|
Nemo 12b tuned for Reflection. Examples: |
|
|
|
<s><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are a world-class AI system, capable of complex reasoning and reflection. Reason through the query inside <thinking> tags, and then provide your final response inside <output> tags. If you detect that you made a mistake in your reasoning at any point, correct yourself inside <reflection> tags.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>### User:How many r's are found in the word strawberry? Think carefully.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>### Response: |
|
<thinking> |
|
To solve this problem, I need to: |
|
1. Break down the word "strawberry" into its component parts |
|
2. Identify the letters that are r's |
|
3. Count the total number of r's |
|
|
|
I should be careful not to make assumptions about the spelling or pronunciation of the word. |
|
|
|
<reflection> |
|
Upon reflection, I realize I should also consider: |
|
- The possibility of multiple r's in a row |
|
- The need to count each r separately, even if they're next to each other |
|
- The importance of not counting r's that are part of other letters (like in "berry") |
|
</reflection> |
|
</thinking> |
|
|
|
<output> |
|
After careful consideration, here's the solution: |
|
|
|
1. Break down the word: strawberry |
|
2. Identify the r's: r, r, r |
|
3. Count the total: 3 r's |
|
|
|
Therefore, there are 3 r's in the word "strawberry". |
|
|
|
This problem demonstrates the importance of careful reading and attention to detail. It also relates to phonetics and spelling conventions in English. |
|
|
|
Would you like me to explain any part of this solution in more detail? |
|
</output> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<s><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>You are a world-class AI system, capable of complex reasoning and reflection. Reason through the query inside <thinking> tags, and then provide your final response inside <output> tags. If you detect that you made a mistake in your reasoning at any point, correct yourself inside <reflection> tags.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>### User: |
|
A banana is sitting on the counter and I place a plate on top of it. A few minutes later, I pick up the plate and put it in the microwave. Where is the banana? |
|
<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>### Response: |
|
<thinking> |
|
This is a classic physics problem that tests our understanding of Newton's laws of motion. Key components to consider: |
|
1. The initial state of the banana |
|
2. The force applied when the plate is placed on top |
|
3. The banana's response to the applied force |
|
4. The banana's state after the plate is removed |
|
|
|
Potential approaches: |
|
1. Analyze the forces acting on the banana |
|
2. Consider the banana's inertia and momentum |
|
3. Examine the banana's potential energy before and after the plate is removed |
|
|
|
I'll use the first approach as it provides the most direct explanation. |
|
|
|
<reflection> |
|
Upon further consideration, I realize that simply analyzing the forces might not be sufficient. We should also consider the banana's elasticity and the plate's weight. This will provide a more comprehensive explanation. |
|
</reflection> |
|
</thinking> |
|
|
|
<output> |
|
The banana remains on the counter where it was initially placed. Here's why: |
|
|
|
1. When the plate is placed on top of the banana, it applies a downward force on the banana. This force is equal to the weight of the plate. |
|
|
|
2. The banana, being an elastic object, deforms slightly under this force. However, it doesn't move because it's still in contact with the counter. |
|
|
|
3. When the plate is removed, the banana immediately springs back to its original shape. This happens because the banana has stored elastic potential energy while being compressed. |
|
|
|
4. The banana remains on the counter because it has no horizontal momentum or force acting on it. It doesn't move because there's no net force in the horizontal direction. |