52. 2019 年 7 月 10 日，以色列当局在东耶路撒冷 Silwan 的 Wadi Hulwah 驱逐了一户巴勒斯坦家庭(一名妇女和四个孩子)。在驱逐前两天，高等法院驳回了这家人的上诉许可申请。自 1990 年代初以来，定居者组织 Elad 通过四次诉讼试图接手这一房产，其中三次被耶路撒冷地区法院以部分基于伪造文件为由驳回。106 2009 年，该地区法院裁定，根据《缺席业主房产法》，拥有四分之一产权的两个人不住在东耶路撒冷，因此应被视为“缺席业主”。遭驱逐的妇女是其中一名被认为“缺席业主”的女儿。缺席业主房产保管人随后将所谓的缺席业主房产卖给了 Elad。据报，在进行法律程序时，Elad 又从居住在国外的业主手里购买了另外 50%的产权。这些业主如果没有出售房产的话，很可能会被视为“不在业主”，这意味着他们不会获得任何赔偿。
52. On 10 July 2019, the Israeli authorities evicted a Palestinian family(one woman and four children) in Wadi Hulwah in Silwan, East Jerusalem. Two days before the eviction, the High Court of Justice rejected the family’s request for leave to appeal. Since the early 1990s, the settler organization Elad had attempted to take over the property through four law suits, three of which were dismissed by the Jerusalem District Court as being partially based on forged documents.106 In 2009, the District Court determined that two persons owning one fourth of the property should be considered “absentees” under the Absentee Property Law because they resided outside East Jerusalem. The evicted woman is the daughter of one of the persons considered an “absentee”. The Custodian of Absentees’ Property then sold the so-called absentee property to Elad. During the legal procedures, Elad reportedly bought another 50 per cent of the property from owners living abroad, who likely would have been considered “absentees” if they had not sold the property, meaning that they would have received no compensation.