 with the president's performance of the official duties, the fear of being prosecuted. But I really do not think that the court struck the right balance here. The court easily could have said that they would look at each criminal statute to make sure that the way it's being interpreted did not interfere with official duties, but still that a president is accountable under the law. That is where the court should have come out. And so in this one, I would agree with the dissent, the three dissenting justices.