 I believe second. 2.7 to 4.4. Take the mean of that. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Don't take the mean of that because they're two different numbers. You just take the ranking. So if he's first in one, he's sixth in the other, you take the middle, he's probably third. You take the aggregate, he's probably third. But again, this is all semantics because the market is the thing that tells the story in the end. Right now, the market is telling us that Burns and Skubal are at the top. So we have to try to figure out if that's correct or not. I think it is.