92. 工作组已确定，Mahloof 先生遭拘押系因其行使表达和集会自由权。工作组还注意到：Mahloof 先生另外还被警方传唤了两次，讯问他所作的关于总统卷入腐败阴谋的指控；他还因参与反腐集会而被捕。马尔代夫政府对上述事实无异议，但强调称 Mahloof 先生只是在警方接到投诉后才遭到讯问的，且立刻被释放了。关于 Mahloof 先生被控犯有的两项刑事罪行，政府还坚称对 Mahloof 先生没5 见 E/CN.4/2004/3/Add.3(第 33 段)和第 1/2017 号意见。有歧视态度，因为在同一事件中以类似行为阻挠警方执行公务的其他人也因阻挠警方执行公务而被提起指控、定罪和判刑。
92. The Working Group has already established that the detention of Mr. Mahloof resulted from his exercise of his right to freedom of expression and assembly. The Working Group also notes that Mr. Mahloof was summoned by the police on two further occasions for questioning over allegations he had made about the President’s involvement in a corrupt scheme and that he was arrested for participating in an anti-corruption rally. The Government does not dispute these facts, but emphasizes that Mr. Mahloof was only questioned upon the receipt of complaints by the police and promptly released. In relation to the two criminal offences with which Mr. Mahloof was charged, the Government also argues that there is no discriminatory attitude towards Mr. Mahloof, since others who similarly obstructed police duty in the same incident were also charged, convicted and sentenced for obstruction of police duty.