user1320: This question about fats and oils was moved to Chemistry after I answered it and the answer had been accepted. I don't really see why it was moved. It is no more chemical than lots of other questions that are left in Biology. Fats and oils are natural products/biological material, and the explanation of their properties provides an underpinning for understanding the behaviour of biological membranes.
I'm pretty sure the chemists will see it as too biological.

user6: The question is about the chemistry of a molecule that is very important in biology. It is in the overlapping area between the chemistry and the biology site, and would be on-topic on both of them, in my opinion.
In general, I think we should not migrate  questions in this overlapping area unless the author asks us to.

user69: Whilst the molecules in question are obviously very important in biology, I saw no biological context in either the question or the answer.  With that in mind I applied our guidelines for questions about bio-informatics (requiring a clear biological context) and moved it across to Chemistry, where it has gained another answer.  
I did glance at how much rep would be lost by this action, admittedly I didn't clock that it was accepted and apologise for any inconvenience this caused, however I still felt it wasn't biologically motivated enough to be on-topic for us.  

1320: <p><a href="https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4058/saturated-vs-unsaturated-fats-structure-in-relation-to-room-temperature-state">This question</a> about fats and oils was moved to Chemistry after I answered it and the answer had been accepted. I don't really see why it was moved. It is no more chemical than lots of other questions that are left in Biology. Fats and oils are natural products/biological material, and the explanation of their properties provides an underpinning for understanding the behaviour of biological membranes.</p>

<p>I'm pretty sure the chemists will see it as too biological.</p>
 6: <p>The question is about the chemistry of a molecule that is very important in biology. It is in the overlapping area between the chemistry and the biology site, and would be on-topic on both of them, in my opinion.</p>

<p>In general, I think we should not migrate  questions in this overlapping area unless the author asks us to.</p>
 69: <p>Whilst the molecules in question are obviously very important in biology, I saw no biological context in either the question <em>or</em> the answer.  With that in mind I applied our guidelines for questions about bio-informatics (requiring a clear biological context) and moved it across to Chemistry, where it has gained another answer.  </p>

<p>I did glance at how much rep would be lost by this action, admittedly I didn't clock that it was accepted and apologise for any inconvenience this caused, however I still felt it wasn't biologically motivated enough to be on-topic for us.  </p>
