58. 由于政府没有按时提交回复，工作组决定依照其工作方法第 15 段提出本意见。工作组指出，根据其工作方法第 16 段，工作组根据收到的所有资料提出意见。59. 工作组已在判例中确立了处理证据问题的方式。在来文方有初步证据证明缔约国违反国际规定构成任意拘留时，政府如要反驳指控，则应承担举证责任(见 A/HRC/19/57，第 68 段)。8 在本案中，政府没有对来文方提出的初步认定可信的指控提出异议。60. 工作组注意到，Moussayih 先生、Burgaa 先生、Errami 先生、Baber 先生、Rguibi 先生、Charki 先生、Baalli 先生、Ajna 先生和 Amenkour 先生于 2019 年 1月 25 日获释，Baihna 先生于 2019 年 3 月 17 日获释。在这种情况下，工作组可依照其工作方法第 17 段(a)项选择将案件存档或对他们的拘留的任意性发表意见。工作组注意到，相关人员是在其刑罚执行结束时获释的。此外，ElOuahidi 先生、Dadda 先生、El Hafidi 先生和 Elbeur 先生仍然处于拘留中，他们尚未服满各自的刑期。考虑到这些情况，工作组决定继续审议案件，以期提出意见。61. 来文方在其申诉中提出了有关四类任意拘留的论据。(a) 第一类62. 来文方指称，这批学生是在 2016 年 1 月 24 日至 4 月 16 日之间被逮捕的，当时没有出示逮捕证，也没有向他们告知逮捕理由或所受指控。工作组回顾，根
Discussion 58. In the absence of a timely response from the Government, the Working Group has decided to render the present opinion, in conformity with paragraph 15 of its methods of work. The Working Group notes that pursuant to paragraph 16 of its methods of work, it renders opinions on the basis of all the information it has received. 59. The Working Group has in its jurisprudence established the ways in which it deals with evidentiary issues. If the source has established a prima facie case for breach of international requirements constituting arbitrary detention, the burden of proof should be understood to rest upon the Government if it wishes to refute the allegations (see A/HRC/19/57, para. 68).8 In the present case, the Government has chosen not to challenge the prima facie credible allegations made by the source. 60. The Working Group notes that Mr. Moussayih, Mr. Burgaa, Mr. Errami, Mr. Baber, Mr. Rguibi, Mr. Charki, Mr. Baalli, Mr. Ajna and Mr. Amenkour were released on 25 January 2019, while Mr. Baihna was released on 17 March 2019. In such circumstances, the Working Group has the option of filing the case or rendering an opinion as to the arbitrariness of the detention, in conformity with paragraph 17 (a) of its methods of work. The Working Group notes that the releases occurred at the end of the prison terms imposed on the persons concerned. Mr. El Ouahidi, Mr. Dadda, Mr. El Hafidi and Mr. Elbeur are still in detention, as they have not yet served their sentences in full. Bearing in mind these circumstances, the Working Group has decided to continue considering the case with a view to rendering an opinion. 61. In the complaint, the source presents arguments relating to four categories of arbitrary detention. (a) Category I 62. The source alleges that the arrests of the members of the group of students, which occurred between 24 January and 16 April 2016, were carried out without a warrant and without their being informed of the reasons for their arrest or the charges against them. The