title: Meteor: Angular2 VS Blaze confusion
body: <p>I was enthusiast using Angular2 with Meteor, so I started a project with ng2 and Meteor. But more and more I am asking questions like:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Is ng2 deprecated router the way to go ?</li>
  <li>What is the purpose to use ngForm validation if I use collection2 and autoform to do most of my form validation.</li>
  <li>What are the benefits of ng2 architecture vs Blaze ?</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>So at the end, I am not even sure of why I am using ng2. There is not that much recent and relevant discussions on the topic. Is that the question that is already answered, obvious or just not so relevant ?</p>
  
  <p><br/> </p>
  
  <p><strong>What are the pros/cons of using Angular 2 versus using Blaze ?</strong></p>
  
  <p>Blaze was raised with Meteor and is probably linked to his success. And ng2 could be as famous as ng1.</p>
  
  <p><strong>To be used in serious projects, which one is going to be 'more maintained and last longer' ?</strong></p>
  
  <p>Regards</p>
  
  <p>PS: Also looking at <a href="https://builtwithmeteor.com" rel="nofollow">https://builtwithmeteor.com</a>, Blaze appears to be used more.</p>