 Well, you might, that originalism can come to progressive ends, or that textualism can come to progressive ends. So why don't we just embrace it? Because occasionally it does. So, and this is part of the engine of it, as you said, it's inconsistent, right? It's not really even about history. They use it sometimes, they don't. It's not about text immunity, they just created, not in the text. So, it's, they use it when it's selective, right?