So I'm trying to create a custom post type for my theme. I've written the function to register the post type and I can add a post from the admin panel, but when I try to view the new post's permalink, I get a 404 not found page.   Here's my post type function:  add_action( 'init', 'create_press_coverage' );  function create_press_coverage() {     register_post_type( 'press_coverage',         array(             'labels' =&gt; array(                 'name' =&gt; 'Press Coverages',                 'singular_name' =&gt; 'Press Coverage',                 'add_new' =&gt; 'Add New',                 'add_new_item' =&gt; 'Add New Press Coverage',                 'edit' =&gt; 'Edit',                 'edit_item' =&gt; 'Edit Press Coverage',                 'new_item' =&gt; 'New Press Coverage',                 'view' =&gt; 'View',                 'view_item' =&gt; 'View Press Coverage',                 'search_items' =&gt; 'Search Press Coverage',                 'not_found' =&gt; 'No Press Coverages found',                 'not_found_in_trash' =&gt; 'No Press Coverages found in Trash',                 'parent' =&gt; 'Parent Press Coverage'             ),              'public' =&gt; true,             'menu_position' =&gt; 8,             'supports' =&gt; array( 'title', 'editor', 'comments', 'thumbnail', 'custom-fields' ),             'taxonomies' =&gt; array( '' ),             'has_archive' =&gt; true         )     ); }   I'm using the roots starter theme. Is there some extra configuration I need to do to make custom post types work with it?  Thanks.
I'm developing a Custom Post Type plugin, which works fine in dev. Now that I've moved it to production, I'm getting a 404 when I try to display the template for the CPT.   So, two questions:  1- Is there some mechanism to determine the path WP took to get through the hierarchy?  2- Why wouldn't it just give me the single or index page?  I've dumped $wp_query and a stacktrace at the end of the 404. Here's part of what I found:  [query] =&gt; Array     (         [page] =&gt;          [pagename] =&gt; refletters/proximity     )  [request] =&gt; SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND (wp_posts.ID = '0') AND wp_posts.post_type = 'page'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC  [posts] =&gt; Array     (     )  [queried_object] =&gt;  [queried_object_id] =&gt; 0   And the stack trace:  2013-04-27 22:16:41 - 24.52.197.40 - TRACE - index.php - 404.php[39] -      wordpress/wp-content/themes/notoriousconsultant/404.php[39] - aaLog-&gt;logtrace     wordpress/wp-includes/template-loader.php[50] - include     wordpress/wp-blog-header.php[16] - require_once     wordpress/index.php[17] - require   Thanks for your help.
How to text-to-speech output using command-line? How to get speech output from entered text by using command-line?  Also facility to change speech rate, pitch, volume etc using simple command. Counting unique records across 2 columns and computing a score based on boolean values I have a table that looks like this in Google Big Query:  custID  InteractionDate Purchased?  Sales 1       20150312           F         0 1       20150312           T         200 1       20150314           T         150 2       20150221           T         400 2       20150221           F         0 2       20150221           T         120   ..that I need to transform to the following structure:   custID InteractionDate Success Sales  1     20150312          0.5    200  1     20150314           1     150  2     20150221         0.66    520   ..where in this second table the success column is defined as  count(purchase=Yes)/(count(purchase=Yes) + count(purchase=No)),   and sales is just the sum.  I'm quite new to BQ and no-SQL languages. I simply don't know how to do this, I've searched and seen examples that suggest using partition over but I simply haven't seen any example that does just this. Thanks a lot in advance. Boundary conditions for calculus of variations in phase space and under canonical transformations This might be a stupid question, but I just don't get it. In Hamiltonian mechanics when examining conditions for a $(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{p})\rightarrow(\boldsymbol{Q},\boldsymbol{P})$ transformation to be canonical one starts with $$ \dot{q}_ip^i-H(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{p},t)= \dot{Q}_iP^i-\bar{H}(\boldsymbol{Q},\boldsymbol{P},t)+\frac{d}{dt}W(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{Q},t)$$ where $\bar{H}$ is the transformed Hamiltonian, and $W$ is the generating function (now a function of $\boldsymbol{q}$ and $\boldsymbol{Q}$). This term shouldn't break Hamilton's principle, since $$ \delta\int_{t_1}^{t_2} dt\frac{d}{dt}W(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{Q},t)=\delta W(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{Q},t)|_{t_2}-\delta W(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{Q},t)|_{t_1}=0-0=0 .$$ But I don't see why the variation of $W$ should disappear at the endpoints (say at $t_1$). Expanding leads to: $$ \delta W(\boldsymbol{q},\boldsymbol{Q},t)|_{t_1}=\left(\frac{\partial W}{\partial q_i}\right)_{t_1}\underbrace{\delta q_i(t_1)}_{=0}+ \left(\frac{\partial W}{\partial Q_i}\right)_{t_1}\delta Q_i(t_1)=\left(\frac{\partial W}{\partial Q_i}\right)_{t_1}\delta Q_i(t_1).$$ $\boldsymbol{Q}$ is itself a function of $\boldsymbol{q}$ and $\boldsymbol{p}$, so $$ \delta Q_i(t_1)=\left(\frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial q_k}\right)_{t_1}\underbrace{\delta q_k(t_1)}_{=0}+\left(\frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial p_k}\right)_{t_1}\delta p_k(t_1)=\left(\frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial p_k}\right)_{t_1}\delta p_k(t_1). $$ It seems as if we also needed the variation of $\boldsymbol{p}$ to vanish at the endpoints, and I don't get this because (at least in cartesian coordinates) $\boldsymbol{p}=m\dot{\boldsymbol{q}}$ and the velocity can be different along the original and the varied orbitals even at the endpoints (they can point in totally different directions), so in general $\delta \dot{\boldsymbol{q}}(t_1)\neq 0$. What am I doing wrong? Can someone help me with this, please? Array of zero length Show that the LU decomposition of matrices of the form $\left[\begin{smallmatrix}0& x\\0 & y\end{smallmatrix}\right]$ is not unique How can I show that every matrix of the form $\begin{bmatrix}0&amp; x\\0 &amp; y\end{bmatrix}$ has an $LU$ factorization and that even if $L$ is unit lower triangular there is not a unique factorization?  I am completely stuck. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated Not an essential singularity The following is an old qualifying exam that I cannot solve:  Suppose $f$ is holomorphic on the punctured unit disk and $ \frac{f '}{f} $ has a simple pole at $0$.  Show that $f$ does not have an essential singularity at $0$. Independence of disjoint events Proof of one inequality $a+b+c\leq\frac{a^3}{bc}+\frac{b^3}{ca}+\frac{c^3}{ab}$ How to prove this for positive real numbers? $$a+b+c\leq\frac{a^3}{bc}+\frac{b^3}{ca}+\frac{c^3}{ab}$$  I tried AM-GM, CS inequality but all failed. MapServer (MS4W) test page from shapefile shows only blank white square? I am trying to create a test page with mapserver and shapefile. At the moment I just want to get the map shown on my test page. I have gotten the EXTENT coordinates by opening shapefiles with QGIS - I am sure those are correct. I have followed this  as an example.  I am accessing my test page via this link:  http://localhost:1025/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?map=C:\MS4W\ms4w\Apache\htdocs\mapfile.map   Problem I have - map is not loaded - I only see a blank white square.  When I look at contents of ms4w\Apache\htdocs\output , I see that images are actually getting generated but all of them are white (empty), for example:  lat_pmts_region13941906093724.png lat_pmts_region13941910095144.png lat_pmts_region13941913405500.png ...   Shapefiles are located at this location: C:\MS4W\ms4w\Apache\htdocs\shapefiles.  An example of what is logged to error file:  [Fri Apr 11 11:19:32 2014].883000 CGI Request 1 on process 7888 msWCSDispatch20(): wrong service (none) msWCSParseRequest(): request is KVP. msWCSDispatch(): SERVICE and REQUEST not included msDrawMap(): rendering using outputformat named png (AGG/PNG). msDrawMap(): WMS/WFS set-up and query, 0.000s msDrawMap(): Layer 0 (lat_pmts_region), 0.001s msDrawMap(): Drawing Label Cache, 0.000s msDrawMap() total time: 0.002s msSaveImage(C:/MS4W/ms4w/Apache/htdocs/output/lat_pmts_region13972043727888.png) total time: 0.138s [Fri Apr 11 11:19:33 2014].24000 mapserv request processing time (loadmap not incl.): 0.141s [Fri Apr 11 11:19:33 2014].24000 msFreeMap(): freeing map at 0246EFD8.   ms4w\Apache\htdocs\template.html:  &lt;html&gt; &lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;Mapserver Template HTML Document&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt; &lt;body bgcolor=#AAAAAA&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Template&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;img src="[img]" border=1&gt; &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;   It looks like this:   C:\MS4W\ms4w\Apache\htdocs\mapfile.map:  MAP     CONFIG "MS_ERRORFILE" "C:/MS4W/ms4w/tmp/ms_error.txt"     DEBUG 5     NAME lat_pmts_region     STATUS ON     SIZE 800 600      EXTENT 286878.53 142087.25 799084.10 481123.75     #   lat_pmts_region      UNITS METERS     SHAPEPATH "shapefiles"     IMAGECOLOR 155 155 155      WEB     TEMPLATE "template.html"     IMAGEPATH "C:/MS4W/ms4w/Apache/htdocs/output/"     IMAGEURL "/output/"     END      LAYER     NAME "lat_pmts_region"     DATA lat_pmts_region     STATUS DEFAULT     TYPE POLYGON     END END   I will gladly provide more information if it's asked. How can I check dependency list for a deb package Randomly populating procedural shape (or Image Texture) in Cycles TL;DR  How to take a shape or Image Texture and multiply it with random Location, Rotation and Scale along object:    Background  I have created my first procedural shape on my own from this function: $(x^2 + y^2 - 1)^3 - x^2y^3 = 0$   (big yay for math idiot)   Here is the result:    And I want to do something useful with it.  Research  I've tried to find something similar over the web (this is trending right now) and I'm surprised that this question wasn't asked before or I'm looking with wrong terms. I've tried random pattern, duplicating texture, populating image, random tiles, custom tiles and such. There is a lot about tiling textures but each and every Q&amp;A I've stumbled upon are about non overlapping ones. For example:            Tryout:  The only way I can think of this is to duplicate shape as a group and manually change values in Mapping Nodes:    As you can see this is... Well. Bad.  I've tried messing with Modulo, mixing Noise between vectors, using custom node groups for LocRotScale (thanks Gandalf) but results was none, thus nothing even to show.  Question  I want to populate this shape (or any other) along the object with random Location, Rotation and Scale - with control over its number/density and maybe variation strength.  Edit: I'm not looking for alternative methods of creating this setup such as Particles, Image Textures generated in 3rd party software, OSL shaders (CPU only) and such. My intention is to use this in procedural texture generation in Cycles with GPU support.  Blend file  Nothing really needed for this question but here - have this heart from me :) Suppose 27 cubes are stacked together, suspended in the air, to form a larger cube.  The cube is then painted on all the exposed surfaces and dried.  The smaller cubes are then randomly permuted in both spatial position and spatial orientation to form another large cube.  What is the probability that new larger cube is identical to the original?  This is not homework, it was passed on by a friend who found it somewhere on the internet, and they do not remember where. Hexadecapole potential using point particles? We can get monopole $1/r$, dipole $1/r^2$, quadrupole $1/r^3$ and octupole $1/r^4$ potential falloff by placing opposite point charges at the corners of a point, line, square and cube, respectively. My book cryptically says "and so on", how does one get a $1/r^5$ and higher potential falloff with a finite number of point-charges in 3 dimensions? So i've been working on a Page Object Model framework for a large web application for our current company. It's the first time i've made my own framework and implemented the page object model. Im using Ruby w/Capybara and Selenium-Webdriver for my language/driver of choice.  Currently i've divided each page (or obvious "section of the site") into a class file. This class file has methods for just about everything (or an API of sorts). The problem i've ran into is that I am literally writing a method for every single thing....and i've came across 2 ways people seem to do this:  Lets pretend for a section/page of the site is a widget creation form, the widget has a name/description and some sort of "type" dropdown. Also a save button to save the widget.  Option A (Which is what i've done so far): Make a method for each element (the save button, called save_widget, all the different inputs, etc...)  Option B: Have getter and setter methods for each element, then a larger method which uses these private getter and setter methods.   With Option A my test scripts end up being longer, and honestly not much different than using selenium calls themselves.   Option B would probably call one method (Such as create_widget which would pass in multiple items which that method would call all the smaller getter/setter methods). This would make the test script MUCH shorter and more abstracted. However the getter/setter methods would probably take more actual writing for the page objects themselves (but possibly easier to maintain).  Is there a certain style that favors one over the other? The more I think about it the more Option B seems better...but I wonder if in this case abstraction is a good thing. If A and B play a game with a fair coin such that A wins by getting consecutive TT for the first time, while B wins by getting a consecutive TH.  Who has higher probability of winning the game?   I tried the following method but not sure:  For A to win,     TT, HTT, HHTT ... that is, 2-k for each game length k   For B to win,     TH, HTH, HHTH ... that is, 2-k for each game length k   So ultimately I am getting same probability of each to win. What to do with cross-site duplicates? What's the right course of action for cross-site duplicates?  There are two flavors:   A question is posted which belongs on another site and ends up already having been asked there. I can't find an example right now, but it's bound to happen soon if it hasn't already. The same question is posted in two places at the same time. Take  for example, which is a duplicate of , posted within a half hour of each other by the same user.   Possible actions:   Move it to the proper site and close it once it gets there as a duplicate. Provide a way to close it right away as a cross-site duplicate, without moving it first. Flag it and let a moderator merge them. Close it as "no longer relevant" or something else.   Additionally, flavor 2 is a bit of a special case; perhaps the question really spans both sites in terms of content and intended audience. Should multiple-postings in this case be allowed? If so, should they somehow be linked to each other? If not, how do we avoid a migration war? Reference style links validating as improperly formatted code Check synchronously if file/directory exists in Node.js Difference between "theoretical computer science" and (beta) "computer science" Possible Duplicate:          Title says it all. From what I can see, "theoretical computer science" questions seem to be slightly more isolated to discussing algorithms, whereas "computer science" seems to have questions that are slightly broader and higher-level. Is there any place on the Stack Exchange sites where they give a longer description?  I'm just curious as to what niche the beta "computer science" site is meant to fill, as I see many topics in both forums that overlap. Lost space after removing bootcamp So I removed bootcamp and now there is a partition called "free space" that I can't remove.  Here is my output from diskutil list:    Here is the screenshot from disk utility showing the partitions:    And here is the error I get when I try to remove "free space":    Heres the output when I run   sudo diskutil apfs resizeContainer disk0s2 0