7.3 在本案中，委员会必须对以下问题进行评估：是否有充分理由认为，申诉人如果返回巴基斯坦，本人就会面临遭受酷刑的危险。在评估这项临时，委员会必须依据《公约》第 3 条第 2 款，考虑到所有相关因素，包括遣返目的地国境内是否存在一贯严重、公然、大规模侵犯人权的情况。委员会指出，评估的目的在于弄清相关个人本人是否会在遣返目的地国面临遭受酷刑的可预见、实际的危险。因此，一国存在一贯严重、公然、大规模侵犯人权的情况这一点本身，并不构成据以认定某人在返回该国后将面临遭受酷刑危险的充分理由，还须提出其他理由，证明相关个人本人将面临危险。反过来，不存在公然侵犯人权的情况，并不意味着某人从具体情况来看可能不会遭受酷刑。6
7.3 In the present case, the Committee must assess whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be personally in danger of being subjected to torture upon return to Pakistan. In assessing that risk, the Committee must take into account all relevant considerations, pursuant to article 3 (2) of the Convention, including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in the country of return. The Committee recalls that the aim of the evaluation is to establish whether the individual concerned would be personally at a foreseeable and real risk of being subjected to torture in the country to which he or she would be returned. The existence of a pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in a country therefore does not as such constitute sufficient reason for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture on return to that country, and additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individual concerned would be personally at risk. Conversely, the absence of a consistent pattern of flagrant violations of human rights does not mean that a person might not be subjected to torture in his or her specific circumstances.6