I have added a WordPress blog to my site, added non-canonical URLs, put it through Bing, and Google Webmaster tools added about 100 + backlinks, and I've not had one any of my Wordpress blog pages ran on SEO search engines at all, bing, yahoo, yahoo.co.jp, google.com and other google search pages including google.fr, all of which I want to be ranked for international traffic. The site is a little old, and I hope I am not recovering after old errors and penalities, because from what I have read it could take up to a year, so that's the reason I've been going the extra mile on it, and I have not added too many pages to it, and have recovered some configuration issues where a lot of pages were going to a bad 404 page... However, I have added WordPress to sites many times and can see a transparent issue, wondering if anyone has any tips to get the WordPress pages ranking up soon. Really never seent his issue before. So tried pretty much everything, the Yoast app says there is some conflict with having two sitemaps, but the problem is that the one for my main hosting from the hosting company, is actually important because it comprises the core sitemap for my HTML pages.... So Is there a way to utilize the 'Toggle' sitemaps function? Should matter though because I have even confirmed the site pages exist with an RSS feed in bing webmaster tools, but it won't even rank in bing when I type in site: followed by the domain dot com.... So this RSS feed is also catching data in webmaster tools however there is still nothing.  Any ideas? Anything would help, I lost a lot of ranking on an old blog I used for my business page, that I shut down as I decided to merge everything into one site and forward some of the links between each other, but now it is ranking much worse, and none of my new WordPress pages are ranking after 30 days. And, my apologies if the StackExchange system saw a duplicate memo, this was because the WordPress thread I followed on the site was actually related to WordPress drops... REALLY need help here, my WordPress ranking is fundamental to my site's traffic. Another concern of mine is that someone might be negative backlinking my old broken blog pages, so I keep adding redirects to supplement the negative SEO, it's really bizarre, but I am only happy to at least be ranking on my brand keywords again... Everything else though for external brand related keywords has been quite sabotaged.. And, to think it all use to come from WordPress, I was getting more than 100 clicks a day related to my blogs...
This is a general, community wiki  question and answer pair intended to address any questions   concerning the reasons a site or specific site contents do not appear   in search engine results.      If your question was closed as a duplicate of this question and you   feel that the information provided here does not provide a sufficient   answer, please open a discussion on .   My site (or specific pages on my site) is not appearing in search engine results.  Why isn't my content indexed and what can I do about it?
Why would my TV image turn black when electrical appliances turn on? Is it possible to see cp speed and percent copied? I'm having problems when copying large files using nautilus (it gets stuck). I need to copy, using cp. I would like to know if there are any parameters that shows the % copied and also the transfer speed. Basically, I want the header fonts to use a different (smaller) font size than the size I set using \documentclass. What should be the option I'd be using ?  \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[margin=1in, headsep=10pt]{geometry} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \pagestyle{fancy}  \fancyhead[L]{Personal Statement} % What other option should I use to get a custom font size ? For every $p\in [1,\infty)$, consider the set $\ell^p$ of real sequences $x=(x_n)=(x_1,x_2,\ldots)$ such that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty |x_n|^p&lt;\infty$. This is a Banach space with the norm $\Vert x\Vert_p=(\sum|x_n|^p)^{1/p}$.  I have the following problem:     Is it true that $\ell^p=\bigcup_{1\leq q&lt;p}\ell^q$ for $p&gt;1$?   I don't think it is true, but I'm having problems to show this. Clearly, the statement is true for some $p&gt;1$ iff it is true for every $p&gt;1$.  I'm trying to find a sequence $(a_n)$ such that $\sum |a_n|^s$ converges iff $s\geq 1$. I've tried many sequences (such as $(n^{1+1/n})$, involving $\log$, etc...), but none of them worked. The abstract environment changes the \linewidth for the whole document In the article class, it seems that using the abstract environment has an effect to the rest of the document. More precisely, it seems that it redefines the \linewidth, which equals \textwidth without abstract, is smaller with the abstract. My feeling is that \linewidth is redefined for the abstract environment, but the value is not reseted at the end of the abstract.  Here is a minimal example:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \abstract{This is an abstract. This is an abstract.}\bigskip  This is text. This is text. This is text. This is text. This is text. This is text.\\  \rule{\textwidth}{3em} \rule{\linewidth}{3em} \end{document}   The output is not the same if you comment the \abstract line or not.  Do you have the same problem as I do when you compile (if not, I will upload some PDF files to show)? Is this a (known) bug in LaTeX2e? How can we circumvent the problem?  Note: I compile with the pdflatex command, and I use pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian). My neighbor keeps complaining about my music. How to soundproof my apartment? I live in an old apartment building and the walls are thin. This is a problem because I love to listen to music -- sometimes at odd hours of the night. Yes, I can be an asshole in this way. But my neighbor bangs against the wall even when I'm being perfectly reasonable (his bedroom seems to share a wall with my living room). And it's not just the low frequencies that get to him. He knocks against the wall even when I turn the subwoofer off on my speakers, which are located on the opposite wall.   This is kinda unacceptable. This is my home! What can I do so that I can live in it the way I want? Strategy for "Which is better" questions In questions that are asking:    "Which is better option A or option B?"  It seems that several close reasons immediately come to mind:   Primarily Opinion Based.  In many cases the choice between A and B is simply a personal preference, a "6 vs. half dozen", either approach will work just as well and answers to this type of question will be almost entirely opinion based. Too Broad.  In some cases A is better and in others B is better, to go through every possible use case would lead to too many possible answers or one answer that reads like a short text book. Off-topic, Minimal Understanding, include attempted solutions.  This is perhaps the the most important one. If the OP needs to know "Which is better", they should probably have tried both and decided which is better, based on a practical trial.   Yet another option would be to downvote and/or comment with a "Try it and find out".  So...  Are there cases when these questions are permissible?   Could we add some more specific guidance in the help center?  Or should we continue to handle these case by case and just downvote/close appropriately when they pop up?  Strongly related, but hopefully not a duplicate of:   "Which is faster" isn't the only case where these pop up. Who decides which half of the universe should be destroyed? I want to install the  on my iPhone. On the phone I have iOS 7. When I try to install the App, it tells me it needs at least version 8 of iOS.  I do not want to upgrade my iOS version, especially for the sole purpose of installing an App. However, I do want to use it, it's kind of important.  I searched for a while about how to do this, but I could only find solutions that would work if you installed the App before and it shows up on the "Purchases" page in iTunes or something like that. And this doesn't apply to this case.    How can I install an older version of the App (one that requires "only" iOS 7) without having to upgrade the operating system on my iPhone ? Should I round my uncertainty to nearest hundred? I was doing some exercises on error propagation when I came across this problem:  $4\pi^2/(0,034 \pm 0,004 \space s^2/cm)$  I calculated my uncertainty to be $\Delta$ = 136 $cm/s^2$  And so the hole thing gives me: $(1200 \pm 136) \space cm/s^2$.  Now going into my question I rounded $4\pi^2/0,034 = 1161.12993$ to $1200$ which makes sense since my uncertainty is 136 but in the solution to this problem $136$ is rounded to $100$ and that's not making much sense to me.  So should I always round my uncertainty to the nearest hundred (assuming my uncertainty has 3 digits)? Groups with Same Number Of Elements and Subgroups I am trying to remember the title of a children's SF book I once read, maybe 20 to 25 odd years ago.   I don't have a great number of details (and some of what I recall may be completely wrong), but the details (such as they are):   A war between two alien groups ended, and some technology that should have been destroyed was instead imprinted into a human baby. A few years later, both groups find this out and attempt to retrieve it. The main characters are the child, and an alien that I believe was called "Yacob" (or similar) who was sent to protect the child/retrieve the technology, and the antagonists were the other group of aliens that had previously lost the war and were trying to get the technology to start it up again (again, I don't remember the exact details, but I think it was a fairly simple black &amp; white/good vs. bad scenario, being a children's book and all). There was a scene in which Yacob/the alien gives the child blue food, who complains that it's blue, and the alien states "close your eyes and it's just food". The alien had a space shuttle/some other piece of tech disguised as a van. I vaguely recall a scene in which it is under attack and it flies or something. An example for a homomorphism that is not an automorphism "turn down the volume" or "turn the volume down" - phrasal verb structure I'm learning about phrasal verbs, but I'm not sure if I'll use them correctly. Which one of the following phrasal verb uses correct:  -I don't know how to turn down the volume? -I don't know how to turn the volume down?  I always think that they're same, but lately I feel like there must be a rule how to use them correctly, or perhaps they get different meanings? Why more (and varying number of) logical reads with read ahead (prefetch)? After creating tpch database in my SQL Server, I tried below query:      set statistics io on     DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS;             select top 100 * from dbo.lineitem order by l_partkey;   The table lineitem has a non-clustered index on l_partkey. I issued the above queries for several times and found out that the logical reads vary each time:      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1019, physical reads 4, read-ahead reads 1760, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.     Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1007, physical reads 4, read-ahead reads 1720, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.     Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1030, physical reads 4, read-ahead reads 1792, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   From the post here: , I know it could be caused by read ahead behavior.  BUT exactly why read ahead could cause more logical reads? How does it change the SQL Server behavior? Like SQL Server may read more index page since it's in cache anyway?  Anyway, I disabled read ahead and issue the above query again. Now it reports the same amount of logical reads each time. BUT the logical reads is much smaller!!      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 404, physical reads 160, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   So my question is, why the read ahead feature could cause many more and various logical reads count?  Out of curiosity, I tried another query without the "order by":      select top 100 * from dbo.lineitem   Here's the result without read ahead:      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 5, physical reads 3, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   Here's the result with read ahead:      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 15, physical reads 2, read-ahead reads 3416, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   The one with read ahead still has more logical reads. So, why? Can an html element have multiple ids? Why is a black hole black? \overline outside of math mode If I want to draw an overline over some text, not an equation, how can I do it? \overline seems to only work in math mode, and when used outside of math mode, it automatically says "Missing $ inserted". Fundamental Theorem of Algebra - an elementary complex analysis proof? We begin by assuming that a non-constant complex polynomial $$p(z)=a_n z^n+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+...+a_1 z+a_0,$$ where $a_0 \neq 0$, doesn't vanish in $\mathbb{C}$. Therefore $1/p$ is also an analytical function everywhere. Note that $(p(z)-a_0)/z$ is a polynomial and therefore, due to Cauchy's theorem, the following integral must be zero.  $$\int_{S_r^1}\frac{(p(z)-a_0)/z}{p(z)}dz=\int_{S_r^1}\frac{a_nz^{n-1}+a_{n-1}z^{n-2}+...+a_1}{a_nz^n+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+...+a_1 z+a_0}dz=0.$$  On the other hand  $$\int_{S_r^1}\frac{a_nz^{n-1}+a_{n-1}z^{n-2}+...+a_1}{a_nz^n+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+...+a_1 z+a_0}dz$$  $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{a_n(re^{i\theta})^{n-1}+a_{n-1}(re^{i\theta})^{n-2}+...+a_1}{a_n(re^{\theta})^n+a_{n-1}(re^{i\theta})^{n-1}+...+a_1 (re^{i\theta})+a_0}(ire^{i\theta})d\theta$$  $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}i d\theta - \int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{a_0 i}{a_n(re^{i\theta})^n+a_{n-1}(re^{i\theta})^{n-1}+...+a_1 (re^{i\theta})+a_0}d\theta$$ $$=2\pi i -\int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{a_0i}{p(re^{i\theta})}d\theta.$$  Let $r \rightarrow \infty$ and the integral approaches value $2\pi i$ - a contradiction. Therefore $1/p$ can't be entire and $p$ must vanish somewhere in the complex plane.  EDIT: I have changed this post and deleted the idea that the integral $\int_{\partial D_r}\frac{(p(z)-a_0)/z}{p(z)}dz=0$ could be evaluated with the fundamental theorem of calculus. Now, as it stands, this proof is essentially the same as the one that Mr. José Carlos Santos points out in his comment. dpkg exit with error parsing file `/var/lib/dpkg/status`, what to do?