 You know, one thing that I think is really interesting about that case is that they're not arguing it under a fundamental right to care, custody, and control of your children, right? And that is not actually what the argument is. The argument is an equal protection argument because there are other kids in the state who will have access to that care, right, if they have other sorts of issues. It's only trans kids who can't have access to it. So there's, you know, it's a real reminder of strategy, right?