 You've got the climate establishment going on Twitter and saying these guys are basically poo-poo heads and clowns and deniers. So at this point, you wonder, do they have a scientific response? Because if they did, they would probably write a peer-reviewed paper to refute the ones that just undermined their claims. Well, it's hard to get a peer-reviewed paper when it comes to these topics. What was the kind of hole in the wall that brought this about, so to speak?