 which he separated on his own. He has that as its own thing. He waits. He has the applause. He goes forward with that. That is its own delivery chunk of information, right? There's a message. There's an intent there on immigration. It goes from economics to immigration. Okay, we get it. Again, if he's talking about a nation of laws or a nation of men, a nation of laws, he's trying to stress we have laws on the federal. Well, are those laws constitutional? Obviously, they're not. It is patently obvious that they're not.