Doesn't this mean, then, that having a more or less equal distribution of income makes for a happier society, even if it does not raise anyone's material standard of living ? That is, you can use the fact that people did not feel poor in the 1950s as an argument for a more radical egalitarianism than even most leftists would be willing to espouse.
People did not feel poor in the 1950s.
Equal distribution of income does not make society as a whole happy.
A man is sleep in the picture.
Oh, yeah, I heard all about it.
The family is not going to visit the goat today.
The Grand-Etang is a placid lake surrounded by forest and very quiet.
A man racing his car.
An adult smiles.