40. 解决暴力极端主义的性别层面的政策和方案有明显增加，86 但尚没有对此类方案的优点、影响或人权合规情况进行系统监测和评估。遗憾的是，优先将妇女作为防止和打击暴力极端主义的主体和渠道，很少是以妇女不受歧视和平等的权利为前提，相反，其战略理由是，这种做法可以更全面地认识暴力极端主义的根源，有助于采取更为本地化、更可信的反恐战略，这种将妇女作为交易条件的做法让特别报告员深感关切。87 明显侧重于以妇女为手段改善反恐努力，存在议程被挪用的风险，在此过程中，狭隘地强调“妇女”，分散了对造成性别不平等、排斥和暴力的广泛结构性现实因素的关注。
40. There has been a distinct upsurge in policy and programming addressing the gender dimension of violent extremism, 86 yet there has been no systematic monitoring and evaluation assessing the merits, impacts or human rights compliance of such programming. Regrettably, prioritizing women as both subjects and conduits of the prevention and countering of violent extremism has rarely been premised on their rights to non-discrimination and equality, but rather relies on the strategic rationale that it leads to a more comprehensive understanding of the causes of violent extremism and more localized and credible strategies for countering terrorism, a form of commodification which deeply concerns the Special Rapporteur. 87 The distinct focus on using women as a means of improving counter-terrorism efforts runs the risk of agenda-hijacking, whereby a narrow emphasis on “women” distracts attention from the wider structural realities that produce gender inequality, exclusion and violence.