8. 因此，在第二章中，独立专家以国际人权法为规范框架，并以世卫组织《国际卫生条例》为补充，审查了这场大流行病和控制其传播的措施对享有各类人权造成或加剧的威胁。关于威胁的讨论将分成三小节：经济和社会权利；公民及政治权利；以及发展权。在第三章中，独立专家分析了在这场大流行病背景下，国际团结对于实现人权的必要性，概述了这种必要性的道德和法律依据，主张所强调的义务应具有法律约束力。在第四章中，他提出，这些义务应成为在大流行病背景下确定国际团结差距的规范性框架。在第五章中，他确定并强调了一些积极的努力和最佳做法，随后提出了结论以及针对国家和非国家行为方的建议。
8. Accordingly, in section II, the Independent Expert examines the threats to the enjoyment of all categories of human rights that the pandemic and measures to control its spread have produced or exacerbated, using international human rights law, supplemented by the WHO International Health Regulations, as a normative framework. The threats are discussed in three subsections: economic and social rights; civil and political rights; and the right to development. In section III, he analyses the imperative of international solidarity for the realization of human rights in the context of the pandemic, outlining the ethical and legal rationales for this imperative, arguing in favour of the legally binding nature of the obligations highlighted. In section IV, the obligations are then set out as the normative framework for identifying the gaps in international solidarity in the context of the pandemic. In section V, he identifies and highlights some positive efforts and best practices, which is followed by conclusion and recommendations for States and non-State actors.