"Dates &amp; Times" for Brazil are lower case while other locations it is title case. I am using Ubuntu 18.04.  Where should I report this issue?     I still don't have an answer.  Many languages have Month/Week names with Title case.  It happens that for Portuguese (Brazil) Pt-Br they are in a lower case like shown in the image below.  Do you know where I can place a bug report about that?
I found a problem with an application on Ubuntu.   Questions :   How do I best report the issue?  What sort of information should I provide?
Almost sure convergence of the Poisson process Let $N = \{N(t) \}_{t\geq 0 }$ be a Poisson process. I already know that $N(t)- \lambda t$ is a martingale where $\mathbb{E} [ N(t) ] = \lambda t$.   I want to prove that $$ \frac{N(t)}{t} \rightarrow \lambda, \quad t \rightarrow \infty \quad \text{ a.s.}. $$  To prove this I received a hint that I should use the martingale law of large numbers which states that:  Theorem: (Martingale LLN)  Let $S= (S_n = \sum_{k=1}^n X_k)_{n=1,2,\ldots}$ be a martingale with respect to the filtration $(\mathcal{F}_n)_{n=1,2,\ldots}$. Then $\sum_{k=1}^n X_k/k$ converges almost surely on the set $\left\{ \sum_{k=1}^\infty k^{-2} \mathbb{E}\left[ X_k^2 \mid \mathcal{F}_{k-1} \right] &lt; \infty \right\}$. Hence $S_n/n \rightarrow 0$ a.s. on the same set.  Now to use this theorem I think I need to use Doob-Meyer to decompose $N(t)$ as the sum of a martingale and an increasing process. Which would be the martingale $M(t) = N(t) - \lambda t$ and increasing process $A(t) = \lambda t$. But how is $M(t)$ the sum of a martingale? And I do not know how this exactly relates to the thing I have to prove. Thanks for any help. Why is voltage added when batteries are connected in series but not in parallel? As I understand, the different voltage between two object is caused by the total different charged between two object. Thus, the higher extra electron between two opposite charged object, the higher voltage between them, isn't it? So if i have two battery or capacitor connect in parallel, the negative connect to negative, the positive connect to the positive. Caused the charge from each plate to be double. So that's as my expected, it must be double voltage, but ironically why it's out of my expected and the reality is vice-versa? I wanted to take a sneak peek at Windows 7 so I thought of installing it. I have Windows Vista on my laptop which came pre-installed with it. I didn't want to mess with it.  So I created a partition (20 GB) in my USB external hard disk and tried to install Windows 7 on that partition. But when I booted from a Windows 7 DVD and selected the target partition on USB hard disk, it said it cannot be installed.  Is there any way to install Windows on an external USB hard disk? Why can we treat quantum scattering problems as time-independent? From what I remember in my undergraduate quantum mechanics class, we treated scattering of non-relativistic particles from a static potential like this:   Solve the time-independent Schrodinger equation to find the energy eigenstates.  There will be a continuous spectrum of energy eigenvalues. In the region to the left of the potential, identify a piece of  the wavefunction that looks like $Ae^{i(kx - \omega t)}$ as the incoming wave. Ensure that to the right of the potential, there is not piece of the wavefunction that looks like $Be^{-i(kx + \omega t)}$, because we only want to have a wave coming in from the left. Identify a piece of the wavefunction to the left of the potential that looks like $R e^{-i(kx + \omega t)}$ as a reflected wave. Identify a piece of the wavefunction to the right of the potential that looks like $T e^{i(kx - \omega t)}$ as a transmitted wave. Show that $|R|^2 + |T|^2 = |A|^2$.  Interpret $\frac{|R|^2}{|A|^2}$ as the probability for reflection and $\frac{|T|^2}{|A|^2}$ as the probability for transmission.   This entire process doesn't seem to have anything to do with a real scattering event - where a real particle is scattered by a scattering potential - we do all our analysis on a stationary waves.  Why should such a naive procedure produce reasonable results for something like Rutherford's foil experiment, in which alpha particles are in motion as they collide with nuclei, and in which the wavefunction of the alpha particle is typically localized in a (moving) volume much smaller than the scattering region? Why don't we pluralize "foot" in measurements? RegEx for matching UK Postcodes How do I appropriately examine the dimensionality of binary data? I have 72 binary variables and, at a theoretical level, I am trying to identify groups of variables that seem to vary together. In practice, I am struggling with how to analyze this data properly. I am using R and the psych package. Here is what I have tried and what the outcomes were:  Estimated a tetrachoric correlation matrix (ran without problem) Estimated MSA (relatively strong values, ran without problem) Ran parallel analysis to identify how many factors to extract (ran without problem) EFA using fa() to estimate factors (non-positive definite matrix and strangely high RMSEA) Tried different factor counts, smoothing/unsmoothing, estimation methods, rotations methods, and removing variables (problems persisted) Tried to focus instead on eBIC (always returned as NULL in output) EFA using (inappropriately) Pearson correlations (RMSEA behaved)  From looking at other questions and answers on here, I am now aware that tetrachoric matrices can be problematic like this. However, I don't know what to do with that information. Accept the problems as a limitation and move forward? Conduct a different type of analysis? I considered IRT as is recommended, but am unaware of an exploratory way to conduct IRT analyses. I understand that most of my options are imperfect. My goal is to find an analysis that is at least arguably appropriate for binary variables and that will inform the ways in which I group these variables in my theorizing. Given this, my questions are:  Can I trust EFA on a tetrachoric matrix despite problematic output? Can I somehow recover the lost eBIC value and use that? Is exploratory IRT possible/desirable? Are there other analyses, in R, that can be used to examine the dimensionality of binary data?  I appreciate all feedback! I love learning about data analysis and hearing about how I can improve. How do I install/update drivers on Debian 9? I just installed Debian 9 on my laptop, however Wifi isn't working and I'm not sure if my graphic card is either. I'm sure that it's just a lack of drivers, but I've never actually had to update drivers on Linux before. So how do I do that? Fast calculation for $\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\log x}{x^2+1}dx=0$ I want to show that $\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\log x}{x^2+1}dx=0$, but is there a faster method than finding the contour and doing all computations?  Otherwise my idea is to do the substitution $x=e^t$, integral than changes to $\int _{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{t e^t}{1+e^{2t}}dt$. Next step is to take the contour $-r,r,r+i\pi,-r+i\pi$ and integrate over it... How Can I add HTML And CSS Into PDF I have an HTML (not XHTML) document that renders fine in Firefox 3 and IE 7.  It uses fairly basic CSS to style it and renders fine in HTML.  I'm now after a way of converting it to PDF.  I have tried:   : it had huge problems with tables.  I factored out my large nested tables and it helped (before it was just consuming up to 128M of memory then dying--thats my limit on memory in php.ini) but it makes a complete mess of tables and doesn't seem to get images.  The tables were just basic stuff with some border styles to add some lines at various points; : I actually had better luck with this.  It rendered some of the images (all the images are Google Chart URLs) and the table formatting was much better but it seemed to have some complexity problem I haven't figured out yet and kept dying with unknown node_type() errors.  Not sure where to go from here; and : this seems to work fine on basic HTML but has almost no support for CSS whatsoever so you have to do everything in HTML (I didn't realize it was still 2001 in Htmldoc-land...) so it's useless to me.   I tried a Windows app called Html2Pdf Pilot that actually did a pretty decent job but I need something that at a minimum runs on Linux and ideally runs on-demand via PHP on the Webserver.  What am I missing, or how can I resolve this issue? Is there a specific order to complete Saints Row 2? Book about classical mechanics How do JavaScript closures work? Why do electrons move towards anode in the Photoelectric effect experiment? Consider a Photoelectric effect experiment apparatus as shown in Figure 11.1    The variation of photocurrent with the voltage applied across $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{C}$ is as shown in Figure 11.3.    My question –     Why is the current non-zero even if the voltage is zero?    Consider a situation in which the voltage across the plates is zero. Photons of sufficient frequency strike the outermost surface of the cathode, emitter plate $\mathrm{C}$. Electrons become free from the attraction of nucleus as their net energy becomes positive.  Why I think that there should be no net current?  As soon as photons strike the outermost surface of the cathode(assumed to be $1$ to $10$ atomic diameters thick), electrons become free. Now, as the electrons have kinetic energy, they'll come out of that outermost surface. Now, the electrons(with kinetic energy) should have an equal probability of going in every direction of the surface. So, around half of the electrons should go in the right direction towards the anode and strike it and half should go to the left, trying to penetrate the inner surfaces of the cathode plate.   Now, the electrons which will go to the right will face some field due to the space charge present in the tube but nevertheless, some electrons will definitely reach the anode plate. After they strike with the anode plate, they'll face some resistance but still, some electrons will reach the low resistance copper wires connected to the anode plate and milliammeter.  Now, consider the electrons which go towards left. They'll definitely face resistance from cathode plate but some will still reach the copper wire.  Now, as there is no potential difference applied between $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{C}$, there is no need of commutator and voltmeter. So, the ammeter is connected in series with the anode plates and cathode plates with copper wires.  Now, if there is steady state current in the circuit, electrons emitted to any one of the sides should dominate over the other. But the number of electrons emitted on both the sides is same, and all the electrons should face the same resistance as the current(electrons) should flow in a closed loop. But if the number and velocity of electrons coming from both the sides are same, there should be no net current. But there is. Why?  Edit –  From the answers of anna v and mmainville, it can be seen that the emission of electrons is dependent on the angle of emission of light.  But still, the question remains. If the electrons emitted towards anode have enough energy to complete the circuit and again reach the holes in cathode despite the resistance in between, the electrons emitted to the left should have enough energy to come to anode plate via copper wires and again get ejected through anode plate by the virtue of their kinetic energy and reach the cathode plate. In this case too, the current should be zero which is not true. Why? arithmetic progression of primes Prove that there is no arithmetic progression that consists only of primes.  A question that I've been set; I'm guessing it makes use of primes being written in the form 4k+1 and 4k+3? Not sure where to start.  Thanks. Okay, obviously beyond Data and the Soong-type androids. But seriously, we have more robots in our daily life now than there apparently are on Trek. Is there a canon answer why not? It seems like Star Wars is more on the nose in this regard - it’s unclear why all dirty/dangerous/boring work wouldn’t be done by robots (anthropomorphic or not). Placing nodes midway on paths using |- or -| in tikz I make frequent use of |- and -| with computed points in diagrams, like so:  \coordinate (a) at (0,0); \foreach \x in (1,...,10) {     \coordinate (b) at ({whateverFunction(\x)},{whateverOtherFunction(\x)});     \draw (a) |- (b); %Straight line segment     \draw (b) -| (a); %Another straight line segment     \coordinate (a) at (b); }   To get plots like:   I would like to be able to label the midpoint of each line segment, but doing something like node[midway,above] {a} does not act like expected:    I want something like:    Why does midway not work, and what is a good workaround here? Omitting the Milliseconds in a Date Post Feedback link is broken I first noticed this a while back. But it has yet to resolve itself.  When I click on the  in the 10k tools, it hangs for a while.Then it gives me an error message: Anthology series with suspended animation and a galaxy-wide empire?