 makes it illegal to pay prevailing wage for union employees. Is that correct? I appreciate the chance to correct the record. That is actually not correct. The draft, the chapter expresses no view. There is an alternative view, not a tributary view. So you don't think there should be a repeal of David Spaker? The chapter does not take a position. Do you have a view of whether there should be a repeal? Honestly, I think it's complicated, and I don't know.