

Primary tabs

Diane Tessman's picture

Sometimes I wake up with strange questions in my head, and today, I’m looking for answers to two of them: Iowa is in the middle of this terrible Drought of 2012, and as I looked up at the cloudless, over-heated skies this morning, I suddenly realized that I have not seen a chemtrail since the drought began.

Might the chemtrails have been delaying what is now happening by emitting some kind of vapor which caused a light cloud cover, which helped rain to form?
Or did they somehow contribute to these parched conditions?

I am not a huge chemtrail conspiracist. I think they are strange, I want to know the answer, but there are so many far-out explanations for them, I have never accepted one theory as the truth. I’m not looking for a litany of theories, I think I’ve heard most of them. I just wonder where the chemtrails in Iowa disappeared to!
Maybe I am wrong about this “no chemtrail since the drought began” – and of course, when did the drought begin anyway? So, let’s just say, I haven’t noticed chemtrails at all recently.

Maybe there was a chemtrail budget cut. I shudder to think how much jet fuel it takes for one of the massive “chemtrail exercises” in which the entire sky is eventually covered with the thin chemtrail clouds.

I am just wondering if people in other areas of the country and world are also noticing that chemtrails are not happening and that there is, coincidentally (?), a bad drought.

Second, there is a great new UFO sighting outlined on UFO Casebook in which a pilot, co-pilot, passengers, and corroborating witness on the ground, saw a classic saucer with lights.

This saucer had three blue/white lights on the bottom and one on top of the dome. (Note: This illustration and possible photo of UFO is not connected to the UFO sighting of which I write).

Why did this saucer buzzing the passenger jet need aircraft lights, even if they were not according to our regulations? It maneuvered beside the commercial passenger jet, matched its speed, moved to the other side of the jet, and finally took off at incredible speed. The jet had no say-so in what was happening and the UFO pilot knew this would be so; why did the UFO pilot bother with semi-conventional warning lights?

Two possible reasons:

1.    The saucer wanted the jet to see it
2.    The saucer needed its lights when it returned to its mothership, a simple safety device, the same reason our planes have lights. After all, space is very dark and if you are in a scout craft, you don’t want the mothership to bang into you!

I hope someone out there might have some in-put on these questions. I know there are “chemtrail experts” out there and I admit, I am not one.
I am really looking for some in-put as to whether chemtrails have disappeared over the entire country and beyond.

And, I am looking for in-put as to why a classic saucer, with classic behavior, would bother with polite running lights!

The UFO giant “search lights” on the ground are fascinating also. What specific item are they searching for?  Don’t they have advanced technology which makes search lights obsolete? How much information can be gathered in the relatively narrow beam of a search light in a typical rural or suburban area?
Or do they simply want us to see them?

Sign up for free monthly Exo-Trekking from Diane:



spiralblue's picture

Diane, I always thought this was due to high pressure. The same reason clouds don't form is also the same reason vapor trails don't form. You can watch jets as they fly at 40,000 feet sometimes and see that their vapor trail dissipates almost immediately. Excuse me if I am confusing "chemtrails" with vapor trails.
Diane Tessman's picture

You may be right and I actually did think of "high pressure." The question might be, are chemtrails only contrails after all then? I don't know! If chemtrails exist, then are the jets up there spreading whatever it is, but it doesn't show up, now (same as contrails don't show now), due to high pressure?


Hsaive's picture - CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE for COVERT GEOENGINEERING: In 2010 Aerospace Engineers published conclusive evidence for Covert Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering, (aka "Chemtrails") in a 336 page report called "CASE ORANGE". The report was commissioned by THE BELFORT GROUP (UK), who held a "CHEMTRAILS SYMPOSIUM" where the conclusions were presented and validated by Aerospace Engineer, Dr. Coen Vermeeren.
spiralblue's picture

As a youth, I used to watch jets with my telescope. Even the jets that were at 30,000 feet I could determine if they were TWA or UNITED by their tails. Jets that were lower than 20,000 feet I could read their identification numbers. It seems to me that it would be fairly easy to track where they came from, then test the fuel they used to see if there were additives,such as aluminum oxide. In BEST EVIDENCE documentary one researcher said that aluminum oxide would possibly ruin jet engines.
Diane Tessman's picture

Yes, it should be relatively simple to track down who/what is doing the chemtrails. Again, I am not an expert but I assume someone has tried. Would they have run into "security clearance" restrictions though? However, the correct answer might be in some of the info already on the net, for instance, but how do we readers know which information is the right information? Alas, conspiracy theories which have no relation to any truth, muddy up the waters too.


Author articles