Yamiche Alcindor: But President Trump's past statements, especially tied to race, have led to deep divides among athletes about attending. Some still come to White House ceremonies, but many of the most well-known players in sports have not. In 2017, the president publicly criticized quarterback Colin Kaepernick for kneeling during the national anthem. That same year, the reigning NBA champions, the Golden State Warriors, said they would boycott the White House visit. President Trump claimed he disinvited them. And a visit by the 2018 Super Bowl champions, the Philadelphia Eagles, was canceled after of number of players said they wouldn't attend. Let's explore this divide a bit more. The Red Sox visit today is just one chapter in President Trump's tense relationship with some athletes. To talk about this, I'm joined by Kevin Blackistone, who is a national sports columnist for The Washington Post, a regular contributor to ESPN, and a professor of journalism at the University of Maryland. Thanks so much, Kevin, for being here. There is a split here. Some Red Sox players showed up to the White House. Others chose not to come. What do you make of that? And what does it say about what these sports events at the White House have become under President Trump?<doc-sep>President Donald Trump holds a Boston Red Sox team jersey as he welcomes the 2018 World Series Champion Red Sox at the White House in Washington, D.C., May 9, 2019. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) Zealots politicize nonpartisan events and blame Donald Trump for it. It was a saddening spectacle when the Boston Red Sox were invited to the White House to honor their World Series win and nearly all of those who showed up were white. A slate of black and Latino players, plus Puerto Rico–born manager Alex Cora, pointedly declined to attend. Cora made it clear in statements that this was an act of political opposition. Advertisement Naturally the media blamed the target of this calculated mass protest. “Did Donald Trump honor the Red Sox or the ‘White’ Sox?” asks columnist Edward Montini in the Arizona Republic, adding, “Trying to pretend that President Donald Trump has not caused a widening racial and ethnic divide means not believing what you can hear with your own ears and see — clearly — with your own eyes.” MSNBC guest and former Joe Biden chief of staff Ron Klain said, “I bet [Trump] was happy today that he was able to say that the white players were here and players of color weren’t. That’s the kind of division he fosters deliberately.” The Red Sox boycott is the latest discomfiting incident of professional athletes, especially black and Latino ones, declining to participate in routine White House ceremonies honoring champions. When Clemson’s college-football team was invited to the White House, 74 percent of the team’s players of color “declined the ‘honor,’” Montini points out. The Golden State Warriors and Philadelphia Eagles refused White House invitations en masse, forcing White House cancellations of events planned to honor them. Advertisement Nobody likes to see a glaring race divide in America. Nobody, I suppose, except progressives, who are cheering all of this acrimony and calling for more of the same. Elizabeth Warren praised Cora. The supposedly nonpartisan media is having a chin-stroking moment of reflection, saying, “Isn’t it unfortunate, what Trump has done?” Notes the Washington Post, “What had once been feel-good ceremonies at the White House have become pitched moments of cultural reckoning.” True, but let’s call this what it is: Top athletes, especially top athletes of color, are insulting the president of the United States. They have every right to do this, but let’s at least get the direction of the animosity right. Trump doesn’t invite just white athletes to the White House. The racial resentment in these ceremonies is being flung at him, not by him. The athletes, not the president, are racializing these ceremonies. Before I deal with the “Trump is uniquely bad” argument, an obvious point: These feel-good photo-ops for jocks are nonpartisan. Everyone used to understand this. Participating in a White House ceremony does not constitute an endorsement of a president, much less agreement with all of his policies. Before the Trump era, only a handful of athletes had ever been conspicuous no-shows at White House events to honor them, and most of them hastened to clarify that they had non-political reasons for missing the events. These days everything must be scrutinized for political content. Dave Zirin of The Nation is assailing Tiger Woods for accepting a Presidential Medal of Freedom from Trump, saying it amounted to “to kiss[ing] Trump’s ring.” Trump has broken norms in many ways, but the feedback loop is apparent. His ideological enemies consider Trump’s behavior to be a license to abandon their own norms. The media are hostile in unprecedented ways, so Trump attacks the media in unprecedented ways, which makes the media even more openly hostile. Nonpartisan awards ceremonies turn into unhinged anti-Trump roasts. The formerly good-natured ribbing at the White House Correspondents Dinner becomes so sulfurous that the comedy portion has to be canceled, and Robert De Niro shouts the f-word at the Tony Awards. Reporters can hardly get through a tweet without editorializing about their dislike of the president, and TV news has invented the snark chyron. When President Obama was saying, “If you like your health-care plan, you can keep it” 37 times, I don’t recall CNN ever snark-chyroning him with, “OBAMA REPEATS UNTRUTH ABOUT KEEPING YOUR PLAN.” Obama’s health-care whopper was more consequential than all of Trump’s untruths and lies put together, given that it was critical to the passage of the biggest legislation since the 1960s. Advertisement To cast Trump as uniquely polarizing, hence uniquely deserving of unusual social calumny, is to ignore statistical trends. Americans are simply getting more and more susceptible to polarization, determined to go nuclear on every passing remark: Remember “s***hole countries”? As spinach was to Popeye, so social media is to political outrage. Gallup tells us that of the 15 most divisive years of presidential polling they’ve ever recorded, 14 of those years have been since 2005. (The 15th happened during the Clinton administration.) George W. Bush was the most polarizing president ever, until he was supplanted by Barack Obama, who was supplanted by Donald Trump. It may be that every president turns out to be the most polarizing president ever, for a while. Advertisement Shattered norms can prove difficult to glue back together, and “Two can play that game” is a phrase that must be unfamiliar to many of our friends on the left, including many who play actual games for a living. Should a Democrat be elected president next year, Trump fans are going to be angry and bitter. They’re going to be looking for ways not only to undermine his successor but to embarrass and humiliate that person for the most trivial things — and they’ll have plenty of precedent from the Trump era to cite. Is this the way people on the left want it to be, or would they like to take a deep breath, quiet their hysteria, and start behaving normally again? It’s vital that there be at least some tranquil gardens of nonpartisanship in our civic life, places where we can agree to check our cudgels at the door and talk about sports or movies or our kids. The Left is determined to bring hollering mobs into every one of these redoubts and pollute them with unnecessary rancor and spite. As progressives trample all over respected traditions, “He started it” makes a poor excuse.<doc-sep>
President Trump Donald TrumpTrump lashes out after grand jury seated for New York criminal probe Schumer tees up vote on Jan. 6 commission bill Senators struggle to save Jan. 6 commission MORE on Monday highlighted the success of the Boston Red Sox in the wake of the team's visit to the White House, which several players of color skipped. Trump noted that the Red Sox have won three games in a row since most team members visited last Thursday and suggested making the celebratory White House trip has led to good fortune for others. "Has anyone noticed that all the Boston @RedSox have done is WIN since coming to the White House! Others also have done very well," Trump tweeted. ADVERTISEMENT "The White House visit is becoming the opposite of being on the cover of Sports Illustrated! By the way, the Boston players were GREAT guys!" he added, referencing the idea that teams appearing on the cover of Sports Illustrated experience bad luck. Has anyone noticed that all the Boston @RedSox have done is WIN since coming to the White House! Others also have done very well. The White House visit is becoming the opposite of being on the cover of Sports Illustrated! By the way, the Boston players were GREAT guys! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 13, 2019 Trump's defense of the ceremonial White House visit for championship teams comes as it has become a fraught subject during his presidency. A number of teams and individual athletes have rejected invitations from the president, often citing his rhetoric and policies on race and immigration. The president welcomed the Red Sox to the White House last Thursday to honor the team for its 2018 World Series victory. But manager Alex Cora and a handful of other players were absent. Cora, a native of Puerto Rico, said he did not feel comfortable visiting given the Trump administration's response to Hurricane Maria, which devastated the island in 2017. Reigning American League MVP Mookie Betts, pitcher David Price David Eugene PriceSecret Service: Optics of Trump greeting supporters outside Walter Reed wasn't a factor GOP ramps up attacks on Biden's border wall freeze The US has a significant flooding problem — Congress can help MORE, third baseman Rafael Devers and center fielder Jackie Bradley Jr. were among the players who did not make the trip. All of those who did not attend were people of color.