We are buying and selling a house.  Our new house closes one day before our current house closes, therefore we require a bridge loan to make the down payment. I would like to understand the risks involved and what questions I should be asking my banker or lawyer.  IE: I understand this is high-interest loan, meant to be short term. But is there a risk of the loan going beyond that one day and the potential to pay alot more interest than anticipated?  Thank you in advance!
I am looking to sell and buy a house. But with the current market being as crazy as it is (houses are selling fast for sometimes 150,000 over asking), I'm afraid if we sell first, we could be stuck without a new house. Or stuck settling on or over-paying for something and wishing we never sold at all. I'm wondering if it's possible to buy first. What is the best way to secure my next house before selling my current house without getting locked into a B-lender mortgage or risking too much?  I know there would be some risk putting an offer on a new house without knowing how much the current house will sell for, or the risk we don't sell the current house before the new house closes. I'm also afraid conditional offers will not be considered. Are there any other options?  (We do have a mortgage on the current house, but because the market has gone up so much there is also a good chunk of equity.)
apt-get stuck at 0 [Connecting to us.archive.ubuntu.com] When I do upgrade it gets stuck here:  user@plato:~# sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded:   bind9-host coreutils cpio curl dnsutils libbind9-90 libc-bin libc-dev-bin   libc6 libc6-dev libcgmanager0 libcurl3 libcurl3-gnutls libdns100   libdrm-intel1 libdrm-nouveau2 libdrm-radeon1 libdrm2 libisc95 libisccc90   libisccfg90 libjasper1 liblwres90 libplymouth2 libsepol1 libssl-dev   libssl-doc libssl1.0.0 linux-libc-dev mime-support multiarch-support ntp   ntpdate openssl plymouth plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text python3-distupgrade   ubuntu-release-upgrader-core unzip 39 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 16.0 MB of archives. After this operation, 12.3 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y 0% [Connecting to us.archive.ubuntu.com (2001:67c:1562::15)] ░   When I do update it gets stuck here:  user@plato:~# apt-get update 0% [Connecting to us.archive.ubuntu.com (2001:67c:1562::14)] [Connecting to sec░   I'm able to ping us.archive.ubuntu.com just fine:  user@plato:~# ping us.archive.ubuntu.com PING us.archive.ubuntu.com (91.189.91.23) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from economy.canonical.com (91.189.91.23): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=81.5 ms 64 bytes from economy.canonical.com (91.189.91.23): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=81.5 ms 64 bytes from economy.canonical.com (91.189.91.23): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=81.5 ms 64 bytes from economy.canonical.com (91.189.91.23): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=81.4 ms ^C --- us.archive.ubuntu.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.425/81.528/81.582/0.355 ms   What can i do to fix this?    What I have tried so far.  I've tried following directions on this blog:   To force apt-get to use IPv4 exclusively   Create a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99force-ipv4 Add this line to newly created file Acquire::ForceIPv4 false; Apt-get will now use IPv4 exclusively How can I make realistic looking potions as handouts I need a way of encoding the geometry line symbol. $\overline{AB}$ gives me the line segment symbol and $\overrightarrow{AB}$ gives me the ray symbol, I need a way to get a bar over the letters that has arrows on both ends. $\overrightleftarrow{AB}$ does not work.   Thanks! Complex towers: $i^{i^{i^{...}}}$ If $w = z^{z^{z^{...}}}$ converges, we can determine its value by solving $w = z^{w}$, which leads to $w = -W(-\log z))/\log z$.  To be specific here, let's use $u^v = \exp(v \log u)$ for complex $u$ and $v$.  Two questions:   How do we determine analytically if the tower converges?  (I have seen the interval of convergence for real towers.) Both the logarithm and Lambert W functions are multivalued.  How do we know which branch to use?   In particular $i^{i^{i^{...}}}$ numerically seems to converge to one value of $i2W(-i\pi/2)/\pi$.  How do we establish this convergence analytically?  (Yes, I have searched the 'net, including the tetration forum.  I haven't been able to locate the answer to this readily.) Can someone explain __all__ in Python? I have been using Python more and more, and I keep seeing the variable __all__ set in different __init__.py files.  Can someone explain what this does? How can I tell whether beetroot is still edible? I have some raw beetroot I bought about a week ago, having stored them at room temperature since. It's the first time I bought it raw, and I'm unsure whether it's still edible.   It is already soft, and when I cut it, it smells... Well, different than I expected. It's not a rotten smell as such, but it's nothing like the sweet beet-rooty smell I know from the pre-packaged, pre-boiled supermarket variety.  How can I tell whether it's still safe to eat? Proper fstab entry to mount a samba share on boot? I am a little confused on the proper fstab entry for a samba share in Ubuntu 12.04     I can get the drive to mount manually by using:  sudo mount -t cifs //192.168.2.2/raid_drive /mnt/homeserver -o username=jon,password=password  So I tried putting this in fstab:  //192.168.2.2/raid_drive /mnt/homeserver cifs username=jon,password=password,iocharset=utf8,mode=0777,dir_mode=07‌​77 0 0  Which gives me this error in syslog:  kernel: [ 2217.925354] CIFS: Unknown mount option mode kernel: [ 2217.936345] CIFS VFS: default security mechanism requested.  The default security mechanism will be upgraded from ntlm to ntlmv2 in kernel release 3.3  This  says to use smbfs although I believe smbfs is deprecated?   What is a common fstab configuration for a samba share in Ubuntu 12.04?   EDIT:  Using the accepted answer below I was initially getting this error message (from dmesg):  [   45.520883] CIFS VFS: Error connecting to socket. Aborting operation [   45.520990] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -115   although it turns out this was due to network connectivity issues, and not related to improper fstab entry. Notify close voters when a closed question gets edited As mentioned in , a question closed because it was not well-phrased is currently very unlikely to be reopened after an edit clarifying the issues. Those who voted to close should at least be asked to reconsider and reopen the question after such an edit. Ubuntu 12.04 gnome issue, no clock is shown, strange starter icon cannot be removed i am finding nowhere a solution I am running UBUNTU 12.04 and using GNOME desktop, which I installed additionally. Logging into classic GNOME I see the following:     WHAT is this "earth globe" icon coming from?Seems to be named "starter". It is configured to open a website, from my bookmarks. WHY is it not showing the TIME?   Using dconf-editor I had no luck in answering the above questions.  Any idea? Retrieving Maxwell's equations from the minimum action principle I'm currently working at the start of Alexei Tsvelik's book Quantum Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics. I'm kinda stumped on a few essential steps.  Starting with the action:  $$S = \int dt \int d^3 x \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EM}} = \int dt \int d^3 x \left( -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu} + j_\mu A^{\mu}\right).$$  In the absence of any sources $j_\mu = 0$ and $c=1$, which after pulling in the negative sign implies  $$S = \frac{1}{2}\int dt \int d^3 x  \,\,\left(E^2 - B^2\right)$$ The next step is to take $\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla} \phi + \partial_t \vec{A}$ and $\vec{B} = \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}$. Letting $\phi = 0$ and directly inserting these into the above yields:  $$S = \frac{1}{2} \int dt \int d^3 x  \,\left( (\partial_t \vec{A})^2 - (\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A})^2 \right) $$  Now considering $\vec{A} = \vec{A}_0 + \delta \vec{A}$ as some minimal change in our vector potential, with $\vec{A}_0$ gives a minimum for the action and putting this into the above expression we have: $$\delta S = \int dt \int d^3 x \left(\partial_0 \vec{A}_0 \partial_0 \delta \vec{A} + \left(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}_0\right)\cdot\left(\vec{\nabla} \times \delta \vec{A} \right) \right)+ \mathcal{O}(A^2)\,\,\,\,\,\,\, (1)$$ where I have the term  $$\mathcal{O}(A^2) = \int dt \int d^3 x \left( (\partial_0 \vec{A}_0)^2 + (\partial_0 \delta \vec{A})^2 - (\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}_0)^2-(\vec{\nabla}\times \delta\vec{A})^2\right)$$  The next step is where I lose our author and go from "Oh ok I get this" to "completely clueless". He rewrites $\delta S$ as:  $$\delta S =  \int dt \int d^3 (\delta x) \vec{A} \mathcal{F(\vec{A}_0)}+ \mathcal{O}(A^2)$$  where $\mathcal{F} = \frac{\delta S}{\delta A}$. What is the purpose of $x\to \delta x$ in the above expression? Is the functional derivative $\mathcal{F}$ a vector quantity? He has it bolded with a bolded $\vec{A}$ in the above expression. One last question takes the above expression further. We assume $\delta \vec{A}$ vanishes at infinity, as it should, and integration by parts yields:  $$\delta S =  -\int dt \int d^3 x \left( \partial^2_0 \vec{A}_0 - (\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{\nabla})\times \vec{A}_0  \right)\delta \vec{A}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, (2)$$ How exactly did we go from (1) to (2)? Thanks I appreciate your time! I have just finished my undergraduate studies. During last two semesters I've taken two subjects dealing with manifolds:   Analysis on manifolds, containing: definition of manifold, tangent space (as derivations and classes of curves), vector fields, vector bundles, flows, Lie derivatives, integration on manifolds (Stokes theorem), forms, Hodge decomposition theorem Introduction to differential geometry (for me it should be called introduction to Riemannian manifolds) containing: tensor calculus introduction, Riemannian manifold definition, connections, curvatures, geodesic, normal coordinates, geodesic completness theorem, classification throught curvature, jacobi fields, harmonic maps.    Now, for me differential geometry was/is a theory about manifolds, so anything dealing with manifolds is branch of differential geometry. On the other hand I am preparing for taking part in local conference called: "algebraic and differential topology".  I have read: ,  ,  , yet I still don't really know if differential topology is subtheory of differential geometry or is it seperate theory and how is it located between differential geometry and algebraic topology. For example I expect that studies on Riemmanian manifolds are part of differential geometry but would problem of classification manifolds up to diffeomorphism be a part of differential topology or geometry ?  Request: I would be grateful for your characterisation of differential topology and differential geometry possibly with examples of problems, theorems present at them. How to include PDF pages without a newpage before the first page? Remove .php extension with .htaccess Encountered an error while updating through Synaptic Manager. Subsequent updates gave the error at the bottom of the output. I'm a noob so any help is appreciated.  al@al:~$ sudo apt-get -f upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following NEW packages will be installed:   libjack-jackd2-0:i386 The following packages have been kept back:   linux-headers-generic skype 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/202 kB of archives. After this operation, 493 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 310056 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libjack-jackd2-0:i386 (from .../libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.8~dfsg.2-1precise1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.8~dfsg.2-1precise1_i386.deb (--unpack):  './usr/share/doc/libjack-jackd2-0/buildinfo.gz' is different from the same file on the system dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing:  /var/cache/apt/archives/libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.8~dfsg.2-1precise1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Modulus with a negative number I came across the following question:    This can be easily flagged for too broad or opinion based, but I wonder on which stack-exchange site can one ask answers for such a question? Changing projection of shapefile in QGIS Is there any scientific experiment that can lead us to conclude we live in 3 spatial dimensions without the premise of the conception of limited dimensions?  Thank you all who helped in the improvement of this question (which was not clear at first).   EDIT:  I know that this can be a little philosophical, but it is also a scientific question.  Let's consider the scenario where the mankind was not ever able to see.  Let's also consider that this limitation could be surpassed thus not limiting us to reach a scientific and technological knowledge "similar" to what we have today.  Would this civilization of blind people reach the conclusion that they are living in a 3D spatial world?  Is the sense of touch enough to reach that conclusion? Is there any scientific experiment that can lead us to that conclusion without the premise of the conception of limited dimensions?  Would it be easier, harder, or just different to reach a conclusion predicted by the M-Theory? (please do not focus only on this last question) At the beginning of  we see that Logan (a.k.a. Wolverine) and Colonel William Stryker were working together by the end of the Vietnam War.   For 5 years after the war, he lives in Canada with a girlfriend. But in  we see that Logan was part of some gang at the end of the Vietnam War.   My question is which of these are X-Men movie canon? Why does a subpanel need separate ground and neutral? Why does a power sub panel have to have separate neutral and ground bars other than code satisfaction?  Does a sub panel need a main breaker if there is one at the main?   Also, does the sub panel need a ground wire connected back to the main panel in the same building?