 So you're exactly right. We're all still digesting this. I mean, I think my preliminary sort of reading of the opinion, and I'm still working through it, is that the court has provided actually quite vague guidance to the lower court, the trial court, to try to determine what's official versus unofficial. They've basically posited a bunch of sort of historical analogs and standards with very little precision surrounding what exactly she is supposed to, what sort of rules she should actually bring to bear