75. 工作组注意到来文方列举了大量正当程序权据称遭到侵犯之情事。但是，工作组重申，评估证据是否充分或是处理据称国内法庭犯下的司法错误，不属于工作组的任务范围，除非存在表面证据证明国际法遭到违反。来文方提出的关于Mahloof 先生系在道听途说的证据基础上被定罪或是法官拒绝传唤辩方提出的几位证人的指控不应由工作组来评估，因为工作组不具备评估所有证人陈述内容的条件。
75. The Working Group notes the numerous alleged breaches of due process rights listed by the source. However, it reiterates that it does not fall within its mandate to assess the sufficiency of the evidence or to deal with errors of law allegedly committed by a domestic court, unless there is a prima facie breach of international law. The allegations made by the source that Mr. Mahloof was convicted on the basis of evidence that was hearsay, or that the judge excluded some of the witnesses presented by the defence, is not for the Working Group to assess, as it is not in a position to assess the content of all witness statements.