 And therefore, I acted lawfully. Therefore, I acted lawfully and I'm not criminally liable. Correct. Does that involve a look into motives? Kind of this gets to what Justice Gorsuch was asking. Could you say I was acting within the scope of my authority by granting a pardon, removing a cabinet officer, but then the public authority defense might not apply because you had a bad motive in doing so? No, I don't think so, Justice Barrett. I think that it operates based on objective facts disclosed to