 She's saying that the way that Jack Smith was appointed is not constitutional. She's also saying that the way that he's being funded, it's this unlimited fund that was set up for independent councils has now been used for these special councils over the years. She's saying that that is also inappropriate. So on that basis, she's saying that this case cannot move forward. This could also have implications for the Washington, D.C. case as well, where that has been brought by Jack Smith.