After upgrading to 11.10, the behavior of applications switcher (Alt + Tab) has changed. Now it displays applications across all workspaces. I have a lot of windows opened when working. I'm grouping opened applications to separate sets which are placed on different workspaces. This is how I found myself be more productive. But now it became totally time consuming, if I need click "tab" button more than 10 times while I reach some app.  How can I force the windows switcher to display only applications from current workspace?
I am looking for a clean and fast method to force GNOME in Ubuntu 14.04 to switch between active apps only on the current workspace when pressing the shortcut alt + tab.
How did Sauron remain in control of the Nazgûl? I have several AppExchange apps installed that are failing tests. What is the recommended approach to resolving this? Are tests run when a new package is installed? Is there a way to determine what is actually failing besides the name of the method and something like "expected true, actually false"? The test results rarely show enough information to be useful.   What I'm doing atm, is checking for updates for the packages, and then writing the company with the failing test results.   Any feedback would be appreciated. I'm new to Ubuntu. I tried installing it with Windows 8.1, but failed I lost all my files.  I have successfully formatted my PC and installed Ubuntu, but how do I install codecs to play audio and videos files ? Supremum of a Continuous Function is Continuous How to show that $|D_{2n}| = 2n$ via the presentation? Consider the dihedral group  $$D_{2n}= \langle a,b \mid a^n = 1 = b^2, b^{-1}ab = a^{-1}\rangle$$  How can I show that $|D_{2n}| = 2n$?   I'm trying to show that we can write every element in the form  $$x = a^i b^j$$ where $i= 0, 1, \dots, n-1$; $b = 0,1$.   I managed to show existence, and it is clear that there are $2n$ such elements, so if I can show that every choice of $i,j$ gives a distinct element, I'll be done.  Any ideas? The formula for a one sample t-test, as given by  is  $t = \dfrac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s\big/\sqrt{n}}$  However, in this equation, if the sample standard deviation, $s$, is zero, $t$ will be undefined. Is there any reasonable way to get a $t$ value in this case? Possible Duplicate:          I have tried changing my proxy settings in a terminal as:  export HTTP_PROXY=http://10.1.3.1:8080   and  export http_proxy=http://10.1.3.1:8080   but when I try to install a new package or update apt-get, apt-get starts displaying messages from which it seems it is trying to connect to a previously set proxy:  sudo apt-get update   0% [Connecting to 10.1.2.2 (10.1.2.2)] [Connecting to 10.1.2.2 (10.1.2.2)   I have tried setting the proxy via bashrc file but that din work either. As far as I remember 10.1.2.2 was set using GNOME GUI but I don't have access to the GUI right now so I am trying to set it from terminal. How to install latest HPLIP on my Ubuntu to support my HP printer and/or scanner? Let's assume that one has some modern HP printer and/or scanner which is not supported by HPLIP package from official repository. Currently Ubuntu versions have :  trusty (14.04LTS): 3.14.3-0ubuntu3.4 xenial (16.04LTS): 3.16.3+repack0-1 bionic (18.04LTS): 3.17.10+repack0-5 focal (20.04LTS): 3.20.3+dfsg0-2 groovy (20.10): 3.20.5+dfsg0-3build1 hirsute (21.04): 3.21.2+dfsg1-2   What can one do if printer is supported in newer version of HPLIP (checked this in )? What is the C# Using block and why should I use it? What is the purpose of the Using block in C#? How is it different from a local variable? How to extract BibTeX entries (as DOI, abstract, etc.) I want to automate personal reading notes generation, I'd like to be able to automatically extract a field's content from a BibTeX entry (other than year or author).  E.g. given a BibTeX entry  @article{einstein05,    author={Albert Einstein},    title={Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K{\"o}rper},    abstract={Interesting article, which claims that time is relative.},    journal={Annalen der Physik und Chemie},    volume={17},    year={1905},    pages={891--921} }   I want to have a macro in my TeX file (e.g. \citeabstract) that will return the string Interesting article, which claims that time is relative. (the same for DOI, etc.)  I've found the \printfield command that might help me, but I'm not smart enough to know how to use it.  I don't know if it has any influence on the answer, but I'm using BibLaTeX+BibTeX. How do I display a decimal value to 2 decimal places? EDIT: As of Java 8, static methods are now allowed in interfaces.  Here's the example:  public interface IXMLizable&lt;T&gt; {   static T newInstanceFromXML(Element e);   Element toXMLElement(); }   Of course this won't work.  But why not?  One of the possible issues would be, what happens when you call:  IXMLizable.newInstanceFromXML(e);   In this case, I think it should just call an empty method (i.e. {}).  All subclasses would be forced to implement the static method, so they'd all be fine when calling the static method.  So why isn't this possible?  EDIT: I guess I'm looking for answer that's deeper than "because that's the way Java is".   Is there a particular technological reason why static methods can't be overwritten? That is, why did the designers of Java decide to make instance methods overrideable but not static methods?  EDIT: The problem with my design is I'm trying to use interfaces to enforce a coding convention.  That is, the goal of the interface is twofold:   I want the IXMLizable interface to allow me to convert classes that implement it to XML elements (using polymorphism, works fine). If someone wants to make a new instance of a class that implements the IXMLizable interface, they will always know that there will be a newInstanceFromXML(Element e) static constructor.   Is there any other way to ensure this, other than just putting a comment in the interface? I find even Ctrl+b to be very emacs like but I understand the point. I'm wondering if I could bind it to a single keypress of a key I don't other wise use? namely Super_L (also known as the left windows key. for why I say Super_L start xev in a terminal and press that key) Partition around bad drive sectors? I've seen a lot of hard drives with only a few bad (unrecoverable) sectors (as indicated by SMART). Of course the proper thing to do with a bad drive is replace it, as there's a good chance of the drive crashing completely in the near future; I'm aware of that. However, in the interim, or for those who don't want to spend $70 to save data they don't value highly anyway (sigh, non-technical people), or just to get some use out of old hardware instead of throwing it away, I'm wondering if there's a way to identify where the unrecoverable sectors are ("where" meaning numerically, from 0 to the number of sectors on the drive), so I could stick a blank partition in that general area. Yes, this would involve low-level-formatting the drive and reinstalling the OS, of course.  So:  Would partitioning around unrecoverable sectors even be a workable way of reducing the disk of losing data?  If so, is there a way to find the location of these unrecoverable sectors? Why could the pictures and paintings in Hogwarts talk and the photos of Harry's parents couldn't? Here is a question that's been bothering me since I was a sophomore in university, and should have probably asked before graduating:  In analytic (Lagrangian) mechanics, the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations from the principle of least action assumes that the start and end coordinates at the initial and final times are known. As a consequence, any variation on the physical path must vanish at its boundaries. This conveniently cancels out the contributions of the boundary terms after integration by parts, and setting the requirement for minimal action, we obtain the E.L. equations.  This is all nice and dandy, but our intention is finding the location of a particle at a time in the future, which we do not know a priori; after we derive any equations of motion for a system, we solve them by applying initial values instead of boundary conditions.   How are these two approaches consistent? How to align right within equation array Is this intended behavior (with plain XeTeX):  \input tikz \tikz\draw[dashed] node {$3T\over4$}; \bye   It renders as: !?  The fraction line is dashed, too! Is this intentional? Is there something I can do to change that? I know I can separate the fraction into its own node, but other than that? Logistic regression vs. LDA as two-class classifiers My tea bags are expired, can I still use them? This box of tea has an expiration date which has passed but I would like to know if I can still use it. What do you think?