well in answer to you know answer to the question though i still think the sentencing should be in the hands of the jury even though as you say there are some uh people who are reluctant i do not think again in the matter of uh uh that that judges should have the uh the upper hand or the only hand in that sense because i think if but i i've never served on a jury you probably know this better than i um if the jury does their job and of course there are those on the jury that do not i'm sure but and ask the questions and uh correctly and then one of things i've always wondered is uh the ability of jurors to to ask questions
It's important that the judge does not have more power than the jury in terms of sentencing.
Juries have too much power, and judges not enough.
The case studies have variable quality.
I listened to the music and I could hear the Sitar and the Trumpet. I never thought they actually were played to gether.
Don't look there.
National saving and investment have a direct correlation with federal savings.
The two players are trying to catch the ball.
These pollutants are addressed by current law.