License
What license are the weights under?
Hello, our model is licensed under the Apache 2.0. You can find it on our GitHub project homepage: https://github.com/Alpha-VLLM/Lumina-Image-2.0
Thank you for the great model!
I noticed that in your repository's model zoo, it states that the model uses the VAE from FLUX-VAE-16CH, which I assume falls under the Flux-1-Dev-Non-Commercial License. Wouldn't that mean the model is also required to use the Flux-1-Dev-Non-Commercial License?
@astinmiura The same VAE was released with FLUX.1 schnell, which is licensed as Apache 2.0.
Regarding licensing: Correct me if I'm wrong here, but doesn't the Gemma model that Lumina Image 2.0 incorporates include a license that is incompatible with Apache 2.0, on account of being more restrictive? Is there any way to replace this with CLIP or an Apache 2.0-compatible model like Qwen2.5?
Additionally, I agree with Ostris that the VAE under Schnell and Dev are the same and that we would assume the license for the VAE to match the most permissively licensed upload, but I think it would be best to pull that VAE from the Schnell repo, to head off these kinds of complaints and as a check against accident contamination of restrictive licensed material.
google-deepmind/gemma is licensed under the Apache License 2.0
A permissive license whose main conditions require preservation of copyright and license notices. Contributors provide an express grant of patent rights. Licensed works, modifications, and larger works may be distributed under different terms and without source code.
Permissions: Commercial use, Modification, Distribution, Patent use, Private use
Limitations: Trademark use, Liability, Warranty
Conditions: License and copyright notice, State changes
Source: Gemma model license: https://github.com/google-deepmind/gemma/blob/main/LICENSE