36. 随着世界各地缩减援助预算，防止和打击暴力极端主义让各国政府得以将人道主义和发展援助与其广泛的安全目标相挂钩。对于受援组织而言，防止和打击暴力极端主义增加了获得资金的机会。但是，如世界各地的许多非营利组织和非政府组织所强调指出，这种做法在根本上违背有原则的人道主义行动。有一个非政府组织明确表示，“[打击暴力极端主义的]方法从一开始就政治化，与有原则的、基于需要的人道主义行动互不相容”。81 事实上，这类政策对人道主义和发展干
36. With aid budgets shrinking around the world, the prevention and countering of violent extremism has allowed Governments to link humanitarian and development aid to their broader security objectives. For recipient organizations, preventing and countering violent extremism has increased funding opportunities. However, as highlighted by many non-profit organizations and non-governmental organizations around the world, that approach is fundamentally at odds with principled humanitarian action. One non-governmental organization has taken the clear position that “approaches [to countering violent extremism] 74 A/HRC/28/66, para. 19. 75 Ibid., paras. 22–25. 76 Ibid., paras. 26–30. 77 Ibid., paras. 30–35. 78 Ibid., paras. 36–38. 79 United States Department of State and USAID, joint strategy, p. 6. 80 Switzerland, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, foreign policy action plan on preventing violent extremism, 2016. are politicized from the outset and incompatible with principled, needs-based humanitarian action”.