 if what they're trying to do is roll back the immunity decision, because they would say it's a matter of constitutional law. Obviously, as you've already asked, over the course of the next presidential term, we may see new opportunities to appoint justices to Supreme Court. We may see court reform and changes in composition of court that way. And I think all those things need to be on the table. So those are ways to do it. But I want to take issue with the premise of the question, and I know you will, I think, agree with me on this.