I recently got a microSD card for a music player, I've tried to mount this on my computer to transfer music but have got the following error:  Unable to mount 127 GB Volume     Error mounting /dev/sdb1 at /media/blank/9C33-6BBD: Command-line `mount -t "exfat" -o "uhelper=udisks2,nodev,nosuid,uid=1000,gid=1000,iocharset=utf8,namecase=0,errors=remount-ro,umask=0077" "/dev/sdb1" "/media/blank/9C33-6BBD"' exited with non-zero exit status 32: mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'   I'm trying to mount the microSD via a usb adapter - I've tried 2 different adapters with no difference. My system is Ubuntu 14.04.  I've run   lsusb sudo fdisk -l    and the results are:      blank@blank:~$ lsusb Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 006: ID 0420:1307 Chips and Technologies Celly SIM Card Reader Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 011 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 010 Device 002: ID 04d9:0499 Holtek Semiconductor, Inc. Optical Mouse Bus 010 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 009 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub blank@blank:~$ sudo fdisk -l [sudo] password for blank:     Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x4eb6e04c     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1   *          63   212700599   106350268+   7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda2       212701184   391024639    89161728   82  Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda3       391026686  1953523711   781248513    5  Extended /dev/sda5      1919977472  1953523711    16773120   82  Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda6       391026688  1919977471   764475392   83  Linux  Partition table entries are not in disk order  Disk /dev/sdb: 127.0 GB, 126968922112 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 15436 cylinders, total 247986176 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sdb1           32768   247986175   123976704    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT   Any pointers as to what the issue is and how I can resolve it?
When trying to mount an exfat filesystem, I get the following error:  Error mounting /dev/sda6 at /media/gkp/Backup: Command-line  `mount -t "exfat" -o "uhelper=udisks2,nodev,nosuid" "/dev/sda6" "/media/gkp/Backup"'  exited with non-zero exit status 32: mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'   Exfat is used on some USB sticks and camera sd cards. What can I do to mount this type of filesystem?
How to change Gnome-Terminal title? I have this problem where I can't built slide documents with beamer every time I include a math environment as simple as $\mu = A$. The log file posts this message at the end:  !pdfTeX error: miktex-pdftex.exe (file mathkerncmssi10): Font mathkerncmssi10 a t 657 not found  ==&gt; Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!   I understand that the file (mathkerncmssi10) that is apparently missing is part of the package sansmathaccent, but the package is already there and updated.  This is driving me crazy, I would appreciate any help.    Sure, I tried this with several examples. I can post this one  \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usetheme{Warsaw} \title[Make a LaTeX presentation using Beamer]{Introduction  to Beamer\\How to make a presentation with LaTeX?} \author{Nadir Soualem -- Astozzia} \institute{Math-linux.com} \date{Jule 13, 2007} \begin{document} \begin{frame} \titlepage \end{frame} \begin{frame}{Introduction} This is a short introduction to Beamer class. $\mu=A$ \end{frame} \end{document}    By the way, it turns out that I just tried this one in another PC and works fine. I am wondering if the mass density profile $\rho(\vec{r})$ has been characterized for atomic particles such as quarks and electrons. I am currently taking an intro class in quantum mechanics, and I have run this question by several professors. It is my understanding from the viewpoint of quantum physics a particle's position is given by a probability density function $\Psi(\vec{r},t)$. I also understand that when books quote the "radius" of an electron they are typically referring to some approximate range into which an electron is "likely" to fall, say, one standard deviation from the expectation value of its position or maybe $10^{-15}$ meters.  However it is my impression that, in this viewpoint, wherever the particle "is" or even whether or not the particle "had" any position to begin with (via the Bell Inequalities), it is assumed that if it were (somehow) found, it would be a point mass. This has been verified by my professors and GSIs. I am wondering if its really true.  If the particle was truly a point mass then wherever it is, it would presumably have an infinite mass density. Wouldn't that make electrons and quarks indistinguishable from very tiny black holes? Is there any practical difference between saying that subatomic particles are black holes and that they are point masses? I am aware of such problems as Hawking Radiation although at the scales of the Schwarchild radius of an electron (back of the envelope calculation yields $\tilde{}10^{-57}$ meters), would it really make any more sense to use quantum mechanics as opposed to general relativity?  If anyone knows of an upper bound on the volume over which an electron/quark/gluon/anything else is distributed I would be interested to know. A quick Google Search has yielded nothing but the "classical" electron radius, which is not what I am referring to.  Thanks in advance; look forward to the responses. I have been playing with the settings for the text object recently, and every time I add a new text object, I need to change the font to my favorite one. (Eurostile LT ExtendedTwo) Is there any way to change the default font so I do not need to change it every time I add a new text object?   Example: Prove that $f$ has finite number of roots Let $f:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable function. If there do not exist any $x\in[0,1]$ such that $f(x)=f'(x)=0$, prove that $f$ has only finite number of zeros in $[0,1]$.   I'm not getting any idea how to proceed. Solving the recurrence $T(n) = \sqrt n T(\sqrt{n}) + \sqrt{n}$ Let's say I'm trying to answer a lot of questions just to up my reputation (even if I generally don't know what I'm talking about).  Then, whenever I get downvoted, I just delete my answer so that nobody sees that I've posted stupid answers, and so I don't lose reputation points.   Is this frowned upon? Do I lose reputation points on downvoted answers if I delete them? Why is the Cantor function not absolutely continuous? Is there an easy way to see that the Cantor function is not absolutely continuous that directly uses the definition of absolutely continuous? I recently tried to change a bulb using an adaptor (converting from a E27 to B22 fitting). After switching on the light fitting the fuse had blown. After inspection it turns out the adapter is faulty and must have caused a short-circuit.  After removing the bulb and resetting the switch in the main fuse box, I am now unable to operate the switch on the wall to turn the fitting off (the switch physically won't click).   Is there something I can do to fix the problem?  Thanks, Do we have always $f(A \cap B) = f(A) \cap f(B)$? Suppose $A$ and $B$ are subsets of a topological space and $f$ is any function from $X$ to another topological space $Y$. Do we have always $f(A \cap B) = f(A) \cap f(B)$?  Thanks in advance I need to echo a string containing angle brackets (&lt; and >) to a file on a Windows machine.  Basically what I want to do is the following: echo some string &lt; with angle &gt; brackets &gt;&gt;myfile.txt  This doesn't work since the command interpreter gets confused with the angle brackets.  I could quote the whole string like this: echo "some string &lt; with angle &gt; brackets" &gt;&gt;myfile.txt  But then I have double quotes in my file that I don't want.    Escaping the brackets ala unix doesn't work either: echo some string \&lt; with angle \&gt; brackets &gt;&gt;myfile.txt  Ideas? Suppose I have something like the following:      \begin{eqnarray*} \mathrm{gcd}(x^3 + 6x^2 + 5x + 5, x^3 + 13x^2 + 6x + 3) &amp;=&amp; 102x^2 + 108x + 2 \ \mathrm{with} \ p = 109 \\ \mathrm{gcd}(x^3 + 2x^2 + 9x + 4, x^3 + 3x^2 + 7x + 9) &amp;=&amp; 1 \ \mathrm{with} \ p = 131 \\ \mathrm{gcd}(x^3 + 3x^2 + 9x + 12, x^3 + 6x^2 + 12x + 4) &amp;=&amp; 6x + 122 \ \mathrm{with} \ p = 157 \end{eqnarray*}   How do I align the statements at the end of each line (i.e. the "with p = ..." bit) to the right? Mean and variance of inverse of a normal RV My random variable $X$ is normally distributed with mean $b$ and variance $p$. I defined a new RV, $Y$, such that $Y=1/X$. Does anyone know how to find the mean of $Y$ and $Y^2$? A charged particle undergoing an acceleration radiates photons.  Let's consider a charge in a freely falling frame of reference.  In such a frame, the local gravitational field is necessarily zero, and the particle does not accelerate or experience any force. Thus, this charge is free in such a frame. But, a free charge does not emit any photons. There seems to be a paradox. Does a freely falling charge in a gravitational field radiate? Number reference headline I try to number the header of my references. I succeeded to add the number to the table of contents, but I can't get it to work for the header.  To add the number to the toc I used:  \addcontentsline{toc}{section} \protect\numberline{\thesection}References}   If I try the same for \refname, I get 5References without space.   \renewcommand{\refname}{\protect\numberline{\thesection References}}   When I put the references title outside the curly brackets, it's shown in a new line. What am I missing here? The full bibliography call looks like this:  \renewcommand{\refname}{\protect\numberline{\thesection References}} \addtocounter{section}{1} \cleardoublepage \phantomsection \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\protect\numberline{\thesection}References} \bibliographystyle{apacite} \bibliography{bachelor}   EDIT 1:  As @TeXnician stated, a tilde would solve the problem. It is not very elegant, though, as I have to use approximatly three of them to get the same space as in the other headlines.   \renewcommand{\refname}{\protect\numberline{\thesection~~~References}}   EDIT 2: @Werner suggested a shorter solution, but it throws multiple errors, when I try to integrate it into my .tex file. Here's a short reproducable example which replicates the errors.  \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[margin=1.1in]{geometry} \usepackage{listings} \usepackage{apacite} \usepackage{natbib}  \begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}  @Article{draxler2010sample,     author    = {Draxler, Clemens},     title     = {Sample size determination for Rasch model tests},     journal   = {Psychometrika},     year      = {2010},     volume    = {75},     number    = {4},     pages     = {708--724},     publisher = {Springer}, }  \end{filecontents}   \begin{document}  \tableofcontents      \section{First Chapter}  \citep{draxler2010sample}  \let\oldsection\section% Store \section in \oldsection \renewcommand{\section}[2]{\oldsection{#2}}% Update \section to gobble * \bibliography{mybib} \bibliographystyle{apacite}  \appendix  \section{R Code}  \subsection{Greedings Function}  \begin{lstlisting}     print("Hello World") \end{lstlisting}  \end{document} Meaning of "over in" I read this sentence in a book:     I just took part in a study over in the Psychology Department.   Why do we add over in front of in the here? Normal text is invisible when using beamer with notes and XeLaTeX I use babelbib and I have a source with two authors. Contrarily to when using the plain bib style, as soon as I switch to babplain, the author names are formatted like this:  [1] Müller, Jan und Eva Schulze: Name of the book, 2015.   While I would like both author names to be formatted the same way, that is one of these:  [1] Müller, Jan und Schulze, Eva: Name of the book, 2015. [1] Jan Müller und Eva Schulze: Name of the book, 2015.   sources:  % test.tex \usepackage[ngerman]{babel} \usepackage[fixlanguage]{babelbib} \selectbiblanguage{ngerman} \bibliographystyle{babplain} \bibliography{test}  % test.bib @manual{foo,     author = "Müller, Jan and Schulze, Eva",     title = "Name of the book",     year = "2015", }   I can fix it by specifying and {Schulze, Eva}, but that way all is treated as the last name, that cannot be the solution, can it? I'm trying to find a story for my father, from the 70s or earlier  Earth is at war with aliens (possibly Martians) and was unable to effectively fight back as the aliens had planetary (or at least city-protecting) force fields through which no bombardment was possible.  Earth eventually wins through invention of a device that allows them to teleport weapons (nukes?) under the force fields.  originally believed to be one of Harry Harrison's 'One step from earth' shorts, but this is not the case.  Thanks in advance for any help here! How do you get Mac OS Finder to group folders together when sorting? I have Mac OS 10.7.4 and I'd like Finder to use "Is Folder?" as its first sort criteria, or in other words, group folders before files regardless of the sorting method.  Windows and Linux both do this by default.