29. 在涉及武装冲突中的域外拘留的一些情况下，对国家代理人的侵犯人权行为普遍缺乏问责，从而造成了有罪不罚的气氛，剥夺了受害者诉诸司法和获得补救的机会。93 各人权机制重点指出，对于武装部队人员在域外拘留行动中的侵犯人权行为所进行的调查、起诉和定罪有限。94 在某些情况下，调查过于缓慢，不够独立，而且缺乏透明度。95 在其他情况下，各国没有充分坦诚地说明它们采取了哪些措施来调查关于其武装部队侵犯了该国在国外武装冲突中拘留人员的权利的指控，没有说明采取了哪些措施追究被认定为此类侵犯人权行为责任人的责任，也没有说明向受害者提供了哪些赔偿。9686 《日内瓦第四公约》，第四十九条第(一)款和第七十六条第(一)款。
29. In some instances involving extraterritorial detention in armed conflict, there has been a general lack of accountability for violations committed by State agents, creating a climate of impunity and depriving victims of access to justice and remedy.93 Human rights mechanisms have highlighted the limited number of investigations, prosecutions and convictions of members of armed forces for violations committed in the context of extraterritorial detention.94 In some instances, investigations have been found to have been too slow, insufficiently independent and lacking in transparency.95 In other instances, States were not sufficiently forthcoming about the measures they had implemented to investigate allegations that their armed forces had violated the rights of persons whom the State had detained in armed conflicts abroad, about steps taken to hold accountable persons found responsible for such violations or about reparations provided to victims.96