 And therefore, you can't understand law by just looking at the axioms. You've got to look at what actually happened. So the contemporary argument, the Constitution is a living document, etc.? Yes. Now, of course, as always with Holmes, it's complicated because he recognized the complexity. And by saying that the law is a living document, he didn't by any means say it was up to judges to just make up whatever they thought was good policy and do that.