Thread history

From Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User ascActivity Comment
12:25, 25 January 2012Yecril71pl (Talk | contribs)New thread created 
19:26, 27 January 2012Yecril71pl (Talk | contribs)Comment text edited (they differ only in KDE approval)
16:43, 30 January 2012AnneW (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to GFDL 1.2 is listed twice)

There are two identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that unapproved licenses are allowed?

Should it be assumed that documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?

Yecril71pl12:25, 25 January 2012



Annew16:43, 30 January 2012