I would like to draw four circles inside each other, with some text in the area between the circles (naming that area).  So far I got:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{tikz}  \usetikzlibrary{shapes,backgrounds}  \def\firstcircle{(0,0) circle (1.5cm)} \def\secondcircle{(45:2cm) circle (1.5cm)} \def\thirdcircle{(0:2cm) circle (1.5cm)} \def\fourthcircle{(0:2cm) circle (1.5cm)}  \begin{document}   \begin{tikzpicture}     \draw \firstcircle node[below] {$first$};     \draw \secondcircle node [above] {$second$};     \draw \thirdcircle node [below] {$third$};     \draw \fourthcircle node [below] {$fourth$}; \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document}   but I don't know what to do to:   make one circle bigger than each other (with fourth circle being the largest) make the text not appear inside in the middle of the circle, but in the areas between the circles (it would be nice if the text arched following the circle) make the circles appear inside each other.   Thanks.
I am trying to draw the below given figure. Please help me to plot it in Tikz. I am only able to plot concentric circles. . I would like to have different colors in between different circles. Also, the text should be along the curve. The arrow in between the two concentric circles does not have to overlap with the circle on the right hand side.  I would be grateful if you could help me in plotting this in Tikz. Please let me know if you need more information. Thanks!  \documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}  \ifCLASSINFOpdf  \else  \fi  \usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{positioning} \usetikzlibrary{arrows} \usetikzlibrary{shapes.multipart} \usepackage[caption=false]{subfig} \usepackage{tabularx,tikz} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{color} \usepackage{pdfpages} \begin{document}  \title{Practice Tex}   \maketitle  \section{Introduction}  \begin{figure} \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}     \draw(0,0) circle (0.4cm)   node[draw=none,sloped,above]{cxvzxcv};         \draw(0,0) circle (0.75cm) node[draw=none,sloped,above]{ratio};    \draw(0,0) circle (1.25cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,2.2) {22};    \draw(0,0) circle (2cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,3.8) {33333};    \draw(0,-9) circle (0.4cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-9) {fsgsdgf};      \draw(0,-9) circle (0.75cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-7.8) {fgdsfg};    \draw(0,-9) circle (1.25cm) node[midway,sloped] at (0,-9) {dfsdfad};    \draw(0,-9) circle (2.8cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-6.4) {dfsdfsd};    \draw(0,-9) circle (3.2cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-6) {dfsdfsd};    \draw(0,-9) circle (3.6cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-5.6) {sfdsfd};    \draw(0,-9) circle (4.4cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-4.8) {sdfsf};     \pgfsetlinewidth{3pt}    \draw [-implies][-&gt;] (0,-4) -- (0,-4.6);   \end{tikzpicture}  \end{center} \end{figure} \end{document}
I'm flying Etihad Airways to Melbourne and I've a 14 hours layover at Abu Dhabi.  Some say that as long as you are inside the airport terminal you don't require a transit visa while some say you need a transit visa if your layover is more than 10 hours.  Can I stay inside the airport without a transit visa? How should sockpuppets be handled on Stack Exchange? A high-reputation, highly-active user has already been dinged once for a sockpuppet, and I just dinged him again. He probably has another sockpuppet as well.   What are the guidelines for handling users who game the system in this fashion? Specifically,   How can I be sure I'm looking at a sockpuppet? When should sockpuppets be considered a problem? How should moderators handle problematic sockpuppets once they've been identified? I was suspended for sockpuppetting and feel this is unfair How to deal with cross-thread access exceptions? Android: View.setID(int id) programmatically - how to avoid ID conflicts? Change date and time format from csv file without using date -d I have a .csv file contains   Data1|Data2|10/24/2017 8:10:00 AM   I want to change date and time format of column 3 as following:  From 10/24/2017 8:10:00 AM (12-Hour) to 20171024 08:10:00(24-hour).  Not using -d I am currently developing a website which is going to take some time to finish. I need to move some 'stuff' to production frequently, while maintaining a under construction status. My front page will clearly mention that my website is under construction.  I know crawlers will access my URL before I am ready to go live. Should I tell them my site is under construction (no need to index)? If yes how?  P.S.: Eventually, I am ok to let them see my under construction front page. expected true to respond to true? View linked Excel 'Windows' on separate screens The force of gravity is constantly being applied to an orbiting object.  And therefore the object is constantly accelerating.  Why doesn't gravity eventually "win" over the object's momentum, like a force such as friction eventually slows down a car that runs out of gas?  I understand (I think) how relativity explains it, but how does Newtonian mechanics explain it? What happened to Startups SE? I really enjoyed that site. I've only posted on it once, but I enjoyed seeing other people's posts and appreciated reading about entrepreneurial dilemmas. Isomorphism $H_n(D^n, S^{n - 1};A)$ and $A$ The homomorphism $a \mapsto [[a \cdot f]]$ is supposed to be an isomorphism between $A$ and $H_n(D^n, S^{n - 1};A)$ for any homeomorphism $f: \Delta^n \to D^n$. I have proven that it is well defined and injective, but why is it surjective?  The group $H_n(D^n, S^{n - 1};A)$ is generated by elements of the form $a \cdot \sigma + b \cdot \tau + c \cdot \partial(\kappa)$ where $\sigma: \Delta^n \to D^n$, $\tau: \Delta^n \to S^{n - 1}$ and $\kappa: \Delta^{n + 1} \to D^{n + 1}$ and I do not see how an element of this form represents the same equivalence class of $[[m \cdot f]]$ for some $m \in A$. We can write $\sigma$ as $f f^{-1} \sigma$ to get $f$ in there, but I don't see that working out. Any hints? Remove suggested apps option in iOS 10 Below is an attempt at a proof of the following problem. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thx!  Let $E$ be a set and $O_n = \{x: d(x, E) &lt; \frac{1}{n}\}$. Show  If $E$ is compact then $m(E) = lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} m(O_n)$.  This is false for $E$ closed and unbounded or $E$ open and bounded.   Note that all sets are real and measurable refers to Lebesgue measurable.  Suppose $E$ is compact. Then $m(E) &lt; \infty$. Also, since each $O_n$ is an open set of $\mathbb{R}^d$, $m(O_n) &lt; \infty$. If either of the following is true, we have that $lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}m(O_n)=m(E)$: $O_n \nearrow E$ $O_n \searrow E$ Now  $\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} O_n = \{ x:d(x,E) = 0\}$. That is, $x \in \bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty}O_n \iff \exists n&gt; \frac{1}{\epsilon},\ n \in \mathbb{N} \iff x\in \{x \mid d(x,E) =0\}$. Then we have that $\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty}O_n = E$ and $O_n \searrow E$. Thus $ \ m(E) = lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} m(O_n)$. Suppose $E$ is closed and unbounded. Let $E = \{(x,y): y = 2 \}$ and $O_n = \{(x,y): d(x,E) &lt; \frac{1}{n}\}$. Since $E$ is a line in $\mathbb{R}^2$, $m(E) = 0$. Also, since the measure of a rectangle in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is its volume, $m(O_n) = \left| O_n \right| = \infty$, since the rectangle $O_n$ is unbounded. It is therefore apparent that $m(E) \not = lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} m(O_n)$. Suppose $E$ is open and bounded. Let $E=(0,1)$ and $O_n = \{x \mid d(x,E) &lt; \frac{1}{n}\}$. $\mathbb{R}-E$ is closed and $O_n \in \mathbb{R}-E$. Since $\mathbb{R}-E$ contains all its limit points $lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}O_n = O \in \mathbb{R}-E$. Thus $lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} m(O_n) \neq m(E)$. Difference between cp -r and cp -R (copy command) geometric interpretation of $\vec v \cdot \operatorname{curl} \vec v = 0 $ There is a family of surfaces orthogonal to the vector field $\vec v \in \mathbb R^3$ iff $\vec v \cdot  \operatorname{curl} \vec v = 0 $. Now the necessity part is trivial, but the proof of sufficiency I have seen in physics textbooks, e.g. Kestin: Thermodynamics, is kind of mindless integration similar to the one usually offered to prove Poincare's lemma as in Flanders, or just asserted as in Born&amp;Wolf: Optics. Is there an intuitive and geometric interpretation of this condition that would make it obvious why its sufficiency must be true? I understand that the output voltage is determined by the ratio between the two resistor values, and that if the both resistors are same then output voltage will be exactly same for all; but what's the basis of picking the resistor values?there is any need of consider output current to choose resistor value. Combining the entries of two lists R: Trouble using SMOTE package "invalid 'labels'" Sometimes when attempting to capture a Pokémon, the mon will be wiggling in the ball and the app will disconnect from servers (for mobile connection reasons or whatever), and I'll be left staring at a ball containing Schrodinger's Pokémon. I'll sigh at the loss (or in the case of a 500CP Pinsir, scream in agony), and reload the game.  I thought maybe encounters in general couldn't handle disconnecting well, but sometimes immediately after a Pokémon broke free of a ball, the little icon in the upper left would appear, the game would stall for a bit, but it would recover.   Is there anything I can do to avoid this? Should I be waiting it out, instead of reloading?  (and before anyone says it, yes I have filed a bug report) Proving inequality $(a+\frac{1}{a})^2 + (b+\frac{1}{b})^2 \geq \frac{25}{2}$ for $a+b=1$