I have the following LaTeX code for two tables: \begin{table}[h]     \scriptsize     \centering     \begin{tabular}{c|c}        \textbf{Brand} &amp; \textbf{Customer Engagement Average}   \\ \hline      Apple &amp; 1,937,852.45  \\       Huawei &amp; 156,962.065  \\       Samsung &amp; 174,166.98  \\                  \end{tabular}     \caption{Average Brand Customer Engagement}     \label{brand_ce} %\end{table}  %\begin{table}[h]     \scriptsize     \centering     \begin{tabular}{c|c}        \textbf{Brand} &amp; \textbf{Customer Satisfaction Score Average}   \\ \hline      Apple &amp; 3.37  \\       Huawei &amp; 4.049  \\       Samsung &amp; 3.76  \\                  \end{tabular}     \caption{Average Brand Customer Satisfaction Score}     \label{brand_sscore} \end{table}  Those tables are on top of each other as the following figure:  I need to to put those tables side by side.
Suppose I have two tables that don't have many columns (3, for example). How can I position them side by side?
Many To Many Relationships I am working on a conceptual model for a database. I have the following entities:  Student (id, name, date of birth, department)  Subject (id, name)   This is a many-to-many relationship, one student may be enrolled in many courses, each course has many students. From what I understand, as I should break this many-to-many relationship by introducing a new into a entity, say 'registered' which allows a one-to-one relationship or one-to-many relationship?  Is this correct design decision? I can reproduce that every time now, I go to a site, open an article, then to the next site, open another article. The Feed page pops up for a second, the article page lays over this with some some transparent areas (see picture). The same app-version is ok on a Smartphone with Android 4.4.2. I also sent in some bug reports.    Edit  1.0.71 isn't the solution yet. I go to Meta SE, then to an article. When I want back to Meta SE again, it crashes. Much earlier than before. I already sent in a bug report for this.  Another Edit  I can describe it better now. From the questions-page of a site I go to a post. When I use the back button, everything is ok, I can go to the next site. When I try to go to the next site directly from the post, it crashes. This only happens on the Nexus 10 with Android 5.1.1, App version 1.0.71. Hope this helps.  Edit3  This is fixed in 1.0.73 now. Thanks again. How to Preload Tabs/Set Multiple Websites as Default in Firefox, IE, etc Any website can set as the homepage of Firefox which loads spontaneously. Is this for multiple tabs? Then BBC Health, CNN, Yahoo Health, msn.com would all extemporarily materialise (in four separate tabs); I then wouldn't have to open each website manually. What is the tolerable magnetic field (in Tesla) for a hard disk? I was wondering what would be the safest magnetic field for a hard drive so that the data inside it is safe and not wiped off?  For example I have a 2.1 home theatre system and when I take my android phone near it to check the magnetic field range it gives me a reading of 1000 micro Tesla. Would that be considered safe for a nearby hard disk? How do Zombies differentiate between a zombie and a human being? Zombies are always after human beings. How do Zombies differentiate between a zombie and a human being? Why don't zombies eat each other? Someone mentioned it in the IRC as the slicing problem. How can i limit the character length in excerpt? Possible Duplicate:          I have a question after reading this post (). I like this function(Search Term Without Plugin) very much but the character length is too long. What php code should i add to make the excerpt shorter? Would appreciate if someone can suggest it. Thank you! Limit of $n/\ln(n)$ without L'Hôpital's rule I am trying to calculate the following limit without L'Hôpital's rule:     $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{n}{\ln(n)}$$   I tried every trick I know but nothing works. You don't have to prove it by definition. if recursively find ext, then, else on unix This is what I normally use. But I need to recursively find an extension with, then, and else. The problem with this one is that it is not recursive.  if ls $HOME/Downloads/*.ext &gt;/dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1 then     : else     : fi finding rational roots of polynomials The situation is my  has been enchanted with .  The creature has      when it dies, return it to his owner’s hand   The enchantment says     When enchanted creature dies, return that card to the battlefield under your control with a +1/+1 counter on it.   Who gets the creature? Me or my rival?  Does the creature ability trigger before or after enchantment? Going back twice required to return to search results in the tags view Given, $\{x_n\}$ and $\{y_n\}$ are two real valued sequences such that $\lim_{n\to\infty} (x_{n}^{3}-y_{n}^{3})=0 $ Then is it always true that $\lim_{n\to\infty} (x_n-y_n) =0 $ ? I tried by splitting $ (x_{n}^{3}-y_{n}^{3}) $, but that didn't help as $\lim_{n\to \infty} (x_{n}^{2}+x_{n}y_{n}+y_{n}^{2}) $ can be $0$ or non zero or doesn't exist. After a company has issued shares, why should it care if the value of the shares fluctuate? Since the shares are now publicly traded, if the value fluctuates, that is strictly a transaction between buyer and seller, none of whom are directly related to the company. E.g. if I sell X an iPhone for $100, why should I care if X is selling the iPhone to Y for 1 dollar or 1000 dollars? I have got my $100, so I need not bother. No? L293, L298 and SN754410 H-bridge drivers on low voltage power supply unable to printout arrayOfInt initialised within the class constructor Is the universe really "fine-tuned for life"? I understand what is meant when we say , but I've seen it claimed it's is fine tuned "for life". Is it?  When I look at known or even speculated life in our universe, I see life clinging to a tiny crumbs separated by vast voids. Our life needs baryonic matter, only 5% of the universe. Its density is $10^{-30}  g/cm^3$, but it clumps together leaving vast voids between the clumps. 99% is in stars and black holes and nebula utterly inhospitable to known life.  That leaves the parts "fine tuned for life" to be 0.05% of the universe. The planets, asteroids, and comets seem like just debris separated by  than the life-sustaining clumps preventing life from spreading.  Even that seems to be used very inefficiently. Life requires the energy of a star, but it's spewed out in all directions. We only receive a tiny fraction of it. Similarly, life requires heavier elements created in supernova, but these are also spewed out in all directions. And it took billions of years to develop a being capable of asking "is the universe fine tuned for life?"  It seems like we live on the crumbs of creation warmed by a rounding error of the heat from our star. Taking this view, the universe appears extremely inhospitable to life. It could be a lot better tuned.  Is it that the universe is fine-tuned for life? Or is it that the universe is so large and life requires such an infinitesimal fraction of the universe that it's a near guarantee were we to roll the dice again that some crumb, maybe not even baryonic matter, could develop something complex enough to ask "why is the universe fine tuned for life"? Am I just restating the weak anthropic principle?  I understand this is straying into philosophy. If that's off topic, are my  physical assumptions correct? Orientation on $\mathbb{CP}^2$ Why does an error appear every time I try to open the Ubuntu Software Center? There is a glitch on the Ubuntu Software Center and whenever I open it an error appears and it keeps loading and never opens.  Why does this happen?  I have installed Ubuntu 13.04 on a disk and partitioned it.  Please help me and ask for excess information if you need it.  If you know of any duplicates please show me them!!  I get the following error in a terminal  SystemError: E:Type '&lt;!DOCTYPE' is not known on line 1 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/medibuntu.list   The /etc/apt/sources.list.d/medibuntu.list file contains a HTML document. For $D$ a GCD domain , let $a,b,x \in D \setminus \{0\}$ , then is it true that $\gcd (ax,bx)=x \cdot \gcd (a,b)$?