2. 工作组视下列情况为任意剥夺自由：(a) 显然提不出任何剥夺自由的法律依据(如：某人刑期已满或尽管大赦法对其适用，却仍被关押)(第一类)；(b) 剥夺自由系因行使《世界人权宣言》第七、第十三、第十四、第十八、第十九、第二十和第二十一条、以及(就缔约国而言)《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第十二、第十八、第十九、第二十一、第二十二、第二十五、第二十六和第二十七条所保障的权利或自由(第二类)；(c) 完全或部分不遵守《世界人权宣言》以及当事国接受的相关国际文书所确立的关于公正审判权的国际准则，情节严重，致使剥夺自由具有任意性(第三类)；
2. The Working Group regards deprivation of liberty as arbitrary in the following cases: (a) When it is clearly impossible to invoke any legal basis justifying the deprivation of liberty (as when a person is kept in detention after the completion of his or her sentence or despite an amnesty law applicable to the detainee) (category I); (b) When the deprivation of liberty results from the exercise of the rights or freedoms guaranteed by articles 7, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and, insofar as States parties are concerned, by articles 12, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (category II); (c) When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character (category III);