We haven't gotten a lot of Finnish groups that we liked here at Bananas but I'm pretty happy with this four tracker from Helsinki, apparently recorded in the same place where the Ramones played in the 70's.   I know my question has already been answered. liked is past simple because it is a single action. But I don't agree with it or have not well understood  the answer.  'Bananas' is a music magazine. Every time they receive a record they make a review(like it or not) so this is not a single action and maybe in the future there will be some Finnish band they will like. It may change !!!
Please have a look at this sentence:     We haven't gotten a lot of Finnish groups that we liked here at Bananas but I'm pretty happy with this four tracker from Helsinki, apparently recorded in the same place where the Ramones played in the 70's.     The first verb is in present perfect (up to now) and the second is in simple past tense. I don't understand the simple past for the second verb.  Why "like" is not in its present perfect form as the first verb is?
Why does the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1n$ not converge? Can someone give a simple explanation as to why the       $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1n=\frac 1 1 + \frac 12 + \frac 13 + \cdots $$   doesn't converge, on the other hand it grows very slowly?   I'd prefer an easily comprehensible explanation rather than a rigorous proof regularly found in undergraduate textbooks. Stack Overflow technology makes me write bad answers Today I had some time and felt like writing a relatively good answer on Stack Overflow; explaining both the underlying mechanisms and good practices, unlike usual declarative answers in a "do that" style.  It took me like an hour of time, $50 if I were free lance. It'll bring me nothing but 3-5 occasional views, and - if I get lucky - some ignorant comments.  You know, it's quite discouraging.  Instead of pride for the job that was done, I feel frustrated. I know, this answer may offer help to the OP, if he ever notices it (being already satisfied with other answers).  So the only fate the answer will meet is to sink forever, below thousands other questions, falling like snow.  So, being a programmer, I am thinking of efficiency. It's a waste of time to spend so much effort to answer one question when there is no way to [actually] reuse it. So, I wouldn't do it again but just turn back into short answers mode without explanations.       Seeing other answers, I don't think I am only one with such feeling.  The current policy is driving knowledgeable and educational users away, yet it attracts inexperienced ones in numbers. Ones who will tell you to use [some technology] which they never have laid their hands upon. Ones who write answers just because they have learned some "good practice" from other questions, and this "knowledge" becomes an endless source of rep points.  The idea of Stack Overflow is rotten. It was excellent when trees were high and traffic was low.  It turned bad now; it has become a honeypot for all the "enthusiast programmers" of the world, eager to share their 2 cents faster than you can say the word "close".  You're killing a great resource. Despite all the nice words and proper declarations, it discourages the reuse of the knowledge. And encourages fast on-site answers.  Of course, the rules will tell you contrary. It's all nice and proper (if you don't mind it's strict mutual exclusivity). But mechanically, technologically it works in the way I described.  I tried to write a tag wiki. You know, it was biggest waste of time in my life. As a matter of fact, it is not a wiki at all; you can't even link to a certain section. Not to mention that nobody ever has the idea to read tag wikis.  Reference questions? Don't make me laugh. There is no good mechanism to store and categorize links. Favorites, although intended for the different purpose, are a chunk of crap when you want to use it as a reference. So, you can't compete with 30-seconds answers: a question will get 5 answers before you can even find an appropriate link.  Okay, I can organize links myself but, there are some problems:   I am just a human. I cannot remember everything I am just a human and I cannot answer questions at rate of 1 qpm. One person cannot fight the Tide. It's helpless. When technology makes people writing fast [incomplete] answers -  no good will of proper declarations can do a thing.  Even if a question gets finally closed, it won't hurt anyone - the hydra grew two more already.   You'll call me a brute for insulting honest users and innocent volunteers, but that's fact: There are much more inexperienced users than experienced ones. And inexperienced users have much more spare time to hang over than experts who have their job to do. So, from that fact we can conclude that most of the answers on Stack Overflow have a low quality. Nobody cares. But I do.   There should be a technical way to limit the activity of not-so-knowledgeable-yet-eager-to-answer users. There should be a technical preference for the closing a question over answering it (have a silly answer for the silly question? welcome to comments). There should be a technical solution to accumulate and structure knowledge, a system that lets you choose a good answer instead of writing it by hand.   That's the only way. Otherwise Stack Overflow will remain an automated dispenser of bad practices.  Well, I just felt like letting it out again. Thank you for reading. Search results on https://stackexchange.com are broken because of "insecure content" The search results on  are blocked because of:     [blocked] The page at  ran   insecure content from .   I am using Chrome. Possible Duplicate:          This is a line spoken by the . I always wondered if this is grammatically correct.  Luke says something like "You are mistaken ..." which the Emperor answers with     No, it is you who are mistaken!   Why wouldn't he say     No, it is you who is mistaken!   instead?  I don't know what rules apply here but my stomach tells me the latter is (at least also) correct, although you would say "you are mistaken". It feels as if he should be referring to "you" in the third person.  Could you please shed some light? Are both correct or – if not – which one is correct? And why? Can there be a notification for bounties started on questions you've asked or answered? How do you become a vampire/werewolf in Elder Scrolls Online The game is released for a few days now. I have heard that you can turn into thoses beasts. I have a few questions about that   How do you turn into werewolf/vampire ? On the chat people said they can bite others but who bite them first? How long does the effect last ? Are there any cons ? Maybe if your are a vampire you take damage from the sun like in older Elder Scrolls ? Should I say "She is in the park" or "She is at the park"? I am really confused.  Which preposition is correct?     She is in/at the park.   They are in/at the park.   I am in/at the park.   Should I use in or at in these sentences? How are Pokestops chosen? After playing the game for a little while, I've noticed that Pokestops are chosen seemingly at random locations on the map. A few of them are even in inaccessible places; an abandoned church building, inside of an airforce base, etc. How are these locations chosen as Pokestops? $f(x+1)-f(x)$ converges $\Rightarrow\frac{f(x)}x$ converges Questions with declarative forms have the same meaning as their interrogative counterparts or not? I need to show that for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there is a set A $\subseteq \mathbb{Q}$ such that (A, &lt;) is isomorphic to ($\alpha, \in$).  To do it I am supposed to show the following stronger statement by induction on ordinals $\alpha$ &lt; $\omega_{1}$:  Let P($\alpha$) be the statement "For every interval (a, b) with rational endpoints, there is an A $\subseteq$ (a,b) such that (A, &lt;) is isomorphic to ($\alpha, \in$)."  I think that the purpose of breaking $\mathbb{Q}$ into intervals (a,b) is to make $\mathbb{Q}$ a countable set, but I don't see the significance of doing this or how it would make the proof easier.  I feel like I need to define a well-ordered set in (a,b) but I don't know how to do this since if a and b are both negative then there is no least element, so no well-ordering.  I believe that I am supposed to be using transfinite induction? But I don't know how P($\alpha$) implies P(S($\alpha$)) for S($\alpha$) successor of $\alpha$.  Any help would be greatly appreciated... thanks in advance. Clearly if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ then $p(\lambda)$ is an eigenvalue of $p(A)$ where $p$ is a polynomial. And there are cases where $A$ may have eigenvalues other than these.   Is there a general rule for finding all eigenvalues of $p(A)$? Does it depend on the field from which the elements of $A$ are taken? Are their any partial solutions to this problem? Aristotle's Categories with academic commentary WordPress Installation Failed I am trying to install Wordpress on Lubuntu. I followed the instructions . Including PHP Apache and MySQL setups. Apache and MySQL appear to be running fine.  However, when I go to http://localhost/blog/, I get the following error:     Neither /etc/wordpress/config-localhost.php nor /etc/wordpress/config-localhost.php could be found.   Ensure one of them exists, is readable by the webserver and contains the right password/username. Not all files are visible over MTP I have LG L5 (e610 model) device with Cyanogenmod 10. When I connect the phone to a computer with Linux (I have mtpfs installed), I can see both internal storage and the SD card.  However when I navigate inside them, I can't see some of the files.  For example, if I open file manager app on the phone, I can see several files in the Internal storage/Notifications directory, however the directory on the computer only shows one of those files.  If I switch USB connection type to PTP (camera) - as OS X doesn't support MTP natively - Image Capture sees the phone as a camera, however it can only see about a third of all the images present on the phone.  I don't have a Windows machine to try, but I suspect the results would be similar.  I tried upgrading Cyanogenmod to the latest nightly, clearing and reinstalling it - same results.  Any idea as to what is going on?  How can I make all files appear on the host computer? After beating the final boss, can I return to the original castle? Using exec and tee to redirect logs to stdout and a log file in the same time In a bash script, how can I redirect all standard outputs to a log file and tee the output on the screen using exec ?  log_file="$HOME/logs/install.txt-`date +'%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S'`" [ -f "$log_file" ] || touch "$log_file" exec 1&gt;&gt; $log_file 2&gt;&amp;1   This code redirect all the log to the log file but not to the screen . What is the difference between a PDU and a power strip (both 120V, 15A)? I just chatted with an APC rep about upgrading the UPSes at our office. She recommended a single higher-capacity 6-outlet Smart-UPS to replace the four Back-UPS units we currently have. When I asked how she recommended plugging in all the current devices, she recommended using a APC's  PDU, but said not to use a power strip. At first she said I had to use an APC brand PDU, but after I inquired about using a Tripp-Lite PDU, she said any brand PDU would be fine.  The APC PDU previously referenced looks like a standard 120V power strip with overload protection but no surge protection. Other than overload protection (which seems redundant if plugging into the UPS), is there something else I'm missing, or should any power strip (without surge protection) be fine?  Edit: I didn't mention it earlier, but we don't have a proper rack--though I did still plan to mount the PDU or power strip to something. I guess I'm wondering if there's any special reason I should pay as much as $180 for the low-end APC PDU (which just looks like a power strip to me) vs. $20-$30 for a . Word order: "10 minutes more" or "10 more minutes"? Which is the correct question ("Who has" vs "Who have")? The situation is that:  We've already read three English novels.  Which is the correct question for that situation?   Who has already read three English novels?  Who have already read three English novels?    Or could both be correct? Please also provide the grammatical reasons for your answers.