 The official act is appointing ambassadors, and the president appoints a particular individual to a country, but it's in exchange for a bribe. Somebody says, I'll give you a million dollars if I made the ambassador to whatever. How do you analyze that? That, I think, would fall under this court's discussion in Brewster, where the court held, with respect to legislative acts, that bribery is not an official act, which also matches the common law background. So the way that this court in Brewster kind of