 Foes are suing over that because they say, no, this doesn't protect tip workers because it actually lowers the amount the restaurants have to pay because it allows them to take 25% off whatever the minimum wage is and pay them that and hope that the tips that they get arise to that level. So is that, in fact, a misleading title? You've got the same issue with a measure that says that judges will no longer have to face voters every four or six years if they don't