I have answered  on stackoverflow. I have answered this question after about 60 days and got 2 up-votes. I am not sure why I didn't get Revival Badge?
Formerly List of all badges with full descriptions.  What are badge name's requirements? Why didn't I get badge name ? Which badges can I earn multiple times?    Jump to:                    Note: Some badges are awarded based on score. The term score means the total number of upvotes minus the total number of downvotes.  Any badge with a *** next to it is one of 20 badges that count towards the  displayed on a moderator candidate in an election. The candidate score is a total of 40 points: the first 20 are awarded based on the user's rep divided by 1000 and rounded down; the second 20 represents the total number of unique badges earned of the 20 that count. Note that if the same badge is earned multiple times, it will only count once towards the candidate score.  Any badge with a &quot;(retired)&quot; next to it is no longer awarded, but is retained by users who previously earned them. See  for more info on what it means for a badge to be retired.       Visit the  of the  on any site to see a complete list of badges that you can filter by earned, unearned, or type.
The first time I learnt LaTeX, I thought \newcommand properly fits for inline mode and \newenvironment for displayed mode.  Later I noticed it is not correct. So the question is   What is the rule of thumb when deciding whether we should use one over the other one? Discovering transformations and interactions I am teaching myself regression using Regression Modeling Strategies by Harell and the author goes at quite the length to showcase the importance of modeling interactions and transformations of the initial variables. I can't help but wonder how to approach this in a more structured/automated way when dealing with a lot of potential variables.  Can we use recursive partitioning, for example, to somehow to do the work for us and then use the output as variables, shrink the estimates with LASSO to deal with colinearity and do a final step where we use some sort of filtering for feature importance.  In my mind this will leave us with a well specified model which can be manually inspected and improved if need be, but is this reasonable? Are there other ways to approach this? Are there some resources that deal with problems like this? I recently saw a question titled "" (10k+ users only). I thought, "surely someone has asked this question before", and began looking for a duplicate.  is a question with the exact same title, just with a little different punctuation and casing. It was "Jquery vs Javascript" and "jQuery vs. Javascript?". The only difference being the ., ?, and the casing.  Since we now , I propose that when checking for questions with duplicate names, certain punctuation be striped out to prevent the duplicate from occurring in the first place.  As pointed out in the comments, if isn't already, white-space and non-printable characters may want to be removed for duplicate detection as well. How can I attach a file to a question? Any idea why the piece of code below does not add the script element to the DOM?  var code = "&lt;script&gt;&lt;/script&gt;"; $("#someElement").append(code); How do you address unknown peers in email? This is one bit of academic etiquette I'm not sure about. When I write to another researcher, a peer (we're both professors). I've never exchanged with before and never met him but I know of him (and he probably knows of me).  Erring on the side of formality, I write to him “Dear professor Mortimer”. I sign with my first name, because that's how I've always signed my emails (there's a formal signature block below, with full name and contact details) and I think it indicates a willingness to be called by my first name (which I prefer, but I don't want to force people one way or the other).  Is that going to be well received? Will people take the hint? Or should I just start using first names from the start? (it does sound weird to write “dear Philipp” to someone you don't know) What is this plastic chip packing material called? What exactly is heat? Is it energy?  Is it energy per unit volume?  Is it energy per unit time i.e power?  What is it? I was wanting to initialize some strings at the top of my script with variables that have no yet been set, such as:  str1='I went to ${PLACE} and saw ${EVENT}' str2='If you do ${ACTION} you will ${RESULT}'   and then later on PLACE, EVENT, ACTION, and RESULT will be set. I want to then be able to print my strings out with the variables expanded. Is my only option eval? This seems to work:  eval "echo ${str1}"   is this standard? is there a better way to do this? It would be nice to not run eval considering the variables could be anything. Is there a grammatical term for moving a word to the front or back of a sentence? There is a function in Arabic grammar where you may bring forward in sentence order a word - as well as deferring it.  For example: if the sentence order is Subject - Verb - Object, you can bring the object forward to be before the subject,  yielding Object - Verb - Subject or Object - Subject - Verb.  Similarly, if you have Noun Phrase - Verb Phrase, you can move the verb phrase forward so you get Verb Phrase - Noun Phrase.  This is used to add emphasis to the item brought forward. The same applies to moving the item to the end of the sentence.  Is there a grammatical term in English that represents this function or functions? Include sorting of accepted answer on profile I have few things on my mind:   I viewed my profile and I wanted to sort my answers by  "Accepted Answer, Votes" Wanted to know how many answers I've made that is marked as  the accepted answer. Sort by Most liked Question: I'm referring to my question who  have the most numbers of favorites. I wanted to sort the questions I created order by accepted or  unaccepted questions.    1 &amp; 2 seems useful to me but 3 &amp; 4 I don't think are that useful. But who knows, someone in this site might find it useful one day!  My POV: My answer is only sorted by Votes, I also want to see a list of accepted  answers on my profile probably not just to know how many accepted answers  I have but also to know what are the accepted answers that I have. Physical meaning of quantum operators Let's say we have a wavefunction $\psi$ and a measurement operator $\hat A$.  I understand how eigenvalues and eigenvectors of $\hat A$ describe the possible outcomes of the measurement.  I also understand that the average measurement can be computed as $\langle \psi|\hat A|\psi\rangle$.  It's still not clear to me what the direct meaning of $\hat A |\psi\rangle$ is. It is a wavefunction; how does its corresponding quantum state relate (in physical terms) to the original state $\psi$ and the measurement $\hat A$? Can I use a custom Splash screen? The default Splash screens are cool, but I'd like to add some of my own work to remind me of how awesome I am (no, not really).    Is it possible to customize/change the splash screen? What is an adjective referring to “someone who puts people down”? I was just thinking about someone I went to school with who had a penchant for putting people down, and I was trying to think of a word that describes this, but couldn’t find it. It would be a synonym of caustic, abrasive, discouraging, and undermining, but these all have slightly different connotations (to wear away", cause discouragement or to make fall). I want an adjective that has the connotation of a hammer hitting you on the head. The word does not necessarily need to describe someone who does this on purpose, out of evil intent. Is there such a word?    The word should give you a mental picture of someone barraging you with negative comments, but it not necessarily affecting you. Think of someone who so often has something negative to “contribute” that many can just either ignore it or roll their eyes at it, and that is the extent of its effect. I keep getting the mental picture of the word buffet as in, how waves buffet the shore. A constant hitting, without the hitting necessarily being devastating in its destruction. I have 20 to 3o computers on my network and I have a copy of the debian packages on /var/cache/apt/archives but when I take this downloaded copy to any other machine I need to hit an "apt-get update" , How do I avoid this ? Where is the list of packages which is updated by that command stored. I need to copy them as well, and use it on a computer which is completely offline. I am working on the following problem asked in an examination: "What is the maximum number of cylindrical pencils of 0.5 cm diameter that can be stood in a square shaped stand of 5cm × 5cm inner cross section? 1. 99    2. 121   3. 100    4. 105." A simple calculation yielded me the answer 100.  But the answer in the key is 105. I don't how such an answer is possible. Any hint please.....Thanks in advance! How can I show that if the second fundamental form of a surface is identically equal to zero, then the surface is a plane? This is my question:  Let P be a plane considered as a surface in 3-space. Show that its second fundamental form is zero. Conversely, show that if the second fundamental form of a surface is identically zero then the surface is a plane.  So far I have that the general equation of the plane is $$ax+by+cz+d=0.$$ Then $$M(u,v)=(u,v,\alpha u + \beta v + \gamma),$$ where $a,b,c,d,\alpha,\beta, \gamma$ are all constants and $c\not=0$. Then $M_u=(1,0,\alpha)$ and $M_v=(0,1,\beta)$. I know that $\vec{n} =\frac{M_u \times M_v}{|M_u \times M_v|}$ which gives $$ \vec{n}=\frac{(-\alpha,-\beta, 1)}{\sqrt{\alpha^2+\beta^2+1}}.$$ Hence, the unit norm is a constant. $$ M_{uu}=M_{uv}=M_{vv}=0$$ Hence $l=m=n=0$, so the second fundamental form is $$ ldu^2+mdudv+ndv^2=0.$$  Now I need to show the converse, but I don't know how. Please help :) If I know $\| f_n - f \|_{L^p(\mathbb{R})} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, do I know that $\lim_{n \to \infty}f_n(x) = f(x)$ for almost every $x$? Do all starred commands have anything in common? \section* produces an unnumbered section, align* , which is comparable in a way. \newcommand* , which is different.  Stefan Kottwitz :     Commonly, a star symbol * means a version of a command that behaves differently from the original. That often means suppressing numbering but could also refer to special features.   This might answer my question, but perhaps there's more to say (and it's nice to have it as a separate question).  Is there anything all starred commands have in common? Why would one define a starred command as opposed to another, differently named command indicating their semantic difference in the names? It seems that their definitions are usually entirely independent from each other.  Further reading: Bought in, bought on, bought from, bought at?