What is the functioning of a sense amplifier? Does it take 2 inputs and calculate which is higher or lower, then output a signal?  I have come across this in S RAM
The basic 6T structure used for storing data is same as one used in "Positive Feedback Differential Voltage Sense Amplifier", then how come while the data is stored in SRAM memory cell it doesn't get amplified?
How to remove duplicate values from an array in PHP How can I remove duplicate values from an array in PHP? In other words, can I do something like  for() {     for {        for {        }     } }   Except N times? In other words, when the method creating the loops is called, it is given some parameter N, and the method would then create N of these loops nested one in another?  Of course, the idea is that there should be an "easy" or "the usual" way of doing it. I already have an idea for a very complicated one. How To Display Too Much Data We're building a web-based platform where the main dashboard shows a table of data for users to view and analyze. As we're growing this tool, we seem to be adding more and more columns and are running out of horizontal space on smaller screen resolutions (we're seeing some data wrap). It is important to the user to view all columns at once, so column hiding is somewhat out of the question, as is horizontal scrolling (per the boss's request and because horizontal scrolling sucks anyways). I was wondering if anyone knew of a clever UI for tables with many columns.  EDIT  Below is a screen capture of the layout of the table. Unfortunately for security purposes I had to blur out the column titles. This example has rows with practically no data in them, but in use they will have lots of data that will expand wider than their respective column titles. In response to some of the answers, it is imperative that the user see all the columns, as they are all necessary to analyze the data to make certain decisions. All the data is numeric aside from the first three columns. Thanks again for any feedback.    Ok so I see that uploading this image doesn't really do it justice... it takes up the full width of the screen at 1680x1050 resolution (22") and as data fills in the columns, the left column w/the text shrinks down a bit.  EDIT 2 I just wanted to say thank you to everyone's awesome ideas. I can only select one answer, but a lot of your ideas have proven very useful and may end up in the final product. Thanks again! what is the difference between IBE and ABE schemes Can somebody explain in simple words. real life example light help and limitations of these schemes etc. Is it safe to fully cook a stuffed turkey the night before thanksgiving? What are some important applications of the Erdős-Szekeres Theorem? Are there some good overviews of basic facts about images and inverse images of sets under functions? I made changes to iptables config file in /etc/iptables/filter in Ubuntu and want to reload them. I read the man page and also googled but couldn't find the information. Any help will be appreciated. Acount suspension reason is only shown on the main site profile not meta How do I use regular expressions in bash scripts? I want to check if a variable has a valid year using a regular expression. Reading the  I understand I could use the operator =~  Looking at the example below, I would expect to see "not OK" but I see "OK". What am I doing wrong?  i="test" if [ $i=~"200[78]" ] then   echo "OK" else   echo "not OK" fi Why do I get the same result with rand() every time I compile and run? Background  I am a first year calculus student so I would prefer if answers remained in Layman's terms.  It is common knowledge and seems to me a mantra that I keep hearing over and over again to "not treat differentials/derivatives as fractions".  I am of course, in particular, referring to Leibniz notation.  However, aside from a quick response such as "oh, it's because its not a fraction but rather a type of operator", I never really got a full answer as to why we can't treat it as such. It just kind of sits at the edge of taboo in my mind where it sometimes gets used and sometimes doesn't.  Confusion is further compounded when a lot of things seem to just work out if we treat them just as fractions (e.g. u-substitution / related-rates)    Example     Air is being pumped into a balloon at a rate of $100cm^3/s$. We want the rate of change of radius when the radius is at $25cm$.   $$\text{we are given}\ \frac{dv}{dt}=100cm^3/s$$ $$\text{we want}\ \frac{dr}{dt}\ \text{when}\ r=25cm$$ Thus we will solve this by using the relation $v=\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3$ $$\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dr}\frac{dr}{dt}$$ $$\frac{dv}{dt}\frac{dr}{dv}=\frac{dr}{dt}$$ $$100\frac{1}{4\pi r^2}=\frac{1}{25\pi}$$ So the answer is $\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{1}{25\pi}$ when $r=25cm$  *Note the manipulation of derivatives just as if they were common fractions using algebra.    Question  When exactly can I treat differentials/derivatives as fractions and when can I not?   Please keep in mind that at the end of the day, I am a first year college student. An answer that is easy to understand is preferred over one that is more mathematically rigorous but less friendly to a beginner such as me. Network-wide Help Center bug Can someone explain this trigonometric limit? I have $$\lim \limits_{x\to 0}  \frac {\tan(2x)}{\sin(x)}$$ and in my case the result is $\frac{2}{1}$ =2 not whether it is right.  This is my procedure.  $$\lim \limits_{x\to 0}  \frac{\frac {\sin(2x)}{\cos(2x)}}{\frac{\sin(x)}{1}}= \lim \limits_{x\to 0}  {\dfrac {\sin(2x)}{(\cos(2x))(\sin(x))}}=\dfrac{2x\frac {\sin(2x)}{2x}}{\cos(2x)\frac{x\sin(x)}{x}}$$  I separate the limit.  $$\frac{\left(\lim \limits_{x\to 0}2x\right) \cdot \left(\lim \limits_{x\to 0}\frac {\sin(2x)}{2x}\right)}{\lim \limits_{x\to 0}\left(\cos(2x)\right)\cdot\left(\lim \limits_{x\to 0}\frac{x\sin(x)}{x}\right)} = \lim \limits_{x\to 0} \dfrac{2x}{x}=\frac{2}{1} =2$$ Why is menstruation in wild animals not a disadvantage to organismal survival? When I watch wilderness specials for more than a few minutes, I notice a familiar pattern: predators are depicted as being alerted by the scent of blood. Wounded animals seem to make the best prey and predators seem to have a heightened awareness for the smell of blood.   It would seem that it would then be a disadvantage to evolutionary survival for female organisms to menstruate. How do females of a species not attract predators to the signal of menstrual blood?   Do female organisms in the wild actually menstruate? If so, is there a difference in the composition of menses that does not alert predators? How would this not at the very least give predators an idea of the general vicinity of the female?  If wild animals excrete their menses, do they have ways in which they are able to mask the evidence of its release or are they somehow internalizing the tissue so that they are not released?  If female organisms in the wild do menstruate, then why is this not a survival disadvantage? Pointwise convergence of $h_n(x) = x^{1+\frac{1}{2n-1}}$ Okay, maybe I'm missing something obvious but consider $h_n(x) = x^{ 1+ \frac{1}{2n-1}}$ on the set $[-1,1]$. Now consider a fixed $x \in [-1,1]$, we have:  $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} h_n(x) = x \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x^\frac{1}{2n-1} = x$$  But my book says it's $|x|$? Why? My code runs inside a JAR file, say foo.jar, and I need to know, in the code, in which folder the running foo.jar is.  So, if foo.jar is in C:\FOO\, I want to get that path no matter what my current working directory is. Does the proof of Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem require axiom of choice? When selecting the terms of subsequence from each bisections, I thought axiom of choice might be required. But I'm not so sure whether or not, so please tell me. [edited] I'm sorry for the lack of explanation. I want to prove this statement: Let $a_1, a_2, \ldots \in \mathbf{R}$, and $(a_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}}$ is bounded, then $(a_n)$ has some convergent subsequence.  The proof is as follows. Since $(a_n)$ is bounded, for all $n\in\mathbf{N}$,   $a_n \in I = [b, c]$.  Now, let $I_0 = I$ and if $I_n = [b_n, c_n]$,  we define $d_n = (b_n+c_n)/2$ and  if infinite terms of $(a_n)$ is included in $[b_n, d_n]$(resp. $[d_n, c_n]$), we will define  $I_{n+1} = [b_n, d_n]$(resp. $[d_n, c_n]$).If both intervals contain infinite terms, let $I_{n+1}$ be $[d_n, c_n]$. For all $n\in \mathbf{N}$, infinite numbers of $m \in \mathbf{N}$ exist such that $a_m \in I_n$ suffices. We take the sequence of natural numbers $(n(k))_{k\in\mathbf{N}}$which suffices $n(0) &lt; n(1) &lt; \cdots &lt; n(k) &lt; \cdots$ following this procedure: Now we have already selected $a_{n(1)}, \ldots, a_{n(k)}$, there are infinite numbers of $m\in \mathbf{N}$ which suffices $n(k)&lt;m, a_m \in I_{k+1}$, so let's take the minimum m out of it. Applying this process recursively, we obtain a infinite convergent subsequence(?). I think intuitively, by only repeating this process we can't obtain countable infinite terms of subsequence because we have to repeat infinite times. Regular cast vs. static_cast vs. dynamic_cast I've been writing C and C++ code for almost twenty years, but there's one aspect of these languages that I've never really understood. I've obviously used regular casts i.e.  MyClass *m = (MyClass *)ptr;   all over the place, but there seem to be two other types of casts, and I don't know the difference. What's the difference between the following lines of code?  MyClass *m = (MyClass *)ptr; MyClass *m = static_cast&lt;MyClass *&gt;(ptr); MyClass *m = dynamic_cast&lt;MyClass *&gt;(ptr); According to the documentation, the  method uses a round-to-even algorithm which is not common for most applications. So I always end up writing a custom function to do the more natural round-half-up algorithm:  public static decimal RoundHalfUp(this decimal d, int decimals) {     if (decimals &lt; 0)     {         throw new ArgumentException("The decimals must be non-negative",              "decimals");     }      decimal multiplier = (decimal)Math.Pow(10, decimals);     decimal number = d * multiplier;      if (decimal.Truncate(number) &lt; number)     {         number += 0.5m;     }     return decimal.Round(number) / multiplier; }   Does anybody know the reason behind this framework design decision?  Is there any built-in implementation of the round-half-up algorithm into the framework? Or maybe some unmanaged Windows API?  It could be misleading for beginners that simply write decimal.Round(2.5m, 0) expecting 3 as a result but getting 2 instead.