In a forgery case, a fingerprint was found on a forged document that was used to commit a fraud. The fingerprint was lifted and compared to the fingerprints of the suspect and was found to be a match. This evidence is an example of:
A. Class evidence
B. Individual evidence
C. Circumstantial evidence
D. Documentary evidence
Answer:C
In a forgery case, a fingerprint was found on a forged document that was used to commit a fraud. The fingerprint was lifted and compared to the fingerprints of the suspect and was found to be a match. This evidence is an example of:
A. Class evidence B. Individual evidence C. Circumstantial evidence D. Documentary evidence
Explanation: In this case, the fingerprint found on the forged document is circumstantial evidence that links the suspect to the crime. Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that requires inference or presumption to establish a fact. In this case, the fingerprint provides circumstantial evidence of the suspect’s involvement in the forgery.