Is there an editable file that contains all the shortcut a user introduces to LyX (additionally to the standart shortcuts) ?  I already looked in cua.bind and my shortcuts aren't there.  This whole issue arised because I assigned some commands with some weird character-shortcut key (do to the fact that the shift key was involved in creating the shortcut-key) and now I have the problem, that I can't remove them anymore, i.e.if I do, they disappear from the list, but appear again displaying the shortcut list. Restarting LyX didn'help. I assume this is a bug!
I recently updated my version of Lyx from 1.6.7 to 2.0.6. I would like to transfer my old keyboard shortcuts to this new version, but I am having difficulty because I was inconsistent with the way that I set them up:   Some were defined in the specified .bind file,  but others were modified in the lyx preferences menu.   I found that when importing my old .bind file into this updated version of lyx, it imported the keyboard shortcuts that were in the .bind file, but not those that I had added in the preferences menu.  Does anyone know if these keyboard shortcuts that were added via the preferences menu are stored in another .bind file somewhere in the lyx directory? Has anyone else successfully transferred keyboard shortcuts that had been implimented in the preferences menu?
Is it possible to mark or modify a player with a specific item in their inventory I'm building a CTF map of sorts, using command blocks in vanilla 1.8. I've discovered two commands for detecting if an item is in a players inventory:  /clear @a[team=Red] banner 4 0  /testfor @a[team=Red] {Inventory:[{id:"minecraft:banner"}]}  Those work fine, unless you want to perform a command ON the player carrying that item. For example: I want to cause the player who picks up a banner of the opposite team, to automatically equip that banner in their head slot with a command similar to this:  /replaceitem entity @a[???????] slot.armor.head banner 1 4  Can this be done? If not, is there a way to mark a specific player carrying an item using scoreboards? I am always really hesitant to mess around with $IFS because it's clobbering a global.   But often it makes loading strings into a bash array nice and concise, and for bash scripting, conciseness is hard to come by.   So I figure it might be better than nothing if I try to "save" the starting contents of $IFS to another variable and then restore it immediately after i am done using $IFS for something.   Is this practical? Or is it essentially pointless and I should just directly set IFS back to whatever it needs to be for its subsequent uses? "He was telling me that he is going..." vs. "He told me that he is going..." I'm struggling with my lab report. I have a questionnaire which contains Likert responses (1-7) as well as questions that require only yes or no answers. I want to see if there is a correlation between higher scores on the likert scale and responses to the binary answers to the other questions.   Specifically - the likert response is about anxiety levels. The binary (yes/no) answer is about negative consequences due to alcohol use. I want to just run the one ordinal likert item with all the negative consequence responses to see if there is a relationship. Can anyone help me?     Thanks so much for the fast comments. It definitely assures me that Spearman's Rho can be used but my main problem is the fact that i am mixing binary and ordinal variables together in the one correlation matrix.  I have one ordinal variable (anxiety - 1-7 on likert scale) crossed with 13 dichotomous (0 or 1 representing yes or no) to answers ("have you ever been hospitalised due to your alcohol use?). I get statistically significant answers (&lt;.05 and &lt; .01 but the Correlation coefficients are tiny (i.e o.2) at best.   the hospitalisation is the DV an the anxiety levels the IV.   I just think i'm doing something wrong here. should i collapse the 13 binary variables in to one some how?   i can't see how SPSS will recognise the values between 1-7 when correlating with binary answers. i keep thinking it will just read that there is something in that box (ordinal) but not recognise the value (i.e 1-7) . but people keep saying that SPSS does in fact recognise this difference and account for it. How do I get rid of OneDrive completely? If you are talking on behalf of you and someone else what is the correct usage?  On behalf of my wife and me On behalf of my wife and I On behalf of me and my wife On behalf of myself and my wife On behalf of my wife and myself ...  My understanding is that after that phrase you would carry on talking in first person. When is it appropriate to use the original pronunciation of a foreign word versus the English pronunciation? When reading to an audience, or speaking in conversation, when is it appropriate to use the original pronunciation of a foreign word versus the English pronunciation (assuming you know the appropriate pronunciation for it)? Is it considered rude, or condescending? Or is it considered a mark of being knowledgeable?  One of the things to consider are place names. When referring to Paris, France, should it be pronounced with the silent 'S' as the French would say it, or with the 'S'? Should Hiroshima be pronounced as a Japanese speaker would pronounce it slightly more emphasis on RO, rather than the SHI? Should Mount Pinatubo be pronounced as a Filipino speaker would pronounce it with shorter stronger vowels, or the longer vowels? (e.g. Pi as is 'pick' rather than 'pea'.) Should Wichita be pronounces as the original "shi" rather than the modern "chi"?  Pronounce pesos or sombrero as a Spanish speaker 'eh' or the English 'ay'?  (I can't think of other common words right now that aren't words taken from other languages like hurricane, boondocks, tornado, etc. which I think have (correctly) changed to English pronunciations.) Uncertainty modeling for samples I have instances of data that are composed of 6 attributes. Each attribute takes values between 1-10. Any instance has a utility calculated by some utility function:  Example: {1,1,2,5,5,2} , utility = 0.89  In some readings for these attribute values, undefined values may appear in the instance, I mark them as question mark '?'  Example: {1,1,?,5,?,2}  These question marks represents uncertainty in the instance.  How can I model this uncertainty in a statistical or mathematical way ?   Thanks I don't know how to disconnect a face from the rest of the mesh in edit mode.  This isn't like pressing P to separate the selection into a completely different object. I just want to select a face and disconnect/rip it away from the rest of the mesh but keep it as a part of the original object.  One way to do it would be to duplicate the face with ShiftD and then delete the original face. But I suspect there is a "native" command for disconnecting selected faces and I would like to learn it. Correcting for multiple kruskal wallis tests I am running a kruskal wallis test a number of times (37) and wanted to know if I have to adjust the p-values of the kruskal tests before I look any further into the post hocs? Evaluate forecasting ability of GARCH models with RMSE and MAE I am evaluating different forecasting models and their ability to forecast index volatility during period of market turmoil, using two measurements, Root Mean Square Error and Mean Absolute Error. For the previous evaluated models, ARMA (1,1) as an example, I was able to obtain the residuals and calculate the RMSE quite easily in Stata.   When estimating the GARCH (1,1) model in Stata I am however not able to correctly obtain the residuals in the post estimation procedure, no option to directly obtain the RMSE is available. Perhaps I have misunderstood how one should evaluate the forecasting ability of GARCH models, since the models specifies the conditional variance unlike ARMA which specifies the conditional mean.   Does anyone have a suggestion on how to obtain these evaluation measurements after estimating a GARCH model? And preferably how to do it in Stata. I installed Ubuntu today and since the first start up I have a problem with the mouse cursor.  It starts randomly disappearing and flickering a lot.  I have searched for a solution on Google and here but didn't find anything. Find the general solution of $y'= a^{x + y}$ where y is the function Thanking users who answered my question Quite often a number of users will give similar answers to one of my questions. Sometimes someone will give an answer that is interesting, but does not really help with my question.  In all cases, I feel a need to thank the people who answered my question. It isn't always appropriate for me to upvote every answer, and I can only accept one answer. Giving a "thanks" comment on every answer appears to be frowned upon.  So, what's the etiquette? How can I run an external program from C and parse its output? I've got a utility that outputs a list of files required by a game.  How can I run that utility within a C program and grab its output so I can act on it within the same program? UPDATE: Good call on the lack of information.  The utility spits out a series of strings, and this is supposed to be portable across Mac/Windows/Linux.  Please note, I'm looking for a programmatic way to execute the utility and retain its output (which goes to stdout). I am currently writing a paper with several multiple regression analyses. While visualizing univariate linear regression is easy via scatter plots, I was wondering whether there is any good way to visualize multiple linear regressions?   I am currently just plotting scatter plots like dependent variable vs. 1st independent variable, then vs. 2nd independent variable, etc. I would really appreciate any suggestions. Firstly, I apologise if my thinking is completely incorrect - I am by no means a physicist (yet!), I have included layman illustrations to hopefully assist in explaining my thinking.  I am imagining the big bang to be, for lack of a better word, an explosion, thus the universe to be progressively expanding:    Therefore, to me it seems logical to suggest that there is an edge.  If this is the case, then is it reasonable to suggest that explosion + edge = 'bright edge'? Where light projects in all directions at the edge, not just outwards into the 'nothingness'.     So, this brings me to my question: why, when someone looks deeply enough 'at the edge' do they see an absence of light?   Again, apologies if I'm jumping to irrational conclusions &amp; am way off. Character of the subobject classifier in the topos of $\mathbf{M}$-sets. A coworker and I are locked in a debate over the value of SEO keywords in the URL of a page. She wants to change all the filenames of the HTML pages of a fencing company so they look like residential-home-chicago.html, contact-chicago-contractor.html, and so on. She is convinced that because Google highlights keywords in URLs in search results, that means that putting keywords here is more valuable.  My position is that these do not improve SEO, since Google doesn't seem to give keywords in the URL any more weight than keywords in the body of the page, and . In the meantime, they make it harder for me to find the pages I want when its time to edit them, and the site as a whole looks cheap and spammy.   suggests to me that yes, keywords in URLs are useful, but not superior, and that they are more useful for human readability than search engine rankings.  I'm looking for authoritative sources that support either position, not blog articles from SEO optimization companies trying to promote themselves. Is $0 \, \mathrm m = 0 \, \mathrm s = 0 \,\mathrm {kg} = 0$? How do we define $[0 \, \mathrm m]$?  I once was given an assignment where I was asked to deduce and write down some physical quantity. It turned out that this quantity was $0$ in one unit or another, so I decided to drop the physical units because I figured that it didn't matter anyhow.  But I got to thinking:  If $0 \, \mathrm m = 0$, then we could add units of different dimensions (an operation not normally defined) like so: $5 + 0 \,\mathrm m = 5$.   Does $[ \cdot ]$ map $0 \, \mathrm m$ to both $0$ and $L$? Is there an established regime of thinking about physical quantities as an abstract algebra? Perhaps as a vector space where formal sums such as $5 \, \mathrm m + 10 \, \mathrm s$ are allowed? Would it be improper to drop the units of measurement of $0 \,\mathrm m$ like this in an academic paper?