OFFICIAL DISCUSSION THREAD: September 13th, 2019 by hankjmoody in Maher

[–]asdf 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My parents are of the same mindset as BarI Weiss (we’re jewish). Super annoying to deal with. They’re unable to see that there becomes a tipping point where human rights issue dominates the idea of a jewish state for a lot of people other than themselves. Very shortsighted.

I am Ace Watkins, the only Gamer running for President of the United States, AMA! by gamerpres2020 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]asdf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mr watkins will you pledge to shut down the epic game store on the first day of your presidency

Logging HTTP requests in Go by kjk in golang

[–]asdf 18 points19 points  (0 children)

writing your own logrotator is literally the opposite of optimizing for complexity

Logging HTTP requests in Go by kjk in golang

[–]asdf 15 points16 points  (0 children)

not sure why the author wrote their own log rotator when things like logrotate exist?

Weekly Update and Discussion Thread 8-19 to 8-25 by Alax94 in ElizabethWarren

[–]asdf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

how many more threads about warren going on joe rogan do we need

DANK STANK 🔥🔥🔥🔥 by branstarksbitch in StonerCringe

[–]asdf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

dang you’ve got a deep bench of rugrats weed memes

CNN is frustrating! by return2ozma in ElizabethWarren

[–]asdf 10 points11 points  (0 children)

the anchors’ only purpose in life is to manufacture controversies for their panels to discuss so I don’t expect this to ever change

Arguing the World — Can Elizabeth Warren run for president and bring ideas back into our politics, all at the same time? by wenchette in ElizabethWarren

[–]asdf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i’ve noticed downvotes for discussion posts in general, especially if they are centered around material critical of Warren.

not sure what the deal is, i hope that changes

Critique of Warren’s trade plan. What do you think? by asdf in ElizabethWarren

[–]asdf[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty good article until the last moment.

Yeah unfortunately it was clear by the end that the author's whole argument was: "Warren has counter-establishment trade ideas. Trump has counter-establishment trade "ideas". Trump is an idiot and has no real plan. Therefore Warren's plan must be bad," which is a fallacious argument. Really annoying.

I hope that we get some actual policy-based critiques of Warren's positions to debate and mull over; so far all of the arguments I've heard have boiled down to appeals to people's fear of change