large/7264/free_press_1206_librivox_64kb_mp3/freepress_12_belloc_64kb_83
large/7264/free_press_1206_librivox_64kb_mp3/freepress_12_belloc_64kb
English
7264
The defence of Brandeis interests me and instructs me. THE DEFENCE OF BRANDYCE INTERESTS ME AND INSTRUCTS ME
ense. Charles Maurras is one of the most powerful writers living, and when he points out in the "Action Française" that the French Supreme Court committed an illegal action at the close of the Dreyfus case, he is doing useful work, for he is telling the truth on a matter of vital public importance. But when he goes on to say that such a thing would not have occurred under a nominal Monarchy, he is talking nonsense. Any one with the slightest experience of what the Courts of Law can be under a nominal Monarchy shrugs his shoulders and says that Maurras's action may have excellent results, but that his proposed remedy of setting up one of these modern Kingships in. France in the place of the very corrupt Parliament is not convincing. The "New Republic" in New York vigorously defends Brandeis because Brandeis is a Jew, and the "New Republic" (which I read regularly, and which is invaluable to-day as an independent instructor on a small rich minority of American opinion) is Jewish in tone. GREE WITH HIM FOR IT WAS NONSENSE CHARLES MORRIS IS ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL WRITERS LIVING AND WHEN HE POINTS OUT IN THE ACTION FRANCIS THAT THE FRENCH SUPREME COURT COMMITTED AN ILLEGAL ACTION AT THE CLOSE OF THE DRY FIST CASE HE IS DOING USEFUL WORK FOR HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH ON A MATTER OF VITAL PUBLIC IMPORANCE BUT WHEN HE GOES ON TO SAY THAT SUCH A THING WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED UNDER A NOMINAL MONARCHY HE IS TALKING NONSENSE ANY ONE WITH THE SLIGHTEST EXPERIENCE OF WHAT THE COURTS OF LAW CAN BE UNDER A NOMINAL MONARCHY SHRUGS HIS SHOULDERS AND SAYS THAT MARAT'S ACTIONS MAY HAVE EXCELLENT RESULTS BUT THAT HIS PROPOSED REMEDY OF SETTING UP ONE OF THESE MODERN KINGSHIPS IN FRANCE IN THE PLACE OF VERY CORRUPT PARLIAMENT IS NOT CONVINCING THE NEW REPUBLIC IN NEW YORK VIGOROUSLY DEFENDS BRANDYCE BECAUSE BRANDYCE IS A JEW AND THE NEW REPUBLIC WHICH I READ REGULARLY AND WHICH IS INVALUABLE TO DAY AS AN INDEPENDENT INSTRUCTOR ON A SMALL RICH MINORITY OF AMERICAN OPINION IS JEWISH IN TONE
large/7264/free_press_1206_librivox_64kb_mp3/freepress_12_belloc_64kb
file
download/librilight/large/7264/free_press_1206_librivox_64kb_mp3/freepress_12_belloc_64kb.flac