80. 来文方还声称，Mahloof 先生的律师于 2016 年 7 月 25 日被禁止参与诉讼，当日 Mahloof 先生被判犯有阻挠警方设置路障的罪行，并被判处另外监禁 6 个月。来文方还声称，Mahloof 先生获得充足时间准备答辩的权利遭到侵犯，因为就在 Mahloof 先生在闭门听证会上被匆匆判处入狱 4 个月零 24 天的 2016年 7 月 18 日当日，还举行了一场与另一项定罪有关的听证会。在该听证会上，法官宣布将于次日听取结案陈词，而审判将于 2016 年 7 月 25 日完成。2016年 7 月 25 日，Mahloof 先生在其律师未获准出席的一场听证会上被判处入狱 6个月。
80. The source also alleges that Mr. Mahloof’s lawyer was barred from the proceedings on 25 July 2016, when Mr. Mahloof was convicted for obstruction of police barriers and sentenced to a further six months’ imprisonment. The source also alleges that the right of Mr. Mahloof to adequate time to prepare a defence was violated, as on 18 July 2016 when Mr. Mahloof was summarily sentenced in a closed hearing to a prison term of 4 months and 24 days, a hearing regarding his other conviction also took place. During that hearing, the judge announced that the concluding statements would be made the following day and the trial concluded on 25 July 2016, when Mr. Mahloof was sentenced to a prison term of six months at a hearing which his lawyer was not permitted to attend.