I have multiple files in a folder all the different name in windows with common suffix say _(new). Example:  File Name_(new).mp4   How do I rename all the files by removing the suffix _(new) but not changing the name of the files?
I've got a bunch of files named with a the pattern 99 - DescriptiveName.txt and I'd like to remove the number from the front so I just have DescriptiveName.txt.  How can I do this? Can I do it from the command line or is there a utility that can do this?
Got 2,919 PB/s in Ubuntu Terminal I have problem (seems to be trivia) about Ubuntu Terminal. Once my network connection slow down then it (sometimes but very rare to happened) showed some information like this.     I shocked because I have been got 2,919 PB/s. Sorry my mouse block some part of letter 'P' (I actually rush to print screen) but I believe you can recognize it.    EDIT    based on answer given to me, and I got similar info then, I'd like to add more clearly new image after.    Can someone explain it to me?  Best Regards! (p → q) ∧ ¬p ⇒ ¬q  I have tried to use the rules of inference in many ways to prove this argument to be valid. However, I cannot seem to find a way to validate the argument, but I am afraid I have missed something.  Using a truth table I find that when p and q is 0, then p → q is 1, ¬p is 1 and ¬q is 1. Would that not make the argument valid?  I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood the whole concept. Any answer would be much appreciated. Thank you What is the correct way to use infinitive after the verb "help": with or without "to"? What is the correct way to use infinitive after the verb "help": with or without "to"?  For example:     Please, help me to understand this.   or:     Please, help me understand this. How do I disable usb storage? I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 and I want to block usb storage on it. What is the correct way to do this? Proof that the real numbers are countable: Help with why this is wrong I was just thinking about this recently, and I thought of a possible bijection between the natural numbers and the real numbers.  First, take the numbers between zero and one, exclusive.  The following sequence of real numbers is suggested so that we have bijection.    0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 0.01, 0.02, ... , 0.09, 0.10, 0.11, ... , 0.99, 0.001, 0.002, ... , 0.999, 0.0001, etc.  Obviously, this includes repeats, but this set is countable.  Therefore, the set of all numbers between zero and one is a subset of the above countable set, and is thus countable.  Then we simply extend this to all real numbers and all the whole numbers themselves, and since the real numbers, as demonstrated above, between any two whole numbers is countable, the real numbers are the union of countably many countable sets, and thus the real numbers are countable.    Please help me with this.  I understand the diagonalization argument by Cantor, but I am curious specifically about this proof which I thought of and its strengths and flaws.  Thanks. Is there an option to output a manual page in a different language? I don't want to change the computer language completely, but only specific manual pages. For example  $ man -English man Man is a manual program … $ man -Russian man Инструцтия для Unix, BSD и Linux. … So, I mount a 200mm lens on my Canon 450D. It effectively becomes a 320mm lens. Is this the equivalent of 320mm on a full frame camera? That is, from what I've figured out I get an equivalent field of view but nothing I've read is indicating that I get the magnification to go along with it.  So as my question says in the title, does my crop sensor camera really turn my lens into a longer one (in terms of magnification), or does it just look like it based on the reduced field of view I get? Proof for Property of Complex Numbers Is the inequality $\lvert z_1 + z_2 \rvert \ge \lvert z_1 \rvert - \lvert z_2 \rvert$ incorrect, where $z_1$ and $z_2$ are any two complex numbers? I need an example to prove that it is. And in case it is correct, can you please give the proof? Thanks for any help. how to reset gnome panel? I think my gnome-panel is messed up because I alt+right click it and nothing pops up.  I'm on 12.04, classic gnome desktop.  so I used locate and found gnome-panel in .gconf somewhere, how do I clear just gnome-panel's settings so that I can add things to my panel again?   edit:  matt: ~/.gconf $ find|grep -iw panel ./desktop/ibus/panel ./desktop/ibus/panel/%gconf.xml ./apps/gnome-settings/gnome-panel ./apps/gnome-settings/gnome-panel/%gconf.xml Make a substitution to express the integrand as a rational function and then evaluate the integral  $$\int {\frac{2}{x\sqrt{x+1}}}\, dx$$  What is the substitution that I have to make? We walk or ride on our vehicles to our destinations daily. Does our movement have any effect on the rotation of the earth according to Newton's law? What will be the effect if we move all the peoples along with their vehicles at their maximum velocity in one line in one direction along the equator? How much effect will it make? Protons and Neutrons Overshoot Actual Mass? When I add up the mass of 6 protons and 6 neutrons in amu, I get a mass that is greater than the mass of carbon. I thought that it should be the other way around, because I have not including binding energy when I add up the mass of the protons and neutrons.  Proton: 1.007276466812 u  Neutron: 1.00866491600 u  6(1.007276466812)+6(1.00866491600)=12.099  Carbon: 12 u  Why is this so? Number of reflexive relations defined on a set A with n elements Can the real and imaginary parts of $\dfrac{\sin z}z$ be simplified? I have calculated the real and imaginary parts of $\dfrac{\sin z}z.$ I've obtained  $$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\sin z}z&amp;=&amp;\frac{\sin(x+iy)}{(x+iy)}\\ &amp;=&amp; \frac{\sin(x)\cosh(y)+i\cos(x)\sinh(y)}{x+iy}\\ &amp;=&amp; \frac{x\sin(x)\cosh(y)+y\cos(x)\sinh(y)}{x^2+y^2}+i\frac{x\cos(x)\sinh(y)-y\sin(x)\cosh(y)}{x^2+y^2}. \end{eqnarray}$$  Before calculating it, I hoped I could use this in a solution to a certain problem, but I would need to differentiate the real and imaginary parts of $\dfrac{\sin z}z$ with regard to $x$ and $y$. But what I'm getting is very complicated. I understand that it could be that that's just the way it is. But maybe there are some simplifications to be done either in the functions or in their derivatives? I've never really used hyperbolic functions before so I'm not sure I'm not missing something.  Added. The problem I'm working on is the following.     Prove that the solutions of the equation $$\tan z=z$$ are all real.   I will sketch the solution I know here.  It can be calculated that  $$\tan(x+iy)=\frac{\sin(2x)}{\cos(2x)+\cosh(2y)}+i\frac{\sinh(2y)}{\cos(2x)+\cosh(2y)}.$$  Plugging this to the equation, we get  $$\begin{eqnarray} x&amp;=&amp;\frac{\sin(2x)}{\cos(2x)+\cosh(2y)}\\ y&amp;=&amp;\frac{\sinh(2y)}{\cos(2x)+\cosh(2y)}. \end{eqnarray}$$  From this we can get   $$\sin(2x)\cdot2y=\sinh(2y)\cdot2x.$$  By plotting the functions $\sin,$ $\mathrm{id}$ and $\sinh$ (and proving the right inequalities we can see from the plots), we can see that this is only possible when $xy=0$. But when we plug $x=0$ to the second equation, we can show that the only solution is $y=0$, which ends the proof.  What strikes me in this solution is the fact that $\dfrac{\sin z}z$ is used. (Not explicitly in my statement.) This function has another connection to the problem:     The non-zero solutions of the equation $\tan z=z$ are exactly the zeros of the derivative of $\dfrac{\sin z}z.$   This is easy to prove. I wondered if there shouldn't be a solution to the problem which uses this fact, given that $\dfrac{\sin z}z$ appears in the solution I know. How do I remove the space between inline/inline-block elements? Current in wire + moving charge next to wire creates magnetic force in the stationary reference frame OR electric force in the moving reference frame from special relativity due to change in charge density etc.... I think I understand this and I think it's super cool. Now here's the rub...  Current in wire + stationary charge next to wire creates no net charge. This is how nature behaves. I get it. My question is why can't I use the same special relativity logic as above, that is, current in wire cause electrons in wire to contract in accordance with special relativity so there has to be a net charge on the wire, which then acts on stationary charge next to wire.  I have been reading and reading and reading and I have come up with the following:  (1) When electrons in wire get accelerated to create current the distance between them actually expands in accordance with special relativity - something to do with bells spaceship paradox - which I am not going to pretend to understand  (2) This expansion from (1) above is exactly opposite and equal in magnitude to the contraction special relativity then causes and the expansion and contraction cancel out to keep the charge density in the wire constant and therefore no net charge on the wire  Here are my questions:  Is the explanation above correct? If so, please elaborate because i dont understand  If not correct, what is going on?  This is driving me absolutely nuts. Customize newform save button - Save and redirect to another form What is the best way to add redirect function into the save button on a newform in SharePoint 2013.  When the user create a list item, he/she should be redirected to another form. Is it possible to get and parse the new generated item ID?  Start - Newform URL:   End - Editform URL:   Thanks gedit "cannot open display" , on remote computer , using ssh - Ubuntu 12.04 Adding parentheses around subfig references Say I have a figure with two subfloats inserted using the subfig package.  When I reference them with \ref{myLabel} I get this     Figure 3.5a and 3.5b.     But what I want is this:     Figure 3.5(a) and 3.5(b).   How can I add the parentheses? How to use `ybar interval` without skipping the last value