 He's acting like an independent counsel, even though they claim he's nothing more than an inferior appointee reporting to the Attorney General. And when the judge said, okay, can you give me any examples? They didn't. Exactly. Exactly right. Exactly right. So, ladies and gentlemen, here's the problem. We have a constitutional construct that's set up. The Appointments Clause was put there historically, and it was debated at great length at the Constitutional Convention. It's discussed in the Federalist Papers. And what?