large/6138/whatisproperty_1312_librivox_64kb_mp3/whatisproperty_01_proudhon_64kb_127
large/6138/whatisproperty_1312_librivox_64kb_mp3/whatisproperty_01_proudhon_64kb
English
6138
He then sold, for the value of the paper, the remaining copies of the "Essay" published by him in 1837. In 1850, they were still lying in a grocer's back shop. A neighboring publisher then placed the edition on the market, with the attractive name of Proudhon upon it. HE THEN SOLD FOR THE VALUE OF THE PAPER THE REMAINING COPIES OF THE ESSAY PUBLISHED BY HIM IN EIGHTEEN THIRTY SEVEN IN EIGHTEEN FIFTY THEY WERE STILL LYING IN A GROCER'S BACKSHOP A NEIGHBOURING PUBLISHER THEN PLACED THE EDITION ON THE MARKET WITH THE ATTRACTIVE NAME OF PRUDENCE UPON IT
, to P. J. Proudhon, printer at Besancon. The judges were MM. Amedde Jaubert, Reinaud, and Burnouf. "The committee," said the report presented at the annual meeting of the five academies on Thursday, May 2, 1839, "has paid especial attention to manuscripts No. 1 and No. 4. Still, it does not feel able to grant the prize to either of these works, because they do not appear to be sufficiently elaborated. The committee, which finds in No. 4 some ingenious analyses, particularly in regard to the mechanism of the Hebrew language, regrets that the author has resorted to hazardous conjectures, and has sometimes forgotten the special recommendation of the committee to pursue the experimental and comparative method." Proudhon remembered this. He attended the lectures of Eugene Burnouf, and, as soon as he became acquainted with the labors and discoveries of Bopp and his successors, he definitively abandoned an hypothesis which had been condemned by the Academy of Inscriptions and Belles-lettres.  P J PUDON PRINTER AT BOSONZIN THE JUDGES WERE MESSIEURS AMET GUBERT REYNAUD AND BERNOUF THE COMMITTEE SAID THE REPORT PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE FIVE ACADEMIES ON THURSDAY MAY SECOND EIGHTEEN THIRTY NINE HAS PAID ESPECIAL ATTENTION TO MANUSCRIPTS NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER FOUR STILL IT DOES NOT FEEL ABLE TO GRANT THE PRIZE TO EITHER OF THESE WORKS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT APPEAR TO BE SUFFICIENTLY ELABORATED THE COMMITTEE WHICH FINDS IN NUMBER FOUR SOME INGENIOUS ANALYSES PARTICULARLY IN REGARD TO THE MECHANISM OF THE HEBREW LANGUAGE REGRETS THAT THE AUTHOR HAS RESORTED TO HAZARDOUS CONJECTURES AND HAS SOMETIMES FORGOTTEN THE SPECIAL RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE TO PURSUE THE EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE METHOD POULDON REMEMBERED THIS HE ATTENDED THE LECTURES OF E JEANNE BERNOUF AND AS SOON AS HE BECAME ACQUAINTED WITH THE LABOURS AND DISCOVERIES OF BOB AND HIS SUCCESSORS HE DEFINITIVELY ABANDONED AN HYPOTHESIS WHICH HAD BEEN CONDEMNED BY THE ACADEMY OF INSCRIPTIONS AND BELLETRE
large/6138/whatisproperty_1312_librivox_64kb_mp3/whatisproperty_01_proudhon_64kb
file
download/librilight/large/6138/whatisproperty_1312_librivox_64kb_mp3/whatisproperty_01_proudhon_64kb.flac