large/11381/principles_political_economy_1812_librivox_64kb_mp3/principlesofpoliticaleconomy_03_mill_64kb_103
large/11381/principles_political_economy_1812_librivox_64kb_mp3/principlesofpoliticaleconomy_03_mill_64kb
English
11381
The German mind has always been familiar with the interference of the state, and a class of writers has arisen, not only advocating the inductive method, but strongly imbued with a belief in a close connection of the state with industry; and, inasmuch as the essence of modern socialism is a resort to state help, this body of men, with Wagner at their head, has received the name of "Socialists(85) of the Chair," and now wield a wide influence in Germany. THE GERMAN MIND HAS ALWAYS BEEN FAMILIAR WITH THE INTERFACE OF THE STATE AND A CLASS OF WRITERS HAS ARISEN NOT ONLY ADVOCATING THE INDUCTIVE METHOD BUT STRONGLY IMBUED WITH A BELIEF IN A CLOSE CONNECTION OF THE STATE WITH INDUSTRY AND INASMUCH AS THE ESSENCE OF MODERN SOCIALISM IS RESORT TO STATE HELP THIS BODY OF MEN WITH WAGNER AT THEIR HEAD HAS RECEIVED THE NAME OF SOCIALISTS OF THE CHAIR AND NOW WIELD A WIDE INFLUENCE IN GERMANY
e separate operation of each of the conjoined forces. The most prominent of the new school is Wilhelm Roscher,(82) of Leipsic, who wrote a systematic treatise, “System der Volkswirthschaft” (1854, sixteenth edition, 1883), in the first division of which the notes contain a marvelous collection of facts and authorities. He agrees in results with Adam Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, and Mill, but does not seem to have known much of Cairnes. This book, however, is only a first of four treatises eventually intended to include the political economy of (2) agriculture, (3) industry and commerce, and (4) the state and commune. The ablest contemporary of Roscher, who was probably the first to urge the historical method, is Karl Knies,(83) in “Die politische Oekonomie vom Standpunkte der geschichtlichen Methode” (1853, second edition, 1881-1883). The third of the group who founded the historical school is Bruno Hildebrand,(84) of Jena, author of “Die Nationalökonomie der Gegenwart und Zukunft” (1848). F THE CONJOINED FORCES THE MOST PROMINENT OF THE NEW SCHOOL IS WILHELM GROSCHER OF LEIPZIC WHO WROTE A SYSTEMATIC TREATISE SYSTEM DER VOLKSVIZCRAFT EIGHTEEN FIFTY FOUR SIXTEENTH EDITION EIGHTEEN EIGHTY THREE IN THE FIRST DIVISION OF WHICH THE NOTES CONTAIN A MARVELLOUS COLLECTION OF FACTS AND AUTHORITIES HE AGREES IN RESULTS WITH ADAM SMITH RICARDO MALTHUS AND MILL BUT DOES NOT SEEM TO KNOW MUCH OF CAIRN'S THIS BOOK HOWEVER IS ONLY A FIRST OF FOUR TREATISE EVENTUALLY INTENDED TO INCLUDE THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF TWO AGRICULTURE THREE INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE AND FOUR THE STATE IN COMMUNE THE ABLEST CONTEMPORARY OF RASSIA WHO IS PROBABLY THE FIRST TO URGE THE HISTORICAL METHOD IS KARL NIZ IN THE POLITICHE O ECONOMI VON STANPUNKI DER GESHCHAITLIN METHOD EIGHTEEN FIFTY THREE SECOND EDITION EIGHTEEN EIGHTY ONE EIGHTEEN EIGHTY THREE THE THIRD OF THE GROUP WHO FOUNDED THE HISTORICAL SCHOOL IS BRUNO HILDEBRAND OF YENNA AUTHOR OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY DER GEGEN VORT UN ZUNKUMFT EIGHTEEN FORTY EIGHT
large/11381/principles_political_economy_1812_librivox_64kb_mp3/principlesofpoliticaleconomy_03_mill_64kb
file
download/librilight/large/11381/principles_political_economy_1812_librivox_64kb_mp3/principlesofpoliticaleconomy_03_mill_64kb.flac