6.2 委员会注意到，申诉人称，在警察对团结民主运动总部采取的行动中，他的右臂受了严重枪伤，尽管他的健康状况不佳，警察仍用枪托和警棍打他，还踢他的全身，持续了约 15 分钟。委员会还注意到：(a) 警察让申诉人待在其车后座上四个多小时，才把他送到医院；(b) 警察不允许布隆迪红十字会人员向申诉人提供医疗救助；(c) 申诉人受到侮辱和恐吓；(d) 在一个民间社会组织施加压力的情况下，申诉人才被送往医院。委员会还注意到，医院没有按照申诉人律师的要求提供他的医疗记录，以便能够向当局提出其遭受虐待的证据。委员会还注意到申诉人称，对他的殴打给他造成了严重的疼痛和痛苦，包括精神和心理上的痛10 CAT/C/BDI/CO/1，第 17 段。另见 CAT/C/BDI/CO/2，第 15 段，以及联合国人权事务高级专员办事处，“The international community should continue to help Burundi to implement its internationalhuman rights obligations”，2010 年 5 月 28 日新闻稿。11 O.N.诉布隆迪(CAT/C/71/D/843/2017)，第 4 段；Ndagijimana 诉布隆迪(CAT/C/62/D/496/2012 和CAT/C/62/D/496/2012/Corr.1)，第 7 段；Ndarisigaranye 诉布隆迪(CAT/C/62/D/493/2012 和CAT/C/62/D/493/2012/Corr.1)，第 7 段；以及 Ntikarahera 诉布隆迪(CAT/C/52/D/503/2012)，第4 段。苦，据称警察是为了惩罚和恐吓他而故意这么做的。另外，委员会还注意到，缔约国从未对这些事实提出异议。在这种情况下，委员会得出结论认为，申诉人陈
6.2 The Committee notes the complainant’s claim that he suffered a serious gunshot wound to the right arm during the police operation at the headquarters of the Mouvement pour la solidarité et la démocratie and that despite his condition, police officers beat him with rifle butts and batons and kicked him all over his body for 15 minutes. The Committee also notes that: (a) the police officers kept the complainant in the back of their vehicle for over four hours before taking him to hospital; (b) that the police officers did not allow Burundi Red Cross personnel to provide the complainant with medical assistance; (c) that the complainant was insulted and threatened; and (d) that it was only as a result of pressure from a civil society organization that the complainant was taken to hospital. The Committee also 10 CAT/C/BDI/CO/1, para. 17. See also CAT/C/BDI/CO/2, para. 15, and Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, “The international community should continue to help Burundi to implement its international human rights obligations”, press release, 28 May 2010. 11 O.N. v. Burundi (CAT/C/71/D/843/2017), para. 4; Ndagijimana v. Burundi (CAT/C/62/D/496/2012 and CAT/C/62/D/496/2012/Corr.1), para. 7; Ndarisigaranye v. Burundi (CAT/C/62/D/493/2012 and CAT/C/62/D/493/2012/Corr.1), para. 7; and Ntikarahera v. Burundi (CAT/C/52/D/503/2012), para. 4. notes that the hospital did not comply with requests from the complainant’s lawyer for his medical records to enable him to present evidence to the authorities of the abuse the complainant had suffered. The Committee likewise takes note of the complainant’s allegations that the blows he received caused him extreme pain and suffering, including anguish and psychological suffering, and were reportedly deliberately inflicted by agents of the State with the objective of punishing and intimidating him. At no time have these