7.6 委员会注意到，移民与公民事务部及难民复审法庭在裁决中接受申诉人的以下说法：2012 年，他曾遭巴基斯坦主管机构的任意拘留和虐待。委员会还注意到缔约国的这一论点，即申诉人在多次当面询问和提交的材料中表示，实施虐待的人为巴基斯坦不同的主管机构的人员，这会使人们对他的可信度产生怀疑。同时，委员会注意到提交人的论点，即在进行庇护程序过程中，他一直通过口译员进行交流，而且他一直表示，行凶者为代表巴基斯坦主管机构、身穿制服的武装人员。委员会认为，申诉人作出的解释为何及解释。委员会并不认为，申诉人陈述中用语的不一致会使人们对他的可信度产生怀疑。6 例如，见第 550/2013 号来文，S.K.和其他人诉瑞典，2015 年 5 月 8 日通过的意见，第 7.3 段。7 例如，见第 203/2002 号来文，A.R.诉荷兰，2003 年 11 月 14 日通过的意见，第 7.3 段。
7.6 The Committee notes that, in its decisions, the Department of Immigration and Citizenship and the Refugee Review Tribunal accepted the complainant’s claim that, in 2012, he had been arbitrarily detained and subjected to ill-treatment by Pakistani authorities. The Committee also notes the State party’s argument that the fact that the complainant has in various interviews and submissions referred to the perpetrators of the ill-treatment as being members of different Pakistani authorities raises doubts as to his credibility. The Committee further notes the author’s argument that he had been communicating via interpreters during the asylum proceedings and that he has always been consistent in describing the perpetrators as armed, in uniform and representing Pakistani authorities. The Committee finds the explanation provided by the complainant to be reasonable and does not consider that the variation of terminology in his declarations raises doubts about his credibility.