45. 但是，我们不应放弃当地社区和最易受极端主义影响的社区的价值和作用。地方参与不仅最有成效，而且能在地方一级各种错综复杂的情况下参与协调，帮助制定并执行政策，在最为艰难脆弱的环境中维持当地社区和民间社会。自相矛盾的是，由于对资助恐怖主义行为实施基于风险的方法会产生下游影响，这类社区遭遇撤资、丧失支持的风险最大，也最有可能缺少全面的人道主义豁免。最终受援方必须处于这一进程的中心位置，由外部人员发挥辅助作用。93
45. However, we should not abandon the value and roles of local communities and those most vulnerable to and affected by extremism. Not only are local engagements the most effective, but they also involve and engage at the local level, in all its complexity, in the making and implementation of policy, sustaining local communities and civil society in the most fraught and fragile settings. Paradoxically, those are often the communities most at risk of defunding and lack of support through the downstream effect of the risk-based approach to the financing of terrorism and the lack of a comprehensive humanitarian exemption. End users must be placed at the centre of the process, with outsiders playing a supporting role.93