I am trying to install older version of Google Chrome. I am able to install older versions on my machine, but as soon as installation processes are getting completed, it will start updating the latest version automatically. This stops me to do my work.  Can anyone suggest me how to stop this auto updating process in chrome.  Thanks, Sourabh
I have downloaded the offline (consumer, i.e. not msi package) installer for Google Chrome. But when I run it, it tries to contact a Google server to check for a newer version. If it finds it, it will download that first, and then install that version. It doesn't use the version that is already there, as part of the EXE file. For me, that defeats the point of having an offline installer. I keep a repository of all the free and purchased software locally, so that I can install them quickly whenever I need to. But as more and more people get access to broadband Internet connections, many developers and companies are pushing for offline installers with new releases. Many software titles, like Google Chrome, are almost exclusively distributed with online installers.  File name: ChromeStandaloneSetup.exe File version: 1.3.21.115 Size: 36.6 MB (38 416 368 bytes) SHA-1: 2393BAB7F408DC8D30F039FCA5D6B45600A0C4E7   How do I install Chrome as is, without automatically checking for and getting a newer version?  Will  work with Chrome installer? Is there a switch to disable version check when running the installer?  Update:  The "duplicate" question linked to below points out File Hippo as a possible repository where you one can get previous versions of Chrome. They do have a healthy listing of pretty much every single Chrome version ever released on Windows, both beta, dev and stable versions. Unfortunately they don't host the installer files, they only redirect to Google servers for downloads, which only spits out the installers for the latest versions of Chrome. It's not just File Hippo, I also tried downloading an older version of Chrome from CNET Downloads, and they too just redirect you to Google servers for download.  For whatever the reason (security related probably), Google doesn't like anyone to install an older version of Chrome on any system. Apparently not even your common source for downloading an older version of a software, like the CNET Downloads, not even they are allowed to host the Chrome installer files on their own servers. The redirects to Google is probably dictated by Google.     Google is a dictator!   They don't even allow full standalone offline installers to be installed as is, without checking for newer version. I tried running the installer from cmd with some of the command line switches used for Chromium. I only ended up with errors.    The business oriented msi installer (GoogleChromeStandaloneEnterprise.msi) might have some additional command line options you can use, but I wouldn't know if there is one that disables the check for a newer version. I have yet to find a complete list of switches you can use. The only one I've found so far is /update but that only does the opposite thing. So I'll give up here and go back to the trusty Firefox.
Is there a single word which means "a person, and all of his ancestors", or "a person, and all of his descendants"? There are a lot of words describing ancestral relationships between people, such as:  parent grandparent great-grandparent any of the above can be described as an "ancestor".  child grandchild great-grandchild any of the above can be described as a "descendant".   I am wondering if there are single words (nouns) which describe any of the following concepts:  A person and all of his/her ancestors A person or any of his/her ancestors A person and all of his/her descendants A person or any of his/her descendants   Any ideas? I am trying to draw a cantor set in LaTeX and I am having issues doing this. I am trying multiple \put commands, but they just go to the right of one another. Does anyone know how to do this?  Any help would be much appreciated. Recently upgraded to Ubuntu 18.10, having two problems.  Easiest to explain: when I open "settings", go to "privacy", select "screen lock", I get the popup window with the screen lock settings, but everything is grayed out:   Second issue: If I step away from the machine for long enough (seems to be 5 minutes), the screen blanks. Hitting a key or moving the mouse wakes it up. But when it wakes up, the only things on the screen are the icon bar at the left and the top bar with status icons on the right end. The rest of the screen is blue, not my normal lock screen image. The screen isn't locked, it doesn't prompt for a password, it's just...blue.  I can move the mouse pointer around the screen, the icons react if I click on one, I can bring up the popup with volume/brightness controls on the top bar. But if the pointer is on the blue background, neither left nor right button clicks do anything.  Now, if I press ctrl-alt-F1 from there, I get a lock screen where I can enter my password. Then I get the blue screen back, but if I press ctrl-alt-F2 I get my normal screen (with running applications) back.  ctrl-alt-F2 without going through the lock screen first does nothing.  I'm not finding anything while searching that matches either of these sets of symptoms. Suggestions? Product of manifolds & orientability I'm studying orientability of manifolds currently and I'm having trouble to prove the following: $M\times N$ is orientable iff $M$ and $N$ are orientable.   I am able to prove that the product is orientable if components are orientable (chart is $\{(U_\alpha\times V_{\beta},\phi_\alpha\times \psi_\beta):(\alpha,\beta)\in A\times B \}$, and $\det J=\det J_1 \det J_2&gt;0$ by Cauchy-Binet's theorem), but I don't know how to prove the other direction.   So why this holds: if $M\times N$ is orientable, then $M$ and $N$ are orientable?  Thanks in advance. Can we please move the  "Start a bounty" link to be in the same location as all of the other action buttons? It makes no sense to me for this to be buried after the comments - It's an action on the Question. It can be very difficult to locate, especially when your question gets .  I don't think this should be that difficult to implement - it's just moving the location of a design element. Can we please get this button moved? How do I play Minecraft with people online, besides using a server? Why is the node editor showing different kinds of nodes? I have been following  tutorial until I started adding nodes. The problem is that he has completely different nodes than I have. Even nodes that are created at start are different (I have Material and Output and he has Render Layers and Composite). Have I missed something or should I use different nodes than he? Fighting Spam - What can I do as an: Email Administrator, Domain Owner, or User? This is a  about Fighting Spam.   Also related:                    There are so many techniques and so much to know about fighting SPAM. What widely used techniques and technologies are available to Administrator, Domain Owners, and End Users to help keep the junk out of our inboxes?  We're looking for an answer that covers different tech from various angles. The accepted answer should include a variety of technologies (eg SPF/SenderID, DomainKeys/DKIM, Graylisting, DNS RBLs, Reputation Services, Filtering Software [SpamAssassin, etc]); best practices (eg mail on Port 25 should never be allowed to relay, Port 587 should be used; etc), terminology (eg, Open Relay, Backscatter, MSA/MTA/MUA, Spam/Ham), and possibly other techniques. Second mean value theorem proof I am asked to prove the second mean value theorem:  Let $f$ and $g$ be defined on $[a,b]$ with $g$ continuous, $f\ge 0$, and $f$ integrable. Then there is a point $x_0 \in (a,b)$ such that $$ \int_{a}^{b}f(x)g(x)dx = g(x_0) \int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx. $$  My (incomplete) proof goes as follows:  Since $ [a,b] $ is compact and $ g $ is continuous, we know there exist $ x_1, x_2 \in [a,b] $ such that $ g(x_1) \le g(x) \le g(x_2) $ for any $ x \in [a,b] $. Thus, we have the following string of inequalities $$ f(x)g(x_1) \le f(x)g(x) \le f(x)g(x_2), \, \, \forall x \in [a,b], $$ $$ \Rightarrow g(x_1)\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx \,\le \, \int_{a}^{b} f(x)g(x) dx \, \le  \, g(x_2)\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx. $$  My problem now is to show the final equality. It seems to me the intermediate value theorem is somehow involved, but I cannot see how to use it. Furthermore, how do I make use of the $f\ge 0$ condition in the hypothesis? How fast a (relatively) small black hole will consume the Earth? This question appeared quite a time ago and was inspired, of course, by all the fuss around "LHC will destroy the Earth".   Consider a small black hole, that is somehow got inside the Earth. Under "small" I mean small enough to not to destroy Earth instantaneously, but large enough to not to evaporate due to the . I need this because I want the black hole to "consume" the Earth. I think reasonable values for the mass would be $10^{15} - 10^{20}$ kilograms.   Also let us suppose that the black hole is at rest relative to the Earth.  The question is: How can one estimate the speed at which the matter would be consumed by the black hole in this circumstances? Apache: Scammers point dozens of domain names at my dedicated IP. How to prevent this? For the sake of discussion, pretend that I have an Apache webserver which serves a website at www.example.org. This domain name resolves to the public IP address at 192.168.1.100 (pretend this is a public IP).  The discussion at  demonstrates that anyone can point their domain at my IP. Apache won't prevent this by default, but an administrator can deal with these one at a time through use of a blacklist.  However, it's becoming more common for scammers to register dozens of domains (or more) for use in a scam. I'm concerned about the following possible attack:   A scammer registers hundreds of domain names, and points them at my dedicated IP address. The scammer directs search engines at their scam domains, thus using my content to increase their standing in the search engines. Later, the scammer moves their domain names to point to their own servers which host a scam/porn, or a competing business, etc. thereby reaping the benefits of their standing in the search engines. Some of these domains might be used to in  as well. Profit!!   I believe I have seen scammers using this trick in the past, involving dozens of domains. We didn't realize the scam implications at the time, and assumed these were misconfigured domains.  Is there a term for this nefarious SEO trick? SEO masquerading? DNS Diversion?  How could I prevent this using Apache? I'm considering a "whitelist" fix based on using a default VirtualHosts, ServerNames &amp; ServerAliases so that Apache only responds to requests where these white-listed ServerNames appear in the "Host: " header. Everything else would be rejected (or redirected to a particular page). However, I am unsure if this is the best approach.  For example, I've configured the domain  to point at the IP for Serverfault.com. You can see the results here:  . There are many cards that can put multiple permanents onto the battlefield simultaneously, such as , , or .  How do these interact with the following types of abilities?  As [this permanent] enters the battlefield... You may have [this permanent] enter the battlefield as... [This permanent] enters the battlefield with... When [a permanent with certain characteristics] enters the battlefield...   Justification There have been many questions already about particular instances of this situation.  This question is intended to be a canonical question and answer to all questions such as:      Note to moderators: three of these five questions have already been marked as duplicates pointing to this one.  Can we do the same for the remaining two? Why is my Wi-Fi connection speed much slower than a wired connection? When I plug my laptop via LAN cable and check speed on speedtest.net I have over 32 Mb/sec. When I unplug the cable and connect to the same router I have less than 15 Mb/sec. I tried to change channels already but this didn't help. I'm sitting just near the router.   What can it be? The router is a Dlink 400. Use a baseline including all observations in lm() Question about Conditional Expectation Let ${\rm f}:\left[a, b\right]\to\mathbb{R}$ be twice differentiable, and suppose   $$\lim_{x\to a^{+}} \frac{{\rm f}\left(x\right) - {\rm f}\left(a\right)}{x - a} = \lim_{x\to b^{-}}\frac{{\rm f}\left(x\right) - {\rm f}\left(b\right)}{x - b} =0 $$  Show that there exists $\xi \in \left(a, b\right)$ such that $\displaystyle{% \left\vert\vphantom{\Large A}\,{\rm f}''\left(\xi\right)\right\vert \geq \frac{4\left\vert\vphantom{\Large A}% \,{\rm f}\left(a\right) - {\rm f}\left(b\right)\right\vert} {\left(b - a\right)^{2}}}$.  I don't know how to start. Any hints ?. Why can't I move a window to the top left corner with wmctrl in Unity? I've been playing around with wmctrl to take more control of my windows. I've encountered a weird behaviour where Unity reserves double the space. See this screen shot:    I opened the terminal and moved the window using the top command. It should be at the top left corner (X=0 Y=0). But for some reason there is some margin between the terminal and the Unity bars.  If I understand the man pages correctly it might have something to do with the WA: 65,24.  Can anybody help me to fix this? Area51 proposals are being advertised now all over the network? Is it safe to have laptop turned on 24/7? Can XeLaTeX generate bold and italic font styles for typefaces that lack them? I use XeLaTeX in order to have easy access to fonts installed on my operating system, and Chinese in particular. Some of the Latin typefaces most pleasing to my eye do not have bold or italic font styles, and I wonder if XeLaTeX can remedy that.  I'm aware of the FakeBold and FakeSlant transformations within the fontspec package, but I'd be glad to know of a more attractive process, if there is one. (The specification, v2.1f, says, "Please don’t overuse these features; they are not a good alternative to having the real shapes.")