













Comments     Threshold


RE: Slightly more useful than a pad imo
By reader1 on 3/8/2010 10:23:22 AM , Rating: -1
Multitasking is a bad idea for mobile devices. Extending battery life is more important.

RE: Slightly more useful than a pad imo
By uibo on 3/8/2010 11:37:26 AM , Rating: 2
Then don't use it. The decreased battery life might not come into play at all if your gonna hook it up to a charger well before it gets empty.

RE: Slightly more useful than a pad imo
By reader1 on 3/8/10, Rating: -1
RE: Slightly more useful than a pad imo
By retrospooty on 3/8/2010 2:15:48 PM , Rating: 2
"Apps running on mobile processors would take a significant performance hit when multitasking. People would try it once, realize it was too slow, and never do it again.

Once again, Apple is ahead of the curve. "


Back to reality, other phones do it without a battery life problem... Why does the iphone have a problem?

It reminds me of Job's excuse for why the first iPhone didnt have 3G - Jobs said it was becasue it sucks the battery life. OF course dozens of other phones from other makers had been using it fro well over a year without battery problems. then, 1 year later the iPhone 3G comes out and it doesnt have battery life issues...

My Point- Jobs is full of sheeeeeiit!

By retrospooty on 3/8/2010 2:16:37 PM , Rating: 2
edit / battery life and perfomance. Other phoness do it all without issue.

By adiposity on 3/8/2010 6:18:53 PM , Rating: 1
Apps running on mobile processors would take a significant performance hit when multitasking. People would try it once, realize it was too slow, and never do it again. Once again, Apple is ahead of the curve.

I'm starting to think you are just making fun of apple lovers. Not implementing something=ahead of the curve? I can understand justifying the decision, but how is this an advantage?

By your own statement, multi-processing devices can just as easily be used as single-processing ones! So where is the advantage in only allowing one option?

