 This law was only meant to apply to evidence tampering, that what they were doing didn't fall under the scope of this law. And the Supreme Court, by a vote of six to three, although not divided on ideological lines, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the majority, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was a Trump appointee, joined the dissent, said that this law is more limited than the government would say. And so they sent the case back.