I typed /kill @e into a repeating, always active command block.   Now whenever I respawn, I am immediately killed.  I've tried to use world edit but was unable to correct the situation.
I set a command block to /tp. It was supposed to activate only if you had 0 time left, and to activate the command block with a hopper clock to keep giving it power.   But it is not checking if you have 0 time left, so it keeps teleporting me. I can't get close enough to the command block to break it, so I'm stuck in a neverending teleport loop.  Any ideas?
Taking Seats on a Plane I know several questions were asked about the difference between "going to" and "will". Based on several answers (see, for instance, ,  and ), I understood that "will" is more spontaneous and "going to" is used with more planned actions.  So, it seems that everything is pretty fine. However, in , Kosmonaut has an answer in which he states: "Let's say that tomorrow you will walk your dog from 7 - 8 AM".  On the one hand, you probably planned to walk your dog long before and thus I should use "Let's say that tomorrow you're going to walk your dog from 7 - 8 am".   On the other hand, since I'm saying "let's say...", I'm deciding right now (thus, unplanned) that you will walk your dog. So, even though in this hypothetical situation you made a plan, I'm in a more spontaneous mood deciding right now that that's what you will do tomorrow, and, thus, I should use "will".  Which one (if any) of the above explanations is right? Where should the period be put when an entire sentence is quoted at the end of a sentence? I have noticed a couple of kinds of behavior that seem to crop up in the SO community, and it really seems to artificially boost reputation. There may not be a solution (or it may not be a problem!) but here are some thoughts.  The first is the fact that "celebrity" users, or users with lots of reputation, are treated significantly better than others. Take Joel Spolsky's most recent question:    It was closed, opened, closed, and re-opened. And the question has earned Joel - what - 1030 reputation 103 votes, and lots of reputation! Wow! I'm not saying that Joel's question is a bad one. But lets compare to other questions that one might consider to be in the same equivalence class - easily answerable, specific questions, short questions:   (5 votes)   (5 votes)  If you look at the , I can hardly find any which are specific technical questions. So that Joel's question was so upvoted could only mean that:   It was upvoted based on his celebrity People have been interpreting the questions as a sort of zen-like wakeup call, designed to get people talking and thinking about they way they vote.   I do not mean any disrespect toward Joel, and again, I think his question was a good one. This post isn't about Joel! But the boost in reputation did not (imho) mean "Joel is really good at programming, and he has earned my trust as someone knowledgeable about computers." It may be true that Joel is a proficient computer expert, but not based on the merit of that one question.  Which leads me to an example about myself. I recently gave  (130 reputation) to a question about PHP's image-creating libraries. I am very appreciative of the community's support for my answer - an answer which I believe was well-thought and that I put effort into.  At the same time I can't look someone and tell them, with a straight face, that my reputation is a great reflection of my computer-related knowledge. Billions of people on the net have created tutorials for PHP's GD image library - I just happened to be the person to post a few of them. Heck if I know why it got 13 votes! (oh, but please don't downvote it!!)  SO is built by the community - so the community absolutely gets to decide what questions are important, and how they choose to dispense reputation. But in practice, I feel like peoples' reputation would be much lower if the community were more discriminating about the way they voted.  So: am I totally off base here? Is this even something that can be corrected with a different reputation algorithm? Or am I the only one who sees this as a detriment to the SO community?  (And, to be completely clear, I do not intend for this to be an ad hominem, and I am not jealous about not having a higher reputation. But I do take reputation with a grain of salt, in part for these reasons, and I thought I'd bring it up! It is meta, after all!) A little brain fart What is a nicer, less immature saying?  I love using 'A Freudian slip', but that is only applicable in certain situations. Suppose we have a magnetic field directed into the computer screen. Assume that there is no gravitational field. Now suppose we have a stationary positively charged particle in the magnetic field. The magnetic force is given by $$\mathbf{F}=q\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}$$  Since $\mathbf{v}=0, \mathbf{F}=0$.  Now pick a reference frame moving to the left with constant velocity. In this frame, the particle is moving to the right with constant velocity. So, the magnetic force is directed upwards.  From what I've learnt in physics, forces are independent of choice of reference frames as long as the frames are inertial. But in the 2 inertial reference frames I have chosen, I get 2 different magnetic forces. How do we reconcile this? Purely "algebraic" proof of Young's Inequality states that if $a, b \geq 0$, $p, q &gt; 0$, and $\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1$, then $$ab\leq \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}$$ (with equality only when $a^p = b^q$).  Back when I was in my first course in real analysis, I was assigned this as homework, but I couldn't figure it out.  I kept trying to manipulate the expressions algebraically, and I couldn't get anywhere.  But every proof that I've seen since uses calculus in some way to prove this.  For example, a common proof is based on this  and integration.  The proof on Wikipedia uses the fact that $\log$ is concave, which I believe requires the analytic definition of the logarithm to prove (correct me if I'm wrong).  Can this be proven using just algebraic manipulations?  I know that that is a somewhat vague question, because "algebraic" is not well-defined, but I'm not sure how to make it more rigorous. But for example, the proof when $p = q = 2$ is something I would consider to be "purely algebraic":  $$0 \leq (a - b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab,$$ so $$ab \leq \frac{a^2}{2} + \frac{b^2}{2}.$$ PGFplots foreach equivalent to TikZ's with multiple variables separated by a slash Indenting a whole paragraph How do I indent a whole paragraph at the same distance from my left margin, with the simplest command or environment? Proving $\int_{0}^1\frac{x-1}{\log x}dx=\log 2$ and $\int_{0}^1\frac{\log x}{x-1}dx=\frac{\pi^2}{6}$ I would like to know how to prove the following two definite integrals.  A: $$\int_{0}^1\frac{x-1}{\log x}dx=\log 2$$  B:$$\int_{0}^1\frac{\log x}{x-1}dx=\frac{\pi^2}{6}$$  I found these two by using wolfram-alpha, but I can't prove them. I suspect that the following relations might be used.  $$\log 2=1-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4}+\cdots=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n}$$and$$\frac{\pi^2}{6}=\frac{1}{1^2}+\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3^2}+\frac{1}{4^2}+\cdots=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^2}$$  I need your help. I have a complex command that I'd like to make a shell/bash script of.  I can write it in terms of $1 easily:  foo $1 args -o $1.ext   I want to be able to pass multiple input names to the script. What's the right way to do it?    And, of course, I want to handle filenames with spaces in them. How to prove that any idempotent matrix is diagonalizable? why is there no non-degenerate 2-forms on 4-sphere? I want Ctrl+Alt+B bring up a browser.  Ctrl+Alt+Delete is handy.  Can I set up Ctrl+Alt+B to bring up a browser (either default or specific)? How would Gauss' law hold in time varying electric fields? How do I execute the following shell command using the Python  module?  echo "input data" | awk -f script.awk | sort &gt; outfile.txt   The input data will come from a string, so I don't actually need echo.  I've got this far, can anyone explain how I get it to pipe through sort too?  p_awk = subprocess.Popen(["awk","-f","script.awk"],                           stdin=subprocess.PIPE,                           stdout=file("outfile.txt", "w")) p_awk.communicate( "input data" )   UPDATE:  Note that while the accepted answer below doesn't actually answer the question as asked, I believe S.Lott is right and it's better to avoid having to solve that problem in the first place! Suppose $f(x)$ is linear i.e. $f(x + y) = f(x) +f(y) $ and monotone on $[-\infty, +\infty]$, then $f(x) = ax$, a real. Suppose $f(x)$ is linear i.e. $f(x + y) = f(x) +f(y) $ and monotone on $[-\infty, +\infty]$, then $f(x) = ax$, a real.  We know $f(0)=0$, and if one assumes differentiability it is quite easy.      But how does monotone make up for differentiability? When I apply to a PhD program, may I ask a postdoc who closely supervised me to write a recommendation letter? My supervisor also has written one for me, but I believe the postdoc can comment on my research skills in a more detailed and precise way. Does a postdoc have enough authority to convince admission committee? How do you convert a number to a string showing dollars and cents?  eg: 123.45    =&gt; '$123.45' 123.456   =&gt; '$123.46' 123       =&gt; '$123.00' .13       =&gt; '$0.13' .1        =&gt; '$0.10' 0         =&gt; '$0.00' The table cards were A,K,K,8,3. All four suits were on the board. Player one had A,8. Player two had A,3.   Is this a split pot?