13. 特别报告员强调指出了另一个关键的、表面上不符合人权的做法，即在多个国家的国内法中使用和适用“极端主义”一词，而不仅仅是“暴力极端主义”。她对在多个国家的政策和法律中使用“极端主义”这一术语及其不断扩大的范围24深表关切。25 她十分担心这个术语会让人对什么是极端主义做出不正当的判断，并强调这可能会导致非暴力团体被列入“极端主义”实体的政府名单，其中一个明显的例子是应对气候紧急情况的团体。26
13. The Special Rapporteur highlights another critical and prima facie non-human rights compliant practice, namely, the use and application of the term “extremism” – and not only “violent extremism” – in national law in multiple States. She has grave concerns about the use of the terminology of “extremism” and its expanding ambit,24 in both policy and law in multiple States.25 She has serious concerns that the term lends itself to illegitimate judgments about what extremism is, highlighting that this can lead to the inclusion of non-violent groups on executive lists of “extremist” entities, one notable example of which is groups responding to the climate emergency.26