That’s what they want you to believe



Other relevant work has examined the psychological impact of exposure to conspiracy theories, particularly in relation to mass media sources (e.g. Butler et al., 1995 [who studied the psychological impact of the film JFK]), but also in relation to the third-person effect (the tendency for people to believe that persuasive media has a larger influence on others than themselves). In one study, Douglas and Sutton (2008) had participants read material containing conspiracy theories about Princess Diana‚Äôs death before rating their own and others‚Äô agreement with the statements, as well as their perceived retrospective attitudes. They found that participants significantly underestimated how much the conspiracy theories influenced their own attitudes.

The piece also covers why conspiracy theories can seem so attractive and discusses compatibility with prior beliefs, the fact they might fill an emotional need, and how they might reflect a general distrust of authority.

However, it doesn’t touch on the fact that truth can often be stranger than fiction, giving even the most unlikely theories a wide margin of error:

The CIA setting-up fake brothels to spike punters with LSD to test its effectiveness as a new generation of mind control drug – been done; secret international network to listen in on telephone calls, faxes and e-mails – old hat; foreign journalists in the pay of intelligence services to spin the media – yesterday’s news.

It is interesting that both conspiracy theorists and conspiracy hiders use this grey area to equal effect.

Link to Psychologist article ‘The truth is out there’.

Full disclosure: I’m an unpaid associate editor and occasional columnist for The Psychologist. This site is entirely independent of the Knights Templar.

4 thoughts on “That’s what they want you to believe”

  1. Ah, but you DON’T say you’re NOT being controlled by the Freemasons – I think that’s pretty suspicious………..
    Douglas Adams (que en paz descanse) made one of the best comments on government manipulations hush-ups etc, to the effect that, if governments are so good at these clandestine activities, how come they’re so bad at everything else?

    1. DUH!….if gov’t’s were so *GOOD* at *EVERYTHING*, then either we wouldn’t know what happened at all, (it wouldn’t ever be known), or else we would all believe the same story.
      You missed that particular “South Park” episode….
      The gov’t openly “bungles” things, to maintain their “plausible deniability”.
      And, yes, the truth is stranger than fiction.
      For example, since Pope Francis has been in office, it’s been (more openly & widely) revealed that the Vatican Bank also functions as a mafia-complicit money laundry, and that yes, the Church *HAS* protected known pedophiles. Yet, the average Catholic will say, “What?!, no way, the Pope would never shield pedophiles! That’s just some Islamic (or Protestant….)*CONSPIRACY**THEORY*”….

      see how that works?

  2. I’m s victim of something that has to do with orchestrated trauma, anxiety,harassment etc. etc. When I went to look for resources on this um, whatever it is, I found that there are people intentionally misleading victims like myself to adopt certain terminology to describe what it is and core beliefs about who is generating it.

    Upon further investigation, I found that both my harassers (using Ericksonian NLP no less) and the people claiming to be victims were pushing standard right wing conspiracy theories as the origins. I had never even heard of them – I’m a researcher but I don’t work on US internet pop culture. I didn’t fall for the Illuminati NWO or end-of-times theories even during the worst of it.

    The irony is that I fell for the idea that there was a stalker network out to get me. I have proof and a case number for the internet part of the stalking. Surely I wasn’t the only one? But common sense eventually prevailed.

    The other aspect was “electronic harassment.” It appears that the symptoms reported by most are actually symptoms of various types of seizures. I don’t doubt that at least initially there is an external generation of those symptoms but it’s made to look like something it’s probably not.

    I don’t even like the term “mind control” since it’s really about behavior modification or brain-to-behavior studies. It’s more like unethical and illegal mind harassment coupled with attempts to intentionally distort a victim’s reality.

    The problem now is getting justice for what actually is going on and letting others know without falling into the standard “CIA is out to get me” routine. I don’t know who’s generating it, but it most certainly is intentional.

  3. …..and now, almost 5 years later, I wonder if you’re still online, and what’s the update?…..
    Because, what if *some* of your story *is* true?
    Maybe you really *ARE* a victim of internet/gang stalking….?

Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s