title: Browser statistics on JavaScript disabled
body: <p>I am having a hard time  collecting publically available statistics on the percentage of web users that browse with JavaScript disabled.</p>
  
  <p><a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2010/10/how-many-users-have-javascript-disabled/" rel="noreferrer">Yahoo has published data from 2010</a> and <a href="http://blog.strictly-software.com/2009/09/javascript-usage-browser-breakdown.html" rel="noreferrer">R. Reid published data from 2009</a> (picked from a site he had access to). </p>
  
  <p>The findings from Yahoo were rather interesting at that time:</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>We took a combination of access logs and beacon data (previously
    included in the page) and filtered out all of the automated requests,
    leaving us with a set of requests we could confirm were sent by actual
    users. This data, which is completely anonymous, gave us a good
    indication of traffic patterns in several countries.</p>
    
    <p>After crunching the numbers, we found a consistent rate of
    JavaScript-disabled requests hovering around 1% of the actual visitor
    traffic, with the highest rate being roughly 2 percent in the United
    States and the lowest being roughly 0.25 percent in Brazil. All of the
    other countries tested showed numbers very close to 1.3 percent.</p>
    
    <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/fpIkl.jpg" alt="Yahoo browser percentage with JavaScript disabled, 2010"></p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>This is about what I could find so far. But since this data is getting old, I wonder what the percentages are today. </p>
  
  <p>I also looked at <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/" rel="noreferrer">Statcounter</a>, which seems to be the only company left to still openly publish browser statistics. But they do not publish data about JavaScript. I know that <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" rel="noreferrer">W3schools also publish stats</a>, but since the target is aimed at developers, this data is extremely biased and therefore not interesting for me. (it has to be representative for ordinary users).</p>
  
  <p>I, therefore, ask you to provide:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>links to any open, freely available statistics which touches this area</li>
  <li>Your own stats, preferably from larger sites with do not target developers</li>
  </ul>