2.11 因此，申诉人声称：(a) 可用的国内补救办法无法满足他的诉求，因为当局本应根据他的指称展开刑事调查，却没有对他报告的情况作出回应；(b) 这些补救办法超出了合理的期限，因为在他 2014 年 3 月 14 日报告酷刑行为三年零四个月后，仍未开展任何调查；(c) 他若采取进一步行动会有危险，因为酷刑责任者是警察和亲政府的人。申诉人认为，他不可能用尽国内补救办法，因为这些办法是无效的、徒劳的。
2.11 Consequently, the complainant claims that: (a) he gained no satisfaction from the available domestic remedies, as the authorities did not respond to his reports whereas they should have opened a criminal investigation on the basis of his allegations; (b) the remedies have taken an unreasonably long time given that three years and four months after the acts of torture were reported, on 14 March 2014, no investigation had been opened; and (c) it was dangerous for him to take further steps, as the perpetrators of the acts of torture were police officers and persons close to the current Government. The complainant is of the opinion that it is impossible for him to exhaust domestic remedies owing to the fact that they are ineffective and unlikely to bring relief.