How can I create "buffers" or vector from values ​​from a layer of points, where the "buffers" are "tied" to the streets?  Example: A bus station, I would like to create vectors within 100 m range with streets, from the point, regardless of the direction, following the road system.   I need to make a linear "buffer", following the system road, to identify the distance the bus station will cover on every street.
Is there any way in QGIS to apply service area buffers e.g if I have a point on a map I wish to show the service coverage of 1 mile, 2 mile, 3 mile, breaks using  the road network?
Computing the cardinality of a combinatorial set Define two sets: $S_1$ and $S_2$ where we have that $a$ is an odd natural number and $b\in \mathbb{N}$, $S_1 = \Big\{ \frac{2}{a},\frac{2}{a-2},\frac{2}{a-4},...,\frac{2}{a-(a-1)},$ $\frac{2+4}{a+2},\frac{2+4}{a},\frac{2+4}{a-2},...,\frac{2+4}{a-(a-1)},$ $\frac{2+8}{a+4},...,\frac{2+8}{a-2},...,\frac{2+8}{a-(a-1)},$ $\vdots$ $\frac{2+4\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor}{a+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor},\frac{2+4\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor}{a+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-2},...,\frac{2+4\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor}{a-(a-1)},$ $\frac{2+4(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+1)}{a+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor},\frac{2+4(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+1)}{a+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-2},...,\frac{2+4(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+1)}{a-(a-1),}$ $\frac{2+4(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+2)}{a+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-2},\frac{2+4(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+2)}{a+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-4},...,\frac{2+4(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+2)}{a-(a-1)}$ $\vdots$ $\frac{2+4b}{a},\frac{2+4b}{a-2},...,\frac{2+4b}{a-(a-1)} \Big\}$ and $S_2 = \Big\{ \frac{2}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil}, \frac{2}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil-1},\frac{2}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil-2},...,\frac{2}{1}$ $\frac{2+2}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil+1},\frac{2+2}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil},\frac{2+2}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil-1},...,\frac{2+2}{1},$ $\vdots$ $\frac{2+2(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-1)}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil+(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-1)},\frac{2+2(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-1)}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil+(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-2)},...,\frac{2+2(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-1)}{1}$ $\frac{2+2\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor},...,\frac{2+2\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor}{1},$ $\frac{2+2(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+1)}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-1},...,\frac{2+2(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+1)}{1},$ $\frac{2+(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+2)}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil+\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor-2},...,\frac{2+(\lfloor\frac{b}{2}\rfloor+2)}{1}$ $\vdots$ $\frac{2+2b}{\lceil\frac{a}{2}\rceil-1},...,\frac{2+2b}{1} \Big\}$ The question is, how do I determine the cardinality of the intersection of these two sets i.e. how would I compute the value $|S_1 \cap S_2|$? Note that duplicates may appear within both sets such as $\frac{1}{2}=\frac{2}{4}$ etc. Therefore we must make sure that for each fraction $\frac{n}{m}$ we have $\text{gcd}(n,m)=1$. I am aware of the existence of , but not entirely sure if that identity would be useful here. Why does the zoom sometimes stop at a point? I am a history teacher and I like to make my own maps (I can never find exactly what I want).  I am using QGIS 1.8 and .  I want to reproject their cross-blended hypso rasters into projections that are more familiar looking to my students, like Lambert Conic Conformal.  I have tried changing the crs for the whole project, and the warp and assign functions from the raster menu, and changing the crs for the raster layer itself.  None of these seem to work properly - the resulting maps are unrecognizable and extremely large (file size).  I feel like I am making some kind of basic mistake but I don't know where to begin with this.  Any help would be appreciated. How can I enable Ctrl+Alt+Backspace? Ctrl+Alt+← can usually be set to restart X, however I can't find the option to allow this (it is disabled by default).  I have looked in System-&gt;Preferences-&gt;Keyboard and System-&gt;Preferences-&gt;Keyboard Shortcuts but I can't find an option to enable it.  Where can I change this setting? Irreducibility check for polynomials not satisfying Eisenstein Criterion. My Question is to check Irreducibility for polynomials not satisfying Eisenstein Criterion.  As an Illustration, to check whether $x^{p-1}+.....+x+1$ for p a prime is irreducible or not, we replaced $x$ by $x+1$ and by using Eisenstein's Criterion for the resulting polynomial we conclude that resulting polynomial is irreducible and so is the original polynomial.  In general, for a given irreducible polynomial $f(x)$ with coefficients in a known U.F.D, is there some element $a$ such that we can apply Eisenstein's criterion to $f(x+a)$?  I am sure there would be no general structure for this but I expect there to be at least some special cases.   Any Reference/suggestion would be appreciated.  Thank You. Apologies if this has been asked somewhere before, but I didn't see what I was looking for after several pages of Google results.  I was reading Jech's The Axiom of Choice and was introduced to the equivalence of the ultrafilter lemma and the compactness theorem for FOL. I gather that these are also equivalent to the completeness theorem. I am primarily interested in trying to understand the "ultrafilter lemma $\implies$ completeness/compactness" direction. Jech's own proof takes an odd route through "binary messes" and I don't really follow the last couple of steps. (It's on pp.17,18 of the 2008 Dover reprint, if one is interested).  I'm wondering if anyone knows a good reference for, or can provide, a readable proof that the ultrafilter lemma implies completeness or compactness, with a preference for completeness. Alternatively, if you have Jech's book on hand, helping me bridge the concluding paragraph of his $\textrm{(ii)}\implies\textrm{(iii)}$ step with the preceding steps would clear up much of my puzzlement. (Though in this case I can't offer any help in saying what, specifically, is missing in the way of a bridge). Inequality with exponents $x^x+y^y \ge x^y +y^x$ Let $x,y$ be positive numbers. Prove that $x^x+y^y \ge x^y +y^x$.   This question appeared in Summer 1991 Russian Olympiad team test. Apparently, I tried to come up with different approach such as Jensen, Karamata's inequality and nothing works so far. I just need a discussion here. Hints are not necessary. Find the general solution of $xy''-(1+x)y'+y=x^2$ knowing that the homogeneous equation has the following solution: $e^{ax}$, where $a$ is a parameter you have to find.  I have found that $a=1$ or $a=1/x$. CSS transition shorthand with multiple properties? Is there a function to round a float in C or do I need to write my own?       float conver = 45.592346543;   I would like to round the actual value to one decimal place, conver = 45.6. What are the uses of "using" in C#? User  answered the wonderful  question by mentioning the using keyword. Can you elaborate on that? What are the uses of using? XIV pages in page counts? Is it possible to make biblatex output page counts for both the regular pages and the roman-numbered pages, for example:     Cook, Theodore Andrea. The Curves of Life : Being an Account of Spiral Formations and Their Application to Growth in Nature, to Science and to Art; with Special Reference to the Manuscripts of Leonardo da Vinci. — London : Constable and Company, 1914. — xxx + 479 p.   Here there are "30 pages + 478 pages" in total. Thanks! du shows completely different folder size for * and folder name I'm trying to move some data over and to start with I'd like to make sure that the size is ok. I run into a problem however, if I check the folder with   du -sh  myfolder/ 780M    myfolder/   but   du -sh * .. 71M     myfolder ..   I thought it might be something to do with hidden files but this particular folder does not have any inside.  Am I missing something? Uniqueness in existence of a bilinear form Let $E$ be a finite dimensional vector space over field $\mathbb R$ with $E^*$ as the dual space of $E$.($\dim E=n$)   $\Omega^P(E):=\{ \alpha\colon \overbrace{E\times\cdots\times E}^{p- times}\rightarrow \mathbb R\  \ , \alpha \text{ is alternating multilinear map}\}$ $\Omega^P(E^*):=\{ u\colon \overbrace{E^*\times\cdots\times E^*}^{p- times}\rightarrow \mathbb R\  \ , u \text{ is alternating multilinear map}\}$  I wish to prove that there exist an $\textbf{unique}$ bilinear form $B\colon \Omega^p(E^*)\times\Omega^p(E)\rightarrow\mathbb R$   such that for all $ f_i\in E^* \ , u_j\in E^{**}\simeq E \qquad  i,j=1,\cdots,p$, it has the following rule:  $B(u_1\wedge\cdots\wedge u_p,f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_p)=\det[f_i(u_j)]$.  $\wedge$ is wedge product between alternating maps i.e. $\alpha\wedge\beta(v_1,\cdots,v_{p+p})=\dfrac{1}{p! p!}\displaystyle\sum_{\sigma\in S_{p+p}}sign(\sigma)\alpha(v_{\sigma(1)},\cdots,v_{\sigma(p)})\beta(v_{\sigma(p+1)},\cdots,v_{\sigma(p+p)})$  How can I do this? How do I create an .exe for a Java program? Careers ads break the Android app Clicking any Careers (or Jobs) ad in the Android app feed results in an instant crash for the Android App version 1.0.89. If rest mass does not change with $v$ then why is infinite energy required to accelerate an object to the speed of light? I know that as the velocity increases, the mass of the object also increases so it becomes tougher and tougher to move the object which ultimately leads to a requirement of infinite energy to accelerate an object to the speed of light. But I have a doubt.  As far as I know only the observable mass (Relativistic mass) increases but not the Proper Mass or Intrinsic Mass, right? The actual mass of the object will remain the same. So if the actual mass ($m_0)$ remains the same and only the observable mass increases, why is more and more energy required? I know that even if the object exceeds the speed of light, we will not be able to say that it is moving faster than the speed of light but is it possible to make it move faster than light?  If rest mass does not change with $v$ then why is infinite energy required to accelerate an object to the speed of light?  I quote Igor Ivanov (a stackexchange user from this question ) to give an insight into my question.     The mass (the true mass which physicists actually deal with when they calculate something concerning relativistic particles) does not change with velocity. The mass (the true mass!) is an intrinsic property of a body, and it does not depends on the observer's frame of reference. I strongly suggest to  popular article by Lev Okun, where he calls the concept of relativistic mass a "pedagogical virus".   EDIT  After reading the answers I have a doubt.  SO can I say that only the overall energy of the system increases while the mass remains constant? But then if mass remains constant, then why is more and more energy gradually required? I mean there should be a reason for that requirement of infinite energy. Mongo find documents where array contains x values of given array distribution upgrade 14.04 to 15.04 halted due to multiple errors Consider the infinite line, $L$ in $2D$ consisting of all points $p$ such that $p.[0.3511 0.9263]= 6$. Find the point on the line closest to $(10, 20)$. Find the point on the line closest to $(4, 3)$. Find the distance from the line to both of these points.  Hi, I was reading the book $3D$ Maths Primer for Graphics and Game Development. The book mention about $2$ formulas but I don't know how to apply them.   $\text{Signed distance} = d-q.n$  $q' = q + (d-q.n)n$  for any point $q$, the point $q'$ that is the closest point on $L$ to $q$.  This is what I have tried,   Since the lines are parallel then the normal are the same so   $q' = q + (6 - q(0.3511 0.9263))(0.3511 0.9263)$   I'm stuck here.