The court found that the UK citizen should have been treated the same as a French national in regards to compensation for his injuries, because as a tourist he was entitled to take advantage of the freedom of provision of services.
Kohus leidis, et Briti kodanikule oleks tulnud pakkuda vigastuste eest hüvitist samadel alustel Prantsuse kodanikega, sest turistina oli tal õigus teenuste osutamise vabadusest teenuste vastuvõtjana kasu saada.