I have checked the positions of assembler array in this functions and they are not empty. But I am getting the following error Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException  While debugging the .equals method is giving this exception. So please help in understanding this problem.  Here is the code snippet.  public static void lc(int i, String[][] assembler, String[][] mc) {         int x = Integer.parseInt(assembler[0][3]),j;         int flag;         for(j=0;j&lt;13;++j) {             flag = 0;             if(assembler[j][1].equals("START") || assembler[j][1].equals("END") || assembler[j][1].equals("STOP") || assembler[j][1].equals("LTORG") || assembler[j][1].equals("EQU") || assembler[j][1].equals("ORIGIN")) {                 flag = 2;                 //System.out.println("Hi");             }             if(assembler[j][1].equals("ORIGIN")) {                 x = Integer.parseInt(assembler[j][3]);                 mc[j+1][0] = assembler[j][3];                 flag = 1;             }             if(assembler[j][2].equals("DS")) {                 x += Integer.parseInt(assembler[j][3]);                 mc[j+1][0] = Integer.toString(x);                 flag = 1;             }             if (flag == 0) {                 x += 1;                 mc[j + 1][0] = Integer.toString(x);             }             if(flag == 2)                 mc[j+1][0] = Integer.toString(x);         }         mc[j][0] = "null";     }
What are Null Pointer Exceptions (java.lang.NullPointerException) and what causes them?  What methods/tools can be used to determine the cause so that you stop the exception from causing the program to terminate prematurely?
Block network access of a process? Is it possible to block the (outgoing) network access of a single process? Convert a column into a comma separated list In the following snippet:  public class a {     public void otherMethod(){}     public void doStuff(String str, InnerClass b){}     public void method(a){         doStuff("asd",             new InnerClass(){                 public void innerMethod(){                     otherMethod();                 }             }         );     } }   Is there a keyword to refer to the outer class from the inner class?  Basically what I want to do is outer.otherMethod(), or something of the like, but can't seem to find anything. Colored borders around windows after update Cardinality of the Cartesian Product of Two Equinumerous Infinite Sets Is the cardinality of the Cartesian product of two equinumerous infinite sets the same as the cardinality of any one of the sets? I couldn't find this explicitly stated in any handout or text. This certainly seems to be true from the examples I have seen:  The Cartesian product of two infinitely countable sets is again infinitely countable. The Cartesian product of two sets with cardinality of continuum again has cardinality of continuum. To give you some background, I have a grasp on the basics of statistics and probability theory and even remember touching Bayes theorem at the university data mining course. But being a few years away from the university made my math got extremely rusty (so much for last-minute pre-exam cramming). While I remember various random basic concepts, there are a lot of gaps in my understanding of them.  What would be a good material (a book, a site, or otherwise equally accessible medium) to revise the fundamentals and go beyond basics? I'd like a book that can be actually read as a book (most statistics books are really dry and are close to being reference material, rather than a book). As part of graduating from Area51 and becoming a full fledged site we sometimes change domain names from http://topic.stackexchange.com to http://example.com. Aside from the obvious 301 redirect rules to support existing urls transparently, are there other techniques that would aid in the preservation of SEO? How to get back Windows 10 [UEFI] after Legacy installation of Fedora 24? Position of \caption gets counter incremented twice Can there be temperature inside of a massive Black Hole? Proving $1-\exp(-4x^2/ \pi) \ge \text{erf}(x)^2$ What does this notation mean? $f(x) \equiv A$? If $\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}f(x) = A$, prove that $f(x)\equiv A$.  Any help would be appreciated! I just don't even understand the question. Returning from a finally block in Java I was surprised recently to find that it's possible to have a return statement in a finally block in Java.  It seems like lots of people think it's a bad thing to do as described in ''. Scratching a little deeper, I also found '' which shows some pretty horrible examples of other types of flow control in finally blocks.  So, my question is, can anyone give me an example where a return statement (or other flow control) in a finally block produces better / more readable code? Today I had some time and felt like writing a relatively good answer on Stack Overflow; explaining both the underlying mechanisms and good practices, unlike usual declarative answers in a "do that" style.  It took me like an hour of time, $50 if I were free lance. It'll bring me nothing but 3-5 occasional views, and - if I get lucky - some ignorant comments.  You know, it's quite discouraging.  Instead of pride for the job that was done, I feel frustrated. I know, this answer may offer help to the OP, if he ever notices it (being already satisfied with other answers).  So the only fate the answer will meet is to sink forever, below thousands other questions, falling like snow.  So, being a programmer, I am thinking of efficiency. It's a waste of time to spend so much effort to answer one question when there is no way to [actually] reuse it. So, I wouldn't do it again but just turn back into short answers mode without explanations.       Seeing other answers, I don't think I am only one with such feeling.  The current policy is driving knowledgeable and educational users away, yet it attracts inexperienced ones in numbers. Ones who will tell you to use [some technology] which they never have laid their hands upon. Ones who write answers just because they have learned some "good practice" from other questions, and this "knowledge" becomes an endless source of rep points.  The idea of Stack Overflow is rotten. It was excellent when trees were high and traffic was low.  It turned bad now; it has become a honeypot for all the "enthusiast programmers" of the world, eager to share their 2 cents faster than you can say the word "close".  You're killing a great resource. Despite all the nice words and proper declarations, it discourages the reuse of the knowledge. And encourages fast on-site answers.  Of course, the rules will tell you contrary. It's all nice and proper (if you don't mind it's strict mutual exclusivity). But mechanically, technologically it works in the way I described.  I tried to write a tag wiki. You know, it was biggest waste of time in my life. As a matter of fact, it is not a wiki at all; you can't even link to a certain section. Not to mention that nobody ever has the idea to read tag wikis.  Reference questions? Don't make me laugh. There is no good mechanism to store and categorize links. Favorites, although intended for the different purpose, are a chunk of crap when you want to use it as a reference. So, you can't compete with 30-seconds answers: a question will get 5 answers before you can even find an appropriate link.  Okay, I can organize links myself but, there are some problems:   I am just a human. I cannot remember everything I am just a human and I cannot answer questions at rate of 1 qpm. One person cannot fight the Tide. It's helpless. When technology makes people writing fast [incomplete] answers -  no good will of proper declarations can do a thing.  Even if a question gets finally closed, it won't hurt anyone - the hydra grew two more already.   You'll call me a brute for insulting honest users and innocent volunteers, but that's fact: There are much more inexperienced users than experienced ones. And inexperienced users have much more spare time to hang over than experts who have their job to do. So, from that fact we can conclude that most of the answers on Stack Overflow have a low quality. Nobody cares. But I do.   There should be a technical way to limit the activity of not-so-knowledgeable-yet-eager-to-answer users. There should be a technical preference for the closing a question over answering it (have a silly answer for the silly question? welcome to comments). There should be a technical solution to accumulate and structure knowledge, a system that lets you choose a good answer instead of writing it by hand.   That's the only way. Otherwise Stack Overflow will remain an automated dispenser of bad practices.  Well, I just felt like letting it out again. Thank you for reading. Was Mjolnir ever used for building something? In the movie Thor (2011), while he was about to crown Thor as the next king of Asgard, Allfather Odin describes the mighty hammer Mjolnir as the following:      So long entrusted with this mighty hammer, Mjolnir. Forged in the heart of a dying star, from the sacred metal of Uru. Only one may ift it. Only one is worthy. Who wields this hammer commands the lightning and the storm. Its power has no equal -- as a weapon, to destroy, or as a tool, to build. It is a fit companion for a King.   We know Mjolnir as a weapon of destruction but are there references where it is used to build something? If my data is overdispersed when binomial but not when Poisson does that alone mean I should use Poisson GLM? Top is Poisson, bottom is Binomial Source of variation is different people observed over a week long period. 118 people to be exact.  want to make predictions about the proportion of days/week one exercises if they wake up at a given time.  &gt; summary(FMR7)  Call: glm(formula = No.Days.Ex ~ WaketimeStand, family = poisson, data = PSD)  Deviance Residuals:       Min        1Q    Median        3Q       Max   -2.99043  -0.64677  -0.03492   0.67393   1.51943    Coefficients:               Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(&gt;|z|)     (Intercept)    1.36991    0.04689  29.218   &lt;2e-16 *** WaketimeStand -0.08309    0.04806  -1.729   0.0839 .   --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  (Dispersion parameter for poisson family taken to be 1)      Null deviance: 124.55  on 115  degrees of freedom Residual deviance: 121.51  on 114  degrees of freedom AIC: 479.71  Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4  &gt; summary(FMR6)  Call: glm(formula = cbind(No.Days.Ex, No.Days.NotEx) ~ WaketimeStand,      family = quasibinomial(link = logit), data = PSD)  Deviance Residuals:      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max   -3.7483  -0.9585  -0.0625   1.0428   2.9739    Coefficients:               Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|)   (Intercept)     0.2595     0.1009   2.571   0.0114 * WaketimeStand  -0.1869     0.1020  -1.832   0.0695 . --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  (Dispersion parameter for quasibinomial family taken to be 2.015388)      Null deviance: 288.42  on 115  degrees of freedom Residual deviance: 281.57  on 114  degrees of freedom AIC: NA  Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4  Quite clear that there is much more overdispersion on the quasibinomial than the poisson. The response variable is no.days exercise per week and so my original thought was to analyse with binomial GLM as it is the proportion of days in a week someone exercises. However, when modelled with a Poisson GLM it is much less overdispersed. Is this a sign I am using the wrong distribution. Is there a keyboard command for 'show desktop'? Like Windows, I want to hit Super+D to jump to the desktop or minimize all windows. I don't see command like that in Keyboard Shortcuts. Any idea? Using JQuery and Prototype in the same page Several of my pages use both JQuery and Protoype. Since I upgraded to version 1.3 of JQuery this appears to be causing problems, because both libraries define a function named '$'.  JQuery provides a function noConflict() which relinquishes control of $ to other libraries that may be using it. So it seems like I need to go through all my pages that look like this:  &lt;head&gt;           &lt;script type="text/javascript" src="/obp/js/prototype.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;     &lt;script type="text/javascript" src="/obp/js/jquery.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;/head&gt;   and change them to look like this:  &lt;head&gt;           &lt;script type="text/javascript" src="/obp/js/prototype.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;     &lt;script type="text/javascript" src="/obp/js/jquery.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;     &lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;         jQuery.noConflict();         var $j = jQuery;     &lt;/script&gt; &lt;/head&gt;   I should then be able to use '$' for Prototype and '$j' (or 'jQuery') for JQuery. I'm not entirely happy about duplicating these 2 lines of code in every relevant page, and expect that at some point somebody is likely to forget to add them to a new page. I'd prefer to be able to do the following    Create a file jquery-noconflict.js which "includes" jquery.js and the 2 lines of code shown above Import jquery-noconflict.js (instead of jquery.js) in all my JSP/HTML pages   However, I'm not sure if it's possible to include one JS file in another, in the manner I've described? Of course an alternate solution is simply to add the 2 lines of code above to jquery.js directly, but if I do that I'll need to remember to do it every time I upgrade JQuery. My phone was just stolen an hour or so ago. Are there any options for tracking? I realize this is a long shot, but my phone was lost or stolen a few hours ago.  At the time it was stolen, I didn't have any specific applications installed to track it or wipe the data. So... my bad. I'm hoping the fact that I have a pattern lock will at least prevent anyone from accessing my data.  My question is, do I have any options for tracking or data wipe after the fact? (I'm more interested in tracking.)  Note: I have read similar questions, but unless I'm mistaken, they all address the question in terms of preparation before losing the phone. I'm asking about fallback options after losing the phone. I am having difficulty in how to calculate the Pearson's $\chi^2$ statistic for a contingency table with entries: (3, 0) and (0, 3) (row-wise).  I was studying Agresti's categorical data analysis and found this table. He calculated it as 6.  Through what calculation did he reach this answer?