 They can define things that are absolutely upside down. Like in Jeremy Kaufman's library case, they said that, well, if you're making profit off of something before it goes out, well, then it's a security. And I said, well, weren't you giving it away for free? And he said, yes. And they said that that's profiting. They just said that that's... Yeah, that's not profiting at all. It's just giving something away. They just defined it as something that's absolutely not how that actual word is used because they're not speaking English. They're speaking legalese.