gynecology and obstetrics
Evaluation of Breast Disorders
Evaluation
History includes the following: Presence and type of pain Presence and color of nipple discharge Relation of symptoms to menses and pregnancy Presence of skin changes Use of hormonal contraceptives or menopausal hormone therapy Date and results of last mammogram or other breast imaging study Personal or family history of breast cancer Each breast is inspected for irregularities in shape (bulging, irregular contour), nipple abnormalities (inversion, retraction, discharge, crusting), and skin changes (dimpling, retraction, edema, erythema, scaling, ulceration—see figurefor usual positions). A size difference between breasts is common and is not considered an abnormality, unless the patient reports that this is a recent change (because this may be due to breast edema). Examining the patient in more than one position may help detect abnormalities. An underlying cancer is sometimes detected by having the patient press both hands against the hips or the palms together in front of the forehead (see figure). In these positions, the pectoral muscles are contracted, and a subtle dimpling of the skin may appear if a growing tumor has entrapped one of the Cooper ligaments (vertical cutaneous ligaments that attach to the chest wall and support the shape of the breast). Gwen Shockey/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY Gwen Shockey/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY Gwen Shockey/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY Positions include the patient seated or standing (A) with arms at sides; (B) with arms raised over the head, elevating the pectoral fascia and breasts; (C) with hands pressed firmly against hips; or (D) with palms pressed together in front of the forehead, contracting the pectoral muscles. (E) Palpation of axilla; arm supported as shown, relaxing the pectoral muscles. (F) Patient supine with pillow under the shoulder and with the arm raised above the head on the side being examined. (G) Palpation of breast in a circular pattern from the nipple outward. The axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes are most easily examined with the patient seated or standing (see figure). Supporting the patient’s arm during the axillary examination allows the arm to be fully relaxed so that nodes deep within the axilla can be palpated. The breast is palpated with the patient seated and again with the patient supine, the ipsilateral arm above the head, and a pillow under the ipsilateral shoulder (see figure). Having the patient roll to one side, so that the breast on the examined side falls medially, may help differentiate breast and chest wall tenderness because the chest wall can be palpated separately from breast tissue. The breast should be palpated with the palmar surfaces of the second, third, and fourth fingers, moving systematically in a small circular pattern from the nipple to the outer edges (see figure). Precise location and size (estimated or measured with a caliper or measuring tape) of any abnormality should be noted; some clinicians use a paper or digital drawing of the breast for documentation. A written description of the consistency and mobility of the abnormality and degree to which it can be distinguished from surrounding breast tissue should also be included. Clinicians apply pressure, moving clockwise, to the areola to check for a discharge and, if a discharge is elicited, to determine its source (eg, whether it is multiductal). If discharge is present, it is examined to determine whether it is bloody or blood-tinged. A bright light and magnifying lens can help determine whether nipple discharge is uniductal or multiductal. The following findings are of particular concern: A mass or thickening that feels distinctly different from other breast tissue A mass that is fixed to the skin or chest wall A persistent mass Changes in the shape of a breast or persistent breast swelling Peau d'orange (pitting, puckering, reddening, thickening, or dimpling in the skin of the breast) Scaly skin around the nipple Changes in the nipple (eg, retraction) A unilateral nipple discharge, especially if it is bloody and/or occurs spontaneously Imaging tests are used for Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention : Testing of asymptomatic women to detect early cancer Diagnosis: Evaluation of breast abnormalities (eg, masses, nipple discharge) Women should be Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention ( Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention None In mammography, low-dose x-rays of both breasts are taken in 1 (oblique) or 2 views (oblique and craniocaudal). Breast tomosynthesis (3-dimensional mammography),used for both screening and diagnosis, is done with digital mammography, increases the rate of cancer detection slightly, and decreases the rate of recall imaging; this test is helpful for women with dense breast tissue. However, the test exposes women to almost twice as much radiation as traditional mammography. Diagnostic mammographyis used to do the following: Evaluate masses, pain, and nipple discharge Determine size and location of a lesion and provide images of surrounding tissues and lymph nodes Guide biopsy After surgery, image the breast to check for recurrence Diagnostic mammography requires more views than screening mammography. Views include magnified views and spot compression views, which provide better visualization of suspect areas. Ultrasonographycan be used to do the following: Provide initial imaging of breast abnormalities detected in women < 30 years old Identify abnormal axillary nodes that may require core biopsy Evaluate abnormalities detected by MRI or mammography (eg, determine whether they are solid or cystic) Guide biopsy needle into abnormal breast tissue MRIcan be used to do the following: Evaluate abnormal findings on breast examination or other imaging studies Before surgery, accurately determine tumor size, chest wall involvement, and number of tumors, especially in women with dense breast tissue Identify abnormal axillary lymph nodes (to help Grading and staging ) 1.The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Practice bulletin no. 179: Breast cancer screening.Obstet Gynecol130 (1), 241–243, 2017. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002151 