53. 此外，来文方认为，剥夺 Naser 先生(案件 1)和 Fadhul 先生(案件 5)的自由也属于第五类，即因为是基于政治见解的歧视。Naser 先生是巴林一位著名宗教人士的孙子，此前曾因参加在祖父家周围举行的和平集会而被捕，检方出示了Fadhul 先生九年多之前参加抗议活动的照片作为证据。在这两个案件上，被告属于政治反对派或表达了政治反对言论，是导致他们在不相关案件上被定罪的因素。
53. Moreover, the source believes that the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Naser (case 1) and Mr. Fadhul (case 5) also falls under category V, namely for reasons of discrimination based on political opinion. Mr. Naser is the grandson of a prominent religious figure in Bahrain and has previously been arrested for participating in peaceful assemblies around his grandfather’s house, and pictures of Mr. Fadhul participating in protests from more than nine years ago were presented as evidence by the prosecution. In both cases, the defendants’ belonging to or expression of political opposition were factors that contributed to their conviction in an unrelated case.