5.2 申诉人说，他的指称是可信的、一致的。他认为，在拘留和毒打他的人员的身份方面，尤其是在这些人员所在的机构方面他的陈述的不一致，属于用词上细小的、无足轻重的差异。他认为，他一直提及的是相同的行凶者和事件，因此他的提法是一致的。他说，他在庇护程序过程中一直依靠口译人员的帮助，很难要求酷刑受害者做到绝对一致。他说，他曾再三表示，将他任意拘留，对他进行拷打和毒打的人员是携带武器、身穿制服的人员，来自巴基斯坦主管机构。他说，缔约国没有对他遭到巴基斯坦主管机构人员的任意拘留和毒打的说法提出异5 第 83/1997 号来文，G.R.B.诉瑞典，1998 年 5 月 15 日通过的意见，第 6.3 段。议。他认为，考虑到他曾经遭到巴基斯坦主管机构人员的拷打，缔约国移民事务机构得出的认为如果他被遣送回巴基斯坦，他不会面临酷刑危险的结论，是武断的，也是毫无道理的。他还认为，缔约国移民事务机构得出的认为他不可能被要求为主管机构刺探消息的结论，也是不合理的、武断的。
5.2 The complainant argues that his claims are credible and have been consistent. He considers the variation in his statements regarding the identification of the persons who detained and beat him, particularly as regards the authority they are from, to be a minor and immaterial difference in terminology. He submits that he has always referred to the same perpetrators and events and has thus been consistent. He notes that he has been relying on interpreters during the asylum proceedings and that absolute consistency can seldom be expected of victims of torture. He argues that he has been consistent in stating that the persons who detained him arbitrarily, tortured and beat him had been armed, uniformed and from the Pakistani authorities. He notes that the State party does not contest that he was arbitrarily detained and beaten by Pakistani authorities. He submits that, given that he has previously been tortured by the Pakistani authorities, the conclusion of the State party immigration authorities that he would not face a risk of torture if deported to Pakistan is arbitrary and unreasonable. He further considers that the conclusion of the State party immigration authorities that he would not have been asked to spy for the authorities is irrational and arbitrary.