 He is required to follow the law. But he's not if there's no criminal prosecution. If there's no threat of criminal prosecution, what prevents the president from just doing whatever he wants? All the structural checks that are identified in Fitzgerald and a whole series of this court's cases that go back to Martin against Mott, for example, impeachment, oversight by Congress, public oversight. There's a long series. Fitzgerald directly addresses this in the civil context. And we think that language naturally ports. I'm not sure that that's much of a backstop. And what I'm, I guess,