 If it's an official act, there needs to be impeachment and conviction beforehand because the framers viewed that kind of very low risk. If it's an official act, is it an official act? If it's an official act, it's impeachment. Is it an official act? On the way you've described that hypothetical, it could well be. I just don't know. Again, it's a fact-specific context, a specific determination. That answer sounds to me as though it's like, yeah, under my attest, it's an official act. But that sure sounds bad, doesn't it?