I am currently having issues with a very long tabular which I had to divide across several pages (for my purposes \table did not work) and which I now want to show up in the list of tables. Is there a good way of doing this? I tried to add \table in front of \tabular, but this turned out horrible in my landsacpe environment (with no options to fix, at least not for me). Is there a smooth way of getting this done?  I would be very very greatful for any advice, as I have been trying several things unsuccessfully.
I have got codes like the following (generated by Kile). How can I add a caption. I guess I should have used the table environment. Is there any solution now?  \newcommand{\mc}[3]{\multicolumn{#1}{#2}{#3}} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{rccll}      &amp;   &amp; \mc{3}{c}{Colin}\\      &amp;   &amp; a &amp; \mc{1}{c}{b} &amp; \mc{1}{c}{c}\\\cline{3-5} Rose &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{A} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(1,2)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(2,5)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(4,4)}\\\cline{3-5}      &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{B} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(7,4)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(3,5)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(0,6)}\\\cline{3-5} \end{tabular} \end{center}
Opening Chromium on Ubuntu VPS Ubuntu noob here. I recently got a VPS running Ubuntu, and decided to install Chromium, my preferred browser, on it. After installation completed, I got a message stating that I cannot open Chromium with root privileges. How would I go about opening Chromium? I watch a lot of old movies, and I've noticed that American actors of the 1930s and 1940s often spoke in a quasi-generic-posh-British accent.  Katherine Hepburn's accent would be the perfect example. It seems exaggerated, and I imagine it was not common off the stage and screen. What was that? Was it just an accent or was it a dialect? Did real people actually speak that way? Why does this code:  class A {     public:          explicit A(int x) {} };  class B: public A { };  int main(void) {     B *b = new B(5);     delete b; }   Result in these errors:   main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: main.cpp:13: error: no matching function for call to ‘B::B(int)’ main.cpp:8: note: candidates are: B::B() main.cpp:8: note:                 B::B(const B&)   Shouldn't B inherit A's constructor?  (this is using gcc) Is it possible to access a 64-bit dll from a 32-bit application? I am wondering if the mass density profile $\rho(\vec{r})$ has been characterized for atomic particles such as quarks and electrons. I am currently taking an intro class in quantum mechanics, and I have run this question by several professors. It is my understanding from the viewpoint of quantum physics a particle's position is given by a probability density function $\Psi(\vec{r},t)$. I also understand that when books quote the "radius" of an electron they are typically referring to some approximate range into which an electron is "likely" to fall, say, one standard deviation from the expectation value of its position or maybe $10^{-15}$ meters.  However it is my impression that, in this viewpoint, wherever the particle "is" or even whether or not the particle "had" any position to begin with (via the Bell Inequalities), it is assumed that if it were (somehow) found, it would be a point mass. This has been verified by my professors and GSIs. I am wondering if its really true.  If the particle was truly a point mass then wherever it is, it would presumably have an infinite mass density. Wouldn't that make electrons and quarks indistinguishable from very tiny black holes? Is there any practical difference between saying that subatomic particles are black holes and that they are point masses? I am aware of such problems as Hawking Radiation although at the scales of the Schwarchild radius of an electron (back of the envelope calculation yields $\tilde{}10^{-57}$ meters), would it really make any more sense to use quantum mechanics as opposed to general relativity?  If anyone knows of an upper bound on the volume over which an electron/quark/gluon/anything else is distributed I would be interested to know. A quick Google Search has yielded nothing but the "classical" electron radius, which is not what I am referring to.  Thanks in advance; look forward to the responses. List selectors for Objective-C object I have an object, and I want to list all the selectors to which it responds. It feels like this should be perfectly possible, but I'm having trouble finding the APIs. The new ask page is now live on the network! How to make all faces flip to the right/consistent direction? What's happening is that I have tried to flip the normals, inside and out, but there are always faces which have to be flipped!  Normals recalculated   Inside View    If I flip them again, all faces get flipped and end up horrible and, not working at all. So how can I make all of the faces flip to the right direction? Capturing emoticons using regular expression in python Markdown change: Intra-word emphasis now works There are tons of questions I could maybe post this as an answer to, but before choosing the best one, I'll just post this as an announcement question that can be linked elsewhere. The short story From now on, intra-word emphasis is possible in our Markdown version. That means you can now write  The &quot;V&quot; is for Model**View**Controller. That's un*fricking*believable.  and it renders like this:  The &quot;V&quot; is for ModelViewController. That's unfrickingbelievable.  This only works for asterisks, not for underscores. It works in posts and comments. The reasons There are two big reasons for this. For one thing, this is more or less the behavior of , which we eventually . &quot;More or less&quot; because CommonMark's emphasis behavior is still in flux, and supports a few things that we don't support yet, but at least with this change we're closer. The other reason is languages that don't even have the concept of &quot;words separated by spaces&quot;. See  and  for two examples. This change allow posts in those languages to emphasize words without having to resort to HTML tags. To use an example from the first linked post,  **北京**和**上海**是直辖市。   now renders like this:  北京和上海是直辖市。  Possible issues In the 99% cases, this should only make things better; I've only found very few posts where this change causes unintended bolding/italicizing. And even in those cases, note that the rendered versions of questions and answers are not re-rendered until a post is edited, so this will not affect anything in posts retroactively. Unlike posts, comments are rendered , so this immediately applies to all comments. In most cases this doesn't change anything or actually fixes things. Should you discover a rare case where this breaks an important comment badly, we can always edit it to fix. There's one side effect that I'd like to mention: If you find a great quicksort implementation on GitHub that has a bug that causes a crash when sorting Windows versions, and the author doesn't want to fix it, you may be inclined to say  f**k this s**t   (i.e., &quot;fork this sort&quot;). With intraword emphasis, this would however look like this:  fk this st  So you would have to escape the asterisks (one of them would actually be enough). I'm not worried about this case too much, since if you must put censor-worthy words into a post, you might as well have to jump through a little hoop. Some details This being Meta, there are probably lots of people interested in a more detailed description of the new behavior (don't feel bad if you're not one of them; just skip this section). Here are the major rules regarding intraword-emphasis:  As mentioned, it only applies to asterisks, not underscores. Underscores  this restriction was in place at all; asterisks are much less of a problem.  If a single or double asterisk is supposed to be interpreted as intra-word emphasis, it cannot have punctuation on one side; it actually must be inside a word. An example of an edge case this solves is  It's a web*-based solution. *see Wikipedia for a definition of &quot;web&quot;  where the asterisks after &quot;web&quot; could cause unintended italicizing if there was a second asterisk in the same paragraph somewhere.  For italics, the &quot;inside a word&quot; part of rule 2 is even a bit stricter. For bolding, any word or digit character is allowed; for italics, digits don't work either. That's because the asterisk is often used as a multiplication symbol, so  The game worked in 320200 and 640480 resolution.  wouldn't look right without this restriction.  A minor addition that I made that's only tangentially related to intra-word emphasis is that a sequence of more than three underscores or more than three asterisks will no longer take part in any emphasis. This shouldn't really cause any problems, but fixes some (e.g. the underline in the second blockquote in , while not really visible, is a weird combination of bold and italic underscore characters; after this change, it would just be (more) underscore characters). This behavior also matches CommonMark. Defining the appropriate Projected Coordinate System Is it possible to make LaTeX mark overfull boxes in the output? Are static class instances unique to a request or a server in ASP.NET? On an ASP.NET website, are static classes unique to each web request, or are they instantiated whenever needed and GCed whenever the GC decides to disposed of them?  The reason I ask is because I've written some static classes before in C# and the behavior is different than I would have expected. I would have expected static classes to be unique to each request, but it doesn't seem like that is the case.  If they are not unique to each request, is there a way to allow them to be?  UPDATE: The answer driis gave me was exactly what I needed. I was already using a singleton class, however it was using a static instance and therefore was being shared between requests even if the users were different which in this case was a bad thing. Using HttpContext.Current.Items solves my problem perfectly. For anyone who stumbles upon this question in the future, here is my implementation, simplified and shortened so that it easy to understand the pattern:  using System.Collections; using System.Web;  public class GloballyAccessibleClass {     private GloballyAccessibleClass() { }      public static GloballyAccessibleClass Instance     {         get         {             IDictionary items = HttpContext.Current.Items;             if(!items.Contains("TheInstance"))             {                 items["TheInstance"] = new GloballyAccessibleClass();             }             return items["TheInstance"] as GloballyAccessibleClass;         }     } } How do I calculate $\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} x\ln x$ I was thinking about the reasons behind $0^0=1$ and I remember one of my friends studying math arguing about the continuity of the function $x^x$ in $0$. But when I write as $$x^x=e^{x\ln x}$$ I am now looking at $$\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} x\ln x$$ Graphically I can see in Mathematica that it goes to $0.$ But I can't calculate by using a Taylor expansion, because I can't expand log around $0$. How do you prove that? lsusb relevant output Bus 001 Device 006: ID 0bda:8812 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8812AU 802.11a/b/g/n/ac WLAN Adapter  Upon plugging the device it is recognized by lsusb, however when I go to wireless settings no adapter is recognized. The driver is installed (by going to software and updates -> addition drivers and selecting the open source driver). All I want to see are the specs Is there a way to see the processor and speed of a Cisco UCS B230 Blade Server without the enclosure that runs it? The enclosure that we have does not power on and all I need is to see what cpu and processor speed is in it. How can I check if a single character appears in a string? In my  I was printing a double using cout that got rounded when I wasn't expecting it.  How can I make cout print a double using full precision? How do I remove all loose edges? I have cut a hole in a plane, but I am left with some loose edges.  Is there an easy way to select and delete them all?  See this screenshot:    See this edges siting out with no face? I want to make a JavaScript application that's not open source, and thus I wish to learn how to can obfuscate my JS code? Is this possible?