I created a  Sitemap Index (/sitemap-dec2019/sitemap_index.xml) for a site as follows:  &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;     &lt;sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"&gt; &lt;sitemap&gt; &lt;loc&gt;https://www.example.com/sitemap-dec2019/sitemap1.txt&lt;/loc&gt; &lt;lastmod&gt;2019-12-10T18:24:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt; &lt;/sitemap&gt; &lt;sitemap&gt; &lt;loc&gt;https://www.example.com/sitemap-dec2019/sitemap2.txt&lt;/loc&gt; &lt;lastmod&gt;2019-12-10T18:24:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt; &lt;/sitemap&gt; &lt;sitemap&gt; &lt;loc&gt;https://www.example.com/sitemap-dec2019/sitemap3.txt&lt;/loc&gt; &lt;lastmod&gt;2019-12-10T18:24:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt; &lt;/sitemap&gt; . . . &lt;sitemap&gt; &lt;loc&gt;https://www.example.com/sitemap-dec2019/sitemap536.txt&lt;/loc&gt; &lt;lastmod&gt;2019-12-10T18:24:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt; &lt;/sitemap&gt; &lt;/sitemapindex&gt;   Each Sitemap Child is a simple list of 49,999 URLs and they are all under 10MB in size.  I uploaded the Sitemap Index and all of the Sitemap Children to the server.  I double-checked to make sure the Sitemap Index and all the Sitemap Children are all accessible on the server, and they are.  However, when I submit the Sitemap Index to Google via the Google Search Console, I get a success message saying "Sitemap index processed successfully", no errors are reported anywhere, and yet it only lists 9 of the 106 Sitemap Children (and they all happen to start with 'sitemap1'):  Sitemap                         Status  Discovered URLs /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap1.txt   Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap10.txt  Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap100.txt Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap101.txt Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap102.txt Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap103.txt Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap104.txt Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap105.txt Success 49,999 /sitemap-dec2019/sitemap106.txt Success 49,999 1-9 of 9   There is nothing different in the Sitemap Index that would make Google select only those 9 specific Sitemap Children.  Under total discovered URLs, it says 449,991 which happens to be 49,999 x 9.  When I remove the Sitemap and re-add the Sitemap Index, the same 9 Sitemap Children get listed, and none of the others appear anywhere.  Considering there are over 100 Sitemap Children, this means more than 90% are being completely ignored.  How can I fix this so that all 100% of the Sitemap Children (and their respective URLs) get discovered?
I submitted a new version of the sitemap index for my site in Google Search Console two days ago. Soon after submission, GSC started saying that the index was "processed successfully", and yet has continued to display zero as the number of discovered URLs.  Note that my sitemap index points to about 11000 sitemaps, which provide actual links to pages.  I'm pretty sure the format of both the sitemap index and the individual sitemaps is correct.  Screenshot:    Should I worry about this? What does it mean?  Edit on 2020-02-03:  Google finally started displaying the right number in Total discovered URLs. It must have happened sometime in January. Why so late - I have no idea...
How can I go back to the original interface layout? I don't know what the hell I did I just want to get back to modelling \sqrt[x]{y} Breaks With unicode-math What happens if you plug more than one charger in the new MacBook Pro (2016)? Apple's  decision to convert all the ports on their 2016 MacBook Pro lineup to USB-C ports contributes to blur the difference between ports that supply power (such as a power adapters) and ports that can power external devices (such as USB keys, mice or other gadgets).    This made me think about the following scenario: you sit at a table where your laptop is plugged in on the right, and don't notice that it is plugged in, so you decide to charge it with a second nearby charger that is laying around (i.e. belonging to someone who lives with you and who recently sat at the same spot).  What would happen then?   Would the computer charge twice as fast, would one of the chargers be dismissed by the system (which one?), or would it generate a surcharge that would destroy the computer?  I couldn't find anything about this online, but since I am always trying to force a USB in the MagSafe charger of my MacBook Air, I think that I could easily end up making this kind of mistake.  Note: My question asks what happens when two chargers are inserted into a MacBook Pro, but I am also wondering what would happend if 3, or 4 chargers were inserted. Although this scenario is unlikely to happen by mistake, it would constitute an obvious vulnerability to an exposed device, i.e. in a public space. Is there any point in taking the alternate exits in Bit Trip Runner 2?  I can't see any benefit to doing so in terms of unlocking a different path in the overworld, so is it just for your own benefit? I use tikz (and tikzpicture) a fair bit, but files that used to compile fine before the latest slew of updates to pgf, and pstricks, no longer seem to do so (at least, on my MikTeX installation). The MWE (below) seems to compile correctly, but the DVI can't be rendered using yap, and dvi -> ps -> pdf fails (the dvi -> ps seems to be ok -- to the extent it isn't throwing errors), but ps2pdf fails miserably, with the following errors:   Error: /undefined in XC@.  Operand stack:    --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   -  -nostringval--   --nostringval-- Execution stack: %interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --  nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --  nostringval--   false   1   %stopped_push   2045   1   3   %oparray_pop    2044   1   3   %oparray_pop   2025   1   3   %oparray_pop   1884   1   3    %oparray_pop   --nostringval--   %errorexec_pop   .runexec2   --nostringval-  -   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval-- Dictionary stack:   --dict:979/1684(ro)(G)--   --dict:1/20(G)--   --dict:87/200(L)--   --    dict:182/300(L)--   --dict:58/200(L)--   Current allocation mode is local   Current file position is 99615   GPL Ghostscript 9.26: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1   Here is the MWE:  \documentclass[12pt,letterpaper,oneside]{article}  \usepackage{tikz}  \usetikzlibrary{decorations,shapes,arrows,matrix,positioning}  \begin{document}  \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[x=0.175cm,y=0.175cm,scale=1]  % set up maximum and minimum x- and y-coordinates \def\xmin{0} \def\xmax{23.5} \def\ymin{0} \def\ymax{23.5}  % draw and label axes    \draw[-&gt;,thick] (\xmin,0) -- (\xmax,0) node[below=8pt,near end]  {\small{abundance ($N$)}};   \draw[-&gt;,thick] (0,\ymin) -- (0,\ymax) node[above=12pt,near   start,rotate=90] { \small{birth rate ($b$)}};  % draw vertical reference line at K/2=50   \draw[color=black, thick,  smooth] (0,20) -- (20,0)  node[below=6pt,midway,rotate=-45] {\small{slope~$=a$}};  % draw circle around point where function intersects x-axis \draw [red] (0,20)  ellipse (0.2cm and 0.2cm) node[right=3pt,black] {$b_0$};   \end{tikzpicture}  \end{center}   \end{document} Is my phone liable to explode if I charge it with a charger that came with a different phone? My friend and I both have droids and we often user each other's wall chargers out of convenience. I was told that it's possible that my phone might explode if it's charged with a charger that wasn't built specifically for my phone. How true is this across droids? Restore main APFS container to full disk To seek the maximum value of $S=x_1x_2+x_2x_3+\cdots+x_nx_1$ on this domain:  $x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n=0$ and  $x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2=1$.  I have made some trivial observations:  1) $S\in[-1,1)$ by the rearrangement inequality.  2) We can make $S$ arbitrarily close to $1$ by increasing $n$.  3) An equivalent problem is to minimise $(x_1-x_2)^2+\cdots+(x_n-x_1)^2$.  But does the maximum have a meaningful closed form  for each $n$? I have played and tried to GM games since I was in elementary school, beginning with games like Shadowrun, Earthdawn, and Champions. Recently, I've gotten dack into gaming with a variety of other games (newer Shadowrun and Earthdawn, plus TOON! and Outbreak:Undead).  I've found examples of actual play and advice on how to actually GM a game in games to be lacking. I can only help but feel I am not alone as someone who isn't already a LITERAL dungeon MASTER.  I fully realize that there are an unlimited number of GM styles, personalities, etc. I do not think I am a very good GM though. No one else wants to be the GM, and few care enough to learn the complex rules that I often have to assist with and explain AS WE PLAY. Being left with the responsibility is quite overwhelming unless I create dynamic encounters or make it all up on the spot. I'm often left having no idea what to do.  Examples of Why I Think I Need Help  This question isn't about these examples so please don't dig into them in the answers - they're here to explain the basic things that leave me feeling like I don't know how to proceed as a GM.  I've read preparation is important, but last time I tried to make a story, the players immediately killed the primary character (a friendly person.) within about 2 minutes of starting the game. While I realize now that I let the dice take control over the story, it was rather difficult to continue a story that relied on this friendly character, with the players making enemies with the character's faction. It is still discouraging when my only other attempt at a prepared story ended with the players wanting to go in a complete opposite direction of where I planned. Both times, the hours of work I put into it were completely wasted, leaving me as ignorant as I always was before.  My group often wants to play Shadowrun, Earthdawn, or L5R- but I feel as though I am a horrible GM. The last time we played Shadowrun, I was bored out of my mind as we rolled hundreds of dice to do an obvious straight-forward "kick down the door" mission.   If I make security as I believe it should or as the forum threads describe their security or a few example missions I can scrounge up (examples of stories, not actual gameplay), my players literally feel completely hopeless as to how to achieve their mission without total failure.   One time when I was a teenager, I had players blow up at me saying "We have no idea what would work. You're telling us that our character's experience or the ally operative says that would get us killed, but what else can we do?" Since there are no examples of what players can do - I am left with the same feeling as the players. As an adult, I've had a similar occurrence where a player said to me, "I don't know what to do. I don't think we can even begin this mission." I had to make something up and just go with it, creating an NPC group (that fit in with the story) that goes in before the players to do something stupid so they don't have to. Mainly because I ALSO didn't know how to accomplish the mission, so I acted as the players would using my NPC group. Extremely boring and IMO a failed dungeon run.  I've had successful stories, but I've had more boring encounters than successful ones. Seeing as how roleplaying takes endless hours to complete a story, I do not see benefit in an activity that wastes more time than is enjoyable.  How Do You Learn To GM?  Where are the resources? Books, blogs, gameplay examples? Am I missing them? How did YOU learn to be a good GM? Or do you feel as bad at this as I do, even when it's a successful, fun encounter? Is the converse of Cayley-Hamilton Theorem true? The question is motivated from the following problem:     Let $I\neq A\neq -I$, where $I$ is the identity matrix and $A$ is a real $2\times 2$ matrix. If $A=A^{-1}$, then the trace of $A$ is   $$ (A) 2 \quad(B)1 \quad(C)0 \quad (D)-1 \quad (E)-2$$   Since $A=A^{-1}$, $A^2=I$. If the converse of  is true, then $\lambda^2=1$ and thus $\lambda=\pm1$. And then $\rm{trace}(A)=1+(-1)=0$.   Here are my questions:   Is  $C$ the answer to the quoted problem?  Is the converse of Cayley-Hamilton Theorem, i.e.,"for the square real matrix $A$, if $p(A)=0$, then $p(\lambda)$ is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix $A$" true? If it is not, then what's the right method to solve the problem above? Are there difference between those sentences?        Alex is getting married next month.     Alex will get married next month.      Seems that the first one is expressed in present continues, and the second on in future tense. Am I correct? Since I upgraded to the latest version of Ubuntu, I cannot install the Java OpenJDK package needed to compile Android custom ROMs. When I run sudo apt-get install openjdk-7-jdk, the following error appears:  Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation:  The following packages have unmet dependencies:  openjdk-7-jdk :  Depends: openjdk-7-jre (= 7u51-2.4.6-1ubuntu4) E: Unable to correct  problems, you have held broken packages.   How do I fix this problem? Inbox chops messages in the middle of an HTML character reference The messages in the inbox get chopped if they too long, and the chop can occur in the middle of an HTML character reference as can be seen in this screenshot:    The character being chopped is [ and it appears inside a code snippet, in case it makes a difference. Frequency count of two column in R PDF of a sum of exponential random variables Let $X_i$ for $i=1,2,...$ be a sequence of i.i.d exponential random variables with common parameter $\lambda$. Let $N$ be a geometric random variable with parameter $p$ that is independent of the sequence $X_i$. What is the pdf of the random variable $Y=\Sigma_{i=1}^N X_i$. $SU(2)$ is the covering group of $SO(3)$. What does it mean and does it have a physical consequence?  I heard that this fact is related to the description of bosons and fermions. But how does it follow from the fact that $SU(2)$ is the double cover of $SO(3)$? Difference between "little" and "small" Is there a difference between them? If so, how and when are they used?  For example:     I fixed a little/small typo. I want to put the section title in the left margin using titlesec. However, it results to a superfluous empty line when using list environment. How should I remove it without using vspace?  Minimal example:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{   a4paper,   top=2cm,   bottom=2cm,   left=4.5cm,   right=1.5cm, }  \usepackage{titlesec} \titleformat{\section}[leftmargin]{\large\scshape\sffamily}{}{0cm}{} \titlespacing{\section}{2.5cm}{2ex}{0.5cm}  \usepackage{enumitem}  \usepackage{mwe}  \begin{document}  \section{Section A}  This line is aligned with the section title.  \blindtext  \section{Section B}  \begin{itemize}[nosep]   \item This line is not aligned with the section title. \end{itemize}  \end{document} Loading OpenStreetMap data in QGIS? i m using ubuntu 10.10. please tell me how to type in hindi fonts in open office word. please help