Take the 2-minute tour ×

The Government has decided to introduce the new scheme for the upliftment of poor.

Should it be "of the poor" or not?

share|improve this question
Without the definite article, poor does not refer to anything in particular, certainly not the poor people as should be. –  Kris Sep 19 '12 at 11:39
Upliftment? How about "...for uplifting the poor." (I'm not going down the no-such-word road, but it does seem rare or unusual at best). –  J.R. Sep 19 '12 at 15:00

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Yes, the poor is correct.

The reason is that poor on its own is an adjective, which invites the question "poor what?". To turn it definitively into a noun it needs to be the poor.

Having said that, I did find a quote where just poor is used, in the Hindustan Times:

The Delhi government does not have an estimate of the number of poor living in the metropolis.

This indicates that it may be an acceptable Indian-English idiom.

As an aside, upliftment is awkward. Uplift is better; improvement or betterment better still.

share|improve this answer
The number of poor is acceptable everywhere, I'd say. –  Matt E. Эллен Sep 19 '12 at 11:09
Yes, because it implies 'people' - the number of poor people, which is evidently correct. –  Guy F-W Sep 19 '12 at 11:16
However @GuyF-W, "... for the upliftment of poor." definitely doesn't work in BrEng. Poor is an uncountable noun there, so it needs an article or to be turned into an adjective. –  Matt E. Эллен Sep 19 '12 at 11:25
Yes indeed. Thanks for the clarification. –  Guy F-W Sep 19 '12 at 11:29
+1 for pointing out that upliftment is an awkward word (espoused by Indian English in particular?). Agreed, betterment is much better. –  FumbleFingers Sep 19 '12 at 12:54

Your Answer


