There is one discrepancy in this case: the entry for 685 in the version of the Chronicle assigns Ceawlin a son, Cutha, but in the 855 entry in the same manuscript, Cutha is listed as the son of Cuthwine.
Jedna nesrovnalost tu ale je: zápis k roku 685 ve verzi Anglosaské kroniky připisuje Ceawlinovi syna, prince Cuthu, ale v zápise k roku 855 té samé verze rukopisu, je Cutha zanesen jako syn prince Cuthwina.