The progressive tense is allowed for happen, e.g. "It is happening now". Thus happen should be a dynamic verb. However, it seems that happen also looks like a stative verb sometimes, e.g. "I happen to be there". I want to make sure if happen is a stative or dynamic verb or both.  Note: This question is very different from the question suggested to be the duplicate because I ask in this question whether happen is a stative or dynamic verb or both, which is not answered in another one.
Based on Logman dictionary:       happen to do something: if you happen to do something, you do it by chance.   for example take a look at these examples:     They happen to be unemployed at the time. I happen to have a degree in computer science.    So based on the definition of the happen to do something, first one means they are probably unemployed at the time. and the second one means I probably have a degree in computer science.     Am I right?
How do I kill a process that won't die? I'm unable to kill a process using any of the techniques I'm aware of ("Force Quit" in Activity Monitor, top, killall from the Terminal) and wonder if there are some additional steps I can take.    ~ $ sudo killall -KILL 77439 Password: No matching processes were found ~ $ killall -KILL 77439 No matching processes belonging to you were found ~ $ killall 77439 No matching processes belonging to you were found ~ $ killall Mathematica No matching processes belonging to you were found   FWIW the process is "Mathematica" which I cannot relaunch, Quit, or Force Quit, or sample, either by name or PID, and it appears to have some odd side effects (screenshots don't appear, can't empty trash, and can't even shut down the system).  Are there additional steps that can be taken to really really kill a badly behaved process? I need to use a metaheuristic algorithm to solve an optimization problem on a Python codebase.  Metaheuristics usually need to be written in C++ or Java as they involve a lot of iterations, while Python is weak from this point of view.  Questions:   do any Python metaheuristic packages which wrap faster languages as C++/Java exist? do any Python metaheuristic packages based on maybe cython on numba exist? other solutions? I would really like to see all of my questions and answers on the profile page, even if some of them were deleted, and I don't have enough rep to see them on the site. (Note that some questions are  after 30 days or 1 year, and the author might be oblivious about what happened.)   , the &quot;deleted recent [questions/answers]&quot; links in one's own user profile now list all respective posts that were deleted in the past 60 days, rather than just those that were originally posted in the last 60 days. , users with the &quot;access to moderator tools&quot; privilege (10k+ on designed sites, 2k+ on beta and non-designed sites) can use the search operator deleted:1 to see all their own deleted posts. , deleted questions and answers that were posted in the past 60 days, can be seen using the &quot;deleted recent questions&quot; and &quot;deleted recent answers&quot; links on the questions and answers tabs (at the bottom of the tab) in your user profile. For older posts: as of 2013-04-23 you can  if you already have a link to them, but they still aren't linked from the user profiles (not even just for you). Nor do you see inbox notifications for comments on them if you come back a few hours later. You have to have thought to bookmark your question, or you have to go digging for it in your browser history. How can I design a tree graph with node shapes as this photo? Does a photon in vacuum have a rest frame? Quite a few of the questions given on this site mention a photon in vacuum having a rest frame such as it having a zero mass in its rest frame. I find this contradictory since photons must travel at the speed of light in all frames according to special relativity.  Does a photon in vacuum have a rest frame? How to find a Java Memory Leak How do you find a memory leak in Java (using, for example, JHat)? I have tried to load the heap dump up in JHat to take a basic look. However, I do not understand how I am supposed to be able to find the root reference () or whatever it is called. Basically, I can tell that there are several hundred megabytes of hash table entries ([java.util.HashMap$Entry or something like that), but maps are used all over the place... Is there some way to search for large maps, or perhaps find general roots of large object trees?  [Edit] Ok, I've read the answers so far but let's just say I am a cheap bastard (meaning I am more interested in learning how to use JHat than to pay for JProfiler). Also, JHat is always available since it is part of the JDK. Unless of course there is no way with JHat but brute force, but I can't believe that can be the case.  Also, I do not think I will be able to actually modify (adding logging of all map sizes) and run it for long enough for me to notice the leak. If all motion is relative, how does light have a finite speed? I've often heard that Einstein shattered the notion of absolute motion (i.e. all things move relative to one another) and that he established the speed of light as being absolute. That sounds paradoxical to me; I cannot understand how the two concepts can be reconciled.  Before going further, I'd like to say: 1) Over the years, I've seen many layman's explanations on these topics (including the nice YouTube video by Vsauce, ). I understand everything that's said (or, at least, I think I do). Just nothing I've found seems to address this apparent contradiction. 2) More recently, I've tried to find the answer on my own. That includes searching the posts on this site. Some come close (), but nothing I've been able to find seems address specifically what I'm asking.  Back to the question: Relativity shows us that there is no universal frame of reference by which to judge motion, so object A might be reckoned as moving at 10&nbsp;m/s relative to object B or as stationary relative to object C. This is fine for me. I can grasp that the universe has no intrinsic coordinate system, that we only think that way on Earth because we have the ground to move over.  Then there's the speed of light (in a vacuum). The speed of light is the ultimate "speed limit," it's often said. But if there is no universal frame of reference, how can there be any such speed? The very idea only make sense if there is a universal frame.   If one object is moving (uniformly) at 60%&nbsp;c and another object is also moving at 60%&nbsp;c, but in the exact opposite direct, then from the perspective of either one (if they could still see each other) the other would appear to violate that speed limit. All these spacetime bending consequences used to explain why nothing can move past this speed only seems to enshrine the concept that there is some ultimate speed standard. If there is only relative speed, then the concept of light having a specific speed in the vacuum should be a nonsensical one since it having speed (x m/s) would only make sense when measured against some other body.   Since I was very young, it has always sounded to me like motion is only mostly relative, that until you get close to the speed of light, the effects of an absolute frame of reference are negligible. Perhaps that there is an actual fabric of space which everything moves relative to, which is why there is something to expand between galaxies (faster than light can propagate) in the metric expansion of space. Growing up, I always thought this would just start makes sense with time. Now I'm up to a first year (college) level in physics, I even know basic calculus, yet I'm still hopelessly confused.  EDIT:  Thank you to whoever suggested this may be a duplicate of . It and others are very much related and at least partially answer my question. Unfortunately, explaining that distances become shorter and time becomes slower as a way to stop you from exceeding the speed of light does not explain how that speed is not an absolute.  By my reckoning, if all speed is relative, then no matter how fast you go light should always race away from you at the same apparent speed. I.e. there should be no speed limit. For there to be a speed which you cannot exceed or you would catch up (and make time irrelevant) requires the very concept of some external speed by which light can travel and nothing else can reach - thus my logical paradox continues unabated. What are irreducibles in the ring $R$ of entire functions? I was wondering if anybody knew a command that would allow me to open a Nautilus (if that's the right name for the Ubuntu graphic/window explorer) window from the command line at the current directory that the user is at.  So, if I open a command line, and type:  cd /home/myUser/some/long/path/to/a/directory   Then, I'd like to be able to issue some command:  nautilus open-sesame   And have a graphic window opened to /home/myUser/some/long/path/to/a/directory. Is this even possible? How can I know the default PGF line width? Is there some macro that will tell me what the default PGF line width is? I have tried creating my own macro by cloning \pgflinewidth before it has been modified, i.e.  \let\defaultlinewidth\pgflinewidth   but \defaultlinewidth seems to be affected by \pgfsetlinewidth anyway, and change to whatever \pgflinewidth is. So, the problem is that after I have called \pgfsetlinewidth, I don't know what the default pgf line width is anymore. Is there some way to get around this? What's the difference between  and ,  and ? java.lang.RuntimeException Cannot find FacesContext Splitting pieces of a mesh into a new object JTable won't show column headers How do I boot into recovery mode? MySQL Database User: Which Privileges are needed? The short installation instruction for WordPress () state that:     Create a database for WordPress on your web server, as well as a MySQL user who has all privileges for accessing and modifying it.   While setting up a new blog professionally I was wondering how that maps to what the MySQL database user privileges/permissions configuration offers me:   Data: SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE Definition: CREATE, ALTER, DROP Extra: INDEX More:  LOCK TABLES REFERENCES CREATE TEMPORARY TABLES CREATE VIEW SHOW VIEW CREATE ROUTINE EXECUTE ALTER ROUTINE    I'm pretty sure for the first three groups, I named them Data, Definition and Extra here. But what about the others below the More entry? Normally I would say, those are not needed, but I would like to get a second opinion. If $f^2$ and $f^3$ are $C^{\infty}(\mathbb R)$ then $f$ is $C^{\infty}(\mathbb R)$ When is 6 a square in Zp To find when $6$ is a square I divided $6$ in to $2$ and $3$ by The Legendre symbol.  $$\frac{6}{p} = \frac{2}{p} \times \frac{3}{p}$$  I know that we can multiply the cases of when $2$ and $$ are squares because then it is (1)(1) by Legendre.   $2$ is a square when $p \equiv 1 \pmod{8}$   $3$ is a square when $p \equiv 1 \pmod{12}$  so $6$ is a square when $p \equiv 1 \pmod {24}$ ($96$, but the $lcm(8,12)= 24$)   but how do I find the cases when $2$ and $3$ are both NOT squares? because then $6$ would be a square then as well, $(-1)(-1) = 1$ by Legendre. Line breaking with hyperref href with an underline in itemize I have a simple itemized list like the following MWE:  \documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{lmodern} \usepackage[left=2cm,right=2cm,top=2cm,bottom=2cm]{geometry} \usepackage{lipsum} \begin{document} \begin{itemize} \item \href{http://google.com}{[ID1]: \underline{\lipsum[1]}} \end{itemize} \end{document}   This unfortunately doesn't break the block of text as expected, as shown below:    How can I fix this item so it will line break properly? Is Object constructor called when creating an array in Java? In Java, an array IS AN Object. My question is... is an Object constructor called when new arrays is being created? We would like to use this fact to instrument Object constructor with some extra bytecode which checks length of array being constructed. Would that work?