宣扬暴力极端主义的言论。48 特别报告员担心，这种做法可能适得其反，因为它既可能被视为对现状的维护，也可能导致对民间社会和政府失去信任，在允许反宣传言论不透露真实意图的情况下尤其如此。49 同样，虽然关于传播和极端主义之间的联系、包括极端主义在线内容消费和线下暴力活动之间的联系的证据有限且存在争议，50 但许多防止和打击暴力极端主义的措施坚决实行内容监管。在多个国家，内容监管已经直接转化为对表达自由的广泛、不加区别和过度的限制。
The Special Rapporteur is concerned that that approach may be counterproductive, given that it can both appear as a defence of the status quo49 and contribute to a loss of trust in civil society and in government, in particular where opacity with regard to the genuine nature of the countering voices is tolerated. Similarly, while there is limited and contested evidence on the connection between communication and extremism, including the link between consuming online extremist content and offline violent activity,50 many measures to prevent and counter violent extremism have ploughed definitively into content regulation, which is directly translated in multiple national contexts into broad, indiscriminate and overreaching limitations on freedom of expression.