4.1 2016 年 4 月 15 日，缔约国就来文可否受理和所涉实质问题提出了意见。缔约国认为，从委员会议事规则第 113 条(b)款来看，申诉人的指称明显缺乏根据，因此这些指称不予受理。如果委员会认为指称可予受理，那么，缔约国的意见是，这些指称缺乏法律依据，因为没有充足的理由认为，申诉人如果被遣送回巴基斯坦，将面临遭受酷刑的危险。
4.1 On 15 April 2016, the State party submitted its observations on the admissibility and merits of the communication. It considers that the complainant’s allegations are inadmissible as manifestly unfounded under rule 113 (b) of the Committee’s rules of procedure. Should the Committee take the view that the allegations are admissible, the State party submits that the claims are without merit as there are no substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being tortured if deported to Pakistan.