I'm attempting a manual upgrade of a Vagrant VM box (of the WordPress dev environment , which uses ) from 14.04 (14.04.5 LTS I think...) to 16.04.2 LTS.  This is the second time I've attempted this, I took a snapshot beforehand.  I used do-release-upgrade rather than the Debian method, and I didn't see any obvious errors/problems during it.  On completion it reboots and hangs, until it gets as far as this:  [...] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid usbhid: USB HID core driver random: nonblocking pool is initialized     The VM apparently doesn't have grub, so I downloaded an Ubuntu Live CD ISO image, configured VirtualBox to boot from that, and ran boot-repair.   Latest options I've tried:      I was then able to access Grub and boot into recovery mode. (Incidentally grub is giving me two sets of options, version 4.4 and an earlier v3.13, I'm using the most recent).    I tried updating grub and doing dpkg --configure -a, though I suspect there was nothing wrong with either and these made no difference, it still hangs in the same place.  What do I do now / what to look for?  Also, if I were to restore the 14.04 snapshot and upgrade again, is there anything I could do beforehand that would likely prevent this?  Software versions:  Vagrant 1.9.2 VirtualBox 5.1.10 Mac OS X 10.11.6 (El Capitan)  VirtualBox settings:   Linux Ubuntu (64-bit) 2 MB RAM, Chipset ICH9 Enable I/O APIC - on Enable EFI - off Hardware clock in UTC time - on    4 CPUs Enable PAE/NX - off  Acceleration: Paravirtualisation interface: legacy Enable nested paging - on  Storage: SATA controller type AHCI 2 ports (1 for HDD, 1 for optical)
I'm trying to boot Canonical's Azure 16.04 .vhd file in a VirtualBox VM and it hangs at "non blocking pool is initialized".  It works in Hyper-V, so it may only be a bug in virtual box (5.0.20).
If two limits don't exist, are we sure the limit of sum doesn't exist? This is a true/false question.     If the limits $$\lim_ {x\to a}\ f(x)\quad \text{ and }\quad  \lim_ {x\to a}\ g(x)$$ don't exist, limits $$\lim_ {x\to a}\ (f(x)+g(x))\quad \text{ and }\quad \lim_ {x\to a}\ (f(x)g(x))$$ don't exist also.   My idea is, that, because $$\lim_ {x\to a}\ (f(x)+g(x))=\lim_ {x\to a}\ f(x)+\lim_ {x\to a} g(x)$$ then the limits doesn't exist, correct? Can Raise Dead revive a character with zero maximum Hit Points? So, a character died from Draining Kiss of a succubus and his Max HP is 0. Can he be restored by Raise Dead, or does he need a higher level spell? Or a Greater Restoration cast on his lifeless body before Raise dead? I'm probably interested in RAW interpretation, since the character is in Adventurerer's league. How to avoid the wrinkle at the poles of the UV sphere? When I create a UV sphere and add the subdivision surface modifier, the following wrinkle appears.    How can I avoid it?  I've read the article  but there seems to be no clear solution.  UPDATE 1  I've used the word 'apply' in the first sentence of the initial version of this question. It's misleading since I want to preserve the modifier without 'applying' it. Rather, what I meant is 'adding' the modifier.  UPDATE 2  I followed josh sanfelici's solution, but still there is an artifact at the pole.  Here is the screen: (A rendered view with a sun lamp)    Maybe it's the limitation of the general-purpose subdivision modifier.  BTW, when the cast modifier is added after the subdivision modifier, the sphere becomes perfect (even for my original wrinkled sphere).  But since I want to edit the resulting sphere (for example, scaling X, Y, etc) while modifier is added but not applied, it's not usable. Suppose we want to prove $$ k \binom{n}{k} = n \binom{n-1}{k-1}$$   In the LHS we are choosing a team of $k$ players from $n$ players. Then we are choosing a captain. In the RHS we are choosing a captain from the $n$ players. Then we are choosing the remaining $k-1$ players from the $n-1$ players.   Is this a correct interpretation? This is from problem $8$, Chapter II of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis.  The problem asks for a Borel set $M$ on $R$, such that for any interval $I$, $M \cap I$ has measure greater than $0$ and less than $m(I)$.  I was thinking of taking the Cantor approach: taking $R$ to be the union of $[a,b]$ with $a$ and $b$ rationals, and for each $[a,b]$ we construct Cantor sets inside it. During theconstruction of each Cantor set, in order to have positive measure on it, we need to take off smaller and smaller intervals from it, namely the proportion goes to $0$. As a result, these Cantor sets are extremely "dense" on their ends. If for an interval $I$ it intersects with the Cantor set on $[a,b]$ while $b-a&gt;&gt;m(I)$, we shall expect the measure of intersection to be rather close to $m(I)$ and then we lose control on these cases.  Is there any way to fix this or shall I consider other approaches?  Thank you Write space with TCPDF into a PDF file How can I use Unicode-aware regular expressions in JavaScript?  For example, there should be something akin to \w that can match any code-point in Letters or Marks category (not just the ASCII ones), and hopefully have filters like [[P*]] for punctuation, etc. Can ASP.NET MVC generate elements with lower case name and id attributes I am not able to find an answer to the following question:     For which positive even integers $k$ is the integer   $$p^2+k$$ prime, where $p$ is a prime number $\gt5$? Prove that inequality $\sum _{cyc}\frac{a^2+b^2}{a+b}\le \frac{3\left(a^2+b^2+c^2\right)}{a+b+c}$ Performance of Non Clustered Indexes on Heaps vs Clustered Indexes compares the performance for individual select/insert/delete/update and range select statements on a table organized as a clustered index vs that on a table organized as a heap with a non clustered index on the same key columns as the CI table.  Generally the clustered index option performed better in the tests as there is only one structure to maintain and because there is no need for bookmark lookups.  One potentially interesting case not covered by the paper would have been a comparison between a non clustered index on a heap vs a non clustered index on a clustered index. In that instance I would have expected the heap might even perform better as once at the NCI leaf level SQL Server has a RID to follow directly rather than needing to traverse the clustered index.   Is anyone aware of similar formal testing that has been carried out in this area and if so what were the results? Should flour be thrown out past its expiry date? For $D$ a GCD domain , let $a,b,x \in D \setminus \{0\}$ , then is it true that $\gcd (ax,bx)=x \cdot \gcd (a,b)$? Identifying records in MC to delete I'm trying to delete a large number of records from SFMC to avoid being charged extra. I've run several different SQLs to help identify the records I don't need, but when I run the Contact Count report, it still shows approx 100K billable contacts and approx 60K distinct email addresses.  Here are the SQLs I've tried:   No Opens in past 5 days Leads/Contacts not in SFDC  SubscriberKey as Email Address Leads/Contacts where SubscriberKey is Empty Unspecified records (DE populated by MC Support)    These efforts reduced the count a good amount, but not as much as I was expecting.   Has anyone else gone through this process before and if so, what queries can you share that might help my case? What does 'condescending' exactly mean? I'm really confused about the meaning of the word 'condescending'. Online dictionaries define it as bossy/disdainful, which fits with...    But I find other usages where being condescending is obviously considered a good thing, perhaps more like being humble, or equal, rather than superior...    (and  of "condescending and friendly" in Google Books)  What's going on? Does this word really have two almost opposite meanings? Enumerate after \label Ubuntu 12.04 boots to TTY1 In System Info in 11.10, the graphics driver wasn't detected. I use ACER Aspire 4750 with Intel Core i3-2340M and Intel HD Graphics 3000 graphic card  How to install the driver for my Ubuntu? Getting percent sign into an URL in a footnote I'm using the url package. Now, I have some some url with a percent sign in it and want to place it in a footnote. When I let the % where it is, I get a comment, and the whole thing fails to compile because of some unmatched brackets. When it's at the end of a line, it doesn't show up at all in the result. When I write \% instead, this gets literally into the output—but I want the url to be displayed correctly.  What could I do? Let $f$ be a continuous function on a set $E$.  Is it always true that $f^{-1}(A)$ is always measurable if $A$ is measurable?  I say no.  We know that $\bar{\psi(x)}:=\frac{\phi(x)+x}{2}$ where $\phi$ is the Cantor (or Cantor-Lebesgue) function and $\bar{\psi}:[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$.  We know this function maps a measurable subset of $C$ (the Cantor set) into a non-measurable set $W$.  A few observations about $\bar{\psi(x)}$.  It is strictly increasing and continuous, so it has a continuous inverse $\bar{\psi(x)}^{-1}$.  Thus $\bar{\psi(x)}^{-1}(W)=c \subset C$; that is, $\bar{\psi(x)}^{-1}(W)$ is non-measurable, but c is.  Is this correct?