
Messages in this thread
SubjectLinux VM design
Hi VM folks,

I'd like to understand Linux VM but there's not much in
Documentation/vm/* on the subject. I understand that with current
frantic development pace it is hard to maintain such docs.
However, with only a handful of people really understading how VM
works we risk ending in a situation when nobody will know how to fix
it (does recent Andrea's VM rewrite just replaced large part of hardly
maintenable, not-quite-right VM in 2.4.10?)

When I have a stalled problem to solve, I sometimes catch
unsuspecting victim and start explainig what I am trying to do and
how I'm doing that. Often, in the middle of my explanation, I realize
myself what I did wrong. There is an old teacher's joke:
"My pupils are dumb! I explained them this theme once, then twice, I
finally myself understood it, and they still don't".
Since we reached some kind of stability with 2.4, maybe
Andrea, Rik and whoever else is considering himself VM geek
would tell us not-so-clever lkml readers how VM works and put it in
vm-2.4andrea, vm-2.4rik or whatever in Doc/vm/*,
I will be unbelievably happy. Matt Dillon's post belongs there too.
I have an example how I would describe VM if I knew anything about it.
I am putting it in the zip attachment just to reduce number of
people laughing on how stupid I am :-). Most lkml readers won't open
it, I hope :-).

If VM geeks are disagreeing with each other on some VM inner workings,
they can describe their views in those separate files, giving readers
ability to compare their VM designs. Maybe these files will evolve in

Saturday, September 22, 2001, 2:01:02 PM,
Daniel Phillips <> wrote:

DP> - incrementing an age is more efficient than resetting several LRU list links
DP> - also captures some frequency-of-use information


DP> - it can be implemented in hardware (not that that matters much)
DP> - allows more scope for tuning/balancing (and also rope to hang oneself)

DP> The big problem with aging is that unless it's entirely correctly balanced its
DP> just not going to work very well. To balance it well requires knowing a lot
DP> about rates of list scanning and so on. Matt Dillon perfected this art in BSD,
DP> but we never did, being preoccupied with things like just getting the mm
DP> scanners to activate when required, and sorting out our special complexities
DP> like zones and highmem buffers. Probably another few months of working on it
DP> would let us get past the remaining structural problems and actually start
DP> tuning it, but we've already made people wait way too long for a stable 2.4.
DP> A more robust strategy makes a lot of sense right now. We can still play with
DP> stronger magic in 2.5, and of course Rik's aging strategy will continue to be
DP> developed in Alan's tree while Andrea's is still going through the test of
DP> fire.
DP> </musings>

DP> I'll keep reading Andrea's code and maybe I'll be able to shed some more light
DP> on the algorithms he's using, since he doesn't seem to be in a big hurry to
DP> do that himself. (Hi Andrea ;-)

DP> --
DP> Daniel
DP> -
DP> the body of a message to
DP> More majordomo info at
DP> Please read the FAQ at

Best regards, VDA[unhandled content-type:application/x-zip-compressed]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.344 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans