I don't know when Google changed the version of Spreadsheets. Right now when the cell's text is longer than the cell width the display of this line is no longer what it used to be. I want the display of the text to be broken into lines when it is too long, as before.  I've made two examples :    Cell 1: Since there is no content in the cells adjacent to the right, content is displayed over the cells beside it, which makes the cell look like a super long combined cell.    Cell 2: Since there is content in the cell beside it, much of the content is hidden automatically. People cannot see the content unless the cell is clicked.  How can I make such text automatically break into enough lines that all is visible?
How can one format a cell to have word wrap in Google Sheets?  I've tried Shift+Enter, but that doesn't seem to work.  One thing I know works is to place  and then if you edit your cell you can have word wrap in it.  But is there a way to do this without switching modes?
Continued fractions ArcGIS ModelBuilder iterator reports only last input shapefile? Using Arc 10.3.1, if I manually enter the names of multiple shapefiles (all from the same folder) into the Check Geometry tool, the (single) output table lists the errors that exist in all of the shapefiles.    That is, only one output table is created, even if multiple input shapefiles have errors.  For example, if two shapefiles have errors, both will be listed in the single output table. Here's a screen print of the input:    However, if I iterate those same shapefiles (using the Feature Classes option), the output table only lists the last shapefile that went through the iteration.  Here's a screenshot of the model:     I suspect that the iterator is running Check Geometry not once, but three times, with a single input shapefile going through each iteration, overwriting the previous output.    How do I get the iterator to list all of the shapefiles with errors, either in separate output tables or aggregated in a single output table? Manual/automatic line breaks and text alignment in TikZ nodes On Windows 10 Professional, with the November update (Build 10586, Version 1511) , is there any possibility to completely remove Windows Defender ?  I don't want to just disable Windows Defender.  I want to completely uninstall from my system. The annihilator of a module is an ideal Let $R$ be a ring and let $M$ be an $R$-module. Define the annihilator of $M$ to be the following subset of $R$:  $Ann_R(M) =\{r\in R \mid rm = 0_M  \text{ for all } m\in M \}$  Prove that $Ann_R(M)$ is an ideal of $R$.  please help as much as you can a full answer is greatly appreciated   Thanks The problem is to prove the following equivalence:  $$2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_1 \iff \exists\ A,B\in\mathbb{R}^2:\\ \textrm{a)}A\cup B=\mathbb{R}^2 \\\textrm{b)}\ \forall\ \textrm{lines } l\ \textrm{parallel to x-axis, } |A\cap l|\leq\aleph_0 \\\textrm{c)}\ \forall\ \textrm{lines } l\ \textrm{parallel to y-axis, } |B\cap l|\leq\aleph_0$$  I think I know how to prove "$\impliedby$":  Let's assume the RHS and that $2^{\aleph_0}\geq\aleph_2$. Now let's take a sequence $\langle x_{\alpha}:\ \alpha&lt;\omega_1\rangle$. Since $\bigcup_\limits{\alpha&lt;\omega_1}|B\cap x_{\alpha}|\leq \aleph_1\cdot\aleph_0=\aleph_1$ there is such a $y$-coordinate that neither of $(x_{\alpha},y)$ is in $B$. But hence we obtain $\aleph_1$ point which all lie on the same line parallel to $x$-axis. Since $A\cup B=\mathbb{R}^2$ they all must be contained in $A$ $-$ a contradiction as $A$ has at most countably many of those points.  But what about the other implication? Do I contruct these sets by induction? Over all lines or something else? I haven't come up with anything yet, perhaps you could help me. Compile gvim from sources? Parsing DD MM YY HH MM SS columns from TXT file using Python's pandas Why are low-rep users rate-limited when posting questions? I just encountered the following error:  Oops! Your question couldn't be submitted because: users with less than 125 reputation can only post questions every 20 minutes; try again later.  Why do you have this rule? Why 20 minutes? We already had multiple questions about unbalanced data when using , , ,  and a number of other similar questions, what makes it a very popular topic! Unfortunately, each of the questions seems to be algorithm-specific and I didn't find any general guidelines for dealing with unbalanced data.  Quoting , dealing with unbalanced data     (...) heavily depends on the learning method. Most general purpose   approaches have one (or several) ways to deal with this.   But when exactly should we worry about unbalanced data? Which algorithms are mostly affected by it and which are able to deal with it? Which algorithms would need us to balance the data? I am aware that discussing each of the algorithms would be impossible on Q&amp;A site like this, I am rather looking for a general guidelines on when it could be a problem. While finding escape velocity, does human mass counts as the mass of Earth? Escape velocity depends upon the mass of earth. my doubt is whether human mass adds into it or not? If it add then Earth's escape velocity would be increasing! I've got a question about how to drive the car in Europe on Highways. In the US, I can overtake another car on either side, and I am fine.  In Europe I was told that I have to drive on the right side (Germany), and to overtake on the left side of the other driver.  Now I had following situation, and I did not know how to handle this properly: I was driving along on the right lane, the Autobahn was 3 lanes wide on my side, and was going around 110 km/h. Someone overtook me, but he stayed on the middle lane, and suddenly got slower. He wasn't really in front of me, so I could not change to the left lane, but I was told I may not overtake on the right side.  Would I have to brake in such a situation, or should I just ignore it, and overtake him again on the right side?  (I overtook him, and he was on the phone, so I guess that was why he got distracted and slowed down that much). I have a bash script which must call another bash script which varies per-user in order to get some configuration information, like so:  somescript:  #!/bin/bash ${HOME}/.ssconfig echo "Hello, ${VARIABLE}!"   ~/.ssconfig  #!/bin/bash VARIABLE=world   Which, instead of giving me Hello, world! as expected, gives me Hello, ! How can I pass variables up from a script to the one that called it? Where are my installed applications? My machine can't play encrypted DVDs on a fresh install.  How do I add this capability?  Another useful bit of information would be what programs are best for playing DVDs, once I'm able to do so.  See the .  Will I be able to play DVD movies from ? I am trying to understand capitalization rules with Mom and Dad. I believe I have it correct below, but please let me know if I do not.     The one thing I learned from my dad was that it was good to earn the trust of one's children. Dad has shown me how good that a dad can be. One day when I went to his house, and Dad wasn't there, I ran outside....   The above passage is just made-up just so that you would see what I mean about capitalization. Let's put numbers by each one, like so:     The one thing I learned from my dad(1) was that it was good to earn the trust of one's children. Dad(2) has shown me how good that a dad(3) can be. One day when I went to his house, and Dad(4) wasn't there, I ran outside....    This is one where I'm not certain. I believe in this sense I'm showing possession here with "my", and it just didn't seem right saying "my Dad". I don't know what the grammar rule is here, or if I even have it right. This one is obvious—it starts the sentence. In this case, I'm using Dad like a name instead of saying "Larry". Therefore, it should be capitalized. Again, just like 3. How can i change formatting of the table of contents to avoid section numbering and section title to overlap?  Document:  \documentclass[10pt,oneside,notitlepage]{book}  % Use Heuristica Font \usepackage{heuristica} \usepackage[heuristica,vvarbb,bigdelims]{newtxmath} \renewcommand*\oldstylenums[1]{\textosf{#1}}   \begin{document}  \tableofcontents  \part{Part one}  \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh} \chapter{Chapter Oh}   \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi} \section{Chapter Hi}  \end{document}   Example output: Is it possible to host a web server from behind a NAT My PC is behind a NAT router that has a public IP address. If I want to host a website then I believe I need a domain name which I can purchase from some site which would pledge to resolve all DNS requests for that domain name and send the IP address of my NAT router (assuming I do not want to host my domain name on their servers). Now I want to host a web server on my computer.   What changes should be done to the NAT router's configuration to forward all HTTP requests for example.com to my PC in the internal network. Is the above strategy correct? Is it commonly used? Definition of the Pauli group and the Clifford group There seem to be two definitions of the Pauli group. In Nielsen and Chuang, the Pauli group on 1 qubit is defined as \begin{align*} \mathcal{P}_1 = \{\pm I, \pm iI, \pm X, \pm iX, \pm Y, \pm iY, \pm Z, \pm iZ\} = \langle X, Y, Z\rangle. \end{align*} But in other references, such as ,  \begin{align*} \mathcal{P}_1 = \{\pm I, \pm X, \pm iY, \pm Z\} = \langle X, Z\rangle. \end{align*} The second definition makes more sense in the stabilizer formalism, since we usually only consider the action of Pauli strings of $X$ and $Z$. What bothers me is that by the second definition, the phase gate $S$, which is an element of the Clifford group, results in \begin{align*} SXS^\dagger = Y \notin \mathcal{P}_1. \end{align*} I know that the prefactor $\pm i$ somehow doesn't matter, but can someone justify it from a more mathematical/group-theoretical perspective? Do we use abstract algebra in real life? Do we use abstract algebra in real life?   Is there any application of abstract algebra in real life?