4.6 缔约国提及申诉人的以下指称：在巴基斯坦，凡被怀疑与俾路支民族主义运动有联系的人，其人权必然会遭到粗暴、公然、严重侵犯。缔约国说，在进行国内程序过程中，有关方面仔细研究了关于巴基斯坦的大量的国别资料，以及将未能获得庇护的人员遣返的问题。缔约国提及委员会在 G.R.B.诉瑞典一案5 中提出的意见，指出，一般暴力危险并不能构成据以判定某人如被遣送回国，就会面临遭受酷刑的危险的充足理由，因为必须存在其他理由，证明相关个人本人将会面临危险。缔约国说，从近期的国别资料来看，自上次对申诉人的指称进行评估以来，巴基斯坦的状况没有发生显示缔约国将在申诉人的案件中履行不驱回义务的相关的不利变动.
4.6 The State party notes the complainant’s allegations that there is a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights against people suspected of being associated with the Balochi nationalist movement in Pakistan. It argues that extensive country information on Pakistan and the return of failed asylum seekers were carefully considered during the domestic proceedings. The State party refers to the Committee’s views in G.R.B. v. Sweden5 and notes that the existence of a general risk of violence does not constitute a sufficient ground for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon return to that country as additional grounds must exist to show the individual concerned would be personally at risk. The State party submits that, according to recent country information, there has been no relevant adverse change to 5 Communication No. 83/1997, G.R.B. v. Sweden, Views adopted on 15 May 1998, para. 6.3. the country situation since the complainant’s claims were last assessed to indicate that the State party’s non-refoulement obligations would be engaged in the complainant’s case.