title: Hesitating between git and fossil
body: <p>Newbie to Fossil (or any other version control system) here. Used a proprietary one earlier, but never set one up myself.</p>
  
  <p>Currently, I am looking to set one up so that my friends and I can use it for a project.</p>
  
  <p>I chose Fossil primarily because distributed seems to be the way to go, it seems lightweight and has an included bugtracker. But Git seems to be the favoured SCM for a lot of people. Is it worth the added complexity to favour Git+someBugTracker over Fossil? Are there any better alternatives? I will have to start from 0 on all.</p>