The actions of a noncompetitive antagonist are different because, once a receptor is bound by such a drug, agonists cannot surmount the inhibitory effect irrespective of their concentration. In many cases, noncompetitive antagonists bind to the receptor in an irreversible or nearly irreversible fashion, sometimes by forming a covalent bond with the receptor. After occupancy of some proportion of receptors by such an antagonist, the number of remaining unoccupied receptors may be too low for the agonist (even at high concentrations) to elicit a response comparable to the previous maximal response (Figure 2–3B). If spare receptors are present, however, a lower dose of an irreversible antagonist may leave enough receptors unoccupied to allow achievement of maximum response to agonist, although a higher agonist concentration will be required (Figure 2–2B and C; see Receptor-Effector Coupling & Spare Receptors).
Therapeutically, such irreversible antagonists present distinct advantages and disadvantages. Once the irreversible antagonist has occupied the receptor, it need not be present in unbound form to inhibit agonist responses. Consequently, the duration of action of such an irreversible antagonist is relatively independent of its own rate of elimination and more dependent on the rate of turnover of receptor molecules.
Phenoxybenzamine, an irreversible α-adrenoceptor antagonist, is used to control the hypertension caused by catecholamines released from pheochromocytoma, a tumor of the adrenal medulla. If administration of phenoxybenzamine lowers blood pressure, blockade will be maintained even when the tumor episodically releases very large amounts of catecholamine. In this case, the ability to prevent responses to varying and high concentrations of agonist is a therapeutic advantage. If overdose occurs, however, a real problem may arise. If the α-adrenoceptor blockade cannot be overcome, excess effects of the drug must be antagonized “physiologically,” ie, by using a pressor agent that does not act via α adrenoceptors.
Antagonists can function noncompetitively in a different way; that is, by binding to a site on the receptor protein separate from the agonist binding site; in this way, the drug can modify receptor activity without blocking agonist binding (see Chapter 1, Figure 1–2C and D). Although these drugs act noncompetitively, their actions are often reversible. Such drugs are called negative allosteric modulators because they act through binding to a different (ie, “allosteric”) site on the receptor relative to the classical (ie, “orthosteric”) site bound by the agonist and reduce activity of the receptor. Not all allosteric modulators act as antagonists; some potentiate rather than reduce receptor activity. For example, benzodiazepines are considered positive allosteric modulators because they bind to an allosteric site on the ion channels activated by the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and potentiate the net activating effect of GABA on channel conductance. Benzodiazepines have little activating effect on their own, and this property is one reason that benzodiazepines are relatively safe in overdose; even at high doses, their ability to increase ion conductance is limited by the release of endogenous neurotransmitter. Allosteric modulation can also occur at targets lacking a known orthosteric binding site. For example, ivacaftor binds to the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) ion channel that is mutated in cystic fibrosis. Certain mutations that render the channel hypoactive can be partially rescued by ivacaftor, representing positive allosteric modulation of a channel for which there is no presently known endogenous ligand.