In my case, i have a model, that produce 2 Tables (zonal statistis). I have a script that should work with that tables. How do I pass these tables to a Script? my script takes certain fields in these 2 tables and store them in new table (+ some operations). Model looks like this:  And the script looks like this:  import arcpy  result=arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0)  enviro=r"D:\Skola\Kart+geoinfo\Diplomka\Diplomka.gdb" arcpy.env.workspace=enviro new_T=arcpy.CreateTable_management(enviro,result) arcpy.AddField_management(new_T,"ID","SHORT") arcpy.AddField_management(new_T,"U_Vetrolamu","DOUBLE") arcpy.AddField_management(new_T,"Od_Vetrolamu","DOUBLE") arcpy.AddField_management(new_T,"rozdil","DOUBLE") arcpy.AddField_management(new_T,"rozdil_procenta","DOUBLE")  with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(table,["MEAN","OBJECTID"]) as sCur:  with arcpy.da.InsertCursor(new_T,["U_Vetrolamu","ID"]) as iCur:       for row in sCur:          iCur.insertRow(row)  data = {} with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(table1, ["OBJECTID", "MEAN"]) as sc: for row in sc:     try:      data[row[0]] = data[row[0]] + row[1]     except KeyError:         data[row[0]] = row[1]  with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(result, ["ID", "Od_Vetrolamu"]) as uc:      for row in uc:         row[1] = data[row[0]]         uc.updateRow(row) arcpy.CalculateField_management(result, "rozdil", "[U_Vetrolamu] - [Od_Vetrolamu]", "VB", "") arcpy.CalculateField_management(result, "rozdil", "([U_Vetrolamu] - [Od_Vetrolamu]/[U_Vetrolamu] - [Od_Vetrolamu])*100", "VB", "")   I need to use table and table1 from model in script...
I'm new to modelbuilder and python. I have used modelbuilder to iterate through all rows in a shapefile (Points), process them, and produce a seperate output shapefile for each row.  The filename is generated using an inline variable (I think that is the correct terminology).  i.e. all output files have identical filenames except that the value of the PointID from the original input file is appended to the filename to enable them to be distinguished.  This works fine.  I've also written a python script to take the above output files from the model one at a time and do additional processing.  At present the input filename is hard coded into the script (i.e. I have to edit the script to change the input filename each time I run it).  Again this works fine while just processing a single file. However, I want to integrate the model and the python script so that I can run the script for each row in the original feature class automatically.  My question is therefore, how do I replace the hard coded name of the input file with a variable in the python script and how do I pass the filename to the script.
Prove that $\lambda = 0$ is an eigenvalue if and only if A is singular. I'm trying to prove that statement: Prove that $\lambda = 0$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $A$ is singular.  I'm not sure if my proof is totally correct:  Suppose that $\lambda = 0$ if det(A) = $\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_2 . . .\lambda_n = 0$ then A is singular.  If anyone could show me a better proof that would help. How to insert text before the first line of a file? Install software from packages, or build it from source? No matter how I do it, I always end up with $x = 0, 90, 270$ and $360$. All of those except $270$ is right, but I can't quite figure out how to get the $270$ degrees out of the answer. I've tried using trig identities, I've tried squaring both sides, but I always end up with $$2\sin x\cos x$$ which then leads me to $x = 0, 90, 270, 360$. But $$\sin (270) + \cos (270) = -1$$ so I'm doing something wrong. What reputation do you need on Stack Overflow to receive an invite to Careers? Solve $x^2+2=y^3$ using infinite descent? Differences between Verb + to be + adjectives and Verb + adjective What is in the space between a nucleus of an atom and its electrons? Why do we assume $a+b=b+a$ in a Ring with 1. Also, is it true with Rings without 1? I was wondering why do some people use redundant axioms in definitions?  If you just expand $(a+1)(b+1)=(a+1)b+a+1=ab+b+a+1$ $(a+1)(b+1)=a(b+1)+b+1=ab+a+b+1$. Hence, $ab+a+b+1=ab+b+a+1$, then cancel ab and 1. Then, you get it's commutative for free.   Why do we then assume it?   Also, is it even stronger. If we drop the condition that 1 is in R, then can we still deduce a+b=b+a? As clearly the argument just done falls apart if you haven't got 1 in R. About an Hour ago, I faced a problem and tried different ways to solve it.  At last I was going to post my Question on Stack Overflow, but the last trick which came in my mind worked, and the problem got resolved.    Now, if I want to post that problem on Stack Overflow with the solution which worked for me, for the purpose to help other newbies to get their answer if they face the same problem, what is the proper way of posting such solution to a problem? Splitting all lines in layer at vertices using QGIS I want to automatically split all lines in a QGIS layer at their vertices (). I've done a Google search and found , which is quite close but the workflow is complicated. Because I'll have to train my co-workers (who are unfamiliar with GIS) to use this tool, I want something as simple as a plugin or something that doesn't require GRASS. Since it's been a long time from 2010 - the time of , I wonder if there is any better way to achieve the same result? Most properties of a single binary operation can be easily read of from the operation's table. For example, given $$\begin{array}{c|ccccc} \cdot &amp; a &amp; b &amp; c &amp; d &amp; e\\\hline a     &amp; e &amp; d &amp; b &amp; a &amp; c\\ b     &amp; d &amp; c &amp; e &amp; b &amp; a\\ c     &amp; b &amp; e &amp; a &amp; c &amp; d\\ d     &amp; a &amp; b &amp; c &amp; d &amp; e\\ e     &amp; c &amp; a &amp; d &amp; e &amp; b \end{array}$$ it is easy to check that it is closed (no elements occur in the table which don't occur as row or column index), commutative (the table is symmetric), has a neutral element (the row and column of $d$ are copies of the index row/column), and has an inverse element for each element (there's a $d$ in each row and column). In other words, almost all important properties can immediately be seen. The only part missing is associativity.  Therefore my question: Is there a simple way to see directly from the operation's table (i.e. without doing explicitly all the calculations) if an operation is associative? How do I import a Python module given its relative path?  For example, if dirFoo contains Foo.py and dirBar, and dirBar contains Bar.py, how do I import Bar.py into Foo.py?  Here's a visual representation:  dirFoo\     Foo.py     dirBar\         Bar.py   Foo wishes to include Bar, but restructuring the folder hierarchy is not an option. Is there a way to truly delete all deleted files? I know that on the windows operating system, when you delete a file it's still recoverable.  I'd like to avoid simply paving the harddrive with zeros as I would like to keep my OS installation as is, but is there a way to truly delete files that have been previously deleted? Can Cycles renders be done from the command line? It seems that Cycles is mainly built in the form of Python scripts (as far as I can tell). Is it still possible to use Cycles to render a .blend file from the command line? Finding all differentiable $f(z) = u(x) + iv(y)$ in $\mathbb{C}$ where $u(x),v(y)$ are real valued functions.   I’m not sure what to do. Would $f$ be differentiable simply if and only if both $u$ and $v$ were differentiable?   My thinking is that if the limit $$ \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} $$  exists then it would be equal to  $$ \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{u(x+h)-u(x)}{h} + i\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{v(y+h)-v(y)}{h} $$  and therefore would exist if they existed. But that doesn’t seem quite right.  I also thought about using Cauchy-Riemann equations, but seeing that I’m trying to find ones that are differentiable rather than those that aren’t, I thought they wouldn’t be of much help. Running junit tests in parallel in a Maven build? I'm using JUnit 4.4 and Maven and I have a large number of long-running integration tests.  When it comes to parallelizing test suites there are a few solutions that allow me to run each test method in a single test-class in parallel. But all of these require that I change the tests in one way or another.  I really think it would be a much cleaner solution to run X different test classes in X threads in parallel. I have hundreds of tests so I don't really care about threading individual test-classes.  Is there any way to do this? Word or phrase for making something seem better by comparison What is a word or phrase that expresses the idea of purposely making something seem better by comparison? For example, lemon Starburst was created to make the cherry flavor seem that much tastier. No version of Ubuntu can be installed with any Skylake 6th generation Intel processor "This Apple ID has not been yet been used before in the iTunes Store. Tap review to sign in, then review your account information."   I keep getting this message when I try to install free apps from App Store. I don't want to give my account info until I actually purchase something.   Can I not download free apps until I provide my account information? My email verification is complete. I'm using an iPhone 3GS logged in to my iTunes account.