As per official website Ubuntu 16.04 system requirements are as below,  2 GHz dual core processor or better, 2 GB system memory, 25 GB of free hard drive space,  But my system info is as below,  Processor:- Intel(R) Celeron (R) CPUB815@1.60 GHz, RAM:- 2GB, System type:- 32 bit,  Please help to check whether my system fulfills all requirement?
For a given hardware configuration, how do I find out if Ubuntu will run on it? What considerations should I take into account when choosing an Ubuntu version and  such as:    with a lighter desktop than the usual Gnome and Unity  with the even lighter LXDE desktop   Obviously Ubuntu does not run on some processor architectures. So how do I go about choosing the right version and derivate. How can I find out the minmal system requirements?
I am a beginner of ordinals and I don't know any powerful techniques in it. I come across with a problem about the first uncountable ordinal like this.  Let $X$ be a set of uncountable cardinality. Using the Principle of Well Order we have a well ordering $\le$ on X(and $&lt;$ means $\le$ but not euqual). By adding an element, which we denote by $∞$, and introducing the convention that $x &lt; ∞$ for all $x ∈ X$, we will assume that X has a maximum with respect to $\le$.   We define $ω_1 = \text{min} \{ x ∈ X : \{y ∈ X : y &lt; x \} \  \text{is uncountable}\} $  Clearly such a $ω_1$ exists. we define $0 = \text{min} \ X$ and intervels $[0,x], [x,y), (a,b]$ etc. in the usual sense.  Here are my questions:  (1)For any countable $A ⊂ [0, ω_1)$ there is an $x &lt; ω_1$ so that $A ⊂ [0, x]$.(I don't know how to make use of the countability and uncountablity here)   (2)Equipped with the topology generated by open intervals,  $[0, ω_1]$ is compact.   (3)A famous application of the first uncountable ordinal is to find an example of a Borel measure (with respect to the topology in (2)) that is not Radon. So how to construct a finite Borel measure $µ$ on $[0, ω_1]$ which is not a Radon measure?  Any solutions or elementary references will be appreciated! Why exactly did the Sorting Hat originally want to put Harry in Slytherin? bi-directional sync with rsync I am trying to setup bi-direction or two way sync with rsync. In my case I only need to delete the files when syncing from B to A. So, I was thinking of running rsync twice as follow :  rsync -rtuv ./A/ ./B/ rsync -rtuv --delete ./B/ ./A/   This problem with this solution is that when I run rsync (B->A) which would be right after running the rsync (A-B), Any new file that get created in between the sync will also get removed.  Is there a way I can specify a time stamp as condition that it only delete the file if it created before this date/time.  Updated:  I understand there is a unison solution but the problem with unison is required to install on both ends. I am syncing with a remote server and I can not install unison on the remote end. Ubuntu Software not loading categories Prove that $\left| f'(x)\right| \leq \sqrt{2AC}$ using integration Suppose that $f(x)$ is a $C^2$ function on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $\left| f(x) \right| \leq A$ and $\left| f''(x) \right| \leq C $ for $x \in \mathbb{R}$. Prove that $\left| f'(x)\right| \leq \sqrt{2AC}$. C++ templates that accept only certain types My phone was just stolen an hour or so ago. Are there any options for tracking? Poisson Distribution of sum of two random independent variables $X$, $Y$ What is the proof that given a set of $n$ elements there are $2^n$ possible subsets (including the empty-set and the original set). Meridian convergence. True north, magnetic north and grid north I'm having difficulty wrapping my mind around meridian convergence, the horizontal angular distance between true north and grid north.   Say I want to determine if a feature lies to the east or west of the central meridian (CM) by using true north and grid north designations on a topo map.   I realize grid north is parallel to the CM, while true north points to the poles, and magnetic north is the direction a compass points and constantly changing.   Looking at the figure below, I see grid north points to the east of true north. So does this fact alone mean everything on the grid is to the east of the true north, and therefore the CM? Does this simple fact mean that features in this grid lie to the east of the CM, or am I missing something.   Also, I realize I can just look at the tick marks and and see that this this grid in particular covers -80°22’ to -80°15, and the CM for zone 17R lies at 81°. But had I not known that and wanted to use the north arrows. Please explain. Google Chrome: Have different settings on different computers? What vintage movie had this blue floating holographic head talking to some kind of military installation? Is kinetic energy a relative quantity? Will it make inconsistent equations when applying it to the conservation of energy equations? If the velocity is a relative quantity, will it make inconsistent equations when applying it to the conservation of energy equations?  For example:  In the train moving at $V$ relative to ground, there is an object moving at $v$ relative to the frame in the same direction the frame moves. Observer on the ground calculates the object kinetic energy as $\frac{1}{2}m(v+V)^2$. However, another observer on the frame calculates the energy as $\frac{1}{2}mv^2$. When each of these equations is plugged into the conservation of energy, they will result in 2 distinct results (I think). Chromatic Number The smallest number of colors needed to color a graph $G$ is called its chromatic number, and is often denoted $\chi(G)$.  Show that if graph $G$ is simple, then $$ \chi \ge \frac{V^2}{V^2 - 2E}. $$ Nonzero $f \in C([0, 1])$ for which $\int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n$ AirPort Time Capsule wifi is suddenly very slow: Boom network load In , it is established that Thieves' Cant is more of an encoding system built on top of a language than a language in its own right. According to the Basic Rules,  is:  ...a secret mix of dialect, jargon and code allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves' cant understands such messages. It takes four times longer to convey such a message than it does to speak the same idea plainly. In addition, you understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves' guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run. (PBR, p. 27)  Can two creatures communicate using Thieves' Cant if they do not have a basic spoken language in common, or if they are speaking different basic languages? E.g. if one creature knows Orcish, Goblin, and Thieves' Cant, and another creature knows Elvish, Giant, Common, and Thieves' Cant, can they communicate with each other by embedding Thieves' Cant into their own languages? Hypothetically speaking, I can see how this could be possible in our own world, if we assume that Thieves' Cant depends on nuances of body language, emphasis, and tempo, e.g., one might say to a non-Spanish speaker:  Tenemos quEEEEEEE ir (wink) a la tieeeeenda de (shuffle left foot) armas para (twirl hair and giggle) comprar una espada (wink twice) para mi herMANO (wag right pinky and nod).  The literal message itself (&quot;We need to go to the weapon store to buy a sword for my brother.&quot;) would just be a carrier - the real message might be hidden within the gestures and the accented and extended syllables. Perhaps the drawn-out &quot;E&quot; vowel means &quot;robbery planned&quot;, the wink means &quot;bank&quot;, shuffling the left foot means &quot;be there at sunset&quot;, etc., and these are things that you wouldn't necessarily need to know Spanish to extract. Is this how Thieves' Cant actually works, or does it require actual comprehension of the literal message transmitted before the &quot;secret&quot; message can be extracted from it? How to evaluate this trigonometric limit? I have been struggling to solve this limit.  What is the limit as $x$ approaches $45^0$ of $$\frac{\sqrt{2}\cos x-1}{\cot x-1}?$$   I know how to use L'Hospital's rule to calculate this limit and got the answer as $0.5$. But, how do I calculate the limit by manipulating the function? Please provide only some hints to proceed. Partitions for Ubuntu and Windows 7 dual boot on SSD + HDD setup I have purchased a new SSD (120GB) and I had a HDD (1TB) already installed. I will install both Ubuntu and Windows on these drives. As the file space on the SSD is limited and I've read that writing to an SSD drive is discouraged, I would like to store most of the data on the HDD drive. I am aiming at faster system but also keeping the valuable data safe on the more reliable HDD and expanding the life span of the SSD.  I have already set up Windows on these drives (system files and applications on SSD, Users folder and ProgramData on HDD) and now it's time to set up Ubuntu.  So my question is which partitions I should create, on which drive should they be placed and how large they should be.  Based on my experience and articles I've read, I will probably create /swap, /home and / partitions.   Does it seem reasonable to place /swap and /home partitions on the HDD and / on the SSD?  And how large should / partition be?  Also, will the applications be installed in / partition? If so, is it rational to store the applications on separate partitions on the HDD instead of / on the SSD, and what should the size of the / partition be in this case? Why is it that when you add normally distributed random variables the variance gets larger but in the Central Limit Theorem it gets smaller? When you add two independent normal distributions the resulting distributions' variance is the sum of the variances i.e. it gets larger.  However, the Central Limit Theorem states that  when independent random variables are added, their properly normalized sum tends toward a normal distribution (informally a bell curve) even if the original variables themselves are not normally distributed.   and also says that as you add more variables the variance gets smaller. Why does the variance increase in one case but decrease in the other? Is it because in the CLT case the random variables come from the same underlying distribution?