It is no answer to say the restriction on speech is harmless because, under LSC's interpretation of the Act, its attorneys can withdraw.
It is not harmless to restrict what someone says, because the LSC's attorneys can withdraw.
The interpretation of the Act says that there's no possible consequences for restricting speech.
The man is sitting in a church pew.
The gilded Garuda is in middle of a breakdance move.
Several men are working on a yarn machine.
Trauma physicians aren't covered because they don't primarily provide counseling for substance abuse.
If you decide to do it despite warning, everything will be arranged.
The man is inside.