64. 最后，被拘留的这批学生据称直至被逮捕 48 小时后才被带见法官，除Dadda 先生外，他在被逮捕 72 小时后才被带见法官。然而，来文方称，摩洛哥《刑事诉讼法》第 140 条规定，任何被逮捕者都应在被逮捕后 24 小时内被带见8 另见第 27/2016 号意见，第 36 段。法官。工作组回顾，工作组通常无权确定程序是否遵守国家法律。然而，工作组注意到，国家标准执行的是《公约》第九条第三款，其中规定，任何被逮捕者都应被迅速带见法官。工作组指出，人权事务委员会解释说，这种情况下应当在48 小时内带见法官，9 并注意到，摩洛哥法律规定的时限较短，为 24 小时。工作组认为，根据人权事务委员会的解释，违反这一较为严格的标准也构成违反国际准则，因此，这一问题属于工作组的管辖范围。工作组得出结论认为，政府没有按照该国法律规定将被拘留的学生在 24 小时内带见法官，因此没有履行该国根据《公约》第九条第三款承担的义务。
64. Lastly, once in detention, the members of the group of students were allegedly not brought before a judge until 48 hours after their arrest, with the exception of Mr. Dadda, who was not brought before a judge until 72 hours after his arrest. Yet, according to the source, article 140 of the Moroccan Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that anyone who is arrested must be brought before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest. The Working Group recalls that, as a general rule, the question of whether proceedings were conducted in accordance with national law is outside its jurisdiction. However, it notes that the national standard is consistent with article 9 (3) of the Covenant, which stipulates that anyone who is arrested must be brought promptly before a judge. The Working Group notes that the Human Rights Committee has explained that the time frame in such cases should not exceed 48 hours;9 it further notes that Moroccan law imposes a shorter time limit of 24 hours. In the light of the Committee’s interpretation, the Working Group considers that the violation of this stricter standard also constitutes a violation of the international standard and that the issue therefore falls within its jurisdiction. The Working Group concludes that, by failing to bring the detainees before a judge within the 24-hour time limit established by Moroccan law, the Government failed to meet its obligation under article 9 (3) of the Covenant.