 You bring up a good point, though, because I think I was talking with some of the folks who do this professionally, the legal side. They said it was not a due process case, and that has not been tested. So this ruling said that what they did and the way it was challenged by the guy who was a scumbag was challenging it. And he actually had done some violent things, but they did not challenge it on due process grounds. They challenged it on pure Second Amendment grounds, that you could not remove the Second Amendment.