I have tried frying salmon filet and besides the fact it was very raw on the inside it fell apart when I tried to flip it over. Why?  *Skin was on.
We sometimes buy trout from a local breeder who'll get them fresh out of the water for us, and then cook them a few hours later. They taste great, but the flesh tends to fall apart in a way that doesn't happen with fish from the super market. It's often barely even possible to get them out of the pot without them completely coming apart. We tried leaving them in the fridge for a day so they wouldn't be quite as just-killed-an-hour-ago-fresh, but that didn't help.   We usually prepare them by cooking them in simmering (not boiling) water.  Is there some way to prevent this?
How to create Mist in Blender I already tried several ways to create Mist in Blender, but it never worked 100%. I use Blender 2.78 and I want to create Mist like in this scene here.  What are the exact steps?     Here is what I have tried so far:  I already tried this:  but it simply did not work .. I dont know why.  (EDIT: I managed to fix it: Check out this graphic:   Until now I already used objects successfully as Mist-creators (Volume Scatter under Volume Material). The bad thing about using Objects as Mist-creator is that they dont have an endless mist range + the mist can not be bright. Normally it appears grayish result is bad..  Check it out  Please help Is there a way to install a newer version than in the repository?  Ubuntu installs vagrant 1.4.3 at the moment, but I need at least 1.5 Seeking point cloud (LiDAR) data? Is there any freely available pointcloud data?   I'm especially interested in dense clouds of small areas(5m to 100m radius) but anything else would be fine too.   I've found that these pages have very nice and easy to access point cloud data. Evaluating this integral $ \small\int \frac {x^2 dx} {(x\sin x+\cos x)^2} $ The question:      Compute$$ \int \frac {x^2 \, \operatorname{d}\!x} {(x\sin x+\cos x)^2} $$   Tried integration by parts. That didn't work.  How do I proceed? Find all natural numbers $n$ such that ${(n+1)}^{1/2}-{(n-1)}^{1/2}$ is rational Why is Tony Stark in the Iron Man suit unaffected by G-forces, inertia and blunt force trauma? Tony's suit is an engineering marvel, and they explain many facets of the technology to help give legitimacy to the special powers, abilities and weapons it has.  I never read the Iron Man comics, but in the movie they really don't have a technological explanation for how he miraculously seems to be unaffected by crushing G-forces of sudden acceleration, the inertia of sudden stops and hair-pin turns, and especially the blunt force trauma from getting smashed in the face with Thor's hammer.  Certainly it appears the suit takes punishment, but Tony always remains unscatched, never a collapsed lung, broken bone or even a bloody nose.  In my infantile understanding of theoretical physics, the same technology that would be used to counter G-forces and sudden blunt force trauma to the body inside would be the very same technology used for  which in my honest opinion would be a much more stunning technological achievement than his heralded Arc Reactor.  Was their ever an explanation proferred for this and if so was it indeed attributed to Anti-Gravity? Counting the Lotto number draws which contain consecutive numbers Rich Wizards, Poor Muggles What did Hegel mean by 'world spirit'? I understand that Hegel intends to justify the history of mankind by stating that every town and society that has existed has been a test indirectly arranged by the 'world spirit' in order to eventually create a town in which people would live ethically, and that this process has been done in order for the 'world spirit' to become aware of its freedom. But what exactly is this 'world spirit'?   In the last quiz of a course I'm taking (I´ve taken this year a philosophy course at college), I wrote that the 'world spirit' was some kind of parasitic entity which inhabits every human being that has existed and is going to exist. Does this seem right? Convert a matrix to a 1 dimensional array Modern textbook on statistical field theory with an emphasis on applications to non-equilibrium phenomena? How do I exactly find the zero divisors and units of a ring in the form of $\mathbb{Z}_n \times \mathbb{Z}_m$? For instance, how does one calculate zero divisors and units of $\mathbb{Z}_6 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$? I understand that a zero divisor is a non-zero element of $R$ such that $rs = 0$ for some other non-zero element $s$ in $R$. But I don't really quite understand how to apply that to a ring of the form $\mathbb{Z}_n \times \mathbb{Z}_m$. Also, the units of $\mathbb{Z}_6 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ would be elements that send some element $s$ in $\mathbb{Z}_n \times \mathbb{Z}_m$ to the multiplicative identity, right? (which would be 1)? How do I apply these concepts to "product" rings? Thank you. I am working on a BLDC sensorless motor. I need to detect BEMF Zero-cross event. My Motor is working on 24 Volt power.  Now I need to detect the back E.M.F. As refered in .  My MCU is working on 5V. And ADC range is 0 to 5V. I need to convert the BEMF feedback signal to ADC channed in this.  As we know voltage divider rule says:   In Figure I :-- Now signal (U) which I need to feed is applied at the middle of the two resistors R1 &amp; R7. So what is the value of voltage VU ?   In Figure II :-- Sum of U,V,W  is applied at the middle of the two resistors R11 &amp; R15. So what is the value of voltage VN ?  Also, what are the roles of capacitors C1 &amp; C4?  Please can someone explain the MATH behind this ? PHP: Right way to declare variable before use in loop I have a variable that is built in loop. Something like:  $str = ""; for($i = 0; $i &lt; 10; $i++) $str .= "something";   If $str = "" is ommitted, I get undefined variable notice, but I thought php auto-declare a variable the first time it sees undeclared one?  How do I do this right? Is there a specific purpose in terms of efficiency or functionality why the k-means algorithm does not use for example cosine (dis)similarity as a distance metric, but can only use the Euclidean norm? In general, will K-means method comply and be correct when other distances than Euclidean are considered or used?  [Addition by @ttnphns. The question is two-fold. "(Non)Euclidean distance" may concern distance between two data points or distance between a data point and a cluster centre. Both ways have been attempted to address in the answers so far.] Ordered N-Tuples as Cartesian Products of Indexed Families In Introduction to Topology, Mendelson defines the Cartesian Product of an Indexed Family as follows:     DEFINITION  Let $\{X_\alpha\}_{\alpha \in I}$ be an indexed family of sets. The product  of the sets $\{X_\alpha\}_{\alpha \in I}$,    written  $\prod_{x\in I}X_\alpha$ consists of all functions $x$ with domain the indexing set $I$ having the property that for each $\alpha \in I$, $x(\alpha)\in X_\alpha$.    Halmos, in Naive Set Theory, makes the following observation about this sort of product:     Ordered triples, ordered quadruples, etc., may be defined as families whose index sets are unordered triples, quadruples, etc.   However, it is not immediately apparent to me why this is true. It makes sense if we understand the prior assertions in Halmos that $\prod_{i \in I} X_i = X_i$ and that $\prod_{i \in I} X_i = X_a \times X_b$ when $I = \{a, b\}$, but these already pose difficulty for me.  Let $I = \{0, 1\}$, let $X_0 = \{A, B\}$, and let $X_1 = \{C, D\}$. Then by Mendelson's (and Halmos's) definitions, it would seem to me that . . .  $$\prod_{i \in I} X_ i = \{\{(0, A), (1, C)\}, \{(0, A), (1, D)\}, \{(0, B), (1, C)\}, \{(0, B), (1, D)\}\}$$  This would appear to me to be the set of all functions matching the definition given, but it is not equal to $X_0 \times X_1$. Moreover, extending this to a case where the index set $I$ is a triple, we would not end up with ordered triples, but with each subset of the product containing three ordered pairs.  When Halmos posits the equalities he does, the idea seems easy to grasp, but the peculiar wording of Mendelson's definition suggests something different to me. Limit $\frac{x^2y}{x^4+y^2}$ is found using polar coordinates but it is not supposed to exist. I'm trying to run down a memory leak in a windows forms application.  I'm looking now at a form which contains several embedded forms.  What worries me is that the child forms, in their constructor, take a reference to the parent form, and keep it in a private member field.  So it seems to me that come garbage-collection time:  Parent has a reference to the child form, via the controls collection (child form is embedded there).  Child form is not GC'd.  Child form has a reference to the parent form, via the private member field.  Parent form is not GC'd.   Is this an accurate understanding of how the garbage collector will evaluate the situation?  Any way to 'prove' it for testing purposes? Can a shadow move faster than the speed of light? Force alt + tab to switch only on current workspace in GNOME shell I am looking for a clean and fast method to force GNOME in Ubuntu 14.04 to switch between active apps only on the current workspace when pressing the shortcut alt + tab.