 We respect that states can make their own decisions about state policies, but at a federal level, our approach has to do with economic incentives and support for chargers, not any kind of mandate coming out of the DOT on what technology you're supposed to buy for your vehicle. Sure, but you've said you support giving choice to consumers. Now you've said you support giving choice to states, but those two are conflicting because the state is taking that right away from consumers. So why is it that you side with giving the state the choice as opposed to giving the consumer the choice?