11. 大会关于主权债务重组进程基本原则的第 69/319号决议遭到一些国家的反对，其中一些国家对大部分放贷承担责任，而其他国家则背负着一些最沉重的债务负担。因此，债务重组是在没有法律框架的情况下进行的。私人和半私人债权人表现出的合作意愿甚少，甚至在暂停偿还债务的问题上也是如此。阿根廷主权债务重组谈判凸显出其中涉及的困难。这场大流行病提醒人们，重组主权债务需要一个国际法律框架。希望联合国能再次接手处理这个问题。然而，制定这样一个框架的进展可能太慢，无助于解决发展中国家面临的紧迫问题。必须向债权国施压，鼓励私营部门进行债务重组。债务回购是另一个潜在的有效工具。然而，如果不进行适当的债务重组，新兴市场和发展中国家及其债权人将遭受巨大痛苦。
11. General Assembly resolution 69/319 on the basic principles of sovereign debt restructuring processes had been opposed by a number of countries, among them some responsible for much of the lending and others carrying some of the heaviest debt burdens. Debt restructuring was thus taking place with no legal framework. Private and semi-private creditors had shown little inclination to cooperate, even on the matter of suspending the repayment of debt. The negotiations on restructuring the sovereign debt of Argentina highlighted the difficulties involved. The pandemic was a reminder of the need for an international legal framework for restructuring sovereign debt. It was to be hoped that the United Nations would again take up that issue. Progress in developing such a framework would probably be too slow, however, to be of help in resolving the immediate problems facing developing countries. Pressure must be applied to creditor countries to encourage the private sector to engage in debt restructuring. Debt buy-backs were another potentially effective instrument. However, without adequate debt restructuring, emerging markets and developing countries, along with their creditors, would experience enormous suffering.