Using the css content property, I am trying to make put an HTML entity after an element.  Here is my HTML:  &lt;table id="tic" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="5" bordercolor="black" bordercolorlight="gray" bgcolor="white"&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="x"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="o"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="x"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="o"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="x"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="o"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="x"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="o"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td width="55" height="55" class="x"&gt;&lt;/td&gt;     &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/table&gt;   And my CSS:  table{     text-align:center;     font-size:2em;     font-weight:bold; } td.o:after{     content:"&amp;#9675;";     font-weight:bold; } td.x:after{     content:"&amp;#x2716;" }   Unfortunately, instead of getting the ○ character and the ✖ character, I get the entity names.    How can I fix this? Thanks!
How do you use the CSS content property to add HTML entities?  Using something like this just prints &amp;nbsp; to the screen instead of the non-breaking space:  .breadcrumbs a:before {     content: '&amp;nbsp;'; }
Remove Windows entry in GRUB menu Checking host availability by using ping in bash scripts What is that component from the ADP5091 Schematic? I am looking for an explanation what that component does inside of that circuit.  It can be found on page 3 of the Datasheet of ADP5091:   It would help me out a lot. Thank you in advance! Jordan form, number of blocks. There are three ways I know to pronounce the -ed at the end of an adjective:   /t/ as in cracked. /d/ as in lined. /ɪd/ as in naked   I realise naked is a special case because, as , it comes for Old English nacod, so the suffix isn't added.   shows the pattern of pronunciation of -ed in all other cases. However it doesn't explain why  ends with /ɪd/ (or /id/ or /əd/ depending on the dialect).   that wicked comes from OE wicca, so the d wasn't already there.  Why do we pronounce wicked as /ˈwɪkɪd/ and not /ˈwɪkt/? The question is pretty straight forward. I can get the exit code of the previous command by using $?. But what exactly is it?  I don't think it is a variable, because you can't have any special characters in the name of variable other than _.  foo?foo=10   will result in the error: foo?foo=10: command not found  So if it is not a variable, what is it? Are there others like it? Is reusing old code for a new assignment considered self plagiarism? How to protect yourself if you consider it to be, and a group partner does not? How to use z-index in svg elements? I'm new to inequalities in mathematical induction and don't know how to proceed further. So far I was able to do this:  $V(1): 1≤1 \text{  true}$  $V(n): n!≤((n+1)/2)^n$  $V(n+1): (n+1)!≤((n+2)/2)^{(n+1)}$  and I've got : $(((n+1)/2)^n)\cdot(n+1)≤((n+2)/2)^{(n+1)}$ $((n+1)^n)n(n+1)≤((n+2)^n)((n/2)+1)$ At the end of ‘The Return of the King’, Bilbo, Frodo, Gandalf and others boarded a boat and left Middle-earth for Valinor.  Is there any canon explanation why they couldn’t just take the ring there in the first place and leave Middle-earth altogether? Would Sauron have gone after them? Couldn’t the elves living there safeguard it?  I do realize that without Frodo taking the ring to Mount Doom there would be no story at all, but I wonder whether or not there is any canon explanation for this. Modify a class definition's annotation string parameter at runtime Why is my Nikon 50mm f/1.8 giving me an fEE error? I have a AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8. When I have the aperture setting on the lens to 22 I can take photos. But when I change the dial to anything other than 22(lowest f/stop) then I get a flashing fEE message and r09 where the number of exposure left is.  I don't have the manual for this lens but am just wondering if anyone knows what the issue is here.  My camera is a Nikon D70S. Skype app in my Ubuntu system work perfectly. But today when I run the app, I see this:    How Can I fix this? Why is there no consistency in the plural forms of words ending on an "f" (e.g. safe, roof, dwarf, etc.)? The plural form of leaf is leaves, although according to  leafs is also correct. Dwarf can be pluralized as either dwarfs or dwarves. Conversely, the words roof and safe are pluralized as roofs and safes.  Is there any logic underpinning these variations? Is there a historical trend where words that were previously pluralized as -ves are now being increasingly pluralized as -fs? Two mice heterozygote and black are reproduced. Find the probability of getting the filium dark and heterozygote How accurate is approximating the Earth as a sphere? What level of error do I encounter when approximating the earth as a sphere? Specifically, when dealing with the location of points and, for example, the great circle distances between them.  Are there any studies on the average and worst case error compared to an ellipsoid? I'm wondering how much accuracy I'd be sacrificing if I go with a sphere for the sake of easier calculations.  My particular scenario involves directly mapping WGS84 coordinates as if they were coordinates on a perfect sphere (with the  defined by the IUGG) without any transformation. For some results returned in Google Search, on the right side it displays the company details, logo, contact numbers, etc...   For example, see the following screenshot:    I'd like to know what contributes to this so that I can try to achieve it for my site too. I was following  on creating a watch and noticed that when I rendered the watch, some pieces were messed up.  I'm new to 3D modeling and I've just learned Blender, I can't explain it well, so here's a picture:    Other examples:     I don't know if it's a problem with my World texture, the object, or the object's texture/material, so I can't even guess how to fix it. What causes this? Is it possible to fix it? Find the almost sure limit of $X_n/n$, where each random variable $X_n$ has a Poisson distribution with parameter $n$ $X_{n}$ independent and $X_n \sim \mathcal{P}(n) $  meaning that $X_{n}$ has Poisson distributions with parameter $n$. What is the $\lim\limits_{n\to \infty} \frac{X_{n}}{n}$ almost surely ?    I think we can write $X(n) \sim X(1)+X(1)+\cdots+X(1)$ where the sum is taken on independent identical distribution then use the law of large number. But I am not sure that is it correct or not. Can anyone give me some hints? Thank you in advance! Is there such a thing as a line/vertices symbology? If not a workaround? In some situations, particularly when editing, I would like to see my lines as well as all the vertices similar to the effect I get when using the Edit Vertices tool but on all features in the feature class not just the selected feature.  The solution should be dynamic, without having to create a separate point layer but having one line features class loaded twice in the TOC is acceptable.  Programmatic solution using an example (addin, ArcObjects &amp; VB.Net) is acceptable.  I have the ArcEditor license in case there is a trick to use with representations.