 have all kinds of safeguards on it, to just issuing a memo, issuing a guidance, and saying, hey, this is how we're going to interpret the law. It may be very, very different from how courts have interpreted the law in the case of Bostock. It may be very different from the plain text of the law, but this is how we're interpreting the law now by bureaucratic fiat. And basically, it's a heads up to all the people who would be covered under that law. And it's very effective, but it's not the way that governance is supposed to work in this country.