这一风险时，各国应考虑可能构成酷刑风险迹象的一些人权状况。41 此外，禁止酷刑委员会认为，被移送者必须有可能对移送提出异议。42 如有充分理由相信某人有遭受酷刑的危险，则保证当事人在移送后不会受到酷刑或遭受其他不可弥补的伤害的外交保证和其他保证本身不足以满足不推回原则。43 在作出这种保证之前应事先彻底审查每个案件的案情实质，遵循明确的程序，并设置适当的司法审查机制和有效的监督机制，以评估这些保证是否得到履行。44
Furthermore, according to the Committee against Torture, the person being transferred must be given a possibility to challenge the transfer. 42 Diplomatic assurances and other guarantees assuring that a person will not be tortured or suffer other irreparable harm upon transfer are not, in themselves, sufficient to satisfy the principle of non-refoulement where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 43 Such assurances should be accompanied by a prior thorough examination of the merits of each individual case and be obtained following clear procedures, with adequate judicial mechanisms for review and effective monitoring mechanisms in place to assess whether they have been honoured.44