10. 大会第 72/284 号决议回顾，在滋生恐怖主义的情况下防止暴力极端主义的重要工作牢牢植根于《联合国全球反恐战略》。特别报告员指出，虽然在概念上可以区分打击暴力极端主义和防止暴力极端主义，前者侧重于打击现有暴力极端主义分子的活动，后者侧重于防止暴力极端主义的进一步蔓延，但在实践中，这些概念往往是模糊的，方法往往是一致和结合的。在这些类别中，可以更好地区分打击暴力极端主义和防止暴力极端主义之间的短期、中期和长期协同效应，或更好地区分那些特别旨在寻求阻止激进化和招募进程以防止暴力极端主义的干预措施，与那些寻求使已经加入暴力极端主义组织的个人重新融入社会的干预措施之间的差异。17 处理“吸引因素”的措施已广泛落入打击暴力极端主义的领域。与防止暴力极端主义相关的干预措施的最佳定义是指那些寻求解决暴力极端主义的结构性驱动因素(即“推动因素”)的干预措施。18 在防止和打击暴力极端主义既包括安全又包括发展的情况下，需要确保采取平衡的做法，不能将前者置于后者之上。19
10. In its resolution 72/284, the General Assembly recalled that the important work on preventing violent extremism as and when conducive to terrorism was firmly rooted in the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy. The Special Rapporteur notes that, although it is conceptually possible to distinguish between countering violent extremism and preventing violent extremism, with the former focused on countering the activities of existing violent extremists and the latter focused on preventing the further spread of violent extremism, in practice, those notions are often blurred and approaches are aligned and combined. Within those categories, increased distinctions can be made between what is envisioned for short-term, medium-term and long-term synergies between countering violent extremism and preventing violent extremism17 or between interventions specifically aimed at preventing violent extremism that seek to disrupt the radicalization and recruitment processes and those that seek to reintegrate individuals who have already joined a violent extremist organization. Addressing “pull factors” has broadly fallen into the domain of countering violent extremism. Interventions relevant to preventing violent extremism are most usefully defined as those that seek to address the structural drivers of violent extremism, or “push factors”. 18 Where preventing and countering violent extremism includes both security and development, there is a need to ensure a balanced approach that does not privilege the former over the latter.19