24. 根据《联合国反腐败公约》第六条，所有缔约国都应确保设有预防腐败的机构。作为对应机构，国家人权机构在促进和保护人权方面发挥着重要作用。9 人权理事会第 41/9 号决议鼓励国家反腐败当局和国家人权机构(如有)通过酌情交流信息以及制定联合战略和行动计划开展合作，打击腐败及其对享受人权的不利影响。奥地利报告称，其联邦反腐败局试图以整体方式解决腐败问题，视人权为该机构身份不可或缺的部分，并在其任务说明中反映这一点。通过预防措施，反腐败局也有助于消除腐败对享受人权的不利影响。巴勒斯坦国提到人权机构和巴勒斯坦反腐败委员会之间联系薄弱，并补充道，人权组织没有为该委员会开展的研究和研讨会作出贡献，也没有向其提交侵犯人权方面的腐败指控。这个领域还需要进行进一步研究和分享实践经验。6 见《维也纳宣言和行动纲领》，第二部分，第 71 段(A/CONF.157/23)。7 人权高专办，“反腐败的人权案件”(日内瓦，2013 年)，第 6 页。8 见《关于各国切实落实参与公共事务权的准则》，第 3 页。9 《关于促进和保护人权的国家机构的地位的原则》(《巴黎原则》)是针对国家人权机构的国际标准。关于为反腐败机构制定类似标准的倡议，见《反腐败机构原则雅加达声明》。
24. In line with article 6 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, all States parties should ensure the existence of bodies to prevent corruption. As their counterparts, national human rights institutions play an important role in the promotion and protection of human rights.9 The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 41/9, encouraged national anti-6 See Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, part II, para. 71 (A/CONF.157/23). 7 OHCHR, “The human rights case against corruption” (Geneva, 2013), p. 6. 8 See the guidelines for States on the effective implementation of the right to participate in public affairs, p. 3. 9 The principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (the Paris Principles) are the international standard for national human rights institutions. For corruption authorities and national human rights institutions, where they existed, to cooperate through the exchange of information, where appropriate, and the development of joint strategies and plans of action to fight corruption and its negative impact on the enjoyment of human rights. Austria reported that its Federal Bureau of Anti-Corruption attempted to tackle corruption in a holistic way and that respect for human rights was part of the Bureau’s institutional identity and was reflected in its mission statement. Through preventive measures, it also contributed to countering the negative impact of corruption on the enjoyment of human rights. The State of Palestine referred to the weak link between human rights institutions and the Palestinian Anti-Corruption Commission, adding that human rights organizations did not contribute to studies and workshops undertaken by the Commission, nor did they refer allegations of corruption in the context of human rights violations to it. This is an area that would benefit from further study and the sharing of practical experiences.