Here is a quote: "x Consulting Group provides senior consultants to evaluate, architect and design stable and effective solutions and networks".  What more is it that the consultants are doing that is not already captured by evaluating and designing?
I hear the word architect used as a verb in the technical field and now more often in other industries and groups, for example:     We need to architect a better solution to the problem.   I am interested if this is considered acceptable usage, as I see this word being used more in published technical documents (not necessarily books, but corporate publications).  I can see how a conductor can conduct, a typist can type, but can a scientist "science"?  A scientist might research, analyze, and so forth, as an architect might design, create, build, etc.  Merriam-Webster , however, I have been told that other dictionaries exist that define architect as both a noun and a verb&nbsp;— is there a credible reference or source that authoritatively answers this question?
Is there a built-in function to print all the current properties and values of an object? Basic question, how do I resume interrupted / failed downloads in Firefox? I am monitoring the number of pages indexed by Googlebot for one of my websites .  I noticed that since last week, the number of pages has dropped by about 60 or so. Now to be fair, I have not added that much over the last week. (Actually I don't think I added any new content.) But at the very least, I would have thought that the number of indexed pages would be static (if I was not adding anything new.)  I don't understand why the numbers have dropped.  Does anyone have an official explanation for this?. I have checked the Google Webmaster Tools, and have not come across anything that addresses this issue directly. In Thor: The Dark World, Odin and Loki are discussing Loki's actions during The Avengers.  Loki argues that he would have ruled Earth as &quot;a benevolent god&quot;, and Odin replies:  Odin: We are not gods! We are born, we live, we die, just as humans do.  Now that's pretty definitive.  And Loki's snarky reply (&quot;Give or take five thousand years...&quot;) would seem to confirm that Asgardians have a limited lifespan, and will eventually die of old age.1  And we know that Asgardians can die in battle, because we've seen it happen over and over with supporting characters and Asgardian soldiers. Now, I've always been more of a fan of Thor stories (like Jason Aaron's Thor: God of Thunder arc) in which Thor and the Asgardians are gods.  Straight-up, genuine, higher-level-of-existence gods, not von-Däniken-esque wannabes playing on the tired old notion of magic just being super-advanced science.  BUT, despite my preferences, this exchange would seem to confirm once and for all that in the MCU, the Asgardians are not gods, but rather were mistaken for gods because of their ram-horns full of awesome-sauce and their magnificent bulging pecks. But wait!  Watch that movie for about 30 seconds longer and we come across this exchange:  Thor: She is ill. Odin: She is mortal. Illness is their defining trait.  Wait, what?  I thought Asgardians weren't immortal?  They can die in battle, and they naturally die of old age.  In my book, that makes them long-lived, but entirely &quot;mortal&quot;.  Surely Odin isn't splitting a hair so fine as to say that resistance to disease alone makes one &quot;immortal&quot;? So, if the Asgardians of the MCU aren't actually gods (grumblegrumblegrumble...), and they can't live forever (or even particularly long in a cosmic sense), and they can be killed in battle, in what sense are they &quot;immortal&quot; at all?  1 Fun fact: adjusted for a roughly 5,000 year lifespan, 1,048-year-old Loki is currently in the tail-end of his rebellious teenage phase. I thought I'd post this as it illustrates a problem often encountered on ELU.     In structures such as 'football manager', is 'football' a modifier or   a complement of the head noun?   I've seen both terms used as if there were only one possible correct answer. However, I've come across widely differing definitions of both 'modify' and 'complement' as used in grammar. I believe that people stating baldly that this is either one or the other are assuming a grammar that they prefer, rather than giving a balanced overview.  Notice that I intend this question to explore the usage/s of the term 'modify' and of the term 'complement' in this context. There may be overlap with the question of which word-class 'football' fits into, but that decision hardly answers the question. Round a double to x significant figures Allow deleting a tag wiki or excerpt Sometimes a tag wiki excerpt or body ends up with unacceptable or useless content: plagiarized text that must be removed, or a totally unhelpful dictionary definition. (For example:  — and I've seen this situation many times before.)  The only way to get rid of that content is to submit replacement text that meets the minimum length requirement. This is not always easy as writing a decent wiki, and especially a decent excerpt, requires subject knowledge.  Currently the users or even moderators who are alerted to unacceptable content in a tag wiki cannot remove that content without providing their own, which they are not always in a position to do. Yet these wikis would be better off with no content than with either unacceptable or unhelpful content, or some content written by a non-expert in a hurry.  Please provide a way for users to blank a tag wiki excerpt or body. I'm not sure what the reputation requirement should be: same mechanism as for tag wiki edits (suggested edits with approval), or only done directly by a user with the trusted user (20k) privilege, or moderator-only. Do you know any open source tool to automatically align images, similar to the auto align feature in Photoshop? If $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n^{2}$ converges, then so does $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {a_n}{n}$ Let $a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots$ be reals. Prove that if $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n^{2}$ converges, then so does $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {a_n}{n}$.   For this I have shown the case for when $ a_n^{2} \le\frac {|a_n|}{n}$ $\Rightarrow$ $ |a_n|\le\frac {1}{n}$ $\Rightarrow$ $\frac {|a_n|}{n} \le \frac{1}{n^{2}}$ and we know that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {1}{n^{2}}$ converges and hence $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac {a_n}{n}$ converges by the comparison test. Now considering $ a_n^{2} \ge\frac {|a_n|}{n}$ $\Rightarrow$ $\frac {|a_n|}{n} \le a_n^{2}$ $\rightarrow$ combining the two cases for any n we have: $\frac {|a_n|}{n}\le\frac{1}{n^{2}}+a_n^{2}$ Hence using the comparion test again we know that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n^{2}$ converges and $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {1}{n^{2}}$ converges hence the sum converges so we can conclude that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {a_n}{n}$ is absoluetly convergent $\Rightarrow$ convergent.  Not to sure if this is correct, any help would be much appreciated, many thanks. What is the meaning of this sentence - "Were it not for the bodies there on the ground, it would have appeared to be a normal day at the oasis."? Possible Duplicate:          What is the meaning of this sentence - "Were it not for the bodies there on the ground, it would have appeared to be a normal day at the oasis."?  Does it mean something like this - If the bodies were not there on the ground, it would have appeared to be a normal day at the oasis.  Can anyone also explain the structure of this sentence and example of some similar sentences? Polynomial rings in infinitely indeterminants How can we prove that (the set of all polynomials in infinitely non commutative indeterminants over $k$) is a ring, where $k$ is a ring with unity?   Adding two polynomials is a polynomial, but for commutativity  How can we show the following: $ax_1+bx_2=bx_2+ax_1$ (commutativity of addition) If we have finite number of variable it is easy to prove it, (we take the $n-1$ variables...), but what about the infinite number of variables?  Can someone give me a hint? Is there a way to condition output on a given date? I'd like to be able to print text that varies depending on whether the date matches a given date string  For example  suppose there was a command   \iftoday#1#2#3   which printed #2 if \today matched the string in #1 and #3 otherwise.  So a sample of my proposed usage would be:     \iftoday{February 3, 2016}{There's no garbage today}{Please put out the garbage}    I've tried various commands like pdftexcmd's strcmp, to no avail.    I suspect the problem may have to do with matching the string generated by \today.    While on screen it appears that \today returns February 3, 2016. I can't get it to match February 3, 2016 when I compare strings.  Obviously, I'd be perfectly happy if I could get this to work by represent today's date in any of the standard date formats.  Thanks very much in advance for any suggestions. Can it hurt to put my GRE score on my resume? If my score is good and if I'm applying for an MS program in Europe, can it give me any kind of edge? The university I'm applying to requires GRE scores for certain programs but not the one I'm applying for. And if it won't be advantageous, can it hurt my prospects in anyway? I was granted a visa to Australia few months ago. I’d like to travel to Australia in few days. However, I’ve just renewed my passport and I don’t have enough time to inform them about my passport renewal. Can I travel to Australia by carrying both my old and my new passports? Survey database design: associate an answer to a user I'm doing the conceptual model for a survey database.  The goal is store the answers given by users (it's going to be an Android app).  I have three entities: user, question and option.  A question will have one or more options (for example: How many employees do you have? 1-40, 40-1000, +1000).  Options will have a text (1-40) and a value (the value selected by user).  User will select one (or more) of these options.  My conceptual design is:    I don't know how to associate an answer with an user.  How can I represent that relation? Do I have another entity to represent option value?  This model will store questions and pre-made answers (offered answers) and allows them to be re-used in different surveys.  I have to represent question like this one:    This question is related to this one: Does a sorcerer's metamagic work for non-sorcerer spells? Can a multiclass sorcerer/cleric use the Metamagic class ability with non-sorcerer spells? For example, using Twinned Spell when casting cure wounds to heal two creatures instead of just one? I'm sorry if this question goes against the meta for posting questions - I attached all the "beware, this is a soft-question" tags I could.  This is a question I've been asking myself now for some time. In most areas, there's a "cut off age" to be good at something. For example, you're not going to make the NHL if you start playing hockey at 20. It just won't happen.  So my question then, how late is too late to start studying math and make a career out of it? By "start studying math" I mean, to really try to understand and comprehend the material (as opposed to just being able to do well in a formal, intuitional environment).   I don't mean this from a "do what you love, its not too late" motivational perspective. I mean this from a purely biological perspective; at approximately what age has your brain's capacity to learn effectively and be influenced by your learning stop? When does the biological clock for learning new math run out?  My reasoning for asking this question is (for those who care): I love math. Really I do. But , having spent the first 21 years of my life in sports/video games/obtaining a degree in a scientific field which I care nothing of/etc, despite all my best attempts at trying to learn math, am I just too late starting to ever actually be good enough at it to make it a career? I've almost completed my second degree (in Math), but find that in many cases, despite how I look at a problem, I lack the intuition to comprehend it. I'm going to single him out (sorry), only as an example, but Qiaochu Yuan is my age.   Note 1: If this question isn't a suitable post, I won't be offended at all if you vote to close - I know this question borders what's acceptable to ask.  Note 2: Thanks to everyone for reading and taking the time for the great responses. Really appreciate it! What is the minimum distribution for LaTeX The space $C^0([0;1],\mathbb{R})$ of all continuous, real-valued functions on $[0,1]$ is not reflexive. Which of these two phrases has more negative undertone?      "The interview I had was not very good"    or      "The interview I had was not good"