 I'm struggling to see why in that case, perhaps, the evidence could come in. The strongest possible case, in our view, is what you've described as kind of the core executive powers, the unrestrictable powers within the meaning of CELA law. But again, the holding of, for example, Brewster and Johnson that we've relied on, doesn't turn on how central it is of a legislative act. It's just as if it's an official act, which here we would say applies basically the outer perimeter test of Fitzgerald against Nixon. That doesn't come in.