In addition, while Andersen had certain unusual audit related policies and practices that were not widely known by its partners and may not be shared by many other firms, it was hardly a rogue firm in the profession and any assertions to the contrary are not only inaccurate but also inappropriate.
It would be wrong to say that the firm was badly run or culpable in its roguish behavior.
Andersen was completely out of control because the firm's practices were systemically reckless.
She was in immediate danger.
There is only one person.
a woman is sitting on a beach
the people are outside
The CEF analysis was benchmarked to a 1999 reference case.
It is to lessen their knowledge.