user64500: I have a question about my Biology Stack Exchange post: Do women also love men's chest/nipples at same extent as men's love for women's breasts?
I really don't understand which part of my question is not fitting to this site? I really worked hard, read a lot of articles to ask this question, because I really want to know the reality. But now that my question is closed, I'm feeling hopeless and I don't know what to do. This thing is really important to me. I thought this is the right site on SE network where people would understand the question and will answer it. But I was really surprised and sad when it was closed. I feel very bad and sad when I have a genuine question and I can't find its answer anywhere on the Internet.
So is there any way I can improve my question and get the answer? Is there something specific that can be removed or changed or described better? Is there any other way to ask this question so ultimately I get answer to my original doubts?

user6786: In my opinion, I find this sentence, said by @theforestecologist, is the only helpful feedback for the OP:

your question's premise (does somebody love something) is subjective and opinion-based

The rest of the feedback the OP received only centers on this one. However, this important point is still unclear from the perspective of the OP. We have to respect this perspective. If someone can elaborate on why that premise is subjective, then the OP would be much less confusing. But it seems that no one does that; only continuing them that the question is subjective. I think in their perspective they are doing exactly what they are suggested, to their best. Of course their best is not enough, but telling them to do the thing they have already done will only confuse them.
I think in this case, both sides are victims of the illusion of transparency. If one frequents many sites one can see this phenomenon happens occasionally. I don't know why, but surely it decreases our satisfaction on learning and helping. I guess until we have a concrete theory about subjectivity, we cannot solve this once and for all.
To feedbackers: Perhaps asking Socratic questions is a better approach. Quoting the line you find unclear/unscientific/subjective will make your feedback much clearer than just stating the question unclear/unscientific/subjective. If you find the question is unsaveable, then probably be much helpful to emphasizing OP's lack of background, and recommend them to read an introductory material. If you want OP to be specific in asking question, then you need to be specific first in giving feedback.
To OP: I encourage you to read a literature review on "sexually attractive", or else you will never find the necessary vocabulary to describe their problem. @theforestecologist also links you to Pawlowski, B.A. and Sorokowski, P., 2008. Men's attraction to women's bodies changes seasonally. Perception, 37(7), pp.1079-1085. You can start from this. In this site it's likely you will get answered from complex studies anyway. If you feel like there is a knowledge gap, then asking for introductory material is perfectly fine. I encourage you to ask another question on Psychology & Neuroscience about introductory material for "sexual attraction". I would be surprise if it's closed again

user27148: 
Also, if I use the word love, like, by these word(s), I mainly mean: finding sexually attractive

Then don't say "love". Say "find sexually attractive". Why introduce terminology that you redefine for your question when that terminology has a lot of other baggage attached?
"Do women find the male chest sexually attractive?" seems like a reasonable question to me; it could be answered empirically with a survey approach asking women about physical traits they find attractive. You'd be mistaken to take any of these results as universal or describing any individual, of course. That said, I don't think it belongs on Biology because it doesn't ask about any underlying biology, but I feel it could fit on Psychology.
However, your question has a lot of other rambling junk in it. You go on and on about "hot girls" in movies, personal anecdotes, etc. Why? This is not helpful, it has nothing to do with your core question.
The majority of your question focuses on men's attraction to women's breasts; while it may be reasonable to establish this to ground your question, none of the elaboration is necessary or relevant to the core question. Neither are the parts about stimulation of women's breasts being sexually arousing. If you want to ask about arousal experienced by men from nipple stimulation, then that's a separate question, not related to your title. Keep SE questions focused on one question and one question only.

If yes, why don't we hear/see/listen much about it

This is a purely opinion-based question that has nothing to do with biology, or really psychology for that matter. Leave it out.

If no, why (I assume you would say it's all mostly culture based)?

This also cannot be answered in any scientific way. One can speculate, but it's hard enough to scientifically answer "why" questions for things that exist, let alone those that do not. Leave this out.

Lastly, you've been, from my perspective, quite pushy and rude. You've asked this question 4 times on 3 different sites within just a few hours, and hardly responded to any feedback you've gotten except to complain it's not valid. Listen to feedback you get and try to understand it. Be patient: you were complaining on Skeptics.SE about not getting an answer on Biology Meta helping you with your question not even 2 hours after you posted here. Users here are not at your call, they're volunteering their time and expertise.
There is also a tendency for people to come to some of these sites and ask sexual questions for their own personal titillation. They're not looking for an answer to the question they claim to be asking, they actually just want to talk about sexuality with people on the internet. If you want to ask a science question about sexuality, keep to the science, otherwise it appears you have other motives.

64500: 

<p>I have a question about my Biology Stack Exchange post: <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/98556/do-women-also-love-mens-chest-nipples-at-same-extent-as-mens-love-for-womens">Do women also love men's chest/nipples at same extent as men's love for women's breasts?</a></p>

<p>I really don't understand which part of my question is not fitting to this site? I really worked hard, read a lot of articles to ask this question, because I really want to know the reality. But now that my question is closed, I'm feeling hopeless and I don't know what to do. This thing is really important to me. I thought this is the right site on SE network where people would understand the question and will answer it. But I was really surprised and sad when it was closed. I feel very bad and sad when I have a genuine question and I can't find its answer anywhere on the Internet.</p>
<p>So is there any way I can improve my question and get the answer? Is there something specific that can be removed or changed or described better? Is there any other way to ask this question so ultimately I get answer to my original doubts?</p>
 6786: <p>In my opinion, I find this sentence, <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/98556/do-women-also-love-mens-chest-nipples-at-same-extent-as-mens-love-for-womens#comment178266_98556">said by @theforestecologist</a>, is the only helpful feedback for the OP:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>your question's premise (does somebody love something) is subjective and opinion-based</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The rest of the feedback the OP received only centers on this one. However, this important point is still unclear from the perspective of the OP. We have to respect this perspective. If someone can elaborate on why that premise is subjective, then the OP would be much less confusing. But it seems that no one does that; only continuing them that the question is subjective. I think in their perspective they are doing exactly what they are suggested, to their best. Of course their best is not enough, but telling them to do the thing they have already done will only confuse them.</p>
<p>I think in this case, both sides are victims of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_of_transparency" rel="nofollow noreferrer">illusion of transparency</a>. If one frequents many sites one can see this phenomenon happens occasionally. I don't know why, but surely it decreases our satisfaction on learning and helping. I guess until we have a concrete theory about subjectivity, we cannot solve this once and for all.</p>
<p><strong>To feedbackers:</strong> Perhaps asking <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_questioning" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Socratic questions</a> is a better approach. Quoting the line you find unclear/unscientific/subjective will make your feedback much clearer than just stating the question unclear/unscientific/subjective. If you find the question is unsaveable, then probably be much helpful to <a href="https://psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2407/12937">emphasizing OP's lack of background, and recommend them to read an introductory material</a>. If you want OP to be specific in asking question, then you need to be specific first in giving feedback.</p>
<p><strong>To OP:</strong> I encourage you to read a literature review on &quot;sexually attractive&quot;, or else you will never find the necessary vocabulary to describe their problem. @theforestecologist also links you to <em>Pawlowski, B.A. and Sorokowski, P., 2008. Men's attraction to women's bodies changes seasonally. Perception, 37(7), pp.1079-1085</em>. You can start from this. In this site it's likely you will get answered from complex studies anyway. If you feel like there is a knowledge gap, then asking for introductory material is perfectly fine. I encourage you to ask another question on Psychology &amp; Neuroscience about introductory material for &quot;sexual attraction&quot;. I would be surprise if it's closed again</p>
 27148: <blockquote>
<p>Also, if I use the word love, like, by these word(s), I mainly mean: finding sexually attractive</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Then don't say &quot;love&quot;. Say &quot;find sexually attractive&quot;. Why introduce terminology that you redefine for your question when that terminology has a lot of other baggage attached?</p>
<p>&quot;Do women find the male chest sexually attractive?&quot; seems like a reasonable question to me; it could be answered empirically with a survey approach asking women about physical traits they find attractive. You'd be mistaken to take any of these results as universal or describing any individual, of course. That said, I don't think it belongs on Biology because it doesn't ask about any underlying biology, but I feel it could fit on Psychology.</p>
<p>However, your question has a lot of other rambling junk in it. You go on and on about &quot;hot girls&quot; in movies, personal anecdotes, etc. Why? This is not helpful, it has nothing to do with your core question.</p>
<p>The majority of your question focuses on men's attraction to women's breasts; while it may be reasonable to establish this to ground your question, none of the elaboration is necessary or relevant to the core question. Neither are the parts about stimulation of women's breasts being sexually arousing. If you want to ask about arousal experienced by men from nipple stimulation, then that's a separate question, not related to your title. Keep SE questions focused on one question and one question only.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If yes, why don't we hear/see/listen much about it</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is a purely opinion-based question that has nothing to do with biology, or really psychology for that matter. Leave it out.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If no, why (I assume you would say it's all mostly culture based)?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This also cannot be answered in any scientific way. One can speculate, but it's hard enough to scientifically answer &quot;why&quot; questions for things that exist, let alone those that do not. Leave this out.</p>
<hr />
<p>Lastly, you've been, from my perspective, quite pushy and rude. You've asked this question 4 times on 3 different sites within just a few hours, and hardly responded to any feedback you've gotten except to complain it's not valid. Listen to feedback you get and try to understand it. <strong>Be patient</strong>: you were complaining on Skeptics.SE about not getting an answer on Biology Meta helping you with your question <strong>not even 2 hours after you posted here</strong>. Users here are not at your call, they're volunteering their time and expertise.</p>
<p>There is also a tendency for people to come to some of these sites and ask sexual questions for their own personal titillation. They're not looking for an answer to the question they claim to be asking, they actually just want to talk about sexuality with people on the internet. If you want to ask a science question about sexuality, keep to the science, otherwise it appears you have other motives.</p>
