 Putting that aside, yes, appointing a principal officer is a core power. I am not prepared to say that there is no potential criminal regulation to say you can't do it for corrupt purposes to enrich yourself, for example. Bribery, all right, but that's what I was wondering. Do motives come into the core power analysis or not? And now I'm hearing, I thought I heard no, and now I'm hearing maybe. Justice Gorsuch.