事实上，塔利班作为一个遭到禁止的实体，其领导人尚未被认定为恐怖主义个人，这对我们来说依然是一个谜。我们能否知道，这么做是何道理？难道现在的思路是认为被禁实体的领导人不用为其所领导的被列名团体的所作所为负责？我们就是打算这样应对国际和平与安全的最严重的威胁之一
The fact that the leader of the Taliban, a proscribed entity, is not yet designated a terrorist individual remains a mystery to us. Can we know the rationale for such an approach? Is it now the thinking that leaders of proscribed entities will not be held accountable for the deeds of the listed groups that they head? Is this how we intend to address one of the most serious threats to international peace and security?