14. 来文方称，2016 年 6 月 19 日，在控辩双方所有质证环节已经结束后，一名警员获准就第一起案子作出不利于 Mahloof 先生的证词，从而违反了刑事诉讼程序。该警员作证称：2015 年 4 月 3 日，他在马累拘留所的在押人员押送科当班；Mahloof 先生在被从还押听证会带出后，跑出了刑事法院的大门。Mahloof先生跑到街上后，他是第一个抓住 Mahloof 先生的警员。Mahloof 先生走出门来的时候，警车就停在门外。Mahloof 先生在被要求上车时跑开了。他怀疑Mahloof 先生跑开是为了从警方手中逃脱。
14. The source states that on 19 June 2016, in violation of the criminal procedure, a police officer was allowed to testify against Mr. Mahloof in relation to his first case after all the prosecution and defence testimonies had concluded. The officer testified that on 3 April 2015, he was working at the detainee escort section of Male’ custodial facility and that after Mr. Mahloof was brought out from his remand hearing, he had run out of the main gate of the criminal court; that the officer had been the first to apprehend Mr. Mahloof as he ran into the street; that when Mr. Mahloof came out of the door, the police vehicle had been parked just outside the door; that he had run away while he was being requested to get into the vehicle; and that he suspected that Mr. Mahloof had run away to escape from the police.