 Well, there's a lot of reasons why they could be going down this path. I think that there is an element of they are trying to follow the existing GSA policy. If you go into the policy itself, it is very clear that CEOs are being instructed that they are not to rely on previous price reasonable determinations to basically redetermine if they're unreasonable. So the policy itself is prompting this. That's maybe a policy question that the coalition could ask of GSA, but why is the policy written that way?