That case discussed the nature of television broadcasting, not to determine whether government regulation would alter its usual functioning and thus violate the First Amendment (no government regulation was even at issue in the case), but rather to determine whether state-owned television is a public forum under our First Amendment jurisprudence.
The nature of television broadcasting was a subject in that case.
That case concerned whether government regulation should change its usual functioning.
A man bicycles down a street.
I don't think it will be the same attitude.
The three people are sleeping on the coach, tv still on and blaring.
Everyone I passed seemed to be cold.
You can easily ascend to the top where there is an impressive vista.
A dog laying in the water.