27. 来文方补充称，在根据《刑法》第 1100 条适用基准刑的一般调节比例量刑时，情况就变得很明显：与《刑法》第 1101 条所载内容相反的是，Mahloof 先生所应承担的罪责并不高于其获判罪行的相应罪责。这是因为，与《刑法》第1102 条所载内容相反的是：Mahloof 先生的罪行没有造成特殊伤害；他没有像《刑法》第 1103 条所明确阐述的那样，以极为残忍或严重漠视人之尊严的方式犯下罪行；与《刑法》第 1105 条所述不同，Mahloof 先生所犯罪行没有需要赔偿的受害人。
27. The source adds that when general adjustments to baseline sentences are applied to the penalty, according to section 1100 of the Penal Code, it becomes evident that contrary to the provisions of section 1101 of the Code, Mr. Mahloof does not qualify for a higher level of culpability than the level required by the offence for which he was convicted. That is because, contrary to the provisions of section 1102 of the Code, his offence did not cause special harm; he did not commit an offence in a manner displaying great cruelty or gross disregard for human dignity, as specified in section 1103 of the Code; and his offence did not have a victim to compensate, as prescribed in section 1105 of the Code.