Jump to content

  • Curse Sites


Member Since 12 Jun 2011
Offline Last Active Sep 08 2013 12:09 AM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Is it worth swapping to GS without a wall to use GS3 against?

03 September 2013 - 10:17 AM

GS3 is an evasion, so i would say to save it until you need to dodge an attack, that way you can dodge while DPSing, and you can always GS5 back to your target

In Topic: Who's better with Hammer?

31 January 2013 - 05:58 PM

I would say Warrior's is better all around, Guardian is very slow, the ward can be jumped over, only has one massive CD knockback(though powerful) where as the warrior has a small knockback, a stun, a faster attack chain, and most importantly: earthshaker - AoE stun for 1-2 seconds(based on adrenaline) every 10 seconds. Amazing disruption in PvP.

The Guardian i would say is best for PvE for its constant melee range protection, its knockback is immense on bosses that allow it, immobolize is always useful, and #2 is a blast finisher on 5 second CD, which is awesome for all those group combo fields.

In Topic: Why do people want mounts?

31 January 2013 - 12:38 PM

View PostRed_Falcon, on 30 January 2013 - 09:38 PM, said:

What armor is that?

On topic, I don't think mount would be fitting or useful in GW2.
You can get to any point of the game through teleport, and cover the remaining distances easily by swiftness.
In WvW the whole point of far away waypoints is to prevent people from spawning continuously - having a closer waypoint can turn the tides of a battle - so adding mounts would defeat the whole point of this system.

Cosmetic mounts are not what people are asking, let's face it; it would be pretty much like using minipets and barely anyone does.
People want faster speed in a game where you can get anywhere by waypoint.

Now I would say yes to mounts if waypoints were rare but it's really not the case, and mounted combat would be pretty much a joke in GW2 so let's just leave this cheese to other games.

I ask for purely cosmetic mounts =P

And problem with minipets is that they are stored in your bag, taking up room for junk, and get deposited when you deposit junk, AND are only obtainable for gems, while a lot of people are struggling to make money.

In Topic: Ascended Snubs

30 January 2013 - 02:51 AM

winter armor uses snowflakes and gives stuff like boon duration AFAIK.

Probably what he means

In Topic: Why do people want mounts?

23 January 2013 - 08:55 PM

Its not about recognition for some of us, in WoW i had a kodo, and that was my kodo, very useful for RP sessions, compared to all the players running around with their dragons, my RP felt bolstered by the fact that my mode of travel was an animal native to my homeland.

But nethertheless, more to collect is always good, otherwise they may as well have never made town clothes or mini pets "Because we have legendaries".

I would like the, and would vote for them. But i wouldn't agree that man power should be dedicated to mounts right now, for there to be enough mounts to warrant excitable collection there would have to be manpower dedicated to it, new challenges made for them to be rewarded by/added as rewards to existing content(no-one wants the only mode of collection to be money grinding for gems) and as stated before, right now there are other things at a much higher priority. Though they could likely be added easier, features they have already announced like player/guild housing kind of have the right to come first =P