 If Petitioner were successful and he had actually exercised the appointment and removal power and it had gone through and those fraudulent letters were sent, it would have made the scheme more dangerous, but it would not have changed the crime. And how do we think about things like conversations with the vice president? In other words, things that if you say it that way, it's clear that they would fall under executive privilege. But how does that relate to the question that we're asking here?