in the fires of Pompeii the doctor meets Lobus Caecilius     CAECILIUS: Who are you?       DOCTOR: I am Spartacus.       DONNA: And so am I.    CAECILIUS: Mister and Mrs Spartacus.       DOCTOR: Oh no, no, no. We're not, we're not married.       DONNA: We're not together.       CAECILIUS: Oh, then brother and sister? Yes, of course. You look very much alike.    then after saving him from the volcano  at Christmas 2013 the time of the doctor he regenerates into Lobus  face then in series 8 episode 1 Deep Breath he starts wondering why he choose this face     DOCTOR:Er, have you seen this face before?      BARNEY: No.      DOCTOR: Are you sure?      BARNEY: Sir, I have never seen that face.      DOCTOR: It's funny, because I'm sure that I have. You know, I never know where the faces come from. They just pop up. Zap. Faces like this one. Come on, look at it, have a look, come on, look, look, look.    (The Doctor pulls Barney over to look in the mirror on the ground.)       DOCTOR: Look, it's covered in lines. But I didn't do the frowning. Who frowned me this face? Do you ever look in the mirror and think I've seen that face before?      BARNEY: Yes.      DOCTOR: Really? When?      BARNEY: Well, every time I look in the mirror.      DOCTOR: Oh, yes, yes, yes. Fair enough. Good point. My face is fresh on, though.      BARNEY: Er    (Barney moves away from the nutter in the nightshirt.)      DOCTOR: Why this one? Why did I choose this face? It's like I'm trying to tell myself something. Like I'm trying to make a point. But what is so important that I can't just tell myself what I'm thinking?   then in series 9 episode 5 The Girl Who Died he starts to realize why he choose  this face     DOCTOR:I'm not supposed to. Oh. Oh!    (He looks at his reflection in the water and sees what he saw in the mirror back in Deep Breath.)      CLARA: What? What's wrong?       DOCTOR: My face.        DOCTOR [memory]: Who frowned me this face? Why this one? Why did I choose this face?       CLARA: Doctor, what's wrong with your face?       DOCTOR: I think I know why I chose it.       DOCTOR [memory]: It's like I'm trying to tell myself something.       DOCTOR: I think I know what I'm trying to say.       DONNA [memory]: (to Doctor 10) Just someone. Not the whole town. Just save someone.       DOCTOR 10 [memory]: Come with me.    (A memory of Lobus Caecilus cowering as Vesuvius erupts in Fires of Pompeii. Played by Peter Capaldi, if you'd forgotten.)      DOCTOR: I know where I got this face, and I know what it's for.       CLARA: Okay, what's it for?       DOCTOR: To remind me. To hold me to the mark. I'm the Doctor, and I save    people.    (He shouts at the sky - the Time Lords.)      DOCTOR: And if anyone happens to be listening, and you've got any kind of a problem with that, to hell with you!    which made me think why did the Doctor choose the face of Lobus Caecilius? was it like reminder to save people what was it
Similar to this question posted in August 2014:       Has the fact that  (as  in The Fires of Pompeii, and  in Torchwood’s Children of Earth season) yet been addressed/explained either in, or out of universe?
How to accumulate values of each two rows across a line in linux? External program from our Java program How can I write a program in Java that will execute another program? Also, the input of that program should be given from our program and the output of that program should be written into a file.  This is my small set of code to get its output:  Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("C:\\j2sdk1.4.0\bin\\helloworld.java"); BufferedReader input =         new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream())); while ((line = input.readLine()) != null)    System.out.println(line);  input.close();   This was my set of code but this throws an IOException. How do I protect random people pointing their domain to my server? Prove recursively defined sequence converges I would like some advice on how to solve problems like the following: Let $(x_n)$ be a sequence defined by $x_1= 3$ and $x_{n+1} = \frac{1}{4-x_n}$. Prove that the sequence converges.  My strategy is to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem, but I am having trouble showing that the sequence is decreasing and bounded below. Here's my work so far:  Decreasing: The first 4 values are $3,1,1/3,3/11$, so let's assume $x_n \leq x_{n-1} \leq \ldots \leq x_1$. Want to show $x_{n+1} \leq x_n$. We have $x_{n+1} = \frac{1}{4-x_n}$. I want to have an upper bound for the RHS, but can't find one and don't really know where to go from here.  Bounded below: I wanted to show that all values are positive, but if we assume $x_n &gt; 0$, that doesn't rule out $x_{n+1}$ from being negative. I have seen in American Sniper, Dead-7 and Carrie that when someone is killed, they are laying on the ground with blood leaking out of their back or somewhere else on the body.  The puddle continuously grows with few signs of slowing down. This is obviously not CGI because it is a real liquid (may not be real blood as that would spark an emergency in real life).   I have seen in American Sniper that when the protagonist kills yet another enemy, they are filmed hitting the ground and blood starts pooling around their body.  In Carrie: In the dance room where Carrie sets her powers loose and kills a lot of teenagers in the process, there are a few that hit the ground with blood pooling under their bodies. Sometimes they would be on their side with blood coming out.  In Dead 7: Kimono and the other six killed lots of zombies. Some of the six were killed in the process as well before they came to Apocalypta to kill her. They were filmed hitting the ground dead with blood pooling around them.  I am not sure how they film this as they are wearing thin shirts for these scenes, and not only that, but the characters also have blood (obviously fake) only just dripping out of the side of their mouths (an indicator they have a ruptured and wounded stomach or lung (in this case the blood would be pink and frothy).  What is the film technique that allows this to happen? For example:     Is (A &or; B &or; C) &and; (D &or; E &or; F) the same as   (A &and; D) &or; (A &and; E) &or; (A &and; F) &or; (B &and; D) &or; (B &and; E) &or; ( B &and; F) &or; (C &and; D) &or; (C &and; E) &or; (C &and; F)?   How would I check equivalence in general? How does one add boarding passes to Apple Wallet? Indian Trains Wait List - will I get a seat? After the  of registering an account to book train tickets online using my British VISA card, I finally got into a position of being able to book a ticket, but what it appears to be telling me is that I'm only being added to a wait list, which I assume means my tickets aren't confirmed.  Can someone explain how the wait list works, and what my chances are of getting on the train successfully?    It currently says the wait list is 7 The train is the Mandor Express, from Delhi to Jodhpur on the 18th of Nov   Update: So I got the train! Although it didn't get confirmed until a few hours before it was due to leave. Apport-gpu-error-intel.py crash How to safely change OS name in grub boot menu? I have a system where I am dual-booting Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 and Ubuntu GNOME 16.04, however after installing Ubuntu GNOME 16.04, I have found that in the GRUB boot entry list it is called "Ubuntu", whereas the other one is called something like "Ubuntu GNOME 15.10", is there any way I can change the text of the "Ubuntu" one to "Ubuntu GNOME 16.04"? And also change the names of the other options so that instead of "Advanced options for Ubuntu" it says "Advanced options for Ubuntu GNOME 16.04" etc?  I rather do it manually if it is safe to do so, or a piece of software could be recommended, however nothing from a PPA or other untrusted not official source (I will only install software from the Ubuntu official repositories). What is another word for 'all round' capabilities? I am looking for a positive, passionate word to describe the all-round capabilities of a person.   Are there any words better than 'all-rounder'? Product of square of distances from vertices of a polygon of radius a I want to find out the following product.  $\prod_0^{n-1}  (r^2 + a^2 -2ra\cos(2k\pi/n - \theta))$ I have been trying to use complex numbers but did not work out. The book I am reading the result is directly stated as $r^{2n} + a^{2n} -2r^na^n\cos(\theta)$. Please help. How to redirect output of a program to a ZIP file? Can I travel to the USA while working remotely for my non-US employer? Every time I open a folder from the desktop, a prompt is shown that the said folder is opened. How do I stop that? Show that every prime $p&gt;3$ is either of the form $6n+1$ or of the form $6n+5$, where $n=0,1,2, \dots$ I gave a scammer my telephone number, address, and name. How bad is it? Updated question because old one was embarassing: I saw a spam email from "PayPal" and I didn't realize that it was a phishing attempt. I gave the phishing site my name, telephone number, and email. What could he do with them?  Old question: Well, I saw a spam email, but I didn't realize that it's really a scam at first. I gave him my telephone number, address, and name. What would he do with them? Could he ruin ALL of my reputation with it? How do you install Google Chrome on Ubuntu? What does the notation $\Gamma \vDash \phi$ mean (in Mathematical Logic)? What does the notation $\Gamma \vDash \phi$ mean (in Mathematical Logic)?  I understand that $\Gamma$ represents a system of formulas, and that $\phi$ represents an individual formula.  I also know that $\Gamma \vDash \phi$ means " $\phi$ is a semantic consequence of $\Gamma$" - but I do not understand what this actually means. Can someone explain this idea to me in layman's terms?  Furthermore, suppose I had the following question:     Let $\Gamma \cup \{ \phi \}$. Does $\Gamma \vDash \phi$ hold for the set of formulae   $$ \Gamma = \{ p \rightarrow q, q \rightarrow r, r \rightarrow s \} \hspace{10 mm} \text{ where } \phi \text{ is } p \rightarrow s $$   Would I attempt this question by trying to prove that, for every formula $\psi \in \Gamma$, the valuation $v(\psi) = T$, based on the assumption that $v(\phi) = T$? I am trying to understand the Georgi chapter of tensor methods in $SU(3)$ representations, and I don't know how to resolve the tensor product of 2 matrices in a 2 heavy quark + 2 light antiquark system. Namely:  Let the tetraquark system be:           $QQ\bar q\bar{q}$  So, those $Q$ heavy quarks interact and can be understood in the $3\bigotimes 3$ representations for $SU(3)$, and $\bar q\bar q$ can be understood as the $\bar 3\bigotimes\bar 3=3\bigoplus\bar 6$ representations for $SU(3)$.  The interaction diagram for the $Q$ heavy quarks is shown in the following scheme, which is an analogy to the Feynman Diagram where a gluon is understood to be exchanged between upper and lower arrows:  $i'\xrightarrow{(T_{a})^{i'}_{i}}i ,  {}^iQ$  $j'\xrightarrow{(T_{a})^{j'}_{j}}j ,  {}^jQ$  So, as usuall we consider the elements of $3$ representation as $u^i$, and therefore the elements of $\bar 3$ representation as $v_{j}$.  I must understand how does the following expression transform:  $(T_{a})^{i'}_{i}(T_{a})^{j'}_{j}\cdot(1/2)\cdot (w^iv^j+w^jv^i)=\Xi\cdot(1/2)\cdot(w^{i'}v^{j'}+w^{j'}v^{i'})$  In other words, how can one give the correct value of $\Xi$?  Note1: $T_a$ is understood to be the $a-ith$ generator of the associated Lie Algebra, which come from the definition of the Gell-Mann Matrices.  $(T_{a})^{i}_{j}\propto(\lambda)_{ij}$, in matrix notation.  Note2: I understand the Young Tableaux and they are not intended to be used here, so please don't try to explain this situation through the tables.   Note3: I assume this is a purely solvable mathematical problem and doesn't need a deep insight into the physical concepts...  Also requesting information about how to understand the tensor products in these cases, since I have been checking many sources but the definitions seem not clear enough.