How to return double datatype with 4 decimals in a function in java ?     public static double fun(){     double d=2.5d;     String s=String.format(&quot;%.4f&quot;,d);     double ans=Double.parseDouble(s);     return(ans); }  actual output=2.5 expected output=2.5000
What I would like is a method to convert a double to a string which rounds using the half-up method - i.e. if the decimal to be rounded is 5, it always rounds up to the next number. This is the standard method of rounding most people expect in most situations.  I also would like only significant digits to be displayed - i.e. there should not be any trailing zeroes.  I know one method of doing this is to use the String.format method:  String.format("%.5g%n", 0.912385);   returns:  0.91239   which is great, however it always displays numbers with 5 decimal places even if they are not significant:   String.format("%.5g%n", 0.912300);   returns:  0.91230   Another method is to use the DecimalFormatter:  DecimalFormat df = new DecimalFormat("#.#####"); df.format(0.912385);   returns:  0.91238   However as you can see this uses half-even rounding. That is it will round down if the previous digit is even. What I'd like is this:  0.912385 -&gt; 0.91239 0.912300 -&gt; 0.9123   What is the best way to achieve this in Java?
How to reconcile the cashless human/Federation society with human traders and merchants From a variety of sources, including , we know that the Federation (or at least the humans) don't use money. This raises the problem that humans frequently visit worlds where there is currency, and, in the case of DS9, operate a station that has currency frequently in use (for example, Federation personnel frequently attend Quark's bar). Additionally, we see human traders.   My question is, how do humans get "money" (credits, latinum, etc.)? How would a human even get the resources to purchase their own merchant ship or the resources to fill its cargo holds with merchandise? If Federation personnel can simply be given money for the asking, why haven't they poured so much money down Quark's throat that he chokes on it? $f$ bounded but $f'$ isn't $y'=$ ${-x+\sqrt{(x^2+4y)}}\over 2$ , $y(2)=-1$ Prove that the solutions $y_1$ and $y_2$ for the initial value problem   $y'=$${-x+\sqrt{(x^2+4y)}}\over 2$ , $y(2)=-1$  are:  $y_1=1-x$  $y_2={{-x^2}\over 4}$  And explain why the two solutions not contradiction with the theory of existence and uniqueness.  ( sorry I don't speak English well )  My answer:  For the initial condition :  $y_1=1-x$ Satisfy the initial condition  $y(2)=-1$  $y_1=1-2=-1$   And Satisfy the differential equation  ${y_1}^{\prime}=-1$  ${{-x+\sqrt{x^2+4y}}\over 2}={{-x+\sqrt{x^2+4(1-x)}}\over 2}$  $={{-x+\sqrt{(x-2)^2}}\over 2}$  $={{-x+x-2}\over 2}=-1$  L.h.s.=R.h.s.  $y^{\prime}={{-x+\sqrt{x^2+4y}}\over 2}$  Also $y_2$ Satisfy the initial condition  $y_2={{-x^2}\over4}={-4\over4}=-1$   And satisfy the differential equation.   $y_2^{\prime}={-x\over 2}$  ${{-x+\sqrt{x^2+4y}}\over 2}={{-x+\sqrt{x^2+4({-x^2\over 4})}}\over 2}={-x\over 2}$  And for second part of exercise:  ${\partial f\over \partial y}={1\over \sqrt{x^2+4y}}$  and this not defined when $x=2, \ y=-1$  So $f(x,y)$ no satisfy lipshtize condition in any rectangular has (2,-1), Lipshtize condition including uniqueness of solution, so no contradict with the existence and uniqueness.  True ?  If this also wrong I well be delet it , I answered by the same way of my teacher :( Windows installer for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS onwards Is there any Windows installer (wubi) for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?  When I mount the .iso file with Daemon Tools and run wubi.exe, it just asks me if I want to reboot (I think that's useful only when the .iso  is burned on CD), so is there no "real" installation? I have been taught to use the if I had form in conditional clauses referring to the past:     If the president had asked me, I would have told him the same thing.   As far as I can tell though, the would have construct is sometimes used in conditional clauses as well, so it wouldn't be incorrect to say:     If the president would have asked me, I would have told him the same thing.   What is the difference between the two and the proper use of the latter? Prove the equality: $\det\left[\begin{smallmatrix} -2a &a+b &a+c \\ b+a&-2b &b+c \\ c+a&c+b &-2c \end{smallmatrix}\right] = 4(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)$ i have to prove:   $$\begin{vmatrix} -2a &amp;a+b  &amp;a+c \\   b+a&amp;-2b  &amp;b+c \\   c+a&amp;c+b  &amp;-2c  \end{vmatrix} = 4(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)$$   I have tried many calculations between the rows and columns of the determinant to get to the answer i want to solve the exercise however none of them gave me something right. Can someone help? Formatting section titles Forgive the stupid simplicity of this question, and please feel free to refer me to an older answer. I'm not quite familiar enough with LaTeX terminology to have found it.  All I want to do is set a different default format for my section titles. Instead of just being bolded and slightly larger than the main text, I'd like them to be of normal weight, the same size as the main text, and all caps.   I'm using the article class. Terminal command 'login' fails with error message Coming from Mac OS X, there is a possibility for every ordinary user to open Terminal and type in 'login' to change to a different user account.  When I do this with Ubuntu, it provides the following error message:  login: Cannot possibly work without effective root   Is there any way to remedy this?  Which file do I need to edit and with what to enable the use of this command (even for a standard user)? Why separate Stack Exchange accounts? I understand the reason why Stack Exchange has different sites to separate  from  or . I understand too why the reputation is associated on each site.   Why do I have to create a new  for each web site? I know that when I create a new account, it is automatically associated to my other accounts. But, is there a reason why, when I originally create a user on the first site, I can't go on another site with this user? How can I create an association list from 2 lists? How to get past a forgotten iPhone passcode? Moderators should not close crap, flamebait questions, let the community When a moderator comes across a question that deserves to be closed, they should not. This should be left to the community to handle.   Here's a fresh example right out of the Stack Overflow oven: "".   It's a crappy question, to be sure.  It is long, ranty, and flame-fodder.  It should have been closed, but not by a moderator.  It is not the moderators' jobs to decide on their own what is and is not proper content for a site.  That is the job of the community. By conservation of energy, the solid is left in a lower energy state following emission of a photon.  Clearly absorption and emission balance at thermal equilibrium, however, thermodynamic equilibrium is a statement of the mean behaviour of the system, not a statement that the internal energy is constant on arbitrarily short timescales.  The energy has to come from somewhere during emission, and go somewhere during absorption.  Energy in a solid can be stored as kinetic and potential energy of electrons and nuclei, either individually or in collective modes such as phonons and plasmons.  In thermal equilibrium energy will be stored more or less in various forms depending on the temperature and material.  However, even if most of the thermal energy in a particular solid at temperature $T$ is stored in the form of phonons, it could be that phonons primarily interact with light indirectly via electrons, e.g. a phonon excites an electron in a phonon-electron interaction, which can interact with light via the EM field.  Given that light is an EM field, it makes sense to me that it is emitted and absorbed by charged particles.  The electron-photon interaction is probably dominant for visible and ultraviolet light, given that metals are opaque, while semiconductors and insulators are transparent to (visible and UV) light with energy lower than their bandgap. However, once you get into energies in the IR and below, or X-rays and above, other mechanisms apparently take over.  For example, on the high-energy end of the spectrum I've heard that gamma rays can interact directly with nuclear degrees of freedom, which is reasonable considering that gamma rays are emitted during a lot of nuclear reactions.  A review of  might give clues to important light-matter interactions over a broad range of wavelengths.  Whether all of the these processes are involved in blackbody emission is a somewhat different question.  What physical processes mediate energy transfer during blackbody emission, and in which energy ranges are the various processes dominant? "At the time" versus "at that time" Rounded corners in TikZ trees. The use of “So X as to be Y” First of all, note that this is not a duplicate question of another one asking about the usage of so as to, since this one is asking about the structure of so . . . as to. . . .  I understand this might have been a better question at the , since I’m not a native English speaker. I am asking it here since I want to get some professional advice in regard to this question, since I don’t seem to have found anything similar to this on the Internet.  At the Oxford Dictionaries Online (OD) I have found the following definition of ludicrous:     So foolish, unreasonable, or out of place as to be amusing.   I understand the phrase so as to, simply meaning in order to and preceding the purpose for which an action is done.  So by itself is just therefore, hence, thus, or a way of emphasizing an adjective or adverb.  As to in itself means with regard to or according to, as pointed out in .  In the OD definition of ludicrous, the use of so looks fair to me, that is, it clearly emphasizes the high extent to which something is foolish or unreasonable.  The use of as to doesn’t work in any way I’ve mentioned in this case (neither as in with regard to nor according to). I think the dictionary I’ve referred to has missed one, if not more, meaning of the phrase as to.  In this case, it appears to have likely been used as an alternative to that when used in the form So X, that Y, meaning something is or happens X (a combination of adjectives or adverbs) enough to cause Y to happen.  Of course, I don’t mean that in the structure so X as to Y the phrase as to is absolutely equivalent to that, since substituting as to with that changes the structure of Y.  Does all this mean that the phrase as to is a great alternative to that (although changing the structure of Y) whenever the sentence is of the form so X, that Y (where X is a combination of one or more adjectives or adverbs)?  I am new here and so I’m not too familiar with the variety of existing tags here, so if anyone sees an additional one that would fit, please add it to this question. I would also be glad to see some other corrections of my grammar. Missing Microsoft.Data.Services.Client version 5.6 on Azure Websites What is the best way to store user settings for a .NET application? I have a .NET 2.0 Windows Forms application. Where is the best place the store user settings (considering Windows guidelines)?  Some people pointed to Application.LocalUserAppDataPath. However, that creates a folder structure like:     C:\Documents and Settings\user_name\Local Settings\Application   Data\company_name\product_name\product_version\   If I release version 1 of my application and store an XML file there, then release version 2, that would change to a different folder, right? I'd prefer to have a single folder, per user, to store settings, regardless of the application version. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ What are the requirements to get the "Weed Eater" hat? The hat's description says     answer a question qualifying for the Tumbleweed badge that gets accepted   During the winter bash, I  a question that is a , and it got accepted; yet I did not get the hat. However  answer  and did get the hat. (What was the difference?)  So what are the exact requirements to get the  hat? How critical are macOS Mojave compatibility requirements? As per Apple support document, :     1. Check compatibility      You can upgrade to macOS Mojave from OS X Mountain Lion or later on   any of the following Mac models. Your Mac also needs at least 2GB of   memory and 12.5GB of available storage space, or up to 18.5GB of   storage space when upgrading from OS X Yosemite or earlier.         MacBook introduced in early 2015 or later   MacBook Air introduced in mid 2012 or later   MacBook Pro introduced in mid 2012 or later   Mac mini introduced in late 2012 or later   iMac introduced in late 2012 or later   iMac Pro (all models)   Mac Pro introduced in late 2013, plus mid-2010 or mid-2012 models with a recommended Metal-capable graphics card.      I am currently running macOS High Sierra on my Early 2011 MacBook Pro.  What does Apple's requirements mean for my ability to install Mojave? Is it possible or worthwhile to do so?