I have a pretty big collection of papers (as bibtex records) for which I'd like to add citation relations, i.e. a collection of cites(a,b) where a and b are two keys identifying the citing and cited paper respectively.  I want to avoid doing this annotation manually. Is there some web service to extract this information automatically?
My goal is to produce a graph showing the linkages (and lack there of) between several fields that share a common subproblem by showing who cites whom.  There are many databases that show citations between papers: , , and Google Scholar.  However none allows me to download even part of their database.  Is there some database I have overlooked?  Has someone written a scrapper for one of these websites?    For reference, the fields I'm considering are Mechanics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Signal Processing, Geophysics, and several others.
I was working on historical data looking for anomalous patterns that we would not expect to occur at random. I'd like to create a scheme to analyze data and markets to test for statistical significance and consistency over time.  Question : Are there some tools we could use to evaluate the nonrandomness of a database? What do we use usually to say that something is random or not (statistically)? Figure we work with change in some value over time. I would like to capture the contents of AJAX requests using Greasemonkey.  Does anybody know how to do this? Why should we care about groups at all? Do we know how Senju Hashirama died? How to do multiple joins when using groupby in linq In C# why can't a conditional operator implicitly cast to a nullable type How do I define global variables in CoffeeScript? I have a professor at my university who uses content from an un-cited textbook that he has never referenced anywhere, including his green sheet (syllabus), as an additional resource. At least some slides he has used include parts of content that have been re-worded and others that are 100% the same. I noticed this by Googling for textbooks on the material we're studying in class and found that examples given in one that I found were exactly the same as what he has provided.  Would this technically be plagiarism? Should he be given the benefit of the doubt in this situation? Is there a way to truly delete all deleted files? I know that on the windows operating system, when you delete a file it's still recoverable.  I'd like to avoid simply paving the harddrive with zeros as I would like to keep my OS installation as is, but is there a way to truly delete files that have been previously deleted? Q1: Does a DNS rule for *.domain.com match multi-level domain names? In other words, if I just set *.domain.com in my DNS records, will it match all of:  a.domain.com b.a.domain.com c.b.a.domain.com   as many levels deep as needed, with just that one wildcard DNS specifier?  We have a use case for multi-level DNS and I would like to confirm that we are doing the right thing in setting one wildcard DNS setting for the root domain.  Q2: will this work with round-robin DNS? How do I time a method's execution in Java? Show that any set in a metric space can be written as the intersection of open sets Show that any set contained in the metric space $(X, d)$ can be   written as the intersection of open sets.   Definitions: A set $A \subseteq X$ is open if $\forall x \in A$, $\exists \varepsilon&gt;0$ such that $B_{\varepsilon}(x) \subseteq A$. A set $C \subseteq X$ is closed if and only if $X \setminus C$ is open.   I also know that the intersection of a finite collection of open sets is open and that any open ball contained in $X$ is open. How can I prove this question? Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM? new finding by Minev et al. seems to suggest that transitions between atomic states are not instantaneous, but continuous processes wherein a superposition smoothly adjusts from favoring one state to another (if I understand it correctly). The authors also claim to be able to catch a system "mid-jump" and reverse it. Popular articles are  and .  I am curious if this finding rules out any interpretations of QM. It seems to generally go against the Copenhagen attitude, which describes measurements as collapsing physical systems into a definite classical state. The popular articles indeed claim that the founders of QM would have been surprised by the new finding.  The link with the asterisk mentions that something called "quantum trajectories theory" predicts what was observed. Is this an interpretation, or a theory? And are they implying that other interpretations/theories don't work? How does Cooper get out of the black hole? In the movie Interstellar,  Cooper (played by ) enters a black hole and sends a message to Murph (his daughter). Later, he is found by rangers, but I don't understand how he gets out of the black hole?  As far as I know, nothing can get out of a black hole, as it has extremely high gravity. The Problem  Accessing my site over https (the only protocol allowed) I get the content, but none of the CSS, images etc.  Drupal is creating pages in response to https requests that include http links to these resources, but it should be using https.  What I've done  I have copied a site to a dev server. The site loads and basically works fine - I can log in etc. It's just that all the links drupal generates are http. The site I've copied it from also runs over https. The site does not exist on http (it would just get a Forbidden error). I've drush cc all.  So Apache's working - I can access the site. .htaccess is working (clean urls work, for example).  I'm using SNI to access the site because the server has other vhosts too, but I'm only accessing the site using the latest Firefox (and as it's a dev site and I'm the only dev, nobody else will use it).  I've done this dozens of times and am quite stumped! Why does Drupal not notice that the request came over https?  The fix  Turns out that .htaccess has this to say:   /* Base URL (optional).                                                          If Drupal is generating incorrect URLs on your site, which could             be in HTML headers (links to CSS and JS files) or visible links on pages     (such as in menus), uncomment the Base URL statement below (remove the       leading hash sign) and fill in the absolute URL to your Drupal installation.    Sure enough, putting $base_url = 'https://example.com'; fixed it.  But why is this necessary? I've already done a lot of searching (in particular: ) to try to prove this statement:      $f: A \to B$ is injective if and only if it has a left inverse. [I'm going to also assume $A$ and $B$ are nonempty.]   My attempt so far:     $\Leftarrow$ Suppose $f$ has a left inverse and $f(a_1) = f(a_2)$ for    $a_1, a_2 \in A$. Then there is a function $g: B \to A$ such that   $g\left(f(a_1)\right) = a_1$ and $g\left(f(a_2)\right) = a_2$. Since   $g$ is well-defined, it follows that $g\left(f(a_1)\right) =  g\left(f(a_2)\right)$, and hence $a_1 = a_2$.         $\Rightarrow$Now   suppose $f$ is injective. Then $f(a_1) = f(a_2) \implies a_1 = a_2$.   Furthermore, since $A$ is nonempty, there is an element $x \in A$.   Define $g: B \to A$ by  \begin{equation*} g(b) = \begin{cases}  f^{-1}(b), &amp; b \in \text{Im}(f) \\ x, &amp; b \in A \setminus  \text{Im}(f)\text{.} \end{cases} \end{equation*} This mapping is   well-defined, since if $f$ is injective, $f^{-1}(b)$ is unique.   My main question: does this imply that if $f: A \to B$ is injective that any mapping $g: \text{Im}(f) \to A$ is bijective? Otherwise, I don't understand why we can even use $f^{-1}$ on an element. [Please read the link above for more details - in proof 1.] I'm trying to compute this integral, $$\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln x}{x^{a}(x+1)}dx \hbox{ where } 0&lt;a&lt;1$$ I drew a typical Pacman contour with branch cut at positive real axis. Then, we have $$\int_{\Gamma}\frac{\ln z}{z^{a}(z+1)}dz=\left(\int_{L_{1}}+\int_{L_{2}}+\int_{C_{R}}+\int_{C_{\epsilon}}\right)\frac{\ln z}{z^{a}(z+1)}dz$$ The function has a pole at $z=-1$. Then, by residue theorem, the whole integral becomes  \begin{align*} \int_{\Gamma}\frac{\ln z}{z^{a}(z+1)}dz&amp;=2\pi i\text{res}(\frac{\ln z}{z^{a}(z+1)};-1)\\&amp;=2\pi i\lim_{z\rightarrow-1}(z+1)\frac{\ln z}{z^{a}(z+1)}\\&amp;=2\pi i\lim_{z\rightarrow-1}\frac{\ln z}{z^{a}}\\&amp;=2\pi i\frac{\ln e^{i\pi}}{e^{i\pi a}}\\&amp;=2\pi i\frac{\ln1+i\pi}{e^{i\pi a}}\\&amp;=-\frac{2\pi^{2}}{(e^{i\pi})^{a}} \end{align*} On $L_1$, $z=xe^{i\epsilon}$ where $\epsilon\leq x\leq R$  On $L_{2}$, $z=xe^{i(2\pi-\epsilon)}$ where $\epsilon\leq x\leq R$  On $C_{R}$, $z=Re^{i\theta}$ where $\epsilon\leq\theta\leq2\pi-\epsilon$  Lastly on On $C_{\epsilon}$, $z=\epsilon e^{i\theta}$ where $\epsilon\leq\theta\leq2\pi-\epsilon$  So I tried to compute them separately and I anticipate the curves will both go to $0$ by ML inequality, and two linear integrals will consist of the term $\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln x}{x^{a}(x+1)}dx$ and hence simply solve for it. But I'm having trouble physically solving it out. I think the log is throwing me off. Can anybody please help me? Why do all the planets of the solar system orbit in roughly the same 2D plane? Most images you see of the solar system are 2D and all planets orbit in the same plane. In a 3D view, are really all planets orbiting in similar planes? Is there a reason for this? I'd expect that the orbits distributed all around the sun, in 3D. Has an object made by man (a probe) ever left the Solar System? Return more than 2000 records (SOQL) I'm trying to retrieve a list of Account objects from Salesforce using SOQL. Originally my query was this:  var result = service.query("SELECT Id, Name, RecordTypeId FROM Account"); return result.records.Select(record =&gt; record as Account).ToList();   However this only returns a maximum of 2,000 records and I have over that which I need to be returned by this query. After some digging around I found an example in Java which loops over the SOQL query which will allow a maximum of 10,000 records to be returned. I tried to replicate this in C# but it differs slightly, here is what I have now:  var accounts = new List&lt;Account&gt;(); foreach (Account account in service.query("SELECT Id, Name, Composer_ID__c, RecordTypeId FROM Account").records)     accounts.Add(account);  return accounts;   However this still only returns a maximum of 2,000 records. How can I return more than 2,000 records by querying Account? I'm trying to do some scenes which use a mixture of 3D backgrounds with 2D animated characters.The best way I've figured this out so far is to use a plane with an image sequence of pngs which hold the frames.  The problem with this method is Blender seams to only load image sequences based on image numbering. If I wanted to do a sequence which loops say, frames 0-5, then repeats 4-0 for the 'return' of the animation, I would have to load frames doubled up.  Is there a way, maybe with a script, to change the sequence order? I can see it as a useful plugin but my python skills are pretty much non existent.