94. 最后，是根据关于保护社会免遭恐怖主义行为危害的 2006 年《第 58 号法》对这五人提出起诉的，人权事务委员会曾认定，该法关于恐怖主义的定义过于宽泛。工作组亦曾认定，该条款过于模糊和宽泛。22 在本案上适用模糊和过于宽泛的条款，使工作组得出更多结论，即拘留没有法律依据。
94. Lastly, the five individuals were prosecuted under Law No. 58 of 2006 on the protection of society from terrorist acts, a law that the Human Rights Committee has found to include an overly broad definition of terrorism. The Working Group has also determined that the provision is overly vague and broad.22 The application of vague and overly broad provisions in this case adds to the Working Group’s conclusion that the detentions were without legal basis.