 But before they can get to that issue, they have to decide, are the parties that are bringing this case to us, are they harmed? Is there an injury? As I said earlier, it could be a physical injury, but it could also be a constitutional injury. You violated my free speech rights. That's what this case was about, their free speech rights. And they sidestepped that issue based on this legal construct that the harm is not ongoing because they quit doing it. Well, wait a minute.