 We're going to test your knowledge here. A text came in. Holmes does not seem to be deferential in the ruling on the Schenck case. Please comment on Holmes' arguments and his position on Schenck v. U.S. 1919. Crucial question. It's very important. Why was it that at the end of his life, after having spent his decades essentially upholding laws that he liked and that he didn't like and almost never striking down anything as long as a reasonable person