user8186: Is it alright to ask a question about the movie reference of a drug, only because the producer claims it to be real?
Question in Question:
Does CPH4 exists?
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/20410/whats-the-name-of-this-molecule-if-it-exists

user338: We should not keep questions with so little backup (like one man's claim). They are good questions, but would be a far better fit for Skeptics.se. When someone has actual evidence of a molecule, and wants the name, that's different.
So, basically, closing was the right thing to do, but I personally would have flagged them for migration to Skeptics as well, so that the users who asked them get a good answer, rather than a 'closed as off topic'.

8186: <p>Is it alright to ask a question about the movie reference of a drug, only because the producer claims it to be real?</p>

<p><strong>Question</strong> in Question:</p>

<p><a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/20387/does-cph4-exists?lq=1">Does CPH4 exists?</a></p>

<p><a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/20410/whats-the-name-of-this-molecule-if-it-exists">https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/20410/whats-the-name-of-this-molecule-if-it-exists</a></p>
 338: <p>We should not keep questions with so little backup (like one man's claim). They are good questions, but would be a far better fit for Skeptics.se. When someone has actual evidence of a molecule, and wants the name, that's different.</p>

<p>So, basically, closing was the right thing to do, but I personally would have flagged them for migration to Skeptics as well, so that the users who asked them get a good answer, rather than a 'closed as off topic'.</p>
