4.
Agents that block production or action of angiotensin and thereby reduce peripheral vascular resistance and (potentially) blood volume.
The fact that these drug groups act by different mechanisms permits the combination of drugs from two or more groups with increased efficacy and, in some cases, decreased toxicity. (See Box: Resistant Hypertension & Polypharmacy.)
Dietary sodium restriction has been known for many years to decrease blood pressure in hypertensive patients. With the advent of diuretics, sodium restriction was thought to be less important. However, there is now general agreement that dietary control of blood pressure is a relatively nontoxic therapeutic measure and may even be preventive. Even modest dietary sodium restriction lowers blood pressure (though to varying extents) in many hypertensive persons.
Monotherapy of hypertension (treatment with a single drug) is desirable because compliance is likely to be better and the cost is lower, and because in some cases adverse effects are fewer. However, most patients with hypertension require two or more drugs acting by different mechanisms (polypharmacy). Accord-ing to some estimates, up to 40% of patients may respond inad-equately even to two agents and are considered to have “resistant hypertension.” Some of these patients have treatable secondary hypertension that has been missed, but most do not, and three or more drugs are required. One rationale for polypharmacy in hypertension is that most drugs evoke compensatory regulatory mechanisms for main-taining blood pressure (see Figures 6–7 and 11–1), which may markedly limit their effect. For example, vasodilators such as hydralazine cause a significant decrease in peripheral vascular resistance, but evoke a strong compensatory tachycardia and salt and water retention (Figure 11–4) that are capable of almost completely reversing their effect. The addition of a β blocker prevents the tachycardia; addition of a diuretic (eg, hydrochloro-thiazide) prevents the salt and water retention. In effect, all three drugs increase the sensitivity of the cardiovascular system to each other’s actions. A second reason is that some drugs have only modest maxi-mum efficacy but reduction of long-term morbidity mandates their use. Many studies of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors report a maximal lowering of blood pressure of less than 10 mm Hg. In patients with more severe hypertension (pressure > 160/100 mm Hg), this is inadequate to prevent all the sequelae of hypertension, but ACE inhibitors have important long-term benefits in preventing or reducing renal disease in diabetic persons and in reduction of heart failure. Finally, the toxicity of some effective drugs prevents their use at maximally effective doses. In practice, when hypertension does not respond adequately to a regimen of one drug, a second drug from a different class with a different mechanism of action and different pattern of toxicity is added. If the response is still inadequate and com-pliance is known to be good, a third drug should be added. If three drugs (usually including a diuretic) are inadequate, other causes of resistant hypertension such as excessive dietary sodium intake, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or stimu-lant drugs, or the presence of secondary hypertension should be considered. In some instances, an additional drug may be neces-sary, and mineralocorticoid antagonists, such as spironolactone, have been found to be particularly useful. Occasionally patients are resistant to four or more drugs, and nonpharmacologic approaches have been considered. Two promising treatments that are still under investigation, particularly for patients with advanced kidney disease, are renal denervation and carotid barostimulation.
Mechanisms of Action & Hemodynamic Effects of Diuretics