 And I don't fully follow it 100%. Todd, why don't you lay it out? I don't understand what they're trying to say here. So this whole decision boils down to grammar. Right, that's exactly what I thought. It's grammar. And this is what the Supreme Court is called upon to do often, which is, okay, I see the way the law is written, but it is creating an ambiguity. How do we know it created an ambiguity? Because you had different interpretations in different courts.