但是，我们并不吃惊，因为国际社会已经习惯于印度的这种两面派做法。毕竟，在一个可以篡改历史以适应藏红花式现状的国家，在一个可以颁行的法律唯一目的是使宗教歧视合法化的国家，在一个可以打压持不同政见者声音的国家，更有甚者，在一个像大赦国际这样的知名人权组织因为揭露在被占领的查谟和克什米尔的印度人权状况而被公然强行停止运作的国家，以及在一个制造迫害与屠杀的人可被粉饰成代表现代印度形象的国家，所有不便明说的事实自然都可以被装扮一新。
However, we are not surprised, for the international community is used to such duplicitous Indian behaviour. After all, in a country where history can be rewritten to suit a saffronized version of reality; where laws can be enacted with the sole objective of legitimizing religious discrimination; where dissident voices can be cowed into submission; more still, where reputable human rights organizations such as Amnesty International can be brazenly forced to shut down their operations for shining a spotlight on the human rights situation in India in the occupied Jammu and Kashmir; and where perpetrators of pogroms and massacres can be rehabilitated as the face of modern India, every inconvenient truth can surely be dressed up and garnished in that milieu.