It simply asserts that, in calculating a firm's potential value, you can't assume that earnings are simultaneously retained and paid out--and that the Glassman-Hassett argument depends on precisely these conflicting assumptions.
The Glassman-Hassett argument relies on two assumptions that contradict each other.
The principles of the Glassman-Hassett argument don't conflict with each other.
That is the worst example of what pro bono ought to be like.
Two children are riding camels.
A man is fixing a bicycle.
People are sleeping while others watch.
A man is using a gas blower to clear the street.
Some people think that literary journalism was much better in the past.