user69: When tagging a question I was going to chose neurology - using the 'ology' as previously discussed but neuroscience is the preferred choice at present.  
Would anyone object to renaming neuroscience to neurology to avoid having a 'special case'?

user6: Neuroscience is a far more general term, and probably the best one to use for tagging. Neurology is about disorders of the nervous system, while neuroscience is the study of the nervous system. 
I'd say that neuroscience is at the correct level for tagging, and that we don't need a neurology tag so far.

69: <p>When tagging a question I was going to chose <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/neurology" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;neurology&#39;" rel="tag">neurology</a> - using the 'ology' <a href="https://biology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/184/using-well-known-tags-or-the-ologies">as previously discussed</a> but <a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/neuroscience" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;neuroscience&#39;" rel="tag">neuroscience</a> is the preferred choice at present.  </p>

<p><strong>Would anyone object to renaming <em>neuroscience</em> to <em>neurology</em> to avoid having a 'special case'?</strong></p>
 6: <p>Neuroscience is a far more general term, and probably the best one to use for tagging. Neurology is about disorders of the nervous system, while neuroscience is the study of the nervous system. </p>

<p>I'd say that neuroscience is at the correct level for tagging, and that we don't need a neurology tag so far.</p>
