 He says these past and threatened future injuries were caused by and traceable to censorship that officials coerced. The evidence was more than sufficient to establish one of the users standing to sue. He cites case law on it. He goes, we are obligated to tackle the free speech issue that the case presents. The court, however, shirks that duty and thus permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what people say