6. 因此，在我们看来，此时如将工作组的工作范围仅限于一种办法而将其他办法排除在外，并无任何好处。如果接受这一前提，工作组就必须找出缩小港到港办法与门到门办法之间的距离的途径。这显然是一个政策上难以两全的问题，因此，应在 9 月份会议上拿出充足的时间讨论这一问题，或许应在工作组继续审议各条款草案之前的会议上提前讨论，以期就工作组未来的工作方向达成共识。
6. Thus, it seems to us that no useful purpose would be served at this juncture by restricting the scope of work in the Working Group to only one approach, to the exclusion of the other. If this premise is accepted, then the Working Group must look for ways of bridging the gap between the port-to-port and door-to-door approaches. Clearly, this is a policy dilemma that should be given sufficient time for discussion at the September meeting, perhaps early on in the session before the Working Group resumes consideration of the draft articles, with the view of reaching a consensus on the future direction of work in the Working Group.