I have a little problem on my site, the text from the content div is going over the footer.  HTML:  &lt;div class="content"&gt; test &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="footer"&gt; &lt;font size="2px"&gt;   &lt;p&gt;text&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;hr color="red"&gt;   &lt;p&gt;text2&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;p&gt;tex3&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;p&gt;E-mail: &lt;a href="mailto:text4?" target="_top"&gt;text4&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href="mailto:text5?" target="_top"&gt;text5&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href="mailto:text6?" target="_top"&gt;text6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="website"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;/font&gt; &lt;/div&gt;   CSS:  .content{ padding-top : 121px; position: absolute; width : 100%; display:inline-block; } .footer {    display: inline-block;    position: absolute;    left: 0;    bottom: 0;    width: 100%;    text-align: center; }   If I write a lot of text, with &lt;br/&gt; included, it goes over the footer. Thanks a lot for helping!
I have a simple 2-column layout with a footer that clears both the right and left div in my markup.  My problem is that I can't get the footer to stay at the bottom of the page in all browsers.  It works if the content pushes the footer down, but that's not always the case.
Find a function $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ that is continuous at precisely one point? Is the function $f(x) = \lim_{k \to +\infty} \tan{kx}$ a right example?  But I do not know whether this is a function at first. Is this a function?  Could you give a correct real-valued function that is continuous at precisely one point?  Thanks. What is the term for taking it out on someone even though you will be harmed by this too? When you are so mad at someone that you make a bad decision, even though you will be harmed by it as well, in order to harm that person; is there a good term for this?   For example burning $100 because he owns $20 of it. Question title overlap in new design when title is longer Today I noticed that in new design view count is getting overlapped with question title on scifi.se for longer title:    But it's not site specific as same problem happen in Beta site too ( Hinduism.se):    That's why asked in main meta. Can anybody please suggest how I can compute the moment generating function of the inner product of two Gaussian random vectors, each distributed as $\mathcal N(0,\sigma^2)$, independent of each other? Is there some standard result available for this? Any pointer is highly appreciated. Is there a way in photoshop to convert k values to alpha values? Basically, I would like to make it so that the lighter a pixel is (the more white it has) the more transparent it becomes. Black pixels would be opaque, white pixels would be transparent.  I currently use the slider in blending options on the first tab to get rid of the white and make it transparent but find it works slightly better if I use the magic wand tool with delete.  I figure that there is some blending option out there but there are so many and I'm not sure which to use to achieve my goal.  (Using Photoshop CS6) $\sum x_n^2$ and $\sum y_n^2$ converge, what does $\sum (x_n + y_n)^2$ do? So I know that $\sum x_n^2$ converges, and $\sum y_n^2$ converges. ${x_n}$ and ${y_n}$ are both sequences of real numbers. How can I prove that $$\sum(x_n+y_n)^2$$ converges? So far I have $$\sum(x_n+y_n)^2=\sum(x_n)^2 +\sum (y_n)^2 +\sum(2x_ny_n)$$ so I need to prove that $\sum 2x_ny_n$ converges. Is this the right way to approach it? If it is, I am completely lost as to the next step.  I also need to prove that $$\sqrt{\sum(x_n+y_n)^2}\leq \sqrt{\sum(x_n)^2}+\sqrt{\sum(y_n)^2}$$  I assume this will follow pretty easily from a result in the first proof, but I'm stuck on that now, and perhaps it is easier to start with the second one. I have a lot of work I've done on the first problem, but none of it seemed to go anywhere. Any hints?  Thanks! Why do statisticians say a non-significant result means "you can't reject the null" as opposed to accepting the null hypothesis? How to stop Mathematica 12.1 from chopping off the axes arrows? How to set a domain to ip address? You can reach this IP address  (if my computer is online). I want to assign a domain to it so I wonder how is that possible when I have no DNS? I do own my domain which is ".com". My IP is static.  Thanks Let $G$ be abelian, $H$ and $K$ subgroups of orders $n$, $m$. Then G has subgroup of order $\operatorname{lcm}(n,m)$. Let $G$ be abelian, $H$ and $K$ subgroups of orders $n$, $m$. Then G   has subgroup of order $\operatorname{lcm}(n,m)$.   This is a statement that my lecturer mentioned in my (beginners') Abstract Algebra class. I'm not sure I understand why it's true.  What I have so far: Use the abelian group structure theorem on $\langle H, K\rangle$ (finite group generated by $H$ and $K$). Then $\langle H,K\rangle=C_{a_1}C_{a_2}\dotsm$ and $n, m |\langle H,K\rangle$. Which means it's also true that $\operatorname{lcm}(n,m)|\langle H,K\rangle$. Can I leverage this to say there's a subgroup of order $\operatorname{lcm}(n,m)$? Basically, I want to turn a continuous "1" into a short "1" pulse then "0". I'm new to logic gates, apologies if it's too obvious. Why did skilled wizards use He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named? Pursuant to , it's plausible that the typical witch or wizard would use 'He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named' (if they assume Taboo Spell is intact after death of Voldemort). But, why would the Aurors and those in the Ministry of Magic (who had first rate protection) also use it? Even Snape (the Half-Blood Prince) hesitated to say 'Voldemort', and he was under the protection of Dumbledore, Dumbledore being the only wizard Voldemort ever feared.  What was the point of the Death Eaters being scared to say 'Voldemort' when, ostensibly, Voldemort wasn't even alive? Yes, it's true that some believed Voldemort would return, but, at the time, it was just that -- a belief. Were people scared that the Death Eaters might give a list of all those who used Voldemort's name to Voldemort upon his return? When to use ' (or quote) in Lisp? What is the cause of gravitional force of attraction? Ok,this is a silly question. But for quite long I have been thinking about this. What is gravitation all about?? My book directly writes since force of gravitation is directly proportional to the masses and inversly proportional to the square of the distance ie. $$F = G\frac{M_1 . M_2}{r^2}$$ . So is this gravitation all about? What is the cause of it? The book then says     We are not in the scope in classical approach so as to discuss the cause of this. However,as a matter of fact that if there are more than one mass,then there is gravitation as it is their fundamental property.( Cause of gravitation can be attributed to exchange of non-classical particles between the masses) .    Then it ended the talkings. What are those non-classical particles? Why and how are they exchanged? So far I have studied physics , I never found such weird phenomenon like this. I want to know what is the cause of gravitation and what is the cause of exchange of those so-called non-classical particles? And how do they do it? Compactly supported continuous function is uniformly continuous How can black hole increase its mass? I need to learn basic optics for a high school academic competition. Does anyone know any good places, preferably free and online, to learn the basics of optics, like lenses, angles of incidence, etc.? I can't seem to find an MIT OpenCourseWare course addressing the issue. I was fighting bandits in the sewers when one of them went into a "cower" animation, and began screaming about how he had given up.  Given that I found his terror endearing, I deigned to spare him. I tried talking to him, to no effect. Then I tried sheathing my weapon - upon which the brigand thought he had a chance, and resumed hostilities with due haste!  Sadly, he did not offer to yield again before I slew him.  And so, the question remained unanswered: do enemies actually surrender, or was this just a clever ploy to catch me with my pants down? What is the procedure to load LAS files in QGIS 2.0.1? What is the present procedure to load LAS files in QGIS 2.0.1?  After some searching I found a paper outlining the procedure; however, it was for 1.8.something, and related posts here are all rather dated. What does "restricted \write18 enabled" mean and why does TexLive keep reporting it?