Jury finds teen guilty of capital murder

Jury finds teen guilty of capital murder



















Capital Murder

The defendant's lawyer says that the prosecutor's evidence is flimsy. And what did he offer that was so extremely powerful that persuaded the jury to find his client not guilty? Absolutely nothing. Burbank is just another stooge who comments after the trial. Attempting to uphold his own trial integrity while demeaning the states evidence. Yet circumstantial evidence is something that has placed many inmates in prison. And defense attorneys do not know how to defend against it. They just " mouth it " away. fragments of a bullet that was never proved...a gun that was not known to either be used or not in the case. BUT...once you correlate any weapon with a police officer's testimony. its a farce to derail the jury. That's why the state is allowed to present circumstantial evidence...and use the investigating officer as collaboration. It makes the jury believe that the evidence is the truth. Farce

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.