var json1 = {   &quot;type&quot;: &quot;FeatureCollection&quot;,   &quot;features&quot;: [     {       &quot;type&quot;: &quot;Feature&quot;,       &quot;properties&quot;: {},       &quot;geometry&quot;: {         &quot;type&quot;: &quot;Point&quot;,         &quot;coordinates&quot;: [           83.94299268722534,           28.218707821027166         ]       }     }   ] } var geolayer = L.geoJSON(json1).addTo(map);  geolayer.bindPopup(features.properties.name).openPopup()
Is it possible in Leaflet that popup opens on mouse-over, not on click?  This is working for just one marker at a time, but I need it for a bigger number of markers:  marker.on('mouseover', function(e){     marker.openPopup(); });
Evaluation Symbol: Consistent Implementation Is this a grammatically correct line in a poem: “Will he roll the dice, and follow it to Vegas?”? I want to use the following line in a poem: "Will he roll the dice, and follow it to Vegas?"   A couple of things to note; firstly, obviously I'm using "roll the dice" in both a figurative/idiomatic sense (as in taking a risk), and in a somewhat more literal sense (painting the image of the person actually following the dice that have been rolled to Las Vegas). That being said, my confusion here is if I can get away with using "follow it" or if I need to say "follow them" .... As I've read online "dice" traditionally refers to more than one die (i.e., the plural of die), but in the modern usage, "dice" can also be used to refer to the singular (i.e., just one die).   So, it seems like if I was referring to the image of just one die, then the way I phrased it could be correct. However, the image I'm trying to paint is the one usually associated with the phrase "roll the dice" (i.e., rolling two dice)...   So could "follow it" still be considered acceptable in this sense... or would I need to use "follow them"?... And if not referring to the dice themselves, could using, could the "it" be taken to refer to the act of rolling the dice, or would that not work either? Thanks so much in advance!! Why doesn't the T-800 run? I just re-watched the first two films in the Terminator series. The T1000 (Robert Patrick) does a lot of running, and is quite fast.  I didn't see many scenes where the T800 (Arnie) ran. Is it because he's really heavy? Is he mainly designed as a heavy "stand your ground" machine?  The only scene I could see him running is in T2 in the mental hostpital where the T1000 morphs through the metal gate and his gun gets caught. Then the T800 does a little jog to get into the elevator following John and Sarah. (anybody know of any other running/jogging scenes?) (EDIT Arnie also breaks into a run while pursuing Reece and Sarah down the alley after the NOIR nightclub attack.)  If he can at least jog though, why wouldn't he do this throughout the entire film? You would think that from a "chance of survival" point of view, if he could get a John even the slightest bit faster then he'd do so.  Of course, maybe I am overthinking this... Arnie walking around slowly is a lot more badass than Arnie jogging around.  Edit: Just watched T3 again, the T800 also ran towards the end when the big hangar door was closing and he ran over to slow it down. Interested in other examples of the T800 running too. php function for collating external variables into a single object regardless of GET or POST I recall reviewing someone else's PHP code once and he had a function or class method that rolled all GET and POST variables into a single plain old object that could then be passed around. If the same name-value pair appeared in both GET and POST, POST would win.  Is there a well-coded PHP add-on out there of any sort that does exactly this? Dini's Theorem - Proof. I'd like to prove the following:  If $f_j$ are continuous functions on a compact set $K$, and $f_{1}(x) \leq f_{2}(x) \leq \dots$ for all $x \in K$, and the $f_j$ converge pointwise to a continuous function $f$ on $K$ then in fact the $f_j$ converge uniformly to $f$ on $K$.  Attempt:  Let $g_{j}(x) = f(x) - f_{j}(x)$ for all $j$. Then, since $f_j \rightarrow f$ pointwise, we see $g_j \rightarrow 0$ pointwise.  Now, let $\varepsilon &gt; 0$ . And examine { $x \in K : g_{j}(x) &lt; \varepsilon$ }.  I've been told that the next step should be to  show that { $x \in K : g_{j}(x) &lt; \varepsilon$ } is equal to the intersection of $K$ with some open set $U_j$. But I'm not certain why this is true?   Advice? Insight? $\left|x_{n+1} - x_n\right| < C\left|x_n - x_{n-1}\right|$ prove this is Cauchy Is there such a thing as a restore point in Ubuntu? Windows has this. Basically what I want is to record the state of the system either manually or periodically and then restore to that point if required. For example, before upgrading the distribution, or before installing a certain package.  What would be the easiest way to do this? Should I sign, watermark or otherwise label a framed print? And if so how? I have an opportunity to show some of my work in a small local coffee shop.  Are there any guidelines/practices to signing, labeling or watermarking a photo which is to be on display?  Or should a photo be signed, labelled or marked at all? Is signing the back of the photo and showing my name on a separate card below the frame itself the "better" way to do this?   I noticed many people on the web put a very noticeable watermark with their logo, copyright and name right on the photo.  Personally, I find this distracting as it often ruins the photograph itself often turning what could be art to kitsch. Painters most often sign the painting itself but this to me is not distracting because it is done with the painter's own hand and it often "works" with the painting. USB flash drive not working or is appearing as an empty disk drive, Disk Management reports "No Media" with 0 bytes size I have a USB flash drive which is no longer recognized by my computer. Windows Disk Management and DiskPart report No Media with no storage space (0 bytes) on the drive and I cannot partition or format the drive:     If the drive appears in Windows Explorer, trying to access it returns an error message indicating that there is no disk inserted, such as the following:     Please insert a disk into drive X:.   Various disk partitioning and data recovery utilities don't recognize the drive or only give a generic name for the drive and cannot access the contents of the drive.  What can I do? How do I recover data from the drive?     This question comes up often and the answers are usually the same. This post is meant to provide a definitive, canonical answer for this problem. Feel free to edit the answer to add additional details. Indian passport holder. Do I need transit visa in Sydney? Is there a detailed user's documentation for KDE Plasma 5? Each number in a subset $S\subseteq \{1,\ldots,2n\}$ does not divide another one. Then $\max |S|$? This problem comes from a seemingly innocuous question from a professor during a lesson for a Math Olympiad course. [A part of this question is really a classic of number theory/combinatorics]  Problem: Let $S$ be a a non-empty subset of $\{1,2,\ldots,2n\}$. It is clear that if $|S|$ is "enough large" then, independently from the choice of $S$, there are for sure some distinct $a,b \in S$ such that $a$ divides $b$.  Then, what is the maximal $k$ such that, for some $S$ with cardinality $k$, if $a,b$ are distinct members of $S$ then $a$ does not divide $b$?  [Ps. I know the solution] Bugged display in search using negation Possessive form of "one of [a list]"? How do I change text on the submission button in the node form? In Greek, λογικοφανής is a word that describes a person who spits out seemingly logical statements. It often has a negative connotation as it is targeted towards people who tend to fool the public with supposedly beautifully-constructed thoughts that sound convincing in our ears but are not necessarily accurate. The first word that comes to mind is deceptive, but it is not quite what I look for. Any thoughts? Find $\min(\operatorname{trace}(AA^T))$ for invertible $A_{n\times n}$ For invertible $A_{n\times n}$ find $\min(\operatorname{trace}(AA^T))$  (a) $0$ (b) $1$ (c) $n$ (d) $n^2$  Clearly for $A=I$, it is $n$, and I am unable to get any lower values, but how do I prove it. Sorry if this is very basic but here's a question.   Let $\mathbf{v}=(v_1,\ldots, v_n)\in k^n$ where $k=\bar{k}$.      Why do we have   $$ \sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^n |v_i|^2} \leq \sum_{i=1}^n |v_i|,  $$   where the left-hand side can be thought of as the $2$-norm $\|\mathbf{v}\|_2$ on $L^2(k^n)$?   $\mathbf{General \; case}$: If this is true for $p=2$-norm, I am guessing that this is true for all $p\geq 1$:  $$ \left( \sum_{i=1}^n |v_i|^p\right)^{1/p}\leq \sum_{i=1}^n |v_i|.  $$     In fact, does this inequality hold when $p$ is a rational number? A nice user suggested  to . The edit, though very good and desirable, was rejected. I do not understand the reasons, and I did not find a way to contact those people who rejected it. What can I do to re-approve the edit? How do I clone a single branch in Git?