title: Is "Merged in" a commit message created by bitbucket, or git?
body: <p>The style guide "How to Write a Git Commit Message" section <a href="http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/#imperative" rel="nofollow">5. Use the imperative mood in the subject line</a> states that git itself uses the imperative mood:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>The imperative can sound a little rude; that's why we don't often use it. But it's perfect for git commit subject lines. One reason for this is that git itself uses the imperative whenever it creates a commit on your behalf.</p>
    
    <p>For example, the default message created when using git merge reads:</p>
    
    <p><code>Merge branch 'myfeature'</code> </p>
    
    <p>And when using git revert:</p>
    
    <p><code>Revert "Add the thing with the stuff"</code></p>
    
    <p><code>This reverts commit cc87791524aedd593cff5a74532befe7ab69ce9d.</code></p>
    
    <p>Or when
    clicking the "Merge" button on a GitHub pull request:</p>
    
    <p><code>Merge pull request #123 from someuser/somebranch</code></p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>However, on a git repository on bitbucket, I encounter the indicative mood:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>Merged in feature/123 (pull request #1234)</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Is this a message created by bitbucket as opposed to git?</p>