So I ran three paired samples t-tests to see if people did a certain action more after hearing a target stimulus. my prediction is that they would do the action more. All tests were one-tailed as i was only looking at one direction: did it increase after x. n = 29 for each test. the p values for tests were, First test:.061, one-tailed, Second test:p = .098, one-tailed and third test: p = .13, one-tailed. But in every result the mean was higher in the group I predicted would be higher after the stimulus. So, when I report this what can I say? Should I say that while not 'significant' they were in the 'expected direction' and that repeating the test with a larger sample is needed? In other words that there is an interesting trend and deserves more investigation? Thanks so much!
The general consensus on a similar question,  is that "highly significant" is a valid, though non-specific, way to describe the strength of an association that has a p-value far below your pre-set significance threshold. However, what about describing p-values that are slightly above your threshold? I have seen some papers use terms like "somewhat significant", "nearly significant", "approaching significance", and so on. I find these terms to be a little wishy-washy, in some cases a borderline disingenuous way to pull a meaningful result out of a study with negative results. Are these terms acceptable to describe results that "just miss" your p-value cutoff?
I just posted on a closed question   How?  Side point:  I do not see any indication that the post is closed on the app How to test apex classes with Pagereference? I'm struggling to test a class with pagereference. Following is the class...  public with sharing class redirectOrderPartner{  public String currentRecordId {get;set;} public orders__c orderId {get;set;}  public redirectOrderPartner(ApexPages.StandardController controller) {      }     Public Pagereference go(){      currentRecordId  = ApexPages.CurrentPage().getparameters().get('orderid');      system.debug('---currentRecordId  ---'+currentRecordId  );     orderId = [select id from orders__c where name =: currentRecordId limit 1];      system.debug('---orderid---'+orderId);      PageReference pageRef = new PageReference('/apex/OrderTrackingClass?id='+orderId.id);     pageRef.setRedirect(true);     return pageRef;    }   }   Following is what I tried....    @isTest  public class redirectOrderPartner_TEST  {             static testMethod void Test(){            Account acc = new Account(Name='ABC Corp.');           insert acc;            orders__c tempOrder = new orders__c(name = '0001234567', account__c = acc.id );           insert tempOrder;            Test.startTest();            PageReference pageRef = Page.redirectOrderPartner;           Test.setCurrentPage(pageRef);            ApexPages.Standardcontroller sc = new ApexPages.Standardcontroller(tempOrder);           ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().put('Id',tempOrder.name);           PW_redirectOrderPartner ec = new redirectOrderPartner(sc);           ec.go();                                   Test.stopTest();       }   } I get the following error message on testing..     System.QueryException: List has no rows for assignment to SObject   What am I missing? Thanks Why don't Lightroom or PSE recognize CR2 files from my Canon 7D mk II even though they are up to date? Reprojecting raster from lat/lon to UTM in R? Did Sidious know the secret of cheating death? For example Lets use the Marrutact from Sandstorm, it can cast as a 5th level wizard. if it then takes a prestige class that requires the ability to cast 1st level Arcane spells and advances arcane casting such as Abjurant Champion. assuming it meets all other prerequisites does the Marrutacts spellcasting improve when it takes a level in Abjurant Champion or does it gain no benefit? A variation on the induced topology (subspace topology) I am currently learning electromagnetism and I am getting really annoyed using a physical hand to accomplish the right hand rule. I get it, i've seen diagrams, and i've solved problems with it but still somehow I mess up because I bend a finger or twist my wrist a strange way. I am tired of using my hand.  So my question is can I find an entirely mathematical basis for this?  Lets say for any given diagram I define the positive $x$ axis as going to the right, the positive $y$ axis as going up and the positive $z$ axis as going into the page. Then I just did unit vectors for everything to determine the missing component?  As I understand it $\vec{F} = q (\vec{V}\times\vec{B})$ and with that definition I am confident I could find out the direction of the electric field given the velocity of a particle of charge and the magnetic field but how can I re-arrange this so I can solve for other variables? For example what does $\vec{B}$ equal in terms of a cross product involving $\vec{V}$ and $\vec{F}$? I have been denied a visa several times in a row. How does one deal with such serial refusals? Why isn't my Gravatar image updating? Related questions with over 99 score display incorrectly The score for the 4 questions are 111, 1218, 261 and 5 respectively, but they display 2 digits per line. This is an obvious bug in design. In iOS 8.4.1, if a caller who has 6 numbers, calls you and you see a missed call. Then, clicking the "i" symbol next to the missed call showed you all the 6 numbers of the caller and the number from which he called, was indicated with blue. This helped in knowing exactly what number he called me from and I could call back on the same number.  iOS 9.0.1 call log does not indicate the number the caller called from with blue (if the caller has more than one number). So, it becomes impossible to call the person back on the same number.  This was one very important feature that made iOS 8 very useful. Apple has taken away a very important feature. Is propagation of uncertainties linear? I'm in doubt with one thing: let's imagine that we have $n+1$ quantities, $n$ of them being directly measured, and the other one being related to the first $n$ by a function $f : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$. If the $x_i$ is one of the quantities being directly measured and if $\Delta x_i$ is it's uncertainty, then I've learned that the uncertainty of the quantity $y = f(x_1, \dots x_n)$ is given by:  $$\Delta y=\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\Delta x_i}$$  My problem in understanding this is: well, if $f$ is such a function, it's derivative is the linear transformation $df : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ given by:  $$df=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}dx_i$$  Where $dx_i : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ is given by $dx_i(a_1 \dots a_n) = a_i$. Hence, what we are saying, is that $\Delta y = df ( \Delta x_1, \dots \Delta x_n)$, in other words, we are saying that the uncertainty of $y$ is given by a linear function of the vector of uncertainties of the quantities $x_i$. Why should that be true? I mean, what's the reasoning behind this? I really didn't get the point, my teacher just gave the equation without justifying or anything like that.  Any help and reference is appreciated. Are Jedi bound by a code of honor or morals? In The Phantom Menace alone, Qui-Gon (and in part Obi-Wan) are quick to use Jedi mind tricks and not only gamble but also cheat at it. They seem happy with this fact.  Do Jedi have morals and ethics, or a code of honor? What are the advantages of Light Application objects I was hoping that the introduction of "Light Application object" would do something about the data storage of junction objects, but it doesn't seem to do anything about it.  The  seems limited to why I would use a "Light Application object", what are the advantages? Are there any   editors for ? Perhaps something similar to    but for PGF/TikZ?   If there is no WYSIWYG editor for this tandem, is there one perhaps that allows the user to easily generate PGF/TikZ templates?  Alternatively, how can I most easily generate PFG/TikZ code from a visual conception? Do people mostly code their PGF/TikZ graphics from scratch? Exercise from Atiyah-Macdonald, Chapter 1, 2.iv) Let $A$ be a ring and let $A[x]$ be the ring of polynomials in an indeterminate $x,$ with coefficients in $A.$ Let $f=a_0 + a_1x+\cdots+a_nx^n \in A[x].$ $f$ is said to be primitive if $(a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_n)=(1).$     Prove that if $f,g\in A[x],$ then $f$ and $g$ are primitive $\Rightarrow$ $fg$ is primitive.   I know Gauss lemma holds true for UFDs, but in this case it isn't required $A$ to be UFD: is it possible to drop the assumption, or is some hypothesis missing here? Is there any other way to do a clean install withot formatting /home? I think my Ubuntu is a bit broken from messing around with it.  Unfortunately during installation, I did not make a separate partition for /home. Now I need to re-install but want to keep my music and films.  Any ideas... I want to boot Ubuntu into recovery mode but there is no grub menu entry allowing me to do so. I pressed e and now I am able to edit boot options. It looks like that:  setparams 'Ubuntu , with Linux 3.6.0-26-generic'  recordfail gfxmode $linux_gfx_mode insmod gzio insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd0,msdos5)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root &lt;uuid&gt; linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic root=&lt;uuid&gt; ro ipv6.disable=1 quirt splash $vt_handoff initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-26-generic   The  documentation says:     Boot to the recovery mode even if it is not listed on the menu:         Remove existing kernel options from the linux line and add single      But this sentence doesn't make any sense, maybe the wiki page is broken somehow. How to modify the boot menu to boot directly into recovery mode?  Note: I don't have access to grub config or anything else, only the boot menu edit page is available. What is the symbolic significance of the Night King's message? In Game of Thrones S8E1,        Ned Umber is found pinned to a wall by the Night King with a symbolic message, which looks like tentacles coming out of the body of Ned.   Is there some meaning to that symbolic message? If yes, then what is that?