His popular but flawed description of tulip mania as a speculative bubble remains prominent, even though since the 1980s economists have debunked many aspects of his account.
Tema populaarne, kuid ilmselt vigane käsitlus tulbimaaniast kui majandusmullist on endiselt hinnas, kuigi alates 1980. aastatest on majandusteadlased mitmed selle aspektid ümber lükanud.