 Totally agree. And I wasn't actually contrasting the absolute immunity rule. I was saying that if there was some sort of official private, there are consequences towards about making immunity. Okay. And since you bring up the private acts, this is my last question. So I had asked Mr. Sauer about on page 46 and 47 of your brief. Yes. You say, even if the court were inclined to recognize some immunity for a former president's official acts, it should remand for trial because the indictment alleges substantial private conduct.