3.6 缔约国剥夺了申诉人提起刑事诉讼的机会，也就剥夺了他就酷刑这样的严重罪行获得赔偿的任何补救办法。此外，他在遭受酷刑后没有得到任何康复援助，以帮助他实现身体、心理、社会和经济上尽可能全面的恢复。鉴于司法当局的消极态度，客观上说其他救济都无法实现，特别是无法通过损害赔偿民事诉讼获得赔偿。布隆迪当局很少采取赔偿酷刑受害者的措施，委员会在 2006 年关于布隆迪初次报告的结论性意见中曾提到这一点。7 2014 年，委员会注意到新的《刑事
3.6 By depriving the complainant of criminal proceedings, the State party has at the same time deprived him of any remedy to obtain compensation for serious crimes such as torture. Furthermore, he received no rehabilitation assistance of any kind to help him to recover as fully as possible, either physically or mentally, or in social and financial terms. In view of the passivity of the judicial authorities, other remedies to obtain redress, such as a civil suit for damages, are entirely unlikely to be successful. The Burundian authorities have taken few measures to compensate victims of torture, a point raised by the Committee in its concluding observations on the initial report of Burundi in 2006.7