Today ,I use the \tableofcontentsto yield a content ,however ,it lacks of the reference .  My trial        \documentclass{ctexart }       \begin{document  }         \addcontentsline{ toc }{ section }{Reference }         \tableofcontents       \end{ document }   Fortunately ,the reference appear to the first line ,while I need it appear on the last line.  so I wonder how to revise.thanks .
I need to make my (BibTeX) references section appear in the table of contents of my LaTeX document (documentclass: article), with section numbering too.  My approach until now has been making a new section and including the bibliography (references.bib) at that point:  \section{References} \bibliography{references}   However, the final document shows both the section title that I have written and the section title that BibTeX writes, which is quite redundant and I definitely dislike.  How can I either remove BibTeX's section title, or make the BibTeX bibliography appear in the table of contents without making a new section?  If I were to make the BibTeX bibliography appear in the table of contents without making a new section, how could I assure that the section title that BibTeX writes looks exactly like sections typeset with \section?
Is this mold? Black? White? Guys I need to find out what this is- it's also on my wooden bed racks To use Windows and Ubuntu on one computer, which should I install first? How can I change the color of a part of a TextView? Proving a sequence converges by defining the sequence recursively. Let $a &gt; 0$. Choose $x_1 &gt;$ $\sqrt a$. Define a sequence {$x_n$} recursively as $x_{n+1} = 1/2(x_n + a/x_n)$ for $n &gt; 1$.   Prove that lim$x_n = \sqrt a$.  I think I first want to prove that {$x_n$} is bounded below by $\sqrt a$. But, I am having trouble with this. Could someone help me out a little? How do the sets $\emptyset\times B,\ A\ \times \emptyset, \ \emptyset \times \emptyset $ look like? If we have a function $f:A \rightarrow B$, then one way to give meaning, I think, to this function, in terms of set theory, is to say, that $f$ is actually a binary relation $f=(A,B,G_f)$, where $G_f \subseteq A \times B$ is the graph of the function. Now my question is: what is $f$ if   $\bullet \ A=\emptyset, \ B\neq\emptyset$,?  $ \bullet \ B=\emptyset, \ A\neq\emptyset$ ?  $ \bullet \ B=\emptyset, \ A=\emptyset$ ?  (Another way to formulate this, I think, would be: How do the sets $\emptyset\times B,\ A\ \times \emptyset, \ \emptyset \times \emptyset $ look like? Are they all $\emptyset$ ?) I took a look at my profile, where I stuck my flair. Here's the flair:    However, I don't have 28k rep. According to chat, I have 19.7k.  Note: I know about the combined flair - I've had this in my profile for at least a year. It had been showing me the same as in chat, now it isn't.   What is going on here?  Edit: I'm reporting a bug here, that the combined flair is not showing the correct number, as it has in the past. How did the DeLorean travel to 1885? At the end of Back to the Future II, a lightning bolt hits the DeLorean which sends it back to 1885.  At the time though, the DeLorean wasn't moving; it was relatively stationary hovering in the storm.  Yet, it's emphasised repeatedly that the DeLorean must reach 88 miles per hour (which becomes a key plot point in Back to the Future III).  So, considering the DeLorean wasn't traveling at 88mph when the lightning struck the DeLorean sending it to 1885, what is the in-universe explanation of how it travelled there?  Some other factors to bear in mind:   If a lightning bolt was sufficient to send the DeLorean time traveling, then the 88mph business would be irrelevant Note that there are the firey tracks left after the DeLorean time travels in the '66' shape.  The thing to note about this though is that we never see these before the DeLorean disappears.  These tracks are always appearing after the DeLorean has traveled away.  This would seem to indicate that the DeLorean did move, but following the activation of the time circuits. How can I make a "Movie Clip" node start at a certain frame of the scene? Why is it that     All right angles are equal to each other    -a postulate in Euclid's Elements (). Shouldn't it be a congruence rather than an equivalence? Isn't this just a special case of the definition of congruent angles? When should I use "didn't" instead of "haven't"? Is haven't supposed to mean something I may still do and didn't not?  Can I use didn't for something I might still do? What is the difference between building from source and using an install package? I know that Wubi is slower in disk IO, but I can't find anything about it online other than vague statements such as "slightly slower disk seeks".  Has anyone done any benchmarks to quantify the speed difference? I haven't filed 2020 taxes yet. On my last return (2019) my adult daughter was on my return as a dependent. When I file 2020, I will not put her on my return as a dependent, because she finished college in 2019. I had her file her 2020 return early this year so she would be sure to get a stimulus check in case they did another one (I assumed they would exclude adult dependents as they had with previous stimulus payments). Today, she got the $1,400 deposited to her account by the Treasury. However, I was surprised to see $4,200 deposited to my account, when I expected only $2,800 (for me and my wife). They paid for my daughter twice, $1,400 to her (based on her 2020 return) and $1,400 to me (based on my 2019 return that showed her as a dependent). They have the social security numbers, so I assumed the IRS and Treasury would have figured this out. I have searched and searched, but am unsure whether this overpayment will be clawed back or not. I can't even find a mechanism for returning it (and getting credit for doing that if they later do say I owe it to them). I've read if your 2019 income made you eligible, but your 2020 income (if you file after the stimulus) would have made you ineligible, they won't claw back the stimulus they sent. Stimulus money for people that died between the tax return and the stimulus disbursement does have to be returned to the treasury. I can't find guidance for our situation. There must be a fair number of people with college kids that have the same scenario. This question  seems at first to ask the same thing, but it doesn't include the key point of overpayment by the Treasury. Understanding reference counting with Cocoa and Objective-C I'm just beginning to have a look at Objective-C and Cocoa with a view to playing with the iPhone SDK. I'm reasonably comfortable with C's malloc and free concept, but Cocoa's references counting scheme has me rather confused. I'm told it's very elegant once you understand it, but I'm just not over the hump yet.  How do release, retain and autorelease work and what are the conventions about their use?  (Or failing that, what did you read which helped you get it?) Supremum of a product measurable function... The LOTR wiki  Eru Ilúvatar intervened in the history of Arda:   creating Elves and Men removing Aman from the spherical Earth resurrecting Gandalf making Gollum trip      In a letter written by Tolkien, he stated that Eru again intervened, this time in the Third Age, causing Gollum to trip and fall into the fires of Mount Doom while still holding the One Ring, thus destroying it.   Is this correct? If so, what letter is this, and exactly what did Tolkien say? What to do when witches appear early in the game? Determine destination location of apt-get install ? How can I understand a Vortex Tube and its efficiency? A  takes a pressurized input stream, most typically of a gas, and creates two output streams with a temperature differential. .  Both linked sources are scarce with information about how and why this works. Now, I have two questions:   Why does it work, specifically why should the situation in the vortex lead to a transfer of thermal energy from the inner stream to the outer one? How efficient can it be?  How do you define the efficiency of a device that may be closer to Maxwell's Demon than to a heat pump? My feeling is that any analysis should not only take into account the sum of input energy (thermal and mechanical energy instream) and sum output (thermal energies and pressures of both gas streams), but also the Temperature differential that is created - since that contains an ability to create work.* If course it's pointless to create heat from high grade 8mech.) energy to transform it back to mech. energy - but it gives an idea on the worth of the output. Q&A Identification of seldom man-made physical objects not being piece of art? Is SE Q&amp;A format relevant for "identification of seldom physical objects observed in real world"?  Questions like "I do not know function of this object (picture) - which purpose does it have?"  In many cases I suppose these question could have civil engineering or handcraft i.e. cultural/historical background. In second case "SE history" might be okay. For first case, I do not know.