情。第二，我要提请安理会注意服刑问题。我国在安理会的发言中曾指出，关于前南斯拉夫问题国际法庭（前南问题国际法庭）和刑事法庭余留事项国际处理机制（余留机制）宣布的服刑条件，这方面历时几十年的惯例应该有所改变。然而，在余留机制的报告中，包括在最近一份关于5月16日至11月15日期间的报告（见S/2019/888，附件二）中，有人要求修订《程序和证据规则》关于赦免、减刑和提前释放的第151条。第2422（2018）号决议第10段“鼓励余留机制考虑予以妥善解决，包括考虑在适当情况下设置提前释放的条件”。
Secondly, let me draw the attention of the Council to the issue of serving sentences. In its statement to the Council, my country argued that the decades-long practice regarding the conditions of serving the sentences pronounced by the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT) should be somewhat changed. In the reports of the Mechanism, however, including in the most recent one, for the period of 16 May to 15 November (see S/2019/888, annex II), requests are bandied about to amend rule 151 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence relative to pardon, commutation of sentences and early release. Resolution 2422 (2018), in paragraph 10, “encourages the Mechanism to consider an appropriate solution, including by considering putting in place conditions on early release in appropriate cases”.