 Well, it is a problem, but it's not going to cause a massive shock to the legal system. What you're doing is you're taking a situation now which creates massive shocks because you have radical expansions of power and flip-flops and so forth, and you substitute that for a smaller but very real problem, which is how do you interpret these statutes when it turns out that you have people who say, A, they're ambiguous and say exactly the opposite thing. That was what was at stake in the cases that they had.