Hey, On 9/27/07, ant elder wrote: > What are people thoughts on how strict reviews should be when saying an > issue is serious enough to block a podling release? This is somewhat subjective, which is not bad in my book. We're all trying to balance at least two serious considerations: the importance of cutting releases in order to increase adoption and community, and the importance of learning "the Apache Way," one component of which is proper attention to licensing, notices, disclaimers, etc. > So I'm wondering if as podling releases are not endorsed by the ASF and if > the "incubating" and the disclaimer text is everywhere as required then > could we be a little more lenient? Maybe just note any issues so they can be > fixed in the next release? Personally, that's my take on it, and what I've done historically. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org