 Do you think it has to be a jury question? And I mean, let's see, I wasn't necessarily proposing actually treating it as a defense that was done at the outset and then subject to interlocutory appeal. I was proposing, what about an immunity doctrine that drew from the public authority defense that the Department of Justice thinks would otherwise apply? So just go with me on that for a minute. Why would it be so bad for it not to be a jury question? I mean, it seems to me that some of these Article 2 concerns would be exacerbated by having it go to a jury rather than a judge.