function nonlocally. Show that a Cauchy sequence has a fast-Cauchy subsequence I've had my Trek 3900 for about a year now, and I replaced the chain about 3 months ago, but otherwise it's running with the same parts it came with (not counting tubes and tires).  I had to replace my chain because it had gotten really rusty from riding in rain/mud/water on trails, and had started skipping.    My problem is, whenever I ride, if I get above or below a very light pressure when pedaling, the chain skips. I was wondering if this could be caused by my chain, which has gotten a little rusty but not as stretched as the other one was, or if I might need a new cassette?    I just readjusted my derailer, but it still skips.   Does anybody know what could be causing this? There were so many discussions about an Ubuntu with RR. They were so many pros and contras. At the end ubuntu wont be changed, the 6 month cycle system wont be changed. Thats fine!   But because there are so many people who would like to use an ubuntu with RR Im asking myself why isnt there an Ubuntu Derivate with RR. I couldnt found one, there are a loooot of Ubuntu Derivates but no RR. Is it just impossible? I mean Ubuntu = 6 months cycle, so the derivate have to be a 6 month cycle too? Is there no other option? Or are there already some smart guys trying to solve this problem? Thank you! what exactly is mathematical rigor? I am a programmer moving up to computer science and even in my past life as a mechanical engineer I used sufficient maths to get by but I have always wondered what exactly is this thing called rigor.  Please make me understand it. Icons of Meta.SE and Stack Apps have gone missing The word "Print" appears after every source using \printbibliography homeomorphism of cantor set extends to the plane? Suppose C is a Cantor set in the Euclidean plane, or even in R^3. Suppose h is a homeomorphism of C onto itself. Can h be extended to a homeomorphism of the whole space? What about if h preserves the ´end points´ of the Cantor set? Seems that the latter is a necessary condition but I don´t know how to prove it. See screenshot:    Curiously, there are older badge achievement messages further down the list which display properly. Moment of inertia of a cylinder about its base I've tried to find the moment of inertia of a cylinder rotating about an axis parallel to its base (i.e about the 'End diameter') as one can see  . But when I checked my results with different references ,I've found that it's incorrect!.I need a help to figure out where I did it wrong. since $$I=\int\limits x^2.dm$$ $$dm = \rho.dv$$ where $$dv= r.d\theta . dr .dh$$ &amp; $$\rho=\frac{M}{\pi R^2 H}$$ $M$:cylinder total mass. $H$:total height of cylinder. $R$:the radius of the cylinder. The distance of each infinitesimal element from the axis of rotation would be : $$\sqrt{r^2+h^2}$$ Therfore, $$I= \frac{2M}{ R^2 H}\int\limits_{0}^{R} \int\limits_{0}^{H}\, r(r^2+h^2)dh\,dr$$ and this gives a result of : $$\frac{M~H^2}{3}+\frac{M~R^2}{2}$$ Which is obviously wrong since the second term should be multiplied by a factor of $1/2$. Making a (simple) directory tree I'm trying to make a simple directory tree representation in LaTeX. Something like:  spam  |  +-- ham  +-- eggs      |      +-- more spam      +-- dead parrots   The tree won't be that long (say, 10--15 entries or so), with three or so levels, and is a one-off thing. So, quick-and-dirty solutions are welcome. When recommending tikz, please note that I have almost no experience with it, so I'd appreciate a clean simple solution, even if it doesn't look quite perfect.   On Tex.SE tikz is almost like the jquery recurring joke on StackOverflow..    Edit: As per Thorsten's suggestion,  is a nice and easy-to-use solution. The example from above could be written as:  \usepackage{dirtree} ... \dirtree{% .1 spam. .2 ham. .2 eggs. .3 more spam. .3 dead parrots. } How do you make sure email you send programmatically is not automatically marked as spam? How to check a particular directory is mounted on the Linux machine. For instance there is a folder named test, I want to check if it is mounted or not. Name of mean absolute error analogue to Brier score? Yesterday's question  got me curious about probability scoring. The  $$\frac{1}{N}\sum\limits _{i=1}^{N}(\text{prediction}_i - \text{reference}_i)^2$$ is a mean squared error measure. Does the analogous mean absolute error performance measure $$\frac{1}{N}\sum\limits _{i=1}^{N}|\text{prediction}_i - \text{reference}_i|$$ have a name, too? I've tried searching for this question but couldn't find it on stackexchange. This is a common type of interview question; I ran into it doing brain teasers on a probability puzzles app, and if you fine people agree with my logic, I will inform the app developer that his/her answers are incorrect.   The problem is essentially this:  You are sentenced to death for thievery. The King is magnanimous and decides to put your fate in the hands of chance. You are given $100$ white marbles and 100 black marbles, and $2$ urns. The king will choose an urn at random and pull out a single marble at random; if the marble is white, you live, if its black, you die. If you place the marbles in the best way possible, what is your probability of survival?  I started with the base case: $100$ white marbles in one urn, $100$ black marbles in the other. This comes down to a $50$-$50$ chance of survival. I then worked my way to deciding that placing $1$ white marble in one urn and $99$ white marbles + $100$ black marbles in the other urn would be the "best way possible", which yields the following:  $$P(\text{Survival}) = \frac{1}{2}(1+\frac{99}{199}) \approx .749$$  Selecting $1$ of $2$ urns at random gives $\frac{1}{2}$, the urn containing $1$ marble gives $1$, and the other that contains $99$ white marbles and $100$ black marbles gives $\frac{99}{199}$ because there are $99$ possible white marbles to select out of $199$ total marbles.  The app claims that the correct answer is $\frac{1}{2}(1+\frac{99}{200}) \approx .748$   I see where the $200$ comes from, but I do not think it is right to say that there are $200$ marbles in the other urn. Who is correct?