user12909: I decided to start this thread in light of March Ho's question here.

Since many of us do not monitor post we vote close or delete, we need a way to draw attention to post that deserve another look. By drawing attention, I mean post that need to be looked at for reopening, undeletion, etc. For example, if you noticed a closed thread that has been substantial edited to fall within appropriate site guidelines, you can post it as an answer here so the others can vote to reopen.
Please do not use this thread to engage in debates on contentious matters (e.g. reasons for closure). That should be done in a separate linked thread. The goal is to keep this meta thread free of tension, so that everyone feels comfortable posting here. Please be polite, and respect the many different viewpoints in our diverse community.
To inform readers of the current (and past) states of the targeted post, please prepend tags such as:

Reopened, Reclosed or
Undeleted, Redeleted

at the start of the answer when a change of status occurs. (This also makes it easier to browse through the list by creating a visual difference for posts that still require action.)
Beware that "short" requests such as "request reopening of " may be automatically converted to comments by the SE software, so you may need to write more (e.g. why you think that the question should be reopened or undeleted).

The idea was borrow from math.SE here. Also, the linked thread will give everyone and opportunity to see how it works.

user12909: 
Reopened

Why do humans stop growing? was closed for asking personal medical advice. However, OP edited their post prior to it being closed to remove the personal aspect. 
They have shown that they believe age is an attributing factor to max height so it should be reopened.

12909: <p>I decided to start this thread in light of March Ho's question <a href="https://biology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2902/how-much-research-is-generally-required-for-it-to-stop-being-closed-for-homework">here</a>.</p>
<hr />
<p>Since many of us do not monitor post we vote close or delete, we need a way to draw attention to post that deserve another look. By drawing attention, I mean post that need to be looked at for reopening, undeletion, etc. For example, if you noticed a closed thread that has been substantial edited to fall within appropriate site guidelines, you can post it as an answer here so the others can vote to reopen.</p>
<p>Please do not use this thread to engage in debates on contentious matters (e.g. reasons for closure). That should be done in a separate linked thread. The goal is to keep this meta thread free of tension, so that everyone feels comfortable posting here. Please be polite, and respect the many different viewpoints in our diverse community.</p>
<p>To inform readers of the current (and past) states of the targeted post, please prepend tags such as:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Reopened, Reclosed</strong> or</p>
<p><strong>Undeleted, Redeleted</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>at the start of the answer when a change of status occurs. (This also makes it easier to browse through the list by creating a visual difference for posts that still require action.)</p>
<p>Beware that &quot;short&quot; requests such as &quot;request reopening of &quot; may be automatically converted to comments by the SE software, so you may need to write more (e.g. why you think that the question should be reopened or undeleted).</p>
<hr />
<p>The idea was borrow from math.SE <a href="https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19042/requests-for-reopen-undeletion-votes-etc-volume-01-2015-current-versio">here</a>. Also, the linked thread will give everyone and opportunity to see how it works.</p>
 12909: <blockquote>
  <p><strong>Reopened</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/30937/why-do-humans-stop-growing">Why do humans stop growing?</a> was closed for asking personal medical advice. However, OP edited their post prior to it being closed to remove the personal aspect. </p>

<p>They have shown that they believe age is an attributing factor to max height so it should be reopened.</p>
