 that says there's no way any jury could find that he had criminal intent because he would come across as a guy with difficulty remembering things, and then cites the specific examples, not being able to remember the years he was vice president, not being able to remember the year his son died, and so forth. And then strike three, I mean, I'm skipping over a lot here, but strike three has got to be that debate. And so in the midst of all this...