Leicestershire Constabulary a Freemasonic Stasi

Stasi logo. Notice the Freemasonic compasses in the centre of the wreath.

The logo of the Policia Judiciaria - the Portuguese Police who are analagous to the British CID or Criminal Investigation Department.

A Leicestershire Constabulary badge. This county police force in England is entrusted with the so-called continuing Madeleine McCann investigation. Four years after the disappearance the public is none the wiser as to any kind of progress in the case. Is it really a long term cover-up being dragged out while it masquerades as a bona fide investigation?

When Madeleine McCann disappeared in 2007, the British public soon found out that the Portuguese Police system was run on completely different lines to that in the United Kingdom. In Britain, when a crime is committed, the police typically appear on television news bulletins to give regular updates to the public about their investigation. The Yorkshire Ripper case, the Soham murders and more recently, the Shannon Matthews faked abduction, are three famous high profile cases where we saw the police making regular appearances in the media.

In Portugal, policing doesn’t operate like that.


The logo of the Policia Judiciaria - the Portuguese Police who are analagous to the British CID. This branch of the Portuguese police force became the main investigators in the Madeleine disappearance.

Their laws call for a strict judicial secrecy. This means that the police will not make the same kind of public updates that we are accustomed to in the UK. As the Madeleine disappearance unfolded in 2007, these laws seemed draconian at the time because not having updated information seemed to allow rumours and false stories to fester in the public domain.

Of course, the Portuguese judicial secrecy was not foolproof and for whatever reason, we had several leaks of information throughout that summer of 2007 and in 2008 before the case was shelved as a cold-case. The McCanns used those leaks to criticise the PJ. Their main complaint was that they themselves couldn’t speak out in public so why were unknown persons within the PJ leaking information from the ongoing investigation?

This criticism was a valid point by the McCanns but was it entirely true? More importantly, did it make any real difference?

Despite Kate and Gerry hiding behind the judicial secrecy veil in interviews, they didn’t exactly keep their mouths shut either. In Kate Healy’s latest book “madeleine”, she describes how she and Gerry met up with Freemason solicitor Ed Smethurst and their soon to be benefactor, Brian Kennedy. Kate goes on to describe her meeting in London with Scottish tycoon Kennedy on Friday September 14, 2007:

Brian was much younger than I was expecting, very relaxed and personable. He told us a little about himself. Originally from Edinburgh and married with five children, he was wealthy, obviously, but a self-made man: he had started out as a window cleaner. Then he asked me to give him an account of what had happened on the evening of 3 May. I talked for a couple of minutes before he stopped me. ‘OK, that’s enough. I’ve always believed you. I just wanted to hear it from you. That’s fine.’

So in Kate’s own words, four years down the line she reveals that she deliberately broke the laws of judicial secrecy by describing what happened on the night of May 3, 2007 to a man she had only just met that day – a comparative stranger. That’s funny: when Kate appeared on many interviews, she would refuse to tell the interviewer how she knew that Madeleine had been abducted because Kate would claim that she was prohibited from doing so because of “the investigation”.

In the BBC’s Panorama documentary aired on November 19, 2007, Smethurst appears in the documentary and he effectively reveals that Kate and/or Gerry have broken the judicial secrecy laws:

part of the reason why we’re here disclosing evidence to you today as opposed to keeping our powder dry is a recognition that there were two strands to this case…

Whether Smethurst was officially hired by the McCanns as their attorney, Smethurst had no right to disclose anything his clients or acquaintances had revealed to him, and certainly not to a television programme aired in public to millions of viewers.

There are other examples of the McCanns’ double standards in respecting the judicial secrecy laws but the general point is that Kate and Gerry used those laws in ways that suited them. If a negative leak came out they would jump all over the PJ. Clarence Mitchell served as their amplifier in this regard and we can famously remember him claiming “the gloves are off” after a leak in 2008 when the McCanns visited the European Parliament. Leaks about Murat and Malinka didn’t seem to evoke any responses from the McCanns. Of course it wouldn’t – the heat was off them in those kind of leaks!



On the whole, the Portuguese system doesn’t seem so bad. In the UK, a veil of silence descends on a case when someone is charged and the case is declared sub judice. Even in prolific crime cases, the police will only divulge what they want the public to know and there really isn’t that much difference between the two systems.

But what then of the British police with the responsibility of investigating the Madeleine disappearance? Leicestershire Constabulary are entrusted with that task, and, quite literally, the case file at police HQ in Enderby, Leicestershire is called “Operation Task“. The Leicestershire police were the obvious choice of investigating law enforcement because that is the county where the McCanns live.

Have Leicestershire Constabulary fared any better with public liaison and handling the media with regular updates on progress in the case?

That has to be a resounding NO! To date, Leicestershire Constabulary have:

  • Allowed the key suspects (Kate and Gerry McCann) to be on first name terms with the investigators.
  • Allowed MI5/MI6 to accompany them in meetings with the Portuguese police.
  • Allowed the key suspect (Gerry McCann) to retrieve unknown DNA from his home to send to Portugal for DNA testing.
  • Allowed Kate’s aunt to retrieve DNA samples (and who knows what else!) to send to a quack in South Africa (Danie Krugel) with a Heath-Robinson contraption that he imported to Portugal without passing through customs (Was this part of the charade used to send an item or items to the McCanns that would have been intercepted had it gone straight to Portugal from the UK? Krugel could quite easily have been a mule…)
  • Advertised the commercial money-making website “findmadeleine.com” on their own website.
  • Met with Gordon Brown 3 days after the McCanns returned to England from Portugal under the pretext of a Community/Neighbourhood Policing smokescreen.
  • Hidden a vital police interview from Portuguese Police after 2 doctors who alleged that David Payne and Gerry McCann were possible paedophiles only 13 days after Madeleine was reported missing.
  • Not publicly mentioned the aforementioned interview where Payne and McCann were suspected of paedophilia by their doctor friends who went on holiday with them to Majorca in 2005.
  • Given a police escorted ride to the McCanns from East Midlands Airport to Rothley in September 2007. (West Yorkshire police also gave Kate McCann, Michael Wright and the McCann twins an escorted ride from Leeds/Bradford Airport to Skipton in 2007).
  • Refused to properly reply to legitimate Freedom of Information requests citing exemptions of either National Security or that this is an ongoing investigation.
  • Never given proper updates typical of a major crime to the British public.
  • Performed an abysmal job with the rogatory interviews of the various witnesses and the Tapas friends of the McCanns. In Russell O’Brien’s interview, the DVD recorder was not functioning properly and large chunks of his interview were not recorded on video. They also asked many leading questions and they did not seem to interview witnesses with a view to finding out the real truth.

Given the above, which police force has been the most secretive? Quite clearly Leicestershire Constabulary is running Operation Task like some Cold War era Stasi (German Secret Police) investigation. After four years, the public knows little about Operation Task apart from information in the Portuguese police file released in 2008 and the associated financial costs of the investigation. Given the lack of feedback it makes one wonder whether Operation Task is really a Government cover-up masquerading as a real investigation.

This shouldn’t surprise anyone because it has happened before. Former Leicester MP Greville Janner QC was implicated in a paedophilia scandal in the city of Leicester back in the early 90s. That scandal was hushed up swiftly and efficiently by the same police force. The Greville Janner case even involved the same freemasonic law firm that the McCanns used and is the location where they met Ed Smethurst and Brian Kennedy in September 2007: Kingsley Napley.

Apparently there is a law for the public and there is a different set of laws for the McCanns.

And then we have the suspected influence by Freemasons within the ranks of Leicestershire police. Another example of how freemasons in the British police reek of corruption came to light after two Leicester businessmen were awarded £85,000 compensation after being beaten up by Lancashire police. Their story illustrates the depth and depravity of the “Brotherhood” within the UK police:

…what happens to others who have run-ins with Freemasonic officers? Two Leicester businessmen found out when they decided to have a late night drink at the Goat Moat House Hotel in Blackburn where they were staying in April 1988. Sidney and Shaun Callis (father and son) were unaware they had walked into the ‘Ladies night’ organized by the Victory Lodge of Blackburn. Two Masonic Lancashire police officers approached the pair and ordered them out of the hotel bar. After refusing to leave, the couple were beaten up and then charged with assault by other Masonic police officers also present. When the two men were released on bail the following morning, they found that the hotel management had seized the Callis’ belongings demanding compensation for damage to the bar. The Hotel manager was later found to be a Mason and a member of the Victory Lodge. The Callis’ also found that the tires of their car had been drained of air and the hubcaps removed.

When their assault charge reached court the following year, the jury rejected police evidence and acquitted the pair. The Callis’ subsequently sued Lancashire Police for malicious prosecution and won £85,000 in compensation. The total pay out, including court costs, came to £170,000. However, the retribution did not stop there. Since 1989, unknown police officers put phony criminal records for Sidney and Shaun Callis on the police national computer. Another unnamed person wrote to police suggesting that Sidney Callis was responsible for murdering two people, shot dead on the Pembrokeshire Coast in 1989. He was arrested for murder and interrogated at Hinckley Police Station before being released. Leicestershire Police also made efforts to revoke Sidney Callis’s 12-bore shotgun license. As Callis told Private Eye magazine in April: “I’ve never had so much as a parking fine.”

The Home Affairs Select Committee was told that the Victory Lodge in Blackburn, whose members triggered this catalogue of retribution, is a lodge set up for police Masons.



Anyone thinking that Stasi is an exaggerated term for Leicestershire Constabulary, think again. Look at the logo for the Stasi and see the Masonic influence in the compasses at the centre of the wreath. This part of the logo is derived from the flag of the former East Germany.

16 Responses to “Leicestershire Constabulary a Freemasonic Stasi”

  1. 1
    Miss BEHAVING Says:

    This is an interesting piece. I wholeheartedly agree with the sentiments regarding the UK police being, too friendly, too many things not adding up, and the time delays in forwarding pertinent information to the PJ’s. I would further add that the Mccanns are indeed a shade different from most of us with regards the “attention” they get regarding a big publicy drive, but a smoke screen regarding the details of a missing child. It is a bit like having ones cake, and everyone else’s and eating it, slowly, deliberatly to add annoyance.

    However, I am truly fed up with this nonsense about the “Freemasons” being involved in an abduction/cover up whatever.

    I would like to make it quite clear that I am not a mason( on account that I am a female) Also,I have no need or desire to clear the name of any body Regarding this phenomenon. However, I am going to educate in laymens terms, about the Freemasons, and why I BELEIVE they have nothing to do with this missing child case.

    The name Free masons comes from biblical times when King Solomon was building a temple ( he was the wise King) in the times of slaves he wanted to impress GOD by using the best stone masons. (MASON!) He was considered wise because on the slave issue, he decided to free men (slaves) so that they would do GOD’s work. Free men – stone masons. Do you get the connection yet? Anyway, the freemason men, were treated very well, and were paid, fed and given housing etc. They were important for that perioD – held in high esteem. They became a brotherhood to protect their rights after work had been done and to protect their communities etc. The main political criteria was: NO RELIGION HAD A DOMINATING SAY ON THE WORK – WELFARE – MORALITY of the men. In later years as the Masons kept promis to generations and newcommers, The catholic church became envious of the power and money which was accumilated. The pope tried to persuade the Masons to relinquish governance to him. The Masons history ( much of which I would love to know about) refused to be dominated by any organised religion, even though they did encourage men and families to have a faith. The Catholic church envious of this MADE THEM decide to create their own version. They call it “The knights of St Columbus”. you may have never heard of them that’s because….. THEY ARE A SECRET. The RC DEMANDED THAT NO CATHOLIC SHOULD HAVE ANY DEALINGS WITH THIS SINFUL ORGANISATION.( popish propeganda at it’s best!)

    Catholics were deemed as anti christ if they supported this organisation. Sooo some of the Catholics duley followed their leader. NOW, what we have is people talking about Gerry and Kate involving themselves with Masons to cover up whatever. As they are catholics, my bet is with the Knights of St Columbus as their chosen “secret society”. Hence the pope visit. The freemasons are not a secret society, they just do not want to be “owned” by the state or religious bigots”.
    Oh, by the way, as they have stone mason history: the symbol of the tool/ compass goes hand in hand with stone masionery. Also there is an apron which builders to this day wear to carry/ hold tools. There is something which I am not sure about and that is the “seeing eye”. I don’t know it’s relevence. Hope that clears a few things up. That is not to say police and peedo people are not members in the masons, but it is certainly not a requirement to join! AND it is most certainly not something the good catholic parents would join. Trust me on this one.

    The other point I wanted to touch on was the “abduction”.

    There is NO evidence to convince me that there was a stranger abduction of young Madeleine.
    Does this mean I DO not concede there was an abduction, Well actually, there are other kinds of abduction.
    1. The parent/s could have hired out their daughter. And never got her back as agreed (Lolita photos?)

    2. The abduction was pre planned by persons known to the parent/s
    3. The parent/s could have abducted her for whatever reason and the plans went wrong.

    These are fanciful ideas I know, unbelievable, incredable, but no more so that the stranger abductions because….THEY HAVE DNA FOR MY 3 OPTIONS. which is a start,if you think about it. “Gerry was the LAST person to see her”….Hmm how would he know that?. would the last person not be the abductor? Oh well, never mind.

    Google in “the knights of St Columbus”!

    Site Admin: Thanks for your post Miss Behaving. Your theories on abduction are as valid as any other. However, your history of Freemasonry is a little awry. If you research the subject thoroughly you will discover it is not as simple as Googling “knights of Columbus.” If you really want some research material, Google “Sir Roger Hollis”, “Propaganda Due P2 Lodge”, or “Kenneth Noye Freemason”. This is a massive topic.

    As for Freemason involvement in the Madeleine case, there is clear proof of it: Ed Smethurst, Uncle Brian Kennedy, Bates Wells & Braithwaite forming the fund, Haysmacintyre the auditors, Rosamund McCarthy’s friendship with Freemason “Homintern” Gordon Brown, Doug Skehan et al.

    These alliances were the “favours” called in by Uncle Brian Kennedy that he inadvertently mentioned in a TV interview in May 2007. Greville Janner escaped significant embarrassment through such alliances back in the 90s. Freemason Judges such as Lord Widgery, Cullen and Brian Hutton were all brought in to protect the Establishment in Bloody Sunday, Dunblane and the David Kelly inquiries. It is a tried and tested system and a Freemason “whitewash” works wonders. It has in the Madeleine McCann case as well…

  2. 2
    Grace Johnson Says:

    I don’t believe this case has anything to do with Freemasons,perhaps there is something else that connects the names that Site Admin has put together above eg Smethurst,Brian Kennedy Gordon Brown etc ??????.

  3. 3
    Anthony Miller Says:

    “The freemasons are not a secret society”

    I see the local masonic representative has been posting…

    Well, to quote the Masons themselves they are not “a secret society but a society with secrets”. In other words people who join at the bottom do not understand the total function of the organisation they are joining. The Masons works on the “levels of knowledge” system also favourite with Scientologists. Really the Masons are a cult – like scientology. Compare the theta levels of scientology with the degrees of freemasonry and you’ll soon get the idea. Cults tend to have secrets and levels of knowledge and membership. And rely on the knowledge as a box within a box within a box explanation of the Universe (only the man at the top knows the final secret in the last box). Whereas religions tend to rely on the so-many-people-believe-it-that-it-must-be-true explanations of divinity. This is why large organised religions like the Catholic church don’t have “secrets” – they have “mysteries” instead and opt instead for types of specialised membership. Turning the bread and wine to the body and bloody of Christ and interpreting the sacred texts is a specialised job that only a priest can perform. But everyone who is not a priest (the layity) is a different class of person and all are kept firmly at the bottom of the power pyramid.

    The financial model of the Masons is a socially selective top down power pyramid typical of cults is a much faster way of making money …BUT the more members you get the harder it is to maintain. Eventually it becomes obvious to the ordinary members that the distribution of power is not fair and they want to know what the “secrets” are. Therefore in order to grow your membership beyond a certain size you cannot operate in the way the Masons do. So the Catholic Church raises money by taking a small amount from a large number or people. The Masons work by taking a large amount of money from a small number of people. Result they are naturally always in constant conflict. The purpose of the Masons is social exclusivity whereas the purpose of the Catholic Church is to convert EVERYONE. It is one of the redeeming features of organised religions like the RCC that they have a go a cults.

    The “Free Masons” claims to date back to King Solomon (the black and white tiles in lodges are supposed to resemble the floor of the temple) are nonsense. They are a 16th century construct that comes from pagan roots and performed early union type functions. If they had an existence prior to this they must have kept a very low profile indeed as they have no history anyone can find. Solomon lived in the 10th century BC so that there is no record of them between his reign and about 1600 suggests that really they were a by-product of the Reformation. They are really a protestants’ club. The CofE keeps them at arms length and often criticises them when they come into conflict but it tolerates them as they perform the same function for them that Opus Dei does for the RCC (rasing money faster than the main organisation). The Orange Order was based deliberately and cynically on the Masons – a sort of Masons but-this-time-we-really-mean-it. I should point out too that if Miss Behaving doesn’t realise that the Masons is a religious organisation they should look again at the Masons website which states that while conformity to a particular religious organisation is not required a belief in GOD definitely is. Indeed people have been thrown out the Masons for declaring themselves atheists.

    The Knights of ColumbUS (not to be confused with it’s UK sister organisation the Knights of St ColumbA was indeed the Catholic Church’s attempt to replicate the Masons. While the Catholic Church insists in its churches that all parishoners are equal in the eyes of God and the Church it has always encouraged lay organisations that make money faster than the main organisation. Opus Dei is one such “spin off” from the main Church which is often criticised as a cult.

    The Knights of ColumbUS (named in 1881 after Christopher Columbus) has 3-4 “degrees” (levels of ritual membership). The duplicate UK operation the Knights of Saint Columbus (started in 1919) also had degrees of membership but these were abolished in the 1960s. Both are something to do with Rerum Novarum an encyclical issued by Pope Leo XIII published on May 15, 1891 about trade union relations. Anyway the KSC is not technically a cult anymore …although it certainly was when it started and this position is slightly undermined by its links to its US sister (or should that be brother) organisation.

    Oh yes, the “seeing eye” was a multi-use religious symbol dating back to the Eye of Horus (for those of you rusty on your egyptology. It is also to be found on US bank notes but it has become synonymous over the years with freemasonry by appearing on their logo. Probably because it suits their political position of there-being-a-monotheistic-God-but-we-wont-tell-you-which-one-because-we-dont-want-to-lose-members.

    The Catholic Church and the Masons have been biting chunks out of each other (and playing cat and mouse) for centuries and probably always will be till the end of time.

    As to the McCanns … erm … I really dont know what went on but they’ve certainly done okay out of it in terms of self-publicity.

  4. 4
    Leo Says:

    I have no doubt that the child died in the hands of her parents. I also have no doubt that this “murder” (if the child has been killed indeed), is covered suspiciously by British police. But reading this page the author sends confusing messages, doing no favors to the truth. In particular the author states that Sidney and Shaun Callis (father and son) were beaten up by “Freemason” police officers (I have no doubt about this) but they were vindicated in court and won £85000 in damages BY A JUDGE. If all the case were covered by Freemasons why the Freemason police officers have not managed to find a “Freemason” judge to protect them? It has happened before and it is happening every day. The police find their “own judges” to convict or intimidate police victims in criminal and family courts. I am confused and puzzled. Do we have a non mason Judges? or simply the police are saying “go ahead we beat the crap out of the victim and the taxpayer will pay for it.”
    I am really confused having been a victim of both the judicial and the police. There is a cover up in this case. No doubt. As someone wrote before e the social services should have removed their children because they have shown neglect of the child leading to its disappearance or death. The other concerning fact is that this couple have lost their child and they gained overnight fame and financial gain worth few million pounds. There are many children been abducted every year in Europe or around the word. The poor parents of these children they be lucky to persuade their local press let alone their local police and National TV stations to search for their children or child. Share a thought of the thousands of children abducted by the social services in Great Britain. So my opinion is that there is a secret cult which sacrifices children and something went wrong and the child died. The question is Are there evidences to link this mysterious “sick” cult with the free masons? Why Freemasons are supporting the Macans? We need an investigation by the government because the child was a British citizen and she left this country ALIVE. Her parents should have faced criminal prosecution for neglect, Can you imagine an ordinary folk in United Kingdom to come forward and say ” I lost my child” The police will arrest the parents,. And the social services will ask for an Emergency order to remove the “other” children.

    Site Admin: Thanks for your comprehensive post Leo. To deal with your confusion over why a judge ruled in favor of Sidney and Shaun Callis, the big difference with their case is that it was a prima facie case of the two men being beaten up at a Freemason’s evening function. The Freemasons were the defendants. It would be difficult to rule any other way in that case because the evidence was overwhelmingly in the Callis’s favour. In the Madeleine case, this was a cover up. Evidence was destroyed, manipulated, hidden etc. The biggest piece of evidence – Madeleine – has never been found. We agree with your sentiments – the parents should have faced some kind of judicial trial or inquest. However, the law only allows for an inquest when there is a death. With no body that means no inquest.

  5. 5
    Leo Says:

    Site Admin. May I please disagree with your comment: “However, the law only allows for an inquest when there is a death. With no body that means no inquest”.
    When an inquiry commences the inquiry deals with the disappearance of a United Kingdom citizen in a foreign soil.
    It is the same if someone in the United Kingdom reports that her/his/their child has disappeared.
    Unfortunately we have witness that all these disappearances in the United Kingdom results in the death of the child.

    There is not difference with Madeleine case. They should have commenced an investigation of her disappearance or an inquiry regarding the child’s disappearance, having in mind that the parents of the child have already admitted that they have neglected all their 3 children, and this alone is an offense of child neglect. Of course without a body I agree that it is hard to prove foul play or murder and can only be speculations. But everything leading us to conclude that this child have met her death and her parents have capitalize from the loss of this innocent child. For this alone the parents should face prosecution for neglect and fraud. But something does not seems right. So unless someone comes with solid evidence we can only speculate. Our thoughts are with the loss of Madeleine.

    Site Admin: We encourage people to have their own views on this case and you are entitled to yours. However, I’m not sure what you are disagreeing with. An Inquiry in England and Wales does not concern itself with missing people. An Inquiry is a legal requirement to establish the causes of a sudden and unexplained death. There were no Inquests in the disappearances of Ben Needham or Lord Lucan. How could there be? Disappeared people may still (logically) be alive. Some people disappear intentionally and don’t want to be found (e.g. Lord Lucan).

    The controversy surrounding the murder of Dr David Kelly is that he died suddenly and unexpectedly and they didn’t hold an official Inquest into his death. They held an event called the Hutton Inquiry but right from the outset Hutton ruled his death a suicide and therefore this legal tactic effectively shut down a proper investigation that would have been done had it been an official Inquest.

    You are absolutely right that the McCanns should have faced some kind of investigation. In the United States, their case would most likely have come before a Grand Jury who would have determined that in the face of overwhelming circumstantial evidence that they should be put on trial. However, do not confuse this with the fact that an Inquest looks into sudden and unexplained deaths and is not concerned with missing people.

  6. 6
    James Says:

    This debate needs considerable unpacking. The issues related to Freemasonry are interesting but conflate two entirely different themes viz, Madeleine’s disappearance and the cult of secretiveness and conspiracy (Freemasonry). I address only the second when I say that it is deeply offensive and wholly without foundation to accuse Madeleine’s parents of such horrendous immoral practices. I have followed their agonising experiences with great heartache and cannot imagine that such accusations are intended to help find Madeleine’s abductor. Hold anyone’s private life up to the microscope and there will be flaws – even yours – so why dwell on inconsequential periphery? The criminal is still at large and the police need to find him / her / them – so focus on fact and evidence and not speculation that hurts innocent people.

  7. 7
    Adam Says:

    My own opinion is that freemasons will protect their own obviously, including pedophiles, that GMcC and his friend DP were involved in (allegedly) pedophilia, that G McC and his masonic friends had knowledge of high-up involvment in pedophilia, so the McC’s scratch the high-ups backs, they scratch his. Masons are evil and their net is spread wide, make no mistake. The secret-handshakers are letting pedophiles take over the world with no retribution for any of the evil men. Kate McC is probably piggy in the middle, wanting to protect her other children, who, btw, are probably going to grow up totally screwed up.

  8. 8
    snake eyes Says:

    Miss BEHAVING Says:
    July 12th, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    However, I am truly fed up with this nonsense about the “Freemasons” being involved in an abduction/cover up whatever. — i say [1] jerry mcann is a master mason- [2] the kids were bein programed to perform sex acts on adults !!! so miss behave ur full of shit n should shut ya mouth!triggers for trances? oh your twisting my nips man ;

  9. 9
    Anna Wiseman Says:

    There’s perhaps not much point writing opinions on sites such as these, as it is plainly obvious that you nut cases just publish the opinions of other nut cases that agree with you. What concerns me is that whoever the site administrator(s) is/are on this site- Well, I am concerned about your mental health more than anything. You Really do need to go and see an experienced psychiatrist and get put on medication, because you suffer from very serious paranoid delusions, and all you are doing up here in cyberspace is exciting the imaginations of fellow sufferers!

    Site Reply: But Anna….or is it Natascha Winchester…perhaps Betty Keogh? Maybe Milly Keogh? Your alter-egos are all writing messages of bile to this website. If you wrote bona-fide comments with a consistent email address perhaps your comments would be published. Go and troll somewhere else with these email addresses marked as spam: millykeogh@gmail.com, naomiwiseman@hotmail.com, unawinchester@gmail.com. There is only one nut case here: YOU!

  10. 10
    enochered Says:

    This case is perfectly straight forward. A child vanishes. The Police are called. They question the parents and their friends. The responses of the “witnesses” are ambiguous and inconsistent. The Police are not convinced by the information and would like to make further investigations, which is quite normal in Portugal as it is the UK. More children come to harm at the hands of their parents than they do by strangers. At which point the UK Establishment interferes with the Police investigations. What we do not know is what gave the UK reason to believe that the McCann’s would encounter any problem should the enquiry continue? On the face of it without sufficient evidence the case would have been kicked out of Court. Why did the McCann’s beat a hasty retreat at the thought of a trial? The other aspect is what did the McCann’s know which may have come out in Court? Remember paedophiles can be Masons but not all Masons are paedophiles.There is no good reason for denying the Portuguese police the right to continue an investigation into a possible murder on their soil.

  11. 11
    Dave Says:

    Google greville janner. Search results are being removed by Google following a legal complaint.Someone does not want the truth to get out.

  12. 12
    J.Robs Says:

    There are quite a few ‘cults’ operating here – Freemasonry, Medicine (there is a massive ‘cover-up culture in the NHS) Catholicism – possibly even paedophilia. I am still a bit mystified by why the McCann’s have received protection from such high places, though. I can see why Murdoch wanted the abduction story – it was guaranteed to fill a lot of media slots and sell newspapers. And it may well be that it was a cracker of a human interest story (in journalistic terms) which would overshadow other things that were going on politically. It may well have been a convenient way to keep the media and public away from other politically sensitive issues, while sending everyone off on a wild goose chase around the world.

    The Fund that purports to ‘find Madeleine’ has been mighty handy for the McCann’s as they globe-trot around the world, hire expensive detectives, lawyers, spin doctors and reputation managers. Not to mention sueing everyone who finds their abduction theory preposterous. Which it is.

    The only reasonable explanation I can think of is that Madeleine came to harm in an accident and/or with a drug overdose and the parents tried to cover it up with the abduction theory. Nothing else makes any sense to me. It is possible that their friends also had their own reasons to support the abduction theory (perhaps they too sedated their children to keep them asleep given that they did not use babysitters). The paedophile comments about Gerry and the other doctor are also worrying – was there another darker agenda going on? How could the parents feel comfortable leaving children alone, especially is they had been sedated, knowing that anyone could let themselves into the apartment? Yet according to the McCanns abduction was the very last thing they expected. Which is why it is mighty strange that it is the very first conclusion they reached when they found Madeleine missing.

    There are so many red flags flying around over Gerry and Kate McCann it’s a wonder they don’t take off into the air like a giant parachute. What is deeply shocking is how many people have made themselves a small fortune (including the McCanns) off the tragic disappearance and in all probability death of an innocent child. Shocking. And the McCanns have the audacity to claim the victim role, sueing their critics left, right and centre, leaving a trail of destruction behind them. They really are disgusting.

  13. 13
    J.Robs Says:

    Of course the other possibility is that one or other of the McCann’s lost their tempers and struck out at Madeleine. That is entirely possible. The McCann family dynamic may not have been a bed of roses, despite outward appearances.

    Ah, Greville Granner, Labour MP for Leicester……hmmm…….

  14. 14
    enochered Says:

    The “new” British Police investigation, illustrates exactly, as did the investigation into the death of Princess Diana, an inability to present, even an impression of detachment, from a verdict with which they have already been provided.
    A serious investigation must start with those whom had access to the sleeping quarters of the children, namely, those whom were eating at the Tapas Bar.
    Unless this has been done in secret, moving to stage two is a waste of time. Some dupe has already presented himself as the possible “sketch” which was drawn from a description of someone, fleetingly glimpsed in the twilight. There is something very sinister behind all of this nonsense.The donations, from those whom have a kindness of heart, very quickly turns to greed, which leads to Private Investigators whom can spot a Golden Goose.

  15. 15
    Helen Pender Says:

    Check out Masonic membership of deputy chief constable Simon Edens, Detective Chief Inspector Geoff Brooks, Inspectors Monks, Mansfield, perhaps but not certain Inspector Mistry, Sergeants DS David McDonald, Foster, Collier PC Andy King and then retired but still working Inspector Wenlock. Then look at connection to local Rutland politicians Cllrs Charles Haworth, Alf Dewis, Stan Stubbs, Nowell, Cllr and Mr Lucas, Paul Beech, Terry King, Roger Begy, Cllr Bool, Gene Plews, Helen Briggs and Richard White. Then look at my blog – HelenPender.blogspot.com and at 4Rutland website – letter from DS David McDonald to three elected Cllrs threatening them with police action if they didn’t desist from asking awkward questions of the corrupt council over the alleged suicide of Aman Mehra – see Private Eye Rotten Boroughs January 2012. Muderin’s not something they blunder it’s not even properly investigated. The fiasco of supposed police enquiries is a shameful indictment of the police. Stop and talk to Cllr Gale on market days around 11 am to get more information.

  16. 16
    Nicholas muton Says:

    We all know about the leicester masonic lodges up London road meeting behind closed doors
    Judges and solicitors passing sentences at a meeting over lunch weather guilty or not !!!
    Look at my name and the news feeds blocking the M1 because I had an argument with my wife then ex partner ?
    Rubbish never been married and didn’t speak to the ex partner why would I ? But the real reasons where and still are the social services and family court where corrupt as hidden so that the solicitors and judges could financialy gain though long delays ( adjournments) and hundreds of millions taken from the public fund to be given to the corrupt masonic people
    Even to this day the police cps and others keep it quiet I’ve been arrested about 7-8 times with out charge even for inciting. The same crime as done for in 2002 -4 with out charge why cause I could proof the cps lied in court and last week proofed the police covered up information blatant even on the disks in interview why is that? I don’t fear the corruption but I do expect I will be shot or something will happen to me and it will be reported as a sueside !!! On here I will confirm that is not in my mind far from it !! It’s coming to a head at the minute and shortly there will be either a huge cover up or the press will be lapping up the corruption in papers on line and all around the world like my case was before

Leave a Reply

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.


Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes