 Well, as somebody who's graded over thousands exam answers in constitutional law, we realize that in constitutional law, some answers can be good, some can be bad, some can be weak, some can be strong. Her opinion reads to me as if it vacillates between being weak and wrong. It's really a terrible opinion, has very little support, and I think is likely to be overturned on appeal. There's a lot in these 93 pages, and we've only got a few minutes, but tell me one thing that strikes you as weak or wrong.