33. 特别报告员指出，利用基于信仰的理由、言论和批判性思维工具，与负责说服人们加入极端主义团体的招募人员合作，是防止极端主义的有效方法。72 不过，她同意宗教或信仰自由特别报告员的意见，即寻找任何宗教或信仰的“真实声音”不是政府的职责，宗教或信仰的内涵应由信徒来界定。73 她回顾说，有观点认为政府可以通过定向的意识形态或神学干预措施批准或控制个人思维方式或信仰，或规定何种思想或信仰获得批准，这类观点在法治和尊重人的尊严的社会中没有立足之地。
33. The Special Rapporteur notes that working with recruiters who are responsible for convincing people to join extremist groups using faith-based reasons, rhetoric and critical thinking tools is an effective method to prevent extremism.72 She agrees with the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief however that it is not the Government’s role to look for the “true voices” of any religion or belief and that the contents of a religion or belief should be defined by the worshippers.73 She recalls that the perception that a Government can authorize or control the way that individuals think or what they believe, through targeted 68 A/HRC/28/66/Add.1, paras. 19 and 26. 69 A/73/362, paras. 19–21. 70 See United Kingdom, guidance for specified authorities in England and Wales on the duty in the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 to have due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism (available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-guidance); A/HRC/43/46/Add.1 and A/HRC/40/52/Add.4. 71 Note the specific recommendations regarding medical and other professionals in A/HRC/40/52/Add.5. 72 UNDP, “Report on Oslo II”. 73 A/HRC/7/10/Add.3, para. 76. ideological or theological interventions, or what authorized thoughts or beliefs are has no place in societies governed by the rule of law and respect for human dignity.