Print 17 comment(s) - last by Xs1t0ry.. on Feb 28 at 7:06 PM

Rhodococcus bacteria are among the strains useful in bioremediation for their absorption of mineral contaminates.  (Source: University of Cambridge)
New research promises sustainable filters, fuel, and a better understanding of fluid dynamics

Bioremediation, the study of using living organisms to remove pollutants or contaminants from the environment, is a hot new field of research.  Nanotechnology, including carbon nanotubes, nanoparticles, and nanomembranes is another extremely hot field, which promises to one day provide revolutionary improvements to nearly every field of science.  Combine the two fields and you get the University of Nottingham's new research.

Rather than just study nanofilters with nanopores or waste-eating bacteria, the English researchers at the University of Nottingham -- headed by Nidal Hilal, Professor of Chemical and Process Engineering in the Centre for Clean Water Technologies -- combined the two exciting fields to develop a new prototype system, which provides a glimpse at the potential future of water filtration.

The water enters the system and is first passed through colonies of bacteria, which eat contaminants.  The water then flows through an adjacent nanofilter, featuring pores, which are between ten thousandths of a millimeter to one nanometer thick. 

The work is similar to other research funded by the Middle East Desalination Research Centre on nanofiltration and ultrafiltration.  The goal is to be able to create pure, drinkable fresh water from sea water or water contaminated from industrial processes.

The key improvement in the Professor Hilal's system is the use of bacteria.  The bacteria eat the contaminates which prevent the filter from getting clogged and keep the water flowing.  The tech can thus be used in a closed system without the need for regular membrane replacement. 

The research is sponsored by a tech partnership with Cardev International, an oil filtration company based in Harrogate, England.

One fortunate benefit of the process is that the waste it generates in the form of contaminate-laden bacteria has a high calorific content, meaning that it makes an ideal fuel.  This could improve the efficiency of many types of industrial power generation. 

Another benefit of the research is by using state-of-the-art atomic force microscope equipment at the University, researchers are studying fluid movement at the nanoscale, which will allow for a better understanding of how liquids flow and pull apart at the nanoscale.  This could have broad applications in mechanical engineering, including improving oil flow and thus efficiency in automotive engines.  Researchers are testing liquids over a broad temperature range from -50 deg. C to 150 deg. C, which should help to yield a broad understanding of behavior.

Professor Hilal sees the research as unparalleled in terms of both the study of fluids at an atomic level and in providing a sustainable nanofiltration system.  He states proudly, "Examining the properties of liquids has never been done before at this scale.  By using bioremediation and nanofiltration technology combined, the water cleaning process is integrated — using far less energy than current processes. Add to this the recycling of waste products as fuels and you have a greener technology."

Comments     Threshold


RE: Morality
By Gondorff on 2/22/2008 9:00:44 PM , Rating: 2
Religion certainly plays a large role in the US, but the above posters' critiques of the article were dead on. The researcher found in his studies that many people thought nanotech was immoral, yet the connection to religion was entirely speculation.
The answer, Scheufele believes, is religion

Note that there is no evidence behind this claim. It is simply the researcher's own ramblings, and completely unscientific. Therefore, it is rather objectionable that the story should show up in the news as "Religion Colors American's Views of Nanotechnology", when no correlation was shown. Only biased opinions.
Additionally there is the issue of the wording of the question, which is not explained.

It would seem far more plausible to me that the issue is simply that people don't know what nanotech really is (note that it is only by the researcher's own word that we learn that the survey respondents understood nanotech. How does he know that? He cites no source for that information). This would also agree with the related article on that same page that describes the low level of public awareness about nanotech.

