 Well, I'm not a lawyer. From what I've read, though, it kind of cuts the baby in half. Most were frustrated that the ruling meant lower courts would now need to decide which conduct the former president could be prosecuted for. Why did they wait till the final day of the session? They've had this in on their agenda. Why did they drag it out? Some, though, were pleased with the 6-3 ruling. The question is, when is a president not involved in an official act?