在教育部门。”28 事实上，特别报告员发现，尽管扩大了对暴力极端主义驱动因素和临界点的了解，但这方面的辩论往往主要由私人行为体和咨询人所主导，这些人或是自诩专家，或是受到仍在推进已被科学证伪问题的政府政策的影响。29这一现象突显了以下挑战，即如何将研究和证据同政策和方案相挂钩，确保政策和方案不会无效和适得其反，不会加剧助长恐怖主义滋生的不满情绪。30 学术专
28 In fact, the Special Rapporteur finds that, despite some increase in the knowledge base on the drivers and tipping point of violent extremism, the debate thereon is often largely dominated by private actors and consultants who are self-proclaimed experts or influenced by government policies that continue to pursue issues that have been scientifically disproven, 29 which highlights the challenge of linking research and evidence to policies and programmes to ensure that they are not ineffective and counterproductive, exacerbating the grievances on which terrorism feeds.30 Academic experts, professionals and civil society actors who could