 And would that be, I mean, I don't know how often this happens. Would that be a normal thing for an appeals court to say, well, yes, in fact, our own judge does seem to be biased here. There's an appearance of bias. Let's try again. It would be unusual. That's for sure. But that, again, is what we're looking at in this situation. What she's ruled here is basically backed up by a concurrence, a single concurrence from Clarence Thomas. That's basically her primary authority. No other justices have demonstrated their interest in overturning this mechanism.