47. 最后，来文方指出：(a) 对这批学生提起的诉讼不符合《公约》第九条和第十四条规定的关于公正审判权的国际法要求；(b) 根据《公约》第九条第二款，对他们的逮捕是非法的；(c) 他们根据《公约》第十四条第三款(子)项享有的被告知对其提出的指控的权利受到侵犯；(d) 将在酷刑下和/或被迫签署的供词作为刑事证据违反了《公约》第十四条第三款(午)项；(e) 他们根据《公约》第十四条第一款和第三款(丑)项享有的获得法律援助和充分辩护的权利受到侵犯；(f) 他们根据《公约》第十四条第一款享有的接受公开审判的权利没有得到尊重。据来文方称，所有这些侵权行为使剥夺这批学生的自由具有任意性，属于第三类情况。
47. In conclusion, the source asserts that: (a) the proceedings brought against the members of the group of students did not meet the requirements of international law on the right to a fair trial, as set out in articles 9 and 14 of the Covenant; (b) their arrest was unlawful under article 9 (2) of the Covenant; (c) their right to be informed of the charges against them, under article 14 (3) (a) of the Covenant, was violated; (d) the use of confessions signed under torture and/or duress as criminal evidence was a violation of article 14 (3) (g) of the Covenant; (e) their right to legal counsel and to a proper defence, under article 14 (1) and (3) (b) of the Covenant, was violated; and (f) their right to a public hearing, under article 14 (1) of the Covenant, was not respected. According to the source, all these violations render the detention of the members of the group of students arbitrary under category III.