69. 工作组指出，过去几年间，工作组审议了若干来自马尔代夫的案件，内容涉及表达与执政政权相左见解的个人。4 在本案中，工作组注意到，Mahloof 先生据称越过了警方路障，但是，就连马尔代夫政府都没有提出 Mahloof 先生的行为具有暴力性质或是导致他人进一步实施暴力。政府只是提出，Mahloof 先生的行为违犯了法律，而违犯法律本身就意味着其行为不再是和平行为。2 见第 33/2015 号意见，第 80 段。3 见第 40/2005 号意见。4 见第 33/2015 和第 59/2016 号意见。
69. The Working Group notes that over the past years it has considered a number of cases from Maldives, which concern individuals expressing opinions that are not in line with those of the ruling political establishment.4 In the present case, the Working Group notes that Mr. Mahloof allegedly breached police barriers, but even the Government does not contend that the actions of Mr. Mahloof were violent or led to further violence by others. The Government has only submitted that his actions breached the law and that this in itself meant that his actions were no longer peaceful.