user8842: I have a question about my Biology Stack Exchange post: Is the tube for anal and vaginal canal the same/equal sensitivity? I can feel a bowel's spatial dimensions; same ability to sense object internally?
I asked in chat at https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/55208400#55208400 but the room does not seem active, so repeating here:

Can I ask if https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/95156 is locked for a reason (or should I wait for further
comments/notifications)? 15:53

I was reading Silly question about two human mechanisms: induced "REM dreams" by masturbation?
and felt that my question was then on-topic.

My question was just as deep as Silly question about two human mechanisms: induced "REM dreams" by masturbation?,
I used the same language.


https://biology.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask says "You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face." which I took to heart, I gave my "stack" as programmers say. I was proud I stuck to (medical) words my doctor has used in the examination room (and if I said "shit" my doctor said the word cordially back to me).
Before somebody guesses what I asked based on words I did not say, I did not say "does it feel XYZ?" I asked if you can identify the object inside, and to what degree (words I would have edited to add to my original question by now)?
I would challenge anybody to think (and explain) the wording I should have used to be mature? I thought literally decades about the question here so I think I know a few words about how others may think as well comparing and contrasting the ability to map/coordinates/blender.org/identify the object internally.
I tried to be very sanitary with my language. Which is why I understand but am surprised after using biology/medical terminology for most descriptors, and just the word "sh_t" for "doo doo" felt reasonable enough, and now I'm asking what is the actual language usage problem. I actually described some of my personal history ("my stack" as I wrote above) to try to balance and soften the blow of reading even if you are (ironically, hypersensitive like me) hypersensitive.
I was deliberately sanitary, dense, distant, and could have gone for the "Can you feel X/A/1 in your Y/B/2 like I feel in my Z/C/3?" directly but chose to use the indirect sounding medical terminology, which is legalese-like and wordy. I mean I tried to make the process sound technical, like I would in real life normally. I rarely (basically never) say the word "Sex" even, even never with friends either, my private searches being not known, and so the question in question is the 0.01% of my written public activity to make any mention of genital vocabulary. I made a sincere effort to use the dictionary/Wikipedia phrasing for body parts and did not make graphic language references besides that.
I made a puny "covering my ass" pun to be cordial with the subject matter I presented, given I am relating asking (to myself first, then here) as being a human individual being sensitive to my own body alone; the only body being described is my own, and barely except generically. I thought that might help calm some people down if the albeit appropriate words were still intense, I'd understand even vague mention can be triggering, but I've heard we all curse on the toilet (even in public bathrooms, vocal dignified cursing seems normal before/during plopping), I felt mature responders could thus manage to navigate.
I deliberately made an effort to require readers to read carefully and not just skim for trigger-words. I figured if you could read how my voice would be as difficult for a doctor to parse, and how that doctor would realize I did not just want to talk about my ___hole directly (so I said "tube"), the writing would be self-muted and self-censored enough.
(So far I have the feeling the correct question wording would ultimately be the title of the peer-reviewed scientific literature ["Empirical Review of Conscious Biological Recognition of Inner Organ Sensitivity in the Human Body" I guess], the question in is going to be another question from the question going out, and I wanted to preserve that, to be mature, as well as the sciencey determination.
And am I being attacked for having a unique personal individual perspective and experience?)
In my original question I asked "Should I ask https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com or http://biology.stackexchange.com here?", was that an issue?
Is there a specific reason my question is being called into question, because I was not informed of any reason(?) so far.

user27148: Your question is nothing like the one you are comparing it to, and it only makes sense to make that comparison if you think the word "masturbation" is the reason your post was deleted; it is not.
Specific words were not the issue, their arrangement into sentences was.
As David quoted to you, your post "was flagged as spam or offensive content and deleted by Community♦".
I don't have any intent to continue this conversation.

8842: 

<p>I have a question about my Biology Stack Exchange post: <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/95156/is-the-tube-for-anal-and-vaginal-canal-the-same-equal-sensitivity-i-can-feel-a">Is the tube for anal and vaginal canal the same/equal sensitivity? I can feel a bowel's spatial dimensions; same ability to sense object internally?</a></p>

<p><em>I asked in chat at <a href="https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/55208400#55208400">https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/55208400#55208400</a> but the room does not seem active, so repeating here:</em></p>
<ul>
<li><p>Can I ask if <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/95156">https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/95156</a> is locked for a reason (or should I wait for further
comments/notifications)? 15:53</p>
</li>
<li><p>I was reading <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/93632/silly-question-about-two-human-mechanisms-induced-rem-dreams-by-masturbation">Silly question about two human mechanisms: induced &quot;REM dreams&quot; by masturbation?</a>
and felt that my question was then on-topic.</p>
</li>
<li><p>My question was just as deep as <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/93632/silly-question-about-two-human-mechanisms-induced-rem-dreams-by-masturbation">Silly question about two human mechanisms: induced &quot;REM dreams&quot; by masturbation?</a>,
I used the same language.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask">https://biology.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask</a> says &quot;You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on <strong>actual problems that you face.</strong>&quot; which I took to heart, I gave my &quot;stack&quot; as programmers say. <strong>I was proud I stuck to (medical) words my doctor has used in the examination room</strong> (and if I said &quot;shit&quot; my doctor said the word cordially back to me).</p>
<p>Before somebody guesses what I asked based on words I did not say, I did not say &quot;does it feel XYZ?&quot; I asked if you can identify the object inside, and to what degree (words I would have edited to add to my original question by now)?</p>
<p>I would challenge anybody to think (and explain) the wording I should have used to be mature? I thought literally decades about the question here so I think I know a few words about how others may think as well comparing and contrasting the ability to map/coordinates/blender.org/identify the object internally.</p>
<p><em><strong>I tried to be very sanitary with my language</strong>. Which is why I understand but am surprised after using biology/medical terminology for most descriptors, and just the word &quot;sh_t&quot; for &quot;doo doo&quot; felt reasonable enough, and now I'm asking what is the actual language usage problem. I actually described some of my personal history (&quot;my stack&quot; as I wrote above) to try to balance and soften the blow of reading even if you are (ironically, hypersensitive like me) hypersensitive.</em></p>
<p><em>I was deliberately sanitary, dense, distant, and could have gone for the &quot;Can you feel X/A/1 in your Y/B/2 like I feel in my Z/C/3?&quot; directly but chose to use the indirect sounding medical terminology, which is legalese-like and wordy. I mean I tried to make the process sound technical, like I would in real life normally. I rarely (basically never) say the word &quot;Sex&quot; even, even never with friends either, my private searches being not known, and so the question in question is the 0.01% of my written public activity to make any mention of genital vocabulary. I made a sincere effort to use the dictionary/Wikipedia phrasing for body parts and did not make graphic language references besides that.</em></p>
<p><em>I made a puny &quot;covering my ass&quot; pun to be cordial with the subject matter I presented, given I am relating asking (to myself first, then here) as being a human individual being sensitive to <strong>my own body alone; the only body being described is my own, and barely except generically</strong>. I thought that might help calm some people down if the albeit appropriate words were still intense, I'd understand even vague mention can be triggering, but I've heard we all curse on the toilet (even in public bathrooms, vocal dignified cursing seems normal before/during plopping), I felt mature responders could thus manage to navigate.</em></p>
<p><em>I deliberately made an effort to require readers to read carefully and not just skim for trigger-words. <strong>I figured if you could read how my voice would be as difficult for a doctor to parse, and how that doctor would realize I did not just want to talk about my ___hole directly (so I said &quot;tube&quot;)</strong>, the writing would be self-muted and self-censored enough.</em></p>
<p>(So far I have the feeling the correct question wording would ultimately be the title of the peer-reviewed scientific literature <em>[&quot;Empirical Review of Conscious Biological Recognition of Inner Organ Sensitivity in the Human Body&quot; I guess]</em>, the question in is going to be another question from the question going out, and I wanted to preserve that, to be mature, as well as the sciencey determination.</p>
<p>And am I being attacked for having a unique personal individual perspective and experience?)</p>
<p>In my original question I asked &quot;Should I ask <a href="https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com">https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com</a> or <a href="http://biology.stackexchange.com">http://biology.stackexchange.com</a> here?&quot;, was that an issue?</p>
<p>Is there a specific reason my question is being called into question, because I was not informed of any reason(?) so far.</p>
 27148: <p>Your question is nothing like the one you are comparing it to, and it only makes sense to make that comparison if you think the word &quot;masturbation&quot; is the reason your post was deleted; it is not.</p>
<p>Specific words were not the issue, their arrangement into sentences was.</p>
<p>As David quoted to you, your post &quot;was flagged as spam or offensive content and deleted by Community♦&quot;.</p>
<p>I don't have any intent to continue this conversation.</p>
