Guest Blogger: Katherine Ramsland: Who Killed Nicole?

15 Nov

Who Killed Nicole?


Nicole Brown Simpson’s Body at her Bundy Home







Rogers and Meoli



I asked about the start of their correspondence.






















7 responses to “Guest Blogger: Katherine Ramsland: Who Killed Nicole?

  1. Sheila Lowe

    November 16, 2012 at 1:32 am

    as a handwriting analyst, my first thought is that I would like to see some of the letters Rogers wrote (if they are handwritten). They may reveal whether or not he is lying.


    • Anthony

      November 19, 2012 at 7:20 am

      If you consider than Rogers wrote me over 1,100 pages of letters, I don’t know where you would begin in detecting handwriting analysis for any malingering. He didn’t write one letter, he wrote hundreds.

      As far as the Simpson admissions, there is no marked deviation from any of the other letters. I give handwriting analysis some credibility, but nowhere near as much as 50 hours sitting in front of a human being and being able to read them. See and hear their voice inflection, mood, affect, tone, eye movements, eyebrow fluctuations when recollecting facts, do the facts coincide with known events and police reports, etc. So, I see where you are coming from, but you will not find the answers you seek in his handwriting.


      • Sheila Lowe

        March 15, 2019 at 8:11 pm

        I have now seen some of his handwriting, which may not answer the question posed in this article, but it does, in fact, answer other questions. Handwriting always tells the truth about the inner self.


  2. liberty

    December 20, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    Even if he was hired; end game is who hired him. I have no doubt like many other mafia guys that were sent to jail for tax evadion, O.J. went due to huge egoism and sado masochistic attitud. How many hits to the head matters not. He is where he belongs. Same as Specter.


  3. tony

    November 21, 2013 at 5:35 am

    @ Shelia Lowe,

    I have about 1100 pages wherein you can “analyze” his handwriting. As far as his confessions, there is no change in his handwriting style, spacing, wording, sentence structure, vocabulary or anything else remarkable. Let us remember, which has gone largely ignored, he has alluded to his involvement since 1995, not since 2012.

    While I would love to dismiss what Glen said as pure hogwash, there is no one else who sat across from Rogers for nearly 60 hours to listen to him talk. There may be a few, but those would be family members.

    Glen is not close with his family, certainly not Clay Rogers, who narrated the documentary. Clay, to my knowledge, has never visited Glen nor have they written in years. Sue, his sister, has visited, but last in 2010 I believe.

    Not only is Glen very convincing in private, his letters admit readily to his involvement. He was not even being asked and was forthcoming about some details. Glen often would not leave the issue alone, as if it was eating him up, and constantly spoke about a “plan” at the end wherein he would discuss what happened. I explained his plan would never work and felt compelled to tell what I knew.

    In the end the case remains unsolved, OJ was found not guilty whether people like it or not. The police investigation was deplorable and I would have reached the same verdict myself.

    I will leave you with this:

    Where was the blood on the wall if OJ scaled it (with his bloody outfit on) and bloody Bruno Magli shoes?

    Did anyone say that there were not 2 people in the truck?

    Did Glen assert OJ was truly innocent?

    DId OJ hire people when he needed his all-important sports memorabilia back? Yes.

    So, we have a scene, at night, with a limousine coming (and OJ knows it is coming) but he decides this is the night to commit this crime. He leaves his house, in his Bronco, goes to the house and pretends to be a burglar. He sneaks up to the door, knocks, but does not push her inside? No. Something else happened, we know this.

    The crime scene is consistent with Nicole coming outside because she heard something, otherwise if she had seen what was going on she would have called the police and shut the door. She was killed second, not first. But how does 1 person kill 2 people without 1 getting away? I think the recreation that Glen provides is very convincing. The idea that Nicole fainted when stabbed was a new wrinkle I had not expected him to say. It does answer how not only she banger the right side of her head on the wall, but was easily controlled.

    The fact it took place outside makes sense in Glen’s recreation of why OJ’s footprints were there. He walked through the scene, but was expecting it to be inside, not outside. The footprints oddly were never analyzed to show HOW they appear. It is not that his footprints are there, but how they appear on the blood itself. If you are committing a crime, you are involved in it and your whole print would not be in the pool of blood as you are part of the crime. It would be around your foot. The unsub who committed this crime would not have clear prints DURING the crime, his prints would be covered up to a large degree.

    Simply put: Next time it rains, go outside. If you walk in the rain after it rains, you leave whole footprints. If you stand there when it is raining, you do not. Same with mud or any substance. Basic physics. I thought his footprints (on top) of the blood was an interesting wrinkle in this crime, which is alleged to have taken 3-6 minutes. Not much time for that much blood to pool to such a degree.

    Post mortem wounds were found on Nicole. First-time killers, even spouses, do not do this. Hedonistic killers do this.


    • Sheila Lowe

      March 15, 2019 at 8:12 pm

      I only just now saw your comment to me, as you misspelled my name.


  4. Muse

    March 14, 2019 at 7:16 pm

    The “ruse,” at first glance could be execution extension, a la Ted Bundy. However, I am doubtful of the veracity of these latest assertions by, unbelievably, his own brother, Clay, especially in light of Clay’s psychopathy by his own admission, no less, and also simply from what was revealed in the transcripts themselves. Simply go back and read; the jury had no doubt. The DA simply failed to prove it. The end.



Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: