Is there any way to insert a JSON object in the middle of another JSON object using jsonPath? I'm using Javascript in the Postman test script after I recieve a JSON object as a response, and I need to insert JSON data in the middle of the response. I can access the part of the response I want using "$..decision[0]". Is there a way to add data using "$..decision[1]" so that this:   ... "decision": [             {                 "var1": 43,                 "var2": 1,             }         ],...   becomes this:   ... "decision": [             {                 "var1": 43,                 "var2": 1             },             {                 "foo1": "true",                 "foo2": "false"             }         ],...   If I can't, is there another simple way to append data into the middle of a JSON object?
I am looking for a JavaScript array insert method, in the style of:  arr.insert(index, item)   Preferably in jQuery, but any JavaScript implementation will do at this point.
Regression with only categorical variables Question:  Is it possible to get multiple correct results when evaluating an indefinite integral?  If I use two different techniques to evaluate an integral, and I get two different answers, have I necessarily done something wrong?    Often, an indefinite integral can be evaluated using different techniques.  For example, an integrand might be simplified via partial fractions or other algebraic techniques before integration, or it might be amenable to a clever substitution.  These techniques give different results.  For example, looking over a few other questions on MSE:      From : evaluate $$ \int x(x^2+2)^4\,\mathrm{d}x. $$    Via the substitution $u = x^2+2$, this becomes $$ \int x(x^2+2)^4\,\mathrm{d}x       = \frac{1}{10}x^{10} + x^8 + 4x^6 + 8x^4 + 8x^2 + \frac{32}{5} + C.     $$ However, multiplying out the polynomial and integrating using the power rule gives $$ \int x(x^2+2)^4\,\mathrm{d}x       = \frac{1}{10}x^{10} + x^8 + 4x^6 + 8x^4 + 8x^2 + C    $$     From :  evaluate   $$ \int \frac{1-x}{(x+1)^2} \,\mathrm{d}x. $$    Simplifying the integrand using partial fractions then integrating gives $$ \int \frac{1-x}{(x+1)^2} \,\mathrm{d}x       = \frac{-2}{(x+1)} - \ln|x+1| + C.    $$ Via integration by parts, we get $$ \int \frac{1-x}{(x+1)^2} \,\mathrm{d}x       = \frac{x-1}{(x+1)} - \ln|x+1| + C.    $$     From : evaluate   $$ \int \frac {\tan(\pi x)\sec^2(\pi x)}2\,\mathrm{d}x. $$    Using the substitution $u = \sec(\pi x)$, this becomes $$ \int \frac {\tan(\pi x)\sec^2(\pi x)}2\,\mathrm{d}x       = \frac {\sec^2(\pi x)}{4\pi} + C.    $$ Using the substitution $u = \tan(\pi x)$, this becomes $$ \int \frac {\tan(\pi x)\sec^2(\pi x)}2\,\mathrm{d}x       = \frac {\tan^2(\pi x)}{4\pi} + C.    $$ Is it possible to somehow mark a System.Array as immutable.  When put behind a public-get/private-set they can't be added to, since it requires re-allocation and re-assignment, but a consumer can still set any subscript they wish:  public class Immy {     public string[] { get; private set; } }   I thought the readonly keyword might do the trick, but no such luck. Does Blender have different languages (language as in speech language as english, not computer language as python)? Sometimes it's more convenient for me to use Blender in another language. Does Blender have different languages (language as in speech language as english, not computer language as python)? How do I use dependency injection on \Drupal::moduleHandler() to a Controller? I am using the following line in a controller class.      \Drupal::moduleHandler()-&gt;alter('mymodule_myfunction', $plugin_items);   Pareview.sh is giving me this error message.     \Drupal calls should be avoided in classes, use dependency injection instead.   How should I accomplish this? Do I need to create a constructor, create a method, or a service? If so, what code should the service need? I found an example on  for a case where a service already exists. JavaScript: getting ImageData without canvas Before upgrading to 14.04 when I clicked on a file in the dash, it opened the file.   This still happens on my 12.04 machine.  In 14.04 when I click on a file in dash search results, it offers me 3 options: 'Email', 'Open' and 'Show in Folder'.  How can I get back the previous behaviour - i.e. to immediately open the files on the first click? What's the best way to find the inverse of datetime.isocalendar()? Showing that $|f(z)| \leq \prod \limits_{k=1}^n \left|\frac{z-z_k}{1-\overline{z_k}z} \right|$ Install brother dcp195c, receiving data but nothing happens, why? Can someone please help me to install brother dcp195c drivers on Ubuntu v12?  Using the default driver, the printer says that it is receiving data but nothing happens. I have a web service in C# and would like to have a nested inner class, that abstracts away the session collection, something like this:     public class Service : System.Web.Services.WebService {     [WebMethod]     public string Foo(string ticket)     {         SessionPool.getSession(ticket);     }      private class SessionPool      {         public static Session getSession(string ticket)         {             // this is what i want to do, but I can't access Context             return (Session)Context.Session[ticket];         }     } }    Is it possible to access the HTTP context of the WebService class via a nested class? If not, is there way I can store the reference to it? A case of optional “that”: “check the” vs. “check that the” Consider the following use case:   Please check the username and password are correct. Please check that the username and password are correct.   In this case, I would say that that is required because it feels more natural to me and so the flow is better. However, is the lack of that wrong in this case?  The question boils down to: when is that optional? See . A quick summary:   That is optional if the pronoun is the object. That is required if the pronoun is the subject.   I think that we fall into the second case: that is required because the relative pronoun is the subject. But I'm not sure if I'm interpreting these rules correctly. Can someone please advise? Proof that total derivative is the only function that can be added to Lagrangian without changing the EOM So I was reading this:  and while the answers for the first question are good, nobody gave much attention to the second one. In fact, people only said that it can be proved without giving any proof or any.  So, if I have a Lagrangian and ADD an arbitrary function of $\dot{q}$, $q$ and $t$ in such a way that the equations of motion are the same, does this extra function MUST be a total time derivative?   EDIT Ok, I changed my question a little bit:  Question: If I have a function that obeys the Euler-Lagrange equation off-shell, this implies that my function is a time derivative? (This was used in Qmechanic's answer of this other question: , equation 14.)  Also, why people only talk about things that change the Lagrangian only by a total derivative? If this is not always the case that keeps the equation of motion the same, so why is it so important? And why in the two questions I posted about the same statement on Landau&amp;Lifshitz's mechanics book only consider this kind of change in the Lagrangian? How do you validate that two math expressions are equal? Let's say you have a few expressions like the following:  $$\begin{array}((x+17)^2 \\ x^2 + 34x + 289 \end{array} \\ 288 + \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^2}{2} + 34x + 1 \\ [...] $$  You get the idea: there's an infinite number of ways of representing the same expression. The challenge is that my application is validating answers to math problems, input by math students practicing a certain concept. I'd like to make sure that whenever they submit an answer, the checker is completely insensitive to the issues of ordering, simplification, formatting etc. which would be plain frustrating. I'd also ideally like to support more than one variable such as x, y, z in the same expression.  What's a reliable way to check that two expressions are the same? The most brute force way I can think of would be to just plug a number into each variable of each expression and see what the result is.  I have a hunch however that there might be ways of getting false positives this way. That, and I might be either missing something really obvious about this, or there might be a better way of doing the comparison.  Would love to hear what you think. How to study/prepare for the Salesforce Developer Certification I am fairly new to Force.com development (less than a year). I did not learn it from the ground up. So I think it will be good to study for the developer exam to strengthen my basics and improve my overall knowledge of Force.com + it will be great to have this certification.  Now it's surprising that there is not a lot of great information on the web about how to go about obtaining this certification. Most other major certifications have dedicated study guide books available but there are few for Force.com and I don't think any of them are official.   The official page has little information. The Study guide gives a broad description of the topics in the test.   I see a lot of the esteemed members are here certified developers. I think if you guys could give us a little information, hints/tips and some advice on how to prepare for this exam, it will really be of great help. Also is DEV401 required/helpful?  Also if we could get recommendations for great resources(books, online training etc) and practice tests it will be awesome. Recursively copy files from one directory to another I have all my music in a folder /media/kalenpw/MyBook/Music/ABunchOfOtherFoldersWithFilesInside. I want to copy all of the mp3s to /media/kalenpw/HDD/Music so I used:  cp -R /media/kalenpw/MyBook/Music/*.mp3 /media/kalenpw/HDD/Music   however this only copied the mp3s in the root music folder and did not open any of the artist subdirectories and copy those files.  I was under the impression -R would recursively copy all the files. How can I achieve said goal? $\sqrt{7\sqrt{7\sqrt{7\sqrt{7\sqrt{7\cdots}}}}}$ approximation Is there a word or phrase for something that one might wish exists, but most certainly doesn't? Why can't photons have a mass? Could you explain this to me in a short and mathematical way? Reverse polarity protection