59. 最后，来文方声称，Ghadde 先生受到歧视，因此，对他的拘留具有任意性，属第五类。然而，指称的歧视行为是基于工作组就第二类任意拘留得出的有利于来文方的结论中已经涵盖的权利的行使。工作组认为，这一结论在本案中已经足够。
59. Lastly, the source claims that Mr. Ghadde is being discriminated against, thereby rendering his detention arbitrary under category V. However, the alleged discrimination is based on the exercise of protected rights that are already covered in the Working Group’s finding in favour of the source in relation to category II. The Working Group is of the view that this finding suffices in the present case.