11. 此外，委员会重申其长期以来的判例，即监督复审程序是一种特殊的补救办法，不是提交来文之前必须用尽的补救办法，个人来文的提交人在与委员会接触时享有法律代表权(《公约》第二条和《任择议定书》第一条)。
11. Moreover, the Committee reiterates its long-standing jurisprudence that the supervisory review procedure constitutes an extraordinary remedy and is not a remedy that must be exhausted before the submission of a communication, and that authors of individual communications have the right to legal representation in approaching the Committee (art. 2 of the Covenant and art. 1 of the Optional Protocol).