user9943: It's about What are the advantages of forgetting?
I just do not see any benefit of close voting a question that

received an accepted answer 5 days before question closure;
was well received by the community at large (6k views, 22 upvotes);
received 4 answers;
accepted answer is well referenced,  well upvoted and not downvoted once. 

Of course, the question stats are positive because it became hot, but in general I do not see the benefits of closing a question when established users have answered it and where the answer apparently makes sense. 
I personally often remove close votes when the answer(s) make up for a mediocre question. The art of answering is writing interesting stuff and I am of the opinion that answers can make the question. 

user6: I've reopened the question. The chosen close reason was that the question would fit better on a different site. That is generally an invalid reason to close, as long as the question isn't actually out of the scope of this site. 
We have very fuzzy borders to various other sciences, and many questions could fit on multiple sites. But that doesn't mean we have to move them to the best fitting site, migrations are disruptive and should not be done without necessity. If a question is relevant to biology, even if it would be a better fit on another scientific site, it should stay here.

9943: <p>It's about <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/57128/why-is-forgetting-good-for-the-brain">What are the advantages of forgetting?</a></p>

<p>I just do not see any benefit of close voting a question that</p>

<ul>
<li>received an accepted answer 5 days before question closure;</li>
<li>was well received by the community at large (6k views, 22 upvotes);</li>
<li>received 4 answers;</li>
<li>accepted answer is well referenced,  well upvoted and not downvoted once. </li>
</ul>

<p>Of course, the question stats are positive because it became hot, but in general I do not see the benefits of closing a question when established users have answered it and where the answer apparently makes sense. </p>

<p>I personally often remove close votes when the answer(s) make up for a mediocre question. The art of answering is writing interesting stuff and I am of the opinion that <strong>answers can make the question</strong>. </p>
 6: <p>I've reopened the question. The chosen close reason was that the question would fit better on a different site. That is generally an invalid reason to close, as long as the question isn't actually out of the scope of this site. </p>

<p>We have very fuzzy borders to various other sciences, and many questions could fit on multiple sites. But that doesn't mean we have to move them to the best fitting site, migrations are disruptive and should not be done without necessity. If a question is relevant to biology, even if it would be a better fit on another scientific site, it should stay here.</p>
