51. 来文方也指出，所有被告都受到了不公正审判。他们在没有逮捕令和没有被告知逮捕的理由的情况下被逮捕，在审判前没有被允许会见律师，在没有律师的情况下受到审问，并且没有被允许提供证据为自己的辩护。据称，其中四名被告是基于他们在酷刑和胁迫下所作的供词被定罪的，另一名被告是基于其他被告在酷刑逼供情况下的供词被定罪的。据称，在所有五个案件上，检方都将供词作为对被告不利的主要证据，有时还援引其他不相关的证据，例如在Fadhul先生的案件上(案件 5)。
51. The source also submits that all defendants were subjected to unfair trials as they were arrested without a warrant and without being given a reason for their arrest, were not granted access to legal counsel before their trial, were interrogated without their lawyers and were not allowed to present evidence in their own defence. Four of the defendants were reportedly convicted based on confessions they made under torture and duress and one of them was convicted based on confessions made by the other defendants extracted through torture. In all five cases, the prosecution reportedly relied on the confessions as the primary evidence against the defendants, sometimes invoking other irrelevant evidence as in the case of Mr. Fadhul (case 5).