When I receive push notifications from the StackExchange app, my expectation that tapping them should take me to the post on which the notification happened is always violated. It seems wrong to me that tapping a push notification should just do the same thing as opening the app the normal way.  I would like to request that tapping a push notification from the Android app should bring the user to the post that generated the notification.  If the user has multiple inbox messages, at least open the inbox.
When I get a notification on android that someone had posted an answer or comment, if I click the notification, it opens the Stack Exchange app but shows the main view with the inbox opened, not the comment or answer that was in the notification.  If there is only one notification pending, when you tap it it should show you the actual contents rather than just the inbox.
Title page line spacing I have a simple problem but I didn't manage to find any answer for it. In my title page, I just used  \title{Name of the title}   then  \hrule height 0,1cm \leavevmode \\[0,5cm]     {\Huge{\textbf{\@title}}}\\[0,5cm] \hrule height 0,1cm \leavevmode \\[0,5cm]   to print the title of my document. But it takes more than 3 lines on the PDF file, and I have a different spacing between the 1st and 2nd line compared to the 2nd and 3rd, which is a bit frustrating.   Anyone got an idea of why ? Renaming hundreds of files at once for proper sorting I have a ton of files, all named stuff like 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg, and so on up to 1439.jpg, however, I have a problem with one of my projects and alphabetizing. It will usually go in the order 1.jpg, 10.jpg, 11.jpg and so on.  What I need is some way to name the files so they are in the format such as 00001.jpg all the way up to 01439.jpg.  How would I be able to do this quickly and efficiently? Let $f:[0,\infty)\rightarrow [0,\infty) $ be a continuous strictly increasing function and $g=f^{-1}$. Let $a,b&gt;0$ and $a\neq b$. Then how $\displaystyle\int_{0}^af(x)dx+\int_0^bg(y)dy\geq ab.$ Any hint will be appreciated. Evaluating $\int_0^{\tfrac{\pi}{4}}\ln(\cos x-\sin x)\ln(\cos x) dx - \int_0^{\tfrac{\pi}{4}}\ln(\cos x+\sin x)\ln(\sin x)dx=\frac{G\ln 2}{2}$ In order to compute, in an elementary way,  $\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{x \arctan x \log \left( 1-x^2\right)}{1+x^2}dx$  (see  )  i need to show, in a simple way, that:  $\displaystyle \int_0^{\tfrac{\pi}{4}}\ln(\cos x-\sin x)\ln(\cos x) dx - \int_0^{\tfrac{\pi}{4}}\ln(\cos x+\sin x)\ln(\sin x)dx=\dfrac{G\ln 2}{2}$  $G$ being the Catalan constant.  The reason of my interest for this question is, if i am right, that this formula permits to find out a relation between integrals:  $\displaystyle \int_0^1 \dfrac{\ln(1+x)\ln(1+x^2)}{1+x^2}dx$  $\displaystyle \int_0^1 \dfrac{\ln(1+x)^2}{1+x^2}dx$  $\displaystyle \int_0^{\tfrac{\pi}{4}}\big(\ln(\cos x)\big)^2 \dfrac{}{}dx$  and some constants. Is there a single word for something that is simultaneously not interesting and not boring? I am looking for a word that would describe a concept or activity, such as playing a game X, that is1 neither boring nor interesting. In other words, it should mean ‘neutral’ wrt intrestingness (~ boringness) but still comparable on the scale of intrestingness to both ‘boring’ and ‘interesting’.  An example sentence would be  As far as I'm concerned, long-distance running is [insert word]; it is not boring but it's also not interesting.  Criteria2   Has to be unambiguous3, and may consist of two words at most. Has to be a single word. Should be formal in the sense that it is included in Cambridge Dictionary, or Merriam Webster, or both. Should not contain negating prefixes, such as ‘un-’.   Does such a word exist in the English language?  For readers' convenience, please state which criteria you believe your word suggestion has met. You may do so, e.g., by adding a disclaimer at the top or bottom of your answer. Simply writing (1., 2.) is sufficient.        1 Assume a ternary system of intrestingness.   2 If not all criteria can be met, you may relax  the requirements from bottom to top, in the following order: 4. -> 3.  -> 2. -> 1. Answers with the smallest number of relaxed criteria in this order will be preferred in accepting. For example, fulfilling  (1., 2., 3.) is better than achieving (1., 3., 4.). Situations where a  higher priority ordering fulfills fewer criteria than a lower priority  vector, such as (1.) vs (3.,  4.), will be assessed on a case-by-case  basis.   3 Words such as ‘unappealing’ thus even fail  criterium 1 because in a three-valued system ‘unappealing’ ~ ‘not  appealing’ ~ ‘not interesting’ can be taken to mean either ‘boring’ or  ‘neutral wrt intrestingness’. I was wondering what might be making my questions less attractive to users?  I get very low views most of the time. What should be done to increase a question's popularity? Can there be true conclusions without assumptions? I was thinking of the sentence  "I think therefore I am",  which I had for a long time considered indisputable because it's self-evident.   Then I considered the hypothetical situation where my thoughts are illogical – and of course I can't be aware that they are – and so to a logical outsider I am not saying something that is actually indisputable and self-evident, but in fact may be total nonsense. Perhaps there is a hypothetical evil demon altering my ability to reason. However convincing it seems to me that I MUST exist since, in whatever since "I" or "exist" is, there is the ability to question whether I do, the conclusion can't actually be trusted without doubt since I cannot know if I am in fact reasoning logically.  Even what I consider to be trivial tautologies require this assumption of sanity, and therefore there is no true conclusion without assumption – an assumption about the nature of my own reasoning. The only absolute truth I have is unspeakable subjective experience, and any articulation (and I realize the apparent circular reasoning I've cornered myself into here...) is necessarily uncertain.  I realize that perhaps this doesn't even make sense, but was just curious if anyone had entertained this line of thought and come to some satisfying resolution. How to enable ssh root access on Ubuntu 14.04 I´d like to enable the ssh root access on Ubuntu 14.04. Editing the /etc/ssh_config (PermitRootLogin yes) didn't affect anything. Are positive real numbers $x,y$ allowed to be taken out during this proof? Prove $$\left(x^2 - y^2\right)\left(\frac1y - \frac1x\right) \ge 0$$ where $x$ and $y$ are positive real numbers.   Can I simplify $\frac{(x^2 - y^2)(x-y)}{xy} \ge 0$ and then $(x^2 - y^2)(x-y) \ge 0$ cancelling out the $xy$?  Is this valid because then  \begin{align} (x+y)(x-y)(x-y)&amp;\ge  0\cdot(x-y)^2\ge 0 \end{align}  which is always true and then prove backwards from here? Rewriting Triple Integral in different order How can I rewrite, say: $$\int^1_0\int^{z^2}_0\int^y_0{f}dxdydz$$ In the orders $dzdxdy$ and $dydzdx$?  Would I have to solve this triple integral all the way or is there a simple way to do this? We're planning to upgrade an existing farm from 2007 to 2013. I learned that the best way and maybe the only way to achieve this is by migrating in two steps. 2007 to 2010 and 2010 to 2013. The actual farm is a sql-server(2008r2 64 bit) and a sperate sharepoint-server(web-frontend, etc....) I want to keep the sql-server as it is, if possible and we want to install a new 64bit host for sharepoint 2013. We will design a new branding for 2013 afterwards, so we need to keep the content, but not the layout. There's so much about migration available on the web, but Can I find something like best practises? I want to use the "BackSpace" button as a shortcut key on nautilus. I want to return to the previous folder whilst browsing the Home folder, just like windows 7.   Also I want the same thing while using Firefox, In a way that when I press the shortcut key I will return to the previous web page. Badge "multiplier" a little bit misaligned on the profile page Well, you can see it for yourself. The badge multiplier is a bit misaligned. Can you fix this please? (I know it's kinda a minor issue but it's bugging me and it's somehow off)    If it helps, I'm using Chrome version 44.0.2403.125 m. (Also repro'ed on FireFox 39.0 and )    For no good reason, that's a screenie from 's profile page. How to recover/reset forgotten Gnome Keyring Password? What type of solder is safest for home (hobbyist) use? Let $S$  be a square of unit area. Consider any quadrilateral whose $4$ vertices lie on each side square $S$. Let the length of the sides of this quadrilateral be $a,b,c,d$. Then prove that $$2 \leq a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2 \leq 4$$     This problem appeared in IIT JEE $1997$ (re-exam).I really do not know know how to approach this problem properly.I have managed to prove $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 +d^2  \leq 4$ but not the initial inequality. Install Win7 theme on Ubuntu 16.04 I'm totally new to Ubuntu. I've installed version 16.04 and I'm having trouble finding my way around. I've tried just about all possible ways to make Ubuntu look like windows 7. Every way I tried was missing something, Is there a way to make version 16.04 be like win7? Indefinite integral $\int(\sin x)^2/(x\cdot\cos x-\sin x)^2\,dx$ How to find the antiderivative of $\dfrac{(\sin x)^2}{(x\cdot\cos x-\sin x)^2}$? I know that series theory can solve the problem. But I wish to solve the problem by the antiderivative way. The numerator and denominator divide the $x^2$ at the same time, don't they? Much effort has been expended on a famous unsolved problem about the .  Not surprisingly, it's called the Riemann hypothesis, which asserts:  $$ \zeta(s) = 0 \Rightarrow \operatorname{Re} s = \frac1 2 \text{ or } \operatorname{Im} s = 0 .$$  Now there are numerical methods for approximating $\zeta(s)$, but as I understand, no one knows any exact values except at even integers, which include the trivial zeroes for which $\operatorname{Im} s = 0 $.  So I've always wondered:  For the rest, how does one prove $\operatorname{Re} s = 1/2$ exactly?  (All I know that seems vaguely useful is the argument principle, which I'm not sure helps here, but I'd be happy to learn about other techniques that aren't too far advanced.)  Edit:  Looking over this again, I found out I missed the closed-form values at .  This doesn't affect the question but seemed worth correcting.  Thanks to the people who contributed. Changing parameter values according to other parameter choice in Processing script using QGIS 3?