title: Is there a difference with the HTMLEditFormat function in ColdFusion CF9 versus CF10?
body: <p>I'm seeing a difference in how HTMLEditFormat works in CF9 and CF10. </p>
  
  <pre><code>HTMLEditFormat("&amp;gt;")
  </code></pre>
  
  <ul>
  <li>In CF9: showing up as "&amp;gt;" (no difference)</li>
  <li>In CF10: showing up as "&amp;amp;gt;" (double-escaped, which seems correct to me)</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>I've looked through the <a href="http://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/release-note/coldfusion-10-release-notes.html" rel="nofollow">CF10 notes</a> and reviewed the <a href="https://wikidocs.adobe.com/wiki/display/coldfusionen/HTMLEditFormat" rel="nofollow">HTMLEditFormat documentation</a>, but cannot find any mention of there being a difference in how this function works. Does anyone know of a difference, or know of documentation that proves there is no difference? ...Or know of any other settings (ColdFusion or web server) that might cause this to work different?</p>
  
  <p>(This question is not a duplicate because am not asking about <code>encodeForHTML</code>. I understand that is the ideal solution, but am asking to understand why <code>HTMLEditFormat</code> might be different in CF9 vs. CF10.)</p>