46. 据政府称，由于 Ghadde 先生被指控行为的性质和参议院的废除，他不受议会豁免保护，来文方对这种解释提出质疑。来文方指出，Ghadde 先生于 2017 年8 月 10 日被捕，而参议院直到 8 月 15 日才根据总统令被正式废除，来文方向工作组提交了这份总统令。来文方进一步指出，政府没有提供任何法律依据，证明根据提出的指控撤销豁免权是合理的。来文方回顾说，《宪法》第 50 条保障议会豁免权，但被当场抓获或议会授权对在议会职能之外实施的行为提起诉讼的情况除外。然而，议会没有授权撤销 Ghadde 先生的豁免权。
46. The source challenges the Government’s justifications according to which Mr. Ghadde could not benefit from parliamentary immunity owing to the nature of the acts he is charged with and the abolishment of the Senate. The source points out that Mr. Ghadde was arrested on 10 August 2017 when the Senate was not officially abolished until 15 August by a presidential decree that the source has submitted to the Working Group. The source further points out that the Government did not provide any legal basis justifying the revocation of immunity on the basis of the charges laid. The source recalls that article 50 of the Constitution guarantees parliamentary immunity except in cases of flagrante delicto or where the parliament authorizes proceedings to be brought against a person for acts performed outside of his or her parliamentary functions. However, the parliament did not issue an authorization to revoke Mr. Ghadde’s immunity.