Is there a difference between are here also and are also here?     In this street you see 2 trees, 1 mithril rock and 1 patch of wheat.   You look around and notice that Bob, Sara and Tom are also here.   This is my actual use case, but I wonder if one of the two makes it more implicit. My intention is to say "besides all these resources, you also see some users". Or perhaps there's even better wording..
What is the correct position of the word 'also'?     I would like to also talk about ...      I would also like to talk about ...
Uniform Continuity implies Continuity Let $f$ be a function from a metric space $X$ to a metric space $Y$. Show that if $f$ is uniformly continuous on $X$ then $f$ is continuous on $X$. Show that the converse is not true.  Uniform continuity definition:  $∀ε&gt;0:∃δ&gt;0:∀p,q∈X:d_{X}(p,q)&lt;δ⟹d_{Y}(f(p),f(q))&lt;ε$  Continuity definition:  $∀ε&gt;0:∀p∈X:∃δ&gt;0:∀q∈X:d_{X}(p,q)&lt;δ⟹d_{Y}(f(p),f(q))&lt;ε$  I wonder if these proofs are correct and if they are formal enough?    Uniform continuity ⟹ Continuity   Let $f$ be uniformly continuous. Fix $ε_{0}$, obtain $δ_{0}(ε_{0})$ (as a function of $ε_{0}$), fix any $p_{0}$ and $q_{0}$ and we know that:   $d_{X}(p_{0},q_{0})&lt;δ_{0}⟹d_{Y}(f(p_{0}),f(q_{0}))&lt;ε_{0}$   If we want to prove that $f$ is continuous at $p_{0}$, we fix $ε_{0}$ and we pick the same $δ_{0}$ as above and fix any $q_{0}$ and we are assured by 1. that   $d_{X}(p_{0},q_{0})&lt;δ_{0}⟹d_{Y}(f(p_{0}),f(q_{0}))&lt;ε_{0}$   Since $p_{0}$ was arbitrary, $f$ is continuous at $X$.     Continuity $\color{red}{\implies}$ Uniform continuity   Let $f$ be continuous. Fix $ε_{0}$, fix any obtain $p_{0}$ and $p_{1}$, obtain both $δ_{0}(ε_{0},p_{0})$ and $δ_{1}(ε_{0},p_{1})$ (not necessarily equal), fix any $q_{0}$ and $q_{1}$ and we know that:   $d_{X}(p_{0},q_{0})&lt;δ_{0}⟹d_{Y}(f(p_{0}),f(q_{0}))&lt;ε_{0}$  $d_{X}(p_{1},q_{1})&lt;δ_{1}⟹d_{Y}(f(p_{1}),f(q_{1}))&lt;ε_{0}$   For $f$ to be uniformly continuous, if we fix $ε_{0}$, obtain $δ$, fix any $p_{0}$, $p_{1}$, $q_{0}$ and $q_{0}$ we must have that:   $d_{X}(p_{0},q_{0})&lt;δ⟹d_{Y}(f(p_{0}),f(q_{0}))&lt;ε_{0}$  $d_{X}(p_{1},q_{1})&lt;δ⟹d_{Y}(f(p_{1}),f(q_{1}))&lt;ε_{0}$   But those two implications need not hold for the same $δ$ as shown above. Suppose we pick $δ_{0}$ and w.l.o.g. we suppose $δ_{0}&gt;δ_{1}$. Then it could be the case that   $δ_{1}&lt;d_{X}(p_{1},q_{1})&lt;δ_{0}$  but we cannot conclude ⟹$d_{Y}(f(p_{1}),f(q_{1}))&lt;ε_{0}$.  Therefore, continuity does not imply uniform continuity. The extension of smooth function If $U$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb R^n$ whose boundary is smooth, and $f$ is a smooth function on $U$ whose partial derivatives of all orders have a continuous extensions to $\bar U$. For an arbitrary domain $V \supseteq \bar U$, is there a smooth function $\tilde f$ on $V$ extending $f$? What's the best option to display Unicode text (hebrew, etc.) in VB6 I have some customers who want to use our speech therapy software in Hebrew.  The programs are in VB6. The best option I'm aware of are:   use the Forms 2.0 controls from MS Office, but you can't distribute them.    $899   $499   Any other options? Do 'learn by heart' & 'learn by rote' mean the same? Here in India, both the phrases learning by heart and learning by rote are taken to have the same meaning, i.e., blind memorisation without true understanding.    However, some sources say that to learn something by heart implies that one knows something so well that it has been thoroughly internalised and imbibed.    So is it wrong to conflate the two? While browsing I have received notification on Google "Unusual traffic from your computer network"   We're sorry..."your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now." See Google Help for more information.  Right now I am using the "Ubuntu 12.04" 32 bit version.  Any suggestion, why this is happens &amp; How it resolve?  Thank you for your worthy suggestion. Change date and time format from csv file without using date -d I have a .csv file contains   Data1|Data2|10/24/2017 8:10:00 AM   I want to change date and time format of column 3 as following:  From 10/24/2017 8:10:00 AM (12-Hour) to 20171024 08:10:00(24-hour).  Not using -d In D&amp;D 4e there was an option to Delay your initiative:     Perform your actions as desired and adjust your initiative to your new   position in the order.   Does this rule to change initiative order still exist in 5th edition? I cannot find it in the PHB. It was announced on  (at 1:05:26) that Stack Exchange has its own URL shortener, http://s.tk/. Users can't create their own, they can only use the ones that are built-in. What shortened URLs are available through it? \nameref breaks for the star versions of section, paragraph when titlesec is loaded. I have a document that numbers paragraphs by default, but I have a few I do not want to number but would like to refer to. These are marked with \paragraph*, however, if the titlesec package is loaded at the same time, it causes nameref to display an empty string (the link box of hyperref is still visible).  MWE:  \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[sf]{titlesec} %comment this out and it works fine. \usepackage{hyperref} \begin{document} \section{Sections} \label{sec} This is \nameref{sec} \paragraph{A named Paragraph} \label{par} This is \nameref{par} \paragraph*{A starred named Paragraph} \label{par:star} This is \nameref{par:star} \end{document}   I suspect titlesec causes this defect for ALL star variants of sectioning commands but have not tested this. For me only paragraph* is relevant however a fix for all variants would be the best.  I have a hunch it might be related to this:  however this happens to go way beyond my latex knowledge and is just "magic" for me. Story about an intelligent, walled city; people are reproduced by machines, protagonist rebels and tries to leave Does Windows log programs that have been run/called? I have been thinking about ways of teaching electronics and I'm wondering if the following is true...  For starters, when we talk about voltage as energy per unit charge, is this energy manifest simply as the kinetic energy of the electron?  So, all other things being equal, will the electrons coming out of a 4 volt battery will have twice the velocity of electrons coming out of a 1 volt battery because of ${1 \over 2}mv^2$?  This would seem to imply that the voltage drop across different parts of the circuit is essentially a comparison of the electron speeds at those points.  Furthermore doesn't this imply that the electrons are nearly halted by the time they reach the positive terminal of the battery? This makes intuitive sense to me, it seems pedagogically sound, and it provides an explanation for how electrons "know" to give up their energy across the circuit -- electrostatic repulsion communicates later resistances to earlier parts of the circuit.  How much of the above is correct? The one things that makes me suspicious is that, in this picture, electron density at the positive terminal of the battery is very high, and repulsive forces would prohibit this. On the other hand, if the Joules per Coulomb are not coming from kinetic energy, then what? The field? But wouldn't that just dissipate as light?  Something is wrong but I don't know what. jQuery get the rendered height of an element? How do I match any character across multiple lines in a regular expression? How can I install Windows after I've installed Ubuntu? Getting polygon boundaries of City in JSON from Google Maps API? When searching Google Maps for a city, the city's administrative boundary is displayed.    Is there a way to get the polygon boundaries of City in a JSON format using google maps api? How do I tell which point-and-shoot cameras take good low light photos? I have a Canon Powershot A710 and I previously had a previous Powershot A-series model. I love them due to the high amount of control they offer. Sadly, they both suck in low light conditions, their flash is very unresponsive, and the camera takes several seconds preparing itself for the next shot after a flash shot. And even then, the pictures they take in low light/flash are as bad as good are those with good light.  I'd like a camera which gives a lot of control options, but what do I need to look for to find one that's great in low light, with or without flash? There is some behavior I can't understand in the Unity Desktop.   Open nautilus via. clicking in the launcher onto the home-button Navigate to for example the windows-partition in nautilus Minimize nautilus Click on nautilus in the launcher doesn't open the nautilus with windows-partition, instead it opens a new window with the home folder.   Is there a workaround for this strange behavior?  Regards, Arthur Can [sic] be used to highlight a punctuational error?    In the sentence below, the bracketed sic would obviously denote that the punctuation preceding it was an error &mdash; that is, a semicolon should supplant the comma. Has anybody ever seen this usage, and would you support it?     The sun is high, [sic] put on some sunblock. how to change landscape mode