67. 几个成员国欢迎新评价政策与联合国各基金和方案的评价政策保持一致，同时考虑到联合国发展系统改革和内部变革管理不断变化的背景，并强调分配充足资源的重要性。鼓励妇女署力争达到方案支出的 2%-3%范围的上限。各代表团注意到某些关键绩效指标(KPI)有所下降，敦促妇女署在国家层面进行能力建设，以确保在各个层面都有高质量的评价职能。建议妇女署继续开展由 IES 牵头的国家项目组合评价，以更加侧重于战略评价和更高水平的结果，并继续加强对评价的回复和关键见解的实施。各成员国提到，他们希望对每个区域的每个关键绩效指标进行更详细的分析，因为这将能使执行局更加全面地了解妇女署内部的评价文化。他们支持加强对“评价使用情况”的关注以及与知识管理的联系，因为年度报告中的第一批结果表明这种方法正在取得成果。年度报告中有关该领域分散评价的其他信息受到欢迎。为了充分了解加强努力后产生的影响，各代表团同意监督咨询委员会的看法，即了解不同的报告系统如何相互协作，从而全面了解如何利用评价结果改进方案或管理问责制，将是一件很有意思的事情。
67. Several Member States welcomed the alignment of the new evaluation policy with those of United Nations Funds and Programmes, taking into account the changing context of the United Nations Development System reform and internal change management and emphasizing that the allocation of sufficient resources is crucial. UN-Women was encouraged to aim for the upper end of the range of 2–3 per cent of programme expenditure. Noting a drop in some key performance indicators (KPIs), delegations urged UN-Women to build capacity at the country level to ensure a high-quality evaluation function at all levels. UN-Women was advised to continue IES-led country portfolio evaluations to focus more on strategic evaluations and higher-level results and to continue strengthening the response to evaluations and the implementation of key insights. Member States mentioned that they would appreciate a more detailed analysis on each KPI per region, since this would allow the Executive Board to see the bigger picture of the evaluation culture within UN-Women. They supported the strengthened focus on “use of evaluation” and the link to knowledge management, since the first results in the annual report suggest this approach is bearing fruit. Additional information in the annual report on decentralized evaluations in this area was welcomed. To fully grasp the impact of these strengthened efforts, delegations agreed with the ACO that it would be interesting to learn how the different reporting systems work together to provide an overall picture of the uses of evaluation findings for programme improvement or management accountability.