47. 关于 Ghadde 先生被逮捕和拘留的情况，来文方指出，政府只是说警察有权在任何时候逮捕任何人，而没有证实这一说法，也没有解释为什么逮捕发生在深夜，随后仅仅因为诽谤指控就将 Ghadde 先生拘留了若干天。来文方还指出，Ghadde 先生第一次被警方羁押的时间超过了法定期限，并且没有下发任何法院指令授权每 48 小时对羁押予以延期，或是授权过多的延期次数。此外，来文方指出，第二个拘留期也超过了法定限制。因此，来文方认为，在警察羁押方面违反了以下正当程序保障：起草面谈报告、由公共检察官办公室在 48 小时后予以延期、通知家人以及在警察拘留时间延长时与律师沟通。为了支持这些指称，来文方指出，政府未能出示文件证明对 Ghadde 先生的诉讼所据称的合法性。
47. Regarding the conditions in which Mr. Ghadde was arrested and detained, the source recalls that the Government merely stated that the police was entitled to arrest anyone at any time, without substantiating the statement or justifying why the arrest took place in the middle of the night and was followed by several days of detention for mere allegations of defamation. The source also recalls that Mr. Ghadde’s first period in police custody exceeded statutory limits and that no court order had been issued authorizing the extension of the custody every 48 hours or the excessive number of extensions. In addition, the source notes that the second period of detention also exceeded statutory limits. Accordingly, in the source’s view, the following due process guarantees in the context of police custody were violated: the drawing up of interview reports, the 48-hour renewal by the public prosecutor’s office, notification of the family and communication with counsel when police custody is extended. In support of these assertions, the source recalls that the Government failed to produce documents proving the purported legality of the proceedings against Mr. Ghadde.