I have a problem that I really want to solve which concerns almost every society -  preventing wrongful convictions. Since I'm a developer, I want to see if there's anything I can develop that might help mitigate this problem.    Would I post this question in a software-related Stack Exchange site or law-related Stack Exhange site, and which one?
I'm on SO pretty much every day researching something to do with programming, and over the last month or two, I find I'm growing frustrated and a little disgusted at how many interesting questions have been closed as "not a good fit" or "too subjective".  I think there is a confusion between "subjective" and "calls for judgement". To me one of the most valuable things about SO is the tremendous breadth and depth of experience of the members, and experience translates into smart decisions and advice, and that advice cannot always be asked for, or expressed in terms of, bald facts and data.  It's going to be 'subjective'.  I don't think SO should be Wikipedia. I think that if I could ask a question to a group of skilled programmers sitting around a table at lunch, and get interesting, valuable answers, then I don't care whether the question or the answers are 'subjective', I think that question should equally well be fair game for Stack Overflow.  I would like to see a mechanism whereby people who vote to close a question lose reputation when somebody expresses interest in that question or its responses.  How can I, or can I, influence this aspect of SO?
Number of solutions of $x_1+2x_2+\cdots+kx_k=n$? We have to evaluate the following integral:  $$\int \frac{\sqrt{\sin x}}{\sqrt{\sin x} + \sqrt{\cos x}} dx$$  I tried this:  I multiplied both the numerator and denominator by $\sec x$ And substituted $\tan x = t$.  But after that I got stuck.  The book where this is taken from gives the following as the answer: $$\ln(1+t)-\frac14\ln(1+t^4)+\frac1{2\sqrt2}\ln\frac{t^2-\sqrt2t+1}{t^2+\sqrt2t+1}-\frac12\tan^{-1}t^2+c$$ where $t=\sqrt{\cot x}$ java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ng.filter.StrutsPrepareAndExecuteFilter when starting Simple Struts2 Application what question should be asked to make a persona Prove if $a\mid b$ and $b\mid a$, then $|a|=|b|$ , $a, b$ are integers. Form the assumption, we can say $b=ak$ ,$k$ integer, $a=bm$, $m$ integer.  Intuitively, this conjecture makes sense. But I can't make further step. Lightning New Case action override I have action override on New Case button which runs our custom component.  As you know, we can create a new Case from different places in org, e.g. from related lists. When creating a Case from related list on Account using standard action in Lightning we have prepopulated AccountId to the lookup field. Is it possible to do the same with custom component? I can't catch the AccountId using force:hasRecordId, because action override redirects me to the new page with custom component where I don't have a context of Account. URL also doesn't contain its Id. What can I do to grab Id of context object and populate it to my component? $I_m - AB$ is invertible if and only if $I_n - BA$ is invertible. The problem is from  Algebra by Artin, Chapter 1, Miscellaneous Problems, Exercise 8. I have been trying for a long time now to solve it but I am unsuccessful.      Let $A,B$ be $m \times n$ and $n \times m$ matrices. Prove that $I_m - AB$ is invertible if and only if $I_n - BA$ is invertible.    Please provide with only a hint. Sum of the alternating harmonic series $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{k} = \frac{1}{1} - \frac{1}{2} + \cdots $ CPU Emulation and locking to a specific clock speed If you had read my other , you'll know I've spent this weekend putting together a 6502 CPU emulator as a programming exercise.  The CPU emulator is mostly complete, and seems to be fairly accurate from my limited testing, however it is running incredibly fast, and I want to throttle it down to the actual clock speed of the machine.  My current test loop is this:      // Just loop infinitely.     while (1 == 1)     {                         CPU.ClockCyclesBeforeNext--;          if (CPU.ClockCyclesBeforeNext &lt;= 0)         {             // Find out how many clock cycles this instruction will take             CPU.ClockCyclesBeforeNext = CPU.OpcodeMapper.Map[CPU.Memory[CPU.PC]].CpuCycles;              // Run the instruction             CPU.ExecuteInstruction(CPU.Memory[CPU.PC]);              // Debugging Info             CPU.DumpDebug();             Console.WriteLine(CPU.OpcodeMapper.Map[CPU.Memory[CPU.PC]].ArgumentLength);              // Move to next instruction             CPU.PC += 1 + CPU.OpcodeMapper.Map[CPU.Memory[CPU.PC]].ArgumentLength;                                                 }     }   As you can tell, each opcode takes a specific amount of time to complete, so I do not run the next instruction until I count down the CPU Cycle clock. This provides proper timing between opcodes, its just that the entire thing runs way to fast.  The targeted CPU speed is 1.79mhz, however I'd like whatever solution to the clock issue to keep the speed at 1.79mhz even as I add complexity, so I don't have to adjust it up.  Any ideas? Converting a drupal/drupal site to Work With Composer Power set equivalency of Axiom of Choice Trouble understanding the Bohr model of the atom How do people understand astromech droids? How to move boot and root partitions to another drive Is it correct to hyphenate with compound premodifiers? If so, where is the hyphen placed? For example, "file system" and "related". Is it "file system-related"? It will appear as if it is a compound of "file" and "system-related", won't it? Get TEXT value of a CLOB OID in Postgresql Suppose you have a group isomorphism given by the first isomorphism theorem: $$G/\ker(\phi) \simeq \operatorname{im}(\phi)$$ What can we say about the group $\ker(\phi)\times \operatorname{im}(\phi)$? In particular, when does the following hold: $$G\simeq \ker(\phi)\times \operatorname{im}(\phi)?$$ I ask this question because i want to prove that $GL_n^+(\mathbb{R}) \simeq SL_n(\mathbb{R}) \times \mathbb{R}^*_{&gt;0}$, with $GL_n^+(\mathbb{R})$ the group of matrices with positive determinant. I proved that $SL_n(\mathbb{R})$ is a normal subgroup and that $GL_n^+(\mathbb{R})/  SL_n(\mathbb{R}) \simeq \mathbb{R}^*_{&gt;0}$, using the surjective homomorphism $\det(M)$. I tried something with semidirect products but I got stuck. Quite simply (and similarly to my other questions about previous versions of this feat  and ) I want to know if this feat is balanced and if not then what should be done to improve it? Since the last iteration I have changed the wording as per David Coffron's answer, increased the time and monetary cost as well as added in the action requirement to activate the rune as per Ruse's answer and increased the costs as per linksassin's answer     Rune Caster      Prerequisites: ability to cast at least one spell of 1st level or higher      When you take this feat you can imbue your spells of 1st level or higher into a rune by casting the spell as a rune, this means that you must have the object you want to put the rune on within reach for the entire duration of the casting as well as any tools required to make the rune.      When casting a rune you add the time listed in the cost time table to the casting time and the cost listed in the cost time table to the components of the spell in accordance with the stored spell.      \begin{array}{|l|l|l|} \hline \text{Spell level} &amp; \text{Time (hrs)} &amp; \text{Cost (GP)}\\ \hline 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 50 \\ \hline 2 &amp; 2 &amp; 100\\ \hline 3 &amp; 4 &amp; 500\\ \hline 4 &amp; 6 &amp; 1,000\\ \hline 5 &amp; 8 &amp; 5,000\\ \hline 6 &amp; 12 &amp; 10,000\\ \hline 7 &amp; 16 &amp; 50,000\\ \hline 8 &amp; 18 &amp; 100,000\\ \hline 9 &amp; 24 &amp; 500,000\\ \hline \end{array}      When making a rune you choose a trigger which is touch and/or command word and can be specified to only a group of people/creatures or a body part. When defining creatures that can activate the rune you may be as specific or general as you want. The DM interprets the designated creatures as your character would have interpreted them when you made the rune.      When you store a spell in a rune some of the ranges are altered, a range of touch becomes a range of self, a range and target keeps the same range and the person who activates the rune designates the target and range with an aoe sets the origin to the center of the rune, lastly a range of self stays the same.      When a rune is activated the spell is released acting as if it had just been cast without requiring any components or concentration. The rune then disappears leaving no trace of its presence. To activate a rune you must complete the trigger, this means speaking any command words and physically touching the rune each if applicable, this requires the activator to use the object interaction action while within reach for touch runes and while within 60 ft for command words. If both triggers are used then they must both be fulfilled within the same turn. How to enable hibernation? In Ubuntu 12.04 and newer, . How can I enable this back? I asked this question  but I haven't gotten a useful answer. Could you tell me the difference in meaning between these sentences?        Do you think you will visit them next week?     Will you visit them next week?     Are you going to visit them next week?     Are you visiting them next week?     Are you going to be visiting them next week?     Are you planning to be visiting them next week?     Do you plan to visit them next week?      Will there be any difference in the answers?        I think I will visit them next week.     I will visit them next week.     I am going to visit them next week.     I am visiting them next week.     I am going to be visiting them next week.     I am planning to be visiting them next week.     I plan to visit them next week.      Can I use "planning to" instead of "going to"?  (E.g. "Are you planning to visit them next week? — Yes, I am planning to visit them next week.") Which of these sentences show that the subject of conversation has already been discussed? For example, I talked with a friend of mine about my plans to visit somebody. So my friend is aware of my plans.  And my last question. Which of these seven sentences express that the action will certainly take place?