 evidence of those official acts were precluded at trial. So is that what you're saying, that the prosecution should not be permitted at trial to prove the official acts as part of the conspiracies that are alleged? Absolutely. And we think that's just the clear implications of Brewster and Johnson and their discussion in a very analogous context. Thank you. Justice O'Meara? I'm a little bit confused by that. If you have a scheme to defraud,