29. 来文方得出结论称，刑事法庭未能遵守使 Mahloof 先生有权获得从轻处罚的《宪法》第 59 条以及《刑法》各相关条款。因此，Mahloof 先生遭监禁构成任意拘留，属工作组在审议提交其处理的案件时所指的第一类任意拘留情况。
29. The source concludes that the criminal court failed to observe article 59 of the Constitution and the sections of the Penal Code entitling Mr. Mahloof to the benefit of a lesser punishment. The imprisonment of Mr. Mahloof therefore constitutes arbitrary detention under category I of the arbitrary detention categories referred to by the Working Group when considering cases submitted to it.