I cite a specific paper for my publication. The problem is when I add the middle initial of one author, the entire author list gets omitted from the references list, as shown in the image. I omitted the middle initial in the second example.   Any clues as to why?
In my .bib file, I have two entries with exactly the same author names:  @article{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....  @article{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....   When cited after each other, and typeset with the IEEEtran bibliography style, the .bbl file reads:  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St} K.~Seshadrinathan, R.~Soundararajan, A.~C. Bovik, and L.~K. Cormack, ``A   subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms,''   \emph{SPIE Proceedings Human Vision and Electronic Imaging}, 2010.  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec} ------, ``Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video,''   \emph{IEEE Transactions on Image Processing}, 2009.   As you can see, the author names have been replaced with ------. It looks like this in the final PDF:    Is this normal behavior?
I try to find a good proof for invertibility of strictly diagonally dominant matrices (defined by $|m_{ii}|&gt;\sum_{j\ne i}|m_{ij}|$).  There is a proof of this in  but I'm wondering whether there are are better proof such as using determinant, etc to show that the matrix is non singular. How do I unlock the Dream Suite in Animal Crossing New Leaf? Since upgrading to 13.10, I can't log in to unity desktop. Light dm works correctly, but attempting to log in tries to start the session then drops back to light. I've already dropped to terminal (ctrl+alt+f2) and done this:  sudo apt-get update  sudo apt-get install --reinstall ubuntu-desktop  sudo apt-get install unity   Logging in as a guest session also fails. Logging in to other window managers works with varying degrees of success.  Note: I have Cinnamon 2.0 installed from PPA.  I'm using a 2 monitor setup.  Also of note is that the session prior to my upgrade to 13.10 the background of unity failed to display at all, instead showing what was there in the screen buffer from the previous frame. The entire OS worked correctly otherwise though, so I just ignored it for the session. No other upgrades or even updates were done prior to this occurring.  My upgrade path to 13.10 was basically this: Install 13.04 alongside Windows 7, use ubuntu as a glorified web browser for a while, get updates (in preparation for 13.10), install 13.10.  I also used Unity Tweak Tool to change some aspects of unity, particularly auto-hide.  Any help or ideas would be appreciated, as I'm typing this on my phone :( How can I return the current action in an ASP.NET MVC view? I wanted to set a CSS class in my master page, which depends on the current controller and action. I can get to the current controller via ViewContext.Controller.GetType().Name, but how do I get the current action (e.g. Index, Show etc.)? How to navigate to C drive in bash on WSL-Ubuntu? A question about causality and Quantum Field Theory from improper Lorentz transformation I configured a journey in Marketing Cloud where i sent an email. My requirement is adding BCC email addresses to this email, but I noticed that we can only add valid email addresses. Could you confirm me that is not possible to add BCC /CC Address using personalization strings or Ampscript functions (e.g. Lookup) inside the Journey Email's settings? Loop doesn't see value changed by other thread without a print statement How can I recreate geometry using a photograph? I understand that if a particle approaches a finite potential barrier of height $V_0$ with energy $E &lt; V_0$, there is still a finite probability of finding the particle on the other side of the barrier due to quantum tunneling.  My question is, since the wavefunction is nonzero inside the barrier region, is it possible to actually make a position measurement and locate a particle inside the barrier?  I mean, if we can say that "there is a nonzero probability that the particle is inside the barrier", surely this would suggest we can do so?  If not, why not? Am I understanding the whole wavefunction/probability distribution thing right? Search across Stack Exchange sites in Android app Comments can now be upvoted and flagged. How do those features work? Do users get rep for their upvoted comments? Do upvoted comments have any effect on comment sorting? And can users see their own comment upvote number somewhere?  Related:  The  about comments Why would spacetime curvature cause gravity? It is fine to say that for an object flying past a massive object, the spacetime is curved by the massive object, and so the object flying past follows the curved path of the geodesic, so it "appears" to be experiencing gravitational acceleration. Do we also say along with it, that the object flying past in reality exeriences NO attraction force towards the massive object? Is it just following the spacetime geodesic curve while experiencing NO attractive force?  Now come to the other issue: Supposing two objects are at rest relative to each other, ie they are not following any spacetime geodesic. Then why will they experience gravitational attraction towards each other? E.g. why will an apple fall to earth? Why won't it sit there in its original position high above the earth? How does the curvature of spacetime cause it to experience an attraction force towards the earth, and why would we need to exert a force in reverse direction to prevent it from falling? How does the curvature of spacetime cause this?  When the apple was detatched from the branch of the tree, it was stationary, so it did not have to follow any geodesic curve. So we cannot just say that it fell to earth because its geodesic curve passed through the earth. Why did the spacetime curvature cause it to start moving in the first place? What happens if both players have the ability to pump their creature an unlimited number of times? Say that both players each had 2 , 2 , and a . (Or any other way to get unlimited mana, and a Nantuko Shade).  Player 1 attacks with his , and player 2 blocks with his . Before damage is assigned, each has chances to pump up their  as much as they want. They can't just declare them to be "infinite," but each can always one-up the other player. What happens?  It seems there would be a loop of events, but would one player eventually be forced to break the loop as per rule 714.3? Is it considered the same game state after each player pumps their creature a bunch as it was before?  This was discussed at length on the Draw3Cards Magic Q&amp;A site (which is no longer available), but no conclusion was reached. Some felt that the game would simply be a draw, others felt that the active player would be forced to make a different decision to break the loop. Others felt that you would just have to call a judge and see what he decides. Installed Ubuntu alongside Windows 8, and W8 won't boot anymore No sound ALC294 Asus ROG Strix 512 Ubuntu 20.04.01 Appropriate data transformation I want to create an effect/color like this image of the cloud in the Parse.com logo. It is not quite white, and seems to have a texture. I am new to illustrator, but have a white "cloud" made thanks to some other tutorials. How do I proceed? Did I derive a new form of the gamma function? PostgreSQL check bloating of a table