I have a staff member with a Win8 Asus Laptop.  They have decided they want to wipe it clean and install Windows7. There is no data on the computer they want to preserve.  So, I have a new copy of Win7 Home Premium to install on it. I've tried using custom install and selected the partition and everything seems to go fine. However, when it comes to reboot after installation, it hangs at 'starting windows'. Safemode hangs as disk.sys.   I'm leaning towards deleting all the partitions as I think there is some issue with the Win8 partitions.  What is the best way to replace Win8 with Win7 on a clean computer where there isn't any data or settings to worry about? Should I partition or wipe the whole drive? What is the best way to tackle this problem?
I recently purchased an ASUS K55A. Like all Windows 8 machines, it come with a UEFI feature called Secure Boot. This basically makes sure that the laptop won't load anything other than the Windows 8 OEM version that came with it.  However the Asus UEFI allows for me to disable Secure Boot, and therefore I should be able to revert to Windows 7, Linux, etc. (drivers may or may not be supported). When I insert my Linux Mint boot disc and try to boot from it, though, nothing happens. There isn't even a boot priority list in the UEFI settings (I can provide screenshots later). It just says "Windows 8 Bootloader" and also on the other tab it says "WINDOWS 8 BOOT OVERRIDE".  Has anybody purchased a Windows 8 machine and successfully installed Windows 7 or Linux on it?
What is the reasoning behind restricting the number of migration paths? On the religion and culture stackexchange sites, many, many users will initially ask a question in a place that's kind of off-topic there, but are fully on-board elsewhere.    Christianity.SE, for example, gets a lot of general philopsophical questions that would be better on Philosophy, historical questions that might be better on History.SE, and hermenutical questions that are better on BH.SE.  It is, however, unreasonable in my mind for a user with a question to be required to have domain expertise on which sub-site each has. Indeed, even amongst users with a high amount of knowledge, there can be disagreement.  Likewise, , but as just about every one of those is in beta, the user would have to be very saavy (or would have to find that post) in order to nail it every time.  That said, recommending that a question be moved is much harder than it needs to be.  I have seen business rule logic that says, for example,    migration paths only exist to graduated sites (ergo politics, money, history, and quantitative finance wouldn't qualify) migration paths seem to be limited to 5.   Anything not on a migration path requires a moderator (and not just a high rep user) to get involved.  So, what is the reasoning behind this?  Note, I'm not asking for a solution (although the obvious solution would be to allow migration paths to any established site, beta or not, i.e. a VTC as off topic b/c it belongs on another site should allow you to pick any other site) - I just want to understand the business purpose in restricting migration paths to a small, predefined number for everyone other than a mod. What is an "AppImage"? How do I install it? I just read . It talks about downloading an AppImage.     Yes, Linux; the Linux packages is distributed as an .appimage for 32-bit and 64-bit distributions, and should run across all major Linux distributions without any issues. The team currently have no plan to provide a native .deb (or .rpm) installer.   What are AppImages? How do they differ from snaps? Let G be a finitely generated abelian group and M a compact manifold,  I want to prove that $H_r(M,G)$ is finitely generated for $r\ge 0 $.  First I was thinking if  I could do induction over $r$ because for $r=0$, $H_0(M,G) \cong \bigoplus_{i=1}^nG$ where $n$ denotes the number of connected components of M.But for $r&gt;0$ I can't see a way to relate $H_r(M,G$) and $H_{r+1}(M,G)$.  Then I tried to use the fact that for every compact surface there exists a finite cover $\{A_i\}_{i=1}^m$ such that the finite intersections of $A_i$'s are contractile.Let $\{A_i\}_{i=1}^m$ such cover for $M$.Then,using induction on $m$, we have :  -For $m=0$, $M$ is contractile and $G$ finitely generated then $H_r(M,G) $is finitely generated.  -For $m=r$ it's true by induction hypothesis.  -For $m=r+1$ now putting $A_{r+1}=B$ and $\cup_{i=1}^r A_i=A$, and using Mayer Vietoris we get:  $$ ...\rightarrow H_{r+1}(A\cap B,G)\rightarrow  H_{r+1}(A,G) \oplus H_{r+1}(B,G) \rightarrow H_{r+1}(M,G)\rightarrow H_{r}(A\cap B,G) \rightarrow...$$   Here I don't know what to do, maybe I'm missing some algebraic argument It's easy to see that $H_{r+1}(A\cap B,G)$ and $H_{r+1}(A,G) \oplus H_{r+1}(B,G)$ are finitely generated.But how can I argue that $H_{r+1}(M,G)$ is finitely generated? Any idea would be aprecciated. How is the Starkiller Base supposed to work more than one time, given how it draws its power? In Star Wars: The Force Awakens, once the Starkiller Base has depleted the star it is drawing power from, is it supposed to travel to another star where it can draw more power? Or is it non-mobile and supposed to fire a few, limited shots only? Or can it somehow reuse the star it is drawing power from, even after it has been depleted?  Its name suggests that it will "kill" or completely deplete the star it is drawing power from, but I haven't noticed an indication in the film that the Starkiller Base can travel to other stars. Show that $\mathbb{Q}\times \mathbb{Q}$ is denumerable Are nested functions a bad thing in gcc ? Equation left margin I have equations inside an environment which has a larger left-margin than the main text (analogous to an enumerate/itemize environment, implemented with the changepage package's adjustwidth environment). Just as equations in enumerate/itemize behave, the equations are centered with respect to the entire text, rather than just the width of the container environment. I want the latter behavior.  I'm trying to accomplish this by wrapping all display-math in minipages. Namely, I'm modifying the mathdisplay environment in amsmath.sty as follows:  \makeatletter \let\oldmd\mathdisplay \def\mathdisplay#1{%   \newline   \begin{minipage}{\textwidth-\@totalleftmargin}%     \oldmd{#1}% } \let\oldendmd\endmathdisplay \def\endmathdisplay#1{%   \oldendmd{#1}%   \end{minipage} } \makeatother   This is almost working, but there are some issues with spacing which I don't understand how to fix. Here's how the the normal \[ ... \] and numbered \begin{equation} ... \end{equation} look with the above modification:      My main confusion is why the numbered version is behaving so differently from the unnumbered. But all in all I want to fix this so that the spacing above and below is even as it usually is. Any help is appreciated, thanks.  Edit: Here's a compilable example:  \documentclass{amsart}  \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{calc} \usepackage{changepage}  \makeatletter \let\oldmd\mathdisplay \def\mathdisplay#1{%   \newline   \begin{minipage}{\textwidth-\@totalleftmargin}%     \oldmd{#1}% } \let\oldendmd\endmathdisplay \def\endmathdisplay#1{%   \oldendmd{#1}%   \end{minipage} } \makeatother  \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}  \begin{document}  \lipsum[1]  \begin{adjustwidth}{20pt}{} \lipsum[2] \[ x \mapsto \hom(-,x) \]  \lipsum[3] \begin{equation}   y \mapsto \hom(y,-) \end{equation} \lipsum[4] \end{adjustwidth}  \lipsum[5]  \end{document} Windows 8 OEM Reinstalling I know this question is a repetition but I didn't find any solution of my problem from any of the previous questions. Recently I formatted my Laptop HDD and now I want to re install windows 8 I've a Windows 8 OEM license but the problem is I don't have a disc , I downloaded en_windows_8_x64_dvd_915440 from msdn , but when I boot the windows it shows the error that the current version is not suitable with my serial key, so where I can find an OEM Windows 8 and also I've a retail windows 8 disc so if I install that windows 8 in my pc and is there any way to activate it using my OEM key Inequality vs. Inequation, Equation vs. Equality When talking about statements that two terms are mathematically (un-)equal (e.g., 1 = 1, 1 &lt; 2, or 1 != 2), what is the correct notion for such mathematical statements? Are there special cases w.r.t. "mixed" relations like x &lt;= y? Can some notions be used interchangeably?  It seems many online sources use "equation" and "inequality" but there is also a . Apart from personal posts in forums, I have not found any sources using "equality" in such a situation, yet. Systematically, I would think that "equation" and "inequation" would make more sense than "equation" and "inequality", but not everything (probably very few things) in natural languages have developed according to a purely logical system.  Note that this question is more general than  for that it particularly asks for the relation between the notion for equations and the one for inequalities. Equations are not part of the existing question at all. Is Meta Stack Overflow just the meta for Stack Overflow or is it a somewhat special meta site? Initially I thought that Meta Stack Overflow was the common meta for all SE sites.   Then I noted that  has its own meta site.   It took a while for me to learn that even Server Fault has its own meta site.  Looking at my reputation points, I see difference between Stack Overflow and Meta Stack Overflow, but not between the other sites and there corresponding meta sites.  Now, is Meta Stack Overflow in some sense the master meta site of all or not? I always thought with "any" I should use the plural, but on the internet I can find both:   It can be found in any book. It can be found in any books Do you have any books? It can be said in any language.  This can be understood by anyone.  It has been used in any form.   So, what's correct?  Is there any rule? Prove if f(z) is entire function s.t $|f(z)|\leq M|z|$ then $f(z)$ Is polynomial of degree $1$ Let $f(z)$ be an entire function s.t $|f(z)|\leq M|z|$ ; $M&gt;0$ is a constant then $f(z)$ Is polynomial of degree 1   My try $f(z)$ is entire so it can be written as a $\sum a_n z^n$  $$|\sum a_n z^n|\leq \sum |a_n||z|^n\leq M|z|$$  So $n=1$  Seems that the move $\sum |a_n||z|^n\leq M|z|$ is problematic PDO's FETCH_INTO $this class does not work Shifting -5 V to +5 V signal to 0 to +5 V for ADC I want to convert the  output voltage of an ECG (-5 to +5) to 0 - +5 volt for ADC. Should i use Op amp ? What is my problem in this picture? I simulated it in Proteus ... but when input voltage is higher than 4 V or lower than -4 V Vout gives an unexpected value.   Below is another simulink that have same problem ...    My idea to make this level of voltage is (Vin +10)/2 that give the range 0-5 V. Why are neural networks becoming deeper, but not wider? In recent years, convolutional neural networks (or perhaps deep neural networks in general) have become deeper and deeper, with state-of-the-art networks going from 7 layers () to 1000 layers ( in the space of 4 years. The reason behind the boost in performance from a deeper network, is that a more complex, non-linear function can be learned. Given sufficient training data, this enables the networks to more easily discriminate between different classes.  However, the trend seems to not have followed with the number of parameters in each layer. For example, the number of feature maps in the convolutional layers, or the number of nodes in the fully-connected layers, has remained roughly the same and is still relatively small in magnitude, despite the large increase in the number of layers. From my intuition though, it would seem that increasing the number of parameters per layer would give each layer a richer source of data from which to learn its non-linear function; but this idea seems to have been overlooked in favour of simply adding more layers, each with a small number of parameters.  So whilst networks have become "deeper", they have not become "wider". Why is this? Multi-core vs Multi-CPU I am requesting a new server from our Server team. Which is better for SQL Server performance: 2 CPUs with 8 cores per CPU or 1 CPU with 16 cores? link new object to scene with python in 2.8 In Python 2.8, I would like to create copies of the object 'CubeTemplate' but am having no luck.  I have reviewed every blender.stackexchange post on this subject (, ,  and ) but cannot get them to work - either they don't apply or the sample code throws errors (perhaps because it was pre 2.8).  The code below throws this error:       AttributeError: 'bpy_prop_collection' object has no attribute 'link'   for x in range(1, 3):     bpy.data.objects['CubeTemplate'].select_set(True)     bpy.context.view_layer.objects.active = bpy.data.objects['CubeTemplate']     me = bpy.context.object.data # use current object's data     me_copy = me.copy()     ob = bpy.data.objects.new('CubeCopy'+str(x), me_copy)     ob.location = (0, 0, x)     scene = bpy.context.scene     scene.objects.link(ob)     scene.update() How to solve the diffencial equation for power series $(1+x²)y'' - 6xy=0$ in $x_{0}=0$ I have tried for the power series but when suppose the solution is $y(x)=\sum _{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n$ appeared sums dependents of $a_n$,  $a_{n+2}$ and $a_{n-1}$ and this is not possible. Let n be an even integer. How many different ways can I choose subsets of the set {1,2...,n} Let n be an even integer. How many different ways can I choose subsets of the set {1,2...,n} if they all have to have odd size, but the intersection of any two of them has to have even size?  Please help me answer this question or lead me in the right direction. Thank you :) Do the Ents go to the Undying Lands?