I am a beginner in Quantum Mechanics so i am pretty new to the EPR paradox although i have heard about it a long time ago but finally studying in detail. And came across a doubt: Why the hidden characteristics in any particle as predicted by Einstein can not exist? If anyone can provide an  elaborated explanation !
I bet the automatic response to my question would be "Bell's theorem" and of course I am not disputing Bell's proof. I am however uncertain of one of his assumptions.  The so called "no conspiracy" assumption states that we somehow posses this magical thing called free will which makes us able to break free from the causal chain of events that make us measure the $y$-axis instead of the $x$-axis and so on in experiments. Obviously this makes little sense once reviewed under the light of logic. What this naturally implies is that, if a theory is fully deterministic, it is instantly super-deterministic.  Simon Kochen and John Conway published a theorem in 2009, , which simply-put states: either everything is deterministic (super-deterministic) or every particle has free will.  Among the few who accept this to the fullest extent is Gerard 't Hooft. He has proposed that what we call sub-atomic particles are really just templates and that there is a realm beneath the quantum where the true fabric of reality is "hidden". By accepting determinism he escapes Bell's theorem (due to not having to accept the "no conspiracy" assumption) and can construct a local, deterministic and realist hypothesis of reality. In Gerard 't Hooft's model there is cellular automata somewhere near the Planck scale which gives rise to the "emergent quantum mechanics".  This means that there exist no superpositions in objective reality, the cat is always either dead or alive, no collapse of wave functions, no branching universes, non-locality or retro-causality.  The big question for me is basically: Why do people have such a hard time accepting determinism? Some will object and say "oh but it's SUPER-determinism", but that makes no sense whatsoever, either everything is determined (determinism) or only somethings are (quasi-determinism). By accepting it we escape Bell's theorem. Bell himself was well aware of this and mentioned it a few times in interviews in the 80's.  I know some are concerned that if we accept complete determinism we can no longer do science because it's all a HUGE CONSPIRACY. Gerard 't Hooft has answered critics who bring up this here: , section 6.  Additionally, another author who has taken a deeper look into the worries of "conspiracies" in QM interpretations is Peter J. Lewis in his paper  (also ).  So to all of you who dismiss local hidden variables I ask: Why?
Who is bound to the Prime Directive? In the galaxy there are a fair number of pre-warp societies. A Federation ship is not to contact them. But what about other, non-Federation species?   If for example a Ferengi ship passes by a pre-warp planet, would they be allowed to contact it? What would a Federation ship observing this contact have to do? Are they obliged to intervene? Are they allowed to? Or were they merely allowed to "strongly discourage" the attempt of the Ferengi?  If it is legal to use force to stop the Ferengi, than in essence the Ferengi were bound to the Prime Directive too. And if so: does this go for all Federation territory? Is this confined to the Federation territory? If Janeway observes such an incident, what are her rights to intervene? Or does she have the duty to do so? Just read this which basically says you can freeze and thaw food in the fridge any number of times.    I'm still unclear on one point. If I had food which would be good in the fridge for 4 days and i put it in the freezer after 3 days, when I put it back in the fridge is my food good after its thawed for another 4 days or 1 more day? I gave Google my phone number to verify it, not knowing that it would change it, and now my phone number is completely different? What have I done, and how do I unverify it and change my phone number back? Where can I get a clean ISO of a specific build of Windows 10? Unable to install ECW support on lubuntu 14.04 What is the correct way to write 1.5 hours? I'm a bit confused in describing 1.5hrs in words.   Is writing one and a half an hour correct or should it be one and half hour?  E.g:     I'll see you there in one and a half an hour.     OR       I'll see you there in one and half hour.   Or is there any other correct way of writing this? How can I create launchers on my desktop? Avoiding if statement inside a for loop? Why are Bitmap-Fonts used automatically? I have the following LaTeX-document:  \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage[ngerman]{babel}  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}  \title{Sample} \author{Litb}  \begin{document}  \maketitle  \begin{abstract}  This is a report about my praxis phase at the company foo bar which I enjoyed. \end{abstract}  \end{document}   Much to my frustration, compiling with pdflatex creates a document with Bitmap-fonts. The reader's font-list shows that it uses Type3 fonts.  If I remove the fontenc loading, then I get a PDF using vector-fonts, but I heard that I should keep it, for having native German Umlauts working.  Does anyone know how I can get vector fonts with T1, and why it keeps using bitmap fonts if I have that package-load line in it? In other words, why don't we always use Schottky diodes if they are so much better? What diode properties do Schottky diodes have that makes them unfit for certain applications? What are the practical differences between 256-bit, 192-bit, and 128-bit AES encryption? We all know some curves can be described by $y=f(x)$ and some surfaces can be described by $z=f(x,y)$ However, there exists curves and surfaces which cannot be described by those, such as a circle and a sphere. Therefore, we introduce parameterized vector equations, which can describe them. For example, circle: $\vec r(t)=r\cos(t)\hat i+r\sin(t)\hat j$ sphere: $\vec r(u,v)=\rho\cos(u)\sin(v)\hat i+\rho\sin(u)\sin(v)\hat j+\rho\cos(v)\hat k$ However, all curves described by $y=f(x)$ and  $z=f(x,y)$ can be parameterized. For curves, $$\vec r(t)=t\hat i+f(t)\hat j$$ For surfaces, $$\vec r(u,v)=u\hat i+v\hat j+f(u,v)\hat k$$ Therefore, I think this suggests the set of all parameterized surfaces (or curves) is the super-set of the set of all surfaces (or curves) described by $z=f(x,y)$ (or $y=f(x)$). Is that correct? Now, here comes the the real challenge. A curve can also be described by an implicit function $f(x,y)=0$ and a surface can also be described by an implicit function $f(x,y,z)=0$ I have 3 questions regarding this.   Can all surfaces (curves) described by an implicit function be parameterized? (If yes, then what is the general way?) Can all surfaces (curves) described by parametric vector equations be represented using implicit function? (If yes, then what is the general way?) Compare the set of all parameterized surfaces (curves) and the set of all surfaces (curves) represented by implicit function. (which is which super-set?)   Sorry for the use of nontechnical terms. I use them because I don't know the technical ones. I have only started learning vector calculus last year in university.  EDIT: I think my question is not too clear, so I will give an example of writing the surface $f(x,y,z)=0$ into $\vec r(u,v)$ We want to parameterize a sphere. $$x^2+y^2+z^2-\rho^2=0$$ Let $x=\rho\cos(u)\sin(v)$, $y=\rho\sin(u)\sin(v)$, $z=\rho\cos(v)$, $$\rho^2\cos^2(u)\sin^2(v)+\rho^2\sin^2(u)\sin^2(v)+\rho^2\cos^2(v)-\rho^2$$ $$=\rho^2\sin^2(v)(\cos^2(u)+\sin^2(u))+\rho^2\cos^2(v)-\rho^2=\rho^2-\rho^2=0$$ I want to know if there is a general way of finding $x=x(u,v)$, $y=y(u,v)$ and $z=z(u,v)$ for any given $f(x,y,z)=0$ Beginner Question: How to close/split panels? I am about to start a web project and have been working almost exclusively with a LAMP stack for the past 5 years.  I would like to build something larger and more scalable and hence have been looking into Java EE.  The division of logic between JSP and EJB seems ideal for what I want to do.  Can anyone recommend resources for getting familiar with Java EE?  And perhaps if anyone knows of technologies that are more scalable than PHP that I should consider as well, I'm all ears.  Thanks a lot! Ligatures in figures and pdftex I finally got fed up when wanting to read about bash's read and it's -s option with man bash. I found the right spot eventually (around line 4500), but it was a frustrating as usual, since both /read and even /\s-s\s searches have way too many matches.  So, the question is: How can I read long man pages efficiently, or get same information in other ways, locally? As a specific example, how to reach the relevant documentation after seeing read -s pwd in a shell script? A good answer could be a shell script snippet, or hint about some tool and how it is used, or something else entirely, as long as it helps in finding the right spot to read.  Note: I'm not tagging with  because I want the question to be about man page reading in general, even though that quite possibly is the most commonly encountered humongous man page. This is a problem from Rudin's Functional Analysis:  Show that there is a sequence of functions $\{ f_n \}$ in $X$ (the vector space of all complex functions) such that $f_n \to 0$ pointwise, but if any sequence $\{ \gamma_n \}$ tends to $\infty$, $\gamma_n f_n \not\to 0$.  The hint says to use the fact that the collections of all complex sequences converging to $0$ has the same cardinality as $[0,1]$. Honestly, this confused me more than it helped me.  My main issue is through the method of showing existence: I am not sure if I should attempt to construct an explicit sequence $f_n$, or if I need to appeal to other nonconstructive means such as Zorn's Lemma, etc. I have been trying to construct clever choices of sequences for a good bit now, but it always seems like I will be able to find a sequence that diverges slowly enough to allow that $\gamma_n f_n \to 0$.   Thanks! Export each image from a collection in Google Earth Engine Is there an elementary proof that $\sum \limits_{k=1}^n \frac1k$ is never an integer? I'd like to extract the text from an HTML file using Python.  I want essentially the same output I would get if I copied the text from a browser and pasted it into notepad.    I'd like something more robust than using regular expressions that may fail on poorly formed HTML.  I've seen many people recommend Beautiful Soup, but I've had a few problems using it.  For one, it picked up unwanted text, such as JavaScript source.  Also, it did not interpret HTML entities.  For example, I would expect &amp;#39; in HTML source to be converted to an apostrophe in text, just as if I'd pasted the browser content into notepad.  Update html2text looks promising. It handles HTML entities correctly and ignores JavaScript.  However, it does not exactly produce plain text; it produces markdown that would then have to be turned into plain text. It comes with no examples or documentation, but the code looks clean.    Related questions: