 So even if this were to be upheld, and I know that there's dispute over that, they could still move forward with this case under a different circumstance led by someone else or if they went through a different process of appointing the prosecutor. Is that right? I mean, it sounds like that's what she would require of them from her opinion, that this thing has to go back to the very roots of it, that there has to be somebody else in place, that there has to be, you know, because Justice Thomas didn't go just to